Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol., 21 March 2022
Sec. Predictive Toxicology

Transcriptome Changes and Potential Immunotoxicity Analysis in RAW264.7 Macrophages Caused by Bisphenol F

Huiling Chen&#x;Huiling Chen1Yanchao Zhang&#x;Yanchao Zhang1Xing LiXing Li1Wei ZhangWei Zhang1Haoqi HeHaoqi He1Bohai DuBohai Du1Tianlan LiTianlan Li1Huanwen TangHuanwen Tang1Yungang LiuYungang Liu2Li Li
Li Li1*Ming Shi,
Ming Shi1,3*
  • 1Dongguan Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine, School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China
  • 2Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
  • 3Dongguan Liaobu Hospital, Dongguan, China

As a viable substitute for bisphenol A (BPA), BPF has been widely used in the plastic industry and daily consumer goods, resulting in its detection in humans at a comparable concentration. Evidence reveals that BPF and BPA may have similar toxic effects due to their similar structures. However, there is less information about BPF and its latent implications on the immune system, which is associated with many disorders. In this study, the in vitro toxicity of BPF on RAW264.7 macrophages was explored. The cells were treated with different concentrations of BPF (5, 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 μM), the cell viability and apoptosis were detected, the gene expression profile was analyzed by whole-transcriptome sequencing, and the mRNA levels were detected by qRT-PCR. The results showed a high concentration of BPF could significantly reduce the survival rate of RAW264.7 macrophages. Although the medium concentration (20–50 μM) of BPF seemed to have no impact on the cell activity of macrophages, it caused the occurrence of apoptosis. The results of differential transcription showed that compared with the control group, 121 genes were upregulated and 82 genes were downregulated in the BPF group. The significantly changed gene functions were mainly concentrated in cell cycle, phagosome, lysosome, and antigen processing and presentation. These findings provide valuable information for correctly understanding the immunotoxicity risk of BPF and may help to improve the hazard identification of bisphenol compounds.

1 Introduction

Bisphenol F (BPF, 4,4′- dihydroxy diphenyl-methane), as a viable substitute for bisphenol A (BPA), has been widely used in the manufacture of plastics, epoxy resins, adhesives, water pipes, and food contact materials (Wang et al., 2014). As the output and consumption of BPF increase year by year, it is widely detected in natural water, sediment, sludge, and indoor dust, resulting in a significant increase in the human exposure risk (Zhang et al., 2019). The environmental contamination of BPF could enter into the human body through diet, drinking water, or dermal contact and has been detected in biological samples such as urine, blood, breast milk, and maternal and cord plasma (Niu et al., 2017; Kolatorova et al., 2018; Lehmler et al., 2018; Rocha et al., 2018). It was reported that the concentration of BPF in the human plasma was three times higher than that of BPA (Andra et al., 2015). With the in-depth study of BPF, the adverse effects of BPF, including mutagenicity, genotoxicity, endocrine disorder, developmental toxicity, and immunotoxicity, have attracted people’s attention (Chen et al., 2016; Pelch et al., 2019).

As it is well-known, the immune system is the barrier and the guard of a host body, and macrophages play an important role in both innate and adaptive immunity. Macrophages participate in every stage of the acute immune response, as well as the regulation of tissue homeostasis and the coordination of the tissue repair process (Jain et al., 2019). If the function of macrophages is disturbed, it may lead to diseases, such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, metabolic diseases, and cancer (Odegaard and Chawla, 2011; Okabe and Medzhitov, 2016; Ritz et al., 2018; Van den Bossche and Saraber, 2018). Kim et al. found that tetramethyl BPF could activate osteoclast differentiation by activating the MAPK signaling pathway and JNK and p38 in RAW264.7 cells, which had a negative impact on bone remodeling and the stability of the bone environment (Kim et al., 2021). At present, the immunotoxicity of BPA has been confirmed by in vivo and in vitro experiments (Youn et al., 2002; Rogers et al., 2013). In view of the structural similarity between BPF and BPA, it is reasonable to speculate that BPF may have similar effects on the immune system under environmental or occupational exposure. Qiu et al. found that BPF had its immunotoxicity similar to BPA during the development of zebrafish embryos and larvae, which may pose a risk to the ecosystem and human health (Qiu et al., 2018). Nevertheless, studies on the immunotoxicity of BPF are limited.

RAW264.7 is a type of macrophage derived from murine, which has been widely used to be a good in vitro model to evaluate the immunotoxicity of compounds or pollutants (Makene and Pool, 2015; Ye et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2017). RNA deep sequencing (RNA-seq) is the newly developed high-throughput gene expression quantitative technology, which is utilized to analyze the genome-wide gene expression. RNA-seq can help us to generate an unprecedented global view of the transcriptome and its organization for many species and cell types (Wang et al., 2009). In this study, to investigate the effect of BPF on the RAW264.7 macrophages, cell viability and apoptosis were explored; whole transcriptome sequencing was used to obtain the information on the genome-wide expression changes induced by BPF. The mRNA levels of genes with a significant difference in the cell cycle, phagosome, lysosome, and antigen processing and presentation pathway were detected by qRT-PCR. It is hoped that our research could provide effective information for the potential immunotoxicity of BPF to macrophages.

2 Materials and Methods

2.1 Cell Culture

The BALB/c-derived RAW264.7 macrophages were a generous gift from Professor Chong Yan (Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China). RAW264.7 macrophages were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Bovogen, New Zealand) and incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cells were seeded in a 6-well plate at a density of 5.0 × 105 cells/well and incubated overnight. Then, cells were harvested after 24 h treatment with different concentrations of BPF (CAS No. 620-92-8, purity 98%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) or BPA (CAS No.80-05-7, purity 97%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States), which was dissolved in 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States). Untreated cells (0 μM BPF) were exposed to 0.1% DMSO.

2.2 Cell Viability

The cell viability of RAW264.7 macrophages treated with BPF (or BPA) was determined by CCK-8 (Cell Counting Kit-8) (CCK-8, Dojindo Laboratories, Japan). Briefly, RAW264.7 macrophages were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 1.0 × 104 cells per well. After incubation for 24 h, 0, 1, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, or 200 μM BPF (or BPA) in DMEM medium was added to 96-well plates and incubated for another 24 h. Then, the CCK-8 solution (10 μl) was added to each well and subsequently cultured for 3 h at 37°C. The absorbance at 450 nm was read by using a microplate reader (ELx808, BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, United States). The cell viability was calculated by the absorbance ratio of the sample well to the control well and expressed as a percentage, assigning the cell viability of the control well as 100%.

2.3 LDH Releasing Assay

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity released in the culture media was measured by the CytoTox 96® non-radioactive cytotoxicity assay (Promega corporation, Wis, United States), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Absorbance at 490 nm was recorded using a microplate reader. LDH release % = (Experimental LDH Release (OD490)/Maximum LDH Release (OD490)) × 100.

2.4 Apoptosis Assay

Apoptosis assay was measured with an Annexin V-FITC/PI Apoptosis Detection Kit (KeyGen Biotech, Nanjing, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, the RAW264.7 macrophages (5 × 105 cell/well) were seeded in a 6-well plate and exposed to BPF at different concentrations. After 24 h treatment, the cells and cell culture medium were collected and centrifuged at 1,000 g for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the cells were suspended with Annexin V-FITC binding buffer and stained with 5 µl Annexin V-FITC and 5 µl PI for 15 min at room temperature. The apoptosis of RAW264.7 macrophages was detected by flow cytometry (FACScantoII System, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, United States). All the experiments were conducted in triplicates.

2.5 RNA Isolation, cDNA Library Construction, and Sequencing

RAW264.7 macrophages (5 × 105 cell/well) were cultured in 6-well plates and exposed to 20 μM BPF for 24 h. Then, the supernatant was removed, and the cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS buffer solution. The total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Life technologies, NY, United States), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, United States) was used to assess the RNA integrity. Samples were sent to Shanghai Jikai Gene Technology Co., Ltd. for whole-transcriptome sequencing analysis. Briefly, a total amount of 1 µg RNA per sample was used as input material for the RNA sample preparations. Sequencing libraries were generated using the NEBNext® UltraTM RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, Beijing, China), and index codes were added to attribute sequences to each sample. The clustering of the index-coded samples was performed on a cBot cluster generation system using the TruSeq PE Cluster Kit v3-cBot-HS (Illumina), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After cluster generation, the library preparations were sequenced on an Illumina Novaseq platform, and 150-bp paired-end reads were generated.

2.6 Bioinformatics Analysis of Sequencing Results

RNA-seq experiments were performed using the Illumina Novaseq platform. Raw data (raw reads) of fastq format were first processed through in-house perl scripts to obtain clean data (clean reads) by removing reads containing adapter, reads containing ploy-N, and low-quality reads from raw data. The processed reads were mapped to the reference using HISAT2. The mapped reads of each sample were assembled by StringTie (Pertea et al., 2015), and then, FPKM of each gene was calculated based on the length of the gene and read counts mapped to this gene. FPKM, the expected number of fragments per kilobase of transcript sequence per million’s base pairs sequenced, considers the effect of the sequencing depth and gene length for the read counts at the same time, and it is currently the most used method for estimating gene expression levels. Differential expression analysis of two conditions was performed using the edgeR R package. The p values were adjusted using the Benjamini & Hochberg method. A corrected p-value of 0.05 and |log2 (fold change)| of 0.26 were set as the threshold for significantly differential expressions. The gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes was implemented by the cluster Profiler R package. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database was used to identify significant pathways of RAW264.7 macrophages altered by BPF. We used the cluster Profiler R package to test the statistical enrichment of differential expression genes in KEGG pathways.

2.7 qRT-PCR

The total RNA of RAW264.7 macrophages was extracted with TRIzol reagent, and then, cDNAs were synthesized by using the reverse transcription kit (Takara Bio, Japan), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The TB Green Real-time PCR kit (Takara Bio, Japan) was used and detected by PikoReal 96 fluorescence quantitative PCR. qRT-PCR amplification was carried out under the following conditions for 40 cycles: 95°C for 30 s, 95°C for 15 s, and 60°C for 30 s. The primers of H2-T23, Sec61a1, Sec61b, Sec61g, Eea1, Hspa5, Psme2b, Psme2, Canx, Gusb, Hexb, Atp6v0a1, Hyal1, Idua, Mdm2, Cdk1, Cdc20, Bub1b, Dbf4, Atp6v0d2, Snp23, Vamp7, Vps34, Rab7, and β-actin were synthesized by Shanghai Generay Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), which are listed in Table 1. The relative quantity of mRNA was calculated using the standard 2−ΔΔCT method with β-actin serving as an internal standard.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Primer sequences used for qRT- PCR.

2.8 Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed by GraphPad Prism version 8.0.2. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan’s multiple range tests was performed for each response variable. Significance was determined at p < 0.05.

3 Results

3.1 Cytotoxicity of BPF

The cytotoxicity of BPF on RAW264.7 macrophages was measured by CCK-8 and LDH releasing assay after 24 h treatment. The result of the CCK-8 assay showed that when the concentration of BPF was lower than 100 μM, the viability of macrophages was not significantly affected (p > 0.05). When the BPF concentration was 100 and 200 μM, it could significantly inhibit the viability of macrophages. The inhibition rate on cell viability of 200 μM BPF was close to 50% compared to the control group (Figure 1A). Under normal conditions, LDH exists in the cytoplasm. When the integrity of the phospholipid bilayer structure of the cell membrane is destroyed, LDH will leak into the culture medium through the incomplete cell membrane. Hence, the degree of cell damage can be reflected by detecting the LDH activity in the cell culture supernatant. The result of LDH releasing assay presented that BPF significantly promoted the release rate of LDH at the concentration of 100 and 200 μM (Figure 1B), which was consistent with the result of CCK-8 assay. The aforementioned results showed that there was no obvious cytotoxicity of BPF on RAW264.7 macrophages when the concentration was lower than 100 μM, but high concentrations of BPF could significantly reduce the survival rate of RAW264.7 macrophages. Furthermore, the cytotoxicity of BPA was detected by CCK-8 and LDH assays (Supplementary Figures S1A,B). It is proved that the cytotoxicity of BPF is lower than that of BPA on RAW 264.7 macrophages.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Cytotoxicity induced by BPF on RAW264.7 macrophages: (A) CCK-8 assay. (B) LDH release assay (n = 5). After calculation, the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of BPF was 248.60 μM. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 are compared with the control group (0 μM).

3.2 The Effect of BPF on RAW264.7 Macrophage Apoptosis

In this study, flow cytometric measurement (Annexin V/FITC and PI double staining) was used to quantify the extent of apoptosis of RAW264.7 macrophages after BPF exposure. In normal cells, phosphatidylserine (PS) is located on the inner side of the lipid bilayer of the cell membrane, and the cell membrane is intact. When cells undergo early apoptosis, the cell membrane remains intact, while PS everts to the side of the cell membrane and binds with annexin V-FITC with high affinity to emit green fluorescence. In the late stage of apoptosis, the cell membrane structure is damaged. Propidium iodide (PI) enters the cell through the damaged cell membrane, and the cells emit red fluorescence and green fluorescence at the same time. The proportion of cells with early apoptosis and late apoptosis was analyzed by detecting the signals of annexin V-FITC (green fluorescence) and PI (red fluorescence) simultaneously. The total apoptosis rate is the sum of the early apoptosis rate and late apoptosis rate. It was found that the BPF exposure for 24 h triggered macrophage apoptosis in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 2A). BPF concentrations at 20, 50, 100, and 200 μM induced approximately 7.40, 21.69, 23.66, and 36.16% total apoptosis rate (Figure 2B) and 4.52, 7.36, 8.70, and 13.03% late apoptosis rate, respectively (p < 0.05) (Figure 2D). Moreover, treatment with 50, 100, and 200 μM BPF induced approximately 14.33, 14.97, and 23.13% early apoptosis rate, respectively (p < 0.001) (Figure 2C). These results showed that the apoptosis events of RAW264.7 macrophages treated with non-cytotoxic doses (20–50 μM) of BPF observed in CCK-8 assay were significantly increased. It suggested that although the medium dose of BPF exposure seemed to have no impact on the cell activity of macrophages, it caused the occurrence of apoptosis.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Apoptosis induced by BPF on RAW264.7 macrophages. (A) Flow cytometry was used to analyze the cell apoptosis status of RAW264.7 (n = 3). (B) The total apoptosis rates. (C) The early apoptosis rates. (D) The late apoptosis rates. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 are compared with the control group (0 μM).

3.3 Global Analysis of Gene Expressions by RNA-Seq

RNA-seq was applied to identify gene expression changes induced by BPF treatment in RAW264.7 macrophages. The heat map (Figure 3A) showed the expression amount of differentially expressed genes between the BPF group and control group. The genes with high expression (red) and low expression (green) were distributed in the opposite direction, indicating that BPF treatment induced significant differences in the gene expression. The volcano map (Figure 3B) revealed that there were 203 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the BPF group and control group. Of these genes, 121 genes were upregulated, and 82 genes were downregulated by BPF. The Venn diagram (Figure 3C) could show the overlap of different genes between the BPF group and control group. There were 11,750 genes expressed both in the control group and BPF group, and 194 genes were expressed only in the BPF group.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. Differential expression patterns of mRNAs between control and BPF-exposed RAW264.7 macrophages. (A) The cluster heat map. (B) The volcano map of all the sequenced genes from the samples (p < 0.05 and |log2 (fold change)| > 0.26). (C) Venn diagram of co-expressed genes between control and BPF-exposed RAW264.7 macrophages.

3.4 Functional Enrichment Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes

To understand the implications of these differentially expressed genes and clarify the potential regulatory mechanisms on BPF-treated RAW264.7 macrophages, functional enrichment analysis based on the GO annotation category and KEGG pathway category was performed. The GO annotation category is a comprehensive database describing the gene function, which can be divided into the biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), and molecular function (MF). The adjusted p value less than 0.05 was taken as the threshold value for significant enrichment of GO function, and the most significant 30 terms were shown in the histogram. In this study, the upregulated genes after BPF treatment were enriched in mitosis, cell cycle, chromosome segregation, and so on. However, the downregulated genes were enriched in the immune response and ATPase activity (Figures 4A,B; Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). KEGG is a database resource to understand the advanced functions and utility of biological systems (such as cells, organism, and ecosystems) by using molecular level information such as large-scale molecular data sets generated by genome sequencing and other high-throughput experimental technologies. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis takes the adjusted p value < 0.05 as the threshold of significant enrichment. When RAW264.7 macrophages were treated with BPF for 24 h, the most significant 20 terms of the KEGG pathway were shown in the bubble charts (Figures 4C,D). The upregulated genes were enriched in protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum, protein export, cell cycle, and so on. However, the downregulated genes were enriched in lysosome, glycosaminoglycan degradation, rheumatoid arthritis, and so on.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs based on the GO annotation category and KEGG pathway category. GO enrichment analysis histogram. X-axis: the serial number of GO Term (see Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 for function description corresponding to GO enrichment analysis); Y-axis: the significant difference of GO enrichment between the control group and BPF treatment group (−log10 p value). (A) GO enrichment analysis histogram of upregulated DEGs. (B) GO enrichment analysis histogram of downregulated DEGs. (C) KEGG bubble charts of upregulated DEGs (C) and downregulated DEGs (D). The size of dots represents the number of genes annotated to GO enrichment or the KEGG pathway, and the color from red to purple represents the significance of enrichment.

3.5 Effect of BPF on Immune Function-Related Pathways

In KEGG enrichment analysis, the following terms were significantly enriched in our gene list: protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum (mmu04141), lysosome (mmu04142), phagosome (mmu04145), cell cycle (mmu04110), antigen processing and presentation (mmu04612), N-Glycan biosynthesis (mmu00510), protein export (mmu03060), and glycosaminoglycan degradation (mmu00531), which are exhibited in Table 2. The upregulated and downregulated DEGs in the top eight most significant results of KEGG enrichment are shown in Table 3. Terms including lysosome (mmu04142), phagosome (mmu04145), and antigen processing and presentation (mmu04612) provided clues that BPF may have effect on immune function of RAW264.7 macrophages.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 2. Significant KEGG pathways from differentially expressed genes.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 3. Upregulated and downregulated DEGs in the top eight most significant results of KEGG enrichment.

3.6 Effects of BPF on the Cell Cycle, Phagosome, Lysosome, and Antigen Processing and Presentation Pathway

As shown in Figure 5, the influence of BPF on the cell cycle, phagosome, lysosome, and antigen processing and presentation pathway was depicted by using the path view package in R software according to the results from cluster analyses (Figures 5A–D), and the FPKM relative expressions of the top five genes with significant differences in these four pathways are represented by a histogram. BPF upregulated the expressions of Mam2, Cdk1, Cdc20, Bub1b, and Dbf4 of the cell cycle pathway (Figure 5E), upregulated the expressions of Sec61a1, Sec61b, Sec61g, and Eea1, and downregulated H2-T23 in the phagosome pathway (Figure 5F). At the same time, BPF downregulated the expressions of Gusb, Hexb, Atp6v0a1, Hyal1, and Idua of the lysosome pathway (Figure 5G). In the antigen processing and presentation pathway, the expressions of Hspa5 and Psme2 were upregulated, and the expressions of Psme2b and H2-T23 were downregulated (Figure 5H).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 5. Results of the effects of BPF on the cell cycle, phagosome, lysosome, and antigen processing and presentation pathway. (A–D) Schematic diagram of the KEGG signaling pathway of cell cycle, phagosome, lysosome, and antigen processing and presentation pathway induced by BPF, respectively. Red and green symbols represent upregulated and downregulated gene expressions. (E–H) FPKM/relative expression levels of the top five genes with significant difference in the aforementioned KEGG signaling pathway. (I–L) The mRNA levels of the top five genes in the aforementioned KEGG signaling pathway re-confirmed by qRT-PCR. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 are compared with the control group (0 μM).

The top five genes with significant differences in these four pathways were re-confirmed by qRT-PCR. The results showed that BPF upregulated the expressions of Mam2 and Cdc20, downregulated those of Cdk1, Bub1b, and Dbf4 of the cell cycle pathway (Figure 5I), upregulated the expressions of Sec61a1, Sec61b, Sec61g, and Eea1, and downregulated H2-T23 in the phagosome pathway (Figure 5J). In addition, BPF downregulated the expressions of Hexb, Hyal1, and Idua and upregulated the expression of Gusb in the lysosome pathway (Figure 5K). In the antigen processing and presentation pathway, the expression of Hspa5 was upregulated, and the expressions of Psme2, H2-T23, and Canx were downregulated (Figure 5L). Although the expression of a few genes differed from the results of RNA-seq, these results still suggested that BPF could affect the cell cycle, phagocytosis, and antigen processing and presentation of macrophages.

The fusion of phagosome and lysosome is the main driving factor of phagosome maturation and is targeted by several adaptive intracellular pathogens. The damage of this process will have a significant impact on microbial infection, tissue inflammation, adaptive immunity, and diseases. Given the importance of phagosome-lysosome fusion to phagocyte function, the genes related to the phagosome-lysosome fusion (Atp6v0d2, Snap23, Rab7, Vps34, and Vamp7) were selected and detected by qRT-PCR. The expressions of Atp6v0d2, Vamp7, and Vsp34 were significantly downregulated, while that of Snap23 was upregulated by BPF (Supplementary Figure S2). It suggested that BPF may affect the phagosome-lysosome fusion of RAW264.7 macrophages.

4 Discussion

Although the immunotoxicity of environmental pollutants has drawn much attention, there are few studies on the effect of BPF on the immune system. Švajger et al. reported that 50 μM of BPF and BPA significantly decreased the endocytotic capacity of immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells (iMDDCs) (Švajger et al., 2016). It suggested BPF and BPA may have similar immunotoxicity mechanisms. Yann et al. reported that BPF and BPA significantly increased IL-17 production in mouse T cells but not in human T lymphocytes at low and environmentally relevant concentrations. However, BPF, not BPA, could increase IL-17 secretion in mouse naive T cells undergoing Th17 differentiation in vitro (Malaisé et al., 2020a). In addition, Yann et al. reported that pregnant C3H/HeN mice exposed to 5 or 50 mg/kg body weight of BPA, or BPF daily from gestation day 15 to weaning, exhibited altered immune profiles. Only exposure to the high dose of BPA decreased IgA levels in the feces of the adult offspring (Malaisé et al., 2020b). These studies suggest that the immunotoxicity mechanisms of BPF and BPA are not identical. In our previous study, we found BPF induced M1 polarization and promoted the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines of RAW264.7 macrophages, which suggested that BPF enable affecting the immune function of macrophages (Shi et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021). The potential molecular mechanisms underlying these effects of BPF remain largely obscure. It is urgent to understand the potential mechanisms of BPF. Nowadays, transcriptomics analysis is widely considered as a novel and valuable strategy to conduct mechanistic studies (Tasic et al., 2016; Lee and Park, 2019). In this study, we found that high doses (100 and 200 μM) of BPF exposure significantly reduced the cell viability, and BPF induced the apoptosis at 20 μM and higher concentrations. On this basis, RNA-sequencing of RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 20 μM BPF was performed, and it was noticed that BPF has a significant effect on the cell cycle and immune-related functions such as lysosome transport and catabolism, phagosome transport and catabolism, and antigen processing and presentation.

Under the homeostatic physiological conditions, macrophages are a ubiquitous cellular component present in all tissues and body compartments (Ginhoux and Guilliams, 2016). Macrophages are highly plastic in the innate immune system and play an important role in resisting microorganisms and a variety of diseases. In addition, macrophages have many non-immunological effects during development, such as functions in morphogenesis of other tissues (neurons and bone), angiogenesis, and adipogenesis (Pollard, 2009). However, the death of macrophages, especially apoptosis, could aggravate the progress of certain diseases, such as viral infection, tuberculosis, atherosclerotic plaque formation, inflammation, and sepsis (Robinson et al., 2019). Exposure to environmental pollutants may induce apoptosis of macrophages. In the present study, only exposure to higher concentrations of BPF (100–200 μM) significantly reduced the cell viability but BPF could induce apoptosis of RAW264.7 macrophages at the non-cytotoxic concentrations (20–50 μM). This indicated that a certain BPF exposure seemed to have no impact on macrophage viability but caused the occurrence of apoptosis. These results suggested that exposure to BPF may increase the risk of diseases by inducing apoptosis and cell death of macrophages.

As lower concentrations of BPF could induce the late apoptosis while having no effect on the cell viability in RAW264.7 macrophages, 20 μM of BPF was selected for RNA-seq. From mRNA transcriptome sequencing results, 203 DEGs were obtained after BPF treatment, suggesting that BPF exposure induced adverse biological effects on RAW264.7 macrophages. GO enrichment analysis of all DEGs suggested that the cell division processes and immune response of the RAW264.7 macrophages were significantly disturbed by BPF treatment. In KEGG enrichment analysis, the cell cycle pathway and the immune-related pathways including phagosome, lysosome, and antigen processing and presentation pathway were significantly regulated. The aforementioned results suggested that the immune system of RAW264.7 macrophages was also severely affected after exposure to BPF.

The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) and cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) are two of many important cell cycle regulators. They control the cell cycle through ubiquitination and phosphorylation, respectively. APC/C performs spatiotemporal regulation through a variety of mechanisms, including phosphorylation, the interaction of structurally related co-activators Cdc20 and Cdh1, loading different E2 ubiquitin-binding enzymes, binding to inhibitors, and different affinities to various substrates (Yamano, 2019). In this study, the results of KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the expressions of Cdk1 and Cdc20 in RAW264.7 macrophages were upregulated after exposure to BPF for 24 h. Mdm2-encoded protein can promote tumor formation by targeting tumor suppressor proteins, such as p53, for proteasomal degradation. Meanwhile, the gene of Bub1b was the essential component of the mitotic checkpoint, which may play a role for tumor suppression. We found the expression of Mdm2 was upregulated, and the expression of Bub1b was downregulated after treatment with BPF for 24 h by qRT-PCR. These results suggested that BPF may lead to the disorder of the macrophage cell cycle.

Phagocytosis, a symbol in host defense, is the fundamental process of macrophages to ingest and eliminate pathogens, which requires dynamic changes in plasma membrane fusion and fission. Formation of phagosomes is the key to phagocytosis. We found that the genes of Sec61a1, Sec61b, Sec61g, and Eea1 were influenced with BPF treatment in RAW264.7 macrophages, which were involved in the formation of phagosomes. Lysosomes are one of kingpins in macrophages. When tissues are infected, macrophages phagocytize and internalize the pathogen into phagosomes and then fuse with lysosomes to obtain an acidic environment that kills and degrades the closed microorganisms (Fairn and Grinstein, 2012; Levin et al., 2016; Pauwels et al., 2017). More than 60 lysosomal hydrolases have been identified to decompose proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, and carbohydrates (Appelqvist et al., 2013; Xu and Ren, 2015). In this study, BPF influenced the expressions of Gusb, Hexb, and Idua that encode lysosomal hydrolases in RAW264.7 macrophages, which suggested that BPF may affect the production of lysosome hydrolases. The activities of lysosomal hydrolases require an acidic environment, which is achieved by the proton pump activity of V-ATPase. Atp6v0d2, together with Atp6v1d and Atp6v1f, forms a central stalk of the V-ATPase. Cotter, K et al. identified a non-redundant role for Atp6v0d2 in the formation of the autolysosome that enables efficient clearing of damaged organelles and ingested bacteria, which in turn limits inflammation (Cotter et al., 2015). Another key process by which macrophages play phagocytosis is the fusion of phagolysosomes. In eukaryotic cells, biological membrane fusion is generally executed by fusogenic-soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor (NSF) attachment protein (SNAP) receptors (SNAREs) (Chen and Scheller, 2001). Snap23 and vesicle-associated membrane protein 7 (Vamp7) are ubiquitously expressed SNARE proteins that regulate phagosome formation and maturation in macrophages (Sakurai et al., 2012; Aksoy et al., 2018). The earlier studies showed that inhibition of Vps34 (class III PI3Ks) in macrophages leads to the phagolysosome fusion defect, which hinders phagocytes from acquiring late endosomal/lysosomal products (Vieira et al., 2001). Rab7, a small GTPase, is momentous for the fusion between late-stage phagosomes and lysosomes, which will affect phagocytes to remove pathogens and apoptotic cells (Via et al., 1997; Harrison et al., 2003). Our data showed that Atp6v0d2, Vamp7, and Vsp34 were significantly downregulated while Snap23 was upregulated by BPF. These results suggested that BPF may affect the phagosome-lysosome fusion of RAW264.7 macrophages.

Antigen processing and presentation is another major immune function of macrophages. Macrophages recognize foreign antigens in class I and II major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs) and present them to T cells, which recognize MHC-antigen complexes through their T-cell receptors (Guerriero, 2019). It is well known that CD8+ T cells usually recognize peptides on MHC I molecules, while CD4+ T cells recognize peptides (swallowed by APC and digested into antigen peptides in phagocytosis/lysosome) on MHC II molecules (Inaba and Inaba, 2005). The genes of Hspa5, Psme2, H2-T23, and Canx were important for MHC I antigen processing and presentation. In this study, the expression of Hspa5 was upregulated, and those of Psme2, H2-T23, and Canx were downregulated by BPF. These suggested that BPF might affect antigen processing and presentation in macrophages.

5 Conclusion

In total, we found that a higher dose (100 and 200 μM) of BPF exposure significantly altered the cell viability and induced apoptosis at 20 μM and higher concentrations on RAW264.7 macrophages. Furthermore, this study unveiled the potential immunotoxicity of BPF on macrophages from a transcriptomics perspective. In this current study, 121 upregulated genes and 82 downregulated genes were identified. GO and KEGG pathway analysis demonstrated that these differentially expressed genes were mainly clustered in cell division processes and immune-related biological processes. Moreover, we verified the sequencing results by qRT-PCR. The results were basically consistent with the sequencing results, indicating that BPF has potential immunotoxic effects on macrophages. Collectively, our data indicate that BPF may exert harmful effects via regulation of these functional pathways and related biological processes. Nevertheless, further studies are still needed to verify whether these differentially expressed genes have a regulatory function on BPF-induced macrophage immunotoxicity.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra; SRR17509627, SRR17509626, SRR17509625, SRR17509624, SRR17509623, and SRR17509622.

Author Contributions

MS: conceptualization, writing-reviewing and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, and supervision. LL: conceptualization, writing-reviewing and editing, and funding acquisition. HC: project administration, methodology, validation, writing-original draft, data curation, and visualization. YZ: project administration, software, formal analysis, validation, and investigation. WZ: investigation and validation. XL: investigation, methodology, and validation. HT: project administration and writing-reviewing and editing. YL: project administration and writing-reviewing and editing. TL: methodology, investigation, and methodology. HH: methodology, investigation, and methodology (query). BD: methodology, investigation, and methodology.

Funding

This study was funded by the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2020A1515010521 and 2018A030307009), the Funds for PHD researchers of Guangdong Medical University in 2021 (4SG21275G), and the Discipline Construction Project of Guangdong Medical University (4SG21003G).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2022.846562/full#supplementary-material

References

Aksoy, E., Saveanu, L., and Manoury, B. (2018). The Isoform Selective Roles of PI3Ks in Dendritic Cell Biology and Function. Front. Immunol. 9, 2574. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.02574

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Andra, S. S., Charisiadis, P., Arora, M., van Vliet-Ostaptchouk, J. V., and Makris, K. C. (2015). Biomonitoring of Human Exposures to Chlorinated Derivatives and Structural Analogs of Bisphenol A. Environ. Int. 85, 352–379. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Appelqvist, H., Wäster, P., Kågedal, K., and Öllinger, K. (2013). The Lysosome: from Waste Bag to Potential Therapeutic Target. J. Mol. Cel Biol 5 (4), 214–226. doi:10.1093/jmcb/mjt022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, D., Kannan, K., Tan, H., Zheng, Z., Feng, Y. L., Wu, Y., et al. (2016). Bisphenol Analogues Other Than BPA: Environmental Occurrence, Human Exposure, and Toxicity-A Review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (11), 5438–5453. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b05387

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y. A., and Scheller, R. H. (2001). SNARE-mediated Membrane Fusion. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cel Biol 2 (2), 98–106. doi:10.1038/35052017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cotter, K., Stransky, L., McGuire, C., and Forgac, M. (2015). Recent Insights into the Structure, Regulation, and Function of the V-ATPases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 40 (10), 611–622. doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2015.08.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fairn, G. D., and Grinstein, S. (2012). How Nascent Phagosomes Mature to Become Phagolysosomes. Trends Immunol. 33 (8), 397–405. doi:10.1016/j.it.2012.03.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ginhoux, F., and Guilliams, M. (2016). Tissue-Resident Macrophage Ontogeny and Homeostasis. Immunity 44 (3), 439–449. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guerriero, J. L. (2019). Macrophages: Their Untold Story in T Cell Activation and Function. Int. Rev. Cel Mol Biol 342, 73–93. doi:10.1016/bs.ircmb.2018.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harrison, R. E., Bucci, C., Vieira, O. V., Schroer, T. A., and Grinstein, S. (2003). Phagosomes Fuse with Late Endosomes And/or Lysosomes by Extension of Membrane Protrusions along Microtubules: Role of Rab7 and RILP. Mol. Cel Biol 23 (18), 6494–6506. doi:10.1128/mcb.23.18.6494-6506.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Inaba, K., and Inaba, M. (2005). Antigen Recognition and Presentation by Dendritic Cells. Int. J. Hematol. 81 (3), 181–187. doi:10.1532/ijh97.04200

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jain, N., Moeller, J., and Vogel, V. (2019). Mechanobiology of Macrophages: How Physical Factors Coregulate Macrophage Plasticity and Phagocytosis. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 21 (1), 267–297. doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-121224

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, H.-M., Lee, S.-M., Choi, J., Soung, N.-K., and Heo, J.-D. (2021). Effects of Bisphenol A and its Alternatives, Bisphenol F and Tetramethyl Bisphenol F on Osteoclast Differentiation. Molecules 26, 6100. doi:10.3390/molecules26206100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kolatorova, L., Vitku, J., Hampl, R., Adamcova, K., Skodova, T., Simkova, M., et al. (2018). Exposure to Bisphenols and Parabens during Pregnancy and Relations to Steroid Changes. Environ. Res. 163, 115–122. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, H. S., and Park, Y. (2019). Identification of Metabolic Pathways Related to the Bisphenol A-Induced Adipogenesis in Differentiated Murine Adipocytes by Using RNA-Sequencing. Environ. Res. 171, 161–169. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lehmler, H. J., Liu, B., Gadogbe, M., and Bao, W. (2018). Exposure to Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F, and Bisphenol S in U.S. Adults and Children: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013-2014. ACS Omega 3 (6), 6523–6532. doi:10.1021/acsomega.8b00824

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Levin, R., Grinstein, S., and Canton, J. (2016). The Life Cycle of Phagosomes: Formation, Maturation, and Resolution. Immunol. Rev. 273 (1), 156–179. doi:10.1111/imr.12439

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Makene, V. W., and Pool, E. J. (2015). The Assessment of Inflammatory Activity and Toxicity of Treated Sewage Using RAW264.7 Cells. Water Environ. J. 29 (3), 353–359. doi:10.1111/wej.12127

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malaisé, Y., Le Mentec, H., Sparfel, L., and Guzylack-Piriou, L. (2020a). Differential Influences of the BPA, BPS and BPF on In Vitro IL-17 Secretion by Mouse and Human T Cells. Toxicol. Vitro 69, 104993. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104993

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malaisé, Y., Lencina, C., Cartier, C., Olier, M., Ménard, S., and Guzylack-Piriou, L. (2020b). Perinatal Oral Exposure to Low Doses of Bisphenol A, S or F Impairs Immune Functions at Intestinal and Systemic Levels in Female Offspring Mice. Environ. Health 19 (1), 93. doi:10.1186/s12940-020-00614-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Niu, Y., Wang, B., Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., and Shao, B. (2017). Highly Sensitive and High-Throughput Method for the Analysis of Bisphenol Analogues and Their Halogenated Derivatives in Breast Milk. J. Agric. Food Chem. 65 (48), 10452–10463. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04394

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Odegaard, J. I., and Chawla, A. (2011). Alternative Macrophage Activation and Metabolism. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 6 (1), 275–297. doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-011110-130138

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Okabe, Y., and Medzhitov, R. (2016). Tissue Biology Perspective on Macrophages. Nat. Immunol. 17 (1), 9–17. doi:10.1038/ni.3320

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pauwels, A. M., Trost, M., Beyaert, R., and Hoffmann, E. (2017). Patterns, Receptors, and Signals: Regulation of Phagosome Maturation. Trends Immunol. 38 (6), 407–422. doi:10.1016/j.it.2017.03.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pelch, K., Wignall, J. A., Goldstone, A. E., Ross, P. K., Blain, R. B., Shapiro, A. J., et al. (2019). A Scoping Review of the Health and Toxicological Activity of Bisphenol A (BPA) Structural Analogues and Functional Alternatives. Toxicology 424, 152235. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2019.06.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pertea, M., Pertea, G. M., Antonescu, C. M., Chang, T. C., Mendell, J. T., and Salzberg, S. L. (2015). StringTie Enables Improved Reconstruction of a Transcriptome from RNA-Seq Reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 33 (3), 290–295. doi:10.1038/nbt.3122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pollard, J. W. (2009). Trophic Macrophages in Development and Disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9 (4), 259–270. doi:10.1038/nri2528

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qiu, W., Shao, H., Lei, P., Zheng, C., Qiu, C., Yang, M., et al. (2018). Immunotoxicity of Bisphenol S and F Are Similar to that of Bisphenol A during Zebrafish Early Development. Chemosphere 194, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ritz, T., Krenkel, O., and Tacke, F. (2018). Dynamic Plasticity of Macrophage Functions in Diseased Liver. Cell Immunol 330, 175–182. doi:10.1016/j.cellimm.2017.12.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Robinson, N., Ganesan, R., Hegedűs, C., Kovács, K., Kufer, T. A., and Virág, L. (2019). Programmed Necrotic Cell Death of Macrophages: Focus on Pyroptosis, Necroptosis, and Parthanatos. Redox Biol. 26, 101239. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2019.101239

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rocha, B. A., de Oliveira, A. R. M., and Barbosa, F. (2018). A Fast and Simple Air-Assisted Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Procedure for the Simultaneous Determination of Bisphenols, Parabens, Benzophenones, Triclosan, and Triclocarban in Human Urine by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Talanta 183, 94–101. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2018.02.052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rogers, J. A., Metz, L., and Yong, V. W. (2013). Review: Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Immune Responses: a Focus on Bisphenol-A and its Potential Mechanisms. Mol. Immunol. 53 (4), 421–430. doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2012.09.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sakurai, C., Hashimoto, H., Nakanishi, H., Arai, S., Wada, Y., Sun-Wada, G. H., et al. (2012). SNAP-23 Regulates Phagosome Formation and Maturation in Macrophages. Mol. Biol. Cel 23 (24), 4849–4863. doi:10.1091/mbc.E12-01-0069

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, M., Lin, Z., Ye, L., Chen, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., et al. (2020). Estrogen Receptor-Regulated SOCS3 Modulation via JAK2/STAT3 Pathway Is Involved in BPF-Induced M1 Polarization of Macrophages. Toxicology 433-434, 152404. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2020.152404

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Švajger, U., Dolenc, M. S., and Jeras, M. (2016). In Vitro impact of Bisphenols BPA, BPF, BPAF and 17β-Estradiol (E2) on Human Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cell Generation, Maturation and Function. Int. Immunopharmacol 34, 146–154. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2016.02.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tasic, B., Menon, V., Nguyen, T. N., Kim, T. K., Jarsky, T., Yao, Z., et al. (2016). Adult Mouse Cortical Cell Taxonomy Revealed by Single Cell Transcriptomics. Nat. Neurosci. 19 (2), 335–346. doi:10.1038/nn.4216

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Van den Bossche, J., and Saraber, D. L. (2018). Metabolic Regulation of Macrophages in Tissues. Cel Immunol 330, 54–59. doi:10.1016/j.cellimm.2018.01.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Via, L. E., Deretic, D., Ulmer, R. J., Hibler, N. S., Huber, L. A., and Deretic, V. (1997). Arrest of Mycobacterial Phagosome Maturation Is Caused by a Block in Vesicle Fusion between Stages Controlled by Rab5 and Rab7. J. Biol. Chem. 272 (20), 13326–13331. doi:10.1074/jbc.272.20.13326

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vieira, O. V., Botelho, R. J., Rameh, L., Brachmann, S. M., Matsuo, T., Davidson, H. W., et al. (2001). Distinct Roles of Class I and Class III Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases in Phagosome Formation and Maturation. J. Cel Biol 155 (1), 19–25. doi:10.1083/jcb.200107069

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Yang, L., Jin, X., and Zhang, L. (2014). Electrochemical Determination of Estrogenic Compound Bisphenol F in Food Packaging Using Carboxyl Functionalized Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Food Chem. 157, 464–469. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.02.079

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Gerstein, M., and Snyder, M. (2009). RNA-seq: a Revolutionary Tool for Transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10 (1), 57–63. doi:10.1038/nrg2484

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, H., and Ren, D. (2015). Lysosomal Physiology. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 77, 57–80. doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-021014-071649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yamano, H. (2019). APC/C: Current Understanding and Future Perspectives. F1000Res 8, 725. doi:10.12688/f1000research.18582.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ye, F., White, C. C., Jin, Y., Hu, X., Hayden, S., Zhang, X., et al. (2015). Toxicity and Oxidative Stress Induced by Semiconducting Polymer Dots in RAW264.7 Mouse Macrophages. Nanoscale 7 (22), 10085–10093. doi:10.1039/C5NR01857A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Youn, J. Y., Park, H. Y., Lee, J. W., Jung, I. O., Choi, K. H., Kim, K., et al. (2002). Evaluation of the Immune Response Following Exposure of Mice to Bisphenol A: Induction of Th1 Cytokine and Prolactin by BPA Exposure in the Mouse Spleen Cells. Arch. Pharm. Res. 25 (6), 946–953. doi:10.1007/bf02977018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Li, J., and Yang, M. (2019). Occurrence and Exposure Assessment of Bisphenol Analogues in Source Water and Drinking Water in China. Sci. Total Environ. 655, 607–613. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, W., Jiang, P., Chen, J., Zhu, C., Mao, Z., and Gao, C. (2017). Application of Melatonin-Loaded poly(N-Isopropylacrylamide) Hydrogel Particles to Reduce the Toxicity of Airborne Pollutes to RAW264.7 Cells. J. Colloid Interf. Sci 490, 181–189. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2016.11.075

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, W., Li, L., Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, Z., et al. (2021). Bisphenol F Promotes the Secretion of Pro-inflammatory Cytokines in Macrophages by Enhanced Glycolysis through PI3K-AKT Signaling Pathway. Toxicol. Lett. 350, 30–39. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2021.06.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: bisphenol F, RAW264.7 macrophages, immunotoxicity, apoptosis, transcription

Citation: Chen H, Zhang Y, Li X, Zhang W, He H, Du B, Li T, Tang H, Liu Y, Li L and Shi M (2022) Transcriptome Changes and Potential Immunotoxicity Analysis in RAW264.7 Macrophages Caused by Bisphenol F. Front. Pharmacol. 13:846562. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.846562

Received: 31 December 2021; Accepted: 15 February 2022;
Published: 21 March 2022.

Edited by:

Eleonore Fröhlich, Medical University of Graz, Austria

Reviewed by:

Chirag Vasavda, Johns Hopkins Medicine, United States
Andi Wangzhou, University of California San Francisco, United States
Xing Yuan, Northeast Normal University, China

Copyright © 2022 Chen, Zhang, Li, Zhang, He, Du, Li, Tang, Liu, Li and Shi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Li Li, lily2017@gdmu.edu.cn; Ming Shi, shiming@gdmu.edu.cn

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.