Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Oncol., 08 June 2022
Sec. Hematologic Malignancies

Successful Preservation of Native BCR::ABL1 in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Primary Leukocytes Reveals a Reduced Kinase Activity

  • 1Department of Medicine, General Pathology Section, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
  • 2Department of Medicine, Hematology Section, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
  • 3Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
  • 4AB Analitica, Padova, Italy

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative disease caused by the acquisition of t(9;22) generating the fusion tyrosine kinase BCR::ABL1. However, despite the crucial role of this protein in the dysregulation of numerous signal transduction pathways, a direct measure of BCR::ABL1 kinase activity in chronic phase (CP) CML was never accomplished due to intense degradative activity present in mature leukocytes. Therefore, we developed a procedure suitable to preserve BCR::ABL1 protein under non-denaturing, neutral pH conditions in primary, chronic phase (CP)-CML samples. As a result, specific kinase activity was detected utilizing a biotinylated peptide substrate highly selective for c-ABL1. Furthermore, through this approach, BCR::ABL1 kinase activity was barely detectable in CP-CML compared to Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia primary samples, where kinase activity is comparable to those measured in Ph+ cell lines. These in vitro findings provide the first direct measure of BCR::ABL1 kinase activity in primary CP-CML and reveal the presence of a still uncharacterized inhibitory mechanism that maintains BCR::ABL1 in a low activity state in CP-CML despite its overexpression.

Introduction

Reportedly from literature, at least one third of patients who initially respond to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment relapsed due to the BCR::ABL1 kinase activity independence of primitive chronic myeloid leukemia cells (13). Characterizing this phenomenon has been challenging—while intact BCR::ABL1 can be easily isolated from cultured Ph+ cell lines (e.g., K562), its recovery from primary cells in non-denaturing lysis conditions typically fails due to the presence of intense degradative activity in mature PMNs, requiring denaturing lysis conditions to preserve the protein (4, 5). However, denaturation precludes the direct analysis of enzymatic activity (6, 7). Consequently, despite decades of research on BCR::ABL1 protein, its enzymatic activity in CP-CML has never been directly measured in primary leukocytes. This widely recognized issue has led to the development of alternative/indirect assays that measure BCR::ABL1 activity by detecting a downstream-phosphorylated substrate such as p-CRKL (812) with no direct demonstration that its phosphorylation is due to BCR::ABL1 itself or to other activated tyrosine kinase/s present and active in the cells.

Measuring BCR::ABL1 activity (as opposed to just the protein levels) in primary cells could be a valuable way to test the kinase inhibitor efficacy at the beginning of the patient’s treatment (13), but methods to directly assay it are still a need in the field. A specific cell-based assay suitable for measuring endogenous BCR::ABL1 kinase activity has been described but awaits validation in primary leukemia samples (1416). Therefore, we sought to devise a non-denaturing cell lysis method capable of protecting the critical targets in CML primary leukocytes, predominantly in the protease-rich fraction represented by myeloid cells, from proteolysis (in this specific case including, but not restricted to, BCR::ABL1), followed by a specific kinase assay. Following setup and validation in the CML cell lines, we successfully applied these procedures on samples derived from primary Ph+ leukemia samples [CML and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)].

Methods

Cell Lines

Murine pro-B cell line Ba/F3 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg) medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM L-glutamine, and 10% conditioned medium from WEHI cell culture producing murine recombinant IL-3 and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 atmosphere. K562 cell lines were cultured as detailed above without addition of murine IL-3. All cell lines were routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination.

Kinase Inhibitors

Imatinib (STI-571) and dasatinib (BMS-354825) were purchased from Selleckchem (Houston, TX, USA). Stock solutions of imatinib and dasatinib at 1 or 10 mM in sterile water were filtered and stored at −20°C. For imatinib (1 µM) and dasatinib (1 nM) exposure, the indicated concentration was added to the cell cultures for the indicated times before harvesting the cells for Western blot analysis and immunoprecipitation experiments.

Patients’ Population

The patients in this study were enrolled onto the trial “Studio sperimentale esplorativo sul monitoraggio PRecoce mediante biosensore dell’attività degli INibitori delle Tirosin chinasi in pazienti con leucemia mieloide cronica (SPRINT, protocol 1053CESC)”—a study conducted on adult patients with newly diagnosed CML. EDTA-anticoagulated peripheral blood (PB) cells were obtained from newly diagnosed patients with CP CML. All patients were enrolled within 7 days of diagnosis, without history of TKIs or interferon therapy.

Thawing Procedure for the Patient Samples

ALL Ph+ samples were kindly provided by Prof. Bonifacio (Hematology Section of the Department of Medicine, Verona). Briefly, after the standard Ficoll separation of the leukocyte fraction from the bone marrow aspirate, cells were collected by the interface, diluted in RPMI 1640, centrifuged at 200 × g for 10 min and resuspended in RPMI1640, 30% v/v FBS and 10% v/v DMSO. The samples were transferred in cryovials, stored overnight at -70°C in a Cryobox™, and then transferred in liquid nitrogen vapor phase. Samples were thawed in Iscove Modified Dulbecco Media at 37°C containing 10 U/ml of deoxyribonuclease I (Sigma, St. Louis, MI, USA) to avoid clumping. The cells were centrifuged at 200 × g for 15 minutes and then treated according to the LeukoProtect protocol, as described below. The featured patients are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Characteristics of the chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Characteristics of the acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients.

Cell Lysis and LEUKOPROTECT Protocol

Whole blood was suspended in Roche + LeukoProtect (R+L) pre-treatment buffer which was prepared as follows: Roche tablet, cOmplete™ ULTRA Tablets, Mini, EDTA-free (Sigma, St. Louis, MI), was resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as suggested by the manufacturer, and then LeukoProtect (AB Analitica, Padova, Italy) and 10 mM EDTA were added. After 20 min of incubation at room temperature (with continuous slow shaking), osmotic lysis of red blood cells (RBC) was performed (RBC lysis buffer: 0.155 M NH4Cl, 0.01 M KHCO3, and 0.1 mM EDTA in ddH2O). The cells were centrifuged at 200 × g for 5 min, the supernatant was removed, and the pelleted leukocytes (myeloid + lymphoid cell fraction) were lysed in an appropriate volume of cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton-X 100, 2 mM EDTA, and cOmplete™ ULTRA Tablets 1× in ddH2O). The samples were kept on ice for 15 min and then centrifuged at 13,000 × g at 4°C for 15 min. The protein concentration of the resulting cleared lysate was quantified using the Bradford protein assay (SERVA Electrophoresis, Heidelberg, Germany). The lysate aliquots were stored at -80°C.

BCR::ABL1 Immunoprecipitation

Protein lysates were incubated with an antibody against total c-Abl (Cell-Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) for 2 h at 4°C on a rotating wheel. Protein G-Dynabeads (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were added, and the mixture was incubated for 1 h at 4°C on wheel. The kinase assay (described below) was performed, and the beads containing BCR::ABL1 protein were then heated in Laemmli buffer for 5 min at 95°C to denature and elute the bound protein before separation on SDS–polyacrylamide gels.

Kinase Assay

We utilized a peptide designed and validated as specific for ABL kinase (Sequence: EAIYAAPFAKK-biotinK-GGCGGAPTYSPPPPPG) (14, 17). After BCR::ABL1 immunoprecipitation, but before denaturation in Laemmli sample buffer, 1 µM substrate peptide (GenScript Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, USA) was resuspended in kinase assay buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.05% Triton-X, 20 µM ATP, 1 mM DTT, and 0.1 mM Na3VO4 in H2O) and added to the immunocomplexes for 30 min on a rotating wheel at 4°C. The peptide was recovered from the supernatant via its biotinylated site by capture on NeutrAvidin™ Coated High-Capacity Plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After three washes, mouse monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibody, clone 4G10 (Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA, USA), was added and then incubated at 4°C overnight. The plates were washed and incubated with anti-mouse IgG antibody conjugated with HRP for 1 h at room temperature. Amplex Ultra Red Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) developing solution was then added. The plates were analyzed in a Victor plate reader (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) at 540-nm excitation and 572-nm emission wavelengths.

Western Blotting

Protein samples in SDS–PAGE gels were transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules CA). Blocking was performed using a solution of TBS 0.1% Tween 20/BSA 3%. Incubations with primary antibodies were done overnight at 4°C in a shaking system. Incubation with secondary horseradish peroxidase–conjugated anti-mouse IgG or anti-rabbit IgG antibodies (Cell-Signalling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) was performed for 1 h. All antibodies were employed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (details are shown in Table 3). Antibodies were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence with ECL Supernova (Cyagen, Santa Clara, CA, USA). All images were acquired with the ImageQuant®LAS 4000 biomolecular imager (GE Healthcare Europe GmbH, Germany). The bands were quantified to obtain optical density values as described below.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 List of antibodies.

Optical Density Detection

The densitometry values of blotted bands were quantified using the ImageJ software and then normalized with the indicated housekeeping proteins. The optical density values for BCR::ABL1 immunoprecipitated from primary samples were standardized in ImageJ software using a calibration curve derived from different amounts of BCR::ABL1 immunoprecipitated from K562 cells in order to calculate the corrected values (Figure S1).

Statistical Analysis

Analyses were performed using GraphPad 7 Instat software, and data are displayed as the mean ± SD. P-values were calculated using Student’s t-test for evaluation of differences between groups. Thresholds defined for statistically significant p-values are noted in each figure where relevant.

Results

BCR::ABL1 Activity Detection in Ph+ Cell Lines

The conditions for the kinase assay protocol were developed initially in Ba/F3 cells stably expressing native and drug-resistant mutants of BCR::ABL1. Normalized kinase activity was consistent with the sensitivity of the mutant to TKIs (18) (Figure 1A). A Western blot of protein eluted from immunoprecipitation demonstrated that BCR::ABL1 was present and intact (Figure 1B). These results show that this assay can identify TKI sensitivity and resistance, supporting its efficacy for identifying drug-responsive and drug-resistant cells.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Kinase assay optimization and setup of a protease protection protocol. (A) BCR-ABL1 and variants transfected into mouse-derived pro-B Ba/F3 cell lines were treated with 1 μM imatinib and 1 nM dasatinib for 12 h alongside an aliquot of each cell type and non-transfected Ba/F3 maintained without tyrosine kinase inhibitors as controls. Scatter plots represent three independent experiments in which the kinase activity measurements were normalized to a total BCR-ABL1 protein amount detected by Western blot analysis of immunoprecipitated samples. One-way ANOVA multiple comparison was applied for all cell lines with a p-value significance threshold of < 0.05 applied. (B) Examples of Western blot analysis of immunoprecipitated BCL-ABL1 and variants from the experiments shown in (A). (C) Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from healthy donor blood. Each cell population was spiked with BCR-ABL1-positive cell line (K562) at 10:1 ratio. The cell mixture was lysed using a non-denaturing lysis buffer, including protease inhibitors, as described in the Supplementary Information. Total protein was quantified via the Bradford assay, and Western blot analysis was performed, showing that the PMN fraction contained a degradative activity. (D) Healthy whole-blood samples combined with K562 (ratio 10:1) were pretreated with Roche cOmplete™ ULTRA Tablets inhibitors alone, LeukoProtect alone, or the combination of both. K562 cell lysate was used as a reference. (E) Densitometry analysis of BCR-ABL1 protein detected by Western blot as shown in (D). One-way ANOVA multiple comparison was applied, with a p-value significance threshold of < 0.05 (*) applied. (F) Combined Roche and LeukoProtect (R+L) pre-treatment protocol preserves several kinases from degradation. Western blot analysis of lysates from CP-CML pre-treated (+) or not (-) with R+L before lysis. The membrane was probed with the specific antibodies indicated. K562 cell lysate is loaded as a reference. *p< 0.05.

Our goal was to establish a protocol and the conditions that could overcome the known proteolytic degradation issue arising in PMN cell preparations (46). We first confirmed published reports that standard protease inhibitors used alone in non-denaturing cell lysis buffer were insufficient to inhibit the strong protease activity present in primary leukocytes (Figure 1C) (see the Supplementary Methods for a complete description).

We then used a mixture of healthy donor blood and K562 cells (10:1 ratio) as a model system to simulate primary CML samples and worked to develop conditions that could prevent degradation. Optimal protection was achieved by pre-treating the blood/K562 with a mixture of cOmplete™ ULTRA protease inhibitors (Roche) with LeukoProtect (AB Analitica) and EDTA in PBS (Figures 1D, E). These R+L pre-treatment conditions were then demonstrated with primary CML samples, successfully preserving the BCR::ABL1 protein from degradation (Figure 1F). Of note is that we also showed that other relevant kinases (e.g., AKT, BTK, JAK2, and SYK) are subject to degradation and protected by the pre-treatment conditions that we developed. In contrast, the other proteins (LYN, ERK1/2, p38 MAPK, and ACTIN) appear unaffected (Figure 1F).

BCR::ABL1 Kinase Activity Measurement in CP-CML and ALL Ph+ Patient Samples

We then used the protective R+L pre-treatment described above to prepare immunoprecipitated kinase from whole blood mixed with K562 cells at 10/1 ratio (or whole blood alone as a negative control) to simulate primary CML and performed the kinase assay. Figure 2A shows that the BCR::ABL1 activity is preserved only when the R+L pre-treatment is performed. The protocol (including protective pre-treatment, immunoprecipitation, and kinase assay) was validated in primary samples from Ph+ leukemia patients, confirming the protection of BCR::ABL1, and from the measurement of kinase activity from immuno-precipitated material (Figure 2B). Interestingly, chronic phase (CP)-CML patient samples showed a barely detectable BCR::ABL1 kinase activity compared to the K562 cell line, representing a blast crisis CML. To verify that the reduced activity measured in CP-CML was not a general property of BCR::ABL1 isolated from primary cells, we performed the same analysis on BCR::ABL1 immuno-precipitated from Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia samples (Ph+ ALL) in a series of samples expressing both p210 and p190 protein variants. Despite similar levels of total BCR::ABL1 protein and Y245 phosphorylation, the kinase activity observed for Ph+ ALL was much higher than for CP-CML, comparable to the activity seen in the K562 cell line (Figure 2C).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 BCR-ABL1 kinase activity measurement in CP-CML and ALL Ph+ patient samples. (A) Immunoprecipitates obtained from healthy donor blood and the same blood samples mixed with K562 to simulate CML were processed with (+) or without (-) R+L pretreatment protocol and tested for specific kinase activity using the Abl substrate peptide. Kinase activity graph (top) and representative Western blot analysis (bottom) underline the preservation of both BCR-ABL1 protein integrity and function only after the R+L pre-treatment procedure. (B) Kinase activity assay (top) with BCR-ABL1 protein immunoprecipitated from 500 µg of CP-CML or ALL Ph+ primary leukocyte lysate, with K562 cell line as reference. Reduced kinase activity seen in the CP-CML sample compared to a cell line in BC-CML phase (K562) and to the ALL Ph+ sample (duplicates). Western blot analysis performed on total and P-Y245 BCR-ABL1 derived from the same immunoprecipitated samples whose activity was measured (bottom). (C) BCR-ABL1 kinase activity from 13 patient samples (including 10 CP-CML and 3 ALL Ph+) alongside K562 (n = 7 biological replicates). The values obtained were normalized by an immunoprecipitated protein amount measured by densitometry analysis (ImageJ software on western blot membrane probed with anti-ABL1-antibody). One-way ANOVA multiple comparison was applied with a p-value significance threshold of < 0.05 applied. **p = 0.0017; ****p < 0.0001.

Discussion

Based on these data, we speculate that a previously unidentified kinase inhibitory mechanism may be active in the early phase of CML, for which the biochemical basis deserves further investigation. This observation could also explain the relatively indolent evolution of the chronic phase of CML that gives rise to peripheral blood leukocytes that preserve nearly normal differentiation and function, which is then lost as a part of the evolution to the later stages of the disease. We are currently exploring this in more detail.

Overall, our data demonstrate that, under native lysis conditions, the substantial degradation of BCR::ABL1 and other critical signaling proteins preclude their recovery from primary samples but that the conditions that we developed for pre-treatment with a protective buffer (the R+L pre-treatment protocol) can rescue that recovery. This suggests the need to apply this protocol for a comprehensive analysis of a functional cell proteome under native lysis conditions. Measuring kinase activity in protease-protected lysates opens the possibility to measure the kinetic parameters of specific kinases derived from protease-rich primary cells from both ex vivo- and in vivo-treated conditions, which has not been feasible previously. This method has considerable relevance in CML and, in general, for defining an intact and comprehensive protein/phosphoprotein landscape in both healthy and diseased leukocytes.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by SPRINT, protocol 1053CESC (Comitato etico per la sperimentazione clinica delle province di Verona e Rovigo). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

Funding were provided by University of Verona-Joint Project 2016-2017 and by a research grant from AB Analitica, Padova, Italy.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.904510/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Corbin AS, Agarwal A, Loriaux M, Cortes J, Deininger MW, Druker BJ. Human Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells are Insensitive to Imatinib Despite Inhibition of BCR-ABL Activity. J Clin Invest (2011) 121:396–409. doi: 10.1172/JCI35721

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Perrotti D, Silvestri G, Stramucci L, Yu J, Trotta R. Cellular and Molecular Networks in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: The Leukemic Stem, Progenitor and Stromal Cell Interplay. Curr Drug Targets (2017) 18:377–88. doi: 10.2174/1389450117666160615074120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Zhao H, Deininger MW. Declaration of Bcr-Abl1 Independence. Leukemia (2020) 34:2827–36. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-01037-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Maxwell SA, Kurzrock R, Parsons SJ, Talpaz M, Gallick GE, Kloetzer WS, et al. Analysis of P210bcr-Abl Tyrosine Protein Kinase Activity in Various Subtypes of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Cells From Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Patients. Cancer Res (1987) 47:1731–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

5. Patel H, Marley SB, Gordon MY. Conventional Western Blotting Techniques Will Not Reliably Quantify P210bcr-ABL1 Levels in CML Mononuclear Cells. Blood (2007) 1091335–36. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-10-050799

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Guo JQ, Wang JY, Arlinghaus RB. Detection of BCR-ABL Proteins in Blood Cells of Benign Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Patients. Cancer Res (1991) 51:3048–51.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

7. Patel H, Marley SB, Gordon MY. Detection in Primary Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia Cells of P210bcr-ABL1 in Complexes With Adaptor Proteins CBL, CRKL, and GRB2. Genes Chromosomes Cancer (2006) 45:1121–9. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20377

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Desplat V, Lagarde V, Belloc F, Chollet C, Leguay T, Pasquet JM, et al. Rapid Detection of Phosphotyrosine Proteins by Flow Cytometric Analysis in Bcr-Abl-Positive Cells. Cytometry A (2004) 62:35–45. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Schultheis B, Szydlo R, Mahon FX, Apperley JF, Melo JV. Analysis of Total Phosphotyrosine Levels in CD34+ Cells From CML Patients to Predict the Response to Imatinib Mesylate Treatment. Blood (2005) 105:4893–4. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-01-0210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Weerkamp F, Dekking E, Ng YY, van der Velden VH, Wai H, Bottcher S, et al. Flow Cytometric Immunobead Assay for the Detection of BCR-ABL Fusion Proteins in Leukemia Patients. Leukemia (2009) 23:1106–17. doi: 10.1038/leu.2009.93

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Lucas CM, Harris RJ, Giannoudis A, Knight K, Watmough SJ, Clark RE. BCR-ABL1 Tyrosine Kinase Activity at Diagnosis, as Determined via the Pcrkl/CrkL Ratio, is Predictive of Clinical Outcome in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia. Br J Haematol (2010) 149:458–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.08066.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Lof L, Arngarden L, Olsson-Stromberg U, Siart B, Jansson M, Dahlin JS, et al. Flow Cytometric Measurement of Blood Cells With BCR-ABL1 Fusion Protein in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Sci Rep (2017) 7:623. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00755-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. White D, Saunders V, Grigg A, Arthur C, Filshie R, Leahy MF, et al. Measurement of In Vivo BCR-ABL Kinase Inhibition to Monitor Imatinib-Induced Target Blockade and Predict Response in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol (2007) 25:4445–51. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.9499

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Yang TY, Eissler CL, Hall MC, Parker LL. A Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) Method to Detect Bcr-Abl Kinase Activity in CML Using a Peptide Biosensor. PLoS One (2013) 8:e56627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056627

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Ouellette SB, Noel BM, Parker LL. A Cell-Based Assay for Measuring Endogenous BcrAbl Kinase Activity and Inhibitor Resistance. PLoS One (2016) 11:e0161748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161748

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Montecchini O, Braidotti S, Franca R, Zudeh G, Boni C, Sorio C, et al. A Novel ELISA-Based Peptide Biosensor Assay for Screening ABL1 Activity In Vitro: A Challenge for Precision Therapy in BCR-ABL1 and BCR-ABL1 Like Leukemias. Front Pharmacol (2021) 12:749361. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.749361

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Placzek EA, Plebanek MP, Lipchik AM, Kidd SR, Parker LL. A Peptide Biosensor for Detecting Intracellular Abl Kinase Activity Using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. Anal Biochem (2010) 397:73–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.09.048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Redaelli S, Piazza R, Rostagno R, Magistroni V, Perini P, Marega M, et al. Activity of Bosutinib, Dasatinib, and Nilotinib Against 18 Imatinib-Resistant BCR/ABL Mutants. J Clin Oncol (2009) 27:469–71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.8853

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: chronic myelogenous leukemia, acute lymphocytic leukemia, philadelphia chromosome, Bcr Abl, tyrosine kinase, imatinib (Gleevec), kinase activity, kinase assay

Citation: Boni C, Bonifacio M, Vezzalini M, Scaffidi L, Tomasello L, Parker LL, Boscarino D, Paladin D, Krampera M and Sorio C (2022) Successful Preservation of Native BCR::ABL1 in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Primary Leukocytes Reveals a Reduced Kinase Activity. Front. Oncol. 12:904510. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.904510

Received: 25 March 2022; Accepted: 19 April 2022;
Published: 08 June 2022.

Edited by:

Simona Soverini, University of Bologna, Italy

Reviewed by:

Belinda Pinto Simoes, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Paulo Rodrigues-Santos, University of Coimbra, Portugal
Michele Bianchini, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina

Copyright © 2022 Boni, Bonifacio, Vezzalini, Scaffidi, Tomasello, Parker, Boscarino, Paladin, Krampera and Sorio. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Claudio Sorio, claudio.sorio@univr.it

Present address: Luisa Tomasello, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Biomedical Research TowerColumbus, Ohio, United States

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.