Skip to main content

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Pediatr., 25 August 2022
Sec. Pediatric Cardiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Hot Topics in Pediatrics View all 50 articles

Long-term management of Fontan patients: The importance of a multidisciplinary approach

\nDiletta Martino
Diletta Martino1*Caterina Rizzardi
Caterina Rizzardi1*Serena VigezziSerena Vigezzi1Chiara GuarientoChiara Guariento1Giulia SturnioloGiulia Sturniolo1Francesca TesserFrancesca Tesser1Giovanni di SalvoGiovanni di Salvo2
  • 1Pediatric Unit, Department for Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy
  • 2Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology Unit, Department for Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy

The Fontan operation is a palliative procedure that leads to increased survival of patients with a functional single ventricle (SV). Starting from 1967 when the first operation was performed by Francis Fontan, more and more patients have reached adulthood. Furthermore, it is expected that in the next 20 years, the population with Fontan circulation will reach 150,000 subjects. The absence of right ventricular propulsion and the inability to improve cardiac output because of the low cardiac reserve are the main issues with the Fontan circulation; however, potential complications may also involve multiple organ systems, such as the liver, lungs, brain, bones, and the lymphatic system. As these patients were initially managed mainly by pediatric cardiologists, it was important to assure the appropriate transition to adult care with the involvement of a multidisciplinary team, including adult congenital cardiologists and multiple subspecialists, many of whom are neither yet familiar with the pathophysiology nor the end-organ consequences of the Fontan circulation. Therefore, the aim of our work was to collect all the best available evidence on Fontan's complications management to provide “simple and immediate” information sources for practitioners looking for state of the art evidence to guide their decision-making and work practices. Moreover, we suggest a model of follow-up of patients with Fontan based on a patient-centered multidisciplinary approach.

Introduction

Many complex cardiac malformations are characterized (functionally or anatomically) by the existence of only one ventricle that must sustain both pulmonary and systemic circulations, which are therefore not connected in series but connected in parallel. Such a circuit has two major disadvantages: arterial desaturation and a chronic volume overload to the single ventricle (SV) (1, 2). The Fontan operation is the palliative procedure of choice when a biventricular reconstruction is not feasible in cases, such as tricuspid atresia, double-outlet right ventricle, some types of pulmonary atresia, and atrioventricular septum defects with unbalanced ventricles (24). A cavopulmonary shunt is manufactured to connect the systemic venous return to the pulmonary arteries without the interposition of an adequate ventricle.

The consequences of these changes are numerous, which are as follows: increment in systemic venous pressure, decreased cardiac output, non-pulsatile hepatic congestion, and high pulmonary artery pressure. These features have an impact on both visceral organs and lymphatic drainage, causing multiorgan complications that require lifelong multidisciplinary management (4, 5). Despite the high morbidity and mortality, up to 70,000 people with Fontan-type palliation are alive worldwide, and the population is expected to double in the next 20 years, therefore, requiring appropriate transition to adult care (6).

Despite the existence of international and European guidelines (3, 7), the precise timing and panel of tests for the surveillance strategy in patients with Fontan is not universally defined and up until now in many countries, the follow-up is mostly based on the single centers' expertise without uniform application of diagnostic methods to screen for relevant outcomes (5). This article aims to review the state of the art of complications of Fontan palliation and to provide an example of a multidisciplinary approach, based on our center protocol and according to international guidelines, to guide clinicians in the management of these patients in work practice.

Materials and methods

To write this article, we reviewed the literature to examine the state of the art of standardized programs for patients with Fontan. To select the works, we searched the major electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus) using the terms “Fontan complications,” “Failure Fontan,” “single ventricle circulation,” “complications,” and “Fontan pathophysiology.” We selected only articles written in English without restriction based on the year of publication. Finally, we performed a selection considering only articles describing Fontan complications at least after 6 months of circulation compilation. We retrieved and assessed for eligibility all potentially relevant titles and abstracts.

Complication of Fontan palliation

Heart failure

Heart failure (HF) can result from systolic or diastolic ventricular dysfunction, and it occurs in 40%−60% of patients with Fontan (8). In the pediatric population, the systolic dysfunction is the most frequently identified, whereas diastolic dysfunction manifestations increase with the duration of follow-up (9). After the Fontan palliation, the SV evolves from being volume overloaded and overstretched to being overgrown in the face of a newly low preload. This deprivation in volume can lead to a progressive decline in cardiac output known as “disuse hypofunction” (1).

Other factors contributing to the development of HF include arrhythmias, increased neurohormonal activation, older age at repair, prolonged cyanosis, myocardial perfusion abnormalities, and atrio-ventricular valve (AVV) regurgitation (10). In particular, AVV failure occurs in nearly one-third of all patients by 30 years of age, more frequently affecting common AVV or tricuspid valves (2, 11). Clinical manifestations are similar to those of biventricular HF; cyanosis may develop due to veno-venous collaterals or in those patients with a fenestration between the intra-cardiac conduit and the pulmonary atrium, while the non-pulsatile flow to the lower lung segments may cause ventilation-perfusion mismatch and subsequent hypoxia (3). Diagnosis is challenging, particularly in younger patients, who often remain asymptomatic despite significant circulatory impairment.

A multimodal approach for follow-up is fundamental as described in detail in Table 1. Trans-thoracic echocardiography (ETT) is a diagnostic cornerstone and should be performed at least yearly (12).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Proposed organ system surveillance strategy.

The complex anatomy and lack of normal reference values and functional indexes render the quantification of cardiac function problematic (12). The introduction of 3D ETT has provided useful information on the structure of valve leaflets and subvalvular apparatus. In patients with poor acoustic windows, transesophageal ETT can provide excellent and more detailed imaging. Cardiac MR (CMR) helps to characterize ventricle performance, valvular function, and flow data (13). CT is an excellent alternative to CMR. Holter-ECG monitoring, exercise stress tests, and annual laboratory tests are useful to track each patient's individual path and to guide treatment (3, 14). With regards to the failing Fontan, the first approach should aim to ameliorate anatomical defects (i.e., pulmonary venous obstruction, pulmonary artery stenosis, obstruction within the Fontan baffle, or aorto-pulmonary collaterals) by surgical or interventional strategies (3, 15). For example, the timing of the surgical approach to AVV regurgitation should be individualized: on the one hand, a delayed intervention can cause irreversible damage to the pulmonary system and ventricular function, on the other side, a premature intervention may cause surgical failure or postoperative valve regurgitation (16).

Pharmacological therapy for HF has not been established in adult patients with Fontan but it is reasonable to treat SV dysfunction with standard medication used in biventricular HF (3, 7). The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has shown conflicting results in patients with Fontan (17, 18); beta-blocking agents might be helpful to reduce the sympathetic hyperactivity responsible for myocardial hypertrophy, but may also increase the risk of cardiac sinus block. As of today, there is still no clear data about the benefits of nesiridite but it is believed to be an hypothetically interesting therapeutic agents in acute decompensated HF (19). Phosphodiesterase inhibitors and endothelin receptor antagonists may be used to decrease vascular resistance and improve preload to treat pulmonary hypertension (20). In diastolic HF, diuretic therapy is the only medication proven to be effective. Less common treatments include cardiac resynchronization therapy, fenestration creation, mechanical circulatory support, and conversion of an atriopulmonary Fontan connection to an extracardiac conduit (ECC) Fontan (7, 21). Although the improvement in recent Fontan survival is impressive, it remains a palliative procedure, the only curative treatment remains heart transplantation, especially in those with major Fontan-associated morbidities. Transplant indications, contraindications, and the optimal timing of intervention are still debated but outcomes in children look promising (22).

Arrhythmias and thromboembolism

The anatomical changes brought by the subversion of the heart anatomy lead to a predisposition to arrhythmias, which are an important contributor to morbidity. Furthermore, arrhythmias can increase the risk of thromboembolic events (TEs), which have a mortality rate of 25% (23, 24). On the other hand, all patients with Fontan have per se a higher risk of TE related to the low-flow state, atrial stasis, and increased central venous pressure; in particular, the latter causes hepatic dysfunction and therefore coagulation abnormalities (23, 25). The incidence of arrhythmias after Fontan operation increases with age and time from surgery, and it is estimated to be around 25%−60% (26). Tachyarrhythmias have the highest prevalence, the most common being intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) (3, 2628), while sinus node dysfunction is the most frequent bradyarrhythmia (3, 26). Several factors contribute to the development of atrial dysrhythmias, such as manipulation of the atrial wall with possible injury to the sinus node during surgery or atrial dilation and hypertrophy following modification of the hemodynamic status. The type of surgery plays another important role, in particular, atriopulmonary connection is the surgical technique associated with the greater risk of developing both atrial arrhythmias and TEs (2730). Between ECC and lateral tunnel, studies suggest that the first is associated with a minor risk of arrhythmias (3, 7, 28, 29), probably having a minor impact of the atrial tissue (28). Early detection of arrhythmias in patients with Fontan by a regular cardiological follow-up, such as transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), ECG, Holter-ECG, and blood tests, is crucial to both prevent thrombosis and manage hemodynamic consequences (Table 1). Patients at high suspicion for TE deserve supplementary exams, such as TEE, CT, and CMR (25). Antiarrhythmic drugs in Fontan must be used with caution, especially inotropic negative ones, because these can critically alter ventricular contractility and vascular resistance (1, 3, 31). Moreover, in patients with an atriopulmonary connection, a conversion to an ECC Fontan has been shown to improve arrhythmia outcomes and hemodynamics (3, 31, 32). When recognized promptly, IART can be treated by direct current cardioversion (31, 33). Pacemaker implantation is indicated if significant sinoatrial node dysfunction is present (30, 31). According to most studies, there is a lower incidence of TE in patients receiving prophylaxis when compared with no TE-prophylaxis. The current American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) guidelines recommend the use of antithrombotic therapy, either aspirin or warfarin, as medical prophylaxis in patients with Fontan. However, the agent of choice and the optimal duration of treatment remain controversial (7, 23, 25, 32). Data comparing warfarin and aspirin showed similar outcomes, and, at the moment, there is a paucity of safety and efficacy evidence on the use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with Fontan (33). In current practice, aspirin can be used as the primary prophylactic agent and the introduction of warfarin, with a goal international nor-malized ratio (INR) of 2–3, can be considered in patients with risk factors, but also taking the possible bleeding risk on account (29, 31, 34). In a recent retrospective study evaluating the incidence of late clinical TE in a large cohort of patients with Fontan after different prophylaxis strategies, warfarin showed no better outcomes when compared with aspirin, despite a higher combined rate of major and clinically relevant bleeding. These findings suggest the possibility of a simpler antithrombotic regimen, for example, starting with warfarin in the first 3–6 months, then switching to aspirin (32). At the moment, no risk stratification scores for TE are available for patients with Fontan and the standard risk stratification scores, such as CHADS2/CHADS2-VASc scores, seem to be not predictive in patients with congenital heart disease, as evidenced in a relevant multicenter study (24, 34). More studies are needed to develop a risk stratification tool to guide antithrombotic therapy and to compare the different treatment strategies.

Veno-lymphatic complications

The higher central venous pressure and the lower cardiac output of the Fontan circulation obligate the lymphatic system to operate at functional limits causing lymphatic overproduction, creation of abnormal channels, and lymphatic hypertension. This can be tolerated for years, but in the long term, it determines leakage of the fluids in the interstitium, and complications related to lymphatic insufficiency will occur. Every anatomical district can be affected, but the most relevant includes protein-losing enteropathy (PLE) and plastic bronchitis (PB). PLE is caused by intestinal congestion due to lymphatic insufficiency and portal hypertension; this leads to enteric protein loss. PB is a disease defined by the presence of thick tenacious casts within the airways secondary to leakage of lymphatic fluid caused by fistulous connections of lymphatic vessels to the airways. Airway inflammatory reaction contributes to pathogenesis. PLE affects 5%−12% of patients with Fontan while PB occurs in <5%. The onset can be 1 month to nearly two decades after the Fontan procedure, usually occurring between 2 and 3 years following the palliation (3). Clinically, PB presents with chronic cough or coughing fits, breathlessness, wheezing, and other respiratory symptoms. Low oxygen saturation and asphyxia may occur because of ventilation-perfusion mismatch. Life-threatening events may occur in up to 40% of patients (35). PLE manifests with edema and ascites due to the reduction of the oncotic pressure. Excessive protein loss can cause diarrhea and fat malabsorption, immunodeficiency, bone abnormalities due to hypocalcemia, and potential gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to altered coagulation (36). The gold standard test to diagnose PLE is an increased α-1 antitrypsin clearance in a 24-h stool collection. Getting the adequate specimen samples is challenging, therefore, the diagnosis can also be made on an increased α-1 antitrypsin level in a single stool sample associated with hypoalbuminemia and edema, with no other identified cause (17). On the other side, diagnosis of PB can be confirmed in the presence of casts by the patient's expectoration or by bronchoscopic removal. Surveillance of lymphatic complications is a relatively new concept so precise guidelines are not available; a suggested follow-up approach is indicated in Table 1. Routine surveillance of oxygen saturation, chest X-ray, and pulmonary function testing are the best options to evaluate pulmonary status. MR lymphography based on heavily T2-weighted sequences can visualize the vascular architecture and eventually map abnormal networks in the chest (24) and, when performed in conjunction with endoscopy, can show leakage into the bowels (37). The goal of treatment, both in PLE and PB, is to optimize systemic circulation and reduce the overload with diuretic therapy. Treatment options for PB include diuretics and pulmonary vasodilator, such as endothelin receptor antagonist (ERAs) and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE-5) inhibitors, that can be considered in cases of increased pulmonary pressure in selected patients with controlled ventricular end-diastolic pressure (7, 38). Some patients may benefit from anti-inflammatory measures using inhaled or systemic steroids; mucolytics and nebulized tissue plasminogen activators can improve cast expectoration, and bronchodilators and chest physiotherapy can be useful. In PLE, to replace protein loss, intravenous albumin and immunoglobulins can be necessary; dietary modifications can adjuvate the process. Considering the inflammatory patterns, oral controlled-release budesonide may be helpful (20). In some cases, anticoagulant therapy with heparin can help and octreotide may be effective in some patients by decreasing thoracic duct lymphatic drainage (39). Lymphatic intervention, by accessing and occluding the abnormal connection, with selective embolization, is an emerging strategy, potentially promising but still needs technical refinements (40, 41). Currently, these invasive therapies are considered only in selected patients and the only effective cure for lymphatic dysfunction is heart transplantation.

Liver disease

Hepatic anomalies, known as Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD), constitute an early finding within the first 5 years since the Fontan completion (42, 43). The increased venous pressure in the hepatic veins and sinusoids leads to a decreased portal venous inflow, resulting in progressive liver hypoperfusion; the consequent injury is centrilobular fibrosis up to cirrhosis, with increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (44). Clinical manifestations are those of portal hypertension. When considering laboratory markers, liver enzymes and clotting parameters may result in normal even in very advanced stages of hepatic fibrosis. Hyperbilirubinemia generally can be identified only in decompensated liver cirrhosis. Thrombocytopenia, instead, is a useful marker of portal hypertension and correlates with the degree of portal fibrosis (45). Alpha-fetoprotein should be monitored as a predictor of hepatocarcinoma. Follow-up with abdominal imaging, clinical evaluations, and biomarkers is important (7); timing of surveillance should be individualized according to the grade of liver damage (Table 1) (3). Although liver ultrasound is not a sensitive tool for the identification of liver fibrosis, Doppler ultrasound tracing can be useful in the evaluation of portal flow, arterialization of hepatic flow, and changes in celiac and mesenteric flow resistances (3). Ultrasound elastography can provide a non-invasive estimate of the onset and progression of liver fibrosis by evaluation of hepatic stiffness, even though further studies for the standardization of fibroscan scores are needed (46). CT and MR provide accurate information about liver morphology, structure, and vascular enhancement patterns, especially in the characterization of hepatic nodules and hepatocellular carcinoma (47). Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for the evaluation and grading of liver fibrosis but should be reserved for patients with focal lesions or in whom a diagnosis of cirrhosis remains in doubt (46, 47). In terms of treatment, efforts should focus on the prevention of FALD with proper optimization of the Fontan circulation. Patients should be encouraged to maintain a healthy lifestyle and to avoid alcohol and excessive use of acetaminophen; immunization for hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis A virus (HBV) should be recommended (45). Some promising medical therapies may be of potential benefit but are yet of unproven efficacy in the prevention and stabilization of FALD; these include pulmonary vasodilator therapy, vascular decongestant agents, or antifibrotic therapies (3). Isolated liver transplant is not considered a feasible option, in whom graft cirrhosis would soon develop, therefore, patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis should be carefully selected for combined heart and liver transplant (48).

Kidney dysfunction

Fontan renal dysfunction can be detected in at least 10% of younger patients and its prevalence increases as they become adults. The decreased cardiac output and the increased central venous pressure (CVP) following Fontan reduce glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and increase glomerular filtration pressure causing glomerular injury (49). The multiple surgeries and the exposure to nephrotoxic medications, iodinated contrast agents, and chronic hypoxia contribute to kidney impairment (3, 50). Monitoring for a renal function is sensible in Fontan patients (Table 1). Proteinuria and microalbuminuria are useful markers, and cystatin C-based GFR gives a more accurate assessment of renal function as compared to creatinine (51). Recent evidence showed that ETT can be useful to predict the risk of nephropathy by monitoring the indexed inferior vena cava diameter (iIVC) as a surrogate for high CVP if enlarged (52). Furthermore, measurement of the renal resistive index (RRI) is important to estimate vascular compliance. An increased RRI (>0.81) detects progressive renal injury related to HF and increased mortality (53). Measures that preserve kidney function include hydration, blood pressure control, and saving of toxic drugs; it is unclear if medications, such as ACE inhibitors, have a protective renal effect (3, 49).

Surveillance strategy of patients with Fontan and the role of a multidisciplinary approach

The survival rate of patients with Fontan is increasing, and these children require lifelong follow-up with medical care and management of their multiorgan complications. As patients with Fontan move into adulthood, there is a progression of organ system complications and therefore, the optimal surveillance strategy should be tailored to each patient, considering age, stage of surgery, and general clinical conditions. It is reasonable to offer surveillance testing that systematically evaluates cardiovascular and end-organ health periodically; however, at this moment, there is insufficient evidence to precisely define a universal timing and panel of tests for the surveillance strategy of patients with Fontan. We therefore suggest a scheme to guide follow-up (Table 1), according to the surveillance testing toolkit proposed by the American Heart Association (AHA) writing group and that is based most on our current practice. The main goal of the Fontan surveillance strategy is to include a multidisciplinary team to approach not only cardiovascular but also end-organ complication with caution and to adapt any intervention to each patient's life stage, development, and needs. Future studies are needed to better understand the progressive nature of end-organ dysfunction in Fontan circulation and to evaluate further strategies for surveillance and treatment of complications.

Author contributions

DM collected the studies available in literature about arrhythmias and thromboembolism in Fontan circulation. CR studied about heart failure. FT studied about lymphatic complications. GSt studied about the liver and implemented the bibliography. CG collected information about renal and neurological complications. SV provided the introduction. CR and DM summarized all the information and created a model of follow-up based on a multidisciplinary approach with the table. SV, CG, and FT arranged the lay out. All authors conducted a literature research with key words such as “Fontan complications”, “long term complications” and it was conducted separately for each complication in order to find the majority of available studies. They reviewed the articles and finally provided a scheme with the recent evidence about the correct diagnosis and management of this problem.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

AVV, atrio-ventricular valve; CVP, central venous pressure; ECC, extra-cardiac conduit; FALD, Fontan-associated liver disease; HF, heart failure; PB, plastic bronchitis; PLE, protein-losing enteropathy; TE, thromboembolic events.

References

1. Gewillig M. The FONTAN circulation. Heart. (2005) 91:839–46. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.051789

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. de Lange C. Imaging of complications following Fontan circulation in children — diagnosis and surveillance. Pediatr Radiol. (2020) 50:1333–48. doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04682-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Rychik J, Atz AM, Celermajer DS, Deal BJ, Gatzoulis MA, Gewillig MH, et al. Evaluation and management of the child and adult with Fontan circulation: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. (2019) 140:e234–84. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000696

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Johnson JN, Connelly HM. Overview of the management and prognosis of patients with Fontan circulation UpToDate. In: UpToDate. Last updated Feb. 2021. Available online at: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-the-management-and-prognosis-of-patients-with-fontan-circulation#H1721621772 (accessed December 31, 2021).

Google Scholar

5. Kelly JM, Mirhaidari GJM, Chang YC, Shinoka T, Breuer CK, Yates AR, et al. Evaluating the longevity of the Fontan pathway. Pediatr Cardiol. (2020) 41:1539–47. doi: 10.1007/s00246-020-02452-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. van der Ven JPG, van den Bosch E, Bogers AJCC, Helbing WA. State of the art of the Fontan strategy for treatment of univentricular heart disease. F1000Research. (2018) 7:935. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.13792.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Baumgartner H, De Backer J, Babu-Narayan SV, Budts W, Chessa M, Diller GP, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J. (2021) 42:563–645. doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4702

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Rodriguez FH, Book WM. Management of the adult Fontan patient. Heart. (2020) 106:105–10. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-314937

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Ohuchi H. Adult patients with Fontan circulation: what we know and how to manage adults with Fontan circulation? J Cardiol. (2016) 68:181–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.04.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Deal BJ, Jacobs ML. Management of the failing Fontan circulation. Heart. (2012) 98:1098–104. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301133

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. King G, Ayer J, Celermajer D, Zentner D, Justo R, Disney P, et al. Atrioventricular valve failure in Fontan palliation. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2019) 73:810–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Zaki NC, Kelleman MS, James Parks W, Slesnick TC, McConnell ME, Oster ME. The utility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in post-Fontan surveillance. Congenit Heart Dis. (2019) 14:140–6. doi: 10.1111/chd.12692

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Hauser JA, Taylor AM, Pandya B. How to image the adult patient with fontan circulation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. (2017) 10:e004273. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.004273

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Broda CR, Downing TE, John AS. Diagnosis and management of the adult patient with a failing Fontan circulation. Heart Fail Rev. (2020) 25:633–46. doi: 10.1007/s10741-020-09932-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Budts W, Ravekes WJ, Danford DA, Kutty S. Diastolic heart failure in patients with the fontan circulation: a review. JAMA Cardiol. (2020) 5:590. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5459

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Tseng SY, Siddiqui S, Di Maria MV, Hill GD, Lubert AM, Kutty S, et al. Atrioventricular valve regurgitation in single ventricle heart disease: a common problem associated with progressive deterioration and mortality. J Am Heart Assoc. (2020) 9:e015737. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015737

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Wilson TG, Iyengar AJ, Winlaw DS, Weintraub RG, Wheaton GR, Gentles TL, et al. Australia and New Zealand Fontan Registry. Use of ACE inhibitors in Fontan: rational or irrational? Int J Cardiol. (2016) 210:95–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.02.089

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Burchill LJ, Redington AN, Silversides CK, Ross HJ, Jimenez-Juan L, Mital S, et al. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system genotype and serum BNP in a contemporary cohort of adults late after Fontan palliation. Int J Cardiol. (2015) 197:209–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Zentner D, Celermajer DS, Gentles T, d'Udekem Y, Ayer J, Blue GM et al. Management of people with a Fontan circulation: a Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand position statement Heart Lung Circ (2020) 29:5–39. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.09.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Ghanayem NS, Berger S, Tweddell JS. Medical management of the failing Fontan. Pediatr Cardiol. (2007) 28:465–71. doi: 10.1007/s00246-007-9007-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Oldenburger NJ, Mank A, Etnel J, Takkenberg JJM, Helbing WA. Drug therapy in the prevention of failure of the Fontan circulation: a systematic review. Cardiol Young. (2016) 26:842–50. doi: 10.1017/S1047951115002747

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. McCormick AD, Schumacher KR. Transplantation of the failing Fontan. Transl Pediatr. (2019) 8:290–301. doi: 10.21037/tp.2019.06.03

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Alsaied T, Alsidawi S, Allen CC, Faircloth J, Palumbo JS, Veldtman GR. Strategies for thromboprophylaxis in Fontan circulation: a meta-analysis. Heart. (2015) 101:1731–7. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307930

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Ephrem G, Hebson C, John A, Moore E, Jokhadar M, Ford R, et al. Frontiers in Fontan failure: innovation and improving outcomes: a conference summary. Congenit Heart Dis. (2019) 14:128–37. doi: 10.1111/chd.12685

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Egbe AC, Connolly HM, McLeod CJ, Ammash NM, Niaz T, Yogeswaran V et al. Thrombotic and embolic complications associated with atrial arrhythmia after fontan operation. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2016) 68:1312–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Quinton E, Nightingale P, Hudsmith L, Thorne S, Marshall H, Clift P, et al. Prevalence of atrial tachyarrhythmia in adults after Fontan operation. Heart. (2015) 101:1672–7. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307514

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Carins TA, Shi WY, Iyengar AJ, Nisbet A, Forsdick V, Zannino D, et al. Long-term outcomes after first-onset arrhythmia in Fontan physiology. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2016) 152:1355–63.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.07.073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Stephenson EA, Lu M, Berul CI, Etheridge SP, Idriss SF, Margossian R, et al. Arrhythmias in a contemporary Fontan cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2010) 56:890–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.079

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. d'Udekem Y, Iyengar AJ, Galati JC, Forsdick V, Weintraub RG, Wheaton GR, et al. Redefining expectations of long-term survival after the fontan procedure: twenty-five years of follow-up from the entire population of Australia and New Zealand. Circulation. (2014) 130(11_suppl_1):S32–8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007764

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Pundi KN, Pundi KN, Johnson JN, Dearani JA Li Z, Driscoll DJ, et al. Sudden cardiac death and late arrhythmias after the Fontan operation. Congenit Heart Dis. (2017) 12:17–23. doi: 10.1111/chd.12401

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM, Child JS, Connolly HM, Dearani JA, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2008) 52:e143–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.10.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Brida M, Baumgartner H, Gatzoulis MA, Diller GP. Early mortality and concomitant procedures related to Fontan conversion: quantitative analysis. Int J Cardiol. (2017) 236:132–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Khairy P, Van Hare GF, Balaji S, Berul CI, Cecchin F, Cohen MI, et al. PACES/HRS expert consensus statement on the recognition and management of arrhythmias in adult congenital heart disease. Can J Cardiol. (2014) 30:e1–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.09.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Khairy P, Aboulhosn J, Broberg CS, Cohen S, Cook S, Dore A, et al. Thromboprophylaxis for atrial arrhythmias in congenital heart disease: a multicenter study. Int J Cardiol. (2016) 223:729–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.223

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Brogan TV, Finn LS, Pyskaty DJ, Redding GJ, Ricker D, Inglis A, et al. Plastic bronchitis in children: a case series and review of the medical literature. Pediatr Pulmonol. (2002) 34:482–7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10179

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Kay WA, Moe T, Suter B, Tennancour A, Chan A, Krasuski RA, et al. Long term consequences of the fontan procedure and how to manage them. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. (2018) 61:365–76. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2018.09.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Dori Y. Novel lymphatic imaging techniques. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. (2016) 19:255–61. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2016.10.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Gnanappa GK, Celermajer DS, Sholler GF, Gentles T, Winlaw D, d'Udekem Y, et al. The long-term management of children and adults with a Fontan circulation: a systematic review and survey of current practice in Australia and New Zealand. Pediatr Cardiol. (2017) 38:56–69. doi: 10.1007/s00246-016-1484-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. John AS, Phillips SD, Driscoll DJ, Warnes CA, Cetta F. The use of octreotide to successfully treat protein-losing enteropathy following the Fontan operation: octreotide treatment of PLE post Fontan. Congenit Heart Dis. (2011) 6:653–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2011.00518.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Al-Shawk M, Banjoko A, Axiaq A, Amin K, Harky A. Perioperative and long-term management of Fontan patients. Cardiol Young. (2021) 31:775–85. doi: 10.1017/S1047951120004618

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Hraška V. Decompression of thoracic duct: new approach for the treatment of failing Fontan. Ann Thorac Surg. (2013) 96:709–11. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.02.046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Ghaferi AA, Hutchins GM. Progression of liver pathology in patients undergoing the Fontan procedure: chronic passive congestion, cardiac cirrhosis, hepatic adenoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2005) 129:1348–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.10.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Agnoletti G, Ferraro G, Bordese R, Marini D, Gala S, Bergamasco L, et al. Fontan circulation causes early, severe liver damage. Should we offer patients a tailored strategy? Int J Cardiol. (2016) 209:60–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.02.041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. DiPaola FW, Schumacher KR, Goldberg CS, Friedland-Little J, Parameswaran A, Dillman JR. Effect of Fontan operation on liver stiffness in children with single ventricle physiology. Eur Radiol. (2017) 27:2434–42. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4614-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Gordon-Walker TT, Bove K, Veldtman G. Fontan-associated liver disease: a review. J Cardiol. (2019) 74:223–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.02.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Chen B, Schreiber RA, Human DG, Potts JE, Guttman OR. Assessment of liver stiffness in pediatric Fontan patients using transient elastography. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2016) 2016:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2016/7125193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Lewis MJ, Hecht E, Ginns J, Benton J, Prince M, Rosenbaum MS. Serial cardiac MRIs in adult Fontan patients detect progressive hepatic enlargement and congestion. Congenit Heart Dis. (2017) 12:153–8. doi: 10.1111/chd.12422

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Bryant R, Rizwan R, Zafar F, Shah SA, Chin C, Tweddell JS, et al. Contemporary outcomes of combined heart-liver transplant in patients with congenital heart disease. Transplantation. (2018) 102:e67–73. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001978

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Zafar F, Lubert AM, Katz DA, Hill GD, Opotowsky AR, Alten JA, et al. Long-term kidney function after the fontan operation. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2020) 76:334–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Dimopoulos K, Diller GP, Koltsida E, Pijuan-Domenech A, Papadopoulou SA, Babu-Narayan SV, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and prognostic value of renal dysfunction in adults with congenital heart disease. Circulation. (2008) 117:2320–8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.734921

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Kirelik D, Fisher M, DiMaria M, Soranno DE, Gist KM. Comparison of creatinine and cystatin C for estimation of glomerular filtration rate in pediatric patients after Fontan operation. Congenit Heart Dis. (2019) 14:760–4. doi: 10.1111/chd.12776

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Patel S, Anne P, Somerfield-Ronek J, Du W, Zilberman MV. Inferior vena cava diameter predicts nephropathy in patients late after Fontan palliation. Pediatr Cardiol. (2020) 41:789–94. doi: 10.1007/s00246-020-02313-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Ohuchi H, Negishi J, Hayama Y, Miyazaki A, Shiraishi I, Ichikawa H. Renal resistive index reflects Fontan pathophysiology and predicts mortality. Heart. (2017) 103:1631–7. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310812

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Fontan, failure Fontan, complications, Fontan circuit, multidisciplinary

Citation: Martino D, Rizzardi C, Vigezzi S, Guariento C, Sturniolo G, Tesser F and Salvo Gd (2022) Long-term management of Fontan patients: The importance of a multidisciplinary approach. Front. Pediatr. 10:886208. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.886208

Received: 28 February 2022; Accepted: 11 July 2022;
Published: 25 August 2022.

Edited by:

Christian Apitz, Ulm University Medical Center, Germany

Reviewed by:

Willem A. Helbing, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands
Renate Kaulitz, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Germany

Copyright © 2022 Martino, Rizzardi, Vigezzi, Guariento, Sturniolo, Tesser and Salvo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Diletta Martino, diletta.martino@aopd.veneto.it; Caterina Rizzardi, caterina.rizzardi@aopd.veneto.it

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.