Skip to main content

OPINION article

Front. Pediatr., 06 May 2015
Sec. Children and Health

Picky eating in children

  • Internal Medicine and Pediatrics Department, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI, USA

Although there is no consistent definition of picky eating, the term is generally used to characterize children who eat a limited amount of food, have strong food preferences, have restricted intake (particularly of vegetables), and who are unwilling to try new foods (1). Picky eating is a relatively common behavioral problem. Recent studies have found that picky eating is not associated with having an eating disorder (2) and does not have a significant effect on growth (1).

Prevalence

The prevalence of picky eating is difficult to account for, since there is no universally accepted definition. In a recent study involving 4,018 participants conducted in the Netherlands, the prevalence of picky eating was 26.5% at 18 months of age, 27.6% at 3 years of age, and declined to 13.2% at 6 years of age (3). The data from the study suggest that picky eating is usually a temporary behavior and is a part of normal development in preschool children.

Etiology

Environmental factors play a role in taste and eating preferences. Flavors from aromatic compounds derived from maternal food consumption are transmitted into the amniotic fluid and breast milk; these flavors have strong influences in taste preferences and food acceptance later in life (46). An experimental study demonstrated that infants of mothers who drank carrot juice during the last trimester of pregnancy enjoyed carrot-flavored cereals more than infants whose mothers did not drink carrot juice or eat carrots (6). Human milk is composed of flavors that are a reflection of food consumed by breast-feeding mothers (7, 8). Varied diet in breast-feeding mothers produces more flavor exposure and experiences in children, which may help explain why breastfed infants are less picky (9) and more willing to try new foods (10). This notion was also supported in a recent study, in which 127 children who were exclusively breastfed for 6 months were observed to have lower odds of developing a preference for food to be prepared in a certain way by 78%, food rejection by 81%, and avoidance of new food (neophobia) by 75% (11). Genetics also play a role in picky eating. Early preferences for sweet taste have been observed in newborns (12). On the other hand, bitter taste is innately disliked, possibly due a protective mechanism since most bitter compounds are toxic (13). Hence, neophobia may be an evolutionary protective mechanism, serving to protect children from ingesting potentially toxic substances. These innate food preferences may become barriers for acceptance of certain food. A study involving 5,390 pairs of twins from 8 to 11 years of age suggested that neophobia is a highly heritable trait, meaning a child’s reluctance to try new food may be partly due to genetics and not parental practices (14).

Promoting Food Acceptance

There are many ways to promote food acceptance among children. Mothers (particularly those who do not plan to breast-feed) are recommended to eat a variety of food during their pregnancy and then expose their child to variety of food at an early age (15). Children may exhibit normal exploratory behaviors with new foods such as touching, smelling, playing, putting foods in their mouth, and then spitting them out before they are willing to taste and swallow various foods (16). Repeated taste exposure and modeling of behaviors in non-coercive fashion has shown to increase food acceptance (10, 17, 18). Conversely, pressuring children to eat can cause them to dislike those foods (19). Researchers in a study of 3,022 infants found that many caregivers were not aware that their infants and toddlers needed as many as 8–15 exposures to a particular food before they gained acceptance of that food (20). Increased acceptance and consumption of poorly liked food by children such as nutrient-rich fruits and vegetables (21) can be achieved by offering children very small tastes of new and previously disliked fruits and vegetables (2224). Food is also more readily accepted in young children when others around them are eating the same type of food (25, 26). Such modeling positively highlights the enjoyment of such foods. Praising children for trying new food and giving them small token rewards, such as stickers (but not treats) also increases acceptance. Some authors have argued that providing rewards for performing a task diminishes intrinsic motivation (27). However, this only applies to interesting tasks. Most children who are labeled as “picky eaters” have little interest in eating fruits and vegetables. Hence, “there is little or no intrinsic motivation to undermine” (27).

Differential Assessment

Other causes that may appear as “picky eating” should also be taken into consideration. Lactose intolerance or food allergies can present with failure to thrive, oral pruritus, abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, and refusal of specific types of food (28). Gastroesophageal reflux disease can present with frequent complaints of heartburn, vomiting, and refusal of foods given the negative association. Children with oral hypersensitivity may also develop adverse reactions to feeding due to the abnormally strong and unpleasant sensation(s) with different types of food.

Conclusion

Picky eating is a relatively common behavioral problem that most children will eventually outgrow. Its roots stem from both environmental and genetic influences. It may serve as a protective mechanism to avoid exposure to potentially toxic substances. Increasing exposure to a variety of flavors during pregnancy and infancy (either directly or indirectly via breast milk) may reduce the incidence of picky eating. Repeated exposure to new food in a non-coercive manner and in an environment that is both fun and rewarding may help overcome picky eating. Patience, time, and repetition may be the keys to success. While more research is needed on this topic, it is reasonable to recommend that healthcare providers offer reassurance and education to parents who are concerned about picky eating in their child after they have assessed for any treatable causes. Education is particularly important in parents who plan to have additional children in the futures.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Mascola AJ, Bryson SW, Agras WS. Picky eating during childhood: a longitudinal study to age 11 years. Eat Behav (2010) 11(4):253–7. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2010.05.006

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Jacobi C, Schmitz G, Agras WS. Is picky eating an eating disorder? Int J Eat Disord (2008) 41(7):626–34. doi:10.1002/eat.20545

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Cardona Cano S, Tiemeier H, Van Hoeken D, Tharner A, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, et al. Trajectories of picky eating during childhood: a general population study. Int J Eat Disord (2015). doi:10.1002/eat.22384

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Beauchamp GK, Mennella JA. Flavor perception in human infants: development and functional significance. Digestion (2011) 83(Suppl 1):1–6. doi:10.1159/000323397

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Forestell CA, Mennella JA. Early determinants of fruit and vegetable acceptance. Pediatrics (2007) 120:1247–54. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-0858

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Mennella JA, Jagnow CP, Beauchamp GK. Prenatal and postnatal flavor learning by human infants. Pediatrics (2001) 107(6):E88. doi:10.1542/peds.107.6.e88

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Mennella JA, Beauchamp GK. Maternal diet alters the sensory qualities of human milk and the nursling’s behavior. Pediatrics (1991) 88:737–44.

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Mennella JA, Beauchamp GK. Smoking and the flavor of breast milk. N Engl J Med (1998) 339:1559–60. doi:10.1056/NEJM199811193392119

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Galloway AT, Lee Y, Birch LL. Predictors and consequences of food neophobia and pickiness in young girls. J Am Diet Assoc (2003) 103:692–8. doi:10.1053/jada.2003.50134

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Sullivan SA, Birch LL. Infant dietary experience and acceptance of solid foods. Pediatrics (1994) 93:271–7.

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Shim JE, Kim J, Mathai RA. Associations of infant feeding practices and picky eating behaviors of preschool children. J Am Diet Assoc (2011) 111(9):1363–8. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2011.06.410

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Desor JA, Maller O, Turner RE. Taste in acceptance of sugars by human infants. J Comp Physiol Psychol (1973) 84(3):496. doi:10.1037/h0034906

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Glendinning JI. Is the bitter rejection response always adaptive? Physiol Behav (1994) 56(6):1217–27. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(94)90369-7

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Cooke LJ, Haworth CM, Wardle J. Genetic and environmental influences on children’s food neophobia. Am J Clin Nutr (2007) 86(2):428–33.

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Beauchamp GK, Mennella JA. Early flavor learning and its impact on later feeding behavior. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr (2009) 48(Suppl 1):25–30. doi:10.1097/MPG.0b013e31819774a5

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Johnson SL, Bellows L, Beckstrom L, Anderson J. Evaluation of a social marketing campaign targeting preschool children. Am J Health Behav (2007) 31(1):44–55. doi:10.5993/AJHB.31.1.5

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Hendy HM. Effectiveness of trained peer models to encourage food acceptance in preschool children. Appetite (2002) 39(3):217–25. doi:10.1006/appe.2002.0510

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Hendy HM, Raudenbush B. Effectiveness of teacher modeling to encourage food acceptance in preschool children. Appetite (2000) 34(1):61–76. doi:10.1006/appe.1999.0286

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Birch LL, Birch D, Marlin DW, Kramer L. Effects of instrumental consumption on children’s food preference. Appetite (1982) 3(2):125–34. doi:10.1016/S0195-6663(82)80005-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Carruth BR, Ziegler PJ, Gordon A, Barr SI. Prevalence of picky eaters among infants and toddlers and their caregivers’ decisions about offering a new food. J Am Diet Assoc (2004) 104:57–64. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2003.10.024

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Cooke L, Wardle J. Age and gender differences in children’s food preferences. Br J Nutr (2005) 93:741–6. doi:10.1079/BJN20051389

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Horne PJ, Greenhalgh J, Erjavec M, Lowe CF, Viktor S, Whitaker CJ. Increasing pre-school children’s consumption of fruit and vegetables. A modelling and rewards intervention. Appetite (2011) 56(2):375–85. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2010.11.146

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Lakkakula A, Geaghan JP, Wong WP, Zanovec M, Pierce SH, Tuuri G. A cafeteria-based tasting program increased liking of fruits and vegetables by lower, middle and upper elementary school-age children. Appetite (2011) 57(1):299–302. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.04.010

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Lakkakula A, Geaghan J, Zanovec M, Pierce S, Tuuri G. Repeated taste exposure increases liking for vegetables by low-income elementary school children. Appetite (2010) 55(2):226–31. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2010.06.003

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Addessi E, Galloway AT, Visalberghi E, Birch LL. Specific social influences on the acceptance of novel foods in 2-5-year-old children. Appetite (2005) 45(3):264–71. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2005.07.007

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Birch LL. Effects of peer models’ food choices and eating behaviors on preschoolers’ food preferences. Child Dev (1980) 51:489–96. doi:10.2307/1129283

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol Bull (1999) 125(6):627. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Sicherer SH. Manifestations of food allergy: evaluation and management. Am Fam Physician (1999) 59(2):415–24.

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: picky eating, children, vegetables, fruits, neophobia, food acceptance

Citation: Lam J (2015) Picky eating in children. Front. Pediatr. 3:41. doi: 10.3389/fped.2015.00041

Received: 19 January 2015; Accepted: 21 April 2015;
Published: 06 May 2015

Edited by:

Mazyanga Lucy Mazaba-Liwewe, World Health Organisation, Zambia

Reviewed by:

Seter Siziya, Copperbelt University, Zambia

Copyright: © 2015 Lam. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jason Lam, Jason.lam@med.wmich.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.