Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Pediatr., 28 February 2017
Sec. Neonatology
This article is part of the Research Topic The Neonatal Immune System: A Unique Host-Microbial Interface View all 15 articles

Age-Appropriate Functions and Dysfunctions of the Neonatal Neutrophil

  • 1Pediatrics, Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, UCSD, La Jolla, CA, USA
  • 2Division of Host-Microbe Systems and Therapeutics, UCSD, La Jolla, CA, USA
  • 3Pharmacology, UCSD, La Jolla, CA, USA
  • 4Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, UCSD, La Jolla, CA, USA

Neonatal and adult neutrophils are distinctly different from one another due to well-defined and documented deficiencies in neonatal cells, including impaired functions, reduced concentrations of microbicidal proteins and enzymes necessary for pathogen destruction, and variances in cell surface receptors. Neutrophil maturation is clearly demonstrated throughout pregnancy from the earliest hematopoietic precursors in the yolk sac to the well-developed myeloid progenitor cells in the bone marrow around the seventh month of gestation. Notable deficiencies of neonatal neutrophils are generally correlated with gestational age and clinical condition, so that the least functional neutrophils are found in the youngest, sickest neonates. Interruption of normal gestation secondary to preterm birth exposes these shortcomings and places the neonate at an exceptionally high rate of infection and sepsis-related mortality. Because the fetus develops in a sterile environment, neonatal adaptive immune responses are deficient from lack of antigen exposure in utero. Newborns must therefore rely on innate immunity to protect against early infection. Neutrophils are a vital component of innate immunity since they are the first cells to respond to and defend against bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. However, notable phenotypic and functional disparities exist between neonatal and adult cells. Below is review of neutrophil ontogeny, as well as a discussion regarding known differences between preterm and term neonatal and adult neutrophils with respect to cell membrane receptors and functions. Our analysis will also explain how these variations decrease with postnatal age.

Introduction

The creation of life through human pregnancy is an astonishing achievement of nature, by which the allogeneic fetus is protected from maternal rejection through placental separation of fetal and maternal vascular systems as well as immunosuppression resulting from high levels of maternal progesterone and placental production of glucocorticoids (1). Intriguingly, this protection ensues even if the fetus is genetically diverse from its carrier, as observed with surrogate pregnancies, indicating a similarly tolerant fetus. Although suppressed, maternal immunity provides primary protection to the developing fetus against in utero infections and helps safeguard the newborn during the first year of life. This protection is achieved not only through placental transport of maternal immunoglobulins during the last trimester of pregnancy (2) but also by the newborn’s consumption of breast milk, rich in antimicrobial proteins, immunoglobulins, and beneficial oligosaccharides (3). If maternal defenses are breeched by pathogens, resulting in chorioamnionitis or neonatal infection, a detrimental inflammatory cascade may be initiated in the neonate with the potential for devastating long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae (4, 5) and/or perturbations in the normal development of the immune system (6).

Because the fetus develops in a sterile milieu, neonatal adaptive immune responses are naïve from lack of antigen exposure in utero. Newborns must, therefore, rely on innate immunity to protect against early infection (79). Neutrophils are a vital component of innate immunity because they are the first circulating immune cells to respond to and defend against bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. However, notable phenotypic and functional disparities exist between neonatal and adult cells. The severity of these impairments is inversely related to gestational age (GA), revealing progressive neutrophil maturation throughout pregnancy, from the earliest hematopoietic precursors in the yolk sac to the well-developed myeloid progenitor cells in the bone marrow around the seventh month of pregnancy. These deficiencies place our most vulnerable patients at risk for infection and sepsis-related mortality.

Environmental factors also directly impact neutrophil phenotype and function, and differ considerably between the maturing fetus and adult. The intrauterine environment is exceedingly hypoxic with oxygen concentrations measured in the range of 1–5%, compared to 21% in the Earth’s atmosphere. This low oxygen content necessitates cellular suppression mechanisms to counteract hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α)-mediated pro-inflammatory gene expression. Similarly, immune tolerance is vital during and after parturition, when the neonate is newly exposed to trillions of microorganisms that will become important components of its healthy microbiome.

For more than 50 years, scientists have been striving to understand the intrinsic mechanisms underpinning the normal transition of the suppressed in utero neutrophil into the fully functional postpartum cell capable of combating pathogenic organisms. This quest is even more urgent for extremely premature neonates, who are born at the limits of viability, and join the world before the immune developmental program is properly executed. As a consequence, these vulnerable neonates experience a profound compromise of both innate and adaptive immune responses. In this review, we explore differences between neonatal and adult neutrophils, describe neutrophil maturation throughout pregnancy, and highlight therapies trialed in neonates to enhance neutrophil function.

Development

Hematopoiesis

Fetal hematopoiesis, or the creation of all blood cells, is an evolutionarily conserved process that originates in the extra-embryonic yolk sac around the third week of embryogenesis and gives rise to a transient population of primeval erythroid cells, macrophages, and megakaryocytes (10, 11). Around the seventh to eighth week of gestation, genuine hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are derived from specialized intra-embryonic endothelial cells located in the ventral wall of the descending aorta (1214). These self-renewing primitive HSCs, with increased proliferation potential (15), will seed the liver, thymus, and spleen, where hematopoiesis will continue until the seventh month of gestation (10, 16). After this time, hematopoiesis will transition to the bone marrow, such that by the end of term gestation, the bone marrow becomes the primary source of red cells, white cells, and platelets (17, 18).

Neutrophils first appear in the human clavicular marrow at 10–11 weeks post conception (19). By the end of the first trimester, neutrophil precursors are detected in the peripheral blood, while mature cells appear by 14–16 weeks of fetal development (20, 21). HSCs that generate neutrophils are situated in specialized niches in the trabecular regions of long bones near the endosteum, or the interface between the bone and bone marrow, in proximity to osteoblasts (2224). To exit the bone marrow, neutrophils must traverse the bone marrow endothelium through tight-fitting pores by a process known as transcellular migration, whereby the cells pass through the cell bodies of the endothelium rather than through cell junctions (25, 26).

Neutrophils reside in three different groups, or pools, known as the proliferative, circulating, and marginating pools, with numbers in each influenced by the maturational development of the cell and the individual’s state of health. A delicate balance between neutrophil maturation, bone marrow storage and release, intravascular margination, and migration into peripheral tissues is closely regulated by conventional dendritic cells through the controlled production of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), CXCL1, CCL2, and CXCL10 (27).

Proliferative Bone Marrow Pool

The proliferative pool comprised mitotic neutrophil precursors, including myeloblasts, promyelocytes, and myelocytes, which maintain their ability to multiply in order to replenish neutrophil numbers (28, 29). In human adults, the proliferative pool is estimated to contain between 4 and 5 × 109 cells/kg bodyweight (30, 31). In term neonates, however, this pool is greatly diminished at only 10% of adult values, with more than two-thirds of their cells residing in an active cell cycle, resulting in substantial cell turnover (20, 32). The absolute neutrophil cell mass per gram body weight in term neonates is also considerably less, calculated to be only one-fourth that of adult levels (33), while preterm infants <32 weeks of gestation exhibit even lower values (~20% adult numbers) (34) (Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Variances between neonatal and adult neutrophils.

Neutrophils are activated from the early phases of bloodstream or deep tissue infection, causing their numbers in circulation to rapidly rise (35). Hence, bone marrow reserves of mature neutrophils are rapidly depleted due to limited stores, necessitating the release of immature granulocytes (IGs), known as a “left shift,” which is often used to assess a person’s probability of serious infection or sepsis (36). Because newborns, particularly very low birth weight premature neonates, have an exceptionally limited ability to recruit or generate significant neutrophil numbers, they are more likely to develop neutropenia when confronted by a pathogenic challenge, thereby increasing sepsis-associated morbidity and mortality (16, 20, 37). By contrast, adults maintain a large number of quiescent neutrophil progenitors that can be rapidly recruited into the cell cycle during times of sepsis (16, 20, 37, 38), coupled to a sizable bone marrow reserve of near-mature and mature neutrophils that can be quickly mobilized in early inflammatory responses (20 times that found in circulation) (30). Ultimately, neutrophil numbers in term and preterm infants will rise over the first few weeks of life to achieve adult values by 4 weeks of age (34).

Diminished Neutrophil Production and Neonatal Neutropenia

Neonates who are small for gestational age (SGA) at birth, or have a birthweight <10th percentile, also have higher rates of neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count of <1,000/mL) compared to non-SGA infants, with an incidence of 6 vs. 1%, respectively. SGA neutropenia usually persists for the first week of life and is associated with thrombocytopenia in more than 60% of neonates (39). Previous conclusions of a direct correlation between neutropenia and preeclampsia (40), or related placental deficiency, have since been disproven with regression models demonstrating no higher incidence of low neutrophil counts over and above that calculated for SGA alone (39, 41). SGA neutropenia most likely results from in utero growth restriction rather than high maternal blood pressure because the severity of neutropenia is directly correlated with the number of circulating nucleated red blood cells (39). Diminished neutrophil production, rather than accelerated neutrophil destruction or excessive margination, is considered the primary mechanism underlying this phenomenon, as a normal immature to total (I:T) neutrophil ratio is maintained (39). Additionally, findings of decreased neutrophil production from pluripotent hematopoietic progenitors, reduced concentrations of granulocyte-macrophage progenitors, diminished bone marrow neutrophil proliferative and storage pools, and absence of evidence for excessive margination have been found in experimental models (40). Impaired neutrophil production is therefore thought to result from (1) downregulation of neutrophil growth or transcription factors due to high concentrations of erythropoietin (42), (2) inadequate G-CSF production, or (3) a placental inhibitor of neutrophil production that has yet to be identified (39). Notably, neutropenic SGA infants have an increased probability of being diagnosed with late-onset sepsis, as well as a fourfold increased risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis for reasons that remain unclear (39).

Intriguingly, extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants, or those born less than 1,000 g at birth, experience the highest frequency of neutropenia of any other neonatal group without an identified cause (43). Unlike older gestational aged neonates, neutropenia in ELBW infants is usually not associated with sepsis (44). Therefore, ELBW infants with and without neutropenia experience similar mortality rates in the NICU (43).

Trials investigating the clinical use of recombinant G-CSF and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to increase neutrophil numbers in preterm infants have yielded disappointing results, granted that sample sizes have been small. Although both drugs increased overall neutrophil numbers, no differences in mortality were observed by day 14 from the start of therapy in preterm infants with suspected or proven systemic infection who received concurrent antibiotic therapy (45, 46). The PROGRAMS trial, which specifically studied the prophylactic use of GM-CSF in SGA preterm infants in the first 5 days of life, also found no benefit in sepsis-free survival to day 14 from trial entry compared to the control group (47). In this study, GM-CSF was preferentially chosen because of its ability to illicit a TH1 immune response, prime neutrophils and monocytes to enhance bactericidal activity, and stimulate proliferation of neutrophil progenitors. A subgroup analysis by the Cochrane Group, however, identified 97 preterm infants from three studies, who suffered from both neutropenia and systemic infection at time of enrollment and received either drug. Remarkably, this defined group experienced a significant reduction in mortality by day 14 [RR 0.34 (95% CI 0.12–0.92); NNT 6 (95% CI 3–33)] (46), signifying that further appropriately powered studies should be undertaken to determine efficacy in this specific patient population (48).

Granulopoiesis

Neutrophil development is defined by the formation of granules within the maturing cell, known as granulopoiesis. This process begins between the myelocyte and promyelocyte stages of development and proceeds over the subsequent 4–6 days to produce mature, segmented neutrophils (Figure 1) (4951). Formation of neutrophil granules occurs in a continuum by a process known as “targeting by timing,” whereby granule proteins are sequentially packaged as they are produced, so that azurophilic granules are synthesized in promyelocytes, specific granule proteins in myelocytes, and gelatinase granule proteins in metamyelocytes and band cells, after which granule formation concludes and secretory vesicles form (50, 5254). Recent findings reveal that direct sorting of granule components is also imperative for proper neutrophil granule formation. This is exemplified by the proteoglycan serglycin, which is essential for the shuttling and packaging of α-defensin and elastase into azurophilic granules (5557). Additionally, the discovery of adaptor protein complexes and the monomeric Golgi-localized γ-adaptin ear homology ARF (GGA)-binding protein have shown that together, these substances recognize, organize, and traffic granule proteins from the trans-Golgi network to their respective granule compartments based on complex co- and posttranslational processing similar to that of lysosomal sorting of other cell types (58, 59).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Neutrophil granulopoiesis. Neutrophil maturation is defined by the sequential formation of three different granules and secretory vesicles, as well as nuclear segmentation. Granulopoiesis begins with the development of azurophilic granules in myeloblasts/promyelocytes and concludes after creation of secretory vesicles in mature, segmented cells. Azurophilic granules, which contain acidic hydrolases and microbicidal proteins, fuse with phagosomes to form highly toxic enclosures for oxidative reactions, necessary for pathogen destruction. Specific granules participate in both extracellular and intracellular microbial killing and are rich in antibiotic substances. Gelatinase granules are mobilized when the neutrophil establishes rolling contact with inflamed endothelium and contain matrix-degrading enzymes (gelatinase) and membrane receptors. Secretory vesicles are the first to be mobilized after minimal neutrophil stimulation and contain membrane-associated receptors that are key for chemotactic-directed migration and the establishment of firm contact with activated vascular endothelium.

Neutrophil granules are exocytosed in the reverse order of their formation in a hierarchical fashion based on the function of their contents and the magnitude of the stimulus (50, 51, 60). Thus, secretory vesicles are the first to be extruded after minimal cellular stimulation or activation. Although not considered a true neutrophil granule, secretory vesicles are mobilized in the earliest stages of neutrophil-mediated inflammatory responses and are vital reservoirs of membrane-associated receptors that allow the neutrophil to establish firm contact with activated vascular endothelium and transmigrate into inflamed tissues. Gelatinase granules follow and contain matrix-degrading enzymes (gelatinases) and membrane receptors that are important for extravasation into inflamed tissues during early inflammatory processes. Specific granules are mobilized next and release their antimicrobial contents extracellularly or discharge their substances into phagosomes. Phagosomes provide lethal enclosures for the intracellular killing of phagocytosed microorganisms through the creation of confined spaces that allow for exposure to high concentrations of microbicidal proteins and hydrolytic enzymes. Azurophilic granules are the last to be mobilized and are unique among the neutrophil granules because they can only degranulate their contents into phagosomes after activation by very powerful stimuli. Because azurophilic granules contain acidic hydrolases and microbicidal proteins that can be harmful to surrounding tissues if released extracellularly, close regulation is necessary. Recently identified variations in soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complexes explain these differences: whereas all neutrophil granules contain syntaxin 4 and SNARE complexes within their membranes, specific and gelatinase granules have SNARE complexes with high concentrations of VAMP-1, VAMP-2, and 23-kDa synaptosome-associated protein 23, while azurophilic granules have increased levels of VAMP-1 and VAMP-7 (61, 62).

Circulating and Marginating Neutrophil Pools

More mature neutrophils that reside outside of the proliferative pool (metamyelocytes, bands, and segmented cells) are found in equilibrium between the free flowing circulating pool and marginating pool (63). Remarkable fluctuations of the circulating pool occur in nearly all neonates after birth due to a surge in neutrophil numbers in the first 6–24 h of life to levels never again encountered in one’s lifetime while healthy (64). This rise occurs earlier in neonates ≥28 weeks of GA with peak levels of 25–28,000 cells/μL noted around 6–12 h of life, while in those <28 weeks of GA experience a more gradual but dramatic rise, with maximum numbers of up to 40,000 cells/μL being achieved around 24 h of life (64). Irrespective of GA at birth, all newborns will subsequently undergo a gradual decline in neutrophil numbers over the next 72 h, with neutrophil composition and counts closely approximating that of adults by the third day of life (64).

Differences in neutrophil composition also exist, as term neonates have an increased number of IGs (promyelocytes, myelocytes, and metamyelocytes) when compared to adults (12 vs. 5%, respectively) (65). The higher quantity of IGs, which are deficient in vital early pro-inflammatory proteins and receptors due to incomplete or absent development of gelatinase granules or secretory vesicles, may increase a neonate’s risk of infection after birth while simultaneously guarding against inappropriate inflammatory responses during the creation of its microbiome. Because neonates have a limited proliferative pool, neutrophils involved in this early surge are theorized to accrue from the marginating pool in response to birth-related stress hormones produced in the neonate, although the exact source and mechanism involved remain unknown.

Functional Differences of Neonatal Neutrophils

Microbicidal Proteins and Activity

Degranulation capabilities are similar between term neonatal and adult neutrophils, while those from preterm infants have considerable impairments in the release of bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI), elastase, and lactoferrin when compared to either term neonatal or adult cells (66, 67). Additionally, neutrophils from term healthy newborns and adults contain equal concentrations of the azurophilic granule proteins myeloperoxidase and defensin, while BPI is decreased threefold in unstimulated term neonatal neutrophils compared to adult controls (68). Interestingly, term infants with early-onset sepsis (EOS) experience a rise in plasma levels of BPI comparable to those of older children with sepsis syndrome (69) and adults with bacteremia (70) or pneumonia (67, 71). In laboratory studies using the stimulus phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), Nupponen and colleagues demonstrated that term and adult neutrophils generated similar concentrations of BPI, while its production remained significantly diminished in preterm neonatal cells. This finding suggests that BPI mobilization within the neutrophil exhibits an age-dependent maturational effect (67). BPI has a high affinity for the lipid A portion of lipopolysaccharide (LPS; the endotoxin of Gram-negative bacteria), thereby neutralizing its pro-inflammatory properties (68, 72). BPI also enhances phagocytosis of Gram-negative bacterium by acting as an opsonin (68, 73). These factors may explain why preterm infants deficient in BPI mobilization are more likely to become septic with Gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, the leading cause of EOS in preterm infants. Additionally, the specific granule protein lactoferrin has direct bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities against viruses, Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacillis, and fungi (74). Lactoferrin measured in term neonatal neutrophils was half of adult concentrations, while preterm cells had even lower quantities (75).

Galectin-3, a S-type lectin receptor, is a non-traditional neutrophil membrane receptor with pro-inflammatory autocrine/paracrine effects on neutrophil phagocytosis, particularly of Candida species (76, 77). This receptor recognizes and binds to β-(1-2) oligomannan, thereby allowing the cell to distinguish between pathogenic and non-pathogenic fungi (76). Following its release extracellularly by activated or damaged neutrophils, galectin-3 binds to the neutrophil cell membrane. This binding results in the co-ligation of CD66a and CD66b, which leads to receptor clustering, integrin-mediated adhesion, and enhanced phagocytic capabilities (77). Galectin-3 has also been shown to increase reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, enhance neutrophil degranulation, and inhibit apoptosis (7779). Although contrasting data exist regarding serum and plasma levels in term neonates and adults, serum levels appear to be lower in preterm compared with term infants and rises throughout gestation (76, 80). Galectin-3 levels have also been demonstrated to be higher in neonates delivered vaginally compared to cesarean without labor, which may prime labor exposed neutrophils and render them more responsive to challenges with Gram-negative bacteria (79) or fungi (76, 80).

Chemotaxis and Migration

Neutrophils comprise the majority (60%) of leukocytes in humans (51) and are the “police force” of the immune system because they are the first immune cells to respond to and combat invading pathogens. During the earliest stages of infection or inflammation, chemoattractants derived from either the host (e.g., chemokines, cytokines, leukotrienes) and/or pathogen (e.g., LPS, fMLP) are released into the bloodstream, causing stimulation and activation of quiescent neutrophils. These agents also create a biochemical gradient that is sensed by specialized G protein-coupled receptors and induce intracellular signaling cascades that result in cell polarization, cytoskeletal rearrangement, and adhesion molecule clustering. These changes are necessary to enable the activated neutrophil to hone in and migrate toward the site of infection in the process known as chemotaxis (8, 81).

Neonatal neutrophils have similar chemotactic abilities, irrespective of GA (63, 82), but demonstrate reduced responsiveness when compared to adult cells (8387). Though the number and affinity of cell surface receptors are comparable, deficiencies in neonates are attributed to reduced mobilization of intracellular calcium that result in aberrations in chemoattractant-induced signaling (88), as well as anomalies in microfilamentous cytoskeletal organization from delayed F-actin induction (89). IGs are also inept at chemotaxis and are found in higher numbers in neonates after birth as compared to adults (90, 91). In general, though, neutrophils from term infants achieved similar chemotactic abilities to adult cells by around 4 weeks of age. By contrast, deficiencies persisted in nearly half of preterm infants at 42 weeks of GA for reasons that remain unclear (84, 85), indicating that birth and extrauterine environmental factors do not fully correct the developmental program of maturation.

Once the stimulated neutrophils arrive at the site of infection, extravasation into the tissue requires four mechanisms: (1) capture and rolling, (2) firm adhesion, (3) crawling, and (4) diapedesis or transmigration (Figure 2). Initial contact between the neutrophil and vascular endothelium occurs during rolling and capture, which depends upon the interaction of L-selectin on the neutrophil and P- or E-selectin on the endothelium. Once contact is established, chemokines located on the inflamed endothelium bind to specific chemokine receptors on the neutrophil cell surface, thereby triggering a conformational change of the neutrophil, shedding of L-selectin (92), and induction of β2 integrin expression, including lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1) and CR3 (CD11b/CD18, αMβ2, MAC-1), by inside-out signaling (93). L-selectin is then shed from the neutrophil, and the β2 integrins establish firm adhesion with the endothelium by binding to members of the immunoglobulin superfamily of adhesion molecules, such as intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and 2 (ICAM-1 and ICAM-2), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), and receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (8, 50, 60).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Neutrophil recruitment and tissue extravasation. Chemoattractants derived from the host and/or invading pathogens activate quiescent neutrophils and provide a chemical gradient for stimulated neutrophils to hone onto and migrate toward the site of infection. Once at the inflamed site, initial contact between the neutrophil and vascular endothelium occurs during rolling and capture, which is facilitated by L-selectin on the neutrophil and E-selectin on the inflamed endothelium. This initial contact causes shedding of L-selectin and triggers the induction of lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 and CR3, which establishes firm adhesion. Neutrophils then exit the vasculature by paracellular migration at the endothelial borders (70–90%) or via transcellular passage (not shown).

