Gilles Houvenaeghel1*
Monique Cohen1
Anthony Gonçalves2Axel Berthelot2Marie Pierre Chauvet3Christelle Faure4Jean Marc Classe5Eva Jouve6Laura Sabiani1Marie Bannier1Louis Tassy2Marc Martino1Agnès Tallet7
Alexandre de Nonneville2- 1Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), Institut Paoli−Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INSERM, Marseille, France
- 2Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), Institut Paoli−Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INSERM, Marseille, France
- 3Surgical Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
- 4Surgical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- 5Institut René Gauducheau, Site hospitalier Nord, St Herblain, France
- 6Surgical Oncology Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
- 7Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), Institut Paoli−Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INSERM, Marseille, France
Background: Elderly breast cancer (BC) patients have been underrepresented in clinical trials whereas ~60% of deaths from BC occur in women aged 70 years and older. Only limited data are available on the prognostic impact of age according to treatment, especially in the triple-negative (TN) and Her2-positive because of the lower frequency of these subtypes in elderly patients. We report herein the results of a multicenter retrospective study analyzing the prognostic impact of age according to treatment delivered in TN and Her2-positive BC patients of 70 years or older, including comparison by age groups.
Methods: The medical records of 31,473 patients treated from January 1991 to December 2018 were retrieved from 13 French cancer centers for retrospective analysis. Our study population included all ≥70 patients with TN or Her2-positive BC treated by upfront surgery. Three age categories were determined: 70-74, 75-80, and > 80 years.
Results: Of 528 patients included, 243 patients were 70-74 years old (46%), 172 were 75-80 years (32.6%) and 113 were >80 years (21.4%). Half the population (51.9%, 274 patients) were TN, 30.1% (159) Her2-positive/hormone receptors (HR)-positive, and, 18% (95) Her2-positive/endocrine receptors (ER)-negative BC. Advanced tumor stage was associated with older age but no other prognostic factors (tumor subtype, tumor grade, LVI). Adjuvant chemotherapy delivery was inversely proportional to age. With 49 months median follow-up, all patient outcomes (overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS)) significantly decreased as age increased. In multivariate analysis, age >80, pT2-3 sizes, axillary macrometastases, lymphovascular involvement, and HR-negativity tumor negatively affected DFS and OS. Comparison between age >80 and <=80 years old showed worse RFS in patients aged > 80 (HR=1.771, p=0.031).
Conclusion: TN and Her2-positive subtypes occur at similar frequency in elderly patients. Older age is associated with more advanced tumor stage presentation. Chemotherapy use decreases with older age without worse other pejorative prognostic factors. Age >80, but not ≤80, independently affected DFS and OS.
Highlights:
● TN and Her2-positive subtypes occur at a similar frequency in elderly patients
● Older age is associated with more advanced tumor stage presentation
● Chemotherapy use decreases with older age without worse other pejorative prognostic factors.
● Age >80, but not ≤80, independently affected DFS and OS.
Introduction
Breast cancer (BC) incidence increases with age and more than one-third of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer are aged 65 years or older (1). Although not fully consensual, a patient is considered elderly after the age of 70 according to several international recommendations (2). Between 1990 and 2023, the annual number of new BC in women doubled in France from 29,934 to 61,214 annual cases (+104%) (3). Half of this increase is attributable to population growth and aging (+26% and +21%, respectively). Age-specific trends show an average increase in breast cancer of approximately +1% per year for all ages, except for women in their 70s, for whom the increase is greater (+1.9%) (4). The decrease in breast cancer mortality is the result of major therapeutic advances (hormone therapy, taxanes, and anti-Her2 targeted therapy) associated with an increase in the proportion of cancers diagnosed at an early stage, notably through organized screening. However, this benefit in mortality appears to be less obvious in the elderly patient and 60% of deaths related to breast cancer occur in women aged 65 and over (4).
Elderly patients present more advanced BC, partly due to the absence of systemic screening (5, 6), display higher rates of hormone receptors (HR)-positive/Her2-negative cases than younger cohorts such as those included in pivotal studies (7), with higher triple-negative (TN) BC and Her2-positive tumors in young (<= 40 years old) and very young (<= 35 years old) patients (8). Elderly BC patients are often under-treated compared with younger BC patients (9–12) and present higher rates of recurrence and mortality (10, 13–17), with a 5-year survival rate of 82.4% in patients 70-79 and 74% in patients more than 80 (13, 17–19). To note that non-compliance to endocrine therapy and radiotherapy is higher in patients 80 years and older (16, 20–25). Most elderly patients are considered for upfront surgery, whatever the tumor phenotype and neo-adjuvant treatments seem less frequently offered to older patients, particularly those patients more than 80 years. However, an increasing proportion of elderly women appears as fit with few comorbidities and should be offered similar treatments to younger women. Hence, a significant proportion of older patients with TN and Her2-positive BC should receive neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (+/- Trastuzumab): cN1 or cN0 usN1 with positive axillary lymph node and cN0 pT2. Meanwhile, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is discussed in patients with cN0 pT1c (mainly in 15-20 mm tumors) (26, 27). After up-front surgery, lymph node-positive or lymph node-negative and > pT1b patients should receive adjuvant chemotherapy in TN phenotypes (28, 29) and adjuvant chemotherapy and Trastuzumab in Her2-positive disease (28, 30).
There is a lack of data on TN and Her2-positive BC in elderly patients because of the lower frequency of these subtypes. We report herein the results of a multicenter retrospective study analyzing the prognostic impact of age according to treatment delivered in TN and Her2-positive BC patients of 70 years or older, including comparison by age groups (70-74, 75-80, and >80 years). Comparison between patients 70-80 years and >80-years, and results according to age groups for pT1, pN0 or pN0(i+) or pN1mi were analyzed.
