Effects of three flavonoids on the metabolism of lenvatinib

Lenvatinib is a first-line therapy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), an active multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The interaction between Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and chemicals has increasingly become a research hotspot. The objective of this study was to pinpoint the effects of three flavonoids on the metabolism of lenvatinib. Enzyme reaction system was established and optimized in vitro, and in vivo experiments were conducted in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, where the analytes were detected by ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). We found that among three flavonoids, luteolin and myricetin had strong inhibitory effects on lenvatinib metabolism, with half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) values of 11.36 ± 0.46 µM and 11.21 ± 0.81 µM in rat liver microsomes (RLM), respectively, and 6.89 ± 0.43 µM and 12.32 ± 1.21 µM in human liver microsomes (HLM), respectively. In Sprague-Dawley rats, the combined administration of lenvatinib and luteolin obviously expanded the exposure to lenvatinib; however, co-administered with myricetin did not have any changes, which may be due to the poor bioavailability of myricetin in vivo. Furthermore, the inhibitory type of luteolin on lenvatinib showed an un-competitive in RLM and a mixed in HLM. Collectively, flavonoids with liver protection, especially luteolin, may inhibit lenvatinib metabolism in vitro and in vivo.

1 Introduction

Liver disease remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide (Qian et al., 2021). It is estimated that approximately two million people around the world die from this disease (Mokdad et al., 2014), of which liver cancer ranks third among the global causes of cancer death (Rumgay et al., 2022), while hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of liver cancer and the second leading cause of death from malignant tumors in the world (Mazzanti et al., 2016). This is mainly due to the fact that most people do not have symptoms in the initial stages of HCC, until the terminal stage, when liver transplantation is not possible (Ogunwobi et al., 2019; Buttell and Qiu, 2023), ultimately leading to a continuous increase in incidence and a 5-year survival rate of less than 20% (Chou et al., 2014).

Lenvatinib is an oral small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that selectively inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1–3 (VEGFR 1–3), fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRα), and proto-oncogenes kinase inhibitor (KIT) (Matsui et al., 2008; Ikuta et al., 2009). At present, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved it as a first-line treatment of unresectable HCC (Nair et al., 2021), and its therapeutic effect is not inferior to that of sorafenib (Kudo, 2018). The major metabolic product of lenvatinib is O-desmethyl lenvatinib (M1), and current studies have shown that CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP2B6, and CYP3A4 are the most efficient enzymes for the formation of these metabolites (Vavrová et al., 2022). Nevertheless, lenvatinib often has adverse reactions such as hepatotoxicity (Furuse et al., 2023), hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, and thrombocytopenia during treatment (Suyama and Iwase, 2018). Drug adverse reactions are one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in the clinic every year (Wu et al., 2014), where drug interaction accounts for 30% of all adverse drug events (Becker et al., 2007).

Drug-drug interactions is a major problem in clinical practice and has been recognized as one of the primary threats to public health (Sennesael et al., 2018; Hoel et al., 2021; Ye et al., 2021; Zerah et al., 2021; Bruggemann et al., 2022). Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is frequently used in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs (Hu et al., 2005). In addition to flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenoids, and others have been proven to have good anti-tumor effects (Zhao et al., 2023). Among them, flavonoids are a type of polyphenols widely found in fruits, vegetables, beer, and other common foods (Santes-Palacios et al., 2020). Research by Aune et al. indicates that its intake is closely related to reducing the incidence of cancer (Aune et al., 2017). For instance, luteolin can improve liver lesions by inhibiting inflammatory factors, alleviating oxidative stress, inducing liver cancer cell apoptosis and autophagy (Yao et al., 2023); myricetin can suppress the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma by decreasing the regulation of YAP expression (Li et al., 2019); fisetin can protect the liver by increasing GSH and reducing inflammatory mediators and CYP2E1 (Ugan et al., 2023). However, the interaction between flavonoids and lenvatinib has rarely been reported.

Therefore, in this study, we systematically selected luteolin (Yao et al., 2023), myricetin (Xu et al., 2020), and fisetin (Ugan et al., 2023), three kinds of flavonoids with live protective effects, to explore the changes of lenvatinib at present of them. First, in vitro, we used rat liver microsomes (RLM) and human liver microsomes (HLM) to investigate their effects on lenvatinib metabolism and the corresponding potential mechanisms. Subsequently, in vivo, Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were applied to discover changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters of lenvatinib by luteolin and myricetin. The results may provide certain data to support the personalized precision treatment of lenvatinib in clinical practice.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Chemicals and reagents

Lenvatinib, O-desmethyl lenvatinib (M1), internal standard (IS, regorafenib), melatonin, 6-hydroxy melatonin, bupropion, hydroxy bupropion, midazolam and 1′-hydroxy midazolam were purchased from Beijing Sunflower Technology Development Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). Luteolin, myricetin and fisetin were provided by Shanghai Canspec Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) was procured from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). HLM (mixed gender, pool of 50 donors) was from iPhase Pharmaceutical Services Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu, China), while RLM was prepared by our team. All solvents and reagents included in this study were above of analytical grade.

2.2 Detection condition of UPLC-MS/MS

A Waters Acquity ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) system was used for the quantitative analysis of the analytes. Chromatographic separation of lenvatinib, M1 (the main metabolite of lenvatinib), and IS was carried out by an Acquity BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 μm; Milford, MA, United States) at a temperature of 40°C. The mobile phase was composed of 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B), with a gradient elution at a flow rate of 0.40 mL/min for 2 min. Mass spectrometry information of the analytes were obtained by a Waters Xevo TQ-S triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (Milford, MA, United States) with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in positive mode. Furthermore, the main operating parameters of the mass spectrometers for lenvatinib, M1, IS and specific CYP isoform probes were summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

Table 1. Ion transitions and the main operating parameters for lenvatinib, M1, regorafenib (IS) and specific CYP isoform probes of the mass spectrometer.

2.3 Enzyme preparation of RLM

The enzyme preparation of RLM was referred to previously reported literature (Wang et al., 2015). The main processes were as follows: the rat liver was weighted on balance and homogenized according to the ratio of 1 g plus 2.5 mL pre-cooled PBS-0.25 mM sucrose buffer. The homogenates were then centrifuged at 11,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C, and after repeated centrifugation of the supernatants, the supernatant was centrifuged at 75,600 × g at 4°C for 2 h. Next, the precipitations were mixed with pre-cooled PBS buffer in a 1:3 ratio to obtain RLM. Finally, a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific) was used to determine the protein concentration. Absorbance was measured at 562 nm, and the results showed that the average concentration was 17.58 ± 0.63 mg/mL.

2.4 Enzyme reaction system

To determine the enzymatic kinetic parameter (the Michaelis constant, K_m) of lenvatinib in RLM and HLM, we established a 200 μL enzyme reaction system, which included 2–100 μM lenvatinib, 0.3 mg/mL RLM or HLM, 0.1 M Tris-HCl, and 1 mM NADPH. In this study, the K_m of specific CYP isoform probes, including melatonin (CYP1A2), bupropion (CYP2B6) and midazolam (CYP3A4), were determined by a mixed method. The mixed probe substrates were added to an incubation mixture containing 0.3 mg/mL RLM, 0.1 M PBS, and 1 mM NADPH. First, the mixture without NADPH was pre-incubated at 37°C for 5 min, and then 10 μL NADPH was added to start the reaction. After incubation for 30 min, the samples were immediately freezed to −80°C to terminate the reaction. About 20 min later, 300 μL acetonitrile and 10 μL regorafenib (200 ng/mL) as IS were added to precipitate the protein. When the samples were fully vortexed for 2 min and completely mixed, the mixture was centrifuged for 10 min at 13,000 rpm. In the end, each supernatant was detected and analyzed by UPLC-MS/MS.

To explore the ability of three flavonoids to inhibit lenvatinib metabolism in vitro, we measured the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) of luteolin, myricetin, and fisetin, respectively. The 200 μL incubation system consisted of Tris-HCl (0.1 M), RLM or HLM (0.3 mg/mL), NADPH (1 mM), lenvatinib (23.5 μM in RLM or 16.9 μM in HLM) and three flavonoids (0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 25, 50 and 100 μM). To evaluate the effects of three flavonoids on CYP1A2, CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 activity in RLM, the specific CYP isoform probe mixture was incubated with a single inhibitor and the specific CYP isoform probe was used at a concentration equal to or slightly below its corresponding K_m value (Dinger et al., 2014). A similar incubation system was established including PBS (0.1 M), RLM (0.3 mg/mL), NADPH (1 mM), mixed probes (30.0 μM melatonin, 8.0 μM bupropion and 1.5 μM midazolam) and three flavonoids (0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 25, 50 and 100 μM). Subsequently, on the basis of the IC₅₀ values and the data from animal experiments, we deeply studied the potential mechanism of interaction between lenvatinib and luteolin. In the 200 μL mixture, the concentration of lenvatinib was set to 5.88, 11.75, 23.50, 47.00 μM in RLM and 4.23, 8.45, 16.90, 33.80 μM in HLM (according to the corresponding K_m value), and the concentration of luteolin was 0, 2.94, 5.89, 11.77 μM in RLM and 0, 3.44, 6.87, 13.74 μM in HLM (according to the corresponding IC₅₀ value). Finally, the samples were processed as mentioned above.

2.5 Metabolic stability

Using the UPLC-MS/MS technique, metabolic stability tests were carried out to monitor any discernible drop in lenvatinib concentration in the RLM matrix (Shang et al., 2021). 1.0 μM lenvatinib was incubated with 0.3 mg/mL RLM and 1 mM NADPH in 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer until a final volume of 0.2 mL was reached. NADPH was introduced following a 5 min pre-incubation period, and the reaction was stopped at various intervals of 0, 5, 10, 45, 60, and 90 min. Similarly, three flavonoids were added to the above incubation system to study the effects of the three flavonoids on the metabolic stability of lenvatinib. The post-treatment method was same as the above enzyme reaction. The metabolic stability curve for lenvatinib was constructed from the obtained data.

2.6 Animal experiments

In this study, healthy male Sprague-Dawley rats (200 ± 10 g) were obtained from the Animal Experimental Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Zhejiang, China). Experiment animals were cared as required by the National Research Council Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Moreover, the research protocol was in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines and was approved by the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Ethics approval number: WYYY-IACUC-AEC-2024–014).

Fifteen SD rats were randomly divided into three groups (n = 5): Group A, lenvatinib (1.2 mg/kg, p. o.) (Cui et al., 2021); Group B, lenvatinib (1.2 mg/kg, p. o.) + luteolin (30 mg/kg, p. o.) (Chen et al., 2010); Group C, lenvatinib (1.2 mg/kg, p. o.) + myricetin (50 mg/kg, p. o.) (Lan et al., 2017). Three drugs were suspended in 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose sodium salt (CMC-Na) solution, respectively, prepared when used. Before the formal experiment, SD rats fasted for 12 h to avoid the effect of food intake on drug absorption, but were free to drink water. At the beginning of the experiment, group A was given equal volumes of 0.5% CMC-Na solution, while group B and C were received luteolin and myricetin, respectively. After 30 min, all three groups were gavaged with a single dose of 1.2 mg/kg lenvatinib. At 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after lenvatinib administration, blood samples were collected from the tail vein into a 1.5 mL EP tube treated with heparin, respectively. The 50 μL plasma supernatant was precisely extracted and put into a new 1.5 mL EP tube after centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 10 min. 150 μL acetonitrile and 10 μL IS working solution (200 ng/mL) were added and fully vortexed, then centrifuged for 10 min at 13,000 rpm. Finally, the liquid supernatant was taken to UPLC-MS/MS to detect the concentration of the analytes.

2.7 Statistical analysis

The experimental data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± S.D.). Through GraphPad Prism 9.5 software, the Michaelis-Menten curves of lenvatinb in RLM and HLM were drawn based on the Michaelis-Menten analysis curve fitting program in nonlinear regression analysis, and the log(inhibitor) vs normalized response mode was applied to acquire the corresponding IC₅₀ curve diagram. The Lineweaver-Burk plot was got by the Lineweaver-Burk double reciprocal mode, and its subsidiary plot was drawn on the slope (K_m/V_max vs. inhibitor concentration) and y-intercept (1/V_max vs. inhibitor concentration) of the drawn line. Besides, the mean plasma concentration-time curve of lenvatinib was plotted based on the pharmacokinetic data. Drug and Statistics (DAS) software (version 3.0 software, Mathematical Pharmacology Professional Committee of China, Shanghai, China) with non-compartment model analyzes was used to obtain the corresponding pharmacokinetic parameters. SPSS (version 24.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States of America) with one-way ANOVA was used to compare the difference between the combination and the single group, respectively. p < 0.05, it was considered statistically significant.

3 Results

3.1 UPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of lenvatinib and M1

The chromatograms in Figure 1 showed that within 2 min of elution time, the retention times of lenvatinib, M1, and IS were 1.16 min, 1.17 min, and 1.49 min, respectively, could be well separated without interference from endogenous substances. Furthermore, lenvatinib and M1 had good linear relationships in the range of 2–500 ng/mL and 2–20 ng/mL, respectively, both with correlation coefficients greater than 0.99. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of lenvatinib and its main metabolite was 2 ng/mL.

Figure 1

Figure 1. UPLC-MS/MS chromatograms of lenvatinib, M1 and regorafenib (IS). (A) Blank rat plasma. (B) Blank rat plasma added with analytes at LLOQ. (C) Rat plasma samples from animal experiments.

3.2 Luteolin and myricetin both have strong inhibitory effects on the metabolism of lenvatinib in vitro

According to Figure 2, in RLM, the IC₅₀ of luteolin, myricetin, and fisetin to inhibit the metabolism of lenvatinib were 11.36 ± 0.46 µM, 11.21 ± 0.81 µM, and 21.75 ± 0.86 µM, respectively, which showed that luteolin and myricetin can mightily reduce the metabolic activity of lenvatinib. Additionally, in HLM, the IC₅₀ values of luteolin, myricetin, and fisetin were 6.89 ± 0.43 µM, 12.32 ± 1.21 µM, and 21.22 ± 0.93 µM, respectively, in which the inhibition rate of luteolin was significantly higher than in RLM.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Inhibitory potency of three kinds of hepatoprotective TCM on lenvatinib metabolism in vitro. (A–C) The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) of luteolin (A), myricetin (B) and fisetin (C) in RLM, respectively. (D–F) The IC₅₀ curve diagram of luteolin (D), myricetin (E) and fisetin (F) in HLM. Data are presented as the mean ± S.D.

