Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Oncol., 11 July 2023
Sec. Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgical Oncology
This article is part of the Research Topic Advances in Surgical Approaches for the Treatment of Glioma View all 12 articles

Editorial: Advances in surgical approaches for the treatment of glioma

  • Department of Neurosurgery, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Presently, maximal-safe resection is still the primary pursuit for surgically treating glioma. Accordingly, there are a variety of novel techniques being developed. Therefore, this Research Topic aimed to summarize advances in glioma surgery along with emerging auxiliary techniques.

On the whole, there are four aspects to consider: balancing between the extent of resection and preserving neurological function, shortening intraoperative examination time while improving the accuracy of detection, minimizing surgical incision while achieving total resection, and utilizing in vivo histological testing just before completion of resection while guaranteeing patient safety.

1 Clinical studies

Intraoperative direct electrical stimulation (DES) can directly identify neural networks crucial for brain function and remains the gold standard for eloquent cortex localization (1, 2). Although there remains some debate (3, 4), awake brain mapping plus DES is generally associated with more extensive resection, better overall survival, and fewer severe persistent neurological deficits compared with resection under general anesthesia (58). Wang et al. presented their experience in awake craniotomy with intraoperative DES mapping for gliomas invading eloquent areas. With a similar surgical strategy, Yao et al. reviewed their single-center experience of treating diffuse lower grade glioma (DLGG) in the central lobe (including precentral and postcentral gyri and paracentral lobule). Both studies reported favorable results. Moreover, Wang et al. established a high sensitivity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a relatively brief screening tool for assessment of this population’s cognitive impairment.

Compared with awake surgery, surgery under general anesthesia is less time-consuming, with lower intraoperative risk (9, 10). Cui et al. reported their experience of removing glioma under general anesthesia assisted by intraoperative multimodal techniques (combined use of neuronavigation, iMRI, with/without DES/neuromonitoring). The large sample size (nearly 500 patients) was the strength of this study. The researchers confirmed that the application of multimodal techniques improved the extent of resection (EOR) and rate of gross total resection (GTR) while associated with a lower incidence of permanent language deficits (PLD). They also found clinical factors for predicting language deficit. It is worth noting that the researchers achieved a higher rate of GTR (72.7%) than all previous studies of awake craniotomy, with only a slightly higher incidence of PLD (13.4%). The established predictive model may provide surgeons and patients a reference in choosing an appropriate surgical strategy (e.g., awake craniotomy with DES for patients with the highest risk of language deficit, while multimodal techniques under general anesthesia for those with moderate risk). However, the model should be validated with more studies.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can generate a magnetic field, inducing transient electric fields within the targeted brain cortex. High/low frequency stimulation excites/inhibits neuron activity (11). As another way to directly test the crucial neurocircuits of brain function besides DES, navigated TMS (nTMS) has a similar effect in predicting the location of eloquent areas (1215). Li et al. verified the reliability of individual-target TMS in preoperative mapping. They showed that compared to intraoperative DES in awake surgery, the combination of nTMS can lead to an improvement in language performance as well as in brain-structure preservation. Precise localization by preoperative methods may help reduce the time required for awake surgery.

It has been reported that subtle neuropsychological disturbances are more frequent than traditional thoughts after glioma surgery (1618). Therefore, some scholars even proposed performing awake surgery in all LGG patients regardless of tumor location and monitoring more subtle cognitive and behavioral functions intra-operatively (19). As studies showed mental disorders such as depression (2022) and post-traumatic stress disorder (23, 24) were associated with shorter survival periods of LGG patients, the underlying neurocircuitry of emotion may also be considered.

Less traumatic procedures could reduce patients’ pain, improve cosmetic appearance, mitigate neurophysiological reflex response, and reduce the risk of infection (25, 26). Some previous studies have utilized an endoscope to resect deep-seated glioblastoma (27, 28). Sakata et al. further expanded its use in resecting superficial glioblastomas. In their six-case series, all achieved gross total/near total resection. The author emphasized the importance of prior endovascular tumor embolization. Huge intraoperative blood loss (>1000 ml) only occurred in one case, for whom the preceding embolization could not be performed due to the non-localization of a proper feeder artery.

2 Imaging studies

Jiang et al. reviewed four main intraoperative systems for delineating malignant tumors: intraoperative MRI (iMRI), fluorescence, Raman histology, and mass spectrometry. iMRI overcomes brain drift defects and has been shown to increase the complete resection rate (29, 30). Besides, functional MRI (fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and MR spectroscopy (MRS) can be applied with patients asleep for the whole surgical procedure, giving a panoramic view of the functional brain cortex, fiber tracts, and metabolic change levels. To solve the problem that the DTI reconstruction process relies on the experience of operators and is time-consuming, Yuan et al. developed an in-house software, “DiffusionGo.” It can reconstruct DTI automatically and quickly. The researchers demonstrated its efficacy in language function preservation for three patients who underwent surgical resection of gliomas. DiffusionGo is especially suitable for intraoperative use, and its adaptation to iMRI may be a future research direction. Although clinical implementation should be further established with a larger sample size, this software has presented promising value.

Yang et al. also mentioned in their review of surgical treatment options in gliomas, the augmented reality (AR) neuronavigation system, which integrates MR/CT images into the surgical field and presents three-dimensional virtual tissues to guide resection (3133).

Cui et al. did bibliometric research on artificial intelligence developments in nervous system diseases. They found “glioma” to be the leading research hotspot, and “machine learning,” “brain metastasis,” and “gene mutations” were at the research frontier. This result indicated a promising prospect for radiomics biomarkers and multi-omics studies.

3 Histological studies

Hong et al. developed a new confocal laser endomicroscopy with a “Lissajous scanning pattern.” In in vitro and ex vivo experiments, they demonstrated its feasibility for indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence-guided brain tumor diagnosis. Through direct tumor cell visualization, confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) can reveal tumor cell invasion in the adjacent normal brain and display the tumor-brain interface. Zhang et al. reviewed the latest research on Raman spectroscopy (RS) in glioma. RS is a label-free imaging method that uses intrinsic biochemical markers to identify tumors (34, 35) and has the advantages of being non-destructive, rapid and accurate. Presently, the above two techniques for histological tests are used for resected human tissue. Both methods can be equipped with miniaturized hand-held probes, so they can potentially test in vivo tumor tissue, offering guidance on the range of resection. However, their respective safety and accuracy should be further evaluated.

In summary, the 11 studies included in this Research Topic included advances in surgical approaches from various aspects, and future progress in this realm can be anticipated.

Author contributions

HB and CJ wrote the manuscript. HB revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Duffau H. Stimulation mapping of white matter tracts to study brain functional connectivity. Nat Rev Neurol (2015) 11:255–65. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.51

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Gogos AJ, Young JS, Morshed RA, Hervey-Jumper SL, Berger MS. Awake glioma surgery: technical evolution and nuances. J Neurooncol (2020) 147:515–24. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03482-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Fukui A, Muragaki Y, Saito T, Nitta M, Tsuzuki S, Asano H, et al. Impact of awake mapping on overall survival and extent of resection in patients with adult diffuse gliomas within or near eloquent areas: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis of awake craniotomy vs. general anesthesia. Acta Neurochir (Wien) (2022) 164:395–404. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04999-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Pichierri A, Bradley M, Iyer V. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided glioma resections in awake or asleep settings and feasibility in the context of a public health system. World Neurosurg X (2019) 3:100022. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2019.100022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Gerritsen JKW, Arends L, Klimek M, Dirven CMF, Vincent AJE. Impact of intraoperative stimulation mapping on high-grade glioma surgery outcome: a metaanalysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) (2019) 161:99–107. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3732-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Lima GLO, Dezamis E, Corns R, Rigaux-Viode O, Moritz-Gasser S, Roux A, et al. Surgical resection of incidental diffuse gliomas involving eloquent brain areas. rationale, functional, epileptological and oncological outcomes. Neurochirurgie (2017) 63:250–8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2016.08.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Staub-Bartelt F, Radtke O, Hänggi D, Sabel M, Rapp M. Impact of anticipated awake surgery on psychooncological distress in brain tumor patients. Front Oncol (2022) 11:795247/PDF. doi: 10.3389/FONC.2021.795247/PDF

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Duffau H. Awake mapping with transopercular approach in right insularcentered low-grade gliomas improves neurological outcomes and return to work. Neurosurgery (2022) 91:182–90. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001966

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Gravesteijn BY, Keizer ME, Vincent A, Schouten JW, Stolker RJ, Klimek M. Awake craniotomy versus craniotomy under general anesthesia for the surgical treatment of insular glioma: choices and outcomes. Neurol Res (2018) 40(2):87–96. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2017.1402147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Chowdhury T, Gray K, Sharma M, Mau C, McNutt S, Ryan C, et al. Brain cancer progression: a retrospective multicenter comparison of awake craniotomy versus general anesthesia in high-grade glioma resection. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol (2022) 34:392–400. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000778

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Siebner H, Rothwell J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: new insights into representational cortical plasticity. Exp Brain Res (2003) 148:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1234-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Takakura T, Muragaki Y, Tamura M, Maruyama T, Nitta M, Niki C, et al. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for glioma removal: prognostic value in motor function recovery from postsurgical neurological deficits. J Neurosurg (2017) 127:877–91. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.JNS16442

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Frey D, Schilt S, Strack V, Zdunczyk A, Rösler J, Nraula B, et al. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation improves the treatment outcome in patients with brain tumors in motor eloquent locations. Neuro Oncol (2014) 16:1365–72. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Aonuma S, Gomez-Tames J, Laakso I, Hirata A, Takakura T, Tamura M, et al. A high-resolution computational localization method for transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping. NeuroImage (2018) 172:85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Raffa G, Quattropani MC, Germanò A. When imaging meets neurophysiology: the value of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for preoperative neurophysiological mapping prior to brain tumor surgery. Neurosurgical Focus (2019) 47:E10. doi: 10.3171/2019.9.FOCUS19640

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Mandonnet E, De Witt Hamer P, Poisson I, Whittle I, Bernat AL, Bresson D, et al. Initial experience using awake surgery for glioma: oncological, functional, and employment outcomes in a consecutive series of 25 cases. Neurosurgery (2015) 76:382–9. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000644

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Moritz-Gasser S, Herbet G, Maldonado IL, Duffau H. Lexical access speed is significantly correlated with the return to professional activities after awake surgery for low-grade gliomas. J Neuro-Oncol (2012) 107:633–41. doi: 10.1007/s11060-011-0789-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Racine CA, Li J, Molinaro AM, Butowski N, Berger MS. Neurocognitive function in newly diagnosed low-grade glioma patients undergoing surgical resection with awake mapping techniques. Neurosurgery (2015) 77:371–9. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000779

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Duffau H. Is non-awake surgery for supratentorial adult low-grade glioma treatment still feasible? Neurosurg Rev (2018) 41:133–9. doi: 10.1007/s10143-017-0918-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Mainio A, Hakko H, Timonen M, Niemela A, Koivukangas J, Rasanen P. Depression in relation to survival among neurosurgical patients with a primary brain tumor: a 5-year follow-up study. Neurosurgery (2005) 56:1234–41. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000159648.44507.7f

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Litofsky NS, Farace E, Anderson F Jr, Meyers CA, Huang W, Laws ER Jr. Depression in patients with high-grade glioma: results of the glioma outcomes project. Neurosurgery (2004) 54:358–66. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000103450.94724.a2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Gathinji M, McGirt MJ, Attenello FJ, Chaichana KL, Than K, Olivi A, et al. Association of preoperative depression and survival after resection of malignant brain astrocytoma. Surg Neurol (2009) 71:299–303. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2008.07.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Jiang C, Wang J. Post-traumatic stress disorders in patients with low-grade glioma and its association with survival. J Neurooncol (2019) 142:385–92. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03112-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Chen Z, Wang G, Jiang C. Post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) in patients with cushing's disease before and after surgery: a prospective study. J Clin Neurosci (2019) 66:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.05.059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Jensen KK, Henriksen NA, Jorgensen LN. Endoscopic component separation for ventral hernia causes fewer wound complications compared to open components separation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc (2014) 28:3046–52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3599-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Shabanzadeh DM, Sorensen LT. Laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery decreases surgical site infection in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg (2012) 256:934–45. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318269a46b

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Ogura K, Tachibana E, Aoshima C, Sumitomo M. New microsurgical technique for intraparenchymal lesions of the brain: transcylinder approach. Acta Neurochir (2006) 148:779–85. doi: 10.1007/s00701-006-0768-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Kassam AB, Engh JA, Mintz AH, Prevedello DM. Completely endoscopic resection of intraparenchymal brain tumors. J Neurosurg (2009) 110:116–23. doi: 10.3171/2008.7.JNS08226

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Senft C, Bink A, Franz K, Vatter H, Gasser T, Seifert V. Intraoperative mri guidance and extent of resection in glioma surgery: a randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol (2011) 12:997–1003. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70196-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Qiu TM, Yao CJ, Wu JS, Pan ZG, Zhuang DX, Xu G, et al. Clinical experience of 3T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging integrated neurosurgical suite in shanghai huashan hospital. Chin Med J (Engl) (2012) 125:4328–33.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

31. Contreras López WO, Navarro PA, Crispin S. Intraoperative clinical application of augmented reality in neurosurgery: a systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg (2019) 177:6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.11.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Deng W, Li F, Song Z. Easy-to-use augmented reality neuronavigation using wireless tablet PC. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg (2014) 92:17–24. doi: 10.1159/000354816

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Mahvash M, Tabrizi LB. A novel augmented reality system of image projection for image-guided neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir (2013) 155:943–7. doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1668-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Hansen RW, Pedersen CB, Halle B, Korshoej AR, Schulz MK, Kristensen BW, et al. Comparison of 5-aminolevulinic acid and sodium fluorescein for intraoperative tumor visualization in patients with high-grade gliomas: a single-center retrospective study. J Neurosurg (2019) 133:1324–31. doi: 10.3171/2019.6.JNS191531

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Di L, Eichberg DG, Huang K, Shah AH, Jamshidi AM, Luther EM, et al. Stimulated raman histology for rapid intraoperative diagnosis of gliomas. World Neurosurg (2021) 150:e135–43. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: surgery, glioma, direct electrical stimulation (DES), IMRI, histological examination

Citation: Bai H and Jiang C (2023) Editorial: Advances in surgical approaches for the treatment of glioma. Front. Oncol. 13:1236341. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1236341

Received: 07 June 2023; Accepted: 03 July 2023;
Published: 11 July 2023.

Edited and Reviewed by:

David D. Eisenstat, Royal Children’s Hospital, Australia

Copyright © 2023 Bai and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hongmin Bai, baihmfmmu@vip.163.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.