Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol., 30 July 2024
Sec. Head and Neck Cancer
This article is part of the Research Topic Progressive Role of Artificial Intelligence in Treatment Decision - Making in the Field of Medical Oncology View all 4 articles

Improving the response to lenvatinib in partial responders using a Constrained-Disorder-Principle-based second-generation artificial intelligence-therapeutic regimen: a proof-of-concept open-labeled clinical trial

Tal SigawiTal Sigawi1Ram GelmanRam Gelman1Ofra MaimonOfra Maimon2Amal YossefAmal Yossef2Nila HemedNila Hemed1Samuel AgusSamuel Agus3Marc Berg,Marc Berg4,5Yaron Ilan*&#x;Yaron Ilan1*†Aron Popovtzer&#x;Aron Popovtzer2†
  • 1Department of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
  • 2Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
  • 3Oberon Sciences, Kfar Tavor, Israel
  • 4Area9, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 5Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States

Introduction: The main obstacle in treating cancer patients is drug resistance. Lenvatinib treatment poses challenges due to loss of response and the common dose-limiting adverse events (AEs). The Constrained-disorder-principle (CDP)-based second-generation artificial intelligence (AI) systems introduce variability into treatment regimens and offer a potential strategy for enhancing treatment efficacy. This proof-of-concept clinical trial aimed to assess the impact of a personalized algorithm-controlled therapeutic regimen on lenvatinib effectiveness and tolerability.

Methods: A 14-week open-label, non-randomized trial was conducted with five cancer patients receiving lenvatinib—an AI-assisted application tailored to a personalized therapeutic regimen for each patient, which the treating physician approved. The study assessed changes in tumor response through FDG-PET-CT and tumor markers and quality of life via the EORTC QLQ-THY34 questionnaire, AEs, and laboratory evaluations. The app monitored treatment adherence.

Results: At 14 weeks of follow-up, the disease control rate (including the following outcomes: complete response, partial response, stable disease) was 80%. The FDG-PET-CT scan-based RECIST v1.1 and PERCIST criteria showed partial response in 40% of patients and stable disease in an additional 40% of patients. One patient experienced a progressing disease. Of the participants with thyroid cancer, 75% showed a reduction in thyroglobulin levels, and 60% of all the participants showed a decrease in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio during treatment. Improvement in the median social support score among patients utilizing the system supports an ancillary benefit of the intervention. No grade 4 AEs or functional deteriorations were recorded.

Summary: The results of this proof-of-concept open-labeled clinical trial suggest that the CDP-based second-generation AI system-generated personalized therapeutic recommendations may improve the response to lenvatinib with manageable AEs. Prospective controlled studies are needed to determine the efficacy of this approach.

1 Introduction

Drug resistance is the main obstacle to achieving a cure in patients with cancer (1). Multiple mechanisms are associated with developing resistance, which presents a major therapeutic challenge (2). The current methods for overcoming resistance are far from satisfactory (3).

Thyroid cancer is the fastest-increasing malignancy in the United States and the eighth most common cancer globally (4). The treatment of its most common form, differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), consists of surgery, radiotherapy, and radioactive iodine (RAI) (5). Up to 15% of DTCs are refractory to RAI and carry a poor prognosis (5, 6). Lenvatinib, a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was approved as a monotherapy for treating locally advanced or metastatic RAI refractory DTC (RR-DTC) (5). Lenvatinib is also approved for advanced renal cell carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma (7). Despite its efficacy, lenvatinib is associated with the development of drug resistance and with a spectrum of adverse events (AEs), including hypertension, fatigue, proteinuria, and gastrointestinal disturbances, which often necessitate dose reduction, interruption, or permanent discontinuation (5, 6, 810). Traditional strategies to overcome resistance, such as combination therapies and dose escalation, have not been widely implemented into clinical practice for DTC treatment and may be accompanied by increased toxicity (10). Further, a temporary cessation of treatment (i.e., a “drug holiday”) carries the risk of cancer progression.

The Constrained Disorder Principle (CDP) defines complex systems by their degree of inherent variability (11). Integrating CDP-based second-generation artificial intelligence (AI) systems into treatment regimens has shown promising results in enhancing therapeutic outcomes, overcoming drug resistance, and minimizing AEs (1217). Personalized variability-based regimens optimized drug effectiveness in patients with congestive heart failure, multiple sclerosis, and chronic pain (1315, 1720).

The present study aimed to assess for the first time the effect of personalized dynamic adjustment of lenvatinib dosages and administration timing, guided by an AI-driven mobile application, on drug efficacy and AEs in patients with drug resistance or intolerance.

