Skip to main content

GENERAL COMMENTARY article

Front. Pediatr., 20 June 2022
Sec. Neonatology

Commentary: Transarterial Embolization in Neonatal Kasabach–Merritt Syndrome

\nHuaijie WangHuaijie WangZhengtuan Guo
Zhengtuan Guo*
  • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, China

A Commentary on
Transarterial Embolization in Neonatal Kasabach–Merritt Syndrome

by Wang, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., Bi, S., Zhang, J., Zha, P., and Dai, L. (2021). Front. Pediatr. 9:788120. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.788120

Introduction

In the article entitled “Transarterial Embolization in Neonatal Kasabach-Merritt Syndrome” Wang et al. reported eleven neonates with Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon (KMP) treated with transarterial embolization (TAE) (1). We compliment the authors for their excellent results. Nevertheless, we have a few comments on the diagnosis and management of KMP.

Comments and Discussion

Confusion in Terminology and Definition Regarding KMP

The authors defined KMP as giant hemangioma - thrombocytopenia syndrome, which is outdated. In 1997, Sarkar et al. revealed KMP was associated with Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma (KHE) and not with common infantile hemangioma (2). In the same year, Enjolras et al. found infants with KMP did not have “true” classical hemangiomas (3). Currently, KMP is defined as a coagulopathy (thrombocytopenia) associated with KHE and tufted angioma (TA) (4). KHE and TA are considered to be synonymous vascular tumors with similar presenting symptoms and potential for KMP (5). Thus, KMP specifically occurs in KHE and TA, does not occur with common hemangioma.

Terminologies associated with KMP used in this report included hemangioma, Kaposi hemangioendothelioma and tufted hemangioma. In the latest ISSVA (the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies) classification for vascular anomalies, the term hemangioma encompass a broad group of tumors, including infantile hemangioma, congenital hemangioma, spindle-cell hemangioma, epithelioid hemangioma, hobnail hemangioma, etc. (5). As we mentioned above, KMP occurs exclusively with KHE and TA. Incorrect use of the term hemangioma in KMP adds to the confusion regarding the diagnosis, understanding and management of this entity, which should be avoided.

Terms Kaposi hemangioendothelioma and tufted hemangioma are also incorrect and should be abandoned. In the latest ISSVA classification for vascular anomalies, correct nomenclatures are Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma (5).

KMP Does Not Occur in Hepatic Congenital Hemangioma

In the 11 neonates reported, we noticed three had hepatic hemangioma. All three hemangiomas are unifocal, which suggests the diagnosis of congenital hemangioma (CH) rather than KHE (6). KHE or TA has never been confirmed and found in liver parenchyma in literature (6).

CH proliferates in utero and reaches peak size just prior to or at birth. Diagnosis may be made prenatally. Possible complications with hepatic CH include intralesional bleeding, thrombocytopenia, hypofibrinogenemia, and high-output cardiac failure (6). However, thrombocytopenia and hypofibrinogenemia associated with CH is not KMP. These laboratory findings in CH are generally transient, mild to moderate, and rarely necessitate interventions, which can improved naturally as CH regresses spontaneously. Also, we noticed high output heart failure developed in one patient (maybe the case 6 with a hepatic hemangioma). This is a typical complication with hepatic CH and is not a known feature of KMP. High output heart failure has never been found in confirmed KHE in literature.

Additionally, images provided in the Figure 2 of article strongly support the diagnosis of hepatic CH. Typically, hepatic CH shows to be a well-defined, solitary, spherical tumor with centripetal enhancement and central sparing on computed tomography or enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (6). Images in the Figures 2C,E showed typical features above.

Sirolimus Shows Very Promising Results for KMP

Medical treatment is the mainstay in KMP management, mainly including vincristine, corticosteroids and sirolimus. These drugs can be administered as the first-line treatment (7, 8). Especially, sirolimus also has shown very excellent response for multimodal-resistant KHE/KMP (7). Until now, no response to sirolimus has never been reported in confirmed KHE/KMP in literature.

Authors used single corticosteroids as the initial therapy. However, the overall response rate of this monotherapy is relatively low, ranging 10–27% (7). The continuing propranolol was administered in four patients. For managing vascular anomalies, infantile hemangioma is considered to be the only entity responsive to propranolol. No study has confirmed therapeutic role of propranolol in KHE/KMP. The statement “Glucocorticoids, sirolimus, or propranolol is most commonly used to treat KMS” is inappropriate. Propranolol is not used to treat KHE/KMP.

Additionally, the very short duration of treatment (3–10 days) may contribute to the “poor effect” of medication prior to TAE. Even the most promised sirolimus administering, the time of platelet count renormalization is still more than a week (8).

Consequently, sirolimus alone or sirolimus based combination therapy (plus steroids and/or vincristine) is recommended as a first-line therapy for the treatment of KHE/KMP.

TAE Plays an Additive Role to Systemic Treatment for KMP

The additive role of TAE to systemic sirolimus for KMP has been reported recently, in which adjunct TAE induced a more rapid resolution of KMP, however, tumor response as well as rebound rates were similar to the group of sirolimus only (9). TAE have historically been used in KHE. The effects have proven to be temporary and are currently used primarily as a temporizing role to provide additional time for medical therapy to be effective, or as an adjunct to surgery to reduce bleeding during a planned surgery (4).

In literature, complete response to TAE only has not been reported in KHE/KMP. All had at least two modalities of treatment regarding TAE for KHE/KMP (10). TAE showed no response or temporary partial response in literature (4, 10). TAE should not be considered as the main treatment for KHE/KMP.

Authors did not provided data of follow-up. Considering the temporary effect and adjunctive role of TAE to systemic medication for KHE/KMP, the follow-up is very important for readers.

Author Contributions

HW conceptualized and designed this study, and drafted the manuscript. ZG contributed to literature research and manuscript review. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Wang Y, Wang S, Wang L, Bi S, Zhang J, Zha P, et al. Transarterial embolization in neonatal kasabach-merritt syndrome. Front Pediatr. (2021) 9:788120. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.788120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Sarkar M, Mulliken JB, Kozakewich HP, Robertson RL, Burrows PE. Thrombocytopenic coagulopathy (Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon) is associated with Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and not with common infantile hemangioma. Plast Reconstr Surg. (1997)100:1377–86. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199711000-00001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Enjolras O, Wassef M, Mazoyer E, Frieden IJ, Rieu PN, Drouet L, et al. Infants with Kasabach-Merritt syndrome do not have “true” hemangiomas. J Pediatr. (1997)130:631–40. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(97)70249-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Drolet BA, Trenor CC 3rd, Brandão LR, Chiu YE, Chun RH, Dasgupta R, et al. Consensus-derived practice standards plan for complicated Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma. J Pediatr. (2013) 163:285–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.03.080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. issva.org. ISSVA Classification for Vascular Anomalies. (2018). Available online at: http://www.issva.org/UserFiles/file/ISSVA-Classification-2018.pdf (accessed January 12, 2018).

Google Scholar

6. Iacobas I, Phung TL, Adams DM, Trenor CC 3rd, Blei F, Fishman DS, et al. Guidance Document for Hepatic Hemangioma (Infantile and Congenital) Evaluation and Monitoring. J Pediatr. (2018) 203:294–300.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.08.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Ji Y, Chen S, Yang K, Xia C, Li L. Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma: current knowledge and future perspectives. Orphanet J Rare Dis. (2020) 15:39. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-1320-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Wang H, Guo X, Duan Y, Zheng B, Gao Y. Sirolimus as initial therapy for kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma. Pediatr Dermatol. (2018) 35:635–8. doi: 10.1111/pde.13600

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Brill R, Uller W, Huf V, Müller-Wille R, Schmid I, Pohl A, et al. Additive value of transarterial embolization to systemic sirolimus treatment in kaposiform hemangioendothelioma. Int J Cancer. (2021) 148:2345–51. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33406

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Ryan C, Price V, John P, Mahant S, Baruchel S, Brandão L, et al. Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon: a single centre experience. Eur J Haematol. (2010) 84:97–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01370.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma, tufted angioma, Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon, hemangioma, sirolimus, embolization, vascular anomalies

Citation: Wang H and Guo Z (2022) Commentary: Transarterial Embolization in Neonatal Kasabach–Merritt Syndrome. Front. Pediatr. 10:846207. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.846207

Received: 30 December 2021; Accepted: 30 May 2022;
Published: 20 June 2022.

Edited by:

Arjan Te Pas, Leiden University, Netherlands

Reviewed by:

Wang Zuopeng, Fudan University, China

Copyright © 2022 Wang and Guo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhengtuan Guo, guozhengtuan@hotmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.