This article is a commentary on:
Serum EZH2 is a novel biomarker for bladder cancer diagnosis and prognosis
Tao Wang
Guo-Ming Zhang- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shuyang Hospital, The Affiliated Shuyang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Shuyang, Jiangsu, China
A Commentary on
Serum EZH2 is a novel biomarker for bladder cancer diagnosis and prognosis
By Li F, Wang P, Ye J, Xie G, Yang J, Liu W (2024). Front Oncol 14:1303918. doi: .10.3389/fonc.2024.1303918
1 Introduction
Feng Li et al. (1) reported that “serum EZH2 is a novel biomarker for bladder cancer diagnosis and prognosis” in an article published in Frontiers in Oncology. In this study, to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of EZH2 for bladder cancer (BC), the investigators collected 115 BC patients and 115 healthy individuals. The ability of EZH2 to discriminate BC patients from healthy individuals was determined via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the diagnostic performance of EZH2 levels was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. These researchers found that the EZH2 level was used to distinguish BC patients from healthy individuals, and the AUC was 0.87. Therefore, these authors concluded that EZH2 is a novel diagnostic biomarker for BC diagnosis.
2 Commentary and discussion
The study by Feng Li et al. (1) is very interesting as it notes that serum EZH2 is a novel diagnostic biomarker for BC. However, the study has three limitations. First, the number of controls was not more than the number of BC patients, and the controls had only healthy individuals without BC and did not include patients with benign disease. To our knowledge, the number of controls was greater than the number of subjects studied. Therefore, the present study is considered a case-control study (2).
Second, it was neither enrolled in a study cohort consecutively nor was it predesigned for inclusion. The study is a two‐gate design study (2). The BC patients and the controls were from different cohorts. The number of BC patients and the number of controls were not constant or fixed. Therefore, the number of BC patients is crucial, and if the number of BC patients is lower, sensitivity will be underestimated. However, the number was lower for the controls, and there was an underestimation of specificity (2). As such, the sensitivity and specificity of a study were strongly affected by the ratio of researched subjects to controls (3–5). The number of controls (including patients with benign disease and healthy individuals) is crucial for evaluating EZH2 levels for BC diagnosis. The signs, risk factors, and symptoms of healthy individuals are different from those of BC patients. It is not necessary to distinguish in BC and in healthy individuals by using the EZH2 level. A study should use a one-gate design, and it should be based on both exclusion criteria and prespecified inclusion criteria for consecutive enrollment. In this study, BC patients, patients with benign disease, and healthy controls whose EZH2 level should be tested for diagnostic value in BC detection were included.
Third, the authors simply and crudely used t-test without testing whether the data had a Gaussian distribution (6). The authors should have described the point selection method for optimal cutoff value, for example, the point corresponding to the maximum Youden index (7) or (and) the points closest to the upper left corner of the ROC curve from the point on the AUC. At the same time, the authors should have also provided 95% confidence intervals of sensitivity and specificity.
In conclusion, EZH2 appears to be a novel diagnostic biomarker for BC. However, researchers should use a one‐gate design for a well‐designed study to avoid the limitations. Healthy individuals and patients with benign disease should be included as controls, and the number of controls should be greater than the number of subjects researched.
Author contributions
TW: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. XZ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GMZ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Li F, Wang P, Ye J, Xie G, Yang J, Liu W. Serum EZH2 is a novel biomarker for bladder cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Front Oncol. (2024) 14:1303918. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1303918
2. Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Vandenbroucke JP, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM. Case-control and two-gate designs in diagnostic accuracy studies. Clin Chem. (2005) 51:1335–41. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.048595
3. Huang XL, Zhang GM. Serum exosomal long noncoding RNA CRNDE level for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. J Clin Lab Anal. (2022) 36:e24144. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24144
4. Hu ZD. Circulating biomarker for Malignant pleural mesothelioma diagnosis: pay attention to study design. J Thorac Dis. (2016) 8:2674–6. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.10.94
5. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JH, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA. (1999) 282:1061–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.11.1061
6. Ocak Y, Cicek O, Ozkalayci N, Erener H. Investigation of the relationship between sagittal skeletal nasal profile morphology and malocclusions: A lateral cephalometric film study. Diagnostics (Basel). (2023) 13. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030463
Keywords: EZH2, bladder cancer, diagnosis, ROC, biomarker
Citation: Wang T, Zhang X and Zhang G-M (2024) Commentary: Serum EZH2 is a novel biomarker for bladder cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Front. Oncol. 14:1417921. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1417921
Received: 15 April 2024; Accepted: 02 September 2024;
Published: 24 September 2024.
Edited by:
Fabio Grizzi, Humanitas Research Hospital, ItalyReviewed by:
R.C. Koumar, Yenepoya University, IndiaMohamed Ahmed Ahmed Abdelaziz Hegazi, Humanitas Research Hospital, Italy
Copyright © 2024 Wang, Zhang and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Guo-Ming Zhang, Z21AeHpobXUuZWR1LmNu; emx5NTIxMjBAMTYzLmNvbQ==
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share last authorship