Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Oncol., 09 August 2024
Sec. Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgical Oncology
This article is part of the Research Topic Clinical Therapy of Brain Tumors View all 17 articles

Revisiting the potential of regulated cell death in glioma treatment: a focus on autophagy-dependent cell death, anoikis, ferroptosis, cuproptosis, pyroptosis, immunogenic cell death, and the crosstalk between them

Maowen Luo,&#x;Maowen Luo1,2†Xingzhao Luan,&#x;Xingzhao Luan3,4†Chaoge Yang,,&#x;Chaoge Yang1,2,5†Xiaofan Chen,Xiaofan Chen1,2Suxin YuanSuxin Yuan4Youlin Cao,Youlin Cao3,4Jing ZhangJing Zhang4Jiaying Xie,Jiaying Xie1,2Qinglian Luo,,Qinglian Luo1,2,5Ligang Chen,,Ligang Chen1,2,5Shenjie Li,,Shenjie Li1,2,5Wei Xiang,,*Wei Xiang1,2,5*Jie Zhou,,*Jie Zhou1,2,5*
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, the Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
  • 2School of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
  • 3Department of Neurosurgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Panzhihua University, Panzhihua, Sichuan, China
  • 4School of Clinical Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Panzhihua University, Panzhihua, Sichuan, China
  • 5School of Clinical Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Luzhou, Sichuan, China

Gliomas are primary tumors that originate in the central nervous system. The conventional treatment options for gliomas typically encompass surgical resection and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy. However, despite aggressive interventions, the median survival for glioma patients is merely about 14.6 months. Consequently, there is an urgent necessity to explore innovative therapeutic strategies for treating glioma. The foundational study of regulated cell death (RCD) can be traced back to Karl Vogt’s seminal observations of cellular demise in toads, which were documented in 1842. In the past decade, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) has systematically classified and delineated various forms and mechanisms of cell death, synthesizing morphological, biochemical, and functional characteristics. Cell death primarily manifests in two forms: accidental cell death (ACD), which is caused by external factors such as physical, chemical, or mechanical disruptions; and RCD, a gene-directed intrinsic process that coordinates an orderly cellular demise in response to both physiological and pathological cues. Advancements in our understanding of RCD have shed light on the manipulation of cell death modulation - either through induction or suppression - as a potentially groundbreaking approach in oncology, holding significant promise. However, obstacles persist at the interface of research and clinical application, with significant impediments encountered in translating to therapeutic modalities. It is increasingly apparent that an integrative examination of the molecular underpinnings of cell death is imperative for advancing the field, particularly within the framework of inter-pathway functional synergy. In this review, we provide an overview of various forms of RCD, including autophagy-dependent cell death, anoikis, ferroptosis, cuproptosis, pyroptosis and immunogenic cell death. We summarize the latest advancements in understanding the molecular mechanisms that regulate RCD in glioma and explore the interconnections between different cell death processes. By comprehending these connections and developing targeted strategies, we have the potential to enhance glioma therapy through manipulation of RCD.

1 Introduction

Glioma is a highly heterogeneous, aggressive primary brain tumor. The current standard of care for patients diagnosed with glioma includes performing a maximum safe extent resection of the tumor, undergoing radiotherapy over a 6-week period, and receiving concomitant systemic therapy with the alkylating agent TMZ (1). In addition to this, treatments such as immunotherapy, targeted precision therapy, electric field therapy, and supportive care have resulted in some improvement in the survival duration of glioma patients. However, these patients typically experience a poor prognosis and low quality of life, with only a 4-5% 5-year survival rate (2). Furthermore, cognitive and focal neurological deficits can significantly impact long-term survivors of brain tumors, regardless of tumor histology and grading (3).

The genesis of the scientific inquiry into RCD is often attributed to Karl Vogt’s discernment of cellular demise in toads in 1842. A significant leap in the conceptual framework occurred in 1972 when Kerr, Wyllie, and Currie introduced the term “apoptosis” to the research lexicon, propelling the study of RCD to the scientific forefront (4). The discovery by Sulston and Horvitz in 1976, utilizing the model organism C. elegans, was instrumental in unearthing the genetic underpinnings of apoptosis and revealing a predetermined fate for approximately 13% of somatic cells during embryogenesis (5). Over the past decade, NCCD has meticulously curated a taxonomy of cell death modalities, based on distinguishing cellular morphology, biochemistry, and functional outcomes. The dichotomy between cell death pathways lies within two realms: accidental pathways triggered by external factors such as mechanical, chemical, and physical stressors that lead to cellular demise when they surpass the cell’s compensatory capacities; and RCD, which represents an inherent and orchestrated cessation of cellular function mediated precisely by genetic regulation to maintain internal homeostasis. This gene-directed cessation in a physiological context is also known as programmed cell death (PCD) (6). Diverging from the unregulated nature of accidental cell death (ACD), RCD involves a meticulous network of signaling cascades and molecular machinery. The exploration of RCD has revealed numerous novel mechanisms with profound connections to human pathologies, expanding beyond apoptosis to encompass diverse processes such as autophagy-dependent cell death, ferroptosis, lysosome-dependent cell death, mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT)-driven necrosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, anoikis, NETosis, among others (7). Each mechanism reflects a unique aspect of the cell’s ability to maintain physiological integrity and their ongoing elucidation holds significant promise in enlightening the pathogenesis of various diseases and refining therapeutic strategies.

RCD, a significant pathway in the cell death process, exhibits dual effects in central nervous system tumors, particularly glioma. On one hand, dysregulated apoptotic pathways in gliomas can contribute to the anti-apoptotic properties of tumor cells, thereby facilitating tumor growth and resistance to treatment (8, 9). Over-expression of anti-apoptotic proteins, such as members of the Bcl-2 family, by glioma cells potentially inhibits the activation of RCD (10, 11). Moreover, the abnormal regulation of RCD pathways can make glioma cells resistant to conventional therapies such as RT and chemotherapy (12). However, in certain scenarios, RCD can have an inhibitory impact on glioma. Studies have indicated that by enhancing RCD in glioma cells, tumor volume can be reduced and treatment efficacy can be improved (13, 14).

Despite the progress made in the realm of RCD, the journey toward its clinical application remains challenging. To date, therapeutic strategies harnessing apoptosis have only yielded a limited number of approved pharmacological agents for human disease management. No agents that intentionally inhibit apoptosis have been established for clinical use. An example of an approved therapy is Venetoclax, a BCL2 inhibitor which has demonstrated efficacy as a monotherapy or in combination regimens for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (1517). Furthermore, the caspase inhibitor Emricasan garnered accelerated attention from the U.S. FDA in 2016 for its focus on non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH); nevertheless, the clinical outcomes have exhibited variability, underscoring the unpredictable nature of current interventions (18, 19). Looking ahead, a comprehensive investigation into the molecular intricacies of cell death, particularly within the context of the interconnected networks among various RCD pathways, is expected to stimulate innovative breakthroughs. It is through such a thorough understanding of the interplay between these pathways that novel therapeutic strategies can be developed, paving the way for their translation from laboratory research to practical application in medical treatment. The emphasis on these mechanistic insights holds great promise for unveiling new opportunities for clinical intervention and represents a significant advancement in harnessing RCD for disease management.

Overall, the regulation of RCD in glioma involves intricate signaling pathways and regulatory factors. Its influence on glioma depends on the complex interplay of multiple factors, including tumor cell characteristics, the tumor microenvironment, and treatment modalities (20, 21). Thus, this review provides a concise overview of the role of RCD in the onset, treatment, and prognosis of glioma. It focuses on several significant apoptotic pathways including autophagy-dependent cell death (22, 23), anoikis (24), ferroptosis (25, 26), cuproptosis (27), pyroptosis and immunogenic cell death (Figures 1, 2; Table 1). We propose strategies to optimize and coordinate traditional or novel approaches for glioma treatment based on these pathways. This comprehensive understanding of RCD in glioma will not only enhance readers’ comprehension of its underlying mechanisms but also serve as a theoretical foundation for developing more effective treatment strategies.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. This image provides a comprehensive illustration of the molecular mechanisms underlying three pathways of regulated cell death (RCD): autophagy-dependent cell death, anoikis, and ferroptosis. Autophagy-dependent cell death is characterized by the crucial role of autophagy in degrading essential cellular components, ultimately leading to cell demise. During autophagy-dependent cell death, continuous autophagic activity undermines cellular structure and function, resulting in eventual cell death. Anoikis is primarily initiated when cells dissociate from the extracellular matrix, causing them to lose vital survival signals. This detachment disrupts integrin and other adhesion molecule signaling pathways, leading to the downregulation of survival pathways such as PI3K/Akt and Ras/MAPK, while upregulating pro-apoptotic factors like Bim and Bid. The resulting alterations in mitochondrial membrane potential facilitate the insertion of pro-apoptotic proteins Bax and Bak into the mitochondrial membrane, which then releases cytochrome c and activates downstream apoptotic caspases, ultimately driving cell apoptosis. The process of ferroptosis is initiated by elevated intracellular iron levels, which amplify the Fenton reaction and enhance ROS production. This process triggers lipid peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids in the cell membrane, leading to oxidative stress and compromising membrane integrity, ultimately resulting in cell death.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. This image elucidates the specific mechanisms of three significant RCD pathways: cuproptosis, pyroptosis, and ICD. Cuproptosis, a copper-dependent form of cell death, is initiated by the intracellular accumulation of copper ions. The mechanism involves the binding of copper ions to thioredoxin cluster proteins, leading to protein aggregation and mitochondrial dysfunction. Pyroptosis, another RCD process, is mediated by inflammasome activation in response to pathogens or intracellular danger signals, resulting in a robust inflammatory response. ICD represents an RCD pathway that triggers a potent anti-tumor immune response. This process involves the release of specific death signals and DAMPs that activate the immune system.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Comparison of distinct aspects of RCD pathways.

2 Glioma and glioma immunotherapy

Gliomas represent 40-60% of primary central nervous system tumors in adults and are the most prevalent primary intracranial tumors in this population. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), gliomas are classified into four grades: grades 1 and 2 are low-grade, whereas grades 3 and 4 are high-grade (32). Despite advancements in glioma treatment over the past decades, challenges persist due to their unique location and the characteristics of “cold” tumors, which contribute to high recurrence rates, poor prognoses, and short median survival times (33).

The immune system fulfills three critical roles: immune surveillance, immune defense, and immune homeostasis, all of which are integral to tumor initiation, progression, metastasis, and response to treatment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy in recent years. However, gliomas, characterized as “cold” tumors, often exhibit poor or non-responsive behavior to ICIs, limiting the success of immunotherapy. Enhancing the immune microenvironment to convert “cold” tumors into “hot” ones may provide a new avenue for improving treatment responses (34, 35).

Bevacizumab, an FDA-approved monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), inhibits tumor vascularization rather than directly targeting T cells (36). PD-1 inhibitors such as Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab have shown promise in clinical trials. PD-1, a receptor on T cells, interacts with PD-L1 to suppress T cell activity, aiding tumor immune evasion. Pembrolizumab disrupts this interaction, reactivating T cells to recognize and attack tumor cells (37, 38). Similarly, Nivolumab restores T cell functions by blocking the PD-1 receptor. Although a phase III clinical trial comparing Nivolumab plus RT to TMZ plus RT in newly diagnosed patients with non-methylated MGMT promoter gliomas did not achieve the primary endpoint of extending overall survival, it marked a significant step towards using Nivolumab with RT in glioma treatment, without identifying major safety concerns (39). Other immunotherapy strategies are also being explored. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) selectively replicate within and induce apoptosis in cancer cells while sparing normal tissues. A multicenter study using the oncolytic virus DNX-2401 in combination with an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody demonstrated safety and survival benefits (40). Dendritic cell (DC) vaccines like DCVax-L hold promise in clinical trials; these vaccines involve extracting and loading dendritic cells with tumor antigens in vitro before re-injecting them into the patient to stimulate an immune response (41).

The Nobel Prize in Medicine was awarded to James Allison and Tasuku Honjo six years ago for their groundbreaking work in immunotherapy (42). Current standard treatment for glioblastoma includes surgical resection combined with TMZ chemotherapy but remains insufficient. Recent studies indicate that RCD can play a synergistic role in anti-tumor immunotherapy, including for ICI-resistant tumors. Existing research highlights significant distinctions in RCD processes between low-grade and high-grade gliomas. In low-grade gliomas, apoptosis levels are relatively low, and the role of autophagy remains controversial, though these tumors generally exhibit better cellular survival activity. By contrast, high-grade gliomas demonstrate a higher resistance to apoptosis and possess a more intricate autophagy function, often accompanied by more extensive necrotic areas. These malignant tumors feature markedly different gene expression profiles, which in turn lead to varied treatment responses. Low-grade gliomas tend to be more responsive to radiation and chemotherapy, while high-grade gliomas exhibit a stronger resistance to these treatments (43). As immunotherapy advances, it becomes crucial to investigate the different pathways that either inhibit or activate various RCD processes, as well as their synergistic effects. Such exploration could pave the way for more effective targeted treatments for gliomas.

