Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Phys., 13 September 2022
Sec. Interdisciplinary Physics
This article is part of the Research Topic Emerging Non-Volatile Memories and Beyond: From Fundamental Physics to Applications View all 5 articles

Editorial: Emerging non-volatile memories and beyond: From fundamental physics to applications

  • Applied Materials Italia, Applied AI MDLx, Reggio Emilia, Italy

At the beginning of the 21st century, many scientists and engineers from the most important semiconductor industries began to question whether, and to which extent, the NAND memory technology could be further scaled or not. Due to the widespread exploitation of NAND memories in electronic devices, this debate became soon a hot topic. While the mainstream NAND technology relies on charge trapping and floating gates, broadly speaking the alternative technologies rely instead on the possibility to alter the state of a material as the means to store the information, the device physics and physical structure being unique to each technology. All these technologies (phase change memories [1], resistive RAMs [2], spin-transfer-torque RAMs [3], ferroelectric memories [4], and others) were collectively addressed to as Emerging Non-Volatile Memories.

At the International Electron Devices Meeting IEDM 2012, the attendants to the panel session Will Future Non-Volatile-Memory Contenders Disrupt NAND? were asked to vote which technology in their opinion would have taken the lead in the next decade. The majority of the votes were cast to the NAND technology, that was indicated as the successor of itself; and among the emerging technologies, phase change memories were on top of the list closely followed by resistive RAMs. As a matter of fact, the manufacturing understanding of the alternative technologies was largely immature, the fabrication costs were substantially higher, and the long-term behavior was not well evaluated and established as that of the NAND technology. The predominance of phase change memories as a possible replacement for NAND derived from the deeper investigation of such a technology, that was started by the pioneering and visionary work of Ovshinskiy in the 1960s. In the late 2000s only phase change memories had in fact been commercially exploited by Numonyx aiming at a replacement for NOR memories in mobile phones, this shedding good light for their inclusion in further products. The commercial exploitation of phase change memories has recently been summarized by Fantini [5].

With the only significant exception of Intel and Micron’s 3D XPoint memory, we cannot list nowadays any commercial solution or mass product where the so called emerging non-volatile memories have been incorporated at large scale, and the entire semiconductor industry is still dominated by NAND memories. Three questions raise spontaneously: is there really room for emerging non-volatile memories at production stage, or will they be emerging forever? Which are nowadays their limiting factors that hinder their potential? And, finally, are there alternative applications to exploit them as advanced devices, besides the pure memory functionality?

In this Research Topic devoted to Emerging Non-Volatile Memories and Beyond: From Fundamental Physics to Applications, 3 original research articles and a review paper take into consideration these questions, focusing on phase change memories and resistive RAMs.

The first contribution by Elisa Petroni et al. investigate Ge-rich Ge-Sb-Te alloys for phase change memories to be employed in automotive applications. Stricter requirements on data retention than conventional non-volatile memories are called for to fulfill the soldering compliance, and these specs can be met only be appropriate material engineering. During memory operations, elemental segregation leading to a local compositional variability occurs, as a result of a complex thermodynamics and electro-diffusive driving forces.

In this paper, the authors define a metrics for classifying the local composition on a statistical basis, use it to get rid of outliers of the main distribution, to compare trials to each other, and to quantify compositional properties and link them to the memory performance, thus better enabling alloy engineering.

The second paper of this issue, by Rossella Brunetti et al. also investigate chalcogenide alloys focusing on the dynamics of threshold switching. As a matter of facts, chalcogenide alloys of slightly different composition than those used in phase change memories, are exploited as two-terminal selectors in cross-point architectures. These selectors suffer from a delay time that occurs from the moment when the biasing voltage reaches the threshold voltage and the moment when the OFF-ON switch effectively occurs, as witnessed by a steep rise of the current. Such a delay is crucial to define the speed of the selector. Brunetti ad coworkers propose a model and investigate possible sources of this delay, splitting it into an intrinsic component given by the time required to generate a sufficiently large population of hot carriers, which represents the theoretical lower limit, and into an amplifying factor due to unavoidable parasitics, wirings and circuitry, that often dominates and quantifies the measured delay.

Going beyond the memory functionality, phase change memories and resistive RAMs have shown a high potential for in-memory and neuromorphic computing, thanks to their multi-level, quasi-analog programming capability that enables in-place data processing [6]. In the third paper of this issue, Fernando L et al. investigate the behavior of large cross-point arrays of RRAMs through a full time-dependent, compact model to be included into SPICE simulations. The authors are thus able to extend previous similar models by better clarifying the program operation of the synaptic weights in terms of time and precision, leveraging the major technological knobs.

The fourth and last contribution is a review paper by Ye et al. The article revises how memristors can be manufactured using binary oxides, 2D materials, solid-state electrolytes, and ferroelectric materials; then, memristors are classified as electronic, photonic, or optoelectronic, according to their working principle. Finally, neural networks of different kinds, such as artificial neural networks, deep neural networks, spiking neural networks, and photonic-based neural networks are analyzed and compared in terms of performances, limits, potential best application, and outlook in the near future.

Author contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.

Conflict of interest

EP is an employee of Applied Materials Italia.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Wong H-SP, Raoux S, Kim SB, Liang J, Reifenberg JP, Rajendran B, et al. Phase change memory. Proc IEEE (2010) 98(12):2201–27. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2010.2070050

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Wong H-SP, Lee H-Y, Yu S, Chen Y-S, Wu Y, Chen P-S, et al. Metal-oxide RRAM. Proc IEEE (2012) 100(6):1951–70. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2012.2190369

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Xuanyao F, Yusung K, Venkatesan R, Choday SH, Raghunahan A, Roy K. Spin-transfer torque memories: Devices, circuits and systems. Proc IEEE (2016) 104(7):1449–88. doi:10.1109/jproc.2016.2521712

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Mikolajick T, Schroeder U, Slesazeck S. The past, the present, and the future of ferroelectric memories. IEEE Trans Electron Devices (2020) 767(4):1434–43. doi:10.1109/TED.2020.2976148

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Fantini P. Phase change memory applications: The history, the present and the future. J Phys D Appl Phys (2020) 53(28):283002. doi:10.1088/1361-6463/ab83ba

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Sebastian A, Le Gallo M, Khaddam-Aljameh R, Eleftheriou E. Memory devices and applications for in-memory computing. Nat Nanotechnol (2020) 10:529–44. doi:10.1038/s41565-020-0655-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: phase change memories, resistive memories, neural networks, SPICE simulation, memristor

Citation: Piccinini E (2022) Editorial: Emerging non-volatile memories and beyond: From fundamental physics to applications. Front. Phys. 10:1006756. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2022.1006756

Received: 29 July 2022; Accepted: 22 August 2022;
Published: 13 September 2022.

Edited and reviewed by:

Alex Hansen, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

Copyright © 2022 Piccinini. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Enrico Piccinini, enrico_piccinini@amat.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.