Opiate Drugs with Abuse Liability Hijack the Endogenous Opioid System to Disrupt Neuronal and Glial Maturation in the Central Nervous System

The endogenous opioid system, comprised of multiple opioid neuropeptide and receptor gene families, is highly expressed by developing neural cells and can significantly influence neuronal and glial maturation. In many central nervous system (CNS) regions, the expression of opioid peptides and receptors occurs only transiently during development, effectively disappearing with subsequent maturation only to reemerge under pathologic conditions, such as with inflammation or injury. Opiate drugs with abuse liability act to modify growth and development by mimicking the actions of endogenous opioids. Although typically mediated by μ-opioid receptors, opiate drugs can also act through δ- and κ-opioid receptors to modulate growth in a cell-type, region-specific, and developmentally regulated manner. Opioids act as biological response modifiers and their actions are highly contextual, plastic, modifiable, and influenced by other physiological processes or pathophysiological conditions, such as neuro-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. To date, most studies have considered the acute effects of opiates on cellular maturation. For example, activating opioid receptors typically results in acute growth inhibition in both neurons and glia. However, with sustained opioid exposure, compensatory factors become operative, a concept that has been largely overlooked during CNS maturation. Accordingly, this article surveys prior studies on the effects of opiates on CNS maturation, and also suggests new directions for future research in this area. Identifying the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the adaptive responses to chronic opiate exposure (e.g., tolerance) during maturation is crucial toward understanding the consequences of perinatal opiate exposure on the CNS.

Introduction

Maternal opiate abuse and neonatal abstinence syndrome are increasing at an alarming rate and this is in large part fueled by increases in the illicit use of prescription opiates (1–4). A 2015 press release from the National Institute on Drug Abuse noted that “Delivering mothers using or dependent on opiates rose nearly fivefold from 2000 to 2009” (5). Opiate drugs with abuse liability alter brain development through direct and indirect actions on neuronal and glial maturation. The goal of this review is to examine our current understanding of the direct cellular and molecular effects of opiates on central nervous system (CNS) maturation. Although it was well established in the 1970s that in utero and perinatal exposure to opiate drugs would hinder brain maturation, not until the early 1990s was it realized that opiates per se, through direct actions on opioid receptor-expressing immature neurons and glia, could intrinsically affect the maturation of the CNS. This realization by no means discounts or understates the importance of the myriad psychosocial and psychiatric (e.g., anxiety and depression) problems, comorbid bacterial (e.g., pneumonia and sexually transmitted diseases) and viral [e.g., human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)] infections (bacterial and viral), endocrine (6), pulmonary, and cardiovascular complications (7, 8) resulting from opiate abuse that also influence brain development. Rather, by elucidating the direct developmental consequences of opiate exposure that are unavoidable even, if all the other comorbid psychosocial and medical problems associated with opiate addiction are treated, should provide insight into how to better manage the CNS consequences of perinatal opiate exposure and neonatal abstinence syndrome. Accordingly, a major goal of our studies has been to determine the direct cellular consequences of opioid exposure on brain maturation in children; rather than to study addiction per se. Many of the brain regions that are most dramatically affected by perinatal opioids are thought to be unrelated to addiction. Although understanding the underlying neural substrates of addiction is a critically important problem, and some speculative discussion on how developmental exposure to opioids might contribute to addiction in adults is provided in this review, many of the effects of opioid exposure presumably unrelated to addiction are essential for understanding the pathophysiological consequences of perinatal opioid exposure. Finally, the clinical effects of opiates on perinatal development have been reviewed elsewhere in the literature (7–13) and in this special issue of Frontiers in Pediatrics.

Opiates (derivatives of the opium poppy), such as morphine, which is a major bioactive metabolite of heroin in the brain, can have tremendous therapeutic value for alleviating chronic pain, but can also have significant abuse liability. Opiate drugs act by affecting and interfering with endogenous opioid receptors and peptides (14–20), which are collectively referred to as the endogenous opioid system (20–22). To understand the actions of opiate drugs during development, it is important to appreciate how endogenous opioid neuropeptides and receptors modulate growth and maturation. It is also important to specifically identify how opiate drugs interfere with the endogenous opioid system. Much work remains to be done.

Opioids are Modulatory

Unlike trophic factors, which can turn cellular processes on or off, e.g., neurotrophins that activate tyrosine receptor kinases (23) or wingless-type mouse mammary tumor virus integration site family (Wnt)/β-catenin signaling (24), that can switch cellular processes on or off, opioids are modulatory, meaning that they adjust biological responses quantitatively rather than qualitatively. This is especially evident during development. While opioids modify rates of ongoing cellular proliferation, differentiation, or death, and can modulate the effects of trophic factors, they do not trigger or discontinue maturational events. Instead, opioids act later in the developmental process, coordinating the timing and numerical matching of neurons and glia within a particular brain region and following the more dramatic actions of trophic factors. In fact, some brain regions that express endogenous opioid peptides and receptors during maturation—do so only transiently and no longer express them in the adult, which supports the notion that opioids are playing a unique role in development. Moreover, endogenous opioid peptides and receptors can be transiently expressed by adult neuronal progenitors in the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the dentate gyrus (discussed below). Thus, the effects of opioids on cellular growth are not restricted to embryonic and early postnatal development but continue to affect cellular maturation throughout ontogeny and are important mediators of adult neuroplasticity.

Another concept for understanding the actions of opioids in maturation is that their actions are largely dependent on context. The effects of opioids can vary depending on the cell-type, duration of exposure or stage of development, and may also depend on pre- or co-exposure to other factors (25). In neurons, for example, morphine-induced μ-opioid receptor (MOR) signaling typically activates extracellular-signal regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 (26), while prolonged morphine exposure negatively via MOR regulates ERK 1/2 signaling in astrocytes (27). Coupling of MOR, δ-opioid receptors (DOR), κ-opioid receptors (KOR), and opioid related nociceptin receptor 1 (also known as the nociceptin or orphanin FQ receptor) to downstream signaling events may be similar or can differ among cell types (28). Despite an abundance of MOR binding early during development, MOR-dependent activation of Gα_i/o, as assessed by d-Ala²-MePhe⁴, Gly-ol⁵-enkephalin (DAMGO)-stimulated [³⁵S]guanosine-5′-O-(3-thio)triphosphate ([³⁵S]GTPγS) binding, can increase as much as 19-fold from postnatal day 5 compared with some adult brain regions (29). This suggests that MOR receptor-effector coupling may be highly dynamic and vary at different times during maturation (29). In addition to differences in receptor-effector coupling, a highly speculative notion is that the molecular structure of MOR may differ among cell types (30). Multiple MOR polymorphisms and 19 splice variants have been reported (31, 32). MOR-1, MOR-1A, MOR-1X, and MOR-1K splicing variants of the human OPRM1 gene have been reported to be differentially expressed by neurons, astroglia, microglia, vascular endothelial cells, and pericytes (30).

Developing Neurons and Glia Can Express Opioid Neuropeptides and Receptors

Opioid receptors are expressed by the neural progenitor cells (NPCs) that are the common precursors of all CNS neurons and macroglia, inferring that opioids per se might directly influence very early lineage and fate decisions via paracrine or autocrine feedback loops. The occurrence of opioid peptides and receptors is not restricted to a particular stage of development, as opioids can be expressed by developing neural cells throughout ontogeny. For example, radioligand binding (33–35), in situ hybridization (36, 37), and immunocytochemical (38–40) approaches have all been used to identify MOR, DOR, and/or KOR expression on immature neural cells in the ventricular zone (VZ) and subventricular zone (SVZ) (Figure 1). MOR and KOR transcripts are expressed in murine blastocyst-derived embryonic stem cells (41) and are also present in neural progenitors in SGZ of the adult hippocampus (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Schematic diagram showing sites of neural precursor production throughout ontogeny. Neural cells are initially produced in the ventricular zone (VZ) and the subventricular zone (SVZ). The cerebellar external granular (or germinal) layer (EGL) is a secondary proliferative zone that arises from the brainstem and exclusively generates neurons (42). The SVZ becomes a major source of macroglia relatively early during maturation (approximately at birth in rodents and during the third trimester in humans), while the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the dentate gyrus is a major site of adult neurogenesis. As discussed in this review article, opiates affect the production and maturation of neurons and/or glia in each of these four regions and at different times throughout ontogeny.

Endogenous opioid peptide genes can be transiently expressed during proliferation or differentiation, but not in the mature phenotype, suggesting that the expression is solely related to growth and development. Developing neural cells that temporarily express opioid peptides are particularly intriguing, since transient expression is not associated with the onset of the expression of an adult opioidergic phenotype, but presumably involved in some aspect of cellular maturation, which includes the proliferation, differentiation, and/or programmed cell death of immature neurons and glia or their progenitors. The proteases necessary for cleavage of opioid peptides to bioactive forms, such as those involved in proenkephalin [proprotein or prohormone convertases 1 (PC1) and 2 (PC2) and furin (43)], prodynorphin (Pdyn) [PC2 (44)] and processing of proopiomelanocortin (POMC)-derived precursors into β-endorphin [PC2 (45–48)], are expressed very early during maturation within germinal zones in the CNS (49). The endogenous opioid peptide gene most frequently expressed by immature neurons and glia is preproenkephalin (Penk), whose products can be expressed as partially or fully cleaved peptide products. The expression of proenkephalin peptides can be short-lived and can temporally coincide with cell division in neuroblasts (50–52) and glia (53). The cerebellar external granular layer (EGL) is a transient germinative zone comprised with granule neuron precursors (54, 55). The EGL forms from an outcropping of the SVZ at the rostral portion of the rhombic lips (56, 57). Enkephalin immunoreactivity is transiently expressed by neuroblasts in the EGL (50). EGL neuroblasts express Penk mRNA (58, 59), as well as partially processed proenkephalin peptide fragments and the fully processed enkephalin pentapeptide, Met-enkephalin (58, 59). However, the expression of Penk mRNA and enkephalin peptides largely disappears as the immature neurons differentiate into adult granule neurons (50, 58), suggesting the expression of Penk is unrelated to a mature, terminally differentiated phenotype. This represents a departure from the transcriptional maintenance programs typical of most developing neurons (60) that never switch off and in which continued activity is necessary to maintain the adult transmitter phenotype (61). Penk expression by developing astroglia (53, 62–64) and a variety of non-neuronal types during maturation infers that Penk expression is important for maturation. Finally, because neural progenitors express opioid receptors it is reasonable to speculate that opioids per se might directly influence neural cell maturation via paracrine or autocrine feedback. Although there is evidence that applying opioid antagonists alone can enhance growth in vivo (discussed below), this is rarely supported by findings in isolated opioid-expressing neural cells in vitro where opioid antagonists by themselves only infrequently effect cellular maturation.

Unlike the temporary Penk expression patterns that can be present in neuroblasts and immature neurons, Pdyn gene products do not appear to be expressed transiently by neuroblasts or immature neurons. Thus, subsets of immature neurons that express Pdyn mRNA or Pdyn-derived peptides in the cerebral cortex and striatum (65, 66), hippocampus (66, 67), and hypothalamus (68–70) of rats, retain their dynorphinergic phenotype in the adult. By contrast to neurons, Pdyn-derived peptides are transiently expressed by differentiating immature oligodendrocytes in vitro and disappears with maturation (39). Pdyn also differs from Penk in that Pdyn expression is not found in immature or mature astrocytes (53, 62).

The POMC gene is less widely expressed in the CNS compared with Penk or Pdyn genes, and typically in association with areas, such as the hypothalamus (71) and pituitary, that are involved in neuroendocrine function and stress (72, 73). Importantly, however, POMC is expressed and post-translationally processed into β-endorphin by adult hippocampal progenitors in the SGZ of the hippocampal dentate gyrus (74, 75) (discussed below).

Endogenous Opioids Tend to Inhibit Growth

In the context of cellular maturation, endogenous opioids tend to inhibit growth (Figure 2). For example, artificially increasing endogenous opioid levels can reportedly inhibit the proliferation of EGL neuroblasts, while opioid receptor blockade using widely selective opioid receptor antagonists, such as naloxone and naltrexone, increase EGL neuroblast proliferation (39). There are exceptions to the notion that opioids inhibit growth, highlighting the concept that their actions are contextual and cell-specific. For example, acute opioid exposure is mitogenic to immature oligodendrocytes. Both effects on proliferation are discussed in more detail later.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. In general, excess opioids can inhibit and delay growth, while opioid receptor blockade can transiently accelerate growth. By inhibiting maturation, opioids decelerate the pace of development among overlapping populations of neurons and glia within specific brain regions. In the absence of opioids, there is some evidence that critical periods may become abbreviated and some developmental events may have insufficient time for completion—resulting in an increased likelihood of errors.

That endogenous opioids inhibit growth is inferred by reports showing that chronic administration of high-dose opioid antagonists to mice and rats can accelerate growth (51, 76, 77) (Figure 2). The long-acting opioid antagonist naltrexone was particularly useful in this regard as a single daily dose of 50 mg/kg in rats or 10 mg/kg in mice was sufficient to continuously block MOR, DOR, and KOR for 24 h (51, 76, 77). Paradoxically, low dosages of naltrexone were found to inhibit growth, presumably because transient exposure to a low dose of naltrexone results in a compensatory upregulation of opioid peptides and receptors (78–80). The experimental evidence for this has not been consistent; the extent to which Penk mRNA and enkephalin levels are increased appears to differ among brain regions (78). Importantly, findings from studies with sustained exposure to high-dose opioid antagonists provide circumstantial evidence that the endogenous opioid system is tonically active and can modulate development (51, 77).

Opioid peptides are broadly associated with cellular maturation both within and outside of the CNS, and can affect cellular growth through canonical pathways involving the activation of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G-protein)-coupled receptors (GPCRs) or by less well-characterized actions such as transcriptional regulation that involve non-canonical mechanisms. Much of our later discussions will be limited to opioid actions at GPCRs, which are the mode of action of abused opiate drugs. However, it is important to appreciate that proenkephalin contains DNA binding domains (81). Proenkephalin transcripts lacking exon 2 have been identified in rat forebrain neurons (82). Experimentally, the exon 2 deletion protein is redirected to the nucleus, presumably due to loss of a normal cytoplasmic-signaling sequence (83). Opioid peptides trafficked in this manner can act as transcription factors (84) to affect cells both within and outside the nervous system. By virtue of its actions as a transcriptional regulator, proenkephalin can regulate the proliferation and direct the fate of T-lymphocytes (84, 85), as well as modulate the production of cytokines such as IL-6 (84). In addition, proenkephalin-derived peptides (86) and the POMC-derived peptide, β-endorphin (87), are expressed by a large variety of cancers. This includes lung cancer cells (88, 89) and neoplastic cells of neural and non-neural origin (90). Opioid receptor activation can suppress the division of cancer cells in culture, while the blockade of opioid receptors can enhance cell proliferation (88, 89) or differentiation, mirroring the observations made in most non-neoplastic cells. Opioid-induced immune suppression, including diminished natural killer cell activity, phagocytosis, and antibody production may also promote tumor growth (91). Few studies have examined the effects of opiate tolerance on cancer cells and whether biological adaptation occurs following sustained exposure. The role of the endogenous opioid system and opiate drugs in neoplasia is inconclusive and has been reviewed elsewhere (92–94).

A key initial step toward understanding the mechanisms by which opioids modulate neuronal and glial maturation is to determine the extent to which opioids act directly or indirectly to alter proliferation, migration, differentiation, or survival of these cells and their progenitors. Since opioids have pronounced effects on a wide variety of physiological systems outside the CNS, such as respiration, gastrointestinal, and endocrine functions, and metabolism, that can in turn affect cell growth and development, determining the direct cellular effects of opioids is critical, and the direct effects of opioid signaling on the major types of CNS cells are considered individually in the following sections.

Neuroblast Proliferation

To determine whether opioids might be directly affecting the growth of cerebellar EGL neuroblasts, we used a procedure developed by Hatten and coworkers (95, 96) in which enriched populations of EGL neurons are isolated using a two-step Percoll gradient and reaggregated into neurosphere cultures (95, 96). The isolated murine EGL neuroblasts and their granule neuron progeny possessed MOR and DOR, but not KOR, immunoreactivity in vitro, as well as proenkephalin immunoreactivity (97). In the EGL cultures, morphine exposure (1 µM) significantly reduced DNA synthesis at 24 h and the number of EGL cells and their granule neuron progeny at 48 h (97) (Figure 3). The inhibitory effects of morphine on DNA synthesis and cell numbers were prevented by naloxone (3 µM) suggesting that the anti-proliferative effects of morphine are due to the activation of specific opioid receptors. By contrast, the DOR agonists Met-enkephalin, [D-Pen^2,5]-enkephalin (DPDPE) and [D-Ala²]-deltorphin II (Delt) (both were added at a 1 µM concentration) had no effect on DNA synthesis at 24 h (Figure 3) or on EGL cell numbers at 48 h (97).

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Opioids can directly inhibit the proliferation, but not the survival, of neuronal progenitors in the cerebellar external granular layer (EGL) the cerebellar external granular layer (EGL) in vitro. (A–C) Neuroblasts from the EGL were isolated using Percoll density gradient centrifugation and reaggregated into neurospheres in vitro. Exposure (24 h) to the morphine-induced μ-opioid receptor agonist morphine (Morph), but not the δ-opioid receptor agonists Met-enkephalin (Enk), [D-Pen^2,5]-enkephalin (DPDPE), or [D-Ala²]-deltorphin II (Delt), significantly decreased incorporation of the thymidine analog 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) by granule neuron precursors (*p > 0.025 versus untreated controls) (D). Compared with untreated controls (A), continuous morphine treatment (1 µM) for 24 h reduced the proportion of neuroblasts incorporating BrdU [(B); arrow]. The inhibitory effects of morphine were prevented by concurrent administration of naloxone (3 µM) (C,D). Neuroblasts incorporating BrdU were densely labeled (arrow); daughter cells appear near one another after dividing. Data represent the mean ± SEM of n = 4–6 experiments. Scale bar = 25 µm (A–C). Effect of opioids on neuronal precursor survival. (E,F) Electron micrographs showing large numbers of viable and some degenerating EGL neuronal precursors in untreated cultures. (E,F) Compromised neurons displayed cytoplasmic vacuoles and swollen mitochondria [arrows in (E)] or accumulated cytoplasmic vacuoles and marginal heterochromatin [arrow in (F)], while some dying cells were evident and displayed pyknotic nuclei with shrunken and densely packed heterochromatin [* in (F)]. Scale bars = 5 µm (E) and 10 µm (F). (G,H) Fluorescent images of living (green fluorescence) and non-viable (red fluorescence) immature neurons from the EGL in untreated control (G) and morphine-treated (H) neurospheres. Exposure to morphine (1 µM) for 24 h had no effect on EGL cell death (scale bar = 20 µm) (H). Reprinted from Ref. (97); Copyright (2000), with permission from John Wiley and Sons.

While experiments in vivo have not yet fully assessed the direct effects of opioids on individual cell types, many of the in vitro findings are at least partly mirrored in vivo. Acute opiate exposure typically inhibits the proliferation of neuroblasts (51, 52, 98–105) in vivo. Initial studies showed that exposure to morphine or methadone markedly reduced cell numbers in the forebrain during the time when cells are generated from VZ/SVZ (99, 106, 107). Some caution is warranted when interpreting in vivo studies that largely rely on measuring the incorporation of thymidine analogs [e.g., [³H]thymidine or 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU)] using biochemical and/or morphologic (counting the number or proportion of [³H]thymidine- or BrdU-labeled cells) to assess cell proliferation. Although there is typically a high degree of correlation between increased DNA synthesis and whether a cell subsequently divides, examining DNA synthesis alone can yield an inaccurate picture of cell division (108). Measuring DNA synthesis alone assumes (i) that cells entering the DNA synthesis (S) phase of the cell cycle will subsequently undergo mitosis, (ii) that the duration of the other phases of the cell cycle, or (iii) the incorporation of thymidine itself is not affected by the experimental conditions. Exploring other parameters such as cell death is paramount since neurons in the developing nervous system can be frequently overproduced only to be later culled through programmed cell death (discussed later).

Growth inhibition is not restricted to a particular brain region, stage of development, or opioid receptor type. For example, enkephalinamide reduces [³H]thymidine incorporation in the forebrain, hypothalamus, and cerebellum of 11-day-old rats (104). Administering Met-enkephalin (52, 109) or other proenkephalin A derivatives (109) similarly attenuated DNA synthesis brain within the cerebellum and medullary area in 6-day-old rats. In a more detailed study, administering MOR (DAMGO), DOR [(d-Ser⁸)-leucine enkephalin-Thr (DSLET)], or KOR (bremazocine) agonists caused time-dependent (2.5, 4.5, and 8.5 h post-injection) alterations in [³H]thymidine labeling and mitotic indices in germinal cells of the cortical VZ of embryonic day 16 rats exposed in utero that differed among MOR, DOR, or KOR agonists and that displayed subtle differences between right and left hemispheres (38). In general, the MOR agonist DAMGO was mitogenic at 8.5 h and to a greater extent at 4.5 h post-injection, while DOR activation with DSLET decreased [³H]thymidine labeling and mitotic indices at 4.5 h post-injection suggesting the duration of the S and the mitotic (M) phases of the cell cycle are reduced (38). This study demonstrated the widespread and coordinated actions of the endogenous opioid system in modulating the generation of new neurons in the VZ or SVZ. Furthermore, the results provided novel evidence that KOR activation may regulate the development of circuitry involved in the lateralization of the brain (38).

A speculative notion is that the actions of KOR agonists during maturation may partially underlie the neurochemical and functional (right versus left)-asymmetry seen in the enkephalinergic and dynorphinergic systems in the adult CNS of rodents (110–113) and humans (114). For example, the lateralization of enkephalinergic and dynorphinergic processing in the anterior cingulate cortex is hypothesized to be involved in the differential regulation of positive and negative emotions and in the perception of pain in the right- versus left-hand sides of the brain (114). Alterations in Pdyn-derived peptide processing, dynorphin levels, and KOR signaling in forebrain areas including the prefrontal cortex and striatum have been implicated in substance abuse and pro-addictive behaviors (115–118). Enduring changes in these systems during maturation are likely to cause lasting alterations in neural circuitry underlying addiction, as well as other CNS functions unrelated to addiction.

The developmental effects of opioids on the cerebellar EGL have been explored in more detail than in many other regions. Opioid peptides and receptors are highly expressed by the immature EGL cells (consisting of neuroblasts and immature, postmitotic neurons), while the mature granule neurons derived from this germinative zone lose this expression (34, 50, 58). Thus, the opioid system in the EGL is positioned to be more involved in maturational processes and less related to the development/maintenance of adult neurochemical systems (42). Manipulation of the opioid system alters the proliferation of EGL neuroblasts and production of granule neurons derived from the EGL (51, 52, 77, 105). Morphine or methadone, which act preferentially at MOR, reduced thymidine incorporation and/or resulted in reductions in EGL cell numbers in vivo (119–121). Alternatively, despite findings that opioid receptor antagonists augment EGL cell proliferation in vivo (51) and that EGL cells express proenkephalin peptides in vitro (97), neither the broad-spectrum opioid receptor antagonist naloxone nor selective DOR antagonists alone affected the proliferation of isolated EGL cells (97). Findings in isolated EGL cells suggest that opioids do not directly affect EGL neuroblast growth through autocrine and/or paracrine feedback. Instead, opioids may affect another aspect of cerebellar maturation, such as Purkinje cell development, which in turn can influence EGL cell growth (122, 123).

Neuronal Differentiation

Unlike the effects of morphine on EGL proliferation, morphine had no effect on granule neuron differentiation (97). Alternatively, dendritic growth was stunted by 48 h exposure to the selective DOR agonists enkephalin (1 µM) or Delt (1 µM), but not the selective DOR agonist DPDPE (97). The fact that distinct DOR agonists act differently at the same receptor strongly infers that the effects of DOR agonists on neuronal differentiation are functionally selective and displaying “biased agonism” (124–126), meaning that individual ligands selectively stimulate different signal transduction pathways via the same receptor. Finally, the findings also provide clear evidence that different opioid receptor types, MOR or DOR, can independently regulate different aspects of development in the same cell.

Unlike the effect of morphine in EGL neuroblasts, morphine can inhibit the differentiation of Purkinje cells in organotypic explants from 1-day-old mice (127). At 7–10 days in vitro, calbindin-D_28k-immunoreactive Purkinje cells in control, as well as morphine-treated explant cultures, possessed dendrites with growth cones and filopodial processes indicative of active growth (Figure 4). The presence of developing synapses was also confirmed by using electron microscopy (Figure 4). Continuous exposure to morphine (Figure 4E) for 7–10 days in vitro caused concentration-dependent reductions in the length of growing dendrites in cerebellar explants derived from 1-day-old mice. Exposure to morphine for 7–10 days resulted in a significant reduction in dendritic length (EC₅₀ = 49 nM) and the effects of a high (10 µM) concentration of morphine were completely reversed by concurrent naloxone administration. Importantly, the effects were shown to be concentration-dependent and preventable by naloxone suggesting that the effects of morphine are mediated by specific opioid receptors. Although the cellular site(s) of morphine’s actions within the cerebellum are uncertain, the results clearly indicate that morphine, through direct actions on the cerebellum per se, can inhibit the differentiation of Purkinje cell dendrites. Morphine can directly reduce EGL cell proliferation and granule cell numbers (97), and given the well-known trophic ability of granule cells to direct Purkinje cell maturation (128) and known interdependence between these two cell types (122, 123), this is strong evidence that morphine modulates granule cell and Purkinje cell trophic interactions during development.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Morphine inhibits Purkinje cell dendritic differentiation and increases their death in a concentration-dependent manner in organotypic cultures of the mouse cerebellum. (A–C) Bilaterally matched explant pairs were grown in the presence and absence of morphine. (A) Schematic drawing of the cerebellum from a 1-day-old mouse illustrating the “homologous- or mirror-pair” paradigm (129, 130) used to assess the experimental effects of opiates in this study (127). (B,C) Bilaterally matched explant pairs are matched in size, shape, and cytoarchitecture and this is maintained by organotypic culture conditions. Purkinje cells in the untreated control explants (B) had larger dendrites compared with their matched-pair counterparts continuously treated with morphine (1 µM) (C) for 7–10 days [scale bar = 25 µm; (B,C) are the same scale]. (D,E) Composite camera lucida drawings of calbindin-D_28k-immunoreactive Purkinje cells illustrating the effects of high concentrations (10 µM) of morphine on Purkinje cell numbers. Compared with untreated controls (D), continuous exposure to morphine (E) for 7–10 days in vitro caused concentration-dependent reductions in dendritic length and in the number of calbindin-D_28k-immunoreactive Purkinje cells in cerebellar explants derived from 1-day-old mice. Filopodial processes (arrowheads) extend from the cell body or dendrites of developing calbindin-D_28k-immunoreactive Purkinje cells—some filopodia terminate in growth cones (arrowheads) [scale bar = 25 µm; (D,E) are the same scale]. (F–J) Electron micrographs of Purkinje cells in organotypic explants continuously exposed to morphine for 7–10 days in vitro. Many Purkinje cells in morphine-treated organotypic explants display normal ultrastructural features. Cerebellar Purkinje cells can be identified by unique features, such as subsurface or hypolemmal cisternae [arrows in (F)] (131–133) (scale bar = 1 µm). (H) Developing Purkinje cell (scale bar = 5 µm). (G) Higher magnification of the axosomatic synapse contacting the Purkinje cell in [(H); arrows] (scale bar = 2 µm). (I,J) Degenerating cells in morphine-treated organotypic explants at 7–10 days in vitro. (I) A degenerating Purkinje cell with a deficit in cytoplasmic organelles and abnormally dense marginal heterochromatin (scale bar = 2 µm). (J) A large, dying neuron resembling a Purkinje cell with access lipid inclusions and glycogen in the cytoplasm and partial destruction of the nuclear membrane (scale bar = 3 µm). With progressive degeneration and loss of cellular morphology, it can be difficult to identify Purkinje cells with certainty. Reprinted from Ref. (127); Copyright (1994), with permission from Elsevier.

The cerebellum is becoming increasingly linked to neural circuitry involved in addictive behaviors including aversion, reward, motivational drive, and saliency (134, 135). Addiction is associated with “impaired response inhibition” and “salience attribution” (136–138). Emerging evidence suggests that the cerebellum maintains the homeostatic balance among these brain regions (134, 135), and is critical for habit formation, attention to novel stimuli, and behavioral inhibition—behavioral traits associated with addiction (135). Moreover, chronic exposure to a variety of substances in adults can result in structural deficits in the gray matter and/or white matter within cerebellar lobules VI, VIIb, Crus I, Crus II, and within the vermis (134, 139). Assuming greater sensitivity of developing versus the mature cerebellum, perinatal exposure to opiates is likely to have profound organizational effects on the neural circuits regulating drug taking behavior. Importantly, not only do Purkinje cells in the cerebellar vermis transiently express Penk mRNA and enkephalin immunoreactivity during development (58, 59), but also the dendritic complexity and/or the density of spines of Purkinje cells within the vermis of cerebellar lobule VIII in 10-day-old rats and lobules VI–VIII in 21-day-old rats is altered in response to prolonged opioid antagonist exposure during maturation (21). The extent to which the transient developmental increases in opioid expression in cerebellar neurons influence adult CNS functions is uncertain.

Exposure to morphine (100) or methadone (140) during development inhibits the neurochemical (140) and morphological (107, 120) maturation of the brain, including reductions in neuronal numbers (106). Hammer and coworkers demonstrated that sustained morphine (10 mg/kg/day) exposure via subcutaneous osmotic minipump from gestational day 12 until postnatal day 6 in rats results in significant reductions in neuronal density and in the absolute numbers of neurons in layers II–III, IV, and V of the primary somatosensory cortex, but not layer VI (103). The same study found no effect of morphine on the thickness of layers II through VI of the somatosensory cortex. Interestingly, sustained exposure to the opioid antagonist naltrexone (10 mg/kg/day) also decreased neuronal density in cortical layers II through V and the total number of neurons in layer V, while increasing the thickness of layers II–III and throughout the entire cortex (103). Possible explanations for similar actions of morphine and naltrexone might include: (i) Naltrexone may act by transiently enhancing dendritic differentiation in rat somatosensory cortex (21) and/or (ii) by increasing glial numbers (39). Either action would result in a decrease in the relative density and number of neurons per unit volume, while increasing the overall thickness of the cortex. Earlier work by Hammer and coworkers (141) established that exposure to morphine during perinatal development decreased the length of basilar dendrites of layers II–III pyramidal neurons in somatosensory cortex. Morphine-dependent reductions in basilar dendritic complexity were prevented by co-administering naltrexone (141). In confirmatory studies, the offspring of pregnant rats exposed to morphine (5 mg/kg first 3 days; 10 mg/kg thereafter) during gestational days 11–18, showed enduring reductions in dendritic complexity in layer II/III pyramidal neurons of the secondary visual cortex at postnatal day 25 (142). Decreases in pyramidal cell numbers in hippocampal areas CA1, CA2, and CA3 are also reported in postnatal day 18 or day 32 offspring of female mice chronically administered morphine (10 mg/kg/day) before mating, during gestation, and postnatally (143). More recently, postnatal morphine exposure (2 mg/kg, b.i.d.) from postnatal days 3 through 7 in rats was found to decrease incorporation of the thymidine analog BrdU by NPCs in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus (144). In addition, the same study detected lower levels of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), taurine, and myo-inositol by functional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and decreased amounts of myelin basic protein (144) (important for myelinogenesis) in the hippocampus (144). Reductions in GAD, essential for the interconversion of glutamate to γ-aminobutyric acid, suggest marked imbalances in excitatory versus inhibitory neurotransmission.

The accelerated maturation seen with opioid receptor blockade can seem dramatic during peak periods of development in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum. However, the effects are often transient and in many brain regions untreated controls appear to catch-up during later development (21).

Neuronal Cell Death

The effects of opioids on cell death and survival in neural and non-neural cells, especially in relation to immune and endocrine function, chronic pain, and cancer in adults have been studied (145–147) and extensively reviewed previously (148).

Purkinje cell death is evident in organotypic explants from 1-day-old mice exposed to pharmacological concentrations of opiates (127). Continuous exposure to high concentrations of morphine (>1 μM) for 7–10 days in vitro caused reductions in the number of calbindin-D_28k-immunoreactive Purkinje cells in cerebellar explants derived from 1-day-old mice (127). The ability of morphine to decrease the number of calbindin-D_28k-immunopositive Purkinje cells was concentration-dependent (EC₅₀ = 3.6 µM) and morphine-induced (10 µM) death in Purkinje neurons was antagonized by co-exposure to naloxone. To assess whether reductions in Purkinje cell numbers might potentially be due to a morphine-dependent decline in calbindin-D_28k expression, electron microscopy was used to confirm that Purkinje cell death was occurring especially in morphine-treated explant cultures (Figure 4). Although morphine was cytotoxic to Purkinje cells in organotypic explants from 1-day-old mouse cerebella, toxicity was not evident in Purkinje cells in explants taken from 7-day mouse cerebella (127). This suggests that, even at high concentrations, morphine is not inherently toxic to Purkinje cells; rather, morphine is likely to be interfering with critical developmental events affecting survival during the first, but not second, week of postnatal development in mice. Although cell death is not seen with concentrations of morphine exceeding 1 µM in cultured mouse EGL cells (97) (Figure 3), prolonged (5-day) exposure to a range of morphine concentrations between 10⁻¹² and 10⁻⁴ M induces classic apoptosis, including DNA fragmentation, in human fetal brain neurons (147). This suggests that the duration of exposure to opiates may also be important in triggering programmed cell death (147). The varied response among neuron types and conditions highlights that the mechanism(s) and pathways underlying opiate-induced cell death are far from being completely understood, and likely vary among cell types and context. Other investigators have demonstrated that opiates can modulate cell death via PI3K and ERK 1/2 signaling in Chinese hamster ovary or HEK293 cells stably transfected with the murine MOR (149). In some instances, opiates may affect cell survival in addition to their effects on proliferation, although this is not a consistent observation. Alternatively, surrounding glia, which can display extreme regional and developmentally diverse phenotypic patterns of MOR, DOR, and KOR expression (150, 151) (discussed below), may also contribute to varied developmental responses among different neuronal types to opioids.

The death of neuronal precursors is occasionally reported as a consequence of exposure to opiates (152) or endogenous opioids (153) by themselves. In addition, opioids can modulate the effects of existing apoptotic signals [especially in immune cells (154, 155)], and opiates may be cofactors in regulating neural cell death (156, 157) [see Ref. (148)]. Cell death is evident in cultured Purkinje cells with more chronic 7-day exposure to morphine (discussed above) (127), and Purkinje cell losses have been reported in chronic heroin abusers who are HIV-seronegative (158).

