Madeleine W. Sumner1
Alicia Kanngiesser2
Kosar Lotfali-Khani3
Nidhi Lodha2Diane Lorenzetti4Anna L. Funk2†
Stephen B. Freedman5*†- 1Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- 2Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- 3Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- 4Health Sciences Library and Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- 5Sections of Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Gastroenterology, Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Objective: To estimate the proportion of SARS-CoV-2 infected children experiencing hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, severe outcomes, and death.
Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, and MedRxiv were searched for studies published between December 1, 2019 and May 28, 2021. References of relevant systematic reviews were also screened.
Study Selection: We included cohort or cross-sectional studies reporting on at least one outcome measure (i.e., hospitalization, ICU admission, severe outcomes, death) for ≥100 children ≤21 years old within 28 days of SARS-CoV-2 positivity; no language restrictions were applied.
Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Estimates were pooled using random effects models. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.
Main Outcomes and Measures: Percentage of SARS-CoV-2 positive children experiencing hospitalization, ICU admission, severe outcome, and death.
Results: 118 studies representing 3,324,851 SARS-CoV-2 infected children from 68 countries were included. Community-based studies (N = 48) reported that 3.3% (95%CI: 2.7–4.0%) of children were hospitalized, 0.3% (95%CI: 0.2–0.6%) were admitted to the ICU, 0.1% (95%CI: 0.0–2.2%) experienced a “severe” outcome and 0.02% (95%CI: 0.001–0.05%) died. Hospital-based screening studies (N = 39) reported that 23.9% (95%CI: 19.0–29.2%) of children were hospitalized, 2.9% (95%CI: 2.1–3.8%) were admitted to the ICU, 1.3% (95%CI: 0.5–2.3%) experienced a severe outcome, and 0.2% (95%CI: 0.02–0.5%) died. Studies of hospitalized children (N = 31) reported that 10.1% (95%CI: 6.1–14.9%) of children required ICU admission, 4.2% (95%CI: 0.0–13.8%) had a severe outcome and 1.1% (95%CI: 0.2–2.3%) died. Low risk of bias studies, those from high-income countries, and those reporting outcomes later in the pandemic presented lower estimates. However, studies reporting outcomes after May 31, 2020, compared to earlier publications, had higher proportions of hospitalized patients requiring ICU admission and experiencing severe outcomes.
Conclusion and Relevance: Among children tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 3.3% were hospitalized, with rates being higher early in the pandemic. Severe outcomes, ICU admission and death were uncommon, however estimates vary by study population, pandemic timing, study risk of bias, and economic status of the country.
Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier [CRD42021260164].
Introduction
As the COVID pandemic has progressed, children have represented an expanding population of those infected, with those <20 years old representing 20% of reported cases worldwide, and 0.4% of deaths (1). In the United States, this proportion is approximately 19.0% (2). Although the clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children is generally mild, hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and death, do occur (3–7). Several studies have examined severe outcomes among children with COVID-19; however, estimates vary widely based on testing strategies, study populations, and outcome definitions. While 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data estimates that 2.3% of children <18 years old in the United States infected with SARS-CoV-2 are hospitalized, with 0.8% requiring intensive care, and <0.1% dying (3), the Public Health Agency of Canada data reports lower rates (0.5, 0.07, and 0.005%, respectively) (8). Moreover, meta-analyses estimate higher rates of severe outcomes than the CDC (9–11). Higher death and ICU rates have also been reported in low-/middle-income countries (LMIC) compared to high income countries (12).
To provide clarity regarding the risk of severe outcomes in children, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis focused on estimating the risk of severe or critical outcomes among children infected with SARS-CoV-2 and provide study setting-based [i.e., population-level, hospital, and inpatient] pooled risk estimates. Secondary objectives were to explore sources of between-study heterogeneity through subgroup analyses stratified by risk of bias (RoB), country economic status, and data collection time-period.
Methods
The protocol for this review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021260164) and this report adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines (13).
Search Strategy
Electronic searches of PubMed, EMBASE (via Ovid), and MedRxiv for studies published between December 1, 2019 and May 28, 2021, were conducted with the assistance of a medical librarian (DL). Our search terms aimed to identify studies reporting on clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 in children, without restriction by subject area (see Supplementary Table 1 for search strategy). We performed a manual search of the references of systematic reviews describing relevant aspects of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children to identify additional eligible studies. There were no language or geographic restrictions. Given the large number of publications identified, we did not search for unpublished studies or contact experts in the field.
