Adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptor interaction controls fatigue resistance

Introduction: Caffeine and the selective A_2A receptor antagonist SCH58261 both have ergogenic properties, effectively reducing fatigue and enhancing exercise capacity. This study investigates in male Swiss mice the interaction between adenosine A_2A receptors and dopamine D₂ receptors controlling central fatigue, with a focus on the striatum where these receptors are most abundant.

Methods: We employed DPCPX and SCH58261 to antagonize A₁ and A_2A receptors, caffeine as a non-competitive antagonist for both receptors, and haloperidol as a D₂ receptor antagonist; all compounds were tested upon systemic application and caffeine and SCH58261 were also directly applied in the striatum. Behavioral assessments using the open field, grip strength, and treadmill tests allowed estimating the effect of treatments on fatigue.

Results and discussion: The results suggested a complex interplay between the dopamine and adenosine systems. While systemic DPCPX had little effect on motor performance or fatigue, the application of either caffeine or SCH58261 was ergogenic, and these effects were attenuated by haloperidol. The intra-striatal administration of caffeine or SCH58261 was also ergogenic, but these effects were unaffected by haloperidol. These findings confirm a role of striatal A_2A receptors in the control of central fatigue but suggest that the D₂ receptor-mediated control of the ergogenic effects of caffeine and of A_2A receptor antagonists might occur outside the striatum. This prompts the need of additional efforts to unveil the role of different brain regions in the control of fatigue.

1 Introduction

Central fatigue, characterized by a reduced ability to maintain cognitive and physical performance, stems from intricate neurobiological (Gandevia, 2001; Davis et al., 2003; Meeusen et al., 2006; Aguiar et al., 2020) and metabolic interactions (Glaister, 2005; Wan et al., 2017). Studies linking aerobic performance, oxidative metabolism, and fatigue have shown that blocking brain adenosine receptors increases resistance to physical fatigue (Davis et al., 2003; Aguiar et al., 2020), highlighting the significant role of adenosine in fatigue signaling (Aguiar et al., 2021). Moreover, by integrating pharmacological research with knockout mouse models, we have previously demonstrated that adenosine A_2A receptors (A_2AR) are crucial for the performance-enhancing effects of caffeine (Aguiar et al., 2020). However, non-toxic doses of caffeine selectively antagonize both adenosine A_2A and A₁ receptors to format information flow within brain neuronal circuits (Lopes et al., 2019) and it remains to be clarified if A₁R also play a role in controlling fatigue.

Additionally, we identified a specific role of A_2AR in the striatum for controlling central fatigue (de Bem Alves et al., 2023). Notably, A_2AR interacts closely with dopamine D₂ receptors (D2R) in this region, forming A_2AR-D₂R heteromers (Ferré et al., 2008; Ferré and Ciruela, 2019), a concept pioneered by Kell Fuxe in the early 90’s (Ferré et al., 1991). These interactions are significant in various conditions, including Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, substance abuse, and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), as reviewed in the literature (Fuxe et al., 2003; Ballesteros-Yáñez et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2023). Consequently, the antagonism of D₂R by haloperidol affects the efficacy of A_2AR antagonists in modulating effort-related behaviors (Salamone et al., 2009; Pardo et al., 2012; Rotolo et al., 2023). While A_2AR-D₂R interactions have been observed in other areas of the brain (Pandolfo et al., 2013; Dremencov et al., 2017; Real et al., 2018), their functional significance remains less understood.

This study aimed to evaluate the potential ergogenic effects of selective antagonists for A₁R and A_2AR, along with the non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine. Our objective was to determine whether and how these effects are altered by a D₂R antagonist, particularly in the striatum, an area previously shown to influence central fatigue (Davis et al., 2003; Aguiar et al., 2020; de Bem Alves et al., 2023). Additionally, we venture into new territory by examining the impact of adenosine receptors on exercise physiology, specifically focusing on strength performance, which is predominantly dependent on anaerobic metabolism. This approach allows us to expand our understanding of fatigue mechanisms across various physical activities and metabolic requirements.

2 Methods

2.1 Animals

We used one hundred and twelve (112) male Swiss mice (49.4 ± 1.5 g, 8–10 weeks old), housed in collective cages (38 × 32 × 17 cm) maintained on a 12-h light-dark cycle at a controlled room temperature of 22°C ± 1°C, and food and water ad libitum. The sample size for ANOVA comparison was set at α = 0.05 and β = 0.8. The experimental protocol (CEUA 1503210519) was granted approval by the Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). The assignment of mice to experimental groups was random, with each animal treated as an individual experimental unit for every test.

2.2 Drugs

The first experiments were the systemic treatments. The drug administration schedule was as follows: caffeine at 6.0 mg/kg and SCH58261 at 1.0 mg/kg were administered 15 min before the behavioral tests while haloperidol (Haldol^®) at 250 μg/kg and DPCPX at 1.0 mg/kg were administered 30 min prior. The dosages and administration times for caffeine (Solano et al., 2017; Aguiar et al., 2020; de Bem Alves et al., 2023), SCH58261 (El Yacoubi et al., 2000a; Aguiar et al., 2020), and DPCPX (Griebel et al., 1991; El Yacoubi et al., 2000b; Prediger et al., 2004; Li et al., 2018; Szopa et al., 2018; 2021) were determined based on prior pilot studies and existing evidence. Doses of 0.25–1.0 mg/kg, i.p. of haloperidol were tested in the catalepsy test (Shiozaki et al., 1999; Mihara et al., 2007), showing that 250 μg/kg did not cause either catalepsy or motor impairment (see Results). Caffeine and haloperidol were diluted in saline (0.9% NaCl) whereas SCH58261 and DPCPX were diluted in 5.0% DMSO. Control groups received either saline or DMSO vehicles. The systemic treatment was intraperitoneal (i.p.) at a volume of 10 mL/kg. All drugs were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

For stereotactic surgeries, mice were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine for cannula implantation in both the right (AP 0.5 mm; ML 2.0 mm; DV −3.0 mm) and left (AP 0.5 mm; ML −2.0 mm; DV −3.0 mm) striata, using Paxinos and Franklin’s stereotaxic coordinates (Paxinos and Franklin, 2012). One-week post-surgery, we injected 4 μL at 2 μL/min of either saline, DMSO, caffeine (15 μg) or SCH58261 (2 μg) into the conscious animals immediately before the behavioral tests. Haloperidol (250 μg/kg, i.p) was given 30 min before the behavioral tests. The mortality rate was 5% (10 animals). The placement of the cannulae was verified post-euthanasia by dissecting the mouse brain.

2.3 Motor and fatigue behavioral tests

Experiments were conducted from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. during the mice’s light circadian phase in a sound-controlled room, maintaining controlled temperature, humidity, and low-intensity light (approximately 10 lx). The behavioral apparatus was cleaned with 10% ethanol after each trial to ensure cleanliness and prevent contamination. Additionally, the order of the tests was randomized to eliminate bias.

[Open field] Each mouse was allowed to explore a circular arena with a diameter of 600 mm for 5 min using the Insight^® EP154 apparatus (Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil). A manual count of the number of crossings was then carried out.

[Grip strength test] We used the Bonther^® 5 kgf grip strength meter (Bonther, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil) to evaluate fatigue, placing each mouse on the bar and gently pulling its tail, opposing the firm grip of its front paws over four 10-s trials (de Bem Alves and Aguiar, 2024). The final score is the average strength measured in three trials (Personius et al., 2010; Takeshita et al., 2017).

[Treadmill incremental running test] Mice were habituated to a mouse treadmill (Bonther, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil) over 3 days. The regimen started with a 10-min session at 5 m/min, followed by a 5-min session each at 5 m/min and 10 m/min, and concluded with 10 min at 10 m/min. After a 48-h rest period, they underwent an incremental test where the belt speed increased by 5 m/min every 3 min, conducted at a 1.7° slope and with a 0.2 mA shock intensity, to estimate (vertical) running power (AS Aguiar et al., 2018; Aguiar et al., 2020). The external length of the cannulas limited treadmill testing to only those animals treated systemically.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Data are presented as means ± SEM, generated using GraphPad Prism version 10 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, United States; www.graphpad.com). Adhering to the intention-to-treat principle, statistical analysis was conducted using STATISTICA version 13.5.0.17 (StatSoft, Inc.; www.statsoft.com). The analyses included one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test and repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for fatigue resistance (force × time). Effect sizes were evaluated using Cohen’s η², categorizing them as small (0.01), medium (0.09), or large (0.25). Statistical power (β) was also assessed. An alpha level of p < 0.05 was used to determine significance.

2.5 Data availability statement

This work is available as open data under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. For details, see (Speck et al., 2024).

3 Results

Figure 1A displays the dose-response curve of haloperidol in the catalepsy test, which prompted selecting the non-cataleptic dose of 250 μg/kg. As expected, systemic caffeine acted both as a psychostimulant and as an ergogenic agent: it increased open field crossings, an effect mitigated by the non-cataleptic dose of haloperidol (F_3,35 = 4.3, η² = 0.27, β = 0.83, p < 0.05, Figure 1B). In the incremental treadmill test (Figure 1C), caffeine boosted running power, an effect that was not affected by haloperidol (F_3,27 = 3.2, η² = 0.25, β = 0.67, p < 0.05, Figure 1D). In the grip strength test, caffeine enhanced grip time (F_3,35 = 17.5, η² = 0.6, β = 0.99, p < 0.05, Figure 1F) and impulse (F_3,34 = 36.4, η² = 0.76, β = 1.0, p < 0.05, Figure 1H) without increasing peak strength (Figure 1E), and haloperidol mitigated these effects. Additionally, caffeine improved the resistance to fatigue in the grip test, a benefit not present in animals also receiving haloperidol (F_30,350 = 4.7, η² = 0.29, β = 1.0, p < 0.05, Figure 1G).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Effects of systemic treatment with caffeine and/or haloperidol on locomotion, running power and grip strength. Panel (A) shows the dose-response curve for haloperidol in the catalepsy test, identifying 250 μg/kg as a non-cataleptic dose. Panel (B) shows that systemic administration of caffeine increased the number of crossings in the open field, which is reduced by a non-cataleptic dose of haloperidol. Panel (C,D) show that systemic caffeine enhances running power in the incremental treadmill test, an effect prevented by haloperidol. Panel (E–G) show that systemic caffeine improved grip time (F) and impulse (H), without changes in peak strength (E), and improved the resistance to fatigue (G), all these effects being attenuated by haloperidol. Results are shown as median ± interquartile range (A) or mean ± standard error of the mean (B–H). N = 8–10 animals/group for 2-3 independent experiments. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) versus control (*) or versus caffeine (#), with effect sizes (η²) and power (β) confirming robust results, was determined using ANOVA and post hoc tests, as detailed in the Methods’ section. AUC, area under the curve. ND, not detectable.

When applied directly in the striatum, caffeine also triggered a psychostimulant and ergogenic response: it increased the number of open field crossings (F_2,12 = 31.1, η² = 0.83, β = 0.99, p < 0.05, Figure 2A), grip time (F_2,26 = 6.4, η² = 0.055, β = 0.99, p < 0.05, Figure 2C), resistance to fatigue (F_8,104 = 4.0, η² = 0.23, β = 0.98, p < 0.05, Figure 2D) and impulse (F_2,12 = 31.1, η² = 0.83, β = 0.99, p < 0.05, Figure 2E) without increasing peak strength (Figure 2B). Strikingly, although haloperidol mitigated the psychostimulant effect of caffeine in the open field, it did not alter the ergogenic properties of intra-striatal caffeine in the treadmill and grip tests.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Effects of intra-striatal injection with caffeine, without or with systemic administration of haloperidol, on locomotion and grip strength. Panel (A) shows that caffeine increased the number of open field crossings, an effect mitigated by haloperidol. Panel (B) shows a lack of modification of the peak grip strength upon treatments with intra-striatal caffeine without or with systemic haloperidol. Intra-striatal caffeine improved grip time (C), fatigue resistance (D) and impulse (E) and all these effects were not significantly modified by systemic treatment with haloperidol. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean. N = 8–10 animals/group for 2-3 independent experiments. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) versus control (*) or versus caffeine (#), was confirmed by effect sizes (η²) and power (β) through ANOVA and post hoc analysis, as elaborated in the Methods’ section. AUC, area under the curve.

Since caffeine non-competitively antagonizes adenosine A₁ and A_2A receptors (Fredholm et al., 1999), we exposed animals to DPCPX and SCH58261, which are selective antagonists for these respective receptors. DPCPX administration did not alter any measured behaviors, whereas SCH58261 increased locomotion in the open field; this effect was nullified in the presence of haloperidol (F_3,36 = 11.4, η² = 0.48, β = 0.99, p < 0.05, Figure 3A). Figure 3B shows the increase in running power with increased speed. SCH58261 also significantly improved running power in the treadmill test, a gain blocked by haloperidol (F_3,20 = 9.8, η² = 0.59, β = 0.99, p < 0.05, Figure 3C). While treatments did not affect peak grip strength (Figure 3D), SCH58261 enhanced both grip time (F_3,36 = 8.3, η² = 0.41, β = 0.98, p < 0.05, Figure 3E) and area under the curve (AUC, impulse) (F_3,36 = 6.3, η² = 0.34, β = 0.94, p < 0.05, Figure 3G), with haloperidol diminishing these effects. Additionally, haloperidol reduced resistance to fatigue in SCH58261-treated animals (F_12,144 = 1.9, η² = 0.14, β = 0.9, p < 0.05, Figure 3F).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Effects on locomotion, running power and grip strength of systemic treatment with DPCPX or with SCH58261 without or with haloperidol. DPCPX was devoid of effects in all behavioral measures. Panel (A) shows that systemic SCH58261 increased locomotion in the open field, an effect abrogated by haloperidol. Panel (B,C) show that systemic SCH58261 increased running power, an effect prevented by haloperidol. In the grip test, systemic SCH58261 did not modify peak grip strength (D) but prolonged grip time (E), increased resistance to fatigue (F) and endurance (AUC, Figure 3G), all these effects being prevented by haloperidol. N = 8–10 animals/group for 2-3 independent experiments. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) versus control (*) or versus SCH58261 (#), was confirmed by effect sizes (η²) and power (β) through ANOVA and post hoc analysis, as elaborated in the Methods’ section. AUC, area under the curve.

Lastly, we assessed the intra-striatal effects of SCH58261, foregoing DPCPX due to its lack of systemic effects. Intra-striatal administration of SCH58261 increased locomotion in the open field, an effect that was mitigated by haloperidol (F_2,12 = 37.7, η² = 0.86, β = 1.00, p < 0.05, Figure 4A). While intra-striatal SCH58261 did not affect peak grip strength (Figure 4B), it prolonged grip time (F_2,27 = 5.5, η² = 0.29, β = 0.80, p < 0.05, Figure 4C) and enhanced impulse (F_2,27 = 5.5, η² = 0.28, β = 0.80, p < 0.05, Figure 4E). All animals exhibited a decline in strength over time, with no significant differences between treatments observed (F_6,81 = 2.7, η² = 0.16, β = 0.84, p < 0.05, Figure 4D). Notably, alterations induced by intra-striatal SCH58261 in grip strength were not modified by haloperidol.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Effects of the intra-striatal injection of SCH58261 without or with systemic haloperidol on locomotion and grip strength. Panel (A) shows that intra-striatal SCH58261 increased locomotion in the open field test, an effect attenuated by haloperidol. Panel (B) confirmed that intra-striatal SCH58261 did not alter peak grip strength but increased grip time (C) and endurance (AUC, Figure 4E), both effects unaffected by haloperidol. Panel (D) shows a consistent strength decline, unaffected by any of the treatments. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean. N = 5 animals/group for 2 independent experiments. Significance (p < 0.05) versus control (*) or versus SCH58261 (#), supported by effect sizes (η²) and power (β), is based on ANOVA and post hoc analysis, as explained in the Methods’ section. AUC, area under the curve.

All effect sizes were large, except for the resistance to fatigue comparisons following systemic treatment with DPCPX or SCH58261 (Figure 3F), and intra-striatal treatment with caffeine (Figure 2C), which exhibited medium effect sizes. Generally, the statistical power for our analyses was high, exceeding 80%. The only exception was the systemic treatment with caffeine and haloperidol (Figure 1D), which had a statistical power of 67%; however, this did not significantly impact our overall conclusions.

4 Discussion

The present study confirmed that the systemic administration of either caffeine and of the selective antagonist of A_2AR, SCH58261 were ergogenic and that these effects were largely reproduced by the direct injection of caffeine or SCH58261 in the striatum, aligning with previous findings (de Bem Alves et al., 2023) and the general role of striatal A_2AR in effort-related behaviors, reviewed in Chen et al. (2023).

The first novelty provided by this study is the re-enforcement of our previous contention that A_2AR are the likely molecular targets operated by caffeine to produce its ergogenic effects (Aguiar et al., 2020). Physiological concentrations of caffeine, achieved in the brain parenchyma after consuming non-toxic doses, influence neuronal network information flow primarily through A₁R and A_2AR antagonism (Lopes et al., 2019), without involving other mechanisms such as phosphodiesterases or ryanodine receptors, which are activated by toxic caffeine doses (Fredholm et al., 1999). Our findings that caffeine’s ergogenic effects are replicated by the selective A_2AR antagonist SCH58261, but not by the A₁R antagonist DPCPX, provide direct evidence that caffeine’s ergogenic effects are specifically mediated through A_2AR rather than A₁R. Additionally, caffeine’s influence on other behavioral responses that rely on striatal information processing, such as locomotion, arousal, or response to psychostimulants, is also mediated by A_2AR rather than A₁R (El Yacoubi et al., 2000a; Chen et al., 2000). Therefore, the specific involvement of A_2AR, rather than A₁R, observed in the acute effects of caffeine on exercise performance, further supports the significant role of striatal A_2AR in governing caffeine’s ergogenic effects (Aguiar et al., 2020). This is especially pertinent given the high density of A_2AR in the striatum compared to other brain regions, which predominantly exhibit A₁R-mediated effects following acute caffeine exposure (Elmenhorst et al., 2012; Kerkhofs et al., 2018).

Another significant conclusion drawn from this study pertains to the interaction between A_2AR and D₂R in managing exercise endurance. This presumed interplay between A_2AR and D₂R is supported by: i) their co-localization within medium spiny neurons of the striatum (Svenningsson et al., 1997; Canals et al., 2003), a region recognized for the ergogenic effects prompted by caffeine blockade (de Bem Alves et al., 2023); ii) their established functional crosstalk (Hillion et al., 2002; Ferré et al., 2016); iii) their dynamic heteromerization, which results in new receptosomes with novel properties (Canals et al., 2003; Fernández-Dueñas et al., 2015); iv) their interplay in controlling motor activity, the impact of psychostimulants, and effort-related behavioral performance (e.g., Pardo et al., 2013; reviewed in Borroto-Escuela et al., 2018; Nunes et al., 2010; Rotolo et al., 2023). Additionally, dopamine signaling has been experimentally linked to exercise and fatigue (reviewed in Meeusen et al., 2021). Exercise induces a hyperdopaminergic state (Greenwood, 2019) and dopamine depletion correlates with mental fatigue (Moeller et al., 2012; Aguiar et al., 2016; Scheffer et al., 2021). Furthermore, polymorphisms within various components of the dopaminergic system have been associated with fatigue (Malyuchenko et al., 2010), L-DOPA has been shown to alleviate physical fatigue (Lou et al., 2003; Scheffer et al., 2021; de Bem Alves and Aguiar, 2024), and exposure to reserpine, which depletes monoamines, serves as an experimental fatigue model (Scheffer et al., 2021; de Bem Alves and Aguiar, 2024).

Despite these findings, the specific dopamine receptors involved in the control of fatigue and their brain locations remain unclear. The traditional view of striatal dopaminergic signaling suggests a primary role for D₁R, but the simplistic dichotomy of behaviors influenced by D₁R and D₂R in medium spiny neurons is being reevaluated (Soares-Cunha et al., 2016). The improvement of performance with increased forced running is linked to dopamine and specifically to the activation of striatal D₁R and extrastriatal D₂R (Toval et al., 2021). Additionally, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has been proposed as important during exhaustive exercise (Bigliassi and Filho, 2022). These insights align with our unexpected findings: i) haloperidol reduces the ergogenic effects of systemically administered caffeine or SCH58261; ii) notably, haloperidol does not affect the ergogenic effects when caffeine or SCH58261 is applied directly to the striatum.

These results lead us to conclude that A_2AR-D₂R interactions play a significant role in regulating exercise endurance and fatigue, predominantly outside the striatum. This suggests that adenosine’s central role in exercise endurance and fatigue might involve primarily changes in striatal circuits, but also modifications in other brain areas. This concept aligns with the noted involvement of striatal and extrastriatal circuits in other behaviors affected by A_2AR-D₂R interplay, such as responses to psychostimulants (reviewed in Borroto-Escuela et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2023). However, this conclusion that the extra-striatal A_2AR-D₂R interplay is involved in ergogenic effects should still be regarded as preliminary since it will require confirmation based on direct pharmacological and genetic manipulations of A_2AR and D₂R only in the striatum and the identification of the brain regions where this interaction takes place to control fatigue. Additionally, future studies should also investigate a putative role of dopamine D₁R, which is also abundantly present in the striatum and other brain regions and has also been reported to tightly interact with adenosine A₁R (Ginés et al., 2000) and dopamine D₂R (Rashid et al., 2007; Frederick et al., 2015).

Interestingly, our current findings indicate that the ergogenic effects of caffeine and SCH58261 are distinct from their psychostimulant properties. This observation is supported by our previous research showing that SCH58261 has both psychostimulant and ergogenic effects in male mice, but only ergogenic effects in females, without clear psychostimulant impacts (Aguiar et al., 2020). This adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting a unique role for various A_2AR populations in different cellular locations in modulating diverse behavioral responses (Shen et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2008; Wei et al., 2014).

In summary, our study confirms the critical role of striatal A_2AR in the adenosine modulation of central fatigue and in the ergogenic responses of A_2AR antagonists. Furthermore, we found a dissociation between the psychostimulant and ergogenic effects of caffeine and SCH58261. In parallel, the ergogenic effects of caffeine and of SCH568261 were controlled by D₂R blockade with haloperidol, but this A_2AR-D₂R interplay seems to mostly occurs in extra-striatal circuits. These findings underscore the need for further investigation into the intricate interplay between adenosine and dopamine signaling in striatal and extra-striatal circuits to control central fatigue and other motivational behaviors such as the response to psychostimulants.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by the Comissão de Ética no Uso de Animais (CEUA) da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

AnA: Writing–review and editing, Writing–original draft, Methodology, Investigation. NS: Writing–review and editing, Investigation. AT: Writing–review and editing, Investigation. GP: Writing–review and editing, Investigation. AS: Writing–review and editing, Writing–original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation. RC: Writing–review and editing, Formal Analysis, Conceptualization. AdA: Writing–review and editing, Writing–original draft, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Software, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Formal Analysis, Conceptualization.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The research and authorship of this work were supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Programa de Apoio à Pós-Graduação (CAPES/PROAP), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, #424539/2018-7) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina (FAPESC, #2021TR001414). The Article Processing Charge (APC) for the publication of this research was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES (ROR identifier: 00x0ma614). For open access purposes, the authors have assigned the Creative Commons CC BY license to any accepted version of the article. AdA is a research productivity fellow (CNPq #310635/2020-9).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank UFSC for support. This manuscript is part of AnA’s doctoral thesis supervised by AdA (AnA, 2023; CAPES, 2023).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Aguiar, A. S., Lopes, S. C., Tristão, F. S. M., Rial, D., de Oliveira, G., da Cunha, C., et al. (2016). Exercise Improves Cognitive Impairment and Dopamine Metabolism in MPTP-Treated Mice. Neurotox. Res. 29 (1), 118–125. doi:10.1007/S12640-015-9566-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aguiar, A. S., Speck, A. E., Canas, P. M., and Cunha, R. A. (2020). Neuronal adenosine A2A receptors signal ergogenic effects of caffeine. Sci. Rep. 10, 13414. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69660-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aguiar, A. S., Speck, A. E., Canas, P. M., and Cunha, R. A. (2021). Deletion of CD73 increases exercise power in mice. Purinergic Signal 17, 393–397. doi:10.1007/S11302-021-09797-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

AS Aguiar, A. S. I. A. P. C. R. C., Aguiar, A. S., Speck, A. E., Amaral, I. M., Canas, P M., and Cunha, R. A. (2018). The exercise sex gap and the impact of the estrous cycle on exercise performance in mice. Sci. Rep. 8 (1), 10742. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29050-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ballesteros-Yáñez, I., Castillo, C. A., Merighi, S., and Gessi, S. (2018). The role of adenosine receptors in psychostimulant addiction. Front. Pharmacol. 8, 985. doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00985

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bigliassi, M., and Filho, E. (2022). Functional significance of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during exhaustive exercise. Biol. Psychol. 175, 108442. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108442

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borroto-Escuela, D. O., Wydra, K., Filip, M., and Fuxe, K. (2018). A2AR-D2R heteroreceptor complexes in cocaine reward and addiction. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 39, 1008–1020. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2018.10.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Canals, M., Marcellino, D., Fanelli, F., Ciruela, F., de Benedetti, P., Goldberg, S. R., et al. (2003). Adenosine A2A-dopamine D2 receptor-receptor heteromerization: qualitative and quantitative assessment by fluorescence and bioluminescence energy transfer. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 46741–46749. doi:10.1074/jbc.M306451200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, J. F., Beilstein, M., Xu, Y. H., Turner, T. J., Moratalla, R., Standaert, D. G., et al. (2000). Selective attenuation of psychostimulant-induced behavioral responses in mice lacking A2A adenosine receptors. Neuroscience 97, 195–204. doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(99)00604-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, J. F., Choi, D. S., and Cunha, R. A. (2023). Striatopallidal adenosine A2A receptor modulation of goal-directed behavior: Homeostatic control with cognitive flexibility. Neuropharmacology 226, 109421. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2023.109421

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Davis, J. M., Zhao, Z., Stock, H. S., Mehl, K. A., Buggy, J., and Hand, G. A. (2003). Central nervous system effects of caffeine and adenosine on fatigue. Am. J. Physiol. 284, 399–404. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00386.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Bem Alves, A. C., and Aguiar, A. S. (2024). Caffeine plus haloperidol reduces fatigue in an experimental model of Parkinson's disease - a prospective to A2AR-D2R heterodimer antagonism. Purinergic Signal 20, 29–34. doi:10.1007/s11302-023-09933-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Bem Alves, A. C., Speck, A. E., Farias, H. R., Martins, L. M., dos Santos, N. S., Pannata, G., et al. (2023). The striatum drives the ergogenic effects of caffeine. Purinergic Signal 19, 673–683. doi:10.1007/S11302-023-09922-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dremencov, E., Lacinova, L., Flik, G., Folgering, J. H., Cremers, T. I., and Westerink, B. H. (2017). Purinergic regulation of brain catecholamine neurotransmission: in vivo electrophysiology and microdialysis study in rats. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 36, 431–441. doi:10.4149/gpb_2017039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Elmenhorst, D., Meyer, P. T., Matusch, A., Winz, O. H., and Bauer, A. (2012). Caffeine occupancy of human cerebral A1 adenosine receptors: in vivo quantification with 18F-CPFPX and PET. J. Nucl. Med. 53, 1723–1729. doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.105114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

El Yacoubi, M., Ledent, C., Ménard, J. F., Parmentier, M., Costentin, J., and Vaugeois, J. M. (2000a). The stimulant effects of caffeine on locomotor behaviour in mice are mediated through its blockade of adenosine A2A receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 129, 1465–1473. doi:10.1038/SJ.BJP.0703170

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

El Yacoubi, M., Ledent, C., Parmentier, M., Costentin, J., and Vaugeois, J. M. (2000b). The anxiogenic-like effect of caffeine in two experimental procedures measuring anxiety in the mouse is not shared by selective A2A adenosine receptor antagonists. Psychopharmacol. Berl. 148, 153–163. doi:10.1007/s002130050037

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fernández-Dueñas, V., Taura, J. J., Cottet, M., Gómez-Soler, M., López-Cano, M., Ledent, C., et al. (2015). Untangling dopamine-adenosine receptor-receptor assembly in experimental parkinsonism in rats. Dis. Models Mech. 8, 57–63. doi:10.1242/dmm.018143

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferré, S., Bonaventura, J., Tomasi, D., Navarro, G., Moreno, E., Cortés, A., et al. (2016). Allosteric mechanisms within the adenosine A2A–dopamine D2 receptor heterotetramer. Neuropharmacology 104, 154–160. doi:10.1016/J.NEUROPHARM.2015.05.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferré, S., and Ciruela, F. (2019). Functional and neuroprotective role of striatal adenosine A2A receptor heterotetramers. J. Caffeine Adenosine Res. 9, 89–97. doi:10.1089/caff.2019.0008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferré, S., Quiroz, C., Woods, A. S., Cunha, R., Popoli, P., Ciruela, F., et al. (2008). An update on adenosine A2A-dopamine D2 receptor interactions: implications for the function of G protein-coupled receptors. Curr. Pharm. Des. 14, 1468–1474. doi:10.2174/138161208784480108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferré, S., von Euler, G., Johansson, B., Fredholm, B. B., and Fuxe, K. (1991). Stimulation of high-affinity adenosine A2 receptors decreases the affinity of dopamine D2 receptors in rat striatal membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 7238–7241. doi:10.1073/pnas.88.16.7238

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frederick, A. L., Yano, H., Trifilieff, P., Vishwasrao, H. D., Biezonski, D., Mészáros, J., et al. (2015). Evidence against dopamine D1/D2 receptor heteromers. Mol. Psychiatry 20, 1373–1385. doi:10.1038/MP.2014.166

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fredholm, B. B., Bättig, K., Holmén, J., Nehlig, A., and Zvartau, E. E. (1999). Actions of caffeine in the brain with special reference to factors that contribute to its widespread use. Pharmacol. Rev. 51, 83–133.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Fuxe, K., Agnati, L. F., Jacobsen, K., Hillion, J., Canals, M., Torvinen, M., et al. (2003). Receptor heteromerization in adenosine A2A receptor signaling: relevance for striatal function and Parkinson's disease. Neurology 61, S19–S23. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000095206.44418.5c

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gandevia, S. C. (2001). Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiol. Rev. 81, 1725–1789. doi:10.1152/physrev.2001.81.4.1725

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ginés, S., Hillion, J., Torvinen, M., Le Crom, S., Casadó, V., Canela, E. I., et al. (2000). Dopamine D1 and adenosine A1 receptors form functionally interacting heteromeric complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 8606–8611. doi:10.1073/PNAS.150241097

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glaister, M. (2005). Multiple sprint work: physiological responses, mechanisms of fatigue and the influence of aerobic fitness. Sports Med. 35, 757–777. doi:10.2165/00007256-200535090-00003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Greenwood, B. N. (2019). The role of dopamine in overcoming aversion with exercise. Brain Res. 1713, 102–108. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2018.08.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Griebel, G., Saffroy-Spittler, M., Misslin, R., Remmy, D., Vogel, E., and Bourguignon, J. J. (1991). Comparison of the behavioural effects of an adenosine A1/A2-receptor antagonist, CGS 15943A, and an A1-selective antagonist, DPCPX. Psychopharmacol. Berl. 103, 541–544. doi:10.1007/BF02244256

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hillion, J., Canals, M., Torvinen, M., Casadó, V., Scott, R., Terasmaa, A., et al. (2002). Coaggregation, cointernalization, and codesensitization of adenosine A2A receptors and dopamine D2 receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 18091–18097. doi:10.1074/jbc.M107731200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kerkhofs, A., Xavier, A. C., da Silva, B. S., Canas, P. M., Idema, S., Baayen, J. C., et al. (2018). Caffeine controls glutamatergic synaptic transmission and pyramidal neuron excitability in human neocortex. Front. Pharmacol. 8, 899. doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00899

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Pan, X., He, Y., Ruan, Y., Huang, L., Zhou, Y., et al. (2018). Pharmacological Blockade of Adenosine A2A but not A1 receptors enhances goal-directed valuation in satiety-based instrumental behavior. Front. Pharmacol. 9, 393. doi:10.3389/FPHAR.2018.00393

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lopes, J. P., Pliássova, A., and Cunha, R. A. (2019). The physiological effects of caffeine on synaptic transmission and plasticity in the mouse hippocampus selectively depend on adenosine A1 and A2A receptors. Biochem. Pharmacol. 166, 313–321. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2019.06.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lou, J. S., Kearns, G., Benice, T., Oken, B., Sexton, G., and Nutt, J. (2003). Levodopa improves physical fatigue in Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Mov. Dis. 18, 1108–1114. doi:10.1002/mds.10505

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malyuchenko, N. V., Schegolkova, J. V., Kulikova, M. A., Timofeeva, M. A., Shlepzova, V. A., Sysoeva, O. V., et al. (2010). Effects of genetic variations in the dopaminergic system on fatigue in humans: gender aspects. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 149, 226–232. doi:10.1007/s10517-010-0913-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meeusen, R., Van Cutsem, J., and Roelands, B. (2021). Endurance exercise-induced and mental fatigue and the brain. Exp. Physiol. 106, 2294–2298. doi:10.1113/EP088186

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meeusen, R., Watson, P., Hasegawa, H., Roelands, B., and Piacentini, M. F. (2006). Central fatigue: the serotonin hypothesis and beyond. Sports Med. doi:10.2165/00007256-200636100-00006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mihara, T., Mihara, K., Yarimizu, J., Mitani, Y., Matsuda, R., Yamamoto, H., et al. (2007). Pharmacological characterization of a novel, potent adenosine A1 and A2A receptor dual antagonist, 5-[5-amino-3-(4-fluorophenyl)pyrazin-2-yl]-1-isopropylpyridine-2(1H)-one (ASP5854), in models of Parkinson’s disease and cognition. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 323, 708–719. doi:10.1124/JPET.107.121962

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moeller, S. J., Tomasi, D., Honorio, J., Volkow, N. D., and Goldstein, R. Z. (2012). Dopaminergic involvement during mental fatigue in health and cocaine addiction. Transl. Psychiatry 2, e176. doi:10.1038/tp.2012.110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nunes, E. J., Randall, P. A., Santerre, J. L., Given, A. B., Sager, T. N., Correa, M., et al. (2010). Differential effects of selective adenosine antagonists on the effort-related impairments induced by dopamine D1 and D2 antagonism. Neuroscience 170, 268–280. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.05.068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pandolfo, P., Machado, N. J., Köfalvi, A., Takahashi, R. N., and Cunha, R. A. (2013). Caffeine regulates frontocorticostriatal dopamine transporter density and improves attention and cognitive deficits in an animal model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 23, 317–328. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.04.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pardo, M., Lopez-Cruz, L., Valverde, O., Ledent, C., Baqi, Y., Müller, C. E., et al. (2012). Adenosine A2A receptor antagonism and genetic deletion attenuate the effects of dopamine D2 antagonism on effort-based decision making in mice. Neuropharmacology 62, 2068–2077. doi:10.1016/J.NEUROPHARM.2011.12.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pardo, M., López-Cruz, L., Valverde, O., Ledent, C., Baqi, Y., Müller, C. E., et al. (2013). Effect of subtype-selective adenosine receptor antagonists on basal or haloperidol-regulated striatal function: studies of exploratory locomotion and c-Fos immunoreactivity in outbred and A2AR KO mice. Beh Brain Res. 247, 217–226. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.03.035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paxinos, G., and Franklin, K. B. J. (2012) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Springer US. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13057-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Personius, K. E., Jayaram, A., Krull, D., Brown, R., Xu, T., Han, B., et al. (2010). Grip force, EDL contractile properties, and voluntary wheel running after postdevelopmental myostatin depletion in mice. J. Appl. Physiol. 109, 886–894. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00300.2010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prediger, R. D. S., Batista, L. C., and Takahashi, R. N. (2004). Adenosine A1 receptors modulate the anxiolytic-like effect of ethanol in the elevated plus-maze in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 499, 147–154. doi:10.1016/J.EJPHAR.2004.07.106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rashid, A. J., So, C. H., Kong, M. M. C., Furtak, T., El-Ghundi, M., Cheng, R., et al. (2007). D1-D2 dopamine receptor heterooligomers with unique pharmacology are coupled to rapid activation of Gq/11 in the striatum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 654–659. doi:10.1073/PNAS.0604049104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Real, J. I., Simões, A. P., Cunha, R. A., Ferreira, S. G., and Rial, D. (2018). Adenosine A2A receptors modulate the dopamine D2 receptor-mediated inhibition of synaptic transmission in the mouse prefrontal cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 47, 1127–1134. doi:10.1111/ejn.13912

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rotolo, R. A., Ecevitoglu, A., Presby, R. E., Lindgren, H., Mombereau, C., Nicholas, C., et al. (2023). Effort-related effects of chronic administration of the DA D2 receptor antagonist haloperidol via subcutaneous programmable minipumps: Reversal by co-administration of the adenosine A2A antagonist istradefylline. Psychopharmacol. Berl. 240, 2173–2185. doi:10.1007/S00213-023-06439-Y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salamone, J. D., Farrar, A. M., Font, L., Patel, V., Schlar, D. E., Nunes, E. J., et al. (2009). Differential actions of adenosine A1 and A2A antagonists on the effort-related effects of dopamine D2 antagonism. Beh Brain Res. 201, 216–222. doi:10.1016/J.BBR.2009.02.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scheffer, D. D. L., Freitas, F. C., Aguiar, A. S., Ward, C., Guglielmo, L. G. A., Prediger, R. D., et al. (2021). Impaired dopamine metabolism is linked to fatigability in mice and fatigue in Parkinson's disease patients. Brain Comm. 3, fcab116. doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcab116

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shen, H. Y., Coelho, J. E., Ohtsuka, N., Canas, P. M., Day, Y. J., Huang, Q. Y., et al. (2008). A critical role of the adenosine A2A receptor in extrastriatal neurons in modulating psychomotor activity as revealed by opposite phenotypes of striatum and forebrain A2A receptor knock-outs. J. Neurosci. 28, 2970–2975. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5255-07.2008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shiozaki, S., Ichikawa, S., Nakamura, J., Kitamura, S., Yamada, K., and Kuwana, Y. (1999). Actions of adenosine A2A receptor antagonist KW-6002 on drug-induced catalepsy and hypokinesia caused by reserpine or MPTP. Psychopharmacol. Berl. 147, 90–95. doi:10.1007/s002130051146

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Soares-Cunha, C., Coimbra, B., Sousa, N., and Rodrigues, A. J. (2016). Reappraising striatal D1-and D2-neurons in reward and aversion. Neurosc Biobehav Rev. 68, 370–386. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Solano, A. F., Scheffer, D. da L., Alves, A.C. de B., Jr, A. S. A., and Latini, A. (2017). Potential pitfalls when investigating the ergogenic effects of caffeine in mice. J. Syst. Integr. Neurosci. 3, 1–4. doi:10.15761/jsin.1000156

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Speck, A. E., de Bem Alves, A. C., and Aguiar, A. S. (2024). A2A and D2 Receptor Interaction Enhances Fatigue Resistance: Dataset Overview. https://Osf.Io/4b6vw/.

Svenningsson, P., Le Moine, C., Kull, B., Sunahara, R., Bloch, B., and Fredholm, B. B. (1997). Cellular expression of adenosine A2A receptor messenger RNA in the rat central nervous system with special reference to dopamine innervated areas. Neuroscience 80, 1171–1185. doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00180-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szopa, A., Bogatko, K., Herbet, M., Serefko, A., Ostrowska, M., Wośko, S., et al. (2021). The interaction of selective A1 and A2A adenosine receptor antagonists with magnesium and zinc ions in mice: behavioural, biochemical and molecular studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 1840–1925. doi:10.3390/IJMS22041840

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szopa, A., Poleszak, E., Bogatko, K., Wyska, E., Wośko, S., Doboszewska, U., et al. (2018). DPCPX, a selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, enhances the antidepressant-like effects of imipramine, escitalopram, and reboxetine in mice behavioral tests. Naunyn Schmiedeb. Arch. Pharmacol. 391, 1361–1371. doi:10.1007/s00210-018-1551-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Takeshita, H., Yamamoto, K., Nozato, S., Inagaki, T., Tsuchimochi, H., Shirai, M., et al. (2017). Modified forelimb grip strength test detects aging-associated physiological decline in skeletal muscle function in male mice. Sci. Rep. 7, 42323–42329. doi:10.1038/srep42323

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Toval, A., Garrigos, D., Kutsenko, Y., Popović, M., Do-Couto, B. R., Morales-Delgado, N., et al. (2021). Dopaminergic modulation of forced running performance in adolescent rats: role of striatal D1 and extra-striatal D2 dopamine receptors. Mol. Neurobiol. 58, 1782–1791. doi:10.1007/s12035-020-02252-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wan, J. J., Qin, Z., Wang, P. Y., Sun, Y., and Liu, X. (2017). Muscle fatigue: general understanding and treatment. Exp. Mol. Med. 49, e384. doi:10.1038/emm.2017.194

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, C. J., Augusto, E., Gomes, C. A., Singer, P., Wang, Y., Boison, D., et al. (2014). Regulation of fear responses by striatal and extrastriatal adenosine A2A receptors in forebrain. Biol. Psychiatry 75, 855–863. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, L., Shen, H. Y., Coelho, J. E., Araújo, I. M., Huang, Q. Y., Day, Y. J., et al. (2008). Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists exert motor and neuroprotective effects by distinct cellular mechanisms. Ann. Neurol. 63, 338–346. doi:10.1002/ana.21313

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar