Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Pharmacol., 02 September 2022
Sec. Translational Pharmacology
Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1005123

Corrigendum: Pharmacokinetic assessment of staphylococcal phage K following parenteral and intra-articular administration in rabbits

This article is a correction to:

  1. Pharmacokinetic Assessment of Staphylococcal Phage K Following Parenteral and Intra-articular Administration in Rabbits

    1. Read original article
Katherine M. C. TottenKatherine M. C. Totten1Scott A. CunninghamScott A. Cunningham2Naomi M. GadesNaomi M. Gades3Athema EtzioniAthema Etzioni4Robin Patel, Robin Patel2,5*
  • 1Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
  • 2Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
  • 3Department of Comparative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, United States
  • 4Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, United States
  • 5Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States

A Corrigendum on
Pharmacokinetic assessment of staphylococcal phage K following parenteral and intra-articular administration in rabbits

by Totten KMC, Cunningham SA, Gades NM, Etzioni A and Patel R (2022). Front. Pharmacol. 13:840165. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.840165

In the published article, there was an error. There was a typographical error included in the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) reference number of phage K.

A correction has been made to Materials and Methods, Bacteriophage. This sentence previously stated:

“High-titer (2 × 1012 pfu/ml ± 1 × 101 pfu/ml) purified phage K (ATCC 19695-B1) in phage buffer (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl Tris, pH 8.0) was prepared by TAILΦR Labs of Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, TX), as previously described (Green et al., 2017; Gibson et al., 2019; Terwilliger et al., 2021). Working stocks passed in-house sterility and endotoxin testing (8 EU/mL endotoxin C). Stocks were light-protected and stored at 4°C until administration. On study day 28, animals received 0.05 ml phage [1011 ± 101 plaque forming units (pfu)] IA administered as above, or IV through an ear catheter with subsequent port flushing by saline or heparinized saline.”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“High-titer (2 × 1012 pfu/mL ± 1 × 101 pfu/mL) purified phage K (ATCC 19685-B1) in phage buffer (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl Tris, pH 8.0) was prepared by TAILΦR Labs of Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, TX), as previously described (Green et al., 2017; Gibson et al., 2019; Terwilliger et al., 2021). Working stocks passed in-house sterility and endotoxin testing (8 EU/mL endotoxin C). Stocks were light-protected and stored at 4°C until administration. On study day 28, animals received 0.05 ml phage [1011 ± 101 plaque forming units (pfu)] IA administered as above, or IV through an ear catheter with subsequent port flushing by saline or heparinized saline.”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: phage, pharmacology, periprosthetic joint infection, staphylococci, pharmacokinetics

Citation: Totten KMC, Cunningham SA, Gades NM, Etzioni A and Patel R (2022) Corrigendum: Pharmacokinetic assessment of staphylococcal phage K following parenteral and intra-articular administration in rabbits. Front. Pharmacol. 13:1005123. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1005123

Received: 27 July 2022; Accepted: 08 August 2022;
Published: 02 September 2022.

Edited and reviewed by:

Alastair George Stewart, The University of Melbourne, Australia

Copyright © 2022 Totten, Cunningham, Gades, Etzioni and Patel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Robin Patel, cGF0ZWwucm9iaW5AbWF5by5lZHU=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.