Glial Maturation

The generation of neurons throughout the CNS is thought to be essentially complete at birth in rodents apart from the formation of interneurons of the olfactory bulbs, the dentate gyrus, and the cerebellar cortex (159–162). Nevertheless, in the 1980s, there were emerging reports demonstrating opioid-dependent alterations in DNA synthesis and cell numbers, without changes in cell survival, in neural cells throughout the brain long after peak periods of neurogenesis (98, 100, 104). In fact, in adult rats, increases in [³H]thymidine labeling in the SVZ were evident 1 h after morphine injection (10 mg/kg, s.c.) (163) in brain regions that are not associated with adult neurogenesis. This discrepancy prompted us to question whether opioids might have widespread effects on the generation of glia throughout the CNS.

There were several indications that glial-restricted precursors (GRPs), as well as their astroglial and oligodendroglial progeny, could be a direct target of opioids during maturation. (i) As mentioned, opioid exposure has widespread effects on cell numbers during periods of peak gliogenesis, when most macroglial types in the forebrain are being generated from the SVZ and after the production of neurons is largely complete. The sustained mitogenic effects seen in the postnatal forebrain 8–10 weeks following exposure to naltrexone (98) could hardly be explained by alterations in neurogenesis—since the production of neurons from the SGZ and rostral migratory stream is relatively small compared with the observed alterations in cell numbers. In addition to timing, (ii) opioids affect sites of glial production in the SVZ. (iii) Opioid receptors are often expressed by GRPs and immature astroglia, including radial glia (40), and oligodendroglia, but less frequently by their adult counterparts (39) (Figure 5). (iv) Finally as discussed in detail below, opioids can directly affect the proliferation and differentiation of immature astrocytes and oligodendrocytes isolated in vitro. Thus, many of the effects of opioids on cell numbers in the postnatal CNS are largely attributable to enduring alterations in gliogenesis rather than neurogenesis.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Opioid receptors can be expressed by immature neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. (A) μ-Opioid receptor (MOR) (Mu; green fluorescence) immunoreactive cells can be present in some portions of the ventricular zone and/or subventricular zone (SVZ) of postnatal day 5 mice (scale bar = 20 µm). Many of the MOR+ cells entering the SVZ are NeuN-immunoreactive neurons (red fluorescence). The dashed lines represent the borders of the lateral ventricle. (B) Photomicrograph showing combined neuronal nuclear (NeuN; red fluorescence), glutamate transporter (GLAST, also known as excitatory amino acid transporter 1; blue fluorescence), and MOR (green fluorescence) immunofluorescence in cells from postnatal day 5 mice. Subpopulations of both neurons (arrows) and astroglia (*) express MOR. (C) Thymidine analog, 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) labeled (red fluorescence), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP+) astrocytes (green fluorescence) are indicated by the arrows (C); cell nuclei are counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (blue fluorescence) [scale bar in (B) = 25 µm; (B,C) are the same magnification]. (D) Effect of morphine and/or naltrexone on BrdU incorporation in GFAP-expressing cells within the postnatal day 5-mouse brain. Morphine significantly decreased the proportion of BrdU+ astrocytes (*p < 0.05) and there is a significant difference between morphine-treated and naltrexone-treated mice (^#p < 0.05). (E–J) Oligodendrocytes express MOR and κ-opioid receptors (KOR) in a developmentally regulated manner in vitro. Oligodendrocytes are labeled using the specific anti-O4 antibody (red fluorescence) and colocalized with MOR (E,F) or KOR (H,I) immunoreactivity. (E,F) MOR are localized within discrete perinuclear regions of the cell body (arrows) (green fluorescence); areas where O4 and MOR or KOR are colocalized display yellow fluorescence. MORs can be associated with oligodendrocytes at different stages of development, including very immature oligodendrocytes with negligible O4 immunoreactivity [crossed arrow; (E)] and more mature oligodendrocytes with large process networks [arrow; (F)] [scale bar in (F) = 10 µm; (E,F) are the same magnification]. (G) The effect of opioid receptor agonists and antagonists on BrdU uptake in cultured O4+ oligodendrocytes of two different ages. At 1 day after enrichment, oligodendrocytes are still relatively immature and express only μ-receptors. A 27-h exposure to the MOR agonist PL017 increases BrdU uptake by nearly 300% compared with control values. In the presence of naloxone (PL017/Nal), this effect is not seen. At 3–4 days after enrichment, neither MOR nor a KOR agonist (U50,488) or antagonist [nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI)] affect BrdU uptake in a significant manner. Cells were counted on duplicate coverslips from 4 to 5 different cultures (*p < 0.01; ANOVA with post hoc Newman-Keuls testing). (H,I) By contrast to MOR, KOR are distributed through the entire cell body cytoplasm. Occasional oligodendrocytes also have KOR-immunoreactivity within regions along cell processes [arrows; (I)] [scale bar in (I) = 20 µm; (H,I) are the same magnification]. (J) Effects of opioid receptor agonists and antagonists on oligodendrocyte cell area. After 48 h of exposure, the only significant effect is seen with the KOR antagonist, nor-BNI, which increased the average cell area compared with control cells (*p < 0.025) (J). This effect was not seen at 27 h (164). The finding that nor-BNI increases the elaboration of cytoplasmic processes provides circumstantial evidence that endogenous opioids are expressed and inhibit oligodendrocyte differentiation (164). Subsequent studies showed that differentiating oligodendrocytes produce dynorphins and these endogenous KOR peptide ligands appear to preferentially decrease the survival of oligodendrocytes during later maturation (165). Thus, an alternative explanation is that the loss of more mature oligodendrocytes results in a net increase in immature oligodendrocytes and the perception that dynorphin is restricting differentiation. Figures (A–D) are reprinted from Ref. (39); Copyright (2001), with permission from John Wiley and Sons. Figures (E–J) are reprinted with slight modifications from Ref. (164); Copyright (1998), with permission from John Wiley and Sons.

Astrocyte Production and Development

We and others have proposed that astroglia are direct targets for opioid drugs with abuse liability (25, 166–170). Astroglial growth has been shown to be inhibited by opioids in vitro and in vivo (25, 39, 109, 169, 171–174). Astroglia can express MOR, DOR, and/or KOR (39, 150, 168, 169, 171, 174–178). Opioid receptor expression by astrocytes in primary culture is developmentally regulated, differs among brain regions (150, 173, 175, 177, 179–181), and in the case of DOR, appears to be cell cycle-dependent (150, 179). Activation of MOR, KOR, or DOR causes reduced astroglial proliferation (169, 174, 177). In addition to inhibiting astroglial division, morphine also causes astrocytes to hypertrophy. MOR-dependent inhibition of astroglial proliferation and hypertrophy are mediated by increases in intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca²⁺]_i) (174, 177). In these studies, MOR-dependent increases in [Ca²⁺]_i could be elicited by morphine (100 nM) or the more selective MOR agonist H-Tyr-Pro-Phe (N-Me)-D-Pro-NH₂ (PL017) (10 nM, 100 nM, or 1 µM), and resulted from both extracellular Ca²⁺ influx via L-type Ca²⁺ channels and from Ca²⁺ mobilization from intracellular stores (174). The effects of morphine on astroglial proliferation and cellular hypertrophy can be mimicked by artificially increasing [Ca²⁺]_i (in the absence of morphine) or prevented by chelating intracellular Ca²⁺. Nifedipine (1 µM) was used to assess whether influx through L-type Ca²⁺ channels might be operative. While blocking influx through L-type Ca²⁺ channels attenuated MOR-dependent [Ca²⁺]_i increases in astrocytes, this strategy had no effect on morphine’s ability to inhibit proliferation or stimulate hypertrophy. Thapsigargin and dantrolene were used to assess the role of Ca²⁺ mobilization from intracellular sources. Sustained (24 h) exposure to thapsigargin (100 nM), which blocks sarco/endoplasmic reticulum (ER) Ca²⁺ ATPase (182) and prevents Ca²⁺ sequestration into ER thereby depleting the ER of Ca²⁺, was intrinsically toxic to astrocytes confounding any interpretation of the results. Alternatively, blocking Ca²⁺-induced Ca²⁺ release from intracellular stores using dantrolene (10 µM) selectively prevented morphine-induced decreases in astroglial proliferation and cellular hypertrophy (174). Dantrolene selectively blocks ryanodine receptors (RyR) by blocking Ca²⁺ channels associated with the RyR1 and RyR3, but not the RyR2, isoform (183). The results indicate that opiates regulate astroglial growth and maturation through a pathway involving MOR-dependent mobilization of [Ca²⁺]_i via RyR1 and/or RyR3.

In flat-polyhedral (type I) astroglia isolated from the cerebral forebrain of postnatal day 1–4 ICR mice, KOR-mediated increases in [Ca²⁺]_i were initiated using the selective agonists trans-(+/−)-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)cyclohexyl]benzeneacetamide hydrochloride (U50,488H) (10 nM, 100 nM, or 1 µM) or (+)-(5α,7α,8β)-N-methyl-N-[7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-oxaspiro[4.5]dec-8-yl]-benzeneacetamide (U69,593) (10 nM, 100 nM, or 1 µM) (184, 185). The effects of U69,593 on astroglial proliferation and hypertrophy could be mimicked by artificially increasing [Ca²⁺]_i in the absence of drug and could be prevented by the KOR antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI). Process-bearing (type II) astrocytes, which resemble radial glia, isolated from postnatal day 1–3 mouse spinal cord, widely expressed KOR. Unlike the results in type I astrocytes from the cerebral forebrain, exposing type II spinal cord astrocytes to the KOR agonist U50,488 (1 µM) for 3 DIV or 6 DIV increased DNA synthesis as assessed by BrdU incorporation in vitro, while concurrent administration of the KOR antagonist nor-BNI or the use of KOR^−/− astrocytes negated the effects of U50,488 (186). A similar mitogenic effect was noted in serum-starved (28 h) astrocytes isolated from cerebral cortex of postnatal day 1 Sprague–Dawley rat pups or from immortalized rat cortical astrocytes (CTX TNA2; ATCC) exposed for 24 h to U69,593 (1 µM) or the KOR agonist derived from salvinorin A, MOM-Sal-B (1 µM) (187). The collective findings suggest that KOR activation can have both inhibitory and excitatory effects on astroglial proliferation and that this may differ among astroglial types, brain regions, and context. Inhibition of astrogliogenesis through MOR-and KOR-mediated events was shown to be driven via ERK, by contrast to the implication of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in opioid-mediated attenuation of neurogenesis (41). Importantly, opioids can modulate basic fibroblast growth factor and/or epidermal growth factor activation of ERK in C6 glioma cells or in primary astrocytes (170, 188, 189). Whether DOR-dependent increases in astroglial [Ca²⁺]_i are also antimitotic have not been explored. The “reactive” cellular hypertrophy is accompanied by increased glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) immunoreactivity and aspects may mimic reactive gliosis in vivo (174, 190).

In 4–5-day-old postnatal mice, 4.5 h of morphine (20 mg/kg s.c.) exposure significantly decreased BrdU incorporation by astrocytes in the SVZ of the lateral ventricle (39). A similar slowing of proliferation was suggested in a study where the G₂/M phase of cell cycle was lengthened in GFAP+ radial glia in the cerebral cortex when gestational day 15.5 (E 15.5) embryonic mice were exposed to morphine (E 15 pregnant dams received 3 × 10 mg/kg s.c. at 3 h intervals) (191). Based on findings that opioid receptor activation can regulate cellular development, it seems probable that the varied patterns of opioid receptor and peptide expression within diverse cell types permit the simultaneous and coordinated control of development within heterologous subpopulations of cells. Moreover, findings that many NPCs likely express MOR, and that morphine acutely alters astroglial development, prompt speculation that chronic opiate exposure might cause lasting changes in neural function by disrupting gliogenesis.

Morphine normally has little or no effect on astroglial viability during maturation after either acute or sustained exposure (192). Indeed, morphine can protect neonatal astrocytes against the cytotoxic effects of peroxynitrite (193). Similarly, astroglial apoptosis, as assessed by caspase-3 cleavage, was not evident in neonatal rat pups exposed to morphine (10 mg/kg; b.i.d.) on postnatal day 1 through 7 (194). Alternatively, morphine-induced death is evident in astrocytes in mixed-NPC cultures from 14-day mouse embryos (195). Although astrocyte death is not reported with exposure to opiates alone in vitro, sustained (96 h) exposure to morphine (500 nM) causes small, but nevertheless significant, increases in the death of immature astrocytes or glially restricted precursors that have been co-exposed to the HIV-1 Tat (transactivator of transcription) protein (100 nM) (156). This and other evidence suggests that the response of target cells to morphine can be “reprogrammed” by exposure to HIV-1 Tat. Morphine (and presumably other opiates) can act as biological response modifiers, imparting very different intracellular signals that instruct some astrocytes to die if they have been pre- or co-exposed to HIV-1 Tat (156), and perhaps other biological stressors. These findings illustrate the importance of context in shaping how developing neural cells interpret an opioid signal.

Oligodendrocytes

Oligodendrocytes produce myelin in the CNS (196) and originate during a second wave of glial maturation following genesis of astroglia (197, 198). Slow generation of new oligodendrocytes and adaptive myelination are processes that continue throughout life (199). Importantly, chronic opiate exposure results in significant, selective disruption of white matter tracts throughout the CNS (200–203). While some of this injury may be due to indirect effects involving inflammatory changes or loss of support from astroglia, it is also clear that significant effects of opiates occur directly on oligodendroglia. Our labs were the first to show that oligodendrocytes express MOR and KOR (164, 204). Unlike the situation in neuroblasts and astroglia, where MOR activation inhibits cell replication, MOR activation appears to be mitogenic in immature oligodendroglia since proliferation as assessed by BrdU was stimulated by the MOR-selective agonist PL017 (1 μM) and prevented by co-administration of naloxone (3 μM) (204). By contrast to MOR, KOR begins to be expressed in more mature, non-dividing oligodendroglia (164). KOR blockade with nor-BNI, in the absence of exogenously added opiates, increased the size of myelin-like membranes in cultured oligodendroglia (164), suggesting that the cells themselves might produce KOR agonists. This was later borne out by studies showing production and release of Penk- and Pdyn-derived peptide products by cultured oligodendroglia (165). Nor-BNI greatly enhanced glutamate-induced death of oligodendroglia while causing only modest effects on its own, again invoking the issue of context in opiate effects on survival as well as growth/differentiation (165). A relationship between KOR and oligodendrocyte function/myelin production was also suggested by our finding that KOR (but not MOR) was severely reduced on oligodendrocytes, but not neurons, in the jimpy mouse, a dysmyelinating mutant (205). More recent work has also shown that KOR agonists, including U50,488, can promote differentiation/myelination in human oligodendrocytes derived from immortalized pluripotent stem cells (206). Thus, similar to granule neurons, different aspects of oligodendroglial development appear to be independently regulated by opioid signaling. However, unlike granule neurons and their EGL precursors, which do not appear to express KOR in vitro (97), MOR activation in immature oligodendroglia is mitogenic (164).

More recently, chronic, 9 days MOR or KOR activation was shown to increase the production of young oligodendrocytes during the sequential differentiation of murine embryonic stem cells, seemingly at the expense of neurogenesis and astrogliogenesis (207). Effects of the MOR-selective agonist DAMGO (1 µM) or the KOR selective agonist U69,593 (1 µM) were similarly dependent on ERK and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways.

Buprenorphine is a newer treatment for opiate addiction than methadone that was initially thought to have fewer side effects, less abuse liability, and greater safety because of its actions as a partial MOR agonist (208–211). In addition to its actions at MOR, buprenorphine can act as a partial antagonist at KOR (212) and as an agonist at nociceptin/orphanin FQ (NOP or OLR1) receptors (212, 213). Though beneficial in treating pregnant addicts (214–218), like methadone, buprenorphine can cross the placenta (219), has abuse liability (220–222), and at high doses it can have variable effects on neurogenesis (223, 224). Prenatal exposure to large dosages of buprenorphine can reduce myelin basic protein levels and the number of myelinated axons (213) and can trigger depressive-like behavior (225) in rats. The aberrant myelin patterns seen with high concentrations of buprenorphine are attributed to its actions as a partial KOR antagonist, although possible agonist actions at ORL1 receptors, which have an emerging role in CNS plasticity (226), cannot be overlooked.

Methadone is also beneficial as an addiction therapy during pregnancy. Unlike buprenorphine, methadone is a preferential MOR agonist with far fewer actions at KOR. Methadone crosses the placenta (227) and some methadone is present in milk during lactation (228). Recent evidence from the investigators that studied the effects of buprenorphine on white matter development described above, indicates that methadone also affects oligodendrocyte maturation and myelination. Gestational day 7 pregnant rats were continuously administered subcutaneous methadone (9 mg/kg/day) via osmotic minipumps throughout the pregnancy and during lactation until the day of sacrifice on postnatal days 11 or 19. This early methadone exposure significantly increased oligodendrocyte proliferation and differentiation, including the production of myelin basic protein, myelin proteolipid protein, and myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (229). Myelin ultrastructure was markedly affected. Methadone exposure (24 h) caused concentration-dependent increases in DNA synthesis in oligodendrocyte progenitors in cell culture (229), similar to what we had previously observed with the selective MOR agonist PL017 in immature oligodendrocytes in vitro (164, 204). Finally, these results suggest that increases in [³H]thymidine labeling in the SVZ 1 h after morphine injection (10 mg/kg, s.c.) in adult rats mentioned earlier (163) may be due to a mitogenic effect of morphine on adult oligodendrocyte precursors, since immature astroglia show reduced proliferation following acute morphine exposure (39). The collective findings indicate that, unlike the response of neuroblasts and immature astroglia in which acute opiate exposure inhibits proliferation, MOR receptor activation can be mitogenic to young oligodendrocytes and their progenitors.

Inhibition of Adult Neurogenesis and CNS Plasticity

Although the intention of this review is to emphasize the role of opiates during development, opiate-dependent reductions in synaptodendritic complexity are not restricted to the pre- and post-natal brain maturation periods. The adult CNS remains highly plastic and modifiable with sustained opiate exposure; however, unlike the situation during development, the effects of opiates on dendritic culling in the mature brain tend to be less severe. Since several authoritative reviews on the effects of opioids (230–234), as well as other substances with abuse liability (235), on adult neurogenesis have been published, we will only minimally address the topic here.

Adult neurogenesis was first described in rodents (236, 237) and later described in nonhuman primates (238) and humans (239). In mammals, adult neurogenesis is thought to be restricted to two specialized “neurogenic” regions within the SGZ of the hippocampal dentate gyrus and within the SVZ of the lateral ventricle. Adult neurogenesis in both regions (the SGZ and the SVZ) declines with aging (240). Newly generated neurons within the SGZ become granule neurons within the dentate gyrus, while neurons produced within the SVZ of the lateral ventricle migrate through the rostral migratory stream to become interneurons in the olfactory bulb in rodents and nonhuman primates (241–243). In humans, new SVZ neurons do not appear to migrate into the olfactory bulb, but instead remain as interneurons within the striatum (244). Adult hippocampal progenitors derived from the rat SGZ express the endogenous MOR peptide β-endorphin—a post-translational product of the POMC gene (245). In fact, POMC expression has been used as a marker for adult neural progenitors in the hippocampus (246). Adult hippocampal neural progenitors can be visualized in mice in which an enhanced-green fluorescent protein reporter is driven by POMC expression (246).

To what extent do opiate drugs directly affect the maturation and fate of adult neural progenitors? In the dentate gyrus, adult neurogenesis is sustained by a complex relationship between environmental factors imparted by adjacent neural cell types within the unique neurogenic niche of the SGZ (247–250). Although it may not be possible to preserve the complex spatial relationships [especially between the vasculature and the neurogenic niche (251, 252)] necessary to maintain the unique milieu of the neurogenic niche in cell culture (243, 251–253), acutely dissociated (in which physical cell-to-cell interrelationships are lost), reaggregate neurospheres (254), or organotypic (in which the vascular niche is no longer functional) cultures of adult SGZ neural progenitors continue to divide and retain key phenotypic characteristics permitting some experimentation in vitro.

The effects of morphine on adult hippocampal neurogenesis were first described by Eisch et al. (255). In these studies, adult rats received chronic morphine either subcutaneously (75 mg morphine time-release pelleted implant) for 5 days or via self-administration for 26 days. Importantly, morphine received via either delivery route had sustained reductions in BrdU-labeled neural progenitors in the dentate gyrus, granule cell layer, and/or hilus of the hippocampus, thus indicating reductions in adult neurogenesis (255). Among other outcomes, this effect may have consequences for drug-seeking behavior, as illustrated by the finding that radiation-induced destruction of adult neural progenitors increases morphine, but not sucrose, self-administration (256). This interesting result suggests that chronic opiate abuse, by limiting the pool of adult neural progenitors, may restrict the formation of new neural circuitry that is beneficial in limiting drug-seeking behavior (256).

Morphine-dependent decreases in neurogenesis have been more specifically attributed to increased numbers of neuroblasts being retained in the S phase of the cell cycle, as well as fewer young postmitotic neurons exiting the cell cycle (257). It was also suggested, based on cleaved caspase-3 immunoreactivity, that increased numbers of proliferating neuroblasts were dying (257); however, immunocytochemical evidence of caspase-3 cleavage is not definitive evidence of impending cell death since caspase-3 can be partially activated to intermediate levels during cellular remodeling without triggering downstream effectors, such as caspase activated DNase, necessary for cell death (258).

β-endorphin influences the growth of SGZ progenitors through autocrine and/or paracrine feedback (75, 245). The proliferative effects of β-endorphin in adult hippocampal neuronal progenitors are mediated through a signaling pathway involving phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3-kinase), [Ca²⁺]_i, and MAPK activation (245). Importantly, in addition to neurons, the adult hippocampus contains multipotent progenitors that can also give rise to astrocytes and oligodendrocytes (259), so in addition to being mitogenic, β-endorphin can influence the balance of neuronal and glial types in the hippocampus. Adult neural progenitors in the hippocampus can express MOR and DOR, but not KOR (75). Broad-acting opioid receptor antagonists such as naloxone increase the proliferation of neuroblasts, but cause corresponding decreases in the production of astroglia and oligodendroglia in vitro (75, 245). Incubating adult rat hippocampal progenitors with the more selective MOR or DOR antagonists, β-funaltrexamine (10 µM) or naltrindole (1 or 10 µM), respectively, for 48 h increases the number of newly generated neurons, while reducing the number of astrocytes and oligodendrocytes in culture (75). This suggests the effects are selectively meditated by MOR or DOR or potentially MOR–DOR heteromeric complexes (260). Additional evidence that MOR activation inhibits adult neurogenesis is provided by findings that deleting MOR increases the generation of new neurons (261). The results intimate that in addition to modulating the proliferation and death of neuronal and glial precursors, opioids may additionally influence the cell fate decisions of bi- or multi-potential neural cell precursors in the SGZ.

Opioids and Adult Neurogenesis Outside the Hippocampal SGZ

Recently, β-endorphin-expressing neurons in the hypothalamus were discovered to innervate and regulate the division of adult neural progenitors in the anterior ventral VZ–SVZ that will become deep granule interneurons within the olfactory bulb (262). In these studies, the selective KOR agonist ICI 204448 (263) was demonstrated to increase the proliferation of VZ–SVZ progenitors and this was prevented by the selective irreversible KOR antagonist 2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methyl-N-[(1S)-1-(3-isothiocyanatophenyl)-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethyl]acetamide hydrochloride (DIPPA) (264). While β-endorphin typically acts as a preferential agonist at MOR and to a lesser extent DOR, it is nevertheless modestly potent at KOR (265). It is interesting that the same POMC gene-derived neuropeptide, β-endorphin, affects adult neurogenesis in the hippocampal SGZ through actions at MOR and DOR (75, 245), and in the SVZ associated with the lateral ventricles via actions at KOR (262).

Opioids and Adult NPC Fate Decisions

If the selective MOR antagonist, β-funaltrexamine (10 µM) increases the number of newly generated neurons, while reducing the number of astrocytes (75) (as noted above), does exposure to opiate drugs, most of which are preferential MOR agonists, direct the fate of NPCs toward an astroglial lineage? Xu and coworkers have addressed this question and found that opiates can promote the differentiation of hippocampal NPCs toward an astroglial fate (266). Moreover, these investigators also demonstrate that although both morphine and fentanyl can promote NPCs toward an astroglial fate by activating MORs, they do so by activating different downstream signaling pathways (discussed below) with different consequences (266). By contrast, an escalating dose of methadone, also a preferential MOR agonist and frequently used in maintenance therapy for opiate addiction, failed to alter adult hippocampal neurogenesis (267). The implications of these findings are important and indicate that functional selectivity or biased agonism [reviewed in Ref. (126, 268, 269)] is operative. As noted earlier, this implies that different opioid agonist ligands, acting through MORs, can differentially affect development by uniquely coupling to one or more signaling pathways downstream of MOR. For example, upon stimulation, GPCRs, such as MOR, can subsequently activate one or more downstream effectors including Gα and Gβγ (G-protein subunits), and β-arrestin—each of which can uniquely affect cell function. Therefore, each of the frequently abused opiate drugs (e.g., heroin, fentanyl, and oxycodone), newly synthesized designer drugs, and opiate addiction therapies (e.g., methadone and buprenorphine) may differentially effect the maturation and fate of adult hippocampal neural progenitors within the SGZ. Because the molecular mechanisms underlying how a particular agonist ligand selectively activates one or more signaling pathways downstream of MOR are not well understood, it is challenging to predict how a particular drug will affect development without empirical testing. Finally, because there is evidence that biased agonism similarly dictates the actions of opiates throughout maturation, then key aspects of our understanding of the effects of opiates on neuronal and glial development may need revisiting since a majority of studies to date have used morphine to study maturation.

Although the mechanisms by which opiates direct the maturation and fate of adult NPCs in the SGZ are not fully understood, morphine exposure directs NPCs toward an astroglial fate by increasing microRNA-181a (miR-181a) in NPCs via a notch1-dependent pathway (270). MicroRNAs such as miR-181a are short non-coding RNA sequences that bind specific classes of target mRNAs thereby interfering with translation. Since a single microRNA can coordinate the interference of a number of related mRNAs, microRNAs can act as master regulators of translation. Notch1 activation triggers a large number of specific transcriptional processes in a cell-specific manner (271), and in the case of adult NPCs, is necessary for morphine to direct NPCs toward an astroglial fate (266). The selective MOR agonist fentanyl (unlike morphine) acts via a pathway involving β-arrestin-dependent extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation and inhibition of miR-190 production (266, 272), while morphine triggers protein kinase Cε (PKCε)-dependent activation of both ERK and trans-activation response element RNA-binding protein and increased levels of miR-181 (266); both morphine and fentanyl inhibit calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type IIα (CamKIIα) (266). Importantly, the actions of both morphine and fentanyl were prevented by the selective MOR antagonist Cys²-Tyr³-Orn⁵-Pen⁷-amide (CTOP) suggesting morphine’s effects were mediated by specific MORs and that biased agonism is responsible for any differences between morphine and fentanyl (270).

Concurrent Effects of HIV

We have been particularly interested in the concurrent effects of HIV and opiates on CNS development, as HIV and opiate abuse are linked epidemics, highlighted by outbreaks of HIV in communities suffering from the recent surge in opiate addiction (4). In humans, the period of CNS development extends through adolescence, with full myelination in prefrontal cortex and attainment of executive function not achieved until early in the third decade of life (273–275). Individuals who are vertically infected at birth, or who become HIV+ during the period of CNS development, have a high degree of neuropathology and behavioral deficits (276, 277). We have hypothesized that this is due to specific effects of HIV, HIV proteins, and/or inflammation on developing NPCs, and that concurrent exposure to opiates worsens these outcomes. Our in vitro work has shown that the HIV-1 protein Tat, as well as supernatant from HIV-infected cells that contains virions, viral proteins, and inflammatory mediators, can reduce the proliferation of both murine and human neural progenitors, and that concurrent exposure to morphine exacerbates these anti-proliferative effects (278, 279). A similar outcome reported by others showed that Tat-morphine exposure prolonged the Gap 1 (G₁) phase of the cell cycle, and was dependent on the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 (280). In neonatal mice exposed to HIV-1 Tat from embryonic day 17 to postnatal day 7, progenitor proliferation was also reduced, and 4 days of morphine co-exposure further reduced proliferation in SRY-Box 2-immunoreactive (Sox2+) cells (278). Although effects of morphine and Tat were not observed on overall cell populations in the striatum, this may require a longer period of morphine exposure.

Since HIV is a human-specific disease, we re-examined the findings in other models using a human primary neural progenitor system exposed to HIV to more closely mimic aspects of the disease. Human progenitors derived from 8 to 10 week in utero tissue samples were exposed to various HIV ± morphine treatment regimens. While morphine treatment over 48 h did not by itself affect human NPC proliferation, morphine did significantly enhance the anti-proliferative effect of HIV exposure acutely, and resulted in an altered doubling time (279). In the 2-week period after the removal of growth factors that sustain the progenitor phenotype, HIV alone accelerated the appearance of both astroglial and neuronal markers in human NPCs, and morphine significantly accelerated this premature differentiation process (Figure 6). As these results were obtained in 8–10-week human gestational tissue, they are especially relevant to developing systems exposed to opiates ± HIV. They mirror the findings discussed earlier in mice exposed perinatally and in murine cultures, which also showed profound, interactive reductions in progenitor proliferation due to morphine-HIV-1 Tat exposure. Overall, these outcomes suggest that chronic exposure of the developing CNS to morphine or HIV, but especially to the combination, is likely to alter the production of mature cells, as well as the differentiation choices of progenitors, biasing the balance of neuronal and glial populations produced as brain regions mature. Although the consequences of these effects have not yet been defined, they are potentially quite damaging to brain function. This study also confirmed that, at least under these conditions, NPCs could be infected and produce new virions. Of great importance, morphine enhanced the production of new HIV virions by naïve human progenitors in a serial dilution and passaging assay. Opiates may thus have the effect of raising viral titers and worsening neurodegenerative outcomes in the developing brain.

FIGURE 6

Figure 6. HIV-1 ± morphine co-exposure promotes immature neural progenitor cells (NPCs) to become neurons and astrocytes. (A) Representative immunostaining of SRY-Box 2 (SOX2—a marker of undifferentiated NPCs; red fluorescence), microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2—a neuronal marker; green fluorescence—left-hand panel), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP—an astroglial marker; green fluorescence—right-hand panel) in human NPCs treated with morphine (500 nM), spent medium (supernatant) from HIV-1-infected (HIV_sup) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) containing 500 pg/ml of the HIV-1 p24 capsid protein alone (HIV 500) or with morphine (HIV 500 + M) for 12 days in cell culture. (B) Analysis of human NPCs continuously treated with morphine, HIV_sup at 50 pg/ml p24 (HIV 50), 500 pg/ml p24 (HIV 500) alone or with morphine (M), and equal dilutions of supernatant from uninfected PBMCs (UNF50 or UNF500) alone or with morphine (M). The percentage of NPCs expressing nestin (transiently expressed by immature neural cells), SOX2, MAP2, and GFAP from each treatment group was calculated from >200 cells per study. Error bars show mean ± SEM from n = 5 separate studies each using NPCs derived from independent tissue samples. ^$p < 0.05 versus control; *p < 0.05. Reprinted from Ref. (279); Copyright (2017), with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Outstanding Questions/Understudied Areas

Although the main purpose of this review has been to survey prior studies exploring the maturational effects of opiates on neurons and glia, it seems appropriate to briefly suggest new directions for future research in this area.

To What Extent Do Developing Cells Adapt to Chronic Opiate Exposure?

This review has emphasized the decline in cellular growth observed with relatively acute, constant, opiate exposure. However, outside of controlled, clinical settings opiate exposure is rarely acute, and blood levels of opiates often fluctuate widely within the same individual. Tolerance and dependence can be observed at the cellular level as evidenced by dichotomous regulation of adenylate cyclase responsiveness in NG108-15 neuroblastoma × glioma cells following 1–4 days exposure to morphine (10 µM) and after morphine withdrawal (281). However, limited studies have examined the cellular consequences of sustained opioid exposure in developing neurons or glia. Even fewer studies have examined the consequences of opioid tolerance or withdrawal on cellular maturation. Although the well-documented decline in growth after relatively short opiate exposure times has been emphasized in this review, a return to near normal numbers of immature astrocytes despite sustained exposure to the preferential DOR agonists Met-enkephalin (171) or DPDPE (169) has been observed and suggests that compensatory factors can become operative. There is a paucity of literature examining the neurodevelopmental consequences of opiate tolerance or withdrawal on neuronal and glial maturation in the developing brain in vivo. An understanding of the cellular mechanisms underlying adaptive responses to chronic opiate exposure is crucial toward understanding the consequences of perinatal opiate exposure.

Modeling the Pharmacology of Self-Administration during Maturation

An even greater challenge is to better model the pharmacology of opiate drug exposure as seen with opiate self-administration in addicts during perinatal/postnatal development. The pharmacokinetics of “on-off” (intermittent, including contingent and non-contingent patterns of administration) versus “steady state” (continuous, e.g., as seen with an osmotic minipump or time-release drug implant) drug administration (282) and resultant pharmacodynamic differences are likely to have a significant impact on neuronal and glial maturation. Addicts inject opiates repeatedly, 3–4 times per day, to maximize the rewarding effects of the drug. Fluctuating levels of opiates are responsible for a relative “high” or “rush” and 3–4 periods of relative/mild withdrawal per day disrupt a wide variety of physiological systems and are through to be inherently more destabilizing than exposure to constant drug levels (282, 283). We speculate that fluctuating levels of opiates are more likely to have deleterious effects on CNS maturation than exposure to constant drug levels, which infers that the amount, frequency, and duration of drug exposure are important determinants of developmental outcome. Intermittent and fluctuating levels of opiates would be encountered during in utero exposure of offspring of opiate addicts; more constant levels of opiate exposure would be encountered when opiates were provided to neonates and newborns for pain management (284). Self-administration studies are particularly challenging to perform in pregnant or lactating dams, and may not be possible in young animals. Although the neuropharmacological and neurobehavioral consequences of intermittent versus continuous drug exposure, as well as contingent versus non-contingent opiate administration, have been examined in detail in adult animal models (285), the consequences of differing patterns of opiate administration on CNS maturation in children are unclear.

What Are the Long-Term Consequences of Opioids on Development?

A vast majority of studies in animals involve relatively acute exposure to opioids with durations lasting 1 week or less; with notable exceptions (255), studies that extend opiate exposure durations beyond 2 weeks are rare. In this regard, the clinical literature may provide more insight than studies examining acute bouts of opiate exposure in animals—especially in rodents in which development is relatively rapid. Moreover, a greater understanding of the pharmacokinetic consequences of opiate exposure (as noted in the preceding paragraph), as well as potential differences among opiate treatment options such as methadone versus buprenorphine (286, 287), are critical for designing strategies for treating mothers or offspring with opiates when medically necessary. Drug exposure causes long-term changes in neuroplasticity during the switch from casual drug use to an addicted state (17, 136, 288). Opiate-dependent alterations in neural circuitry may be greater during maturation when increased levels of MOR expression are evident in rodents (discussed earlier) and humans (289), and large-scale changes in CNS organization and synaptogenesis are occurring throughout the brain. For example, infant rats made briefly tolerant and dependent to fentanyl from P14 to P17, but not exposed thereafter, show lasting tolerance to morphine as juveniles and young adults 1 year later (290). By contrast, it cannot be assumed a priori that opiate exposure during development will only effect neural circuitry involved in addiction. In fact, this is unlikely the case since in many instances the cellular targets, and regional patterns of opioid peptide and receptor expression, during maturation are transient (and not present in adults) or thought to be unrelated to addiction (34, 50, 153, 291–293). It seems plausible that exposure to opiate drugs at critical periods during development results in lasting or permanent alterations in the structure and function of neural circuits directly related, as well as unrelated, to addiction.

Author Contributions

KH and PK both wrote the article and edited the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The support of grants R01 DA018633, R01 DA044939, DA024461, DA06204, and K02 DA027374 from the NIH—National Institute on Drug Abuse is gratefully acknowledged.

References

1. Patrick SW, Schumacher RE, Benneyworth BD, Krans EE, McAllister JM, Davis MM. Neonatal abstinence syndrome and associated health care expenditures: United States, 2000-2009. JAMA (2012) 307(18):1934–40. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.3951

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Patrick SW, Davis MM, Lehmann CU, Cooper WO. Increasing incidence and geographic distribution of neonatal abstinence syndrome: United States 2009 to 2012. J Perinatol (2015) 35(8):650–5. doi:10.1038/jp.2015.36

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Williams AR, Bisaga A. From AIDS to opioids – how to combat an epidemic. N Engl J Med (2016) 375(9):813–5. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1604223

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Kolodny A, Courtwright DT, Hwang CS, Kreiner P, Eadie JL, Clark TW, et al. The prescription opioid and heroin crisis: a public health approach to an epidemic of addiction. Annu Rev Public Health (2015) 36:559–74. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122957

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. National Institute of Drug Abuse. Dramatic Increases in Maternal Opioid Use and Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome. Bethesda: NIDA, USDHHS (2015). Available from: https://www.drugabuse.gov/related-topics/trends-statistics/infographics/dramatic-increases-in-maternal-opioid-use-neonatal-abstinence-syndrome

Google Scholar

6. Vuong C, Van Uum SH, O’Dell LE, Lutfy K, Friedman TC. The effects of opioids and opioid analogs on animal and human endocrine systems. Endocr Rev (2010) 31(1):98–132. doi:10.1210/er.2009-0009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kaltenbach KA, Finnegan LP. Prenatal narcotic exposure: perinatal and developmental effects. Neurotoxicology (1989) 10(3):597–604.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

8. Kaltenbach K, Berghella V, Finnegan L. Opioid dependence during pregnancy. Effects and management. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am (1998) 25(1):139–51. doi:10.1016/S0889-8545(05)70362-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Yazdy MM, Desai RJ, Brogly SB. Prescription opioids in pregnancy and birth outcomes: a review of the literature. J Pediatr Genet (2015) 4(2):56–70. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1556740

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Ross EJ, Graham DL, Money KM, Stanwood GD. Developmental consequences of fetal exposure to drugs: what we know and what we still must learn. Neuropsychopharmacology (2015) 40(1):61–87. doi:10.1038/npp.2014.147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Kaltenbach K, Finnegan LP. Perinatal and developmental outcome of infants exposed to methadone in utero. Neurotoxicol Teratol (1987) 9(4):311–3.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

12. Messinger DS, Bauer CR, Das A, Seifer R, Lester BM, Lagasse LL, et al. The maternal lifestyle study: cognitive, motor, and behavioral outcomes of cocaine-exposed and opiate-exposed infants through three years of age. Pediatrics (2004) 113(6):1677–85. doi:10.1542/peds.113.6.1677

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Behnke M, Smith VC; Committee on Substance Abuse; Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Prenatal substance abuse: short- and long-term effects on the exposed fetus. Pediatrics (2013) 131(3):e1009–24. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-3931

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Le Merrer J, Becker JA, Befort K, Kieffer BL. Reward processing by the opioid system in the brain. Physiol Rev (2009) 89(4):1379–412. doi:10.1152/physrev.00005.2009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Filliol D, Ghozland S, Chluba J, Martin M, Matthes HW, Simonin F, et al. Mice deficient for delta- and mu-opioid receptors exhibit opposing alterations of emotional responses. Nat Genet (2000) 25(2):195–200. doi:10.1038/76061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Chen Y, Mestek A, Liu J, Hurley JA, Yu L. Molecular cloning and functional expression of a μ-opioid receptor from rat brain. Mol Pharmacol (1993) 44:8–12.

Google Scholar

17. Nestler EJ. Molecular basis of long-term plasticity underlying addiction. Nat Rev Neurosci (2001) 2(2):119–28. doi:10.1038/35053570

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Di Chiara G, North RA. Neurobiology of opiate abuse. Trends Pharmacol Sci (1992) 13(5):185–93. doi:10.1016/0165-6147(92)90062-B

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Pert CB, Snyder SH. Opiate receptor: demonstration in nervous tissue. Science (1973) 179(4077):1011–4. doi:10.1126/science.179.4077.1011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Spanagel R, Herz A, Shippenberg TS. Opposing tonically active endogenous opioid systems modulate the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1992) 89(6):2046–50. doi:10.1073/pnas.89.6.2046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Hauser KF, McLaughlin PJ, Zagon IS. Endogenous opioid systems and the regulation of dendritic growth and spine formation. J Comp Neurol (1989) 281(1):13–22. doi:10.1002/cne.902810103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Drolet G, Dumont EC, Gosselin I, Kinkead R, Laforest S, Trottier JF. Role of endogenous opioid system in the regulation of the stress response. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry (2001) 25(4):729–41. doi:10.1016/S0278-5846(01)00161-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Huang EJ, Reichardt LF. Neurotrophins: roles in neuronal development and function. Annu Rev Neurosci (2001) 24:677–736. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.677

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Clevers H. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in development and disease. Cell (2006) 127(3):469–80. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Hauser KF, Mangoura D. Diversity of the endogenous opioid system in development – Novel signal transduction translates multiple extracellular signals into neural cell growth and differentiation. Perspect Dev Neurobiol (1998) 5(4):437–49.

Google Scholar

26. Macey TA, Lowe JD, Chavkin C. Mu opioid receptor activation of ERK1/2 is GRK3 and arrestin dependent in striatal neurons. J Biol Chem (2006) 281(45):34515–24. doi:10.1074/jbc.M604278200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Ikeda H, Miyatake M, Koshikawa N, Ochiai K, Yamada K, Kiss A, et al. Morphine modulation of thrombospondin levels in astrocytes and its implications for neurite outgrowth and synapse formation. J Biol Chem (2010) 285(49):38415–27. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.109827

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Al-Hasani R, Bruchas MR. Molecular mechanisms of opioid receptor-dependent signaling and behavior. Anesthesiology (2011) 115(6):1363–81. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e318238bba6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Talbot JN, Happe HK, Murrin LC. Mu opioid receptor coupling to Gi/o proteins increases during postnatal development in rat brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (2005) 314(2):596–602. doi:10.1124/jpet.104.082156

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Dever SM, Xu R, Fitting S, Knapp PE, Hauser KF. Differential expression and HIV-1 regulation of μ-opioid receptor splice variants across human central nervous system cell types. J Neurovirol (2012) 18(3):181–90. doi:10.1007/s13365-012-0096-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Pasternak GW. Opioids and their receptors: are we there yet? Neuropharmacology (2014) 76(Pt B):198–203. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.03.039

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Pasternak GW, Pan YX. Mu opioids and their receptors: evolution of a concept. Pharmacol Rev (2013) 65(4):1257–317. doi:10.1124/pr.112.007138

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Kornblum HI, Hurlbut DE, Leslie FM. Postnatal development of multiple opioid receptors in rat brain. Brain Res (1987) 465(1–2):21–41. doi:10.1016/0165-3806(87)90226-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Kinney HC, White WF. Opioid receptors localize to the external granular cell layer of the developing human cerebellum. Neuroscience (1991) 45(1):13–21. doi:10.1016/0306-4522(91)90099-A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Leslie FM, Loughlin SE. Ontogeny and plasticity of opioid systems. 1 ed. In: Hammer RP Jr, editor. The Neurobiology of Opiates. Physiology of Drug Abuse. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press (1993). p. 85–123.

Google Scholar

36. Zhu Y, Hsu MS, Pintar JE. Developmental expression of the mu, kappa, and delta opioid receptor mRNAs in mouse. J Neurosci (1998) 18(7):2538–49.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

37. Leslie FM, Chen Y, Winzer-Serhan UH. Opioid receptor and peptide mRNA expression in proliferative zones of fetal rat central nervous system. Can J Physiol Pharmacol (1998) 76(3):284–93. doi:10.1139/y98-028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Reznikov K, Hauser KF, Nazarevskaja G, Trunova Y, Derjabin V, Bakalkin G. Opioids modulate cell division in the germinal zone of the late embryonic neocortex. Eur J Neurosci (1999) 11(8):2711–9. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00680.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Stiene-Martin A, Knapp PE, Martin K, Gurwell JA, Ryan S, Thornton SR, et al. Opioid system diversity in developing neurons, astroglia, and oligodendroglia in the subventricular zone and striatum: impact on gliogenesis in vivo. Glia (2001) 36(1):78–88. doi:10.1002/glia.1097

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Sargeant TJ, Day DJ, Mrkusich EM, Foo DF, Miller JH. Mu opioid receptors are expressed on radial glia but not migrating neuroblasts in the late embryonic mouse brain. Brain Res (2007) 1175:28–38. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.07.091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Kim E, Clark AL, Kiss A, Hahn JW, Wesselschmidt R, Coscia CJ, et al. Mu- and kappa-opioids induce the differentiation of embryonic stem cells to neural progenitors. J Biol Chem (2006) 281(44):33749–60. doi:10.1074/jbc.M603862200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Hauser KF, Khurdayan VK, Goody RJ, Nath A, Saria A, Pauly JR. Selective vulnerability of cerebellar granule neuroblasts and their progeny to drugs with abuse liability. Cerebellum (2003) 2(3):184–95. doi:10.1080/14734220310016132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Breslin MB, Lindberg I, Benjannet S, Mathis JP, Lazure C, Seidah NG. Differential processing of proenkephalin by prohormone convertases 1(3) and 2 and furin. J Biol Chem (1993) 268(36):27084–93.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

44. Day R, Lazure C, Basak A, Boudreault A, Limperis P, Dong W, et al. Prodynorphin processing by proprotein convertase 2. Cleavage at single basic residues and enhanced processing in the presence of carboxypeptidase activity. J Biol Chem (1998) 273(2):829–36. doi:10.1074/jbc.273.2.829

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Zhou A, Bloomquist BT, Mains RE. The prohormone convertases PC1 and PC2 mediate distinct endoproteolytic cleavages in a strict temporal order during proopiomelanocortin biosynthetic processing. J Biol Chem (1993) 268(3):1763–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

46. Zhou A, Mains RE. Endoproteolytic processing of proopiomelanocortin and prohormone convertases 1 and 2 in neuroendocrine cells overexpressing prohormone convertases 1 or 2. J Biol Chem (1994) 269(26):17440–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

47. Castro MG, Morrison E. Post-translational processing of proopiomelanocortin in the pituitary and in the brain. Crit Rev Neurobiol (1997) 11(1):35–57. doi:10.1615/CritRevNeurobiol.v11.i1.30

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Fricker LD. Neuropeptide-processing enzymes: applications for drug discovery. AAPS J (2005) 7(2):E449–55. doi:10.1208/aapsj070244

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Zheng M, Streck RD, Scott RE, Seidah NG, Pintar JE. The developmental expression in rat of proteases furin, PC1, PC2, and carboxypeptidase E: implications for early maturation of proteolytic processing capacity. J Neurosci (1994) 14(8):4656–73.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

50. Zagon IS, Rhodes RE, McLaughlin PJ. Distribution of enkephalin immunoreactivity in germinative cells of developing rat cerebellum. Science (1985) 227(4690):1049–51. doi:10.1126/science.3883485

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Zagon IS, McLaughlin PJ. Opioid antagonist (naltrexone) modulation of cerebellar development: histological and morphometric studies. J Neurosci (1986) 6(5):1424–32.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

52. Zagon IS, McLaughlin PJ. Endogenous opioid systems regulate cell proliferation in the developing rat brain. Brain Res (1987) 412(1):68–72. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(87)91440-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Hauser KF, Osborne JG, Stiene-Martin A, Melner MH. Cellular localization of proenkephalin mRNA and enkephalin peptide products in cultured astrocytes. Brain Res (1990) 522(2):347–53. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(90)91482-V

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Altman J. Postnatal development of the cerebellar cortex in the rat. I. The external germinal layer and the transitional molecular layer. J Comp Neurol (1972) 145(3):353–97. doi:10.1002/cne.901450305

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Altman J. Experimental reorganization of the cerebellar cortex. 3. Regeneration of the external germinal layer and granule cell ectopia. J Comp Neurol (1973) 149(2):153–80. doi:10.1002/cne.901490203

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Wang VY, Rose MF, Zoghbi HY. Math1 expression redefines the rhombic lip derivatives and reveals novel lineages within the brainstem and cerebellum. Neuron (2005) 48(1):31–43. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Hatten ME, Heintz N. Mechanisms of neural patterning and specification in the developing cerebellum. Annu Rev Neurosci (1995) 18:385–408. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.002125

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Osborne JG, Kindy MS, Spruce BA, Hauser KF. Ontogeny of proenkephalin mRNA and enkephalin peptide expression in the cerebellar cortex of the rat: spatial and temporal patterns of expression follow maturational gradients in the external granular layer and in Purkinje cells. Brain Res Dev Brain Res (1993) 76(1):1–12. doi:10.1016/0165-3806(93)90117-S

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Osborne JG, Kindy MS, Hauser KF. Expression of proenkephalin mRNA in developing cerebellar cortex of the rat: expression levels coincide with maturational gradients in Purkinje cells. Brain Res Dev Brain Res (1991) 63(1–2):63–9. doi:10.1016/0165-3806(91)90067-S

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Deneris ES, Hobert O. Maintenance of postmitotic neuronal cell identity. Nat Neurosci (2014) 17(7):899–907. doi:10.1038/nn.3731

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Hobert O. Regulation of terminal differentiation programs in the nervous system. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol (2011) 27:681–96. doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154226

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Vilijn MH, Vaysse PJ, Zukin RS, Kessler JA. Expression of preproenkephalin mRNA by cultured astrocytes and neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1988) 85(17):6551–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.85.17.6551

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Spruce BA, Curtis R, Wilkin GP, Glover DM. A neuropeptide precursor in cerebellum – proenkephalin exists in subpopulations of both neurons and astrocytes. Embo J (1990) 9(6):1787–95.

Google Scholar

64. Shinoda H, Marini AM, Cosi C, Schwartz JP. Brain region and gene specificity of neuropeptide gene expression in cultured astrocytes. Science (1989) 245(4916):415–7. doi:10.1126/science.2569236

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Alvarez-Bolado G, Fairen A, Douglass J, Naranjo JR. Expression of the prodynorphin gene in the developing and adult cerebral cortex of the rat: an in situ hybridization study. J Comp Neurol (1990) 300(3):287–300. doi:10.1002/cne.903000302

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Perez-Rosado A, Gomez M, Manzanares J, Ramos JA, Fernandez-Ruiz J. Changes in prodynorphin and POMC gene expression in several brain regions of rat fetuses prenatally exposed to Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol. Neurotox Res (2002) 4(3):211–8. doi:10.1080/10298420290023936

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Zamir N, Quirion R, Segal M. Ontogeny and regional distribution of proenkephalin- and prodynorphin-derived peptides and opioid receptors in rat hippocampus. Neuroscience (1985) 15(4):1025–34. doi:10.1016/0306-4522(85)90251-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Khachaturian H, Alessi NE, Munfakh N, Watson SJ. Ontogeny of opioid and related peptides in the rat CNS and pituitary: an immunocytochemical study. Life Sci (1983) 33(Suppl 1):61–4. doi:10.1016/0024-3205(83)90444-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Khachaturian H, Lewis ME, Alessi NE, Watson SJ. Time of origin of opioid peptide-containing neurons in the rat hypothalamus. J Comp Neurol (1985) 236(4):538–46. doi:10.1002/cne.902360409

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Khachaturian H, Alessi NE, Lewis ME, Munfakh N, Fitzsimmons MD, Watson SJ. Development of hypothalamic opioid neurons: a combined immunocytochemical and [3H]thymidine autoradiographic study. Neuropeptides (1985) 5(4–6):477–80. doi:10.1016/0143-4179(85)90058-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Pritchard LE, Turnbull AV, White A. Pro-opiomelanocortin processing in the hypothalamus: impact on melanocortin signalling and obesity. J Endocrinol (2002) 172(3):411–21. doi:10.1677/joe.0.1720411

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Akil H, Watson SJ, Young E, Lewis ME, Khachaturian H, Walker JM. Endogenous opioids: biology and function. Annu Rev Neurosci (1984) 7:223–55. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.07.030184.001255

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Amir S, Brown ZW, Amit Z. The role of endorphins in stress: evidence and speculations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev (1980) 4(1):77–86. doi:10.1016/0149-7634(80)90027-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Overstreet-Wadiche LS, Westbrook GL. Functional maturation of adult-generated granule cells. Hippocampus (2006) 16(3):208–15. doi:10.1002/hipo.20152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Persson AI, Thorlin T, Bull C, Zarnegar P, Ekman R, Terenius L, et al. Mu- and delta-opioid receptor antagonists decrease proliferation and increase neurogenesis in cultures of rat adult hippocampal progenitors. Eur J Neurosci (2003) 17(6):1159–72. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02538.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Zagon IS, McLaughlin PJ. Opioid antagonist modulation of murine neuroblastoma: a profile of cell proliferation and opioid peptides and receptors. Brain Res (1989) 480(1–2):16–28. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(89)91562-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Zagon IS, McLaughlin PJ. Increased brain size and cellular content in infant rats treated with an opioid antagonist. Science (1983) 221:1179–80. doi:10.1126/science.6612331

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Zagon IS, McLaughlin PJ. Gene-peptide relationships in the developing rat brain: the response of preproenkephalin mRNA and [Met⁵]-enkephalin to acute opioid antagonist (naltrexone) exposure. Brain Res Mol Brain Res (1995) 33(1):111–20. doi:10.1016/0169-328X(95)00119-D

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Tempel A, Gardner EL, Zukin RS. Neurochemical and functional correlates of naltrexone-induced opiate receptor up-regulation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (1985) 232(2):439–44.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

80. Zukin RS, Tempel A. Neurochemical correlates of opiate receptor regulation. Biochem Pharmacol (1986) 35(10):1623–7. doi:10.1016/0006-2952(86)90314-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Bakalkin G, Telkov M, Yakovleva T, Terenius L. [Leu⁵]enkephalin-encoding sequences are targets for a specific DNA-binding factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1995) 92(20):9024–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.20.9024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Brooks PJ, Funabashi T, Kleopoulos SP, Mobbs CV, Pfaff DW. Cell-specific expression of preproenkephalin intronic heteronuclear RNA in the rat forebrain. Brain Res Mol Brain Res (1993) 19(1–2):22–30. doi:10.1016/0169-328X(93)90144-E

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Böttger A. Proenkephalin is a nuclear protein responsive to growth arrest and differentiation signals. J Cell Biol (1995) 130(6):1251–62. doi:10.1083/jcb.130.6.1251

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Kamphuis S, Eriksson F, Kavelaars A, Zijlstra J, van de Pol M, Kuis W, et al. Role of endogenous pro-enkephalin A-derived peptides in human T cell proliferation and monocyte IL-6 production. J Neuroimmunol (1998) 84(1):53–60. doi:10.1016/S0165-5728(97)00240-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Plotnikoff NP, Murgo AJ, Faith RE. Neuroimmunomodulation with enkephalins: effects on thymus and spleen weights in mice. Clin Immunol Immunopathol (1984) 32(1):52–6. doi:10.1016/0090-1229(84)90042-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Bostwick DG, Null WE, Holmes D, Weber E, Barchas JD, Bensch KG. Expression of opioid peptides in tumors. N Engl J Med (1987) 317(23):1439–43. doi:10.1056/NEJM198712033172304

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Roth KA, Barchas JD. Small cell carcinoma cell lines contain opioid peptides and receptors. Cancer (1986) 57(4):769–73. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19860215)57:4<769::AID-CNCR2820570415>3.0.CO;2-J

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Maneckjee R, Minna JD. Opioid and nicotine receptors affect growth regulation of human lung cancer cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1990) 87(9):3294–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.87.9.3294

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Maneckjee R, Minna JD. Nonconventional opioid binding sites mediate growth inhibitory effects of methadone on human lung cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1992) 89(4):1169–73. doi:10.1073/pnas.89.4.1169

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Zagon IS, McLaughlin PJ, Goodman SR, Rhodes RE. Opioid receptors and endogenous opioids in diverse human and animal cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst (1987) 79(5):1059–65.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

91. Vallejo R, de Leon-Casasola O, Benyamin R. Opioid therapy and immunosuppression: a review. Am J Ther (2004) 11(5):354–65. doi:10.1097/01.mjt.0000132250.95650.85

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Afsharimani B, Cabot P, Parat MO. Morphine and tumor growth and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev (2011) 30(2):225–38. doi:10.1007/s10555-011-9285-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Gach K, Wyrebska A, Fichna J, Janecka A. The role of morphine in regulation of cancer cell growth. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol (2011) 384(3):221–30. doi:10.1007/s00210-011-0672-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Juneja R. Opioids and cancer recurrence. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care (2014) 8(2):91–101. doi:10.1097/SPC.0000000000000056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Gao W-Q, Heintz N, Hatten ME. Cerebellar granule cell neurogenesis is regulated by cell-cell interactions in vitro. Neuron (1991) 6:705–15. doi:10.1016/0896-6273(91)90168-Y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Hatten ME. Neuronal regulation of astroglial morphology and proliferation in vitro. J Cell Biol (1985) 100(2):384–96. doi:10.1083/jcb.100.2.384

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Hauser KF, Houdi AA, Turbek CS, Elde RP, Maxson W III. Opioids intrinsically inhibit the genesis of mouse cerebellar granule cell precursors in vitro: Differential impact of μ and δ receptor activation on proliferation and neurite elongation. Eur J Neurosci (2000) 12(4):1281–93. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.01015.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Schmahl W, Funk R, Miaskowski U, Plendl J. Long-lasting effects of naltrexone, an opioid receptor antagonist, on cell proliferation in developing rat forebrain. Brain Res (1989) 486(2):297–300. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(89)90515-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Steele WJ, Johannesson T. Effects of prenatally-administered morphine on brain development and resultant tolerance to the analgesic effect of morphine in offspring of morphine treated rats. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh) (1975) 36(3):243–56. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0773.1975.tb00792.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Kornblum HI, Loughlin SE, Leslie FM. Effects of morphine on DNA synthesis in neonatal rat brain. Brain Res (1987) 428(1):45–52. doi:10.1016/0165-3806(87)90081-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Zagon IS, McLaughlin PJ. Opioid antagonist-induced modulation of cerebral and hippocampal development: histological and morphometric studies. Brain Res (1986) 393(2):233–46. doi:10.1016/0165-3806(86)90025-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Hammer RP Jr, Ricalde AA, Seatriz JV. Effects of opiates on brain development. Neurotoxicology (1989) 10(3):475–83.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

103. Seatriz JV, Hammer RP Jr. Effects of opiates on neuronal development in the rat cerebral cortex. Brain Res Bull (1993) 30(5–6):523–7. doi:10.1016/0361-9230(93)90078-P

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Vértes Z, Melegh G, Vértes M, Kovacs S. Effect of naloxone and D-met2-pro5-enkephalinamide treatment on the DNA synthesis in the developing rat brain. Life Sci (1982) 31(2):119–26. doi:10.1016/0024-3205(82)90423-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Lorber BA, Freitag SK, Bartolome JV. Effects of beta-endorphin on DNA synthesis in brain regions of preweanling rats. Brain Res (1990) 531(1–2):329–32. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(90)90795-D

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Zagon IS, Mclaughlin PJ. Neuronal cell deficits following maternal exposure to methadone in rats. Experientia (1982) 38(10):1214–6. doi:10.1007/Bf01959747

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Zagon IS, McLaughlin PJ. Methadone and brain development. Experientia (1977) 33:1486–7. doi:10.1007/BF01918824

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Mandyam CD, Norris RD, Eisch AJ. Chronic morphine induces premature mitosis of proliferating cells in the adult mouse subgranular zone. J Neurosci Res (2004) 76(6):783–94. doi:10.1002/jnr.20090

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Zagon IS, McLaughlin PJ. Identification of opioid peptides regulating proliferation of neurons and glia in the developing nervous system. Brain Res (1991) 542(2):318–23. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(91)91585-O

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Chazov EI, Bakalkin G, Yarigin KN, Trushina ED, Titov MI, Smirnov VN. Enkephalins induce asymmetrical effects on posture in the rat. Experientia (1981) 37(8):887–9. doi:10.1007/BF01985696

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Kononenko O, Galatenko V, Andersson M, Bazov I, Watanabe H, Zhou XW, et al. Intra- and interregional coregulation of opioid genes: broken symmetry in spinal circuits. FASEB J (2017) 31(5):1953–63. doi:10.1096/fj.201601039R

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Hussain ZM, Fitting S, Watanabe H, Usynin I, Yakovleva T, Knapp PE, et al. Lateralized response of dynorphin a peptide levels after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma (2012) 29(9):1785–93. doi:10.1089/neu.2011.2286

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Bakalkin G, Kobylyansky AG. Opioids induce postural asymmetry in spinal rat: the side of the flexed limb depends upon the type of opioid agonist. Brain Res (1989) 480(1–2):277–89. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(89)90193-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Watanabe H, Fitting S, Hussain MZ, Kononenko O, Iatsyshyna A, Yoshitake T, et al. Asymmetry of the endogenous opioid system in the human anterior cingulate: a putative molecular basis for lateralization of emotions and pain. Cereb cortex (2015) 25(1):97–108. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Kuzmin A, Chefer V, Bazov I, Meis J, Ogren SO, Shippenberg T, et al. Upregulated dynorphin opioid peptides mediate alcohol-induced learning and memory impairment. Transl Psychiatry (2013) 3:e310. doi:10.1038/tp.2013.72

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Sarkisyan D, Bazov I, Watanabe H, Kononenko O, Syvanen AC, Schumann G, et al. Damaged reward areas in human alcoholics: neuronal proportion decline and astrocyte activation. Acta Neuropathol (2017) 133(3):485–7. doi:10.1007/s00401-017-1675-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Karpyak VM, Winham SJ, Preuss UW, Zill P, Cunningham JM, Walker DL, et al. Association of the PDYN gene with alcohol dependence and the propensity to drink in negative emotional states. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol (2013) 16(5):975–85. doi:10.1017/S1461145712001137

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Walker BM, Valdez GR, McLaughlin JP, Bakalkin G. Targeting dynorphin/kappa opioid receptor systems to treat alcohol abuse and dependence. Alcohol (2012) 46(4):359–70. doi:10.1016/j.alcohol.2011.10.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Zagon IS, McLaughlin PJ. Comparative effects of postnatal undernutrition and methadone exposure on protein and nucleic acid contents of the brain and cerebellum in rats. Dev Neurosci (1982) 5(5–6):385–93. doi:10.1159/000112698

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Zagon IS, McLaughlin PJ. Effect of chronic maternal methadone exposure on perinatal development. Biol Neonate (1977) 31(5–6):271–82. doi:10.1159/000240975

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Zagon IS, McLaughlin PJ. Morphine and brain growth retardation in the rat. Pharmacology (1977) 15(3):276–82. doi:10.1159/000136699

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Wechsler-Reya RJ, Scott MP. Control of neuronal precursor proliferation in the cerebellum by Sonic Hedgehog. Neuron (1999) 22(1):103–14. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80682-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Smeyne RJ, Chu T, Lewin A, Bian F, Sanlioglu S, Kunsch C, et al. Local control of granule cell generation by cerebellar Purkinje cells. Mol Cell Neurosci (1995) 6(3):230–51. doi:10.1006/mcne.1995.1019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Rankovic Z, Brust TF, Bohn LM. Biased agonism: an emerging paradigm in GPCR drug discovery. Bioorg Med Chem Lett (2016) 26(2):241–50. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.12.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Gesty-Palmer D, Luttrell LM. Refining efficacy: exploiting functional selectivity for drug discovery. Adv Pharmacol (2011) 62:79–107. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-385952-5.00009-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Kenakin T. New concepts in pharmacological efficacy at 7TM receptors: IUPHAR review 2. Br J Pharmacol (2013) 168(3):554–75. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02223.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Hauser KF, Gurwell JA, Turbek CS. Morphine inhibits Purkinje cell survival and dendritic differentiation in organotypic cultures of the mouse cerebellum. Exp Neurol (1994) 130(1):95–105. doi:10.1006/exnr.1994.1188

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Morrison ME, Mason CA. Granule neuron regulation of Purkinje cell development: striking a balance between neurotrophin and glutamate signaling. J Neurosci (1998) 18(10):3563–73.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

129. Toran-Allerand CD. Sex steroids and the development of the newborn mouse hypothalamus and preoptic area in vitro. II. Morphological correlates and hormonal specificity. Brain Res (1980) 189(2):413–27. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(80)90101-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Toran-Allerand CD. Sex steroids and the development of the newborn mouse hypothalamus and preoptic area in vitro: implications for sexual differentiation. Brain Res (1976) 106(2):407–12. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(76)91038-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Wood JG, McLaughlin BJ, Barber RP. The visualization of concanavalin A binding sites in Purkinje cell somata and dendrites of rat cerebellum. J Cell Biol (1974) 63(2 Pt 1):541–9. doi:10.1083/jcb.63.2.541

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Palay SL, Chan-Palay V. Cerebellar Cortex: Cytology and Organization. New York, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (1974). 348 p.

Google Scholar

133. Landis SC. Ultrastructural changes in the mitochondria of cerebellar Purkinje cells of nervous mutant mice. J Cell Biol (1973) 57(3):782–97. doi:10.1083/jcb.57.3.782

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Moulton EA, Elman I, Becerra LR, Goldstein RZ, Borsook D. The cerebellum and addiction: insights gained from neuroimaging research. Addict Biol (2014) 19(3):317–31. doi:10.1111/adb.12101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Miquel M, Vazquez-Sanroman D, Carbo-Gas M, Gil-Miravet I, Sanchis-Segura C, Carulli D, et al. Have we been ignoring the elephant in the room? Seven arguments for considering the cerebellum as part of addiction circuitry. Neurosci Biobehav Rev (2016) 60:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.11.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Koob GF, Volkow ND. Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis. Lancet Psychiatry (2016) 3(8):760–73. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00104-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications. Nat Rev Neurosci (2011) 12(11):652–69. doi:10.1038/nrn3119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

138. Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry (2002) 159(10):1642–52. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.10.1642

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Lin WC, Chou KH, Chen CC, Huang CC, Chen HL, Lu CH, et al. White matter abnormalities correlating with memory and depression in heroin users under methadone maintenance treatment. PLoS One (2012) 7(4):e33809. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033809

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

140. Slotkin TA, Seidler FJ, Whitmore WL. Effects of maternal methadone administration on ornithine decarboxylase in brain and heart of the offspring: relationships of enzyme activity to dose and to growth impairment in the rat. Life Sci (1980) 26(11):861–7. doi:10.1016/0024-3205(80)90348-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

141. Ricalde AA, Hammer RP Jr. Perinatal opiate treatment delays growth of cortical dendrites. Neurosci Lett (1990) 115(2–3):137–43. doi:10.1016/0304-3940(90)90444-E

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

142. Mei B, Niu L, Cao B, Huang D, Zhou Y. Prenatal morphine exposure alters the layer II/III pyramidal neurons morphology in lateral secondary visual cortex of juvenile rats. Synapse (2009) 63(12):1154–61. doi:10.1002/syn.20694

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

143. Ghafari S, Golalipour MJ. Prenatal morphine exposure reduces pyramidal neurons in CA1, CA2 and CA3 subfields of mice hippocampus. Iran J Basic Med Sci (2014) 17(3):155–61.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

144. Traudt CM, Tkac I, Ennis KM, Sutton LM, Mammel DM, Rao R. Postnatal morphine administration alters hippocampal development in rats. J Neurosci Res (2012) 90(1):307–14. doi:10.1002/jnr.22750

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

145. Mao J, Sung B, Ji RR, Lim G. Neuronal apoptosis associated with morphine tolerance: evidence for an opioid-induced neurotoxic mechanism. J Neurosci (2002) 22(17):7650–61.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

146. Greeneltch KM, Kelly-Welch AE, Shi Y, Keegan AD. Chronic morphine treatment promotes specific Th2 cytokine production by murine T cells in vitro via a Fas/Fas ligand-dependent mechanism. J Immunol (2005) 175(8):4999–5005. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.175.8.4999

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

147. Hu S, Sheng WS, Lokensgard JR, Peterson PK. Morphine induces apoptosis of human microglia and neurons. Neuropharmacology (2002) 42(6):829–36. doi:10.1016/S0028-3908(02)00030-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

148. Tegeder I, Geisslinger G. Opioids as modulators of cell death and survival – unraveling mechanisms and revealing new indications. Pharmacol Rev (2004) 56(3):351–69. doi:10.1124/pr.56.3.2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

149. Polakiewicz RD, Schieferl SM, Gingras AC, Sonenberg N, Comb MJ. mu-Opioid receptor activates signaling pathways implicated in cell survival and translational control. J Biol Chem (1998) 273(36):23534–41. doi:10.1074/jbc.273.36.23534

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

150. Stiene-Martin A, Zhou R, Hauser KF. Regional, developmental, and cell cycle-dependent differences in µ, δ, and κ-opioid receptor expression among cultured mouse astrocytes. Glia (1998) 22(3):249–59. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199803)22:3<249::AID-GLIA4>3.0.CO;2-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

151. Fitting S, Zou S, Chen W, Vo P, Hauser KF, Knapp PE. Regional heterogeneity and diversity in cytokine and chemokine production by astroglia: differential responses to HIV-1 Tat, gp120, and morphine revealed by multiplex analysis. J Proteome Res (2010) 9(4):1795–804. doi:10.1021/pr900926n

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

152. Meriney SD, Gray DB, Pilar G. Morphine-induced delay of normal cell death in the avian ciliary ganglion. Science (1985) 228(4706):1451–3. doi:10.1126/science.2990029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

153. Meriney SD, Ford MJ, Oliva D, Pilar G. Endogenous opioids modulate neuronal survival in the developing avian ciliary ganglion. J Neurosci (1991) 11(12):3705–17.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

154. Singhal P, Kapasi A, Reddy K, Franki N. Opiates promote T cell apoptosis through JNK and caspase pathway. Adv Exp Med Biol (2001) 493:127–35. doi:10.1007/0-306-47611-8_15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

155. Singhal PC, Bhaskaran M, Patel J, Patel K, Kasinath BS, Duraisamy S, et al. Role of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation and Fas-Fas ligand interaction in morphine-induced macrophage apoptosis. J Immunol (2002) 168(8):4025–33. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.168.8.4025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

156. Khurdayan VK, Buch S, El-Hage N, Lutz SE, Goebel SM, Singh IN, et al. Preferential vulnerability of astroglia and glial precursors to combined opioid and HIV-1 Tat exposure in vitro. Eur J Neurosci (2004) 19(12):3171–82. doi:10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03461.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

157. Gurwell JA, Nath A, Sun Q, Zhang J, Martin KM, Chen Y, et al. Synergistic neurotoxicity of opioids and human immunodeficiency virus-1 Tat protein in striatal neurons in vitro. Neuroscience (2001) 102(3):555–63. doi:10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00461-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

158. Oehmichen M, Meissner C, Reiter A, Birkholz M. Neuropathology in non-human immunodeficiency virus-infected drug addicts: hypoxic brain damage after chronic intravenous drug abuse. Acta Neuropathol (1996) 91(6):642–6. doi:10.1007/s004010050478

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

159. Altman J. Proliferation and migration of undifferentiated precursor cells in the rat during postnatal gliogenesis. Exp Neurol (1966) 16(3):263–78. doi:10.1016/0014-4886(66)90063-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

160. Rakic P. Neuron-glia relationship during granule cell migration in developing cerebellar cortex. A Golgi and electronmicroscopic study in Macacus Rhesus. J Comp Neurol (1971) 141(3):283–312. doi:10.1002/cne.901410303

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

161. Miale IL, Sidman RL. An autoradiographic analysis of histogenesis in the mouse cerebellum. Exp Neurol (1961) 4:277–96. doi:10.1016/0014-4886(61)90055-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

162. Altman J, Das GD. Autoradiographic and histological studies of postnatal neurogenesis. I. A longitudinal investigation of the kinetics, migration and transformation of cells incorporating tritiated thymidine in neonate rats, with special reference to postnatal neurogenesis in some brain regions. J Comp Neurol (1966) 126(3):337–89. doi:10.1002/cne.901260302

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

163. Miller CR, O’Steen WK, Deadwyler SA. Effect of morphine on ³H-thymidine incorporation in the subependyma of the rat: an autoradiographic study. J Comp Neurol (1982) 208(2):209–14. doi:10.1002/cne.902080209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

164. Knapp PE, Maderspach K, Hauser KF. Endogenous opioid system in developing normal and jimpy oligodendrocytes: mu and kappa opioid receptors mediate differential mitogenic and growth responses. Glia (1998) 22(2):189–201. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199802)22:2<189::AID-GLIA10>3.0.CO;2-U

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

165. Knapp PE, Itkis OS, Zhang L, Spruce BA, Bakalkin G, Hauser KF. Endogenous opioids and oligodendroglial function: possible autocrine/paracrine effects on cell survival and development. Glia (2001) 35(2):156–65. doi:10.1002/glia.1080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

166. Fattore L, Puddu MC, Picciau S, Cappai A, Fratta W, Serra GP, et al. Astroglial in vivo response to cocaine in mouse dentate gyrus: a quantitative and qualitative analysis by confocal microscopy. Neuroscience (2002) 110(1):1–6. doi:10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00598-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

167. Beitner-Johnson D, Guitart X, Nestler EJ. Glial fibrillary acidic protein and the mesolimbic dopamine system: regulation by chronic morphine and Lewis-Fischer strain differences in the rat ventral tegmental area. J Neurochem (1993) 61(5):1766–73. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1993.tb09814.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

168. Eriksson PS, Hansson E, Rönnbäck L. Mu and delta opiate receptors in neuronal and astroglial primary cultures from various regions of the brain-coupling with adenylate cyclase, localisation on the same neurones and association with dopamine (D1) receptor adenylate cyclase. Neuropharmacology (1991) 30:1233–9. doi:10.1016/0028-3908(91)90170-G

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

169. Stiene-Martin A, Hauser KF. Glial growth is regulated by agonists selective for multiple opioid receptor types in vitro. J Neurosci Res (1991) 29:538–48. doi:10.1002/jnr.490290415

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

170. Belcheva MM, Tan Y, Heaton VM, Clark AL, Coscia CJ. Mu opioid transactivation and down-regulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor in astrocytes: implications for mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling. Mol Pharmacol (2003) 64(6):1391–401. doi:10.1124/mol.64.6.1391

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

171. Stiene-Martin A, Hauser KF. Opioid-dependent growth of glial cultures: suppression of astrocyte DNA synthesis by met-enkephalin. Life Sci (1990) 46(2):91–8. doi:10.1016/0024-3205(90)90041-O

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

172. Stiene-Martin A, Gurwell JA, Hauser KF. Morphine alters astrocyte growth in primary cultures of mouse glial cells: evidence for a direct effect of opiates on neural maturation. Brain Res Dev Brain Res (1991) 60(1):1–7. doi:10.1016/0165-3806(91)90149-D

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

173. Hauser KF, Stiene-Martin A. Characterization of opioid-dependent glial development in dissociated and organotypic cultures of mouse central nervous system: critical periods and target specificity. Brain Res Dev Brain Res (1991) 62(2):245–55. doi:10.1016/0165-3806(91)90172-F

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

174. Hauser KF, Stiene-Martin A, Mattson MP, Elde RP, Ryan SE, Godleske CC. μ-Opioid receptor-induced Ca²⁺ mobilization and astroglial development: morphine inhibits DNA synthesis and stimulates cellular hypertrophy through a Ca²⁺-dependent mechanism. Brain Res (1996) 720(1–2):191–203. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(96)00103-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

175. Ruzicka BB, Fox CA, Thompson RC, Meng F, Watson SJ, Akil H. Primary astroglial cultures derived from several rat brain regions differentially express μ, δ and kappa opioid receptor mRNA. Mol Brain Res (1995) 34:209–20. doi:10.1016/0169-328X(95)00165-O

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

176. Thorlin T, Eriksson PS, Persson PA, Aberg ND, Hansson E, Rönnbäck L. Delta-opioid receptors on astroglial cells in primary culture: mobilization of intracellular free calcium via a pertussis sensitive G protein. Neuropharmacology (1998) 37(3):299–311. doi:10.1016/S0028-3908(98)00026-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

177. Gurwell JA, Duncan MJ, Maderspach K, Stiene-Martin A, Elde RP, Hauser KF. κ-Opioid receptor expression defines a phenotypically distinct subpopulation of astroglia: relationship to Ca²⁺ mobilization, development, and the antiproliferative effect of opioids. Brain Res (1996) 737(1–2):175–87. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(96)00728-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

178. Eriksson PS, Hansson E, Rönnbäck L. Delta and kappa opiate receptors in primary astroglial cultures from rat cerebral cortex. Neurochem Res (1990) 15(11):1123–6. doi:10.1007/BF01101714

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

179. Thorlin T, Persson PAI, Eriksson PS, Hansson E, Rönnbäck L. Delta-opioid receptor immunoreactivity on astrocytes is upregulated during mitosis. Glia (1999) 25(4):370–8. doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-1136(19990215)25:4<370:aid-glia6>3.0.co;2-j

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

180. Eriksson PS, Hansson E, Rönnbäck L. δ and kappa opiate receptors in primary astroglial cultures. Part II: receptor sets in cultures from various brain regions and interactions with β-receptor activated cyclic AMP. Neurochem Res (1992) 17:545–51. doi:10.1007/BF00968781

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

181. Ruzicka BB, Fox CA, Thompson RC, Akil H, Watson SJ. Opioid receptor mRNA expression in primary cultures of glial cells derived from different rat brain regions. Regul Pept (1994) 54:251–2. doi:10.1016/0167-0115(94)90484-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

182. Rogers TB, Inesi G, Wade R, Lederer WJ. Use of thapsigargin to study Ca²⁺ homeostasis in cardiac cells. Biosci Rep (1995) 15(5):341–9. doi:10.1007/BF01788366

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

183. Zhao F, Li P, Chen SR, Louis CF, Fruen BR. Dantrolene inhibition of ryanodine receptor Ca²⁺ release channels. Molecular mechanism and isoform selectivity. J Biol Chem (2001) 276(17):13810–6. doi:10.1074/jbc.M006104200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

184. Zukin RS, Eghbali M, Olive D, Unterwald EM, Tempel A. Characterization and visualization of rat and guinea pig brain kappa opioid receptors: evidence for kappa 1 and kappa 2 opioid receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1988) 85(11):4061–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.85.11.4061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

185. Frey HH. Effect of mu- and kappa-opioid agonists on the electroconvulsive seizure threshold in mice and antagonism by naloxone and MR 2266. Pharmacol Toxicol (1988) 62(3):150–4. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0773.1988.tb01863.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

186. Xu M, Bruchas MR, Ippolito DL, Gendron L, Chavkin C. Sciatic nerve ligation-induced proliferation of spinal cord astrocytes is mediated by kappa opioid activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Neurosci (2007) 27(10):2570–81. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3728-06.2007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

187. McLennan GP, Kiss A, Miyatake M, Belcheva MM, Chambers KT, Pozek JJ, et al. Kappa opioids promote the proliferation of astrocytes via Gβγ and beta-arrestin 2-dependent MAPK-mediated pathways. J Neurochem (2008) 107(6):1753–65. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05745.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

188. Belcheva MM, Haas PD, Tan Y, Heaton VM, Coscia CJ. The fibroblast growth factor receptor is at the site of convergence between mu-opioid receptor and growth factor signaling pathways in rat C6 glioma cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (2002) 303(3):909–18. doi:10.1124/jpet.102.038554

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

189. Bohn LM, Belcheva MM, Coscia CJ. µ-Opioid agonist inhibition of κ-opioid receptor-stimulated extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation is dynamin-dependent in C6 glioma cells. J Neurochem (2001) 74(2):574–81. doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.740574.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

190. Hauser KF, Harris-White ME, Jackson JA, Opanashuk LA, Carney JM. Opioids disrupt Ca²⁺ homeostasis and induce carbonyl oxyradical production in mouse astrocytes in vitro: transient increases and adaptation to sustained exposure. Exp Neurol (1998) 151(1):70–6. doi:10.1006/exnr.1998.6788

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

191. Sargeant TJ, Day DJ, Miller JH, Steel RW. Acute in utero morphine exposure slows G2/M phase transition in radial glial and basal progenitor cells in the dorsal telencephalon of the E15.5 embryonic mouse. Eur J Neurosci (2008) 28(6):1060–7. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06412.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

192. Gurwell JA, Hauser KF. Morphine does not affect astrocyte survival in developing primary mixed-glial cultures. Dev Brain Res (1993) 76(2):293–8. doi:10.1016/0165-3806(93)90222-V

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

193. Kim MS, Cheong YP, So HS, Lee KM, Kim TY, Oh J, et al. Protective effects of morphine in peroxynitrite-induced apoptosis of primary rat neonatal astrocytes: potential involvement of G protein and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3 kinase). Biochem Pharmacol (2001) 61(7):779–86. doi:10.1016/S0006-2952(01)00541-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

194. Bajic D, Commons KG, Soriano SG. Morphine-enhanced apoptosis in selective brain regions of neonatal rats. Int J Dev Neurosci (2013) 31(4):258–66. doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2013.02.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

195. Willner D, Cohen-Yeshurun A, Avidan A, Ozersky V, Shohami E, Leker RR. Short term morphine exposure in vitro alters proliferation and differentiation of neural progenitor cells and promotes apoptosis via mu receptors. PLoS One (2014) 9(7):e103043. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

196. Baumann N, Pham-Dinh D. Biology of oligodendrocyte and myelin in the mammalian central nervous system. Physiol Rev (2001) 81(2):871–927. doi:10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.871

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

197. Skoff RP, Knapp PE. Division of astroblasts and oligodendroblasts in postnatal rodent brain: evidence for separate astrocyte and oligodendrocyte lineages. Glia (1991) 4(2):165–74. doi:10.1002/glia.440040208

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

198. Skoff RP. Gliogenesis in the rat optic nerve: astrocytes are generated in a single wave before oligodendrocytes. Dev Biol (1990) 139:149–68. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(90)90285-Q

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

199. Gibson EM, Purger D, Mount CW, Goldstein AK, Lin GL, Wood LS, et al. Neuronal activity promotes oligodendrogenesis and adaptive myelination in the mammalian brain. Science (2014) 344(6183):1252304. doi:10.1126/science.1252304

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

200. Li W, Li Q, Wang Y, Zhu J, Ye J, Yan X, et al. Methadone-induced damage to white matter integrity in methadone maintenance patients: a longitudinal self-control DTI study. Sci Rep (2016) 6:19662. doi:10.1038/srep19662

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

201. Upadhyay J, Maleki N, Potter J, Elman I, Rudrauf D, Knudsen J, et al. Alterations in brain structure and functional connectivity in prescription opioid-dependent patients. Brain (2010) 133(Pt 7):2098–114. doi:10.1093/brain/awq138

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

202. Bora E, Yucel M, Fornito A, Pantelis C, Harrison BJ, Cocchi L, et al. White matter microstructure in opiate addiction. Addict Biol (2012) 17(1):141–8. doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2010.00266.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

203. Qiu Y, Jiang G, Su H, Lv X, Zhang X, Tian J, et al. Progressive white matter microstructure damage in male chronic heroin dependent individuals: a DTI and TBSS study. PLoS One (2013) 8(5):e63212. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063212

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

204. Knapp PE, Hauser KF. μ-Opioid receptor activation enhances DNA synthesis in immature oligodendrocytes. Brain Res (1996) 743:341–5. doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(96)01097-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

205. Knapp PE, Adjan VV, Hauser KF. Cell-specific loss of kappa-opioid receptors in oligodendrocytes of the dysmyelinating jimpy mouse. Neurosci Lett (2009) 451(2):114–8. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2008.12.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

206. Mei F, Mayoral SR, Nobuta H, Wang F, Desponts C, Lorrain DS, et al. Identification of the Kappa-opioid receptor as a therapeutic target for oligodendrocyte remyelination. J Neurosci (2016) 36(30):7925–35. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1493-16.2016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

207. Hahn JW, Jagwani S, Kim E, Rendell VR, He J, Ezerskiy LA, et al. Mu and kappa opioids modulate mouse embryonic stem cell-derived neural progenitor differentiation via MAP kinases. J Neurochem (2010) 112(6):1431–41. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06479.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

208. Elkader A, Sproule B. Buprenorphine: clinical pharmacokinetics in the treatment of opioid dependence. Clin Pharmacokinet (2005) 44(7):661–80. doi:10.2165/00003088-200544070-00001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

209. Kreek MJ, LaForge KS, Butelman E. Pharmacotherapy of addictions. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2002) 1(9):710–26. doi:10.1038/nrd897

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

210. Robinson SE. Buprenorphine-containing treatments: place in the management of opioid addiction. CNS Drugs (2006) 20(9):697–712. doi:10.2165/00023210-200620090-00001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

211. Woody GE, Poole SA, Subramaniam G, Dugosh K, Bogenschutz M, Abbott P, et al. Extended vs short-term buprenorphine-naloxone for treatment of opioid-addicted youth: a randomized trial. JAMA (2008) 300(17):2003–11. doi:10.1001/jama.2008.574

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

212. Sanchez ES, Bigbee JW, Fobbs W, Robinson SE, Sato-Bigbee C. Opioid addiction and pregnancy: perinatal exposure to buprenorphine affects myelination in the developing brain. Glia (2008) 56(9):1017–27. doi:10.1002/glia.20675

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

213. Eschenroeder AC, Vestal-Laborde AA, Sanchez ES, Robinson SE, Sato-Bigbee C. Oligodendrocyte responses to buprenorphine uncover novel and opposing roles of µ-opioid- and nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptors in cell development: implications for drug addiction treatment during pregnancy. Glia (2012) 60(1):125–36. doi:10.1002/glia.21253

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

214. Altice FL, Sullivan LE, Smith-Rohrberg D, Basu S, Stancliff S, Eldred L. The potential role of buprenorphine in the treatment of opioid dependence in HIV-infected individuals and in HIV infection prevention. Clin Infect Dis (2006) 43(Suppl 4):S178–83. doi:10.1086/508181

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

215. Carrieri MP, Amass L, Lucas GM, Vlahov D, Wodak A, Woody GE. Buprenorphine use: the international experience. Clin Infect Dis (2006) 43(Suppl 4):S197–215. doi:10.1086/508184

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

216. Khalsa J, Vocci F, Altice F, Fiellin D, Miller V. Buprenorphine and HIV primary care: new opportunities for integrated treatment. Clin Infect Dis (2006) 43(Suppl 4):S169–72. doi:10.1086/508179

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

217. Lum PJ, Tulsky JP. The medical management of opioid dependence in HIV primary care settings. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep (2006) 3(4):195–204. doi:10.1007/s11904-006-0016-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

218. Sullivan LE, Fiellin DA. Buprenorphine: its role in preventing HIV transmission and improving the care of HIV-infected patients with opioid dependence. Clin Infect Dis (2005) 41(6):891–6. doi:10.1086/432888

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

219. Nanovskaya T, Deshmukh S, Brooks M, Ahmed MS. Transplacental transfer and metabolism of buprenorphine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (2002) 300(1):26–33. doi:10.1124/jpet.300.1.26

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

220. Cicero TJ, Inciardi JA. Potential for abuse of buprenorphine in office-based treatment of opioid dependence. N Engl J Med (2005) 353(17):1863–5. doi:10.1056/NEJM200510273531724

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

221. Sporer KA. Buprenorphine: a primer for emergency physicians. Ann Emerg Med (2004) 43(5):580–4. doi:10.1016/S0196064403012058

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

222. Comer SD, Sullivan MA, Walker EA. Comparison of intravenous buprenorphine and methadone self-administration by recently detoxified heroin-dependent individuals. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (2005) 315(3):1320–30. doi:10.1124/jpet.105.090423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

223. Pettit AS, Desroches R, Bennett SA. The opiate analgesic buprenorphine decreases proliferation of adult hippocampal neuroblasts and increases survival of their progeny. Neuroscience (2012) 200:211–22. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.10.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

224. Wu CC, Hung CJ, Shen CH, Chen WY, Chang CY, Pan HC, et al. Prenatal buprenorphine exposure decreases neurogenesis in rats. Toxicol Lett (2014) 225(1):92–101. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.12.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

225. Hung CJ, Wu CC, Chen WY, Chang CY, Kuan YH, Pan HC, et al. Depression-like effect of prenatal buprenorphine exposure in rats. PLoS One (2013) 8(12):e82262. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

226. Mallimo EM, Kusnecov AW. The role of orphanin FQ/nociceptin in neuroplasticity: relationship to stress, anxiety and neuroinflammation. Front Cell Neurosci (2013) 7:173. doi:10.3389/fncel.2013.00173

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

227. Nekhayeva IA, Nanovskaya TN, Deshmukh SV, Zharikova OL, Hankins GD, Ahmed MS. Bidirectional transfer of methadone across human placenta. Biochem Pharmacol (2005) 69(1):187–97. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2004.09.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

228. Jansson LM, Velez M, Harrow C. Methadone maintenance and lactation: a review of the literature and current management guidelines. J Hum Lact (2004) 20(1):62–71. doi:10.1177/0890334403261027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

229. Vestal-Laborde AA, Eschenroeder AC, Bigbee JW, Robinson SE, Sato-Bigbee C. The opioid system and brain development: effects of methadone on the oligodendrocyte lineage and the early stages of myelination. Dev Neurosci (2014) 36(5):409–21. doi:10.1159/000365074

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

230. Eisch AJ, Harburg GC. Opiates, psychostimulants, and adult hippocampal neurogenesis: insights for addiction and stem cell biology. Hippocampus (2006) 16(3):271–86. doi:10.1002/hipo.20161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

231. Zhang Y, Loh HH, Law PY. Effect of opioid on adult hippocampal neurogenesis. ScientificWorldJournal (2016) 2016:2601264. doi:10.1155/2016/2601264

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

232. Sargeant TJ, Miller JH, Day DJ. Opioidergic regulation of astroglial/neuronal proliferation: where are we now? J Neurochem (2008) 107(4):883–97. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05671.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

233. Drake CT, Chavkin C, Milner TA. Opioid systems in the dentate gyrus. Prog Brain Res (2007) 163:245–63. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(07)63015-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

234. Venkatesan A, Nath A, Ming GL, Song H. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis: regulation by HIV and drugs of abuse. Cell Mol Life Sci (2007) 64(16):2120–32. doi:10.1007/s00018-007-7063-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

235. Canales JJ. Adult neurogenesis and the memories of drug addiction. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2007) 257(5):261–70. doi:10.1007/s00406-007-0730-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

236. Altman J, Das GD. Postnatal neurogenesis in the guinea-pig. Nature (1967) 214(5093):1098–101. doi:10.1038/2141098a0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

237. Altman J, Das GD. Autoradiographic and histological evidence of postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis in rats. J Comp Neurol (1965) 124(3):319–35. doi:10.1002/cne.901240303

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

238. Gould E, Reeves AJ, Graziano MS, Gross CG. Neurogenesis in the neocortex of adult primates. Science (1999) 286(5439):548–52. doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.548

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

239. Eriksson PS, Perfilieva E, Björk-Eriksson T, Alborn AM, Nordborg C, Peterson DA, et al. Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat Med (1998) 4(11):1313–7. doi:10.1038/3305

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

240. Kuhn HG, Dickinson-Anson H, Gage FH. Neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat: age-related decrease of neuronal progenitor proliferation. J Neurosci (1996) 16(6):2027–33.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

241. Gage FH. Mammalian neural stem cells. Science (2000) 287(5457):1433–8. doi:10.1126/science.287.5457.1433

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

242. Ming GL, Song H. Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian central nervous system. Annu Rev Neurosci (2005) 28:223–50. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.051804.101459

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

243. Ming GL, Song H. Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian brain: significant answers and significant questions. Neuron (2011) 70(4):687–702. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

244. Ernst A, Alkass K, Bernard S, Salehpour M, Perl S, Tisdale J, et al. Neurogenesis in the striatum of the adult human brain. Cell (2014) 156(5):1072–83. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

245. Persson AI, Thorlin T, Bull C, Eriksson PS. Opioid-induced proliferation through the MAPK pathway in cultures of adult hippocampal progenitors. Mol Cell Neurosci (2003) 23(3):360–72. doi:10.1016/s1044-7431(03)00061-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

246. Cowley MA, Smart JL, Rubinstein M, Cerdan MG, Diano S, Horvath TL, et al. Leptin activates anorexigenic POMC neurons through a neural network in the arcuate nucleus. Nature (2001) 411(6836):480–4. doi:10.1038/35078085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

247. Song H, Stevens CF, Gage FH. Astroglia induce neurogenesis from adult neural stem cells. Nature (2002) 417(6884):39–44. doi:10.1038/417039a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

248. Lim DA, Alvarez-Buylla A. Adult neural stem cells stake their ground. Trends Neurosci (2014) 37(10):563–71. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2014.08.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

249. Ihrie RA, Alvarez-Buylla A. Lake-front property: a unique germinal niche by the lateral ventricles of the adult brain. Neuron (2011) 70(4):674–86. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

250. Lie DC, Colamarino SA, Song HJ, Desire L, Mira H, Consiglio A, et al. Wnt signalling regulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Nature (2005) 437(7063):1370–5. doi:10.1038/nature04108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

251. Shen Q, Wang Y, Kokovay E, Lin G, Chuang SM, Goderie SK, et al. Adult SVZ stem cells lie in a vascular niche: a quantitative analysis of niche cell-cell interactions. Cell Stem Cell (2008) 3(3):289–300. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.07.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

252. Tavazoie M, Van der Veken L, Silva-Vargas V, Louissaint M, Colonna L, Zaidi B, et al. A specialized vascular niche for adult neural stem cells. Cell Stem Cell (2008) 3(3):279–88. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.07.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

253. Hansen DV, Lui JH, Parker PR, Kriegstein AR. Neurogenic radial glia in the outer subventricular zone of human neocortex. Nature (2010) 464(7288):554–61. doi:10.1038/nature08845

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

254. Pastrana E, Silva-Vargas V, Doetsch F. Eyes wide open: a critical review of sphere-formation as an assay for stem cells. Cell Stem Cell (2011) 8(5):486–98. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2011.04.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

255. Eisch AJ, Barrot M, Schad CA, Self DW, Nestler EJ. Opiates inhibit neurogenesis in the adult rat hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2000) 97(13):7579–84. doi:10.1073/pnas.120552597

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

256. Bulin SE, Mendoza ML, Richardson DR, Song KH, Solberg TD, Yun S, et al. Dentate gyrus neurogenesis ablation via cranial irradiation enhances morphine self-administration and locomotor sensitization. Addict Biol (2017). doi:10.1111/adb.12524

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

257. Arguello AA, Harburg GC, Schonborn JR, Mandyam CD, Yamaguchi M, Eisch AJ. Time course of morphine’s effects on adult hippocampal subgranular zone reveals preferential inhibition of cells in S phase of the cell cycle and a subpopulation of immature neurons. Neuroscience (2008) 157(1):70–9. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.08.064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

258. Enari M, Sakahira H, Yokoyama H, Okawa K, Iwamatsu A, Nagata S. A caspase-activated DNase that degrades DNA during apoptosis, and its inhibitor ICAD. Nature (1998) 391(6662):43–50. doi:10.1038/34112

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

259. Palmer TD, Takahashi J, Gage FH. The adult rat hippocampus contains primordial neural stem cells. Mol Cell Neurosci (1997) 8(6):389–404. doi:10.1006/mcne.1996.0595

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

260. Fujita W, Gomes I, Devi LA. Heteromers of mu-delta opioid receptors: new pharmacology and novel therapeutic possibilities. Br J Pharmacol (2015) 172(2):375–87. doi:10.1111/bph.12663

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

261. Harburg GC, Hall FS, Harrist AV, Sora I, Uhl GR, Eisch AJ. Knockout of the mu opioid receptor enhances the survival of adult-generated hippocampal granule cell neurons. Neuroscience (2007) 144(1):77–87. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.09.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

262. Paul A, Chaker Z, Doetsch F. Hypothalamic regulation of regionally distinct adult neural stem cells and neurogenesis. Science (2017) 356(6345):1383–6. doi:10.1126/science.aal3839

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

263. Carroll FI, Carlezon WA Jr. Development of kappa opioid receptor antagonists. J Med Chem (2013) 56(6):2178–95. doi:10.1021/jm301783x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

264. Chang AC, Takemori AE, Portoghese PS. 2-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)-N-methyl-N-[(1S)-1-(3-isothiocyanatophenyl)-2-(1-pyrrolidi nyl)ethyl]acetamide: an opioid receptor affinity label that produces selective and long-lasting kappa antagonism in mice. J Med Chem (1994) 37(11):1547–9. doi:10.1021/jm00037a001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

265. Raynor K, Kong H, Chen Y, Yasuda K, Yu L, Bell GI, et al. Pharmacological characterization of the cloned kappa-, delta-, and mu-opioid receptors. Mol Pharmacol (1994) 45(2):330–4.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

266. Xu C, Zheng H, Loh HH, Law PY. Morphine promotes astrocyte-preferential differentiation of mouse hippocampal progenitor cells via PKCε-dependent ERK activation and TRBP phosphorylation. Stem Cells (2015) 33(9):2762–72. doi:10.1002/stem.2055

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

267. Sankararaman A, Masiulis I, Richardson DR, Andersen JM, Morland J, Eisch AJ. Methadone does not alter key parameters of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in the heroin-naive rat. Neurosci Lett (2012) 516(1):99–104. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.066

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

268. Wisler JW, Xiao K, Thomsen AR, Lefkowitz RJ. Recent developments in biased agonism. Curr Opin Cell Biol (2014) 27:18–24. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2013.10.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

269. Kenakin T. Functional selectivity and biased receptor signaling. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (2011) 336(2):296–302. doi:10.1124/jpet.110.173948

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

270. Xu C, Zhang Y, Zheng H, Loh HH, Law PY. Morphine modulates mouse hippocampal progenitor cell lineages by upregulating miR-181a level. Stem Cells (2014) 32(11):2961–72. doi:10.1002/stem.1774

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

271. Andersson ER, Sandberg R, Lendahl U. Notch signaling: simplicity in design, versatility in function. Development (2011) 138(17):3593–612. doi:10.1242/dev.063610

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

272. Zheng H, Zeng Y, Zhang X, Chu J, Loh HH, Law PY. mu-Opioid receptor agonists differentially regulate the expression of miR-190 and NeuroD. Mol Pharmacol (2010) 77(1):102–9. doi:10.1124/mol.109.060848

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

273. Sowell ER, Peterson BS, Thompson PM, Welcome SE, Henkenius AL, Toga AW. Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nat Neurosci (2003) 6(3):309–15. doi:10.1038/nn1008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

274. Anderson VA, Anderson P, Northam E, Jacobs R, Catroppa C. Development of executive functions through late childhood and adolescence in an Australian sample. Dev Neuropsychol (2001) 20(1):385–406. doi:10.1207/S15326942DN2001_5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

275. Rubia K, Overmeyer S, Taylor E, Brammer M, Williams SC, Simmons A, et al. Functional frontalisation with age: mapping neurodevelopmental trajectories with fMRI. Neurosci Biobehav Rev (2000) 24(1):13–9. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(99)00055-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

276. Crowell CS, Malee KM, Yogev R, Muller WJ. Neurologic disease in HIV-infected children and the impact of combination antiretroviral therapy. Rev Med Virol (2014) 24(5):316–31. doi:10.1002/rmv.1793

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

277. Hoare J, Ransford GL, Phillips N, Amos T, Donald K, Stein DJ. Systematic review of neuroimaging studies in vertically transmitted HIV positive children and adolescents. Metab Brain Dis (2014) 29(2):221–9. doi:10.1007/s11011-013-9456-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

278. Hahn YK, Podhaizer EM, Hauser KF, Knapp PE. HIV-1 alters neural and glial progenitor cell dynamics in the central nervous system: coordinated response to opiates during maturation. Glia (2012) 60(12):1871–87. doi:10.1002/glia.22403

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

279. Balinang JM, Masvekar RR, Hauser KF, Knapp PE. Productive infection of human neural progenitor cells by R5 tropic HIV-1: opiate co-exposure heightens infectivity and functional vulnerability. AIDS (2017) 31(6):753–64. doi:10.1097/QAD.0000000000001398

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

280. Malik S, Saha R, Seth P. Involvement of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2)-p53-p21 axis in mediating neural stem/progenitor cell cycle arrest in co-morbid HIV-drug abuse exposure. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol (2014) 9(3):340–53. doi:10.1007/s11481-014-9523-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

281. Sharma SK, Klee WA, Nirenberg M. Dual regulation of adenylate cyclase accounts for narcotic dependence and tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1975) 72(8):3092–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.72.8.3092

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

282. Kreek MJ. Tolerance and dependence: implications for the pharmacological treatment of addiction. NIDA Res Monogr (1987) 76:53–62.

Google Scholar

283. Kreek MJ. Drug addictions. Molecular and cellular endpoints. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2001) 937:27–49. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03557.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

284. Anand KJ, Hickey PR. Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus. N Engl J Med (1987) 317(21):1321–9. doi:10.1056/NEJM198711193172105

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

285. Attarian S, Tran LC, Moore A, Stanton G, Meyer E, Moore RP. The neurodevelopmental impact of neonatal morphine administration. Brain Sci (2014) 4(2):321–34. doi:10.3390/brainsci4020321

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

286. Klaman SL, Isaacs K, Leopold A, Perpich J, Hayashi S, Vender J, et al. Treating women who are pregnant and parenting for opioid use disorder and the concurrent care of their infants and children: Literature Review to Support National Guidance. J Addict Med (2017) 11(3):178–90. doi:10.1097/ADM.0000000000000308

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

287. Jones HE, O’Grady KE, Johnson RE, Velez M, Jansson LM. Infant neurobehavior following prenatal exposure to methadone or buprenorphine: results from the neonatal intensive care unit network neurobehavioral scale. Subst Use Misuse (2010) 45(13):2244–57. doi:10.3109/10826084.2010.484474

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

288. Robison AJ, Nestler EJ. Transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms of addiction. Nat Rev Neurosci (2011) 12(11):623–37. doi:10.1038/nrn3111

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

289. Tripathi A, Khurshid N, Kumar P, Iyengar S. Expression of delta- and mu-opioid receptors in the ventricular and subventricular zones of the developing human neocortex. Neurosci Res (2008) 61(3):257–70. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2008.03.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

290. Thornton SR, Smith FL. Long-term alterations in opiate antinociception resulting from infant fentanyl tolerance and dependence. Eur J Pharmacol (1998) 363(2–3):113–9. doi:10.1016/S0014-2999(98)00783-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

291. Kinney HC, Filiano JJ, Assmann SF, Mandell F, Valdes-Dapena M, Krous HF, et al. Tritiated-naloxone binding to brainstem opioid receptors in the sudden infant death syndrome. J Auton Nerv Syst (1998) 69(2–3):156–63. doi:10.1016/S0165-1838(98)00021-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

292. Filiano JJ, Kinney HC. Sudden infant death syndrome and brainstem research. Pediatr Ann (1995) 24(7):379–83. doi:10.3928/0090-4481-19950701-10

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

293. Kinney HC, Ottoson CK, White WF. Three-dimensional distribution of ³H-naloxone binding to opiate receptors in the human fetal and infant brainstem. J Comp Neurol (1990) 291(1):55–78. doi:10.1002/cne.902910106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar