OpenPVSignal: Advancing Information Search, Sharing and Reuse on Pharmacovigilance Signals via FAIR Principles and Semantic Web Technologies

Signal detection and management is a key activity in pharmacovigilance (PV). When a new PV signal is identified, the respective information is publicly communicated in the form of periodic newsletters or reports by organizations that monitor and investigate PV-related information (such as the World Health Organization and national PV centers). However, this type of communication does not allow for systematic access, discovery and explicit data interlinking and, therefore, does not facilitate automated data sharing and reuse. In this paper, we present OpenPVSignal, a novel ontology aiming to support the semantic enrichment and rigorous communication of PV signal information in a systematic way, focusing on two key aspects: (a) publishing signal information according to the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Re-usable) data principles, and (b) exploiting automatic reasoning capabilities upon the interlinked PV signal report data. OpenPVSignal is developed as a reusable, extendable and machine-understandable model based on Semantic Web standards/recommendations. In particular, it can be used to model PV signal report data focusing on: (a) heterogeneous data interlinking, (b) semantic and syntactic interoperability, (c) provenance tracking and (d) knowledge expressiveness. OpenPVSignal is built upon widely-accepted semantic models, namely, the provenance ontology (PROV-O), the Micropublications semantic model, the Web Annotation Data Model (WADM), the Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) and the Time ontology. To this end, we describe the design of OpenPVSignal and demonstrate its applicability as well as the reasoning capabilities enabled by its use. We also provide an evaluation of the model against the FAIR data principles. The applicability of OpenPVSignal is demonstrated by using PV signal information published in: (a) the World Health Organization's Pharmaceuticals Newsletter, (b) the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb Web site and (c) the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Drug Safety Communications, also available on the FDA Web site.

Introduction

Definitions and Problem Statement

Pharmacovigilance (PV) is “the science and activities related with the detection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse effects or any other possible drug-related problems” (World Health Organization, 2002). According to CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences), a PV signal is “information that arises from one or multiple sources (including observations and experiments), which suggests a new potentially causal association, or a new aspect of a known association, between an intervention and an event or set of related events, either adverse, or beneficial, that is judged to be of sufficient likelihood to justify verificatory action” (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), 2010). Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) have significant consequences on public health, including a huge financial cost (Sultana et al., 2013), (Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC), 2011). Therefore, facilitating the timely identification, early communication and the processing of a PV signal is imperative.

Typically, information regarding PV signals is disseminated via free-text reports. For example, the World Health Organization (WHO) releases its bi-monthly Pharmaceuticals Newsletter, containing a section devoted to PV signals identified and assessed by Uppsala Monitoring Centre¹, while other organizations (e.g., the European Medicines Agency (EMA)², the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States³, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the United Kingdom⁴, the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre (Lareb)⁵) publish information regarding new PV signals on their Web sites. A typical structure of a PV signal report contains a title referring to the ADR and the respective drug(s), the author(s) of the report, a summary of the report and/or an introductory section, evidence supporting the signal (e.g., individual case safety reports (ICSRs), a.k.a. individual case reports or spontaneous reports, coming from Spontaneous Reporting Systems (SRS), and the literature), a conclusion and, finally, the respective bibliographic references.

Current free-text based dissemination practices do not facilitate automated processing, linkage and reuse of the respective information, since this information is not provided in a “computable” format, i.e., interoperable and well-structured format. The introduction of information technology (IT) tools and the use of semantically-enriched metadata can reinforce data expressiveness, exchange, linkage, and verification (through provenance information), as well as processing capabilities. The need for using metadata to annotate publicly available datasets has been pinpointed both by research and industry, and such technologies are currently used in order to facilitate data discovery and interlinking (Weaver and Tarjan, 2013; Noy, 2017). Such an improvement in PV signal dissemination could have significant impact for (a) PV experts exploiting such information to investigate candidate PV signals, (b) regulatory authorities which typically use such information to decide for further action on the specific drugs, and (c) healthcare professionals (HCPs) who may consult such reports during their clinical practice.

Contribution and Foundations of the Current Work

In this paper, we introduce OpenPVSignal, a novel ontology aiming to facilitate the publication of PV signal information in a reusable, extendable and computable knowledge representation format, thereby reinforcing access, discovery, and explicit data interlinking. We show how a semantically-enriched representation and communication of PV signals can be significantly facilitated through the Linked Data (Bizer, 2009) and the Semantic Web (Berners-Lee et al., 2001) paradigms. The ultimate goal of OpenPVSignal is the advancement of current practices as regards the publication and further processing of PV signal information by focusing on two key goals:

(a) publishing information following the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data principles (Wilkinson et al., 2016), and

(b) exploiting automated reasoning capabilities upon the interlinked PV signal report data.

The term “Linked Data” refers to an ecosystem of technologies, recommendations and standards which aim at the interconnection of heterogeneous data in one unified processing realm (Heath and Bizer, 2011). The Semantic Web vision (Shadbolt et al., 2006) concerns the interconnection of semantic annotations of publicly available data through the Internet, and it is built upon Linked Data standards. The appropriateness of these paradigms/technologies to satisfy the main OpenPVSignal goals is summarized below:

• Linked Data (and therefore Semantic Web) standards and recommendations are based on the Resource Description Framework (RDF)⁶. RDF uses Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) to unambiguously identify resources (e.g., a Web page, a person, a data item, a process, a concept, etc.). URIs make data uniquely identifiable and, thus, findable and accessible through the Internet.

• RDF, RDF Schema⁷, and the Web Ontology Language (OWL)⁸—the main “languages” used to define knowledge in the Semantic Web paradigm—enable both syntactic and semantic interoperability by defining the rules for communicating data, the semantic structures to represent knowledge, and the interlinking of data with third-party datasets or ontologies.

