Hypoglycemia Associated With Drug–Drug Interactions in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using Dipeptidylpeptidase-4 Inhibitors

Background: Dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i′s) are considered to be safe for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, little is known about drug–drug interactions between DPP-4i′s and concurrent medications.

Methods: Data on patients using DPP-4i′s for T2DM during 2011–2017 were retrieved from Chang Gung Research database provided by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Patients were excluded if they were aged <30 years or >90 years; had incomplete demographic data; had insulinoma; or had records of concomitant insulin use. A generalized estimating equation–based Poisson model was employed for statistical analysis. The primary outcome was hypoglycemia events.

Results: We retrieved data on a total of 97,227 patients using DPP-4i′s. After patients were excluded according to the mentioned criteria, the remaining 77,047 DPP-4i users were studied (mean age 64 ± 12 years, men 54.4%). The most common medications coprescribed with DPP4is over all person-quarters were acetaminophen, simvastatin, fluvastatin, and colchicine (all >20,000 person-quarters). The combinations of a DPP-4i with bumetanide, captopril, colchicine, acetaminophen, cotrimoxazole, and pantoprazole were associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia. Compared with the ratios observed for person-quarters of DPP-4i use alone (reference category), the adjusted prevalence ratios per 100 person-years of hypoglycemia for person-quarters of DPP-4i use in combination with bumetanide, captopril, colchicine, acetaminophen, cotrimoxazole, and pantoprazole were 2.44 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78–3.36), 2.97 (95% CI, 2.26–3.90), 1.87 (95% CI, 1.44–2.42), 2.83 (95% CI, 2.44–3.29), 2.27 (95% CI, 1.27–4.04), and 3.03 (95% CI, 1.96–4.68), respectively.

Conclusion: Among patients taking DPP-4i′s for T2DM, concurrent use of such inhibitors with bumetanide, captopril, acetaminophen, and pantoprazole was associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia compared with the use of DPP-4i′s alone. Physicians prescribing DPP-4i′s should consider the potential risks associated with their concomitant use with other drugs.

Introduction

Therapeutic armamentaria for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have been increasingly diversified in mechanism of actions in recent decades. Dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i′s), also known as gliptins, are among the newest categories of antidiabetic medications (ADMs) (Idris and Donnelly, 2007). DPP-4i′s were developed to improve glucose control through the increase in incretin levels (GLP-1 and GIP) that which inhibit glucagon release and produce more insulin only when it is needed, with benefit of no weight gain and rare hypoglycemic events (Scheen, 2005; Tella and Rendell, 2015). Since T2DM patients often have comorbid conditions such as cardiovascular diseases requiring the use of additional antihypertensive or antihyperlipidemic agents, it is important to ascertain that the risks of drug–drug interactions when multiple medications are prescribed together (Scheen, 2010; Cosentino et al., 2019).

DPP-4i′s that have been brought to the market comprise sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, vildagliptin, and alogliptin, existing either as single agents or in fixed-dose combined formulations with metformin (Ahrén and Foley, 2016; Nishimura et al., 2019). Preclinical studies with DPP-4i′s pharmacokinetic interactions have described with some of commonly coprescribed medications, including diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, statins, antibiotics, and proton pump inhibitors, with DPP-4i′s (Kim et al., 2006; Ayalasomayajula et al., 2007; Chu et al., 2007; He et al., 2008; Patel et al., 2011; Patel et al., 2011; Arulmozhiraja et al., 2016; May and Schindler, 2016). The knowledge of these scientific hypotheses in the laboratory however, cannot supplant clinical scenarios where drug-drug interactions may be far more complicated then what is known from translational medicine. Limited data exists in real-world situations where these drug-drug interactions are examined in large-scale patients using DPP-4i′s. Accordingly, we conducted this study to investigate the drug–drug interactions between DPP-4i′s and commonly concurrent medications, measure the frequency of such coprescriptions, and describe the associated risk of hypoglycemia in the coprescribed medicaitons.

Methods

Data Source

In this retrospective cohort study, patient data were obtained from the largest health care provider in Taiwan, the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital system, which comprises three major teaching hospitals and four tertiary-care medical centers (Tsai et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019). The health care provider has more than 10,000 beds and admits more than 280,000 patients, servicing approximately one-tenth of the Taiwanese population each year. The hospital identification number of each patient was encrypted and deidentified to protect their privacy. Therefore, informed consent was waived for this study. The diagnosis and laboratory data could be linked and continuously monitored using consistent data encryption. To examine ADM use among patients with T2DM, we retrieved data for a population-based panel of patients with T2DM between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017, from the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD) provided by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. The Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital approved the study protocol (IRB No. 201802084B1).

Study Design

We designed a panel study for patients with T2DM who received DPP-4i prescriptions between 2011 and 2017, We followed the patients until death or until May 31, 2018, the end of the study period. Follow-up data for each included patient were analyzed at the person-quarter level, which served as the analytic unit. Information on comedications and outcomes was collected by each observed person-quarter. We excluded patients who were aged <30 or >90 years; had incomplete demographic data; received a diagnosis of insulinoma; or used insulin in conjunction with a DPP-4i (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. Study design and flowchart for patient enrollment.

Selected Drugs for the Study of Drug–Drug Interactions with DPP-4i′s.

After reviewing the medical literature for studies describing drug–drug interactions between commonly prescribed medications and DPP-4i′s, we selected the following medications for investigation: bumetanide (a diuretic), captopril and fosinopril (ACE inhibitors), verapamil (a calcium channel blocker), simvastatin and fluvastatin (statins), gemfibrozil (a fibrate), duloxetine (an anxiolytic agent), sulfinpyrazone and colchicine (uric acid–lowering agents), acetaminophen (an analgesic agent), cotrimoxazole (an antibiotic agent), and pantoprazole (a proton pump inhibitor).

Follow-up Periods and Person-Quarters

In this study, each calendar year was partitioned into four quarters for each patient and each year after the first DPP-4i prescription. The analytic unit was one person-quarter. Person-quarters were used because medications for chronic illnesses were refilled after a maximum of 3 months according to the Taiwan National Health Insurance reimbursement policy, as previously described (Chang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019 Aug 6). Accordingly, medications and covariates were assessed for each person-quarter, which simplified the assessment of the complex prescription pattern of DPP-4i′s and multiple drugs. Person-quarters exposed to DPP-4i′s with or without concurrent medications were identified. The hypoglycemia risks of person-quarters exposed to DPP-4i′s and 13 concurrent medications (bumetanide, captopril, fosinopril, verapamil, simvastatin, fluvastatin, gemfibrozil, duloxetine, sulfinpyrazone, colchicine, acetaminophen, cotrimoxazole, and pantoprazole) were compared with person-quarters exposed to DPP-4i alone.

Study Outcomes

The primary outcome was hypoglycemia diagnosed on admission or emergency visit. According to International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes (Supplementary Table S1), hypoglycemia was defined as a condition that may necessitate clinical intervention involving infusion of at least two 20-ml ampules of 50% glucose or injection of 1 mg of glucagon. Patients were followed up from the first reported date of DPP-4i use to December 31, 2017, or to the date of DPP-4i discontinuation.

Statistical Analysis

Baseline characteristics between the drug groups are reported as mean ± standard deviation and numbers with percentages. A generalized estimating equation–based Poisson model was used to estimate the adjusted prevalence of hypoglycemia in DPP-4i users between person-quarters (Twisk, 2004). Because our analytic unit was person-quarter, we computed the yearly prevalence (crude and/or adjusted) rates by applying a 0.25 weighting. Significance was set at p < 0.05. All analyses were performed using SAS software, version 9.4. To validate our findings and assess potential selection bias, we performed a sensitivity analysis using a negative control outcome unrelated to hypoglycemia; specifically, we used cataract operation for analysis to assess the pattern of analysis.

Results

Study Population

Data on 97,227 patients with T2DM taking DPP-4i′s were retrieved from the CGRD for the period 2011–2017. After the exclusion of patients in accordance with the exclusion criteria, 77,047 patients remained for analysis, corresponding to a total of 694,300 person-quarters (Figure 1; Table 1). The mean age of the patients was 64 ± 12 years, with the Charlson comorbidity index being 3.39 ± 2.33. Patients with comorbidities of hypertension, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease constituted 71.4, 4.7, 10.23, 3.45, and 21.09% of the study population, respectively. Regarding the commonly coprescribed ADMs, biguanide, sulfonylurea, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinedione, meglitinide, and sodium-glucose cotransporter two inhibitors were prescribed in 75.96, 53.09, 13.19, 10.32, 6.23, and 0.39% of the study population, respectively.

TABLE 1

TABLE 1. Baseline characteristics of study patients.

Risk of Hypoglycemia With Concurrent use of Specific Medications

During the follow-up period, 13,546 hypoglycemia events occurred in 694,300 person-quarters with DPP-4i prescriptions. Table 2 and Figure 2A present a summary of the prevalence, adjusted prevalence, and adjusted prevalence differences for hypoglycemia associated with drug–drug interactions between the DPP-4i′s and 13 concurrent medications. Supplementary Figures S1–S5 illustrate the crude and adjusted prevalence for hypoglycemia associated with drug–drug interactions between individual DPP-4i′s (sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, vildagliptin, and alogliptin) and the selected medications. The most common medications coprescribed with DPP-4i′s over all person-quarters were acetaminophen (65,188 person-quarters), simvastatin (46,989 person-quarters), fluvastatin (30,318 person-quarters), and colchicine (22,006 person-quarters) (all >20,000 person-quarters). Combinations of a DPP-4i with bumetanide, captopril, acetaminophen, and pantoprazole were associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia. Compared with the ratios observed for person-quarters of DPP-4i use alone (reference category), those with greater than twice (>2-fold) the adjusted rate ratios per 100 person-years of hypoglycemia for person-quarters of DPP-4i use in combination with bumetanide, captopril, colchicine, acetaminophen, cotrimoxazole, and pantoprazole were 2.44 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78–3.36), 2.97 (95% CI, 2.26–3.90), 2.83 (95% CI, 2.44–3.29), 2.27 (95% CI, 1.27–4.04), 3.03 (95% CI, 1.96–4.68), respectively. Combined use of a DPP-4i with the other medications was not associated with increased prevalence of hypoglycemia. Colchicine was associated with a reduced adjusted prevalence of hypoglycemia. Figure 2B displays the adjusted prevalence ratio, and Supplementary Table S2 presents the results obtained from the analysis of the negative control outcome. We observed a high prevalence of cataract operation in patients concomitantly using a DPP-4i and acetaminophen; this can probably be attributed to the high rates of analgesic prescriptions in patients undergoing cataract surgery.

TABLE 2

TABLE 2. Selected drugs to study for drug-drug interactions.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. (A) Crude prevalence and adjusted prevalence of hypoglycemia associated with drug–drug interactions between DPP-4i′s and selected medications. (B) Adjusted prevalence ratios of hypoglycemia associated with drug–drug interactions between DPP-4i′s and selected medications.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to examine a wide range of commonly prescribed medications and their drug–drug interactions with DPP-4i′s (which among the safest categories of ADMs) (Idris andand Donnelly, 2007). Our findings suggest that when used in combination with DPP-4i′s, bumetanide, captopril, acetaminophen, cotrimoxazole, and pantoprazole may increase the risk of hypoglycemia more than twice and require the intervention of glucose infusion or glucagon injection.

DPP-4i′s have favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics, are neither inducers nor inhibitors of cytochrome P-450 isoforms, and have few or no reported drug interactions (Idris andand Donnelly, 2007). They do not significantly modify the pharmacokinetic profile and exposure of other drugs; similarly, other drugs do not significantly alter the pharmacokinetic profile of DPP-4i′s (Scheen, 2005; Tella and Rendell, 2015). However, drugs commonly coprescribed to patients with T2DM, such as statins and antihypertensive agents, interfere with the cytochrome (CYP) P-450 system (Scheen, 2005; Idris and Donnelly, 2007; Tella and Rendell, 2015). Although the mechanism of action of all DPP-4 inhibitors are considered similar, slightly different pharmacokinetic properties have been described. Saxagliptin is metabolized via CYP3A4/5, and thus can interact with CYP3A4-inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, diltiazem, ritonavir and clarithromycin) or CYP3A4-inductors (e.g., rifampicin) (Filippatos et al., 2014; Tella and Rendell, 2015). However, other DPP-4i′s such as sitagliptin, vildagliptin, linagliptin, and aloptin are either being less of a substrate or not as a substrate for CYP3A4/5 (Capuano et al., 2013). In addition, a high percentage of certain DPP-4i′s such as sitagliptin, viltagliptin, saxagliptin, and alogliptin are renally excreted (75–87%)except linagliptin (5%) (Capuano et al., 2013).

Although drug–drug interactions between DPP-4i′s and other drugs have been reported to be rare in preclinical studies, it is imperative such evidences from large-scale, real-world population-based research also observed. T2DM patients with cardiovascular disease and elderly T2DM patients having multiple prescriptions are especially at a high risk of drug-drug interactions. Studies of drug-drug interactions between DPP-4i′s and concurrent medications have only been investigated in diuretics, ACE inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, statins, antibiotics, and proton pump inhibitors in terms of translational researches (Kim et al., 2006; Ayalasomayajula et al., 2007; Chu et al., 2007; He et al., 2008; Patel et al., 2011; Patel et al., 2011; Arulmozhiraja et al., 2016; May and Schindler, 2016). In this study, we explored possible drug–drug interactions between DPP4i′s and concurrent medications that cause hypoglycemic events requiring clinical intervention. Our results show that the commonly prescribed cardiovascular medications bumetanide and captopril, the analgesic acetaminophen, and the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole may cause sufficiently severe hypoglycemia necessitating glucose infusion or glucagon injection at a hospital. For instances, bumetanide may cause increased incidence of hypoglycemia when prescribed with sitagliptin and linagliptin. Captopril may cause increased incidence of hypoglycemia when prescribed with sitagliptin, saxagliptin, and linagliptin. Colchicine may cause increased incidence of hypoglycemia with prescribed with sitagliptin and linagliptin. Acetaminophen may cause increased incidence of hypoglycemia when prescribed with sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, and vildagliptin. Pantoprazole may cause increased incidence of hypoglycemia when prescribed with sitagliptin, may due in part that decreased renal excretion of sitagliptin via transporter OAT3 when coadministered with OAT3 inhibitors such as pantoprazole (Chu et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2019). Notably, although ACE inhibitors are generally safe medications (Marney et al., 2010), captopril was observed to be associated with hypoglycemia events when used in addition to DPP-4i′s. In contrast to previous research suggesting interactions between the nondihydropyridine calcium channel blocker diltiazem and a DPP-4i (He et al., 2008), we observed that verapamil did not have adverse drug–drug interactions that could lead to hypoglycemia. In particular, a frequently prescribed analgesic such as acetaminophen may not be as safe as previously thought when taken with a DPP-4i. However, additional studies are required to determine whether this phenomenon can be observed in other ethnic populations subjected to the same coprescription. Our negative control analysis using cataract operation as an outcome revealed a high prevalence of cataracts in patients concomitantly using DPP-4i′s and acetaminophen; this was probably associated with their use of analgesics.

In summary, this is the first nationwide population-based study on the drug–drug interactions between DPP-4i and concurrent medications to measure the risk of hypoglycemia. Postmarketing surveillance using large patient registries should be helpful to improve the detection of clinically relevant DPP-4i drug–drug interactions.

Limitations

Several limitations are associated with the use of epidemiological data from the CGRD. First, the use of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for patient screening may have resulted in missing cases for conditions coded incorrectly. Second, the data from the claim-based CGRD had inherently limited clinical medical information, such as examination report details. Third, alogliptin had a relatively late introduction in Taiwan, and thus the number of patients taking alogliptin (in the hundreds) was relatively small compared with that of those taking other DPP-4i′s (in the thousands). Therefore, many drug–drug interactions could not be analyzed. Fourth, because this study involved a retrospective and observational design, causality could not be established. Finally, the study sample and background population were ethnically homogenous; therefore, the generalizability of the results to other populations and settings may require further research.

Conclusion

Among patients taking DPP-4i′s for T2DM, concurrent use of such inhibitors with bumetanide, captopril, acetaminophen, cotrimoxazole, and pantoprazole was associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia compared with the use of DPP-4i′s alone. Physicians prescribing DPP-4i′s should consider the potential risks associated with concomitant use of the inhibitors with other drugs.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author Contributions

Conception/Design of the work: C-YR, VC-CW, S-HC Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: H-TT, Y-TH Drafting the work: C-YR, VC-CW, S-HC Revising it critically for important intellectual content: C-LW, C-FK Final approval: C-YR, VC-CW, S-HC Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work: C-YR, VC-CW, S-HC.

Funding

This study is based in part on data from the National Health Insurance research database provided by the National Health Insurance Administration and managed by Health and Welfare Data Science Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare. However, the interpretation and conclusions contained herein do not represent the position of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, National Health Insurance Administration and Ministry of Health and Welfare. Grants This work was funded by research grants (CMRPG3I0092) from the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of the Maintenance Project (Grant Numbers CORPG3G0271, CORPG3J0031, and CLRPG3D0046) of the Center for Big Data Analytics and Statistics at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for its assistance with the study design, monitoring, data analysis, and interpretation.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.570835/full#supplementary-material.

References

Ahrén, B., and Foley, J. E. (2016). Improved glucose regulation in type 2 diabetic patients with DPP-4 inhibitors: focus on alpha and beta cell function and lipid metabolism. Diabetol 59 (5), 907–917. doi:10.1007/s00125-016-3899-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arulmozhiraja, S., Matsuo, N., Ishitsubo, E., Okazaki, S., Shimano, H., and Tokiwa, H. (2016). Comparative binding analysis of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) with antidiabetic drugs – an ab initio fragment molecular orbital study. PLoS One 11 (11), e0166275. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166275

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ayalasomayajula, S. P., Dole, K., He, Y.-L., Ligueros-Saylan, M., Wang, Y., Campestrini, J., et al. (2007). Evaluation of the potential for steady-state pharmacokinetic interaction between vildagliptin and simvastatin in healthy subjects. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 23 (12), 2913–2920. doi:10.1185/030079907x233296

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Capuano, A., Sportiello, L., Maiorino, M. I., Rossi, F., Giugliano, D., and Esposito, K. (2013). Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes therapy – focus on alogliptin. Drug Des. Devel Ther. 7, 989–1001. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S37647

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, S.-H., Chou, I.-J., Yeh, Y.-H., Chiou, M.-J., Wen, M.-S., Kuo, C.-T., et al. (2017). Association between use of non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants with and without concurrent medications and risk of major bleeding in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA 318 (13), 1250–1259. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.13883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chu, X.-Y., Bleasby, K., Yabut, J., Cai, X., Chan, G. H., Hafey, M. J., et al. (2007). Transport of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin by human organic anion transporter 3, organic anion transporting polypeptide 4C1, and multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 321 (2), 673–683. doi:10.1124/jpet.106.116517

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cosentino, F., Grant, P. J., Aboyans, V., Bailey, C. J., Ceriello, A., Delgado, V., et al. (2019). ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD: the Task Force for diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Eur. Heart J. 41 (2), 255–323. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz486pii: ehz486[Epub ahead of print] No abstract available. PMID: 31497854

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Filippatos, T. D., Athyros, V. G., and Elisaf, M. S. (2014). The pharmacokinetic considerations and adverse effects of DDP-4 inhibitors. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 10 (6), 787–812. doi:10.1517/17425255.2014.907274

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, Y.-L., Ligueros-Saylan, M., Sunkara, G., Sabo, R., Zhao, C., Wang, Y., et al. (2008). Vildagliptin, a novel dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor, has no pharmacokinetic interactions with the antihypertensive agents amlodipine, valsartan, and ramipril in healthy subjects. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 48 (1), 85–95. doi:10.1177/0091270007307880

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Idris, I., and Donnelly, R. (2007). Dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors: a major new class of oral antidiabetic drug. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 9 (2), 153–165. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2007.00705.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, Y. B., Kopcho, L. M., Kirby, M. S., Hamann, L. G., Weigelt, C. A., Metzler, W. J., et al. (2006). Mechanism of Gly-Pro-pNA cleavage catalyzed by dipeptidyl peptidase-IV and its inhibition by saxagliptin (BMS-477118). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 445 (1), 9–18. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2005.11.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marney, A., Kunchakarra, S., Byrne, L., and Brown, N. J. (2010). Interactive hemodynamic effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibition and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in humans. Hypertension 56 (4), 728–733. doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.110.156554

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

May, M., and Schindler, C. (2016). Clinically and pharmacologically relevant interactions of antidiabetic drugs. Ther. Adv. Endocrinol. 7 (2), 69–83. doi:10.1177/2042018816638050

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nishimura, R., Kato, H., Kisanuki, K., Oh, A., Hiroi, S., Onishi, Y., et al. (2019). Treatment patterns, persistence and adherence rates in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan: a claims-based cohort study. BMJ Open 9 (3), e025806. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025806

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Patel, C., Li Li, L., Girgis, S., Kornhauser, D. M., Frevert, E. U., and Boulton, D. (2011). Two-way pharmacokinetic interaction studies between saxagliptin and cytochrome P450 substrates or inhibitors: simvastatin, diltiazem extended-release, and ketoconazole. Clin Pharmacol. 3, 13–25. doi:10.2147/cpaa.s15227

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scheen, A. J. (2010). Dipeptidylpeptitase-4 inhibitors (gliptins). Clin. Pharmacokinet. 49 (9), 573–588. doi:10.2165/11532980-000000000-00000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scheen, A. J. (2005). Drug interactions of clinical importance with antihyperglycaemic agents. Drug Saf. 28 (7), 601–631. doi:10.2165/00002018-200528070-00004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tella, S. H., and Rendell, M. S. (2015). DPP-4 inhibitors: focus on safety. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 14 (1), 127–140. doi:10.1517/14740338.2015.977863

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tsai, M.-S., Lin, M.-H., Lee, C.-P., Yang, Y.-H., Chen, W.-C., Chang, G.-H., et al. (2017). Chang Gung Research Database: a multi-institutional database consisting of original medical records. Biomed. J. 40 (5), 263–269. doi:10.1016/j.bj.2017.08.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Twisk, J. W. (2004). Longitudinal data analysis. A comparison between generalized estimating equations and random coefficient analysis. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 19 (8), 769–776. doi:10.1023/b:ejep.0000036572.00663.f2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, C.-L., Wu, V. C.-C., Chang, K.-H., Tu, H.-T., Kuo, C.-F., Huang, Y.-T., et al. (2019). Assessing major bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation patients concurrently taking non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and antiepileptic drugs. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacother. 6 (3), 147–154. doi:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz035pii: pvz035[Epub ahead of print]

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, C.-L., Wu, V. C.-C., Lee, C.-H., Kuo, C.-F., Chen, Y.-L., Chu, P.-H., et al. (2019). Effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients with thrombocytopenia. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 47 (4), 512–519. doi:10.1007/s11239-018-1792-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, C. L., Wu, V. C., Kuo, C. F., Chu, P. H., Tseng, H. J., Wen, M. S., et al. (2018). Efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients with impaired liver function: a retrospective cohort study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 7 (15), e0099263. doi:10.1161/jaha.118.009263

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, C. L., Wu, V. C. C., Huang, Y. T., Kuo, C. F., Chu, P. H., Chen, Y. L., et al. (2019). Safety and effectiveness of non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and anemia: a retrospective cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc. 8 (9), e012029. doi:10.1161/JAHA.119.012029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Ren, J., Sun, Q., Zhang, Z., Lin, Y., Deng, S., et al. (2019). Organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3)-mediated transport of dicaffeoylquinic acids and prediction of potential drug-drug interaction. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 133, 95–103. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2019.03.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar