Salvatore Leotta
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
- 1Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico “G-Rodolico”- San Marco - Catania, Catania, Italy
- 2Dipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Agostino Gemelli University Policlinic Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
- 3Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
Editorial on the Research Topic
Allogenic hematopoietic cell transplant in hematological malignancies: controversies and perspective
The Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) represents the unique chance of cure for patients affected by some hematologic malignancies and in particular for acute leukemias, myelodysplasia (MDS) and myelofibrosis. Several unmet needs are still on the table and are object of research.
First, transplant indications. The novel classification of acute leukemias, derived from a refinement of the knowledge of the bio-molecular patterns underlining the hematologic neoplasms, allowed a more precise risk-stratification (1, 2). Based on such stratification expert panels have identified high risk-categories for which the transplant approach in the front-line setting is mandatory (3). By converse for low and intermediate risk-categories the HSCT in 1st complete remission is more controversial and evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) in this setting plays a crucial role (4, 5).
Also for myelofibrosis and MDS the improvements in knowledge of the pathogenetic patterns refined the prognosis and the transplant’s indications (6, 7). For multiple myeloma and lymphoma, given the advent of the bi-specific antibodies and CAR-T, the perspective of HSCT has become increasingly distant and remains confined to settings such as plasma cell leukemia, relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and some T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas.
Second, If by one hand, HSCT can cure a relevant proportion of patients, for about half of the transplanted patients relapse of the hematological disease and treatment-related mortality are the main causes of transplant-failure.
In the last two decades significant improvements in conditioning regimens, graft-versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, management of infections and maintenance therapies have increased the opportunity to perform transplantation for an even greater number of patients by reducing transplant-related mortality (TRM) and by preventing relapse.
The introduction of the novel reduced-toxicity conditionings (8, 9) and novel GVHD-prophylaxis regimens (10–12) contributed to reduce the TRM and to extend the transplant to an increasingly large population both in terms of age, co-morbidities and absence of an HLA fully-matched donor.
The introduction of the busulfan-fludarabine regimens (8) and of treosulfan (9) have reduced the impact of the conditioning on non-hematological toxicity and extended the HSCT up to 70 years-old patients or higher. Furthermore, different combinations of alkylating drugs and dosages generates a series of reduced-intensity conditionings (RIC). The RIC regimens, if by one hand are associated with lower TRM, on the other hand correlate with a greater risk of relapse (13) and experts recommend their use in an individualized approach that takes into account age, fitness and relapse-risk (14).
The application of the T-cell-replete HSCT based on the use of post-HSCT cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has made possible to extend the haploidentical transplantation in favor of a greater number of patients who lacks an HLA-compatible donor. Furthermore, also centers that do not perform expensive ex vivo T-depletion may perform such procedure.
Nowadays, the results of the T-replete transplantation with PTCy from haploidentical donors are comparable with those of HSCT from unrelated and related HLA-matched donors (10–12). PTCy has been proposed as a novel GVHD-Prophylaxis regimen also for transplants from HLA-compatible donors as an alternative to antithymocyte globuline (ATG) or anti-T- lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) that, together with calcineurin-Inhibitors and methotrexate, have been for years a cornerstone of GVHD-prophylaxis (15).
In patients with donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies strategies to overcome the donor-sensitization by combining immunosuppressive therapy and plasma-exchange allowed to achieve engraftment also in such challenging situation (16).
The scenario of the pre-remissional treatment has been enriched with novel targeted drugs such as hypomethylating agents and venetoclax that have made possible for elderly patient (> 60 years old) unfit for intensive chemotherapy, to achieve complete remission and HSCT (17). Other classes of targeted drugs, such as tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and blinatumomab have increased the number of patients who reach a deeper remission before transplantation (18–21).
At the same time the introduction of the targeted therapies improved the transplant outcome when applied as post-transplant maintenance and by synergizing with the Graft Versus Leukemia effect (22–27).
The GVHD, historically considered an “orphan disease”, in the past ten years has been the subject of clinical trials that led to the approval of new agents such as ruxolitinib (FDA and EMA-approved for acute and chronic steroid-refractory GVHD) (28–29), ibrutinib (30) and belumosudil (31) (FDA-approved as second and third-line for chronic GVHD, respectively).
As regard to acute GVHD-prophylaxis, recently new drugs have undergone to investigation: vedolizumab (32), abatacept (33), fecal transplantation (34), begelomab (35), α1 antitrypsin (AAT) (36). A phase 2/3 study is evaluating the AAT as prophylaxis of acute GVHD (NCT03805789).
In regard of chronic GVHD, axatilimab, a CSF-R inhibitor, is under investigation in steroid-refractory chronic GVHD alone or in combination with Extracorporeal Photopheresis (NCT06821542, NCT06663722) following the promising results of a phase 1/2 study (37). Other studies are ongoing to investigate axatilimab as first line therapy in combination with other agents (steroids or ruxolitinib) (NCT06388564, NCT06585774).
Another line of research focuses on the use of anti-GVHD cellular therapies and the potential target represented by the T-regulatory lymphocytes (38).
Moreover, growing evidence supports the contribution of loss of the gut microbiome diversity and of the endothelial dysfunction to transplant morbidity, justifying studies aimed at developing novel therapies in these fields of application (39, 40).
The transplantation is the platform on which to add strategies aimed at preventing relapse. Novel studies evaluated the employment of post-transplant immunotherapy. Such interventions may be represented by conventional T-cells (prophylactic or pre-emptive DLI) (41), by selected subsets of T-cells (such as CD45RA-) (42) or by modified effector cells (either NK cells or T-cells redirected against leukemia antigens) (43). Results of these studies although promising, require further research.
Based on these assumptions we propose a Research Topic dedicated to HSCT. The purposes of the research-topic are:
providing transplant-physicians and hematologists with a description of the current “state of the art” in some particular settings such as HSCT from alternative donors, transplantation in multiple myeloma and primary myelofibrosis.
Furnishing experience about some topics such as transplantation from AB0- mismatched donors, impact of donor-parity on outcome of HSCT, transplantation in patients with immunological sensitization against the donor, post-transplant maintenance.
Specialists in the subjects selected and reviewed the Research Topics and we hope that it can be a valid tool to support the reader in improving the knowledge and the clinical practice.
Author contributions
SL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SG: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JM: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Döhner H, Wei AH, Appelbaum FR, Craddock C, DiNardo CD, Dombret H, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN. Blood. (2022) 140(12):1345–77. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022016867
2. Duffield AS, Mullighan CG, Borowitz MJ. International consensus classification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. Virchows Arch. (2023) 482(1):11–26. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03448-8
3. Snowden JA, Sánchez-Ortega I, Corbacioglu S, Basak GW, Chabannon C, de la Camara R, et al. European society for blood and marrow transplantation (EBMT). indications for haematopoietic cell transplantation for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: current practice in europe, 2022. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2022) 57(8):1217–39. doi: 10.1038/s41409-022-01691-w
4. Heuser M, Freeman SD, Ossenkoppele GJ, Buccisano F, Hourigan CS, Ngai LL, et al. Update on MRD in acute myeloid leukemia: a consensus document from the european LeukemiaNet MRD working party. Blood. (2021 2021) 138(26):2753–67. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021013626
5. Berry DA, Zhou S, Higley H, Mukundan L, Fu S, Reaman GH, et al. Association of minimal residual disease with clinical outcome in pediatric and adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. (2017) 3(7):e170580. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0580
6. Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, Ditschkowski M, Gagelmann N, Griesshammer M, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN international working group. Lancet Haematol. (2024) 11(1):e62–74. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00305-8
7. Garcia-Manero G. Myelodysplastic syndromes: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. (2023) 98(8):1307–25. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26984
8. Cavallaro G, Grassi A, Pavoni C, Micò MC, Busca A, Cavattoni IM, et al. Busulfan-fludarabine versus busulfan-cyclophosphamide for allogeneic transplant in acute myeloid leukemia: long term analysis of GITMO AML-R2 trial. Blood Cancer J. (2024) 14(1):141. doi: 10.1038/s41408-024-01116-5
9. Beelen DW, Stelljes M, Reményi P, Wagner-Drouet EM, Dreger P, Bethge W, et al. Treosulfan compared with reduced-intensity busulfan improves allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes of older acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome patients: Final analysis of a prospective randomized trial. Am J Hematol. (2022) 97(8):1023–34. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26620
10. Sanz J, Galimard JE, Labopin M, Afanasyev B, Sergeevich MI, Angelucci E, et al. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide containing regimens after matched sibling, matched unrelated and haploidentical donor transplants in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission, a comparative study of the ALWP of the EBMT. J Hematol Oncol. (2021) 14(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01094-2
11. Sanz J, Galimard JE, Labopin M, Afanasyev B, Angelucci E, Ciceri F, et al. Acute leukemia working party of the european society for blood and marrow transplantation (EBMT). post-transplant cyclophosphamide after matched sibling, unrelated and haploidentical donor transplants in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a comparative study of the ALWP EBMT. J Hematol Oncol. (2020) 13(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00882-6
12. Bacigalupo A, Jones R. PTCy: The "new" standard for GVHD prophylaxis. Blood Rev. (2023) 62:101096. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2023.101096
13. Scott BL, Pasquini MC, Fei M, Fraser R, Wu J, Devine SM, et al. Myeloablative versus reduced-intensity conditioning for hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes-Long-Term follow-up of the BMT CTN 0901 clinical trial. Transplant Cell Ther. (2021) 27(6):483.e1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.02.031
14. Gagelmann N, Kröger N. Dose intensity for conditioning in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: can we recommend "when and for whom" in 2021? Haematologica. (2021) 106(7):1794–804. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.268839
15. Bonifazi F, Rubio MT, Bacigalupo A, Boelens JJ, Finke J, Greinix H, et al. Rabbit ATG/ATLG in preventing graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: consensus-based recommendations by an international expert panel. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2020) 55(6):1093–102. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-0792-x
16. Kongtim P, Vittayawacharin P, Zou J, Srour S, Shaffer B, Shapiro RM, et al. ASTCT consensus recommendations on testing and treatment of patients with donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies. Transplant Cell Ther. (2024) 30(12):1139–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.09.005
17. Russo D, Polverelli N, Bernardi S, Santarone S, Farina M, Borlenghi E, et al. Venetoclax plus decitabine as a bridge to allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (VEN-DEC GITMO): final report of a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. (2024) 11(11):e830–8. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00241-2
18. Brissot E, Labopin M, Beckers MM, Socié G, Rambaldi A, Volin L, et al. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors improve long-term outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult patients with philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. (2015) 100(3):392–9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.116954
19. Sayyed A, Chen C, Gerbitz A, Kim DDH, Kumar R, Lam W, et al. Pretransplant blinatumomab improves outcomes in b cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Transplant Cell Ther. (2024) 30(5):520.e1–520.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.03.004
20. Candoni A, Rambaldi A, Fanin R, Velardi A, Arcese W, Ciceri F, et al. Outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A registry-based study of the italian blood and marrow transplantation society (GITMO). Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. (2019) 25(12):2388–97. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.07.037
21. Stone RM, Mandrekar SJ, Sanford BL, Laumann K, Geyer S, Bloomfield CD, et al. Midostaurin plus chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia with a FLT3 mutation. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377(5):454–64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614359
22. Burchert A, Bug G, Fritz LV, Finke J, Stelljes M, Röllig C, et al. Sorafenib maintenance after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3-internal tandem duplication mutation (SORMAIN). J Clin Oncol. (2020) 38(26):2993–3002. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.03345
23. Xuan L, Wang Y, Yang K, Shao R, Huang F, Fan Z, et al. Sorafenib maintenance after allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia: long-term follow-up of an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. (2023) 10(8):e600–11. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00117-5
24. Gaballa MR, Banerjee P, Milton DR, Jiang X, Ganesh C, Khazal S, et al. Blinatumomab maintenance after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for b-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. (2022) 139(12):1908–19. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021013290
25. Candoni A, Chiusolo P, Lazzarotto D, Sartor C, Dargenio M, Chiaretti S, et al. Ponatinib as a prophylactic or pre-emptive strategy to prevent cytological relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia transplanted in complete cytological remission. Cancers (Basel). (2024) 16(11):2108. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112108
26. Saini N, Marin D, Ledesma C, Delgado R, Rondon G, Popat UR, et al. Impact of TKIs post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL. Blood. (2020) 136(15):1786–9. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019004685
27. Levis MJ, Hamadani M, Logan B, Jones RJ, Singh AK, Litzow M, et al. Gilteritinib as post-transplant maintenance for AML with internal tandem duplication mutation of FLT3. J Clin Oncol. (2024) 42(15):1766–75. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02474
28. Zeiser R, von Bubnoff N, Butler J, Mohty M, Niederwieser D, Or R, et al. REACH2 trial group. ruxolitinib for glucocorticoid-refractory acute graft-versus-Host disease. N Engl J Med. (2020) 382(19):1800–10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917635
29. Zeiser R, Polverelli N, Ram R, Hashmi SK, Chakraverty R, Middeke JM, et al. Ruxolitinib for glucocorticoid-refractory chronic graft-versus-Host disease. N Engl J Med. (2021) 385(3):228–38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2033122
30. Miklos D, Cutler CS, Arora M, Waller EK, Jagasia M, Pusic I, et al. Ibrutinib for chronic graft-versus-host disease after failure of prior therapy. Blood. (2017) 130(21):2243–50. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-07-793786
31. Cutler C, Lee SJ, Arai S, Rotta M, Zoghi B, Lazaryan A, et al. Belumosudil for chronic graft-versus-host disease after 2 or more prior lines of therapy: the ROCKstar study. Blood. (2021) 138(22):2278–89. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022015598
32. Chen YB, Mohty M, Zeiser R, Teshima T, Jamy O, Maertens J, et al. Vedolizumab for the prevention of intestinal acute GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a randomized phase 3 trial. Nat Med. (2024) 30(8):2277–87. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03016-4
33. Kean LS, Burns LJ, Kou TD, Kapikian R, Lozenski K, Langston A, et al. Abatacept for acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. (2024) 144(17):1834–45. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023023660
34. Shouval R, Geva M, Nagler A, Youngster I. Fecal microbiota transplantation for treatment of acute graft-versus-Host disease. Clin Hematol Int. (2019) 1(1):28–35. doi: 10.2991/chi.d.190316.002
35. Bacigalupo A, Angelucci E, Raiola AM, Varaldo R, Di Grazia C, Gualandi F, et al. Treatment of steroid resistant acute graft versus host disease with an anti-CD26 monoclonal antibody-begelomab. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2020) 55(8):1580–7. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-0855-z
36. Magenau JM, Goldstein SC, Peltier D, Soiffer RJ, Braun T, Pawarode A, et al. α1-antitrypsin infusion for treatment of steroid-resistant acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood. (2018) 131(12):1372–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-11-815746
37. Kitko CL, Arora M, DeFilipp Z, Zaid MA, Di Stasi A, Radojcic V, et al. Axatilimab for chronic graft-Versus-Host disease after failure of at least two prior systemic therapies: Results of a phase I/II study. J Clin Oncol. (2023) 41(10):1864–75. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00958
38. Bolivar-Wagers S, Larson JH, Jin S, Blazar BR. Cytolytic CD4+ and CD8+ regulatory t-cells and implications for developing immunotherapies to combat graft-Versus-Host disease. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:864748. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.864748
39. Peled JU, Gomes ALC, Devlin SM, Littmann ER, Taur Y, Sung, et al. Microbiota as predictor of mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. (2020) 382(9):822–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1900623
40. Milone G, Bellofiore C, Leotta S, Milone GA, Cupri A, Duminuco A, et al. Endothelial dysfunction after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A review based on physiopathology. J Clin Med. (2022) 11(3):623. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030623
41. Schmid C, Labopin M, Schaap N, Veelken H, Brecht A, Stadler M, et al. Long-term results and GvHD after prophylactic and preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2022) 57(2):215–23. doi: 10.1038/s41409-021-01515-3
42. Castagna L, Valli V, Timofeeva I, Capizzuto R, Bramanti S, Mariotti J, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of CD45RA+ depleted donor lymphocytes infusion after haploidentical transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in patients with hematological malignancies. Transplant Cell Ther. (2021) 27(6):478.e1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.03.010
Keywords: hematologic malignancies, acute leukemia, controversies, perspectives, hematopoietic (stem cell) transplant (HSCT)
Citation: Leotta S, Giammarco S and Mariotti J (2025) Editorial: Allogenic hematopoietic cell transplant in hematological malignancies: controversies and perspective. Front. Oncol. 15:1582751. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1582751
Received: 24 February 2025; Accepted: 28 February 2025;
Published: 19 March 2025.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Alessandro Isidori, AORMN Hospital, ItalyCopyright © 2025 Leotta, Giammarco and Mariotti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Salvatore Leotta, leotta3@yahoo.it; Sabrina Giammarco, sabrina.giammarco@policlinicogemelli.it; Jacopo Mariotti, jacopo.mariotti@cancercenter.humanitas.it