2 Regulated cell death and glioma

2.1 Autophagy-dependent cell death

Coined by Christian de Duve and colleagues in 1963, the term “autophagy” describes the process by which cellular components, whether originating from within or outside the cell, are transported to lysosomes for degradation (44). Since the 1990s, research on autophagy has been greatly expanded due to its use as a model organism in yeast studies. Initial findings showed an accumulation of autophagosomes and lysosomes in dying cells, leading to the naming of “autophagic cell death” (45, 46). Autophagy plays multifaceted roles throughout disease progression, particularly in tumor. In the early stages of oncogenesis, autophagy acts as a guardian of genomic integrity and internal stability by regulating quality control and responding to oxidative stress. This helps prevent tissue damage, inflammation, and ultimately inhibits tumorigenesis and metastasis. However, during advanced stages of tumor, autophagy can serve as a source of nutrients that facilitate neoplastic growth, enhance immune evasion, and promote tumor advancement (47). Historically, reliance on morphological delineation has been the cornerstone of autophagy research, resulting in a gap in establishing causal relationships between autophagy and cell death. The present consensus among scientists categorizes autophagy’s involvement in cell death into three primary types: autophagy-related, autophagy-dependent, and autophagy-mediated cell death (48). Autophagy-dependent cell death is considered as a regulated form of cell death that relies on the autophagic apparatus and generally adheres to the following criteria (1): elevated autophagy flux occurring simultaneously with cell death (2), reversibility of cell death when autophagy is inhibited through pharmacological or genetic means (3), dependence on at least two components of the autophagic process, and (4) absence of concurrent alternative forms of cell death (6).

The notion of autophagy-dependent ferroptosis emerged amidst deepening investigations into ferroptosis, a form of cell death described in 2012 as iron-dependent and distinct from apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis (49). However, the specificity of this classification has come under scrutiny. Because Minghui Gao et al. found that under the action of ferroptosis activator, autophagosomes gradually accumulated, and cells died because of some components of the autophagy mechanism, they named this death mode as autophagy dependent ferroptosis (5052). This reevaluation highlights the dynamic and interconnected nature of autophagic processes and cell fate, keeping autophagy at the forefront of contemporary biomedical research.

As far as the current research on glioma is concerned, most of the research still stays on the acceleration or delay of the autophagy process. Celastrol, a triterpenoid compound derived from Tripterygium wilfordii, a traditional Chinese medicine, demonstrates potential anti-glioma effects. It activates the ROS/JNK signaling pathway while inhibiting the Akt/mTOR pathway, leading to G2/M phase arrest and triggering autophagy (53). Thiolidazine enhances P62-mediated autophagy by upregulating AMPK activity and the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting glioma cell proliferation and migration (54).

In this case, there are still a few studies to explore the relationship between autophagy dependent cell death and the occurrence and development of glioma. Investigator Svenja Zielke established a rigorous criterion for autophagy-dependent cell death and carefully identified three effective agents - loperamide, pimozide, and STF-62247 - from a wide range of over 70 compounds that induce autophagy. These agents were observed to promote LC3B lipidation and puncta formation, which are hallmarks of autophagic activity. This promotes autophagic flux through interactions with essential autophagy proteins ATG5 and ATG3. Ultrastructural analysis revealed an abundance of autophagosomes and autolysosomes in cells treated with loperamide and pimozide. Additionally, these compounds induced a noticeable dephosphorylation trend in complex 1 of the mammalian targets of rapamycin (mTOR), indicating activation of autophagy. Consequently, these findings suggest that loperamide, pimozide, and STF-62247 could potentially trigger autophagy-dependent cell death in glioma cells, providing a novel paradigm for therapeutic intervention in glioblastomas (55). Separately, amentoflavone (AF), a polyphenolic compound endemic to the Selaginella species, exhibits a broad spectrum of biological activities including anti-inflammatory, anti-neoplastic, radioprotective, antioxidative, and neuroprotective properties. Experimental observations have documented conspicuous depletion in intracellular glutathione levels and mitochondrial membrane potential following AF exposure, concomitant with a surge in cellular iron concentrations, malondialdehyde, and lipid peroxidation. Subsequent inquiry has substantiated the capability of AF to inhibit neoplastic proliferation by instigating autophagy-dependent ferroptosis in vivo potentially attributable to the modulation of the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)/mTOR signaling cascade (56). These insights could delineate unrecognized molecular conduits for curtailing tumor growth and reinforce the therapeutic potential of autophagy-centric interventions in tumor management.

2.2 Anoikis

When a cell loses its normal connection to the stroma, it senses signaling abnormalities that trigger anoikis, leading to disruption of intracellular signaling and cell death. Ultimately, this results in the effective removal of displaced cells (29). Because of this characteristic, this RCD pathway has been named amnesiotic apoptosis. NCCD defines lost-nest apoptosis as a specific variant of intrinsic apoptosis induced by integrin-dependent anchoring loss (6).

In the case of tumors, the absence of anoikis can promote tumor cell survival and proliferation, thereby facilitating tumor development and drug resistance (5759).

With advancements in bioinformatics, several researchers have developed predictive models based on genes associated with anoikis. Zhongzheng Sun et al. utilized nine genes related to anoikis to predict the survival rate and prognosis of glioma patients. They constructed a risk score and employed this model to forecast patient outcomes. Based on these findings, the possibility of exploring immunotherapy for glioma using genes and mechanisms correlated with anoikis was investigated (60). Dongdong Zhang analyzed the expression and survival of genes related to five types of anoikis, including ETV4, HMOX1, MYC, NFE2L2, and UBE2C. Additionally, a clinical prediction model was constructed (61). This work laid the foundation for subsequent progress in basic experimental research. The lncRNA ANRIL exhibited a positive correlation with glioma grade in glioma tissues regarding the induction of anoikis, and it was found to indirectly induce anoikis by inhibiting the anti-apoptosis gene Bcl-2 (62). In terms of the tumor microenvironment, MNX1 was found to be ectopically expressed in glioma cells and associated with glioma grade. This substance was observed to contribute to cell adhesion and potentially enhance the ability of glioma cells to evade anoikis by regulating the expression of its downstream molecule TrkB (63).

2.3 Ferroptosis

Ferroptosis is a recently discovered novel form of RCD that is dependent on reactive oxygen species (ROS). The process of cell death is typically accompanied by significant accumulation of iron and lipid peroxidation (64). With the deepening of the understanding of ferroptosis, many studies believe that ferroptosis should be attributed to autophagy dependent ferroptosis, but due to the uniqueness of its cause and process, it is still discussed as a separate concept here.

Ferroptosis is intricately linked to various diseases and pathological processes, encompassing neurological conditions (e.g., Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease) (65, 66), cardiovascular diseases (67), and liver diseases (68). The orchestrated process of ferroptosis in gliomas is primarily regulated by four pathways, including metabolism, the GPX4 pathway, the FSP1 pathway, and lipid metabolism (69). In the process of iron metabolism, cells absorb ferric ions (Fe3+) via the transferrin receptor TfR1, and subsequently reduce them to ferrous ions (Fe2+). The GPX4 pathway represents the classical pathway of ferroptosis. At the heart of this pathway is the lipid repair enzyme glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), which plays a crucial role in inhibiting intracellular lipid peroxidation by degrading small molecule peroxides and some lipid peroxides using GSH as a substrate (70).

Current studies have provided evidence that various factors and pathways can either induce or inhibit ferroptosis in glioma. Strychnine, a weakly basic indole alkaloid derived from strychnine seeds, has demonstrated potent antitumor activity against multiple tumor types, including glioma (71). Recent investigations have revealed its ability to induce ferroptosis in glioma cells (72). TRIM7, which utilizes a K4-linked chain, directly binds to and ubiquitinates nuclear receptor coactivator 4 (NCOA4), thereby reducing NCOA4-mediated ferritin phagocytosis and subsequent ferroptosis in human glioblastoma cells (73). Ferroptosis exhibits both beneficial and adverse effects in the development and progression of glioma. Some studies have suggested that increased ferroptosis may compromise the efficacy of PD-L1 immunotherapy, while inhibiting ferroptosis remodels the immunosuppressive microenvironment and enhances the effectiveness of immunotherapy (74). Conversely, plumbagin has exhibited tumor growth inhibition by targeting the NQO1/GPX4 pathway-mediated ferroptosis, suggesting therapeutic implications for inducing ferroptosis (75). In summary, ferroptosis exhibits dual effects on glioma, influencing the efficacy of immunotherapy and potential therapeutic strategies. However, a comprehensive understanding of ferroptosis in gliomas remains elusive, necessitating further research to identify key molecular targets and mechanisms.

2.4 Cuproptosis

Similar to ferroptosis, cuproptosis is a copper-dependent and unique cell death (76). A recent study suggests that cuproptosis is an independent form of RCD and is highly associated with mitochondrial respiration and the lipoic acid (LA) pathway (77), and plays a key role in tumor cell proliferation, metastasis, and drug resistance.

Studies on cuproptosis in glioma have mainly relied on bioinformatics and gene sequencing techniques for which there are limited experimental validations available. Due to the restricted predictive value of individual biomarkers, researchers have incorporated multiple biomarkers into models to predict the behavior and progression of glioma accurately. For example, Bo Chen et al., identified a signaling pathway along with 13 ligand-receptor pairs such as ICAM8, ITGAX, ITGB1 ANXA2-FRR1 etc., constructing an activity score based on genes associated with cuproptosis while ensuring its stability through machine learning technology (78). Similarly, Lin Wang et al. identified 10 lncRNAs associated with cuproptosis that target 7 resistance genes (FDX1, LIAS, LIPT1, DLD, DLAT, PDHA1, and PDHB) and 3 sensitization genes (MTF1, GLS, and CDKN2A). They developed a prognostic risk model based on these cuproptosis-related lncRNAs which accurately predicts the tumor microenvironment status (79). Notably, FDX1 has been found to be highly expressed in gliomas and is primarily involved in lipid acylation of tumor proteins and cuproptosis, which significantly affects the prognosis of low-grade gliomas (80). Methylation of FDX1 is believed to promote malignant behavior in glioma. Functional experiments further revealed that the target gene C-MYC enhances the proliferation and invasion of glioma cells through YTHDF1 and FDX1 methylation, possibly due to aberrant copper ion behavior in mitochondria (81). Although existing studies are insufficient to establish the clinical value of cuproptosis-related mechanisms in glioma development and progression, multiple potential factors indicate that cuproptosis, like other RCD modalities, warrants further investigation and can profoundly impact glioma research.

2.5 Pyroptosis

Pyroptosis, a newly identified form of RCD, plays a pivotal role in the body’s defense against pathogens. This mechanism is distinguished by specific morphological changes, including cell swelling, vesicle formation, membrane perforation, and eventual cell lysis. Unlike ferroptosis and autophagy, cell pyroptosis is mediated by proteins of the gasdermin (GSDM) family, which cause progressive cell swelling until membrane rupture. This process is tightly linked to inflammatory cascades and immune responses and can be categorized into classical and non-classical types based on the activation of caspase-1 (82).

To date, most investigations into pyroptosis in glioma have been conducted at the bioinformatics level, with limited experimental and clinical validation. Guilong Tanzhu and colleagues developed a prognostic model leveraging lncRNAs associated with pyroptosis to predict glioma patient outcomes. They further analyzed molecular alterations and immune infiltration across different risk groups, constructing a lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network grounded in prognostic gene risk scores (83). Hanzhang Liu et al. identified nine key differential genes by examining 523 low-grade glioma (LGG) and 1,152 normal tissue samples. Their findings indicate that these genes are instrumental in LGG progression and tumor immunity, potentially benefiting prognosis and immunotherapy (84). Caspase-6 (CASP6), a critical protein in the pyroptosis pathway, presents fluctuating relevance in glioma prognosis. Kai Guo et al. conducted an extensive analysis of four bioinformatics data routes, extracting pyroptosis-related differentially expressed genes (PRDEGs) from 81 data sets within the GeneCards database. Their research revealed CASP6 overexpression in glioma, primarily implicating it in immune responses and antigen processing. CASP6 expression was inversely correlated with overall survival and disease progression in glioma patients (85).

In summary, bioinformatics analyses suggest a significant link between pyroptosis and glioma pathogenesis. Future studies encompassing basic experimental validation and clinical research are crucial to elucidate the precise mechanisms and impacts of pyroptosis in glioma.

2.6 Immunogenic cell death

Prior to the identification of ICD, apoptosis was typically regarded as a non-immunogenic process. The recent definitions by the Committee on Cell Death Nomenclature (NCCA) describe ICD as a regulated form of cell death that can activate host immune responses within an adaptive immune context. Unlike other forms of cell death, ICD is triggered by a narrow range of stimuli, including chemotherapy agents, viral infections, and various physical or chemical factors. These stimuli induce a cascade of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), subsequently eliciting an immune response (6).

Curcumin, a bioactive phenolic compound, exhibits antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antibacterial properties, and has been documented to modulate several cell death pathways. Research conducted by Zenghe Xiu et al. demonstrated that curcumin can potentiate ionizing radiation-induced death of glioma cells via activation of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress PERK-eIF2α and IRE1α-XBP1 signaling pathways—a finding corroborated in murine models (86). Carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) is a tumor-associated cell surface glycoprotein that moderates tumor cell survival by influencing pH homeostasis. S4, a highly selective CAIX inhibitor, has shown substantial efficacy in breast and colorectal cancer models. Investigations by Jing Cui et al. revealed that S4 markedly diminishes glioma cell viability and induces both apoptosis and autophagy. Further analysis indicated that S4 promotes calreticulin exposure and the release of HMGB1 and HSP70/90, thereby activating the PERK-eIF2α and IRE1α-XBP1 pathways and facilitating DAMP release linked to ICD in glioma cells through the ER stress pathway (87). Recent studies assessed the potential of TNFAIP2 knockout in enhancing the therapeutic outcomes of PD-1 inhibitors. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that TNFAIP2 knockout increases surface expression of calreticulin (CALR), heat shock protein 70 (HSP70), and heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) in glioblastoma (GBM) cell lines, thereby inducing ICD. Consequently, TNFAIP2 knockout during PD-1 therapy could significantly bolster survival rates in glioma patients (88).

While molecular mechanisms underlying ICD have been extensively studied, the clinical implications of ICD in disease classification, treatment, and prognosis remain underexplored. Bioinformatics offers a robust platform to address these challenges. Jiayang Cai et al. identified 34 ICD-related genes, ultimately focusing on 12 key genes including IL17RA, IL1R1, EIF2AK3, CD4, PRF1, CXCR3, CD8A, BAX, PDIA3, CASP8, MYD88, and CASP1. They established associations with non-codeletion of 1p19q, higher WHO grades, wild-type IDH, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments (89). Additionally, Sun et al. analyzed 1,896 glioma samples across five databases, devising a risk score model based on 14 ICD-associated genes that independently predicts survival and response to immunotherapy in glioma patients (90).

2.7 Crosstalk between multiple RCDs

Different modes of RCD, including apoptosis and necroptosis, have been extensively studied and elucidated. Apoptosis, characterized by its orderly and systematic nature, is vital for maintaining tissue homeostasis and eliminating damaged cells, thereby influencing numerous diseases and pathophysiological states. Under physiological conditions, apoptosis ensures the timely demise of cells through the meticulous regulation of both intrinsic and extrinsic signaling pathways (91). Glioma cells frequently demonstrate overexpression of anti-apoptotic proteins (e.g., Bcl-2, Bcl-xL) and deactivation of pro-apoptotic proteins (e.g., Bax, Caspase family). This apoptosis evasion mechanism not only enhances the survivability of tumor cells but also increases their resistance to conventional chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy (92). Hence, restoring the normal apoptotic pathway is a pivotal research direction in anti-glioma therapies, with the reactivation of apoptosis presenting a promising strategy for effective tumor cell eradication. Necroptosis, a form of RCD that intersects characteristics of both apoptosis and necrosis, is primarily regulated by the receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinases 1 and 3 (RIPK1 and RIPK3). In contrast to apoptosis, necroptosis resembles necrosis through the rupture of the cell membrane and the release of pro-inflammatory factors (93). Glioma cells often manipulate the necroptosis pathway to avert cell death, including the inhibition of RIPK1/RIPK3 activity and the prevention of downstream mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) translocation (94). The induction of necroptosis via exogenous signals such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) or chemotherapeutic agents can lead to irreversible cell death in glioma cells, coupled with a potent inflammatory response that augments the immune system’s ability to target tumor cells. However, the excessive activation of necroptosis can also precipitate unnecessary tissue damage and inflammation, underscoring the necessity of precise regulation and the establishment of an optimal therapeutic window. Overall, a deeper understanding of necroptosis in glioma could pave the way for the development of innovative targeted therapies, thereby enhancing patient outcomes.

Tumors exhibit intricate crosstalk among various RCD pathways. Despite mechanistic and regulatory differences, these pathways can interact and influence one another under certain conditions, highlighting the importance of intercellular communication, especially as tumor cells develop mechanisms to evade drug-induced apoptosis in the context of targeted therapies.

Pyroptosis and apoptosis are primarily interconnected through the caspase family. The caspase-3/GSDME axis acts as a switch between these two forms of cell death, significantly impacting conditions like lung cancer and melanoma (95, 96). In infectious disease contexts, ZBP1 functions as a sensor for NLRP3 inflammasome activation triggered by influenza virus, paralleling the role of caspase-11 or caspase-4/5 in the non-classical LPS-induced pathway, intertwining with both pyroptosis and apoptosis. Additionally, ZBP1 is crucial in initiating PANoptosis in response to IAV (97).

The tumor suppressor gene TP53 mediates apoptosis and ferroptosis. TP53 upregulates numerous pro-apoptotic genes including BAX, PUMA, and NOXA, promoting mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis by inducing mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization, releasing cytochrome c, and activating downstream caspases. TP53 also suppresses the SLC7A11 gene, which encodes a component of the system Xc^- transmembrane amino acid transporter responsible for importing glutathione precursor cysteine. Consequently, inhibition of SLC7A11 by TP53 reduces glutathione synthesis, leading to lipid peroxide accumulation and inducing ferroptosis (98). Ferroptosis is characterized by ROS generation and lipid peroxidation, processes that intersect with endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Under ER stress, transcription factors such as IRE1, PERK, and ATF6 are activated, regulating apoptosis-related proteins like Bcl-2 and cytochrome c, thereby influencing the apoptosis pathway. Thus, modulating ferroptosis can also impact apoptosis (99).

Autophagy, particularly lipid autophagy and Beclin-1-mediated xCT degradation, can precipitate ferroptosis. Recent research has revealed that autophagy can induce ferroptosis through the regulation of intracellular ROS, LIP, and lipid peroxide levels, defined as autophagy-dependent ferroptosis (52). Studies by Eunhee Park et al. demonstrated that autophagy could be induced by ROS generated by erastin, an inducer of ferroptosis, with ferritin degradation and increased transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) expression leading to ferroptosis. NRF2 plays a pivotal role in both ferroptosis and necroptosis; it can activate NLRP3 and AIM to induce necroptosis and exhibits specific functions in ferroptosis. Contrarily, NRF2 can also inhibit NLRP3 activation by reducing ROS levels, thereby blocking necroptosis (100, 101).

ICD is distinctive for its capacity to elicit an immune response. Although distinct from apoptosis, programmed necrosis, autophagy, and ferroptosis, these pathways can transition into ICD under specific conditions. Research on processes such as copper-induced cell death and aneuploid apoptosis in gliomas remains limited, with insufficient evidence to confirm their interaction with other RCD pathways. Collectively, the interrelationships among various RCD pathways are complex and tightly knit, forming an interactive network that regulates cell death and immune responses. Understanding these relationships is paramount for advancing treatments for tumors, autoimmune diseases, and infectious diseases.

3 The promise of RCD in targeted glioma therapy

3.1 Potential application of autophagy-dependent cell death in glioma targeted therapy

Autophagy-dependent cell death is a type of RCD that relies on autophagy mechanisms or components and plays a significant role in the central nervous system (28). Despite extensive research, there is still no definitive causal link between autophagy and cellular demise. The interplay between autophagy and various forms of cell death makes it challenging to distinguish them based solely on morphological observations throughout the cellular lifecycle. Therefore, here we mainly discuss the therapeutic concepts and methods based on inhibiting or accelerating the autophagy process to hinder tumor development.

The underlying mechanisms of autophagy that contribute to cellular death are notably distinct from those that promote cellular survival. These differences are primarily characterized by variations in the rate of autophagic flux, the duration and intensity of the involved pathways, as well as the nature and turnover rates of the substrates undergoing autophagic recycling and degradation. Such nuances play a crucial role in determining the balance between cell viability and death, thus representing potential focal points for innovative tumor therapies. A wealth of preclinical research has meticulously examined the function of autophagy in tumor treatment, employing two prevalent methodologies. The first method involves triggering autophagy through the administration of broad-spectrum anticancer agents, such as rapamycin, which antagonizes mTORC1 (102). The second strategy involves indirectly activating autophagy by selectively inhibiting specific drug targets, such as the inhibition of ERK in PDAC cell lines (103). Although the precise mechanism underlying modulation of autophagy remains elusive, the current understanding leans towards the notion that upregulation of autophagy confers a protective effect on tumor cells.

With the increasing understanding of autophagy, novel therapeutic agents targeting glioma cell autophagy have entered clinical trials. Chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), known for their anti-malarial properties, have shown potential in inhibiting autophagy and enhancing the efficacy of DNA damage therapy. Previous studies investigated combination therapy with hydroxychloroquine for glioma by conducting phase I/II clinical trials to determine its efficacy and maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Despite effectively inhibiting autophagy, the clinical application of hydroxychloroquine is limited due to its toxicity at higher dosages (104). After that, while HCQ has been widely used in the treatment of malaria (105), primary progressive multiple sclerosis (106), IgA nephropathy (107), and even COVID-19 (108), it has rarely been utilized for glioma. However, in 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the urgent need for new glioma treatments, HCQ and CQ have regained attention, leading to the emergence of corresponding clinical trial studies. In a recent study by Inge Compter et al., the investigators examined the safety, pharmacokinetics, and MTD of a combination therapy consisting of chloroquine, RT, and daily TMZ administration in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. This novel therapeutic approach holds promise for the treatment of gliomas (109).

Furthermore, due to the gradual advancement of autophagy research and the rapid progress in bioinformatics in recent years, numerous studies have progressed to the stage of clinical trials. Mutations in the epidermal growth factor (EGF) have been implicated in gliomas’ resistance to conventional chemotherapy (110). Chloroquine, a potent autophagy inhibitor, impairs this survival mechanism by blocking the lysosomal degradation pathways activated by mutated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRvIII). This recently registered clinical study marks a new frontier in efforts to overcome therapeutic resistance within gliomas. A pioneering Phase I/II clinical trial, initiated in 2020, is investigating the combined efficacy of dabrafenib, trametinib, and hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of recurrent gliomas characterized by BRAF mutations. This trial specifically focuses on determining the extent of autophagy inhibition and its correlation with resistance profiles of gliomas, as well as the specific involvement of autophagic processes in the context of BRAF anomalies. Building on preclinical findings, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol (CBD) have demonstrated their potential in tempering glioma proliferation and metastasis. These phytocannabinoids engage type 1 and type 2 cannabinoid receptors, triggering the endoplasmic reticulum stress response and subsequently inducing autophagy (111). Last year witnessed the initiation of a Phase I multicentric clinical trial in Spain dedicated to assessing the therapeutic safety of this novel combined modality. Phase I/II clinical trials are currently underway to investigate sphingoid modulators and the glioma autophagy inducer idroxioleic acid. These studies aim to determine the MTD of these drugs, evaluate their safety and initial efficacy, and shed light on their potential for anti-tumor treatment of glioma (112).

Unfortunately, numerous autophagy-related molecules possess a wide range of vital physiological roles beyond their established functions within the autophagic pathway. Autophagy-related genes (ATGs) exert their influence on various processes, both in healthy and pathological states, that go beyond their canonical duties as autophagy facilitators. For example, the ATG5-ATG12/ATG16L1 protein complex has demonstrated antiviral capabilities mediated by interferon-gamma—actions that differ from its involvement in autophagy (113, 114). Additionally, ATG7 is one of the core proteins of autophagy, but the ATG7 dependent non-autophagy pathway plays a key role in the regulation of neovascularization (115). While the classical autophagy pathway remains an essential aspect of ATG function, the non-autophagic capabilities demonstrated by these molecules cannot be disregarded. The multifaceted nature of autophagy-related molecules often complicates the understanding of their complex physiological interactions, presenting a significant challenge in unraveling their roles in clinical trials, which may contribute to suboptimal outcomes observed. Future research endeavors must adopt a broader perspective that is not confined to the solitary functions attributed to autophagy-related molecules. Enhancing our understanding of their versatile involvement in cell death regulation and the distinct disease-modulating processes mediated through autophagy-dependent death pathways in various neoplastic contexts will be crucial for advancing therapeutics.

3.2 Potential application of anoikis in glioma targeted therapy

Anoikis, a distinct form of RCD triggered by cell detachment, holds significant importance in maintaining cellular homeostasis and microenvironmental stability. Mechanisms that activate resistance to anoikis hinder the induction of apoptosis in cells upon tumor initiation, impeding their ability to undergo cell death when detached. This phenomenon promotes the proliferation and migration of tumor cells. Consequently, inhibiting resistance to anoikis and restoring normal anoikis processes emerge as promising avenues for exploration in tumor research (Figure 3).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Anoikis resistance mechanism and targeted drugs in glioma. In this image, we elucidate the intricate anoikis-resistance pathways operative in glioma, along with their consequential clinical implications. Anoikis, which is inherently designed to eliminate impaired cells, is crucial for maintaining cellular equilibrium within the microenvironment. However, in gliomas, a disrupted resistance to anoikis emerges, enabling cancerous cells to evade this regulatory process and disrupting the natural course of malignant cell clearance.

Despite the inherent radiation resistance of gliomas, RT remains a standard treatment in the context of tumor drug resistance (116). In a study of prostate cancer, Erk and PIK-AKT signaling enabled isolated tumor cells to acquire resistance related to anoikis, leading to drug resistance (117). In glioma, the commonly used alkylating agent TMZ is an essential component of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, recent research has demonstrated that astrocytes resistant to anoikis exhibit robust resistance to TMZ, resulting in minimal reduction in cell viability and unaffected colony formation (118). These findings suggest a potential association between induction of anoikis and drug resistance in glioma.

Considering the potential correlation between anoikis and the development of drug resistance in RT and chemotherapy, targeted therapy against anoikis demonstrates promise as an ideal adjunctive strategy in glioma treatment. Exploring the molecular regulation of anoikis may provide novel insights into prognostic assessment in glioma. For instance, a recent study developed a prognostic model for low-grade glioma (LGG) based on the ANRG and LGG subtypes (119). Another investigation employed differentially expressed anoikis-related genes (ARG) derived from GeneCards to construct a prognostic ARG model for glioma, revealing that patients in the high-risk group exhibit a worse prognosis (61). These findings collectively underscore the clinical significance of anoikis in glioma treatment and prognosis, despite the need for further mechanistic investigations. Continued research in this area will undoubtedly contribute to advancements in glioma therapeutics.

3.3 Potential application of ferroptosis in glioma targeted therapy

With the increasing understanding of ferroptosis, researchers have initiated investigations into its potential in tumor therapy. Multiple studies have demonstrated that specific anti-tumor drugs can induce ferroptosis, highlighting its potential in glioma treatment.

Recent findings suggest a close association between ferroptosis and treatment resistance in targeting tumor cells. Viswanathan et al. demonstrated that the lipid peroxidase pathway, mediated by GPX4 which can partially suppress ferroptosis, regulates the development of highly resistant mesenchymal cells (120). Another study revealed that depleting immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment can reverse drug resistance through ferroptosis (121). These findings underscore the potential of ferroptosis as an effective adjunct therapy against glioma resistance.

Extensive research has been sparked into the potential induction of ferroptosis in tumor treatment, with several clinically approved drugs (e.g., sorafenib and artesunate) demonstrated to effectively induce ferroptosis (122). The integration of nanomaterials with targeted ferroptosis has garnered significant attention in the field of tumor treatment research. Nano-based drug delivery systems offer advantages such as enhanced stability, improved availability, minimal side effects, and robust targeting capabilities. Chen et al. developed trehalose-loaded nanoparticles that combined GSH consumption-induced ferroptosis with trehalose-induced autophagy, demonstrating the potential of nanaterial design in developing ferroptosis-induced nanomedicine (123). While most nanoscale research on ferroptosis has focused on breast and liver cancer, this approach is expected to become a future treatment strategy for glioma. It also demonstrates the importance of interconnection between different RCD pathways.

The increasing recognition of the significance of ferroptosis in the tumor microenvironment and its potential as a prognostic predictor has led to studies investigating its clinical relevance. Zhuo et al. conducted a study examining genetic markers associated with ferroptosis and found that these markers could potentially serve as prognostic indicators for glioma patients (124). Similarly, Wan RJ et al. identified differential expression of ferroptosis-related genes between glioma patients and non-patients, suggesting the possibility of using these genes as a new standard for prognostic evaluation in the future (125). These findings highlight the significance of comprehending the role of ferroptosis in the tumor microenvironment and its potential as a prognostic marker for glioma patients. Further research is necessary to validate and expand upon these findings, ultimately advancing prognostic prediction in glioma.

3.4 Potential application of cuproptosis in glioma targeted therapy

Perturbations in serum and tumor tissue copper levels have been observed in patients with malignant tumors such as lung cancer (126) and breast cancer (127), suggesting alterations in copper homeostasis that may contribute to tumor progression, invasiveness, or drug resistance. Although experimental research on cuproptosis is still in its early stages, it is undeniable that cuproptosis holds promising potential as a therapeutic target for tumor treatment.

Pertinent findings from several studies have established a correlation between cuproptosis markers and the prognosis of glioma. In research conducted by Li Wang and colleagues, notably elevated expression levels of cuproptosis-related genes were observed in the high-risk group of glioma patients as compared to the low-risk group. Moreover, the researchers developed a risk model grounded on long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) associated with cuproptosis, which partially reflects its prognostic significance in glioma (79). However, additional experimental validation is necessary to corroborate the prognostic implications of cuproptosis-related genes in this disorder.

In our review of tumors, we have discovered that certain metal ions, namely cadmium (128), chromium (129), and bismuth (130), possess carcinogenic properties to some extent (Table 2). Recent research suggests that their mechanism of action may be closely linked to ferroptosis, cuproptosis, and autophagy. Ashish Tyagi et al. conducted mouse experiments and found that chronic exposure to cadmium consistently activates the NOX1 complex, leading to the generation of ROS and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in cells. This activation subsequently results in defective autophagy (131). In a separate study conducted by Caijun Zhao et al., it was discovered that cadmium-induced ER stress mediates the activation of autophagy, which leads to ferroptosis in renal tubular epithelial cells (128). The potential therapeutic application of these metal ions in disease treatment is a topic of discussion, for instance, bismuth has been widely used for the eradication of H. pylori infection (132). It is important to note that the therapeutic and side effects of metal ions are often dose-dependent and influenced by the method of administration. Currently, metal ions have not been utilized in tumor therapy, and further research is necessary to explore their potential in this field.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Comparative analysis of metal-mediated RCD pathways.

3.5 Potential application of pyroptosis in glioma targeted therapy

The relationship between pyroptosis and tumor dynamics, particularly in glioma, is intricate and multifaceted. On one hand, as a significant form of RCD, pyroptosis can effectively inhibit tumor initiation and progression. Conversely, the inflammation and immune responses triggered by pyroptosis release various inflammatory mediators and cytokines, such as interleukin-1β and interleukin-8, which might promote tumor growth, modify the tumor microenvironment, and contribute to drug resistance (133).

Current research endeavors aim to harness pyroptosis to enhance glioma treatment. For instance, Li-Wen Ren utilized weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) on data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to identify key genes in glioblastoma (GBM). Using the connectivity map (CMAP) platform, three substances—flubendazole, mebendazole, and fenbendazole—were identified as potential anti-glioma agents. These compounds were shown to induce pyroptosis in GBM cells via the NF-κB/NLRP3/GSDMD pathway and also trigger mitochondria-dependent apoptosis in nude mice models (134). In another study, Wenpeng Zhao and colleagues conducted high-throughput screening of 2,718 compounds from approved drug and clinical compound libraries. They discovered that the second-generation small molecule polyCDK inhibitor AT7519 holds promise as a GBM therapy. AT7519 notably inhibited glioma cell viability and proliferation in a dose-dependent manner and induced pyroptosis through caspase-3-mediated cleavage of gasdermin E (GSDME) (135). Meanwhile, Chinese researchers have explored traditional Chinese medicine formulations, identifying Xihuang Pill as a noteworthy candidate. This traditional preparation promotes the pyroptosis of glioma cells via the POU4F1/STAT3 axis and effectively halts glioma proliferation, although its precise mechanisms and clinical applicability warrant further investigation (136). Despite these promising approaches, translating them into effective clinical treatments faces substantial challenges. The glioma microenvironment is exceptionally complex and exhibits significant heterogeneity in treatment response. Furthermore, researchers must address issues of selectivity, drug delivery, side effects, and resistance associated with pyroptosis-inducing agents.

In summary, while pyroptosis offers potential therapeutic avenues for glioma, extensive research is necessary to overcome the inherent challenges and fully realize its clinical benefits.

3.6 Potential application of ICD in glioma targeted therapy

In 1893, American orthopedic surgeon William Coley made a serendipitous discovery that postoperative pyogenic streptococcal infections could induce tumor regression in sarcoma patients, thus marking the dawn of tumor immunotherapy. Over the past decade, ICD has emerged as a crucial link between oncological treatment and the immune system, paving the way for numerous advancements in cancer therapy. Several factors can induce ICD, including chemotherapeutic agents, oncolytic viruses, high hydrostatic pressure, and cytotoxic heat shock (31). ICD inducers can be categorized based on their immune induction mechanisms: Type I inducers primarily comprise genotoxic agents that lead to abnormal protein activation and DNA damage, while Type II inducers are generally more potent, inducing endoplasmic reticulum oxidative stress, perturbing ER homeostasis, raising intracellular Ca2+ levels, and rapidly activating danger signal pathways to expose and release DAMPs (137139). Consequently, modulating these factors in cancer therapy might offer new targeted treatment strategies.

Sonodynamic therapy (SDT) is a novel treatment modality that integrates low-intensity ultrasound with chemotherapeutic drugs, boasting high tissue penetration and non-invasive characteristics. Yan Zhou et al. first identified that TMZ, a standard treatment for glioma, generates significant reactive oxygen species (ROS) when exposed to ultrasound. Therefore, employing TMZ as an SDT sensitizer could enhance glioma treatment efficacy (140). Subsequent studies have shown that TMZ-based SDT causes ER expansion, mitochondrial swelling, and initiates the ER stress response (ERSR), nuclear DNA damage, and mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) opening. This process also induces “danger signals” from glioma cells, promoting the maturation and activation of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs), ultimately reshaping the glioma immune microenvironment and eliciting robust anti-tumor responses. Anti-tumor vaccines have recently gained attention in immunotherapy. These vaccines are created by exposing autologous dendritic cells to glioma tissue-induced ICD, wherein the dead glioma cells produced by ICDs activate astrocytoma cells and DAMPs. Upon administration to patients, the DC-presented tumor antigens trigger a specific T cell response, targeting residual astrocytoma cells, thereby reducing tumor recurrence and extending patient survival (141). Furthermore, genetically engineered virus technologies are being developed to leverage ICD, using viral vectors to deliver cytotoxic agents specifically to tumor tissues, thus inducing ICD and circumventing the blood-brain barrier’s interference with therapeutic efficacy (142).

Recently, two drugs, lurbinectedin and belantamab mafodotin, have been validated to drive ICD-mediated tumor treatment and have received FDA approval for cancer therapy (143145). Despite the current fragmented, uncertain, and indirect nature of research on ICD-based cancer treatments, the promising potential of ICD underpins its prospective role as a pivotal component in future cancer therapies, necessitating further investigation.

4 Probing the synergistic impact of variegated RCD pathways for oncological treatment strategies

RCD orchestrates a range of physiological and pathological phenomena, including developmental dynamics, homeostatic integrity, and immune responses (7). It fundamentally interfaces with disease pathogenesis and healthcare outcomes. RCD plays a pivotal role in terminal cellular demise and is intricately linked to critical pathological episodes such as myocardial infarctions and neurodegenerative disorders (146148). Furthermore, aberrations in RCD signaling cascades are implicated in uncontrolled cellular proliferation and excessive mass accumulation characteristic of neoplastic transformation (149). From an interventional standpoint, ACD is triggered by acute environmental insult, a phenomenon considered spontaneous and inevitable according to prevailing research paradigms. Conversely, the processes of RCDs are regarded as modifiable and potentially therapeutically manipulable due to their more gradual and controlled nature (150).

In recent decades, with the deepening of research on RCD, people have gradually explored the potential of various RCD pathways in treating diseases, especially tumors, using different therapeutic approaches such as targeted drug therapy, gene therapy, adjuvant RT, and immunotherapy (151, 152). Despite extensive clinical scrutiny, the translation of these insights into effective treatments has been limited due to various obstacles including challenges related to pharmacokinetics and dynamics, suboptimal trial outcomes, and safety concerns. A significant obstacle is the profound interconnectivity and complexity within mammalian RCD signaling networks; blocking one pathway pharmacologically often requires simultaneous inhibition of multiple molecular entities and cascades, thus hindering specificity. Furthermore, despite extensive research on RCD, the field remains in its early stages, with many molecular mechanisms and signaling conduits yet to be elucidated. Hasty intervention risks disrupting other physiological processes, raising doubts about the feasibility and prudence of applying RCD inhibitors in therapeutic contexts. With the emergence of one difficulty after another, researchers have gradually shifted their focus to the combination treatment and mutual tandem of RCD, which has brought new hope for tumor treatment (Figure 4).

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. The therapeutic prospect of RCD in glioma. This image delineates the multifaceted role of RCD as a dynamic player in oncological treatments, encompassing gene therapies, precision pharmacotherapy, immune-modulatory strategies, and radiological interventions. Research highlights the intricate involvement of RCD mechanisms in mediating therapeutic efficacy. Advancing this domain, a synergistic approach that harnesses the collective force of RCD pathways and seamlessly integrates various treatment modalities holds promise as a novel paradigm in tumor management.

RT functions primarily by inducing double-strand DNA breaks, which subsequently increase the permeability of the mitochondrial outer membrane (153). This elevation in permeability facilitates the release of pro-apoptotic proteins, thereby triggering downstream apoptotic signaling cascades. Accumulating evidence from RT research has revealed instances of anti-tumor responses in non-irradiated regions, a phenomenon known as the bystander effect. Subsequent investigations suggest that this effect may stem from the activation of anti-tumor T cells and the initiation of specific RCD mechanisms. These processes facilitate tumor eradication and, on occasion, may induce systemic bystander effects (154). Occasionally, radiation may also evoke autophagy-dependent cell death, serving as a damage control mechanism to eliminate compromised cells (155). Conversely, TMZ, an alkylating agent, inflicts DNA damage through alkyl group addition to DNA strands, culminating in cell death. The DNA damage response (DDR), particularly involving the p53 pathway, is activated during this process and leads to apoptosis. Notably, reports indicate that TMZ may also induce various forms of RCD, including necrosis, ferroptosis, and autophagy-dependent cell death (156). By leveraging these insights into radiation and TMZ-induced cell death pathways, there is potential to optimize glioblastoma treatment paradigms, thereby advancing therapeutic efficacy.

Future research endeavors may benefit from unraveling the collective dynamics among different RCD modalities. Concurrently, exploring the propagation of secondary RCD after initial cellular demise and the signal transduction of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) could provide fertile ground for pharmacological targeting.

In this immediate discourse, we focus on the interplay between autophagy and ferroptosis, particularly how autophagic mechanisms modulate the latter in response to external ferroptotic stimuli. Several studies have proposed the term “iron-dependent autophagy” to describe ferroptosis as a subset within the spectrum of autophagy. However, their distinct pathways require separate consideration; thus, this discourse will analyze their interrelation separately. Autophagy initiates ferroptosis by regulating intracellular levels of ROS, LIP, and lipid peroxides (52). Findings from these studies have primarily revolved around the xc, GPX4, and FTH systems. The phosphorylation of Beclin-1 by AMPK generates a complex with SLC7A11, thereby inhibiting its function as a Cys transporter and stimulating lipid peroxidation and iron metabolism (157). PNO1-induced autophagy enhances the synthesis and accumulation of intracellular glutamate, augmenting system Xc activity and preventing ferroptosis. Moreover, by preserving redox homeostasis, PNO1-autophagy metabolism activates system Xc responsible for cysteine synthesis and cell protection against ferroptosis (158). Owing to its interaction with distinct autophagy receptors, GPX4 has been demonstrated to be degraded following treatment with inducers of ferritin deposition or excessive copper, thereby instigating ferroptosis (159).

Within the contemporary oncological therapeutic landscape, the strategic coordination of two or more RCD pathways to combat tumor progression is increasingly evident. Lu01-m, identified as a natural compound, demonstrates a potential in stymieing prostate cancer proliferation and dissemination by propelling cells into G2/M phase arrest accompanied by DNA damage, thereby eliciting RCD pathways including necroptosis and autophagy (160). Cisplatin, a stalwart in lung cancer chemotherapy, has been documented to invoke caspase-3/GSDME-dependent pyroptosis in neoplastic cells, alongside the induction of ferroptosis through reduced glutathione levels and compromised glutathione peroxidase activity (95). Dihydroartemisinin (DHA), an artemisinin derivative, exerts its anti-tumorigenic effects by inducing cell cycle standstill and impairing angiogenesis, which culminates in the ferroptosis and apoptosis of malignant cells (161). Research by Farhan Basit and colleagues has underscored the role of BAY 87-2243, an inhibitor of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I, in unleashing mitochondrial dysregulation, augmented ROS accumulation, lipid peroxidation, and reduced glutathione stores to foster autophagosome formation and propel ferroptotic cell death in melanoma cells (162). In the context of ovarian cancer, an investigation by Rongjun Zhang et al. unveiled the DNA-damaging capabilities of a citrus-derived substance through upregulation of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase in a dose-dependent manner, which subsequently instigates autophagy and apoptosis. This substance also precipitates mitochondrial membrane potential diminution and ROS generation, facilitating pyroptotic cell demise (163).

The combined RCD effect has demonstrated utility in overcoming tumor resistance. Clinically, the concomitant use of resveratrol (RSV) with docetaxel (DTX) has been observed to suppress Bcl-2, amplify apoptosis, and necroptosis, thereby mitigating the drug resistance often associated with DTX monotherapy and elevating therapeutic efficacy (164). In the realm of triple-negative breast cancer, the combination of cetuximab with miR-155-5p antagonists can induce an increase in EGFR levels, promoting apoptosis and pyroptosis in breast cancer cells through the upregulation of GSDME-N and cleaved caspase-1, opening new possibilities for treatment (165).

While these insights predominantly derive from non-glioma malignancies potentially confined by the blood-brain barrier, similar therapeutic principles have been identified in glioma (Table 3). Yucheng Liu and colleagues have detailed an apoptotic regulatory cascade that starts with autophagy inhibition leading to mitochondrial turnover disruption, ROS amplification, DNA injury, p53 trans-activation, and culminating in apoptosis. Such suppression of autophagy propelled by TRPML1 modulation significantly hinders glioma cell proliferation. An ongoing clinical trial is investigating the synergistic impact of Haloperidol Tablets (HP) in conjunction with TMZ. TMZ has been reported to increase dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) expression, which can cause chemotherapy resistance. As a DRD2 antagonist, Haloperidol mitigates this mechanism and enhances GBM’s susceptibility to TMZ by inducing pathways of autophagy and ferroptosis (166).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. List the RCD pathway inhibitors or inducers that have been approved/are undergoing clinical trials.

In summary, the mechanisms and functions of individual RCD pathways have been relatively well studied and understood, and inhibitors for these pathways have been discovered and applied (Table 4). However, the common mechanisms and interactions among all RCD pathways have not yet been fully elucidated. This is mainly because research in these areas is still in its early stages and is constantly evolving, encompassing a range of processes from unique molecular signals to biological processes. Despite these challenges, our discussion has revealed potential commonalities among these RCD pathways, suggesting promising directions for future research. Our hope is that these exploratory pathways will bring about key advancements in the field of tumor targeted drug therapy (Figure 5).

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. A summary of small molecule inhibitors targeting key components of RCD.

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Explores potential commonalities among diverse RCD pathways. The intricate nature of RCD mechanisms remains an active area of investigation, with each pathway governed by distinct molecular signals and biological processes. As such, the full scope of autophagy-dependent cell death, ferroptosis, cuproptosis, anoikis, pyroptosis and immunogenic cell death remains to be elucidated. Nevertheless, certain fundamental characteristics might be common across these mechanisms, which include: Cellular stress response, encompassing the adaptation of proteins, lipids, DNA, and organellar structures to various forms of injury. ROS generation, where an excess can impair lipids, proteins, and DNA, hence functioning as a ubiquitous harbinger of cellular demise. Organelle dynamics involving mitochondria, lysosomes, and the endoplasmic reticulum that may engage in a coordinated response. Convergence of key molecular pathways, such as those involving tumor suppressor P53, the Bcl-2 protein family, and caspases. Perturbations in protein and lipid metabolism, which are increasingly recognized as contributors to RCD.

5 Conclusion and future perspectives

Currently, in glioma investigations, there is a primary emphasis on either enhancing or impeding the autophagy cascade for autophagy-dependent cell death. While ferroptosis studies have not gained as much prominence as in other tumor types, a subset has advanced to clinical evaluation. However, research into the modalities of cuproptosis and anoikis remains relatively scarce, with the majority confined to preliminary bioinformatics analyses.

Although different forms of RCD pathways may appear distinct, there is a close connection among them. Therefore, comprehensively studying and applying multiple mechanisms could potentially become a means of targeted therapy for glioma in the future.

By regulating autophagic processes, there is potential to improve therapeutic outcomes for glioma. Current studies mainly focus on related genes, pathways, and adhesion molecules; however, there are evident limitations due to the specific nature and location of glioma. In the future, drawing upon research strategies from other tumors and proposing relevant studies on anoikis and glioma could provide valuable insights for analyzing and modulating the tumor microenvironment of gliomas. Considering the accumulation and abnormal distribution of metal ions in glioma therapy, understanding the mechanisms of ferroptosis and cuproptosis holds significant therapeutic potential. Future studies could investigate the underlying mechanisms behind the abnormal accumulation of iron and copper ions in glioma cells, which would involve developing novel therapeutic strategies targeting these metal ions to regulate apoptosis, as well as evaluating their clinical efficacy and safety.

The continuous advancement of artificial intelligence has led to the increasing utilization of deep learning in the diagnosis, grading, typing, and prognosis prediction of gliomas. Lei Jin et al. employed deep learning techniques on slide images and molecular markers stained with hematoxylin and eosin to classify gliomas, achieving an accuracy rate of 86.5% at the slide level and 87.5% at the patient level (167). In a separate investigation, Chenhua Luo et al. extracted 512 histopathological features from HE stained slides and constructed a deep learning model based on histological images to forecast glioma recurrence and patients’ survival (168). Currently, there are four commonly used methods for detecting RCD: histopathological examination, immunohistochemical staining, Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP Nick End Labeling (TUNEL), and Annexin V/PI staining. Among these methods, one of the most prevalent approaches is to stain and microscopically observe biopsy or surgical excision tissue specimens in order to detect changes in cell morphology (169). In the future, the utilization of machine learning and deep learning algorithms to analyze vast medical image datasets, combined with artificial intelligence’s capability to identify and extract features associated with RCD, may present a viable method for predicting glioma cell apoptosis. Integrating such a method into the diagnosis and prognosis of gliomas holds the potential to significantly improve treatment outcomes for glioma patients.

Over the years, the concept of RCD has been proposed and extensively studied. However, current research primarily focuses on analyzing and constructing clinical prediction models through bioinformatics, which has its limitations. Relying solely on large-scale data analysis and statistical methods for research may lead to data overfitting where the model becomes overly complex and fails to accurately fit new data. Furthermore, these models are constructed based on predetermined assumptions as well as patterns derived from existing data, which may potentially overlook other essential factors and underlying mechanisms. Moreover, observations and reasoning that solely rely on population statistics often disregard individual differences and heterogeneity, thereby impeding the adoption of precision therapy. Although bioinformatics tools along with predictive models offer great potential in medical research and clinical practice, it is vital to recognize their limitations. It is necessary to make efforts towards addressing these limitations while optimizing the utilization of such models. In future advancements within this field, emphasis should be placed on conducting large-scale clinical trials as well as practical applications to assess and refine both the validity and reliability of said predictive models.

Author contributions

ML: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. XL: Writing – review & editing. CY: Writing – review & editing. XC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SY: Writing – review & editing. YC: Writing – review & editing. JZ (7th Author): Writing – review & editing. JX: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. QL: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. LC: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. SL: Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing. WX: Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing. JZ (13th Author): Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82072780), Sichuan Science and Technology Program (Grant No. 2022YFS0630), Sichuan medical youth innovation research project (Grant No. Q22044) Luzhou Science and Technology Program (2022-ZRK-184), Southwest Medical University Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (Grant No.202210632054, S202210632192), and Panzhihua Medical Research Center Project (Grant No. PYYZ- 2023-02 and PYYZ-2023-04).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

RCD, regulated cell death; PCD, programmed cell death; NCCD, Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death; ACD, accidental cell death; MPT, mitochondrial permeability transition; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; SLL, small lymphocytic lymphoma; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; WHO, World Health Organization; TMZ, temozolomide; NCOA4, nuclear receptor coactivator 4; LA, lipoic acid; CBD, cannabidiol; RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ARG, anoikis-related gene; Lnc RNA, long non-coding RNA; ROS, reactive oxygen species; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; PTE, Pterostilbene; CQ, chloroquine; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; mTOR, mammalian targets of rapamycin; AF, amentoflavone; LA, lipoic acid; EGF, epidermal growth factor; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; ATG, Autophagy-related gene; DAMP, damage-associated molecular pattern; DHA, dihydroartemisinin; RSV, resveratrol; HP, Haloperidol Tablets.

References

1. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. (2005) 352:987–96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043330

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Alexander BM, Cloughesy TF. Adult glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. (2017) 35:2402–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.0119

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Franceschi E, Reni M, Gatta G, Vecht C. Glioblastoma in adults. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. (2008) 67:139–52. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.02.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Kerr JF, Wyllie AH, Currie AR. Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics. Br J Cancer. (1972) 26:239–57. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1972.33

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Hengartner MO, Ellis RE, Horvitz HR. Caenorhabditis elegans gene ced-9 protects cells from programmed cell death. Nature. (1992) 356:494–9. doi: 10.1038/356494a0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ. (2018) 25:486–541. doi: 10.1038/s41418-017-0012-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Tang D, Kang R, Berghe TV, Vandenabeele P, Kroemer G. The molecular machinery of regulated cell death. Cell Res. (2019) 29:347–64. doi: 10.1038/s41422-019-0164-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Han L, Zhou J, Li L, Wu X, Shi Y, Cui W, et al. SLC1A5 enhances Malignant phenotypes through modulating ferroptosis status and immune microenvironment in glioma. Cell Death Dis. (2022) 13:1071. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-05526-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Tong S, Hong Y, Xu Y, Sun Q, Ye L, Cai J, et al. TFR2 regulates ferroptosis and enhances temozolomide chemo-sensitization in gliomas. Exp Cell Res. (2023) 424:113474. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2023.113474

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Tian YH, Jia LW, Liu ZF, Chen YH. LINC01087 inhibits glioma cell proliferation and migration, and increases cell apoptosis via miR-384/Bcl-2 axis. Aging (Albany NY). (2021) 13:20808–19. doi: 10.18632/aging.v13i16

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Feng J, Yao Z, Yang H, Ma J, Zhong X, Qin Y, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells expressing BMP2 suppress glioma stem cell growth and stemness through Bcl-2/Bax signaling. J Cancer Res Ther. (2022) 18:2033–40. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1983_21

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Tang JH, Yang L, Chen JX, Li QR, Zhu LR, Xu QF, et al. Bortezomib inhibits growth and sensitizes glioma to temozolomide (TMZ) via down-regulating the FOXM1-Survivin axis. Cancer Commun (Lond). (2019) 39:81. doi: 10.1186/s40880-019-0424-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Gao H, Liu Z, Xu W, Wang Q, Zhang C, Ding Y, et al. Pterostilbene promotes mitochondrial apoptosis and inhibits proliferation in glioma cells. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:6381. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85908-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Liu Y, Yaozu Z, Zhao H, Peng P, Tingbao Z, Jincao C. Inhibition of glioma cell growth and apoptosis induction through targeting wnt10B expression by pyrazolo[4,3-c]pyridine-4-one. Med Sci Monit. (2020) 26:e923912. doi: 10.12659/MSM.923912

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Roberts AW, Davids MS, Pagel JM, Kahl BS, Puvvada SD, Gerecitano JF, et al. Targeting BCL2 with venetoclax in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. (2016) 374:311–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513257

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. DiNardo CD, Jonas BA, Pullarkat V, Thirman MJ, Garcia JS, Wei AH, et al. Azacitidine and venetoclax in previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. (2020) 383:617–29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2012971

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Fischer K, Al-Sawaf O, Bahlo J, Fink AM, Tandon M, Dixon M, et al. Venetoclax and obinutuzumab in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. N Engl J Med. (2019) 380:2225–36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1815281

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Harrison SA, Goodman Z, Jabbar A, Vemulapalli R, Younes ZH, Freilich B, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of emricasan in patients with NASH and F1-F3 fibrosis. J Hepatol. (2020) 72:816–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.11.024

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J, Kayali Z, Harrison SA, Abdelmalek MF, Lawitz E, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of emricasan for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-related cirrhosis with severe portal hypertension. J Hepatol. (2020) 72:885–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.12.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. He J, Huang Z, He M, Liao J, Zhang Q, Wang S, et al. Circular RNA MAPK4 (circ-MAPK4) inhibits cell apoptosis via MAPK signaling pathway by sponging miR-125a-3p in gliomas. Mol Cancer. (2020) 19:17. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1120-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Wan S, Zhang G, Liu R, Abbas MN, Cui H. Pyroptosis, ferroptosis, and autophagy cross-talk in glioblastoma opens up new avenues for glioblastoma treatment. Cell Commun Signal. (2023) 21:115. doi: 10.1186/s12964-023-01108-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Levine B, Kroemer G. Biological functions of autophagy genes: A disease perspective. Cell. (2019) 176:11–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.048

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Klionsky DJ, Petroni G, Amaravadi RK, Baehrecke EH, Ballabio A, Boya P, et al. Autophagy in major human diseases. EMBO J. (2021) 40:e108863. doi: 10.15252/embj.2021108863

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Raeisi M, Zehtabi M, Velaei K, Fayyazpour P, Aghaei N, Mehdizadeh A. Anoikis in cancer: The role of lipid signaling. Cell Biol Int. (2022) 46:1717–28. doi: 10.1002/cbin.11896

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Tang D, Chen X, Kang R, Kroemer G. Ferroptosis: molecular mechanisms and health implications. Cell Res. (2021) 31:107–25. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-00441-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Chen X, Kang R, Kroemer G, Tang D. Broadening horizons: the role of ferroptosis in cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. (2021) 18:280–96. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-00462-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Chen L, Min J, Wang F. Copper homeostasis and cuproptosis in health and disease. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2022) 7:378. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01229-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Denton D, Kumar S. Autophagy-dependent cell death. Cell Death Differ. (2019) 26:605–16. doi: 10.1038/s41418-018-0252-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Taddei ML, Giannoni E, Fiaschi T, Chiarugi P. Anoikis: an emerging hallmark in health and diseases. J Pathol. (2012) 226:380–93. doi: 10.1002/path.3000

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Dubyak GR, Miller BA, Pearlman E. Pyroptosis in neutrophils: Multimodal integration of inflammasome and regulated cell death signaling pathways. Immunol Rev. (2023) 314:229–49. doi: 10.1111/imr.13186

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Kroemer G, Galassi C, Zitvogel L, Galluzzi L. Immunogenic cell stress and death. Nat Immunol. (2022) 23:487–500. doi: 10.1038/s41590-022-01132-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA, Figarella-Branger D, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol. (2021) 23:1231–51. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Xu S, Tang L, Li X, Fan F, Liu Z. Immunotherapy for glioma: Current management and future application. Cancer Lett. (2020) 476:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.02.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Zou W. Immunosuppressive networks in the tumour environment and their therapeutic relevance. Nat Rev Cancer. (2005) 5:263–74. doi: 10.1038/nrc1586

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Mohme M, Riethdorf S, Pantel K. Circulating and disseminated tumour cells - mechanisms of immune surveillance and escape. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. (2017) 14:155–67. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.144

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Curry RC, Dahiya S, Alva Venur V, Raizer JJ, Ahluwalia MS. Bevacizumab in high-grade gliomas: past, present, and future. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. (2015) 15:387–97. doi: 10.1586/14737140.2015.1028376

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Cloughesy TF, Mochizuki AY, Orpilla JR, Hugo W, Lee AH, Davidson TB, et al. Neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy promotes a survival benefit with intratumoral and systemic immune responses in recurrent glioblastoma. Nat Med. (2019) 25:477–86. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0337-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Zhao J, Chen AX, Gartrell RD, Silverman AM, Aparicio L, Chu T, et al. Immune and genomic correlates of response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in glioblastoma. Nat Med. (2019) 25:462–9. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0349-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Omuro A, Brandes AA, Carpentier AF, Idbaih A, Reardon DA, Cloughesy T, et al. Radiotherapy combined with nivolumab or temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma with unmethylated MGMT promoter: An international randomized phase III trial. Neuro Oncol. (2023) 25:123–34. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noac099

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Lang FF, Conrad C, Gomez-Manzano C, Yung WKA, Sawaya R, Weinberg JS, et al. Phase I study of DNX-2401 (Delta-24-RGD) oncolytic adenovirus: replication and immunotherapeutic effects in recurrent Malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol. (2018) 36:1419–27. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.8219

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Liau LM, Ashkan K, Brem S, Campian JL, Trusheim JE, Iwamoto FM, et al. Association of autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccination with extension of survival among patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma: A phase 3 prospective externally controlled cohort trial. JAMA Oncol. (2023) 9:112–21. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5370

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Fridman WH, Teillaud JL. [From the time in the wilderness to the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine awarded to James Allison and Tasuku Honjo: the Long March of cancer immunotherapy]. Med Sci (Paris). (2019) 35:367–73. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2019074

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Peng F, Liao M, Qin R, Zhu S, Peng C, Fu L, et al. Regulated cell death (RCD) in cancer: key pathways and targeted therapies. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2022) 7:286. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01110-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Klionsky DJ, Emr SD. Autophagy as a regulated pathway of cellular degradation. Science. (2000) 290:1717–21. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5497.1717

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Tsukada M, Ohsumi Y. Isolation and characterization of autophagy-defective mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. (1993) 333:169–74. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80398-E

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Thumm M, Egner R, Koch B, Schlumpberger M, Straub M, Veenhuis M, et al. Isolation of autophagocytosis mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. (1994) 349:275–80. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00672-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Li X, He S, Ma B. Autophagy and autophagy-related proteins in cancer. Mol Cancer. (2020) 19:12. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-1138-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Klionsky DJ, Abdelmohsen K, Abe A, Abedin MJ, Abeliovich H, Acevedo Arozena A, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition). Autophagy. (2016) 12:1–222. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Yang Z, Klionsky DJ. Eaten alive: a history of macroautophagy. Nat Cell Biol. (2010) 12:814–22. doi: 10.1038/ncb0910-814

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Kang R, Tang D. Autophagy and ferroptosis - what’s the connection? Curr Pathobiol Rep. (2017) 5:153–9. doi: 10.1007/s40139-017-0139-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Hou W, Xie Y, Song X, Sun X, Lotze MT, Zeh HJ 3rd, et al. Autophagy promotes ferroptosis by degradation of ferritin. Autophagy. (2016) 12:1425–8. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1187366

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Gao M, Monian P, Pan Q, Zhang W, Xiang J, Jiang X. Ferroptosis is an autophagic cell death process. Cell Res. (2016) 26:1021–32. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.95

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Liu X, Zhao P, Wang X, Wang L, Zhu Y, Song Y, et al. Celastrol mediates autophagy and apoptosis via the ROS/JNK and Akt/mTOR signaling pathways in glioma cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2019) 38:184. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1173-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Chu CW, Ko HJ, Chou CH, Cheng TS, Cheng HW, Liang YH, et al. Thioridazine enhances P62-mediated autophagy and apoptosis through wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in glioma cells. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:473. doi: 10.3390/ijms20030473

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Zielke S, Meyer N, Mari M, Abou-El-Ardat K, Reggiori F, van Wijk SJL, et al. Loperamide, pimozide, and STF-62247 trigger autophagy-dependent cell death in glioblastoma cells. Cell Death Dis. (2018) 9:994. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-1003-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Chen Y, Li N, Wang H, Wang N, Peng H, Wang J, et al. Amentoflavone suppresses cell proliferation and induces cell death through triggering autophagy-dependent ferroptosis in human glioma. Life Sci. (2020) 247:117425. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117425

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Yu Y, Song Y, Cheng L, Chen L, Liu B, Lu D, et al. CircCEMIP promotes anoikis-resistance by enhancing protective autophagy in prostate cancer cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2022) 41:188. doi: 10.1186/s13046-022-02381-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Wang YN, Zeng ZL, Lu J, Wang Y, Liu ZX, He MM, et al. CPT1A-mediated fatty acid oxidation promotes colorectal cancer cell metastasis by inhibiting anoikis. Oncogene. (2018) 37:6025–40. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0384-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Ashrafizadeh M, Mohammadinejad R, Tavakol S, Ahmadi Z, Roomiani S, Katebi M. Autophagy, anoikis, ferroptosis, necroptosis, and endoplasmic reticulum stress: Potential applications in melanoma therapy. J Cell Physiol. (2019) 234:19471–9. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28740

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Sun Z, Zhao Y, Wei Y, Ding X, Tan C, Wang C. Identification and validation of an anoikis-associated gene signature to predict clinical character, stemness, IDH mutation, and immune filtration in glioblastoma. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:939523. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.939523

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Zhang D, Wang Y, Zhou H, Han X, Hou L, Lv Z, et al. The study of an anoikis-related signature to predict glioma prognosis and immune infiltration. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. (2023) 149:12659–76. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05138-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Dai W, Tian C, Jin S. Effect of lncRNA ANRIL silencing on anoikis and cell cycle in human glioma via microRNA-203a. Onco Targets Ther. (2018) 11:5103–9. doi: 10.2147/OTT

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Jiang L, Chen S, Zhao D, Yan J, Chen J, Yang C, et al. MNX1 reduces sensitivity to anoikis by activating TrkB in human glioma cells. Mol Med Rep. (2018) 18:3271–9. doi: 10.3892/mmr

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, Skouta R, Zaitsev EM, Gleason CE, et al. Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. (2012) 149:1060–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.042

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Mahoney-Sánchez L, Bouchaoui H, Ayton S, Devos D, Duce JA, Devedjian JC. Ferroptosis and its potential role in the physiopathology of Parkinson’s Disease. Prog Neurobiol. (2021) 196:101890. doi: 10.1038/s41418-021-00785-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Ma H, Dong Y, Chu Y, Guo Y, Li L. The mechanisms of ferroptosis and its role in alzheimer’s disease. Front Mol Biosci. (2022) 9:965064. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.965064

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Fang X, Ardehali H, Min J, Wang F. The molecular and metabolic landscape of iron and ferroptosis in cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2023) 20:7–23. doi: 10.1038/s41569-022-00735-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Yu Y, Jiang L, Wang H, Shen Z, Cheng Q, Zhang P, et al. Hepatic transferrin plays a role in systemic iron homeostasis and liver ferroptosis. Blood. (2020) 136:726–39. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019002907

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Lu M, Zhou Y, Sun L, Shafi S, Ahmad N, Sun M, et al. The molecular mechanisms of ferroptosis and its role in glioma progression and treatment. Front Oncol. (2022) 12:917537. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.917537

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Luo Y, Tian G, Fang X, Bai S, Yuan G, Pan Y. Ferroptosis and its potential role in glioma: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Antioxidants (Basel). (2022) 11:2123. doi: 10.3390/antiox11112123

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Zlotos DP, Mandour YM, Jensen AA. Strychnine and its mono- and dimeric analogues: a pharmaco-chemical perspective. Nat Prod Rep. (2022) 39:1910–37. doi: 10.1039/D1NP00079A

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Lu S, Wang XZ, He C, Wang L, Liang SP, Wang CC, et al. ATF3 contributes to brucine-triggered glioma cell ferroptosis via promotion of hydrogen peroxide and iron. Acta Pharmacol Sin. (2021) 42:1690–702. doi: 10.1038/s41401-021-00700-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Li K, Chen B, Xu A, Shen J, Li K, Hao K, et al. TRIM7 modulates NCOA4-mediated ferritinophagy and ferroptosis in glioblastoma cells. Redox Biol. (2022) 56:102451. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102451

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Liu T, Zhu C, Chen X, Guan G, Zou C, Shen S, et al. Ferroptosis, as the most enriched programmed cell death process in glioma, induces immunosuppression and immunotherapy resistance. Neuro Oncol. (2022) 24:1113–25. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noac033

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Zhan S, Lu L, Pan SS, Wei XQ, Miao RR, Liu XH, et al. Targeting NQO1/GPX4-mediated ferroptosis by plumbagin suppresses in vitro and in vivo glioma growth. Br J Cancer. (2022) 127:364–76. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01800-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Wang Y, Zhang L, Zhou F. Cuproptosis: a new form of programmed cell death. Cell Mol Immunol. (2022) 19:867–8. doi: 10.1038/s41423-022-00866-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Tsvetkov P, Coy S, Petrova B, Dreishpoon M, Verma A, Abdusamad M, et al. Copper induces cell death by targeting lipoylated TCA cycle proteins. Science. (2022) 375:1254–61. doi: 10.1126/science.abf0529

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Chen B, Zhou X, Yang L, Zhou H, Meng M, Zhang L, et al. A Cuproptosis Activation Scoring model predicts neoplasm-immunity interactions and personalized treatments in glioma. Comput Biol Med. (2022) 148:105924. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105924

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Wang L, Li Y, Wang Y, Li J, Sun Y, Chen J, et al. Identification of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs for prognosis and immunotherapy in glioma. J Cell Mol Med. (2022) 26:5820–31. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17603

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Lu H, Zhou L, Zhang B, Xie Y, Yang H, Wang Z. Cuproptosis key gene FDX1 is a prognostic biomarker and associated with immune infiltration in glioma. Front Med (Lausanne). (2022) 9:939776. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.939776

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Guowei L, Xiufang L, Qianqian X, Yanping J. The FDX1 methylation regulatory mechanism in the Malignant phenotype of glioma. Genomics. (2023) 115:110601. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2023.110601

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Al Mamun A, Mimi AA, Aziz MA, Zaeem M, Ahmed T, Munir F, et al. Role of pyroptosis in cancer and its therapeutic regulation. Eur J Pharmacol. (2021) 910:174444. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174444

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Tanzhu G, Li N, Li Z, Zhou R, Shen L. Molecular subtypes and prognostic signature of pyroptosis-related lncRNAs in glioma patients. Front Oncol. (2022) 12:779168. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.779168

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Liu H, Tao T. Prognosis and immune features of pyroptosis-related RNA patterns in low-grade glioma. Front Oncol. (2022) 12:1015850. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1015850

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Guo K, Zhao J, Jin Q, Yan H, Shi Y, Zhao Z. CASP6 predicts poor prognosis in glioma and correlates with tumor immune microenvironment. Front Oncol. (2022) 12:818283. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.818283

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Xiu Z, Sun T, Yang Y, He Y, Yang S, Xue X, et al. Curcumin enhanced ionizing radiation-induced immunogenic cell death in glioma cells through endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling pathways. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2022) 2022:5424411. doi: 10.1155/2022/5424411

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Cui J, Xu H, Shi J, Fang K, Liu J, Liu F, et al. Carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitor S4 triggers release of DAMPs related to immunogenic cell death in glioma cells via endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway. Cell Commun Signal. (2023) 21:167. doi: 10.1186/s12964-023-01180-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Hou C, Shi S, Gao M, Ji J, Ma C, Wang T, et al. Targeting TNFAIP2 induces immunogenic cell death and sensitizes glioblastoma multiforme to anti-PD-1 therapy. J Neurooncol. (2023) 165:79–90. doi: 10.1007/s11060-023-04449-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Cai J, Hu Y, Ye Z, Ye L, Gao L, Wang Y, et al. Immunogenic cell death-related risk signature predicts prognosis and characterizes the tumour microenvironment in lower-grade glioma. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:1011757. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1011757

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Sun Z, Jiang H, Yan T, Deng G, Chen Q. Identification of immunogenic cell death-related signature for glioma to predict survival and response to immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel). (2022) 14:5665. doi: 10.3390/cancers14225665

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Kashyap D, Garg VK, Goel N. Intrinsic and extrinsic pathways of apoptosis: Role in cancer development and prognosis. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. (2021) 125:73–120. doi: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2021.01.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Panada J, Klopava V, Kulahava T, Koran S, Faletrov Y, Frolova N, et al. Differential induction of C6 glioma apoptosis and autophagy by 3β-hydroxysteroid-indolamine conjugates. Steroids. (2023) 200:109326. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2023.109326

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Martens S, Bridelance J, Roelandt R, Vandenabeele P, Takahashi N. MLKL in cancer: more than a necroptosis regulator. Cell Death Differ. (2021) 28:1757–72. doi: 10.1038/s41418-021-00785-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Sun L, Wang H, Wang Z, He S, Chen S, Liao D, et al. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein mediates necrosis signaling downstream of RIP3 kinase. Cell. (2012) 148:213–27. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.031

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Zhang CC, Li CG, Wang YF, Xu LH, He XH, Zeng QZ, et al. Chemotherapeutic paclitaxel and cisplatin differentially induce pyroptosis in A549 lung cancer cells via caspase-3/GSDME activation. Apoptosis. (2019) 24:312–25. doi: 10.1007/s10495-019-01515-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Erkes DA, Cai W, Sanchez IM, Purwin TJ, Rogers C, Field CO, et al. Mutant BRAF and MEK inhibitors regulate the tumor immune microenvironment via pyroptosis. Cancer Discovery. (2020) 10:254–69. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0672

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Zheng M, Kanneganti TD. The regulation of the ZBP1-NLRP3 inflammasome and its implications in pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis (PANoptosis). Immunol Rev. (2020) 297:26–38. doi: 10.1111/imr.12909

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Wang H, Guo M, Wei H, Chen Y. Targeting p53 pathways: mechanisms, structures, and advances in therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2023) 8:92. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01347-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Rochette L, Dogon G, Rigal E, Zeller M, Cottin Y, Vergely C. Lipid peroxidation and iron metabolism: two corner stones in the homeostasis control of ferroptosis. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 24:449. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010449

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Yan Z, Qi W, Zhan J, Lin Z, Lin J, Xue X, et al. Activating Nrf2 signalling alleviates osteoarthritis development by inhibiting inflammasome activation. J Cell Mol Med. (2020) 24:13046–57. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15905

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Ahmed SM, Luo L, Namani A, Wang XJ, Tang X. Nrf2 signaling pathway: Pivotal roles in inflammation. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. (2017) 1863:585–97. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.11.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Laplante M, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell. (2012) 149:274–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Bryant KL, Stalnecker CA, Zeitouni D, Klomp JE, Peng S, Tikunov AP, et al. Combination of ERK and autophagy inhibition as a treatment approach for pancreatic cancer. Nat Med. (2019) 25:628–40. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0368-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Rosenfeld MR, Ye X, Supko JG, Desideri S, Grossman SA, Brem S, et al. A phase I/II trial of hydroxychloroquine in conjunction with radiation therapy and concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. Autophagy. (2014) 10:1359–68. doi: 10.4161/auto.28984

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Zhou W, Wang H, Yang Y, Chen ZS, Zou C, Zhang J. Chloroquine against malaria, cancers and viral diseases. Drug Discovery Today. (2020) 25:2012–22. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.09.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Koch MW, Kaur S, Sage K, Kim J, Levesque-Roy M, Cerchiaro G, et al. Hydroxychloroquine for primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. (2021) 90:940–8. doi: 10.1002/ana.26239

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Zhang J, Lu X, Feng J, Li H, Wang S. Effects of hydroxychloroquine on proteinuria in igA nephropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BioMed Res Int. (2021) 2021:9171715. doi: 10.1155/2021/9171715

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, Hoang VT, Meddeb L, Mailhe M, et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents. (2020) 56:105949. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Compter I, Eekers DBP, Hoeben A, Rouschop KMA, Reymen B, Ackermans L, et al. Chloroquine combined with concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a phase IB trial. Autophagy. (2021) 17:2604–12. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1816343

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Xu B, Huo Z, Huang H, Ji W, Bian Z, Jiao J, et al. The expression and prognostic value of the epidermal growth factor receptor family in glioma. BMC Cancer. (2021) 21:451. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08150-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Scott KA, Dalgleish AG, Liu WM. The combination of cannabidiol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol enhances the anticancer effects of radiation in an orthotopic murine glioma model. Mol Cancer Ther. (2014) 13:2955–67. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0402

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Lopez J, Lai-Kwon J, Molife R, Welsh L, Tunariu N, Roda D, et al. A Phase 1/2A trial of idroxioleic acid: first-in-class sphingolipid regulator and glioma cell autophagy inducer with antitumor activity in refractory glioma. Br J Cancer. (2023) 129:811–8. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02356-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Hwang S, Maloney NS, Bruinsma MW, Goel G, Duan E, Zhang L, et al. Nondegradative role of Atg5-Atg12/Atg16L1 autophagy protein complex in antiviral activity of interferon gamma. Cell Host Microbe. (2012) 11:397–409. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.03.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Hamaoui D, Subtil A. ATG16L1 functions in cell homeostasis beyond autophagy. FEBS J. (2022) 289:1779–800. doi: 10.1111/febs.15833

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Chen J, Liang Y, Hu S, Jiang J, Zeng M, Luo M. Role of ATG7-dependent non-autophagic pathway in angiogenesis. Front Pharmacol. (2023) 14:1266311. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1266311

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Fleischmann DF, Schön R, Corradini S, Bodensohn R, Hadi I, Hofmaier J, et al. Multifocal high-grade glioma radiotherapy safety and efficacy. Radiat Oncol. (2021) 16:165. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01886-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Kyjacova L, Hubackova S, Krejcikova K, Strauss R, Hanzlikova H, Dzijak R, et al. Radiotherapy-induced plasticity of prostate cancer mobilizes stem-like non-adherent, Erk signaling-dependent cells. Cell Death Differ. (2015) 22:898–911. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.97

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

118. da SSR, de SLT, da Silva CT, Gonçalves JD, Lerario AM, Marie SKN, et al. Cellular model of Malignant transformation of primary human astrocytes induced by deadhesion/readhesion cycles. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:4471. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094471

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Zhao S, Chi H, Ji W, He Q, Lai G, Peng G, et al. A bioinformatics-based analysis of an anoikis-related gene signature predicts the prognosis of patients with low-grade gliomas. Brain Sci. (2022) 12:1349. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12101349

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Viswanathan VS, Ryan MJ, Dhruv HD, Gill S, Eichhoff OM, Seashore-Ludlow B, et al. Dependency of a therapy-resistant state of cancer cells on a lipid peroxidase pathway. Nature. (2017) 547:453–7. doi: 10.1038/nature23007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Zhang C, Liu X, Jin S, Chen Y, Guo R. Ferroptosis in cancer therapy: a novel approach to reversing drug resistance. Mol Cancer. (2022) 21:47. doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01530-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Su Y, Zhao B, Zhou L, Zhang Z, Shen Y, Lv H, et al. Ferroptosis, a novel pharmacological mechanism of anti-cancer drugs. Cancer Lett. (2020) 483:127–36. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.02.015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Yang Y, Tian Q, Wu S, Li Y, Yang K, Yan Y, et al. Blue light-triggered Fe(2+)-release from monodispersed ferrihydrite nanoparticles for cancer iron therapy. Biomaterials. (2021) 271:120739. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120739

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Zhuo S, Chen Z, Yang Y, Zhang J, Tang J, Yang K. Clinical and biological significances of a ferroptosis-related gene signature in glioma. Front Oncol. (2020) 10:590861. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.590861

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Wan RJ, Peng W, Xia QX, Zhou HH, Mao XY. Ferroptosis-related gene signature predicts prognosis and immunotherapy in glioma. CNS Neurosci Ther. (2021) 27:973–86. doi: 10.1111/cns.13654

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Wang F, Lin H, Su Q, Li C. Cuproptosis-related lncRNA predict prognosis and immune response of lung adenocarcinoma. World J Surg Oncol. (2022) 20:275. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02727-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Zou Y, Xie J, Zheng S, Liu W, Tang Y, Tian W, et al. Leveraging diverse cell-death patterns to predict the prognosis and drug sensitivity of triple-negative breast cancer patients after surgery. Int J Surg. (2022) 107:106936. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106936

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Zhao C, Yu D, He Z, Bao L, Feng L, Chen L, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated autophagy activation is involved in cadmium-induced ferroptosis of renal tubular epithelial cells. Free Radic Biol Med. (2021) 175:236–48. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.09.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Li X, Abdel-Moneim AE, Yang B. Signaling pathways and genes associated with hexavalent chromium-induced hepatotoxicity. Biol Trace Elem Res. (2023) 201:1888–904. doi: 10.1007/s12011-022-03291-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Leussink BT, Nagelkerke JF, van de Water B, Slikkerveer A, van der Voet GB, Srinivasan A, et al. Pathways of proximal tubular cell death in bismuth nephrotoxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. (2002) 180:100–9. doi: 10.1006/taap.2002.9379

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Tyagi A, Chandrasekaran B, Navin AK, Shukla V, Baby BV, Ankem MK, et al. Molecular interplay between NOX1 and autophagy in cadmium-induced prostate carcinogenesis. Free Radic Biol Med. (2023) 199:44–55. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2023.02.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Gravina AG, Priadko K, Granata L, Facchiano A, Scidà G, Cerbone R, et al. Single capsule bismuth quadruple therapy for eradication of H. pylori infection: A real-life study. Front Pharmacol. (2021) 12:667584. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.667584

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Rao Z, Zhu Y, Yang P, Chen Z, Xia Y, Qiao C, et al. Pyroptosis in inflammatory diseases and cancer. Theranostics. (2022) 12:4310–29. doi: 10.7150/thno.71086

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Ren LW, Li W, Zheng XJ, Liu JY, Yang YH, Li S, et al. Benzimidazoles induce concurrent apoptosis and pyroptosis of human glioblastoma cells via arresting cell cycle. Acta Pharmacol Sin. (2022) 43:194–208. doi: 10.1038/s41401-021-00752-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Zhao W, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Jiang Z, Lu H, Xie Y, et al. The CDK inhibitor AT7519 inhibits human glioblastoma cell growth by inducing apoptosis, pyroptosis and cell cycle arrest. Cell Death Dis. (2023) 14:11. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-05528-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Tang N, Zhu Y, Yu J. Xihuang pill facilitates glioma cell pyroptosis via the POU4F1/STAT3 axis. Funct Integr Genomics. (2023) 23:334. doi: 10.1007/s10142-023-01263-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Moserova I, Truxova I, Garg AD, Tomala J, Agostinis P, Cartron PF, et al. Caspase-2 and oxidative stress underlie the immunogenic potential of high hydrostatic pressure-induced cancer cell death. Oncoimmunology. (2017) 6:e1258505. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1258505

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

138. Buytaert E, Callewaert G, Hendrickx N, Scorrano L, Hartmann D, Missiaen L, et al. Role of endoplasmic reticulum depletion and multidomain proapoptotic BAX and BAK proteins in shaping cell death after hypericin-mediated photodynamic therapy. FASEB J. (2006) 20:756–8. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-4305fje

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Dewaele M, Martinet W, Rubio N, Verfaillie T, de Witte PA, Piette J, et al. Autophagy pathways activated in response to PDT contribute to cell resistance against ROS damage. J Cell Mol Med. (2011) 15:1402–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01118.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

140. Wang F, Xu L, Wen B, Song S, Zhou Y, Wu H, et al. Ultrasound-excited temozolomide sonosensitization induces necroptosis in glioblastoma. Cancer Lett. (2023) 554:216033. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.216033

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

141. Zhou Y, Jiao J, Yang R, Wen B, Wu Q, Xu L, et al. Temozolomide-based sonodynamic therapy induces immunogenic cell death in glioma. Clin Immunol. (2023) 256:109772. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2023.109772

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

142. Koks CA, Garg AD, Ehrhardt M, Riva M, Vandenberk L, Boon L, et al. Newcastle disease virotherapy induces long-term survival and tumor-specific immune memory in orthotopic glioma through the induction of immunogenic cell death. Int J Cancer. (2015) 136:E313–25. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29202

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

143. Kepp O, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. Lurbinectedin: an FDA-approved inducer of immunogenic cell death for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. Oncoimmunology. (2020) 9:1795995. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1795995

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

144. Xie W, Forveille S, Iribarren K, Sauvat A, Senovilla L, Wang Y, et al. Lurbinectedin synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade to generate anticancer immunity. Oncoimmunology. (2019) 8:e1656502. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2019.1656502

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

145. Montes de Oca R, Alavi AS, Vitali N, Bhattacharya S, Blackwell C, Patel K, et al. Belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916) drives immunogenic cell death and immune-mediated antitumor responses in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther. (2021) 20:1941–55. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-21-0035

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

146. Galluzzi L, Blomgren K, Kroemer G. Mitochondrial membrane permeabilization in neuronal injury. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2009) 10:481–94. doi: 10.1038/nrn2665

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

147. Lee Y, Karuppagounder SS, Shin JH, Lee YI, Ko HS, Swing D, et al. Parthanatos mediates AIMP2-activated age-dependent dopaminergic neuronal loss. Nat Neurosci. (2013) 16:1392–400. doi: 10.1038/nn.3500

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

148. Liu Y, Shoji-Kawata S, Sumpter RM Jr., Wei Y, Ginet V, Zhang L, et al. Autosis is a Na+,K+-ATPase-regulated form of cell death triggered by autophagy-inducing peptides, starvation, and hypoxia-ischemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2013) 110:20364–71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319661110

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

149. Koren E, Fuchs Y. Modes of regulated cell death in cancer. Cancer Discovery. (2021) 11:245–65. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0789

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

150. Galluzzi L, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Kepp O, Kroemer G. Regulated cell death and adaptive stress responses. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2016) 73:2405–10. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2209-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

151. Meyer N, Henkel L, Linder B, Zielke S, Tascher G, Trautmann S, et al. Autophagy activation, lipotoxicity and lysosomal membrane permeabilization synergize to promote pimozide- and loperamide-induced glioma cell death. Autophagy. (2021) 17:3424–43. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.1874208

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

152. Battaglia AM, Chirillo R, Aversa I, Sacco A, Costanzo F, Biamonte F. Ferroptosis and cancer: mitochondria meet the “Iron maiden” Cell death. Cells. (2020) 9:1505. doi: 10.3390/cells9061505

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

153. Baskar R, Lee KA, Yeo R, Yeoh KW. Cancer and radiation therapy: current advances and future directions. Int J Med Sci. (2012) 9:193–9. doi: 10.7150/ijms.3635

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

154. Rodríguez-Ruiz ME, Vanpouille-Box C, Melero I, Formenti SC, Demaria S. Immunological mechanisms responsible for radiation-induced abscopal effect. Trends Immunol. (2018) 39:644–55. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2018.06.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

155. Kuwahara Y, Tomita K, Urushihara Y, Sato T, Kurimasa A, Fukumoto M. Association between radiation-induced cell death and clinically relevant radioresistance. Histochem Cell Biol. (2018) 150:649–59. doi: 10.1007/s00418-018-1728-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

156. Chiang IT, Liu YC, Liu HS, Ali AAA, Chou SY, Hsu TI, et al. Regorafenib reverses temozolomide-induced CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling and triggers apoptosis mechanism in glioblastoma. Neurotherapeutics. (2022) 19:616–34. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01194-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

157. Song X, Zhu S, Chen P, Hou W, Wen Q, Liu J, et al. AMPK-mediated BECN1 phosphorylation promotes ferroptosis by directly blocking system X(c)(-) activity. Curr Biol. (2018) 28:2388–2399.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.094

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

158. Hu X, He Y, Han Z, Liu W, Liu D, Zhang X, et al. PNO1 inhibits autophagy-mediated ferroptosis by GSH metabolic reprogramming in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. (2022) 13:1010. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-05448-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

159. Xue Q, Yan D, Chen X, Li X, Kang R, Klionsky DJ, et al. Copper-dependent autophagic degradation of GPX4 drives ferroptosis. Autophagy. (2023) 19:1982–96. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2023.2165323

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

160. Lin HY, Lin YS, Shih SP, Lee SB, El-Shazly M, Chang KM, et al. The Anti-Proliferative Activity of Secondary Metabolite from the Marine Streptomyces sp. against Prostate Cancer Cells. Life (Basel). (2021) 11:1414. doi: 10.3390/life11121414

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

161. Lin R, Zhang Z, Chen L, Zhou Y, Zou P, Feng C, et al. Dihydroartemisinin (DHA) induces ferroptosis and causes cell cycle arrest in head and neck carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. (2016) 381:165–75. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.07.033

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

162. Basit F, van Oppen LM, Schöckel L, Bossenbroek HM, van Emst-de Vries SE, Hermeling JC, et al. Mitochondrial complex I inhibition triggers a mitophagy-dependent ROS increase leading to necroptosis and ferroptosis in melanoma cells. Cell Death Dis. (2017) 8:e2716. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.133

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

163. Zhang R, Chen J, Mao L, Guo Y, Hao Y, Deng Y, et al. Nobiletin triggers reactive oxygen species-mediated pyroptosis through regulating autophagy in ovarian cancer cells. J Agric Food Chem. (2020) 68:1326–36. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b07908

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

164. Lee SH, Lee YJ. Synergistic anticancer activity of resveratrol in combination with docetaxel in prostate carcinoma cells. Nutr Res Pract. (2021) 15:12–25. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2021.15.1.12

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

165. Liu JH, Yang Y, Song Q, Li JB. MicroRNA-155regulates the proliferation and metastasis of human breast cancers by targeting MAPK7. J buon. (2019) 24:1075–80.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

166. Liu Y, Wang X, Zhu W, Sui Z, Wei X, Zhang Y, et al. TRPML1-induced autophagy inhibition triggers mitochondrial mediated apoptosis. Cancer Lett. (2022) 541:215752. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.215752

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

167. Jin L, Shi F, Chun Q, Chen H, Ma Y, Wu S, et al. Artificial intelligence neuropathologist for glioma classification using deep learning on hematoxylin and eosin stained slide images and molecular markers. Neuro Oncol. (2021) 23:44–52. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa163

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

168. Luo C, Yang J, Liu Z, Jing D. Predicting the recurrence and overall survival of patients with glioma based on histopathological images using deep learning. Front Neurol. (2023) 14:1100933. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1100933

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

169. Obeng E. Apoptosis (programmed cell death) and its signals - A review. Braz J Biol. (2021) 81:1133–43. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.228437

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: glioma, autophagy-dependent cell death, anoikis, ferroptosis, cuproptosis, pyroptosis, immunogenic cell death, regulated cell death

Citation: Luo M, Luan X, Yang C, Chen X, Yuan S, Cao Y, Zhang J, Xie J, Luo Q, Chen L, Li S, Xiang W and Zhou J (2024) Revisiting the potential of regulated cell death in glioma treatment: a focus on autophagy-dependent cell death, anoikis, ferroptosis, cuproptosis, pyroptosis, immunogenic cell death, and the crosstalk between them. Front. Oncol. 14:1397863. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1397863

Received: 08 March 2024; Accepted: 22 July 2024;
Published: 09 August 2024.

Edited by:

Gerardo Caruso, University Hospital of Policlinico G. Martino, Italy

Reviewed by:

Prakashbabu Phanithi, University of Hyderabad, India
Suyasha Roy, National Institutes of Health (NIH), United States

Copyright © 2024 Luo, Luan, Yang, Chen, Yuan, Cao, Zhang, Xie, Luo, Chen, Li, Xiang and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Wei Xiang, c2N4aWFuZ3dlaTIzQDE2My5jb20=; Jie Zhou, emhvdWppZUBzd211LmVkdS5jbg==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.