Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Phys., 16 May 2023
Sec. Nuclear Physics​
This article is part of the Research Topic Clustering in Light Nuclei: Current Research, New Aspects, Challenges and Perspectives View all 7 articles

Investigation of 22Mg levels via resonant scattering of 18Ne + α

S. M. Cha,S. M. Cha1,2K. Y. Chae
K. Y. Chae1*K. AbeK. Abe3S. Bae,S. Bae2,4D. N. BinhD. N. Binh5S. H. ChoiS. H. Choi4N. N. Duy,N. N. Duy1,6Z. Ge,Z. Ge7,8K. I. Hahn,K. I. Hahn2,9S. HayakawaS. Hayakawa3B. HongB. Hong10N. Iwasa,N. Iwasa7,11D. Kahl,D. Kahl12,13L. H. Khiem,L. H. Khiem14,15A. Kim,A. Kim10,16D. Kim,D. Kim2,16E. J. KimE. J. Kim17G. W. Kim,G. W. Kim16,18M. J. KimM. J. Kim1K. KwakK. Kwak19M. S. Kwag,M. S. Kwag1,20E. J. LeeE. J. Lee1S. I. LimS. I. Lim16B. Moon,B. Moon2,10J. Y. MoonJ. Y. Moon20S. Y. Park,S. Y. Park16,18V. H. PhongV. H. Phong7H. ShimizuH. Shimizu3H. YamaguchiH. Yamaguchi3L. YangL. Yang3
  • 1Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
  • 2Center for Exotic Nuclear Studies, Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • 3Center for Nuclear Study, The University of Tokyo, Wako, Japan
  • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 530 MeV Cyclotron Center, Tran Hung Dao Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • 6Institute of Postgraduate Program, Van Lang University, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
  • 7RIKEN Nishina Center, Wako, Japan
  • 8GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
  • 9Department of Science Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 10Department of Physics, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 11Department of Physics, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
  • 12School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 13Extreme Light Infrastructure-Nuclear Physics, Horia Hulubei National Institute for R&D in Physics and Nuclear Engineering (IFIN-HH), Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
  • 14Institute of Physics, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vienam
  • 15Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vienam
  • 16Department of Physics, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 17Division of Science Education, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
  • 18Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • 19Department of Physics, College of Natural Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea
  • 20Rare Isotope Science Project, Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

The α resonant scattering on 18Ne was measured in inverse kinematics to understand the α-clustering of proton-rich 22Mg nucleus, performed at the CNS Radio-Isotope Beam Separator (CRIB) of Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo, located at the RIBF of RIKEN Nishina Center. The excitation function of 22Mg was obtained for the excitation energies of 10–16 MeV by adopting the thick-target method. Several resonances were evident in the present work, which implies the existence of energy levels with large α widths. Since energy levels were not clearly observed at the astrophysically important energy range, upper limits on the 18Ne (α, α)18Ne cross section were set. The astrophysical impact was also investigated by estimating the 18Ne (α, p)21Na cross section.

1 Introduction

The α-cluster structure in atomic nuclei has been one of the most interesting topics in nuclear physics. The α-clusterization of self-conjugate (N = Z) and A = 4n (n = 2, 3, 4, ⋯) nuclei including 8Be, 12C, 16O, and 20Ne has been studied extensively for decades [13]. The strong evidence for the α-cluster structure was found through the studies. Observations of a series of levels with large α reduced widths that form a rotational band can provide a convincing probe for α-cluster configuration in the nuclei. The development of theoretical models and rare isotope beams has provided significant opportunities to extend our knowledge of the α-cluster structure in exotic nuclei. Experimental investigations on the α-clusterization of neutron-rich nuclei, including 10Be, 12Be, and 14C, have been performed [46]. These studies have substantially improved our understanding of the α-cluster structure in neutron-rich nuclei; however, α-cluster studies of proton-rich (neutron-deficient) nuclei have not been sufficiently established. Considering the isobaric invariance of the nuclear force, the characteristics of the α-cluster structure for a proton-rich nucleus are similar to those for its mirror nucleus. For example, experimental results indicate that some of the observed resonances in 11C may originate from the negative-parity cluster band, which is analogous to its mirror nucleus 11B [7, 8].

The α-cluster structure of neutron-rich 22Ne has been extensively investigated both experimentally and theoretically [913]. Rogachev et al. observed a splitting of 1, 3, 7, and 9 α-cluster states into doublets [10], which could be theoretically explained by the extended two cluster model (ETCM) calculation assuming the α + 18O two-cluster configuration [11]. Recently, Kimura suggested the presence of two kinds of α-cluster structures in 22Ne using the hybrid-generator coordinate method (GCM) calculation. The first is the molecular orbital bands with the α + 16O core and two valence neutrons, which correspond to the observed α-cluster states below the α + 18O threshold energy reported in [14, 15]. The other is the α + 18O molecular bands, which correspond to the observed states above the threshold energy reported in Ref. [10].

Studies on the α-cluster structure of proton-rich 22Mg are still very rare. The GCM calculation predicted the existence of the 1 and 3 doublet states located at excitation energies of 12–13 MeV, assuming the α + 18Ne two-cluster model [11]. Considering the lower energy level density of proton-rich nuclei than that of neutron-rich nuclei, observing doublets should be easier in the case of the 22Mg nucleus. However, the experimental data obtained by Goldberg et al. [12] show no clear evidence of the doublets. Although the excitation function of mirror nucleus 22Ne in [12] show the existence of the strong 1 and 3 doublets originating from the α-clustering, the excitation function of 22Mg is rather featureless. The authors could not specify the reason for the absence of the doublets since the quality of the 22Mg data was not sufficient for independent analysis.

A powerful approach for investigating the α-cluster structure in the 22Mg nucleus is to populate α-cluster states by resonant elastic scattering of 18Ne and α. Therefore, we measured 18Ne + α resonant scattering using 18Ne rare isotope beam to identify predicted 1 and 3 doublets. The excited states of 22Mg have been extensively investigated by various nuclear reactions, including 12C (16O, 6He)22Mg [16]; 24Mg (p, t)22Mg [17, 18]; 18Ne (α, p)21Na [1921]; and 21Na (p, p)21Na [2224]. The α partial widths are, however, not known for most levels, which cannot provide a clear evidence of the α-clusterization in the 22Mg nucleus. In the present study, the excitation function of 22Mg was obtained for excitation energies of Ex ∼ 10–16 MeV, which can provide important information about the energy level properties including α partial widths.

Investigating the spectroscopic information of 22Mg also plays a crucial role in understanding the astrophysically important 18Ne (α, p)21 Na reaction because the reaction occurs through the resonances in the compound nucleus. The 18Ne (α, p)21Na reaction is known as one of the possible breakout routes from the hot-CNO cycles, which leads the rapid proton capture (rp) process [2527]. In a recent sensitivity study by Cyburt et al., the 18Ne (α, p)21Na reaction was identified as one of the most important reactions which impact on the X-ray burst light curve and the composition of burst ashes [28]. Considering the typical X-ray burst temperature of T ∼ 2 GK, the Gamow window corresponds to the excitation energy Ex ∼ 9.56–10.96 MeV. Therefore, it is important to study the energy level properties of 22Mg in this energy region. The 18Ne (α, p)21Na reaction has been studied by direct measurements [1921] and time-reversal reaction measurement [29]. The experimental results, however, show a large discrepancy. In the present work, the 18Ne (α, p)21Na reaction cross section was estimated based on the experimental level structure of the 22Mg nucleus.

2 Experiment

The α resonant elastic scattering of 18Ne was measured in inverse kinematics at the CNS Radio-Isotope Beam Separator (CRIB) [30, 31] of the Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo, located at the RIBF of RIKEN Nishina Center. A schematic of the experimental setup is shown in Figure 1. The 18Ne rare isotope beam was produced by using the in-flight (IF) method. A primary 16O beam with an energy of 8.026 MeV/u from the AVF cyclotron [32] was delivered to the F0 focal plane of CRIB and bombarded a 3He gas target. Then, a secondary 18Ne beam was produced by the 3He (16O, 18Ne)n reaction. The 3He gas was contained in the cell at a pressure of 360 Torr. The 3He gas atoms were isolated from the beam line kept at a high-level vacuum by using 2.5-μm-thick Havar foils as the entrance and exit windows. To increase the density of the 3He gas target and the intensity of the secondary 18Ne beam, a cryogenic system using liquid nitrogen was used [33]. The areal thickness of the 3He gas target was achieved to be 1.54 mg/cm2 by keeping the temperature at T ∼90 K.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Schematic view of the CRIB separator (top) and the experimental setup for the 18Ne + α resonant scattering measurement at the F3 focal plane (bottom). The 18Ne beam particles were identified and monitored by two F3 PPACs. 4He gas at 470 Torr was filled to the chamber, which was sealed with a 23-μm-thick Mylar foil as a beam entrance window. The energy and position of the recoiling α particle were measured by ΔE-E silicon detector telescopes (Tel 1 and Tel 2).

18Ne10+ ions were selected by a double achromatic system with a proper magnetic rigidity () value of 0.5920 Tm, which is optimized to obtain the maximum 18Ne beam production rate. A slit of ±15 mm was installed at the momentum dispersive focal plane (F1) to remove the beam contaminations produced due to various nuclear reactions, yielding the momentum dispersion Δp/p ∼ 1%. The secondary beam particles were further purified using the Wien Filter (WF) system by applying a high voltage of ±59.5 kV. Two delay-line-type PPACs [34] were installed downstream of the WF to measure the time and the two-dimensional position information for each secondary beam particle. By using PPACs, the secondary beam identification after the WF was performed. The 18Ne beam intensity and purity were ∼2.6 × 105 pps and ∼ 65%, respectively. The impurities were 17F9+ (∼ 28%) and 16O8+ (∼ 4%), respectively. A small amount of other beam species including 15O8+, 13N7+, and 4He2+ was also observed. These contaminants were clearly excluded by the time-of-flight information in the final analysis.

The F3 target chamber was filled with 4He gas for α scattering measurement. The 4He gas was at a pressure of 470 Torr and was sealed with a 23-μm-thick aluminized Mylar foil as a beam entrance window. The 4He target pressure was selected to stop the 18Ne beam before it reaches the detector. The 18Ne beam energy after passing through the target entrance window was measured as 45.2 ± 1.1 MeV, which is consistent with an energy loss calculation result considering the value of 0.5920 Tm and the effective thickness of ∼ 45 μm Mylar foil for the two PPACs and the beam entrance window. By adopting the thick-target method in inverse kinematics [35], a wide range of excitation energies of 22Mg was investigated with a single 18Ne beam energy.

The energy and position of the recoiling α particles were obtained using two sets of ΔE-E silicon detector telescopes. The central telescope (Tel 1) was installed at 430 mm downstream from the entrance window of the target chamber along the beam axis. The other telescope (Tel 2) was located at 10.15° off from the beam axis, as viewed from the center of the entrance window. Tel 1 (Tel 2) consisted of 20-μm-, 496-μm-, and 485-μm-thick (20-μm- and 1500-μm-thick) silicon detectors. The most energetic α particles from the 18Ne (α, α)18Ne reaction could be entirely stopped under these conditions. Each detector had 16 strips and an active area of 50 × 50 mm2. Energy calibration of each strip was carried out by using an α-emitting source composed of 148Gd (3.148 MeV), 241Am (5.462 MeV), and 244Cm (5.771 MeV). Since the energy range of recoiling α particles is much wider (0–27 MeV) than that of the α particles from the source, additional energy calibration was required for the high-energy region. α beams at various energies (13, 15, 20, and 25 MeV) were used for this purpose.

Even after the beam purification using the CRIB spectrometer, beam-like α particles were transported to the F3 reaction target chamber. These beam-like α particles were produced at the upstream of the beam line and selected by the value which was set for the 18Ne beam particles of interest. The number of the beam-like α particles was much less than the number of 18Ne beam particles (≪ 0.01%); however, an amount comparable to that of the reaction products reached the central telescope. Therefore, the argon target was used for the background measurement. The argon gas pressure of about 87 Torr was selected so that the incident particles exhibit energy losses similar to those of 4He gas. By comparing the two α spectra obtained with and without the 4He gas target, the contribution from beam-like α particles was identified.

3 Data analysis

3.1 Kinematics reconstruction

The particle identification was performed by the standard energy loss techniques. A typical particle identification plot obtained at the central telescope is shown in Figure 2. The total energy deposition of the particles is plotted as a function of energy deposition in the ΔE detector. As shown in the figure, α particles were clearly separated without significant contamination from other charged particle groups. The α particles with Etot ∼ 13 MeV were observed in the background run with argon gas, as shown in Figure 2B, indicating that those α particles were contaminants in the secondary beams. The beam-like α particles were clearly distinguished by using the time-of-flight information between the PPAC and the second layer of the telescope, as shown in Figure 3.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. A typical particle identification plot is shown. The total energy of a recoiling particle is plotted as a function of the energy deposition in the first layer of the telescope. Events in the region with thick solid lines are identified as α particles from (A) 4He and (B) argon gas run.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. The ToF between the F3 PPAC and the second layer of the Tel 1 is plotted as a function of the energy of α particles. The beam-like α particles from the upstream were clearly separated from the recoiling α particles. The slope-like dependence observed at high energies is due to the slewing effect (which is not corrected in this plot).

The α particles in coincidence with the 18Ne beams incident in the target chamber were selected for further analysis. The measured energy of the α particle (Eα) was converted to the center-of-mass energy of 18Ne + α system (Ec.m.) by assuming the elastic scattering kinematics using

Ec.m.=MNe+Mα4MNecos2θlabEα,(1)

where MNe and Mα are the nuclear masses of the 18Ne and α particle, respectively, and θlab is the scattering angle in the laboratory frame. The value of θlab was determined using the trajectories of the recoiling α particle and corresponding 18Ne beam particle at the reaction vertex. The reaction vertex in the extended gas target was reconstructed by considering the energy losses of the 18Ne beam and recoiling α particle in 4He gas. The energy loss functions were obtained using the SRIM code [36]. Direct measurement of the energy loss of the 18Ne beam at six different target pressures in the present study was in good agreement with the SRIM calculation result.

3.2 Excitation function of 18Ne + α elastic scattering

The differential cross section of 18Ne + α resonant elastic scattering in the center-of-mass frame was calculated by

dσdΩc.m.=14cosθlabdσdΩlab=14cosθlabYINΔΩlab,(2)

where Y is the yield of recoiling α particles, θlab is the scattering angle in the laboratory frame, I is the number of 18Ne beam particles incident on the target, N is the number of 4He target atoms, and ΔΩlab is the solid angle covered by the detector.

The number of incident 18Ne beam particles was counted using two F3 PPACs. To obtain the precise number of beam particles entering into the target chamber through the entrance window, an additional cut was applied to the 18Ne beam events. The positions of the beam particles at the target entrance were reconstructed event-by-event by extrapolating the beam trajectory obtained at two F3 PPACs, and then 18Ne beam events falling in the diameter of the entrance of the target chamber were selected. A total of ∼ 1.33 × 101018Ne beam ions impinged on the target during the runs.

The excitation function of 18Ne + α resonant elastic scattering was extracted by selecting α events with an angular range of 0° ≤ θlab ≤ 7° (166° ≤ θc.m. ≤ 180°). The solid angle was calculated using the known detector geometry and reaction vertex of each event as a function of Ec. m. Due to the finite angular range of θlab, an average value of solid angle at the reaction vertex (or Ec. m.) was used. The areal number density of 4He atoms was obtained by considering the effective target thickness as a function of Ec. m.. The uncertainty in Ec. m. was measured to be approximately 50–100 keV, depending on the energy. The uncertainty originates from the energy resolution of a silicon detector (30–90 keV) and energy straggling of the 18Ne beam and α particles in the gas (20–60 keV).

3.3 Upper limits on the cross section

The 18Ne (α, α)18Ne cross section extracted in the present work is rather smooth in the energy region below Ec. m. < 3 MeV. In this region, however, two small bumps were observed at Ec. m. ∼2.6 MeV and 2.7 MeV in the cross section spectrum. Several resonances in 22Mg have been identified in the energy range through the previous 18Ne (α, p)21Na reaction study as reported in [20]. For instance, two energy levels located at the resonance energies of Er = 2.52 ± 0.14 MeV and Er = 2.72 ± 0.14 MeV have been reported in the previous direct measurement by Groombridge et al. [20]. However, the existence of these resonances is not obvious in our data, possibly due to the insufficient statistics. Therefore, the upper limits on the cross section were set to indicate the possible maximum resonant cross section that is consistent with our experimental spectrum. Figure 4 shows the obtained upper limits by assuming hypothetical levels located at Ec. m. = 2.63 MeV (top) and Ec. m. = 2.75 MeV (middle). The upper limit with both hypothetical levels is also plotted in the figure (bottom). The black circles represent the empirical cross sections obtained at 0° ≤ θlab ≤ 7°. The blue solid lines represent the best fit curves for the observed bumps. The reduced χ2 value of the best fit curve is 0.893. The shape of the resonance was assumed to be Gaussian, as plotted as a red dotted line in the figure, because the broadening by the experimental resolution is expected to dominate the width. The width of the Gaussian was assumed to be 50 keV to fit the observed bumps. The normalization factor of the distribution was then increased until the χ2 value decreased to a prescribed amount, resulting in a one-sigma confidence level. The red dashed lines represent the upper limits of the 18Ne (α, α)18Ne cross section. A fluctuation of experimental data points was also observed at Ec. m. ∼ 2.9 MeV. This bump could be a corresponding resonance at Er = 2.87 ± 0.14 MeV reported in a previous work [20]; however, it does not fall into the Gamow window at T ∼ 2 GK. Therefore, the upper limit was not evaluated for this resonance.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. The upper limits of the 18Ne (α, α)18Ne cross section by assuming hypothetical levels located at Ec. m. = 2.63 MeV (top) and Ec. m. = 2.75 MeV (middle) are plotted as red dashed lines. The upper limit with both resonances is also plotted (bottom). The one-sigma confidence level was considered to obtain the upper limit. The black circles represent the experimental excitation function obtained at 0° ≤ θlab ≤ 7°, the blue solid line represents the best fitting result of it, and the red dotted line represents each hypothetical level.

4 Discussion

4.1 Astrophysical implication

Two small bumps observed in the present work fall within the Gamow window of the astrophysically important 18Ne (α, p)21Na reaction relevant to a temperature of T ∼ 2 GK. The contribution of the observed bumps to the 18Ne (α, p)21Na reaction was then investigated. The cross section of the 18Ne (α, p)21Na reaction was calculated using the Breit–Wigner formula [37].

σBWE=λ24π2Jr+12JNe+12Jα+1ΓαΓpEEr2+Γtot/22,(3)

where λ is the de Broglie wavelength; Er is the resonance energy; J, JNe, and Jα are the spins of resonance, 18Ne, and 4He, respectively. Γα, Γp, and Γtot are the α partial width, proton partial width, and total width, respectively. Γtot = Γα + Γp was assumed in the calculations. Two hypothetical levels used in the upper limit calculation were considered to be the resonances for the 18Ne (α, p)21Na reaction, where the resonance energies were adopted as Er = 2.63 and 2.75 MeV. Γα values of both resonances were determined by further analyzing with the R-matrix code SAMMY8 [38, 39], where the experimental energy increase of ∼ 50 keV was assumed. The best fit yielded values of Γα = 15 keV for both resonances. The spin and parity of both resonances was adopted as Jπ = 0+ while calculating the cross section. Several Jπ values for the resonances located in the astrophysically important energy region have been suggested in the previous direct measurement by Groombridge et al. [20], including Jπ = 0+. However, the choice of other Jπ values such as Jπ = 1 or 2+ for observed bumps would imply our Γα which exceed the Wigner limit. Table 1 summarizes the resonance parameters used in the 18Ne (α, p)21Na cross section calculations.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. The resonance parameters used in the 18Ne (α, p)21Na cross section calculation are summarized. Two sets of parameters (“COM1” and “COM2”) are used in the calculation to illustrate the sensitivity of the Γp for the reaction cross section. All energies are expressed in MeV.

Although proton resonant scattering on the 21Na nucleus has been measured in literatures [2224], Γp in the corresponding energy region has not been reported so far. To approximate Γp values for the resonances, the Wigner limit for the proton was calculated by Γw = 22/μR2Pl, where μ is the reduced mass, R is the interaction radius, and Pl is the penetrability of a given orbital angular momentum l. An interaction radius of R = 1.35 (1 + 211/3) fm [24] was adopted in the calculation. By considering the global mean reduced proton width θp2 = 0.0045, suggested in [40], Γp was estimated to be ∼10 keV for the resonances at Er = 2.63 and 2.75 MeV, which is summarized as “COM1” in Table 1. To illustrate the sensitivity of the proton widths for the 18Ne (α, p)21Na reaction cross section, another set of Γp values for the resonances was approximated by assuming Γp = Γtot − Γα (“COM2” in Table 1). We adopted Γtot = 0.1 MeV (Γtot = 0.21 MeV) for the resonance at Er = 2.63 MeV (Er = 2.75 MeV), as reported in the previous direct measurement by Groombridge et al. [20].

The calculation results for the 18Ne (α, p)21Na reaction cross section are shown in Figure 5, in comparison with the previous experimental results. The cross sections deduced by the Breit–Wigner formula using two sets of Γp values are shown as the green dashed and black solid lines, respectively. The blue triangles represent the experimental data obtained by Salter et al. [29], which were determined from the time-reversal reaction measurement. The 18Ne (α, p0)21Na reaction cross section was inferred by using the principle of the detailed balance theorem [41]; therefore, their data can provide a lower limit for the cross section. The red squares represent the 18Ne (α, p)21Na cross section derived from the resonance parameters reported by Groombridge et al. [20]. The black squares represent the recent direct measurement results by Anastasiou et al. [21], which shows a lower cross section by almost an order of magnitude compared with that of Groombridge et al. As shown in the figure, our calculation results indicate that the 18Ne (α, p)21Na reaction cross section depends critically on the proton widths of the resonances in the astrophysically important energy region. Thus, experimental studies of the Γp are highly required for a conclusive understanding of the 18Ne (α, p)21Na reaction cross section.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 5. Comparison of the 18Ne (α, p)21Na reaction cross section calculations in the present work with the previous measurements by Salter et al. [29], Groombridge et al. [20], and Anastasiou et al. [21] is shown.

4.2 R-matrix analysis and α-cluster structure

The excitation function of 18Ne + α elastic scattering obtained at the higher excitation energy region Ex ∼ 11–16 MeV is shown in Figure 6. The black circles represent the differential cross sections of the 18Ne (α, α)18Ne obtained at 0° ≤ θlab ≤ 7°. Several peaks were evident in the spectrum, which implies the existence of resonances with large Γα. Since the strength of the α-clustering feature of a resonance state is reflected by its α width, observed peaks in the present work are possible candidates of α-cluster states. To constrain the energy level properties of 22Mg including Γα, an analysis using the R-matrix calculation code SAMMY8 [38, 39] has been in progress. A channel radius of Rc = 5.0 fm was adopted in the calculation, which is the same value used in the GCM calculation [11]. We calculated the excitation function at an average angle of θc.m. = 173 °, and the result was then broadened considering the experimental energy resolution.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 6. The excitation function of the elastic scattering of α particles on 18Ne obtained at 0°≤ θlab ≤7° (black circles) with the R-matrix fit with three resonances (red solid line) is shown.

By introducing three resonances in the R-matrix calculation, the fitting curve was obtained at Ex ≤ 12.3 MeV, which is plotted as red solid line in Figure 6. The resonance parameters are summarized in Table 2. Since the spectroscopic information of 22Mg nucleus in this energy region is very limited, an intensive R-matrix analysis with all possible spin and natural parity combinations for observed resonances should be carefully performed until the experimental excitation function is well-reproduced. The resonance parameters with best fitting result will be provided in the future. The χ2 analysis will be performed to deduce possible parameters for each peak. The dimensionless partial width θa2 for each level will be calculated by θa2 = ΓαW, where ΓW is the Wigner limit of Γα, which can provide a direct comparison with theoretical predictions in [11]. More detailed calculations would be necessary to reveal the nature of those levels, if they are shell-model-like or cluster-like states.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 2. Resonance properties of 22Mg extracted from the present work are summarized. Results from the previous works are listed for comparison.

5 Summary

We measured α resonant elastic scattering on 18Ne using the thick-target method in inverse kinematics technique to improve our knowledge of the α-cluster structure of proton-rich 22Mg nucleus. The excitation function for 18Ne (α, α)18Ne in the energy range of Ex ∼ 10–16 MeV was obtained at 0° ≤ θlab ≤ 7°. Several levels with large α widths were evident in our result, which can be candidates for the α-cluster states. To clarify the energy level properties of 22Mg and to investigate α-clustering features, the R-matrix analysis is in progress. The resonance parameters will be extracted considering all possible combinations of spin and parity for observed peaks. The first experimental constraints on spectroscopic information of 22Mg above Ex ∼ 13 MeV will be provided. To better understand the experimental results, complete theoretical descriptions are required in the future.

No levels were evident at Ex < 11 MeV in the present work, even though two small bumps were observed in the cross section spectrum. Therefore, we set upper limits on the 18Ne (α, α)18Ne cross section, which indicate the possible maximum resonant cross section assuming the hypothetical levels at Ex = 10.772 and 10.892 MeV (Ec.m. = 2.63 and 2.75 MeV). We also estimated the astrophysically important 18Ne (α, p)21Na reaction cross section based on our experimental data. The calculation indicates that the 18Ne (α, p)21Na cross section depends on the proton widths of the resonances as well. Experimental studies on Γp are necessary to evaluate the 18Ne (α, p)21Na reaction cross section conclusively.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

KC was the spokesperson of the experiment. All authors contributed to the setup of the experiment and the measurements. SMC wrote the first draft, the revised versions, and the final version of the manuscript. All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Funding

This work was supported by the Institute for Basic Science (IBS) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, Korea (Grant No. IBS-R031-D1). This work was also supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIT) Nos. 2020R1A2C1005981 and 2019K2A9A2A10018827. This work has been supported by the Rare Isotope Science Project of Institute for Basic Science funded by the Ministry of Science and NRF of Korea (2013M7A1A1075765). AK acknowledges the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the Korean Government (Grant No. 2018R1A5A1025563). LHK acknowledges the support of the International Centre of Physics at the Institute of Physics (Grant No. ICP.2023.04).

Acknowledgments

The experiment was performed at the RIBF operated by RIKEN Nishina Center and CNS, University of Tokyo. The authors are grateful to the RIKEN and CNS accelerator staff for their technical support.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Ikeda K, Takigawa N, Horiuchi H. The systematic structure-change into the molecule-like structures in the self-conjugate $4n$ nuclei. Prog Theor Phys Suppl (1968) E68:464–75. doi:10.1143/PTPS.E68.464

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Freer M. The clustered nucleus—Cluster structures in stable and unstable nuclei. Rep Prog Phys (2007) 70:2149–210. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/70/12/R03

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Horiuchi H, Ikeda K, Katō K. Recent developments in nuclear cluster physics. Prog Theor Phys Suppl (2012) 192:1–238. doi:10.1143/PTPS.192.1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Freer M, Angélique JC, Axelsson L, Benoit B, Bergmann U, Catford WN, et al. Exotic molecular states in 12Be. Phys Rev Lett (1999) 82:1383–6. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1383

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Freer M, Angélique JC, Axelsson L, Benoit B, Bergmann U, Catford WN, et al. Helium breakup states in 10Be and 12Be. Phys Rev C (2001) 63:034301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.63.034301

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Yamaguchi H, Kahl D, Hayakawa S, Sakaguchi Y, Abe K, Nakao T, et al. Experimental investigation of a linear-chain structure in the nucleus 14C. Phys Lett B (2017) 766:11–6. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.12.050

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Yamaguchi H, Hashimoto T, Hayakawa S, Binh DN, Kahl D, Kubono S, et al. α resonance structure in 11B studied via resonant scattering of 7Li+α. Phys Rev C (2011) 83:034306. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.83.034306

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Yamaguchi H, Kahl D, Wakabayashi Y, Kubono S, Hashimoto T, Hayakawa S, et al. α-resonance structure in 11C studied via resonant scattering of 7Be + α and with the 7Be(α, p) reaction. Phys Rev C (2013) 87:034303. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.034303

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Descouvemont P. Microscopic investigation of the α+18O system in a three-cluster model. Phys Rev C (1988) 38:2397–407. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.38.2397

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Rogachev GV, Goldberg VZ, Lönnroth T, Trzaska WH, Fayans SA, Källman KM, et al. Doubling of α-cluster states 22Ne. Phys Rev C (2001) 64:051302. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.64.051302

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Dufour M, Descouvemont P. Microscopic study of α-cluster states in 22Ne. Nucl Phys A (2003) 726:53–66. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.07.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Goldberg VZ, Rogachev GV, Trzaska WH, Kolata JJ, Andreyev A, Angulo C, et al. Investigation of the α-cluster structure of 22Ne and 22Mg. Phys Rev C (2004) 69:024602. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.69.024602

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Kimura M. Molecular orbitals and α +18O molecular bands of 22Ne. Phys Rev C (2007) 75:034312. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.75.034312

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Scholz W, Neogy P, Bethge K, Middleton R. 0+ state at 6.24 MeV in 22Ne excited by the reaction 18O(7Li,t)22Ne. Phys Rev Lett (1969) 22:949–51. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.949

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Scholz W, Neogy P, Bethge K, Middleton R. Rotational bands in 22Ne excited by the 18O(7Li,t)22Ne reaction. Phys Rev C (1972) 6:893–900. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.6.893

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Chen AA, Lewis R, Swartz KB, Visser DW, Parker PD. Structure of 22Mg and its implications for explosive nucleosynthesis. Phys Rev C (2001) 63:065807. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.63.065807

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Chae KY, Bardayan DW, Blackmon JC, Chipps KA, Hatarik R, Jones KL, et al. Constraint on the astrophysical 18Ne(α,p)21Na reaction rate through a 24Mg(p,t)22Mg measurement. Phys Rev C (2009) 79:055804. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.79.055804

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Matic A, Berg AM, Harakeh MN, Wörtche HJ, Berg GPA, Couder M, et al. High-precision (p, t) reaction measurement to determine 18 Ne(α,p)21Na reaction rates. Phys Rev C (2009) 80:055804. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.80.055804

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Bradfield-Smith W, Davinson T, DiPietro A, Laird AM, Ostrowski AN, Shotter AC, et al. Breakout from the hot CNO cycle via the 18 Ne(α,p)21Na reaction. Phys Rev C (1999) 59:3402–9. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.59.3402

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Groombridge D, Shotter AC, Bradfield-Smith W, Cherubini S, Davinson T, Di Pietro A, et al. Breakout from the hot CNO cycle via the 18 Ne(α,p)21Na reaction. II. Extended energy range Ec.m. ∼ 1.7 − 2.9MeV. Phys Rev C (2002) 66:055802. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.66.055802

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Anastasiou M, Wiedenhöver I, Blackmon JC, Baby LT, Caussyn DD, Hood AA, et al. Measurement of the 18 Ne(α,p)21Na reaction with the ANASEN active-target detector system at Ec.m. = 2.5 − 4MeV. Phys Rev C (2022) 105:055806. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.105.055806

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. He JJ, Kubono S, Teranishi T, Hu J, Notani M, Baba H, et al. Investigation of excited states in 22Mg via resonant elastic scattering of 21Na + p and its astrophysical implications. Phys Rev C (2009) 80:015801. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.80.015801

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. He JJ, Zhang LY, Parikh A, Xu SW, Yamaguchi H, Kahl D, et al. The 18 Ne(α,p)21Na breakout reaction in x-ray bursts: Experimental determination of spin-parities for α resonances in 22Mg via resonant elastic scattering of 21Na + p. Phys Rev C (2013) 88:012801. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.012801

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Zhang LY, He JJ, Parikh A, Xu SW, Yamaguchi H, Kahl D, et al. Investigation of the thermonuclear 18 Ne(α,p)21Na reaction rate via resonant elastic scattering of 21Na + p. Phys Rev C (2014) 89:015804. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.89.015804

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Wallace RK, Woosley SE. Explosive hydrogen burning. Astrophys J Suppl Ser (1981) 45:389–420. doi:10.1086/190717

