Abstract
The human intestine is home to a variety of microorganisms. In healthy populations, the intestinal flora shares a degree of similarity and stability, and they have a role in the metabolism, immunological response, and physiological function of key organs. With the rapid advent of high-throughput sequencing in recent years, several researchers have found that dysbiosis of the human gut microflora potentially cause physical problems and gynecological malignancies among postmenopausal women. Besides, dysbiosis hinders tumor treatment. Nonetheless, the importance of maintaining homeostatic gut microbiota and the effective use of probiotics in the treatment of gynecological malignancies should not be disregarded. Moreover, intestinal flora regulation and the involvement of probiotics as well as associated biologically active substances in gynecological malignancies could be an adjuvant treatment modality related to surgery and chemoradiotherapy in the future. Herein, this article aims to review the potential relationship between gut microorganisms and postmenopausal status as well as gynecologic malignancies; then the relationship between gut microbes and early screening as well as therapeutic aspects. Also, we describe the role of probiotics in the prevention, treatment, and prognosis of gynecologic malignancies.
Introduction
Cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, and endometrial cancer are the most common gynecological cancers. Based on the latest global cancer data, cervical cancer among women has the 4th and 6th highest incidence and mortality rates, respectively, whereas ovarian cancer has the 5th highest mortality rate, topping the list of gynecological malignant tumors (1). Moreover, as the human living standards improve, obesity (2), endocrine disorders, environmental pollution may also increase the incidence and mortality of gynecological cancers. However, there is no clear conclusion on the causes and mechanisms of gynecologic malignancies. Thus, a discussion on the importance of intestinal flora to gynecologic malignancies and the potential role of probiotics help scholars investigate gynecologic malignancies from a different angle. This article reviews the microbial and gynecological malignancy importance from the following aspects: First is the effect of changes in gut microbes (GM) on the development of gynecological malignancies. Second is the hypothesis of biomarkers of gynecologic malignancies. Lastly are the aspects related to the treatment of gynecologic malignancies, such as the relationship between microorganisms and the sensitivity of chemotherapeutic agents including platinum drugs, as well as the use of probiotics and flora transplantation in the treatment and prognosis of gynecologic malignancies. Here, our objective is to investigate the effect of changes in body flora on gynecological malignancies geared towards providing novel insights for early screening and subsequent treatment of gynecological malignancies.
Intestinal Microecology
GM
The human GM comprise numerous groups of microorganisms including bacteria, archaea, viruses, eukaryotes, and parasites. The microbial community in the human gut is extremely large containing up to 150 times more genes than the human genome (3).The majority of these microbes are bacteria interacting with the human intestinal tract in the long-term evolution process; they primarily include Bacteroides, Clostridium, Bifidobacterium, and Lactobacillus. Pathogenic flora is a small minority. Disruption of commensal flora or invasion of pathogenic bacteria including Salmonella (4), affects the homeostasis of he intestinal microenvironment, resulting in abdominal pain, diarrhea, and other diseases. Studies reveal that patients with gynecologic malignancies display changes in intestinal microflora before the onset and during treatment (5, 6), thereby suggesting a correlation between GM and gynecologic malignancies.
GM and Cancer
GM includes microorganisms residing in the human intestine; these microbes are living interdependently with the human body, and therefore their homeostasis plays a significant role in human health. GM is involved in the digestion and absorption of the body’s intake and modulates the development and treatment of diabetes (7), cardiovascular disease (8), osteoporosis (9), Alzheimer’s disease (10, 11), autism (12), depression (13), as well as cancer. Healthy and stable intestinal flora inhibits the development of cancer, whereas dysregulated intestinal flora has a limited protective effect on the body and could promote cancer development (Figure 1). Healthy individuals and colorectal cancer patients have significantly distinct gut flora structures. In contrast with healthy individuals, colorectal cancer patients have more abundance of Bacteroides fragilis, Enterococcus, Escherichia/Shigella, Klebsiella, Streptococcus, and Peptostreptococcus. Enrichment of opportunistic pathogens potentially promotes the occurrence of colorectal cancer by causing related inflammation. Besides, the decrease of butyric acid-producing bacteria is common among colorectal cancer patients. Butyric acid plays an important role in body immunity and inhibition of tumors in vivo. This means that an imbalance in GM diminishes the original protective effect and promotes the development of colorectal cancer (14). Also, GM may affect the efficacy of drugs during cancer treatment by targeting the immune response and disrupting the chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity (15, 16). At present, immunotherapy for cancer is a major hot topic in cancer treatment. As immunotherapies including CAR-T cells continue to mature, scholars are gradually shifting their focus to the impact of microbiota on cancer immunotherapy. One study found that CTLA-4 specific antibody displayed no effect on the tumor of antibiotic-treated and germ-free mice, whereas the presence of specific bacteria, including B. Fragilis had an important effect on the efficacy of CTLA-4 blockade. This indicates that the existence and structure of intestinal flora mediate the efficacy of tumor immunotherapy, nevertheless, research on specific mechanisms is still ongoing (17). Recent studies suggest that short-chain fatty acids, including butyric acid produced by intestinal microbial fermentation potentially affect T cell metabolism and related gene expression levels, thereby improving the activity of anti-tumor T cells. Besides, inosine, produced by intestinal bacteria B.Pseudolusgum potentially plays an auxiliary role in improving the efficacy of ICB immunotherapy (18). Additionally, the radiotherapy process in cancer patients causes dysbiosis of GM (5), which in turn becomes more detrimental to cancer treatment. The use of antibiotics, probiotics, fecal microbiota transplants (FMT), and certain metabolites to artificially manage the gut flora could provide a strong adjunct to cancer treatment. Mechanistic aspects of the effect of GM on cancer development are also a focus of future research.
