Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Phys., 13 May 2022
Sec. Condensed Matter Physics
This article is part of the Research Topic High-Tc Superconductivity in Electron-Doped Iron Selenide and Related Compounds View all 9 articles

Editorial: High-Tc Superconductivity in Electron-Doped Iron Selenide and Related Compounds

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, California State University at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
  • 2Institute of Solid State and Materials Physics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
  • 3Department of Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Iron-selenide superconductors comprise a particularly interesting group of materials inside the family of iron-based superconductors. The simplest member of the group is bulk FeSe, which has a modest critical temperature of Tc = 9 K. Like iron-pnictide superconductors, bulk FeSe shows a structural transition at Ts = 90 K from a tetragonal to an orthorhombic phase driven by nematic ordering of the electronic degrees of freedom. Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES), for example, reveals a small hole Fermi surface pocket at the center of the Brillouin zone and two electron Fermi surface pockets at the corner of the Brillouin zone, each with unequal dxz/dyz-orbital character. Unlike in iron-pnictide superconductors, however, no magnetic order coexists with the nematic order at temperatures below the structural transition. Inelastic neutron scattering (INS) spectroscopy finds a spin resonance inside the energy gap of the superconducting phase in bulk FeSe, however, at wavevectors corresponding to a stripe spin-density wave (SDW) [1]. It strongly suggests s+− superconductivity across the hole and electron Fermi surface pockets driven by associated antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations. INS also finds spin fluctuations at the Néel wavevector (π, π) above the superconducting energy gap [2]. This suggests that superconductivity, nematic order, stripe-SDW order, and some type of Néel antiferromagnetic order compete at low temperature in bulk FeSe. One of the editors of the research topic has proposed that the latter is hidden Néel order [3, 4]. The superconducting critical temperature increases dramatically to 30–40 K and above upon doping iron selenide with electrons. The latter has been achieved in various ways; for example, by alkali-metal intercalation, by placing a monolayer of FeSe on a substrate, and by organic-molecule intercalation. ARPES finds that the hole bands at the center of the Brillouin zone lie buried below the Fermi level. INS finds a spin resonance inside the superconducting energy gap, but it lies midway between the SDW and Néel wavenumbers [5]. INS also finds peaks and rings of low-energy spin excitations above the energy gap around the Néel wavevector [6, 7]. ARPES and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) find a non-zero superconducting energy gap. The situation with electron-doped FeSe is rather puzzling then, with high-Tc superconductivity existing over electron Fermi surface pockets alone! This is not expected in iron-selenide superconductors, where electron-electron repulsion is strong [8]. The latter requires that the sign of the pair wave function oscillates over the Brillouin zone [4].

It is our pleasure to introduce eight articles from the Research Topic that address many of the unsolved problems that have emerged in the field of iron-selenide superconductors, some of which we have listed above. The contributions to the Research Topic contain articles on both theory and experiment, with four papers reporting on original research, and with four review papers. Chen et al. review how nematicity in bulk iron selenide can be scrutinized by exploiting detwinning techniques [9], while Coldea reviews the series of nematic superconductors FeSe1−xSx [10]. Both articles tackle the interplay between nematicity and superconductivity that exists in bulk FeSe, with or without chemical substitutions. Yeh et al. show that insulating Fe4Se5 becomes a superconductor with Tc = 8 K after proper annealing [11]. They thereby argue that Fe4Se5 is the insulating parent compound for iron-selenide superconductors. It would clearly be useful to compare future studies of the low-energy spin excitations in Fe4Se5 with those of its electron-doped counterpart Rb2Fe4Se5 [5, 6]. Finally, Dong et al. review a new soft-chemical technique to grow high-quality single crystals of organic-molecule intercalated FeSe [12]. Their samples have critical temperatures of Tc = 42 K, and they notably show record critical currents.

On the theory side, Yu et al. review 3d-orbital-selective physics in iron superconductors [13]. They point out how the dxy orbital is the one most susceptible to Mott localization in iron-selenide superconductors [8]. They also emphasize how the relatively small energy splitting between the dxz/dyz orbitals that is seen by ARPES in the nematic phase of bulk FeSe, ΔEΓ and ΔEM < 50 meV, can be reconciled with the large orbitally-dependent wavefunction renormalizations seen by STM in the same phase, Z(dyz)/Z(dxz) = 4. Dzero and Khodas study the effect of point disorder on the stripe SDW state by exploiting a quasi-classical Green’s function technique [14]. They find that the tetragonally symmetric stripe SDW state is more robust with respect to disorder than the orthorhombically symmetric one. This result could have bearing on the absence of magnetic order in the nematic phase of bulk FeSe, for example. Last, Ptok et al. study a two-band model for iron superconductors that includes intra-band and inter-band coupling between Cooper pairs [15]. They notably find Cooper pair states in relative orbitals of mixed symmetry. Finally, Gupta et al. applied muon-spin rotation/relaxation (μSR) on the iron-pnictide superconductor NdFeAsO0.65F0.35, thereby obtaining London penetration lengths [16]. Interestingly, a two-band analysis of their data yields only weak inter-band coupling of the Cooper pairs.

