Shengguang Wang1†
Shiming Zhang- 1School of Pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
- 2School of Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
Lung alveolar type-II (AT-II) cells produce pulmonary surfactant (PS), consisting of proteins and lipids. The lipids in PS are primarily responsible for reducing the air-fluid surface tension inside the alveoli of the lungs and to prevent atelectasis. The proteins are of two types: hydrophilic and hydrophobic. Hydrophilic surfactants are primarily responsible for opsonisation, thereby protecting the lungs from microbial and environmental contaminants. Hydrophobic surfactants are primarily responsible for respiratory function. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) enters the lungs through ACE-2 receptors on lungs and replicates in AT-II cells leading to the etiology of Coronavirus disease – 2019 (COVID-19). The SARS-CoV-2 virus damages the AT-II cells and results in decreased production of PS. The clinical symptoms of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in COVID-19 patients are like those of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). The PS treatment is first-line treatment option for NRDS and found to be well tolerated in ARDS patients with inconclusive efficacy. Over the past 70°years, a lot of research is underway to produce natural/synthetic PS and developing systems for delivering PS directly to the lungs, in addition to finding the association between PS levels and respiratory illnesses. In the present COVID-19 pandemic situation, the scientific community all over the world is searching for the effective therapeutic options to improve the clinical outcomes. With a strong scientific and evidence-based background on role of PS in lung homeostasis and infection, few clinical trials were initiated to evaluate the functions of PS in COVID-19. Here, we connect the data on PS with reference to pulmonary physiology and infection with its possible therapeutic benefit in COVID-19 patients.
Introduction
Human pulmonary surfactant (PS) is an endogenous lipoprotein complex produced naturally in the lungs. PS forms a layer on the alveolar epithelium and is responsible in reducing surface tension at the air-fluid interface on the alveolar surface (Agassandian and Mallampalli, 2013). The reduced alveolar surface tension will allow the expansion of alveoli and allows gas exchange (Seadler et al., 2020). Human PS contains phospholipids, mainly dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), and surfactant proteins- A, B, C, and D. The PS is present as a barrier when inhaled particle and noxious agents come in contact with it and enhances the clearance of particles. PS also participate in host defense against infections and inflammation. The loss or deficiency in endogenous surfactant is implicated with respiratory disorders (Wert et al., 2009). During the gestation period, the production of endogenous lung surfactant results in lowering alveolar surface tension and stabilizes the alveoli to prevent the lung from collapsing at resting transpulmonary pressures. Premature infants are highly likely to be PS deficient, which causes increased surface tension leading to lung collapse and results in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). NRDS is associated with fast breathing, increased heart rate and apoxia, which in certain cases may lead to death (Khawar and Marwaha, 2021). PS therapy is currently the first-line treatment for NRDS.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients admitted in intensive care units are mainly those with clinical symptoms of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2-induced lung injury in COVID-19 patients may lead to respiratory failure. Emerging evidence on respiratory mechanisms suggests that clinical symptoms of ARDS in COVID-19 patients resemble to those of NRDS caused by surfactant deficiency.
In this review, we connect the current understanding of the pathophysiology of lungs in COVID-19 patients with the possible role of PS in circumventing ARDS symptoms in COVID-19 patients.
Pulmonary Surfactant in Lung Homeostasis
PS is an important biosurfactant in human. PS lines the alveoli and terminal bronchioles, thereby protecting the lungs from atelectasis (Han and Mallampalli, 2015). PS is synthesized in type II alveolar epithelial cells, stored in lamellar bodies, and is secreted via exocytosis into the alveolar lumen. PS is a complex mixture comprising 90% lipids and 10% surfactant proteins by weight. The lipids are made of DPPC (36%), unsaturated phosphatidylcholine (PC; 32%), phosphatidylglycerol (PG; 8%), cholesterol (7%), other phospholipids (PL; 4%) and other neutral lipids (NL; 3%). The surfactant proteins consist of plasma protein (3%), surfactant protein (SP)-A (5%), SP-B (0.7%), SP-C (0.8%) and SP-D (0.5%) as depicted in Figure 1A) (Bernhard, 2016).
FIGURE 1. Lung pulmonary surfactant (PS) (A) Relative precent of various components in PS (B) Representative structure of PS (C) Molecular representation of surfactant protein (SP)-A (D) Molecular representation of SP-B (E) Molecular representation of SP-C (F) Molecular representation of SP-D. DPPC, dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine; NL, neutral lipid; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; PL, phospholipid; SP, surfactant protein.
The PS lipids forms a monolayer at the air-fluid interface, reduces the surface tension to a minimum of <10 mN/m and thus, prevents the collapse of alveoli and maintains the alveolar stability (Sunde et al., 2017). The main active component of PS lipids is DPPC.
The SPs are classified into hydrophilic SPs (SP-A and SP-D) and hydrophobic SPs (SP-B and SP-C; Figures 1C–F). The details of SPs and PS lipids are provided in Table 1 (Wang et al., 2020). SP-A and SP-D are highly ordered collagen-like oligomeric glycoprotein belonging to collectin family. These two SPs are part of innate immune response and protect the lungs against inhaled chemicals and microorganisms via stimulating phagocytosis by alveolar macrophages. They are also involved in surfactant metabolism. SP-A is the most abundant SP and accounts for 2–3% w/w of total SPs. It does not have any effect on surface tension at air-fluid interface in alveoli. However, it enhances the phospholipid absorption process to the air-fluid interface, regulates the PS secretion by AT-II cells, binds specific carbohydrate moieties found on lipids and on the surface of microorganisms and prevents the inhibition of surfactant function by plasma proteins which are leaked into the alveolar space (Echaide et al., 2017). The encoded protein may also be involved in surfactant metabolism. SP-B and SP-C are apolipoproteins comprising of 1–2% w/w of total SPs (Echaide et al., 2017). These are involved in the spreading of the surfactant layer at the air-fluid interface and thus reduce the surface tension (Weaver and Conkright, 2001). The SP-B enhances the rate of spreading and increases the stability of monolayers.
TABLE 1. Characteristics and details of pulmonary surfactant proteins and surfactant lipids.
Pulmonary Surfactant Deficiency/Dysfunction
In anticipation of birth during gestation period, the alveoli start producing PS in 24th week and reaches to the peak production in 34th week. The endogenous cortisol stimulates the production of PS during gestation. Premature infants, especially those born before 34th weeks, have immature lungs and are deficient in pS. These infants have difficulty in breathing and develop a condition called NRDS (Nogee, 2019). Pregnant women who are at the risk of premature delivery are given betamethasone for 48 h before delivery to improve the lung maturity and reduce the risk of developing NRDS. The genetic disorders comprising the mutations in SP-B and SP-C are reported to cause surfactant dysfunction, leading to the development of NRDS. Observational studies suggested that humans with ARDS have altered PS composition and its functions. AT-II epithelial cells are reported to be the primary site of influenza virus replication. Mice infected with influenza virus have shown lower amounts of phosphatidylcholine and alters the metabolism of PS, which are attributed to the development of ARDS (Woods et al., 2016).
The effects of SP deficiencies or dysfunctions is paramount in the pathogenesis of neonatal respiratory diseases (Verlato et al., 2018). In neonates, SP-A is critical in lung immune system while SP-B is important in sustaining respiratory physiology. It was also substantiated that there is a significant lack of surfactant protein found in preterm newborns with RDS or had experienced failure in extubation than that of newborns with normal functioning lungs (Ballard et al., 2019). It is also known that polymorphisms of SP-A, B and D showed association with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and various other pulmonary diseases. Chang et al. reported that SP-A +186A/G and SP-B 1580C/T polymorphisms results in the elevated risk of preterm NRDS; on the other hand, polymorphisms of SP-B –18A/C, SP-D Met11 ThrT/C, and Ala160 ThrG/A genes are not associated to the risk of NRDS (Chang et al., 2016).
The beneficial use of surfactant protein as a treatment in neonates with RDS has been a breakthrough and has been studied in-depth for neonatal medicine in the past 3 decades (Speer et al., 2013). Thus, it is logical to hypothesize that restoration of PS does improve the lung function (Echaide et al., 2017) and circumvent the symptoms of NRDS in infants and ARDS in adults.
Applications of Pulmonary Surfactant
The primary application of pulmonary surfactants is in the treatment of NRDS in premature infants. However, the studies did not demonstrate significant benefit of pulmonary surfactants in ARDS. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the effect of surfactant in adult patients with ARDS (Ballard et al., 2019) revealed neither improvements in the mortality nor improvement in oxygenation. Marcel Filoche et al. proposed that insufficient delivery of PS to the lungs in adults could be the reason for showing the efficacy in adults (Speer et al., 2013). One of the postulations put forward to explain the observed differences in clinical efficacy of PS in NRDS and ARDS is that in case of NRDS, the surfactants are administered well in advance before the RDS becomes severe in infants who are at the risk of developing NRDS. Thus, it is worth to explore the option of checking the efficacy of PS in early stages of ARDS. However, this approach requires the identification of patients who are at the stage of developing ARDS. Thus, identification of PS levels in serum would predict the occurrence of ARDS.
The clinical efficacy of PS is also being actively investigated in other pulmonary diseases such as asthma and pneumonia (Choi et al., 2020). One study reported that PS improved lung function in an acute asthma exacerbation but not in stable asthma (Tepper et al., 2012). One study reported the administration of PS improved oxygenation in Gram-negative lobar pneumonia and in HIV-infected patients with P. carinii pneumonia or RSV pneumonia (Han and Mallampalli, 2015). Another study reported that PS improved the pulmonary function in adult patient with stable chronic bronchitis (Agudelo et al., 2020). In addition, PS is reported to decrease the cytokine release, synthesis of inflammatory mediators, lymphocyte proliferation, immunoglobulin production, and expression of adhesion molecules. Another study reported PS improves the anti-inflammatory effect of amikacin. All the above observations suggest the possible role of surfactants in modulating the immune responses in pulmonary diseases.
The SP-A and SP-D are reported to bind to viruses (influenza A, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), SARS-CoV) and inhibit their activity of the viruses through viral neutralization, agglutination, and enhanced phagocytosis (Cañadas et al., 2020).
Therapeutic Pulmonary Surfactants
There are two types of therapeutic PS: natural and synthetic. Natural PS are derived from animals while synthetic PS contain peptides that mimic SP-B and SP-C. Therapeutic PS are the first-line treatment option for NRDS (Whitsett, 2014; Hentschel et al., 2020). The natural therapeutic PS are being sourced from bovine, porcine, and human amniotic fluid. Currently the use of human amniotic fluid for sourcing therapeutic PS are halted mainly because of non-availability and cost. The advantage of natural surfactants is that they contain surfactant-associated proteins and thus results in better spreading and lung defense properties.
Due to the difficulties in sourcing animal derived surfactant, well-defined synthetic surfactants were developed. Initially, the synthesis of artificial SP-B and SP-C used for the treatment of neonatal RDS was indeed challenging. It was also reported that synthetic surfactant containing only one protein has not found success (Johansson and Curstedt, 2019). Both synthetic and natural surfactants are found to be effective in RDS with natural surfactants containing SP-B and SP-C are found to be superior in clinical efficacy.
To date, the list of natural surfactants, and synthetic surfactants developed for the treatment of respiratory infections are shown in Table 2. First generation synthetic surfactants were prepared in combination of DPPC with either egg phosphatidylglycerol (ALEC®) or hexadecanol and tyloxapol (Exosurf®) (Zhang et al., 2011). However, the first-generation surfactants do not contain either SP-B or SP-C peptide mimics, thus limiting their clinical efficacy. The second-generation of synthetic surfactants contain either SP-B (Surfaxin®) or SP-C (Venticute®) peptide (Bae et al., 2016). The second-generation of synthetic surfactants are found to be clinically effective, suggesting the presence of SP-B and SP-C in surfactants are essential.
TABLE 2. Clinical trials on pulmonary surfactants for the treatment of ARDS in COVID-19 patients.
Colfosceril palmitate is a first generation commercially available artificial surfactant (Law et al., 2014; Sardesai et al., 2017). At present, it is under the state of cancellation in the post-marketing stage because of adverse effects. In addition to being useful in RDS, it has also shown to significantly reduce the risk of pneumothoraces, pulmonary interstitial emphysema and mortality, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage and patent ductus arteriosus. Sinapultide, also known as KL4 peptide, mimics human SP-B. It is administered as its aqueous dispersion with the phospholipids. Lucinactant is a synthetic surfactant containing sinapultide, and lipids, DPPC, palmitoyloleoyl phosphatidylglycerol (POPG) and a palmitic acid. Pumactant is another synthetic surfactant containing naturally occurring phospholipids DPPC and PG.
Calfactant is a natural pulmonary surfactant from calf lungs containing phosphatidylcholine, SP-B and SP-C. Beractant is another natural pulmonary surfactant from bovine lungs containing phosphotidylcholine, triglycerides, fatty acids, SP-B and SP-C. Portactant alfa is another natural pulmonary surfactant from porcine lungs containing phosphatidylcholine, dipaImitoylphosphatidylcholine, SP-B and SP-C.
Pulmonary Surfactants in COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2 enters the body through lungs via binding of viral spike protein with angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) receptor (Mason, 2020). After entry, SARS-CoV-2 is postulated to destroy type II alveolar cells, the site for the synthesis of pulmonary surfactants, resulting in decreased production of pS. Decreased surfactant production causes atelectasis and reduced the pulmonary compliance. The patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are presented with clinical symptoms which are very similar to those observed in NRDS (Nieman et al., 2018; Schousboe et al., 2020) for which deficiency in PS is the primary cause (Figure 2). Decreased concentration of PS, altered composition of PS and mutations in PS are reported to be the critical factors in COVID-19 mortality (Weiskirchen, 2020). Mirastschijski et al. has suggested to include pulmonary surfactants therapy in the early stages together with standard ARDS care. Preliminary observations from lung autopsies of COVID-19 patients found that pulmonary surfactant increased blood oxygenation, reduced pulmonary edema, and ameliorated the excessive inflammatory reaction (Mirastschijski et al., 2020). In addition, PS is reported to have the ability to recognize the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and thereby activate the macrophages for phagocytosis (Matera et al., 2020). This evidence motivated the interventional clinical trials to investigate the clinical effectiveness of PS in COVID-19 patients.
FIGURE 2. Pathological changes in the lung alveolus during COVID-19 (A) Normal alveolus is wrapped with capillaries containing red blood cells. Oxygen in the alveolus is exchanged with carbon dioxide in the capillaries. The alveolus surface contains alveolar Type I and Type II cells. Type I cells enables gas exchange. Type II cells secrete pulmonary surfactant (PS). PS lines the alveolus and prevent it from collapsing (B) In a moderately infected lung, Alveolar Type II cells are inflamed resulting in reduced pulmonary surfactant. Surface tension and pressure increase inside the alveolus affecting the gas exchange. Vasodilation of the capillary occurs resulting in the release of inflammatory cytokines and accumulation of protein-rich fluid inside the alveolus (C) In severely infected lung, the alveolar type II cells become more inflamed thereby resulting in complete loss of pulmonary surfactant. Scar tissue on the alveolar surface began to form. The release of inflammatory cytokines is increased, and more protein-rich fluid accumulate inside the alveolus. The oxygen/carbon dioxide exchange is greatly hindered and thus patients in this stage must undergo intubation as an aid to breathe.
Gattinoni et al. (Gattinoni et al., 2020) has classified COVID-19 patients into two different groups; one group develops acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with low compliance and another group develops non-ARDS with normal compliance. Gene expression studies on lung biopsy cells in COVID-19 patients have confirmed the downregulation of pulmonary surfactant proteins and their metabolism which has provided a scientific base to advocate further studies on investigating the usefulness of surfactant therapy in COVID-19 patients (Islam and Khan, 2020). Clinical trials are underway to determine the association of SP-D levels (NCT04618861) and SP genetic variants (NCT04650191) with severity of COVID-19 infection (Surfactant Protein D Levels in Covid-19 Infection: Case-Control Study; Surfactant Protein Genetic Variants in COVID-19 Infection) and the results are not yet available.
Peter et al. (Schousboe et al., 2020) has postulated that COVID-19 patients with pulmonary surfactant deficiency develop symptoms resembling neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). A clinical trial (NCT04609488) is underway to determine the levels of surfactant proteins in COVID-19 patients to delineate the association between surfactant deficiency and progression of COVID-19 disease.
Lung surfactant therapy is a standard, safe and effective therapy for the treatment of ARDS in neonates, however clinical trials on recombinant SP-C based surfactant was found to be ineffective in the treatment of ARDS in adults (Spragg et al., 2004). The natural surfactants, compared to synthetic surfactants, are reported to be superior in improving the blood oxygenation and shortening the ventilation time in infants (Ainsworth et al., 2000; Been and Zimmermann, 2007). These observations suggest that early administration of natural surfactant to COVID-19 patients might be beneficial to improve the pulmonary function (Mirastschijski et al., 2020).
A recent review article by Francesco et al. (Cattel et al., 2021) has highlighted the potential use of exogenous surfactants early in the treatment of COVID-19 ARDS. Kumar et al. (Kumar, 2020) has proposed an innovative hypothesis that co-aerosolized exogenous pulmonary surfactant and ambroxol can be a potential therapeutic option for the treatment of COVID-19 ARDS. The hypothesis was made based on reported evidences on beneficial effects of exogenous surfactants (Davidson et al., 2006; Dushianthan et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2013; Meng et al., 2019) and ambroxol (Malerba and Ragnoli, 2008; Paleari et al., 2011; Kantar et al., 2020) in the treatment of ARDS. However, this hypothesis is yet to be tested. A prospective observational cohort study revealed that autoimmunity in severe COVID-19 patients is mediated through binding of immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies to human surfactant protein B (SP-B) and surfactant protein C (SP-C) leading to reduced levels of pulmonary surfactant (Sinnberg et al., 2021).
Abbas et al. (Abbasi et al., 2021) has made a serendipitous observation that non-invasive ventilation improved the survival of mice with bacterial pneumonia and the improved survival is associated with the expression of surfactant protein A. Majority of the COVID-19 patients are also reported to be co-infect with other pathogens (Hughes et al., 2020; Jiang et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2020; Roh et al., 2021) and many research papers (Floros and Phelps, 2020; Tekos et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020) have highlighted that SP-A variants have shown beneficial effects in the treatment of ARDS in COVID-19 patients under different scenarios. Thus, in an opinion article by Abbs et al. (Abbasi et al., 2021), the team has expressed that non-invasive ventilation using high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) may be beneficial for COVID-19 patients which warrants further laboratory and clinical studies to confirm (Abbasi et al., 2021).
A clinical study (Choreño-Parra et al., 2021) has concluded that serum SP-D level is high only in pandemic influenza A (H1N1) but not in COVID-19. However, contradicting to this study, another clinical study (Kerget et al., 2020) has concluded that human SP-D levels is higher in individuals with COVID-19 compared to those without COVID-19. The contradictory results from these two studies may be due to differences in the population demographics, and objectives of the study. Thus, more clinical studies are warranted to confirm the association between SP-D levels and progression of COVID-19 infection.
In a case study of a 48-year-old-male non-smoker COVID-19 patient with comorbidities of hyperlipidemia and prediabetes (Heching et al., 2021), it is reported that administration of surfactant (Calfactant) directly to the lungs has improved oxygenation. This observation rises a hope that surfactant therapy would be beneficial for treating ARDS in COVID-19 and thus warrant further detailed investigations to confirm the therapeutic efficacy of surfactants in COVID-19 patients.
The recombinant fragment of human lung surfactant protein D (rfhSP-D) is reported to be more potent than remdesivir, an antiviral, in inhibiting the replication and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 and the activity is found to mediated through down regulation of RdRp gene expression (Hsieh et al., 2021; Madan et al., 2021).
Computational fluid dynamics simulation studies (Kitaoka et al., 2021) using 3D human airway models has predicted that wedge instillation of pulmonary surfactant from subsegmental bronchi is better than conventional method to deliver the effective concentration of pulmonary surfactant to the lungs to protect them from COVID-19 infection.
Hideyuki has put forward a hypothesis (Takano, 2020) based on cumulative scientific evidences that pulmonary surfactants or synthetic surfactants or surfactant production stimulants may be effective for either prophylaxis or treatment for COVID-19. However, this hypothesis is yet to be tested and validated in clinic.
Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Surfactants in COVID-19 Patients
Based on the data retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/, accessed on June 15, 2021, the details of on-going clinical trials in surfactants related to COVID-19 are provided in Table 3. Three surfactant products: poractant alfa, bovine lung extract surfactant (BLSE), and lucinactant are in phase I/II trials to test their efficacy in improving the clinical outcomes of ARDS in COVID-19 patients. There are two trials that are underway on poractant alfa using two different routes of administration: bronchial fibroscopy and endotracheal intubation. Another two trials are underway on BLSE using two different routes of administration: endotracheal intubation and inhalation. As for lucinactant, one trial is underway, and it is administered via injection only. In addition, two trials are going on to determine the levels of surfactants present in the lungs and serum of COVID-19 patients with the objective of finding the association between the surfactant levels and ARDS symptoms. Lastly, one clinical trial is underway to determine the efficacy of new drug delivery system directly to the lungs using COVsurf.
TABLE 3. List of natural and synthetic surfactant proteins.
Conclusion
SARS-CoV-2 uses ACE-2 receptor on lungs for entry and alveolar type II cells for replication. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 causes ARDS which may lead to respiratory failure. AT II cells are the sites of pulmonary surfactant production. Lack of PS is the principal cause for NRDS and viral infections are known to reduce PS levels in lungs. PS therapy is the mainstay for NRDS treatment across the world for many years. The results from clinical trials on the efficacy and safety PS in adults with ARDS were not significant in terms of clinical outcomes but they were proven to be safe. The lack of efficacy is attributed to the insufficient delivery of PS to the lungs and thus research has been initiated to investigate new drug delivery systems for improving the PS delivery directly to the lungs. Serum PS levels were found to be low in COVID-19 patients and ARDS clinical symptoms in COVID-19 were found to be like those of NRDS. The science of pulmonary surfactant has come a long way since it was discovered in the 1950s and provides very strong theoretical evidence suggesting that PS could play a role in COVID-19 treatment. In the current COVID-19 pandemic crisis, researchers and health care workers across the globe have been working hard to find a solution to end the pandemic. Few clinical trials are in progress to test the efficacy of three pulmonary surfactants in improving the clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients, to determine the association between surfactant levels and severity of ARDS in COVID-19 patients, and new drug delivery systems for improved and safe delivery of PS in COVID-19 patients.
Author Contributions
SW and ZL searched the literature, collected the data, and drafted the manuscript. SW, ZL, XW, and SZ contributed to analysis and manuscript preparation. SZ, PG, and ZS helped in checking the figures and tables. SZ and XW downloaded the documents and made classification. SZ, PG, and ZS contributed comments for version of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This research was funded by National Major Science and Technology Projects of China, 2018ZX09721004-011.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
AA, amino acid; ACE-2, angiotensin converting enzyme 2; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; AT-II, alveolar type-II; COVID-19, Coronavirus disease 2019; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; DAD, diffuse alveolar disease; DPPC, dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; NCT, National Clinical Trials; NL, neutral lipid; NRDS, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; PL, phospholipid; POPG, palmitoyloleoyl phosphatidylglycerol; PS, pulmonary surfactant; RDS, respiratory distress syndrome; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; SARS-CoV-2, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SP, surfactant protein.
References
Abbasi, A., Phelps, D. S., Ravi, R., and Floros, J. (2021). Can Prophylactic High Flow of Humidified and Warmed Filtered Air Improve Survival from Bacterial Pneumonia and Sars-Cov-2 in Elderly Individuals? the Role of Surfactant Protein a. Antioxidants 10, 640. doi:10.3390/antiox10050640
Agassandian, M., and Mallampalli, R. K. (2013). Surfactant Phospholipid Metabolism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (Bba) - Mol. Cel Biol. Lipids 1831, 612–625. doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.09.010
Agudelo, C. W., Kumley, B. K., Area-Gomez, E., Xu, Y., Dabo, A. J., Geraghty, P., et al. (2020). Decreased Surfactant Lipids Correlate with Lung Function in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). PLoS One 15, e0228279. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228279
Ainsworth, S., Beresford, M., Milligan, D., Shaw, N., Matthews, J., Fenton, A., et al. (2000). Pumactant and Poractant Alfa for Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Neonates Born at 25-29 Weeks' Gestation: a Randomised Trial. The Lancet 355, 1387–1392. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02136-X
Bae, C.-W., Chung, S.-H., and Choi, Y.-S. (2016). Development of a Synthetic Surfactant Using a Surfactant Protein-C Peptide Analog: In Vitro Studies of Surface Physical Properties. Yonsei Med. J. 57, 203–208. doi:10.3349/ymj.2016.57.1.203
Ballard, P. L., Keller, R. L., Keller, R. L., Truog, W. E., Chapin, C., Horneman, H., et al. (2019). Surfactant Status and Respiratory Outcome in Premature Infants Receiving Late Surfactant Treatment. Pediatr. Res. 85, 305–311. doi:10.1038/s41390-018-0144-3
Been, J. V., and Zimmermann, L. J. I. (2007). What's New in Surfactant? Eur. J. Pediatr. 166, 889–899. doi:10.1007/s00431-007-0501-4
Bernhard, W. (2016). Lung Surfactant: Function and Composition in the Context of Development and Respiratory Physiology. Ann. Anat. - Anatomischer Anzeiger 208, 146–150. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2016.08.003
Cañadas, O., Olmeda, B., Alonso, A., and Pérez-Gil, J. (2020). Lipid-Protein and Protein-Protein Interactions in the Pulmonary Surfactant System and Their Role in Lung Homeostasis. Ijms 21, 3708. doi:10.3390/ijms21103708
Cattel, F., Giordano, S., Bertiond, C., Lupia, T., Corcione, S., Scaldaferri, M., et al. (2021). Use of Exogenous Pulmonary Surfactant in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS): Role in SARS-CoV-2-Related Lung Injury. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 288, 103645. doi:10.1016/j.resp.2021.103645
Chang, H.-Y., Li, F., Li, F.-S., Zheng, C.-Z., Lei, Y.-Z., and Wang, J. (2016). Genetic Polymorphisms of SP-A, SP-B, and SP-D and Risk of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Neonates. Med. Sci. Monit. 22, 5091–5100. doi:10.12659/msm.898553
Choi, Y., Jang, J., and Park, H.-S. (2020). Pulmonary Surfactants: a New Therapeutic Target in Asthma. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 20, 1–8. doi:10.1007/s11882-020-00968-8
Choreño-Parra, J. A., Jiménez-Álvarez, L. A., Ramírez-Martínez, G., Cruz-Lagunas, A., Thapa, M., Fernández-López, L. A., et al. (2021). Expression of Surfactant Protein D Distinguishes Severe Pandemic Influenza A(H1N1) from Coronavirus Disease 2019. J. Infect. Dis. 223, jiab113. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiab113
Davidson, W., Dorscheid, D., Spragg, R., Schulzer, M., Mak, E., and Ayas, N. (2006). Exogenous Pulmonary Surfactant for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Results of a Meta-Analysis. Crit. Care 10, R41. doi:10.1186/cc4851
Dushianthan, A., Cusack, R., Goss, V., Postle, A. D., and Grocott, M. P. (2012). Clinical Review: Exogenous Surfactant Therapy for Acute Lung Injury/acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome - where Do We Go from Here? Crit. Care 16, 238. doi:10.1186/cc11512
Echaide, M., Autilio, C., Arroyo, R., and Perez-Gil, J. (2017). Restoring Pulmonary Surfactant Membranes and Films at the Respiratory Surface. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (Bba) - Biomembranes 1859, 1725–1739. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.03.015
Floros, J., and Phelps, D. S. (2020). Is the Role of Lung Innate Immune Molecules, SP-A1 and SP-A2, and of the Alveolar Macrophage Being Overlooked in COVID-19. COVID-19 Diverse Outcomes. Pneumon. 33, 1–5. doi:10.1016/s0925-4439(98)00077-5
Gattinoni, L., Chiumello, D., and Rossi, S. (2020). COVID-19 Pneumonia: ARDS or Not? Crit. Care 24, 154. doi:10.1186/s13054-020-02880-z
Han, S., and Mallampalli, R. K. (2015). The Role of Surfactant in Lung Disease and Host Defense against Pulmonary Infections. Ann. ATS 12, 765–774. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201411-507FR
Heching, M., Lev, S., Shitenberg, D., Dicker, D., and Kramer, M. R. (2021). Surfactant for the Treatment of ARDS in a Patient with Coronavirus Disease 2019. Chest S0012-3692, 00100–8. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.028
Hentschel, R., Bohlin, K., van Kaam, A., Fuchs, H., and Danhaive, O. (2020). Surfactant Replacement Therapy: from Biological Basis to Current Clinical Practice. Pediatr. Res. 88, 176–183. doi:10.1038/s41390-020-0750-8
Hsieh, M.-H., Beirag, N., Murugaiah, V., Chou, Y.-C., Kuo, W.-S., Kao, H.-F., et al. (2021). Human Surfactant Protein D Binds Spike Protein and Acts as an Entry Inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 Pseudotyped Viral Particles. Front. Immunol. 12, 641360. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.641360
Hughes, S., Troise, O., Donaldson, H., Mughal, N., and Moore, L. S. P. (2020). Bacterial and Fungal Coinfection Among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: a Retrospective Cohort Study in a UK Secondary-Care Setting. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 26, 1395–1399. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.025
Islam, A. B. M. M. K., and Khan, M. A.-A.-K. (2020). Lung Transcriptome of a COVID-19 Patient and Systems Biology Predictions Suggest Impaired Surfactant Production Which May be Druggable by Surfactant Therapy. Sci. Rep. 10, 19395. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76404-8
Jiang, S., Liu, P., Xiong, G., Yang, Z., Wang, M., Li, Y., et al. (2020). Coinfection of SARS-CoV-2 and Multiple Respiratory Pathogens in Children. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 58, 1160–1161. doi:10.1515/cclm-2020-0434
Johansson, J., and Curstedt, T. (2019). Synthetic Surfactants with SP-B and SP-C Analogues to Enable Worldwide Treatment of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Other Lung Diseases. J. Intern. Med. 285, 165–186. doi:10.1111/joim.12845
Kantar, A., Klimek, L., Cazan, D., Sperl, A., Sent, U., and Mesquita, M. (2020). Ambroxol for the Treatment of Children with Acute and Chronic Respiratory Diseases: an Overview of Efficacy and Safety. Multidis Res. Med. 15, 511. doi:10.4081/mrm.2020.511
Kerget, B., Kerget, F., Koçak, A. O., Kızıltunç, A., Araz, Ö., Uçar, E. Y., et al. (2020). Are Serum Interleukin 6 and Surfactant Protein D Levels Associated with the Clinical Course of COVID-19? Lung 198, 777–784. doi:10.1007/s00408-020-00393-8
Kim, D., Quinn, J., Pinsky, B., Shah, N. H., and Brown, I. (2020). Rates of Co-infection between SARS-CoV-2 and Other Respiratory Pathogens. California: Stanford, Jama 323, 2085–2086. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.6266
Kitaoka, H., Kobayashi, H., Takimoto, T., and Kijima, T. (2021). Proposal of Selective Wedge Instillation of Pulmonary Surfactant for COVID-19 Pneumonia Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation. BMC Pulm. Med. 21, 1–5. doi:10.1186/s12890-021-01435-4
Kumar, P. (2020). Co-aerosolized Pulmonary Surfactant and Ambroxol for COVID-19 ARDS Intervention: What Are We Waiting for? Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 577172. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.577172
Law, V., Knox, C., Djoumbou, Y., Jewison, T., Guo, A. C., Liu, Y., et al. (2014). DrugBank 4.0: Shedding New Light on Drug Metabolism. Nucl. Acids Res. 42, D1091–D1097. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1068
Madan, T., Biswas, B., Varghese, P. M., Subedi, R., Pandit, H., Idicula-Thomas, S., et al. (2021). A Recombinant Fragment of Human Surfactant Protein D Binds Spike Protein and Inhibits Infectivity and Replication of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Samples. Am. J. Respir. Cel Mol. Biol. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2021-0005oc
Malerba, M., and Ragnoli, B. (2008). Ambroxol in the 21st century: Pharmacological and Clinical Update. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 4, 1119–1129. doi:10.1517/17425255.4.8.1119
Mason, R. J. (2020). Thoughts on the Alveolar Phase of COVID-19. Am. J. Physiology-Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 319, L115–L120. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00126.2020
Matera, M. G., Rogliani, P., Calzetta, L., and Cazzola, M. (2020). Pharmacological Management of COVID-19 Patients with ARDS (CARDS): A Narrative Review. Respir. Med. 171, 106114. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106114
Meng, S.-S., Chang, W., Lu, Z.-H., Xie, J.-F., Qiu, H.-B., Yang, Y., et al. (2019). Effect of Surfactant Administration on Outcomes of Adult Patients in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. BMC Pulm. Med. 19, 9. doi:10.1186/s12890-018-0761-y
Mirastschijski, U., Dembinski, R., and Maedler, K. (2020). Lung Surfactant for Pulmonary Barrier Restoration in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia. Front. Med. 7, 1–4. doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.00254
NCT04618861 Surfactant Protein D Levels in Covid-19 Infection: Case-Control Study ClinicalTrials.Gov. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04618861 (Accessed November 6, 2020).
NCT04650191 Surfactant Protein Genetic Variants in COVID-19 Infection. Available at: https://ezp2.imu.edu.my/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsclt&AN=edsclt.NCT04650191&site=eds-live (Accessed Dcemeber 2, 2020).
Nieman, G. F., Andrews, P., Satalin, J., Wilcox, K., Kollisch-Singule, M., Madden, M., et al. (2018). Acute Lung Injury: How to Stabilize a Broken Lung. Crit. Care 22, 1–11. doi:10.1186/s13054-018-2051-8
Nogee, L. M. (2019). Genetic Causes of Surfactant Protein Abnormalities. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 31, 330–339. doi:10.1097/MOP.0000000000000751
Paleari, D., Rossi, G. A., Nicolini, G., and Olivieri, D. (2011). Ambroxol: A Multifaceted Molecule with Additional Therapeutic Potentials in Respiratory Disorders of Childhood. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 6, 1203–1214. doi:10.1517/17460441.2011.629646
Roh, K. H., Kim, Y. K., Kim, S.-W., Kang, E.-R., Yang, Y.-J., Jung, S.-K., et al. (2021). Coinfections with Respiratory Pathogens Among COVID-19 Patients in Korea. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2021, 1–9. doi:10.1155/2021/6651045
Sardesai, S., Biniwale, M., Wertheimer, F., Garingo, A., and Ramanathan, R. (2017). Evolution of Surfactant Therapy for Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Past, Present, and Future. Pediatr. Res. 81, 240–248. doi:10.1038/pr.2016.203
Schousboe, P., Wiese, L., Heiring, C., Verder, H., Poorisrisak, P., Verder, P., et al. (2020). Assessment of Pulmonary Surfactant in COVID-19 Patients. Crit. Care 24, 4–5. doi:10.1186/s13054-020-03268-9
Seadler, B. D., Kaushik, R., and Sharma, S. (2020). Physiology, Alveolar Tension. FL: Treasure Island, StatPearls PublishingAvailable at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30969647 (Accessed November 25, 2020).
Sinnberg, T., Lichtensteiger, C., Ali, O. H., Pop, O. T., Gilardi, M., Risch, L., et al. (2021). IgA Autoantibodies Target Pulmonary Surfactant in Patients with Severe COVID-19. Matthias S. Matter 6 Lukas Flatz 17, 19. doi:10.1101/2021.02.02.21250940
Speer, C. P., Sweet, D. G., and Halliday, H. L. (2013). Surfactant Therapy: Past, Present and Future. Early Hum. Dev. 89, S22–S24. doi:10.1016/S0378-3782(13)70008-2
Spragg, R. G., Lewis, J. F., Walmrath, H.-D., Johannigman, J., Bellingan, G., Laterre, P.-F., et al. (2004). Effect of Recombinant Surfactant Protein C-Based Surfactant on the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 351, 884–892. doi:10.1056/nejmoa033181
Sunde, M., Pham, C. L. L., and Kwan, A. H. (2017). Molecular Characteristics and Biological Functions of Surface-Active and Surfactant Proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 86, 585–608. doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-044847
Takano, H. (2020). Pulmonary Surfactant Itself Must Be a strong Defender against SARS-CoV-2. Med. Hypotheses 144, 110020. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110020
Tekos, F., Skaperda, Z., Goutzourelas, N., Phelps, D. S., Floros, J., and Kouretas, D. (2020). The Importance of Redox Status in the Frame of Lifestyle Approaches and the Genetics of the Lung Innate Immune Molecules, SP-A1 and SP-A2, on Differential Outcomes of Covid-19 Infection. Antioxidants 9, 784, 1–22. doi:10.3390/antiox9090784
Tepper, R. S., Wise, R. S., Covar, R., Irvin, C. G., Kercsmar, C. M., Kraft, M., et al. (2012). Asthma Outcomes: Pulmonary Physiology. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 129, S65–S87. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.986
Verlato, G., Simonato, M., Giambelluca, S., Fantinato, M., Correani, A., Cavicchiolo, M. E., et al. (2018). Surfactant Components and Tracheal Aspirate Inflammatory Markers in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. J. Pediatr. 203, 442–446. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.08.019
Wang, F., Liu, J., and Zeng, H. (2020). Interactions of Particulate Matter and Pulmonary Surfactant: Implications for Human Health. Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci. 284, 102244. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2020.102244
Weaver, T. E., and Conkright, J. J. (2001). Function of Surfactant Proteins B and C. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 63, 555–578. doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.63.1.555
Weiskirchen, R. (2020). Severity of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Does Surfactant Matter? Front. Microbiol. 11, 1905. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01905
Wert, S. E., Whitsett, J. A., and Nogee, L. M. (2009). Genetic Disorders of Surfactant Dysfunction. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 12, 253–274. doi:10.2350/09-01-0586.1
Whitsett, J. A. (2014). The Molecular Era of Surfactant Biology. Neonatology 105, 337–343. doi:10.1159/000360649
Woods, P. S., Doolittle, L. M., Rosas, L. E., Joseph, L. M., Calomeni, E. P., and Davis, I. C. (2016). Lethal H1N1 Influenza a Virus Infection Alters the Murine Alveolar Type II Cell Surfactant Lipidome. Am. J. Physiology-Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 311, L1160–L1169. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00339.2016
Xu, H. N., Lin, Z., Gandhi, C. K., Amatya, S., Wang, Y., Li, L. Z., et al. (2020). Sex and SP-A2 Dependent NAD(H) Redox Alterations in Mouse Alveolar Macrophages in Response to Ozone Exposure: Potential Implications for COVID-19. Antioxidants 9, 915–919. doi:10.3390/antiox9100915
Zhang, H., Fan, Q., Wang, Y. E., Neal, C. R., and Zuo, Y. Y. (2011). Comparative Study of Clinical Pulmonary Surfactants Using Atomic Force Microscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (Bba) - Biomembranes 1808, 1832–1842. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.03.006
Keywords: pulmonary surfactant, COVID-19, SARS-cov-2, ARDS, NRDS
Citation: Wang S, Li Z, Wang X, Zhang S, Gao P and Shi Z (2021) The Role of Pulmonary Surfactants in the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in COVID-19. Front. Pharmacol. 12:698905. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.698905
Received: 22 April 2021; Accepted: 17 June 2021;
Published: 29 June 2021.
Edited by:
Chandrabose Selvaraj, Alagappa University, IndiaReviewed by:
Gopinath Krishnasamy, University of Turku, FinlandBikash Kumar Paul, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Bangladesh
Pradeep Kumar, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
Copyright © 2021 Wang, Li, Wang, Zhang, Gao and Shi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Peng Gao, NDgzOTU1MDRAcXEuY29t; Zuorong Shi, enVvcm9uZ3NoQDE2My5jb20=
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship