Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Pediatr., 12 December 2017
Sec. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Corrigendum: Assessment of Sensory Processing Characteristics in Children between 3 and 11 Years Old: A Systematic Review

  • 1Centro de Terapia Infantil AYTONA, Madrid, Spain
  • 2Facultad de Terapia Ocupacional, Logopedia y Enfermería, Psychology, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Talavera de la Reina, Spain
  • 3Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
  • 4West Health District, Primary Care Center Francia, Madrid Health Service, Madrid, Spain

A corrigendum on

Assessment of Sensory Processing Characteristics in Children between 3 and 11 Years Old: A Systematic Review
by Jorquera-Cabrera S, Romero-Ayuso D, Rodriguez-Gil G, Triviño-Juárez J-M. Front Pediatr (2017) 5:57. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00057

Error in Figure/Table

In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 2 “Tools selected for the assessment of sensory processing in children aged 3 to 11 years”. We want to clarify that the errors we have corrected in this document occurred when transcribing the data. We want to clarify that these errors have not been intentioned

The corrected Table 2 appears below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Tools selected for the assessment of sensory processing in children aged 3–11 years.

The original article has been updated.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Keywords: assessment, children, sensory integration, sensorial modulation, sensory processing

Citation: Jorquera-Cabrera S, Romero-Ayuso DM, Rodriguez-Gil G and Triviño-Juárez J-M (2017) Corrigendum: Assessment of Sensory Processing Characteristics in Children between 3 and 11 Years Old: A Systematic Review. Front. Pediatr. 5:266. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00266

Received: 18 September 2017; Accepted: 28 November 2017;
Published: 12 December 2017

Edited and Reviewed by: Ashok Mysore, St. John’s Medical College, India

Copyright: © 2017 Jorquera-Cabrera, Romero-Ayuso, Rodriguez-Gil and Triviño-Juárez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Dulce María Romero-Ayuso, ZHJheXVzbyYjeDAwMDQwO2dtYWlsLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.