The brief survey above of the author contributions to the Research Topic conveys the richness of the field of iron-selenide superconductivity and related materials. We believe that you will enjoy reading the Research Topic.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Wang Q, Shen Y, Pan B, Hao Y, Ma M, Zhou F, et al. Strong Interplay between Stripe Spin Fluctuations, Nematicity and Superconductivity in FeSe. Nat Mater (2016) 15:159–63. doi:10.1038/nmat4492

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Wang Q, Shen Y, Pan B, Zhang X, Ikeuchi K, Iida K, et al. Magnetic Ground State of FeSe. Nat Commun (2016) 7:1–7. doi:10.1038/ncomms12182

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Rodriguez JP. Spin Resonances in Iron Selenide High-Tc Superconductors by Proximity to a Hidden Spin Density Wave. Phys Rev B (2020) 102:024521. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.102.024521

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Rodriguez JP. Superconductivity by Hidden Spin Fluctuations in Electron-Doped Iron Selenide. Phys Rev B (2021) 103:184513. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.184513

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Park JT, Friemel G, Li Y, Kim J-H, Tsurkan V, Deisenhofer J, et al. Magnetic Resonant Mode in the Low-Energy Spin-Excitation Spectrum of Superconducting Rb2Fe4Se5 Single Crystals. Phys Rev Lett (2011) 107:177005. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.177005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Friemel G, Park JT, Maier TA, Tsurkan V, Li Y, Deisenhofer J, et al. Reciprocal-space Structure and Dispersion of the Magnetic Resonant Mode in the Superconducting Phase of RbxFe2ySe2 Single Crystals. Phys Rev B (2012) 85:140511(R). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.85.140511

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Pan B, Shen Y, Hu D, Feng Y, Park JT, Christianson AD, et al. Structure of Spin Excitations in Heavily Electron-Doped Li0.8Fe0.2ODFeSe Superconductors. Nat Commun (2017) 8:123. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00162-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Yi M, Liu Z-K, Zhang Y, Yu R, Zhu J-X, Lee JJ, et al. Observation of Universal strong Orbital-dependent Correlation Effects in Iron Chalcogenides. Nat Commun (2015) 6:7777. doi:10.1038/ncomms8777

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Chen T, Yi M, Dai P. Electronic and Magnetic Anisotropies in FeSe Family of Iron-Based Superconductors. Front Phys (2020) 8:314. doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00314

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Coldea AI. Electronic Nematic States Tuned by Isoelectronic Substitution in Bulk FeSe1−xSx. Front Phys (2021) 8:594500. doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.594500

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Yeh K-Y, Chen Y-R, Lo T-S, Wu PM, Wang M-J, Chang-Liao K-S, et al. Fe-Vacancy-Ordered Fe4Se5: The Insulating Parent Phase of FeSe Superconductor. Front Phys (2020) 8:567054. doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.567054

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Dong X, Zhou F, Zhao Z. Electronic and Superconducting Properties of Some FeSe-Based Single Crystals and Films Grown Hydrothermally. Front Phys (2020) 8:586182. doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.586182

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Yu R, Hu H, Nica EM, Zhu J-X, Si Q. Orbital Selectivity in Electron Correlations and Superconducting Pairing of Iron-Based Superconductors. Front Phys (2021) 9:578347. doi:10.3389/fphy.2021.578347

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Dzero M, Khodas M. Quasiclassical Theory of C4-Symmetric Magnetic Order in Disordered Multiband Metals. Front Phys (2020) 8:356. doi:10.3389/fphy2020.0035610.3389/fphy.2020.00356

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Ptok A, Kapcia KJ, Piekarz P. Effects of Pair-Hopping Coupling on Properties of Multi-Band Iron-Based Superconductors. Front Phys (2020) 8:284. doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00284

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Gupta R, Maisuradze A, Zhigadlo ND, Luetkens H, Amato A, Khasanov R. Self-Consistent Two-Gap Approach in Studying Multi-Band Superconductivity of NdFeAsO0.65F0.35. Front Phys (2020) 8:2. doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: iron chalcogenide, iron-based superconductor Fe(SeTe), iron selenide superconductors, high-temperature superconductors, antiferromagnetic ordering

Citation: Rodriguez JP, Inosov DS and Zhao J (2022) Editorial: High-Tc Superconductivity in Electron-Doped Iron Selenide and Related Compounds. Front. Phys. 10:885420. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2022.885420

Received: 28 February 2022; Accepted: 25 April 2022;
Published: 13 May 2022.

Edited and reviewed by:

James Avery Sauls, Northwestern University, United States

Copyright © 2022 Rodriguez, Inosov and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jose P. Rodriguez, anJvZHJpZ0BjYWxzdGF0ZWxhLmVkdQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.