Methods
Study design and data source
The medical records of 31,473 patients treated for invasive BC by up-front surgery were retrieved from the clinical databases of 13 cancer centers in France for retrospective analysis. All clinical variables analyzed in this study were retrieved from patient’s medical records. Up-front surgery was realized for 14,488 patients from January 1991 to December 2018, including 11,495 (79.3%) HR-positive Her2-negative BC, 1,232 (8.5%) TNBC, and 1,761 (12.1%) Her2-positive BC (614 HR-negative and 1,147 HR-positive). Patients ≥70 represented 19.2% (2,206/11,495), 22.2% (274/1,232), and 14.4% (254/1,761) of HR-positive Her2-negative, TN, and Her2-positive BC, respectively. Our study population included all ≥70 patients with TN or Her2-positive BC treated by upfront surgery (Supplementary Figure 1). Three categories of age were determined: 70-74, 75-80, and > 80 years.
Factors associated with adjuvant chemotherapy administration, type of surgery (breast conservative surgery or mastectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)), radiation therapy delivery (regional nodal irradiation (RNI), post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT)) were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analyses. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were assessed with univariate and multivariate analyses. In this large cohort of patients, chemotherapy regimens were not recorded. However, during this long period, chemotherapy differ, particularly before and since 2005. Consequently, we analyzed results also according these two periods.
Pathological assessment
ER and Her2 status were determined according to French guidelines (immunohistochemistry (IHC) detection on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, of estrogen and/or progesterone receptors with a 10% threshold for ER positivity; Her2 positivity with a 3+ IHC score and/or Her2 amplification identified by in situ hybridization). Lymphovascular invasion (LVI), defined as tumor cells lying in an endothelium-lined space within the peritumoral area, were assessed by trained pathologists on examination of hematoxylin, eosin & safran (HES) slides (31).
Statistical analysis
Overall survival (1), DFS (2), relapse-free survival (RFS, 3), and BCSS (4) were defined as the time interval from the date of surgery to (1) death or last follow-up, (2) any event (recurrence, metastasis, or death) or last follow-up, (3) local, regional, or distant recurrence whichever comes first or last follow-up, and (4) the date of cancer death or last follow-up, respectively. Patients lost to follow-up were considered alive at the date of last contact. The associations between categorical values were evaluated via χ2 tests. Factors significantly associated with pN status were determined by binary logistic regression adjusted for all significant variables determined by univariate analysis. Survival functions were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method with differences assessed via the log-rank test. Multivariate survival analyses were performed using the Cox proportional-hazard-regression model adjusted for significant variables. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Analyses were performed with SPSS-16.0 (SPSS-Inc., Chicago-Illinois, USA) and R version 3.2.4 software (http://www.cran.r-project.org/). All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were done by the French ethical standards and with the 2008 Helsinki Declaration. As this was a retrospective non-interventional study, no formal personal consent was required. Authorization to use the database was obtained from the strategic orientation committee of Paoli-Calmettes Institute (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02869607).
Results
Patient characteristic
Five hundred twenty-eight patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including 243 patients 70-74 years old (46%), 172 75-80 years (32.6%), and 113 > 80 years (21.4%). Half the study population (51.9%, 274 patients) were TN, 30.1% (159) HR-positive and Her2-positive, and 18% (95) HR-negative and Her2-positive BC. The higher the age, the more the tumor stage was advanced (higher tumor size, more node involvement). Other prognostic factors (tumor subtype, tumor grade, LVI) were not significantly different between group ages (Table 1).
Table 1 Characteristics of patients in the three age groups.
Treatments according to age groups
Adjuvant chemotherapy rates were inversely proportional to age (61.7%, 58.7%, and 27.4% in 70-74, 75-80, and > 80 years, respectively (p<0.0001)) (Supplementary Table 1). In binary logistic regression, adjuvant chemotherapy was less frequently performed in patients 75-80 years (OR=0.535, p=0.011) and >80 –years (OR=0.099, p<0.0001) (Table 2). Axillary node assessment (ALND or SLNB alone) was not significantly different according to age groups (Table 3). Although mastectomy appeared, at first glance, more frequently used in older patients (28%, 40.7%, and 46% in 70-74, 75-80, and > 80 years, respectively, p=0.001), it turned out not to be influenced by age after adjusting for confounding factors (Tables 3, 4). Although post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) administration appeared independent of patients’ age, patients >80 years were less likely to receive regional nodal irradiation (RNI) (OR=0.281, p=0.001) (Table 4). Surprisingly, in 159 HR-positive Her2-positive BC, the endocrine therapy uses decreased with the increasing age group, with a lower rate in patients more than 80 years old (85.1% versus 93.3% and 95.8% in patients 70-74 years and 75-80 years, respectively) approaching statistical significance (p=0.052) (Table 1). Regarding periods of treatment, 138 patients were treated before 2005 (26.1%) and 390 since 2005. Tumor subtypes rates were 60.9% (84/138), 10.9% (15/138) and 28.3% (39/138) before 2005, 48.7% (190/390), 20.5% (80/390) and 30.8% (120/390) since 2005, for TNBC, ER- Her2+ and ER+ Her2+ BC, respectively (p=0.015).
Table 2 Adjuvant chemotherapy administration: multivariate analysis.
Table 3 Breast and axillary surgery: multivariate analysis.
Table 4 PMRT and RNI: multivariate analysis.
Survival results, all patients
Median follow-up was 49 months (mean 51, 95% CI 48.3-53.7), with decreasing values according to the three age groups (56.23, 49, 31.54). In univariate analysis, all patient outcomes (OS, DFS, BCSS, and RFS) significantly decreased as age increased, especially in patients older than 80 years (Supplementary Table 2). In multivariate analysis, age >80, pT2-3 sizes, axillary macrometastases, LVI, and HR-negative/Her2-positive tumor subtype, all negatively affected OS (Figure 1). Tumor size, axillary macrometastases, and LVI remained independent prognostic factors for DFS, BCSS, and RFS, whereas age > 80 did not. (Table 5). When periods were included in multivariate analysis, similar results were observed for patients over 80-years old for OS (HR=3.009, p<0.0001), DFS (HR=2.534, p<0.0001), RFS (HR=1.948, p=0.025) and BCSS (HR=2.255, p=0.030) and better results were observed for period ≥ 2005.
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for overall survival in 70-74, 75-80, and >80 years old patients.
Table 5 OS, DFS and BCSS: multivariate analysis.
