Antipsychotic Treatment of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD): Management of Extrapyramidal Side Effects

Antipsychotic drugs are often used for the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), especially psychosis and behavioral disturbances (e.g., aggression and agitation). They are prescribed alone or in conjunction with anti-dementia (e.g., anti-Alzheimer’s disease drugs) and other psychotropic drugs (e.g., antidepressants). However, antipsychotic drugs frequently produce serious extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) including Parkinsonian symptoms (e.g., bradykinesia, akinesia, tremor, and muscle rigidity). Therefore, appropriate drug choice and combination strategy are important in the treatment of BPSD. Among anti-Alzheimer’s disease drugs, cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs, e.g., donepezil and galantamine) have a propensity to potentiate EPS associated with antipsychotic treatment in a synergistic manner. In contrast, the NMDA receptor antagonist memantine reduces antipsychotic-induced EPS. Antidepressant drugs, which inhibit 5-HT reuptake into the nerve terminals, also synergistically augment antipsychotic-induced EPS, while mirtazapine (α₂, 5-HT₂ and 5-HT₃ antagonist) reduces the EPS induction. Importantly, previous studies showed that multiple 5-HT receptors play crucial roles in modulating EPS associated with antipsychotic treatment. Specifically, activation of 5-HT_1A receptors or blockade of 5-HT₂, 5-HT₃ and 5-HT₆ receptors can alleviate EPS induction both by antipsychotics alone and by combined antipsychotic treatments with ChEIs or 5-HT reuptake inhibitors. In this article, we review antipsychotic use in treating BPSD and discuss the favorable drug selection in terms of the management of antipsychotic-induced EPS.

Introduction

Dementia is a neurodegenerative brain disorder with diverse clinical symptoms including cognitive impairment (e.g., memory loss and learning deficits) and non-cognitive disorders (e.g., behavioral and psychological deficits). Nearly 50 million patients worldwide develop dementia and this population is expected to exceed 130 million in 2050 (Prince et al., 2015; Jin and Liu, 2019). The global cost associated with dementia was about 1,000 billion dollars in 2015, and this continues to increase rapidly. There are numerous causes of dementia including Alzheimer’s disease, cerebrovascular diseases, Parkinson’s disease, Lewy body disease, and mixed types, among which Alzheimer’s disease is the most frequent (Lee et al., 2004; Prince et al., 2015; Sturm et al., 2018).

Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) occur in the majority (up to 90%) of dementia patients, and this causes significant distress to both patients and caretakers (O’Donnell et al., 1992; O’Brien, 2003; Rosdinom et al., 2013). BPSD includes behavioral excitement (e.g., agitation and aggression), mood disorders (e.g., apathy, depression and anxiety), psychosis (e.g., hallucinations and delusions) and other symptoms (e.g., eating disturbances and sleep disorders) (Figure 1). Although the prevalence of BPSD varies among reported studies, hallucinations occur in 15–50% of patients with dementia, delusions in 10–75% and behavioral disturbances (e.g., agitation and aggression) in about 50%, while affective symptoms are less common (van der Linde et al., 2014; Devshi et al., 2015). To treat BPSD, non-pharmacological interventions such as cognitive stimulation training, exercise, music therapy, light therapy and aromatherapy are recommended as first-line treatments. Nonetheless, pharmacological treatments with antipsychotics and other psychotropic drugs are necessary to treat BPSD (Brimelow et al., 2019; Jin and Liu, 2019; Kales et al., 2019) (Figure 1). Specifically, antipsychotic drugs are the first choice to reduce psychosis and behavioral disturbances despite their frequent side effects (Lee et al., 2004; Trifirò et al., 2009; Brimelow et al., 2019; Sturm et al., 2018).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1 Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) in Alzheimer’s disease. Patients with dementia show not only core symptoms of dementia (e.g., memory loss and learning deficits), but also various associated symptoms including BPSD (e.g., psychosis, behavioral excitation, and mood disorders). Cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease is usually treated with cognitive enhancers such as the cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs, e.g., donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine) and the NMDA antagonist (e.g., memantine). In the treatment of BPSD, antipsychotic drugs are used for psychosis and behavioral disturbances, and antidepressants for depressive mood.

It is well known that antipsychotic drugs commonly cause serious extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) (e.g., bradykinesia, muscle rigidity, tremor, and akathisia) by blocking dopamine D₂ receptors in the striatum (Remington and Kapur, 1999; Kapur and Remington, 2001; Ohno et al., 2013; Ohno et al., 2015; Ohno, 2019). Antipsychotic-induced EPS often leads to suboptimal treatment of BPSD or treatment discontinuation. In addition, recent studies showed that cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs), licensed drugs for cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease, potentiate EPS induction with antipsychotic treatments (Shimizu et al., 2015). It is therefore important to understand the mechanism underlying antipsychotics-induced EPS and antipsychotic drug interactions with other medications in the treatment of BPSD.

In this article, we review the pharmacological features of antipsychotic drugs, especially those related to EPS, and discuss the proper usage and selection of antipsychotics in treating BPSD in terms of EPS management.

Antipsychotic Use in BPSD Treatment

Antipsychotic drugs are used to treat BPSD with a prescription rate of about 20–50% (Lee et al., 2004; Brimelow et al., 2019; Sturm et al., 2018). The target symptoms of antipsychotic drugs include agitation, aggression, psychosis, and inappropriate behaviors (Figure 1). None of the antipsychotics, except for haloperidol and risperidone in several countries, are approved to treat BPSD; therefore, these drugs are generally prescribed as off-label. Nonetheless, antipsychotic drugs are reported to produce significantly better improvements than placebos in treating BPSD (Lee et al., 2004; Brimelow et al., 2019; Sturm et al., 2018).

Antipsychotic drugs commonly possess dopamine D₂ blocking actions. It is known that D₂ receptor blockade by antipsychotics in the cortico-limbic regions (e.g., nucleus accumbens) contributes to antipsychotic activities, which alleviates psychosis (e.g., hallucinations and delusions) and behavioral excitation (e.g., agitation, aggression and hyperactivity) (Figure 2). However, it should be noted that all antipsychotic drugs frequently cause extrapyramidal motor disorders due to the striatal D₂ receptor blockade, which disrupts the effective treatment of BPSD.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2 Pharmacological actions of atypical antipsychotics. Likely typical antipsychotic drugs, D₂ blocking actions of serotonin and dopamine antagonists (SDA)-type and multiple-acting receptor targeted antipsychotics (MARTA)-type antipsychotics ameliorate positive symptoms (e.g., hallucination, delusions, and excitation) in schizophrenia, but induce extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). On the other hand, SDA-type and MARTA-type antipsychotics show higher 5-HT₂ than D₂ binding affinities and possess potent 5-HT₂ antagonistic actions. The 5-HT₂ blocking activities of SDA-type antipsychotics ameliorate negative symptoms (e.g., apathy and social withdrawal) in schizophrenia and can reduce EPS. Thereby, overall EPS liability of SDA-type antipsychotics is lower than typical antipsychotics (D₂ antagonists).

Antipsychotic drugs are generally classified into two groups, typical and atypical (Ohno et al., 1997; Ohno et al., 2012). Typical antipsychotics are the classic standard drugs and frequently cause severe EPS. Based on their chemical structures, they are grouped into several classes, phenothiazines (e.g., chlorpromazine and fluphenazine), butyrophenones (e.g., haloperidol and spiperone), benzamides (e.g., sulpiride and tiapride), and others. On the other hand, atypical antipsychotics were developed as second generation, and are generally less potent than typical ones in inducing EPS (Figures 2 and 3). These include the serotonin and dopamine antagonists (SDAs) with potent blocking action for 5-HT₂ receptors, the multiple-acting receptor targeted antipsychotics (MARTAs) and the dopamine D₂ partial agonists (Ohno et al., 2012). Besides reduced EPS, these drugs were originally expected be superior to typical antipsychotics in terms of their efficacy to treat negative symptoms (e.g., apathy and emotional withdrawal) (Figure 2). However, comprehensive clinical studies including the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) and European First-Episode Schizophrenia Trial (EUFEST), revealed no clear advantages of atypical over typical drugs in terms of efficacy (Lieberman et al., 2005; Keefe et al., 2007; Davidson et al., 2009). Nonetheless, due to the reduced side effect profile, atypical antipsychotics are widely used as a first line drug in BPSD treatment as well as schizophrenia treatment.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3 Classification and characteristics of atypical antipsychotic drugs. Figure shows chemical structures of atypical antipsychotics with their receptor binding profiles (affinities). Most atypical antipsychotics possess potent 5-HT₂ blocking actions and act as serotonin and dopamine antagonists (SDAs). Among SDAs, clozapine derivatives (e.g., olanzapine and quetiapine) show various actions on other receptors than D₂ and 5-HT₂ receptors, including histamine H₁, adrenergic α_1, and muscarinic blocking actions. Thereby, they are sometimes called as multi-acting receptor-targeted antipsychotics (MARTAs) and differentiated from SDAs (e.g., risperidone, perospirone, and lurasidone). Although aripiprazole possess moderate 5-HT₂ blocking activities, it primarily acts as a dopamine D₂ partial agonist. Furthermore, several atypical antipsychotics have own characteristics such as 5-HT_1A partial agonistic actions for perospirone, lurasidone and aripiprazole, 5-HT₆ blocking actions for olanzapine and quetiapine, and 5-HT₃ blocking actions for olanzapine.

Antipsychotic-Induced EPS

Clinical Symptoms

Major EPS symptoms associated with antipsychotic treatment of BPSD include Parkinsonian symptoms, akathisia, and dystonia. Tardive dyskinesia (repeated abnormal involuntary movements) is another antipsychotic-induced EPS, but is rare during the relatively short-term BPSD treatment as it is a chronic side effect associated with long-term antipsychotic treatment and usually appears upon the cessation of treatment.

Parkinsonian Symptoms

Antipsychotic-induced Parkinsonian symptoms are involuntary movement disorders including bradykinesia, tremor and muscle rigidity (Samii et al., 2004; Haddad and Dursun, 2008; Ohno et al., 2015). Parkinsonian symptoms usually occur in a few weeks after starting the antipsychotic treatment. Bradykinesia refers to reduced motor activity and slowing movements, which leads to akinesia in more severe cases. Tremor is an involuntary, rhythmic muscle contraction and relaxation (oscillation or twitching movements), affecting the hands, feet and head especially during resting state. In addition, affected patients often exhibit a stooped posture with increased muscle tone (rigidity) and a slow gait without arm swing.

Akathisia

Patients with akathisia suffer from restlessness and repetitive movements of the legs and feet (Keefe et al., 2007; Haddad and Dursun, 2008). As a result, they cannot keep sitting and frequently shift their body position. Akathisia usually appears soon after starting antipsychotics or after increasing the dose.

Dystonia

Dystonia causes sustained muscle contraction, often leading to postural distortion (Haddad and Dursun, 2008). Dystonia often attacks the neck muscles, tongue, trunk, and limbs. Acute dystonia usually appears in the first week after starting or increasing the dose of antipsychotics.

Neural Mechanism of EPS Induction

It is well known that antipsychotic-induced EPS are caused by the blockade of dopamine D₂ receptors in the striatum (caudate-putamen) (Ohno et al., 1997; Ohno et al., 2013; Ohno et al., 2015; Ohno, 2019) (Figure 4). The GABAergic medium spiny neurons in the striatum receive excitatory glutamatergic inputs from the cerebral cortex and acetylcholinergic inputs from striatal interneurons. The medium spiny neurons also receive inhibitory dopaminergic inputs from the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) and express a high density of D₂ receptors (Ohno et al., 2015). In addition, the dopaminergic neurons from the SNc also negatively regulate activities of the acetylcholinergic interneuron via D₂ receptors. Most antipsychotic drugs commonly act as dopamine D₂ receptor antagonists and activate the medium spiny neurons and acetylcholinergic interneurons in the striatum, eliciting various EPS symptoms (Ohno et al., 2013) (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4 Pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the induction of extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) with antipsychotic treatments. Antipsychotic drugs commonly exert dopamine D₂ blocking actions in the striatum, which relieves the striatal neurons (GABA-containing medium spiny neurons and acetylcholine (ACh)-containing interneurons) from negative regulation by the nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons. Thus, overall activation of striatal medium spiny neurons by antipsychotics evokes EPS (e.g., bradykinesia, tremor, and muscle rigidity). Antipsychotic-induced EPS can be alleviated by anti-muscarinic drugs (e.g., trihexyphenidyl and biperidene), which reverses the imbalance between dopamine and ACh neuron activities in the striatum. However, due to the side effects, these agents are not recommended for the elderly patients.

To reduce EPS, a series of atypical antipsychotics, that show potent 5-HT₂ blocking activities have been developed in the last three decades (Ohno et al., 1997; Ohno et al., 2012) (Figures 2 and 3). These agents include risperidone, perospirone, olanzapine, quetiapine, lurasidone, and paliperidone, and they commonly exhibit higher 5-HT₂ than D₂ affinities. Since olanzapine and quetiapine also show high affinities for other multi-receptors (e.g., histamine H₁, adrenergic α_1, and muscarinic acetylcholine (mACh) receptors), these drugs are sometimes called as MARTAs and distinguished from SDAs.

It is well documented that blockade of 5-HT₂ receptors attenuates antipsychotic-induced EPS associated with the striatal D₂ receptor blockade (Figure 2). 5-HT₂ receptors are located on nerve terminals and cell bodies of dopaminergic neurons in the striatum and the SNc, respectively, and inhibit dopaminergic neuron activities (Ohno et al., 1997; Ohno et al., 2012; Ohno et al., 2013). It is therefore proposed that blockade of 5-HT₂ receptors relieves 5-HT₂ receptor-mediated inhibition of dopamine release in the striatum and of dopamine neuron firing in the SNc, which leads to alleviation of EPS (Figure 5) (Remington and Kapur, 1999; Kapur and Remington, 2001). In fact, blockade of 5-HT₂ receptors can reverse various responses of striatal neurons to antipsychotics (D₂ receptor blockade), such as the enhancement of acetylcholine (ACh) release, the increase in metabolic turnover rate of dopamine and the induction of Fos protein expression, in the striatum Ohno et al., 1997; Ohno et al., 2013).

FIGURE 5

Figure 5 Mechanisms underlying serotonergic modulation of antipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). Activation of 5-HT_1A receptors, especially postsynaptic 5-HT_1A receptors in the striatum and cerebral cortex, alleviates antipsychotic-induced EPS. Blockade of 5-HT₂ receptors on nigral dopamine neurons and their nerve terminals in the striatum can relieve the negative serotonergic regulation and thereby can increase the dopaminergic activities, which contributes to EPS reduction. Similarly, blockade of 5-HT₃ and 5-HT₆ receptors attenuates antipsychotic-induced EPS possibly via acting in the striatum. This figure is quoted and arranged from Biol. Pharm. Bull. 36, 1396, 2013.

Serotonergic Modulation of Antipsychotic-Induced EPS

As described previously, the serotonergic nervous system plays an important role in modulating EPS induction. Specifically, antipsychotic-induced EPS is augmented by stimulation of 5-HT₂ receptors and attenuated by 5-HT₂ receptor blockade. Besides 5-HT₂ receptors, several 5-HT receptor subtypes, including 5-HT_1A, 5-HT₃ and 5-HT₆ receptors, are involved in regulation of EPS induction associated with antipsychotic treatment (Ohno et al., 2013; Ohno et al., 2015).

5-HT_1A receptors function as both presynaptic autoreceptors and postsynaptic receptors, which inhibits neural activities via activating G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying K⁺ channels (Baumgarten and Grozdanovic, 1995; Barnes and Sharp, 1999; Shimizu et al., 2013a; Shimizu et al., 2013b; Ohno, 2019). Activation of 5-HT_1A receptors is known to reduce antipsychotic-induced EPS and motor disorders in animal models of Parkinson’s disease (Neal-Beliveau et al., 1993; Wadenberg et al., 1999; Mignon and Wolf, 2002; Ohno et al., 2008a; Ohno et al., 2008b; Ohno et al., 2009; Shimizu et al., 2010). Our previous studies showed that selective 5-HT_1A agonists (e.g., 8-OH-DPAT) ameliorated haloperidol-induced EPS (e.g., bradykinesia and catalepsy) and reversed the striatal Fos protein expression by the haloperidol treatment (Ohno et al., 2008a; Ohno et al., 2008b; Ohno et al., 2009). In addition, the anti-EPS action of 5-HT_1A agonists persisted against the denervation of 5-HT neurons with p-chlorophenylalanine treatment, illustrating that postsynaptic 5-HT_1A receptors are responsible for EPS reduction (Neal-Beliveau et al., 1993; Mignon and Wolf, 2002; Ohno et al., 2008a; Ohno et al., 2008b) Furthermore, microinjection of 5-HT_1A agonists into the striatum or the cerebral cortex (i.e., motor cortex) also attenuated extrapyramidal disorders (Shimizu et al., 2010). Therefore, it is likely that activation of 5-HT_1A receptors reduces antipsychotic-induced EPS by inhibiting neural activity in the striatum and motor cortex (Figure 5). Nonetheless, several studies suggest that presynaptic 5-HT_1A autoreceptors are also involved to reduce EPS (Wadenberg et al., 1999; Mombereau et al., 2017).

5-HT₃ receptors function as cation (Na⁺, K⁺, and Ca²⁺)-permeable ion channels and excite target neurons (Barnes and Sharp, 1999; Ohno, 2019). Several studies demonstrated that blockade of 5-HT₃ receptors reduced haloperidol-induced EPS (e.g., catalepsy and bradykinesia) (Silva et al., 1995; Ohno et al., 2011; Tatara et al., 2012) (Figure 5). Clinical studies also showed that the selective 5-HT₃ antagonist, ondansetron, reduced the incidence and severity of antipsychotic-induced EPS in the schizophrenia treatment (Zhang et al., 2006; Akhondzadeh et al., 2009).

5-HT₆ receptors are highly expressed in the basal ganglia (e.g., striatum), as well as the limbic (e.g., olfactory tubercles and hippocampus) and cortical regions (Barnes and Sharp, 1999; Ohno, 2019). We previously showed that the selective 5-HT₆ antagonist, SB-258585, alleviated haloperidol-induced bradykinesia and catalepsy (Ohno et al., 2011; Tatara et al., 2012). In addition, EPS induction was also reduced by microinjection of SB-258585 into the striatum, implying that blockade of the striatal 5-HT₆ receptors is at least partly involved in alleviating EPS. Since 5-HT₆ receptors positively regulate the neural activities of the striatal ACh interneurons (Bonsi et al., 2007), it is conceivable that 5-HT₆ antagonists reduce antipsychotic-induced EPS by inhibiting them (Figure 5).

Regarding other 5-HT receptor subtypes, neither 5-HT₄ (GR-125487), 5-HT_5a (SB-699551), nor 5-HT₇ (SB-269970) antagonists affected antipsychotic-induced EPS (Ohno et al., 2011). Therefore, the modulatory roles of these 5-HT receptors in modulating EPS appear to be minimal.

Effects of Anti-Alzheimer’s Disease Drugs on Antipsychotic-Induced EPS

Alzheimer’s disease is the major component of elderly dementia. Since Alzheimer’s disease accompanies the loss of ACh neurons (Fibiger, 1991; Silva et al., 2014), several ChEIs such as donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine, which can increase the ACh level by inhibiting cholinesterase, are widely used to treat the cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. In addition, an NMDA receptor antagonist, memantine, is also used to alleviate the cognitive impairment. These anti-Alzheimer’s disease drugs are often prescribed in combination with antipsychotic drugs which can reduce BPSD (Salamone et al., 2001; Kozman et al., 2006), giving greater efficacy than monotherapy (Schmitt et al., 2004).

Although information on the drug interactions between antipsychotic and anti-Alzheimer’s disease drugs is limited, our previous study revealed that they markedly potentiated antipsychotic-induced EPS induction (Shimizu et al., 2015). Specifically, donepezil and galantamine rarely induce EPS signs when taken alone; however, they markedly potentiated bradykinesia induction by low dose of haloperidol in a dose-dependent and synergistic manner (Figure 6). In addition, the bradykinesia potentiation by galantamine was significantly reversed by a 5-HT_1A agonist (8-OH-DPAT), a 5-HT₂ antagonist (ritanserin) and a 5-HT₆ antagonist (SB-258585) (Shimizu et al., 2015). These findings indicate that caution is needed in the combined usage of antipsychotics and ChEIs in BPSD treatment. Furthermore, antipsychotics that can stimulate 5-HT_1A receptors or antagonize 5-HT₂ and 5-HT₆ receptors appear favorable as an adjunctive therapy for BPSD. Interestingly, in contrast to ChEIs, memantine, which antagonizes NMDA receptors, attenuated antipsychotic-induced EPS (Figure 6). Therefore, it seems likely that memantine is more favorable than ChEIs in the combined therapy of BPSD with antipsychotics.

FIGURE 6

Figure 6 Interactions between anti-Alzheimer’s disease drugs and antipsychotics in induction of extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). Bradykinesia was estimated by the pole test, where mice were placed head-upward at the top of a pole (45 cm in height) and the time for mice to rotate downward (T_turn) and to descend to the floor (T_descent) was measured (Ohno et al., 2008a). Bradykinesia was evaluated as the prolongation of T_turn or T_descent Values. Although low dose (0.5 mg/kg) of haloperidol showed marginal effects in the pole test, combined treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors, donepezil, and galantamine, markedly potentiated haloperidol-induced bradykinesia in a synergistic manner. By contrast, the NMDA antagonist, memantine, significantly reduced bradykinesia induced by a high dose (1 mg/kg) of haloperidol. *P<0.05, **P,0.01; Significantly different from the control values. This figure is partly quoted and arranged from J. Pharmacol. Sci. 127, 439, 2015.

Precise mechanisms underlying the synergistic potentiation of EPS by ChEIs is still unknown. However, the action of antipsychotics on cholinergic interneurons in the striatum seems to be involved since the firing of striatal cholinergic interneurons is negatively regulated by dopaminergic neurons and is reportedly facilitated by antipsychotics, increasing the ACh release (Damsma et al., 1990; DeBoer and Abercrombie, 1996). Therefore, ChEIs may augment the induction of EPS more potently in the presence of antipsychotics than their monotherapy.

Effects of Antidepressant Drugs on Antipsychotic-Induced EPS

Antidepressant drugs, as well as antipsychotic drugs, are often used to treat BPSD, especially the mood disorders such as apathy, depression and emotional withdrawal (Lee et al., 2004; Trifirò et al., 2009; Brimelow et al., 2019; Sturm et al., 2018; Jin and Liu, 2019; Kales et al., 2019) (Figure 6). The majority of antidepressant drugs commonly inhibit neural reuptake of 5-HT and/or noradrenaline, and increase the synaptic levels of 5-HT and/or noradrenaline (Ohno, 2019). These drugs are generally classified as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) (e.g., nortriptyline, clomipramine, and imipramine), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (e.g., fluoxetine, sertraline, and paroxetine) and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) (e.g., milnacipran, duloxetine, and venlafaxine). In addition, tetracyclic antidepressant drugs (e.g., mirtazapine and mianserin), which block adrenergic α2, 5-HT₂ and 5-HT₃ receptors without affecting 5-HT or noradrenaline transporters (Wood et al., 1993; Anttila and Leininen, 2001; Wikström et al., 2002; Fernández et al., 2005; Gillman, 2006), are also used to treat BPSD (Figure 1). These agents enhance noradrenaline and 5-HT release by inhibiting α2 autoreceptors on adrenergic nerve terminals and α2 heteroreceptors on serotonergic nerve terminals, respectively.

Neither SSRIs nor TCAs induced EPS by themselves; however, they markedly potentiated antipsychotic-induced bradykinesia and catalepsy in a dose-dependent manner (Tatara et al., 2012; Shimizu et al., 2013a; Shimizu et al., 2013b) (Figure 7). Clinical studies also showed that antidepressants worsen extrapyramidal motor disorders (Gill et al., 1997; Govoni et al., 2001; DeBattista and DeBattista, 2010). Therefore, caution should be taken in the combined usage of antidepressants with antipsychotics in BPSD treatment even though antidepressants do not cause EPS by themselves. Since both SSRIs and TCAs commonly enhance serotonergic activity, these agents potentiate antipsychotic-induced EPS probably by stimulating 5-HT₂, 5-HT₃ and 5-HT₆ receptors. In addition, although the synergistic mechanism in potentiating EPS remains uncertain, antipsychotic-induced activation of striatal cholinergic interneurons may be involved since 5-HT excites the cholinergic neurons via 5-HT_2C and 5-HT₆ receptors (Bonsi et al., 2007). In fact, blockade of 5-HT₂ receptors by ritanserin, 5-HT₃ receptors by ondansetron (5-HT₃ antagonist), and 5-HT₆ receptors by SB-258585 (5-HT₆ antagonist), significantly attenuated the EPS augmentation by SSRIs (Tatara et al., 2012). In addition, stimulation of postsynaptic 5-HT_1A receptors by 8-HO-DPAT also alleviated SSRIs-induced EPS augmentation (Shimizu et al., 2013a; Shimizu et al., 2013b). This implies that antipsychotics which possess 5-HT_1A stimulating actions or 5-HT_2, 5-HT_3, and 5-HT₆ blocking actions, could be useful as adjunctive therapies for BPSD.

FIGURE 7

Figure 7 Interactions between antidepressants and antipsychotics in induction of extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). Bradykinesia was estimated by the pole test as described in Figure 6 legend. Although low dose (0.3 mg/kg) of haloperidol showed only weak effects in the pole test, combined treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, fluoxetine and paroxetine, markedly potentiated haloperidol-induced bradykinesia in a synergistic manner. By contrast, the tetracyclic antidepressant mirtazapine, which possesses α₂, 5-HT₂ and 5-HT₃ antagonistic actions, reduced bradykinesia induced by a moderate dose (0.5 mg/kg) of haloperidol. *P<0.05, **P,0.01; Significantly different from the control values. This figure is quoted and arranged from Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 38, 252, 2012.

In contrast to SSRIs and TCAs, tetracyclic antidepressants (mirtazapine and mianserin) did not augment, but rather attenuated antipsychotic-induced EPS (Tatara et al., 2012) (Figure 7). Thus, it seems likely that tetracyclic antidepressants are superior to SSRIs or TCAs in modulating EPS in combined treatment of BPSD with antipsychotics. Since the blockade of α₂ receptors reportedly reduced antipsychotic-induced EPS (Imaki et al., 2009), EPS reduction by tetracyclic antidepressants is probably due to the α2 blocking action in addition to their 5-HT₂ and 5-HT₃ blocking activities.

Drug Selection in BPSD Treatment

We reviewed antipsychotic use in BPSD treatment focusing on EPS, the most frequent side effects associated with the striatal D₂ receptor blockade. Antipsychotic-induced EPS significantly disrupts activities of daily life and impairs the quality of life in the elderly patients with dementia. Therefore, information on the mechanisms and the drug interactions in modulating EPS induction are necessary to achieve proper pharmacotherapy of BPSD. In this regard, we should be very careful not only about EPS liability of antipsychotics by itself, but also about the interaction of antipsychotics with anti-Alzheimer’s disease drugs and antidepressant drugs.

Atypical antipsychotics (e.g., SDAs, MARTAs, and D₂ partial agonists) are now the first line drug to treat psychosis and inappropriate behaviors (e.g., agitation and aggression) in patients with dementia. But, we should pay more attention to individual pharmacological characteristics of the atypical drug, especially their interactions with 5-HT receptor subtypes. Although most SDAs or MARTAs commonly possess high affinities to 5-HT₂ receptors, many atypical antipsychotics shows a differential binding profile each other, interacting with various monoamine receptors (Farah, 2005). In fact, olanzapine additionally show high affinities for 5-HT₃ and 5-HT₆ receptors and acts as antagonist (Bymaster et al., 2001). In addition to 5-HT₂ receptors, the SDA antagonist lurasidone also binds to 5-HT_1A receptors and acts as a partial agonist (Ishibashi et al., 2010). Furthermore, the dopamine D₂ partial agonist aripiprazole also binds to 5-HT_1A and 5-HT₂ receptors, and acts as a partial agonist and an antagonist, respectively (Stark et al., 2007). Since the actions of these agents with 5-HT receptor subtypes can reduce EPS caused by combined treatment of antipsychotics with anti-Alzheimer’s disease drugs and antidepressants, they could be a favorable BPSD treatment in terms of EPS management.

Among anti-Alzheimer’s disease drugs, the NMDA antagonist memantine appears superior to ChEIs in the combined BPSD therapy with antipsychotics as it attenuates antipsychotic-induced EPS. Likewise, the tetracyclic antidepressants (mirtazapine and mianserin) are recommended for combined use with antipsychotics to treat BPSD. Unlike 5-HT reuptake inhibitors (e.g., SSRIs, SNRI, and TCAs), these agents do not augment EPS induction, but alleviate antipsychotic-induced EPS, which is possibly by blocking α₂, 5-HT₂ and 5-HT₃ receptors (Imaki et al., 2009; Ohno et al., 2011).

Closing Remarks

This article provides information on the safe usage of antipsychotics in adjunctive therapy for BPSD in patients with dementia. The crucial roles of 5-HT receptors, especially 5-HT_1A, 5-HT₂, 5-HT₃, and 5-HT₆ receptors, in modulating antipsychotic-induced EPS were revealed. Although antipsychotic drugs are effective for psychosis, agitation, excitation, and abnormal behaviors, we should be very careful about drug selection in the combined use of antipsychotics with anti-Alzheimer’s disease drugs or antidepressants. Specifically, ChEIs and 5-HT reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs, SNRI, and TCAs) markedly potentiate antipsychotic-induced EPS in a synergistic manner. In contrast, the NMDA antagonist (memantine) or the tetracyclic antidepressants (mirtazapine and mianserin) seem to be more suitable for adjunctive therapy of cognitive impairment and mood disorders of BPSD, respectively. Furthermore, antipsychotics which have 5-HT_1A agonistic actions or 5-HT₂, 5-HT_3, and 5-HT₆ antagonistic actions appear to be useful for adjunctive BPSD treatment.

Author Contributions

YO drafted the initial manuscript. All authors (YO, NK, SS) improved, contributed to and agreed on the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partly supported by a research grant from by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (YO:17K08324, SS:16K21501) and from the Smoking Research Foundation (YO).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Akhondzadeh, S., Mohammadi, N., Noroozian, M., Karamghadiri, N., Ghoreishi, A., Jamshidi, A. H., et al. (2009). Added ondansetron for stable schizophrenia: a double blind, placebo controlled trial. Schizophr. Res. 107, 206–212. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.08.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anttila, S. A., Leininen, E. V. (2001). A review of the pharmacological and clinical profile of mirtazapine. CNS Drug Rev. 7, 249–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3458.2001.tb00198.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barnes, N. M., Sharp, T. (1999). A review of central 5-HT receptors and their function. Neuropharmacology 38, 1083–1152. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3908(99)00010-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baumgarten, H. G., Grozdanovic, Z. (1995). Psychopharmacology of central serotonergic systems. Pharmacopsychiatry 28, 73–79. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-979623

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bonsi, P., Cuomo, D., Ding, J., Sciamanna, G., Ulrich, S., Tscherter, A., et al. (2007). Endogenous serotonin excites striatal cholinergic interneurons via the activation of 5-HT_2C, 5-HT₆, and 5-HT₇ serotonin receptors: implications for extrapyramidal side effects of serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Neuropsychopharmacology 32, 1840–1854. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301294

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brimelow, R. E., Wollin, J. A., Byrne, G. J., Dissanayaka, N. N. (2019). Prescribing of psychotropic drugs and indicators for use in residential aged care and residents with dementia. Int. Psychogeriatr. 31, 837–847. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218001229

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bymaster, F. P., Falcone, J. F., Bauzon, D., Kennedy, J. S., Schenck, K., DeLapp, N. W., et al. (2001). Potent antagonism of 5-HT₃ and 5-HT₆ receptors by olanzapine. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 430, 341–349. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2999(01)01399-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Damsma, G., de Boer, P., Westerink, B. H., Fibiger, H. C. (1990). Dopaminergic regulation of striatal cholinergic interneurons: an in vivo microdialysis study. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 342, 523–527. doi: 10.1007/BF00169040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Davidson, M., Galderisi, S., Weiser, M., Werbeloff, N., Fleischhacker, W. W., Keefe, R. S., et al. (2009). Cognitive effects of antipsychotic drugs in first-episode schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder: a randomized, open-label clinical trial (EUFEST). Am. J. Psychiatry 166, 675–682. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08060806

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

DeBattista, C., DeBattista, K. (2010). Safety considerations of the use of second generation antipsychotics in the treatment of major depression: extrapyramidal and metabolic side effects. Curr. Drug Saf. 5, 263–266. doi: 10.2174/157488610791698325

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

DeBoer, P., Abercrombie, E. D. (1996). Physiological release of striatal acetylcholine in vivo: modulation by D₁ and D₂ dopamine receptor subtypes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 277, 775–783.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Devshi, R., Shaw, S., Elliott-King, J., Hogervorst, E., Hiremath, A., Velayudhan, L., et al. (2015). Prevalence of Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia in Individuals with Learning Disabilities. Diagnostics 5, 564–576. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics5040564

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farah, A. (2005). Atypicality of atypical antipsychotics. Prim. Care Companion J. Clin. Psychiatry 7, 268–274. doi: 10.4088/PCC.v07n0602

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fernández, J., Alonso, J. M., Andrés, J. I., Cid, J. M., Díaz, A., Iturrino, L., et al. (2005). Discovery of new tetracyclic tetrahydrofuran derivatives as potential broad-spectrum psychotropic agents. J. Med. Chem. 48, 1709–1712. doi: 10.1021/jm049632c

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fibiger, H. C. (1991). Cholinergic mechanisms in learning, memory and dementia: a review of recent evidence. Trends Neurosci. 14, 220–223. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(91)90117-D

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gill, H. S., DeVance, C. L., Risch, S. C. (1997). Extrapyramidal symptoms associated with cyclic antidepressant treatment: a review of the literature and consolidating hypotheses. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 17, 377–389. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199710000-00007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gillman, P. K. (2006). A systematic review of the serotonergic effects of Mirtazapine in humans: implications for its dual action status. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 21, 117–125. doi: 10.1002/hup.750

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Govoni, S., Racchi, M., Masoero, E., Zamboni, M., Ferini-Strambi, L. (2001). Extrapyramidal symptoms and antidepressant drugs: neuropharmacological aspects of a frequent interaction in the elderly. Mol. Psychiatry 6, 134–142. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000801

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haddad, P. M., Dursun, S. M. (2008). Neurological complications of psychiatric drugs: clinical features and management. Hum. Psychopharmacol. Suppl 1, 15–26. doi: 10.1002/hup.918

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Imaki, J., Mae, Y., Shimizu, S., Ohno, Y. (2009). Therapeutic potential of α₂ adrenoceptor antagonism for antipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal motor disorders. Neurosci. Lett. 454, 143–147. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.03.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ishibashi, T., Horisawa, T., Tokuda, K., Ishiyama, T., Ogasa, M., Tagashira, R., et al. (2010). Pharmacological profile of lurasidone, a novel antipsychotic agent with potent 5-hydroxytryptamine 7 (5-HT₇) and 5-HT_1A receptor activity. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 334, 171–181. doi: 10.1124/jpet.110.167346

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, B., Liu, H. (2019). Comparative efficacy and safety of therapy for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: a systemic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. J. Neurol. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09200-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kales, H. C., Lyketsos, C. G., Miller, E. M., Ballard, C. (2019). Management of behavioral and psychological symptoms in people with Alzheimer’s disease: an international Delphi consensus. Int. Psychogeriatr. 31, 83–90. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218000534

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kapur, S., Remington, G. (2001). Atypical antipsychotics: new directions and new challenges in the treatment of schizophrenia. Ann. Rev. Med. 52, 503–517. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.52.1.503

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keefe, R. S., Bilder, R. M., Davis, S. M., Harvey, P. D., Palmer, B. W., Gold, J. M., et al. (2007). Neurocognitive effects of antipsychotic medications in patients with chronic schizophrenia in the CATIE trial. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 64, 633–647. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.6.633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kozman, M. N., Wattis, J., Curran, S. (2006). Pharmacological management of behavioural and psychological disturbance in dementia. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 21, 1–12. doi: 10.1002/hup.745

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, P. E., Gill, S. S., Freedman, M., Bronskill, S. E., Hillmer, M. P., Rochon, P. A. (2004). Atypical antipsychotic drugs in the treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: systematic review. BMJ 329, 75. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38125.465579.55

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lieberman, J. A., Stroup, T. S., McEvoy, J. P., Swartz, M. S., Rosenheck, R. A., Perkins, D. O., et al. (2005). Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 1209–1223. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051688

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mignon, L., Wolf, W. A. (2002). Postsynaptic 5-HT_1A receptors mediate an increase in locomotor activity in the monoamine-depleted rat. Psychopharmacology 163, 85–94. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1121-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mombereau, C., Arnt, J., Mørk, A. (2017). Involvement of presynaptic 5-HT_1A receptors in the low propensity of brexpiprazole to induce extrapyramidal side effects in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 153, 141–146. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2016.12.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Neal-Beliveau, B. S., Joyce, J. N., Lucki, I. (1993). Serotonergic involvement in haloperidol-induced catalepsy. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 265, 207–217.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

O’Brien, J. (2003). Behavioral symptoms in vascular cognitive impairment and vascular dementia. Int. Psychogeriatr. 15 Suppl 1, 133–138. doi: 10.1017/S1041610203009098

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

O’Donnell, B. F., Drachman, D. A., Barnes, H. J., Peterson, K. E., Swearer, J. M., Lew, R. A. (1992). Incontinence and troublesome behaviors predict institutionalization in dementia. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry Neurol. 5, 45–52. doi: 10.1177/002383099200500108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohno, Y., Ishida-Tokuda, K., Ishibashi, T., Sakamoto, H., Tagashira, R., Horisawa, T., et al. (1997). Potential role of 5-HT₂ and D₂ receptor interaction in the atypical antipsychotic action of the novel succimide derivative, perospirone. Pol. J. Pharmacol. 49, 213–219.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Ohno, Y., Shimizu, S., Imaki, J., Ishihara, S., Sofue, N., Sasa, M., et al. (2008a). Anticataleptic 8-OH-DPAT preferentially counteracts with haloperidol-induced Fos expression in the dorsolateral striatum and the core region of the nucleus accumbens. Neuropharmacology 55, 717–723. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohno, Y., Shimizu, S., Imaki, J., Ishihara, S., Sofue, N., Sasa, M., et al. (2008b). Evaluation of the antibradykinetic actions of 5-HT_1A agonists using the mouse pole test. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 32, 1302–1307. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.04.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohno, Y., Shimizu, S., Imaki, J. (2009). Effects of tandospirone, a 5-HT_1A agonistic anxiolytic agent, on haloperidol-induced catalepsy and forebrain Fos expression in mice. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 109, 593–599. doi: 10.1254/jphs.08313FP

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohno, Y., Imaki, J., Mae, Y., Takahashi, T., Tatara, A. (2011). Serotonergic modulation of extrapyramidal motor disorders in mice and rats: role of striatal 5-HT₃ and 5-HT₆ receptors. Neuropharmacology 60, 201–208. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.08.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohno, Y., Tatara, A., Shimizu, S., Sasa, M., (2012). “Management of cognitive impairments in schizophrenia: the therapeutic role of 5-HT receptors,” in Schizophrenia Research: Recent Advances. Editor Sumiyoshi, T. (NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.), 323–338.

Google Scholar

Ohno, Y., Shimizu, S., Tokudome, K. (2013). Pathophysiological roles of serotonergic system in regulating extrapyramidal motor function. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 36, 1396–1400. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b13-00310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohno, Y., Shimizu, S., Tokudome, K., Kunisawa, N., Sasa, M. (2015). New insight into the therapeutic role of the serotonergic system in Parkinson’s disease. Prog. Neurobiol. 134, 104–121. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.09.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohno, Y. (2019). “Serotonin receptors as the therapeutic target for central nervous system disorders,” in Serotonin: The mediator that spans evolution. Eds. Pilowsky, P. M. (London: Elsevier), 369–390. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800050-2.00018-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prince, M., Wimo, A., Guerchet, M., Ali, G. C., Wu, Y. T., Prina, M., (2015). “World alzheimer report 2015 — The global impact of dementia: an analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends,” (Alzheimer’s Disease International, London).

Google Scholar

Remington, G., Kapur, S. (1999). D₂ and 5-HT₂ receptor effects of antipsychotics: bridging basic and clinical findings using PET. J. Clin. Psychiatry 60 Suppl 10, 15–19.

Google Scholar

Rosdinom, R., Zarina, M. Z., Zanariah, M. S., Marhani, M., Suzaily, W. (2013). Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, cognitive impairment and caregiver burden in patients with dementia. Prev. Med. 57 Suppl, S67–S69. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.12.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salamone, J. D., Correa, M., Carlson, B. B., Wisniecki, A., Mayorga, A. J., Nisenbaum, E., et al. (2001). Neostriatal muscarinic receptor subtypes involved in the generation of tremulous jaw movements in rodents implications for cholinergic involvement in parkinsonism. Life Sci. 68, 2579–2584. doi: 10.1016/S0024-3205(01)01055-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Samii, A., Nutt, J. G., Ransom, B. (2004). Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 363, 1783–1793. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16305-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmitt, B., Bernhardt, T., Moeller, H. J., Heuser, I., Frölich, L. (2004). Combination therapy in Alzheimer’s disease: a review of current evidence. CNS Drugs 18, 827–844. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200418130-00001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shimizu, S., Tatara, A., Imaki, J., Ohno, Y. (2010). Role of cortical and striatal 5-HT_1A receptors in alleviating antipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal disorders. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 34, 877–881. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.04.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shimizu, S., Mizuguchi, Y., Ohno, Y. (2013a). Improving the treatment of schizophrenia: role of 5-HT receptors in modulating cognitive and extrapyramidal motor functions. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 12, 861–869. doi: 10.2174/18715273113129990088

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shimizu, S., Mizuguchi, Y., Tatara, A., Kizu, T., Andatsu, S., Sobue, A., et al. (2013b). 5-HT_1A agonist alleviates serotonergic potentiation of extrapyramidal disorders via postsynaptic mechanisms. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 46, 86–91. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.06.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shimizu, S., Mizuguchi, Y., Sobue, A., Fujiwara, M., Morimoto, T., Ohno, Y. (2015). Interaction between anti-Alzheimer and antipsychotic drugs in modulating extrapyramidal motor disorders in mice. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 127, 439–445. doi: 10.1016/j.jphs.2015.03.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva, S. R., Futuro-Neto, H. A., Pires, J. G. (1995). Effects of 5-HT₃ receptor antagonists on neuroleptic-induced catalepsy in mice. Neuropharmacology 34, 97–99. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(94)00146-J

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva, T., Reis, J., Teixeira, J., Borges, F. (2014). Alzheimer’s disease, enzyme targets and drug discovery struggles: from natural products to drug prototypes. Ageing Res. Rev. 15, 116–145. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2014.03.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stark, A. D., Jordan, S., Allers, K. A., Bertekap, R. L., Chen, R., Mistry Kannan, T., et al. (2007). Interaction of the novel antipsychotic aripiprazole with 5-HT_1A and 5-HT_2A receptors: functional receptor-binding and in vivo electrophysiological studies. Psychopharmacology 190, 373–382. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0621-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sturm, A. S., Trinkley, K. E., Porter, K., Nahata, M. C. (2018). Efficacy and safety of atypical antipsychotics for behavioral symptoms of dementia among patients residing in long-term care. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 40, 135–142. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0555-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tatara, A., Shimizu, S., Shin, N., Sato, M., Sugiuchi, T., Imaki, J., et al. (2012). Modulation of antipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal side effects by medications for mood disorders. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 38, 252–259. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.04.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trifirò, G., Spina, E., Gambassi, G. (2009). Use of antipsychotics in elderly patients with dementia: do atypical and conventional agents have a similar safety profile? Pharmacol. Res. 59, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2008.09.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van der Linde, R. M., Dening, T., Matthews, F. E., Brayne, C. (2014). Grouping of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 29, 562–568. doi: 10.1002/gps.4037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wadenberg, M. L., Young, K. A., Richter, J. T., Hicks, P. B. (1999). Effects of local application of 5-hydroxytryptamine into the dorsal or median raphe nuclei on haloperidol-induced catalepsy in the rat. Neuropharmacology 38, 151–156. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3908(98)00162-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wikström, H. V., Mensonides-Harsema, M. M., Cremers, T. I., Moltzen, E. K., Arnt, J. (2002). Synthesis and pharmacological testing of 1,2,3,4,10,14b– hexahydro-6-methoxy-2-methyldibenzo[c,f]pyrazino[1,2-a]azepin and its enantiomers in comparison with the two antidepressants mianserin and mirtazapine. J. Med. Chem. 45, 3280–3285. doi: 10.1021/jm010566d

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wood, M. D., Thomas, D. R., Watkins, C. J., Newberry, N. R. (1993). Stereoselective interaction of mianserin with 5-HT₃ receptors. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 45, 711–714. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1993.tb07094.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Z. J., Kang, W. H., Li, Q., Wang, X. Y., Yao, S. M., Ma, A. Q. (2006). Beneficial effects of ondansetron as an adjunct to haloperidol for chronic, treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a double-blind, randomize, placebo-controlled study. Schizophr. Res. 88, 102–110 doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.07.010.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar