Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Pediatr., 27 November 2024
Sec. Pediatric Rheumatology

Successful tocilizumab treatment for rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease with anti-MDA5-positive juvenile dermatomyositis: a case report and literature review

\r\nLingzhi QiuLingzhi QiuXiaoyan ShaoXiaoyan ShaoLe MaLe MaZhidan Fan
Zhidan Fan*Haiguo Yu
\r\nHaiguo Yu*
  • Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Children’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Background: Currently, no established integrated treatment regimen exists for anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (anti-MDA5)-positive juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) complicated by rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD). We present a case of refractory anti-MDA5-positive JDM with RP-ILD that was successfully treated using a combination of tocilizumab and plasma exchange, along with a review of the relevant literature.

Methods: A literature review was conducted to gain insights into the clinical features and treatment strategies for managing refractory anti-MDA5-positive JDM complicated by RP-ILD.

Results: We report a case of successful management of anti-MDA5-positive JDM complicated by RP-ILD using a combination of immunosuppressive agents, plasma exchange, and tocilizumab.

Conclusion: Tocilizumab may serve as an effective adjunctive treatment option for patients with refractory anti-MDA5-positive JDM complicated by RP-ILD who do not respond to conventional intensive immunosuppressive therapies.

1 Introduction

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare childhood-onset systemic inflammatory disease, characterized by typical cutaneous lesions, such as Gottron's papules and heliotrope rash, as well as proximal muscle weakness. Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (anti-MDA5)-positive JDM often coexists with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD), which is associated with high mortality and can be life-threatening. Currently, there exists no consensus on the optimal treatment plan for patients with anti-MDA5-positive JDM complicated by RP-ILD. Herein, we present a case of a 3-year-old girl patient with anti-MDA5-positive JDM complicated by RP-ILD, whose lung condition continued to worsen on imaging despite receiving multiple immunosuppressive intensive therapies, including intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), glucocorticoid, tofacitinib, tacrolimus, and cyclophosphamide. Rescue treatments with plasma exchange and tocilizumab were subsequently initiated. Significant pulmonary improvement was observed, as evidenced by lung imaging and resolution of hypoxemia after three sessions of plasma exchange and tocilizumab therapy. Notably, the most substantial improvement was observed after tocilizumab therapy. To the best of our knowledge, this case represents the first reported instance of successful tocilizumab use in an anti-MDA5-positive JDM patient complicated by RP-ILD. Furthermore, tocilizumab demonstrated both efficacy and safety in our case, providing a new idea for the future treatment of refractory anti-MDA5-positive JDM complicated by RP-ILD.

2 Case presentation

A 3-year-old girl was admitted to the hospital due to recurrent rashes for 3 months and limb weakness for 2 months. Physical examination revealed multiple red maculopapules on her face, bilateral elbows, interphalangeal joints, and metacarpophalangeal joints. Gottron's papules and cutaneous ulcers were also observed on the extensor surfaces of the joints. There was no joint tenderness, deformity, or lower limb edema. She exhibited muscle weakness with grade IV muscle strength and normal muscle tone on examination. Laboratory analyses indicated elevated inflammatory markers: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) 31 mm/H (range: 0–20 mm/H), serum ferritin (Ferr) 1,271.4 ng/ml (range: 11–306 ng/ml), and D dimer 1,186 ng/ml (range: <280 ng/ml). Additional laboratory tests revealed increased serum myogenic enzymes: alanine transaminase (ALT) at 345 U/L (range: 7–30 U/L), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) at 866 U/L (range: 14–44 U/L), lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) at 736 U/L (range: 165–395 U/L), and creatine kinase (CK) at 485 U/L (range: 40–200 U/L). The myositis spectrum was positive for anti-MDA5 and anti-RO-52 antibodies, while other autoantibodies and infection-related tests were negative. Electromyography indicated the presence of myogenic changes. Magnetic resonance imaging showed high-density areas in the femoral muscles on both sides, consistent with the characteristics of JDM. Chest CT imaging showed flocculent shadows in both lungs and local consolidation in the right lung (Figure 1A). The patient was diagnosed with anti-MDA5-positive JDM complicated by ILD and received combination therapy, including IVIG (2 g/kg/dose at a 1-month interval), glucocorticoid (2 mg/kg/day), oral hydroxychloroquine (5 mg/kg/day), tacrolimus (0.05 mg/kg/day), and tofacitinib (2.5 mg/dose, b.i.d.). The levels of myogenic enzymes, including ALT, AST, LDH, and CK, all decreased, with Ferr decreasing significantly from 1,271.4 to 316 ng/ml. Subsequent imaging showed improvement in pulmonary lesion absorption (Figure 1B). She also received trimethoprim-sulfadiazine as prophylactic treatment for opportunistic infections. However, her dyspnea progressed rapidly 20 days later, although without cough or sputum, with oxygen saturation dropping to 92%–93% at rest in room air, requiring high-flow nasal oxygen therapy. Serological tests for Epstein–Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, fungi, and mycoplasma were all negative. Her pulmonary status further deteriorated (Figure 1C), accompanied by elevated laboratory indicators (Ferr from 316 to 504.7 ng/ml, ALT from 335 to 350 U/L, and AST from 202 to 281 U/L). Given her diagnosis of RP-ILD, she was treated with intravenous cyclophosphamide (700 mg/m2), followed by three sessions of plasma exchange. This regimen provided symptomatic relief and improved laboratory indicators, but lung CT scans showed no significant changes (Figure 1D). Consequently, intravenous tocilizumab therapy was initiated (10 mg/kg) (Figure 2). The treatment was well tolerated, and subsequent lung CT scans revealed significant amelioration of bilateral pulmonary lesions after tocilizumab therapy (Figure 1E). The patient continued to receive oral glucocorticoid (2 mg/kg/day, with a gradual taper), hydroxychloroquine (5 mg/kg/day), tacrolimus (0.05 mg/kg/day), tofacitinib (2.5 mg/dose, b.i.d.), pirfenidone (50 mg/dose, t.i.d.), IVIG (2 g/kg/month, a total of six sessions), intravenous cyclophosphamide (500–700 mg/m2/month, a total of three sessions), and regular intravenous tocilizumab therapy (8–10 mg/kg/dose, once every 2 weeks for four times, with a gradual extension in the dosing interval to once monthly). Follow-up CT scans confirmed substantial improvement, showing significant absorption of lung inflammation and consolidation (Figure 1F). After 6 months of follow-up, the condition of the patient was stable, and the glucocorticoid dosage was gradually reduced to 5 mg/day.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. CT images of the case. (A,B) Flocculent shadows were observed in both lungs, accompanied by consolidation in the right lung at disease onset. After the initial treatment, these lesions were slightly absorbed. (C,D) Multiple patchy subpleural exudates and interstitial changes were noted in both lungs, with worsening consolidation in the right lung compared to the previous state. (E,F) Following combination therapy, notably with tocilizumab, substantial improvement was observed in both subpleural exudation and consolidation.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Clinical course of the case. The patient received combination therapy, including oral hydroxychloroquine, tofacitinib, tacrolimus, glucocorticoid (tapered off gradually), IVIG (2 g/kg/dose at a 1-month interval), cyclophosphamide (500–700 mg/m2/dose, once a month for three sessions), and regular tocilizumab. The arrow indicates the administration of the marked drugs. After treatment, ALT, AST, LDH, CK, and Ferr levels were all improved to different degrees. ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; LDH, lactic dehydrogenase; CK, creatine kinase; Ferr, ferritin; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; GC, glucocorticoid; TAC, tacrolimus; TOF, tofacitinib; PE, plasma exchange; PFD, pirfenidone; CYC, cyclophosphamide; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; TCZ, tocilizumab.

3 Discussion and conclusion

We present the case of a Chinese girl diagnosed with anti-MDA5-positive JDM complicated by RP-ILD. The patient fulfills the diagnostic criteria set by Bohan and Peter in 1975 and the European Neuromuscular Centre (ENMC) in 2018. Notably, despite the absence of a muscle biopsy, this diagnosis has been conclusively reached. Initially, despite the administration of multiple immunosuppressive medications, the patient did not achieve remission. However, following treatment with tocilizumab, along with plasma exchange and other immunosuppressants, her disease activity, including myogenic enzymes, ferritin levels, and CT scans, quickly improved, allowing for a successful reduction in her glucocorticoid dosage.

JDM is the most common subtype of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy in children, with typical rashes (present in 100% of cases) and muscle weakness (in 90% of cases) being the most common manifestations at onset (1). The anti-MDA5 antibody, one of the myositis-specific autoantibodies first described by Sato et al. in 2005, is strongly associated with a high incidence of RP-ILD and lower survival rates. Reports indicate that the mortality rates for patients with anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis (DM) complicated by RP-ILD can be as high as 56%–80% (2, 3). The first 6 months, especially the first 3 months, are particularly high-risk periods, with more than 90% of RP-ILD cases occurring during this timeframe (2, 4). Therefore, all JDM patients, even those who are negative for anti-MDA5, should be closely monitored for the development of RP-ILD (4).

Treatment of RP-ILD in anti-MDA5-positive JDM is challenging. Given the rarity of this condition, current treatment recommendations are based on expert advice, as no official guidelines exist. The most common treatment strategy is triple therapy, which consists of high-dose glucocorticoids, calcineurin inhibitors, and intravenous cyclophosphamide. A prospective multicenter study conducted in Japan revealed that patients receiving triple therapy exhibited a significantly higher 6-month survival rate than those in the intensive control group (89% vs. 33%, respectively) (5). More recently, early combination therapy incorporating Janus-kinase (JAK) inhibitors has also yielded promising results. Chen et al. (6) showed that early initiation of JAK inhibitor-based combination therapy significantly improved the survival rate of patients with anti-MDA5-positive DM-ILD, with a cumulative 6-month survival rate of 100% in the tofacitinib group compared to 78% in the conventional immunosuppressant group. However, despite the combination of a JAK inhibitor with triple immunosuppressive therapy in our patient, the progression of lung lesions remained unchanged and continued to deteriorate.

Plasma exchange, which can remove antibodies and pro-inflammatory cytokines, has been reported as a rescue treatment option for intractable RP-ILD. In patients with anti-MDA5-positive DM, especially when the standard triple therapy alone is insufficient, adding plasma exchange to the regimen may enhance therapeutic effects and improve outcomes (7, 8). A study by Shirakashi et al. revealed that, among 13 patients with refractory anti-MDA5-positive DM-ILD, five of the eight patients who received plasma exchange survived, while all others who did not receive this treatment succumbed to the disease (8). In our patient, after three plasma exchange sessions, there was a significant decrease in ferritin and myogenic enzyme levels, yet the pulmonary CT scans showed no improvement. Pirfenidone has been added to conventional immunosuppressive treatment for DM-associated subacute interstitial pneumonia with pulmonary fibrosis. Data from a prospective study on antifibrotic agents indicated that mortality was lower in the group receiving pirfenidone compared to the control group (36.7% vs. 51.9%). Furthermore, in the subgroup with subacute ILD, the group receiving pirfenidone exhibited a significantly higher survival rate (90% vs. 44.4%, P = 0.045) (9). While antifibrotic therapies may offer ancillary benefits, at least in a subpopulation of MDA5-DM patients, the expert panel at the Arthritis and Rheumatism seminar may not recommend the use of pirfenidone in patients with RP-ILD associated with anti-MDA5 antibodies (10). Therefore, further studies will be required.

Biologics have been reported as a treatment option for patients with anti-MDA5-positive JDM complicated by RP-ILD. Rituximab is conditionally recommended as one of the first-line treatment options for RP-ILD (11). Case series have reported that four anti-MDA5-positive DM patients with RP-ILD showed improvement regarding respiratory symptoms, lung function tests, and chest imaging after rituximab infusions (12). There are also case reports/series of other biologics, such as infliximab, basiliximab, and daratumumab, but the number of cases is minimal, and larger prospective controlled studies are needed. Although the 2023 ACR guideline conditionally recommends against tocilizumab as a first-line treatment for RP-ILD in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (11), recent studies (1315) have shown that the levels of inflammatory cytokines, such as type 1 interferon, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-18, are significantly increased in patients with anti-MDA5-positive DM-ILD. IL-6, in particular, is closely related to the pathogenesis of this condition. A hyperinflammatory state is a distinctive feature of anti-MDA5-positive DM with RP-ILD. The serum IL-6 level in the RP-ILD subgroup of polymyositis (PM)/DM patients is higher than that in the non-ILD subgroup (16), suggesting that regulating this cytokine might offer a possible treatment strategy for RP-ILD. Only a few previous reports have indicated the use of tocilizumab for treating anti-MDA5-positive DM with RP-ILD. We searched the published literature in PubMed using keywords such as “MDA5,” “dermatomyositis,” “RP-ILD,” and “tocilizumab” (Table 1). As far as we know, all existing reports are limited to adult cases, with no studies involving children. This case is the first successful application of plasma exchange in combination with tocilizumab for treating RP-ILD in anti-MDA5-positive JDM patients. Among our case and the eight cases from the literature, no serious side effects have been reported.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Published cases of tocilizumab treatment for RP-ILD associated with refractory anti-MDA5-positive DM.

In conclusion, tocilizumab proved to be effective and safe in our case, consistent with findings from previous reports. Our patient received six cycles of tocilizumab over 4 months. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating the efficacy of tocilizumab for treating anti-MDA5-positive JDM with RP-ILD. Anti-IL-6 therapy emerges as a novel approach for the treatment of refractory anti-MDA5-positive JDM with RP-ILD, particularly in cases where conventional treatments prove inadequate.

However, this experience is currently limited to a case report, and its findings may not be broadly generalizable. Some potential disease activity markers, such as IL-18 levels or anti-MDA5 antibody titers, were not systematically collected and serially monitored. Larger clinical studies and prospective trials are needed to accumulate more definitive evidence to validate these findings, particularly with respect to longer follow-up periods, the optimal duration and dosage of drug use, and potential adverse effects.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardians/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the minor(s)' legal guardian/next of kin for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this Case Report.

Author contributions

LQ: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Software, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization. XS: Formal Analysis, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. LM: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Formal Analysis. ZF: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. HY: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant number: 2021YFC2702000) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 82271838).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the child enrolled in the study and her guardians.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Barut K, Aydin PO, Adrovic A, Sahin S, Kasapcopur O. Juvenile dermatomyositis: a tertiary center experience. Clin Rheumatol. (2017) 36(2):361–6. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3530-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. You H, Wang L, Wang J, Lv C, Xu L, Yuan F, et al. Time-dependent changes in RPILD and mortality risk in anti-MDA5+ DM patients: a cohort study of 272 cases in China. Rheumatology (Oxford). (2023) 62(3):1216–26. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac450

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Vuillard C, de Chambrun MP, de Prost N, Guérin C, Schmidt M, Dargent A, et al. Clinical features and outcome of patients with acute respiratory failure revealing anti-synthetase or anti-mda-5 dermato-pulmonary syndrome: a French multicenter retrospective study. Ann Intensive Care. (2018) 8(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0433-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Yeşilbaş O, Yıldız M, Yozgat CY, Tahaoğlu I, Yazan H, Çakır E, et al. A fatal interstitial lung disease in an anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (anti-MDA5) antibody negative patient with juvenile dermatomyositis. Turk J Pediatr. (2021) 63(5):903–8. doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2021.05.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Tsuji H, Nakashima R, Hosono Y, Imura Y, Yagita M, Yoshifuji H, et al. Multicenter prospective study of the efficacy and safety of combined immunosuppressive therapy with high-dose glucocorticoid, tacrolimus, and cyclophosphamide in interstitial lung diseases accompanied by anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5-positive dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2020) 72(3):488–98. doi: 10.1002/art.41105

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Chen Z, Wang X, Ye S. Tofacitinib in amyopathic dermatomyositis-associated interstitial lung disease. N Engl J Med. (2019) 381(3):291–3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1900045

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kojima M, Sawasaki N, Senzaki K, Aoki K, Matsushita H, Ito H, et al. Efficacy of plasma exchange in anti-Ro52 and anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis with progressive interstitial lung disease: a case report. Scand J Rheumatol. (2024) 53(6):1–4. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2024.2403181

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Shirakashi M, Nakashima R, Tsuji H, Tanizawa K, Handa T, Hosono Y, et al. Efficacy of plasma exchange in anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis with interstitial lung disease under combined immunosuppressive treatment. Rheumatology (Oxford). (2020) 59(11):3284–92. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa123

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Li T, Guo L, Chen Z, Gu L, Sun F, Tan X, et al. Pirfenidone in patients with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease associated with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:33226. doi: 10.1038/srep33226

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Romero-Bueno F, Del Campo PD, Trallero-Araguás E, Ruiz-Rodríguez JC, Castellvi I, Rodriguez-Nieto MJ, et al. Recommendations for the treatment of anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5-positive dermatomyositis-associated rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2020) 50(4):776–90. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.03.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Johnson SR, Bernstein EJ, Bolster MB, Chung JH, Danoff SK, George MD, et al. 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) guideline for the treatment of interstitial lung disease in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). (2024) 76(8):1051–69. doi: 10.1002/acr.25348

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. So H, Wong VTL, Lao VWN, Pang HT, Yip RML. Rituximab for refractory rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease related to anti-MDA5 antibody-positive amyopathic dermatomyositis. Clin Rheumatol. (2018) 37(7):1983–9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4122-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Horai Y, Koga T, Fujikawa K, Takatani A, Nishino A, Nakashima YS, et al. Serum interferon-α is a useful biomarker in patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) antibody-positive dermatomyositis. Mod Rheumatol. (2015) 25(1):85–9. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2014.900843

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Nara M, Komatsuda A, Omokawa A, Togashi M, Okuyama S, Sawada K, et al. Serum interleukin 6 levels as a useful prognostic predictor of clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease. Mod Rheumatol. (2014) 24(4):633–6. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2013.844390

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Gono T, Sato S, Kawaguchi Y, Kuwana M, Hanaoka M, Katsumata Y, et al. Anti-MDA5 antibody, ferritin and IL-18 are useful for the evaluation of response to treatment in interstitial lung disease with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis. Rheumatology (Oxford). (2012) 51(9):1563–70. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes102

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Kawasumi H, Gono T, Kawaguchi Y, Kaneko H, Katsumata Y, Hanaoka M, et al. IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 are associated with hyperferritinemia in rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease with polymyositis/dermatomyositis. Biomed Res Int. (2014) 2014:815245. doi: 10.1155/2014/815245

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Zhang X, Zhou S, Wu C, Li M, Wang Q, Zhao Y, et al. Tocilizumab for refractory rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease related to anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis. Rheumatology (Oxford). (2021) 60(7):e227–8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa906

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Wang QH, Chen LH. Treatment of refractory anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis complicated by rapidly progressing interstitial pulmonary disease: two case reports. World J Clin Cases. (2023) 11(22):5351–7. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i22.5351

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Teng F, Peng JM, Wang Q, Tian XL, Huo Z, Weng L. Successful treatment with tocilizumab in a patient with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease with positive anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene-5 antibody. Chin Med J (Engl). (2021) 134(8):999–1000. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001235

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: anti-MDA5, juvenile dermatomyositis, rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease, tocilizumab, plasma exchange

Citation: Qiu L, Shao X, Ma L, Fan Z and Yu H (2024) Successful tocilizumab treatment for rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease with anti-MDA5-positive juvenile dermatomyositis: a case report and literature review. Front. Pediatr. 12:1497168. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1497168

Received: 16 September 2024; Accepted: 29 October 2024;
Published: 27 November 2024.

Edited by:

Ozgur Kasapcopur, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Türkiye

Reviewed by:

Oya Koker, Istanbul University, Türkiye
Rabia Miray Kisla Ekinci, Ministry of Health, Türkiye
Sezgin Sahin, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Türkiye

Copyright: © 2024 Qiu, Shao, Ma, Fan and Yu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhidan Fan, emhpZGFuZmFuQG5qbXUuZWR1LmNu; Haiguo Yu, aGFpZ3VvX3l1QG5qbXUuZWR1LmNu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.