Asher Shafrir1,2,3†
Ariel A. Benson1,3†
Lior H. Katz1,3*
Tiberiu Hershcovici1,3Menachem Bitan1,2Ora Paltiel1,4,5Ronit Calderon-Margalit4Rifaat Safadi1,3‡Michal Shauly-Aharonov4,6‡- 1Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- 2Meuhedet Health Medical Organization, Jerusalem, Israel
- 3Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hadassah University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
- 4Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- 5Department of Hematology, Hadassah University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
- 6The Jerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel
Background and Aims: There is conflicting evidence regarding the association between proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and the risk of acquisition and severity of acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.
Aim: To evaluate the association between PPI exposure and infection and development of severe disease in patients infected with SARS-CoV2in a large population-based historical cohort.
Methods: Data were extracted from a health maintenance organization database in Israel that insures over 1,200,000 individuals from across the country. All patients who underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing between March and November 2020 were included. Logistic regression and matched analyses were used to compare patients prescribed and exposed to PPIs to those not prescribed PPIs regarding SARS-CoV-2 positivity. In addition, among SARS-CoV-2 positive patients (n = 44,397) the likelihood of developing severe disease, defined by a composite endpoint of death, ICU admission and prolonged hospitalization, was compared in those exposed and not exposed to PPIs.
Results: Among 255,355 adult patients who underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing by PCR, 44,397 (17.4%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 and 12,066 (4.7%) patients were prescribed PPIs in the 3 months before testing. In a multivariable logistic regression model controlling for age, gender, smoking status, BMI, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, COPD, history of ischemic heart disease and fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels, no significant association was found between PPIs and SARS-CoV-2 positivity (p = 0.09 aOR 0.94, 95% CI – 0.88–1.01). Among SARS-CoV-2 positive patients, 910 (2%) had a severe infection. Multivariate logistic regression controlling for the abovementioned confounders, showed no such association between PPIs and severe COVID-19 (p = 0.28). Elevated FBG levels were significantly associated with both PPI exposure (p < 0.001) and severe COVID-19 infection (p < 0.001). These results were reinforced by a matched analysis (n = 655 pairs).
Conclusion: PPIs are spuriously associated with severe COVID-19 due to the presence of elevated FBG as a confounder. Our study accounted for the FBG levels of patients and known risk factors for severe COVID-19 infection, which may be the reason for the discrepancy in prior studies. These results may aid in understanding potential confounders when evaluating potential associations of PPIs with other respiratory or viral diseases.
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to worldwide morbidity and mortality (Grasselli et al., 2020). Several risk factors have been associated with worse outcomes among patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, including advanced age, obesity, and diabetes mellitus (DM) (Grasselli et al., 2020). In addition, studies have attempted to evaluate the association of several medications with both the risk of increased susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 and the risk of more severe outcomes once infected (Fang et al., 2020). (Meng and Liang, 2021). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used extensively worldwide and can be purchased over the counter depending on the geographic location (Forgacs and Loganayagam, 2008; Katz et al., 2013). Numerous studies have proposed associations between PPIs and various adverse events (Dharmarajan, 2021). While many of these associations were not confirmed via randomized controlled trials (RCT), a RCT and a meta-analysis only confirmed the association between PPIs and enteric infections (D'Silva et al., 2021; Moayyedi et al., 2019).
PPIs inhibit hydrogen-potassium adenosine triphosphatase in gastric parietal cells, thereby decreasing gastric acidity (Engevik et al., 2020). Decreased gastric acidity is thought to cause an increased risk of enteric infections (Ray et al., 2020). At the same time, PPIs also may exert an anti-inflammatory effect, which may potentially be protective against SARS-CoV-2 (Ray et al., 2020; Conrad, 2021). Due to the widespread use of PPIs, their potential impact on SARS-CoV-2 should be carefully examined.
Studies evaluating the association between PPIs and SARS-CoV-2 positivity and COVID-19 disease severity based on self-reported patient surveys and health insurance claims databases showed conflicting results (Almario et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2020). PPIs were associated with more severe COVID-19 outcomes in a nationwide cohort from Korea, but there was no association between PPIs and SARS-CoV-2 positivity (Lee et al., 2020). A post-hoc analysis of this study showed a dose-dependent relationship between higher doses of PPIs and severe COVID-19 (Lee et al., 2021). A national health survey in the United States showed increased self-reported SARS-CoV-2 positivity among those who self-reported PPI use (Almario et al., 2020). A meta-analysis comprising highly heterogeneous studies showed a nonsignificant increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 but also a statistically significant increased risk of more severe COVID-19 outcomes among PPI users (Li et al., 2020). Another meta-analysis showed an increased risk of severe COVID-19 and the development of secondary infection in patients with prior PPI use (Kow and Hasan, 2021). A nationwide study from Denmark showed that current PPI use was associated with a moderately increased odds ratio for SARS-CoV-2 infection of 1.08 (95% CI, 1.03–1.13). Among SARS-CoV-2 cases, PPI use was associated with an increased risk of hospital admission but not with other severe COVID-19 related outcomes (Israelsen et al., 2013). On the other hand, a study of the UK Biobank found no increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or death among PPI users, and an accompanying meta-analysis found no increased SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility with the use of PPIs or H-2 receptor blockers (Fan et al., 2021). Another large study from the UK Biobank, showed no association between PPI use and COVID-19-related mortality after adjusting for overall health status (He et al., 1430). These conflicting results call for additional well-designed studies to clarify the association of PPIs and COVID-19 severity (Lv et al., 2021).
Multiple risk factors for severe COVID-19 have been described, such as advanced age, male gender, cardiovascular disease, increased BMI, and respiratory disease (McGurnaghan et al., 2021; Wolff et al., 2021). A significant confounder when assessing SARS-CoV-2 positivity and COVID-19 severity is abnormal glucose levels in addition to diabetes mellitus (DM) (Zhang et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2020). Recently, data from our health care maintenance organization (HMO) showed that impaired fasting glucose and dysglycemia among patients with diabetes (hypo or hyperglycemia in FBG tests) are associated with an increased risk for severe COVID-19 (Shauly-Aharonov et al., 2021). Prospectively collected data from a comprehensive electronic medical record that includes specific laboratory values and documentation of diagnoses and past medical history enables the assessment of the association between medication exposure and SARS-Cov2 infection and severity while evaluating the role of potential confounding factors.
Methods
Meuhedet HMO is one of the four HMOs in Israel. It is Israel’s third-largest healthcare provider, serving over 1,200,000 individuals. Meuhedet’s computerized database includes real-time input from all physician visits, medical diagnoses, laboratory results, hospitalizations (including SARS-CoV-2 testing from all locations), and dispensing data on prescription and over-the-counter medications. Health data from the electronic medical records (EMR) of all insured individuals aged 18 and above who underwent a SARS-COV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test from 1 March 2020 to 30 November 2020, were extracted. Laboratory confirmation of SARS-COV-2 was defined as a positive result of a real-time PCR assay from nasal and pharyngeal swabs according to World Health Organization guidelines (World Health, 2020). If patients underwent multiple tests during this period, the first positive test was considered the index test. If all tests were negative, the first SARS-CoV-2 test was considered the index test.
Three sectors of Israeli society can be loosely identified based on the clinic’s location. These are the Arab, ultra-orthodox Jewish, and orthodox/secular Jewish. Recent studies showed differences in SARS-CoV-2 prevalence between these groups, and therefore, this variable was included as a potential risk factor (Dagan et al., 2021). Additional data extracted from patient EMRs included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and significant medical diagnoses documented at any point before SARS-CoV-2 testing [e.g., ischemic heart disease (IHD), hypertension, DM, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)]. Prescriptions for omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, and pantoprazole prescribed to patients in the 3 months before SARS-CoV-2 index test were also retrieved. In addition, we included results of the most recent FBG tests and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) performed within 1–12 months prior to SARS-CoV-2 testing.
COVID-19 outcomes were recorded, and the severity of outcomes was assessed. Severe infection was defined as any one of the following events: (1) death, (2) intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or (3) hospitalization of 10 days or more following the test.
This research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the research ethics committee and internal review board of Meuhedet HMO (02-24-08-20).
Statistical Analysis
For descriptive analysis, we used counts and percentages for categorical variables. Continuous variables were summarized as means and standard deviations (SD). Bivariate analysis was performed using the Chi-squared test to compare categorical variables and t-test to compare means of continuous variables. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between PPIs and SARS-CoV-2 positivity and the association between PPIs and severe COVID-19 infection. Odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to control for confounders previously found to be associated with increased risk for severe COVID-19. To further assess the associations between PPIs and SARS-CoV-2, 1:1 matching was performed to equate the distribution of covariates in the treated (i.e., PPI users) and control group. Two closeness measures - propensity score (Rosenbaum and Rubin, 1983) and Mahalanobis distance (Mahalanobis, 1936; Rubin, 1980)—were chosen, and a greedy (i.e., nearest neighbor) algorithm was applied. For propensity score matching, a caliper of 0.2 was used (Austin, 2011). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all analyses. Paired data were analyzed using the McNemar test. Statistical analysis was performed using R software (R Core Team, 2019).
Results
Between 1 March 2020, and 30 November 2020, 378,862 patients enrolled in Meuhedet HMO, including 255,355 (66.9%) aged 18 years and above, underwent SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing. Of these, 44,397 (17.52%) adults had at least one positive SARS-CoV-2 test. On average, patients who tested positive were younger (37.57 ± 16.37 vs. 41.40 ± 17.79 years), more likely to be males (55.9% vs. 46.7%), and less likely to smoke (7.8% vs. 15.2%) compared to those who tested negative. Among the adult cohort, 12,066 (4.7%) patients were prescribed PPIs 3 months before SARS-CoV-2 testing. Additional comparisons are presented in Table 1.
TABLE 1. Characteristics of patients who underwent PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2.
Overall, those prescribed PPIs were less likely than others to have a positive SARS-CoV-2 test (17.7% vs. 13.3%, p value < 0.001) (Figure 1) in the crude analysis. However, in a multivariate logistic regression model controlling for age, gender, sector, smoking status, BMI, history of DM, COPD, IHD, hypertension, and prior FBG levels PPIs were not associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection (p value = 0.1 adjusted OR (aOR) 0.94, 95% CI—0.88–1.01) (Supplementary Table S1). When patients were matched by propensity score algorithm based on the above covariates (n = 6835 pairs of patients), PPIs were not associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection (p value = 0.06, aOR = 0.9 95% CI 0.82–1.0) (Supplementary Table S2).
FIGURE 1. PPIs and SARS-CoV-2 testing results. The numbers on the bars represent the number of patients in each sub-category, whereas the inner partition into orange and blue represents the conditional distribution of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Among patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 910 (2%) had a severe course. Of these, 349 died, 253 were hospitalized in the ICU, and 642 were hospitalized for 10 days or more (non-mutually exclusive). On average, patients with severe infection were older (67.48 ± 18.49 vs. 28.75 years ± 18.07), more likely to be obese (BMI>30 kg/m2, 43.7% vs. 19.3%), more likely to have a diagnosis of DM (35.8% vs. 4.4%), and more likely to have a diagnosis of IHD (17.4% vs. 1.5%). Pre-COVID-19 FBG was higher among patients with severe COVID-19 (114.03 vs. 94.12 p value < 0.001). This finding was statistically significant when analyzed in a subset of patients without a documented diagnosis of DM (95.32 vs. 89.02 p value < 0.001) as well borderline-significant in patients diagnosed with DM (141.66 vs. 133.67 p value = 0.06). Gender and smoking were not found to be significantly associated with severe infection. Additional comparisons are shown in Table 2. Bivariate analysis showed that patients who were prescribed PPIs were more likely to suffer from severe infection (Figure 2) (12.4% vs. 3.4% p-value <0.001). Howver, in multivariate logistic regression controlling for age, gender, BMI, DM, history of smoking, hypertension, COPD, IHD, and FBG levels, there was no significant association between PPIs and severe COVID-19 (p value = 0.28, Figure 3) (Supplementary Table S3). In a similar multivariate logistic regression with substituting HbA1C for FBG, PPIs were not associated with severe disease (p-value = 0.32).
TABLE 2. Characteristics of patients with severe COVID-19, compared to those with non-severe COVID-19.
FIGURE 2. PPIs and COVID-19 severity. The numbers on the bars represent the number of patients in each sub-category, whereas the inner partition into orange and blue represents the conditional distribution of severity.
FIGURE 3. Forest plot of risk factors associated with severe COVID-19 disease (death/ICU/hospitalization longer than 10 days).
When patients were matched by the Mahalanobis distance algorithm based on the above covariates (n = 655 pairs, Supplementary Table S4), PPIs were not associated with increased risk of severe COVID-19 (p-value = 0.48). In addition, a propensity score-matched cohort was constructed using the same parameters as mentioned in the logistic regression, and, in this analysis, (n = 1,019 pairs) PPIs were also not associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19 (p-value = 0.25).
To further study the impact of FBG as a confounder in the potential association of PPIs and severe COVID-19, we tested the association between FBG and PPI use. Higher FBG levels were positively associated with the use of PPIs (Figure 4). Furthermore, a multivariate logistic regression model controlling for age, gender, BMI>30 kg/m2, hypertension, and smoking, showed an association between higher fasting blood glucose levels and PPIs (p-value <0.001, Supplementary Table S5). A similar association was seen with HbA1c levels (p-value <0.001).
FIGURE 4. Percentage of PPI prescription given prior fasting glucose range.
Discussion
In this nationwide cohort of 255,355 adults who underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing, PPI exposure (based on the prescription of PPIs) was not associated with SARS-CoV-2 positivity after controlling for comorbidities and sociodemographic factors. Furthermore, among the 44,397 patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, PPIs were not associated with severe COVID-19, defined as death, ICU stay, or hospitalization of 10 days or longer. As with prior studies assessing the potential adverse events of PPIs in a retrospective cohort and non-randomized studies, confounders likely affect the hypothesized impact of PPIs on diseases and outcomes (Almario et al., 2020; Farsalinos et al., 2020; Hariyanto et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020; Ramachandran et al., 2020; Fan et al., 2021; Luxenburger et al., 2021).
Similar to other studies, our analysis showed that advanced age, male gender, and elevated BMI were associated with severe COVID-19 (Deng and Peng, 2020; Zhou et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2020; Shauly-Aharonov et al., 2021). Since the data in this study was from a large HMO, the analysis could control for confounders found in serum blood tests and not simply rely on diagnoses lists. This is vital as patients with DM and SARS-CoV-2 who had poorly controlled blood glucose levels had significantly worse outcomes (Singh and Singh, 2020; Zhu et al., 2020). In addition, impaired fasting glucose, even without a personal history of DM, was associated with more severe COVID-19 outcomes (Zhang et al., 2020). In this analysis both a diagnosis of DM and FBG levels were included as potential confounders for the regression model. While both confounders are associated with blood sugar levels, it is imperative to differentiate between patients who receive glucose-lowering agents and those who do not. As FBG is affected by the hours that the patient fasted, an additional regression was constructed using HbA1c instead of FBG showing similar results.
The association of PPIs and increased FBG levels can be explained in several directions. PPIs may serve as a risk factor for DM. Yuan et al. analyzed three prospective studies and found a 24% increased risk of developing DM among patients who received PPIs than those who did not (Lee et al., 2021). On the other hand, GI symptoms and disorders are common in patients with DM, and some are correlated with increased glucose levels (Rayner et al., 2000; Careyva and Stello, 2016; Du et al., 2018). Patients with DM are more likely to receive PPIs (Zawada et al., 2018). As such, adjusting for both a history of DM and poor glucose control is vital when assessing PPIs’ potential adverse effects.
This study is a historical cohort and is limited, similar to other administrative database studies (Etminan et al., 2020). A prospective study would be the ideal way to assess PPIs and SARS-CoV-2. However, the feasibility of performing such a study, particularly during the pandemic, would be extremely difficult (Emani et al., 2021). A major limitation of historical cohort studies assessing the association between prescribed pharmaceuticals and outcomes is confounding by indication (Schneeweiss and Avorn, 2005). The underlying disease or complaint for which PPIs were prescribed could not be discerned, and these unknown indications may be related to COVID-19 outcomes. In addition, PPI dosage or length of PPI use could not be assessed. Nonetheless, the PPI prescribing data in our cohort is objective pharmacy data and not based on self-reporting. Additional confounders that impact both FBG and COVID-19 outcomes may have been missing and not controlled for during statistical analysis (Martins, 2015).
During the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic, many people refused to be tested for SARS-CoV-2 out of fear of the isolation restrictions imposed on those who tested positive. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were not compared to those who were not tested for SARS-CoV-2. Untested individuals may have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 and not presented for testing.
An additional limitation is that patients may have taken PPIs without prescription thus misclassifying the exposure and biasing toward the null, this comparison can underestimate the number of COVID-19 patients due to false-negative results. The retrospective nature of the data also limited the definition of severe disease. Hospital data only included length of hospitalization and need for ICU, and we did not have access to in-hospital metrics such as the need for supplemental oxygen. The financial compensation that the HMO pays to the hospital is dependant on hospitalization length and ICU stay; therefore these are validated and reliable data. A composite endpoint of severe disease including death, ICU, and prolonged hospitalization was used. As there is universal health care coverage in Israel, a prolonged hospitalization will not be related to insurance bureaucracy and is a surrogate for more severe disease. Furthermore, effective interventions in COVID-19 are associated with shorter hospitalizations and a milder course of disease (RECOVERY Collaborative Group, 2020). Finally, the degree of physical activity, anti-diabetic/anti-hypertensive medication usage, dietary intake, and use of nutritional supplements are potential confounders when assessing FBG and COVID-19 outcome. However, this data was not available due to this study’s retrospective administrative database manner.
Nonetheless, this study has significant strengths, including a large number of patients and the inclusion of blood test results to assess and control for confounders. It is noteworthy that a strong and statistically significant crude association was found which was obliterated using multiple techniques to control confounding including multivariable analysis and propensity score matching. While other studies may have seen an association between PPIs and SARS-CoV-2 infectivity or death, this may have been a result of protopathic bias, or outcomes being attributed to treatments as opposed to the conditions being treated as was recently demonstrated in a study of 1.9 million patients showing no increased mortality risk with PPI use (Baik et al., 2021). While these findings may provide reassurance that pre-infection PPI exposure is not associated with worse SARS-CoV-2 prognosis, it must be emphasized that PPIs may be overutilized, and use should be limited to appropriate indications and for appropriate durations (Moayyedi, 2020).
In conclusion, after controlling for confounders, this large retrospective cohort study of 255,355 adults shows no association between PPIs and SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity and severity. Our results support continued use of PPIs for patients with an appropriate indication without concern for increased risk of COVID-19.
What is Known
• Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are commonly used
• Prior studies evaluating the association of PPI use with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity showed conflicting results.
What is New Here
• Elevated fasting blood glucose is associated with both severe COVID-19 and PPI use.
• When controlling for fasting blood glucose, no significant association was found between PPIs and COVID-19 severity.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because there are ethical restrictions on sharing our data set because data contain potentially identifying patient information. These restrictions were imposed by the ethics committee of Meuhedet HMO who own the data. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to Liron Yitzchaki, coordinator of Meuhedet research center bGlyb24ueTNAbWV1aGVkZXQuY28uaWw=.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Meuhedet HMO IRB 02-24-08-20. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.
Author Contributions
AS—conceptualization, data curation and analysis, writing and drafting, editing. AB—study design, conceptualization, data collection, data analysis, methodology, writing and drafting, editing, supervision. TH – data analysis, investigation, methodology, editing. MB—data collection, data analysis, editing. OP—data analysis, methodology, editing. RC-M—data analysis, methodology, editing. LK—data analysis, investigation, methodology, editing, supervision. RS—data analysis, investigation, methodology, editing. MS-A—conceptualization, data curation and analysis, writing and drafting, editing.
Conflict of Interest
Authors AS and MB were employed by the company Meuhedet Health Medical Organization.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2022.791074/full#supplementary-material
References
Almario, C. V., Chey, W. D., and Spiegel, B. M. R. (2020). Increased Risk of COVID-19 Among Users of Proton Pump Inhibitors. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 115, 1707–1715. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000993
Austin, P. C. (2011). Optimal Caliper Widths for Propensity‐score Matching when Estimating Differences in Means and Differences in Proportions in Observational Studies. Pharm. Stat. 10, 150–161. doi:10.1002/pst.433
Baik, S. H., Fung, K. W., and McDonald, C. J. (2021). The Mortality Risk of Proton Pump Inhibitors in 1.9 Million US Seniors: an Extended Cox Survival Analysis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. S1542-3565(21)00017-3. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2021.01.014
Careyva, B., and Stello, B. (2016). Diabetes Mellitus: Management of Gastrointestinal Complications. Am. Fam. Physician 94, 980–986. Available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/2016/1215/p980.html
Conrad, K. P. (2021). Might Proton Pump or Sodium-Hydrogen Exchanger Inhibitors Be of Value to Ameliorate SARs-CoV-2 Pathophysiology? Physiol. Rep. 8, e14649. doi:10.14814/phy2.14649
D'Silva, K. M., Mehta, R., Mitchell, M., Lee, T. C., Singhal, V., Wilson, M. G., et al. (2021). Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Risk for Recurrent Clostridioides Difficile Infection: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 27, P697–P703. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2021.01.008
Dagan, N., Barda, N., Kepten, E., Miron, O., Perchik, S., Katz, M. A., et al. (2021). BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Mass Vaccination Setting. New Engl. J. Med. 384 (15), 1412–1423. doi:10.1056/nejmoa2101765
Deng, S. Q., and Peng, H. J. (2020). Characteristics of and Public Health Responses to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak in China. J. Clin. Med. 9, 575. doi:10.3390/jcm9020575
RECOVERY Collaborative Group(2020). Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. New Engl. J. Med. 384, 693–704. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2021436
Dharmarajan, T. S. (2021). The Use and Misuse of Proton Pump Inhibitors: An Opportunity for Deprescribing. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 22, 15–22. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2020.09.046
Du, Y. T., Rayner, C. K., Jones, K. L., Talley, N. J., and Horowitz, M. (2018). Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Diabetes: Prevalence, Assessment, Pathogenesis, and Management. Diabetes Care 41, 627–637. doi:10.2337/dc17-1536
Emani, V. R., Goswami, S., Nandanoor, D., Emani, S. R., Reddy, N. K., and Reddy, R. (2021). Randomised Controlled Trials for COVID-19: Evaluation of Optimal Randomisation Methodologies-Need for Data Validation of the Completed Trials and to Improve Ongoing and Future Randomised Trial Designs. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 57, 106222. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106222
Engevik, A. C., Kaji, I., and Goldenring, J. R. (2020). The Physiology of the Gastric Parietal Cell. Physiol. Rev. 100, 573–602. doi:10.1152/physrev.00016.2019
Etminan, M., Nazemipour, M., Sodhi, M., and Mansournia, M. A. (2020). Potential Biases in Studies of Acid Suppressing Drugs and COVID-19 Infection. Gastroenterology 160 (5), 1443–1446. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.11.053
Fan, X., Liu, Z., Miyata, T., Dasarathy, S., Rotroff, D. M., Wu, X., et al. (2021). Effect of Acid Suppressants on the Risk of COVID-19: A Propensity Score-Matched Study Using UK Biobank. Gastroenterology 160, 455–458. e5. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.09.028
Fang, L., Karakiulakis, G., and Roth, M. (2020). Are Patients with Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus at Increased Risk for COVID-19 Infection? Lancet Respir. Med. 8, e21. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30116-8
Farsalinos, K., Barbouni, A., and Niaura, R. (2020). Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Current Smoking Among Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in China: Could Nicotine Be a Therapeutic Option? Intern. Emerg. Med. 15, 845–852. doi:10.1007/s11739-020-02457-2
Forgacs, I., and Loganayagam, A. (2008). Overprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors. Br. Med. J. Publishing Group 336 (7634), 2–3. doi:10.1136/bmj.39406.449456.be
Grasselli, G., Greco, M., Zanella, A., Albano, G., Antonelli, M., Bellani, G., et al. (2020). Risk Factors Associated with Mortality Among Patients with COVID-19 in Intensive Care Units in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA Intern. Med. 180, 1345–1355. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3539
Hariyanto, T. I., Prasetya, I. B., and Kurniawan, A. (2020). Proton Pump Inhibitor Use Is Associated with Increased Risk of Severity and Mortality from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection. Dig. Liver Dis. 52, 1410–1412. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2020.10.001
He, Q., Xia, B., Meng, W., Fan, D., Kuo, Z.-C., Huang, J., et al. No Associations between Regular Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Risk of All-Cause and Cause-specific Mortality: A Population-Based Cohort of 0.44 Million Participants. Official J. Am. Coll. Gastroenterol. 116 (11), 2286–2291. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001377
Israelsen, S. B., Ernst, M. T., Lundh, A., Lundbo, L. F., Sandholdt, H., Hallas, J., et al. (2013). Proton Pump Inhibitor Use Is Not Strongly Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Related Outcomes: A Nationwide Study and Meta-Analysis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 19 (9), 1845–1854. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2021.05.011
Katz, P. O., Gerson, L. B., and Vela, M. F. (2013). Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 108, 308–328. quiz 329. doi:10.1038/ajg.2012.444
Kow, C. S., and Hasan, S. S. (2021). Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Risk of Adverse Clinical Outcomes from COVID-19: a Meta-Analysis. J. Intern. Med. 289, 125–128. doi:10.1111/joim.13183
Lee, S. W., Ha, E. K., Yeniova, A. Ö., Moon, S. Y., Kim, S. Y., Koh, H. Y., et al. (2020). Severe Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19 Associated with Proton Pump Inhibitors: a Nationwide Cohort Study with Propensity Score Matching. Gut 70 (1), 76–84. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322248
Lee, S. W., Yang, J. M., Yoo, I. K., Moon, S. Y., Ha, E. K., Yeniova, A. Ö., et al. (2021). Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Risk of Severe COVID-19: a post-hoc Analysis from the Korean Nationwide Cohort. Gut 70, 2013–2015. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323672
Li, G. F., An, X. X., Yu, Y., Jiao, L. R., Canarutto, D., Yu, G., et al. (2020). Do proton Pump Inhibitors Influence SARS-CoV-2 Related Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis. Gut 70 (9), 1806–1808. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323366
Luxenburger, H., Sturm, L., Biever, P., Rieg, S., Duerschmied, D., Schultheiss, M., et al. (2021). Treatment with Proton Pump Inhibitors Increases the Risk of Secondary Infections and ARDS in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: Coincidence or Underestimated Risk Factor? J. Intern. Med. 289, 121–124. doi:10.1111/joim.13121
Lv, X.-H., Wang, Z.-J., and Yang, J.-L. (2021). Proton Pump Inhibitors and COVID-19: Confusing Status Quo. Official J. Am. Coll. Gastroenterol. 116, 2153. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001407
Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936). On the Generalized Distance in Statistics. Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. 2, 49–55.
