- 1Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
- 2Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
- 3Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
Background: As a class of analgesics, opioids are frequently used to treat both acute and chronic moderate to severe pain. Patients frequently receive opioid painkillers after orthopedic accidents or surgeries. Evidence suggests that opioid drug users have a 55.1% higher risk of fracture and poor bone repair than non-users of opioid drugs. The key pathogenic alterations in the incidence and progression of poor bone repair are over apoptosis and aging of osteoblasts due to the stress caused by oxidation. Dexmedetomidine (Dex) has been proven to protect against a variety of degenerative illnesses by reducing oxidative stress. However, nothing is known about how it affects bone repair.
Methods: PI3K/Akt/Nrf2 pathway was detected by immunofluorescence and Western blot. SOD, CAT, JC-1, dihydroethidium and mitosox were used in the Oxidative Stress. Micro-CT, H&E and Masson’s staining, immunohistochemically were performed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of DEX on calvarial defects in the morphine-induced rat model.
Results: We found that morphine-induced an imbalance in the metabolism and catabolism of primary rat Osteoblasts. However, these conditions could be inhibited by DEX treatment. In the meantime, DEX induced the expression of Nrf2-regulated antioxidant enzymes such as NQO1, HO-1, GCLm, GCLc, and TrxR1. DEX-mediated Nrf2 activation is linked to the PI3K/Akt signaling system. Furthermore, it has been established that intravenous DEX enhanced the growth of bone healing in a model of a surgically produced rat cranial lesion.
Conclusion: This is the first description of the unique DEX mechanism acting as a Nrf2 activator against morphine-mediated oxidative harm, raising the possibility that the substance may be used to prevent bone defects.
1 Introduction
One of the best opioid analgesics for treating severe acute and chronic pain is morphine (Sverrisdóttir et al., 2015). The analgesic withdrawal symptoms of morphine, which are primarily mediated by μ-opioid receptors, are mediated by numerous types of signaling mechanisms (Zhuang et al., 2022). However, a number of unwanted side effects, including headache, gastrointestinal issues, cough suppression, or respiratory depression, come along with these beneficial antinociceptive benefits (Tiseo et al., 1995). Evidence suggests that compared to non-users of opioids, opioid users had a 55.1% higher risk of fracture and poor bone repair (Saunders et al., 2010; Coluzzi et al., 2020). Numerous studies imply that oxidative stress may contribute to the onset of these unfavorable occurrences (Cai et al., 2016). Reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are created when oxygen is partially reduced, are produced and degraded in an unbalanced manner during oxidative stress events (Filomeni et al., 2015). According to several studies, morphine increases the process of creation of ROS and decreases the activity of several antioxidant-producing enzymes (Reymond et al., 2022; Taghavi et al., 2023).
The cellular antioxidant defense system is heavily dependent on the Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2), an omnipresent regulator of the antioxidant consequence (Kobayashi et al., 2016). Numerous research have been carried on to uncover Nrf2-downstream target genes, which involve antioxidant phase II detoxifying enzymes, despite the Nrf2-dependent antioxidant reaction being an intricate in addition well-structured cellular mechanism (Zhang et al., 2013). Numerous signaling mechanisms, including nuclear localization and nuclear rejection indications, control the nuclear accumulation of Nrf2 (Wang et al., 2022). The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway has been identified as a key upstream controller of Nrf2 nuclear localization and controls a broad range of processes inside cells, which include proliferation, advancement, differentiation, and movement (Yu and Xiao, 2021). Phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 phosphorylates and triggers Akt once PI3K has been triggered by a variety of stimuli, which then causes the stimulation of Nrf2 and the induction of Nrf2-mediated production of antioxidant/phase II detoxification enzymes (Su et al., 2012).
DEX is a highly selective α2-adrenoceptors agonist (AR), it has sedative, analgesic,opioid-sparing, sympatholytic effects (Keating, 2015). DEX also has anti-apoptotic effects and inhibits the production of inflammatory mediators in patients with craniocerebral injury. These actions effectively increase vascular stability, lessen cerebral edema brought on by craniocerebral injury, and improve perioperative brain function in ischemic attack (IA) patients (Benggon et al., 2012; Burlacu et al., 2022). Numerous studies have documented how DEX reduces oxidative stress to protect against a variety of degenerative illnesses (Wang et al., 2020; Shi et al., 2021). The therapeutic effects of DEX on bone abnormalities as a condition brought on by oxidative stress, however, have not been shown. The main objective of this research investigation was to figure out how DEX influences the bone-healing process.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Antibodies and reagents
Abcam (Cambridge, MA, United States) provided the COL1A1, RUNX2, OCN, PI3K, p-PI3K, and GAPDH; and ProteinTech (Wuhan, China) provided the primary antibodies against Nrf2, NQO1, GCLc, and Gclm. The antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technologies (Danvers, MA, United States) and were directed against P-Akt, Akt, TrxR1, Keap1, and HO-1. Fetal bovine serum (FBS), Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), and penicillin/streptomycin were purchased from Gibco BRL (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). The criteria for tissue and cell culture were followed by all other substances, which were all of analytical quality.
2.2 Isolation and primary culture of osteoblasts
One-day-old Sprague Dawley rats’ calvarial bones were used to separate primary osteoblasts, which were then grown in full DMEM complemented with 10% (v/v) FBS and 1% (v/v) penicillin-streptomycin under 5% CO2 at 37°C. (Jonason and O'Keefe, 2014). The cells were transmitted when they amounted to 80%–90% intersection, and the medium was replaced every other day. Cells underwent the following therapy, in brief: 1) Morphine group: cells were cultured in full DMEM media for 2 h after being exposed to 100 μM morphine for 48 h 2) Morphine + DEX group: cells were exposed to 100 μM DEX for 48 h, then co-cultured with 0.1 and 1 μM DEX for 2 hours. 3) Control group: Osteoblasts that had not been given any treatment were cultivated for a comparable period.
2.3 Animal model
At the Shanghai Animal Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 46 male Sprague-Dawley rats were acquired. They were given unlimited access to food and drink while being kept in an SPF environment with a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle. The Wenzhou Medical University Animal Research Committee approved all tests using rats, and the surgical procedures followed the guidelines established by the Ethics Committee for Animal Research (Animal Ethics Number:WYDW 2020-0564). After acclimation of the rats for 1 week, they were divided into three groups.: control, morphine, and DEX + morphine. The rats were subsequently rendered unconscious by an intraperitoneal dose of 50 mg/kg pentobarbital sodium. The dissection was carried down to the calvarium after a 1.5 cm incision was performed in the scalp. A 5-mm-diameter trephine was used to make a critical-size calvarial defect after the periosteum was removed, with saline water being given for cooling. For 12 weeks following craniotomy, rats in the DEX + morphine group received DEX injections at 7 mg/kg using a 5 L microinjector (flat tip diameter, 0.3 mm; needle length, 2.5 cm). A single dosage of 100 mg/kg of morphine hydrochloride was slowly injected into the rats in the morphine group.
2.4 Western blot assay
With the use of the RIPA lysis solution containing 1 mM PMSF (phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride), the total protein in the osteoblasts was extracted. The BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime) was used to calculate the protein concentration. On sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gels, the protein (40 ng) was separated, and then it was transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. Following a 2-h blocking step in which the membrane was incubated with 5% non-fat milk, the membrane was then incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibodies COL1A1, NRF2, RUNX2, OCN, PI3K, p-PI3K, GAPDH, NQO1, GCLc, Gclm, HO-1, P-Akt, Akt, TrxR1, and Keap1. The bands were then identified using the matching secondary antibodies and an electrochemiluminescence reagent (Invitrogen) for 2 hours at room temperature. This was done after three TBST washes. The intensity of blots was then calculated using Image Lab 3.0 software (Bio-Rad).
2.5 Immunofluorescence
Six-well plates with glass coverslips were used to seed osteoblasts, which were then washed with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and permeated with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min. The osteoblasts were treated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibody against Nrf2 (1:200) following blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin for 30 min. The cells were washed the next day and labeled for 1 h at room temperature using Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 594. The slides were examined with a confocal scanning microscope (Nikon, Japan), and ImageJ software 2.1 (Bethesda, MD, United States) was used to evaluate the fluorescence intensity.
2.6 Osteogenic differentiation of Primary Calvarial Osteoblasts
Primary Calvarial Osteoblasts’ Osteogenic Differentiation. A 24-well plate containing the cells was planted with 5 104 cells per well. Osteoblasts were grown in DMEM with 20 mM ascorbic acid and 10 mM -glycerophosphate after receiving the recommended therapy. Every other day, the media was switched out. After 7 days of differentiation, the alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was assessed using the ALP Staining Kit from the Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology in Jiangsu, China. The cells were grown in osteogenic conditions for 21 days to induce mineralization and the development of bone nodules. They were then fixed and stained with Alizarin Red S (ARS) by Solarbio Science and Technology, Beijing, China.
2.7 Quantification of SOD and CAT activities
The appropriately treated cells were lysed on ice for 30 min after being washed twice with PBS. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, commercial assay kits (Jiancheng Biotechnology, Nanjing, China) were used to measure the activity of SOD and CAT in the lysates.
2.8 Intracellular ROS assay and mitochondrial function assays
Reactive oxygen species within cells were measured using a dihydroethidium (DHE) probe (Yeasen, Shanghai, China). According to the manufacturer’s instructions (Beyotime, Shanghai, China), the amounts of superoxide ions and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) in the properly treated osteoblasts were measured by, respectively, staining with JC-1 and MitoSox. A fluorescent microscope (Olympus Life Science; Tokyo, Japan) and confocal scanning microscopy (Nikon; Japan) were used to examine stained cells.
