Kanchana K. Ayyar*
Alan C. Moss- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
Exosomes are 30–150 nm sized vesicles released by a variety of cells, and are found in most physiological compartments (feces, blood, urine, saliva, breast milk). They can contain different cargo, including nucleic acids, proteins and lipids. In Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), a distinct exosome profile can be detected in blood and fecal samples. In addition, circulating exosomes can carry targets on their surface for monoclonal antibodies used as IBD therapy. This review aims to understand the exosome profile in humans and other mammals, the cargo contained in them, the effect of exosomes on the gut, and the application of exosomes in IBD therapy.
Introduction
Exosomes are biological nanovesicles (30–150 nm) that are made by most cell types (Gross et al., 2012). They fuse with the plasma membrane of the cell and are released outside, they can be detected in almost all biological fluids (Edgar, 2016). The exosomal membrane is made of lipids and proteins (Mathivanan et al., 2010). The cargo contained within the exosomes can be proteins, nucleic acids and lipids which may or may not be similar to those of the parent cell (Valadi et al., 2007). Neighboring and/or distant cells can benefit from the cargo of circulating exosomes. They function as signaling molecules and can bring about regulation. The knowledge of their autocrine, paracrine, juxtacrine, and endocrine regulation has aroused the curiosity of many researchers. Studies indicate that exosomes play a role in extracellular matrix remodeling and signal transmission (Beshbishy et al., 2020). They also play vital roles in many disease conditions like cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and others like Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) by regulating immunity, inflammation, and tissue homeostasis.
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) has been widely thought to be a western disease; however, the global prevalence of IBD has been increasing since 2000. One in 200 individuals in Western countries suffers from IBD (Ng et al., 2017). Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are the two distinct disorders of IBD. CD and UC differ in the symptoms, complications, part of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract they affect, pathophysiology, disease course and management. UC affects the colon and is characterized by continuous lesions and superficial inflammation, which can lead to erosions, ulcers and bloody diarrhea. CD is progressive and destructive—many patients have systemic, extra intestinal manifestations, which strongly affects their quality of life due to risk of hospitalization, complications and surgery (Torres et al., 2017).
The pathogenesis of IBD is still ambiguous, the process is linked to genetic, environmental, gut microbiota and immune response factors (Ocansey et al., 2019). Some individuals with IBD have a genetic predisposition due to which there is a failure in maintaining intestinal homeostasis (Console et al., 2019). Intestinal Epithelial Cells (IECs) are constantly exposed to numerous bacteria and dietary-derived antigens. In order to defend itself, the human body needs to mount a robust immune response against invading pathogens, however if this response is prolonged it can be deleterious to the host leading to acute and chronic inflammatory disorder. Thus, the cells of the body employ intricate signaling network to control inflammation (Ayyar and Reddy, 2018). This system includes many small extra cellular components such as extra-cellular vesicles (EV), non-coding RNAs (ncRNA) like miRNA (microRNA), snRNA (small nucleolar RNA), siRNA (small interfering RNA), lncRNA (long non-coding RNA), and others (Ayyar et al., 2014). The immune system of the intestinal mucosa employs the use of such extra-cellular factors such as exosomes to maintain a balance between exhibiting tolerance toward normal microbiota and food proteins and eliciting an immune response toward enteric pathogens. Exosomes regulate cells of the immune system, gut microbes and factors maintaining the gut barrier within the IBD microenvironment. This helps repair damage and restore intestinal mucosal functions. IBD therapy is directed at improving immune regulation and easing intestinal mucosal inflammation. Exosome based therapy can help achieve these goals. In this article, we review the contents of exosomes and their effects in IBD; focusing on their effect on immune cells and gut microbiota. We also examine the potential applications of exosomes and exosomal cargo as biomarkers of IBD and in IBD therapy.
Exosomes
Exosomes, prostasomes, ectosomes, microvesicles, microparticles, tolerosomes, and nanovesicles are collectively referred as EVs. Currently, exosomes cannot be easily separated from other EVs (Beshbishy et al., 2020). Thus, exosomes separated from biological fluids and cell culture supernatants that are used for research are regarded as EVs, as stated in the guidelines developed by the International Society of Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) (Théry et al., 2018). Existence of EVs was documented for the first time in 1946 (Chargaff and West, 1946). By 1977, the release of membrane fragments was considered a ubiquitous feature of viable cells. Till 1980, they were commonly considered as cellular debris (P. Wolf, 1967). The discovery of exosomes occurred in 1983. Pan and Johnstone reported that during maturation of reticulocytes in sheep, small vesicles were engaged in the release of transferrin receptors into the extracellular milieu (Pan and Johnstone, 1983). These vesicles were termed exosomes in 1989 (Johnstone et al., 1989). Subsequent studies demonstrated that exosomes originate from endosomal vesicles.
Biogenesis of Exosomes
Exosomes have a lipid bilayer membrane and are incapable of replicating. The process by which exosomes are synthesized differs from other EVs. These vesicles are forged from a novel multi-step “exosome biogenesis” pathway. The plasma membrane of the cell buds inwards to form membrane enclosed compartments called early endosomes (Pant et al., 2012). Early endosomes mature into late endosomes, these are also called multivesicular bodies (MVB). MVBs acquire intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) in their lumen. Inward budding of early endosomal membrane results in generation of ILVs. ILVs contain biologically active molecules like lipids (Subra et al., 2010), proteins (André et al., 2004) and nucleic acids (Valadi et al., 2007). These components may be selectively enriched by the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRTs) (Tamai et al., 2010). The process may also be orchestrated by ESCRT-independent mechanisms which involve tetraspanins or lipids (Colombo et al., 2013). Depending on the molecules used, the mechanism is considered ESCRT dependent or ESCRT independent (Stuffers et al., 2009). The resultant MVBs can have two fates: survive as exosomes or perish. Fusion of MVBs with plasma membrane leads to their release in extracellular space as exosomes (Gruenberg and Goot, 2006). Alternatively, MVBs may fuse with lysosomes which leads to degradation of their content (Palmulli and Van Niel, 2018). Exosomes are released by exocytosis pathway in the course of cellular crosstalk or during receptor removal mechanisms. Growth factor receptors on the plasma membrane play a pivotal role in the exocytosis pathway (Stoorvogel et al., 2002). It is not yet fully understood as to how exosomes are released. Even though considerable progress has been made in this field, substantial gap exists in our knowledge of cargo sorting mechanisms in exosomes and other vesicular bodies.
Characterization of Exosomes
A few minimal requirements have been made mandatory by ISEV to establish the existence of exosome in a study. Experimental methods like electron microscopy, concentration monitoring techniques, and western blotting are needed to identify the presence of exosomes (Théry et al., 2018). Also, physical properties like particle size are calculated during isolation via ultracentrifugation, density gradient separation, and polymer-based precipitation methods. (Chang et al., 2020). Under TEM (Transmission Electron Microscopy), exosomes resemble cup-shaped lipoidal vesicles (Théry et al., 2009). Most exosomes bear tetraspanin proteins and this superfamily of proteins was considered to be a definitive marker of exosomes. Recent research indicates that micro-vesicles (MVs) also bear CD63, CD9, and CD81 tetraspanin proteins (Simons and Raposo, 2009). Many studies on exosomes have shown Alix and TSG101 (Tumor Susceptibility Gene 101 protein) and heat shock proteins HSC70 and HSP90 to be associated with these vesicles (Maas et al., 2017). The main difference between endosomes and MVs is that MVs are derived from outward blebbing of the plasma membrane (Agrahari et al., 2019).
Trafficking of Exosomes
The cell to cell communication by exosomes can occur via three mechanisms. The first mechanism involves receptor-ligand interaction. Signaling receptors of target cell interact directly with exosomal transmembrane proteins (Munich et al., 2012). In the second mechanism, the plasma membrane of target cell fuses with exosome, the contents of the exosome is directly delivered into the cytosol (Mulcahy et al., 2014). In the third mechanism, the exosomes get internalized by target cells. The internalized exosomes may either merge with endosomes, undergo transcytosis and be released for uptake by neighboring cells or the exosomes mature into lysosome in the target cells and are degraded (Tian et al., 2013). Some of the factors that influence internalization of exosomes have been studied. Exosomal lipid rafts and annexins are essential for exosomal internalization (Koumangoye et al., 2011). This is not to say that all factors responsible for internalization of exosomes are present only on exosomes. The proteins mediating internalization of exosomes are present on both target cells and exosomes (Escrevente et al., 2011). Apart from proteins, alteration of cholesterol content leading to disruption of lipid rafts also impairs exosomal internalization (Gonda et al., 2019). We still lack knowledge of how a mechanism is preferred over another by the exosome and/or the cell; is it condition, cell type or exosome specific?
Exosomal Cargo
Cell-to-cell communication is essential and exosomes help in facilitating this cellular crosstalk (Carrière et al., 2016). The lumen of the exosome contains the cargo-which could be lipids, proteins, nucleic acid like mRNAs, microRNAs, and other non-coding RNAs (ncRNA) (Sato-Kuwabara et al., 2015). The cargo can be same or different from that of the parent cell. Exosomes contain proteins primarily present in endosomes, plasma membrane and cytosol. They rarely enclose factors originating from the nucleus, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum or golgi. Also, formation and secretion of exosomes is a cost intensive process for the cell requiring enzymes and ATP (adenosine triphosphate) (J. Zhang et al., 2015). We believe there is mechanism in the cell for actively selecting exosomes and their cargos.
Proteins
Exosomal research data from different sources reveal that they share common exosomal constituents. As of 2016, 41,860 exosomal proteins, >7,540 exosomal RNA, and 1,116 exosomal lipid molecules have been cataloged from more than 286 exosome-based studies defined as per ISEV guidelines (Keerthikumar et al., 2016). Exosomes have two different kinds of protein content. The first kind depends on the cell and tissue from which it originates, while the other kind of protein constitutively occurs in exosomes and can be used as exosomal markers (Console et al., 2019). TSG101, Charged Multivesicular Body Protein 2a (CHMP2A), Ras-related protein Rab-11B (RAB11B), CD9, CD63, and CD81 are currently used as exosomal protein markers (Gross et al., 2012). Other common proteins documented in exosomes include adhesion molecules, heat shock proteins (such as HSC73, HSC90), annexins I, II, V, and VI, cytoskeletal proteins (synenin, actin, moesin, albumin) and GTPases (Samanta et al., 2018). Interestingly, some cytoskeletal proteins, glycolytic enzymes, and argonaute 1–4 (required for miRNA stability) are not detected in exosomes (Jeppesen et al., 2019).
Lipids
The current knowledge regarding the lipid content of exosomes is limited. Exosomes may contain cholesterol, sphingomyelin, ceramide, and phosphatidylserine. Cholesterol was found in the membrane of internal vesicles of MVB (Möbius et al., 2003). This is relevant as many membrane transporters are sensitive to cholesterol (Dickens et al., 2017). The structure of exosomal membrane is analogus to that of the plasma membrane; it also contains detergent resistant subdomains (Colombo et al., 2014).
Nucleic Acids
The other cargo contained within exosomes is nucleic acids (DNA, mRNA, miRNA, lncRNA, and ncRNA). The delivery of nucleic acids to cells can alter expression of genes and regulate the immune status in neighboring tissue. miRNAs can modulate immune responses by production and release of cytokines and chemokines resulting in a feedback regulation of immune homeostasis (Ayyar and Reddy, 2017). The nucleic acid content within exosomes differ. Identifying them will help us understand the role they may play in many processes. As exosomes are produced by almost all cells, they can be harvested from physiological fluids and their contents may indicate health of the tissues (healthy vs. diseased). They have the potential to be used as biomarkers: a diagnostic tool. A recent study suggests that the DNA found in small EVs are of extracellular origin that are released via an autophagy and multivesicular-endosome-dependent but exosome independent mechanism (Jeppesen et al., 2019). The source of different EV components and their functions is listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1. Source and function of different extracellular vesicle components in IBD.
Exosomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
The role of exosomes in IBD has garnered interest among researchers. Exosomal proteins, RNAs and lipids regulate factors of IBD like immune cells, gut microbiota and the mucosal barrier (Chang et al., 2020). Many studies have used exosomes from a variety of starting materials to study the process of IBD alleviation and related factors of interest. Translational studies are being conducted to tap into the possible use of exosomes as diagnostic markers and drug delivery systems, and also on the utility of modified exosomes in IBD therapy (Ocansey et al., 2020). Many of the studies cited in this review do not differentiate between the different types of EVs like exosomes, endosomes and MVBs, hence for the sake of convenience we have used the general term EVs while describing study findings.
Exosomal Profile in Intestinal Mucosa
Epithelial cells, Paneth cells, macrophages, and lymphocytes are cells in the intestinal tract that are directly exposed to digested food, microbes, and foreign antigens making immune homeostasis a challenging and complex process (Peterson and Artis, 2014). While maintaining immune homeostasis, the intestinal barrier strikes a perfect balance by clearing pathogenic bacteria and maintaining immune tolerance with the commensals. Evidence indicates that dysregulation of intestinal homeostasis leads to IBD pathogenesis. Intestinal homeostasis depends on effective crosstalk between extracellular factors, EVs and the host’s intestinal immune defense (comprised of the mucus membrane, intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) and the immune cells) (Avila-Calderón et al., 2015). EVs act not only as communicator between cells but also between cells and organisms (Chang et al., 2020). This is important as the mammalian intestine encounters 10 trillion (1013) microbes (10X the number of total cells in a mammalian body) (Sartor, 2008). EVs from micro-organisms and the host body communicate and help maintain a peaceful coexistence, maintaining intestinal immune homeostasis which is a major determinant of health (Sommer et al., 2017). Physiological fluids also contain EVs which affect the intestinal microbiota.
Exosomes From Intestinal Epithelial Cells
IECs play a major role in immune modulation in the gut that even though they are not professional antigen presenting cells (APC), they bear major histocompatibility complex (MHC) I, II, and HLA-DM (Lin et al., 2005). The knowledge of IEC releasing EVs has been known for a while now (Van Niel et al., 2001). IEC EVs like parent cells, contain immunomodulatory molecules. They also express MHC I and II, expression of which is elevated during inflammation as compared to basal condition (Van Niel et al., 2001). EVs released from these cells can be released apically or basolaterally. They carry A33 antigen, whose expression is confined to the intestinal epithelium (Van Niel et al., 2001). A33 is now considered a marker for IEC exosomes (Van Niel et al., 2003; Lin et al., 2005; Mallegol et al., 2007).
IEC EVs are known to interact with Dendritic cells (DC) (Mallegol et al., 2007). They stimulate DC, Treg and macrophage maturation with tolerogenic properties through immunoregulatory signals (Jeffrey et al., 2018). Also, tolerogenic DCs are essential for maintaining intestinal homeostasis (Peterson and Artis, 2014). The cytokine, TGF-β is produced in tolerogenic DCs and Tregs in its latent form as LTGF-β. IEC EVs carrying integrin αvβ6 are internalized by intestinal tolerogenic DCs, wherein they help activate TGF-β, induce Treg cells and initiate tolerogenic responses in the gut (Chen et al., 2011). CD4+ T cell proliferation is inhibited by TGF-β containing IEC EVs (Jiang et al., 2016). IEC EVs have a wide spectrum immuno modulatory effect. EVs expressing CD63 and EpCAM (Epithelial cell adhesion molecule) suppress DC maturation and inhibit antigen presentation by DCs and also induce DC apoptosis in post-trauma immune dysfunction in rats (Kojima et al., 2018). EpCAM plays a unique role in immuno-modulation by facilitating a physical interaction between intraepithelial lymphocytes and IECs (Jiang et al., 2016). Annexin 1 (ANXA1) is crucial for maintaining the intestinal barrier during inflammatory response; it is found in exosomes released from IECs (Leoni et al., 2015). These ANXA 1 containing EVs help in resolving inflammation in murine colitis, their number increases during wound healing (Leoni et al., 2013; Perretti and D’Acquisto, 2009). These EVs bind to formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) and may be employed to activate wound repair in epithelial cells (Leoni et al., 2015). In IBD patients, mucosal-luminal interface EVs express MPO (myeloperoxidase). MPO is a defense protein which creates oxidative stress against microbes in the intestines (X. Zhang et al., 2018). At the same time, intestinal fluid EVs from IBD patients have a pro-inflammatory effect on IECs in-vitro (Mitsuhashi et al., 2017). This disparity can be attributed to the source of EVs. EVs secreted by Bacteroides fragilis induce secretion of host mucosal EVs containing sphingosine-1-phosphate, CCL20, and prostaglandin E2 (Deng et al., 2015). Th17 cells are sequestered by Prostaglandin E2 and CCL20 via MyD88-mediated pathway (Deng et al., 2015), while sphingosine-1-phosphate plays a role in tumorigenesis (Kunkel et al., 2013; Hait and Maiti, 2017; Patmanathan et al., 2017). Conversely, it is possible that CCL20 and other pro-inflammatory cytokines are inhibited by EVs derived from healthy intestinal mucosa (Deng et al., 2015). Figure 1 summarizes exosomal effects of IEC derived exosomes on intestinal barrier functions and immunity.
FIGURE 1. Modulation of intestinal inflammation by intestinal epithelial cell derived exosomes. Intestinal epithelial cell derived exosomes help maintain gut immune homeostasis through secretion of Annexin A1. They induce a tolerogenic immune response by secretion of integrin, cytokines and chemokines. They also protect the gut immune barrier from bacterial invasion by secreting myeloperoxidase which creates oxidative stress against bacteria. ANXA1, Annexin A1; αvβ6, Integrin αvβ6; B. fragilis, Bacteroides fragilis; CCL20, C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 20; DC, dendritic cell; IEC, Intestinal epithelial cells; MPO: myeloperoxidase; Th17, TGF-β, transforming growth factor β; T helper 17; Treg, regulatory T cell.
Exosomes From Immune Cells
The mucosal barrier maintains immune homeostasis in the gut by spatially separating the gut microbiota from the host immune system. In IBD, there is dysfunction of the barrier, immune dysregulation and dysbiosis. Both the innate and the adaptive immune system signals lead to IBD pathogenesis. The innate immune response is quicker; it involves phagocytosis, antigen presentation and provides stimulus for initiation of the adaptive immune response. The process involves macrophages, DCs, neutrophils, and monocytes (Ayyar et al., 2014). Many APCs have been reported to secrete exosomes, these exosomes may also bear MHC molecules (Morelli et al., 2004).
DCs are professional APCs of the immune system and can initiate an immune response upon sensing antigens. Based on the stage and maturation of parent DCs, DC derived exosomes may have immune stimulatory/suppressive effects (Lindenbergh and Stoorvogel, 2018; H.; Zhang et al., 2019). EVs from DCs can inhibit T-cell proliferation, this could play a key role in modulating inflammation in IBD (Kim et al., 2007; Tkach et al., 2017). Mature DC-derived exosomes that contain tumor antigens potentially could induce anti-tumor immunity in in-vitro trials, while immature exosomes could induce peripheral tolerance by T-cell immunosuppression (Yang et al., 2010). TGF-β1-modified bone marrow derived DCs (BMDC) produce exosomes that induce CD4+Foxp3+Tregs and attenuate Th17 population in lymphocytes from mesenteric lymph nodes of inflammatory site in DSS induced mice (Cai et al., 2012). Similarly, IL-10 treated DC exosomes inhibit 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS) induced colitis in rats by stimulating CD4+CD25+Tregs (Yang et al., 2010). In a similar study, EVs from Schistosoma japonicum-soluble antigen-treated DCs provided protection during acute IBD development (Tkach et al., 2017; L. Wang et al., 2017). Immune tolerance can be achieved through regulation of activated T cells, by harnessing the immunosuppressive activity of exosomes. APC derived exosomes can activate CD4+ and/or CD8+ T lymphocytes, their antigen presentation capacity relies on DC, indicating that APCs take up DC derived exosomes to promote T cell activation. Exosomes may quickly transfer immune information via APCs (Van Niel et al., 2003).
IBD progression is affected in myriad ways by other immune cell derived EVs. Neutrophil infiltration occurs in IBD and is accompanied by liberating MPO into the extracellular space. MPO results in production of oxidative radicals which damage the gut barrier. It was found that MPO was delivered to IEC via EVs and inflammatory response was enhanced, inhibiting wound closure and healing (Slater et al., 2017). EVs also contain miRNAs as cargo; miRNAs are excellent regulators of immune response (Ayyar et al., 2014). EVs containing proinflammatory miRNAs can promote doublestrand breaks (DSBs) in affected colonic epithelia (Butin-Israeli et al., 2019). Neutrophil derived EVs can contain miR-23a and miR-155. These EVs promote lamin B1- dependent replication fork collapse and also suppress homologous recombination (HR) by repressing RAD51 (Bui and Sumagin, 2019; Butin-Israeli et al., 2019). During transepithelial migration of granulocytes, granulocyte EVs accumulate on IECs. This promotes the recruitment of granulocytes accompanied by a loss of epithelial cadherins (Butin-Israeli et al., 2016). On the other hand, granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells-derived EVs diminish number of Th1 cells and a resultant surge is observed in Treg population in colitis induced mice (Y. Wang et al., 2016). WNT signaling is essential for intestinal epithelium and homeostasis (Kuhnert et al., 2004; Gregorieff et al., 2005). Intestinal stem cells can be rescued by macrophage-derived EVs. They can also improve enterocyte survival post radiation via modulation of WNT signaling pathway (Saha et al., 2016). Figure 2 shows the general modulatory features of immune-cell-derived exosomes on the immune system.
FIGURE 2. Modulation of intestinal inflammation by immune cell derived extracellular vesicles. Exosomes derived from immune cells promote anti-inflammatory responses by inducing immune tolerance and triggering regulatory T cells (Treg) activation while inhibiting T helper cells. Exosome-treated immune cells further express exosomes that encourage anti-inflammatory responses. Mature APC derived exosomes promote loss of E-cadherin, which leads to breach of barrier integrity and facilitates bacterial invasion and transmigration. These exosomes also recruit immune cells and drive a pro-inflammatory immune response. Neutrophil derived exosomes secrete myeloperoxidase and miRNAs which are taken up by intestinal epithelial cells. miR-23a and miR-155 can introduce double strand breaks and impair wound healing in degenerated colonic epithelium. In summary, depending on the parent cells, exosomes derived from immune cells can drive toward a pro-inflammatory or an anti-inflammatory response. APC, antigen presenting cell; BMDC, Bone marrow derived dendritic cell; CD, cluster of differentiation; DC, dendritic cell; EV, extracellular vesicles; FOXP3, Forkhead box protein 3; IL-10, Interleukin 10; miR, microRNA; MPO: myeloperoxidase; TGF-β, transforming growth factor β; Th17, T helper 17; Treg, regulatory T cell.
Exosomal Profile in Animals
Many studies have been conducted in rats and mice to study the effects exosomes in IBD. A radical difference was observed in the proportion of gut-bacteria derived EVs in feces of DSS (dextran sulfate sodium) induced colitis mice in comparison with those from healthy mice (Kang et al., 2013). The fecal EVs can be IEC-derived, microbiome-derived or may come from the diet. When healthy exosomes from mice were transferred to IBD-induced mice, it was observed that the disease severity markedly reduced in recipient mice (Jiang et al., 2016). This shows that exosomes have therapeutic potential. Another study showed that the protein load of exosomes in healthy and acute-colitis induced mice was different. A total of 56 acute phase proteins and immunoglobulins were found to be differentially expressed between the two groups (Wong et al., 2016). Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium are known probiotics which are administered to IBD patients. DCs and EV isolated from TLR2 (toll-like-receptor 2) knockout mice and healthy mice were co-cultured with these bacteria. It was observed that TLR2/6 activity in DCs was reduced significantly (van Bergenhenegouwen et al., 2014). The effect was reversed upon EV depletion suggesting an immunosuppressive role of these EVs. Fecal OMVs (outer membrane vesicles) from colitis induced rats (DSS) reduced the expression of enzyme UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) in human Caco-2 cells while OMVs from healthy rats upregulated the enzyme expression (X. J. Gao et al., 2018). UGT1A1 helps in maintaining the Intestinal epithelial barrier. This study shows that rat OMVs can modulate mucosal immunity. EVs isolated from mesenteric lymph modulated the immune response through DC suppression in post-trauma immune dysfunction in rats (Kojima et al., 2018). When exosomes are introduced in naïve rats from IBD induced rats, antigen specific tolerance is detected; these exosomes were briefly called tolerosomes (Karlsson et al., 2001).
Exosomal Profile in Blood
Diseases like Cancer, inflammatory diseases and infections result in change in exosome composition of patients as compared to healthy controls. These changes can be observed in biological fluids like blood and blood components, saliva, stool, urine. These fluids represent an excellent tool for identification of biomarkers (Barile and Vassalli, 2017). Unfortunately, there are not many reports of EVs or exosomes in blood/serum. In 2015, Leoni et al. looked at serum exosome levels in IBD patients. They found that exosomes released from IECs, entered circulation and expressed ANXA 1, which is crucial for maintaining the intestinal barrier during inflammatory response. Serum of IBD patients contain good number of such vesicles (Leoni et al., 2015). Additional research on the serum exosomal content in IBD patients will help better our understanding.
Role of Dietary EVs in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
The source of exosome existing in human body could be produced by human cells such as immune cells, IECs, tumor cells or by plant cells which are introduced through dietary food. As almost all biological cells produce exosomes; many of the edible foods that we consume contain exosomes.
Plant Derived Exosomes
Some studies have been conducted on exosomes derived from edible plants. Curcuma longa and grapes contain exosomes that helps in alleviating IBD. Curcuma longa is a medical herb, the exosomes derived from this plant may inactivate NF-κB to alleviate colitis and improve intestinal wound repair (H. Zhang et al., 2019). Exosome-like nanoparticles (ELN) from grape juice play a protective role in DSS-induced colitis mice when administered via the oral route (Ju et al., 2013). ELNs from ginger rhizome strongly inhibit NLRP3 (nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat-containing family, pyrin domain-containing 3) inflammasome activation. Events occurring downstream of inflammasome activation like secretion of cytokines IL-1β and IL-18, auto cleavage of caspase-1 and pyroptotic cell death can also be impeded by these ELNs (Chen et al., 2019). Broccoli derived ELNs inhibit induced colitis in mice. These ELNs help in the activation of AMPK (AMP [adenosine monophosphate]-activated protein kinase) in DCs, which promotes DC tolerance and prevents DC activation, leading to inhibition of DSS induced colitis in mice (Deng et al., 2017).
Milk Derived Exosomes
Breast milk not only provides nutrition but also helps shape the neonate gut immune system (Turfkruyer and Verhasselt, 2015). Breast milk has immunoglobulin which help in responding precisely to encountered antigens (Walker and Iyengar, 2015; Doare et al., 2018). Recent studies have shown EVs contained in milk can affect intestinal homeostasis (Admyre et al., 2007). Bioactive milk exosomes are known to carry miRNAs, mRNAs, lncRNAs, TGF-β and a variety of other proteins and lipids (Reinhardt et al., 2012; Reinhardt et al., 2013; Pieters et al., 2015; Tomé-Carneiro et al., 2018). Exosomes are resistant to the harsh conditions in the gastrointestinal tract (Benmoussa et al., 2016; Liao et al., 2017; Kahn et al., 2018) but are actively captured by intestinal epithelial cells (T. Wolf et al., 2015). It has been observed that a considerable portion of milk exosomes (from consumed milk) enter circulation in rodents and humans (Baier et al., 2014; Manca et al., 2018; Betker et al., 2019). The fate of unabsorbed exosomes is not yet known. There is strong evidence that milk exosomes are crucial for maturation and intestinal function (Gao H. N. et al., 2019; Gao R. et al., 2019; Hock et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019; Miyake et al., 2020; Reif et al., 2019; Xie et al., 2020). Strong evidence indicates that human, porcine and bovine milk exosomes aid intestinal cell growth in mice (Gao H. N. et al., 2019; Hock et al., 2017; Reif et al., 2019). Milk exosomes can also attenuate LPS-induced apoptosis (Xie et al., 2019), and prevent intestinal endothelial cell damage (R. Gao et al., 2019b; Miyake et al., 2020). They also enhance goblet cell numbers and mucin production (Li et al., 2019). They can also modify bacterial growth, and promote intestinal microbiota (Doare et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2019). Interestingly, pasteurized fresh milk contains more bioactive milk exosomes as compared to fermented milk products like yoghurt (Yu et al., 2017). Figure 3 describes the role of microbiome derived OMVs and dietary exosomes in modulating intestinal inflammation.
FIGURE 3. Modulation of intestinal inflammation by microbiome derived outer membrane vesicles and dietary exosomes. Exosomes and OMVs (outer membrane vesicles) through their functional components, directly or indirectly interact with gut intestinal epithelial cells (IECs). Dietary exosomes attenuate apoptosis and promote intestinal wound repair. OMVs from commensal bacteria induce the proliferation of IECs and development of the intestinal tract, and indirectly enhance barrier functions by inhibiting components of the inflammatory environment that negatively impact tight junction molecules and IECs. They also interact with immune cells and promote an anti-inflammatory immune response. On the other hand, pathogenic bacteria, though their OMVs can induce inflammation and apoptosis. They can also cause a breach in the epithelial barrier by cleaving E-cadherin. This facilitates bacterial invasion and transmigration into the intestinal tissue. DC, dendritic cell; HAP, hemagglutinin protease; IL, Interleukin; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa light chain enhancer of activated B cells; OMV, outer membrane vesicle, PSA: capsular polysaccharide; sRNA52320, shortRNA 52320; Treg, regulatory T cell; VesC, calcium-dependent trypsin-like serine protease; ZO-1, Zonula occludens 1.
Role of Microbiota Derived Outer Membrane Vesicles in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
All biological life forms are capable of producing EVs. These include micro-organisms encountered in the intestinal tract like protozoa, archaea, bacteria and fungi (Brown et al., 2015). It has been reported that commensal microbes can modulate IECs and immune cells in the intestine by affecting maturation and other related functions. As alterations in intestinal microbiota affect the pathogenesis and development of IBD, the EVs secreted by the commensal microbes may help maintain gut immune homeostasis (Geveres et al., 2014). The involvement of extracellular factors from microbes in modulating immune response has been observed as early as 1967 (S. Chatterjee and Das, 1967). In 1967, Chatterjee and Das showed that the bacteria, Neisseria meningitides secreted endotoxins as cell wall blebs in-vivo (S. Chatterjee and Das, 1967). However, the mechanism has not yet been understood thoroughly.
Pathogenic bacteria exist in the intestines and their EVs can negatively influence gut homeostasis. They breach the intestinal barrier and facilitate mucosal invasion leading to IBD pathogenesis. Helicobacter pylori infection in the gut leads to gastritis, ulceration and malignancy. In 2003, a study found that it was not necessary for the bacterium to associate with the epithelial cell to cause disease, the OMVs released by the bacteria could interact with the host epithelial cell and bring about an adverse reaction (Ismail et al., 2003). Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O157 EVs promote IL-8 secretion in IECs through TLR5 and TLR4/MD-2 pathway (Bielaszewska et al., 2018). They also induce apoptosis by delivering hemolysin from EHEC to endothelial cells and mitochondria (Bielaszewska et al., 2013). UGT1A1 is an important part of intestinal epithelial barrier. Fecal OMVs isolated from colitis induced rats (DSS) reduced the expression of UGT1A1 in human Caco-2 cells while, OMVs from healthy rats upregulated UGT1A1 (X. J. Gao et al., 2018). This shows that gut microbiota can regulate intestinal UGT1A1 expression. Vibrio cholera secretes two proteases, hemagglutinin protease (HAP) and calcium-dependent trypsin-like serine protease (VesC) in association with OMVs, these are transported to human IECs in an active form. Studies show that HAP induces apoptosis and VesC induces necrosis and increases IL-8 secretion in host cells. Data also suggests that VesC promotes intestinal colonization of V. cholerae in mice (Mondal et al., 2016). Also, IECs take up these EVs and stimulate the MAPK and NF-κB pathways in a nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing 1 (NOD1)-dependent manner. This causes a change in the expression of IL-8, GM-CSF, CCL2, CCL20, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (D. Chatterjee and Chaudhuri, 2013). Epithelial cadherin is essential for maintaining epithelial integrity, EVs from Campylobacter jejuni cleaved epithelial cadherin and facilitated the infiltration of pathogenic bacteria into IECs (Elmi et al., 2016; Boehm et al., 2018). Evidence suggests that immune responses mounted against commensal like Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron could trigger colitis in genetically vulnerable hosts (Hickey et al., 2015).
Microbiome derived EVs present in the host can also help maintain gut immune homeostasis. The innate immune defense of the gut relies heavily on the integrity of the epithelial layer which acts as a barrier. Apart from IECs that reinforce this barrier, probiotic bacteria can also influence barrier integrity by regulating the pro-inflammatory signals, reinforcing tight junctions between IECs and by facilitating cross-talk between commensals, gut epithelia and the mucosal immunity. Escherichia coli C25, is a commensal organism present in the human gut, the OMVs released by this bacterium elicits a moderate pro-inflammatory response via secretion of IL-8 in vitro (Patten et al., 2017). This response is beneficial to the host as healthy human intestine has a low-level inflammatory environment. OMVs from E. coli C25 have also shown to regulate the translocation of parent bacteria across the intestinal epithelium. This aids in maintaining a favorable symbiotic relationship with the host (Patten et al., 2017). Another probiotic bacteria, E. coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) helps in maintaining tight junctions by secreting OMVs and soluble factors which induce ZO-1 and claudin-14 expression, and inhibit claudin-2 expression (Alvarez et al., 2016). The pro-inflammatory effect of E. coli OMVs can be ameliorated by Akkermansia muciniphila EVs. Also, A. muciniphila EVs are depleted in colitis induced mice as compared to healthy mice, indicating that they play a protective role in IBD. Indeed, IBD indicators like loss of body weight, length of colon, infiltration of colon wall are maintained when A. muciniphila EVs are delivered orally (Kang et al., 2013). B. fragilis OMVs containing PSA (capsular polysaccharide) can protect against inflammation in TNBS colitis mice model. This is achieved by production of anti-inflammatory cytokines by DCs, enhancing the Treg response (Shen et al., 2012). Pseudomonas aeruginosa releases EVs which contains shortRNAs (sRNA), this sRNA was shown to reduce IL-8 secretion from LPS (lipopolysaccharide) induced IECs. This sRNA termed as sRNA52320 can also attenuate cytokine secretion and neutrophil infiltration (Koeppen et al., 2016). B. thetaiotaomicron produces a phosphatase, BTMinpp which is packaged inside OMVs, thus protecting its catalytic activity. This enzyme promotes intracellular Ca2+ signaling in IECs and thereby the physiological responses of the digestive system are sustained (Stentz et al., 2014). Additionally, E. coli OMVs (probiotic and commensal strains) induce more anti-inflammatory cytokines in explanted colonic tissue, although a modest expression of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6 and IL-8 is also observed (Fábrega et al., 2016).
The host can also combat EVs from pathogenic microbes. OMVs secreted from bacteria contain cargo and this cargo is recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRR) of the host immune system which mount an inflammatory response. The OMV released from E. coli contains peptidoglycan which is recognized by NOD1 receptor. This triggers the NOD1 signaling cascade, inducing the expression of pro-inflammatory molecules like NF-κB, IL-6, and IL-8 (Cañas et al., 2018). However, the OMVs may escape immune surveillance and enter IECs via clathrin-dependent endocytosis resulting in host cell DNA damage (Cañas et al., 2016). It’s not just the EVs from bacteria that regulate host cells but EVs present in the host’s physiological fluid can also interact with bacteria and promote bacterial aggregation (van Bergenhenegouwen et al., 2014). Pathogenic bacteria and commensals derived EVs regulate inter-species communication in the gut which leads to immunoregulation of signaling pathways. The source and functions of different OMV components and their function in IBD is listed in Table 2.
TABLE 2. Source and function of different bacterial outer membrane vesicle components in IBD.
Exosomal Components as Biomarkers for Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Micro-environmental changes take place at the site of intestinal mucosal inflammation: nutrient shortage, dysregulated oxygen supply in tissue and production of reactive nitrogen and oxygen species. Mucosal barrier, cell fate, immune regulation, and gut microbiota are affected by the consequent oxidative and hypoxia derived stress (Taylor and Colgan, 2007; Cao, 2018). An inflammatory cascade is triggered within this microenvironment through intricate crosstalk between different cell types (Marafini et al., 2019). Inflammatory cells such as granulocytes, macrophages and monocytes, and also cells of the adaptive immune system like B and T cells are sequestered within the site of active inflammation, by cytokines like IL-8 (Marafini et al., 2019). When the intestinal barrier is intact, it is very difficult for luminal antigens to approach the lamina propria. When immune cells are within the lamina propria, a tolerance system is set in place which limits induction of an immune response. On the other hand, when barrier integrity is compromised, antigens trespass the barrier and the tolerance system is invalidated. This culminates in secretion of chemokines, recruitment and infiltration of immune cells, further aggravating inflammation (Neurath, 2019). The current diagnosis of IBD involves invasive procedures like endoscopy and colonoscopy. They are also expensive, time-consuming and inconvenient for the patients. There is a need to develop a less-invasive, faster, reliable detection method for IBD.
The origin of exosomes present in the intestinal tract can be host cells, diet or microbial organisms (Chang et al., 2020). The EV content in bile samples of individuals suffering from malignant common bile stenosis was significantly higher than those seen in the bile samples of healthy controls, suggesting that the nature of EVs differs with respect to health condition of the body (Severino et al., 2017). ANXA1 is crucial for maintaining the intestinal barrier during inflammatory response; it is found in exosomes released from intestinal epithelial cells (IEC). Serum of IBD patients contain good number of such vesicles, making it a promising biomarker for intestinal inflammation (Leoni et al., 2015). Proteasome Subunit Alpha type 7 (PSMA7) is found in oral exosomes secreted by the oral mucosal cells of IBD patients. The expression of PSMA7 isolated from saliva in IBD patients is remarkably different than those in healthy controls and is a good biomarker candidate (Zheng et al., 2017). More exosomal characterization studies on biological fluids from IBD patients would help in identifying novel biomarkers that could help in early diagnosis of IBD.
Effect of Exosomes on Current Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatment
IBD treatment involves anti-inflammatory drugs, immune system suppressors, and biologics supplemented with antibiotics and dietary supplements. Biologics are the newest category of drugs in IBD treatment. Most of them are monoclonal antibodies which neutralize inflammation causing proteins in the body. The most common form of biologics administered to IBD patients are TNF blocking agents e.g.,: Infliximab, Adalimumab, Golimumab, and Certolizumab. Other biologics used in IBD treatment are Vedolizumab, which is a α4β7 blocker and Ustekinumab, which blocks the IL12-IL23 pathway.
A recent study detected α4β7 integrin expression on the surface of circulating exosomes from serum of IBD patients being treated with Vedolizumab (VDZ) (Domenis et al., 2020). These α4β7 expressing exosomes were able to bind to VDZ competitively in-vitro. In IBD treatment, VDZ acts by binding to the α4β7 integrin found on a subset of T cells and prevents their trafficking into the gut. This data suggests that exosomes could be involved in mediating VDZ resistance in IBD patients by sequestration of therapeutic molecules into vesicles. Most IBD patients on treatment with a biologic drug respond poorly to a second biologic drug (Gisbert ad Chaparro, 2020). The study by Domenis et al. (2020) reports that the serum exosomal concentration and vesicle surface expression of α4β7 integrin was greater in the serum of patients on TNF blocking drugs compared to TNF naïve patients. The resultant exosomal sequestration of VDZ also increased in patients on TNF blocking drugs suggesting that previous treatment with a biologic drug alters the expression of α4β7 integrin and binding capacity of circulating exosomes. This potentially explains the reduced efficacy of VDZ in IBD patients who were previously treated with TNF blocking agents.
To date this is the only study correlating the effect of exosomes on IBD treatment modalities. Further studies in this direction would help design better treatment strategies that could increase drug bioavailability.
Role of Exosomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapy
Exosomes are natural carriers of functional RNAs, proteins and have the characteristics to be employed for transporting drugs or biologicals. They can also be employed for tissue repair and regeneration. Modification of exosomes either biologically or chemically will boost their therapeutic potential (Ocansey et al., 2020). IBD is characterized by disruption of the immune system and abnormal stimulation of immune cells. As mentioned in this review, DC derived EVs through immune excitation or repression mitigate IBD progression. Hence, it is plausible that immune cells derived EVs may be the new therapeutic intervention for IBD.
The interest in EV research also propels the exploration of artificial nanoparticles as tool for disease treatment. Studies have looked at EV-like nanoparticles as treatment for IBD. Bioadhesive chitosan has been developed, which can be delivered by oral route to accumulate in a safe and specific way to affected areas in the GI tract (Han et al., 2019). Intestinal organoids containing 5-ASA-loaded nanoparticles have been used to relieve IBD (Davoudi et al., 2018). Mannosylated bioreducible cationic polymers have been used to synthesize RNAi (RNA interference) nanoparticles to lower cell-death and improve treatment efficacy in IBD (Xiao et al., 2013). EVs are bio-compatible and stable than artificial nanoparticles as they are innate in nature, being derived from cells and microbes. EVs can also be engineered, enhancing their role in treatment and therapy in IBD (Hood and Wickline, 2012; Hood, 2016). Promising results have been observed with Rifaximin loaded EVs (Kumar and Newton, 2017; García-Manrique et al., 2018). These studies demonstrate that EVs have a potential use in drug delivery.
Breast milk is known to have immunoglobulins, approximately 15 years ago it was discovered that it contains immune-modulatory EVs (Admyre et al., 2007). Since then milk EVs have received considerable attention and a lot of studies have been conducted to understand the process of drug delivery in the intestinal tract. EVs are resilient to gastric/pancreatic digestion (Hata et al., 2010), indicating that breast milk EVs are delivered to intestines of infants (Kahn et al., 2018). Milk derived EVs were also observed in human intestinal crypt-like cells, indicating a possible role in neonatal mucosal immunity (Liao et al., 2017). Several studies recommend that IEC viability, stem-cell activity and proliferation capacity increase when treated with milk derived EVs (T. Chen et al., 2016; Gao H. N. et al., 2019; Hock et al., 2017). Breast milk EVs can prevent cell death in IECs and decrease necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) (Lucas and Cole, 1990; Martin et al., 2018). They also offer the possibility of delivering drugs in milk (Schanler et al., 1992; Zamrik et al., 2018). Small molecules such as siRNA are ideal candidate for therapy but they are unstable during delivery. A 2017 study showed that AF488 could be encapsulated in milk whey and EVs would ensure their delivery to Caco-2 cells (Shandilya et al., 2017).
Protein cargo content of EVs have also been researched. Intestinal EVs contain high levels of the cytokine, TGF-β1 which induces Treg cells and immunosuppressive DCs in IBD mice (Jiang et al., 2016). Meanwhile, ANXA1 containing exosomes stimulates epithelial cell repair in a colitis mice-model. Increased amount of ANXA1 is also observed in sera of IBD patients, the increase is directly proportionate to disease severity (Leoni et al., 2015). This provides strong evidence to use EV components as biomarkers for disease severity and IBD progression but may also have a role in therapy. Anti-tumor immunity can be induced by mature DC-derived exosomes carrying tumor antigens in in-vitro trials (Yang et al., 2010). Most translational EV studies are still in the pre-clinical stages with data available from animal and cellular models. Additional research would help in exploring the application of EVs in diagnostics and therapeutics in a clinical setting.
Discussion
Evidence from recent studies on exosomes in particular and EVs in general indicate that these extracellular vesicles are capable of modulation of genes and cellular function and can thereby regulate inflammation and immune response. Based on our review of published studies, it is evident that exosomal cargo is strongly associated with the nature of the cells which produces them. Exosomal components are optimal for use as biomarkers as they can be extracted with minimal invasive techniques from most biological fluids like blood, urine, saliva, and feces. Existing data in IBD is limited to initial characterizations of exosomes in blood and fecal samples. Further studies are required to identify sensitive and specific markers of mucosal inflammation, and ideally inflammatory pathways. This could guide treatment decisions when several mechanisms of drug action are available to clinicians. As researchers we need to make efforts to develop robust methodologies for isolation of exosomes from fecal samples to ensure results are reliable and reproducible.
Author Contributions
KKA and ACM conceptualized the review. KKA wrote the manuscript. ACM edited the manuscript.
Funding
ACM has received grant funding from the Helmsley Trust and Pfizer Inc.
Conflict of Interest
Author ACM has received grant support from Pfizer inc.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
Admyre, C., Johansson, S. M., Qazi, K. R., Filén, J.-J., Lahesmaa, R., Norman, M., et al. (2007). Exosomes with Immune Modulatory Features Are Present in Human Breast Milk. J. Immunol. 179 (3), 1969–1978. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.179.3.1969
Agrahari, V., Agrahari, V., Burnouf, P.-A., Chew, C. H., and Burnouf, T. (2019). Extracellular Microvesicles as New Industrial Therapeutic Frontiers. Trends Biotechnol. 37 (7), 707–729. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.11.012
Alvarez, C.-S., Badia, J., Bosch, M., Giménez, R., and Baldomà, L. (2016). Outer Membrane Vesicles and Soluble Factors Released by Probiotic escherichia Coli Nissle 1917 and Commensal ECOR63 Enhance Barrier Function by Regulating Expression of Tight junction Proteins in Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Front. Microbiol. 7 (DEC), 1–14. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01981
André, F., Chaput, N., Schartz, N. E. C., Flament, C., Aubert, N., Bernard, J., et al. (2004). Exosomes as Potent Cell-free Peptide-Based Vaccine. I. Dendritic Cell-Derived Exosomes Transfer Functional MHC Class I/Peptide Complexes to Dendritic Cells. J. Immunol. 172 (4), 2126–2136. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.172.4.2126
Avila-Calderón, E. D., Araiza-Villanueva, M. G., Cancino-Diaz, J. C., López-Villegas, E. O., Sriranganathan, N., Boyle, S. M., et al. (2015). Roles of Bacterial Membrane Vesicles. Arch. Microbiol. 197 (Issue 1), 1–10. doi:10.1007/s00203-014-1042-7
Ayyar, K. K., and Reddy, K. V. R. (2018). MAPK and NF‐κB Signalling Pathways Regulate the Expression of miRNA, Let‐7f in Human Endocervical Epithelial Cells. J. Cel. Biochem. 119 (January), 4751–4759. doi:10.1002/jcb.26665
Ayyar, K. K., Saha, D., Shroff, A., and Kvr, R. (2014). MicroRNAs : the Key Regulators of PRR Signaling 2 (3), 116–121.
Ayyar, K., and Reddy, K. V. R. (2017). Transcription Factor CCAAT/enhancer-binding Protein-β Upregulates microRNA,let-7f-1 in Human Endocervical Cells. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 78 (6), e12759. doi:10.1111/aji.12759
Baier, S. R., Nguyen, C., Xie, F., Wood, J. R., and Zempleni, J. (2014). MicroRNAs Are Absorbed in Biologically Meaningful Amounts from Nutritionally Relevant Doses of Cow Milk and Affect Gene Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells, HEK-293 Kidney Cell Cultures, and Mouse Livers. J. Nutr. 144 (10), 1495–1500. doi:10.3945/jn.114.196436
Barile, L., and Vassalli, G. (2017). Exosomes: Therapy Delivery Tools and Biomarkers of Diseases. Pharmacol. Ther. 174, 63–78. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.02.020
Benmoussa, A., Lee, C. H. C., Laffont, B., Savard, P., Laugier, J., Boilard, E., et al. (2016). Commercial Dairy Cow Milk Micrornas Resist Digestion under Simulated Gastrointestinal Tract Conditions. J. Nutr. 146 (11), 2206–2215. doi:10.3945/jn.116.237651
Beshbishy, A. M., Alghamdi, S., Onyiche, T. G. E., Zahoor, M., Rivero-Perez, N., Zaragoza-Bastida, A., et al. (2020). Biogenesis, Biologic Function and Clinical Potential of Exosomes in Different Diseases. Appl. Sci. (Switzerland)MDPI AG 10 (13), 4428. doi:10.3390/app10134428
Betker, J. L., Angle, B. M., Graner, M. W., and Anchordoquy, T. J. (2019). The Potential of Exosomes from Cow Milk for Oral Delivery. J. Pharm. Sci. 108 (4), 1496–1505. doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2018.11.022
Bielaszewska, M., Marejková, M., Bauwens, A., Kunsmann-Prokscha, L., Mellmann, A., and Karch, H. (2018). Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 Outer Membrane Vesicles Induce Interleukin 8 Production in Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells by Signaling via Toll-like Receptors TLR4 and TLR5 and Activation of the Nuclear Factor NF-κB. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 308 (7), 882–889. doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2018.06.004
Bielaszewska, M., Rüter, C., Kunsmann, L., Greune, L., Bauwens, A., Zhang, W., et al. (2013). Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli Hemolysin Employs Outer Membrane Vesicles to Target Mitochondria and Cause Endothelial and Epithelial Apoptosis. Plos Pathog. 9 (12), e1003797–30. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003797
Boehm, M., Simson, D., Escher, U., Schmidt, A.-M., Bereswill, S., Tegtmeyer, N., et al. (2018). Function of Serine Protease HtrA in the Lifecycle of the Foodborne Pathogen Campylobacter Jejuni. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2 (July), 1–8. doi:10.1556/1886.2018.00011
Brown, L., Wolf, J. M., Prados-Rosales, R., and Casadevall, A. (2015). Through the wall: Extracellular Vesicles in Gram-Positive Bacteria, Mycobacteria and Fungi. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13 (10), 620–630. doi:10.1038/nrmicro3480
Bui, T. M., and Sumagin, R. (2019). Progressing from Recurring Tissue Injury to Genomic Instability: A New Mechanism of Neutrophil Pathogenesis. DNA Cel Biol. 38 (8), 747–753. doi:10.1089/dna.2019.4842
Butin-Israeli, V., Houser, M. C., Feng, M., Thorp, E. B., Nusrat, A., Parkos, C. A., et al. (2016). Deposition of Microparticles by Neutrophils onto Inflamed Epithelium: a New Mechanism to Disrupt Epithelial Intercellular Adhesions and Promote Transepithelial Migration. FASEB J. 30 (12), 4007–4020. doi:10.1096/fj.201600734R
Butin-Israeli, V., Bui, T. M., Wiesolek, H. L., Mascarenhas, L., Lee, J. J., Mehl, L. C., et al. (2019). Neutrophil-induced Genomic Instability Impedes Resolution of Inflammation and Wound Healing. J. Clin. Invest. 129 (2), 712–726. doi:10.1172/JCI122085
Cai, Z., Zhang, W., Yang, F., Yu, L., Yu, Z., Pan, J., et al. (2012). Immunosuppressive Exosomes from TGF-β1 Gene-Modified Dendritic Cells Attenuate Th17-Mediated Inflammatory Autoimmune Disease by Inducing Regulatory T Cells. Cell Res 22 (3), 607–610. doi:10.1038/cr.2011.196
Cañas, M.-A., Fábrega, M.-J., Giménez, R., Badia, J., and Baldomà, L. (2018). Outer Membrane Vesicles from Probiotic and Commensal escherichia Coli Activate NOD1-Mediated Immune Responses in Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Front. Microbiol. 9 (MAR), 1–13. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00498
Cañas, M.-A., Giménez, R., Fábrega, M.-J., Toloza, L., Baldomà, L., and Badia, J. (2016). Outer Membrane Vesicles from the Probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 and the Commensal ECOR12 Enter Intestinal Epithelial Cells via Clathrin-dependent Endocytosis and Elicit Differential Effects on DNA Damage. PLoS ONE 11 (8), e0160374–22. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160374
Cao, S. S. (2018). Cellular Stress Responses and Gut Microbiota in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2018, 1–13. doi:10.1155/2018/7192646
Carrière, J., Barnich, N., and Nguyen, H. T. T. (2016). Exosomes: From Functions in Host-Pathogen Interactions and Immunity to Diagnostic and Therapeutic Opportunities. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 172, 39–75. doi:10.1007/112_2016_7
Chang, X., Wang, S.-L., Zhao, S.-B., Shi, Y.-H., Pan, P., Gu, L., et al. (2020). Extracellular Vesicles with Possible Roles in Gut Intestinal Tract Homeostasis and IBD. Mediators Inflamm. 2020, 1–14. doi:10.1155/2020/1945832
Chargaff, E., and West, R. (1946). The Biological Significance of the Thromboplastic Protein of Blood. J. Biol. Chem. 166, 189–197. doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(17)34997-9
Chatterjee, D., and Chaudhuri, K. (2013). Vibrio cholerae O395 Outer Membrane Vesicles Modulate Intestinal Epithelial Cells in a NOD1 Protein-dependent Manner and Induce Dendritic Cell-Mediated Th2/Th17 Cell Responses. J. Biol. Chem. 288 (6), 4299–4309. doi:10.1074/jbc.M112.408302
Chatterjee, S. N., and Das, J. (1967). Electron Microscopic Observations on the Excretion of Cell-wall Material by Vibrio cholerae. J. Gen. Microbiol. 49 (1), 1–11. doi:10.1099/00221287-49-1-1
Chen, T., Xie, M.-Y., Sun, J.-J., Ye, R.-S., Cheng, X., Sun, R.-P., et al. (2016). Porcine Milk-Derived Exosomes Promote Proliferation of Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Sci. Rep. 6 (September), 1–12. doi:10.1038/srep33862
Chen, T., Xue, H., Lin, R., Huang, Z., et al. (2017). MiR-34c and PlncRNA1 Mediated the Function of intestinal Epithelial Barrier by regulating Tight Junction Proteins in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 486 (1), 6–13. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.01.115
Chen, X., Song, C.-H., Feng, B.-S., Li, T.-L., Li, P., Zheng, P.-Y., et al. (2011). Intestinal Epithelial Cell-Derived Integrin αβ6 Plays an Important Role in the Induction of Regulatory T Cells and Inhibits an Antigen-specific Th2 Response. J. Leukoc. Biol. 90 (4), 751–759. doi:10.1189/jlb.1210696
Chen, X., Zhou, Y., and Yu, J. (2019). Exosome-like Nanoparticles from Ginger Rhizomes Inhibited NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. Mol. Pharmaceutics 16 (6), 2690–2699. doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00246
Colombo, M., Moita, C., Van Niel, G., Kowal, J., Vigneron, J., Benaroch, P., et al. (2013). Analysis of ESCRT Functions in Exosome Biogenesis, Composition and Secretion Highlights the Heterogeneity of Extracellular Vesicles. J. Cel Sci. 126 (24), 5553–5565. doi:10.1242/jcs.128868
Colombo, M., Raposo, G., and Théry, C. (2014). Biogenesis, Secretion, and Intercellular Interactions of Exosomes and Other Extracellular Vesicles. Annu. Rev. Cel Dev. Biol. 30 (1), 255–289. doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101512-122326
Console, L., Scalise, M., and Indiveri, C. (2019). Exosomes in Inflammation and Role as Biomarkers. Clinica Chim. Acta 488 (July 2018), 165–171. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2018.11.009
Davoudi, Z., Peroutka-Bigus, N., Bellaire, B., Wannemuehler, M., Barrett, T. A., Narasimhan, B., et al. (2018). Intestinal Organoids Containing Poly(lactic-Co -glycolic Acid) Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 106 (4), 876–886. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36305
Deng, Z., Mu, J., Tseng, M., Wattenberg, B., Zhuang, X., Egilmez, N. K., et al. (2015). Enterobacteria-secreted Particles Induce Production of Exosome-like S1P-Containing Particles by Intestinal Epithelium to Drive Th17-Mediated Tumorigenesis. Nat. Commun. 6 (1), 1–15. doi:10.1038/ncomms7956
Deng, Z., Rong, Y., Teng, Y., Mu, J., Zhuang, X., Tseng, M., et al. (2017). Broccoli-Derived Nanoparticle Inhibits Mouse Colitis by Activating Dendritic Cell AMP-Activated Protein Kinase. Mol. Ther. 25 (7), 1641–1654. doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.01.025
Dickens, D., Chiduza, G. N., Wright, G. S. A., Pirmohamed, M., Antonyuk, S. V., and Hasnain, S. S. (2017). Modulation of LAT1 (SLC7A5) Transporter Activity and Stability by Membrane Cholesterol. Sci. Rep. 7 (1), 1–13. doi:10.1038/srep43580
Doare, K. Le., Holder, B., Bassett, A., and Pannaraj, P. S. (2018). Mother’s Milk: A Purposeful Contribution to the Development of the Infant Microbiota and Immunity. Front. Immunol. Vol. 9, 1. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.00361
Domenis, R., Marino, M., Cifù, A., Scardino, G., Curcio, F., and Fabris, M. (2020). Circulating Exosomes Express α4β7 Integrin and Compete with CD4+ T Cells for the Binding to Vedolizumab. PLOS ONE 15 (11), e0242342. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242342
Edgar, J. R. (2016). Q&A: What Are Exosomes, Exactly? BMC Biol. 14 (1), 1–7. doi:10.1186/s12915-016-0268-z
Eichenberger, R. M., Ryan, S., Jones, L., Buitrago, G., Polster, R., Montes de Oca, M, et al. (2018). Hookworm Secreted Extracellular Vesicles Interact With Host Cells and Prevent Inducible Colitis in Mice. Front. Immunol. 9, 850.
Elmi, A., Nasher, F., Jagatia, H., Gundogdu, O., Bajaj-Elliott, M., Wren, B., et al. (2016). Campylobacter Jejuniouter Membrane Vesicle-Associated Proteolytic Activity Promotes Bacterial Invasion by Mediating Cleavage of Intestinal Epithelial Cell E-Cadherin and Occludin. Cell Microbiol. 18 (4), 561–572. doi:10.1111/cmi.12534
Escrevente, C., Keller, S., Altevogt, P., and Costa, J. (2011). Interaction and Uptake of Exosomes by Ovarian Cancer Cells. BMC Cancer 11 (1), 108. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-11-108
Fábrega, M. J., Aguilera, L., Giménez, R., Varela, E., Cañas, M. A., Antolín, M., et al. (2016). Activation of Immune and Defense Responses in the Intestinal Mucosa by Outer Membrane Vesicles of Commensal and Probiotic Escherichia coli Strains. Front. Microbiol. 7 (MAY). doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00705
Gao, H. N., Guo, H. Y., Zhang, H., Xie, X. L., Wen, P. C., and Ren, F. Z. (2019a). Yak-milk-derived Exosomes Promote Proliferation of Intestinal Epithelial Cells in an Hypoxic Environment. J. Dairy Sci. 102 (2), 985–996. doi:10.3168/jds.2018-14946
Gao, R., Zhang, R., Qian, T., Peng, X., He, W., Zheng, S., et al. (2019b). A Comparison of Exosomes Derived from Different Periods Breast Milk on Protecting against Intestinal Organoid Injury. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 35 (12), 1363–1368. doi:10.1007/s00383-019-04562-6
Gao, X.-J., Li, T., Wei, B., Yan, Z.-X., Hu, N., Huang, Y.-J., et al. (2018). Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles from Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis Differentially Regulate Intestinal UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 Partially through Toll-like Receptor 4/Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase/Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Pathway. Drug Metab. Dispos 46 (3), 292–302. doi:10.1124/dmd.117.079046
Liu, R., Tang, A., Wang, X., Chen, X., Zhao, L., Xiao, Z., et al. (2018). Inhibition of lncRNA NEAT1 Suppresses the Inflammatory Response in IBD by Modulating the intestinal Epithelial Barrier and by exosome-Mediated Polarization of Macrophages. Int. J. Mol. Med. 42, 2903–2913. doi:10.3892/ijmm.2018.3829
García-Manrique, P., Gutiérrez, G., and Blanco-López, M. C. (2018). Fully Artificial Exosomes: Towards New Theranostic Biomaterials. Trends Biotechnol. 36 (Issue 1), 10–14. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.005
Geveres, D., Kugathasan, S., Denson, L. A., Vazquez-Baeza, Y., Van Treuren, W., Ren, B., et al. (2014). The Treatment-Naïve Microbiome in New-Onset Crohn ’ S Disease. Cell Host Microbe 15(3), 382–392. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.005
Gisbert, J. P., and Chaparro, M. (2020). Predictors of Primary Response to Biologic Treatment [Anti-TNF, Vedolizumab, and Ustekinumab] in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Basic Science to Clinical Practice. J. Crohn’s Colitis 14 (5), 694–709. doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz195
Gonda, A., Kabagwira, J., Senthil, G. N., and Wall, N. R. (2019). Internalization of Exosomes through Receptor-Mediated Endocytosis. Mol. Cancer Res. 17 (Issue 2), 337–347. doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-0891
Gregorieff, A., Pinto, D., Begthel, H., Destrée, O., Kielman, M., and Clevers, H. (2005). Expression Pattern of Wnt Signaling Components in the Adult Intestine. Gastroenterology 129 (2), 626–638. doi:10.1016/j.gastro.2005.06.007
Gross, J. C., Chaudhary, V., Bartscherer, K., and Boutros, M. (2012). Active Wnt Proteins Are Secreted on Exosomes. Nat. Cel Biol 14 (10), 1036–1045. doi:10.1038/ncb2574
Gruenberg, J., and van der Goot, F. G. (2006). Mechanisms of Pathogen Entry through the Endosomal Compartments. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cel Biol 7, 495–504. doi:10.1038/nrm1959
Hait, N. C., and Maiti, A. (2017).The Role of Sphingosine-1-Phosphate and Ceramide-1-Phosphate in Inflammation and Cancer. Mediators Inflamm., 2017. 1–17. doi:10.1155/2017/4806541
Han, W., Xie, B., Li, Y., Shi, L., Wan, J., Chen, X., et al. (2019). Orally Deliverable Nanotherapeutics for the Synergistic Treatment of Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer. Theranostics 9 (24), 7458–7473. doi:10.7150/thno.38081
Hata, T., Murakami, K., Nakatani, H., Yamamoto, Y., Matsuda, T., and Aoki, N. (2010). Isolation of Bovine Milk-Derived Microvesicles Carrying mRNAs and microRNAs. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun. 396 (2), 528–533. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.04.135
Hickey, C. A., Kuhn, K. A., Donermeyer, D. L., Porter, N. T., Jin, C., Cameron, E. A., et al. (2015). Colitogenic Bacteroides Thetaiotaomicron Antigens Access Host Immune Cells in a Sulfatase-dependent Manner via Outer Membrane Vesicles. Cell Host & Microbe 17 (5), 672–680. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2015.04.002
Hock, A., Miyake, H., Li, B., Lee, C., Ermini, L., Koike, Y., et al. (2017). Breast Milk-Derived Exosomes Promote Intestinal Epithelial Cell Growth. J. Pediatr. Surg. 52 (5), 755–759. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.01.032
Hood, J. L. (2016). Post Isolation Modification of Exosomes for Nanomedicine Applications. Nanomedicine 11 (13), 1745–1756. doi:10.2217/nnm-2016-0102
Hood, J. L., and Wickline, S. A. (2012). A Systematic Approach to Exosome-Based Translational Nanomedicine. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 4 (4), 458–467. doi:10.1002/wnan.1174
Ismail, S., Hampton, M. B., and Keenan, J. I. (2003). Helicobacter pylori Outer Membrane Vesicles Modulate Proliferation and Interleukin-8 Production by Gastric Epithelial Cells. Iai 71 (10), 5670–5675. doi:10.1128/IAI.71.10.5670-5675.2003
Jeffrey, M. P., Strap, J. L., Jones Taggart, H., and Green-Johnson, J. M. (2018). Suppression of Intestinal Epithelial Cell Chemokine Production by Lactobacillus Rhamnosus R0011 and Lactobacillus Helveticus R0389 Is Mediated by Secreted Bioactive Molecules. Front. Immunol. 9 (NOV), 1–13. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.02639
Jeppesen, D. K., Fenix, A. M., Franklin, J. L., Higginbotham, J. N., Zhang, Q., Zimmerman, L. J., et al. (2019). Reassessment of Exosome Composition. Cell 177 (2), 428–445. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.029
Jiang, L., Shen, Y., Guo, D., Yang, D., Liu, J., Fei, X., et al. (2016). EpCAM-dependent Extracellular Vesicles from Intestinal Epithelial Cells Maintain Intestinal Tract Immune Balance. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–15. doi:10.1038/ncomms13045
Johnstone, R., Bianchini, A., and Teng, K. (1989). Reticulocyte Maturation and Exosome Release: Transferrin Receptor Containing Exosomes Shows Multiple Plasma Membrane Functions. Blood 74 (5), 1844–1851. doi:10.1182/blood.v74.5.1844.1844
Ju, S., Mu, J., Dokland, T., Zhuang, X., Wang, Q., Jiang, H., et al. (2013). Grape Exosome-like Nanoparticles Induce Intestinal Stem Cells and Protect Mice from DSS-Induced Colitis. Mol. Ther. 21 (7), 1345–1357. doi:10.1038/mt.2013.64
Kahn, S., Liao, Y., Du, X., Xu, W., Li, J., and Lönnerdal, B. (2018). Exosomal MicroRNAs in Milk from Mothers Delivering Preterm Infants Survive In Vitro Digestion and Are Taken up by Human Intestinal Cells. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 62 (11), 1701050. doi:10.1002/mnfr.201701050
Kang, C.-S., Ban, M., Choi, E.-J., Moon, H.-G., Jeon, J.-S., Kim, D.-K., et al. (2013). Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Gut Microbiota, Especially Akkermansia Muciniphila, Protect the Progression of Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis. PLoS ONE 8 (10), e76520. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076520
Karlsson, M., Lundin, S., Dahlgren, U., Kahu, H., Pettersson, I., and Telemo, E. (2001). “Tolerosomes” Are Produced by Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 31 (10), 2892–2900. doi:10.1002/1521-4141(2001010)31:10<2892::AID-IMMU2892>3.0.CO;2-I
Keerthikumar, S., Chisanga, D., Ariyaratne, D., Al Saffar, H., Anand, S., Zhao, K., et al. (2016). ExoCarta: A Web-Based Compendium of Exosomal Cargo. J. Mol. Biol. 428 (4), 688–692. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2015.09.019
Kim, S. H., Bianco, N. R., Shufesky, W. J., Morelli, A. E., and Robbins, P. D. (2007). Effective Treatment of Inflammatory Disease Models with Exosomes Derived from Dendritic Cells Genetically Modified to Express IL-4. J. Immunol. 179 (4), 2242–2249. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.179.4.2242
Koeppen, K., Hampton, T. H., Jarek, M., Scharfe, M., Gerber, S. A., Mielcarz, D. W., et al. (2016). A Novel Mechanism of Host-Pathogen Interaction through sRNA in Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles. Plos Pathog. 12 (6), e1005672. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005672
Kojima, M., Costantini, T. W., Eliceiri, B. P., Chan, T. W., Baird, A., and Coimbra, R. (2018). Gut Epithelial Cell-Derived Exosomes Trigger Posttrauma Immune Dysfunction. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 84 (2), 257–264. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000001748
Koumangoye, R. B., Sakwe, A. M., Goodwin, J. S., Patel, T., and Ochieng, J. (2011). Detachment of Breast Tumor Cells Induces Rapid Secretion of Exosomes Which Subsequently Mediate Cellular Adhesion and Spreading. PLoS ONE 6 (9), e24234. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024234
Kuhnert, F., Davis, C. R., Wang, H.-T., Chu, P., Lee, M., Yuan, J., et al. (2004). Essential Requirement for Wnt Signaling in Proliferation of Adult Small Intestine and colon Revealed by Adenoviral Expression of Dickkopf-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101 (1), 266–271. doi:10.1073/pnas.2536800100
Kumar, J., and Newton, A. M. J. (2017). Rifaximin - Chitosan Nanoparticles for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Iad 11 (1). doi:10.2174/1872213x10666161230111226
Kunkel, G. T., MacEyka, M., Milstien, S., and Spiegel, S. (2013). Targeting the Sphingosine-1-Phosphate axis in Cancer, Inflammation and beyond. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 12 (Issue 9), 688–702. doi:10.1038/nrd4099
Leoni, G., Alam, A., Neumann, P.-A., Lambeth, J. D., Cheng, G., McCoy, J., et al. (2013). Annexin A1, Formyl Peptide Receptor, and NOX1 Orchestrate Epithelial Repair. J. Clin. Invest. 123 (1), 443–454. doi:10.1172/JCI65831
Leoni, G., Neumann, P.-A., Kamaly, N., Quiros, M., Nishio, H., Jones, H. R., et al. (2015). Annexin A1-Containing Extracellular Vesicles and Polymeric Nanoparticles Promote Epithelial Wound Repair. J. Clin. Invest. 125 (3), 1215–1227. doi:10.1172/JCI76693
Li, B., Hock, A., Wu, R. Y., Minich, A., Botts, S. R., Lee, C., et al. (2019). Bovine Milk-Derived Exosomes Enhance Goblet Cell Activity and Prevent the Development of Experimental Necrotizing Enterocolitis. PLoS ONE 14 (1), e0211431–12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211431
Liao, Y., Du, X., Li, J., and Lönnerdal, B. (2017). Human Milk Exosomes and Their microRNAs Survive Digestion In Vitro and Are Taken up by Human Intestinal Cells. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 61 (11), 1700082. doi:10.1002/mnfr.201700082
Lin, X. P., Almqvist, N., and Telemo, E. (2005). Human Small Intestinal Epithelial Cells Constitutively Express the Key Elements for Antigen Processing and the Production of Exosomes. Blood Cell Mol. Dis. 35 (2), 122–128. doi:10.1016/j.bcmd.2005.05.011
Lindenbergh, M. F. S., and Stoorvogel, W. (2018). Antigen Presentation by Extracellular Vesicles from Professional Antigen-Presenting Cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 36, 435–459. doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-041015-055700
Liu, H., Liang, Z., Wang, F., et al. (2019). Exosomes From Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Reduce Murine Colonic Inflammation Via A Macrophage-Dependent Mechanism. JCI Insight 4(24), e131273. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.131273
Liu, R., Tang, A., Wang, X., Chen, X., Zhao, L., Xiao, Z., and Shen, S. (2018). Inhibition of lncRNA NEAT1 suppresses the inflammatory response in IBD by modulating the intestinal epithelial barrier and by exosome-mediated polarization of macrophages. International Journal of Molecular Medicine. 42, 2903–2913. doi:10.3892/ijmm.2018.3829
Lucas, A., and Cole, T. J. (1990). Breast Milk and Neonatal Necrotising Enterocolitis. The Lancet 336 (8730–8731), 1519–1523. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)93304-8
Maas, S. L. N., Breakefield, X. O., and Weaver, A. M. (2017). Extracellular Vesicles: Unique Intercellular Delivery Vehicles. Trends Cel Biol. 27 (3), 172–188. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2016.11.003
Mallegol, J., Van Niel, G., Lebreton, C., Lepelletier, Y., Candalh, C., Dugave, C., et al. (2007). T84-Intestinal Epithelial Exosomes Bear MHC Class II/Peptide Complexes Potentiating Antigen Presentation by Dendritic Cells. Gastroenterology 132 (5), 1866–1876. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.02.043
Manca, S., Upadhyaya, B., Mutai, E., Desaulniers, A. T., Cederberg, R. A., White, B. R., et al. (2018). Milk Exosomes Are Bioavailable and Distinct microRNA Cargos Have Unique Tissue Distribution Patterns. Sci. Rep. 8 (1), 1–11. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29780-1
Marafini, I., Sedda, S., Dinallo, V., and Monteleone, G. (2019). Inflammatory Cytokines: from Discoveries to Therapies in IBD. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 19 (Issue 11), 1207–1217. doi:10.1080/14712598.2019.1652267
Martin, C., Patel, M., Williams, S., Arora, H., and Sims, B. (2018). Human Breast Milk-Derived Exosomes Attenuate Cell Death in Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Innate Immun. 24 (5), 278–284. doi:10.1177/1753425918785715
Mathivanan, S., Ji, H., and Simpson, R. J. (2010). Exosomes: Extracellular Organelles Important in Intercellular Communication. J. Proteomics 73 (10), 1907–1920. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2010.06.006
Mitsuhashi, S., Feldbrügge, L., Csizmadia, E., Mitsuhashi, M., Robson, S. C., Moss, A. C., et al. (2016). Luminal Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Exhibit Proinflammatory Effects on Epithelial Cells and Macrophages. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 22 (7), 1587–1595. doi:10.1097/MIB.0000000000000840
Miyake, H., Lee, C., Chusilp, S., Bhalla, M., Li, B., Pitino, M., et al. (2020). Human Breast Milk Exosomes Attenuate Intestinal Damage. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 36 (2), 155–163. doi:10.1007/s00383-019-04599-7
Möbius, W., van Donselaar, E., Ohno-Iwashita, Y., Shimada, Y., Heijnen, H. F. G., Slot, J. W., et al. (2003). Recycling Compartments and the Internal Vesicles of Multivesicular Bodies Harbor Most of the Cholesterol Found in the Endocytic Pathway. Traffic 4 (4), 222–231. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.00072.x
Mondal, A., Tapader, R., Chatterjee, N. S., Ghosh, A., Sinha, R., Koley, H., et al. (2016). Cytotoxic and Inflammatory Responses Induced by Outer Membrane Vesicle-Associated Biologically Active Proteases from Vibrio cholerae. Infect. Immun. 84 (5), 1478–1490. doi:10.1128/IAI.01365-15
Morelli, A. E., Larregina, A. T., Shufesky, W. J., Sullivan, M. L. G., Stolz, D. B., Papworth, G. D., et al. (2004). Endocytosis, Intracellular Sorting, and Processing of Exosomes by Dendritic Cells. Blood 104 (10), 3257–3266. doi:10.1182/blood-2004-03-0824
Mulcahy, L. A., Pink, R. C., and Carter, D. R. F. (2014). Routes and Mechanisms of Extracellular Vesicle Uptake. J. Extracellular Vesicles 3 (1), 24641. doi:10.3402/jev.v3.24641
Munich, S., Sobo-Vujanovic, A., Buchser, W. J., Beer-Stolz, D., and Vujanovic, N. L. (2012). Dendritic Cell Exosomes Directly Kill Tumor Cells and Activate Natural Killer Cells via TNF Superfamily Ligands. OncoImmunology 1 (7), 1074–1083. doi:10.4161/onci.20897
Neurath, M. F. (2019). Targeting Immune Cell Circuits and Trafficking in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nat. Immunol. 20 (8), 970–979. doi:10.1038/s41590-019-0415-0
Ng, S. C., Shi, H. Y., Hamidi, N., Underwood, F. E., Tang, W., Benchimol, E. I., et al. (2017). Worldwide Incidence and Prevalence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the 21st century: a Systematic Review of Population-Based Studies. The Lancet 390 (10114), 2769–2778. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32448-0
Ocansey, D. K. W., Wang, L., Wang, J., Yan, Y., Qian, H., Zhang, X., et al. (2019). Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Gut Microbiota Interaction in the Repair of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: an Enhanced Therapeutic Effect. Clin. Translational Med. 8 (1). doi:10.1186/s40169-019-0251-8
Ocansey, D. K. W., Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Yan, Y., Qian, H., Zhang, X., et al. (2020). Exosome‐mediated Effects and Applications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Biol. Rev. 95 (5), 1287–1307. doi:10.1111/brv.12608
Palmulli, R., and Van Niel, G. (2018). To Be or Not to be... Secreted as Exosomes, a Balance Finely Tuned by the Mechanisms of Biogenesis. Essays Biochem. 62 (2), 177–191. doi:10.1042/EBC20170076
Pan, B.-T., and Johnstone, R. M. (1983). Fate of the Transferrin Receptor during Maturation of Sheep Reticulocytes In Vitro: Selective Externalization of the Receptor. Cell 33 (3), 967–978. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(83)90040-5
Pant, S., Hilton, H., and Burczynski, M. E. (2012). The Multifaceted Exosome: Biogenesis, Role in normal and Aberrant Cellular Function, and Frontiers for Pharmacological and Biomarker Opportunities. Biochem. Pharmacol. 83 (11), 1484–1494. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2011.12.037
Patmanathan, S. N., Wang, W., Yap, L. F., Herr, D. R., and Paterson, I. C. (2017). Mechanisms of Sphingosine 1-phosphate Receptor Signalling in Cancer. Cell Signal. 34, 66–75. doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2017.03.002
Patten, D. A., Hussein, E., Davies, S. P., Humphreys, P. N., and Collett, A. (2017). Commensal-derived OMVs Elicit a Mild Proinflammatory Response in Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Microbiology (United Kingdom) 163 (5), 702–711. doi:10.1099/mic.0.000468
Perretti, M., and D'Acquisto, F. (2009). Annexin A1 and Glucocorticoids as Effectors of the Resolution of Inflammation62–70). Nat. Rev. ImmunologyNat Rev Immunol 9 (Issue 1), 62–70. doi:10.1038/nri2470
Peterson, L. W., and Artis, D. (2014). Intestinal Epithelial Cells: Regulators of Barrier Function and Immune Homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14 (Issue 3), 141–153. doi:10.1038/nri3608
Pieters, B. C. H., Arntz, O. J., Broeren, M. G. A., van Caam, A. P. M., Koenders, M. I., et al. (2015). Commercial Cow Milk Contains Physically Stable Extracellular Vesicles Expressing Immunoregulatory TGF-β. PLoS ONE 10 (3), e0121123. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121123
Reif, S., Elbaum Shiff, Y., and Golan-Gerstl, R. (2019). Milk-derived Exosomes (MDEs) Have a Different Biological Effect on normal Fetal colon Epithelial Cells Compared to colon Tumor Cells in a miRNA-dependent Manner. J. Transl Med. 17 (1), 1–10. doi:10.1186/s12967-019-2072-3
Reinhardt, T. A., Lippolis, J. D., Nonnecke, B. J., and Sacco, R. E. (2012). Bovine Milk Exosome Proteome. J. Proteomics 75 (5), 1486–1492. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2011.11.017
Reinhardt, T. A., Sacco, R. E., Nonnecke, B. J., and Lippolis, J. D. (2013). Bovine Milk Proteome: Quantitative Changes in normal Milk Exosomes, Milk Fat Globule Membranes and Whey Proteomes Resulting from Staphylococcus aureus Mastitis. J. Proteomics 82, 141–154. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2013.02.013
Saha, S., Aranda, E., Hayakawa, Y., Bhanja, P., Atay, S., Brodin, N. P., et al. (2016). Macrophage-derived Extracellular Vesicle-Packaged WNTs rescue Intestinal Stem Cells and Enhance Survival after Radiation Injury. Nat. Commun. 7. doi:10.1038/ncomms13096
Samanta, S., Rajasingh, S., Drosos, N., Zhou, Z., Dawn, B., and Rajasingh, J. (2018). Exosomes: New Molecular Targets of Diseases. Acta Pharmacol. Sin 39 (4), 501–513. doi:10.1038/aps.2017.162
Sartor, R. B. (2008). Microbial Influences in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Gastroenterology 134 (2), 577–594. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.11.059
Sato-Kuwabara, Y., Melo, S. A., Soares, F. A., and Calin, G. A. (2015). The Fusion of Two Worlds: Non-coding RNAs and Extracellular Vesicles - Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications (Review). Int. J. Oncol. 46 (1), 17–27. doi:10.3892/ijo.2014.2712
Schanler, R. J., Burns, P. A., Abrams, S. A., and Garza, C. (1992). Bone Mineralization Outcomes in Human Milk-Fed Preterm Infants. Pediatr. Res. 31 (6), 583–586. doi:10.1203/00006450-199206000-00009
Shandilya, S., Rani, P., Onteru, S. K., and Singh, D. (2017). Small Interfering RNA in Milk Exosomes Is Resistant to Digestion and Crosses the Intestinal Barrier In Vitro. J. Agric. Food Chem. 65 (43), 9506–9513. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03123
Shen, Y., Torchia, M. L. G., Lawson, G. W., Karp, C. L., Ashwell, J. D., and Mazmanian, S. K. (2012). Outer Membrane Vesicles of a Human Commensal Mediate Immune Regulation and Disease protection. Cell Host & Microbe 12 (4), 509–520. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2012.08.004
Simons, M., and Raposo, G. (2009). Exosomes - Vesicular Carriers for Intercellular Communication. Curr. Opin. Cel Biol. 21 (4), 575–581. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2009.03.007
Slater, T. W., Finkielsztein, A., Mascarenhas, L. A., Mehl, L. C., Butin-Israeli, V., and Sumagin, R. (2017). Neutrophil Microparticles Deliver Active Myeloperoxidase to Injured Mucosa to Inhibit Epithelial Wound Healing. J.I. 198 (7), 2886–2897. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1601810
Sommer, F., Anderson, J. M., Bharti, R., Raes, J., and Rosenstiel, P. (2017). The Resilience of the Intestinal Microbiota Influences Health and Disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15 (Issue 10), 630–638. doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.58
Stentz, R., Osborne, S., Horn, N., Li, A. W. H., Hautefort, I., Bongaerts, R., et al. (2014). A Bacterial Homolog of a Eukaryotic Inositol Phosphate Signaling Enzyme Mediates Cross-Kingdom Dialog in the Mammalian Gut. Cel Rep. 6 (4), 646–656. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.01.021
Stoorvogel, W., Kleijmeer, M. J., Geuze, H. J., and Raposo, G. (2002). The Biogenesis and Functions of Exosomes. Traffic 3 (5), 321–330. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0854.2002.30502.x
Stuffers, S., Sem Wegner, C., Stenmark, H., and Brech, A. (2009). Multivesicular Endosome Biogenesis in the Absence of ESCRTs. Traffic 10 (7), 925–937. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00920.x
Subra, C., Grand, D., Laulagnier, K., Stella, A., Lambeau, G., Paillasse, M., et al. (2010). Exosomes Account for Vesicle-Mediated Transcellular Transport of Activatable Phospholipases and Prostaglandins. J. Lipid Res. 51 (8), 2105–2120. doi:10.1194/jlr.M003657
Tamai, K., Tanaka, N., Nakano, T., Kakazu, E., Kondo, Y., Inoue, J., et al. (2010). Exosome Secretion of Dendritic Cells Is Regulated by Hrs, an ESCRT-0 Protein. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun. 399 (3), 384–390. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.07.083
Taylor, C. T., and Colgan, S. P. (2007). Hypoxia and Gastrointestinal Disease. J. Mol. Med. 85 (12), 1295–1300. doi:10.1007/s00109-007-0277-z
Teng, Y., Ren, Y., Sayed, M., Hu, X., Lei, C., Kumar, A., et al. (2018). Plant-Derived Exosomal MicroRNAs Shape the Gut Microbiota. Cell Host Microbe 24 (5), 637–652.e8. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2018.10.001
Théry, C., Ostrowski, M., and Segura, E. (2009). Membrane Vesicles as Conveyors of Immune Responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9 (8), 581–593. doi:10.1038/nri2567
Théry, C., Witwer, K. W., Aikawa, E., Alcaraz, M. J., Anderson, J. D., Andriantsitohaina, R., et al. (2018). Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a Position Statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and Update of the MISEV2014 Guidelines. J. Extracellular Vesicles 7 (1). doi:10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750
Tian, T., Zhu, Y.-L., Hu, F.-H., Wang, Y.-Y., Huang, N.-P., and Xiao, Z.-D. (2013). Dynamics of Exosome Internalization and Trafficking. J. Cel. Physiol. 228 (7), 1487–1495. doi:10.1002/jcp.24304
Tkach, M., Kowal, J., Zucchetti, A. E., Enserink, L., Jouve, M., Lankar, D., et al. (2017). Qualitative Differences in T‐cell Activation by Dendritic Cell‐derived Extracellular Vesicle Subtypes. Embo J. 36 (20), 3012–3028. doi:10.15252/embj.201696003
Tomé-Carneiro, J., Fernández-Alonso, N., Tomás-Zapico, C., Visioli, F., Iglesias-Gutierrez, E., and Dávalos, A. (2018). Breast Milk microRNAs Harsh Journey towards Potential Effects in Infant Development and Maturation. Lipid Encapsulation Can Help. Pharmacol. Res. 132, 21–32. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2018.04.003
Torres, J., Mehandru, S., Colombel, J.-F., and Peyrin-Biroulet, L. (2017). Crohn's Disease. The Lancet 389 (10080), 1741–1755. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31711-1
Turfkruyer, M., and Verhasselt, V. (2015). Breast Milk and its Impact on Maturation of the Neonatal Immune System. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 28 (Issue 3), 199–206. doi:10.1097/QCO.0000000000000165
Valadi, H., Ekström, K., Bossios, A., Sjöstrand, M., Lee, J. J., and Lötvall, J. O. (2007). Exosome-mediated Transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs Is a Novel Mechanism of Genetic Exchange between Cells. Nat. Cel Biol 9 (6), 654–659. doi:10.1038/ncb1596
van Bergenhenegouwen, J., Kraneveld, A. D., Rutten, L., Kettelarij, N., Garssen, J., and Vos, A. P. (2014). Extracellular Vesicles Modulate Host-Microbe Responses by Altering TLR2 Activity and Phagocytosis. PLoS ONE 9 (2), e89121. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089121
Van Niel, G., Mallegol, J., Bevilacqua, C., Candalh, C., Brugière, S., Tomaskovic-Crook, E., et al. (2003). Intestinal Epithelial Exosomes Carry MHC Class II/peptides Able to Inform the Immune System in Mice. Gut 52 (12), 1690–1697. doi:10.1136/gut.52.12.1690
Van Niel, G., Raposo, G., Candalh, C., Boussac, M., Hershberg, R., Cerf–Bensussan, N., et al. (2001). Intestinal Epithelial Cells Secrete Exosome-like Vesicles. Gastroenterology 121 (2), 337–349. doi:10.1053/gast.2001.26263
Walker, W. A., and Iyengar, R. S. (2015). Breast Milk, Microbiota, and Intestinal Immune Homeostasis. Pediatr. Res. 77, 220–228. doi:10.1038/pr.2014.160
Wang, L., Yu, Z., Wan, S., Wu, F., Chen, W., Zhang, B., et al. (2017). Exosomes Derived from Dendritic Cells Treated with Schistosoma Japonicum Soluble Egg Antigen Attenuate DSS-Induced Colitis. Front. Pharmacol. 8 (SEP), 651. doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00651
Wang, Y., Tian, J., Tang, X., Rui, K., Tian, X., Ma, J., et al. (2016). Exosomes Released by Granulocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Attenuate DSS-Induced Colitis in Mice. Oncotarget 7 (13), 15356–15368. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.7324
Wolf, P. (1967). The Nature and Significance of Platelet Products in Human Plasma. Br. J. Haematol. 13 (3), 269–288. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.1967.tb08741.x
Wolf, T., Baier, S. R., and Zempleni, J. (2015). The Intestinal Transport of Bovine Milk Exosomes Is Mediated by Endocytosis in Human Colon Carcinoma Caco-2 Cells and Rat Small Intestinal IEC-6 Cells. J. Nutr. 145 (10), 2201–2206. doi:10.3945/jn.115.218586
Wong, W.-Y., Lee, M. M.-L., Chan, B. D., Kam, R. K.-T., Zhang, G., Lu, A.-P., et al. (2016). Proteomic Profiling of Dextran Sulfate Sodium Induced Acute Ulcerative Colitis Mice Serum Exosomes and Their Immunomodulatory Impact on Macrophages. Proteomics 16 (7), 1131–1145. doi:10.1002/pmic.201500174
Xiao, B., Laroui, H., Ayyadurai, S., Viennois, E., Charania, M. A., Zhang, Y., et al. (2013). Mannosylated Bioreducible Nanoparticle-Mediated Macrophage-specific TNF-α RNA Interference for IBD Therapy. Biomaterials 34 (30), 7471–7482. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.008
Xie, M.-Y., Chen, T., Xi, Q.-Y., Hou, L.-J., Luo, J.-Y., Zeng, B., et al. (2020). Porcine Milk Exosome miRNAs Protect Intestinal Epithelial Cells against Deoxynivalenol-Induced Damage. Biochem. Pharmacol. 175 (November 2019), 113898. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2020.113898
Xie, M.-Y., Hou, L.-J., Sun, J.-J., Zeng, B., Xi, Q.-Y., Luo, J.-Y., et al. (2019). Porcine Milk Exosome MiRNAs Attenuate LPS-Induced Apoptosis through Inhibiting TLR4/NF-κB and P53 Pathways in Intestinal Epithelial Cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 67 (34), 9477–9491. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.9b02925
Yang, X., Meng, S., Jiang, H., Chen, T., and Wu, W. (2010). Exosomes Derived from Interleukin-10-Treated Dendritic Cells Can Inhibit Trinitrobenzene Sulfonic Acid-Induced Rat Colitis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 45 (10), 1168–1177. doi:10.3109/00365521.2010.490596
Yu, S., Zhao, Z., Sun, L., and Li, P. (2017). Fermentation Results in Quantitative Changes in Milk-Derived Exosomes and Different Effects on Cell Growth and Survival. J. Agric. Food Chem. 65 (6), 1220–1228. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05002
Zamrik, S., Giachero, F., Heldmann, M., Hensel, K. O., Wirth, S., and Jenke, A. C. (2018). Impact of an In-House Pediatric Surgery Unit and Human Milk Centered Enteral Nutrition on Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 1–6. doi:10.1155/2018/5042707
Zhang, H., Wang, L., Li, C., Yu, Y., Yi, Y., Wang, J., et al. (2019). Exosome-induced Regulation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front. Immunol. 10 (JUN), 1–9. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01464
Zhang, J., Li, S., Li, L., Li, M., Guo, C., Yao, J., et al. (2015). Exosome and Exosomal microRNA: Trafficking, Sorting, and Function. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics 13 (1), 17–24. doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2015.02.001
Zhang, X., Deeke, S. A., Ning, Z., Starr, A. E., Butcher, J., Li, J., et al. (2018). Metaproteomics Reveals Associations between Microbiome and Intestinal Extracellular Vesicle Proteins in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nat. Commun. 9 (1), 1–14. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05357-4
Zheng, X., Chen, F., Zhang, Q., Liu, Y., You, P., Sun, S., et al. (2017). Salivary Exosomal PSMA7: a Promising Biomarker of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Protein Cell 8 (9), 686–695. doi:10.1007/s13238-017-0413-7
Zhou, F., Paz, H. A., Sadri, M., Cui, J., Kachman, S. D., Fernando, S. C., et al. (2019). Dietary Bovine Milk Exosomes Elicit Changes in Bacterial Communities in C57BL/6 Mice. Am. J. Physiology-Gastrointestinal Liver PhysiologyGastrointestinal Liver Physiol. 317 (5), G618–G624. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00160.2019
Keywords: IBD, colitis, extracellular vesicles, exosomes, inflammation
Citation: Ayyar KK and Moss AC (2021) Exosomes in Intestinal Inflammation. Front. Pharmacol. 12:658505. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.658505
Received: 25 January 2021; Accepted: 11 May 2021;
Published: 09 June 2021.
Edited by:
Dario Sorrentino, Virginia Tech Carilion, United StatesReviewed by:
Fabio Cominelli, Case Western Reserve University, United StatesMartina Fabris, University Hospital of Udine, Italy, Italy
Copyright © 2021 Ayyar and Moss. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kanchana K. Ayyar, a2FuY2hhbmEuYXl5YXJAYm1jLm9yZw==