3.3 Effects of three flavonoids on CYP1A2, CYP2B6, and CYP3A4 activity in RLM

The K_m values of the three specific CYP isoform probes (melatonin, bupropion and midazolam) were determined by the mixed method to be 32.39 ± 0.58 μM, 8.30 ± 0.52 μM and 1.90 ± 0.13 μM, respectively. The IC₅₀ values of three flavonoids were determined according to the mixed K_m values, as shown in Figure 3 and Table 2. When the concentration of luteolin was 100 μM, it showed strong inhibition on CYP1A2, where the activity of the enzyme was inhibited by 96.89% ± 0.23%. In addition, luteolin demonstrated moderate inhibition on CYP2B6 and weak inhibition on CYP3A4. Similar inhibition degree of myricetin was observed on CYP1A2 (IC₅₀ = 5.61 ± 0.25 µM) and CYP3A4 (IC₅₀ = 5.11 ± 0.11 µM), while it exhibited an IC₅₀ value of >20 µM on CYP2B6. The degree of inhibition of fisetin on CYP1A2 and CYP2B6 were similar to that of myricetin, and it showed weak inhibition on CYP3A4.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Effects of three flavonoids on CYP1A2, CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 activity in RLM. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) of luteolin (A), myricetin (B) and fisetin (C).

Table 2

Table 2. Enzymatic kinetic parameters (K_m and IC₅₀) for CYP1A2, CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 of three flavonoids in RLM.

3.4 Metabolic stability

The relative content of lenvatinib in the RLM matrix was calculated after stopping the metabolic reaction at different time periods. The relative content was equal to the percentage of the remaining lenvatinib relative to zero time (representing 100%). As shown in Figure 4, the natural logarithm of the percentage of remaining lenvatinib and incubation time were linearly regression, then the slope k was obtained. The in vitro half-life (t_1/2) was obtained using the equation: t_1/2 = 0.693/k; V (mL/mg) = volume of incubation (Kaci et al., 2023)/protein in the incubation (Rumgay et al., 2022); intrinsic clearance (CL_int) (mL/min/mg protein) = V × 0.693/t_1/2. In RLM, the t_1/2 of lenvatinib was 1018.12 ± 93.22 min, and CL_int was 0.0023 ± 0.0002 mL/min/mg. The metabolic stability results of three flavonoids co-incubated with lenvatinib, including t_1/2 and clearance were shown in Table 3. The results suggested that under the action of three flavonoids, metabolism of lenvatinib slowed down and CL_int decreased in vitro, which verified the results of pharmacokinetic experiments.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Linear part of the metabolic stability curve of lenvatinib and three flavonoids; n = 3.

Table 3

Table 3. Linear regression equation for the linear portion of t_1/2 and CL_int in the presence or absence of three flavonoids.

3.5 Luteolin increased the drug exposure of lenvatinib in SD rats

The mean plasma concentration-time curves of lenvatinib in different groups were shown in Figure 5. The results indicated that the combination of luteolin with lenvatinib increased plasma exposure to lenvatinib, and from the results of the main pharmacokinetic parameters in Table 4, luteolin could rise the AUC_(0-t) and AUC_(0-∞) of lenvatinib by 0.81 and 1.18 times, respectively, while also reducing the elimination rate of lenvatinib by 0.49-fold, thus increasing the accumulation or prolonging the residence time of the drug in SD rats. However, there was no significant difference when lenvatinib and myricetin were administered together compared to single-use.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Mean plasma concentration-time curve of lenvatinib in three groups. Data are presented as the mean ± S.D.; n = 5.

Table 4

Table 4. Main pharmacokinetic parameters of lenvatinib in three groups (n = 5).

3.6 Luteolin inhibited lenvatinib metabolism by different mechanisms in RLM and HLM

The Michaelis-Menten constant K_m of lenvatinib was 23.5 ± 2.17 µM in RLM, while K_m was 16.9 ± 2.42 µM in HLM. Interestingly, Figure 6 showed the different mechanism types of luteolin inhibiting lenvatinib metabolism in RLM and HLM. Luteolin was an un-competitive inhibition in RLM, with a αK_i = 55.44 ± 17.73 µM, while in HLM, it presented a mixed type of non-competitive and competitive inhibition, with K_i = 14.35 ± 4.85 μM and αK_i = 19.27 ± 4.16 μM, respectively.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Potential inhibitory mechanism of luteolin on lenvatinib. (A) Lineweaver-Burk double reciprocal plot and its secondary plot for αK_i of luteolin inhibiting lenvatinib metabolism in RLM. (B) Lineweaver-Burk double reciprocal plot, its secondary plot for αK_i, and its secondary plot for K_i of luteolin inhibiting lenvatinib metabolism in HLM. Data are presented as the mean ± S.D.; n = 3.

4 Discussion

HCC is one of the most common malignancies worldwide and the leading cause of cancer-related death (Vogel et al., 2022). Its prognosis is poor and the mortality rate (830,000 deaths per year) is almost similar to the worldwide incidence (Mazzanti et al., 2016; McGlynn et al., 2021; Siegel et al., 2022). Lenvatinib is a multi-target TKI with anti-VEGFR 1–3, FGFR 1–4, PDGF, and KIT (Tohyama et al., 2014). According to a Phase III REFLECT study (Kudo et al., 2018), lenvatinib treatment is not inferior to sorafenib, which is the first first-line targeted drug approved for the treatment of HCC (Galle et al., 2021). In addition, EMA and FDA have now also approved lenvatinib for the first-line treatment of HCC (Vogel et al., 2021). However, lenvatinib generally appears with hepatotoxicity, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, proteinuria, and other adverse reactions during treatment (Furuse et al., 2023). To greatly improve the overall survival rate of patients, the combination of drugs with hepatoprotective agents is necessary.

The anti-tumor effect of TCM has been widely recognized (Zhao et al., 2023), which exhibit lower toxic side effects than chemotherapy drugs, and are usually taken as food additives or dietary supplements, greatly improves the possibility of interaction between TCM and drugs (Kotwal et al., 2020). Among them, flavonoids commonly found in our daily life have anti-oxidation, anti-cancer, liver protection, and other biological activities (Li et al., 2018). In this study, we systematically chose luteolin, myricetin, and fisetin, to explore their impacts on lenvatinib metabolism both in vitro and in vivo.

Results of the in vitro experiment showed that one of the enzyme kinetic parameters, K_m, in RLM was 23.5 µM, while the K_m value in HLM was 16.9 µM, which was 28.1% lower than in RLM. This was mainly due to the fact that CYP3A4 is widely expressed in HLM, while the CYP2C subfamily is its main enzyme in RLM (Rendic and Di Carlo, 1997; Indra et al., 2019), so there was a stronger affinity between lenvatinib and HLM. In RLM, the IC₅₀ of luteolin, myricetin, and fisetin for lenvatinib was 11.36 ± 0.46 µM, 11.21 ± 0.81 µM, and 21.75 ± 0.86 µM, respectively. Among them, both luteolin and myricetin had potentially inhibitory effects on lenvatinib metabolism. At the same time, the results of our study on the inhibition degree of three flavonoids on specific CYP isoform probes (CYP1A2, 2B6 and 3A4) also confirmed that luteolin and myricetin were potential inhibitors of CYP1A2. In RLM, when the inhibitory concentration was 100 μM, the inhibitory rates of luteolin, myricetin and fisetin on CYP1A2 were 96.89% ± 0.23%、98.12% ± 0.19% and 93.56% ± 0.22%, respectively. Besides, the IC₅₀ values of luteolin, myricetin, and fisetin in HLM were 6.89 ± 0.43 µM, 12.32 ± 1.21 µM, and 21.22 ± 0.93 µM, respectively. Particularly, luteolin may be more likely to increase the risk of adverse reactions of lenvatinib in humans than in SD rats.

In vivo experiments, when luteolin was combined with lenvatinib, the results were in agreement with the conclusions in vitro and can observably increase the AUC_(0-t) and AUC_(0-∞) of lenvatinib by 0.81-fold and 1.18-fold in SD rats, respectively. However, it is slightly less likely to expand toxic side effects than ketoconazole or isavuconazole, which can improve plasma exposure to lenvatinib by 3.01-times or 50.20% (Xia et al., 2023). Nevertheless, the pharmacokinetic parameters of lenvatinib did not change when myricetin and lenvatinib were administered together, which may be due to the poor stability of myricetin in the gastrointestinal tract, and eventually reduce its bioavailability and validity (Xiang et al., 2017). Previous studies had shown that the low absolute bioavailability of myricetin in rats (less than 10%) was attributed to its poor water solubility, which may also be the reason why myricetin had no inhibitory effect on lenvatinib in rats (Hong et al., 2014).

The enzyme responsible for lenvatinib O-demethylation are CYP1A1, 1A2, 2B6, and 3A4 (Vavrová et al., 2022). Furafylline (CYP1A2 selective inhibitor) had a 37% inhibitory effect on the formation of O-desmethyl lenvatinib, which is consistent with the study of Liu et al. (Vavrová et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2023). In previous studies, flavonoids were shown to have strong inhibitory effects on CYP2C8 and CYP1A2 (Kaci et al., 2023). This was also confirmed in our experiment, where the IC₅₀ values of the three flavonoids against CYP1A2 were all <10 μM. Luteolin is a potent CYP1A1 inhibitor and has been reported to inhibit CYP1A2 in vitro with IC₅₀ values < 10 μM (Cao et al., 2017; Shi et al., 2024). Myricetin has been shown to inhibit CYP3A4 and CYP3A2 in RLM and HLM (Lou et al., 2019). In one study, myricetin inhibited tofacitinib non-competitively in both RLM and HLM, with IC₅₀ values of 9.27 μM and 2.35 μM, respectively (Ye et al., 2024), consistent with in vitro results from our experiment. In vitro metabolic stability experiments also revealed that luteolin and myricetin had inhibitory effects on lenvatinib metabolism, and the clearance was decreased to a similar degree.

5 Conclusion

Lenvatinib may have the possibility to be combined with flavonoids, especially luteolin, that can stratify the efficacy of lenvatinib. Thus, when using lenvatinib and flavonoids together in clinical practice, special attention should be paid to avoiding the interaction with luteolin.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

JY: Investigation, Validation, Writing–original draft. JC: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Validation, Writing–original draft. QL: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. RX: Conceptualization, Writing–review and editing. XC: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing–review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Aune, D., Giovannucci, E., Boffetta, P., Fadnes, L. T., Keum, N., Norat, T., et al. (2017). Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality-a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int. J. Epidemiol. 46 (3), 1029–1056. doi:10.1093/ije/dyw319

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Becker, M. L., Kallewaard, M., Caspers, P. W., Visser, L. E., Leufkens, H. G., and Stricker, B. H. (2007). Hospitalisations and emergency department visits due to drug-drug interactions: a literature review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 16 (6), 641–651. doi:10.1002/pds.1351

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bruggemann, R. J., Verheggen, R., Boerrigter, E., Stanzani, M., Verweij, P. E., Blijlevens, N. M. A., et al. (2022). Management of drug-drug interactions of targeted therapies for haematological malignancies and triazole antifungal drugs. Lancet Haematol. 9 (1), e58–e72. doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00232-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Buttell, A., and Qiu, W. (2023). The action and resistance mechanisms of Lenvatinib in liver cancer. Mol. Carcinog. 62 (12), 1918–1934. doi:10.1002/mc.23625

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, L., Kwara, A., and Greenblatt, D. J. (2017). Metabolic interactions between acetaminophen (paracetamol) and two flavonoids, luteolin and quercetin, through in-vitro inhibition studies. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 69 (12), 1762–1772. (in eng). doi:10.1111/jphp.12812

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, X., Liu, L., Sun, Z., Liu, Y., Xu, J., Liu, S., et al. (2010). Pharmacokinetics of luteolin and tetra-acetyl-luteolin assayed by HPLC in rats after oral administration. Biomed. Chromatogr. 24 (8), 826–832. doi:10.1002/bmc.1370

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chou, R., Cuevas, C., Fu, R., Devine, B., Wasson, N., Ginsburg, A., et al. (2014) “Imaging techniques for the diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma,” in AHRQ comparative effectiveness reviews. Rockville (MD).

Google Scholar

Cui, Y., Li, Y., Fan, L., An, J., Wang, X., Fu, R., et al. (2021). UPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of Lenvatinib in rat plasma and its application to drug-drug interaction studies. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 206, 114360. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114360

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dinger, J., Meyer, M. R., and Maurer, H. H. (2014). Development of an in vitro cytochrome P450 cocktail inhibition assay for assessing the inhibition risk of drugs of abuse. Toxicol. Lett. 230 (1), 28–35. (in eng). doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.08.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Furuse, J., Izumi, N., Motomura, K., Inaba, Y., Katamura, Y., Kondo, Y., et al. (2023). Safety and effectiveness of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world clinical practice: an observational post-marketing study in Japan. Drugs Real World Outcomes 10 (2), 195–205. doi:10.1007/s40801-022-00348-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Galle, P. R., Dufour, J. F., Peck-Radosavljevic, M., Trojan, J., and Vogel, A. (2021). Systemic therapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Future Oncol. 17 (10), 1237–1251. doi:10.2217/fon-2020-0758

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoel, R. W., Giddings Connolly, R. M., and Takahashi, P. Y. (2021). Polypharmacy management in older patients. Mayo Clin. Proc. 96 (1), 242–256. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.06.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hong, C., Dang, Y., Lin, G., Yao, Y., Li, G., Ji, G., et al. (2014). Effects of stabilizing agents on the development of myricetin nanosuspension and its characterization: an in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int. J. Pharm. 477 (1-2), 251–260. (in eng). doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.10.044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, Z., Yang, X., Ho, P. C. L., Chan, S. Y., Heng, P. W. S., Chan, E., et al. (2005). Herb-drug interactions: a literature review. Drugs 65 (9), 1239–1282. (in eng). doi:10.2165/00003495-200565090-00005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ikuta, K., Yano, S., Trung, V. T., Hanibuchi, M., Goto, H., Li, Q., et al. (2009). E7080, a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, suppresses the progression of malignant pleural mesothelioma with different proangiogenic cytokine production profiles. Clin. Cancer Res. 15 (23), 7229–7237. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1980

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Indra, R., Pompach, P., Martínek, V., Takácsová, P., Vavrová, K., Heger, Z., et al. (2019). Identification of human enzymes oxidizing the anti-thyroid-cancer drug vandetanib and explanation of the high efficiency of cytochrome P450 3A4 in its oxidation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 (14), 3392. doi:10.3390/ijms20143392

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaci, H., Bodnárová, S., Fliszár-Nyúl, E., Lemli, B., Pelantová, H., Valentová, K., et al. (2023). Interaction of luteolin, naringenin, and their sulfate and glucuronide conjugates with human serum albumin, cytochrome P450 (CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4) enzymes and organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP1B1 and OATP2B1) transporters. Biomed. Pharmacother. 157, 114078. (in eng). doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2022.114078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kotwal, P., Dogra, A., Sharma, A., Bhatt, S., Gour, A., Sharma, S., et al. (2020). Effect of natural phenolics on pharmacokinetic modulation of bedaquiline in rat to assess the likelihood of potential food-drug interaction. J. Agric. Food Chem. 68 (5), 1257–1265. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06529

