data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Pharmacol. , 31 October 2024
Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies
Volume 15 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1507320
This article is a correction to:
Impact of a DSS-supported medication review on the safety of drug therapy and quality of life in patients with antithrombotic therapy
A Corrigendum on
Impact of a DSS-supported medication review on the safety of drug therapy and quality of life in patients with antithrombotic therapy
by Hassanzadeh TE, Hohmann C and Culmsee C (2024). Front. Pharmacol. 15:1194201. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1194201
In the published article, there was an error. The M and SD for the index value were incorrect.
A correction has been made to 3 Results, 3.3 Quality of life. This sentence previously stated:
“First, the descriptive part shows a statistically significant improvement of the index value from M = 0.90 (SD = 0.9) to M = 1.1 (SD = 1.2), second, the evaluation of the VAS improved from M = 67.3 (SD = 14.4) to 73.0 (SD = 13.4).”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“First, the descriptive part shows a statistically significant improvement of the index value from M = 0.81 (SD = 0.2) to M = 0.88 (SD = 0.1), second, the evaluation of the VAS improved from M = 67.3 (SD = 14.4) to 73.0 (SD = 13.4).”
In the published article, there was an error. The M value for QoL, EQ Index was incorrect.
A correction has been made to 4 Discussion, Paragraph 3. This sentence previously stated:
“The difference between the pre- and post-intervention groups was relatively small, with M = 2.4 (adherence), M = 5.7 (QoL, EQ VAS) and M = 0.2 (QoL, EQ Index), respectively.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The difference between the pre- and post-intervention groups was relatively small, with M = 2.4 (adherence), M = 5.7 (QoL, EQ VAS) and M = 0.07 (QoL, EQ Index), respectively.”
The authors apologize for these errors and state that these do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: drug safety, medication review, community pharmacy, interprofessional collaboration, polypharmacy, quality of life, antithrombotic medication
Citation: Hassanzadeh TE, Hohmann C and Culmsee C (2024) Corrigendum: Impact of a DSS-supported medication review on the safety of drug therapy and quality of life in patients with antithrombotic therapy. Front. Pharmacol. 15:1507320. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1507320
Received: 07 October 2024; Accepted: 22 October 2024;
Published: 31 October 2024.
Edited and reviewed by:
Bernd Rosenkranz, Fundisa African Academy of Medicines Development, South AfricaCopyright © 2024 Hassanzadeh, Hohmann and Culmsee. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Tanja Elnaz Hassanzadeh, aGFzc2FuemFkZWhAd2lyLW1hY2hlbi1hbXRzLmRl; Carsten Culmsee, Y3VsbXNlZUBzdGFmZi51bmktbWFyYnVyZy5kZQ==
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.