Eligibility Criteria
Eligible studies reported on the proportions of children experiencing severe COVID-19 outcomes. Eligibility criteria were: (1) ≥100 children and young adults ≤21 years of age with positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid and/or antigen tests; and (2) reported ≥1 outcome of interest (i.e., hospitalization, ICU admission, severe outcome per study definition, and death) occurring within 28 days of SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Observational studies, including prospective and retrospective cohort and cross-sectional studies were eligible. Case-control, case series, case report studies, and modeling studies with no original data were excluded. Studies reported in a language other than English were translated and examined for eligibility by two independent reviewers (MS, AK, KL-K, or NL).
Outcomes
We targeted four measures of disease severity - hospitalization, ICU admission, severe outcome, and death. Sub-group analyses were performed based on study RoB, economic status of study country, and timing of the pandemic.
Data Extraction
Articles underwent title/abstract screening, full text review, and data extraction in duplicate by two of four randomly selected independent reviewers (MS, KL-K, NL, or AK). Agreement was required for studies to advance to full text review and similarly to data extraction. Disagreements and discrepancies were discussed at weekly team meetings until consensus was achieved. Study screening, data extraction and RoB assessment data were entered into a Covidence 2.0 database.
Studies that did not explicitly meet eligibility criteria based on the published paper but included data that could contribute to our analysis (e.g., mixed pediatric-adult studies without age-disaggregated data) were flagged. The corresponding authors of these studies were contacted twice by e-mail, 2-weeks apart, to inquire if they could provide the data required. If there was no reply after 28 days, the paper was excluded.
Datasets and Overlapping Populations
Given the wide availability of COVID-19 datasets, many studies reported data from the same source. To minimize the inclusion of duplicate data, we carefully examined all non-original data to identify the original data source. When duplicate data sets were identified, we included the study with the greatest number of children that reported on at least one of our outcome measures. We excluded studies reporting on data from regional ministries of health if data from a national governmental source were included from another study (e.g., New York Department of Health data that were likely included in CDC data). We did include data from individual hospitals, hospital networks and insurance databases as these sources were deemed unlikely to directly overlap with national surveillance sources.
Definitions
Population-based studies were defined as those based on public health reporting systems (national or regional) or those recruiting children outside of hospital settings. We designated studies as “hospital-based screening” if participants were recruited at a hospital and both outpatients and inpatient outcomes were recorded (e.g., emergency departments). Studies reporting on solely hospital inpatients were analyzed separately.
Severe outcome was defined by reviewing each study’s own definition of “severe” or “critical” disease and looking for commonalities. We included studies in the severe outcome analysis if their definition aligned with the following cluster of symptoms: respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), coma or encephalopathy, shock, myocardial injury, heart failure, coagulation dysfunction, acute kidney injury (AKI), and/or life-threatening multiorgan dysfunction requiring interventions such as invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The studies included in the “severe” outcome analysis and their definitions are provided (Table 1).
Table 1. Definition of severe outcome in the analyzed studies.
The 2020 World Bank Lending Status classification of countries was employed and countries were classified as low-middle income (low-income, low-middle income, and upper-middle income) or high-income (14). Studies reporting data from more than one country had the data extracted separately for each country when possible; if that was not possible, the study was excluded from the economic analyses.
We divided the pandemic into an “early” (until May 31st, 2020) and “mid” (June 1, 2020 to May 28, 2021) pandemic periods. These terms and dates reflect our study period and the fact that the pandemic remains ongoing and recent data are not included in our study. However, as children were frequently admitted to hospital and ICU simply due to a lack of knowledge and comfort with SARS-CoV-2 infection in children during the earliest days of the pandemic, we felt such an analysis was important.
Risk of Bias Assessment
Studies were assessed for RoB by two independent reviewers (MS, KL-K, AK, or NL) using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for cross-sectional and cohort studies (see Supplementary Table 2 for scoring criteria for each domain) (15). Studies could receive a maximum score of 9 points over the following domains: 1. Representativeness of exposed cohort (2 points); 2. Ascertainment of exposure (1 point); 3. Presence of outcome before exposure (2 points); 4. Assessment of outcome (1 point); 5. Type of data collection (1 point); 6. Length of follow-up (1 point); and 7. Completeness of follow-up (1 point). We classified studies with ≤7 points as high RoB and studies with ≥8 points as low RoB (15).
Statistical Analysis
Proportions for our primary outcomes were calculated based on the number of children experiencing the outcome divided by the total number of children for whom outcome data were available. Forest plots were generated and visually inspected to identify outliers which were then re-reviewed by two independent reviewers to confirm eligibility, data extraction, and identify potential sources of heterogeneity (see Supplementary Material). Risk estimates were pooled across studies using the metaprop command in STATA which uses the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model after Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation (16–18). Confidence intervals for the effect size of individual studies were generated using the Wilson score test, and those for pooled estimates were generated using the Wald test (16). We used random effects models to reflect the variations observed across studies and assessed between-study heterogeneity using the I2 statistic with values ≥75% suggesting considerable heterogeneity (19). The Chi2 statistic was computed to compare pooled effect size across groups. Statistical tests were 2-sided, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analyses were performed using Stata, version 16.1 (StataCorp LLC).
Sensitivity Analysis
Given the heterogeneity of both the availability and indications for COVID-19 testing across studies, we performed two sensitivity analysis. First, our analysis of population-based studies was repeated excluding studies without clearly identified testing criteria. We compared these results with our primary analysis. For our second sensitivity analysis, we removed all studies that explicitly stated that they included asymptomatic individuals.
Results
Literature Search
21,127 citations were identified through database searches and 18 additional records were added manually after reviewing relevant systematic review reference lists. After removal of duplicates, 14,417 studies entered title/abstract screening, 1,078 studies progressed to full-text review, and 118 studies were included in our analysis (Figure 1).
Figure 1. PRISMA diagram.
Study Characteristics
The 118 included studies included data from 68 countries and 3,324,851 children (Supplementary Table 3). Studies most frequently were from the United States (N = 23), Italy (N = 11), and Turkey (N = 9). Forty-eight (41%) studies were population-based and 70 (59%) were hospital-based; of the latter group, 31 (44%) reported on inpatients only, and 39 (56%) reported on outpatients, emergency department (ED), and inpatients. The most reported outcome was death (91/118; 77%), followed by ICU admission (66/118; 56%), hospitalization (52/118; 44%), and severe outcomes (38/118; 32%). Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), non-invasive ventilation (NIV), and severe outcomes were reported by 38 (32%), 14 (12%), and 23 (19%) studies, respectively.
Risk of Bias
Sixty-one percent (72/118) of studies were classified as high RoB; 46 (39%) were low RoB (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure 1). Domains with the highest RoB were “Presence of Outcome Before Exposure” (106 studies were biased toward including children who were more symptomatic/severe than the average SARS-CoV-2 infected child in the community), and “Type of Data Collection” (85 studies were cross-sectional or retrospective and lacked a follow-up component).
Figure 2. Summary of risk of bias judgments for included studies.
Primary Analysis
Population-Based Studies
Of the population-based studies (N = 48), 20 reported hospitalization (736,480 participants), 16 reported ICU admission (185,567 participants), 41 reported the proportion of children dying (N = 2,472,217 participants), and four reported “severe” outcomes (N = 1,386 participants). 3.3% of children were hospitalized (95%CI: 2.7–4.0%; I2 = 99%), 0.3% of children were admitted to the ICU (95%CI: 0.2–0.6%; I2 = 94%), 0.1% experienced a severe outcome (95%CI: 0.00–2.2%; I2 = 0%), and 0.02% of children died (95%CI: 0.001–0.05%; I2 = 97%) (Figures 3, 4).
Figure 3. Percentage of participants experiencing outcomes by study type.
Figure 4. Percentage of children experiencing outcomes in population-based studies.
Hospital-Based Screening Studies
In the hospital-based screening studies (N = 39), 32 reported hospitalization (N = 34,034 participants), 28 reported ICU admission (32,355 participants), 23 reported death (6,044 participants), and 14 reported “severe” outcomes (N = 23,481 participants). 23.9% of children required hospitalization (95%CI: 19.0–29.2%; I2 = 99%), 2.9% (95%CI: 2.1–3.8%; I2 = 91%) were admitted to the ICU, 1.3% had a severe outcome (95%CI: 0.5–2.3%; I2 = 86%), and 0.2% died (95%CI: 0.02–0.5%; I2 = 57%) (Figures 3, 5).
Figure 5. Percentage of children experiencing outcomes in hospital-based screening studies.
Inpatient Only Studies
Thirty-one studies reported on hospital inpatients only. Of these studies, ICU admission was reported in 22 studies (21,202 participants), death was reported in 27 studies (23,044 participants), and “severe” outcome was reported in 8 studies (N = 1,572 participants). 10.1% of patients were admitted to the ICU (95%CI: 6.1–14.9%; I2 = 99%), 4.2% of patients experienced a “severe” outcome (95%CI: 0.0–13.8%; I2 = 98%), and 1.1% of patients died (95%CI: 0.2–2.3%; I2 = 97%) (Figures 3, 6).
Figure 6. Percentage of children experiencing outcomes in hospital inpatient studies.
Level of Respiratory Support
Fourteen and thirty-eight studies reported the proportion of children requiring non-invasive and invasive ventilation, respectively. In the population-based studies, 0.1% of children required invasive mechanical ventilation (95% CI: 0.0–0.3; I2 = 53%). In hospital-based screening studies, 1.7% of children required non-invasive ventilatory support (95% CI: 0.5–3.5; I2 = 83%), and 0.8% required invasive mechanical ventilation (95% CI: 0.3–1.4%; I2 = 84%). Studies reporting on hospital inpatients only described 4.6% of children requiring non-invasive ventilation (95% CI: 2.2–7.7%; I2 = 80%) and 3.4% requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (95% CI: 1.7–5.7%; I2 = 93%).
Comparative Analyses
Risk of Bias
Low RoB studies, compared with high RoB studies, had lower point estimate event rates across all study outcomes and populations, except for death in hospital-based studies and hospital admission in population-based studies. This difference was most pronounced for the outcome of ICU admission in population-based (high RoB – 0.5%; low RoB – 0.1%; P = 0.03) and hospitalized inpatients studies (high RoB – 14.2%; low RoB – 5.9%; P = 0.04) (Table 2 and Figure 7).
Table 2. Percentage of participants experiencing outcome based on risk of bias and pandemic timing.
Figure 7. Percentage experiencing outcomes by risk of bias.
Economic Status
Studies reporting data from low-middle income countries (LMIC; N = 59) had higher point estimate event rates of hospitalization (22.4% in LMIC vs. 13.1% in high-income countries; p < 0.001), ICU admission (4.5% in LMIC vs. 3.4% in high-income countries; p = 0.74), and death (0.5% in LMIC vs. <0.001% in high-income countries; p < 0.001) than studies from high-income countries (n = 73) (Figure 8).
Figure 8. Percentage of participants with outcomes by country income status.
Pandemic Timing
43 (36%) studies had a recruitment end date prior to May 31st, 2020 (i.e., early pandemic) and 75 (64%) were classified as mid-pandemic. Although studies that included children tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospitals had greater proportions hospitalized in the early pandemic period (36.3 vs. 18.9%; p = 0.004), among hospitalized children the proportions admitted to ICU and experiencing severe outcomes were higher in the mid-pandemic period (14.6 and 3.2% vs. 5.6 and 2.3%; P = 0.005 and P = 0.04) (Table 2).
Sensitivity Analyses
Of the 49 population-based studies, 25 (51%) did not report the indications for testing. Excluding these studies did not meaningfully alter our estimates for hospitalization (3.6% with asymptomatic excluded, I2 = 88% vs. 3.3% overall, I2 = 99%), ICU admission (0.1%, I2 = 52% vs. 0.3%, I2 = 97% overall), severe outcome (0.09%, I2 = 0% vs. 0.1%, I2 = 0% overall), or death (0.02%, I2 = 76% vs. 0.02%, I2 = 99% overall). However, this sensitivity analysis did reduce the heterogeneity of the estimates, as evidenced by lower I2 values.
Removing studies with asymptomatic children (N = 29) raised our estimate of both population-based hospitalization and death marginally (3.4 vs. 3.3% and 0.03 vs. 0.02%, respectively). ICU rates remained constant (0.3 vs. 0.3%), and our severe outcome estimate shifted lower (0.00 vs. 0.1%).
Discussion
In this meta-analysis, we synthesized data from 118 studies and over 3 million SARS-CoV-2-infected children. We found that hospitalization, ICU admission, and severe outcome occur in 3.3, 0.3, and 0.1% of children recruited from population-based settings and 23.9, 2.9, and 1.3% of those recruited in hospital-based venues, respectively. Among SARS-CoV-2 positive hospitalized inpatients, 10.1% of children are admitted to the ICU and 4.2% experience a severe outcome. Death occurred in 0.02% of children in population-based samples, 0.2% in hospital-based screening (i.e., ED) and 1.1% of hospital inpatients. Lower event rates were reported in low RoB studies and those conducted in high-income countries. While hospitalization occurred more frequently early in the pandemic, as it evolved, ICU admissions and severe outcomes occurred in a greater proportion of inpatient children. There was significant between-study heterogeneity (I2 > 75%) for almost all pooled estimates, including in subgroup analyses.
Meta-analyses, published in early 2021, reported that the risk of severe outcomes for SARS-CoV-2 infected children was between 4 and 7%, with significant inter-study heterogeneity (I2 > 80%) (9–11). Our meta-analysis, which we believe is the first to systematically analyze sources of heterogeneity within estimates through sub-group analysis, clarifies that the risk of severe outcomes is primarily limited to children who are hospitalized and does not reflect the risk in the broader population of SARS-CoV-2 infected children. A much lower percentage of children tested in a community setting experienced severe outcomes (0.1%) compared to hospital screening (e.g., ED; 1.3%) and inpatients (4.2%). We additionally determined that study RoB, country income status, and pandemic timing were associated with the reported risk of severe outcomes.
Our findings of risk within populations and settings aligns with prior reports. A meta-analysis that examined pediatric inpatients estimated that 11% of children are admitted to an ICU, and 2.4% die (20); these results are similar to our estimates of 10.1 and 1.1%, respectively. Similarly, in our community analysis, 0.3% of children were admitted to an ICU and 0.02% died, closely mirroring CDC estimates of 0.7 and 0.03%, respectively (3). Our hospitalization rate, however, was higher than predicted; while Public Health Agency of Canada data indicates that 0.5% of SARS-CoV-2-infected children require hospitalization (8), our meta-analysis revealed a rate over 6-fold higher (3.3%). There are several possible explanations for this discrepancy. Our data are highly heterogeneous (I2 = 99%) and the overall point estimate is driven by a few studies with small numbers of children (Supplementary Material). Asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic children may also be underrepresented in our analysis, given that these patients were less likely to seek testing, and/or may have been ineligible for testing, depending on the timing and setting of infection. As shown in our sensitivity analysis, removing studies with unclear testing indications reduced the heterogeneity of the estimate (I2 = 88%). Additionally, we found that hospitalization rates were higher early in the pandemic, particularly among those tested in hospitals (36.3 vs. 18.9%). This likely reflects the concerns emerging from the early and limited pediatric specific data.
We found that studies reporting outcomes prior to May 31, 2020, had higher hospitalization rates. During this time, there was a great deal of uncertainty regarding the COVID-19 clinical course in pediatric patients and many children with SARS-CoV-2 infection were hospitalized, irrespective of disease severity (21), particularly in countries such as China and Turkey (22, 23). Among inpatients however, we found that a higher proportion experienced ICU admission (14.6 vs. 5.6%) and severe outcome (6.0 vs. 1.8%) during the mid-pandemic period. Although this likely reflects the fact that those hospitalized as the pandemic progressed had more severe symptoms, there is evidence that the Delta variant of concern (VoC) increased the risk of hospitalization in children <10 years by a factor of 2.5 and that younger patients had a greater relative increased risk of death compared with older individuals (24).
Major limitations of our meta-analysis are the heterogeneity of our estimates, and the applicability of our results to the current state of the pandemic. The heterogeneity is a by-product of the variations in study quality, patient population, local testing, and management strategies, all of which evolved over time. Our low RoB subgroup analyses are likely more reflective of the true percentage of children experiencing severe outcomes. Secondly, our meta-analysis only includes data published through May 28, 2021. Since that date, the pandemic has changed with the emergence of the Omicron VoC. Additionally, as vaccination was not yet available for children during our study period, we could not incorporate its effects into our analysis. Finally, as a separate search strategy would have been required to identify studies reporting on the incidence of MIS-C, we were unable to report on this outcome, which is nonetheless important, as it accounts for a large proportion of pediatric ICU admissions and morbidity in this population.
Conclusion
This meta-analysis, which included 118 studies and over 3 million SARS-CoV-2 infected children, demonstrates that although hospitalization was common early in the pandemic, especially in LMICs, severe outcomes and death were uncommon, occurring in 0.1 and 0.02% of infected children in population-based samples. Estimates of severe outcomes vary by study population, RoB, economic status of the country, and pandemic timing. Our meta-analysis merges disparate and highly heterogeneous risk estimates in the literature to provide clinically meaningful pediatric COVID-19 prognostic data.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author Contributions
MS contributed to study concept and design, title/abstract and full text screening, data extraction, data analysis, manuscript drafting, and manuscript critical revision. AK contributed to title/abstract and full text screening, data extraction, and manuscript critical revision. KL-K contributed to study concept and design, title/abstract and full text screening, and data extraction. NL contributed to data extraction and manuscript critical revision. DL contributed to study concept and design, search strategy, and manuscript critical revision. AF conceptualized and designed the study, assisted with title/abstract and full text screening, data extraction and analysis, participated in revising of the manuscript, and supervised the conduct of the study. SF conceptualized and designed the study, assisted with abstract and full-text screening, data extraction and analysis, participated in revising of the manuscript, and supervised the conduct of the study. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding
MS and KL-K received funding for this project through the Alberta Innovates Summer Research Studentship in summer 2021. AF was supported by the University of Calgary Eyes-High Post-Doctoral Research Fund. SF was supported by the Alberta Children’s Hospital Foundation Professorship in Child Health and Wellness.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The handling editor SB declared past collaboration with one of the authors SF.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.916655/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Figure 1 | Risk of bias assessment for included studies.
Supplementary Table 1 | Search strategy.
Supplementary Table 2 | Adapted newcastle-ottawa risk of bias scale for cross-sectional and cohort studies.
Supplementary Table 3 | Selected characteristics of included studies.
Supplementary Text | Description of major outliers.
References
1. UNICEF Data. COVID-19 Confirmed Cases and Deaths. (2021). Available online at: https://data.unicef.org/resources/covid-19-confirmed-cases-and-deaths-dashboard/ (accessed Feb 16, 2022).
2. American Academy of Pediatrics and the Children’s Hospital Association. Children and COVID-19: State Data Report. (2022). Washington, DC: American Academy of Pediatrics and the Children’s Hospital Association.
3. CDCMMWR. Severe Outcomes Among Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) — United States, February 12–March 16, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. (2020). Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6912e2.htm (accessed Feb 16, 2022).
4. García-Salido A, de Carlos Vicente JC, Belda Hofheinz S, Balcells Ramírez J, Slöcker Barrio M, Leóz Gordillo I, et al. Severe manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adolescents: from COVID-19 pneumonia to multisystem inflammatory syndrome: a multicentre study in pediatric intensive care units in Spain. Crit Care. (2020) 24:666. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03332-4
5. McCormick DW, Richardson LC, Young PR, Viens LJ, Gould CV, Kimball A, et al. Deaths in children and adolescents associated with COVID-19 and MIS-C in the United States. Pediatrics. (2021) 148:e2021052273. doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-052273
6. Shekerdemian LS, Mahmood NR, Wolfe KK, Riggs BJ, Ross CE, McKiernan CA, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of children with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection admitted to US and Canadian pediatric intensive care units. JAMA Pediatr. (2020) 174:868–73. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1948
7. Rankin DA, Talj R, Howard LM, Halasa NB. Epidemiologic trends and characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infections among children in the United States. Curr Opin Pediatr. (2021) 33:114–21. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000971
8. Government of Canada. COVID-19 Daily Epidemiology Update. (2020). Available online at: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/epidemiological-summary-covid-19-cases.html (accessed Feb 16, 2022).
9. Mantovani A, Rinaldi E, Zusi C, Beatrice G, Saccomani MD, Dalbeni A. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children and/or adolescents: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Res. (2021) 89:733–7. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-1015-2
10. Cui X, Zhao Z, Zhang T, Guo W, Guo W, Zheng J, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of children with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Med Virol. (2021) 93:1057–69.
11. Bhuiyan MU, Stiboy E, Hassan MZ, Chan M, Islam MS, Haider N, et al. Epidemiology of COVID-19 infection in young children under five years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine. (2021) 39:667–77. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.11.078
12. Kitano T, Kitano M, Krueger C, Jamal H, Al Rawahi H, Lee-Krueger R, et al. The differential impact of pediatric COVID-19 between high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of fatality and ICU admission in children worldwide. PLoS One. (2021) 16:e0246326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246326
13. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med. (2021) 18:e1003583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583
14. The World Bank. World Bank Country and Lending Groups – World Bank Data Help Desk. (2022). Available online at: https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups (accessed Feb 9, 2022).
15. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale for Assessing the Quality of Non-Randomized Studies in Meta-Analysis. (2022). Available online at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed February 16, 2022).
16. Nyaga VN, Arbyn M, Aerts M. Metaprop: a stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Public Health. (2014) 72:39. doi: 10.1186/2049-3258-72-39
17. Freeman MF, Tukey JW. Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Ann Math Stat. (1950) 21:607–11.
19. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. (2010) 1:97–111. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.12
20. Toba N, Gupta S, Ali AY, ElSaban M, Khamis AH, Ho SB, et al. COVID-19 under 19: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Pulmonol. (2021) 56:1332–41.
21. Parri N, Lenge M, Buonsenso D. Children with covid-19 in pediatric emergency departments in Italy. N Engl J Med. (2020) 383:187–90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2007617
22. Guo CX, Yang GP, He L, Bo T, Yin JY, Meng XG, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of pediatric COVID-19. BMC Med. (2020) 18:250. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01719-2
23. Arslan G, Akturk H, Duman M. Clinical characteristics of pediatric COVID-19 and predictors of PCR positivity. Pediatr Int. (2021) 63:1055–61.
24. Fisman DN, Tuite AR. Age-specific changes in virulence associated with SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. Clin Infect Dis. (2022) 174:ciac174. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac174
25. Al Kuwari HM, Al Marri S, Al Romaihi HE, Al Thani MH, Bertollini R, Abdul Rahim HF, et al. Epidemiological investigation of the first 5685 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Qatar, 28 February-18 April 2020. BMJ Open. (2020) 10:e040428. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040428
26. Aykac K, Cura Yayla BC, Ozsurekci Y, Oygar PD, Gurlevik SL, Cengiz AB, et al. The association of viral load and disease severity in children with COVID-19. J Med Virol. (2021) 93:3077–83. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26853
27. Aykac K, Cura Yayla BC, Ozsurekci Y, Lacinel Gurlevik S, Oygar PD, Cengiz AB, et al. Pneumococcal carriage in children with COVID-19. Hum Vaccin Immunother. (2021) 17:1628–34.
28. Bellino S, Rota MC, Riccardo F, Andrianou X, Punzo O, Bella A, et al. Pediatric COVID-19 cases prelockdown and postlockdown in Italy. Pediatrics. (2021) 147:e2020035238. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-035238
29. Ece I, Kocoglu M, Kavurt AV, Bagrul D, Gul AEK, Koca S, et al. Assessment of cardiac arrhythmic risk in children with Covid-19 infection. Pediatr Cardiol. (2021) 42:264–8. doi: 10.1007/s00246-020-02474-0
30. Finelli L, Gupta V, Petigara T, Yu K, Bauer KA, Puzniak LA. Mortality among US patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020. JAMA Netw Open. (2021) 4:e216556. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6556
31. Geng MJ, Wang LP, Ren X, Chang ZR, Zheng CJ, Li Y, et al. Risk factors for developing severe COVID-19 in China: an analysis of disease surveillance data. Infect Dis Poverty. (2021) 10:48.
32. Giacomet V, Barcellini L, Stracuzzi M, Longoni E, Folgori L, Leone A, et al. Gastrointestinal symptoms in severe covid-19 children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. (2020) 39:e317-320. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002843
33. Guo L, Li Z, Zhou X, Zhang X, Liu J, Yang J, et al. Distinct disease severity between children and older adults with COVID-19: impacts of ACE2 expression, distribution, and lung progenitor cells. Clin Infect Dis. (2021) 73:e4154–e4416 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1911
34. Krajcar N, Stemberger Mariæ L, Šurina A, Kureèiæ Filipoviæ S, Trkulja V, Rogliæ S, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of croatian children and adolescents with a PCR-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019: differences between the first and second epidemic wave. Croat Med J. (2020) 61:491–500. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2020.61.491
35. Kushner LE, Schroeder AR, Kim J, Mathew R. For Covid” or “with Covid”: classification of SARS-CoV-2 hospitalizations in children. Hosp Pediatr. (2021) 11:e151–6. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-006001
36. Lazzerini M, Lega S, Conte M, Moressa V, Armocida B, Mariani I, et al. Characteristics and risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 in children tested in the early phase of the pandemic: a cross-sectional study, Italy, 23 February to 24 May 2020. Euro Surveill. (2021) 26:2001248. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.14.2001248
37. Oh B, Hwangbo S, Jung T, Min K, Lee C, Apio C, et al. Prediction models for the clinical severity of patients with COVID-19 in Korea: retrospective multicenter cohort study. J Med Internet Res. (2021) 23:e25852. doi: 10.2196/25852
38. Otto WR, Posch LC, Geoghegan S, Bell LM, Coffin SE, Sammons JS, et al. The epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in a pediatric healthcare network in the United States. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc. (2020) 9:523–9. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piaa074
39. Guner Ozenen G, Sahbudak Bal Z, Umit Z, Bilen NM, Yildirim Arslan S, Kurugol Z, et al. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory features of COVID-19 in children: the role of mean platelet volume in predicting hospitalization and severity. J Med Virol. (2021) 93:3227–37. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26902
40. Parri N, Lenge M, Cantoni B, Arrighini A, Romanengo M, Urbino A, et al. COVID-19 in 17 Italian pediatric emergency departments. Pediatrics. (2020) 146:e20201235. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1235
41. Parri N, Masi S, Magista AM, Marchetti F, Cantoni B, Arrighini A, et al. Characteristic of COVID-19 infection in pediatric patients: early findings from two Italian pediatric research networks. Eur J Pediatr. (2020) 179:1315–23. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03683-8
42. Preston LE, Chevinsky JR, Kompaniyets L, Lavery AM, Kimball A, Boehmer TK, et al. Characteristics and disease severity of US children and adolescents diagnosed with COVID-19. JAMA Netw Open. (2021) 4:e215298. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5298
43. Rabha AC, Oliveira Junior FI, Oliveira TA, Cesar RG, Fongaro G, Mariano RF, et al. Clinical manifestations of children and adolescents with Covid-19: report of the first 115 cases from sabará hospital infantil. Rev Paul Pediatr. (2020) 39:e2020305. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2021/39/2020305
44. Saraiva BM, Garcia AM, Silva TM, Gouveia C, Brito MJ. Clinical and therapeutic approach to hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a pediatric cohort in Portugal. Acta Med Port. (2021) 34:283–90. doi: 10.20344/amp.15360
45. Sharma AK, Chapagain RH, Bista KP, Bohara R, Chand B, Chaudhary NK, et al. Epidemiological and clinical profile of covid-19 in nepali children: an initial experience. J Nepal Paediatr Soc. (2020) 40:202–9.
46. Siddiqui M, Gültekingil A, Bakırcı O, Uslu N, Baskın E. Comparison of clinical features and laboratory findings of coronavirus disease 2019 and influenza A and B infections in children: a single-center study. Clin Exp Pediatr. (2021) 64:364–9. doi: 10.3345/cep.2021.00066
47. Soysal A, Gönüllü E, Arslan H, Kibar BS, Pop S, Yurttaş GN, et al. Comparison of clinical and laboratory features and treatment options of 237 symptomatic and asymptomatic children infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. Jpn J Infect Dis. (2020) 4:273–9. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2020.781
48. Yanover C, Mizrahi B, Kalkstein N, Marcus K, Akiva P, Barer Y, et al. What factors increase the risk of complications in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients? A cohort study in a Nationwide Israeli health organization. JMIR Public Health Surveill. (2020) 6:e20872. doi: 10.2196/20872
Keywords: COVID-19, meta-analysis, SARS-CoV-2, severity, outcomes, children
Citation: Sumner MW, Kanngiesser A, Lotfali-Khani K, Lodha N, Lorenzetti D, Funk AL and Freedman SB (2022) Severe Outcomes Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Pediatr. 10:916655. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.916655
Received: 09 April 2022; Accepted: 18 May 2022;
Published: 09 June 2022.
Edited by:
Silvia Bressan, University of Padua, ItalyReviewed by:
Naïm Ouldali, Hôpital Robert Debré, FranceStephen Aronoff, Temple University, United States
Copyright © 2022 Sumner, Kanngiesser, Lotfali-Khani, Lodha, Lorenzetti, Funk and Freedman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Stephen B. Freedman, c3RlcGhlbi5mcmVlZG1hbkBhbGJlcnRhaGVhbHRoc2VydmljZXMuY2E=
†These authors share senior authorship