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kudo, M., Finn, R. S., Qin, S., Han, K. H., Ikeda, K., Piscaglia, F., et al. (2018). Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet 391 (10126), 1163–1173. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30207-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kudo, M. (2018). Lenvatinib may drastically change the treatment landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer 7 (1), 1–19. doi:10.1159/000487148

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lan, T., Hu, X. X., Liang, B. Q., Pan, W. H., Zhou, Q., Yuan, L. J., et al. (2017). The effect of myricetin on pharmacokinetics of atomoxetine and its metabolite 4-hydroxyatomoxetine in vivo and in vitro. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 42 (2), 261–268. doi:10.1007/s13318-016-0347-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, M., Chen, J., Yu, X., Xu, S., Li, D., Zheng, Q., et al. (2019). Myricetin suppresses the propagation of hepatocellular carcinoma via down-regulating expression of YAP. Cells 8 (4), 358. doi:10.3390/cells8040358

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Ning, J., Wang, Y., Wang, C., Sun, C., Huo, X., et al. (2018). Drug interaction study of flavonoids toward CYP3A4 and their quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) analysis for predicting potential effects. Toxicol. Lett. 294, 27–36. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.05.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., Lu, J., Yao, B., Zhang, Y., Huang, S., Chen, X., et al. (2023). Construction of humanized CYP1A2 rats using CRISPR/Cas9 to promote drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic research. Drug Metab. Dispos. (in eng). doi:10.1124/dmd.123.001500

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lou, D., Bao, S. S., Li, Y. H., Lin, Q. M., Yang, S. F., and He, J. Y. (2019). Inhibitory mechanisms of myricetin on human and rat liver cytochrome P450 enzymes. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 44 (5), 611–618. (in eng). doi:10.1007/s13318-019-00546-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Matsui, J., Funahashi, Y., Uenaka, T., Watanabe, T., Tsuruoka, A., and Asada, M. (2008). Multi-kinase inhibitor E7080 suppresses lymph node and lung metastases of human mammary breast tumor MDA-MB-231 via inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor-receptor (VEGF-R) 2 and VEGF-R3 kinase. Clin. Cancer Res. 14 (17), 5459–5465. (in eng). doi:10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-07-5270

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mazzanti, R., Arena, U., and Tassi, R. (2016). Hepatocellular carcinoma: where are we? World J. Exp. Med. 6 (1), 21–36. doi:10.5493/wjem.v6.i1.21

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McGlynn, K. A., Petrick, J. L., and El-Serag, H. B. (2021). Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 73 (Suppl. 1), 4–13. doi:10.1002/hep.31288

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mokdad, A. A., Lopez, A. D., Shahraz, S., Lozano, R., Stanaway, J., et al. (2014). Liver cirrhosis mortality in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. BMC Med. 12, 145. (in eng). doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0145-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nair, A., Reece, K., Donoghue, M. B., Yuan, W. V., Rodriguez, L., Keegan, P., et al. (2021). FDA supplemental approval summary: lenvatinib for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncologist 26 (3), e484–e491. (in eng). doi:10.1002/onco.13566

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ogunwobi, O. O., Harricharran, T., Huaman, J., Galuza, A., Odumuwagun, O., Tan, Y., et al. (2019). Mechanisms of hepatocellular carcinoma progression. World J. Gastroenterol. 25 (19), 2279–2293. doi:10.3748/wjg.v25.i19.2279

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qian, H., Chao, X., Williams, J., Fulte, S., Li, T., Yang, L., et al. (2021). Autophagy in liver diseases: a review. Mol. Asp. Med. 82, 100973. (in English). doi:10.1016/j.mam.2021.100973

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rendic, S., and Di Carlo, F. J. (1997). Human cytochrome P450 enzymes: a status report summarizing their reactions, substrates, inducers, and inhibitors. Drug Metab. Rev. 29 (1-2), 413–580. doi:10.3109/03602539709037591

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rumgay, H., Arnold, M., Ferlay, J., Lesi, O., Cabasag, C. J., Vignat, J., et al. (2022). Global burden of primary liver cancer in 2020 and predictions to 2040. J. Hepatol. 77 (6), 1598–1606. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Santes-Palacios, R., Marroquin-Perez, A. L., Hernandez-Ojeda, S. L., Camacho-Carranza, R., Govezensky, T., and Espinosa-Aguirre, J. J. (2020). Human CYP1A1 inhibition by flavonoids. Toxicol Vitro 62, 104681. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2019.104681

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sennesael, A. L., Henrard, S., and Spinewine, A. (2018). Drug interactions with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants. JAMA 319 (8), 829. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.20846

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shang, H., Wang, Z., Ma, H., Sun, Y., Ci, X., Gu, Y., et al. (2021). Influence of verapamil on the pharmacokinetics of rotundic acid in rats and its potential mechanism. Pharm. Biol. 59 (1), 200–208. doi:10.1080/13880209.2021.1871634

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, M., Chen, Z., Gong, H., Peng, Z., Sun, Q., Luo, K., et al. (2024). Luteolin, a flavone ingredient: anticancer mechanisms, combined medication strategy, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials, and pharmaceutical researches. Phytother. Res. 38 (2), 880–911. (in eng). doi:10.1002/ptr.8066

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Fuchs, H. E., and Jemal, A. (2022). Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 72 (1), 7–33. doi:10.3322/caac.21708

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suyama, K., and Iwase, H. (2018). Lenvatinib: a promising molecular targeted agent for multiple cancers. Cancer control. 25 (1), 1073274818789361. doi:10.1177/1073274818789361

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tohyama, O., Matsui, J., Kodama, K., Hata-Sugi, N., Kimura, T., Okamoto, K., et al. (2014). Antitumor activity of lenvatinib (e7080): an angiogenesis inhibitor that targets multiple receptor tyrosine kinases in preclinical human thyroid cancer models. J. Thyroid. Res. 2014, 638747. (in eng). doi:10.1155/2014/638747

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ugan, R. A., Cadirci, E., Un, H., Cinar, I., and Gurbuz, M. A. (2023). Fisetin attenuates paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity by regulating CYP2E1 enzyme. Acad Bras Cienc 95 (2), e20201408. (in eng). doi:10.1590/0001-3765202320201408

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vavrová, K., Indra, R., Pompach, P., Heger, Z., and Hodek, P. (2022). The impact of individual human cytochrome P450 enzymes on oxidative metabolism of anticancer drug lenvatinib. Biomed. Pharmacother. 145, 112391. (in eng). doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112391

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vogel, A., Meyer, T., Sapisochin, G., Salem, R., and Saborowski, A. (2022). Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 400 (10360), 1345–1362. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01200-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vogel, A., Qin, S., Kudo, M., Su, Y., Hudgens, S., Yamashita, T., et al. (2021). Lenvatinib versus sorafenib for first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: patient-reported outcomes from a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 6 (8), 649–658. doi:10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00110-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Sun, W., Huang, C. K., Wang, L., Xia, M. M., Cui, X., et al. (2015). Inhibitory effects of curcumin on activity of cytochrome P450 2C9 enzyme in human and 2C11 in rat liver microsomes. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 41 (4), 613–616. doi:10.3109/03639045.2014.886697

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, H. Y., Chiang, C. W., and Li, L. (2014). Text mining for drug-drug interaction. Methods Mol. Biol. 1159, 47–75. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0709-0_4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xia, M., Song, X., Lu, Z., Wang, Y., Zhou, Q., Geng, P., et al. (2023). Evaluation of the inhibitory effect of azoles on pharmacokinetics of lenvatinib in rats both in vivo and in vitro by UPLC-MS/MS. Thorac. Cancer 14 (33), 3331–3341. doi:10.1111/1759-7714.15125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiang, D., Wang, C. G., Wang, W. Q., Shi, C. Y., Xiong, W., Wang, M. D., et al. (2017). Gastrointestinal stability of dihydromyricetin, myricetin, and myricitrin: an in vitro investigation. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 68 (6), 704–711. doi:10.1080/09637486.2016.1276518

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, C., Liu, Y. L., Gao, Z. W., Jiang, H. M., Xu, C. J., and Li, X. (2020). Pharmacological activities of myricetin and its glycosides. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 45 (15), 3575–3583. doi:10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20200426.605

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, C., Dai, S., Wang, C., Fu, K., Wu, R., Zhao, X., et al. (2023). Luteolin as a potential hepatoprotective drug: molecular mechanisms and treatment strategies. Biomed. Pharmacother. 167, 115464. (in eng). doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115464

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ye, Q., Hsieh, C. Y., Yang, Z., Kang, Y., Chen, J., Cao, D., et al. (2021). A unified drug-target interaction prediction framework based on knowledge graph and recommendation system. Nat. Commun. 12 (1), 6775. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27137-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ye, Z., Xia, H., Hu, J., Liu, Y. N., Wang, A., Cai, J. P., et al. (2024). CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms and myricetin interaction on tofacitinib metabolism. Biomed. Pharmacother. 175, 116421. (in eng). doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116421

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zerah, L., Henrard, S., Wilting, I., O'Mahony, D., Rodondi, N., Dalleur, O., et al. (2021). Prevalence of drug-drug interactions in older people before and after hospital admission: analysis from the OPERAM trial. BMC Geriatr. 21 (1), 571. doi:10.1186/s12877-021-02532-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, W., Zheng, X. D., Tang, P. Y. Z., Li, H. M., Liu, X., Zhong, J. J., et al. (2023). Advances of antitumor drug discovery in traditional Chinese medicine and natural active products by using multi-active components combination. Med. Res. Rev. 43 (5), 1778–1808. doi:10.1002/med.21963

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar