Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Pain Res., 25 August 2023
Sec. Geriatric Pain
This article is part of the Research Topic Assessment of Pain in the Older Population View all 5 articles

Editorial: Assessment of pain in the older population

  • 1School of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
  • 2Institute of Nursing Science and Practice, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom

Editorial on the Research Topic
Assessment of pain in the older population

For many years now we have proposed that pain is regularly assessed and fundamental to the management process. To date, there has been a great deal of research exploring the most appropriate pain assessment tools and great strides have been made in their implementation. Assessment of pain in the older population has presented challenges, especially when there are communication difficulties, as seen in adults with dementia or other communication issues. Pain is not a natural part of the ageing process and people should not be expected to live with it. In recent years, there has been recognition that stoicism does not mean there is no pain and a number of behavioural pain assessment tools have been developed, evaluated, and introduced widely, with widespread implementation of validated pain assessment. The papers in this collection examine the issues of pain assessment in older adults and those with dementia, moving forward thinking on these subjects and presenting innovative ways of implementing pain management using technology. The COVID 19 pandemic resulted in many older adults being isolated at home, so they consequently became more isolated. Furthermore, many services were disbanded in the UK and staff were reallocated to COVID areas which resulted in a reduced number of pain services and therefore increased waiting times.

The first paper in this Research Topic, submitted by the Boston MOBILIZE group, accessed data on 765 older adults living in the community in the Boston area. They used the Brief Pain Inventory to assess the impact of MSK pain on seven domains of psychosocial impact. They found that 67% of their participants reported pain interference in their daily activities. Thus supporting the significant impact on the lives of older adults and opening the door to further work exploring innovative ways of helping older adults manage their pain. Our second paper explores innovative technology as a means of conducting pain assessment in older adults with dementia (PainChek). The study used facial technology to record pain. A sample of 3,144 adults with dementia were recruited through care homes and dementia services in Australia. This large-scale study confirms the hypothesis that facial expression can be a reliable indicator of pain. The next study from the US, explores the role of family caregivers in supporting their relatives with dementia. In a randomised controlled trial that provided training to family members, the authors highlight the significant contribution that can be made in providing personal, emotional, and healthcare needs to individuals with dementia, but they also highlight the considerable strain that this role places on the caregiver. The final study in the collection recruited 45 participants into focus groups, exploring the rapid introduction of technology to implement online pain management during COVID-19. Although small in scale, the study reflected the huge move towards alternative care delivery that took place during the pandemic and the potential successes of these changes.

The studies in this collection focus on key issues relating to pain management in older adults, older adults with dementia, and their family carers. Whilst we have seen great improvements in recent decades in the recognition that pain assessment and pain management are important for all, regardless of age. There is still work to be done and there are areas worthy of further investigation, including innovative methods of assessment, not only of pain but also the impact, caregiver support, and new ways of delivering and supporting care for older adults in the community.

Author contributions

Both authors wrote the editorial. PS wrote it down and IG made a critical and constructive revision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all authors and reviewers for the work that contributed to the success of these articles.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: pain assessment in older adults, pain behaviour, dementia, technology-enabled solution, familiy members

Citation: Schofield P and Gnass I (2023) Editorial: Assessment of pain in the older population. Front. Pain Res. 4:1249762. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1249762

Received: 29 June 2023; Accepted: 10 July 2023;
Published: 25 August 2023.

Edited and Reviewed by: Cary Reid, NewYork-Presbyterian, United States

© 2023 Schofield and Gnass. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Irmela Gnass aXJtZWxhLmduYXNzQHBtdS5hYy5hdA==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.