2.9 Micro-CT analysis
Utilizing a cabinet conebeam micro-CT system and related software (CT 50, Scanco Medical; Brüttisellen, Switzerland), a microstructural investigation of the calvarial defect was carried out. The photos were taken at a voltage of 70 kV, an amperage of 200 A, and a spatial resolution of 14.8 mm all around. The trabecular compartment 2 mm below the greatest point of the growth plate to the distal 100 CT slices was included in the volume of interest (VOI), which was used to create three-dimensional reconstructed images. The ratio of bone volume to tissue volume (BV/TV), the mean trabecular number (Tb. N, 1/mm), the mean trabecular thickness (Tb. Th, mm), the mean connective density (Conn.D, 1/mm3) and the mean trabecular separation (Tb. Sp, mm) were among the quantitative bone characteristics evaluated inside the VOI.
2.10 Histopathologic analysis
After removing the dependent tissues, the calvarial defect tissues were collected and preserved with 4% formaldehyde for 48 h. The samples were then decalcified for a month at 4 °C using a 10% ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution. 70%–100% ethanol gradient dehydration, xylene clearing, and paraffin embedding. According to the manufacturer’s directions, longitudinal 4 m-thick serial slices were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and Mason trichrome. For IHC, 6-m-thick sections were treated with the anti-VEGF, CD31 primary antibody before being subjected to the manufacturer’s recommended horseradish peroxidase detection procedure (Vector Laboratories; Burlingame, CA, United States).
2.11 Statistical analysis
The findings have been laid out as mean ± SD. The statistical application SPSS 18.0 was used to examine the data. ANOVA or t-tests were used to evaluate whether there were differences between the groups. At P 0.05, statistical differences within and/or between groups were taken into consideration. Three separate runs of each experiment showed that they could all be reliably repeated.
3 Results
3.1 Effects of morphine and/or DEX treatment on rats’ osteoblasts viability
Figure 1A depicts DEX’s chemical make-up. The CCK8 test was used to investigate the effectiveness of morphine and/or DEX in preserving osteoblast viability. To determine the proper dose and duration of the stimulus, osteoblasts were first given morphine in a dose-dependent manner (0, 25, 50, 100, 200 μM) for 24 h and in a time-dependent manner (0, 6, 12, 24, 48 h) at 100 μM (Figures 1B, C). At a dosage of 100 μM morphine for 48 h, it was found that cell viability was significantly decreased (survival rate <50%). For the following investigations, 100 μM morphine with a 48 h treatment duration was used. The effects of DEX on the cell, whether or not it was combined with morphine, were then also investigated. CCK-8 tests were used to determine how DEX affected cell viability. The findings showed that, in comparison to exposure to 0 μM DEX, there was no significant difference in cell viability when Osteoblasts were subjected to 0.1–10 μM DEX (Figure 1D). The CCK-8 results indicated that the safeguarding effect of DEX towards morphine-induced cytotoxicity was best at the concentration of 1 μM after the cells had been treated with 100 μM morphine and various doses of DEX (Figure 1E). The results mentioned above imply that DEX corrected the reduction in cell viability caused by morphine.
Figure 1. Effects of morphine and/or DEX administration on the viability of rat osteoblastic cells. (A) The dexmedetomidine chemical structure. (B) The percentage of viable cells treated for 24 h with various dosages of morphine. (C) Morphine treatment percentage is given to live cells throughout a time course of 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h at a 100 µM concentration. (D) How various DEX dosages affect cell viability. (E) The impact of morphine on cell survival when combined with various DEX concentrations. Data were evaluated as mean + SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared to the control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared to the morphine stimulation group, n = 3.
3.2 DEX reestablished the mineralization and differentiation of morphine-treated osteoblasts
Osteoblasts’ capacity for bone formation is compromised by oxidative stress and mitochondrial malfunction. Next, we evaluated how DEX affected the morphine-treated cells’ early differentiation and mineralization. Morphine significantly lowered calcium nodule development by the 21st day (Figures 2A–D) and significantly inhibited osteogenic differentiation, as seen by the ALP activity following a 7-day culture. After 7 days of osteogenic induction, cotreatment with DEX increased the levels of the osteogenic transcription factors OCN, COL1A1, and RUNX2, which also restored ALP activity and the degree of mineralization in the morphine-treated osteoblasts (Figures 2E–H). When combined, DEX shields osteoblasts from morphine’s inhibitory effects.
Figure 2. DEX reestablished the mineralization and differentiation of morphine-treated osteobiasts. (A–D) Differentially treated osteoblasts ALP stained on the 7th day and ARS stained on the 21st day after osteogenic induction. DEX restored differentiation and mineralization. (E–H) OCN, RUNX2, and COL1A1 expression levels in the variously treated osteoblasts. Data were evaluated as mean +SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared to the control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared to the morphine stimulation group, n = 3.
3.3 DEX neutralized morphine-induced oxidative stress in osteoblasts
The primary pathogenic changes in delayed bone repair are increased apoptosis and senescence of osteoblasts caused by oxidative stress. We thus assessed the effects of DEX on the generation of ROS, dysfunction of the mitochondria, and the functioning of antioxidant enzymes in the morphine-treated osteoblasts. Using the DHE fluorescence to analyze intracellular ROS, it was shown that morphine administration enhanced ROS buildup, which was countered by DEX pretreatment (Figure 3A). JC-1 and MitoSox probes were used, respectively, to identify the MMP and mitochondrial ROS. In comparison to the control cells, the morphine-treated cells exhibited considerably decreased MMP and higher amounts of superoxide anion, both of which were nearly restored to normal levels by DEX administration (Figures 3B, C). Along with restoring ATP levels, morphine-treated osteoblasts cocultured with DEX also restored the activities of CAT, GPx, and SOD (Figures 3D–G).
Figure 3. DEX Reduced Oxidative Stress in Osteoblasts Caused by Morphine. (A) Images of the DHE stains tnat are representative. (B) Confocal fluorescence microscopy was used to identify JC-1 aggregates (red) and monomers (green) in osteoblasts. (C) MitoSox (red) was used for mtROS staining. MitoSox (red) staining representative photos are displayed as the relative mean fluorescence intensity as determined by flow cytometry. (D–F) The activities of GPx, CAT, and SOD in cells treated with morphine with or without DEX. (G) The osteoblasts received various treatments and their ATP levels. Data were evaluated as mean +SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared to the control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared to the morphine stimulation group, n = 3.
3.4 Effects of DEX on Nrf2 nuclear localization
The expression of Intracellular Nrf2 and Keapl was examined to establish DEX as the powerful Nrf2 activator and to demonstrate Nrf2 nuclear accumulation by DEX. Keapl typically locks Nrf2 away in the cytoplasm, however when Nrf2 is let out into the nucleus, antioxidant/phase II detoxification enzymes can be activated. The level of intracellular Nrf2 expression did not change after morphine treatment, as shown in Figure 4A (p 0.05). However, DEX significantly decreased cytoplasmic Keapl expression at all doses (Figure 4A). The nuclear translocation of Nrf2 was examined to identify the strong Nrf2 promoter as a need for stimulation of the endogenous protective antioxidant system. As seen in Figures 4B–E, DEX caused a more than threefold increase in Nrf2 nuclear accumulation whereas morphine had no impact on Nrf2 translocation. The findings of the immunofluorescence labeling showed that DEX co-administration considerably increased the expression of Nrf2 in comparison to the morphine-treated cells (Figure 4F). These findings indicate that Nrf2 activation is linked to DEX’s protective effect against morphine-induced oxidative damage.
Figure 4. Effects of DEX on Nrf2 nuclear localization (A–E). Immunoblot demonstrating Nrf2-CE, Nrf2-NE, and Keap1 levels in the variously treated osteoblasts. (F) Typical fluorescence pictures displaying Nrf2 localization in the cells that underwent different treatments. Data were evaluated as mean +SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared to the control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared to the morphine stimulation group, n = 3.
3.5 DEX’s effects on phase-II detoxification enzymes and antioxidants
The production of antioxidant/phase II detoxifying enzymes, Nrf2’s downstream target, provided evidence of the transcriptional action of Nrf2. DEX had an impact on the expression of Nrf2-driven antioxidant/phase II detoxification enzymes such as GCLc, CAT, TrxR1, HO-1, and NQO1. When compared to the morphine-treated group, the expression of HO-1, NQO1, GCLc, CAT, and TrxR1 was dramatically increased more than two times, demonstrating that DEX is a powerful trigger of Nrf2-driven antioxidant responses (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Effects of DEX on antioxidant/phase-I| detoxification enzymes. (A,B) The protein expression of HO-1, NQO1, GCLc, CAT, and TrxR1 is shown in the osteoblasts treated as described above. Data were evaluated as mean +SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared to the control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared to the morphine stimulation group, n = 3.
3.6 Impacts of DEX on the downstream antioxidant enzymes and the PI3K/akt/Nrf2 signaling pathway
Recent research suggests that the Nrf2 function involves the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. The activation of downstream targets like Akt and Nrf2 was suppressed using a particular PI3K inhibitor (LY294002) to investigate the mechanism by which DEX upregulates Nrf2 nuclear localization. LY294002 at 10 M significantly reduced the expression of phosphorylated Akt, phosphorylated PI3K, and nuclear Nrf2, as seen in Figures 6A, B. Furthermore, DEX and LY294002 together significantly reduced the increased Akt, PI3K phosphorylation, and Nrf2 nuclear expression caused by DEX at 1 M, showing that DEX-mediated Nrf2 activation was closely related to the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. The corresponding changes in the gene expression of antioxidant enzymes by the PI3K blocker were discovered to comprehend the protective effectiveness of DEX against morphine-induced oxidative damage through the PI3K/Akt/Nrf2 pathway. The results demonstrated that co-treatment with DEX and LY294002 significantly reduced the expression levels of GCLc, GCLm, NQO1, and TrxR, and HO-1compared to DEX alone (Figures 6C, D).
Figure 6. Effects of DEX on the PI3K/Akt/Nrf2 signaling pathway and downstream antioxidant enzymes (A,B) Immunoblot demonstrating the degree of PI3K and AKT phosphorylation. The osteoblasts that had received different treatments for Nrf2-NE levels using Western blotting. (C,D) The protein expression of GCLc, NQO1, GCLm, HO-1, and TrxR in the osteoblasts after the aforementioned treatment is displayed. Data were evaluated as mean +SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared to the control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared to the morphine stimulation group, n = 3.
3.7 DEX mitigates morphine-induced delayed bone healing in vivo
The essential size calvarial defect in the rats model was created by surgery to examine the preventive impact of DEX against delayed bone healing progression in vivo. Micro-CT scans of the morphine group showed minimal new bone growth compared with the control group. In mice treated with DEX, this behavior was, however, less severe (Figures 7A, B). Sections stained with H&E and Masson’s revealed that the morphine group had negligible new bone development. Contrarily, a lot of bone growth was seen in the DEX group (Figures 7C, D). Immunohistochemical examination of VEGF and CD31 was carried out to better understand osteogenesis and angiogenesis (Figure 7E). Representative IHC staining in the morphine group did not show any significant positive staining for VEGF or CD31. The DEX group had more pronounced VEGF and CD31 positive brown staining. These findings were also validated by quantitative analysis (Figure 7F). These results showed that DEX therapy given in combination might enhance neovascularization and bone growth in rats.
Figure 7. DEX slows down the delayed bone repair caused by morphine in vivo. (A,B) 12 weeks following surgery, a micro-CT examination of bone repair in calvarial defects was performed. (C) H&E staining and Masson’s staining of calvarial bone. (D) Quantitative analysis of fatty vacuolation on marrow in HE and BV/TV in Masson staining. (E,F) Calvarial tissue was immunohistochemically stained for VEGF and CD31, and the IHC results were quantified. Data were evaluated as mean +SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared to the control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared to the morphine stimulation group, n = 3.
4 Discussion
The common class of analgesic drugs known as opioids are used to treat both acute and chronic pain that is mild to severe (Corder et al., 2018). Evidence indicates that opioid users have a 55.1% higher risk of fractures. The exact mechanism is thought to be connected to opioid central nervous system side effects, which lower bone density. The secondary cause may be opioid endocrine effects (release of inhibitory hormones like prolactin and growth hormone, hypogonadism), or a direct impact on bone cells (King et al., 2007; Oladeji et al., 2021). Our goal was to research the effects of morphine exposure on Osteoblasts due to the disagreement around morphine’s link with oxidative stress in the present literature and the paucity of information on osteoblasts. The nuclear factor-2 erythroid-related factor (Nrf2), the pathway’s main transcription factor, is responsible for controlling the primary protective mechanisms against oxidative and electrophilic stresses (Ma, 2013). Indeed, it plays a vital role in many physiological functions, including inflammation and mitochondrial function, and it maintains redox homeostasis through endogenous antioxidant mechanisms (Chen, 2022). Numerous genes, including peroxiredoxins, and glutathione peroxidases, thioredoxin reductase 1 (TXNRD1), have been discovered as Nrf2 targets. Currently, more than 250 genes are known to be Nrf2 targets (Gao et al., 2020).
Dex is an agonist of the α-2 receptor that has analgesic, sedative, and anti-sympathetic properties (Lee, 2019). Dex preconditioning is protective against the IRI of important organs such as the brain, liver, heart, kidney, and lung in both in vitro and in vivo tests (Sun et al., 2019; Tang et al., 2020). Only a small number of research, nevertheless, have looked at how Dex postconditioning affects osteoblasts. Our research proved that Dex postconditioning effectively decreased oxidative stress, avoided apoptosis, and safeguarded osteoblasts. To promote apoptosis in osteoblasts during the in vitro experiment, we employed morphine as a ROS source in this work. DEX administration was shown to dramatically lower the levels of cyto and C-caspase3. Additionally, in the investigation at hand, we found that Dex therapy enhanced the expression of the proteins OCN, RUNX2, and COL1A1 that are associated with osteogenesis. This improvement was accompanied by an increase in the osteogenic phenotype of ALP and ARS.
As a crucial transcription factor, Nrf2 is associated with stimulating the expression of downstream genes for a variety of antioxidant enzymes, including SOD, CAT, GPx, and HO-1 (Wang et al., 2021). In the critical size calvarial defect model systems, a variety of Nrf2-activating substances have demonstrated positive benefits, such as lowering inflammatory indicators, oxidative stress, and apoptosis and enhancing synaptic and mitochondrial function (Zhang et al., 2022). Enzymes involved in antioxidant/phase II detoxification contribute to protection by regulating the intracellular redox state (Li et al., 2008). The initial stepwise breakdown of heme is catalyzed by HO-1, producing powerful antioxidants such as free iron, carbon monoxide, and biliverdin (Gao et al., 2022). NQO1 detoxifies reactive quinones to its less harmful hydroquinones, protecting cells from oxidative stress (Ross and Siegel, 2021). TrxR is a homodimeric flavin enzyme that reduces oxidized thioredoxins through NADPH. It contains selenocysteine (Xu et al., 2022). In this work, an efficient antioxidant defense mechanism is provided by the overexpression of TrxR, NQO1, HO-1, and GCLs in response to DEX.
It has been proposed that the Nrf2 upstream regulator is the PI3K/Akt pathway (Liu et al., 2020). According to the results of the current investigation, Nrf2 nuclear accumulation and PI3K/Akt activation were trending in the same direction. Additionally, the DEX-induced production of Nrf2 and its downstream genes was effectively stopped by the PI3K inhibitor LY294002. These results show that DEX increases the nucleus localization of Nrf2, which is facilitated by activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, and therefore stimulates the production of a group of antioxidant/phase II detoxification enzymes.
There is growing evidence that two major pathways can activate Nrf2 (Best et al., 2018). First, it specifically targets the Nrf2/Keapl complex by oxidizing the cysteine residues in Keapl, which modifies Keapl’s conformation and causes the Nrf2-Keapl complex to dissociate (Zhao et al., 2018). The second mechanism involves the activation of upstream kinases such as mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), PI3K/Akt, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), and protein kinase C (PKC). This causes Nrf2 to be phosphorylated and translocated into the nucleus, which encourages the expression of the antioxidant enzyme (Zhuang et al., 2019). According to the findings of the Western blot investigation, DEX activated Nrf2 and consequent downstream antioxidant enzymes through a twofold mechanism that involved the disruption of the Nrf2-Keapl complex and the PI3K/Akt axis. This allowed Nrf2 to be released and go into the nucleus, where it initiates the transcription of antioxidant genes. Our results offer the first proof that DEX may counteract the oxidative stress caused by morphine by triggering the antioxidant defense mechanism that is driven by Nrf2 and that DEX upregulates and activates Nrf2 through the PI3K/Akt pathway.
The result of the present study should be interpreted with some limitations. 1) In the preparation of the animal model for this study, a intraperitoneal dose of 50 mg/kg pentobarbital sodium was used to make rats lose consciousness. Therefore, the combined effect of dexmedetomidine and morphine was obtained under the premise of using pentobarbital sodium, and the combined effect of the two drugs under other anesthesia methods needs to be further explored. 2) There are multiple pathways involved in antioxidant activity, and studies have shown that dexmedetomidine also has an effect on other pathways. This experiment only studied the Nrf2-pI3k pathway. 3) Dexmedetomidine and morphine are commonly used drugs in clinical anesthesia, and the combined use of the two drugs still needs clinical validation for their impact on bone healing.
5 Conclusion
The above results give empirical support for the hypothesis that DEX prevents morphine-induced oxidative injury by enhancing the Nrf2-mediated antioxidant system and PI3K/Akt pathway. According to molecular docking research, Dex displayed substantial interactions with PI3K, Akt, and Nrf2-keapl through hydrogen bonds and van der Waals forces. The first time, the proof was shown that DEX exerted safeguarding properties by activating the antioxidant defense mechanism regulated by PI3K/Akt/Nrf2 in morphine-induced oxidative stress.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors. The original raw data can be found here: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1bL7jX0Ba7E00Ly6Kzaq7vQ, password: 2t54.
Ethics statement
The animal study was approved by The Wenzhou Medical University Animal Research Committee. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
YL: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Writing–original draft. LZ: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing–original draft. ZS: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing–original draft. JZ: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing–original draft. YL: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing–original draft. ZZ: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing–original draft. XC: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing–original draft. JP: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing–review and editing. XZ: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by Department of science and Technology of Zhejiang Province (LGD21H310004).
Acknowledgments
We thank XZ (Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University) and JP (Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University) for technical assistance in this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Benggon, M., Chen, H., Applegate, R., Martin, R., and Zhang, J. H. (2012). Effect of dexmedetomidine on brain edema and neurological outcomes in surgical brain injury in rats. Anesth. analgesia 115, 154–159. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824e2b86
Best, S. A., De Souza, D. P., Kersbergen, A., Policheni, A. N., Dayalan, S., Tull, D., et al. (2018). Synergy between the KEAP1/NRF2 and PI3K pathways drives non-small-cell lung cancer with an altered immune microenvironment. Cell metab. 27, 935–943. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.02.006
Burlacu, C. C., Neag, M. A., Mitre, A. O., Sirbu, A. C., Badulescu, A. V., and Buzoianu, A. D. (2022). The role of miRNAs in dexmedetomidine's neuroprotective effects against brain disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 5452. doi:10.3390/ijms23105452
Cai, Y., Yang, L., Hu, G., Chen, X., Niu, F., Yuan, L., et al. (2016). Regulation of morphine-induced synaptic alterations: role of oxidative stress, ER stress, and autophagy. J. Cell Biol. 215, 245–258. doi:10.1083/jcb.201605065
Chen, Q. M. (2022). Nrf2 for protection against oxidant generation and mitochondrial damage in cardiac injury. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 179, 133–143. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.12.001
Coluzzi, F., Scerpa, M. S., and Centanni, M. (2020). The effect of opiates on bone formation and bone healing. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 18, 325–335. doi:10.1007/s11914-020-00585-4
Corder, G., Castro, D. C., Bruchas, M. R., and Scherrer, G. (2018). Endogenous and exogenous opioids in pain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 41, 453–473. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-061522
Filomeni, G., De Zio, D., and Cecconi, F. (2015). Oxidative stress and autophagy: the clash between damage and metabolic needs. Cell death Differ. 22, 377–388. doi:10.1038/cdd.2014.150
Gao, M., Qi, Z., Deng, M., Huang, H., Xu, Z., Guo, G., et al. (2022). The deubiquitinase USP7 regulates oxidative stress through stabilization of HO-1. Oncogene 41, 4018–4027. doi:10.1038/s41388-022-02403-w
Gao, Q., Zhang, G., Zheng, Y., Yang, Y., Chen, C., Xia, J., et al. (2020). SLC27A5 deficiency activates NRF2/TXNRD1 pathway by increased lipid peroxidation in HCC. Cell death Differ. 27, 1086–1104. doi:10.1038/s41418-019-0399-1
Jonason, J. H., and O Keefe, R. J. (2014). Isolation and culture of neonatal mouse calvarial osteoblasts. Methods Mol. Biol. Clift. N.J. 1130, 295–305. doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-989-5_22
Keating, G. M. (2015). Dexmedetomidine: a review of its use for sedation in the intensive care setting. Drugs 75, 1119–1130. doi:10.1007/s40265-015-0419-5
King, T., Vardanyan, A., Majuta, L., Melemedjian, O., Nagle, R., Cress, A. E., et al. (2007). Morphine treatment accelerates sarcoma-induced bone pain, bone loss, and spontaneous fracture in a murine model of bone cancer. Pain 132, 154–168. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.06.026
Kobayashi, E. H., Suzuki, T., Funayama, R., Nagashima, T., Hayashi, M., Sekine, H., et al. (2016). Nrf2 suppresses macrophage inflammatory response by blocking proinflammatory cytokine transcription. Nat. Commun. 7, 11624. doi:10.1038/ncomms11624
Lee, S. (2019). Dexmedetomidine: present and future directions. Korean J. Anesthesiol. 72, 323–330. doi:10.4097/kja.19259
Li, W., Khor, T. O., Xu, C., Shen, G., Jeong, W. S., Yu, S., et al. (2008). Activation of Nrf2-antioxidant signaling attenuates NFkappaB-inflammatory response and elicits apoptosis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 76, 1485–1489. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2008.07.017
Liu, B., Deng, X., Jiang, Q., Li, G., Zhang, J., Zhang, N., et al. (2020). Scoparone improves hepatic inflammation and autophagy in mice with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis by regulating the ROS/P38/Nrf2 axis and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in macrophages. Biomed. Pharmacother. = Biomedecine Pharmacother. 125, 109895. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2020.109895
Ma, Q. (2013). Role of nrf2 in oxidative stress and toxicity. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 53, 401–426. doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011112-140320
Oladeji, P. O., Broggi, M. S., Spencer, C., Hurt, J., and Hernandez-Irizarry, R. (2021). The impact of preoperative opioid use on complications, readmission, and cost following ankle fracture surgery. Injury 52, 2469–2474. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2021.05.011
Reymond, S., Vujić, T., Schvartz, D., and Sanchez, J. C. (2022). Morphine-induced modulation of Nrf2-antioxidant response element signaling pathway in primary human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Sci. Rep. 12, 4588. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-08712-0
Ross, D., and Siegel, D. (2021). The diverse functionality of NQO1 and its roles in redox control. Redox Biol. 41, 101950. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2021.101950
Saunders, K. W., Dunn, K. M., Merrill, J. O., Sullivan, M., Weisner, C., Braden, J. B., et al. (2010). Relationship of opioid use and dosage levels to fractures in older chronic pain patients. J. general Intern. Med. 25, 310–315. doi:10.1007/s11606-009-1218-z
Shi, J., Yu, T., Song, K., Du, S., He, S., Hu, X., et al. (2021). Dexmedetomidine ameliorates endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in vivo and in vitro by preserving mitochondrial dynamic equilibrium through the HIF-1a/HO-1 signaling pathway. Redox Biol. 41, 101954. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2021.101954
Su, J. D., Yen, J. H., Li, S., Weng, C. Y., Lin, M. H., Ho, C. T., et al. (2012). 3',4'-didemethylnobiletin induces phase II detoxification gene expression and modulates PI3K/Akt signaling in PC12 cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 52, 126–141. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.10.002
Sun, Y. B., Zhao, H., Mu, D. L., Zhang, W., Cui, J., Wu, L., et al. (2019). Dexmedetomidine inhibits astrocyte pyroptosis and subsequently protects the brain in in vitro and in vivo models of sepsis. Cell death Dis. 10, 167. doi:10.1038/s41419-019-1416-5
Sverrisdóttir, E., Lund, T. M., Olesen, A. E., Drewes, A. M., Christrup, L. L., and Kreilgaard, M. (2015). A review of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide's pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships in experimental and clinical pain. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 74, 45–62. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2015.03.020
Taghavi, S. F., Shahsavari, Z., Adjaminezhad-Fard, F., Ghorbani, M., Ghorbanhosseini, S. S., Salimi, V., et al. (2023). Evaluating the expression pattern of the opioid receptor in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET) and the role of morphine and naloxone in the regulation of pituitary cell line growth and apoptosis. Biomed. Pharmacother. = Biomedecine Pharmacother. 157, 114022. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2022.114022
Tang, C., Hu, Y., Gao, J., Jiang, J., Shi, S., Wang, J., et al. (2020). Dexmedetomidine pretreatment attenuates myocardial ischemia reperfusion induced acute kidney injury and endoplasmic reticulum stress in human and rat. Life Sci. 257, 118004. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118004
Tiseo, P. J., Thaler, H. T., Lapin, J., Inturrisi, C. E., Portenoy, R. K., and Foley, K. M. (1995). Morphine-6-glucuronide concentrations and opioid-related side effects: a survey in cancer patients. Pain 61, 47–54. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00148-8
Wang, H., Wang, Q., Cai, G., Duan, Z., Nugent, Z., Huang, J., et al. (2022). Nuclear TIGAR mediates an epigenetic and metabolic autoregulatory loop via NRF2 in cancer therapeutic resistance. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 12, 1871–1884. doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2021.10.015
Wang, X., Yu, J. Y., Sun, Y., Wang, H., Shan, H., and Wang, S. (2021). Baicalin protects LPS-induced blood-brain barrier damage and activates Nrf2-mediated antioxidant stress pathway. Int. Immunopharmacol. 96, 107725. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107725
Wang, Z., Wu, J., Hu, Z., Luo, C., Wang, P., Zhang, Y., et al. (2020). Dexmedetomidine alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute kidney injury by inhibiting p75NTR-mediated oxidative stress and apoptosis. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 5454210. doi:10.1155/2020/5454210
Xu, Z., Xu, J., Sun, S., Lin, W., Li, Y., Lu, Q., et al. (2022). Mecheliolide elicits ROS-mediated ERS driven immunogenic cell death in hepatocellular carcinoma. Redox Biol. 54, 102351. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2022.102351
Yu, C., and Xiao, J. H. (2021). The keap1-nrf2 system: a mediator between oxidative stress and aging. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 6635460. doi:10.1155/2021/6635460
Zhang, M., An, C., Gao, Y., Leak, R. K., Chen, J., and Zhang, F. (2013). Emerging roles of Nrf2 and phase II antioxidant enzymes in neuroprotection. Prog. Neurobiol. 100, 30–47. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.09.003
Zhang, Z., Ji, C., Wang, Y. N., Liu, S., Wang, M., Xu, X., et al. (2022). Maresin1 suppresses high-glucose-induced ferroptosis in osteoblasts via NRF2 activation in type 2 diabetic osteoporosis. Cells 11, 2560. doi:10.3390/cells11162560
Zhao, X. J., Yu, H. W., Yang, Y. Z., Wu, W. Y., Chen, T. Y., Jia, K. K., et al. (2018). Polydatin prevents fructose-induced liver inflammation and lipid deposition through increasing miR-200a to regulate Keap1/Nrf2 pathway. Redox Biol. 18, 124–137. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2018.07.002
Zhuang, Y., Wang, Y., He, X., Zhou, X. E., Guo, S., Rao, Q., et al. (2022). Molecular recognition of morphine and fentanyl by the human μ-opioid receptor. Cell 185, 4361–4375.e19. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.041
Keywords: morphine, oxidative stress, dexmedetomidine, calvarial defect, PI3K/Akt/Nrf2 pathway
Citation: Lou Y, Zou L, Shen Z, Zheng J, Lin Y, Zhang Z, Chen X, Pan J and Zhang X (2024) Protective effect of dexmedetomidine against delayed bone healing caused by morphine via PI3K/Akt mediated Nrf2 antioxidant defense system. Front. Pharmacol. 15:1396713. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1396713
Received: 06 March 2024; Accepted: 13 May 2024;
Published: 28 May 2024.
Edited by:
Magdalena Jasinska-Stroschein, Medical University of Lodz, PolandReviewed by:
Fabio Vivarelli, University of Bologna, ItalyJose Antonio Ibancovichi, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Mexico
Copyright © 2024 Lou, Zou, Shen, Zheng, Lin, Zhang, Chen, Pan and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xutong Zhang, emhhbmd4dXRvbmdAd211LmVkdS5jbg==; Jun Pan, cGFuanVuQHdtdS5lZHUuY24=
†These authors have contributed equally to this work