Neonatal neutrophils exhibit marked impairments in slow rolling and adhesion. One reason is reduced expression and shedding of L-selectin (94). This cell membrane receptor first appears on neonatal neutrophils around 21 weeks of fetal development (38, 95), and its concentration on the neutrophil cell surface increases in an age-dependent manner (38, 93). Although L-selectin shedding improves with fetal maturation, overall quantity and ease of release remains far below that of adult levels at term gestation, with substantial deficits noted in neonates <30 weeks of GA (8, 38, 93, 96).

Another reason for deficient slow rolling and adhesion in neonates is diminished upregulation of CR3 following chemotactic stimulation. Intriguingly, levels of CR3 in mid-gestational aged neonates are similar to those of patients with leukocyte adhesion deficiency type 1 syndrome (38, 93). When cytosolic and cell membrane measurements of CR3 stores were analyzed, investigators found that neonates had only 10% of adult levels at 27 weeks GA, increasing to 48% at 36 weeks GA, and then to 57 ± 4% at term (38). Of note, adult levels of CR3 were not attained by neonatal neutrophils until 11 months of age (38). Conversely, the appearance of LFA-1 in the neutrophil cell membrane is not dependent on maturation, with equivalent abundance in adults and neonates, regardless of GA (8, 38, 97) (Table 1).

The ability of the neonatal vascular endothelium to upregulate its expression of adhesion molecules following exposure to LPS is also greatly reduced in an age-dependent manner (93, 98). Neonatal neutrophils also have impairments of transmigration through the vascular endothelium due to decreased quantities of CR3 and diminished release of chemokines and cytokines from tissue neutrophils and macrophages (47, 99). Thus, only about half as many term neonatal neutrophils transmigrate through the vascular endothelium in response to infection or inflammation when compared to adult cells (38).

Infant health has also been shown to affect chemotaxis. Remarkably, neonates who are ventilated for severe respiratory distress syndrome (but otherwise healthy) (84) and those with superficial infections (100) had neutrophils that exhibit enhanced chemotactic abilities when compared to those of stable preterm and term infants (84). Conversely, septic infants with Gram-negative bacteremia had poorly chemotactic neutrophils (82, 100). Likewise, intrapartum exposure to magnesium sulfate reduced neonatal neutrophil chemotactic abilities with impairment directly correlated with maternal serum magnesium levels (101), and insufficiencies related to antenatal betamethasone exposure were attributed to reductions in endothelial expression of adhesion molecules, including E-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 (102).

Phagocytosis

Neutrophils generally exit the vasculature by paracellular migration at the endothelial borders (70–90%), but a few will travel through the endothelial cell via a transcellular passage (103). Once within the tissue, oxygen deprivation created by the pathological conditions of the infection drives HIF-dependent activation of prosurvival pathways in the neutrophil (104, 105) to enhance its bactericidal activity (106). Neutrophils then continue to migrate along the chemotactic gradient toward the site of microbial invasion. When encountered, neutrophils engulf the pathogens using receptors for complement and the Fc domain of immunoglobulins, including CR1, CR3, FcγRII, and FcγIII (38). While the number of CR1 (107) and both Fcγ receptors (108) are the same between term neonates and adults, CR3 receptors are decreased as previously discussed (38, 109). Conversely, preterm infants at birth express 80–88% of adult levels of FcγRII but only 50% of FcγIII (109). FcγIII levels, however, rise rapidly postnatally to reach adult levels by 2 weeks of life. Together, these four receptors mediate binding, ingestion, and killing of bacteria (38) (Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Similarities between neonatal and adult neutrophils.

Neonatal neutrophils from term, healthy infants opsonize and ingest both Gram-negative (91, 110) and Gram-positive bacteria with equivalent efficiency to adult cells (111). By contrast, phagocytosis was less proficient in preterm infants <33 weeks of GA, who experienced both slower uptake and ingestion of bacteria compared to term neonates and adults. Curiously, these impairments persisted at 1–2 months of age, despite no apparent maturational defect (112). These deficits are believed to result from low circulating levels of opsonization factors, particularly maternal immunoglobulins that are actively transported across the placenta in the last trimester of pregnancy. Supportive evidence comes from the observation that administration of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) normalizes phagocytosis capacity in preterm infants <32 weeks of GA (113). The use of IVIG in the treatment of neonatal sepsis, however, failed to reduce either (1) mortality during the hospital stay or (2) death or major disability at 2 years of age in infants with suspected or proven sepsis in a large cohort of neonates (114, 115). In the face of infective or non-infective clinical stress, the ability of neonatal neutrophils to phagocytose Gram-positive bacteria remained intact, but was impaired for Gram-negative bacteria (116).

Conversely, phagocytosis of Candida not only depends upon the size and form of the pathogen (i.e., hyphae or yeast) but also upon the species (76, 117). Destin and coworkers concluded that neutrophils from preterm and term infants as well as adult controls all failed to phagocytose unopsonized Candida albicans yeast, yet were similarly capable of phagocytosing unopsonized Candida parapsilosis (77, 117). Likewise, oxidative burst was equally robust when challenged with C. albicans hyphae in all groups, but non-existent against C. parapsilosis and attenuated against C. albicans yeast forms (117). Others have also demonstrated reduced phagocytosis and killing of C. albicans by preterm neonatal neutrophils due to deficiencies of opsonization factors (66, 118120). Likewise, galectin-3, mentioned earlier in this review, is critical for the neutrophil’s ability to recognize, engulf, and kill pathogenic Candida species. This finding is most likely due to the ability of galectin-3 to co-ligate neutrophil cell membrane receptors CD66a and CD66b, resulting in cell receptor clustering and integrin-mediated adhesion (77). Galectin-3 also primes/activates the neutrophil, thereby enhancing ROS production, prolonging cell survival, and increasing degranulation of microbicidal proteins and substances (77).

Phagocytosis-Associated Respiratory Burst and Chemiluminescence (CL)

Microorganisms, engulfed by neutrophils, are trapped within phagosomes that fuse with azurophilic and specific granules to form phagolysosomes, which are small, confined spaces designed for toxic, oxidative reactions vital in destroying pathogens while protecting the host tissue against harmful metabolites (121, 122). The formation of phagolysosomes is associated with an increase in hexose monophosphate shunt metabolism of glucose and, in turn, a proportional rise in molecular oxygen consumption that is known as the respiratory burst (121). NADPH oxidase, localized on the membrane of the phagolysosome, is also activated by phagocytosis and is essential in driving the respiratory burst via the reduction of oxygen (O2) to yield hydroxydioxylic acid (HO2) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (121, 123). Inactivating mutations in NADPH oxidase result in chronic granulomatous disease (CGD), which is characterized by recurrent bacterial and fungal infections, as well as granulomas that result from the neutrophils’ inability to completely kill and eliminate pathogens (124). HO2 and H2O2 are weakly bactericidal (125) and lead to considerable acidification of the phagolysosome (95, 121). Myeloperoxidase, also released from azurophilic granules, catalyzes oxidation reactions between H2O2 and chloride (Cl) to form hypochlorous acid (HOCl) (126), hydroxyl radicals (⋅OH), and chloramines, all of which are potent oxidants (127) that further contribute to the microbicidal capabilities of neutrophils (125). The resulting reactions between microorganisms and oxygenation radicals produce electronic excited products that cause light emission in the visible spectrum, known as CL (128).

The generation of O2 can be detected using the nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) test (129), which remains negative (clear) in patients with CGD, but produces a positive (or blue) reaction in neutrophils from healthy term newborns. Neonatal neutrophils induce an intensely positive reaction that corresponds to enhanced oxygen consumption in the initial phase of the respiratory burst and normal or elevated production of H2O2 (130). The NBT is also more intense from cord blood neutrophils exposed to labor than those without, suggesting that parturition primed these cells for increased activity (131, 132). Quantitative differences in the kinetic activity of the neonatal NADPH oxidase system may explain variances in NBT results (131, 133). Comparable bactericidal activity has been demonstrated between healthy neonatal and adult neutrophils toward Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas species, and groups A and B streptococci (127), while neutrophils from stressed preterm and term infants demonstrated significantly decreased bactericidal activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (127). Neutrophils from neonates with perinatal distress also exhibited respiratory burst suppression (134136). Even though the respiratory burst normalized to adult cellular function in preterm infants by 2 months of age, it remained depressed in ill infants receiving intensive care (137).

The interaction between ROS and microorganisms is the foundation of CL. In healthy, term neonates, CL is normal or enhanced for group B Streptococcus (GBS) and opsonized zymosan (111, 138) but is generally dampened in neutrophils from healthy preterm neonates <34 weeks of GA (111, 130, 134, 139). Moreover, critically ill preterm or term infants have significantly reduced CL (140), as do neutrophils challenged with large bacterial loads (141). Although neonatal deficiencies in CL persist throughout the course of serious infection, it tends to normalize to adult levels by 2 months after birth (142).

Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs)

By extruding chromatin material loaded with antimicrobial molecules including citrullinated histones, elastase, myeloperoxidase, lactoferrin, and defensins extracellularly (143) through formation of NETs, neutrophils can entrap and kill bacteria, fungi, and protozoa (144). Neutrophils can produce NETs by two distinct pathways. The first is initiated in response to LPS, TNF-α, or IL-8 (145, 146) and requires activation of NADPH oxidase (147), ROS production (148, 149), and induction of the RIPK3–MLKL cascade (150, 151). Neonatal neutrophils from term and preterm infants fail to form NETs in this manner, even though they have the ability to generate endogenous ROS and have NADPH activity equivalent to adult cells (152). Hence, Lipp and coworkers demonstrated significantly less NET formation, with reduced NET area, from neonatal cord blood neutrophils compared to adult cells following stimulation with N-formylmethionine-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP), PMA, and LPS, with even lower numbers and NET area noted in preterm neonatal neutrophils (153). This may be due to NET-inhibitory factors (nNIF) or nHIF-related peptides, which appear to be unique to neonatal neutrophils and function as important regulators of fetal and neonatal inflammation (154).

Neonatal neutrophils, irrespective of GA at birth, produce NETs via the second, ROS-independent pathway after exposure to certain pathogens and following activation by the complement system (155, 156), TLR2, and/or fibronectin (150). Byrd and colleagues recently demonstrated that preterm and term infants as well as adult controls produced NETs equally well when exposed to fibronectin together with either purified β-glucan or C. albicans hyphae in a ROS-independent manner but did not form NETs when exposed to fibronectin or β-glucan independently (157).

Neutrophils and the Microbiome

During parturition, the once naïve fetus passes through the vaginal canal where it is exposed to trillions of microorganisms that comprise the maternal microbiota. Neutrophil tolerance is imperative during this period to prevent the induction of pro-inflammatory reactions as the newborn is colonized with commensal microbes that harbor a variety of nucleic acids, proteins, and antigens. Once established, a symbiotic relationship is created between the host microbiota and neutrophils to ensure proper neutrophil function and numbers. Interventions that hinder the natural development of the newborn’s microbiota, such as cesarean delivery or exposure to intrapartum and/or postpartum antibiotics, may place the infant at an increased risk for late-onset sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, prolonged length of stay, and/or death (4, 158, 159). Recent discoveries by Deshmukh and colleagues help explain this association. Using a murine model, this group demonstrated that the pup microbiota induced IL-17 production by group 3 innate lymphoid cells in the intestine, which increased G-CSF and, hence, neutrophil production in a TLR-4- and MyD88-dependent manner (160). This interaction also increases the number of aged circulating neutrophils in adult mice, which possess enhanced αMB2 integrin and are more proficient at NET production under inflammatory conditions (161). Similar studies on aging neutrophils, however, are lacking in neonatal models.

Neonatal Neutrophils and Immunologic Quid Pro Quo

After birth, cord blood neutrophils appear “primed” because they demonstrate increased concentrations of pro-inflammatory chemokines and cytokines, as well as experience prolonged survival secondary to deficient programmed apoptosis (162). Shortages of crucial cell membrane receptors, diminished intracellular signaling, and impaired cellular functioning, however, can result in neutrophil dysfunction leading to increased susceptibility to sepsis, tissue damage, and shock. Well-documented examples of enhanced neutrophil inflammatory responses with associated inhibitory mechanisms are outlined below.

Unstimulated cord blood neutrophils from term, healthy neonates have higher concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, TNF-α, and IFN-γ compared to adult controls, irrespective of labor exposure (91). In addition, neonatal neutrophils experience heightened IL-1β expression following stimulation by TNF-α and LPS as compared to adult cells (163). When toll-like receptors (TLRs) 1–9 are directly stimulated, however, neonatal neutrophils exhibit a global decrease in the production of these TH1-polarizing cytokines, which are vital in protecting the newborn against intracellular viral and bacterial infections. Instead, neonatal neutrophils secrete greater amounts of TH2-polarizing cytokines, including IL-6 and IL-10, which are adapted to defend against parasitic infections but can also increase the newborn’s future risk of developing atrophy, allergy, and asthma (9, 164, 165). The reasons for their decreased responsiveness to TH1-mediated responses may include reduced intracellular mediators of TLR signaling (166) or increased levels of plasma adenosine (9).

It has been proposed that adenosine, by binding G protein-coupled A3 adenosine receptors (A3ARs), increases intracellular cAMP levels, thereby preserving generation of TH2-polarizing cytokines, including IL-6, which have anti-inflammatory properties and can impede neutrophil migration to site of inflammation (9). It is known, however, that A3ARs couple to the G protein Gi, which inhibits adenylyl cyclase and lowers cellular cAMP levels (167). Thus, it is possible that alternate G protein coupling may occur in neutrophils or that adenosine may facilitate IL-6 generation through a different member of this receptor family. Although adenosine suppresses neutrophil cell membrane levels of CD11b in neonatal and adult neutrophils, their ability to phagocytose microorganisms remains unaffected. Unlike adult cells (168, 169), however, adenosine does not alter chemotaxis or production of ROS by neonatal neutrophils (170). Nonetheless, adenosine increases susceptibility to infection by intracellular pathogens through TH2-polaring pathways while facilitating colonization of commensal microorganisms after birth by limiting excessive inflammation.

As previously noted, cell membrane levels of galectin-3 are greatly increased in neonatal compared to adult neutrophils (80). Additionally, unstimulated neonatal cells also produced larger amounts of the potent chemoattractant IL-8 (171). Following labor exposure, both galectin-3 and IL-8 concentrations are notably higher in neonatal neutrophils, leading investigators to conclude that fetal neutrophils reside in a “pre-primed” state and become reactive following labor. When stimulated with LPS, however, no differences in neutrophil galectin-3 or IL-8 levels were found, whether or not the neonate was exposed to labor. Importantly, neonatal neutrophils also did not demonstrate improved L-selectin shedding (80). Yost and colleagues also showed similar lack of upregulation of pro-inflammatory mediators after TLR 1–9 stimulation but did demonstrate elevated IL-8 levels using the TLR1/2 heterodimer agonist, PAM3CSK4 (172). While not directly tested in neutrophils, TLR 1/2 activation by PAM3CSK4 in monocytes is associated with significantly increased production of IL-10 (173), thereby blunting pro-inflammatory TH1 reactions in favor of TH2 immune responses. Thus, elevated levels of IL-8 should result in the recruitment of additional activated neutrophils to area of inflammation or infection, amplifying the acute inflammatory response with the potential to propagate local tissue damage. Without the shedding of L-selectin, however, neutrophils experience impaired rolling, firm adhesion, and endothelial transmigration, limiting their accumulation in inflamed tissue. Nonetheless, this dysregulated local response may lead to tissue damage that could result in chronic lung disease or necrotizing enterocolitis, although more research is needed to investigate this association in vivo (169, 174).

Neonatal neutrophils also have exaggerated pro-inflammatory responses to the major cell component of Gram-positive bacteria, peptidoglycan. Exposure to peptidoglycan stimulates neonatal neutrophil expression of CD11b, TNF-α, and IL-8, which improves chemotaxis capabilities and increases ROS production. These actions are facilitated via heat shock proteins, including HSPA1A and OLR1 (175). Conversely, CR3 (CD11b/CD18, MAC-1), an essential pathogen recognition receptor for Gram-negative bacteria, can bind LPS, thereby enhancing neutrophil phagocytic capabilities of these microorganisms. At baseline, however, cell membrane quantities of CR3 are decreased in neonatal cells, particularly in preterm infants, which may impair their ability to detect Gram-negative pathogens. Furthermore, once activated, neonatal neutrophil CR3 levels remain reduced compared to adult cells, which not only inhibits neutrophil activation but may also limit their accumulation at sites of inflammation (97).

Group B Streptococcus remains the leading cause of neonatal EOS and can elicit variable immunologic responses in the host. For example, GBS hemolysin and inflammasome components can trigger pro-IL-1β processing and IL-1β release by neonatal neutrophils, amplifying their recruitment to sites of infection (176). Alternatively, molecular mimicry by GBS capsular sialic acid and β protein attenuates innate immune responses by binding to inhibitory sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin receptors (Siglecs) on neutrophils, triggering SHP-2 phosphatase-dependent signaling to impede neutrophil activation and phagocytic killing (177, 178). Finally, GBS can induce IL-10 production in murine pups compared to adult animals, which impairs neutrophil recruitment to inflamed tissues and reduces bacterial clearance. Attenuation of this response, however, is exhibited by TLR2-deficient murine pups, which experience improved survival by limiting GBS bacterial dissemination through enhanced GBS phagocytosis (179).

Anti-inflammatory neutrophil granular proteins, such as olfactomedin-4 located in specific granules, can also attenuate neutrophil bacterial killing and host innate immunity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (180). Its expression is significantly upregulated in unstimulated cord blood neutrophils from healthy term newborns compared to adult cells (91) and levels are dramatically higher in septic neonates (181). OLFM-4 restricts neutrophil cathespsin c-mediated protease activity and Nod-like receptor-mediated NF-κB activation, thereby restricting antimicrobial killing (180). Elevated OLFM-4 expression is associated not only with decreased levels of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12p40, CXCL2, G-CSF, and GM-CSF but also with greatly increased sepsis-related mortality (180, 182).

Finally, bacterial and host pro-inflammatory mediators can prolong neutrophil survival by delaying apoptosis. While this response is crucial for competent early innate immune responses that facilitate bacterial clearance, it may also promote excessive tissue injury resulting in poor neonatal outcomes (183). Allgaier and colleagues (184) have demonstrated that the overexpression of IL-1β and IL-8 cause activation of NF-κB and induction of anti-apoptotic genes. Additionally, neonatal neutrophils have diminished cellular expression of Siglec-9 and its downstream signaling protein SHP-1, an inhibitory tyrosine phosphate with proapoptotic functions (185). Inflammation resolution and tissue repair are generally facilitated by removal of toxic neutrophils through pathogen-induced programmed cell death via apoptosis with subsequent clearance by tissue macrophages and monocytes. The consequences of delayed neutrophil apoptosis and turnover are clearly demonstrated by Grigg and colleagues (186) who showed direct correlation with higher rates of chronic lung disease and pulmonary injury.

Conclusion

Annually, an estimated 400,000 neonates, or 1 in 10 newborns, are born prematurely in the United States (187, 188), and prematurity-related health issues account for an astonishing 36% of all infant deaths (189). Infectious disease is the second leading cause of neonatal mortality worldwide, preceded only by complications related to preterm birth (190). Technological advancements in ventilator management, thermoregulation, nutrition, and medical therapies (such as surfactant) have permitted survival of extremely preterm infants to the limits of viability, now considered 22–23 weeks of GA or slightly beyond the halfway point of normal gestation. Nature, however, did not intend fetal survival outside the womb at this young age as evidenced by the underdevelopment of all organ systems, which increases the neonate’s risk for infection, intraventricular hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, chronic lung disease, and impaired neurodevelopmental outcomes. While adaptive responses are generally deficient, certain aspects of innate immunity may be absent, including the vernix that develops around 28 weeks’ GA and the stratum corneum in the third trimester (191). As with other organ systems, postnatal neutrophil deficits are exacerbated in the most immature neonates, resulting in a 10-fold greater risk for early infection compared to term infants and 30% mortality rate in those infected (191194).

Neonatal neutrophils have been extensively studied and are often inappropriately characterized as “dysfunctional” when compared to adult cells. Because considerable differences between fetal and adult physiology exist, phenotypic and functional variances are vital. Neonatal neutrophils have adapted and evolved over time to endure extremely hypoxic in utero environmental conditions without triggering HIF-1α-mediated pro-inflammatory responses (195197). Furthermore, neutrophil suppression is essential for the naïve newborn to establish a healthy microbiome in the postpartum period, but detrimental if unable to mount sufficient pro-inflammatory reactions if exposed to pathogenic organisms.

The evolution of laboratory techniques over the last 50 years has enabled researchers to substantially expand our knowledge of neutrophil biology. Neutrophils are no longer viewed as short-lived, indiscriminate phagocytes of the immune system, but instead as essential components necessary for proper B and T cell function, antigen presentation, and tissue repair and regeneration. Differences in laboratory methods and variations in neonatal populations over time may make comparisons between past and present data difficult and yield potentially contrasting results. The rapid evolution of neonatal care, from its first appearance in the 1960s to the present, may also challenge current concepts of neonatal neutrophil biology as younger, sicker babies are resuscitated, pushing the limits of viability to even lower GAs. As scientists continuously strive to discover novel therapies to enhance neutrophil function during neonatal sepsis, efforts and resources must also be dedicated to unraveling the mysteries of neutrophil biology during fetal development, taking into account environmental and compositional influences.

Author Contributions

SL researched and composed this review. RC created the figures and edited the final version of the review. VN helped compose and edited the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by the grant NIH 1UL1TR001442-01.

Abbreviations

AP, adaptor protein complex; BPI, bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein; CGD, chronic granulomatous disease; CL, chemiluminescence; EOS, early-onset sepsis; fMLP, N-formylmethionine-leucyl-phenylalanine; GA, gestational age; GBS, group B Streptococcus; GGA, Golgi-localized γ-adaptin ear homology ARF-binding protein; G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor; HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; ICAM, intercellular adhesion molecule; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; LAD, leukocyte adhesion deficiency; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; LFA-1, lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1; NET, neutrophil extracellular trap; nNIF, NET-inhibitory factors; NBT, nitroblue tetrazolium; NRP, nHIF-related peptides; PMA, phorbol myristate acetate; RAGE, receptor for advanced glycation endproducts; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SGA, small for gestational age; SNARE, soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor; TLR, toll-like receptor; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1.

References

1. Peltier MR. Immunology of term and preterm labor. Reprod Biol Endocrinol (2003) 1:122. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-1-122

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Remington JS, Klein JO, Wilson CB, Nizet V, Maldonado YA. Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders Publishing (2011).

Google Scholar

3. Turfkruyer M, Verhasselt V. Breast milk and its impact on maturation of the neonatal immune system. Curr Opin Infect Dis (2015) 3:199–206. doi:10.1097/QCO.0000000000000165

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Greenwood C, Morrow AL, Lagomarcino AJ, Altaye M, Taft DH, Yu Z, et al. Early empiric antibiotic use in preterm infants is associated with lower bacterial diversity and higher relative abundance of Enterobacter. J Pediatr (2014) 1:23–9. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.01.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Kiser C, Nawab U, McKenna K, Aghai ZH. Role of guidelines on length of therapy in chorioamnionitis and neonatal sepsis. Pediatrics (2014) 6:992–8. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-2927

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Levy O, Wynn JL. A prime time for trained immunity: innate immune memory in newborns and infants. Neonatology (2014) 2:136–41. doi:10.1159/000356035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Levy O. Innate immunity of the newborn: basic mechanisms and clinical correlates. Nat Rev Immunol (2007) 7:379–90. doi:10.1038/nri2075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Nussbaum C, Sperandio M. Innate immune cell recruitment in the fetus and neonate. J Reprod Immunol (2011) 1:74–81. doi:10.1016/j.jri.2011.01.022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Wynn JL, Levy O. Role of innate host defenses in susceptibility to early onset neonatal sepsis. Clin Perinatol (2010) 2:307–37. doi:10.1016/j.clp.2010.04.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Tavian M, Peault B. Embryonic development of the human hematopoietic system. Int J Dev Biol (2005) 49:243–50. doi:10.1387/ijdb.041957mt

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Tober J, Koniski A, McGrath KE, Vemishetti R, Emerson R, de Mesy-Bentley KK, et al. The megakaryocyte lineage originates from hemangioblast precursors and is an integral component both of primitive and of definitive hematopoiesis. Blood (2007) 109:1433–41. doi:10.1182/blood-2006-06-031898

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Bertrand JY, Chi NC, Santoso B, Teng S, Stainier DY, Traver D. Haematopoietic stem cells derive directly from aortic endothelium during development. Nature (2010) 464:108–11. doi:10.1038/nature08738

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Kissa K, Herbomel P. Blood stem cells emerge from aortic endothelium by a novel type of cell transition. Nature (2010) 464:112–5. doi:10.1038/nature08761

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Lam EY, Hall CJ, Crosier PS, Crosier KE, Flores MV. Live imaging of Runx1 expression in the dorsal aorta tracks the emergence of blood progenitors from endothelial cells. Blood (2010) 116:909–14. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-01-264382

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Haneline LS, Marshall KP, Clapp DW. The highest concentration of primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells in cord blood is found in extremely premature infants. Pediatr Res (1996) 39:820–5. doi:10.1203/00006450-199605000-00013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Luis TC, Killmann NM, Staal FJ. Signal transduction pathways regulating hematopoietic stem cell biology: introduction to a series of spotlight reviews. Leukemia (2012) 1:86–90. doi:10.1038/leu.2011.260

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Palis J, Yoder MC. Yolk-sac hematopoiesis: the first blood cells of mouse and man. Exp Hematol (2001) 29:927–36. doi:10.1016/S0301-472X(01)00669-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Baron MH, Isern J, Fraser ST. The embryonic origins of erythropoiesis in mammals. Blood (2012) 119:4828–37. doi:10.1182/blood-2012-01-153486

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Slayton WB, Li Y, Calhoun DA, Juul SE, Iturraspe J, Braylan RC, et al. The first-appearance of neutrophils in the human fetal bone marrow cavity. Early Hum Dev (1998) 53:129–44. doi:10.1016/S0378-3782(98)00049-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Christensen RD, Rothstein G. Pre- and postnatal development of granulocytic stem cells in the rat. Pediatr Res (1984) 18:599–602. doi:10.1203/00006450-198407000-00006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Laver J, Duncan E, Abboud M, Gasparetto C, Sahdev I, Warren D, et al. High levels of granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors in cord blood of normal full-term neonates. J Pediatr (1990) 116:627–32. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(05)81617-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Gong JK. Endosteal marrow: a rich source of hematopoietic stem cells. Science (1978) 199:1443–5. doi:10.1126/science.75570

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Nauseef WM, Borregaard N. Neutrophils at work. Nat Immunol (2014) 15:602–11. doi:10.1038/ni.2921

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Zhang J, Niu C, Ye L, Huang H, He X, Tong WG, et al. Identification of the haematopoietic stem cell niche and control of the niche size. Nature (2003) 425:836–41. doi:10.1038/nature02041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Summers C, Rankin SM, Condliffe AM, Singh N, Peters AM, Chilvers ER. Neutrophil kinetics in health and disease. Trends Immunol (2010) 8:318–24. doi:10.1016/j.it.2010.05.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Burdon PC, Martin C, Rankin SM. Migration across the sinusoidal endothelium regulates neutrophil mobilization in response to ELR + CXC chemokines. Br J Haematol (2008) 142:100–8. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07018.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Jiao J, Dragomir AC, Kocabayoglu P, Rahman AH, Chow A, Hashimoto D, et al. Central role of conventional dendritic cells in regulation of bone marrow release and survival of neutrophils. J Immunol (2014) 192:3374–82. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1300237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Tak T, Tesselaar K, Pillay J, Borghans JA, Koenderman L. What’s your age again? Determination of human neutrophil half-lives revisited. J Leukoc Biol (2013) 94:595–601. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1300237

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Boll IT, Fuchs G. A kinetic model of granulocytopoiesis. Exp Cell Res (1970) 61:147–52. doi:10.1016/0014-4827(70)90268-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Donohue DM, Reiff RH, Hanson ML, Betson Y, Finch CA. Quantitative measurement of the erythrocytic and granulocytic cells of the marrow and blood. J Clin Invest (1958) 37:1571–6. doi:10.1172/JCI103750

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Strydom N, Rankin SM. Regulation of circulating neutrophil numbers under homeostasis and in disease. J Innate Immun (2013) 5:304–14. doi:10.1159/000350282

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Edwards SW. Biochemistry and Physiology of the Neutrophil. 1st ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press Publishing (1994).

Google Scholar

33. Erdman SH, Christensen RD, Bradley PP, Rothstein G. Supply and release of storage neutrophils. A developmental study. Biol Neonate (1982) 41:132–7. doi:10.1159/000241541

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Carr R, Huizinga TW. Low soluble FcRIII receptor demonstrates reduced neutrophil reserves in preterm neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed (2000) 83:F160. doi:10.1136/fn.83.2.F160

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Weinschenk NP, Farina A, Bianchi DW. Premature infants respond to early-onset and late-onset sepsis with leukocyte activation. J Pediatr (2000) 137:345–50. doi:10.1067/mpd.2000.107846

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Christensen RD, Rothstein G. Exhaustion of mature marrow neutrophils in neonates with sepsis. J Pediatr (1980) 96:316–8. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(80)80837-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Christensen RD, Harper TE, Rothstein G. Granulocyte-macrophage progenitor cells in term and preterm neonates. J Pediatr (1986) 109:1047–51. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(86)80297-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Carr R. Neutrophil production and function in newborn infants. Br J Haematol (2000) 110:18–28. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.01992.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Christensen RD, Yoder BA, Baer VL, Snow GL, Butler A. Early-onset neutropenia in small-for-gestational-age infants. Pediatrics (2015) 136:e1259–67. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-1638

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Koenig JM, Christensen RD. Incidence, neutrophil kinetics, and natural history of neonatal neutropenia associated with maternal hypertension. N Engl J Med (1989) 321:557–62. doi:10.1056/NEJM198908313210901

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Wirbelauer J, Thomas W, Rieger L, Speer CP. Intrauterine growth retardation in preterm infants ≤32 weeks of gestation is associated with low white blood cell counts. Am I Perinatol (2010) 27(10):819–24. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1254547

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Christensen RD, Koenig JM, Viskochil DH, Rothstein G. Down-modulation of neutrophil production by erythropoietin in human hematopoietic clones. Blood (1989) 83:309–20.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

43. Christensen RD, Henry E, Wiedmeier SE, Stoddard RA, Lambert DK. Low blood neutrophil concentrations among extremely low birth weight neonates: data from a multihospital health-care system. J Perinatol (2006) 26:682–7. doi:10.1038/sj.jp.7211603

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Teng RJ, Wu TJ, Garrison RD, Sharma R, Hudak ML. Early neutropenia is not associated with an increased rate of nosocomial infection in very low-birth-weight infants. J Perinatol (2009) 29:219–24. doi:10.1038/jp.2008.202

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Aktaş D, Demirel B, Gürsoy T, Ovalı F. A randomized case-controlled study of recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor for the treatment of sepsis in preterm neutropenic infants. Pediatr Neonatol (2015) 56:171–5. doi:10.1016/j.pedneo.2014.06.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Carr R, Modi N, Doré C. G-CSF and GM-CSF for treating or preventing neonatal infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2003) 3:CD003066. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003066

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Carr R, Brocklehurst P, Doré CJ, Modi N. Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor administered as prophylaxis for reduction of sepsis in extremely preterm, small for gestational age neonates (the PROGRAMS trial): a single-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (2009) 373:226–33. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60071-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Chaudhuri J, Mitra S, Mukhopadhyay D, Chakraborty S, Chatterjee S. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for preterms with sepsis and neutropenia: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Neonatol (2012) 4:202–6. doi:10.4103/2249-4847.105993

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Bainton DF, Ullyot JL, Farquhar MG. The development of neutrophilic polymorphonuclear leukocytes in human bone marrow. J Exp Med (1971) 134:907–34. doi:10.1084/jem.134.4.907

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Faurschou M, Borregaard N. Neutrophil granules and secretory vesicles in inflammation. Microbes Infect (2003) 5:1317–27. doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2003.09.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Kennedy AD, DeLeo FR. Neutrophil apoptosis and the resolution of infection. Immunol Res (2009) 43:25–61. doi:10.1007/s12026-008-8049-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Borregaard N, Sørensen OE, Theilgaard-Mönch K. Neutrophil granules: a library of innate immunity proteins. Trends Immunol (2007) 28:340–5. doi:10.1016/j.it.2007.06.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Gullberg U, Andersson E, Garwicz D, Lindmark A, Olsson I. Biosynthesis, processing and sorting of neutrophil proteins: insight into neutrophil granule development. Eur J Haematol (1997) 58:137–53. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0609.1997.tb00940.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Gullberg U, Bengtsson N, Bülow E, Garwicz D, Lindmark A, Olsson I. Processing and targeting of granule proteins in human neutrophils. J Immunol Methods (1999) 232:201–10. doi:10.1016/S0022-1759(99)00177-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Glenthøj A, Cowland JB, Heegaard NH, Larsen MT, Borregaard N. Serglycin participates in retention of α-defensin in granules during myelopoiesis. Blood (2011) 118:4440–8. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-06-362947

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Lemansky P, Smolenova E, Wrocklage C, Hasilik A. Neutrophil elastase is associated with serglycin on its way to lysosomes in U937 cells. Cell Immunol (2007) 246:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.cellimm.2007.06.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Niemann CU, Abrink M, Pejler G, Fischer RL, Christensen EI, Knight SD, et al. Neutrophil elastase depends on serglycin proteoglycan for localization in granules. Blood (2007) 109:4478–86. doi:10.1182/blood-2006-02-001719

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Pham TN. Neutrophil serine proteases: specific regulators of inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol (2006) 6:541–50. doi:10.1038/nri1841

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Sheshachalam A, Srivastava N, Mitchell T, Lacy P, Eitzen G. Granule protein processing and regulated secretion in neutrophils. Front Immunol (2014) 5:448. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2014.00448

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Borregaard N, Cowland JB. Granules of the human neutrophilic polymorphonuclear leukocyte. Blood (1997) 89:3503–21.

Google Scholar

61. Brumell JH, Volchuk A, Sengelov H, Borregaard N, Cieutat AM, Bainton DF, et al. Subcellular distribution of docking/fusion proteins in neutrophils, secretory cells with multiple exocytic compartments. J Immunol (1995) 155:5750–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

62. Mollinedo F, Calafat J, Janssen H, Martín-Martín B, Canchado J, Nabokina SM, et al. Combinatorial SNARE complexes modulate the secretion of cytoplasmic granules in human neutrophils. J Immunol (2006) 177:2831–41. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.2831

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Saverymuttu SH, Peters AM, Keshavarzian A, Reavy HJ, Lavender JP. The kinetics of 111indium distribution following injection of 111indium labeled autologous granulocytes in man. Br J Haematol (1985) 61:675–85. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.1985.tb02882.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Schmutz N, Henry E, Jopling J, Christensen RD. Expected ranges for blood neutrophil concentrations of neonates: the Monroe and Mouzinho charts revisited. J Perinatol (2008) 28:275–81. doi:10.1038/sj.jp.7211916

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Lawrence SM, Eckert J, Makoni M, Pereira HA. Is the use of complete blood counts with manual differentials for determining neutrophil composition in newborns antiquated? Ann Clin Lab Sci (2015) 45:403–13.

Google Scholar

66. Bektas S, Goetze B, Speer CP. Decreased adherence, chemotaxis and phagocytic activities of neutrophils from preterm neonates. Acta Paediatr Scand (1990) 79:1031–8. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.1990.tb11379.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Nupponen I, Turunen R, Nevalainen T, Peuravuori H, Pohjavuori M, Repo H, et al. Extracellular release of bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein in newborn infants. Pediatr Res (2002) 51:670–4. doi:10.1203/00006450-200206000-00002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Levy O, Martin S, Eichenwald E, Ganz T, Valore E, Carroll SF, et al. Impaired innate immunity in the newborn: newborn neutrophils are deficient in bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein. Pediatrics (1999) 104:1327–33. doi:10.1542/peds.104.6.1327

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Wong HR, Doughty LA, Wedel N, White M, Nelson BJ, Havrilla N, et al. Plasma bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein concentrations in critically ill children with the sepsis syndrome. Pediatr Infect Dis J (1995) 14:1087–91. doi:10.1097/00006454-199512000-00011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Froon AH, Dentener MA, Greve JW, Ramsay G, Buurman WA. Lipopolysaccharide toxicity-regulating proteins in bacteremia. J Infect Dis (1995) 171:1250–7. doi:10.1093/infdis/171.5.1250

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Froon AH, Bonten MJ, Gaillard CA, Greve JW, Dentener MA, de Leeuw PW, et al. Prediction of clinical severity and outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (1998) 58:1026–31. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.158.4.9801013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Elsbach P. The bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI) in antibacterial host defense. J Leukoc Biol (1998) 64:14–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

73. Iovine N, Elsbach P, Weiss J. An opsonic function of the neutrophil bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein depends on both its N and C-terminal domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1997) 94:10973–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.20.10973

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Valenti P, Antonini G. Lactoferrin: an important host defence against microbial and viral attack. Cell Mol Life Sci (2005) 62:2576–87. doi:10.1007/s00018-005-5372-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Ambruso DR, Johnston RB Jr. Lactoferrin enhances hydroxyl radical production by human neutrophils, neutrophil particulate fractions, and an enzymatic generating system. J Clin Invest (1981) 67:352–60. doi:10.1172/JCI110042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Linden JR, De Paepe ME, Laforce-Nesbitt SS, Bliss JM. Galectin-3 plays an important role in protection against disseminated candidiasis. Med Mycol (2013) 51:641–51. doi:10.3109/13693786.2013.770607

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Linden JR, Kunkel D, Laforce-Nesbitt SS, Bliss JM. The role of galectin-3 in phagocytosis of Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis by human neutrophils. Cell Microbiol (2013) 15:1127–42. doi:10.1111/cmi.12103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Forsman H, Salomonsson E, Onnheim K, Karlsson J, Bjorstad A, Leffler H, et al. The beta-galactoside binding immunomodulatory lectin galectin-3 reverses the desensitized state induced in neutrophils by the chemotactic peptide f-Met-Leu-Phe: role of reactive oxygen species generated by the NADPH-oxidase and inactivation of the agonist. Glycobiology (2008) 18:905–12. doi:10.1093/glycob/cwn081

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Fermino ML, Polli CD, Toledo KA, Liu FT, Hsu DK, Roque-Barreira MC, et al. LPS-induced galectin-3 oligomerization results in enhancement of neutrophil activation. PLoS One (2011) 6:e26004. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Sundqvist M, Osla V, Jacobsson B, Rudin A, Sävman K, Karlsson A. Cord blood neutrophils display a galectin-3 responsive phenotype accentuated by vaginal delivery. BMC Pediatr (2013) 13:128. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-13-128

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Corriden R, Chen Y, Inoue Y, Beldi G, Robson SC, Insel PA, et al. Ecto-nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 1 (E-NTPDase1/CD39) regulates neutrophil chemotaxis by hydrolyzing released ATP to adenosine. J Biol Chem (2008) 283:28480–6. doi:10.1074/jbc.M800039200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Krause PJ, Herson VC, Boutin-Lebowitz J, Eisenfeld L, Block C, LoBello T, et al. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte adherence and chemotaxis in stressed and healthy neonates. Pediatr Res (1986) 20:296–300. doi:10.1203/00006450-198604000-00004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Fox SE, Lu W, Maheshwari A, Christensen RD, Calhoun DA. The effects and comparative differences of neutrophil specific chemokines on neutrophil chemotaxis of the neonate. Cytokine (2005) 29:135–40. doi:10.1016/j.cyto.2004.10.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Carr R, Pumford D, Davies JM. Neutrophil chemotaxis and adhesion in preterm babies. Arch Dis Child (1992) 67:813–7. doi:10.1136/adc.67.7_Spec_No.813

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Sacchi F, Rondini G, Mingrat G, Stronati M, Gancia GP, Marseglia GL, et al. Different maturation of neutrophil chemotaxis in term and preterm newborn infants. J Pediatr (1982) 101:273–4. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(82)80139-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Tan ND, Davidson D. Comparative differences and combined effects of interleukin-8, leukotriene B4, and platelet-activating factor on neutrophil chemotaxis of the newborn. Pediatr Res (1995) 38:11–6. doi:10.1203/00006450-199507000-00003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Repo H, Jokipii AM, Leirisalo M, Kosunen TU. Leucocyte motility in the newborn: determination of spontaneous movement is essential in the in vitro assessment of neutrophil chemotaxis. Clin Exp Immunol (1980) 40:620–6.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

88. Weinberger B, Laskin DL, Mariano TM, Sunil VR, DeCoste CJ, Heck DE, et al. Mechanisms underlying reduced responsiveness of neonatal neutrophils to distinct chemoattractants. J Leukoc Biol (2001) 70:969–76.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

89. Hilmo A, Howard TH. F-actin content of neonate and adult neutrophils. Blood (1987) 69:945–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

90. Boner A, Zeligs BJ, Bellanti JA. Chemotactic responses of various differential stages of neutrophils from human cord and adult blood. Infect Immun (1982) 35:921–8.

Google Scholar

91. Makoni M, Eckert J, Anne Pereira H, Nizet V, Lawrence SM. Alterations in neonatal neutrophil function attributable to increased immature forms. Early Hum Dev (2016) 103:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.05.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Kansas GS. Selectins and their ligands: current concepts and controversies. Blood (1996) 88:3259–87.

Google Scholar

93. Nussbaum C, Gloning A, Pruenster M, Frommhold D, Bierschenk S, Genzel-Boroviczény O, et al. Neutrophil and endothelial adhesive function during human fetal ontogeny. J Leukoc Biol (2013) 93:175–84. doi:10.1189/jlb.0912468

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Anderson DC, Abbassi O, Kishimoto TK, Koenig JM, McIntire LV, Smith CW. Diminished lectin-, epidermal growth factor-, complement binding domain-cell adhesion molecule-1 on neonatal neutrophils underlies their impaired CD18-independent adhesion to endothelial cells in vitro. J Immunol (1991) 146:3372–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

95. Rebuck N, Gibson A, Finn A. Neutrophil adhesion molecules in term and preterm infants: normal or enhanced leucocyte integrins but defective L-selectin expression and shedding. Clin Exp Immunol (1995) 101:183–9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.1995.tb02296.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Moriguchi N, Yamamoto S, Isokawa S, Andou A, Miyata H. Granulocyte functions and changes in ability with age in newborns; report no. 2, activation of granulocyte functions by cytokines. Pediatr Int (2006) 48:22–8. doi:10.1111/j.1442-200X.2006.02150.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. McEvoy LT, Zakem-Cloud H, Tosi MF. Total cell content of CR3 (CD11b/CD18) and LFA-1 (CD11a/CD18) in neonatal neutrophils: relationship to gestational age. Blood (1996) 87:3929–33.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

98. Lorant DE, Li W, Tabatabaei N, Garver MK, Albertine KH. P-selectin expression by endothelial cells is decreased in neonatal rats and human premature infants. Blood (1999) 94:600–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

99. Anderson DC, Rothlein R, Marlin SD, Krater SS, Smith CW. Impaired transendothelial migration by neonatal neutrophils: abnormalities of Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18)-dependent adherence reactions. Blood (1990) 76:2613–21.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

100. Laurenti F, Ferro R, Marzetti G, Rossini M, Bucci G. Neutrophil chemotaxis in preterm infants with infections. J Pediatr (1980) 96:468–70. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(80)80700-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Mehta R, Petrova A. Intrapartum magnesium sulfate exposure attenuates neutrophil function in preterm neonates. Biol Neonate (2006) 89:99–103. doi:10.1159/000088560

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Fuenfer MM, Herson VC, Raye JR, Woronick CL, Eisenfeld L, Ingardia CJ, et al. The effect of betamethasone on neonatal neutrophil chemotaxis. Pediatr Res (1987) 22:150–3. doi:10.1203/00006450-198708000-00009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Zarbock A, Ley K, Mcever R, Hidalgo A. Leukocyte ligands for endothelial selectins: specialized glycoconjugates that mediate rolling and signaling under flow. Blood (2011) 118:6743–51. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-07-343566

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Peyssonnaux C, Datta V, Cramer T, Doedens A, Theodorakis EA, Gallo RL, et al. HIF-1alpha expression regulates the bactericidal capacity of phagocytes. J Clin Invest (2005) 115:1806–15. doi:10.1172/JCI23865

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Silvestre-Roig C, Hidalgo A, Soehnlein O. Neutrophil heterogeneity: implications for homeostasis and pathogenesis. Blood (2016) 127:2173–81. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-01-688887

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Nordenfelt P, Tapper H. Phagosome dynamics during phagocytosis by neutrophils. J Leukoc Biol (2011) 90:271–84. doi:10.1189/jlb.0810457

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Anderson DC, Freeman KL, Heerdt B, Hughes BJ, Jack RM, Smith CW. Abnormal stimulated adherence of neonatal granulocytes: impaired induction of surface Mac-1 by chemotactic factors or secretagogues. Blood (1987) 70:740–50.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

108. Carr R, Davies JM. Abnormal FcRIII expression by neutrophils from very preterm neonates. Blood (1990) 76:607–11.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

109. Abughali N, Berger M, Tosi MF. Deficient total cell content of CR3 (CD11b) in neonatal neutrophils. Blood (1994) 83:1086–92.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

110. Filias A, Theodorou GL, Mouzopoulou S, Varvarigou AA, Mantagos S, Karakantza M. Phagocytic ability of neutrophils and monocytes in neonates. BMC Pediatr (2011) 11:29. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-11-29

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Falconer AE, Carr R, Edwards SW. Impaired neutrophil phagocytosis in preterm neonates: lack of correlation with expression of immunoglobulin or complement receptors. Biol Neonate (1995) 68:264–9. doi:10.1159/000244245

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Källman J, Schollin J, Schalèn C, Erlandsson A, Kihlström E. Impaired phagocytosis and opsonisation towards group B streptococci in preterm neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed (1998) 78:F46–50. doi:10.1136/fn.78.1.F46

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Fujiwara T, Taniuchi S, Hattori K, Kobayashi T, Kinoshita Y, Kobayashi Y. Effect of immunoglobulin therapy on phagocytosis by polymorphonuclear leucocytes in whole blood of neonates. Clin Exp Immunol (1997) 107:435–9. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2249.1997.d01-957.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. INIS Collaborative Group, Brocklehurst P, Farrell B, King A, Juszczak E, Darlow B, et al. Treatment of neonatal sepsis with intravenous immune globulin. N Engl J Med (2011) 365:1201–11. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1100441

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Ohlsson A, Lacy JB. Intravenous immunoglobulin for suspected or proven infection in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2015) 3:CD001239. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001239.pub5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Wright WC Jr, Ank BJ, Herbert J, Stiehm ER. Decreased bactericidal activity of leukocytes of stressed newborn infants. Pediatrics (1975) 56:579–84.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

117. Destin KG, Linden JR, Laforce-Nesbitt SS, Bliss JM. Oxidative burst and phagocytosis of neonatal neutrophils confronting Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis. Early Hum Dev (2009) 85:531–5. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.05.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Al-Hadithy H, Addison IE, Goldstone AH, Cawley JC, Shaw JC. Defective neutrophil function in low-birth-weight, premature infants. J Clin Pathol (1981) 34:366–70. doi:10.1136/jcp.34.4.366

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Miller ME. Phagocytosis in the newborn infant: humoral and cellular factors. J Pediatr (1969) 74:255–9. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(69)80073-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Xanthou M, Valassi-Adam E, Kintsonidou E, Matsaniotis N. Phagocytosis and killing ability of Candida albicans by blood leucocytes of healthy term and preterm babies. Arch Dis Child (1975) 50:72–5. doi:10.1136/adc.50.1.72

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Allen RC. Neutrophil leukocyte: combustive microbicidal action and chemiluminescence. J Immunol Res (2015) 2015:794072. doi:10.1155/2015/794072

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Klebanoff SJ, Clark RA. The Neutrophil: Function and Clinical Disorders. New York, NY: North-Holland (1978).

Google Scholar

123. Allen RC. Reduced, radical, and excited state oxygen in leukocyte microbicidal activity. Front Biol (1979) 48:197–233.

Google Scholar

124. Segal AW. The molecular and cellular pathology of chronic granulomatous disease. Eur J Clin Invest (1988) 18:433–43. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2362.1988.tb01037.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Clark RA. Activation of the neutrophil respiratory burst oxidase. J Infect Dis (1999) 179:S309–17. doi:10.1086/513849

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Allen RC. Halide dependence of the myeloperoxidase-mediated antimicrobial system of the polymorphonuclear leukocyte in the phenomenon of electronic excitation. Biochem Biophys Res Comm (1975) 63:675–83. doi:10.1016/S0006-291X(75)80437-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Urlichs F, Speer CP. Neutrophil function in preterm and term infants. Neoreviews (2004) 5:e417–29. doi:10.1542/neo.5-10-e417

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Allen RC, Stjernholm RL, Steele RH. Evidence for the generation of an electronic excitation state(s) in human polymorphonuclear leukocytes and its participation in bactericidal activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (1972) 47:679–84. doi:10.1016/0006-291X(72)90545-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Segal AW. Nitroblue-tetrazolium tests. Lancet (1974) 304:1248–52. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(74)90758-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Newburger PE. Superoxide generation by human fetal granulocytes. Pediatr Res (1982) 16:373–6. doi:10.1203/00006450-198205000-00011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Ambruso DR, Stork LC, Gibson BE, Thurman GW. Increased activity of the respiratory burst in cord blood neutrophils: kinetics of the NADPH oxidase enzyme system in subcellular fractions. Pediatr Res (1987) 21:205–10. doi:10.1203/00006450-198702000-00019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Koenig JM, Stegner JJ, Schmeck AC, Saxonhouse MA, Kenigsberg LE. Neonatal neutrophils with prolonged survival exhibit enhanced inflammatory and cytotoxic responsiveness. Pediatr Res (2005) 57:424–9. doi:10.1203/01.PDR.0000153945.49022.96

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Ambruso DR, Bentwood B, Henson PM, Johnston RB Jr. Oxidative metabolism of cord blood neutrophils: relationship to content and degranulation of cytoplasmic granules. Pediatr Res (1984) 18:1148–53. doi:10.1203/00006450-198411000-00019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Drossou V, Kanakoudi F, Tzimouli V, Sarafidis K, Taparkou A, Bougiouklis D, et al. Impact of prematurity, stress and sepsis on the neutrophil respiratory burst activity of neonates. Biol Neonate (1997) 72:201–9. doi:10.1159/000244485

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Gahr M, Blanke R, Speer CP. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte function in term and preterm newborn infants. Biol Neonate (1985) 48:15–20. doi:10.1159/000242147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Komatsu H, Tsukimori K, Hata K, Satoh S, Nakano H. The characterization of superoxide production of human neonatal neutrophil. Early Hum Dev (2001) 65:11–9. doi:10.1016/S0378-3782(01)00188-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Strunk T, Temming P, Gembruch U, Reiss I, Bucsky P, Schultz C. Differential maturation of the innate immune response in human fetuses. Pediatr Res (2004) 56:219–26. doi:10.1203/01.PDR.0000132664.66975.79

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

138. Shigeoka AO, Santos JI, Hill HR. Functional analysis of neutrophil granulocytes from healthy, infected and stressed neonates. J Pediatr (1979) 95:454–60. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(79)80535-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Peden DB, van Dyke K, Ardekani A, Mullett MD, Myerberg DZ, van Dyke C. Diminished chemiluminescent responses of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in severely and moderately preterm neonates. J Pediatr (1987) 111:904–6. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(87)80216-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

140. Björkqvist M, Jurstrand M, Bodin L, Fredlund H, Schollin J. Defective neutrophil oxidative burst in preterm newborns on exposure to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Pediatr Res (2004) 55:966–71. doi:10.1203/01.pdr.0000127018.44938.89

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

141. Mills EL, Thompson T, Björkstén B, Filipovich D, Quie PG. The chemiluminescence response and bactericidal activity of polymorphonuclear neutrophils from newborns and their mothers. Pediatrics (1979) 63:429–34.

Google Scholar

142. Driscoll M, Thomas VL, Ramamurthy RS, Casto DT. Longitudinal evaluation of polymorphonuclear leukocyte chemiluminescence in premature infants. J Pediatr (1990) 116:429–34. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(05)82838-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

143. Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil extracellular traps: is immunity the second function of chromatin? J Cell Biol (2012) 198:773–83. doi:10.1083/jcb.201203170

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

144. Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science (2004) 303:1532–5. doi:10.1126/science.1092385

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

145. Sørensen OE, Borregaard N. Neutrophil extracellular traps – the dark side of neutrophils. J Clin Invest (2016) 126:1612–20. doi:10.1172/JCI84538

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

146. Remijsen Q, Kuijpers TW, Wirawan E, Lippens S, Vandenabeele P, Vanden Berghe T. Dying for a cause: NETosis, mechanisms behind an antimicrobial cell death modality. Cell Death Differ (2011) 18:581–8. doi:10.1038/cdd.2011.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

147. Parker H, Dragunow M, Hampton MB, Kettle AJ, Winterbourn CC. Requirements for NADPH oxidase and myeloperoxidase in neutrophil extracellular trap formation differ depending on the stimulus. J Leukoc Biol (2012) 92:841–9. doi:10.1189/jlb.1211601

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

148. Kirchner T, Möller S, Klinger M, Solbach W, Laskay T, Behnen M. The impact of various reactive oxygen species on the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. Mediators Inflamm (2012) 2012:849136. doi:10.1155/2012/849136

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

149. Stoiber W, Obermayer A, Steinbacher P, Krautgartner WD. The role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the formation of extracellular traps (ETs) in humans. Biomolecules (2015) 5:702–23. doi:10.3390/biom5020702

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

150. Desai J, Mulay SR, Nakazawa D, Anders HJ. Matters of life and death. How neutrophils die or survive along NET release and is “NETosis” = necroptosis? Cell Mol Life Sci (2016) 73:2211–9. doi:10.1007/s00018-016-2195-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

151. Fuchs TA, Abed U, Goosmann C, Hurwitz R, Schulze I, Wahn V, et al. Novel cell death program leads to neutrophil extracellular traps. J Cell Biol (2007) 176:231–41. doi:10.1083/jcb.200606027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

152. Yost CC, Cody MJ, Harris ES, Thornton NL, McInturff AM, Martinez ML, et al. Impaired neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation: a novel innate immune deficiency of human neonates. Blood (2009) 113:6419–27. doi:10.1182/blood-2008-07-171629

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

153. Lipp P, Ruhnau J, Lange A, Vogelgesang A, Dressel A, Heckmann M. Less neutrophil extracellular trap formation in term newborns than in adults. Neonatology (2016) 111:182–8. doi:10.1159/000452615

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

154. Yost CC, Schwertz H, Cody MJ, Wallace JA, Campbell RA, Vieira-de-Abreu A, et al. Neonatal NET-inhibitory factor and related peptides inhibit neutrophil extracellular trap formation. J Clin Invest (2016) 126:3783–98. doi:10.1172/JCI83873

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

155. Wang H, Wang C, Zhao MH, Chen M. Neutrophil extracellular traps can activate alternative complement pathways. Clin Exp Immunol (2015) 181:518–27. doi:10.1111/cei.12654

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

156. Yuen J, Pluthero FG, Douda DN, Riedl M, Cherry A, Ulanova M, et al. NETosing neutrophils activate complement both on their own NETs and bacteria via alternative and non-alternative pathways. Front Immunol (2016) 7:137. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2016.00137

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

157. Byrd AS, O’Brien XM, Laforce-Nesbitt SS, Parisi VE, Hirakawa MP, Bliss JM, et al. NETosis in neonates: evidence of a reactive oxygen species-independent pathway in response to fungal challenge. J Infect Dis (2016) 213:634–9. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiv435

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

158. Bizzarro MJ, Dembry LM, Baltimore RS, Gallagher PG. Changing patterns in neonatal Escherichia coli sepsis and ampicillin resistance in the era of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Pediatrics (2008) 121:689–96. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2171

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

159. Cotten CM, Taylor S, Stoll B, Goldberg RN, Hansen NI, Sánchez PJ, et al. Prolonged duration of initial empirical antibiotic treatment is associated with increased rates of necrotizing enterocolitis and death for extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics (2009) 123:58–66. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-3423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

160. Deshmukh HS, Liu Y, Menkiti OR, Mei J, Dai N, O’Leary CE, et al. The microbiota regulates neutrophil homeostasis and host resistance to Escherichia coli K1 sepsis in neonatal mice. Nat Med (2014) 20:524–30. doi:10.1038/nm.3542

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

161. Zhang D, Chen G, Manwani D, Mortha A, Xu C, Faith JJ, et al. Neutrophil ageing is regulated by the microbiome. Nature (2015) 525:528–32. doi:10.1038/nature15367

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

162. Kobayashi SD, Voyich JM, Whitney AR, DeLeo FR. Spontaneous neutrophil apoptosis and regulation of cell survival by granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor. J Leukoc Biol (2005) 78:1408–18. doi:10.1189/jlb.0605289

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

163. Contrino J, Krause PJ, Slover N, Kreutzer D. Elevated interleukin-1 expression in human neonatal neutrophils. Pediatr Res (1993) 34:249–52. doi:10.1203/00006450-199309000-00002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

164. Philbin VJ, Levy O. Developmental biology of the innate immune response: implications for neonatal and infant vaccine development. Pediatr Res (2009) 65:98R–105R. doi:10.1203/PDR.0b013e31819f195d

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

165. Angelone DF, Wessels MR, Coughlin M, Suter EE, Valentini P, Kalish LA, et al. Innate immunity of the human newborn is polarized toward a high ratio of IL-6/TNF-alpha production in vitro and in vivo. Pediatr Res (2006) 60:205–9. doi:10.1203/01.pdr.0000228319.10481.ea

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

166. Sadeghi K, Berger A, Langgartner M, Prusa AR, Hayde M, Herkner K, et al. Immaturity of infection control in preterm and term newborns is associated with impaired toll-like receptor signaling. J Infect Dis (2007) 195:296–302. doi:10.1086/509892

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

167. Palmer TM, Gettys TW, Stiles GL. Differential interaction with and regulation of multiple G-proteins by the rat A3 adenosine receptor. J Biol Chem (1995) 270:16895–902. doi:10.1074/jbc.270.28.16895

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

168. Chen Y, Corriden R, Inoue Y, Yip L, Hashiguchi N, Zinkernagel A, et al. ATP release guides neutrophil chemotaxis via P2Y2 and A3 receptors. Science (2006) 314:1792–5. doi:10.1126/science.1132559

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

169. Corriden R, Insel PA. New insights regarding the regulation of chemotaxis by nucleotides, adenosine, and their receptors. Purinergic Signal (2012) 8:587–98. doi:10.1007/s11302-012-9311-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

170. Hou PC, Yu HR, Kuo HC, Wang L, Lin LY, Sheen JM, et al. Different modulating effects of adenosine on neonatal and adult polymorphonuclear leukocytes. ScientificWorldJournal (2012) 2012:387923. doi:10.1100/2012/387923

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

171. Vancurova I, Bellani P, Davidson D. Activation of nuclear factor-kappaB and its suppression by dexamethasone in polymorphonuclear leukocytes: newborn versus adult. Pediatr Res (2001) 49:257–62. doi:10.1203/00006450-200102000-00021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

172. Thornton NL, Cody MJ, Yost CC. Toll-like receptor 1/2 stimulation induces elevated interleukin-8 secretion in polymorphonuclear leukocytes isolated from preterm and term newborn infants. Neonatology (2012) 101:140–6. doi:10.1159/000330567

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

173. Funderburg NT, Jadlowsky JK, Lederman MM, Feng Z, Weinberg A, Sieg SF. The Toll-like receptor 1/2 agonists Pam3CSK4 and human β-defensin-3 differentially induce interleukin-10 and nuclear factor-κB signalling patterns in human monocytes. Immunology (2011) 134:151–60. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2567.2011.03475.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

174. Huang HC, Tai FY, Wang FS, Liu CA, Hsu TY, Ou CY, et al. Correlation of augmented IL-8 production to premature chronic lung disease: implication of posttranscriptional regulation. Pediatr Res (2005) 58:216–21. doi:10.1203/01.PDR.0000175886.46201.D7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

175. Fong ON, Chan KY, Leung KT, Lam HS, Cheung HM, Leung TY, et al. Expression profile of cord blood neutrophils and dysregulation of HSPA1A and OLR1 upon challenge by bacterial peptidoglycan. J Leukoc Biol (2014) 95:169–78. doi:10.1189/jlb.0413219

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

176. Mohammadi N, Midiri A, Mancuso G, Patanè F, Venza M, Venza I, et al. Neutrophils directly recognize group b streptococci and contribute to interleukin-1β production during infection. PLoS One (2016) 11:e0160249. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

177. Carlin AF, Uchiyama S, Chang YC, Lewis AL, Nizet V, Varki A. Molecular mimicry of host sialylated glycans allows a bacterial pathogen to engage neutrophil Siglec-9 and dampen the innate immune response. Blood (2009) 113:3333–6. doi:10.1182/blood-2008-11-187302

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

178. Ali SR, Fong JJ, Carlin AF, Busch TD, Linden R, Angata T, et al. Siglec-5 and Siglec-14 are polymorphic paired receptors that modulate neutrophil and amnion signaling responses to group B Streptococcus. J Exp Med (2014) 211:1231–42. doi:10.1084/jem.20131853

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

179. Andrade EB, Alves J, Madureira P, Oliveira L, Ribeiro A, Cordeiro-da-Silva A, et al. TLR2-induced IL-10 production impairs neutrophil recruitment to infected tissues during neonatal bacterial sepsis. J Immunol (2013) 191:4759–68. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1301752

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

180. Liu W, Yan M, Sugui JA, Li H, Xu C, Joo J, et al. Olfm4 deletion enhances defense against Staphylococcus aureus in chronic granulomatous disease. J Clin Invest (2013) 123:3751–5. doi:10.1172/JCI68453

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

181. Wynn JL, Guthrie SO, Wong HR, Lahni P, Ungaro R, Lopez MC, et al. Postnatal age is a critical determinant of the neonatal host response to sepsis. Mol Med (2015) 21:496–504. doi:10.2119/molmed.2015.00064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

182. Welin A, Amirbeagi F, Christenson K, Björkman L, Björnsdottir H, Forsman H, et al. The human neutrophil subsets defined by the presence or absence of OLFM4 both transmigrate into tissue in vivo and give rise to distinct NETs in vitro. PLoS One (2013) 8:e69575. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069575

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

183. Kotecha S, Mildner RJ, Prince LR, Vyas JR, Currie AE, Lawson RA, et al. The role of neutrophil apoptosis in the resolution of acute lung injury in newborn infants. Thorax (2003) 58:961–7. doi:10.1136/thorax.58.11.961

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

184. Allgaier B, Shi M, Luo D, Koenig JM. Spontaneous and Fas-mediated apoptosis are diminished in umbilical cord blood neutrophils compared with adult neutrophils. J Leukoc Biol (1998) 64:331–6.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

185. Rashmi R, Bode BP, Panesar N, King SB, Rudloff JR, Gartner MR, et al. Siglec-9 and SHP-1 are differentially expressed in neonatal and adult neutrophils. Pediatr Res (2009) 66:266–71. doi:10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181b1bc19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

186. Grigg JM, Savill JS, Sarraf C, Haslett C, Silverman M. Neutrophil apoptosis and clearance from neonatal lungs. Lancet (1991) 338:720–2. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)91443-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

187. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: final data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep (2015) 64:1–64.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

188. Ferré C, Callaghan W, Olson C, Sharma A, Barfield W. Effects of maternal age and age-specific preterm birth rates on overall preterm birth rates – United States, 2007 and 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (2016) 65:1181–4. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6543a1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

189. Xu J, Murphy SL, Kochanek KD, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2015. NCHS Data Brief (2016) 267:1–8.

Google Scholar

190. Mukhopadhyay S, Puopolo KM. Risk assessment in neonatal early onset sepsis. Semin Perinatol (2012) 36:408–15. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2012.06.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

191. Visscher MO, Adam R, Brink S, Odio M. Newborn infant skin: physiology, development, and care. Clin Dermatol (2015) 33:271–80. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2014.12.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

192. Moore MR, Schrag SJ, Schuchat A. Effects of intrapartum antimicrobial prophylaxis for prevention of Group-B-streptococcal disease on the incidence and ecology of early-onset neonatal sepsis. Lancet Infect Dis (2003) 3:201–13. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00577-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

193. Stoll BJ, Hansen N. Infections in VLBW infants: studies from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Semin Perinatol (2003) 27:293–301. doi:10.1016/S0146-0005(03)00046-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

194. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Higgins RD, Fanaroff AA, Duara S, Goldberg R, et al. Very low birth weight preterm infants with early onset neonatal sepsis: the predominance of gram-negative infections continues in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, 2002–2003. Pediatr Infect Dis J (2005) 24:635–9. doi:10.1097/01.inf.0000168749.82105.64

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

195. Bhandari T, Nizet V. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) as a pharmacological target for prevention and treatment of infectious diseases. Infect Dis Ther (2014) 3:159–74. doi:10.1007/s40121-014-0030-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

196. Dehne N, Brüne B. HIF-1 in the inflammatory microenvironment. Exp Cell Res (2009) 315:1791–7. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.03.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

197. Imanirad P, Dzierzak E. Hypoxia and HIFs in regulating the development of the hematopoietic system. Blood Cells Mol Dis (2013) 51:256–63. doi:10.1016/j.bcmd.2013.08.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: neonates, neutrophils, granulopoiesis, innate immunity, phagocytosis, chemotaxis, neutrophil extracellular traps, transmigration

Citation: Lawrence SM, Corriden R and Nizet V (2017) Age-Appropriate Functions and Dysfunctions of the Neonatal Neutrophil. Front. Pediatr. 5:23. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00023

Received: 02 December 2016; Accepted: 30 January 2017;
Published: 28 February 2017

Edited by:

James Lawrence Wynn, University of Florida, USA

Reviewed by:

Akhil Maheshwari, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA
Joyce Marie Koenig, Saint Louis University, USA

Copyright: © 2017 Lawrence, Corriden and Nizet. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Shelley Melissa Lawrence, slawrence@ucsd.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.