2 Methods

2.1 Study design and ethical considerations

An open-labeled, prospective, single-center proof-of-concept clinical trial lasting 14 weeks was conducted to investigate the impact of an algorithm-based regimen on lenvatinib efficacy. Subjects were enrolled at the Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center in Jerusalem, Israel. The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The trial was registered at the Israeli Ministry of Health, No. MOH_2023–03-21_012425, NIH GOV No. NCT06321120.

2.2 Study population

Participants were eligible for enrollment if they were 18 or older, non-pregnant, had a pathologically confirmed malignancy treated with lenvatinib monotherapy, and suffered from partial or complete loss of response to treatment or dose-limiting AEs. Participants who could not provide written informed consent or did not possess a smartphone were excluded. Participants were recruited from the Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center Oncology Department in Jerusalem, Israel.

2.3 Second-generation AI system

Altus Care™ is a mobile application developed by Area9 Innovation Apps, aimed at facilitating the digitalization of treatment plans and research protocols (21, 22). Integrated with treatment algorithms utilizing second-generation AI, Altus Care™ enables randomized adjustments in medication dosages and administration times within predefined physician-approved ranges while also serving as a medication reminder for patients (14, 15, 18). This study utilized an algorithmic approach providing randomized dosing regimens of selected drugs (Oberon Sciences, Israel) (14, 15, 18). The application is regulatory-approved and fully complies with privacy laws.

2.4 Designing a personalized treatment plan

Dosages and administration times were tailored within individual predefined ranges to accommodate personalized therapeutic regimens. The first level of the algorithm, employed in the present study, utilizes a pseudo-random number generator to select dosages and administration times from the ranges stipulated by the physician (14, 15, 18, 23). Per protocol, the daily dose was limited to match or remain below the patients’ pre-enrollment dosage level. In the initial four weeks of the follow-up, participants followed a fixed standard regimen with the app as a reminder, allowing for an adaptation period. Subsequently, the algorithm-driven treatment plan was implemented for an additional ten weeks.

2.5 Follow-up parameters

2.5.1 Tumor response to treatment

2.5.1.1 (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT)

All Participants underwent PET-CT at the beginning and end of follow-up. Tumor response was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) (24) and PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) (25, 26) to determine complete response, partial response, stable disease, or progressing disease. The pre-enrollment PET-CT was considered as the baseline for comparison.

2.5.1.2 Tumor markers

Participants with thyroid cancer were tested for thyroglobulin tumor marker levels at the beginning and end of the study.

2.5.1.3 Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)

Complete blood count was tested at the beginning and end of the follow-up. NLR was proposed as a biomarker of disease progression and as a prognostication tool in patients with thyroid cancer treated with lenvatinib. Higher values indicate more severe disease and worse outcomes (2729).

2.5.2 Safety and adverse events monitoring

Safety assessments were performed throughout the study, including recording symptoms and emergency room visits or hospitalizations. It was achieved through monthly telephone check-ups, hospital and ambulatory medical records reviews, and the option for Participants to report AEs online via the application. Hematological and biochemical laboratory testings, urinalysis, and self-conducted home blood pressure monitoring were also executed throughout the study. AEs were assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0.

2.5.3 Quality of life and functional status assessment

2.5.3.1 EORTC QLQ-THY34

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Thyroid Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-THY34) is a validated quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaire for patients with thyroid cancer that was used for QoL assessment at the start and end of follow-up (30). It comprises 34 questions, classified into 16 symptomatic scales and one social support scale with an adjusted score of 0–100 for each scale. Higher scores mean a higher degree of symptoms or support (30).

2.5.3.2 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status

ECOG status was assessed at the beginning and end of the follow-up. Patients were scored on a 0 to 4 scale ranging from fully-functional to completely-disabled, respectively.

2.6 Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are presented as median with minimum and maximum values, while categorical data are expressed as counts and percentages. Due to the small sample size, there was insufficient statistical power for inferential analysis.

3 Results

3.1 Patients’ baseline characteristics and general measures

Six Participants meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled, with one withdrawing consent shortly after enrollment. The final analysis included five Participants. Table 1 presents the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the Participants. The median age was 73 (range 69–76), with two (40%) male patients. Four (80%) patients had thyroid carcinoma, and one had salivary gland carcinoma. All patients had metastatic or recurrent locally advanced disease at enrollment.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Baseline characteristics.

3.2 The algorithm-based treatment regimen was associated with improving or stabilizing disease progression parameters

Table 2 summarizes the patients’ engagement and results. Four (80%) patients completed the 14-week follow-up period. One patient (patient no. 2) completed a 12-week follow-up and dropped out due to treatment substitution under the impression of progressing disease. The median recommended daily dose of lenvatinib before study enrollment was 20 mg (range 14–24), and it was reduced to a median of 16.67 mg (range 12–24) according to the intended experimental treatment plan.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Study results: measured parameters for each of the five patients before and after the intervention.

All patients completed an FDG-PET scan at the beginning and end of the study. According to the RECIST v1.1 and PERCIST criteria, 2 (40%) patients experienced a partial response, 2 (40%) had stable disease, and one (20%) showed progressing disease. Figure 1 presents the imaging results of the partial responders. Notably, patient no. 1 exhibited a partial response despite having a recurrent disease during long-term lenvatinib treatment before enrollment. However, patient no. 2 demonstrated progressing disease, possibly due to a recently diagnosed widespread metastatic poorly differentiated carcinoma and a relatively poor performance status at enrollment.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 FDG-PET-CT results of the partial responders. For each patient, pre-intervention imaging results appear on the left, while comparable post-intervention sections appear on the right. (A) Left: Initially, patient no.1 exhibited right vocal cord uptake [white arrow] and hypermetabolic paratracheal lesions (maximal SUV 29.3) [arrowheads]. Right: Post-intervention, the lesions were almost entirely resolved (maximal SUV 5.8). (B) Left: Patient no.5 initially presented with extensive disease, including enlarged hypermetabolic thyroid, hypermetabolic cervical lymphadenopathy [e.g., white arrows], and multiple hypermetabolic lung metastases [e.g., arrowheads]. Right: Post-intervention PET-CT revealed reduced size and uptake of the thyroid, cervical lymph nodes, and lung metastases.

All four patients with thyroid cancer had thyroglobulin levels tested at the beginning and end of follow-up. Three (75%) patients showed a reduction in thyroglobulin levels by the end of follow-up (Figure 2A). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was calculated at the beginning and end of all patients’ follow-ups. Three (60%) patients showed a decrease in NLR during treatment. The remaining 2 showed mild elevation, with post-interventional values below 3 (Figure 2B).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Effect of intervention on (A) thyroglobulin and (B) neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) levels.

3.3 The algorithm-based treatment regimen was associated with anticipated adverse events of lenvatinib

The documented AEs, classified by the CTCAE severity scale, include the following: Grade 1: ALT elevation (patients no. 1 and 5), thrombocytopenia (patient no. 1), anemia (patient no. 5), xeroderma (patient no.5), and proteinuria (patient no.4); Grade 2: Fatigue (patient no. 2) and stomatitis (patient no.5); Grade 3: Hypertension (patients no. 2 and 5) and proteinuria (patient no.5). No grade 4 AEs were identified. There were no emergency room visits or hospital admissions. A summary of the reported AEs and laboratory results is provided in Table 2.

3.4 The algorithm-based treatment regimen was associated with worsening symptom severity, improved social support, and stable performance status

EORTC QLQ-THY34 questionnaires were completed by 4 (80%) patients at the beginning and end of the follow-up period. The results showed an improvement in the median social support score and either stabilization or deterioration in 15 of the 16 median symptom scores (Table 3). These findings align with those from the phase IV EORTC QLQ-THY34 validation trial, which reported deterioration or stabilization across all tested scales in thyroid cancer patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors within several months of starting therapy (30). The ECOG status, ranging from 0 to 2 at enrollment, remained unchanged throughout the follow-up period.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 Quality of life assessment by the EORTC QLQ-THY34 questionnaire.

3.5 Adherence to the treatment regimen

The patients demonstrated high engagement with the application. Dose interruptions, defined as temporary cessations in drug administration, were observed in all patients, whether planned (e.g., before elective medical procedures) or unplanned (usually to manage AEs). The interruptions occurred in a median of 19% (range 9–26) of the total lenvatinib treatment duration. The median time of the most extended single interruption for a patient was seven days (range 3–15).

4 Discussion

The data of this proof-of-concept feasibility clinical trial showed that it is possible to overcome resistance to lenvatinib using a CDP-based second-generation AI system. The data supports the safety of the system and its ability to improve clinical outcomes. The disease control rate, comprising complete response, partial response, and stable disease cases, was 80% within a 14-week follow-up. The FDG-PET scan-based RECIST v1.1 and PERCIST criteria showed partial response in 40% of patients (Figure 1) and stable disease in an additional 40% of the patients. One patient experienced a progressing disease. 75% of the patients with thyroid cancer showed a reduction in thyroglobulin levels, and 60% of patients showed a decrease in NLR during treatment (Figure 2). Improvement in the median social support score among patients utilizing the system supports an ancillary benefit of the intervention. No grade 4 AEs were recorded, no ER visits occurred, and no functional deterioration was noted.

Resistance to lenvatinib is a significant challenge that may cause loss of response to treatment through various molecular mechanisms related to cell death regulation, metabolism, histological transformation, and epigenetics (9, 10). Currently, methods are lacking to differentiate actual resistance from loss of response due to inadequate dosing, such as serum drug level monitoring. The digital pill, regulated by a CDP-based second-generation AI system, introduces an innovative approach to drug administration by incorporating variability signatures (15). Biological systems inherently display variability, which is mandatory for their proper function. This variability is governed by the CDP, which allows a degree of disorder within set boundaries (3141). Deviating from this range may result in malfunction, disease, and possibly malignancies (42). Chronic medication administration triggers compensatory responses, diminishing effectiveness in up to half of patients with chronic illnesses, which may be associated with steady dosing (13). Research is advancing in using variability-based algorithms to counteract the compensatory responses to chronic medications (12, 2123, 40, 4256). These CDP-based AI systems personalize treatments by dynamically adjusting dosages and timing according to patient-specific and disease-specific variables, aiming to improve drug effectiveness (1315, 18). Machine learning is also being explored to refine treatments by leveraging personalized variability, further enhancing chronic medication efficacy (12, 14, 21, 22, 4262).

In the first level of this methodology, as utilized in the current study, lenvatinib dosages and administration times were randomized within the clinically approved ranges through a pseudo-random number generator, creating an open-loop system that functions independently of direct feedback (1316). In the upcoming levels, the algorithm adapts treatments based on patient responses and clinical outcomes, evolving into a closed-loop system that personalizes therapy by learning from aggregated user data (15). Additionally, incorporating chronotherapy and biological variability markers represents a further refinement, aiming to align treatment regimens more closely with individual pathophysiology (15).

Lenvatinib gained approval for locally recurrent or metastatic progressive RR-DTC following the pivotal SELECT trial - a phase III, double-blind study that showed improved progression-free survival with lenvatinib versus placebo (63). Lenvatinib-related AEs occur in nearly all patients, with the majority being grade 3 or higher, especially in older patients (6, 64). In the SELECT trial, 88.7% of patients older than 65 years exhibited grade 3 or higher AEs, most commonly hypertension and proteinuria (64). Several retrospective analyses assessing the real-life treatment patterns, adherence, and AEs of lenvatinib in RR-DTC also showed a significant grade ≥3 AEs incidence (6567). The absence of self-reported AEs by patients 1, 3, and 4 may be associated with alterations in the AEs perception after long-term pre-enrollment lenvatinib administration (68). Most guidelines advocate for an initial high dose of 24 mg/day of lenvatinib for thyroid cancer. However, the elderly and frail patients may struggle with compliance or may not be suitable candidates for high doses due to anticipated toxicities (5, 6, 64). In the SELECT trial, despite an initially planned dose of 24 mg/day, 67.8% of patients receiving lenvatinib required dose reductions due to AEs, resulting in a mean dose of 17.2 mg/day. Additionally, 82.4% experienced dose interruptions, and 14.2% discontinued treatment due to toxicity, with even higher rates noted in older patients (63, 64). Other studies have reported substantial dose reductions or interruptions exceeding 80% within a few weeks of treatment initiation (6). These interruptions may affect disease progression and outcomes, as more prolonged disruptions are associated with a shorter progression-free survival (69).

Retrospective studies have proposed planned drug holidays as a strategy to address intolerable lenvatinib AEs and prevent recurrent treatment interruptions and potential tumor regrowth (70, 71). However, planned drug holidays are not routinely implemented in clinical practice for RR-DTC treatment, primarily due to concerns regarding disease progression (72). Treatment interruptions are undesirable and can be caused by side effects. Interruptions may lead to loss of effect of the drugs.

Therefore, a method for reducing drug interruptions while maintaining sufficient dosing is needed. In our trial, patients experienced dose interruptions of varying frequencies and durations. Pauses in treatment that are randomly introduced are not the same duration as a typical “planned drug holiday.” One patient discontinued treatment due to disease progression, with no discontinuations attributed to AEs. We attribute reliable drug administration reporting via the application’s user-friendly online system to reflect real-life adherence to the treatment regimen.

Despite the limitations of being an open-label design and small sample size, this study introduces a novel treatment strategy for patients receiving lenvatinib. The study’s relatively short duration precludes assessment of the algorithm’s long-term impact. Additionally, using the app as a reminder can enhance patients’ adherence and outcomes, irrespective of the variability mechanism (20).

In conclusion, conventional fixed regimens fail to address the complexity of lenvatinib treatment, marked by a high incidence of adverse events, emerging resistance mechanisms, and limited alternative therapies. The CDP-based AI-assisted approach offers a user-friendly framework for developing and implementing innovative treatment strategies, benefiting non-responsive patients who cannot tolerate maximum doses. We advocate alternating dose reductions and administration times rather than interruptions or drug holidays. Further research is warranted to assess the impact of variability-based treatment regimens, integrated with AI and digital tools, in reducing dosing interruptions, managing adverse events, and enhancing tumor response. The system provides a novel option for overcoming drug resistance in patients with malignancy.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Hebrew University Hadassah IRB. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

YI: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. TS: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RG: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. OM: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. AY: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. NH: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. SA: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. MB: Conceptualization, Software, Writing – review & editing. AP: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

YI is the founder of Oberon Sciences, SA is a consultant for Oberon Sciences, and MB is a consultant for Area9.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

CDP, constrained disorder principle; AI, artificial intelligence; FDG-PET-CT, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography; AE, adverse event; RECIST, response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; PERCIST, positron emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors; DTC, differentiated thyroid cancer; RAI, radioactive iodine; RR-DTC, radioactive iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; CTCAE, common terminology criteria for adverse events; QoL, quality of life; ECOG, eastern cooperative oncology group; SELECT, study of (E7080) lenvatinib in differentiated cancer of the thyroid.

References

1. Vasan N, Baselga J, Hyman DM. A view on drug resistance in cancer. Nature. (2019) 575:299–309. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1730-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Mansoori B, Mohammadi A, Davudian S, Shirjang S, Baradaran B. The different mechanisms of cancer drug resistance: A brief review. Adv Pharm Bull. (2017) 7:339–48. doi: 10.15171/apb.2017.041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Sun X, Zhao P, Lin J, Chen K, Shen J. Recent advances in access to overcome cancer drug resistance by nanocarrier drug delivery system. Cancer Drug Resist. (2023) 6:390–415. doi: 10.20517/cdr

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Seib CD, Sosa JA. Evolving understanding of the epidemiology of thyroid cancer. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. (2019) 48:23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2018.10.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Wirth LJ, Durante C, Topliss DJ, Winquist E, Robenshtok E, Iwasaki H, et al. Lenvatinib for the treatment of radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: treatment optimization for maximum clinical benefit. Oncologist. (2022) 27:565–72. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Brose MS, Panaseykin Y, Konda B, de la Fouchardiere C, Hughes BGM, Gianoukakis AG, et al. A Randomized Study of Lenvatinib 18 mg vs 24 mg in Patients With Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. JClin Endocrinol Metab. (2022) 107:776–87. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab731

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Motzer RJ, Taylor MH, Evans TRJ, Okusaka T, Glen H, Lubiniecki GM, et al. Lenvatinib dose, efficacy, and safety in the treatment of multiple Malignancies. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. (2022) 22:383–400. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2022.2039123

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Cabanillas ME, Takahashi S. Managing the adverse events associated with lenvatinib therapy in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. Semin Oncol. (2019) 46:57–64. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2018.11.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Bo W, Chen Y. Lenvatinib resistance mechanism and potential ways to conquer. Front Pharmacol. (2023) 14:1153991. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1153991

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. You Q, Li R, Yao J, Zhang YC, Sui X, Xiao CC, et al. Insights into lenvatinib resistance: mechanisms, potential biomarkers, and strategies to enhance sensitivity. Med Oncol. (2024) 41:75. doi: 10.1007/s12032-023-02295-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Ilan Y. The constrained disorder principle defines living organisms and provides a method for correcting disturbed biological systems. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. (2022) 20:6087–96. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.11.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kenig A, Kolben Y, Asleh R, Amir O, Ilan Y. Improving diuretic response in heart failure by implementing a patient-tailored variability and chronotherapy-guided algorithm. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2021) 8:695547. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.695547

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Ilan Y. Overcoming compensatory mechanisms toward chronic drug administration to ensure long-term, sustainable beneficial effects. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. (2020) 18:335–44. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2020.06.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Ilan Y. Second-generation digital health platforms: placing the patient at the center and focusing on clinical outcomes. Front Digit Health. (2020) 2:569178. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2020.569178

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Ilan Y. Improving global healthcare and reducing costs using second-generation artificial intelligence-based digital pills: A market disruptor. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18(2). doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020811

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Gelman R, Hurvitz N, Nesserat R, Kolben Y, Nachman D, Jamil K, et al. A second-generation artificial intelligence-based therapeutic regimen improves diuretic resistance in heart failure: Results of a feasibility open-labeled clinical trial. BioMed Pharmacother. (2023) 161:114334. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114334

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Sigawi T, Lehmann H, Hurvitz N, Ilan Y. Constrained disorder principle-based second-generation algorithms implement quantified variability signatures to improve the function of complex systems. J Bioinf Syst Biol. (2023) 6:82–9. doi: 10.26502/jbsb

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Ilan Y. Next-generation personalized medicine: implementation of variability patterns for overcoming drug resistance in chronic diseases. J Pers Med. (2022) 12(8). doi: 10.3390/jpm12081303

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Hurvitz N, Ilan Y. The constrained-disorder principle assists in overcoming significant challenges in digital health: moving from "Nice to have" to mandatory systems. Clin Pract. (2023) 13:994–1014. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13040089

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Bayatra A, Nasserat R, Ilan Y. Overcoming low adherence to chronic medications by improving their effectiveness using a personalized second-generation digital system. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. (2024). doi: 10.2174/0113892010269461240110060035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Gelman R, Bayatra A, Kessler A, Schwartz A, Ilan Y. Targeting SARS-CoV-2 receptors as a means for reducing infectivity and improving antiviral and immune response: an algorithm-based method for overcoming resistance to antiviral agents. Emerg Microbes Infect. (2020) 9:1397–406. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1776161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Ishay Y, Potruch A, Schwartz A, Berg M, Jamil K, Agus S, et al. A digital health platform for assisting the diagnosis and monitoring of COVID-19 progression: An adjuvant approach for augmenting the antiviral response and mitigating the immune-mediated target organ damage. BioMed Pharmacother. (2021) 143:112228. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112228

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Ilan Y. Making use of noise in biological systems. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. (2023). doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2023.01.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. (2009) 45:228–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. JH O, Lodge MA, Wahl RL. Practical PERCIST: A simplified guide to PET response criteria in solid tumors 1.0. Radiology. (2016) 280:576–84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016142043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. (2009) 50 Suppl 1:122S–50S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Fukuda N, Wang X, Ohmoto A, Urasaki T, Sato Y, Nakano K, et al. Sequential analysis of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for differentiated thyroid cancer patients treated with lenvatinib. In Vivo. (2020) 34:709–14. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11828

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Fukuda N, Toda K, Fujiwara YU, Wang X, Ohmoto A, Urasaki T, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker for anaplastic thyroid cancer treated with lenvatinib. In Vivo. (2020) 34:2859–64. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Tomoda C, Sugino K, Kitagawa W, Nagahama M, Ito K. The time series behavior of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in thyroid cancer patients on tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. (2021) 83:347–53. doi: 10.1159/000514228

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Singer S, Al-Ibraheem A, Pinto M, Iakovou I, Osthus AA, Hammerlid E, et al. International phase IV field study for the reliability and validity of the European organisation for research and treatment of cancer thyroid cancer module EORTC QLQ-THY34. Thyroid. (2023) 33:1078–89. doi: 10.1089/thy.2023.0221

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Ilan Y. Overcoming randomness does not rule out the importance of inherent randomness for functionality. J Biosci. (2019) 44(6). doi: 10.1007/s12038-019-9958-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Ilan Y. Generating randomness: making the most out of disordering a false order into a real one. J Transl Med. (2019) 17:49. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-1798-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. zIlan Y. Advanced tailored randomness: A novel approach for improving the efficacy of biological systems. J Comput Biol. (2020) 27:20–9. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2019.0231

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Ilan Y. Order through disorder: the characteristic variability of systems. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2020) 8:186. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00186

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. El-Haj M, Kanovitch D, Ilan Y. Personalized inherent randomness of the immune system is manifested by an individualized response to immune triggers and immunomodulatory therapies: a novel platform for designing personalized immunotherapies. Immunol Res. (2019) 67:337–47. doi: 10.1007/s12026-019-09101-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Ilan Y. Randomness in microtubule dynamics: an error that requires correction or an inherent plasticity required for normal cellular function? Cell Biol Int. (2019) 43:739–48. doi: 10.1002/cbin.11157

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Ilan Y. Microtubules: From understanding their dynamics to using them as potential therapeutic targets. J Cell Physiol. (2019) 234:7923–37. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27978

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Ilan-Ber T, Ilan Y. The role of microtubules in the immune system and as potential targets for gut-based immunotherapy. Mol Immunol. (2019) 111:73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2019.04.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Forkosh E, Kenig A, Ilan Y. Introducing variability in targeting the microtubules: Review of current mechanisms and future directions in colchicine therapy. Pharmacol Res Perspect. (2020) 8:e00616. doi: 10.1002/prp2.616

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Ilan Y. beta-glycosphingolipids as mediators of both inflammation and immune tolerance: A manifestation of randomness in biological systems. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:1143. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. ilan Y. The constrained disorder principle defines living organisms and provides a method for correcting disturbed biological systems. Comput Struct Biotechnol. (2023). doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.11.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Ilan Y, Spigelman Z. Establishing patient-tailored variability-based paradigms for anti-cancer therapy: Using the inherent trajectories which underlie cancer for overcoming drug resistance. Cancer Treat Res Commun. (2020) 25:100240. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Kessler A, Weksler-Zangen S, Ilan Y. Role of the immune system and the circadian rhythm in the pathogenesis of chronic pancreatitis: establishing a personalized signature for improving the effect of immunotherapies for chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas. (2020) 49:1024–32. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001626

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Kolben Y, Weksler-Zangen S, Ilan Y. Adropin as a potential mediator of the metabolic system-autonomic nervous system-chronobiology axis: Implementing a personalized signature-based platform for chronotherapy. Obes Rev. (2021) 22:e13108. doi: 10.1111/obr.13108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Azmanov H, Ross EL, Ilan Y. Establishment of an individualized chronotherapy, autonomic nervous system, and variability-based dynamic platform for overcoming the loss of response to analgesics. Pain Physician. (2021) 24:243–52.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

46. Potruch A, Khoury ST, Ilan Y. The role of chronobiology in drug-resistance epilepsy: The potential use of a variability and chronotherapy-based individualized platform for improving the response to anti-seizure drugs. Seizure. (2020) 80:201–11. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.06.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Isahy Y, Ilan Y. Improving the long-term response to antidepressants by establishing an individualized platform based on variability and chronotherapy. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. (2021) 59:768–74. doi: 10.5414/CP204000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Khoury T, Ilan Y. Introducing patterns of variability for overcoming compensatory adaptation of the immune system to immunomodulatory agents: A novel method for improving clinical response to anti-TNF therapies. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:2726. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02726

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Khoury T, Ilan Y. Platform introducing individually tailored variability in nerve stimulations and dietary regimen to prevent weight regain following weight loss in patients with obesity. Obes Res Clin Pract. (2021) 15:114–23. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2021.02.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Kenig A, Ilan Y. A personalized signature and chronotherapy-based platform for improving the efficacy of sepsis treatment. Front Physiol. (2019) 10:1542. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01542

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Ilan Y. Why targeting the microbiome is not so successful: can randomness overcome the adaptation that occurs following gut manipulation? Clin Exp Gastroenterol. (2019) 12:209–17. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S203823

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Hurvitz N, Azmanov H, Kesler A, Ilan Y. Establishing a second-generation artificial intelligence-based system for improving diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of patients with rare diseases. Eur J Hum Genet. (2021) 29:1485–90. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00928-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Ilan Y. Digital medical cannabis as market differentiator: second-generation artificial intelligence systems to improve response. Front Med (Lausanne). (2021) 8:788777. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.788777

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Gelman R, Berg M, Ilan Y. A subject-tailored variability-based platform for overcoming the plateau effect in sports training: A narrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19(3). doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031722

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Azmanov H, Bayatra A, Ilan Y. Digital analgesic comprising a second-generation digital health system: increasing effectiveness by optimizing the dosing and minimizing side effects. J Pain Res. (2022) 15:1051–60. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S356319

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Sigawi T, Hamtzany O, Shakargy JD, Ilan Y. The constrained disorder principle may account for consciousness. Brain Sci. (2024) 14:209. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14030209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Chadaga K, Chakraborty C, Prabhu S, Umakanth S, Bhat V, Sampathila N. Clinical and laboratory approach to diagnose COVID-19 using machine learning. Interdiscip Sciences: Comput Life Sci. (2022) 14:452–70. doi: 10.1007/s12539-021-00499-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Corrêa T, Feltes BC, Gonzalez EA, Baldo G, Matte U. Network analysis reveals proteins associated with aortic dilatation in mucopolysaccharidoses. Interdiscip Sciences: Comput Life Sci. (2021) 13:34–43. doi: 10.1007/s12539-020-00406-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Ishay Y, Kolben Y, Kessler A, Ilan Y. Role of circadian rhythm and autonomic nervous system in liver function: a hypothetical basis for improving the management of hepatic encephalopathy. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. (2021) 321:G400–12. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00186.2021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Hurvitz N, Elkhateeb N, Sigawi T, Rinsky-Halivni L, Ilan Y. Improving the effectiveness of anti-aging modalities by using the constrained disorder principle-based management algorithms. Front Aging. (2022) 3. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2022.1044038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Kolben Y, Azmanov H, Gelman R, Dror D, Ilan Y. Using chronobiology-based second-generation artificial intelligence digital system for overcoming antimicrobial drug resistance in chronic infections. Ann Med. (2023) 55:311–8. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2163053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Swanson K, Wu E, Zhang A, Alizadeh AA, Zou J. From patterns to patients: Advances in clinical machine learning for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Cell. (2023) 186:1772–91. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Schlumberger M, Tahara M, Wirth LJ, Robinson B, Brose MS, Elisei R, et al. Lenvatinib versus placebo in radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med. (2015) 372:621–30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406470

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Brose MS, Worden FP, Newbold KL, Guo M, Hurria A. Effect of age on the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer in the phase III SELECT trial. J Clin Oncol. (2017) 35:2692–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.6472

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Hamidi S, Boucher A, Lemieux B, Rondeau G, Leboeuf R, Ste-Marie LG, et al. Lenvatinib therapy for advanced thyroid cancer: real-life data on safety, efficacy, and some rare side effects. J Endocr Soc. (2022) 6:bvac048. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvac048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Jasim S, Iniguez-Ariza NM, Hilger CR, Chintakuntlawar AV, Ryder MM, Morris JC 3rd, et al. Optimizing lenvatinib therapy in patients with metastatic radioactive iodine-resistant differentiated thyroid cancers. Endocr Pract. (2017) 23:1254–61. doi: 10.4158/EP171822.OR

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Masaki C, Sugino K, Saito N, Akaishi J, Hames KY, Tomoda C, et al. Efficacy and limitations of lenvatinib therapy for radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: real-world experiences. Thyroid. (2020) 30:214–21. doi: 10.1089/thy.2019.0221

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Haddad RI, Schlumberger M, Wirth LJ, Sherman EJ, Shah MH, Robinson B, et al. Incidence and timing of common adverse events in Lenvatinib-treated patients from the SELECT trial and their association with survival outcomes. Endocrine. (2017) 56:121–8. doi: 10.1007/s12020-017-1233-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Tahara M, Brose MS, Wirth LJ, Suzuki T, Miyagishi H, Fujino K, et al. Impact of dose interruption on the efficacy of lenvatinib in a phase 3 study in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Cancer. (2019) 106:61–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.10.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Mikoshiba T, Sekimizu M, Kono T, Nagai R, Kawasaki T, Sato Y, et al. Utility and optimal management of planned drug holidays during lenvatinib treatment in patients with unresectable differentiated thyroid cancer: a real-world multi-center study. Endocrine. (2024). doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-03744-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Matsuyama C, Enokida T, Ueda Y, Suzuki S, Fujisawa T, Ito K, et al. Planned drug holidays during treatment with lenvatinib for radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: a retrospective study. Front Oncol. (2023) 13:1139659. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1139659

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Capdevila J, Deandreis D, Durante C, Leboulleux S, Luster M, Netea-Maier R, et al. Use of lenvatinib in the treatment of radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective for daily practice. Eur Thyroid J. (2023) 12. doi: 10.1530/ETJ-23-0068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: thyroid cancer, salivary gland cancer, lenvatinib, artificial intelligence, drug-resistant cancer

Citation: Sigawi T, Gelman R, Maimon O, Yossef A, Hemed N, Agus S, Berg M, Ilan Y and Popovtzer A (2024) Improving the response to lenvatinib in partial responders using a Constrained-Disorder-Principle-based second-generation artificial intelligence-therapeutic regimen: a proof-of-concept open-labeled clinical trial. Front. Oncol. 14:1426426. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1426426

Received: 01 May 2024; Accepted: 16 July 2024;
Published: 30 July 2024.

Edited by:

Nishanth Thalambedu, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, United States

Reviewed by:

Jolanta Anna Krajewska, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Poland
Sandesh Murali, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, United States

Copyright © 2024 Sigawi, Gelman, Maimon, Yossef, Hemed, Agus, Berg, Ilan and Popovtzer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yaron Ilan, aWxhbkBoYWRhc3NhaC5vcmcuaWw=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.