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Schatz H, Aprahamian A, Görres J, Wiescher M, Rauscher T, Rembges J, et al. rp-process nucleosynthesis at extreme temperature and density conditions. Phys Rep (1998) 294:167–263. doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(97)00048-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Woosley SE, Heger A, Cumming A, Hoffman RD, Pruet J, Rauscher T, et al. Models for type I x-ray bursts with improved nuclear physics. Astrophys J Suppl Ser (2004) 151:75–102. doi:10.1086/381533

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Cyburt RH, Amthor AM, Heger A, Johnson E, Keek L, Meisel Z, et al. Dependence of x-ray burst models on nuclear reaction rates. Astrophys J (2016) 830:55. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/55

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Salter PJC, Aliotta M, Davinson T, Al Falou H, Chen A, Davids B, et al. Measurement of the 18 \mathrm{Ne}({\alpha}{,p_{0}})^{21}\mathrm{Na} reaction cross section in the burning energy region for x-ray bursts. Phys Rev Lett (2012) 108:242701. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.242701

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Kubono S, Yanagisawa Y, Teranishi T, Kato S, Kishida Y, Michimasa S, et al. New low-energy RIB separator CRIB for nuclear astrophysics. Eur Phys J A (2002) 13:217–20. doi:10.1140/epja1339-36

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Yanagisawa Y, Kubono S, Teranishi T, Ue K, Michimasa S, Notani M, et al. Low-energy radioisotope beam separator CRIB. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A (2005) 539:74–83. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2004.09.041

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Vorozhtsov S, Perepelkin E, Vorozhtsov A, Watanabe S, Kubono S, Goto A. Beam simulations in computer-modelled 3d fields for riken avf cyclotron upgrade. In: Proceedings of Particle Accelerator Society Meeting; August 1-3, 2017; Sapporo, Japan (2009). p. 240–3.

Google Scholar

33. Yamaguchi H, Wakabayashi Y, Amadio G, Hayakawa S, Fujikawa H, Kubono S, et al. Development of a cryogenic gas target system for intense radioisotope beam production at CRIB. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A (2008) 589:150–6. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2008.02.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Kumagai H, Ozawa A, Fukuda N, Sümmerer K, Tanihata I. Delay-line PPAC for high-energy light ions. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A (2001) 470:562–70. doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00804-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Artemov KP, Belyanin OP, Vetoshkin AL, Wolski R, Golovkov MS, Goldberg VZ, et al. Effective method of study of α-cluster states. Sov J Nucl Phys (1990) 52:408.

Google Scholar

36. Ziegler JF, Ziegler M, Biersack J. Srim – the stopping and range of ions in matter. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B 268 (2010) 1818–23. doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.091

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Rolfs CE, Rodney WS. Cauldrons in the cosmos. Chicago and London: The University of Chocago Press (1988).

Google Scholar

38. Lane AM, Thomas RG. R-matrix theory of nuclear reactions. Rev Mod Phys (1958) 30:257–353. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.30.257

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Larson N. A code system for multilevel R-matrix fits to neutron data using bayes’ equations. unpublished: ORNL/TM-9179/R5 (2000).

Google Scholar

40. Longland R, Iliadis C, Champagne A, Newton J, Ugalde C, Coc A, et al. Charged-particle thermonuclear reaction rates: I. Monte carlo method and statistical distributions. Nucl Phys A (2010) 841:1–30. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.04.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Illiadis C. Nuclear Physics of stars. New York: VCH (2007).

Google Scholar

Keywords: nuclear cluster, α-cluster structure, resonant scattering, energy level properties, thick-target method in inverse kinematics, RI beam, explosive stellar environments, 18Ne(a,p)21Na

Citation: Cha SM, Chae KY, Abe K, Bae S, Binh DN, Choi SH, Duy NN, Ge Z, Hahn KI, Hayakawa S, Hong B, Iwasa N, Kahl D, Khiem LH, Kim A, Kim D, Kim EJ, Kim GW, Kim MJ, Kwak K, Kwag MS, Lee EJ, Lim SI, Moon B, Moon JY, Park SY, Phong VH, Shimizu H, Yamaguchi H and Yang L (2023) Investigation of 22Mg levels via resonant scattering of 18Ne + α. Front. Phys. 11:1163299. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2023.1163299

Received: 10 February 2023; Accepted: 02 May 2023;
Published: 16 May 2023.

Edited by:

Rosario Gianluca Pizzone, Laboratori Nazionali del Sud (INFN), Italy

Reviewed by:

Gábor Kiss, Institute for Nuclear Research (MTA), Hungary
Roberto Linares, Fluminense Federal University, Brazil

Copyright © 2023 Cha, Chae, Abe, Bae, Binh, Choi, Duy, Ge, Hahn, Hayakawa, Hong, Iwasa, Kahl, Khiem, Kim, Kim, Kim, Kim, Kim, Kwak, Kwag, Lee, Lim, Moon, Moon, Park, Phong, Shimizu, Yamaguchi and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: K. Y. Chae, kchae@skku.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.