Comparison between patients 70-80years and 80 years
When aggregating patients in two groups (less or more than 80 years), the univariate analysis still showed older patients to have shorter BCSS (3-year BCSS: 87.7% vs. 88.6%, p=0.006), as well as lower RFS (3-year RFS: 80.5% vs. 88.6%, p<0.0001).
However, after adjusting for tumor and patient characteristics (age, pT, pN, LVI, tumor subtype) and chemotherapy administration, we found no BCSS statistically significant difference in the two age groups (HR=1.633, 95% CI 0.855-3.121, p=0.138), but a worse RFS in patients aged > 80 (HR=1.771, 95% CI 1.055-2.973, p=0.031) (Figure 2). Usual prognostic factors still affected both BCSS and RFS, whereas chemotherapy did not. The tumor subtype impacted BCSS but not RFS (Table 6).
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for recurrence-free survival in 70-80 and >80 years old patients.
Table 6 BCSS and RFS: Comparison between patients 70-80 years and > 80-years in multivariate analysis.
Patients with pT1, pN0 or pN0(i+) or pN1mi, TNBC or Her2-positive
We conducted the same analyses in the three age groups restricted to small tumors (pT1) with no or low nodal involvement (pN0-1mi) to find out whether de-escalation in adjuvant treatments can negatively impact elderly patients’ outcomes.
Two hundred thirty-four patients had pT1pN0-1mi TN (129), HR-Her2+ (30), or ER+Her2+ (75) BC, homogeneously represented in each age group (p=0.461), with 212 patients having pN0 disease (90.6%), 6 pN0(i+) (2.6%) and 16 pN1mi (6.8%) (Supplementary Table 3). In binary logistic regression, age >80 years was significantly associated with less adjuvant chemotherapy administration (OR=0.217, 95% CI 0.08-0.58, p=0.002). Adjuvant chemotherapy administration was significantly associated with pN1mi (OR=9.647, 2.01-46.22, p=0.005) and HR-negative Her2-positive subtype (OR=2.790, 1.12-6.94, p=0.027), without significant association with age 75-80 (OR=0.631, 0.32-1.23, p=0.179), pN0(i+), HR-positive Her2-positive BC and with LVI.
With a median follow-up was 55 months (mean 56.8, 95% CI 52.7-60.8), OS, DFS, and BCSS were not significantly different in the three age groups on multivariate analysis, whereas RFS tended to be lower in > 80 years patients (HR= 2.392, 95% CI: 0.893-6.410, p=0.083) (Supplementary Figure 2).
Discussion
More than 50% of early-stage breast cancers are diagnosed in women aged more than 65 years, and >30% over the age of 70 years with these proportions in constant rise (32, 33). Elderly patients display higher rates of HR-positive/Her2-negative BC compared to TN and Her2-positive subtypes. Due to underrepresentation in clinical trials, only a few data dedicated to TN and Her2-positive elderly BC patients are available. We reported here histoclinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes in 528 BC patients ≥70 years old including 274 with TN subtype and 254 with Her2-positive.
Elderly patient characteristics
Consistently with available reports, our study found older patients having more advanced disease (but also more favorable prognostic factors, such as lower grade and LVI, and more frequently HR-positive tumors) (10, 13–17). We also found larger tumor size and lymph node involvement with increasing age. TN and Her2-positive were well balanced in elderly patients, being way less frequent than HR-positive/Her2-negative subtype, as reported in two large series. Plichta et al. (34) described a series of 156,240 ≤45 years patients and 210,095 ≥75 years patients, finding a TN rate of 14.9% vs. 8.2%, and a Her2-positive rate of 18.6% vs. 9.2%, respectively. Similarly, it was reported in a recent study including 235,368 early breast cancer patients, that the BC subtype distribution differs according to age, with an increase of Luminal BC and decrease of TNBC, Her-positive/HR-positive and Her2-positive/HR-negative BC, with higher age: 46.9%, 29.7%, 15.9%, and 7.5% respectively for age <30-years; 87%, 6.2%, 4.1% and 2.7% respectively for age 70-79 years; and 93.4%, 2.7%, 2.2% and 1.7% for patients age 80-years or older (35).
Elderly patient management
Existing studies have reported elderly patients’ outcomes according to adjuvant treatment delivery, but only a few focused on TN and Her2-positive BC. Elderly patients are often undertreated due to multiple comorbidities as well as patients’ or relatives’ wishes. Jauhari et al. (36) recently reported as much as 5.6%, 11%, and 41.9% of surgery omission in 70-74, 75-79, and ≥ 80 years HR-positive BC patients, respectively, dropping to 3.8%, 3.7%, and 12.3% in HR-negative BC patients. Similar tendencies arose from the National Audit of Breast Cancer in Older Patients (NABCOP) (37) and National Health Service (NHS) (38). In a recent study of early breast cancer patients (35), surgery followed by chemotherapy was realized in 43.4% of all tumor subtypes, and neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in 30.9% (25.7% surgery without chemotherapy) for patients under 30 years; 21% and 2.9% (74.7%) and 1.6% of neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients 70-79 years; 6.3% and 1.1% (87.2%) and 5.4% of neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients 80-years or older. A common strategy in this patient population appears to rely on neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy in HR-positive in more or less debilitated patients, deemed with a short life expectancy (36, 39). Since we limited our study to patients referred for surgery, our data do not help in discussing this strategy. Nonetheless, contrary to several reports (16, 21, 22, 40–43), the type of surgery, including lymph node assessment, was independent of patients’ age in our study. This point is worth emphasizing since axillary surgery in clinically node-negative elderly patients remains moot. Indeed, axillary surgery, whether an ALND or even an SLNB, caters to some unneglectable adverse events (pain, numbness, loss of strength, decreased motion (44), which could substantially alter older patients’ quality of life. However, Corso G et al. (45) reported a matched analysis comparing axillary surgery to its omission in patients aged 70 years or older, stratified by age (70-74, 75-79, 80-84), with a significantly increased 10-y-risk of axillary lymph node recurrence, particularly in Luminal B, Her2-positive, and TNBC. Similarly, Marks et al. (46) showed that in an upfront surgery cohort of clinically node-positive elderly BC patients, the presence of less than 12 lymph nodes was associated with worse OS. Still, in a 1996 randomized trial (47), Avril et al. failed to show the safety of axillary assessment omission in early BC elderly patients. Nonetheless, several ongoing trials are currently evaluating SLNB omission in elderly patients with HR-positive BC. Although more frequent in higher-age patients in our univariate analysis, mastectomy was independent of age in multivariate analysis. Studies from a decade ago suggested that mastectomy prevails over breast-conserving surgery in elderly patients (9, 15, 16, 22, 25, 48), likely in the hope of avoiding adjuvant radiation therapy. Similarly, Jauhari et al. study (49) found the rate of mastectomy to increase with age (70–74, 75–79, and ≥ 80 years), irrespective of ER status. However, when comparing young (≤ 45 years) to elderly (≥ 75 years) patients, Plichta et al. (34) found the mastectomy rate to be higher in young patients (56% vs. 34%).
After breast-conserving surgery, adjuvant radiation therapy is standard of care since it improves the loco-regional recurrence rate and OS (EBCTCG 2014). Nonetheless, several studies reported on adjuvant radiation-therapy omission in the elderly due to fear of radiation toxicity and issues in transportation and mobility (16, 20, 21, 25, 48, 50). Several randomized studies in this setting have constantly found adjuvant radiation therapy to significantly improve local control without any impact on OS (51–57). On the other hand, a recent report by Tang et al. (58) showed that only 4.8% of elderly patients chose to decline adjuvant radiation therapy when asked for their preferred treatment option. PMRT still causes debates, even in young BC patients. Although the EBCTCG meta-analysis demonstrated its benefit in T1-2N1 BC patients who received chemotherapy (59), profuse literature data is currently challenging its actual need in intermediate-risk patients, irrespective of patient age. In our multicenter study, neither surgery nor adjuvant radiation therapy was altered by patient age, except RNI, which was less likely to be offered to older patients.
International guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy (and Trastuzumab) in most patients with HR-negative or Her2-positive disease (60). In our study, we observed fewer adjuvant chemotherapy in patients 75-80 years (OR=0.533) and >80–years (OR=0.106). Few clinical trials have focused on elderly patients, and recommendations rely on the extrapolation of studies conducted in the general population, including a small proportion of elderly patients (61, 62). Multimorbidity competes with cancer on the outcome and the therapeutic ratio is narrower because they are at higher risk of side effects in this population. Recently, the results of the large phase III Unicancer ASTER 70s study have been reported (63). Brain and colleagues have shown that the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to endocrine therapy does not result in a statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit in patients older than 70 years with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, Her2-negative breast cancer with a high tumor genomic grade index. However, in the CALGB 49907 study (64), adjuvant chemotherapy for patients over 65 years showed a beneficial impact, and the greatest benefit was reported in TNBC. In elderly patients, adjuvant treatment administration mainly depends on patient choice and associated comorbidities that may reduce tolerance and compliance with adjuvant treatments (19, 65–68). Moreover, toxicity prediction is challenging, and in a randomized trial, none of the multiple geriatric scores predicted tolerance of therapy (69). There is an increased likelihood of side effects, hospital admissions, and short-term mortality in elderly patients (70, 71).
Elderly patient outcomes
OS and DFS were significantly associated with age > 80 years but without significant difference between age groups for BCSS. However, RFS was significantly lower for patients > 80 years in comparison with patients 70-80 years. For patients with pT1, pN0 or pN0(i+) or pN1mi BC, adjuvant chemotherapy administration was significantly associated and lower with age > 80 years (OR=0.217) but there was no significant OS, DFS, and BCSS difference between three age groups. We reported that systemic treatments were less likely to be administered to older patients. Multivariate analysis conducted on the whole population study found that age ≥ 80 did not affect BCSS or RFS, meaning that worse outcomes observed in this age population in the univariate analysis came from other prognostic factors, such as tumor size and lymph node involvements. Several studies suggest that adjuvant therapy may have a beneficial impact on patients with high-risk BC (node-positive or HR-negative) (39, 72–75). Higher BC recurrence rate (14, 48), higher distant recurrence rate (76), lower DFS and OS rates (16, 22), and higher disease-specific mortality (48) had been reported in elderly BC patients, whatever tumor subtypes. In 2002 patients ≥ 75 years matched by clinic-pathological and therapeutic factors, chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in Her2-positive BC but not in TNBC (77). In multivariate Cox survival analysis of 16,062 patients ≥ 70 years with resected TNBC, a beneficial impact of chemotherapy was observed for all groups of patients according to age subdivided into 5-year tranches and for TNBC with tumor size more than 20mm (78). Moreover, a propensity-matched analysis including 1,884 patients with TNBC, compared patients who received chemotherapy with those who were recommended to but did not receive chemotherapy and reported an OS improvement with chemotherapy (HR=0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.80, p<0.0001). This benefit persisted after stratification for node-negative BC (HR=0.80, p=0.007), node-positive BC (HR=0.76, p=0.006), and those with a comorbidity score >0 (HR=0.74, p=0.013). In the same way, Tang et al. (79) have shown in elderly primary operable TNBC patients (≥70 years old) that age (HR=1.03 per year, p<0.001), T1c (HR=2.95) and chemotherapy (HR=0.79, p=0.035) were associated with lesser cancer-specific survival.
Although adjuvant trastuzumab is beneficial regardless of age, anti-Her2 adjuvant therapy remains only little evaluated in elderly patients (80, 81). The standard approach in elderly patients with early Her2-positive BC is one year of trastuzumab, combined with chemotherapy including docetaxel or weekly paclitaxel. However, the use of chemotherapy-free regimen can be proposed in frail patients (82), considering that age is associated with increased cardiac toxicity, particularly for patients aged 80 years or older with comorbidities (83, 84). Endocrine therapy is indicated in HR-positive BC, regardless of age, with aromatase inhibitors for 5 years, but could be omitted in patients with very low risk (85).
Our analysis in 234 pT1 pN0/1mi identified higher rates of chemotherapy in patients ≤80 years, with HR-negative Her2-positive, and with pN1mi tumors. OS, DFS, RFS, and OS were not significatively impacted by age groups. Only a few data have been reported regarding patients with small tumors without macroscopic lymph node involvements, and we noted in a previous study that tumor size may not be the main prognostic factor in T1 BC (86). While the need for trastuzumab-based adjuvant chemotherapy may be disputed in pT1a-b HR-positive/Her2-positive tumors (30, 87), chemotherapy is rarely omitted in node-negative TN BC larger than 5 mm. However, we recently failed to identify a significant advantage for adjuvant chemotherapy in pT1abN0 TNBC patients (29) and this systemic treatment might be discussed for elderly patients with tumors <1cm.
Our study has several limitations. Due to the retrospective design of the study, some valuable variables are missing from our analysis, including details of chemotherapy protocols on this 27-years’ time frame, collection of geriatric data, quality of life data, treatment acceptability, and socioeconomic data. Indeed, the study sample might be biased by the selection of patients eligible to surgery. The lack of data on patients comorbidities might be one of the principal limitations in this elderly population, because of the potential increase in the risk of chemotherapy-related complications, the effect on patients outcomes, as well as the influence that can occurs on treatment adaptations.
Conclusion
TN and Her2-positive subtypes occur at a similar frequency in elderly patients. Older age is associated with more advanced tumor stage presentation. Chemotherapy use decreases with older age without being affected by other pejorative prognostic factors. This may reflect oncologists’ uncertainty when making management decisions in elderly patients, and the need to optimize BC management for these patients who may be fit, but where multimorbidity may also compete with cancer on outcomes.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by strategic orientation committee of Paoli-Calmettes Institute. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
GH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MC: Resources, Writing – review & editing. AG: Resources, Writing – review & editing. AB: Resources, Writing – review & editing. MPC: Resources, Writing – review & editing. CF: Resources, Writing – review & editing. JC: Resources, Writing – review & editing. EJ: Resources, Writing – review & editing. LS: Resources, Writing – review & editing. MB: Resources, Writing – review & editing. LT: Resources, Writing – review & editing. MM: Resources, Writing – review & editing. AT: Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AN: Conceptualization, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1287253/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Figure 1 | Consort diagram showing patients selection.
Supplementary Figure 2 | Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for recurrence-free survival in 70-80 and >80 years old patients with pT1 pN0, pN0(i+), and pN1mi tumors.
Supplementary Table 1 | Factors associated with adjuvant chemotherapy in univariate analysis.
Supplementary Table 2 | Overall Survival, Disease-Free Survival, Breast Cancer Specific Survival, and Recurrence Free Survival results in univariate analysis.
Supplementary Table 3 | Characteristics of 234 patients pT1 pN0, pN0(i+), pN1mi and adjuvant chemotherapy administration.
References
1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin (2018) 68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
2. Biganzoli L, Battisti NML, Wildiers H, McCartney A, Colloca G, Kunkler IH, et al. Updated recommendations regarding the management of older patients with breast cancer: a joint paper from the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) and the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG). Lancet Oncol (2021) 22:e327–40. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30741-5
3. Panorama des cancers en France, l’Institut national du cancer publie l’édition 2023 rassemblant les données les plus récentes - Dossiers et communiqués de presse. Available at: https://www.e-cancer.fr/Presse/Dossiers-et-communiques-de-presse/Panorama-des-cancers-en-France-l-Institut-national-du-cancer-publie-l-edition-2023-rassemblant-les-donnees-les-plus-recentes (Accessed July 13, 2023).
4. Defossez G, Uhry Z, Delafosse P, Dantony E, d'Almeida T, Plouvier S, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality trends in France over 1990-2018 for solid tumors: the sex gap is narrowing. BMC Cancer (2021) 21(1):726. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08261-1
5. Lodi M, Scheer L, Reix N, Heitz D, Carin A-J, Thiébaut N, et al. Breast cancer in elderly women and altered clinico-pathological characteristics: a systemic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2017) 166:657–68. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4448-5
6. Rottenberg Y, Naeim A, Uziely B, Peretz T, Jacobs JM. Breast cancer among older women: The influence of age and cancer stage on survival. Arch Gerontol Geriatr (2018) 76:60–4. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.02.004
7. Arvold ND, Taghian AG, Niemierko A, Abi Raad RF, Sreedhara M, Nguyen PL, et al. Age, breast cancer subtype approximation, and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol (2011) 29:3885–91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.1105
8. Dufour O, Houvenaeghel G, Classe J-M, Cohen M, Faure C, Mazouni C, et al. Early breast cancer in women aged 35 years or younger: A large national multicenter French population-based case control-matched analysis. Breast Edinb Scotl (2023) 68:163–72. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.02.004
9. LeMasters TJ, Madhavan SS, Sambamoorthi U, Vyas AM. Disparities in the initial local treatment of older women with early-stage breast cancer: A population-based study. J Womens Health (2002) 2017:26:735–44. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5639
10. Yood MU, Owusu C, Buist DSM, Geiger AM, Field TS, Thwin SS, et al. Mortality impact of less-than-standard therapy in older breast cancer patients. J Am Coll Surg (2008) 206:66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.015
11. Tesarova P. Breast cancer in the elderly-Should it be treated differently? Rep Pract Oncol Radiother J Gt Cancer Cent Poznan Pol Soc Radiat Oncol (2012) 18:26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.05.005
12. Cortadellas T, Córdoba O, Gascón A, Haladjian C, Bernabeu A, Alcalde A, et al. Surgery improves survival in elderly with breast cancer. A study of 465 patients in a single institution. Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol (2015) 41:635–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.01.027
13. Bouchardy C. Undertreatment strongly decreases prognosis of breast cancer in elderly women. J Clin Oncol (2003) 21:3580–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.02.046
14. Kiderlen M, van de Water W, Bastiaannet E, de Craen AJM, Westendorp RGJ, van de Velde CJH, et al. Survival and relapse free period of 2926 unselected older breast cancer patients: a FOCUS cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol (2015) 39:42–7. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2014.11.007
15. Schonberg MA, Marcantonio ER, Li D, Silliman RA, Ngo L, McCarthy EP. Breast cancer among the oldest old: tumor characteristics, treatment choices, and survival. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol (2010) 28:2038–45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9796
16. Angarita FA, Chesney T, Elser C, Mulligan AM, McCready DR, Escallon J. Treatment patterns of elderly breast cancer patients at two Canadian cancer centres. Eur J Surg Oncol (2015) 41:625–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.01.028
17. Du Xianglin n, Freeman JL, Nattinger AB, Goodwin JS. Survival of women after breast conserving surgery for early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2002) 72:23–31. doi: 10.1023/A:1014908802632
18. Roder D, Farshid G, Kollias J, Koczwara B, Karapetis C, Adams J, et al. Female breast cancer management and survival: The experience of major public hospitals in South Australia over 3 decades-trends by age and in the elderly. J Eval Clin Pract (2017) 23:1433–43. doi: 10.1111/jep.12819
19. Meresse M, Bouhnik A-D, Bendiane M-K, Retornaz F, Rousseau F, Rey D, et al. Chemotherapy in old women with breast cancer: is age still a predictor for under treatment? Breast J (2017) 23(3):256–66. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12726
20. Strader LA, Helmer SD, Yates CL, Tenofsky PL. Octogenarians: noncompliance with breast cancer treatment recommendations. Am Surg (2014) 80:1119–23. doi: 10.1177/000313481408001127
21. Mamtani A, Gonzalez JJ, Neo D, Slanetz PJ, Houlihan MJ, Herold CI, et al. Early-stage breast cancer in the octogenarian: tumor characteristics, treatment choices, and clinical outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol (2016) 23:3371–8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5368-z
22. Yamada A, Narui K, Sugae S, Shimizu D, Takabe K, Ichikawa Y, et al. Operation with less adjuvant therapy for elderly breast cancer. J Surg Res (2016) 204:410–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.05.031
23. Mackey RV, Chandru Kowdley G. Treatment practices and outcomes of elderly women with breast cancer in a community hospital. Am Surg (2014) 80:714–9. doi: 10.1177/000313481408000729
24. van de Water W, Bastiaannet E, Egan KM, de Craen AJM, Westendorp RGJ, Balducci L, et al. Management of primary metastatic breast cancer in elderly patients—An international comparison of oncogeriatric versus standard care. J Geriatr Oncol (2014) 5:252–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2014.02.005
25. Joerger M, Thürlimann B, Savidan A, Frick H, Rageth C, Lütolf U, et al. Treatment of breast cancer in the elderly: a prospective, population-based Swiss study. J Geriatr Oncol (2013) 4:39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2012.08.002
26. Houvenaeghel G, Nonneville A, Cohen M, Viret F, Rua S, Sabiani L, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: evolution of clinical practice in a french cancer center over 16 years and pathologic response rates according to tumor subtypes and clinical tumor size: retrospective cohort study. J Surg Res (2022) 5:511–25. doi: 10.26502/jsr.10020251
27. de Nonneville A, Houvenaeghel G, Cohen M, Sabiani L, Bannier M, Viret F, et al. Pathological complete response rate and disease-free survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Her2-low and Her2-0 breast cancers. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl (1990) 2022:176:181–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.09.017
28. Burstein HJ, Curigliano G, Thürlimann B, Weber WP, Poortmans P, Regan MM, et al. Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer 2021. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol (2021) 32:1216–35. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.023
29. de Nonneville A, Gonçalves A, Zemmour C, Cohen M, Classe JM, Reyal F, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy in pT1ab node-negative triple-negative breast carcinomas: Results of a national multi-institutional retrospective study. Eur J Cancer (2017) 84:34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.043
30. de Nonneville A, Gonçalves A, Zemmour C, Classe JM, Cohen M, Lambaudie E, et al. Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab in pT1ab node-negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast carcinomas: results of a national multi-institutional study. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2017) 162(2):307–16. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4136-5
31. Houvenaeghel G, Cohen M, Classe JM, Reyal F, Mazouni C, Chopin N, et al. Lymphovascular invasion has a significant prognostic impact in patients with early breast cancer, results from a large, national, multicenter, retrospective cohort study. ESMO Open (2021) 6:100316. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100316
32. Owusu C, Hurria A, Muss H. Adjuvant therapy for older women with early-stage breast cancer: treatment selection in a complex population. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book Am Soc Clin Oncol Annu Meet (2012) 32:3–9. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2012.32.69
33. Okonji DO, Sinha R, Phillips I, Fatz D, Ring A. Comprehensive geriatric assessment in 326 older women with early breast cancer. Br J Cancer (2017) 117:925–31. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.257
34. Plichta JK, Thomas SM, Vernon R, Fayanju OM, Rosenberger LH, Hyslop T, et al. Breast cancer tumor histopathology, stage at presentation, and treatment in the extremes of age. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2020) 180:227–35. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05542-4
35. Dumas E, Laot L, Coussy F, Grandal Rejo B, Daoud E, Laas E, et al. The french early breast cancer cohort (FRESH): A resource for breast cancer research and evaluations of oncology practices based on the french national healthcare system database (SNDS). Cancers (2022) 14:2671. doi: 10.3390/cancers14112671
36. Jauhari Y, Dodwell D, Gannon MR, Horgan K, Clements K, Medina J, et al. The influence of age, comorbidity and frailty on treatment with surgery and systemic therapy in older women with operable triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) in England: A population-based cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol (2021) 47:251–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.022
37. NABCOP 2022 annual report, in: Natl Audit Breast Cancer Older Patients. Available at: https://www.nabcop.org.uk/reports/nabcop-2022-annual-report/ (Accessed July 13, 2023).
38. NHS Breast Screening Programme, England 2021-22. NDRS. Available at: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/breast-screening-programme/england—2021-22 (Accessed July 13, 2023).
39. Biganzoli L, Wildiers H, Oakman C, Marotti L, Loibl S, Kunkler I, et al. Management of elderly patients with breast cancer: updated recommendations of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) and European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA). Lancet Oncol (2012) 13:e148–160. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70383-7
40. Samman S, Cornacchi SD, Foster G, Thabane L, Thomson S, Lovrics O, et al. A population-based study of treatment patterns, 10-year recurrence and breast cancer-specific mortality in a cohort of elderly patients with breast cancer. Am J Surg (2021) 222:361–7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.029
41. Angarita FA, Acuna SA, McCready DR, Escallon J. Management of positive margins after initial lumpectomy in elderly women with breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol (2018) 44:1048–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.011
42. Chagpar AB, Horowitz N, Sanft T, Wilson LD, Silber A, Killelea B, et al. Does lymph node status influence adjuvant therapy decision-making in women 70 years of age or older with clinically node negative hormone receptor positive breast cancer? Am J Surg (2017) 214:1082–8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.036
43. Van Leeuwen BL, Rosenkranz KM, Feng LL, Bedrosian I, Hartmann K, Hunt KK, et al. The effect of under-treatment of breast cancer in women 80 years of age and older. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol (2011) 79:315–20. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.05.010
44. Verbelen H, Gebruers N, Eeckhout F-M, Verlinden K, Tjalma W. Shoulder and arm morbidity in sentinel node-negative breast cancer patients: a systemic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2014) 144:21–31. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2846-5
45. Corso G, Magnoni F, Montagna G, Maisonneuve P, Polizzi A, Massari G, et al. Long-term outcome and axillary recurrence in elderly women (≥70 years) with breast cancer: 10-years follow-up from a matched cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol (2021) 47:1593–600. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.02.027
46. Marks CE, Ren Y, Rosenberger LH, Thomas SM, Greenup RA, Fayanju OM, et al. Surgical management of the axilla in elderly women with node-positive breast cancer. J Surg Res (2020) 254:275–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.04.036
47. Avril N, Dose J, Jänicke F, Ziegler S, Römer W, Weber W, et al. Assessment of axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 2-(Fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst (1996) 88:1204–9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.17.1204
48. van de Water W, Markopoulos C, van de Velde CJH, Seynaeve C, Hasenburg A, Rea D, et al. Association between age at diagnosis and disease-specific mortality among postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. JAMA (2012) 307:590–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.84
49. Jauhari Y, Gannon MR, Dodwell D, Horgan K, Clements K, Medina J, et al. Surgical decisions in older women with early breast cancer: patient and disease factors. Br J Surg (2021) 108:160–7. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa042
50. Guidolin K, Lock M, Brackstone M. Patient-perceived barriers to radiation therapy for breast cancer. Can J Surg J Can Chir (2018) 61:141–3. doi: 10.1503/cjs.015716
51. van Dongen JA, Bartelink H, Fentiman IS, Lerut T, Mignolet F, Olthuis G, et al. Randomized clinical trial to assess the value of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast cancer, EORTC 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (1992) (11):15–8.
52. Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, d’Angelo T, Steinberg SM, Pierce L, et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med (1995) 332:907–11. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199504063321402
53. Blichert-Toft M, Rose C, Andersen JA, Overgaard M, Axelsson CK, Andersen KW, et al. Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: six years of life-table analysis. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (1992) (11):19–25.
54. Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, Banfi A, Clemente C, De Lena M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med (1981) 305:6–11. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198107023050102
55. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med (2002) 347:1233–41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022152
56. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med (2002) 347:1227–32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020989
57. van Maaren MC, de Munck L, de Bock GH, Jobsen JJ, van Dalen T, Linn SC, et al. 10 year survival after breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy compared with mastectomy in early breast cancer in the Netherlands: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol (2016) 17:1158–70. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30067-5
58. Tang C, Msaouel P, Hara K, Choi H, Le V, Shah AY, et al. Definitive radiotherapy in lieu of systemic therapy for oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma: a single-arm, single-centre, feasibility, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol (2021) 22:1732–9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00528-3
59. EBCTCG (Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group), McGale P, Taylor C, Correa C, Cutter D, Duane F, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials. Lancet Lond Engl (2014) 383:2127–35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60488-8
60. Curigliano G, Burstein HJ, Winer EP, Gnant M, Dubsky P, Loibl S, et al. De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol (2017) 28:1700–12. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx308
61. Javid SH, Unger JM, Gralow JR, Moinpour CM, Wozniak AJ, Goodwin JW, et al. A prospective analysis of the influence of older age on physician and patient decision-making when considering enrollment in breast cancer clinical trials (SWOG S0316). Oncologist (2012) 17:1180–90. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0384
62. Sun J, Chia S. Adjuvant chemotherapy and HER-2-directed therapy for early-stage breast cancer in the elderly. Br J Cancer (2017) 116:4–9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.360
63. Brain E, Viansone AA, Bourbouloux E, Rigal O, Ferrero J-M, Kirscher S, et al. Final results from a phase III randomized clinical trial of adjuvant endocrine therapy ± chemotherapy in women ≥ 70 years old with ER+ Her2- breast cancer and a high genomic grade index: The Unicancer ASTER 70s trial. J Clin Oncol (2022) 40:500–0. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.500
64. Klepin HD, Pitcher BN, Ballman KV, Kornblith AB, Hurria A, Winer EP, et al. Comorbidity, chemotherapy toxicity, and outcomes among older women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer on a clinical trial: CALGB 49907 and CALGB 361004 (alliance). J Oncol Pract (2014) 10:e285–292. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001388
65. LeMasters T, Madhavan SS, Sambamoorthi U, Hazard-Jenkins HW, Kelly KM, Long D. Receipt of guideline-concordant care among older women with stage I-III breast cancer: A population-based study. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw JNCCN (2018) 16:703–10. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7004
66. Hamelinck VC, Bastiaannet E, Pieterse AH, van de Velde CJH, Liefers G-J, Stiggelbout AM. Preferred and perceived participation of younger and older patients in decision making about treatment for early breast cancer: A prospective study. Clin Breast Cancer (2018) 18:e245–53. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.11.013
67. Hamelinck VC, Stiggelbout AM, van de Velde CJH, Liefers G-J, Bastiaannet E. Treatment recommendations for older women with breast cancer: A survey among surgical, radiation and medical oncologists. Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol (2017) 43:1288–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.02.006
68. Königsberg R, Pfeiler G, Kurzawa R, Hudec M, Zeillinger R, Dittrich C, et al. Prognostic assessment and adjuvant treatment strategies within early-stage, sporadic triple negative breast cancer patients. Cancer Invest (2011) 29:180–6. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2010.543215
69. von Minckwitz G, Conrad B, Reimer T, Decker T, Eidtmann H, Eiermann W, et al. A randomized phase 2 study comparing EC or CMF versus nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for nonfrail elderly patients with moderate to high-risk early breast cancer (ICE II-GBG 52). Cancer (2015) 121:3639–48. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29506
70. Rosenstock AS, Lei X, Tripathy D, Hortobagyi GN, Giordano SH, Chavez-MacGregor M. Short-term mortality in older patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2016) 157:339–50. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3815-y
71. Barcenas CH, Niu J, Zhang N, Zhang Y, Buchholz TA, Elting LS, et al. Risk of hospitalization according to chemotherapy regimen in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol (2014) 32:2010–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.3676
72. Janeva S, Zhang C, Kovács A, Parris TZ, Crozier JA, Pezzi CM, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in women aged 70 years and older with triple-negative breast cancer: a Swedish population-based propensity score-matched analysis. Lancet Healthy Longev (2020) 1:e117–24. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(20)30018-0
73. Ring A, Battisti NML, Reed MWR, Herbert E, Morgan JL, Bradburn M, et al. Bridging The Age Gap: observational cohort study of effects of chemotherapy and trastuzumab on recurrence, survival and quality of life in older women with early breast cancer. Br J Cancer (2021) 125:209–19. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01388-9
74. Daugherty EC, Daugherty MR, Bogart JA, Shapiro A. Adjuvant radiation improves survival in older women following breast-conserving surgery for estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer (2016) 16:500–6.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.06.017
75. Mamtani A, Gonzalez JJ, Neo DT, Friedman RS, Recht A, Hacker MR, et al. Treatment strategies in octogenarians with early-stage, high-risk breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol (2018) 25:1495–501. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6350-8
76. de Boer AZ, van der Hulst HC, de Glas NA, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Siesling S, de Munck L, et al. Impact of older age and comorbidity on locoregional and distant breast cancer recurrence: A large population-based study. Oncologist (2020) 25:e24–30. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0412
77. Yamada A, Kumamaru H, Shimizu C, Taira N, Nakayama K, Miyashita M, et al. Systemic therapy and prognosis of older patients with stage II/III breast cancer: A large-scale analysis of the Japanese Breast Cancer Registry. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl (1990) 2021:154:157–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.006
78. Crozier JA, Pezzi TA, Hodge C, Janeva S, Lesnikoski B-A, Samiian L, et al. Addition of chemotherapy to local therapy in women aged 70 years or older with triple-negative breast cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. Lancet Oncol (2020) 21:1611–9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30538-6
79. Tang Z, Ji Y, Min Y, Zhang X, Xu W, Zhao L, et al. Prognostic factors and models for elderly (≥70 years old) primary operable triple-negative breast cancer: analysis from the national cancer database. Front Endocrinol (2022) 13:856268. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.856268
80. Cameron D, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Gelber RD, Procter M, Goldhirsch A, de Azambuja E, et al. 11 years’ follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in Her2-positive early breast cancer: final analysis of the HERceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial. Lancet (2017) 389:1195–205. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32616-2
81. Perez EA, Romond EH, Suman VJ, Jeong J-H, Sledge G, Geyer CE, et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: planned joint analysis of overall survival from NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831. J Clin Oncol (2014) 32:3744–52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.5730
82. Brain E, Caillet P, de Glas N, Biganzoli L, Cheng K, Lago LD, et al. Her2-targeted treatment for older patients with breast cancer: An expert position paper from the International Society of Geriatric Oncology. J Geriatr Oncol (2019) 10:1003–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.06.004
83. Reeder-Hayes KE, Meyer AM, Hinton SP, Meng K, Carey LA, Dusetzina SB. Comparative toxicity and effectiveness of trastuzumab-based chemotherapy regimens in older women with early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol (2017) 35:3298–305. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.4345
84. Vaz-Luis I, Keating NL, Lin NU, Lii H, Winer EP, Freedman RA. Duration and toxicity of adjuvant trastuzumab in older patients with early-stage breast cancer: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol (2014) 32:927–34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.1261
85. Houvenaeghel G, de Nonneville A, Cohen M, Classe J-M, Reyal F, Mazouni C, et al. Contribution of endocrine therapy in oestrogen receptor-positive pT1a-b breast cancer: Results of a retrospective study. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl (1990) 2022:176:58–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.08.027
86. Houvenaeghel G, Goncalves A, Classe JM, Garbay JR, Giard S, Charytensky H, et al. Characteristics and clinical outcome of T1 breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Ann Oncol (2014) 25:623–8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt532
Keywords: breast cancer, triple negative, HER2-positive, elderly patients, geriatric oncology
Citation: Houvenaeghel G, Cohen M, Gonçalves A, Berthelot A, Chauvet MP, Faure C, Classe JM, Jouve E, Sabiani L, Bannier M, Tassy L, Martino M, Tallet A and de Nonneville A (2023) Triple-negative and Her2-positive breast cancer in women aged 70 and over: prognostic impact of age according to treatment. Front. Oncol. 13:1287253. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1287253
Received: 01 September 2023; Accepted: 30 November 2023;
Published: 15 December 2023.
Edited by:
Charles Theillet, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), FranceReviewed by:
Cvetka Grašič Kuhar, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, SloveniaToshima Z. Parris, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Copyright © 2023 Houvenaeghel, Cohen, Gonçalves, Berthelot, Chauvet, Faure, Classe, Jouve, Sabiani, Bannier, Tassy, Martino, Tallet and de Nonneville. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Gilles Houvenaeghel, aG91dmVuYWVnaGVsZ0BpcGMudW5pY2FuY2VyLmZy