Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Pediatr., 05 January 2022
Sec. Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition

A Narrative Review on the Update in the Prevalence of Infantile Colic, Regurgitation, and Constipation in Young Children: Implications of the ROME IV Criteria

\nLeilani MuhardiLeilani Muhardi1Marion M. Aw,Marion M. Aw2,3Mohammed Hasosah,Mohammed Hasosah4,5Ruey Terng NgRuey Terng Ng6Sze Yee ChongSze Yee Chong7Badriul HegarBadriul Hegar8Erick Toro-MonjarazErick Toro-Monjaraz9Andy DarmaAndy Darma10Merih CetinkayaMerih Cetinkaya11Chung Mo ChowChung Mo Chow12Urszula KudlaUrszula Kudla13Yvan Vandenplas
Yvan Vandenplas14*
  • 1Friesland Campina AMEA, Singapore, Singapore
  • 2Department of Paediatrics, Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
  • 3Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
  • 4Department of Pediatric, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • 5King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • 6Department of Pediatrics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 7Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ipoh, Malaysia
  • 8Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • 9Unit of Physiology and Gastrointestinal Motility, Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, National Institute of Pediatrics, Mexico City, Mexico
  • 10Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • 11Department of Neonatology, Health Sciences University, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 12Virtus Medical Group, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • 13Friesland Campina, Amersfoort, Netherlands
  • 14UZ Brussel, KidZ Health Castle, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium

Regurgitation, colic, and constipation are frequently reported Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (FGIDs) in the first few years of life. In 2016, the diagnostic criteria for FGIDs were changed from ROME III to ROME IV. This review assesses the prevalence of the most frequent FGIDs (colic, regurgitation and constipation) among children aged 0–5 years after the introduction of the later criteria. Articles published from January 1, 2016 to May 1, 2021 were retrieved from PubMed and Google Scholar using relevant keywords. A total of 12 articles were further analyzed based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. This review consists of two studies (17%) from the Middle East, three (25%) from Asia, two (17%) from the USA, three (25%) from Europe, and one (8%) from Africa. Three studies (25%) were based on data obtained from healthcare professionals, while the rest were parent or caregiver reports. About half of the retrieved studies used the ROME IV criteria. Among infants aged 0–6 months, the reported prevalence of colic ranged between 10–15%, whilst that of regurgitation was 33.9%, and constipation was 1.5%. Among infants aged 0–12 months, the reported prevalence of regurgitation and constipation were 3.4–25.9% and 1.3–17.7%, respectively. The reported prevalence of constipation was 1.3–26% among children aged 13–48 months and 13% among children aged 4–18 years. Despite the large variations due to differences in diagnostic criteria, study respondents and age group, the prevalence of infantile colic was higher, while that for infantile regurgitation and constipation were similar using the ROME IV or III criteria.

Introduction

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a complex organ that plays a primary role in digestion, nutrient absorption, and excretion of waste products (1). In addition, it also has major neural and endocrine functions and is the largest immune organ that is exposed to multiple antigens. It is also home to trillions of microorganisms, including bacteria, viruses, protozoa, and fungi, which together constitute the gut microbiota (2).

The GI tract starts to develop rapidly from 16 days post-conception and continues to mature during the postpartum period (1). It takes time for this digestive system to become fully functional. For example, the production of lipases and bile salts is low in newborn term infants, and the production of enzymes to digest starch and complex carbohydrates reach its optimal level only a half year later (1). Therefore, infants have a relatively immature GI function, especially in the first few months of life, which makes them prone to a variety of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (FGIDs) (3, 4).

Regurgitation, colic, and constipation have been reported to be the most frequent FGIDs in the early years (3, 5). Children with a history of FGIDs during infancy were reported to have a higher risk of persistent FGIDs symptoms later in life (6, 7).

The prevalence of functional constipation varies across countries. The overall prevalence of FGIDs among children aged 0–18 years ranges from 7 to 30% (3, 5, 8). The latest studies reported an estimated prevalence of 31.4% among infants aged 0–1 year coming to pediatric clinics in 10 African countries (9), 7% among children aged 0–4 years in China (10) and 22% among children aged 0–5 years in Saudi Arabia (11). One of the reasons for the differences in the prevalence of FGIDs is the use of different diagnostic criteria. The ROME IV criteria for colic were developed mainly by modifying the Wessel's criteria, and the ROME IV criteria for constipation were developed by categorizing children according to toilet-training status (Table 1) (5, 12). This review aims to assess the prevalence of the most frequent FGIDs in children aged 0–5 years after the introduction of the ROME IV criteria in 2016.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The ROME III and ROME IV criteria for the diagnosis of colic, regurgitation, and constipation.

Methods

Search Strategy

PubMed and Google Scholar were searched to retrieve relevant articles published from January 1, 2016 to May 1, 2021 using the following keywords: prevalence, infant, (young) children, colic, crying/fussing/distress, constipation, gastroesophageal reflux, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and infant regurgitation.

Study Selection

Inclusion criteria were observational studies with a precise definition of the symptoms of FGIDs (ROME III or ROME IV or stricter), published in English, time of publication: January 2016 to May 1, 2021. Exclusion criteria were intervention studies, the study population was children older than 5 years, systematic reviews, and non-English publications. Relevant publications from the list of references were retrieved and further analyzed to check if they met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data retrieval and extraction were performed by one of the authors. The quality of the retrieved articles was not assessed.

Results

Study Results and Characteristics

The search strategy retrieved 186 articles. Among them, 12 articles fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included for further analysis (Figure 1). Only three studies (25%) were based on data obtained from healthcare professionals or well-baby clinics (9, 13, 14). Other studies collected data through surveys among caregivers (mostly mothers). There were two studies (16%) from the Middle East (11, 15), three (25%) from Asia (10, 13, 16), two (16%) from the USA (14, 17), three (25 %) from Europe and one (8%) from Africa (9).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. PRISMA diagram flow chart.

Diagnostic Criteria

Among the seven studies reporting the prevalence of colic, two (28%) used the ROME III criteria (4, 14), four (57%) used the ROME IV criteria (9, 10, 13, 18), and one (14%) applied both the ROME III and ROME IV criteria (17) (Table 2). Among the seven studies reporting the prevalence of regurgitation, one (14%) used the Infant Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R) (19), two (28%) used the ROME III criteria (4, 14) and three (42%) used the ROME IV criteria (10, 13, 18) and one (14%) used both the ROME III and IV criteria (17). Among the twelve studies reporting the prevalence of constipation, six (50%) used the ROME III criteria (4, 11, 1416, 20), five (42%) applied the ROME IV criteria (9, 10, 13, 18), and one (8%) used both the ROME III and ROME IV criteria (17).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. An overview of the retrieved literature.

Prevalence of Colic, Regurgitation, and Constipation

Despite the variation in the retrieved data in this review, the reported prevalence of colic assessed using the ROME IV criteria was higher than those assessed using the ROME III criteria, whereas the reported prevalence of constipation and regurgitation assessed using the ROME IV criteria were similar to those assessed using the ROME III criteria (Table 3).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. An overview of the prevalence of colic, regurgitation, and constipation assessed using the ROME III and ROME IV criteria among infants aged 0–12 months.

Only one study (14%) reported the prevalence of colic assessed using the ROME IV criteria among infants aged 0–5 months (10) (Table 4). The rest of the studies (n = 6; 86%) included older infants (aged 0–12 months) for assessing the prevalence of colic using the ROME IV criteria.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. The prevalence of colic in infants aged 0–12 months.

The prevalence of colic assessed using the ROME IV criteria was 14.9% (10), whereas the prevalence assessed using the ROME III criteria was 10.4% (14). In studies among infants aged 0–12 months, the reported prevalence of colic assessed using the ROME IV criteria ranged from 1.9 to 19.2% (13, 18).

Two surveys reported that the prevalence regurgitation among infants aged 0–6 months ranged from 34 to 40% (Table 5) (10, 19). These two studies reported conflicting prevalence of regurgitation (3% in China and 18% in France) among infants aged 6–12 months using different criteria (10, 19). One study from the USA reported a similar prevalence of regurgitation of 25% using either the ROME III or ROME IV criteria in the same population of children aged 0–12 months (17). Among children aged 0–12 months, three studies using the ROME III criteria reported a wider range of prevalence of regurgitation (4, 14, 17) than that reported in two studies using the ROME IV criteria (13, 18) (8–26% vs. 10–24%, respectively).

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. The prevalence of regurgitation among children aged 0–12 months.

One study reported a similar prevalence of 1.5% for constipation among infants aged 0–6 months and older infants aged 6–12 months (10) (Table 6). Using the ROME III criteria, one study reported a prevalence of constipation of 3% among infants aged 0–12 months (4), whereas one study in Colombia (14) and one study in Turkey reported a prevalence of 16–18% (20). Using the ROME IV criteria, one study that were based on data obtained from parents/caregivers reported a prevalence of 10–12% among infants aged 0–12 months (17), whereas another study that was based on data obtained from pediatricians reported a lower prevalence of 1.3% (13).

TABLE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. The prevalence of constipation among children aged 0–60 months.

Using the ROME III criteria to diagnose constipation among children aged 13–48 months, one study reported a prevalence of 10% in Belgium, Italy, and the Netherlands (4) and 27% in Colombia (14). Two different surveys conducted at different points in time in Turkey reported different prevalence of constipation among infants aged 1–11 months; a survey among parents reported a prevalence of 17.7% assessed using the ROME III criteria (20) whereas the other reported a prevalence of 4.6% assessed based on physician diagnoses using the ROME IV criteria (18). One study from the USA reported a similar prevalence of constipation (13%) using either the ROME III or ROME IV criteria in the same population of children aged 4–18 years (17).

Discussion

This narrative review provides an updated estimate of the prevalence of FGIDs in various countries worldwide. There are limited studies regarding FGIDs in infants/young children from Australia Oceania and Latin America. Only a few studies have been conducted in Asia and Africa although these two continents have a large population of children (21).

In addition, most of the retrieved studies were based on parent-reported questionnaires, which could lead to an overestimation of the prevalence of FGIDs compared to diagnosis by healthcare professionals (22). It is expected that depending on health-seeking behaviors in specific region, parents or caregivers may attempt to self-medicate or manage illness at home and seek to consult a physician only when symptoms persist (23, 24). Although, there are limited studies comparing parents/physician diagnosis on the prevalence of FGIDs, the differences between perception of the symptoms between parents and physicians' have been widely reported and recognized for other clinical conditions. For example, the definition of wheezing is reflected in the differences seen through estimating the prevalence of asthma (25, 26). These differences could also explain a lower prevalence of FGIDs consistently reported by healthcare professionals compared to that reported by parents (13, 18).

Although about half of the retrieved studies used the ROME IV criteria (Table 2), the data obtained in this review largely varied due to differences across studies such as the diagnostic criteria, study respondents, age group, and geographical location. For example, one study that was based on data obtained from similar types of respondents reported an almost similar prevalence of colic and regurgitation using either the ROME III or ROME IV criteria in similar types of study populations (17). However, the prevalence of constipation in this cohort assessed using the ROME IV criteria was twice as high as that assessed using the ROME III criteria. This is quite difficult to explain. Whilst the criteria per se for defining constipation has not changed from Rome III to Rome IV, Rome IV is more explicit in defining constipation in toilet-trained children (27). Another example was from the two surveys on prevalence of constipation conducted in Turkey. These surveys used different diagnostic criteria and included different study populations with different types of respondents; thus they reported different prevalence rates (18, 20). In addition, this review has several limitations such as the use of only two databases and a lack of assessment of the validity and quality of each retrieved study.

Several studies in this review reported the prevalence of colic in infants older than 6 months; despite, the experts' consensus that infantile colic should resolve within the first half year of life (5). The reported prevalence of colic among infants aged 0–5 months assessed using the ROME IV criteria was higher than that assessed using the ROME III criteria (14.9 vs. 10.4%) (Table 4). The range of the prevalence of colic among infants aged 0–12 months assessed using the ROME IV criteria was also larger than that assessed using the ROME III criteria (1.9–19.2% vs. 4.2–5.9%). This increase in prevalence could be due to the fact that the diagnosis of colic using ROME IV is less defined and applies to a larger age group (up to 5 months) compared to those of ROME III (5). In addition, geographical differences in gut microbiota, mode of delivery, sex, place of residence, breastfeeding exclusivity (10, 28) and maternal smoking (29) could also influence these differences. In the future, an age-specific prevalence at each month in the first 6 months of age could be more clinically relevant than an overall prevalence calculated for the first 5 months of life.

The range of the prevalence of regurgitation among infants aged 0–6 months assessed in this review (34–40%) is similar to that reported in a previous systematic review (23–40%) (30). However, this prevalence is lower than that reported in a study conducted in Indonesia in 2005 (44%) among only infants aged 4–6 months using the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) definition (31). In addition, there seem to be regional differences in the prevalence of regurgitation; the reported prevalence of regurgitation among infants aged 6–12 months in France (19) was ten times higher compared to that in China (10). These differences could be attributed to cultural influences in the perception of symptom severity in addition to genetic or feeding differences. A study aiming to validate cow milk symptom score data in relation to reflux reported that healthy Polish infants cried more than the Italians due to differences in parental tolerance (32).

This review is able to provide an age-specific prevalence for constipation. The overall prevalence of constipation (1.5–17%) among children aged 0–12 months seems to be lower than that reported in two previous systematic reviews (0.7–30% and 0.5–32.2%) (8, 33). However, a systematic review of studies conducted in China reported a similar prevalence of constipation (14.4%) among children younger than 2 years of age using earlier ROME II or ROME III criteria (28).

The prevalence of constipation among children aged 3–18 years in this review (13%) was higher than that reported in a recent publication from the western province of Saudi Arabia using the ROME IV criteria (4.7%) (34). In general, the prevalence of constipation increases with age regardless of the diagnostic criteria used.

Knowledge on updated data on the prevalence of FGIDs in various age groups could further help healthcare professionals in managing these symptoms and in reassuring parents or caregivers (35). Prevalence assessed based on physician-diagnosed FGID symptoms might provide a more accurate estimate. However, the primary data collection might be difficult in the near future as there has been a shift of attention to pediatric health during the COVID-19 pandemic (36). Therefore, a multi-country survey among healthcare professionals could provide a better estimate of the magnitude of FGID symptoms. This approach could also capture the differences in genetics, geographical location, symptom's interpretation/ tolerance. It can also serve as a bridging approach during this prolonged COVID-19 pandemic.

In conclusion, despite the high variability in the retrieved data, the reported prevalence in this review for infantile colic was higher when assessed using the ROME IV criteria then those using the ROME III criteria. The prevalence of infantile regurgitation and constipation were similar using either the ROME IV or III criteria.

Author Contributions

YV, UK, and LM provided a conceptualization of the writing. LM conducted literature search and analysis. All authors reviewed and edited the drafts, read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

LM and UK were employed by Friesland Campina.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Tanaka M, Nakayama J. Development of the gut microbiota in infancy and its impact on health in later life. Allergol Int. (2017) 66:515–22. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2017.07.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Jacobi SK, Odle J. Nutritional factors influencing intestinal health of the neonate. Adv Nutr. (2012) 3:687–96. doi: 10.3945/an.112.002683

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Vandenplas Y, Abkari A, Bellaiche M, Benninga M, Chouraqui JP, Cokura F, et al. Prevalence and health outcomes of functional gastrointestinal symptoms in infants from birth to 12 months of age. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. (2015) 61:531–7. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000949

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Steutel NF, Zeevenhooven J, Scarpato E, Vandenplas Y, Tabbers MM, Staiano A, et al. Prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in european infants and toddlers. J Pediatr. (2020) 221:107–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.02.076

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Zeevenhooven J, Koppen IJ, Benninga MA. The New Rome IV Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in Infants and Toddlers. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. (2017) 20:1–13. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2017.20.1.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Indrio F, Di Mauro A, Di Mauro A, Riezzo G, Panza R, Cavallo L, et al. Prevention of functional gastrointestinal disorders in neonates: clinical and socioeconomic impact. Benef Microbes. (2015) 6:195–8. doi: 10.3920/BM2014.0078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Jasani K, Piterman L, McCall L. Gastroesophageal reflux and quality of life. Patient's knowledge, attitudes and perceptions. Aust Fam Physician. (1999) 28(Suppl. 1):S15–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

8. Koppen IJN, Vriesman MH, Saps M, Rajindrajith S, Shi X, van Etten-Jamaludin FS, et al. Prevalence of functional defecation disorders in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr. (2018) 198:121–30 e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.02.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Bellaiche M, Ategbo S, Krumholz F, Ludwig T, Miqdady M, Abkari A, et al. A large-scale study to describe the prevalence, characteristics and management of functional gastrointestinal disorders in African infants. Acta Paediatr. (2020) 109:2366–73. doi: 10.1111/apa.15248

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Huang Y, Tan SY, Parikh P, Buthmanaban V, Rajindrajith S, Benninga MA. Prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in infants and young children in China. BMC Pediatr. (2021) 21:131. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02610-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. AlGhamdi M, Alfetni A. Prevalence and factors associated with functional constipation among children attending well baby clinic in aladel primary health care center in makkah al-mukarramah, 2016. Cross sectional. Int J Adv Res. (2017) 5:1175–85. doi: 10.21474/IJAR01/5170

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Hyman PE, Milla PJ, Benninga MA, Davidson GP, Fleisher DF, Taminiau J. Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders: neonate/toddler. Gastroenterology. (2006) 130:1519–26. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Chew KS, Em JM, Koay ZL, Jalaludin MY, Ng RT, Lum LCS, et al. Low prevalence of infantile functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) in a multi-ethnic Asian population. Pediatr Neonatol. (2021) 62:49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2020.08.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Chogle A, Velasco-Benitez CA, Koppen IJ, Moreno JE, Ramirez Hernandez CR, Saps M. A population-based study on the epidemiology of functional gastrointestinal disorders in young children. J Pediatr. (2016) 179:139–43 e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.08.095

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Altamimi E, Scarpato E, Saleh I, Tantawi K, Alassaf M, Ijam M, et al. National Prevalence Of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders In Jordanian Children. Clin Exp. Gastroenterol. (2020) 13:267–72. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S256276

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Park M, Bang YG, Cho KY. Risk factors for functional constipation in young children attending daycare centers. J Korean Med Sci. (2016) 31:1262–5. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.8.1262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Robin SG, Keller C, Zwiener R, Hyman PE, Nurko S, Saps M, et al. Prevalence of pediatric functional gastrointestinal disorders utilizing the Rome IV criteria. J Pediatr. (2018) 195:134–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.12.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Beser OF, Cullu CF, Dogan G, Akgun O, Elevli M, Yilmazbas P, et al. The frequency of and factors affecting functional gastrointestinal disorders in infants that presented to tertiary care hospitals. Eur J Pediatr. (2021) 180:2443–52. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04059-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Curien-Chotard M, Jantchou P. Natural history of gastroesophageal reflux in infancy: new data from a prospective cohort. BMC Pediatr. (2020) 20:152. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02047-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Sutcu Caglar H, Hisar F. Identification of prevalence of constipation in infants aged 0-12 months in rural areas. Rural Remote Health. (2019) 19:4870. doi: 10.22605/RRH4870

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Population Division UN. World Population Prospects. (2021). Available online at: https://population.un.org/wpp/.

22. Hoang VM, Le TV, Chu TTQ, Le BN, Duong MD, Thanh NM, et al. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders and their relation to selected socio-demographic factors among children aged 18-30 months in northern Vietnam, 2017. Int J Ment Health Syst. (2019) 13:29. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0285-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Aslam M AM, Mushtaq D, Zaid M, Riaz M, Nasir A. Parent-based self-medication in Pakistani children: a qualitative cross-sectional survey. Bangladesh J Med Sci. (2016) 15:33–8. doi: 10.3329/bjms.v15i1.22055

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Mukattash TL JA, Khawaldeh A, Nusair M. Parental self-treatment of their children in Jordan, a qualitative study. J Pharm Health Serv Res. (2019) 10:317–23. doi: 10.1111/jphs.12282

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Cunha SS, Newcombe PJ. Parental understanding of wheeze and its impact on asthma prevalence estimates. Eur Respir J. (2007) 29:1069–70; author reply 70. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00004207

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Michel G, Silverman M, Strippoli MP, Zwahlen M, Brooke AM, Grigg J, et al. Parental understanding of wheeze and its impact on asthma prevalence estimates. Eur Respir J. (2006) 28:1124–30. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00008406

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Lee YJ, Park KS. Understanding the changes in diagnostic criteria for functional constipation in pediatric patients: from Rome III to Rome IV. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. (2019) 25:3–5. doi: 10.5056/jnm18199

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Chu H, Zhong L, Li H, Zhang X, Zhang J, Hou X. Epidemiology characteristics of constipation for general population, pediatric population, and elderly population in China. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014:532734. doi: 10.1155/2014/532734

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Shenassa ED, Brown MJ. Maternal smoking and infantile gastrointestinal dysregulation: the case of colic. Pediatrics. (2004) 114:e497–505. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Singendonk M GE, Langendam M, van Wijk M, van Etten-Jamaludin F, Benninga M, et al. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in infants and children: a systematic review. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. (2019) 68:811–7. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002280

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Hegar B, Boediarso A, Firmansyah A, Vandenplas Y. Investigation of regurgitation and other symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in Indonesian infants. World J Gastroenterol. (2004) 10:1795–7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i12.1795

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Vandenplas Y, Salvatore S, Ribes-Koninckx C, Carvajal E, Szajewska H, Huysentruyt K. The cow milk symptom score (CoMiSSTM) in presumed healthy infants. PLoS ONE. (2018) 13:e0200603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200603

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. van den Berg MM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of childhood constipation: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. (2006) 101:2401–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00771.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Khayat A AG, Baik S, Alhajori M, Banjar D. The effect of using Rome IV criteria on the prevalence of functional abdominal pain disorders and functional constipation among children of the Western Region of Saudi Arabia. Global Pediatric Health. (2021) 8:2333794X211022265. doi: 10.1177/2333794X211022265

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Vandenplas Y, Hauser B, Salvatore S. Functional gastrointestinal disorders in infancy: impact on the health of the infant and family. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. (2019) 22:207–16. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2019.22.3.207

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Akseer N, Kandru G, Keats EC, Bhutta ZA. COVID-19 pandemic and mitigation strategies: implications for maternal and child health and nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr. (2020) 112:251–6. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa171

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Appendix 1

TABLE A1
www.frontiersin.org

Table A1. Search strategy.

Keywords: prevalence, colic, regurgitation, constipation, young children, review

Citation: Muhardi L, Aw MM, Hasosah M, Ng RT, Chong SY, Hegar B, Toro-Monjaraz E, Darma A, Cetinkaya M, Chow CM, Kudla U and Vandenplas Y (2022) A Narrative Review on the Update in the Prevalence of Infantile Colic, Regurgitation, and Constipation in Young Children: Implications of the ROME IV Criteria. Front. Pediatr. 9:778747. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.778747

Received: 27 September 2021; Accepted: 24 November 2021;
Published: 05 January 2022.

Edited by:

Maria Elisabetta Baldassarre, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy

Reviewed by:

Tudor Lucian Pop, Iuliu Haṭieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania
Jan De Laffolie, University of Giessen, Germany

Copyright © 2022 Muhardi, Aw, Hasosah, Ng, Chong, Hegar, Toro-Monjaraz, Darma, Cetinkaya, Chow, Kudla and Vandenplas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yvan Vandenplas, yvan.Vandenplas@uzbrussel.be

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.