Martins, I. J. (2015). COVID-19 Infection and Anti-aging Gene Inactivation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 29554–29573. doi:10.3390/ijms161226190
McGurnaghan, S. J., Weir, A., Bishop, J., Kennedy, S., Blackbourn, L. A. K., McAllister, D. A., et al. (2021). Risks of and Risk Factors for COVID-19 Disease in People with Diabetes: a Cohort Study of the Total Population of Scotland. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 9, 82–93. doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(20)30405-8
Meng, X., and Liang, T. (2021). SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Fecal-Oral Route of Transmission for COVID-19? Gastroenterol. 160 (5), 1467–1469. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.01.005
Moayyedi, P., Eikelboom, J. W., Bosch, J., Connolly, S. J., Dyal, L., Shestakovska, O., et al. (2019). Safety of Proton Pump Inhibitors Based on a Large, Multi-Year, Randomized Trial of Patients Receiving Rivaroxaban or Aspirin. Gastroenterology 157, 682–691. e2. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.05.056
Moayyedi, P. (2020). How to Advise Patients on the Risk of Chronic Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 36, 317–322. doi:10.1097/MOG.0000000000000641
Ramachandran, P., Perisetti, A., Gajendran, M., Jean-Louis, F., Bansal, P., Dwivedi, A. K., et al. (2020). Pre-hospitalization Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 34(2), 137–141. doi:10.1097/meg.0000000000002013
Ray, A., Sharma, S., and Sadasivam, B. (2020). The Potential Therapeutic Role of Proton Pump Inhibitors in COVID-19: Hypotheses Based on Existing Evidences. Drug Res. (Stuttg) 70, 484–488. doi:10.1055/a-1236-3041
Rayner, C. K., Verhagen, M. A., Hebbard, G. S., DiMatteo, A. C., Doran, S. M., and Horowitz, M. (2000). Proximal Gastric Compliance and Perception of Distension in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Effects of Hyperglycemia. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 95, 1175–1183. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02006.x
Rosenbaum, P. R., and Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika 70, 41–55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
Rubin, D. B. (1980). Bias Reduction Using Mahalanobis-Metric Matching. Biometrics, 293–298. doi:10.2307/2529981
R Core Team (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at URL https://www.R-project.org/
Schneeweiss, S., and Avorn, J. (2005). A Review of Uses of Health Care Utilization Databases for Epidemiologic Research on Therapeutics. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 58, 323–337. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.012
Shauly-Aharonov, M., Shafrir, A., Paltiel, O., Calderon-Margalit, R., Safadi, R., Bicher, R., et al. (2021). Both high and Low Pre-infection Glucose Levels Associated with Increased Risk for Severe COVID-19: New Insights from a Population-Based Study. PLOS ONE 16, e0254847. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254847
Singh, A. K., and Singh, R. (2020). Does Poor Glucose Control Increase the Severity and Mortality in Patients with Diabetes and COVID-19? Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 14, 725–727. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.037
Wolff, D., Nee, S., Hickey, N. S., and Marschollek, M. (2021). Risk Factors for Covid-19 Severity and Fatality: a Structured Literature Review. Infection 49, 15–28. doi:10.1007/s15010-020-01509-1
World Health, O. (2020). Diagnostic Testing for SARS-CoV-2: Interim Guidance, 11 September 2020. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Zawada, A. E., Moszak, M., Skrzypczak, D., and Grzymislawski, M. (2018). Gastrointestinal Complications in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 27, 567–572. doi:10.17219/acem/67961
Zhang, J., Kong, W., Xia, P., Xu, Y., Li, L., Li, Q., et al. (2020). Impaired Fasting Glucose and Diabetes Are Related to Higher Risks of Complications and Mortality Among Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 11, 525. doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.00525
Zhou, F., Yu, T., Du, R., Fan, G., Liu, Y., Liu, Z., et al. (2020). Clinical Course and Risk Factors for Mortality of Adult Inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a Retrospective Cohort Study. Lancet 395, 1054–1062. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3
Keywords: COVID - 19, SARS-CoV-2, hyperglycaemia, proton pump inhibitor, impaired fasting blood glucose
Citation: Shafrir A, Benson AA, Katz LH, Hershcovici T, Bitan M, Paltiel O, Calderon-Margalit R, Safadi R and Shauly-Aharonov M (2022) The Association Between Proton Pump Inhibitors and COVID-19 is Confounded by Hyperglycemia in a Population-Based Study. Front. Pharmacol. 13:791074. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.791074
Received: 07 October 2021; Accepted: 12 January 2022;
Published: 04 February 2022.
Edited by:
Angelo A Izzo, University of Naples Federico II, ItalyReviewed by:
Guo Chengxian, Central South University, ChinaTalha Bin Emran, Begum Gulchemonara Trust University, Bangladesh
Duygu Agagündüz, Gazi University, Turkey
Ian James Martins, University of Western Australia, Australia
Copyright © 2022 Shafrir, Benson, Katz, Hershcovici, Bitan, Paltiel, Calderon-Margalit, Safadi and Shauly-Aharonov. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lior H. Katz, a2xpb3JAaGFkYXNzYWgub3JnLmls
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
‡These authors have contributed equally to this work and share senior authorship