• The use of existing semantic models facilitates reusability of the published data, as these are accompanied by well-defined metadata (e.g., about data provenance, time-related information, etc.). The adoption of these models facilitates their integration in already established processing pipelines based on the semantics of the referenced models.

• Finally, RDF Schema and OWL provide the ability to define concepts as well as high-level, semantic relations between them, (e.g., hierarchies among concepts defined as classes, data and object properties, cardinality restrictions on object properties, etc.). These are based on robust logical foundations [e.g., OWL semantics are based on Description Logics (Baader et al., 2004)] and, therefore, can be used by software (so-called “reasoners”) enabling automatic inference.

In order to semantically annotate PV signal information in compliance with the FAIR data principles, OpenPVSignal reuses well-known semantic models (described in detail in section OpenPVSignal Design). These models provide the means for (a) advanced knowledge expressiveness, (b) tracking provenance information, (c) automatic reasoning, and (d) semantic interoperability.

The use of OpenPVSignal requires its instantiation for each PV signal report, i.e., representing the reports' content via the concepts of the OpenPVSignal ontology. Figure 1 depicts an information processing workflow using OpenPVSignal (part b), compared with the current typical approach followed during the search for PV signal information (part a). Typically, a PV expert or a HCP looking for PV signal information would manually conduct a search in the free-text resources provided by the respective PV organizations and manually aggregate the information of interest, based on his/her tacit knowledge and personal experience. This procedure is time consuming, possibly error-prone and heavily dependent on the specific end-user IT skills, as it involves multiple manual steps (Figure 1: steps a1, a2, and a3). The envisioned PV signal information processing workflow using OpenPVSignal allows the end-user to query a knowledge graph that meets FAIR principles (steps b1, b2, and b3), that will be built and processed (e.g., queried or modified) using a software application stack⁹. The knowledge graph creation includes the instantiation of the OpenPVSignal model using the free-text PV signal information and interlinking the obtained information with available knowledge sources, e.g., the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA)¹⁰, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)¹¹, etc. This graph-based articulated knowledge significantly enhances the capabilities of linking, sharing, and automatically processing the original PV signal information. In the scope of this work, we illustrate the applicability and the added value of OpenPVSignal based on its instantiation for three PV signal reports, published by different organizations.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Comparing the current practice for searching PV signal information (Top) with the use of a FAIR knowledge graph based on OpenPVSignal (Bottom).

The structure of the paper is summarized as follows: Section “Related Work: ADR Representation Formalisms and Frameworks” presents related work regarding ADR representation formalisms, ontologies developed to define PV domain concepts and Linked Data knowledge sources for PV use cases. Section “OpenPVSignal Design” presents the key design decisions and the conceptual structure of OpenPVSignal. Section “Exemplar Application of OpenPVSignal” presents the application of OpenPVSignal on three signal reports published by different organizations, and its evaluation against the FAIR data principles. Finally, in section “Discussion” the main conclusions of the presented work are discussed, including future work directions.

Related Work: ADR Representation Formalisms and Frameworks

Representation formalisms concerning ADRs have been employed/proposed in various studies, as well as Linked Data models and ontologies with a focus on PV.

For example, the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics collaborative (OHDSI) developed an evidence base that links evidence items (e.g., MEDLINE abstracts, drug product labels, spontaneous reports, etc.) to health outcomes of interest (Knowledge Base workgroup of the Observational Health Data Sciences Informatics (OHDSI) collaborative, 2017) using Web Annotation Data Model (WADM) graphs (Sanderson et al., 2017). Each graph represents drug and health outcome concepts mentioned in an evidence item as the Body of the annotation and the evidence item itself is summarized using metadata in the Target of the annotation. The concepts in the body of the annotation are mapped to the standard vocabulary used by the OHDSI collaborative¹². This arrangement supports two use cases important to the collaborative: (1) to be able to quantify the evidence that supports a drug—health outcome of interest association, and (2) to enable users to review the context of the association in the original evidence sources. Investigators used the evidence base to develop machine learning algorithms that infer positive and negative drug—health outcome of interest associations (Voss et al., 2017).

ADEpedia (Jiang et al., 2013) encodes Adverse Drug Events (ADE) knowledge using a Linked Data serialization format exploiting several data sources (e.g., FDA Structured Product Labels (SPLs), reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and Electronic Medical Records). Biomedical ontologies, thesauri, and vocabularies, such as RxNorm¹³, NDF-RT¹⁴, and the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS)¹⁵, are used to specify concepts and normalize the interlinked data. The ADEpedia ontology consists of a rather lean concept schema, including two main concepts, namely, “Medication” and “ADE,” and does not include provenance information or statistical information on ADEs (Jiang et al., 2011).

OntoADR (Souvignet et al., 2016) is an OWL ontology, aiming to address the difficulties in expressing the inherent semantics of MedDRA in an OWL format, in order to support automatic reasoning via well-defined OWL semantics upon MedDRA terms. Similar to ADEpedia, OntoADR does not include statistical or provenance information regarding PV signals (Bousquet et al., 2014).

The Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) aims to standardize and integrate medical adverse events (including ADRs), as well as to support computer-assisted reasoning (He et al., 2014). The two key OAE concepts are the intervention and the adverse event. OAE focuses on the semantic categorization of the interventions and the separation of them regarding causality. However, OAE is neither oriented toward provenance, nor on modeling information contained in free-text PV signal reports communicated by PV monitoring organizations.

Probably the most relevant ADR representation formalism compared to OpenPVSignal is the Adverse Event Reporting Ontology (AERO) (Courtot et al., 2014). AERO aims to support clinicians in the data entry phase, while reporting adverse events. It can also automate the classification of adverse event reports and improve the efficiency of discovering potential risks, with the ultimate goal to increase quality and accuracy of the reported information. However, AERO was not designed by taking into account the content of PV reports which are made publicly available by PV monitoring organizations and focuses on vaccine adverse effects (Adverse Events Following Immunization—AEFIs) via the application of a specific ADR signal analysis pipeline based on the Brighton guidelines. Apart from restricting its domain of application to vaccines and the specific ADR analysis workflow, AERO does not provide an explicit way to relate provenance or time-related information.

Compared to the above representation models, OpenPVSignal focuses on the representation of evidence-based PV signal information as communicated through the signal reports released by drug safety authorities. As mentioned in the “Introduction” section, these reports include supporting data originated from various sources, statistical measures (e.g., regarding disproportionality analysis of SRS data), as well as descriptions of the respective biochemical ADR mechanisms. Therefore, a dedicated ontology had to be defined, in order to leverage all these information types into one cohesive knowledge representation structure. Nevertheless, the above-mentioned models were studied in the scope of the current work concerning their concept definitions and their use of the Linked Data paradigm.

OpenPVSignal Design

OpenPVSignal was developed as an OWL ontology using the Protégé knowledge modeling tool (Musen and Protégé, 2015) (Protege, RRID:SCR_003299). The development of OpenPVSignal followed the NeOn knowledge engineering methodology (Suárez-Figueroa et al., 2012), applying the post-coordination approach (Stevens and Sattler, 2013) in an iterative fashion. Overall, we followed an application-driven approach by initially defining the concepts and the relations which served the intended use of the model, and then refining it in order to tackle issues that come-up during its real use.

OpenPVSignal reuses several existing ontologies, in order to exploit their semantics and to facilitate its adoption for other applications which rely on these models. In particular, we employed PROV-O, an ontology providing the formal concepts to represent and interchange provenance metadata independently of the application domain (Gil et al., 2013). In PROV-O, provenance is defined as “information about entities, activities, and people involved in producing a piece of data or thing, which can be used to form assessments about its quality, reliability or trustworthiness.” The PROV-O key concepts (i.e., Entity, Agent, and Activity) are defined as OWL classes, while relations (e.g., wasAttributedTo) are defined as OWL properties. The use of PROV-O in OpenPVSignal allows to clearly define provenance information for PV signal reports. For example, an indicative statement in the OpenPVSignal context would be that a signal report (instance of class Entity) is attributed to its author (instance of class Agent).

WADM is a semantic model enabling the annotation of Web content (e.g., Web pages, images, videos, documents, etc.) through the Linked Data paradigm (Sanderson et al., 2017). The main concepts of WADM are the Annotation, its Target, i.e., the annotated information (e.g., a video or a free-text document) and the annotation's Body, i.e., the information annotating the Target. In OpenPVSignal, WADM was used to annotate specific free-text snippets of PV signal reports. As an example, annotating a specific text snippet of a PV signal report referring to a drug action mechanism would require the definition of this snippet as the annotation's Target and the specific concept of the drug action mechanism as the annotation's Body.

Micropublications is a semantic model aiming to support (semi)automatic verification processes for data published in scientific articles (Clark et al., 2014). Micropublications also provide an OWL serialization that reuses PROV-O and the Open Annotation Core Data Model (WADM's predecessor). In Micropublications, a Claim is the main Statement argued, and each Statement or Data can be part of a Claim's support or challenge graph. Using Micropublications in OpenPVSignal, a PV signal report conclusion is modeled as a Claim, while potential disproportionality analysis outcomes and the cited ICSRs are modeled as Data, and all free-text reporting elements are defined as subclasses of ArticleText.

Furthermore, OAE (He et al., 2014) was used in order to exploit the respective semantics and concept definitions. For example, the concept of Drug Usage was identified as equivalent to the “drug administration” concept defined in OAE. While OAE and OpenPVSignal have a different scope, they incorporate similar concepts. Therefore, the semantic interlinking of some key OpenPVSignal concepts with the respective OAE concepts enables their “understanding” by applications or knowledge models that have already adopted OAE semantics, further advancing the semantic interoperability of the OpenPVSignal model.

Finally, the semantics of “time to onset” information are described in OpenPVSignal using the Duration Description concept defined in the Time Ontology (TO). TO provides a vocabulary for expressing temporal concepts in OWL (Cox et al., 2017) and could be used to apply formal semantics and reasoning upon time-related information.

Moreover, OpenPVSignal enables the semantic enrichment of the respective data by allowing references to external terminologies and thesauri. For example, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System (ATC)¹⁶, RxNorm, and DrugBank¹⁷ codes can be used to identify the respective drugs, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD)¹⁸, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and SNOMED-CT¹⁹ codes can be used to identify diseases and MedDRA codes are used to identify adverse effects. This coded information is not necessarily present in the respective free-text signal reports. However, it can be easily retrieved from online services, facilitating this way the interlinking of source data with reference terminologies.

Figure 2 presents the main concepts of the OpenPVSignal model and their relations with the underlying semantic models, while Table 1 describes the main OpenPVSignal concepts and their relations. We refer to the concepts defined in the underlying semantic models by using the respective model abbreviations as a prefix in each concept name²⁰, i.e., mp for Micropublications, oae for OAE, prov for PROV-O, and to for TO. For example, mp:Claim refers to the concept Claim, which is defined in the Micropublications semantic model. It should be noted that Figure 2 does not exhaustively depict all the concepts and relations of the model, in order to provide a comprehensive overview of the model and preserve readability. The full OpenPVSignal ontology is available through GitHub²¹ and its latest version can be downloaded using its fully dereferenceable base URI²². The complete documentation of the OpenPVSignal model is provided as Supplementary Material.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Main concepts defined in OpenPVSignal (part b), their reference to the concepts defined in the adopted semantic models e.g., Micropublications, Time Ontology, etc. (part a), and their hierarchical and interlinking relationships.

TABLE 1

Table 1. The main concepts of OpenPVSignal.

Exemplar Application of OpenPVSignal

In this section, we present an exemplar application of OpenPVSignal, aiming to illustrate its applicability and validate its effectiveness by highlighting the added value of interlinkage and automatic reasoning. In particular, we describe the instantiation of OpenPVSignal based on three PV signal reports published by different organizations and also present two example use cases to demonstrate the value of data interlinking and automatic reasoning. Finally, we provide a validation of the model's compliance with the FAIR principles.

Elaborated PV Signal Reports

The use of OpenPVSignal is demonstrated by elaborating on three specific types of PV signal reports: (a) signal information contained in the WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter, (b) reports from the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, and (c) announcements contained in the FDA Drug Safety Communication. The WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter disseminates “information on the safety and efficacy of pharmaceutical products, based on information received from a network of “drug information officers” and other sources…”²³. Its “Signals” section presents specific PV signal information in a free-text format, also referring to relevant ICSRs contained in VigiBase²⁴, publications, as well as other data sources. Lareb publishes signal reports also in free-text format via its Web site as soon as a signal is identified, which are searchable through a publicly available user interface²⁵. Finally, FDA publishes Drug Safety Communication announcements as online reports, which are also publicly available through a Web site²⁶. The respective PV signal information sources and formats have been selected as representative ones, due to the following reasons:

• Credibility: These reports originate from reference organizations and they are widely recognized by the PV community and HCPs worldwide. Furthermore, they are based on valid sources of information, properly curated by PV experts, therefore, providing reliable signal information.

• Information richness and heterogeneity: They contain a lot of information originated from diverse data sources like SRS, the literature, etc., along with references to the raw data, and also present information in different granularity levels. For example, Lareb PV signal reports refer to VigiBase ICSRs and Dutch case reports. In contrast, an FDA Drug Safety Announcement may not refer to ICSRs explicitly, but provides aggregated information. Furthermore, some PV signal reports include statistical figures concerning the specific signal (e.g., disproportionality analysis outcomes).

The PV signal reports selected for the example instantiation of the OpenPVSignal model refer to (a) the signal concerning ibrutinib-induced pneumonitis, published in the third WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter of 2017 (Pal and Tanaka, 2017), (b) the signal of (es)omeprazole-induced tinnitus published in 2013 by LAREB (Nederlands Bijwerkingen Centrum Lareb, 2013), and (c) the signal of Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) leading to hypomagnesemia, communicated by FDA (FDA Center for Drug Evaluation Research, 2011).

OpenPVSignal Instantiation

Currently, there is no automatic tool for instantiating OpenPVSignal from the original data sources. Therefore, the instantiation of the elaborated PV signal reports has been performed manually, using Protégé 5.2. Figures 3, 4 (partially) depict the OpenPVSignal modeling of information contained in the Lareb report. The upper part of each figure depicts the respective OpenPVSignal conceptual model part. The respective instantiations referring to the specific signal information are shown at the bottom of each figure, highlighting instances of the respective OpenPVSignal concepts as thick rectangles. It should be noted that we present an overview rather than a detailed walkthrough of the OpenPVSignal instantiation process, as the detailed example instantiations are publicly available in the OpenPVSignal page in GitHub²⁷.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Main signal information contained in the Lareb PV signal report modeled using OpenPVSignal. The respective OpenPVSignal conceptual structure is depicted in the upper part and thick outlines denote instances of OpenPVSignal classes in the bottom part of the figure. The identification of Pantoprazole as a drug belonging to the Proton Pump Inhibitors class and the specific ATC codes are highlighted in red. The respective free text from where this relation has been extracted, is depicted in the bottom right corner of the figure.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Disproportionality analysis outcomes contained in the Lareb report expressed via OpenPVSignal. The respective OpenPVSignal conceptual structure is depicted in the upper part and thick outlines denote instances of OpenPVSignal classes in the bottom part of the figure.

As shown in Figure 3, apart from the main signal information (i.e., the drug and the adverse effect), complementary information can also be modeled through OpenPVSignal. For example, the similar effects of other drugs that belong to the PPIs class are also elaborated in the Lareb report and specific drugs with the same or similar effects are mentioned, e.g., pantoprazole highlighted in Figure 3 with red color. The free-text snippet of the report from which this specific information is inferred is also depicted in the bottom-right corner of Figure 3. Figure 4 depicts the modeling of the disproportionality analysis outcomes mentioned in the Lareb PV signal report.

The instantiation of the signal report selected from the WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter is partially depicted in Figure 5. Besides the drug and the adverse effect, Figure 5 depicts also the modeling of ICSRs mentioned in the respective PV signal report, i.e., information referring to ICSR with ID 12, as well as the “time to onset” information expressed using concepts defined in TO. It should be noted that while ICSR 12 refers to the ibrutinib-pneumonitis signal, it also refers to pantoprazole as a concomitant drug in an ICSR referring to pneumonitis (conceptual linking between pantoprazole and pneumonitis is highlighted with red color). The information depicted in Figure 5 can be of clinical relevance for the investigation of a potential PV signal as both time information and concomitant drugs can be considered in the causality analysis between a drug and the adverse effect.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. VigiBase ICSR data contained in the WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter PV signal expressed via OpenPVSignal. The reference of the specific ICSR to Pantoprazole, the related instances and the respective MeSH and ATC codes are highlighted in red.