Figure 1
Gynecologic Malignancies and GM
Flora Changes and Diseases in Postmenopausal Women
Most gynecological malignancies are predominant in postmenopausal and older women; therefore, it is necessary to explore changes in the intestinal flora and related diseases among postmenopausal women. Lack of endogenous estrogen in women after menopause triggers a wide range of problems, such as increased incidence of cardiovascular disease (19), osteoporosis (20), obesity (21), diabetes (22), breast cancer (23), and other gynecologic cancers. An increase in intestinal permeability has been noted during the menopausal transition; besides, there is a relationship between increased intestinal permeability and the development of inflammation (24). Additionally, unlike premenopausal women, fecal samples from postmenopausal women showed changes in the flora linked to endocrine disorders and osteoporosis, including a decrease in Firmicutes and Roseburia spp. and an increase in Bacteroidetes and toluene-producing genus Tolumonas (25). In turn, hormone replacement therapy (26), used to combat these conditions potentially increases the incidence of estrogen-related cancers including breast and ovarian cancers (27). As such, it is necessary to analyze the effect of microorganisms on estrogen levels and innovate microbial-assisted therapy or reduce the side effects of hormone replacement therapy. Previous studies reported that non-ovarian systemic estrogen levels are directly related to the richness and alpha diversity of intestinal flora and could affect their levels via enterohepatic circulation (28). This leads to thinking whether it is possible to control the disease from the source to reduce the incidence of the disease by artificially intervening the GM of menopausal and postmenopausal women. In addition, vaginal dryness and tissue atrophy in postmenopausal women markedly affect the quality of life. Altered environmental status of the vagina potentially conducive to the invasion of pathogenic bacteria from the vagina resulting in vaginal dysbiosis and gynecological malignancies. In one experiment, the fecal microbes of ovary-intact fecund female mice was transplanted into ovariectomized ones with vaginal atrophy, and consequently, the atrophy symptoms significantly improved. This indicates an interaction between the ovarian and reproductive tract status as well as the GM (29). Moreover, the improvement of vaginal epithelial atrophy symptoms by FMT could exhibit an impact on the prevention of gynecological malignancies by improving vaginal epithelial atrophy-related protective effects. In summary, investigating changes of GM in postmenopausal women and their roles in disease development as well as treatment will yield unprecedented effects on the health and quality of life among postmenopausal women.
GM in Cervical Cancer
Cervical cancer is one of the most prevalent gynecological malignant tumors that threatens the life and health of women. The current research on the relationship between GM and cervical cancer primarily focuses on the changes of GM and related intestinal diseases among cervical cancer patients post-radiotherapy. The majority of scholars share a similar view on gut microbial alterations in cervical cancer patients (6). However, there is controversy on the research of intestinal biomarkers and a lack of research on related biological mechanisms. Through 16S rRNA sequencing comparison, scholars noted differences in GM between cervical cancer patients and healthy individuals. Based on recent reports, phylum Proteobacteria, genus Parabacteroides, Escherichia_Shigells and Roseburia were predicted to be potential biomarkers in the identification of cervical cancer (30). However, another study soon after showed different results, with Kang and colleagues identifying Prevotella, Peptostreptococcus, Finegolida, Ruminococcus, Clostridium, Pseudomonas, and Turibacter as biomarkers for predicting early cervical cancer (31). The aforementioned studies provide a future direction and act as a catalyst for the future upgrading of early prediction and diagnostic modalities for cervical cancer. In addition, the researchers discovered a decrease in butyrate-producing bacteria Ruminococcus and Clostridium in the intestine of patients with early-stage cervical cancer (31). Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) such as butyric acid produced by microbial metabolism have good antitumor activity (32–34), affecting various beneficial processes such as immunity and apoptosis of cancer cells,thus suggesting a possible indirect link between GM and cancer development through the presence or absence of specific genera and altered numbers. Additional experiments are therefore required to validate these possibilities for interrelationship between GM and cervical carcinogenesis and their roles in screening and diagnosis.
GM in Ovarian Cancer
Since abdominal discomfort is a hallmark symptom of ovarian cancer and gastrointestinal adverse effects are evident during treatment, it is meaningful to study the association between GM and ovarian cancer (35). Dysbiosis of the gut microbial environment is strongly associated with the development of ovarian cancer. GM disorder promotes tumor growth and causes an epithelial-mesenchymal transition in xenograft mice (36). Additionally, the imbalance of GM is associated with obesity (37) and estrogen level (15); obesity and estrogen imbalance are risk factors for the incidence of ovarian cancer (2, 38). This indicates that imbalanced GM could cause obesity and estrogen imbalance via an approach that triggers ovarian cancer. Besides, a non-obese individual should regulate their diet. A diet high in oil, fat, and salt is also undesirable. A study on animals subjected to a high-fat diet reported the diet may promote the development of ovarian cancer by disrupting the levels of inflammatory factors (39). Therefore, poor diet and health habits are crucial risk factors for the occurrence of cancer.
Studies on ovarian cancer treatment indicate that GM influences the sensitivity of the human body to platinum drugs. The advert effects of chemotherapy on GM, e.g. dysbiosis, are more prevalent in patients (16) and animal (40) models bearing ovarian cancers. In addition, compared to platinum-sensitive patients, platinum-resistant patients showed a more pronounced dysbiosis of GM, with a decrease in the health-related groups and an increase in the proportion of lactic acid-producing bacteria including Coriobacteriaceae and Bifidobacterium (16). In addition to reduced platinum sensitivity, animal studies have revealed that the destruction of GM contributes to the growth of ovarian malignancies and reduces mice survival (41). Also, it indicates that the integrity and stability of GM regulate the efficacy of chemotherapy drugs. GM metabolites such as bile acids can interact with host drug metabolizing enzymes to affect drug disposition, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (42). The discovery of potential features of GM potentially provides a novel idea for future early detection, treatment, and even prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer. GM and their products may also contribute to the treatment of ovarian cancer. Zhao and colleagues isolated four strains of Bacillus from the stool of healthy individuals and cancer patients and observed that bacterial products inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells, possibly by causing apoptosis (43). These bacterial products may be optimized as anticancer drugs in the future. Furthermore, one study using a mouse model discovered that anticancer drugs have a certain effect on GM, causing the transfer of Gram-positive bacteria to secondary lymphoid organs and producing an immune response (44). This indicates that the intestinal microbiota favorably affects the formation of anticancer immune response and the efficacy of chemotherapy.
Gut microbial changes after ovarian cancer treatment should also be noticed. Unlike pre-operative stool samples of ovarian cancer, the abundance of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes was significantly lower in post-operative stool samples, whereas Proteobacteria abundance was significantly higher. Similar changes were noted in chemotherapy group (5). This implies that the treatment of ovarian cancer has a significant impact on intestinal flora and that there may be a potential correlation between intestinal flora and the clinical prognosis of ovarian cancer patients.
GM in Endometrial Cancer
Endometrial cancer is a group of epithelial malignant tumors of the endometrium that occur most frequently in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. The risk factors of endometrial cancer include obesity, diabetes, and hypertension (45–47). The incidence of endometrial cancer rates varies dramatically not only between premenopausal and postmenopausal women but also among countries with varying degrees of development. Its incidence is higher in Europe and North America than in developing countries (48). Researchers speculate that the development of endometrial cancer could be related to the adverse consequences of hormonal abnormalities and overweight due to the improvement in the quality of life and population diet. The disruption of digestion and absorption induced by dysbiosis of GM potentially causes obesity, and the occurrence of obesity could result in hypertension, diabetes, and hormonal disorders. This suggests a relationship between GM and endometrial cancer. Therefore, analyzing the changes of intestinal flora in obese people potentially provides novel insights for the in-depth study of endometrial cancer. In addition, the incidence of endometrial cancer is associated with menstruation, marriage and childbirth, smoking, drinking, and other factors. Dietary habits, marriage and love policies and customs of different countries, environmental pollution, and even ethnic differences potentially lead to different incidences of endometrial cancer. GM are able to regulate systemic estrogen levels in women. β-glucuronidases and β-glucuronides encoded by estrobolome such as (49) Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, and Lactobacillus are able to act in the intestine to regulate circulating estrogen levels (15, 50). They remove the glucuronides of conjugated estrogens excreted via bile to obtain free estrogen molecules. In addition, hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases are also widely present in the human gut and are involved in the partial reduction process of estrogen synthesis from cholesterol precursors (51). Urinary (52) and serum (53) estrogen levels were positively correlated with gut microbial diversity. GM also confer biological activity to foreign estrogen-like compounds (54, 55). For example, GM are able to catalyze the metabolism of daidzein to the form of equol or O-desmethylangolensin (56). Lignans beneficial effects are also dependent on the activity of gut microbial metabolites enterodiol and enterolactone (57). Therefore, in addition to the direct effects of female genetic differences and altered physical conditions as well as environmental estrogen exposure (58) on hormone levels, the dysbiosis of GM due to poor lifestyle, diet, and antibiotic abuse also indirectly affects estrogen levels, which in turn promotes endometrial carcinogenesis. A recent review on the potential relationship between intestinal flora, obesity, menopausal status, estrogen, and endometrial cancer also suggests that menopause and obesity could modulate the development of endometrial cancer by causing changes in estrogen due to intestinal flora imbalance (59). Obesity contributes to an increased risk and a worse prognosis for endometrial cancer. One study discovered that the endometrial epithelial cells of obese women revealed numerous methylation changes, and 54 overlapping regions of differential methylation with stage I endometrial cancer. This suggests that obesity promotes the development of endometrial cancer by influencing DNA methylation and causing dysregulation of related metabolic pathways (60). The effect of obesity on endometrial cancer has led to speculation on whether bariatric surgery can help ameliorate obesity by stabilizing the GM and estrogen levels and possibly even promote the treatment of endometrial cancer in the future. A related study reported that bariatric surgery causes changes in the GM with beneficial effects, but not in terms of hormones (61), and there was no direct relationship between bariatric surgery and the incidence of endometrial cancer. However, digging into the potential role of bariatric surgery in endometrial cancer could have unprecedented application in future cancer research.
The Potential Role of Probiotics in the Adjuvant Treatment of Gynecological Malignancies
As the name suggests, probiotics are beneficial microorganisms to the body within a certain dose range. The management of probiotics can improve the dysbiosis of GM to certain extent, which in turn can have beneficial effects on gynecological cancers by affecting estrogen levels, cancer immunity, cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis, and drug resistance (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Lactobacillus Rhamnosus
Lactobacillus rhamnosus is a star genus in the field of probiotics with wide range of applications. The potential role of Lactobacillus rhamnosus in cancer is widely divided into the following components. First, Lactobacillus rhamnosus modulates homeostasis of the intestinal flora and protects the mucosa and restores the intestinal barrier function by enhancing the expression of genes related to healthy intestinal permeability (62–64), whereas the homeostatic effect of intestinal flora on gynecological malignancies has been mentioned above. Secondly, regarding human self-protection, Lactobacillus rhamnosus potentially regulates immunity, causing apoptosis of cancer cells and anti-inflammatory effects by activating or inhibiting cytokine expression (65–67), and invasion of pathogens (68, 69). Eventually, Lactobacillus rhamnosus also protects the body from the toxicity and side effects of radiotherapy and other treatment methods (70, 71).
Bacteria Isolated From Secretions or Excretions
Several studies have documented the anticancer activity of certain bacteria isolated from human and animal secretions or excretions. Bifidobacterium adolescentis SPM1005-A (72) isolated from human feces, Lactobacillus plantarum 5BL (73) isolated from vaginal secretions of adolescent females, Lactobacillus gasseri G10 and H15 (74) isolated from the vagina of healthy humans, three potential probiotic strains isolated from human milk Lactobacillus casei SR1, Lactobacillus casei SR2, and Lactobacillus paracasei SR4 (75), and Enterococcus faecalis por1 (76) isolated from porcine intestinal food, etc. have desired probiotic properties and may inhibit cancer development by targeting oncogenes, preventing cancer cell growth, inducing apoptosis or modulating immune response capacity.
Metabolites of the Bacterium
Certain microbial-associated metabolites suppress gynecologic malignancy development. Kevin et al. found that the parasporin-2Aa1 isolated from Bacillus thuringiensis 4R2, activated by proteinase K, induces various human cancer cells from different tissues, including endometrial cancer cell of apoptosis, however, it does not affect normal cells (77). Due to its good properties, parasporin-2Aa1 can be used in the future to reduce the killing of normal cells in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs.
Probiotic Blends and Probiotic Modifications
Probiotic blends and genetically engineered probiotics promote cancer treatment by targeting the immune system. Bermudez and colleagues showed that recombinant Lactococci engineered to express HPV-16 E7 antigen, administered intranasally, stimulates both the cell-mediated (which secretes IL-12 and IFN - γ) and humoral immune systems (which produces antibodies to E7) to prevent HPV-associated cervical cancer (78). Additionally, studies have shown that oral administration of probiotic mixture comprising specific lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and lactoferrin RCXTM regulate the innate and adaptive immune responses of the vagina and the whole body, weaken vaginopathy induced by Gardasella vaginalis (79), and prevent gynecological cancers resulting from inflammation.
Role in Other Aspects Related to Gynecological Malignancies
Estrogen deficiency affects the health of women, nevertheless, improper estrogen supplementation could also cause diseases including breast and endometrial cancers. Therefore, the use of probiotics in combined administration with hormone-related drugs is a hot topic for future estrogen deficiency research. Bioavailable isoflavones with selective estrogen receptor affinity have potential in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis due to estrogen deficiency, at the same time minimizing or eliminating its carcinogenic side effects (80). Also, probiotics modulate the prevention and management of cancer treatment side effects. One possible acute side effect of cervical cancer treatment through radiotherapy is radiation-induced diarrhea, and many experiments have demonstrated that supplementation with probiotics including Lactobacillus lactis, Bifidobacterium animalis, and Lactobacillus acidophilus minimize the incidence and severity of radiation-induced diarrhea in cervical cancer patients (81, 82). Most of the above studies are based on phenomena, and in-depth studies are needed to prove the accuracy of the conclusions. Research on the mechanism of action of probiotics in the treatment of gynecological cancers is still lacking and needs to be further explored.
Prospect
Microorganisms are neither good nor bad by themselves; they are divided into beneficial and harmful bacteria for the host, resulting in a two-sided effect of microorganisms on the host. On one hand, dysbacteriosis and invasion of pathogenic bacteria promote carcinogenesis and are detrimental to the later treatment of gynecological malignancies. Nevertheless, the maintenance of flora homeostasis and the application of probiotics promote cancer inhibition. The effective use of gut microorganisms has a significant impact on the future of gynecologic malignancies. The above studies have promoted the advances in microbiological aspects of gynecological malignancies; however, there have been shortcomings including a small sample size and incomplete study of mechanisms. Therefore, future studies should increase the sample size, consider all relevant parameters influencing the results, and focus on investigating mechanisms and clinical effects for better application in practice.
In summary, the following recommendation will significantly prolong the survival time of patients with gynecological malignant tumors as well as improve the survival rate and quality of life: In-depth research on the relationship between the microbial flora in vivo and the generation as well as the development of gynecological malignant tumors at various stages; the use of microorganisms in predicting early stages of cancer; research on the effect of beneficial microorganisms and genetic engineering transformation;Â the use of probiotics; the transplantation of bacteria and other means to intervene and control the flora in vivo and the use of microorganisms to improve the sequelae after treatment of gynecological malignant tumor.
Funding
This work was supported by CSCO Project (Y-2019Genecast-019,JX), Liaoning Cancer Hospital Yangtse River Scholars Project (JX), Medical-Engineering Cross Research Fund between Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Dalian University of Technology (LD202022, TS) and LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program (XLYC1907160, JX)
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
XJ and TS: Conceived and designed the review. MH and NW wrote the draft of paper. WH and MB drew the picture. All authors read and approved the final manuscript and submission of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
Author BM is employed by Liaoning Microhealth Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
BrayFFerlayJSoerjomataramISiegelRLTorreLAJemalA. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: Globocan Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin (2018) 68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
2
AvgerinosKISpyrouNMantzorosCSDalamagaM. Obesity and Cancer Risk: Emerging Biological Mechanisms and Perspectives. Metabolism (2019) 92:121–35. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.11.001
3
QinJLiRRaesJArumugamMBurgdorfKSManichanhCet al. A Human Gut Microbial Gene Catalogue Established by Metagenomic Sequencing. Nature (2010) 464(7285):59–U70. doi: 10.1038/nature08821
4
FerrariRGRosarioDKACunha-NetoAManoSBFigueiredoEESConte-JuniorCA. Worldwide Epidemiology of Salmonella Serovars in Animal-Based Foods: A Meta-Analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol (2019) 85(14):e00591–19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00591-19
5
TongJZhangXFanYChenLMaXYuHet al. Changes of Intestinal Microbiota in Ovarian Cancer Patients Treated With Surgery and Chemotherapy. Cancer Manag Res (2020) 12:8125–35. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S265205
6
SimsTTColbertLEZhengJLMedranoAYDHoffmanKLRamondettaLet al. Gut Microbial Diversity and Genus-Level Differences Identified in Cervical Cancer Patients Versus Healthy Controls. Gynecol Oncol (2019) 155(2):237–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.09.002
7
SharmaSTripathiP. Gut Microbiome and Type 2 Diabetes: Where We Are and Where to Go? J Nutr Biochem (2019) 63:101–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2018.10.003
8
Ahmad AFDGO'GaraFCaparros-MartinJWardNC. The Gut Microbiome and Cardiovascular Disease: Current Knowledge and Clinical Potential. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2019) 317(5):H923–38. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00376.2019
9
DingKHuaFDingW. Gut Microbiome and Osteoporosis. Aging Dis (2020) 11(2):438–47. doi: 10.14336/AD.2019.0523
10
ZhuangZQShenLLLiWWFuXZengFGuiLet al. Gut Microbiota Is Altered in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis (2018) 63(4):1337–46. doi: 10.3233/jad-180176
11
AngelucciFCechovaKAmlerovaJHortJ. Antibiotics, Gut Microbiota, and Alzheimer's Disease. J Neuroinflamm (2019) 16(1):108. doi:Â 10.1186/s12974-019-1494-4
12
Garcia-GutierrezENarbadARodriguezJM. Autism Spectrum Disorder Associated With Gut Microbiota at Immune, Metabolomic, and Neuroactive Level. Front Neurosci (2020) 14:578666. doi:Â 10.3389/fnins.2020.578666
13
KonjevodMPerkovicMNSaizJStracDSBarbasCRojoD. Metabolomics Analysis of Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Neurodegenerative and Psychiatric Diseases. J Pharm Biomed Anal (2021) 194:113681. doi:Â 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113681
14
WangTCaiGQiuYFeiNZhangMPangXet al. Structural Segregation of Gut Microbiota Between Colorectal Cancer Patients and Healthy Volunteers. ISME J (2012) 6(2):320–9. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.109
15
GrahamMEHerbertWGSongSDRamanHNZhuJEGonzalezPEet al. Gut and Vaginal Microbiomes on Steroids: Implications for Women's Health. Trends Endocrinol Metab (2021) 32(8):554–65. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2021.04.014
16
D'AmicoFPerroneAMRampelliSColuccelliSBaroneMRavegniniGet al. Gut Microbiota Dynamics During Chemotherapy in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients Are Related to Therapeutic Outcome. Cancers (Basel) (2021) 13(16):3999. doi:Â 10.3390/cancers13163999
17
VétizouMPittJMDaillèreRLepagePWaldschmittNFlamentCet al. Anticancer Immunotherapy by Ctla-4 Blockade Relies on the Gut Microbiota. Science (2015) 350(6264):1079–84. doi: 10.1126/science.aad1329
18
LuuMVisekrunaA. Microbial Metabolites: Novel Therapeutic Tools for Boosting Cancer Therapies. Trends Cell Biol (2021) 31(11):873–5. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2021.08.005
19
ZilbermanJM. Menopause: Hypertension and Vascular Disease. Hipertension y riesgo Vasc (2018) 35(2):77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.hipert.2017.11.001
20
IkedaKHorie-InoueKInoueS. Functions of Estrogen and Estrogen Receptor Signaling on Skeletal Muscle. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol (2019) 191:105375. doi:Â 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.105375
21
KoSHKimHS. Menopause-Associated Lipid Metabolic Disorders and Foods Beneficial for Postmenopausal Women. Nutrients (2020) 12(1):202. doi:Â 10.3390/nu12010202
22
Mauvais-JarvisFCleggDJHevenerAL. The Role of Estrogens in Control of Energy Balance and Glucose Homeostasis. Endocrine Rev (2013) 34(3):309–38. doi: 10.1210/er.2012-1055
23
Kulkoyluoglu-CotulEArcaAMadak-ErdoganZ. Crosstalk Between Estrogen Signaling and Breast Cancer Metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab (2019) 30(1):25–38. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2018.10.006
24
ShiehAEpeldeguiMKarlamanglaASGreendaleGA. Gut Permeability, Inflammation, and Bone Density Across the Menopause Transition. JCI Insight (2020) 5(2):e134092. doi:Â 10.1172/jci.insight.134092
25
ZhaoHChenJLiXSunQQinPWangQ. Compositional and Functional Features of the Female Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Gut Microbiota. FEBS Lett (2019) 593(18):2655–64. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13527
26
Diamanti-KandarakisE. Hormone Replacement Therapy and Risk of Malignancy. Curr Opin Obstetrics Gynecol (2004) 16(1):73–8. doi: 10.1097/00001703-200402000-00013
27
VinogradovaYCouplandCHippisley-CoxJ. Use of Hormone Replacement Therapy and Risk of Breast Cancer: Nested Case-Control Studies Using the Qresearch and Cprd Databases. BMJ (2020) 371:m3873. doi:Â 10.1136/bmj.m3873
28
FloresRShiJFuhrmanBXuXVeenstraTDGailMHet al. Fecal Microbial Determinants of Fecal and Systemic Estrogens and Estrogen Metabolites: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Trans Med (2012) 10:253. doi:Â 10.1186/1479-5876-10-253
29
HuangJShanWLiFWangZChengJLuFet al. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Mitigates Vaginal Atrophy in Ovariectomized Mice. AGING-US (2021) 13(5):7589–607. doi: 10.18632/aging.202627
30
WangZWangQZhaoJGongLZhangYWangXet al. Altered Diversity and Composition of the Gut Microbiome in Patients With Cervical Cancer. AMB Express (2019) 9(1):40. doi:Â 10.1186/s13568-019-0763-z
31
KangGUJungDRLeeYHJeonSYHanHSChongGOet al. Dynamics of Fecal Microbiota With and Without Invasive Cervical Cancer and Its Application in Early Diagnosis. Cancers (Basel) (2020) 12(12):3800. doi:Â 10.3390/cancers12123800
32
MirzaeiRAfaghiABabakhaniSSohrabiMRHosseini-FardSRBabolhavaejiKet al. Role of Microbiota-Derived Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Cancer Development and Prevention. BioMed Pharmacother (2021) 139:111619. doi:Â 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111619
33
LuuMRiesterZBaldrichAReichardtNYuilleSBusettiAet al. Microbial Short-Chain Fatty Acids Modulate Cd8(+) T Cell Responses and Improve Adoptive Immunotherapy for Cancer. Nat Commun (2021) 12(1):4077. doi:Â 10.1038/s41467-021-24331-1
34
ParkJKimMKangSGJannaschAHCooperBPattersonJet al. Short-Chain Fatty Acids Induce Both Effector and Regulatory T Cells by Suppression of Histone Deacetylases and Regulation of the Mtor-S6k Pathway. Mucosal Immunol (2015) 8(1):80–93. doi: 10.1038/mi.2014.44
35
GoffBAMandelLSMelanconCHMuntzHG. Frequency of Symptoms of Ovarian Cancer in Women Presenting to Primary Care Clinics. Jama-Journal Am Med Assoc (2004) 291(22):2705–12. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.22.2705
36
XuSLiuZLvMChenYLiuY. Intestinal Dysbiosis Promotes Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Activating Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Ovarian Cancer. Pathog Dis (2019) 77(2):ftz019. doi:Â 10.1093/femspd/ftz019
37
GomesACHoffmannCMotaJF. The Human Gut Microbiota: Metabolism and Perspective in Obesity. Gut Microbes (2018) 9(4):308–25. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2018.1465157
38
ZahidMBeselerCLHallJBLeVanTCavalieriELRoganEG. Unbalanced Estrogen Metabolism in Ovarian Cancer. Int J Cancer (2014) 134(10):2414–23. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28565
39
SaeidiJMotaghipurRSepehrianAMohtashamiMForooghi NiaFGhasemiA. Dietary Fats Promote Inflammation in Wistar Rats as Well as Induce Proliferation, Invasion of Skov3 Ovarian Cancer Cells. J Food Biochem (2020) 44(5):e13177. doi:Â 10.1111/jfbc.13177
40
ChenLZhaiYWangYFearonERNunezGInoharaNet al. Altering the Microbiome Inhibits Tumorigenesis in a Mouse Model of Oviductal High-Grade Serous Carcinoma. Cancer Res (2021) 81(12):3309–18. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-0106
41
ChambersLMEsakovELBraleyCSangwanNVargasRRosePGet al. The Gut Microbiome Attenuates Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Growth and Platinum Sensitivity: Novel Opportunities for Ovarian Cancer Treatment. Gynecol Oncol (2020) 159:108–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.113
42
TsunodaSMGonzalesCJarmuschAKMomperJDMaJD. Contribution of the Gut Microbiome to Drug Disposition, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Variability. Clin Pharmacokinet (2021) 60(8):971–84. doi: 10.1007/s40262-021-01032-y
43
ZhaoMFLiangGDZhouYJChiZPZhuangHZhuSLet al. Novel Bacillus Strains From the Human Gut Exert Anticancer Effects on a Broad Range of Malignancy Types. Invest New Drugs (2020) 38(5):1373–82. doi: 10.1007/s10637-020-00906-5
44
ViaudSSaccheriFMignotGYamazakiTDaillereRHannaniDet al. The Intestinal Microbiota Modulates the Anticancer Immune Effects of Cyclophosphamide. Science (2013) 342(6161):971–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1240537
45
RaglanOKallialaIMarkozannesGCividiniSGunterMJNautiyalJet al. Risk Factors for Endometrial Cancer: An Umbrella Review of the Literature. Int J Cancer (2019) 145(7):1719–30. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31961
46
TsilidisKKKasimisJCLopezDSNtzaniEEIoannidisJP. Type 2 Diabetes and Cancer: Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies. BMJ (2015) 350:g7607. doi:Â 10.1136/bmj.g7607
47
YangXWangJ. The Role of Metabolic Syndrome in Endometrial Cancer: A Review. Front Oncol (2019) 9:744. doi:Â 10.3389/fonc.2019.00744
48
Lortet-TieulentJFerlayJBrayFJemalA. International Patterns and Trends in Endometrial Cancer Incidence, 1978-2013. J Natl Cancer Inst (2018) 110(4):354–61. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx214
49
PlottelCSBlaserMJ. Microbiome and Malignancy. Cell Host Microbe (2011) 10(4):324–35. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.10.003
50
SarkarAHartySJohnsonKVMoellerAHCarmodyRNLehtoSMet al. The Role of the Microbiome in the Neurobiology of Social Behaviour. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc (2020) 95(5):1131–66. doi: 10.1111/brv.12603
51
KisielaMSkarkaAEbertBMaserE. Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases (Hsds) in Bacteria: A Bioinformatic Perspective. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol (2012) 129(1-2):31–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.08.002
52
FuhrmanBJFeigelsonHSFloresRGailMHXuXRavelJet al. Associations of the Fecal Microbiome With Urinary Estrogens and Estrogen Metabolites in Postmenopausal Women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2014) 99(12):4632–40. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2222
53
ShinJHParkYHSimMKimSAJoungHShinDM. Serum Level of Sex Steroid Hormone Is Associated With Diversity and Profiles of Human Gut Microbiome. Res Microbiol (2019) 170(4-5):192–201. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2019.03.003
54
Seyed HameedASRawatPSMengXLiuW. Biotransformation of Dietary Phytoestrogens by Gut Microbes: A Review on Bidirectional Interaction Between Phytoestrogen Metabolism and Gut Microbiota. Biotechnol Adv (2020) 43:107576. doi:Â 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107576
55
ChenKLMadak-ErdoganZ. Estrogen and Microbiota Crosstalk: Should We Pay Attention? Trends Endocrinol Metab (2016) 27(11):752–5. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2016.08.001
56
BoweyEAdlercreutzHRowlandI. Metabolism of Isoflavones and Lignans by the Gut Microflora: A Study in Germ-Free and Human Flora Associated Rats. Food Chem Toxicol (2003) 41(5):631–6. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(02)00324-1
57
SenizzaARocchettiGMoseleJIPatroneVCallegariMLMorelliLet al. Lignans and Gut Microbiota: An Interplay Revealing Potential Health Implications. Molecules (2020) 25(23):5709. doi:Â 10.3390/molecules25235709
58
TapieroHBaGNTewKD. Estrogens and Environmental Estrogens. BioMed Pharmacother (2002) 56(1):36–44. doi: 10.1016/s0753-3322(01)00155-x
59
SchreursMPHde Vos van SteenwijkPJRomanoADielemanSWernerHMJ. How the Gut Microbiome Links to Menopause and Obesity, With Possible Implications for Endometrial Cancer Development. J Clin Med (2021) 10(13):2916. doi:Â 10.3390/jcm10132916
60
NagashimaMMiwaNHirasawaHKatagiriYTakamatsuKMoritaM. Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Analysis in Obese Women Predicts an Epigenetic Signature for Future Endometrial Cancer. Sci Rep (2019) 9(1):6469. doi:Â 10.1038/s41598-019-42840-4
61
ModesittSCHallowellPTSlack-DavisJKMichalekRDAtkinsKAKelleySLet al. Women at Extreme Risk for Obesity-Related Carcinogenesis: Baseline Endometrial Pathology and Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Weight, Metabolic Profiles and Quality of Life. Gynecol Oncol (2015) 138(2):238–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.05.015
62
LavalLMartinRNatividadJNChainFMiquelSde MaredsousCDet al. Lactobacillus Rhamnosuscncm I-3690 and the Commensal Bacteriumfaecalibacterium Prausnitziia2-165 Exhibit Similar Protective Effects to Induced Barrier Hyper-Permeability in Mice. Gut Microbes (2015) 6(1):1–9. doi: 10.4161/19490976.2014.990784
63
MartinRChamignonCMhedbi-HajriNChainFDerrienMEscribano-VazquezUet al. The Potential Probiotic Lactobacillus Rhamnosus Cncm I-3690 Strain Protects the Intestinal Barrier by Stimulating Both Mucus Production and Cytoprotective Response. Sci Rep (2019) 9(1):5398. doi:Â 10.1038/s41598-019-41738-5
64
SpacovaIVan BeeckWSeysSDevosFVanoirbeekJVanderleydenJet al. Lactobacillus Rhamnosus Probiotic Prevents Airway Function Deterioration and Promotes Gut Microbiome Resilience in a Murine Asthma Model. Gut Microbes (2020) 11(6):1729–44. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1766345
65
Riaz RajokaMSZhaoHMehwishHMLiNLuYLianZet al. Anti-Tumor Potential of Cell Free Culture Supernatant of Lactobacillus Rhamnosus Strains Isolated From Human Breast Milk. Food Res Int (2019) 123:286–97. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.05.002
66
OhNSJoungJYLeeJYKimY. Probiotic and Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Lactobacillus Rhamnosus 4b15 and Lactobacillus Gasseri 4m13 Isolated From Infant Feces. PloS One (2018) 13(2):e0192021. doi:Â 10.1371/journal.pone.0192021
67
DehghaniNTafviziFJafariP. Cell Cycle Arrest and Anti-Cancer Potential of Probiotic Lactobacillus Rhamnosus Against Ht-29 Cancer Cells. Bioimpacts (2021) 11(4):245–52. doi: 10.34172/bi.2021.32
68
ChenollEMorenoISanchezMGarcia-GrauISilvaAGonzalez-MonfortMet al. Selection of New Probiotics for Endometrial Health. Front Cell Infect Microbiol (2019) 9:114. doi:Â 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00114
69
LiNPangBLiJJLiuGWXuXGShaoDYet al. Mechanisms for Lactobacillus Rhamnosus Treatment of Intestinal Infection by Drug-Resistant Escherichia Coli. Food Funct (2020) 11(5):4428–45. doi: 10.1039/d0fo00128g
70
HuMMWuXLLuoMWeiHXuDXuF. Lactobacillus Rhamnosus Flrh93 Protects Against Intestinal Damage in Mice Induced by 5-Fluorouracil. J Dairy Sci (2020) 103(6):5003–18. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17836
71
UrbancsekHKazarTMezesINeumannK. Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Antibiophilus (R) in Patients With Radiation-Induced Diarrhoea. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol (2001) 13(4):391–6. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200104000-00015
72
ChaMKLeeDKAnHMLeeSWShinSHKwonJHet al. Antiviral Activity of Bifidobacterium Adolescentis Spm1005-A on Human Papillomavirus Type 16. BMC Med (2012) 10:72. doi:Â 10.1186/1741-7015-10-72
73
NamiYAbdullahNHaghshenasBRadiahDRosliRKhosroushahiAY. Assessment of Probiotic Potential and Anticancer Activity of Newly Isolated Vaginal Bacterium Lactobacillus Plantarum 5bl. Microbiol Immunol (2014) 58(9):492–502. doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12175
74
SungurTAslimBKaraaslanCAktasB. Impact of Exopolysaccharides (Epss) of Lactobacillus Gasseri Strains Isolated From Human Vagina on Cervical Tumor Cells (Hela). Anaerobe (2017) 47:137–44. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.05.013
75
Riaz RajokaMSZhaoHLuYLianZLiNHussainNet al. Anticancer Potential Against Cervix Cancer (Hela) Cell Line of Probiotic Lactobacillus Casei and Lactobacillus Paracasei Strains Isolated From Human Breast Milk. Food Funct (2018) 9(5):2705–15. doi: 10.1039/c8fo00547h
76
AnkaiahDEsakkirajPPerumalVAyyannaRVenkatesanA. Probiotic Characterization of Enterococcus Faecium Por1: Cloning, Over Expression of Enterocin-A and Evaluation of Antibacterial, Anti-Cancer Properties. J Funct Foods (2017) 38:280–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.09.034
77
BrasseurKAugerPAsselinEParentSCoteJCSiroisM. Parasporin-2 From a New Bacillus Thuringiensis 4r2 Strain Induces Caspases Activation and Apoptosis in Human Cancer Cells. PLoS One (2015) 10(8):e0135106. doi:Â 10.1371/journal.pone.0135106
78
Bermúdez-HumaránLGLangellaPCortes-PerezNGGrussAAlcocer-GonzalesJMTamez-GuerraRSet al. Immunisation Intranasale Chez La Souris Avec Des Lactocoques Exportant L’interleukine-12 Et L’antigène E7 Du Hpv-16. Le Lait (2004) 84(1-2):191–206. doi: 10.1051/lait:2003048
79
JangSEJeongJJChoiSYKimHHanMJKimDH. Lactobacillus Rhamnosus Hn001 and Lactobacillus Acidophilus La-14 Attenuate Gardnerella Vaginalis-Infected Bacterial Vaginosis in Mice. Nutrients (2017) 9(6):531. doi:Â 10.3390/nu9060531
80
LambertMNTThyboCBLykkeboeSRasmussenLMFretteXChristensenLPet al. Combined Bioavailable Isoflavones and Probiotics Improve Bone Status and Estrogen Metabolism in Postmenopausal Osteopenic Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Clin Nutr (2017) 106(3):909–20. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.117.153353
81
LinnYHThuKKWinNHH. Effect of Probiotics for the Prevention of Acute Radiation-Induced Diarrhoea Among Cervical Cancer Patients: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins (2019) 11(2):638–47. doi: 10.1007/s12602-018-9408-9
82
ChitapanaruxIChitapanaruxTTraisathitPKudumpeeSTharavichitkulELorvidhayaV. Randomized Controlled Trial of Live Lactobacillus Acidophilus Plus Bifidobacterium Bifidum in Prophylaxis of Diarrhea During Radiotherapy in Cervical Cancer Patients. Radiat Oncol (2010) 5:31. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-31
Summary
Keywords
gut microbe, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, probiotic, postmenopausal status
Citation
Han M, Wang N, Han W, Ban M, Sun T and Xu J (2022) Gut Microbes in Gynecologic Cancers: Causes or Biomarkers and Therapeutic Potential. Front. Oncol. 12:902695. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.902695
Received
23 March 2022
Accepted
21 June 2022
Published
13 July 2022
Volume
12 - 2022
Edited by
Daniele Vergara, University of Salento, Italy
Reviewed by
Marina Damato, University of Salento, Italy; Havva Marzban, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Iran
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Han, Wang, Han, Ban, Sun and Xu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Junnan Xu, xjn002@126.com
This article was submitted to Gynecological Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.