Skip to main content

STUDY PROTOCOL article

Front. Pediatr., 18 October 2023
Sec. Children and Health
This article is part of the Research Topic Cardiovascular Health in Children and Adolescents: Present and future View all 36 articles

Protocol for a 20-year follow-up after a randomized controlled trial of a Mediterranean diet in pregnancy: maternal and offspring risk factors for cardiovascular disease

\r\nHannibal Troensegaard
Hannibal Troensegaard1*Janette KhouryJanette Khoury1Ane C. Westerberg,Ane C. Westerberg2,3Serena TonstadSerena Tonstad4Jeanine Roeters van LennepJeanine Roeters van Lennep5Marit B. VeierdMarit B. Veierød6Per Ole Iversen,Per Ole Iversen1,7Kirsten B. Holven,Kirsten B. Holven1,8Kjetil Retterstl,\r\nKjetil Retterstøl1,9
  • 1Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • 2Department of Obstetrics, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
  • 3School of Health Sciences, Kristiania University College, Oslo, Norway
  • 4Department of Preventive Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • 5Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Cardiovascular Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • 6Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • 7Department of Haematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • 8Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • 9The Lipid Clinic, Department of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Background: An inadequate maternal diet during pregnancy can impair offspring health and may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease later in life. The purpose of the proposed study is to assess the risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease in both mothers and their offspring 20 years following their participation in a Mediterranean diet intervention trial during pregnancy.

Methods: The “Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Diet In Pregnancy” (CARRDIP) study was a randomized controlled trial performed between 1999 and 2001. The participants were randomized to adhere to either a Mediterranean diet or their regular diet during pregnancy. An extensive amount of data such as diet information, ultrasound measurements, anthropometry, and biomarkers from these mothers during pregnancy and their offspring in the neonatal period were collected. The mother–offspring pairs (n = 269) from the CARRDIP study will be invited to participate in a clinical examination and blood sample collection. This follow-up study, conducted 20 years after the original CARRDIP study, will investigate cardiovascular risk factors in mothers and offspring. The primary outcome will be the blood pressure of the offspring. In addition, the study will explore various aspects of cardiovascular health, including metabolic and inflammatory status, clinical history, and body composition of the participants.

Discussion: Previous studies investigating the effects of nutrition during pregnancy on maternal and offspring health have been either observational studies, animal studies, or randomized controlled trials with a follow-up period of less than 5 years. This project aims to study the long-term effects of dietary intervention during pregnancy on maternal and offspring cardiovascular risk markers.

Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier (NCT05030922).

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for about a third of all deaths worldwide (1). Numerous studies have demonstrated that lifestyle interventions, such as smoking, physical inactivity, and dietary habits, can reduce cardiovascular risk factors. Lifestyle intervention, as primordial and primary prevention, is a cost-effective way of combatting the burden of CVD morbidity and mortality (2, 3). Although the main goals for primary and secondary prevention are well established, the targets of primordial prevention for CVD are not as clear. Nevertheless, initiating CVD prevention as early as possible, including during childhood or even in utero, holds significant potential (3, 4).

One of the main causes of CVD is atherosclerosis, a progressive, lifelong process resulting in plaque accumulation and inflammation within the arterial wall, which in turn may lead to thrombosis and stenosis, thereby impeding local blood flow (5). Lifestyle changes, specifically diet, influence the progression of atherosclerosis and stenosis (6, 7). For example, strong evidence demonstrates that replacing saturated fatty acids with polyunsaturated fatty acids in adults reduces the risk of coronary heart disease, as discussed in a systematic review of current evidence by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in the United States (8).

A Mediterranean diet has been shown to alter the atherosclerotic process and protect against CVD (912). There are several variations of the Mediterranean diet, but all are based in principle on increased intakes of whole grain bread, fruit, vegetables, legumes, and sources of polyunsaturated fat such as nuts, fish oil, and olive oil. In addition, this dietary approach involves reducing the intake of pastries, meat, and fat-rich dairy products.

The development and progression of atherosclerotic lesions are dependent on individual lifestyle choices. Notably, epigenetic factors promoting atherosclerosis may be passed on from a pregnant mother to her fetus. A pronounced maternal hypercholesterolemia during pregnancy may adversely affect both the mother and the fetus. Increased levels of cholesterol in the maternal bloodstream can accelerate the development of atherosclerotic lesions in the child during the early stages of life. Observational studies have shown that fatty streak formations in the fetal aorta are modulated by maternal hypercholesterolemia. Some observational studies have shown that signs of atherosclerosis appear in early adulthood (1317). Furthermore, maternal cholesterol levels correlate with offspring cholesterol levels at many stages of development, including 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 6 years, which may increase the long-term risk of CVD (1820).

Observational studies have found associations between maternal dietary intake during pregnancy and the body composition and cardiovascular health of the child. The composition of fatty acids in the maternal blood has been suggested to be related to childhood adiposity, and a Mediterranean dietary pattern during pregnancy has been linked to lower waist circumference in childhood (2124). Although several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the short-term effect of dietary and lifestyle interventions in pregnancy on the health status of infants, there is a lack of long-term follow-up examining these relations in an RCT setting. According to a Cochrane review of interventions in pregnancy, a long-term follow-up is rarely done, and we were unable to identify any RCT with dietary interventions during pregnancy with a follow-up period of longer than 5 years (25).

The Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Diet in Pregnancy (CARRDIP) study was an RCT that examined the effects of a Mediterranean diet intervention on both maternal and fetal outcomes among healthy pregnant women (2630). Some important study findings were identified in this study, including differences in the fatty acid composition in the blood and a reduction of low-density lipoprotein levels in the serum during pregnancy. In addition, the intervention group exhibited a decrease in the instances of premature births compared with the control group. While the CARRDIP study focused on the immediate health effects, we now want to examine the long-term health effects on both mothers and offspring in the CARRDIP cohort. In this study, we describe the protocol for CARRDIP20, a follow-up study conducted 20 years after the original randomized controlled trial involving dietary intervention in pregnancy.

2. Methods and analyses

2.1. Aim

This study aims to examine cardiovascular risk factors in mothers and their offspring 20 years after the mothers participated in the CARRDIP study (Figure 1) (2628).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Illustration of the timeline of the original CARRDIP study and the proposed CARRDIP20 study.

2.2. Design and setting

The CARRDIP study was an RCT with dietary intervention in pregnancy performed between 1999 and 2001. The participating mothers were allocated to either the intervention group (n = 141) or the control (n = 149) group. The aim of the intervention group was to limit dietary cholesterol to 150 mg/day and reduce the intake of saturated fat to 8% of the total energy intake. The intended composition of the total energy intake consisted of 32% from total fat, 16%–17% from protein, and 50%–51% from carbohydrates. The intervention group was encouraged to increase the intake of fatty fish, olive oil, nuts, and avocado to replace meat, butter, and fatty dairy products and to replace full-fat dairy products with skimmed or low-fat ones. The control group consumed their usual diet and did not introduce oils or low-fat meat or dairy products, aiming at 32% of energy from total fat (including 12% from saturated fat), 16%–17% of energy from protein, and 50%–51% of energy from carbohydrates. Total energy intake aimed at a weight gain of 8–14 kg during pregnancy in both study groups (26). The participants were monitored several times during pregnancy with planned follow-up visits at gestation weeks 24, 30, and 36. Mothers and offspring were followed up, both to ensure adherence to the Mediterranean diet in the intervention group and to monitor the health status of both the mother and the fetus (fetal biometric measurements and Doppler measurements). Blood lipid levels, markers of endothelial activation, and inflammation were measured in maternal samples during pregnancy and in cord blood at birth. Several pregnancy and birth outcomes were recorded, and neonatal lipid levels were measured. The CARRDIP study found a significant reduction in the umbilical artery pulsatile index, reflecting decreased placental vascular resistance (27). This reduction in the index between gestational weeks 24 and 30 was a significant predictor of higher systolic blood pressure at 6 months of age, supporting the concept of fetal origins in the development of cardiovascular risk factors (30).

The current CARRDIP20 study will be a long-term follow-up of all mothers and their offspring separately, comparing the effects of intervention against control in both groups.

2.3. Participants

The CARRDIP study included healthy, low-risk pregnancies to minimize possible confounding factors related to later CVD risk in the offspring. Eligible participants were included after an ultrasound showing a single healthy fetus in gestational weeks 17–20. The inclusion criteria were non-smoking pregnant women aged 21–38 years with a body mass index (BMI) of 19–32 kg/m2. The exclusion criteria were high-risk pregnancy due to diabetes mellitus, endocrine disease, chronic hypertension, drug abuse, history of thromboembolic disease, or significant gastrointestinal, cardiac, pulmonary, or hematologic disease. Of the 290 women included in the CARRDIP study, 21 women withdrew their consent before or during the intervention, leaving a final number of 269 mother–offspring pairs. All mothers and their offspring from the CARRDIP cohort will be invited to participate in the follow-up.

2.4. Data collection

The mother–offspring pairs from the original CARRDIP study will be invited to participate in a clinical examination and sample collection at the Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo. Study investigators will be blinded to the original study group allocation. Data to be collected during the visit are presented in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Data to be collected in the CARRDIP20 study both from the mothers and their offspring.

2.5. Outcomes

The primary and secondary outcomes will be based on the findings and sampling methods of the original study and of similar studies on nutritional status during pregnancy (23, 2628, 30, 3339). The assessment, analysis, and reporting of outcomes will follow relevant CONSORT guidelines for clinical trials, and the current study protocol will adhere to the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) guidelines (40, 41).

The primary outcome of the study will be the difference in the mean arterial blood pressure between the control and intervention groups in the CARRDIP offspring group due to hypertension being one of the most important CVD risk factors (42). Maternal exposures during pregnancy have been found to potentially influence offspring's blood pressure and contribute to the development of CVD risk factors later in life. Factors such as maternal smoking, alcohol consumption, or diet have been associated with an increased risk of elevated blood pressure levels in the offspring. In addition, these maternal exposures have been linked to developing other CVD risk factors in the offspring, including dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, obesity, and impaired glucose metabolism (33, 43, 44). Moreover, we have previously collected blood pressure measurements among the offspring at both 1-year and 3-year follow-up visits. Thus, the blood pressure variable presents an opportunity for further analysis on parameters tracking from birth, through childhood, and into early adulthood.

The following secondary outcomes will be differences in the intervention and control groups in both mothers and offspring: lipid profile, fasting glucose and insulin, HbA1c, markers of endothelial activation and inflammation such as tissue plasminogen activator antigen (tPAag), von Willebrand factor (vWF), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) activity, plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 (PAI2) antigen, C-reactive protein (CRP), and differential white blood cell (WBC) count. We will use appropriate cardiovascular risk scores to estimate cardiovascular risk status and compare control and intervention in both the mothers and offspring separately. Additional secondary outcomes will include differences in intima-media thickness in the carotid artery and liver fat content measured by ultrasound, variations in body composition indicators by analyzing fat percentage, and skeletal muscle mass measured by bio-impedance. In addition, measurements of waist circumference, hip circumference, and body mass index will be conducted.

2.5.1. Sample size

The CARRDIP randomized trial was designed to detect a clinically relevant difference in maternal cholesterol levels at week 36 in pregnancy and in neonatal cholesterol levels (26). In the CARRDIP20 study, we examined differences in CVD risk factors, which are typically in the range of 0.5–0.7 standard deviations (SDs) in intervention trials with groups randomized to different diets (45), requiring a sample size of approximately 64–100 per group with 80% power at a 5% significance level. Thus, despite the expected loss to follow-up, we most likely have statistical power to detect clinically relevant differences between the groups (46). If we assume an average difference in the systolic blood pressure of 5 mmHg, with SD = 10 mmHg, we will need 128 participants (64 in each group; power 80%, significance level 5%). This corresponds to 47% of the mothers that participated in the CARRDIP trial.

2.5.2. Data analysis

The differences between the intervention and control group in primary and secondary outcomes will be analyzed separately for the mothers and offspring. We will follow the CONSORT guidelines (4749). The primary outcome, blood pressure, and the majority of the secondary outcomes are continuous with two time points: baseline and a 20-year follow-up. Analysis of covariance will be used to analyze the data (50). There may be some selection of participants in a long-term follow-up. We can adjust for variables that differ between the intervention and control group and are associated with the outcome of interest (48). However, the use of analysis of covariance (i.e., adjustment for the baseline value) may have to be evaluated if there are major indications of selective drop-out. In that case, we will analyze the difference between the values observed at the 20-year follow-up and the baseline using a multivariable linear regression model and adjust for potential covariates.

3. Discussion

The existing evidence suggests that maternal diet during pregnancy may impact the health status of the offspring. Moreover, observational studies support the significance of the in utero metabolic environment on the risk of CVD in the offspring later in life (51, 52). The data from the randomized controlled CARRDIP trial with significant clinical effects in both mother and offspring offer a unique possibility to study possible mechanisms for the observed differences. Furthermore, it is crucial to identify possible targets for appropriate dietary intervention during pregnancy to optimize the health of the offspring, both in utero and later in life. Ideally, these potential targets should be investigated through long-term follow-ups of RCTs.

To date, studies investigating the effects and mechanisms of diet on the long-term health of the child have primarily been observational and animal studies. Thus, the proposed CARRDIP20 study of the long-term (20 years) effects of a Mediterranean diet during pregnancy on offspring health is unique and of potential great clinical and scientific interest.

Pregnancy may be regarded as a “window of opportunity” where interventions can promote the long-term health outcomes of both the mother and the offspring. Further identification of mechanisms responsible for fetal programming of adult CVD may identify possibilities for targeted treatment among groups at risk of CVD, as well as improved dietary recommendations and policy strategies to improve health in the general population.

Data availability statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study will not be publicly available due to privacy concerns of participants in the study. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and with permission from Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics, Norway.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics, Norway. The patients/participants provided written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

HT: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Writing – Original draft, Writing – Review and editing. JK: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Review and editing. AW: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Review and editing. ST: Writing – Review and editing. JR: Writing – Review and editing. MV: Methodology, Writing – Review and editing. PI: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – Review and editing. KH: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – Review and editing. KR: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – Review and editing.

Funding

The authors declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

This study was supported by The South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority and the University of Oslo.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

CARRDIP, Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Diet In Pregnancy; CARRDIP20, 20-year follow-up of Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Diet In Pregnancy.

References

1. World Health Organization. WHO Cardiovascular Diseases (2023). Available at: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (Accessed June 13, 2023).

2. Franco OH, der Kinderen AJ, De Laet C, Peeters A, Bonneux L. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: cost-effectiveness comparison. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. (2007) 23(1):71–9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462307051598

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, Buroker AB, Goldberger ZD, Hahn EJ, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. (2019) 140(11):e596–646. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678.30879355

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Thornburg KL. The programming of cardiovascular disease. J Dev Orig Health Dis. (2015) 6(5):366–76. doi: 10.1017/S2040174415001300

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Gimbrone MA Jr., Garcia-Cardena G. Endothelial cell dysfunction and the pathobiology of atherosclerosis. Circ Res (2016) 118(4):620–36. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306301

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Hjermann I, Velve Byre K, Holme I, Leren P. Effect of diet and smoking intervention on the incidence of coronary heart disease. Report from the Oslo study group of a randomised trial in healthy men. Lancet. (1981) 2(8259):1303–10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(81)91338-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Leren P. The Oslo diet-heart study: eleven-year report. Circulation. (1970) 42(5):935–42. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.42.5.935

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Committee DGA. Scientific report of the 2020 dietary guidelines advisory committee: Advisory report to the secretary of agriculture and the secretary of health and human services. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture ARS (2020).

9. de Lorgeril M, Salen P, Martin JL, Monjaud I, Delaye J, Mamelle N. Mediterranean diet, traditional risk factors, and the rate of cardiovascular complications after myocardial infarction: final report of the Lyon diet heart study. Circulation. (1999) 99(6):779–85. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.99.6.779

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Estruch R, Ros E, Salas-Salvado J, Covas MI, Corella D, Aros F, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil or nuts. N Engl J Med. (2018) 378(25):e34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800389

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Maki KC, Dicklin MR. Is there an optimal diet for primordial prevention of atherosclerosis? Eur Heart J. (2022) 43(34):3189–91. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac434

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Snetselaar L, Bailey R, Sabate J, Van Horn L, Schneeman B, Bahnfleth C, et al. Types of dietary fat and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. US department of agriculture, food and nutrition service, center for nutrition policy and promotion, nutrition evidence systematic review. Washington, USA: US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion (2020). doi: 10.52570/NESR.DGAC2020.SR0501

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Avis HJ, Hutten BA, Twickler MT, Kastelein JJ, van der Post JA, Stalenhoef AF, et al. Pregnancy in women suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia: a harmful period for both mother and newborn? Curr Opin Lipidol. (2009) 20(6):484–90. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3283319127

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Napoli C, Glass CK, Witztum JL, Deutsch R, D'Armiento FP, Palinski W. Influence of maternal hypercholesterolaemia during pregnancy on progression of early atherosclerotic lesions in childhood: Fate of Early Lesions in Children (FELIC) study. Lancet. (1999) 354(9186):1234–41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)02131-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Stary HC. Evolution and progression of atherosclerotic lesions in coronary arteries of children and young adults. Arteriosclerosis. (1989) 9(1 Suppl):I19–32.2912430

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

16. Stary HC. Lipid and macrophage accumulations in arteries of children and the development of atherosclerosis. Am J Clin Nutr. (2000) 72(5 Suppl):1297S–306S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/72.5.1297s

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Khoury JC, Dolan LM, Vandyke R, Rosenn B, Feghali M, Miodovnik M. Fetal development in women with diabetes: imprinting for a life-time? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. (2012) 25(1):11–4. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.626921

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Oyri LKL, Bogsrud MP, Kristiansen AL, Myhre JB, Astrup H, Retterstol K, et al. Cholesterol at ages 6, 12 and 24 months: tracking and associations with diet and maternal cholesterol in the infant cholesterol study. Atherosclerosis. (2021) 326:11–6. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.04.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Christensen JJ, Retterstol K, Godang K, Roland MC, Qvigstad E, Bollerslev J, et al. LDL cholesterol in early pregnancy and offspring cardiovascular disease risk factors. J Clin Lipidol. (2016) 10(6):1369–78.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2016.08.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Jacobs DR Jr., Woo JG, Sinaiko AR, Daniels SR, Ikonen J, Juonala M, et al. Childhood cardiovascular risk factors and adult cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. (2022) 386(20):1877–88. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2109191

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Vidakovic AJ, Gishti O, Voortman T, Felix JF, Williams MA, Hofman A, et al. Maternal plasma PUFA concentrations during pregnancy and childhood adiposity: the generation R study. Am J Clin Nutr. (2016) 103(4):1017–25. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.112847

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Fernandez-Barres S, Romaguera D, Valvi D, Martinez D, Vioque J, Navarrete-Munoz EM, et al. Mediterranean dietary pattern in pregnant women and offspring risk of overweight and abdominal obesity in early childhood: the INMA birth cohort study. Pediatr Obes. (2016) 11(6):491–9. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12092