Added Value of Data Interlinking and Reasoning via OpenPVSignal

In order to highlight the value of OpenPVSignal, we present two example use cases according to which a user exploits the OpenPVSignal instantiations presented above. In the first use case, we assume that the user investigates new, possible adverse effects of drugs belonging to the PPI class. Typically, she/he would search the free-text PV signal information sources, in order to find signals referring to PPIs. While the considered Lareb PV signal report and the FDA Drug Safety Communication explicitly refer to PPIs as the class of drug pantoprazole, the WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter does not refer to PPIs, since ibrutinib does not belong to the PPI class. Therefore, although the expert would have identified the two PV signal reports (by LAREB and FDA) through manual search, probably she/he would not notice ICSR 12 (depicted in Figure 5) mentioned in the WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter. In this ICSR pantoprazole (which belongs to the PPI class) is referred as a concomitant drug in a PV signal report concerning another drug, irrelevant with the PPI class. The use of a knowledge graph based on the OpenPVSignal model enables the retrieval of ICSR 12 as relevant with the requested PPI signal information. In Figure 6, the parts highlighted in red provide the interlinking between the PPI drug class and the ICSR mentioned in the WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter.

FIGURE 6

Figure 6. Interlinking and reasoning upon PV signal reports from the WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter and Lareb (the blue dashed line depicts the logical path interlinking PPIs with ICSR 12 in the WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter).

As a second use case, let us assume that an expert reads a scientific article claiming that mice tests indicate a relation between magnesium deficiency and pneumonitis (Nasulewicz et al., 2004). In order to investigate this claim, she/he searches in the considered PV signal sources for drugs which are related with magnesium deficiency and are also reported to be related with pneumonia. While the FDA Drug Safety Communication indicates a relationship between PPIs and magnesium deficiency and the WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter refers to the use of pantoprazole as a concomitant drug in an ICSR regarding pneumonia, this information could only be retrieved if the expert expanded her/his free-text search to include all drugs belonging to PPIs too, thus, including pantoprazole as a search keyword. However, using a knowledge graph based on the OpenPVSignal model enables the retrieval of ICSR 12 as relevant with hypomagnesemia and pneumonia. As depicted in Figure 7, the parts highlighted in red can provide the interlinking between the concept of magnesium deficiency, the PPI drug class, and the specific ICSR mentioned in the WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter.

FIGURE 7

Figure 7. Interlinking and reasoning upon PV signal reports from the WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter and the FDA Drug Safety Communications (the blue dashed line depicts the logical path interlinking hypomagnesemia and pneumonitis with ICSR 12 mentioned in the WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter).

While the data interlinking presented in these two exemplar use cases can be important for a drug safety investigation, it is difficult to be identified manually, as it would require a significant expansion of the search space across distinct, multiple data sources. This expansion would complicate the investigation process and proliferate the chance of missing useful information. Therefore, the use of the Linked Data paradigm as employed in OpenPVSignal can be particularly helpful to avoid missing information that may be useful when searching for PV signal information across multiple report sources. It should be noted that the logical paths depicted using the blue dashed line are automatically inferred by reasoners, despite the fact that these relationships are not explicitly declared in the respective instantiations.

OpenPVSignal Evaluation: Compliance With the FAIR Principles

The four main guiding principles of the FAIR model, namely, Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable, are further analyzed in a set of 15 more detailed guidelines presented in Table 2 (Wilkinson et al., 2016). Applying FAIR guiding principles to PV data would inherently enhance their value and, therefore, enhancing the “FAIRness” of such data is one of main goals of OpenPVSignal. Therefore, in Table 2 we present a qualitative evaluation of OpenPVSignal against the FAIR principles. It should be noted that in the context of the analysis presented in Table 2, we consider that the term data refers to the original free-text PV signal reports and the term metadata refers to the respective OpenPVSignal instantiations.

TABLE 2

Table 2. The FAIR Guiding Principles and OpenPVSignal approach compliance.

Furthermore, we have evaluated our proposed model against the respective emerging FAIR metrics framework²⁸ proposed by the FAIR Metrics Group²⁹. As the current version of the proposed metrics refers to rather low-level technical details, we consider this evaluation process out of scope for the journal audience, and we consider our qualitative analysis presented in Table 2 more suitable in order to illustrate the “FAIRness” of OpenPVSignal.

Based on the presented analysis, we can conclude that OpenPVSignal complies fully with the FAIR principles.

Discussion

The value of Linked Data and Semantic Web technologies for pharmacological research has been illustrated in various studies and projects. Beyond research on ADR representation, which was extensively presented in section “Related Work: ADR Representation Formalisms and Frameworks”, of note is the Linked Open Drug Data (LODD) initiative (Samwald et al., 2011), a project conducted by the W3C Semantic Web for Health Care and Life Sciences Interest Group (HCLS IG), exploiting semantic discovery techniques to automatically interlink diverse datasets. The Bio2RDF project transforms a variety of life science data sources to RDF [among which DrugBank (Law et al., 2014), SIDER (Kuhn et al., 2016) and FDA Structured Product Labels (Hassanzadeh et al., 2013)], through a well-defined transformation process. Furthermore, OpenPHACTS is an ongoing European initiative, building the so-called “Open Pharmacological Data Space” by collecting and integrating biochemical data from several heterogeneous sources (Hu and Bajorath, 2014), aiming to facilitate the discovery of new drugs.

Interlinking heterogeneous datasets to facilitate drug research using Linked Data has been presented in Boyce et al. (2014), in the scope of the OHDSI initiative, elaborating also on PV use cases [Knowledge Base workgroup of the Observational Health Data Sciences Informatics (OHDSI) collaborative, 2017], while an approach for combining the results of diverse computational PV signal detection methods applied in diverse data sources using Semantic Web technologies was elaborated in the SAFER project (Koutkias and Jaulent, 2015). The PredicTox project aimed to foster ADR prediction through the combination of various data sources (Zaman et al., 2017). Interestingly, biomedical knowledge sources have also been integrated and used for drug repurposing (Himmelstein et al., 2017).

A Linked Data model targeting PV signal investigation was presented in Natsiavas et al. (2017). This model was partially based on RDF resources available via Bio2RDF (Callahan et al., 2013), namely, DrugBank, SIDER, Linked SPL, PharmGKB, and ClinicalTrials.gov, and it was evaluated using three reference datasets containing both positive and negative PV signal controls. The evaluation process confirms or rejects each candidate PV signal based on the information provided by the model. The result was compared for the three reference datasets, aiming to highlight the value of interlinking various data sources for PV signal investigation.

In the current work, we aimed to address the shortcoming arising from the free-text format based on which PV signal reports are made publicly available from organizations which monitor and investigate PV signals. This practice does not facilitate systematic search and automatic interlinking of information. To this end, we presented OpenPVSignal, a novel ontology which provides the knowledge model and the semantics upon which PV signal information contained in the current reports could be annotated and enriched. Through the adoption of the Linked Data paradigm and Semantic Web standards, OpenPVSignal enables overcoming the diversity in the provided free-text report's syntactic structure and the provided information granularity level. Based on common practices in ontology modeling, OpenPVSignal reuses several existing semantic models, namely, Micropublications, PROV-O, WADM, OAE, and TO. For illustration purposes, three PV signal reports originated from different sources were instantiated and two exemplar use cases exploiting these instantiations highlighted the value of OpenPVSignal.

Data interlinking, retrieval, and automatic reasoning are crucial in the PV domain, where the currently applied typical workflow for signal generation and verification relies on complex manual exploration of multiple (mostly free-text) data sources (Koutkias et al., 2017). The advantages of using OpenPVSignal could be summarized as follows:

(1) Facilitates the reusability of valuable information, which can be currently lost due to its unstructured nature.

(2) Saves time and effort, as it significantly facilitates the automation of manually conducted work.

(3) Provides the basis for an advanced computational framework, aiming to facilitate PV signal assessment by interlinking the respective information with other data sources and by applying semantic reasoning.

(4) Given that the RDF representation uses URIs to uniquely identify each information resource (e.g., an ICSR), the use of Linked Data and OpenPVSignal could facilitate the detection of duplicate information and, therefore, allow for their better processing.

The limitations of the presented work include: (a) the need for a more thorough validation of OpenPVSignal by elaborating on PV signal reports published by additional sources and, consequently, (b) the need for potential extensions of our ontology model and (c) the size of the model, which can be a significant barrier for automatic reasoning³⁰. The definition of the OpenPVSignal concepts followed the post-coordination ontology development approach, in a step-by-step fashion and according to their use in the free-text PV signal reports of the considered sources. Thus, these definitions were not a result of an exhaustive procedure, which could entail the analysis of PV signal reports that are published by all relevant organizations. Providing OpenPVSignal as an open-access resource and offering a transparent open-source development process is a key decision toward restricting the above limitations. Overall, we consider the development of the OpenPVSignal model an ongoing process, driven by its use in real-world applications.

It should be noted that the main use case of OpenPVSignal concerns the publication process of PV signal information that is already publicly available in free-text reports. The process of publishing PV signal information and the security risks or ethical issues related with this information are not relevant with the information representation format and as such, we consider them out of the scope of this work. Furthermore, it should be clarified that OpenPVSignal neither employs nor proposes specific statistical processing method(s) for signal detection. OpenPVSignal is a knowledge representation model for publishing PV signal information and this information may typically include references to the statistical methods/measures used for signal detection. Thus, OpenPVSignal provides the mechanism to encode this information without elaborating on its assessment.

Besides extending the OpenPVSignal validation, our future work concerns: (a) the development of a tool to facilitate the automatic population of OpenPVSignal with the content of already released PV signal reports by applying Natural Language Processing techniques, in order to construct the respective knowledge graph, (b) the development of a user-friendly tool to create, publish, browse and query OpenPVSignal instances, appropriate for use by PV signal monitoring organizations and drug regulatory authorities, and (c) the development of a knowledge-based, computational framework for assessing candidate PV signals by exploiting the semantic reasoning capabilities that OpenPVSignal offers. The development of such tools can be facilitated by frameworks that can automatically extract information from free-text data sources. For example, BioKB (Biryukov et al., 2017) provides a paradigm for semantically annotating free-text content and interlinking it with reference vocabularies, while PoeM (Gaignard et al., 2016) provides a way for extracting provenance information in a Linked Data format.

Overall, we believe that OpenPVSignal can be the basis for an advanced PV signal dissemination mechanism, appropriate for adoption by organizations who investigate and publish PV signal information and drug regulatory authorities.

Author Contributions

VK conceived and supervised the study. PN implemented the ontology model. All the authors contributed to the design and critical review of the ontology model as well as to the manuscript writing. All the authors reviewed and approved the content of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a Marie Curie Intra European Fellowship project awarded to the corresponding author within the 7th European Community Framework Programme FP7/2007–2013 under REA grant agreement 330422—the SAFER project. Prof. Richard Boyce has received support via a grant from the United States National Library of Medicine (R01LM011838).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mr. Magnus Wallberg, Technology Evangelist at Uppsala Monitoring Centre, WHO Collaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring, Uppsala, Sweden, for his contribution in formulating the initial idea about a common, semantic model for representing pharmacovigilance signal reports, and Dr. Linda Härmark, Head of Innovation and Projects in the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Netherlands, for her constructive comments and suggestions in the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2018.00609/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

1. ^https://www.who-umc.org/

2. ^http://www.ema.europa.eu

3. ^https://www.fda.gov/

4. ^http://www.mhra.gov.uk

5. ^https://www.lareb.nl/en/

6. ^https://www.w3.org/RDF/

7. ^https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/

8. ^https://www.w3.org/OWL/

9. ^Remark: The current paper focuses on the OpenPVSignal model per se, and we consider the envisioned software stack facilitating the knowledge graph creation and processing as future work.

10. ^https://www.meddra.org/. MedDRA^® the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terminology is the international medical terminology developed under the auspices of the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). The MedDRA^® trademark is owned by IFPMA on behalf of ICH.

11. ^https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/

12. ^https://github.com/OHDSI/CommonDataModel/wiki

13. ^https://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/rxnorm/

14. ^https://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/sourcereleasedocs/current/NDFRT/

15. ^https://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/

16. ^https://www.whocc.no/atc/structure_and_principles/

17. ^https://www.drugbank.ca/

18. ^http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/

19. ^https://www.snomed.org/snomed-ct

20. ^Remark: Concepts contained in WADM are not used to semantically define OpenPVSignal concepts. They are only used to create annotations that explicitly declare the original free-text snippet, which is the source of the respective RDF statement in the OpenPVSignal instantiation. Therefore, they are not referenced in the OpenPVSignal conceptual schema description.

21. ^https://github.com/inab-certh/OpenPVSignal/

22. ^http://purl.org/OpenPVSignal/OpenPVSignal.owl

23. ^http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js21458en/

24. ^https://www.who-umc.org/vigibase/vigibase/

25. ^https://www.lareb.nl/en/databank/

26. ^https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm199082.htm

27. ^https://github.com/inab-certh/OpenPVSignal/tree/master/examples

28. ^https://github.com/FAIRMetrics/Metrics/blob/master/ALL.pdf

29. ^http://fairmetrics.org/

30. ^Remark: The import of OAE in OpenPVSignal increases the size of the model significantly and this leads to vast memory consumption while running reasoners. Removing the OAE import allows a reasoner to build the inferred class hierarchy in seconds. In the presented example instantiations, we used the Hermit reasoner (Hermit, SCR_016006) incorporated in Protégé, in a computer with 16GB RAM and Intel i7 processor.

References

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) (2011). National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. Sydney, NSW. Available online at: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/NSQHS-Standards-Sept2011.pdf (Accessed May 24, 2017).

Baader, F., Horrocks, I., and Sattler, U. (2004). “Description Logics,” in Handbook on Ontologies, eds S. Staab and R. Studer (Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer), 3–28. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web: a new form of web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. Sci. Am. 284, 29–37. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0501-34

CrossRef Full Text

Biryukov, M., Groues, V., Satagopam, V., and Schneider, R. (2017). “BioKB - Text mining and semantic technologies for the biomedical content discovery,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Semantic Web Applications and Tools for Health Care and Life Sciences (SWAT4LS 2017), eds A. Paschke, A. Burger, A. Splendiani, M. S. Marshall, P. Romano, and V. Presutti (Rome: CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)). Available online at: http://www.swat4ls.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/SWAT4LS-2017_paper_5.pdf (Accessed January 23, 2018).

Google Scholar

Bizer, C. (2009). The emerging web of linked data. IEEE Intell. Syst. 24, 87–92. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2009.102

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bousquet, C., Sadou, É., Souvignet, J., Jaulent, M.-C., and Declerck, G. (2014). Formalizing MedDRA to support semantic reasoning on adverse drug reaction terms. J. Biomed. Inform. 49, 282–291. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.03.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boyce, R. D., Ryan, P. B., Norén, G. N., Schuemie, M. J., Reich, C., Duke, J., et al. (2014). Drug Saf. 37, 557–567. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0189-0

CrossRef Full Text

Callahan, A., Cruz-Toledo, J., Ansell, P., and Dumontier, M. (2013). Bio2RDF Release 2: Improved Coverage, Interoperability And Provenance Of Life Science Linked Data (Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer), 200–212.

Google Scholar

Nederlands Bijwerkingen Centrum Lareb (2013). (Es)omeprazole and Tinnitus Case, LAREB. ADR Signal Report. Available online at: https://databankws.lareb.nl/Downloads/KWB_2013_3_(Es)omeprazole_and_tinnitus.pdf (Accessed July 18, 2017).

Clark, T., Ciccarese, P. N., and Goble, C. A. (2014). Micropublications: a semantic model for claims, evidence, arguments and annotations in biomedical communications. J. Biomed. Semantics 5:28. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-5-28

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) (2010). Practical Aspects of Signal Detection in Pharmacovigilance, Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. Report of CIOMS. Working Group VIII. CIOMS, Geneva. Available online at: https://cioms.ch/shop/product/practical-aspects-of-signal-detection-in-pharmacovigilance-report-of-cioms-working-group-viii/

Courtot, M., Brinkman, R. R., and Ruttenberg, A. (2014). The logic of surveillance guidelines: an analysis of vaccine adverse event reports from an ontological perspective. PLoS ONE. 9:e92632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092632

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cox, S., Little, C., Hobbs, J., and Pan, F. (2017). Time Ontology in OWL. Available online at: https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/

Knowledge Base workgroup of the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) collaborative (2017). Large-scale adverse effects related to treatment evidence standardization (LAERTES): an open scalable system for linking pharmacovigilance evidence sources with clinical data. J. Biomed. Semantics 8:11. doi: 10.1186/s13326-017-0115-3

CrossRef Full Text

FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (2011). Drug Safety and Availability - FDA Drug Safety Communication: Low Magnesium Levels can be Associated with Long-Term Use of Proton Pump Inhibitor Drugs (PPIs). Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Available online at: https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm245011.htm (Accessed January 4, 2018).

Gaignard, A., Skaf-Molli, H., and Bihouée, A. (2016). “From scientific workflow patterns to 5-star linked open data,” in 8th USENIX Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance (TaPP 16) (Washington, DC: USENIX Association). Available online at: https://www.usenix.org/conference/tapp16/workshop-program/presentation/gaignard (Accessed January 15, 2018).

Google Scholar

Gil, Y., Miles, S., Belhajjame, K., Deus, H., Garijo, D., Klyne, G., et al. (2013). W3C PROV Model Primer. Available online at: https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-primer/ (Accessed July 12, 2017).

Hassanzadeh, O., Zhu, Q., Freimuth, R., and Boyce, R. (2013). Extending the “web of drug identity” with knowledge extracted from United States product labels. AMIA Jt. Summits Transl. Sci. 2013, 64–68.

Google Scholar

He, Y., Sarntivijai, S., Lin, Y., Xiang, Z., Guo, A., Zhang, S., et al. (2014). OAE: the ontology of Adverse Events. J. Biomed. Semantics 5:29. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-5-29

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heath, T., and Bizer, C. (2011). Linked Data: evolving the web into a global data space. Synth. Lect. Semant. Web Theory Technol. 1, 1–136. doi: 10.2200/S00334ED1V01Y201102WBE001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Himmelstein, D. S., Lizee, A., Hessler, C., Brueggeman, L., Chen, S. L., Hadley, D., et al. (2017). Systematic integration of biomedical knowledge prioritizes drugs for repurposing. Elife 6:e26726. doi: 10.7554/eLife.26726

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, Y., and Bajorath, J. (2014). Learning from “big data”: compounds and targets. Drug Discov. Today 19, 357–360. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.02.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, G., Duke, J. D., Pathak, J., and Chute, C. G. (2011). “An ontological representation of adverse drug events,” in 2nd International Conference on Biomedical Ontology, ICBO 2011 (Buffalo, NY, United States). Available online at: http://icbo.buffalo.edu/2011/workshop/adverse-events/docs/papers/GuoquianAEICBO2011_submission.pdf (Accessed July 17, 2017).

Google Scholar

Jiang, G., Liu, H., Solbrig, H. R., and Chute, C. G. (2013). ADEpedia 2.0: integration of normalized adverse drug events (ADEs) knowledge from the UMLS. AMIA Jt. Summits Transl. Sci. 2013, 100–104.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Koutkias, V. G., and Jaulent, M.-C. (2015). Computational approaches for pharmacovigilance signal detection: toward integrated and semantically-enriched frameworks. Drug Saf. 38, 219–232. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0278-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koutkias, V. G., Lillo-Le Louët, A., and Jaulent, M.-C. (2017). Exploiting heterogeneous publicly available data sources for drug safety surveillance: computational framework and case studies. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 16, 113–124. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2017.1257604

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuhn, M., Letunic, I., Jensen, L. J., and Bork, P. (2016). The SIDER database of drugs and side effects. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1075–D1079. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Law, V., Knox, C., Djoumbou, Y., Jewison, T., Guo, A. C., Liu, Y., et al. (2014). DrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolism. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D1091–D1097. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Musen, M. A., and Protégé, Team (2015). The Protégé project: a look back and a look forward. AI Matters 1, 4–12. doi: 10.1145/2757001.2757003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nasulewicz, A., Zimowska, W., Bayle, D., Dzimira, S., Madej, J., Rayssiguier, Y., et al. (2004). Changes in gene expression in the lungs of Mg-deficient mice are related to an inflammatory process. Magnes. Res. 17, 259–263.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Natsiavas, P., Maglaveras, N., and Koutkias, V. (2017). “Evaluation of linked, open data sources for mining adverse drug reaction signals” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Cham: Springer). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_24

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Noy, N. (2017). Facilitating the Discovery of Public Datasets. Google Res. Blogpost. Available online at: https://research.googleblog.com/2017/01/facilitating-discovery-of-public.html?m=1 (Accessed January 29, 2018).

Pal, S., and Tanaka, D. (2017). Ibrutinib and Pneumonitis, WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter. World Health Organization Available online at: http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/PharmaNewsletter3_17/en/ (Accessed November 14, 2017).

Samwald, M., Jentzsch, A., Bouton, C., Kallesøe, C. S., Willighagen, E., Hajagos, J., et al. (2011). Linked open drug data for pharmaceutical research and development. J. Cheminform. 3:19. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-3-19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanderson, R., Ciccarese, P., and Young, B. (2017). Web Annotation Data Model. Available online at: http://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/ (Accessed September 8, 2015).

Shadbolt, N., Berners-Lee, T., and Hall, W. (2006). The semantic web revisited. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21, 96–101. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2006.62

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Souvignet, J., Declerck, G., Asfari, H., Jaulent, M.-C., and Bousquet, C. (2016). OntoADR a semantic resource describing adverse drug reactions to support searching, coding, and information retrieval. J. Biomed. Inform. 63, 100–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.06.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stevens, R., and Sattler, U. (2013). Post-Coordination: Making Things Up as You Go Along. Available online at: http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/1305 (Accessed December 9, 2017).

Suárez-Figueroa, M. C., Gómez-Pérez, A., and Fernández-López, M. (2012). “The NeOn methodology for ontology engineering,” in Ontology Engineering in a Networked World, eds M. C. Suárez-Figueroa, A. Gómez-Pérez, E. Motta, and A. Gangemi (Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer), 9–34. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-24794-1_2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sultana, J., Cutroneo, P., and Trifirò, G. (2013). Clinical and economic burden of adverse drug reactions. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacother. 4, S73–S77. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.120957

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Voss, E. A., Boyce, R. D., Ryan, P. B., van der Lei, J., Rijnbeek, P. R., and Schuemie, M. J. (2017). Accuracy of an automated knowledge base for identifying drug adverse reactions. J. Biomed. Inform. 66, 72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.12.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weaver, J., and Tarjan, P. (2013). Facebook Linked data via the graph, API. Semant. Web 4, 245–250. doi: 10.3233/SW-2012-0078

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., et al. (2016). The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3:160018. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

World Health Organization, W. C. C. (2002). The Importance of Pharmacovigilance. World Health Organization. Available online at: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js4893e/ (Accessed May 24, 2017).

Google Scholar

Zaman, S., Sarntivijai, S., and Abernethy, D. (2017). Use of biomedical ontologies for integration of biological knowledge for learning and prediction of adverse drug reactions. Gene Regul. Syst. Bio. 11:1177625017696075. doi: 10.1177/1177625017696075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar