Skip to main content

OPINION article

Front. Pharmacol., 10 February 2015
Sec. Integrative and Regenerative Pharmacology
This article is part of the Research Topic Fetal Therapies and Maternal-Fetal Tolerance View all 11 articles

Consensus statement from the first international conference for in utero stem cell transplantation and gene therapy

\r\nTippi C. MacKenzie*Tippi C. MacKenzie1*Anna L. DavidAnna L. David2Alan W. FlakeAlan W. Flake3Graca Almeida-Porada*Graca Almeida-Porada4*
  • 1Eli and Edythe Broad Institute for Regeneration Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • 2Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
  • 3Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • 4Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

On April 17–18, 2014, basic and translational scientists and clinicians convened in San Francisco, CA for a conference in fetal stem cell transplantation, stem cell biology, tolerance, and gene therapy.

The purpose of the meeting (http://pedsurglab.surgery.ucsf.edu/news–events/fetal-symposium-2014.aspx) was to outline the goals of in utero transplantation, review the barriers that have been encountered, and learn about new developments that can be applied to the field.

Information discussed at this conference will help pave the way for developing novel strategies to achieve therapeutic engraftment levels in the fetus, and identify ways to safely translate these strategies to a wide range of clinical applications.

We held a final consensus session to achieve an international agreement for future pre-clinical and clinical studies of in utero hematopoietic cell transplantation (IUHCT). We agreed on the following items:

In utero transplantation is a viable strategy to treat fetuses with selective congenital disorders.

• Given recent publications that the maternal immune response can limit engraftment, the clinical strategy for IUHCT should involve transplantation of autologous or maternal-derived cells. The host immune response may be a limiting factor that might be circumvented with early cell delivery.

• The fetal microenvironment plays a primary role in supporting the engraftment and expansion of transplanted cells and requires further investigation.

• Recent data from large animal studies suggests that intravascular injection may be the delivery route of choice to achieve engraftment of hematopoietic stem cells in the fetus.

• Currently, there is no proven safe method of host conditioning in the fetus. Until specific, non-toxic conditioning methods (such as antibody-mediated depletion of host HSC) are optimized in pre-clinical models, large cell doses should be used to overcome host competitive barriers.

• Experimental model data are sufficient to warrant a phase 1 clinical trial of IUHCT for select fetuses. The most suitable hematological diseases are hemoglobinopathies such as sickle cell disease and thalassemia, given their high morbidity/mortality, the availability of reliable prenatal screening programs, and the paucity of optimum postnatal care options.

• The value of alternative cells, such as mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) and amniotic fluid-derived cells, for other appropriate congenital pathologies warrants investigation.

• Reports of using MSC in utero to treat osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) in a limited number of patients are promising and suggest that, after optimization, MSC could be used to improve/treat OI.

• Treatment of the fetal patient using gene therapy and gene-modified cells have great future potential and should be fields of active investigation.

• A new society focused on fetal stem cell transplantation and gene therapy will be formed (FeTIS: Fetal Transplantation and Immunology Society), with the mission of accelerating clinical applications of stem cell transplantation and gene therapy approaches to treat fetuses with congenital anomalies.

• The society should develop and maintain an international registry of treated patients and their outcomes to facilitate reporting and sharing of results. This database will not be publicly accessible and data will be anonymized.

• The society will provide a forum for members to share best practice and clinical governance for in utero stem cell and gene therapy cases.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The conference was supported by grants from the March of Dimes, the California Institute for Regeneration Medicine, and UCSF Department of Surgery. ALD is supported by the NIHR UCL/UCLH Biomedical Research Centre.

Keywords: in utero transplantation, in utero gene therapy, fetal tolerance, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Stem Cell Niche

Citation: MacKenzie TC, David AL, Flake AW and Almeida-Porada G (2015) Consensus statement from the first international conference for in utero stem cell transplantation and gene therapy. Front. Pharmacol. 6:15. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00015

Received: 25 November 2014; Paper pending published: 05 December 2014;
Accepted: 15 January 2015; Published online: 10 February 2015.

Edited by:

George Joseph Christ, University of Virginia, USA

Reviewed by:

Bryon Petersen, University of Florida, USA

Copyright © 2015 MacKenzie, David, Flake and Almeida-Porada. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: tippi.mackenzie@ucsfmedctr.org; galmeida@wakehealth.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.