The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Breast Cancer
Volume 14 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1473157
This article is part of the Research Topic Multidisciplinary and Personalized Approach in the Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer View all 15 articles
Cyanoacrylate glue in breast surgery: the GLUBREAST Trial
Provisionally accepted- 1 Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, G. Pascale National Cancer Institute Foundation (IRCCS), Naples, Italy
- 2 Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, G. Pascale National Cancer Institute Foundation (IRCCS), Naples, Campania, Italy
In 2018, the National Cancer Institute of Naples has launched the GLUBREAST Trial to verify the efficacy of cyanoacrylate glue to reduce seroma after axillary dissection in breast surgery. The glue is a synthetic sealant (N-Butyl-2-CyanoAcrylate+Metacryloxisulfolane) biocompatible, CE approved for internal human uses and surgical procedures. The assumed mechanism of action in breast surgery is that the glue create a seal coating in the operative field to occlude lymphatic leaks and limit seroma formation. Materials and Methods The trial included one hundred-eighty patients scheduled for breast conserving surgery or radical modified mastectomy. Ninety-one patients were randomized to receive suction drain and sealant glue after axillary dissection (Experimental Arm), whereas eighty-nine patients (Control Arm) received suction drain without glue. Statistics A multivariable mixed effect model on presence of liquid drained and volume drained were calculated. Stratified models by visits were performed. Results The trial ended in June 2022. Older age was associated with a higher volume of seroma drained per day (β 0.30; 95% CI: 0.00-0.60). 5-U increase in Body Mass Index was associated with higher daily drained seroma volume in patients underwent breast conserving surgery (β 5.0; 95% CI: 0.62-9.4), but not in patients underwent mastectomy (β 2.5; 95% CI: -3.6-8.6). We did not find statistically significant differences in presence of liquid drained and volume drained among the study groups. An advantage for the Experimental Arm was observed from 3th and 4th to 5th outpatient visits without reaching a statistical significance (p=0.069 and p=0.072, respectively), so far 5% of patients in the Experimental Group had clinical benefit from the glue.The majority of data in the literature come from case series, thus surgeons need higher level of evidence to drive surgical decision-making and choose proper devices to increase patient quality of life. GLUBREAST trial tested the efficacy of cyanoacrylate sealing glue to prevent seroma in breast surgery. Although only a small number of patients benefited from sealant application, we regret to say this trial has some limitation, i.e. the prolonged presence of suction drain.Further research is warranted to better clarify the benefit of cyanoacrylate glue in breast surgery.
Keywords: Cyanoacrylate glue, Glubran ® 2, Axillary seroma, Axillary dissection, breast cancer
Received: 30 Jul 2024; Accepted: 16 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Esposito, Siani, Donzelli, Crispo, Coluccia, Di Gennaro, Luongo, Avino, Fucito, Marone, Melucci, Saponara and di Giacomo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Emanuela Esposito, Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, G. Pascale National Cancer Institute Foundation (IRCCS), Naples, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.