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Brion MJ, Ness AR, Rogers I, Emmett P, Cribb V, Davey Smith G, et al. Maternal macronutrient and energy intakes in pregnancy and offspring intake at 10 Y: exploring parental comparisons and prenatal effects. Am J Clin Nutr. (2010) 91(3):748–56. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28623

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Stratakis N, Conti DV, Borras E, Sabido E, Roumeliotaki T, Papadopoulou E, et al. Association of fish consumption and mercury exposure during pregnancy with metabolic health and inflammatory biomarkers in children. JAMA Netw Open. (2020) 3(3):e201007. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Teune MJ, van Wassenaer AG, Malin GL, Asztalos E, Alfirevic Z, Mol BW, et al. Long-term child follow-up after large obstetric randomised controlled trials for the evaluation of perinatal interventions: a systematic review of the literature. BJOG. (2013) 120(1):15–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03465.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Khoury J, Henriksen T, Christophersen B, Tonstad S. Effect of a cholesterol-lowering diet on maternal, cord, and neonatal lipids, and pregnancy outcome: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2005) 193(4):1292–301. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Khoury J, Haugen G, Tonstad S, Froslie KF, Henriksen T. Effect of a cholesterol-lowering diet during pregnancy on maternal and fetal Doppler velocimetry: the CARRDIP study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2007) 196(6):549.e1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.01.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Khoury J, Henriksen T, Seljeflot I, Mørkrid L, Frøslie K, Tonstad S. Effects of an antiatherogenic diet during pregnancy on markers of maternal and fetal endothelial activation and inflammation: the CARRDIP study. BJOG. (2007) 114(3):279–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01187.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Amundsen AL, Khoury J, Sandset PM, Seljeflot I, Ose L, Tonstad S, et al. Altered hemostatic balance and endothelial activation in pregnant women with familial hypercholesterolemia. Thromb Res. (2007) 120(1):21–7. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2006.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Khoury J, Knutsen M, Stray-Pedersen B, Thaulow E, Tonstad S. A lower reduction in umbilical artery pulsatility in mid-pregnancy predicts higher infant blood pressure six months after birth. Acta Paediatr. (2015) 104(8):796–800. doi: 10.1111/apa.13020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Carlsen MH, Lillegaard IT, Karlsen A, Blomhoff R, Drevon CA, Andersen LF. Evaluation of energy and dietary intake estimates from a food frequency questionnaire using independent energy expenditure measurement and weighed food records. Nutr J. (2010) 9:37. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-9-37

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Enserro DM, Vasan RS, Xanthakis V. Twenty-year trends in the American Heart Association cardiovascular health score and impact on subclinical and clinical cardiovascular disease: the Framingham offspring study. J Am Heart Assoc. (2018) 7(11):1–9. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008741

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Campbell DM, Hall MH, Barker DJ, Cross J, Shiell AW, Godfrey KM. Diet in pregnancy and the offspring's blood pressure 40 years later. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. (1996) 103(3):273–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09718.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Amati F, Hassounah S, Swaka A. The impact of Mediterranean dietary patterns during pregnancy on maternal and offspring health. Nutrients. (2019) 11(5):1–20. doi: 10.3390/nu11051098

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Chatzi L, Rifas-Shiman SL, Georgiou V, Joung KE, Koinaki S, Chalkiadaki G, et al. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet during pregnancy and offspring adiposity and cardiometabolic traits in childhood. Pediatr Obes. (2017) 12(Suppl 1):47–56. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12191

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Stratakis N, Roumeliotaki T, Oken E, Barros H, Basterrechea M, Charles MA, et al. Fish intake in pregnancy and child growth: a pooled analysis of 15 European and US birth cohorts. JAMA Pediatr. (2016) 170(4):381–90. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.4430

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Murrin C, Shrivastava A, Kelleher CC. Maternal macronutrient intake during pregnancy and 5 years postpartum and associations with child weight status aged five. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2013) 67(6):670–9. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.76

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Moon RJ, Harvey NC, Robinson SM, Ntani G, Davies JH, Inskip HM, et al. Maternal plasma polyunsaturated fatty acid status in late pregnancy is associated with offspring body composition in childhood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2013) 98(1):299–307. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2482

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Shiell AW, Campbell DM, Hall MH, Barker DJ. Diet in late pregnancy and glucose-insulin metabolism of the offspring 40 years later. BJOG. (2000) 107(7):890–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11088.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Boutron I, Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz KF, Ravaud P, Group CN. Consort statement for randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatments: a 2017 update and a consort extension for nonpharmacologic trial abstracts. Ann Intern Med. (2017) 167(1):40–7. doi: 10.7326/M17-0046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Butcher NJ, Monsour A, Mew EJ, Chan AW, Moher D, Mayo-Wilson E, et al. Guidelines for reporting outcomes in trial protocols: the SPIRIT-outcomes 2022 extension. JAMA. (2022) 328(23):2345–56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.21243

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Schnohr P, Jensen JS, Scharling H, Nordestgaard BG. Coronary heart disease risk factors ranked by importance for the individual and community. A 21 year follow-up of 12 000 men and women from the Copenhagen city heart study. Eur Heart J. (2002) 23(8):620–6. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2842

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Brion MJ, Leary SD, Lawlor DA, Smith GD, Ness AR. Modifiable maternal exposures and offspring blood pressure: a review of epidemiological studies of maternal age, diet, and smoking. Pediatr Res. (2008) 63(6):593–8. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31816fdbd3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Leary SD, Ness AR, Emmett PM, Davey Smith G, Headley JE, Team AS. Maternal diet in pregnancy and offspring blood pressure. Arch Dis Child. (2005) 90(5):492–3. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.070698

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Reynolds A, Mann J, Cummings J, Winter N, Mete E, Te Morenga L. Carbohydrate quality and human health: a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Lancet. (2019) 393(10170):434–45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31809-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Fewtrell MS, Kennedy K, Singhal A, Martin RM, Ness A, Hadders-Algra M, et al. How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies? Arch Dis Child. (2008) 93(6):458–61. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.127316

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, Group C. Consort 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Br Med J. (2010) 340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. Consort 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Br Med J. (2010) 340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Butcher NJ, Monsour A, Mew EJ, Chan AW, Moher D, Mayo-Wilson E, et al. Guidelines for reporting outcomes in trial reports: the consort-outcomes 2022 extension. JAMA. (2022) 328(22):2252–64. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.21022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Vickers AJ, Altman DG. Statistics notes: analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. Br Med J. (2001) 323(7321):1123–4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Gaillard R. Maternal obesity during pregnancy and cardiovascular development and disease in the offspring. Eur J Epidemiol. (2015) 30(11):1141–52. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0085-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Poston L. Maternal obesity, gestational weight gain and diet as determinants of offspring long term health. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2012) 26(5):627–39. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2012.03.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: cardiovascular risk factors, offspring health, antenatal care, lifestyle intervention, Mediterranean diet, long-term follow-up, pregnancy, randomized controlled trial

Citation: Troensegaard H, Khoury J, Westerberg AC, Tonstad S, Roeters van Lennep J, Veierød MB, Iversen PO, Holven KB and Retterstøl K (2023) Protocol for a 20-year follow-up after a randomized controlled trial of a Mediterranean diet in pregnancy: maternal and offspring risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Front. Pediatr. 11:1256815. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1256815

Received: 11 July 2023; Accepted: 2 October 2023;
Published: 18 October 2023.

Edited by:

Shikai Yu, Tongji University, China

Reviewed by:

Gabriela Corina Zaharie, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, Romania
Alexandre A. da Silva, University of Mississippi Medical Center, United States

© 2023 Troensegaard, Khoury, Westerberg, Tonstad, Roeters van Lennep, Veierød, Iversen, Holven and Retterstøl. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hannibal Troensegaard aGFubmliYWwudHJvZW5zZWdhYXJkQG1lZGlzaW4udWlvLm5v

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.