Fernando de Sá Del Fiol*
Cristiane de Cássia BergamaschiLuciane Cruz LopesMarcus Tolentino Silva
Silvio Barberato-Filho- Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sorocaba, Sorocaba, Brazil
Background: The social restrictions among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have posed a thoughtful risk to mental health and have implications in the use of drugs, including antidepressants, anxiolytics and other psychotropics.
Objective: This study analyzed the sales data of the psychotropics prescribed in Brazil, in order to verify the change in consumption trends of these drugs during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: This interrupted time-series analyzed psychotropic sales data, between January 2014 and July 2021, using the National System of Controlled Products Management from The Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency. The monthly mean DDDs per 1,000 inhabitants per day of psychotropic drugs was evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett Multiple Comparisons Test. The changes in monthly trends in the use of the psychotropic studied were evaluated by Joinpoint regression.
Results: During the period studied, clonazepam, alprazolam, zolpidem and escitalopram were the most sold psychotropic drugs in Brazil. According to Joinpoint regression, an upward trend was observed in sales during the pandemic of pregabalin, escitalopram, lithium, desvenlafaxine, citalopram, buproprion and amitriptyline. An increase in psychotropic consumption was noted throughout the pandemic period, with the maximum consumption (2.61 DDDs) occurring in April 2021, with a downward trend in consumption that accompanied the drop in the number of deaths.
Conclusions: The increase in sales, mainly of antidepressants during the COVID-19 pandemic, draws attention to issues related to the mental health of the Brazilian population and on the need for greater monitoring in the dispensing of these drugs.
Introduction
On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19, caused by the new Coronavirus, as a new global pandemic (Vindegaard and Benros, 2020). The new virus settles in the respiratory system, leading to cases of viral pneumonia, which is the main factor of morbidity related to the disease. Since the beginning of the pandemic, uncertainties regarding transmissibility, pathogenicity and lethality have taken hold of the scientific community and populations around the world, leading to feelings of apprehension, insecurity and fear (Castillo-Sánchez et al., 2022). World health agencies, in order to contain the pandemic, have established health protocols for the entire population, such as the use of alcoholic gel, masks, social isolation, etc. (Atalan, 2020) (Brodeur et al., 2021).
Modern civilization had never gone through a similar situation, when a part of it found itself “trapped” in their homes, avoiding contagion and infection or experiencing the early mourning of their family members. This naturally caused and continues to cause significant impacts on the mental health of everyone, whether infected or not (Brooks et al., 2020; Dubey et al., 2020; Ali et al., 2021; Castillo-Sánchez et al., 2022). On 25 February 2020, the first case of COVID-19 was confirmed in Brazil and, since then, there have been 24 million infected (January 2022 data), adding up to more than 600,000 deaths (Ministry, 2022).
The high mortality rates at the beginning of the pandemic, social isolation, associated with fear and insecurity due to lack of treatments; and/or the efficacy and availability of vaccines, led a large part of the population, including health professionals and young people (Wathelet et al., 2020; Meherali et al., 2021), to resort to chemical substances such as alcohol, illicit drugs and even psychotropic drugs in order to face this difficult situation (Garcia and Sanchez, 2020; Testino and Pellicano, 2020; Bennett et al., 2021; Levaillant et al., 2021; Madoz-Gúrpide et al., 2021; Søvold et al., 2021; Castillo-Sánchez et al., 2022; Estrela et al., 2022). Some studies have shown that the impact on the mental health of populations was important, with exacerbated conditions of depression, anxiety, panic, including suicidal ideation, especially among young people and health professionals (Gloster et al., 2020; de Vroege and van den Broek, 2021; Varga et al., 2021; Acharya et al., 2022; Appleby et al., 2022; Bozzola et al., 2022; Prudenzi et al., 2022).
In the United States, cases of depression and anxiety diagnosed among adults jumped from 36% to 41% between August 2020 and February 2021, reflecting the effects of the pandemic on this population (Vahratian et al., 2021). Likewise, visits to psychiatric offices also increased in the same period due to the pandemic (Holland et al., 2021). In Brazil, some studies have verified the prevalence and factors associated with depression or anxiety in health professionals or medical students and public-school teachers, during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, nationwide analyses of the sales profile of psychotropic drugs are still lacking in the literature.
In order to verify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of the Brazilian population, this study used the national database on the dispensation of psychotropic drugs as an important resource for public health, since it can reflect the pattern of clinical and subclinical consumption of these drugs. Next, this study analyzed the sales data of psychotropic drugs prescribed in Brazil, in order to verify the consumption trend of these drugs during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Materials and methods
Study design
An interrupted time series was used to analyze the consumption trends of antidepressants and anxiolytics and other psychotropic medications (outcome of interest) during the COVID-19 pandemic (exposure of interest).
Setting and study
Pharmacies and drugstores in Brazil have been required to register the number of all psychotropic medications sold monthly, since 2007, in the National System of Controlled Products Management database (known by the acronym SNGPC) from The Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) (Varga et al., 2021). Monthly sales volume data were collected between January 2014 and July 2021.
Data sources, measurement and variables
Data were publicly available on ANVISA website. The following variables were extracted: name of the active ingredient, trade name and respective presentations. The classification Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) was used. Based on the commercial packaging of each psychotropic drug sold and the concentration of the active ingredient in each (e.g., pack of 10 pills of 20 mg each or pack of 30 pills of 10 mg each), the number of defined daily doses (DDDs)/1,000 inhabitants/day for each drug was calculated, as recommended by the World Health Organization (Acharya et al., 2022).
Statistical analysis
Psychotropic drugs were described in average units of commercial presentations sold between 2014 and 2019 and during the pandemic (January 2020 and July 2021).
The monthly mean DDDs per 1,000 inhabitants per day of psychotropic drugs was evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett Multiple Comparisons Test (Instat GraphPad Software version 3.05). The changes in monthly trends in the use of the psychotropic studied were evaluated by Joinpoint regression (Joinpoint Regression Program, version 4.9.0.0. Statistical Research and Applications Branch, National Cancer Institute). Pearson’s correlation coefficient verified the correlation between psychotropic consumption (expressed in DDDs/1,000 inhabitants/day) and the number of deaths in the same period. The level of statistical significance adopted was p < 0.05.
Results
Table 1 described the 22 most sold psychotropic drugs in Brazil, between January 2014 and July 2021. The data shows the average amount of commercial presentations sold between January 2014 and December 2019 and during the pandemic (January 2020 and July 2021).
TABLE 1. Characterization and sales volume in Brazil of the studied psychotropics (January 2014 to July 2021).
Between January 2014 and July 2021, clonazepam, zolpidem, alprazolam and escitalopram were the most sold psychotropics in Brazil. When comparing the pandemic years with previous years (2014–2019), there were statistically significant increases (p < 0.01) in almost all studied psychotropics (Table 1). The exceptions were Citalopram and benzodiazepines that did not show alterations. Lorazepam decreased by 15% during the studied period.
The data presented in Table 2 showed the consumption in DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day between 2014 and 2019 and during the pandemic, based on the historical series and on the level of significance related to the trend. There was an upward trend in sales of pregabalin, escitalopram, lithium, desvenlafaxine, citalopram, bupropion and amitriptyline.
TABLE 2. Consumption in DDDs between 2014 and 2019 and during the pandemic (January 2020 to July 2021).
Figure 1 shows the average consumption in DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day of psychotropic drugs (bars) and the evolution in the number of COVID-19 cases in the country (line). It was observed that at the beginning of the pandemic (March 2020) and throughout its period, there was an increase in sales of psychotropic drugs. There was an increase from 1.75 DDDs/1,000 inhabitants/day in February 2020 to 2.07 DDDs/1,000 inhabitants/day in the following month. The same was observed when the number of deaths reaches its peak in the country (March 2021); in the following month (April 2021), the consumption of these drugs jumps from 2.26 DDDs/1,000 inhabitants/day to the maximum sale (2.61 DDDs/1,000 inhabitants/day). This drop in the consumption of psychotropic drugs accompanied the drop in the number of deaths caused by COVID-19.
FIGURE 1. Monthly average (in DDDs) of psychotropic consumption in Brazil and number COVID-19 cases in Brazil (July 2019 to July 2021).
There was a strong correlation between the consumption of psychotropic drugs and cases of COVID-19 for most of psychotropics studied. For zolpidem there is very strong correlation (correlation coefficient: 0.91) (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2. Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient of psychotropic and COVID-19 cases in Brazil during the pandemic (2020 January to 2021 July).
Discussion
During the pandemic period, there was an upward trend in sales of psychotropic drugs in Brazil, mainly; desvenlafaxine, pregabalin, quetiapine, zolpidem, escitalopram and lithium; compared to the period between January 2014 and December 2019, in which there were more sales of clonazepam, zolpidem, alprazolam and escitalopram. Between the period January 2014 to July 2021, the historical series showed an upward trend in sales of pregabalin, escitalopram, lithium, desvenlafaxine, citalopram, bupropion and amitriptyline.
The peak of the death toll in the country was in March 2021, when psychotropic consumption was at 2.26 DDDs/1,000 inhabitants/day. In the following month, consumption of these drugs jumped to 2.61 DDDs/1,000 inhabitants/day.
During the pandemic, a strong correlation was observed between the number of cases of deaths from COVID-19 in Brazil and the consumption of psychotropic drugs, especially zolpidem. Zolpidem is a hypnotic drug, non-benzodiazepine imidazopyridine with affinity to the α1 subunit of the GABA A receptor.
Another study conducted in the Brazilian capital (Escalante Saavedra et al., 2022) evaluated the impact of psychotropic consumption before and during the pandemic (2018–2020). The results showed Zolpidem consumption increasing from 6.2 Defined Daily Dose per 1,000 inhabitants-day (DHD) to 8.5 due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Our data are very similar, showing an increase in Zolpidem consumption of around 89.5% (Table 1) in the studied period (2014–2021).
Milani et al. (2021), reported results similar to those found in the present study, showing an increase in the consumption of Z-hypnotics (zolpidem, zaleplon, and eszopiclone) among men and women in the United States and persisting in increased levels in the two waves of COVID-19 (Milani et al., 2021).
In the same sense, Levaillant et al. (2021), found even more alarming data in France, with a weekly increase of 2.5% in new users of hypnotics among young people (12–18 years old), during the pandemic period (Levaillant et al., 2021). In Portugal, a similar scenario was also observed during the pandemic, with a significant increase in the prescriptions of anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedatives, especially in the age group over 65 years (Estrela et al., 2022).
In France, researchers evaluated sleep habits in more than 1,000 patients and the pandemic’s interference in their habits. The authors reported that before the pandemic, only 12% of these patients were using hypnotic drugs. During the pandemic, due to the difficulties imposed on everyone, that number jumped to 41% (Beck et al., 2021). In Brazil, higher education students in the health area reported similar behaviors, with an increase of around 11% in the consumption of anxiolytics during the pandemic (Mata et al., 2021). Italy has also shown a sharp increase in the consumption of psychotropic drugs during the pandemic (Farina et al., 2021).
The reasons for the increase in psychotropic consumption seem very clear to us. In the United States, cases of depression increased about 3 times in the pandemic when compared to previous periods Certainly, the effects of the pandemic will not be restricted to the infectivity and pathogenicity of the virus, but will also leave important psychological consequences that, initially, have been treated with the use of psychotropic medications.
The reasons for the increase in psychotropic consumption seem very clear to us. In the United States, cases of depression increased about 3 times in the pandemic when compared to previous periods (Ettman et al., 2020). Recent studies in several countries around the world are unanimous in showing a significant increase in the consumption of psychotropic drugs during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies from Canada (Ying et al., 2023), France (Benistand et al., 2022; Sanchez et al., 2022), Portugal (Estrela et al., 2022), Scandinavia (Tiger et al., 2023), United States (Amill-Rosario et al., 2022), Danish (Bliddal et al., 2023) showed that the effects of the pandemic were not restricted to the infectivity and pathogenicity of the virus at the level of the respiratory system, but also left important psychological sequelae with increased used of psychotropic medications.
The increase in sales verified in Brazil in the present study, in all classes of psychotropic drugs, shows, in addition to the controlled clinical use of these drugs (through medical records), the sub-clinical use of drugs with high potential for abuse and reinforces the need for a closer look aware of the consumption of these drugs and the consequences of abuse and dependence associated with them.
Conclusions
The increase in sales, mainly of antidepressants during the COVID-19 pandemic, draws attention to issues related to the mental health of the Brazilian population and makes us reflect on the need for greater monitoring in the dispensing of these drugs. Improving the national registration system for sales of psychotropic drugs could contribute with relevant information for the elaboration of public policies focused on mental health, seeking better guidance for personalized care and better doctor-patient decision making.
Data availability statement
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://dados.anvisa.gov.br/dados/SNGPC/Industrializados/
Author contributions
FD, CB, LL, SB-F and MS contributed to the design and implementation of the research, to the analysis of the results and to the writing of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Acharya, B., Subedi, K., Acharya, P., and Ghimire, S. (2022). Association between COVID-19 pandemic and the suicide rates in Nepal. PLoS One 17 (1), e0262958. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262958
Ali, A. M., Alkhamees, A. A., Abd Elhay, E. S., Taha, S. M., and Hendawy, A. O. (2021). COVID-19-Related psychological trauma and psychological distress among community-dwelling psychiatric patients: People struck by depression and sleep disorders endure the greatest burden. Front. Public Health 9, 799812. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.799812
Amill-Rosario, A., Lee, H., Zhang, C., and dosReis, S. (2022). Psychotropic prescriptions during the COVID-19 pandemic among U.S. Children and adolescents receiving mental health services. J. Child. Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 32 (7), 408–414. doi:10.1089/cap.2022.0037
Appleby, J. A., King, N., Saunders, K. E., Bast, A., Rivera, D., Byun, J., et al. (2022). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the experience and mental health of University students studying in Canada and the UK: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 12 (1), e050187. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050187
Atalan, A. (2020). Is the lockdown important to prevent the COVID-9 pandemic? Effects on psychology, environment and economy-perspective. Ann. Med. Surg. (Lond) 56, 38–42. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.06.010
Beck, F., Leger, D., Fressard, L., Peretti-Watel, P., and Verger, P. (2021). Covid-19 health crisis and lockdown associated with high level of sleep complaints and hypnotic uptake at the population level. J. Sleep. Res. 30 (1), e13119. doi:10.1111/jsr.13119
Benistand, P., Vorilhon, P., Laporte, C., Bouillon-Minois, J. B., Brousse, G., Bagheri, R., et al. (2022). Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the psychotropic drug consumption. Front. Psychiatry 13, 1020023. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1020023
Bennett, A. S., Townsend, T., and Elliott, L. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and the health of people who use illicit opioids in New York City, the first 12 months. Int. J. Drug Policy 101, 103554. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103554
Bliddal, M., Rasmussen, L., Andersen, J. H., Jensen, P. B., Pottegard, A., Munk-Olsen, T., et al. (2023). Psychotropic medication use and psychiatric disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic among Danish children, adolescents, and young adults. JAMA Psychiatry 80 (2), 176–180. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.4165
Bozzola, E., Ferrara, P., Spina, G., Villani, A., Roversi, M., Raponi, M., et al. (2022). The pandemic within the pandemic: The surge of neuropsychological disorders in Italian children during the COVID-19 era. Ital. J. Pediatr. 48 (1), 126. doi:10.1186/s13052-022-01324-4
Brodeur, A., Clark, A. E., Fleche, S., and Powdthavee, N. (2021). COVID-19, lockdowns and well-being: Evidence from google trends. J. Public Econ. 193, 104346. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104346
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., et al. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 395 (10227), 912–920. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
Castillo-Sánchez, G., Sacristan-Martin, O., Hernandez, M. A., Munoz, I., de la Torre, I., and Franco-Martin, M. (2022). Online mindfulness experience for emotional support to healthcare staff in times of covid-19. J. Med. Syst. 46 (3), 14. doi:10.1007/s10916-022-01799-y
de Vroege, L., and van den Broek, A. (2021). Substantial impact of COVID-19 on self-reported mental health of healthcare professionals in The Netherlands. Front. Public Health 9, 796591. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.796591
Dubey, S., Biswas, P., Ghosh, R., Chatterjee, S., Dubey, M. J., Chatterjee, S., et al. (2020). Psychosocial impact of COVID-19. Clin. Res. Rev. 14 (5), 779–788. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.035
Escalante Saavedra, P. A., Galato, D., de Souza Silva, C. M., Rodrigues da Silva, I. C., and da Silva, E. V. (2022). Dispensing of psychotropic drugs in the Brazilian capital city before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2018-2020). Front. Pharmacol. 13, 1028233. doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.1028233
Estrela, M., Silva, T. M., Gomes, E. R., Piñeiro, M., Figueiras, A., Roque, F., et al. (2022). Prescription of anxiolytics, sedatives, hypnotics and antidepressants in outpatient, universal care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal: A nationwide, interrupted time-series approach. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 76 (4), 335–340. doi:10.1136/jech-2021-216732
Ettman, C. K., Abdalla, S. M., Cohen, G. H., Sampson, L., Vivier, P. M., and Galea, S. (2020). Prevalence of depression symptoms in US adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw. Open 3 (9), e2019686. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19686
Farina, B., Massullo, C., De Rossi, E., Carbone, G. A., Serraino, R., and Imperatori, C. (2021). Psychotropic medications sales during COVID-19 outbreak in Italy changed according to the pandemic phases and related lockdowns. Public Health 201, 75–77. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2021.10.005
Garcia, L. P., and Sanchez, Z. M. (2020). Alcohol consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic: A necessary reflection for confronting the situation. Cad. Saude Publica 36 (10), e00124520. doi:10.1590/0102-311X00124520
Gloster, A. T., Lamnisos, D., Lubenko, J., Presti, G., Squatrito, V., Constantinou, M., et al. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health: An international study. Impact COVID-19 pandemic Ment. health Int. study 15 (12), e0244809. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244809
Holland, K. M., Jones, C., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Idaikkadar, N., Zwald, M., Hoots, B., et al. (2021). Trends in US emergency department visits for mental health, overdose, and violence outcomes before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Psychiatry 78 (4), 372–379. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4402
Levaillant, M., Wathelet, M., Lamer, A., Riquin, E., Gohier, B., and Hamel-Broza, J. F. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns on the consumption of anxiolytics, hypnotics and antidepressants according to age groups: A French nationwide study. Psychol. Med., 1–7. doi:10.1017/S0033291721004839
Madoz-Gúrpide, A., Leira-Sanmartin, M., Ibanez, A., and Ochoa-Mangado, E. (2021). Self-reported increase in alcohol and drugs intake as a coping strategy in hospital workers during COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study. Adicciones 0 (0), 1643. doi:10.20882/adicciones.1643
Mata, L., Pessalacia, J. D. R., Kuznier, T. P., Neto, P. K. d. S., Moura, C. d. C., and Santos, F. R. D. (2021). Daily lives of University students in the health area during the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil. Invest. Educ. Enferm. 39 (3), e07. doi:10.17533/udea.iee.v39n3e07
Meherali, S., Punjani, N., Louie-Poon, S., Abdul Rahim, K., Das, J. K., Salam, R. A., et al. (2021). Mental health of children and adolescents amidst COVID-19 and past pandemics: A rapid systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18 (7), 3432. doi:10.3390/ijerph18073432
Milani, S. A., Raji, M. A., Chen, L., and Kuo, Y. F. (2021). Trends in the use of benzodiazepines, Z-hypnotics, and serotonergic drugs among US women and men before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw. Open 4 (10), e2131012. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31012
Ministry, B. H. (2022). Covid data in Brazil. Available from https://covid.saude.gov.br/.
Prudenzi, A., Graham, C. D., Rogerson, O., and O'Connor, D. B. (2022). Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Exploring the role of psychological flexibility and stress-related variables. Psychol. Health, 1–24. doi:10.1080/08870446.2021.2020272
Sanchez, M. A., Fuchs, B., Tubert-Bitter, P., Mariet, A. S., Jollant, F., Mayet, A., et al. (2022). Trends in psychotropic drug consumption among French military personnel during the COVID-19 epidemic. BMC Med. 20 (1), 306. doi:10.1186/s12916-022-02497-9
Søvold, L. E., Naslund, J. A., Kousoulis, A. A., Saxena, S., Qoronfleh, M. W., Grobler, C., et al. (2021). Prioritizing the mental health and well-being of healthcare workers: An urgent global public health priority. Front. Public Health 9, 679397. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.679397
Testino, G., and Pellicano, R. (2020). Alcohol consumption in the COVID-19 era. Minerva Gastroenterol. Dietol. 66 (2), 90–92. doi:10.23736/S1121-421X.20.02698-7
Tiger, M., Wesselhoeft, R., Karlsson, P., Handal, M., Bliddal, M., Cesta, C. E., et al. (2023). Utilization of antidepressants, anxiolytics, and hypnotics during the COVID-19 pandemic in Scandinavia. J. Affect Disord. 323, 292–298. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.11.068
Vahratian, A., Blumberg, S. J., Terlizzi, E. P., and Schiller, J. S. (2021). Symptoms of anxiety or depressive disorder and use of mental health care among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic - United States, August 2020-february 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 70 (13), 490–494. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7013e2
Varga, T. V., Bu, F., Dissing, A. S., Elsenburg, L. K., Bustamante, J. J. H., Matta, J., et al. (2021). Loneliness, worries, anxiety, and precautionary behaviours in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal analysis of 200,000 western and northern Europeans. Lancet Reg. Health Eur. 2, 100020. doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2020.100020
Vindegaard, N., and Benros, M. E. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and mental health consequences: Systematic review of the current evidence. Brain Behav. Immun. 89, 531–542. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.048
Wathelet, M., Duhem, S., Vaiva, G., Baubet, T., Habran, E., Veerapa, E., et al. (2020). Factors associated with mental health disorders among university students in France confined during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw. Open 3 (10), e2025591. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25591
Keywords: psychotropics, antidepressants, COVID-19 pandemic, psycoactive substances, COVI-19 pandemic
Citation: Del Fiol FdS, Bergamaschi CdC, Lopes LC, Silva MT and Barberato-Filho S (2023) Sales trends of psychotropic drugs in the COVID-19 pandemic: A national database study in Brazil. Front. Pharmacol. 14:1131357. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1131357
Received: 24 December 2022; Accepted: 08 March 2023;
Published: 17 March 2023.
Edited by:
Limei Zhao, Soochow University, ChinaReviewed by:
Bhupinder Kumar, Indo-Soviet Friendship College of Pharmacy, IndiaMarco Roversi, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy
Copyright © 2023 Del Fiol, Bergamaschi, Lopes, Silva and Barberato-Filho. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Fernando de Sá Del Fiol, ZmVybmFuZG8uZmlvbEBwcm9mLnVuaXNvLmJy