Kurt Sartorius
Samuel O. Antwi
Anil Chuturgoon
Lewis R. Roberts
Anna Kramvis- 1Hepatitis Virus Diversity Research Unit, School of Internal Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- 2The Africa Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancer Consortium (AHPBCC), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
- 3Department of Surgery, KZN Kwazulu-Natal (UKZN) Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Centre, Durban, South Africa
- 4Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
- 5Discipline of Medical Biochemistry, School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences, College of Health Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- 6Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
Despite the early promise of RNA therapeutics as a magic bullet to modulate aberrant signaling in cancer, this field remains a work-in-progress. Nevertheless, RNA therapeutics is now a reality for the treatment of viral diseases (COVID-19) and offers great promise for cancer. This review paper specifically investigates RNAi as a therapeutic option for HCC and discusses a range of RNAi technology including anti-sense oligonucleotides (ASOs), Aptamers, small interfering RNA (siRNA), ribozymes, riboswitches and CRISPR/Cas9 technology. The use of these RNAi based interventions is specifically outlined in three primary strategies, namely, repressing angiogenesis, the suppression of cell proliferation and the promotion of apoptosis. We also discuss some of the inherent chemical and delivery problems, as well as targeting issues and immunogenic reaction to RNAi interventions.
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) therapeutics remain an intractable global problem against a background of rising incidence and changing etiology (1). A wide range of novel HCC therapeutics have been developed and tested over the last two decades, including molecular targeted therapy, protein antibodies, targeted radionucleotide therapy, and epigenetic therapy. Other HCC therapies include immunotherapy, immune-cell therapy, differentiation strategy and RNA interference (RNAi) (2). Despite these advances a cure is yet to be developed and to date survival time has only been modestly extended (3). Central to the problem of HCC management is that this cancer remains (largely) asymptomatic until it is very advanced (4).
This review paper specifically investigates RNAi as a therapeutic option for HCC. RNAi therapeutics involves the deployment of RNA molecules in sequence-specific modulation to repress gene specific expression (5). In this paper we review the deployment of a range of RNAi technology including anti-sense oligonucleotides (ASO), Aptamers, small interfering RNA (siRNA), ribozymes, riboswitches and CRISPR/Cas9 technology for the management of HCC. The use of these RNA based interventions is specifically outlined in three primary strategies, namely, repressing angiogenesis, the suppression of cell proliferation and the promotion of apoptosis.
RNAi Based Therapeutic Options in HCC
Small Interfering RNA
Small interfering RNA (siRNA) are double stranded RNA (dsRNA) that load a guide strand into some form of Argonaut (AGO) based RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) after separation from its passenger strand (see Figure 1). A RISC with its encapsulated RNA attach to a complementary strip of mRNA and cause repression or cleavage. In effect, the silencing process adopted by siRNA is identical to that of microRNA (miRNA) in nature which are endogenously synthesized by endonucleases (DICER) and the guide strand packaged in a specific AGO based RISC in the cytoplasm. In humans, naturally occurring siRNA have a specific target and their origin seems to be the result of responding to a pathogen encountered in the past. For therapeutic purposes, siRNA can be chemically produced and modified and delivered in a wide range of nanoparticles (NPs). To increase their efficacy, siRNA vectors have been developed to achieve longer term application including modifications like a cassette that includes RNA Pol 11 that can perpetuate the transcription of siRNA. Transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) can also be influenced by siRNA where the complementary bases create a complex that binds to DNA (6).
Figure 1 RNAi Therapeutic options for HCC. siRNA (small interfering RNA), ASO (antisense oligonucleotides, Aptamer, Riboswitch, Ribozyme, CRISPR/Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Caspase-9) mRNA (messenger RNA) (mRNA) RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex).
Exogenous siRNAs are dsRNA characterized by a 2nt overhang on the 3’ end of both strands that are delivered to an AGO based RISC that especially represses translation in the critical 2-8 position on the 5’ end of its target mRNA. Although siRNA therapeutics mostly deploys manufactured siRNA, endogenous siRNA can also be harnessed and deployed for RNAi by using a viral vector to express short hairpin RNA (shRNA). Alternatively, manufactured siRNA that are miRNA mimics can be utilized for RNAi. Manufactured siRNA-based therapeutics use siRNAs that have been chemically stabilized to increase their potency and reduce RNase degradation in vivo but challenges remain due to off-target effects, as well as unintended immunogenic reaction (7). The stabilization and delivery of siRNA is, therefore, a critical issue (8).
Clustered Regularly Interspaced Palindromic Repeats/Caspase-9 (CRISPR/Cas9)
CRISPR/Cas9 uses CRISPR to guide Cas9 cleavage of targeted DNA sequences. This therapeutic application has been developed as a guide RNA/enzyme complex that can delete targeted RNA or DNA, as well as conduct precise DNA edits or inserts. CRISPR/Cas9 technology uses gRNA to guide and bind Cas9 cleavage to a its target DNA, however, CRISPR/Cas9 can also be used to re-engineer mutations, as well as ex vivo therapy to edit and then re-introduce edited cells in vivo (9). Cleavage of targeted DNA occurs by RNase 111. The CRISPR/Cas9 DNA gene replacement technology is developed in three steps: (i) insertion of the short sequence of the foreign DNA as a spacer in CRISPR array; (ii) transcription of the precursor cRNA (pre-cRNA) followed by its processing to generate individual cRNAs that comprise of a repeat and a spacer; and (iii) recognition of the target sequence by cRNAs and cleavage of the foreign nucleic acid by Caspase DNA nucleases at sites complementary to the cRNA spacer sequence. Repair of DNA following cleavage is activated by CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing that introduces a donor repair template with homology identical to the area of the dsDNA cleaved DNA. The CRISPR/Cas systems (1, 10, 11) can activate or repress gene expression (7).
Antisense Oligonucleotides
Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are short single stranded (ss) DNA/RNA that exist in nature as small RNA molecules. RNA based ASOs bind to a complementary nucleotide sequence site in mRNA causing splicing, degradation (R Nase H) or the repression of mRNA translation (6, 12) and DNA based ASOs form a DNA-RNA heteroduplex to precipitate RNases. Most ASO based drugs precipitate RNases but they can also repress translation, as well as be deployed to splice target DNA/RNA (7, 10). The chemistry and target sequence of ASOs determine their mechanism of action and the fate of the targeted RNA (13).
RNA Aptamers
Aptamers are short, single-stranded DNA or RNA (ssDNA or ssRNA) molecules that can selectively bind to a specific target. Aptamers can fold into a multi-functional state to bind to a target DNA/RNA in a similar fashion to an antibody to suppress protein expression. Aptamers, often labeled as chemical antibodies, can bind to a wide range of molecules including toxins, viruses, proteins and peptides and its binding facility is not based on complementarity but rather its ability to fold into a 3-dimensional structure to enfold a target molecule in the same way as an antibody (2, 6). RNA aptamers can be used as a delivery vehicle for a wide range of chemical agents and are less expensive and illicit low immunogenicity response compared to antibodies. Aptamers, which have a unique niche in RNAi therapeutics, can be developed to bind to an intracellular or extracellular target, and they can be used to activate or repress target expression (14). RNA aptamers can also bind to cell surface proteins to block their function, for example they can bind to VEGFR to inhibit VEGF signaling (15). Alternatively, they can be used to deliver RNAi based cargo (siRNA, shRNA, miRNA) to the intracellular space where they are encapsulated by RISC and delivered to target mRNA (16).
Ribozymes
Ribozymes are ribonucleic acid enzymes that play a catalytic silencing role to promote the cleaving of target mRNA by hybridizing with. This is a process where two ssRNA molecules combine into a single dsRNA molecule. There are three predominant forms of ribozyme, namely, hammerhead (HH), hepatitis delta virus (HDV) and hairpin (HP) ribozymes (7) but the most common ribozymes used in a therapeutic capacity take a “hammerhead” or “hairpin/paperclip” format (2). Ribozyme RNA molecules can catalyze specific biochemical reactions, as well as RNA splicing (trans-splicing ribozyme), and can be classified as genetic material (like DNA) or a catalyst. The most common activity of ribozymes includes cleavage/degradation of RNA/DNA but they can also play a role in linking peptide sequences (e.g. protein construction) within ribosomes.
Ribozymes can be directed to target the 5’ end of RNA to induce RNaseP and cleavage in a sequence specific manner. Liposome mediated ribozymes can be delivered exogenously or transcribed endogenously to cleave target mRNA and they can be used repeatedly because they are not consumed in the cleavage process. Ribozyme therapy can be used to target most non-coding RNA (ncRNA) including siRNA, microRNA (miRNA), long noncoding (lncRNA), piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA) and small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) that all play a regulatory role in carcinogenesis (17, 18). Trans-cleaving ribozymes can target specific mRNA segments in the same way as a dedicated siRNA (19). Due to poor stability of fully-RNA based ribozymes, they are chemically stabilized for therapeutic deployment using some of the following modifications: 5′-PS backbone linkage, 2′-O-Me, 2′-deoxy-2′-C-allyl uridine, and terminal inverted 3′-3′ deoxyabasic nucleotides (20).
Riboswitches
Riboswitches are a group of dynamic ncRNA motifs found upstream, in the 5′ untranslated region of mRNAs, where they regulate translation through binding of their cognate ligand to their aptamer domain (21). A riboswitch can be in an “on”/”off” state depending on the presence of a ligand. For example, in the absence of a ligand, the riboswitch folds to an “on” state and binds to the ribosome binding site (RBS) triggering translation initiation (RNA Polymerase). Conversely, in the presence of a ligand, the riboswitch folds to an “off” state to bar RBS binding and translation is blocked (7).
RNAi Challenges and Delivery Options
RNA Delivery Challenges
RNA can be delivered in their ‘naked’ state but they have a short circulation life in vivo due to speedy degradation via nuclease activity (22). Some of the problems of RNA-based therapeutics, therefore, include maintaining their stability and efficacy in sustained systemic delivery, as well as avoiding off-target effects. Other problems of RNA delivery include avoiding renal clearance, adverse immunogenic response, such as cytoplasmic RNA triggering IFN expression (2, 22, 23), and avoiding endosomal escape that can trigger unwanted TLR signaling (23). Additional problems arise because of the need to counter the negatively charged phosphate backbone of RNA, as well as its high molecular weight that reduce its stability and act as a barrier to cell entry and repress targeting ability (24). RNA based drugs are easily modified and their long term efficacy can be increased by the inclusion of replicative ability in the RNA based vesicle (6).
Stabilization of RNA
To overcome delivery challenges, a range of chemical modifications can prolong RNA half-life without jeopardizing their biological activity. RNA can be stabilized by chemical modifications to both sense strands, as well as the 3’ and 5’ caps, as well as ribose modifications. Ribose modifications to the 2’-OH site are a common modification to stabilize RNA to be stabilized, including the following options, namely, 2’-Me, 2’-F and 2’-H. RNA molecules can also be stabilized by intramolecular linkages of 2’-Oxygen to 4’-carbon to create bridged nucleic acid (locked nucleic acid-LNA) molecules. Modifications to the RNA backbone can also increase nuclease resistance and involve substituting non bridging phosphate oxygen for sulfur, as well as boranophosphate substituted with the BH3 group (22). These modifications reduce off-target interference (25) and reduce immunogenicity response, mediated by TLR or PKR activation (26).
Nanoparticle Delivery of RNA
A wide variety of nanoparticles (NPs) have been developed and tested over 40 years. Delivery of RNAi based drugs can utilize lipid-based (cholesterol and α-tocopherol) NPs, polymer-based (polyethylene-PEG) NPs, inorganic NPs and a range of exosome-mimetic nanovesicles (27, 28).
Lipid-based NPs (LNPs) include liposomes, micelles, emulsions and solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNPs). LNPs also include stable nucleic acid lipid particles (SNALPs) (29), lipidoid nanoparticles (LNs), and SLNPs (30). LNPs have a biochemical structure (phosphate/sugar group) that mimics a cell membrane thus allowing fusion with a target cell membrane and its transport RNA into a target cell (24). LNPs, for example, are extensively used to deliver siRNA and small activating ds RNA (saRNA) that target gene promoters (7).
Polymer-based NPs like Polyethylene (PEG) can be complexed with Polyvinylimine (PEI) to form a PEG-PEI based RNA conjugate that increases stability in vivo, as well as enhances the targeting of its RNA based cargo (31). PEG can also be complexed with Poly Lysine (PLL) and Poly Amidoamine (PAMAM) that consist of macromolecules designed to carry RNA. Natural polymers conjugated with RNA include chitosan, atelocollagen and Hyaluronic acid (HA) which, for example, readily binds to CD44 expressing cancer cells (32). Upon delivery in the cytoplasm, the RNAi cargo is released from the polymer-based NP by the cleavage of its di-sulfide linkages (22).
NPs can use a ligand to target delivery where these conjugates promote improved binding and reduced immunogenicity. Upon cell entry the NPs can be separated (cleaved) to facilitate RNA loading into an AGO based RISC. For example, a Ga1NAc-siRNA conjugate readily binds to ASGPR thus providing siRNA entry access to hepatocytes (8, 33). Antibodies are also efficient delivery vehicles for cell specific delivery because they are stable in vivo and also specific to a chosen target (34). The delivery of RNA can incorporate nano-emulsions (35) including cationic nano-emulsions which are highly potent, versatile delivery vehicles for siRNA to target pathogens or induce antibodies (31).
Inorganic-based RNA NPs consist of mesoporous silica nanoparticles, superparamagnetic nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes and gold nanoparticles and exosome-mimetic nanovesicles can also be used to transport RNAi cargo (28, 31). Viral vectors are highly effective delivery systems using genetically modified viruses to deliver genetic materials to the cells. Virus-based vectors have been proven to have several advantages in delivering the payload into cells in vitro and in vivo, including high efficacy by natural cell transduction, sustained gene expression, and long-term gene silencing. The use of an adenovirus vector encoding a siRNA, for example, can deliver RNA (36). Finally, aptamers can be modified for delivery of RNA and can be compared to antibodies with respect to their binding specificity. They are also stable, very small and easy to manufacture and can be combined with siRNA/CRISPR technology to target specific cell types (7, 31).
RNAi Strategies
HBV-HCC pathways typically include aberrant expression in the retinoblastoma-tumor protein 53 (RB1-TP53) suppressor networks, the Wingless-related integration site/beta-catenin (WNT/β-Catenin) pathway, and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase (PI3K/MAPK) and Janus kinase/signal transducer (JAK/STAT) pathways and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) signaling (37). Typically, a range of growth factor receptors including VEGFR/IGFR/EGFR/PDGFR/FGFR and C-Met activate receptor tyrosine kinases in the P13/MAPK and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathways (38). TGF-β signaling activates members of the Smad family of signal transducers (39) and activation of the WNT/B-Catenin pathway occurs via the binding of a WNT protein ligand to a Frizzled receptor (40). In addition, the binding of extracellular ligand (IL-6) leads to pathway activation of the JAK/STAT pathway (41).
Three primary strategies are interrogated in this section, namely, anti-angiogenesis, anti-cell proliferation and pro-apoptosis. In each therapeutic strategy, aberrantly expressed mRNA in HCC pathogenesis have been identified and targeted by RNAi therapy (see Figure 2). For example, VEGF mRNA is often targeted in RNAi anti-angiogenesis therapy, MYC mRNA to repress cell proliferation and BIRC5/Survivin mRNA to induce a pro-apoptotic effect (see Tables 1–3).
Figure 2 Therapeutic targets in HCC pathways: Angiogenesis: CXCR4/MDM2(chemokine receptor/murine double minute 2 protein), CTLA-4 (constitutively expressed in regulatory T cells), HIF-1α (hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha, a subunit of a heterodimeric transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor 1 that is encoded by the HIF1A gene), VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor, stimulates the formation of blood vessels), Cell proliferation: TERT (telomerase reverse transcriptase, a catalytic subunit of telomerase, EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), CDCA1 (Cell division cycle associated 1, an oncoantigen), MYC (transcription factor, proto-oncogene), MCL-1 (induced myeloid leukaemia cell differentiation protein), ARL4C (ADP-ribosylation factor-like 4C). Apoptosis: BIRC5/Survivin (baculoviral inhibitor of apoptosis repeat-containing 5 or survivin), BCL-2 (B-cell lymphoma 2, regulatory protein inducing or inhibiting apoptosis), hBAX (human Bcl-2-associated X protein, apoptosis regulator), HDCA2 (histone deacetylase 2, removed acetyl groups from lysine at the N’ terminal of core histones). Receptors: VEGFR (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor), IGFR (insulin-like growth factor receptor), EGFR (epithelial growth factor receptor), FGFR (fibroblast growth factor receptor), PDGFR (platelet-derived growth factor receptor), C-MET (tyrosine-protein kinase Met or hepatocyte growth factor receptor (HGFR)), WNT (Wingless and Int-1). Pathways: JAK/STAT (Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)), P13/AKT/mTOR (phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signalling pathway), RTKs (receptor tyrosine kinases), RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinases), WNT/B-CATENIN (highly conserved pathway).
Table 1 RNAi anti-angiogenesis therapeutics.
Table 2 RNAi anti-proliferation therapeutics.
Table 3 RNAi pro-apoptotic therapeutics.
Anti-Angiogenesis RNAi Strategies
HCC pathogenesis including hypervascularity and marked vascular abnormalities are common feature of disease progression in HCC (115). Vascular abnormalities encompass the arterialization of tumor blood supply, as well as sinusoid capillarization that is promoted in the presence of hypoxia expressed HIF-1α (116). At a molecular level, the drivers of angiogenesis override their inhibitors (117). The drivers of angiogenesis include a range of growth factors (GFs) that include the vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors (VEGF/VEGF-R), fibroblast growth factors and their receptors (FGF/FGF-R) and platelet derived growth factors and their receptors (PDGF/PDGF-R) (see Figure 3). FGFs, in particular, play an important role in angiogenesis and cross-signaling between FGF-2 and VEGF-A occurs early in HCC pathogenesis inducing neovascularization, increased capillarization of sinusoids and tumor growth. FGF expression also promotes angiogenesis by modulating integrin related regulation of endothelial cells in the microenvironment (117, 118). The FGF1, FGF2, FGF4, and FGF8 subfamilies are the most frequently studied FGFs in the angiogenic processes of HCC and FGF2 (in particular) is a characteristic factor in angiogenesis. FGF2 mainly targets FGFR1 as its receptor to mediate angiogenic multiple angiogenic stages (117, 119).
Figure 3 RNAi anti-angiogenic strategies. LNP-siRNA (Lipid nanoparticles for targeted small interfering RNA delivery), CRISPR/Cas9 V (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9), LNP-ASO (lipid nanoparticle associated antisense oligonucleotide), siRNA (small interfering RNA). VEGFR (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor), ASGPR (asialoglycoprotein receptor), RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex), HIF-1α (hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha, a subunit of a heterodimeric transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor 1 that is encoded by the HIF1A gene), CCL2/CCR2 (chemokine CCL2 and its main receptor CCR2), HGFR/PD-L1/CTLA-4 (human growth factor receptor/programmed death-ligand 1/constitutively expressed in regulatory T cells), CXCR4/MDM2/PDGF/C-Met [chemokine receptor/murine double minute 2 protein/platelet-derived growth factor/tyrosine-protein kinase Met or hepatocyte growth factor receptor (HGFR)].
Other growth factors driving angiogenesis are hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and its receptor c-Met, angiopoietins (ANG1/2 and Tie2) and endoglin (CD105) (117, 120–123). Endoglin (CD105) is a type-1 integral transmembrane glycoprotein and coreceptor for transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) ligands that promotes angiogenesis in HCC by participating in the neovascularization process (124). Typically, the drivers of angiogenesis induce endothelial cell tyrosine kinases in the P13/Akt/mTOR cancer pathway. Conversely, angiogenesis inhibitors include angiostatin, endostatin and thrombospondin-1 (125).
The development of RNAi drugs to repress angiogenesis in HCC has been promoted by the moderate efficacy of the Sorafenib family of drugs. RNAi therapeutics to repress angiogenesis include the deployment of siRNA, aptamers, riboswitches, ribozymes, ASOs and CRISPR/Cas9 (See Table 1 and Figure 2).
Small interfering RNA: This branch of therapeutics has largely focused on siRNA repression of the drivers of angiogenesis in HCC including VEGF, FGF, PDGF, HGF, angiopoietins (ANG1/2), endoglin (CD105) and their respective receptors. A preponderance of siRNA therapeutic models targeting angiogenesis in HCC have targeted vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression (117) possibly because Sorafenib and its descendants, FDA approved antiangiogenic agents targeting VEGF, have had modest efficacy (126). RNAi based VEGF siRNAs, delivered by a range of organic and inorganic nanoparticles (NPs), have proved effective to repress VEGF mRNA translation to demonstrate an anti-angiogenic effect on HCC pathogenesis both in vitro and in vivo (see Table 1).
Innovative examples of VEGF delivery using lipid based NPs include a VEGF-siRNA-sorafenib co-loaded pH sensitive liposomes that exhibited enhanced VEGF downregulation and anti-angiogenic effect, as well as induced apoptosis (45). In another model, AMD3100, a CXCR4 antagonist associated with HCC progression (43), as well as VEGF siRNA was delivered by an LNP demonstrated the ability to repress angiogenesis and tumor growth in HCC (44). AMD3100 is a molecule that can block the SDF1α/CXCR4 axis and sensitizes HCC to sorafenib treatment (127). Some lipid-based NPs (LNPs) have used the ASGP-R to gain cell entry and guide siRNA or shRNA delivery to repress VEGF expression. This form of cell entry that is facilitated by the recognition of galactose receptors, also demonstrated effective endosome escape (42, 50, 52). Another innovative LNP included both siRNA and a drug (Tremelimumab) to repress angiogenesis via the PD-L1/CTLA-4 pathway (56) while LNP-siRNA modulation of PD-L1/PD-1 acted as an immunoinhibitory receptor to express T/B cells to overcome the tolerance to angiogenic activity in the liver (128).
VEGF delivery using an inorganic gold NP containing VEGF siRNA repressed tumor revascularization in HCC in vitro and in vivo (48). In another case, a polymer NP complex was used to transport VEGF siRNA and demonstrated a marked anti-angiogenic effect in vitro and in vivo (49). An alternate siRNA design involved methylation of VEGF siRNA ends to stabilize them in vivo and this therapy reduced HCC induced angiogenesis through inactivation of VEGF/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway (46). In another example, stabilized VEGF siRNA significantly reduced VEGF expression and resulted in the knockdown of endothelial cell production in vitro and reduced tumor size in vivo (47).
FGF targeted siRNA models have been largely anchored in a series of in vitro studies and there is little evidence yet that siRNA-based therapeutics have progressed to in vivo applications. For example, transfections of FGF8, FGF19, FGFR4 with siRNA in a range of HCC cell-lines significantly repressed the proliferation and tube formation of hepatic endothelial cells (53, 54). The HGF/c-Met axis is involved in cell proliferation, movement, differentiation, invasion, angiogenesis, and apoptosis by activating multiple downstream signaling pathways (129). Additionally, C-Met (HGF-R) may induce VEGF-A expression to enhance angiogenesis (130). A wide range of siRNA experiments have also targeted the HGFR induced tyrosine kinases in vitro and in vivo (58, 59, 129, 131, 132).
Similarly, PDGFs are secreted growth factors closely related to VEGF and are important in HCC-induced angiogenesis because they activate tyrosine kinases contributing to the upregulation of VEGF and recruitment of perivascular cells (133). Stabilized Mdm2 siRNA or PDGF-B siRNA, transfected into an Hep3B cell line plasmid, demonstrated angiogenic effects in vivo, as well suppressed tumor growth (55). Stabilized siRNA also reported good efficacy in a murine mammary adenocarcinoma experiment to target endoglin which as a receptor for TGF-β signaling (134). Finally a polymer NP complex transporting shRNA and sorafenib and surviving shRNA inhibited tumor growth and angiogenesis for resistant HCC (51).
CRISPR/Cas9: The use of CRISPR/Cas9 therapy in HCC offers an exciting new option to manage pathogenesis. To date examples of this therapy in HCC include an HIF-1α knockout in a xenograft model to repress angiogenesis and invasion (60). HIF-1α is a key transcription factor involved in the hypoxic response of cancer cells. It activates transcription of genes responsible for angiogenesis, glucose metabolism, proliferation, invasion and metastasis in HCC (135). In another in vivo HCC study, a CRISPR/Cas9 system was deployed for gene–chemo-combination therapy that used a silica nanoparticle to initiate CRISPR/Cas9 editing of EGFR, as well as the co-delivery of sorafenib to modulate EGFR-p13K-Akt expression and repress angiogenesis (61).
ASOs: There has been a limited application of ASO-based RNAi for this strategy. One example of an anti-angiogenic ASO repressed HIF-1α led VEGF expression (12).
Aptamers: Although the use of aptamers in RNAi is less evident than other anti-angiogenic strategies in HCC, there are some examples. Aptamers targeting of CCL2/CCR2 and CCR2 expression using small-molecule antagonists, neutralizing antibodies, or RNA aptamer-based inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy to repress angiogenesis in subcutaneous HCC xenografts and endogenous liver tumors (63, 64). In another study, an aptamer-functionalized peptide (H3CR5C) was deployed to co deliver fasudil and miRNA-195 in a nanoparticle to inhibit VEGF expression and suppress vasculogenic activity by repressing ROCK2 (15).
Ribozymes: Ribozyme therapeutics in HCC used an anti-VEGF hairpin ribozyme to effectively inhibit VEGF expression and the tumor growth in vitro and in vivo (65). In another in vivo study, an anti-VEGF-A hammerhead type ribozymes suppressed not only VEGF mRNA but also VEGF protein (66, 67).
Riboswitch: In one HCC study a riboswitch that could sense AFP triggered the promotion of YAP induced 14-3-3σ expression to repress angiogenesis and promote degradation (68).
Anti-Cell Proliferation RNAi Strategies
Cell Proliferation Pathways in HCC: Several signaling pathways in HCC influence cell proliferation in HCC pathogenesis including the TGF-β, Wnt/B-catenin, Hedgehog (Hh), Notch, JAK/STAT and Hippo pathways (see Figure 4). TGF-β upregulates the expression of Snail, downregulates E-cadherin to promote epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastasis. The TGF-β signaling pathway also influences the preservation of the cancer stem cell (CSC) subpopulation and cell proliferation (136). In HCC pathogenesis, aberrant Wnt/β-catenin signaling is often induced by CTNNB1 mutations leading to the accumulation of β-catenin in the nucleus and cytoplasm to promote vascular invasion, cell proliferation, and poorly differentiated tumors (40, 137), as well as cross-talk with hypoxia signaling pathways (138).
Figure 4 RNAi anti-cell proliferation strategies. LNP-siRNA (Lipid nanoparticles for targeted small interfering RNA delivery), CRISPR/Cas9 V (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9), LNP-ASO (lipid nanoparticle associated antisense oligonucleotide), siRNA (small interfering RNA). HIF-1α/Mcl-1/STAT3 (hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha, a subunit of a heterodimeric transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor 1 that is encoded by the HIF1A gene/induced myeloid leukaemia cell differentiation protein gene/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3), MYC/ARL4C (transcription factor, proto-oncogene/ADP-ribosylation factor-like 4C), hTERT/AFP (human telomerase reverse transcriptase/alpha fetoprotein), AFP/c-Jun/c-fos/nucleolin (transcription factors), GAL-14 (galectin 14), CDCA1/INTS (Cell division cycle associated 1, an oncoantigen), EGFR/RRM2/MAPK (epidermal growth factor receptor/ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase subunit M2/mitogen-activated protein kinase), TERT/EGFR/TBLR1 [telomerase reverse transcriptase, a catalytic subunit of telomerase/transducin (beta)-like 1 X-linked receptor 1].
The Hedgehog (Hh) pathway also plays an important role in cell proliferation and invasion (139), as well as in EMT (140) while there is growing evidence that supports the critical role of Notch signaling in HCC in the regulation of the tumor microenvironment, tumorigenesis, progression, angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis (141). Furthermore there is evidence that a Notch1-Snail1-E-cadherin type association affects invasion and metastasis in HCC pathogenesis (142). The JAK/STAT signaling pathway plays important roles in many cellular functions, including cell proliferation activated by the transcription CCND1, BIRC5 and Mcl-1 (143) and the repression of Hippo signaling in HCC pathogenesis via Hippo kinase (Mst1 and Mst2) also plays a role in the promotion of proliferation (144). Finally, the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway is activated in more than 50% of human HCC cases (145) by a range of growth factor receptors in HCC including VEGF-R, EGF-R, FGF-R, PDGF-R and C-MET that interlink with angiogenic expression (146).
siRNA: RNAi based therapeutics to modulate cell proliferation in HCC pathogenesis has deployed a range of polymer and lipid-based NPs, Stable nucleic acid lipo-particles (SNALPs), and chemically stabilized siRNA (see Table 2). For example, a polymer-based NP delivering TBLR1 siRNA inhibited growth and angiogenesis in HCC in both in vitro and in vivo applications. TBLR1 acts as a key oncogene in HCC to promote cell proliferation and angiogenesis in the WNT/B-Catenin pathway (69). In another example, a lipid-polyplex based NP delivering TERT and EGFR shRNA effectively repressed cell proliferation (71). EGFR is (often) highly expressed in HCC and is associated with cell proliferation and an aggressive phenotype that is prone to metastasis (147) Upregulated TERT as a result of mutations in the promoter region are also a frequent event in HCC and are significantly linked to disease progression (72). Another anti-cell proliferation started used LNPs injected into HCC mouse models to target integrin and CDCA1 expression (73). In support of this approach, integrins are found in HCC tissue but not in normal liver tissue and are associated with proliferation and invasion (148). Another SNALP based NP targeting CDCA1 also demonstrated reduced cell proliferation and pro-apoptotic activation as well as linkages with immune response (75, 76).
In another study a liposome complex NP model delivering a siRNA cargo plus Adriamycin inhibited growth by repressing RRM2 in EGFR expressing HCC (74). Interestingly, the elevated expression of RRM2 signifies a poor prognosis in HCC (149). Overexpression of CENP-A is frequently observed in HCC and a stabilized siRNA plasmid model targeting CENP-A reduced proliferation via repression of gene expression promoting cell cycle and inhibiting apoptosis (77). In a phase 1 trial, a Dicer-substrate small interfering RNA (DsiRNA) targeting MYC, exhibited some potential to repress cell proliferation (78). In HCC PLK1 expression, which is associated with cell cycle, is often elevated and a phase 2 trial using an LNP siRNA model is currently in progress to determine its use as an HCC drug to modulate proliferation/apoptosis (79).
Other In vivo based studies deploying stabilized siRNA have yielded positive results to illustrate the potential of RNAi. For example, stabilized siRNA targeting HIPK3 mRNA regulated tumorigenesis via the miR-124-AQP3 axis (11) while another stabilized siRNA model repressed DLGAP5 repression to suppress cell growth, migration and colony formation in vitro (80). Down-regulation of FoxM1 by stabilized siRNA also reduced the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) resulting in reduced cell proliferation in HCC cell lines (81). Silencing of VEGF and KSP mRNA by siRNA inhibited cell proliferation, migration, invasion and induced apoptosis in Hep3B cell-line experiments and it was hypothesized that this could be explained by the significant downregulation of Cyclin D1, Bcl-2 and Survivin (82). In a more recent study, a multi-target siRNA model inhibited NET-1, EMS1 and VEGF mRNA in HCC cells resulting in a significant reduction in proliferation, migration, invasion, angiogenesis and induced apoptosis in HCC cells (83).
CRISPR/Cas9: In a novel in vivo application of this therapy in HCC, CRISPR/Cas9 was used to test the hypothesis that deactivated PTEN/p53 genes in HCC promote carcinogenesis (87). In another application of CRISPR/Cas9 technology the expression of five oncogenes (Tet1, 2, 3, Sry, Uty - 8 alleles) was disrupted to reduce cell proliferation and highlight the key role of methylation of DNA in HCC (85). In addition, CRISPR/Cas9 therapy has been used to promote immunotherapy by modifying PD-1 in immune cells to promote T-cell response (86). In another example, a NSD1 knockout cell line was constructed by a CRISPR/Cas9 editing system to demonstrate its potential therapeutic application to HCC cell proliferation, migration and invasion as a result of NSD1 positive role in the expression of histone H3, Wnt10b and Wnt/β-catenin signaling (84).
ASOs: ASOs have been widely deployed in HCC to suppress oncogene expression that results in promoting cell proliferation. Oncogenes suppressed by a range of stabilized ASOs include Mcl-1, HIF-1α, MYC and STAT3 (62, 88–90). MYC mRNA expression in HCC has also been silenced by siRNA based on a combination of 13 miRNA to suppress aberrant signaling promoting cell proliferation (2) and an MYC ASO model suppressed cell proliferation in mouse and human transgenic models (90). HCC cell proliferation was also repressed in another in vitro ASO based study which targeted ARL4C expression which is often highly expressed in HCC (91).
Aptamer: In 2012, a first report demonstrated that an RNA aptamer was able to detect cancer cells and inhibit proliferation in an alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) expressing HCC cell-line via the suppression of oncogene expression in c-jun and c-fos. This aptamer can also targeted nucleolin (92). In a later study a modified aptamer reduced cell proliferation by the upregulation of GAL-14 expression which is linked to immune response (93).
Ribozyme: In one study it was demonstrated that a trans-splicing ribozyme-mediated replacement of HCC-associated specific RNAs could target and replace AFP mRNA, which becomes increasingly expressed in HCC pathogenesis (94). In another study, a trans-splicing ribozyme was deployed to target hTERT expression which is elevated in HCC pathogenesis and promotes cell proliferation and survival (6).
Riboswitch: In one study deploying this therapy, a chimeric RNA-binding protein-based killing switch targeting MS2 to reduce cell priliferation in HCC (95).
Pro-Apoptotic RNAi Strategies
Apoptosis pathways become increasingly dysregulated in HCC pathogenesis. Mutation od the p53 tumor suppressor gene is a common feature, as well as the disruption of the TGF-β family of cytokines that play a prominent role in apoptosis (150, 151). Other alterations include mutations in the Hedgehog pathway to promote anti-apoptotic resistance (152), as well as dysregulation of the death receptor pathways which include Fas-mediated caspase induced apoptosis (153). The upregulation of many anti-apoptotic proteins is also a common feature including NF-κB, Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL, as well as the downregulation of pro-apoptotic expression by BID, BAX and BCL-Xs (154). Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) common feature in HCC (155) alongside upregulated IGF and IGF-1 signaling pathways which can activate STAT signaling (156). Finally, the repression of many tumor suppressors like SOCS-1/3 can also promote JAK/STAT signaling (157) while PTEN dysregulation promotes P13/MAPK/Akt signaling (158).
siRNA: Multiple RNAi pro-apoptotic siRNA strategies have been developed and tested, especially those targeting BIRC5/survivin. BIRC5/Survivin is often highly expressed in HCC and has been linked to cell proliferation, inhibiting apoptosis and promoting stromal angiogenesis (159) (see Figure 5). A co-polymer complex based NP has been operationalized with superparamagnetic oxide to deliver Survivin siRNA to successfully induce apoptosis (96). In another study targeting Survivin, a polymer based NP was used to deliver survivin shRNA and sorafenib to repress tumor growth and inhibit angiogenesis (51). Survivin is a recently described inhibitor of apoptosis and its overexpression translates into a decrease in the G0/G1 phase and an increase in the S phase in cell cycle controls resulting in the activation of cell cycle network (160–162).
Figure 5 RNAi apoptosis strategies LNP-siRNA (Lipid nanoparticles for targeted small interfering RNA delivery), CRISPR/Cas9 V (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9), LNP-ASO (lipid nanoparticle associated antisense oligonucleotide), siRNA (small interfering RNA); HIF-1α (hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha, a subunit of a heterodimeric transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor 1 that is encoded by the HIF1A gene), TERT (telomerase reverse transcriptase), hBAX (human Bcl-2-associated X protein, apoptosis regulator), eEF1A (Eukaryotic translation elongation factors 1 alpha), BIRC5/Survivin (baculoviral inhibitor of apoptosis repeat-containing 5 or survivin), RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex), ASGP-R (asialoglycoprotein receptor), HDCA2 (histone deacetylase 2, deacetylates lysine of N’ terminal of core histones).
A stabilized siRNA (based on miR-122) model targeting PKM2, induced apoptosis and growth arrest by downregulating PKM2 in HCC in vitro and in vivo (97). In another stabilized siRNA model both HDAC8 and PKM2 mRNA expression was reduced to promote pro-apoptotic effects. Interestingly, HDAC8 caused PKM2 to translocate to the nucleus and synergize with β-catenin transcription to upregulate the expression of cyclin D1 (98). SNALP based NPs have also been used to transport both HDAC1 and HDAC2 siRNA to induce apoptosis by upregulating p57/p27 expression, as well as downregulating bcl-2 expression (100, 101) which is associated with a pro-survival effect in HCC (163). Another stabilized siRNA model demonstrated the synergistic effect between hTERT siRNA and Cisplatin in the suppression of HCC progression and indicated that the combination of hTERT-specific siRNA and cisplatin could be an effective therapy for HCC to promote cell cycle controls via G2/M and S phases thus inducing apoptosis (102). In another study, stabilized siRNA were tested in vivo to demonstrate that the depletion of cyclin E expression in this manner promotes apoptosis in HCC cells and blocks cell proliferation (103). Cyclin E (cyclins E1 and E2) are components of the core cell cycle machinery and are usually co-expressed in proliferating cells (164). Another study using a stabilized siRNA transfection to target CXCL1 induced apoptosis in vitro and in vivo (104). CXCL1 expression promotes fibrogenesis and angiogenesis HCC (165). In another experiment, the knockdown of PDGFR-ß mRNA by siRNA led to the upregulation of LC3-II and downregulation of p62, indicating that knockdown of PDGFR-ß could activate autophagy and indicating that PDGFR-ß plays a role in the Akt/mTOR and Mek/Erk pathways (105).
A multifunctional polymeric NP, that has progressed to clinical trial stage, has been developed to transport shRNA survivin and VEGF siRNA to trigger apoptosis and inhibit angiogenesis in HCC patients (106). This work was largely based on an earlier study by the same researchers where the polymeric NP was deployed in a mouse to transport VEGF siRNA that demonstrated a pro-apoptotic effect as a result of RNAi silenced VEGF mRNA (107). This demonstrates that VEGF and survivin repression can also influence pro-apoptotic activity, as well anti-angiogenic potential in HCC.
CRISPR/Cas9: In one study using a mouse xenograft model, a CRISPR/Cas9 model used Cas9-based genome editing to introduce the prodrug-converting enzyme herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase (HSV1-tk) into the genomes of HCC cells resulting in the precipitation of apoptosis (108). In another study, CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing was deployed to disrupt the expression of the the programmed death 1 receptor (PD-1) to enhance the activity of CAR T cells. Disruption of PD-1, therefore, enhanced the anti-tumor activity of CAR T cells against HCC (86).
ASO: A chemically stabilized ASO was successfully deployed to repress aberrant TERT expression in HCC models to induce apoptosis in vitro and in vivo (109).
Aptamer: A 75 nucleotide long aptamer (GT75) was tested in three HCC cell lines, HepG2, HuH7 and JHH6. When delivered by liposomes. GT75 was able to effectively reduce HCC cell viability and promote apoptosis. No effects on cell cycle were observed and the effect of this aptamer was likely due to the interference with eEF1A activity (110).
Ribozyme: A number of trans-splicing ribozymes have been tested for RNAi therapeutic applications in HCC, many of which have targeted the elevated expression of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) because of its role in promoting cell survival (112). Examples include an in vivo HCC experiment an intra-tumoral injection of an adenovirus encoding for the hTERT-targeting trans-splicing ribozyme demonstrated marked regression of tumors that had been subcutaneously inoculated with hTERT-positive liver cancer cells in mice (112). Another RNAi experiment using an hTERT-targeting ribozyme with an miR-122 target site added to its 3’ end effectively promoted cell death because miR-122 is upregulated in HCC and is the most predominant microRNA(miRNA) expressed in liver tissue. Effectively repressing hTERT and miR-122 levels also improved the selectivity of this therapy, as well as reduced hepatotoxicity (113, 114). Other ribozyme targets in HCC targeted (cleaved) mutant TP 53 mRNA and replaced it with normal TP 53 mRNA to promote TP53 expression and induce apoptosis (111), as well as a trans-splicing ribozyme-mediated replacement of HCC-associated specific AFP to promote cell suicide (94). Ribozyme mediated suppression of VEGF expression enhanced matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1)nexpression in annHCC cell line to underline that repressing one oncoprotein can result in stimulating another (67).
Riboswitch: In one HCC study a riboswitch that could sense AFP triggered the promotion of YAP induced 14-3-3σ expression to promote degradation (68). A chimeric RNA-binding protein-based killing switch targeting HCC cells deployed a synthetic circuit for cNOT7 that is a deadenylase that can inhibit mRNA translation and promote their degradation. It was demonstrated in this study that the result of this deadenylase triggered apoptosis by switching on bcl-2 and repressing hBAX respectively (95).
Conclusion
RNA are key molecules involved in all biological pathways. Their history of therapeutic deployment begins with the first antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) drug in 1998, first aptamer drug in 2004, the first RNAi clinical trial in 2010 and the first siRNA drug in 2018. These RNAi drugs were based on the synthetic development of complementary RNA sequences that can bind to mRNA or a protein to repress (silence) expression. Six FDA approved RNA based drugs have been approved from 1998 to 2019 with the majority developed for muscular dystrophy/atrophy (6).
To date, a few clinical trials have been registered for siRNA RNAi based therapy in HCC. These trials include an LNP to target MYC mRNA to repress proliferation, a SNALP to target PLK1 mRNA (79) to retard cell cycle and an LNP to target EPHA2 mRNA to repress angiogenesis. Other trials include a polymer based NP to target PKN3 mRNA to repress vascularization, an LNP to target STMN1 mRNA to repress cell cycle, an LNP to target miR-34, and a polymer based NP to target RRM2 mRNA to repress cell proliferation (31). Another trial deployed a siRNA (miR-34) tumor suppressor to target 20 HCC associated genes, as well as to sensitize the tumor microenvironment to cytotoxic therapy (166). Bearing in mind the first siRNA-based drug was only approved in 2018 the indications are it will be some time before their true potential can be evaluated (6).
Despite the early promise of RNA therapeutics as a magic bullet to modulate aberrant signaling in cancer, this field remains a work-in-progress largely due to the inherent instability of RNA in vivo, as well as delivery and host immunogenic issues. RNAi targeting is often problematic because of the cross-talk between genes and some RNAi studies have demonstrated that repressing one oncoprotein can result in stimulating another (67). Nevertheless, RNA therapeutics is now a reality for the prevention of viral diseases (COVID-19) and offers great promise for cancer. Currently, most HCC drugs are based on recombinant proteins or antibodies that target pathologic proteins which are often difficult to reach because of their location in the cell. In addition, these drugs often struggle to differentiate between target protein sub-types, whereas RNA can more easily target specific mRNA or other ncRNA (31). A wide range of novel HCC therapeutics, including RNAi have been developed over the last two decades, however, a cure is not a reality at present (3).
Author Contributions
KS conceptualized, developed first draft and responded to reviewer edits and comments to develop final draft. SA reviewed and revised drafts, AC reviewed and revised drafts, AK reviewed and revised drafts. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Akinyemiju T, Abera S, Ahmed M, Alam N, Alemayohu MA, Allen C, et al. The Burden of Primary Liver Cancer and Underlying Etiologies From 1990 to 2015 at the Global, Regional, and National Level: Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. JAMA Oncol (2017) 3(12):1683–91. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3055
2. Feng R, Patil S, Zhao X, Miao Z, Qian A. RNA Therapeutics-Research and Clinical Advancements. Front Mol Biosci (2021) 913. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.710738
3. Shokoohian B, Negahdari B, Aboulkheyr Es H, Abedi-Valugerdi M, Baghaei K, Agarwal T, et al. Advanced Therapeutic Modalities in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Novel Insights. J Cell Mol Med (2021) 25(18):8602–14. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16875
4. Samant H, Amiri HS, Zibari GB. Addressing the Worldwide Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Epidemiology, Prevention and Management. J Gastrointest Oncol (2021) 12(Suppl 2):S361. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2020.02.08
6. Kim Y-K. RNA Therapy: Current Status and Future Potential. Chonnam Med J (2020) 56(2):87. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2020.56.2.87
7. Pandey M, Ojha D, Bansal S, Rode AB, Chawla G. From Bench Side to Clinic: Potential and Challenges of RNA Vaccines and Therapeutics in Infectious Diseases. Mol Aspects Med (2021) 81:101003. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2021.101003
8. Thangamani L, Balasubramanian B, Easwaran M, Natarajan J, Pushparaj K, Meyyazhagan A, et al. GalNAc-siRNA Conjugates: Prospective Tools on the Frontier of Anti-Viral Therapeutics. Pharmacol Res (2021) 173:105864. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105864
9. Li H, Yang Y, Hong W, Huang M, Wu M, Zhao X. Applications of Genome Editing Technology in the Targeted Therapy of Human Diseases: Mechanisms, Advances and Prospects. Signal Transduct Target Ther (2020) 5(1):1–23. doi: 10.1038/s41392-019-0089-y
10. Abdulrahman GO, Rahman GA. Epidemiology of Breast Cancer in Europe and Africa. J Cancer Epidemiol (2012) 2012:1–5. doi: 10.1155/2012/915610
11. Chen G, Shi Y, Liu M, Sun J. Circhipk3 Regulates Cell Proliferation and Migration by Sponging miR-124 and Regulating AQP3 Expression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cell Death Dis (2018) 9(2):175. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0204-3
12. Wu J, Contratto M, Shanbhogue KP, Manji GA, O’Neil BH, Noonan A, et al. Evaluation of a Locked Nucleic Acid Form of Antisense Oligo Targeting HIF-1α in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. World J Clin Oncol (2019) 10(3):149. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v10.i3.149
13. Gagliardi M, Ashizawa AT. The Challenges and Strategies of Antisense Oligonucleotide Drug Delivery. Biomedicines (2021) 9(4):433. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9040433
14. Ladju RB, Pascut D, Massi MN, Tiribelli C, Sukowati CH. Aptamer: A Potential Oligonucleotide Nanomedicine in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncotarget (2018) 9(2):2951. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23359
15. Liu Y, Wu X, Gao Y, Zhang J, Zhang D, Gu S, et al. Aptamer-Functionalized Peptide H3CR5C as a Novel Nanovehicle for Codelivery of Fasudil and miRNA-195 Targeting Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Nanomedicine (2016) 11:3891. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S108128
16. Germer K, Leonard M, Zhang X. RNA Aptamers and Their Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications. Int J Biochem Mol Biol (2013) 4(1):27. doi: 2152-4114/IJBMB1212003
17. Klingenberg M, Matsuda A, Diederichs S, Patel T. Non-Coding RNA in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Mechanisms, Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets. J Hepatol (2017) 67(3):603–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.04.009
18. Xiao Z, Shen J, Zhang L, Li M, Hu W, Cho C. Therapeutic Targeting of Noncoding RNAs in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Recent Progress and Future Prospects. Oncol Lett (2018) 15(3):3395–402. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.7758
19. Balke D, Müller S. Therapeutic Potential of Ribozymes. In: Agrawal S, Gait MJ, editors. Advances in Nucleic Acid Therapeutics, 1st ed (2019) Cambridge, United Kingdom: Royal Society of Chemistry. p. 434. doi: 10.1039/9781788015714-00434
20. Burnett JC, Rossi JJ. RNA-Based Therapeutics: Current Progress and Future Prospects. Chem Biol (2012) 19(1):60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.12.008
21. Scull CE, Dandpat SS, Romero RA, Walter NG. Transcriptional Riboswitches Integrate Timescales for Bacterial Gene Expression Control. Front Mol Biosci (2021) 480. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.607158
22. Ku SH, Jo SD, Lee YK, Kim K, Kim SH. Chemical and Structural Modifications of RNAi Therapeutics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev (2016) 104:16–28. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.10.015
23. Reynolds A, Anderson EM, Vermeulen A, Fedorov Y, Robinson K, Leake D, et al. Induction of the Interferon Response by siRNA is Cell Type–and Duplex Length–Dependent. RNA (2006) 12(6):988–93. doi: 10.1261/rna.2340906
24. Whitehead KA, Langer R, Anderson DG. Knocking Down Barriers: Advances in siRNA Delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2009) 8(2):129–38. doi: 10.1038/nrd2742
25. Jackson AL, Burchard J, Leake D, Reynolds A, Schelter J, Guo J, et al. Position-Specific Chemical Modification of siRNAs Reduces “Off-Target” Transcript Silencing. RNA (2006) 12(7):1197–205. doi: 10.1261/rna.30706
26. Eberle F, Gießler K, Deck C, Heeg K, Peter M, Richert C, et al. Modifications in Small Interfering RNA That Separate Immunostimulation From RNA Interference. J Immunol (2008) 180(5):3229–37. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.5.3229
27. Xin Y, Huang M, Guo WW, Huang Q, zhen Zhang L, Jiang G. Nano-Based Delivery of RNAi in Cancer Therapy. Mol Cancer (2017) 16(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0683-y
28. Dong Y, Siegwart DJ, Anderson DG. Strategies, Design, and Chemistry in siRNA Delivery Systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev (2019) 144:133–47. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2019.05.004
29. Angela Barba A, Lamberti G, Sardo C, Dapas B, Abrami M, Grassi M, et al. Novel Lipid and Polymeric Materials as Delivery Systems for Nucleic Acid Based Drugs. Curr Drug Metab (2015) 16(6):427–52. doi: 10.2174/1389200216666150812142557
30. Bochicchio S, Dalmoro A, Angela Barba A, Grassi G, Lamberti G. Liposomes as siRNA Delivery Vectors. Curr Drug Metab (2014) 15(9):882–92. doi: 10.2174/1389200216666150206124913
31. Scarabel L, Perrone F, Garziera M, Farra R, Grassi M, Musiani F, et al. Strategies to Optimize siRNA Delivery to Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells. Expert Opin Drug Deliv (2017) 14(6):797–810. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2017.1292247
32. Park K, Yang J-A, Lee M-Y, Lee H, Hahn SK. Reducible Hyaluronic Acid–siRNA Conjugate for Target Specific Gene Silencing. Bioconjug Chem (2013) 24(7):1201–9. doi: 10.1021/bc4001257
33. Prakash TP, Graham MJ, Yu J, Carty R, Low A, Chappell A, et al. Targeted Delivery of Antisense Oligonucleotides to Hepatocytes Using Triantennary N-Acetyl Galactosamine Improves Potency 10-Fold in Mice. Nucleic Acids Res (2014) 42(13):8796–807. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku531
34. Dammes N, Peer D. Monoclonal Antibody-Based Molecular Imaging Strategies and Theranostic Opportunities. Theranostics (2020) 10(2):938. doi: 10.7150/thno.37443
35. Mukherjee S, Ray S, Thakur R. Solid Lipid Nanoparticles: A Modern Formulation Approach in Drug Delivery System. Indian J Pharm Sci (2009) 71(4):349. doi: 10.4103/0250-474X.57282
36. Kara G, Calin GA, Ozpolat B. RNAi-Based Therapeutics and Tumor Targeted Delivery in Cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev (2022) 182:114113. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114113
37. Schulz W. Molecular Biology of Human Cancers: An Advanced Student’s Textbook. Switzerland: Springer Science & Business Media (2005).
38. Chen H, Yu J. Crosstalk of Molecular Signaling in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. In: Liver Diseases. Switzerland: Springer (2020). p. 85–94. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-24432-3_8
39. Giannelli G, Villa E, Lahn M. Transforming Growth Factor-β as a Therapeutic Target in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Res (2014) 74(7):1890–4. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0243
40. Khalaf AM, Fuentes D, Morshid AI, Burke MR, Kaseb AO, Hassan M, et al. Role of Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Pathogenesis, and Clinical Significance. J Hepatocell Carcinoma (2018) 5:61. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S156701
41. Harrison DA. The Jak/Stat Pathway. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (2012) 4(3):a011205. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011205
42. Huang K-W, Lai Y-T, Chern G-J, Huang S-F, Tsai C-L, Sung Y-C, et al. Galactose Derivative-Modified Nanoparticles for Efficient siRNA Delivery to Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Biomacromolecules (2018) 19(6):2330–9. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00358
43. Hu F, Miao L, Zhao Y, Xiao Y-Y, Xu Q. A Meta-Analysis for CXC Chemokine Receptor Type 4 as a Prognostic Marker and Potential Drug Target in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Drug Des Dev Ther (2015) 9:3625. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S86032
44. Liu J-Y, Chiang T, Liu C-H, Chern G-G, Lin T-T, Gao D-Y, et al. Delivery of siRNA Using CXCR4-Targeted Nanoparticles Modulates Tumor Microenvironment and Achieves a Potent Antitumor Response in Liver Cancer. Mol Ther (2015) 23(11):1772–82. doi: 10.1038/mt.2015.147
45. Yao Y, Wang T, Liu Y, Zhang N. Co-Delivery of Sorafenib and VEGF-siRNA via pH-Sensitive Liposomes for the Synergistic Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol (2019) 47(1):1374–83. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2019.1596943
46. Zou Y, Guo C, Zhang M. Inhibition of Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumor Angiogenesis by siRNA Silencing of VEGF via Hepatic Artery Perfusion. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci (2015) 19(24):4751–61.
47. Raskopf E, Vogt A, Sauerbruch T, Schmitz V. siRNA Targeting VEGF Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma Growth and Tumor Angiogenesis In Vivo. J Hepatol (2008) 49(6):977–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.07.022
48. Li X, Li J, Li C, Guo Q, Wu M, Su L, et al. Aminopeptidase N-Targeting Nanomolecule-Assisted Delivery of VEGF siRNA to Potentiate Antitumour Therapy by Suppressing Tumour Revascularization and Enhancing Radiation Response. J Mater Chem B (2021) 9(36):7530–43. doi: 10.1039/D1TB00990G
49. Wang G, Gao X, Gu G, Shao Z, Li M, Wang P, et al. Polyethylene Glycol–Poly (ϵ-Benzyloxycarbonyl-L-Lysine)-Conjugated VEGF siRNA for Antiangiogenic Gene Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Nanomedicine (2017) 12:3591. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S131078
50. Huang Z, Dong L, Chen J, Gao F, Zhang Z, Chen J, et al. Low-Molecular Weight Chitosan/Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Short Hairpin RNA for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Life Sci (2012) 91(23-24):1207–15. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2012.09.015
51. Shen J, Sun H, Meng Q, Yin Q, Zhang Z, Yu H, et al. Simultaneous Inhibition of Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis for Resistant Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Co-Delivery of Sorafenib and Survivin Small Hairpin RNA. Mol Pharm (2014) 11(10):3342–51. doi: 10.1021/mp4006408
52. Cao G, Li X, Qin C, Li J. Prognostic Value of VEGF in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated With Sorafenib: A Meta-Analysis. Med Sci Monit (2015) 21:3144. doi: 10.12659/MSM.894617
53. Miura S, Mitsuhashi N, Shimizu H, Kimura F, Yoshidome H, Otsuka M, et al. Fibroblast Growth Factor 19 Expression Correlates With Tumor Progression and Poorer Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. BMC Cancer (2012) 12(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-56
54. Gauglhofer C, Sagmeister S, Schrottmaier W, Fischer C, Rodgarkia-Dara C, Mohr T, et al. Up-Regulation of the Fibroblast Growth Factor 8 Subfamily in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma for Cell Survival and Neoangiogenesis. Hepatology (2011) 53(3):854–64. doi: 10.1002/hep.24099
55. Xiao Z, Wang Y, Ding H. XPD Suppresses Cell Proliferation and Migration via miR-29a-3p-Mdm2/PDGF-B Axis in HCC. Cell Biosci (2019) 9(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13578-018-0269-4
56. Sangro B, Gomez-Martin C, de la Mata M, Iñarrairaegui M, Garralda E, Barrera P, et al. A Clinical Trial of CTLA-4 Blockade With Tremelimumab in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Chronic Hepatitis C. J Hepatol (2013) 59(1):81–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.02.022
57. Pardee AD, Butterfield LH. Immunotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Unique Challenges and Clinical Opportunities. Oncoimmunology (2012) 1(1):48–55. doi: 10.4161/onci.1.1.18344
58. Fu R, Jiang S, Li J, Chen H, Zhang X. Activation of the HGF/c-MET Axis Promotes Lenvatinib Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells With High C-MET Expression. Med Oncol (2020) 37(4):1–7. doi: 10.1007/s12032-020-01350-4
59. Han P, Li H, Jiang X, Zhai B, Tan G, Zhao D, et al. Dual Inhibition of Akt and C-Met as a Second-Line Therapy Following Acquired Resistance to Sorafenib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells. Mol Oncol (2017) 11(3):320–34. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12039
60. Liu Q, Fan D, Adah D, Wu Z, Liu R, Yan QT, et al. CRISPR/Cas9−mediated Hypoxia Inducible Factor−1α Knockout Enhances the Antitumor Effect of Transarterial Embolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncol Rep (2018) 40(5):2547–57. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6667
61. Zhang B-C, Luo B-Y, Zou J-J, Wu P-Y, Jiang J-L, Le J-Q, et al. Co-Delivery of Sorafenib and CRISPR/Cas9 Based on Targeted Core–Shell Hollow Mesoporous Organosilica Nanoparticles for Synergistic HCC Therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces (2020) 12(51):57362–72. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c17660
62. Vanderborght B, De Muynck K, Lefere S, Geerts A, Degroote H, Verhelst X, et al. Effect of Isoform-Specific HIF-1α and HIF-2α Antisense Oligonucleotides on Tumorigenesis, Inflammation and Fibrosis in a Hepatocellular Carcinoma Mouse Model. Oncotarget (2020) 11(48):4504. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27830
63. Avila MA, Berasain C. Targeting CCL2/CCR2 in Tumor-Infiltrating Macrophages: A Tool Emerging Out of the Box Against Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol (2019) 7(2):293–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.11.002
64. Bartneck M, Schrammen PL, Möckel D, Govaere O, Liepelt A, Krenkel O, et al. The CCR2+ Macrophage Subset Promotes Pathogenic Angiogenesis for Tumor Vascularization in Fibrotic Livers. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol (2019) 7(2):371–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.10.007
65. Li L-H, Guo Z-J, Yan L-L, Yang J-C, Xie Y-F, Sheng W-H, et al. Antitumor and Antiangiogenic Activities of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Hairpin Ribozyme in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Cultures and Xenografts. World J Gastroenterol (2007) 13(47):6425. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i47.6425
66. Morino F, Tokunaga T, Tsuchida T, Handa A, Nagata J, Tomii Y, et al. Hammerhead Ribozyme Specifically Inhibits Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Expression in a Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Line. Int J Oncol (2000) 17(3):495–504. doi: 10.3892/ijo.17.3.495
67. Kamochi J, Tokunaga T, Morino F, Nagata J, Tomii Y, Abe Y, et al. Ribozyme Mediated Suppression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Expression Enhances Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 Expression in a Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Line. Int J Oncol (2002) 21(1):81–4. doi: 10.3892/ijo.21.1.81
68. Han X, Yang J, Zeng F, Weng J, Zhang Y, Peng Q, et al. Programmable Synthetic Protein Circuits for the Identification and Suppression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Mol Ther Oncolytics (2020) 17:70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2020.03.008
69. Guo Y, Wang J, Zhang L, Shen S, Guo R, Yang Y, et al. Theranostical Nanosystem-Mediated Identification of an Oncogene and Highly Effective Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Hepatology (2016) 63(4):1240–55. doi: 10.1002/hep.28409
70. Qu C, He D, Lu X, Dong L, Zhu Y, Zhao Q, et al. Salt-Inducible Kinase (SIK1) Regulates HCC Progression and WNT/β-Catenin Activation. J Hepatol (2016) 64(5):1076–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.01.005
71. Hu Y, Shen Y, Ji B, Wang L, Zhang Z, Zhang Y. Combinational RNAi Gene Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Targeting Human EGFR and TERT. Eur J Pharm Sci (2011) 42(4):387–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2011.01.004
72. Ma Z-X, Yang C-M, Li M-G, Tu H. Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Promoter Mutations in Hepatocellular Carcinogenesis. Hepatoma Res (2019) 5. doi: 10.20517/2394-5079.2018.104
73. Bogorad RL, Yin H, Zeigerer A, Nonaka H, Ruda VM, Zerial M, et al. Nanoparticle-Formulated siRNA Targeting Integrins Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression in Mice. Nat Commun (2014) 5(1):1–14. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4869
74. Gao J, Chen H, Yu Y, Song J, Song H, Su X, et al. Inhibition of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Growth Using Immunoliposomes for Co-Delivery of Adriamycin and Ribonucleotide Reductase M2 siRNA. Biomaterials (2013) 34(38):10084–98. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.088
75. Wang Y, Yang Y, Gao H, Ouyang T, Zhang L, Hu J, et al. Comprehensive Analysis of CDCAs Methylation and Immune Infiltrates in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front Oncol (2021) 10:3199. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.566183
76. Li L, Wang R, Wilcox D, Sarthy A, Lin X, Huang X, et al. Developing Lipid Nanoparticle-Based siRNA Therapeutics for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using an Integrated Approach. Mol Cancer Ther (2013) 12(11):2308–18. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0983-T
77. Li Y, Zhu Z, Zhang S, Yu D, Yu H, Liu L, et al. ShRNA-Targeted Centromere Protein A Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma Growth. PloS One (2011) 6(3):e17794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017794
78. Tolcher AW, Papadopoulos KP, Patnaik A, Rasco DW, Martinez D, Wood DL, et al. Safety and Activity of DCR-MYC, a First-in-Class Dicer-Substrate Small Interfering RNA (DsiRNA) Targeting MYC, in a Phase I Study in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors. Am Soc Clin Oncol (2015). doi: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.11006
79. El Dika I, Lim HY, Yong WP, Lin CC, Yoon JH, Modiano M, et al. An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase I, Dose Escalation Study With Phase II Expansion Cohort to Determine the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Antitumor Activity of Intravenous TKM-080301 in Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncologist (2019) 24(6):747–e218. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0838
80. Liao W, Liu W, Yuan Q, Liu X, Ou Y, He S, et al. Silencing of DLGAP5 by siRNA Significantly Inhibits the Proliferation and Invasion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells. PloS One (2013) 8(12):e80789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080789
81. Wu Q-f, Liu C, Tai M-h, Liu D, Lei L, Wang R-t, et al. Knockdown of FoxM1 by siRNA Interference Decreases Cell Proliferation, Induces Cell Cycle Arrest and Inhibits Cell Invasion in MHCC-97H Cells In Vitro. Acta Pharmacol Sin (2010) 31(3):361–6. doi: 10.1038/aps.2010.4
82. Doan CC, Le LT, Hoang SN, Do SM, Van Le D. Simultaneous Silencing of VEGF and KSP by siRNA Cocktail Inhibits Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Hep3B Cells. Biol Res (2014) 47(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/0717-6287-47-70
83. Li T, Xue Y, Wang G, Gu T, Li Y, Zhu YY, et al. Multi-Target siRNA: Therapeutic Strategy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Cancer (2016) 7(10):1317. doi: 10.7150/jca.15157
84. Zhang S, Zhang F, Chen Q, Wan C, Xiong J, Xu J. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Knockout of NSD1 Suppresses the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development via the NSD1/H3/Wnt10b Signaling Pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2019) 38(1):1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1462-y
85. Wang H, Yang H, Shivalila CS, Dawlaty MM, Cheng AW, Zhang F, et al. One-Step Generation of Mice Carrying Mutations in Multiple Genes by CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Engineering. Cell (2013) 153(4):910–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025
86. Guo X, Jiang H, Shi B, Zhou M, Zhang H, Shi Z, et al. Disruption of PD-1 Enhanced the Anti-Tumor Activity of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Against Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front Pharmacol (2018) 9:1118. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01118
87. Xue W, Chen S, Yin H, Tammela T, Papagiannakopoulos T, Joshi NS, et al. CRISPR-Mediated Direct Mutation of Cancer Genes in the Mouse Liver. Nature (2014) 514(7522):380–4. doi: 10.1038/nature13589
88. Sieghart W, Losert D, Strommer S, Cejka D, Schmid K, Rasoul-Rockenschaub S, et al. Mcl-1 Overexpression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Potential Target for Antisense Therapy. J Hepatol (2006) 44(1):151–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.09.010
89. Li W-C, Ye S-L, Sun R-X, Liu Y-K, Tang Z-Y, Kim Y, et al. Inhibition of Growth and Metastasis of Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Antisense Oligonucleotide Targeting Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3. Clin Cancer Res (2006) 12(23):7140–8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0484
90. Dhanasekaran R, Park J, Yevtodiyenko A, Bellovin DI, Adam SJ, Kd AR, et al. MYC ASO Impedes Tumorigenesis and Elicits Oncogene Addiction in Autochthonous Transgenic Mouse Models of HCC and RCC. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids (2020) 21:850–9. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.07.008
91. Harada T, Matsumoto S, Hirota S, Kimura H, Fujii S, Kasahara Y, et al. Chemically Modified Antisense Oligonucleotide Against ARL4C Inhibits Primary and Metastatic Liver Tumor Growth. Mol Cancer Ther (2019) 18(3):602–12. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-0824
92. Lee YJ, Lee S-W. Regression of Hepatocarcinoma Cells Using RNA Aptamer Specific to Alpha-Fetoprotein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2012) 417(1):521–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.11.153
93. Cho Y, Lee YB, Lee J-H, Lee DH, Cho EJ, Yu SJ, et al. Modified AS1411 Aptamer Suppresses Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Up-Regulating Galectin-14. PloS One (2016) 11(8):e0160822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160822
94. Won Y-S, Lee S-W. Targeted Retardation of Hepatocarcinoma Cells by Specific Replacement of Alpha-Fetoprotein RNA. J Biotechnol (2007) 129(4):614–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.02.004
95. Yang J, Ding S. Chimeric RNA-Binding Protein-Based Killing Switch Targeting Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids (2021) 25:683–95. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2021.08.012
96. Wu C, Gong F, Pang P, Shen M, Zhu K, Cheng D, et al. An RGD-Modified MRI-Visible Polymeric Vector for Targeted siRNA Delivery to Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Nude Mice. PloS One (2013) 8(6):e66416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066416
97. Xu Q, Zhang M, Tu J, Pang L, Cai W, Liu X. MicroRNA-122 Affects Cell Aggressiveness and Apoptosis by Targeting PKM2 in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncol Rep (2015) 34(4):2054–64. doi: 10.3892/or.2015.4175
98. Zhang R, Shen M, Wu C, Chen Y, Lu J, Li J, et al. HDAC8-Dependent Deacetylation of PKM2 Directs Nuclear Localization and Glycolysis to Promote Proliferation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cell Death Dis (2020) 11(12):1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03212-3
99. Xu J, Zhu X, Wu L, Yang R, Yang Z, Wang Q, et al. MicroRNA-122 Suppresses Cell Proliferation and Induces Cell Apoptosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Directly Targeting Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway. Liver Int (2012) 32(5):752–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02750.x
100. Lee Y-H, Seo D, Choi K-J, Andersen JB, Won M-A, Kitade M, et al. Antitumor Effects in Hepatocarcinoma of Isoform-Selective Inhibition of HDAC2. Cancer Res (2014) 74(17):4752–61. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3531
101. Yin T, Wang P, Li J, Wang Y, Zheng B, Zheng R, et al. Tumor-Penetrating Codelivery of siRNA and Paclitaxel With Ultrasound-Responsive Nanobubbles Hetero-Assembled From Polymeric Micelles and Liposomes. Biomaterials (2014) 35(22):5932–43. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.072
102. Guo X, Wang W, Zhou F, Lu Z, Fang R, Jia F, et al. siRNA-Mediated Inhibition of hTERT Enhances Chemosensitivity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther (2008) 7(10):1555–60. doi: 10.4161/cbt.7.10.6539
103. Li K, Lin S-Y, Brunicardi FC, Seu P. Use of RNA Interference to Target Cyclin E-Overexpressing Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Res (2003) 63(13):3593–7.
104. Han K-Q, He X-Q, Ma M-Y, Guo X-D, Zhang X-M, Chen J, et al. Targeted Silencing of CXCL1 by siRNA Inhibits Tumor Growth and Apoptosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Oncol (2015) 47(6):2131–40. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2015.3203
105. Pan H, Wang Z, Jiang L, Sui X, You L, Shou J, et al. Autophagy Inhibition Sensitizes Hepatocellular Carcinoma to the Multikinase Inhibitor Linifanib. Sci Rep (2014) 4(1):1–10. doi: 10.1038/srep06683
106. Han L, Tang C, Yin C. Oral Delivery of shRNA and siRNA via Multifunctional Polymeric Nanoparticles for Synergistic Cancer Therapy. Biomaterials (2014) 35(15):4589–600. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.027
107. Han L, Tang C, Yin C. Effect of Binding Affinity for siRNA on the In Vivo Antitumor Efficacy of Polyplexes. Biomaterials (2013) 34(21):5317–27. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.060
108. Chen Z-H, Yan PY, Zuo Z-H, Nelson JB, Michalopoulos GK, Monga S, et al. Targeting Genomic Rearrangements in Tumor Cells Through Cas9-Mediated Insertion of a Suicide Gene. Nat Biotechnol (2017) 35(6):543–50. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3843
109. Ningarhari M, Caruso S, Hirsch TZ, Bayard Q, Franconi A, Védie A-L, et al. Telomere Length is Key to Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diversity and Telomerase Addiction is an Actionable Therapeutic Target. J Hepatol (2021) 74(5):1155–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.052
110. Scaggiante B, Farra R, Dapas B, Baj G, Pozzato G, Grassi M, et al. Aptamer Targeting of the Elongation Factor 1A Impairs Hepatocarcinoma Cells Viability and Potentiates Bortezomib and Idarubicin Effects. Int J Pharm (2016) 506(1-2):268–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.04.031
111. Shin K-S, Sullenger BA, Lee S-W. Ribozyme-Mediated Induction of Apoptosis in Human Cancer Cells by Targeted Repair of Mutant P53 RNA. Mol Ther (2004) 10(2):365–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.05.007
112. Song M, Jeong J, Ban G, Lee J, Won Y, Cho K, et al. Validation of Tissue-Specific Promoter-Driven Tumor-Targeting Trans-Splicing Ribozyme System as a Multifunctional Cancer Gene Therapy Device In Vivo. Cancer Gene Ther (2009) 16(2):113–25. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2008.64
113. Han SR, Lee CH, Im JY, Kim JH, Kim JH, Kim SJ, et al. Targeted Suicide Gene Therapy for Liver Cancer Based on Ribozyme-Mediated RNA Replacement Through Post-Transcriptional Regulation. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids (2021) 23:154–68. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.10.036
114. Kim J, Won R, Ban G, Ju MH, Cho KS, Han SY, et al. Targeted Regression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Cancer-Specific RNA Replacement Through microRNA Regulation. Sci Rep (2015) 5(1):1–13. doi: 10.1038/srep12315
115. Cazejust J, Bessoud B, Colignon N, Garcia-Alba C, Planché O, Menu Y. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Vascularization: From the Most Common to the Lesser Known Arteries. Diagn Interv Imaging (2014) 95(1):27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2013.04.015
116. Xiong XX, Qiu XY, Hu DX, Chen XQ. Advances in Hypoxia-Mediated Mechanisms in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Mol Pharmacol (2017) 92(3):246–55. doi: 10.1124/mol.116.107706
117. Morse MA, Sun W, Kim R, He AR, Abada PB, Mynderse M, et al. The Role of Angiogenesis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res (2019) 25(3):912–20. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1254
118. Zheng N, Wei W, Wang Z. Emerging Roles of FGF Signaling in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Trans Cancer Res (2016) 5(1):1.
119. Sawey ET, Chanrion M, Cai C, Wu G, Zhang J, Zender L, et al. Identification of a Therapeutic Strategy Targeting Amplified FGF19 in Liver Cancer by Oncogenomic Screening. Cancer Cell (2011) 19(3):347–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.01.040
120. Heldin C-H. Targeting the PDGF Signaling Pathway in Tumor Treatment. Cell Commun Signal (2013) 11(1):1–18. doi: 10.1186/1478-811X-11-97
121. Chae YK, Ranganath K, Hammerman PS, Vaklavas C, Mohindra N, Kalyan A, et al. Inhibition of the Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) Pathway: The Current Landscape and Barriers to Clinical Application. Oncotarget (2017) 8(9):16052. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14109
122. Bupathi M, Kaseb A, Janku F. Angiopoietin 2 as a Therapeutic Target in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment: Current Perspectives. Onco Targets Ther (2014) 7:1927. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S46457
123. Li Y, Zhai Z, Liu D, Zhong X, Meng X, Yang Q, et al. CD105 Promotes Hepatocarcinoma Cell Invasion and Metastasis Through VEGF. Tumor Biol (2015) 36(2):737–45. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2686-2
124. Jeng K-S, Sheen I, Lin S-S, Leu C-M, Chang C-F. The Role of Endoglin in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci (2021) 22(6):3208. doi: 10.3390/ijms22063208
125. Sharma BK, Srinivasan R, Kapil S, Singla B, Chawla YK, Chakraborti A, et al. Angiogenic and Anti-Angiogenic Factor Gene Transcript Level Quantitation by Quantitative Real Time PCR in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Mol Biol Rep (2013) 40(10):5843–52. doi: 10.1007/s11033-013-2690-4
126. Wang Y, Liu D, Zhang T, Xia L. FGF/FGFR Signaling in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Carcinogenesis to Recent Therapeutic Intervention. Cancers (2021) 13(6):1360. doi: 10.3390/cancers13061360
127. Gao D-Y, Lin T-T, Sung Y-C, Liu YC, Chiang W-H, Chang C-C, et al. CXCR4-Targeted Lipid-Coated PLGA Nanoparticles Deliver Sorafenib and Overcome Acquired Drug Resistance in Liver Cancer. Biomaterials (2015) 67:194–203. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.07.035
128. Umemoto Y, Okano S, Matsumoto Y, Nakagawara H, Matono R, Yoshiya S, et al. Prognostic Impact of Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand 1 Expression in Human Leukocyte Antigen Class I-Positive Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Hepatectomy. J Gastroenterol (2015) 50(1):65–75. doi: 10.1007/s00535-014-0933-3
129. Wang H, Rao B, Lou J, Li J, Liu Z, Li A, et al. The Function of the HGF/c-Met Axis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front Cell Dev Biol (2020) 8:55. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00055
130. Zhang Y, Gao X, Zhu Y, Kadel D, Sun H, Chen J, et al. The Dual Blockade of MET and VEGFR2 Signaling Demonstrates Pronounced Inhibition on Tumor Growth and Metastasis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2018) 37(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0750-2
131. Tan S, Li R, Ding K, Lobie PE, Zhu T. miR-198 Inhibits Migration and Invasion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells by Targeting the HGF/c-MET Pathway. FEBS Lett (2011) 585(14):2229–34. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.05.042
132. Hu C-T, Wu J-R, Cheng C-C, Wu W-S. The Therapeutic Targeting of HGF/c-Met Signaling in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Alternative Approaches. Cancers (2017) 9(6):58. doi: 10.3390/cancers9060058
133. Moawad AW, Szklaruk J, Lall C, Blair KJ, Kaseb AO, Kamath A, et al. Angiogenesis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma; Pathophysiology, Targeted Therapy, and Role of Imaging. J Hepatocell Carcinoma (2020) 7:77. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S224471
134. Dolinsek T, Markelc B, Sersa G, Coer A, Stimac M, Lavrencak J, et al. Multiple Delivery of siRNA Against Endoglin Into Murine Mammary Adenocarcinoma Prevents Angiogenesis and Delays Tumor Growth. PloS One (2013) 8(3):e58723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058723
135. Lin D, Wu J. Hypoxia Inducible Factor in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Therapeutic Target. World J Gastroenterol (2015) 21(42):12171. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i42.12171
136. Farzaneh Z, Vosough M, Agarwal T, Farzaneh M. Critical Signaling Pathways Governing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Behavior; Small Molecule-Based Approaches. Cancer Cell Int (2021) 21(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-01924-w
137. Zhang X, Luo X, Liu W, Shen A. Identification of Hub Genes Associated With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prognosis by Bioinformatics Analysis. J Cancer Ther (2021) 12(04):186. doi: 10.4236/jct.2021.124019
138. Bogaerts E, Heindryckx F, Vandewynckel Y-P, Van Grunsven LA, Van Vlierberghe H. The Roles of Transforming Growth Factor-β, Wnt, Notch and Hypoxia on Liver Progenitor Cells in Primary Liver Tumours. Int J Oncol (2014) 44(4):1015–22. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2286
139. Cheng W-T, Xu K, Tian D-Y, Zhang Z-G, Liu L-J, Chen Y. Role of Hedgehog Signaling Pathway in Proliferation and Invasiveness of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells. Int J Oncol (2009) 34(3):829–36. doi: 10.3892/ijo_00000209
140. Della Corte CM, Viscardi G, Papaccio F, Esposito G, Martini G, Ciardiello D, et al. Implication of the Hedgehog Pathway in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol (2017) 23(24):4330. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i24.4330
141. Huang Q, Li J, Zheng J, Wei A. The Carcinogenic Role of the Notch Signaling Pathway in the Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Cancer (2019) 10(6):1570. doi: 10.7150/jca.26847
142. Wang XQ, Zhang W, Lui EL, Zhu Y, Lu P, Yu X, et al. Notch1-Snail1-E-Cadherin Pathway in Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Cancer (2012) 131(3):E163–E72. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27336
143. Hin Tang JJ, Hao Thng DK, Lim JJ, Toh TB. JAK/STAT Signaling in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Hepat Oncol (2020) 7(1):HEP18. doi: 10.2217/hep-2020-0001
144. Kim W, Khan SK, Liu Y, Xu R, Park O, He Y, et al. Hepatic Hippo Signaling Inhibits Protumoural Microenvironment to Suppress Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gut (2018) 67(9):1692–703. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314061
145. Moon H, Ro SW. MAPK/ERK Signaling Pathway in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (2021) 13(12):3026. doi: 10.3390/cancers13123026
146. Dimri M, Satyanarayana A. Molecular Signaling Pathways and Therapeutic Targets in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (2020) 12(2):491. doi: 10.3390/cancers12020491
147. Liu Z, Chen D, Ning F, Du J, Wang H. EGF is Highly Expressed in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Promotes Motility of HCC Cells via Fibronectin. J Cell Biochem (2018) 119(5):4170–83. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26625
148. Giannelli G, Astigiano S, Antonaci S, Morini M, Barbieri O, Noonan DM, et al. Role of the α3β1 and α6β4 Integrins in Tumor Invasion. Clin Exp Metastasis (2002) 19(3):217–23. doi: 10.1023/A:1015579204607
149. Lee B, Ha SY, Song DH, Lee HW, Cho SY, Park C-K. High Expression of Ribonucleotide Reductase Subunit M2 Correlates With Poor Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gut Liver (2014) 8(6):662. doi: 10.5009/gnl13392
150. Hussain S, Schwank J, Staib F, Wang X, Harris C. TP53 Mutations and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Insights Into the Etiology and Pathogenesis of Liver Cancer. Oncogene (2007) 26(15):2166–76. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210279
152. Wang Y, Han C, Lu L, Magliato S, Wu T. Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Regulates Autophagy in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells. Hepatology (2013) 58(3):995–1010. doi: 10.1002/hep.26394
153. Lee SH, Shin MS, Lee HS, Bae JH, Lee HK, Kim HS, et al. Expression of Fas and Fas-Related Molecules in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Hum Pathol (2001) 32(3):250–6. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2001.22769
154. Fabregat I. Dysregulation of Apoptosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells. World J Gastroenterol (2009) 15(5):513. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.513
155. Johnstone RW, Frew AJ, Smyth MJ. The TRAIL Apoptotic Pathway in Cancer Onset, Progression and Therapy. Nat Rev Cancer (2008) 8(10):782–98. doi: 10.1038/nrc2465
156. Breuhahn K, Longerich T, Schirmacher P. Dysregulation of Growth Factor Signaling in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncogene (2006) 25(27):3787–800. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209556
157. Yoshikawa H, Matsubara K, Geng-Sun Q, Jackson P, Groopman JD, Manning JE, et al. SOCS-1, a Negative Regulator of the JAK/STAT Pathway, is Silenced by Methylation in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Shows Growth-Suppression Activity. Nat Genet (2001) 28(1):29. doi: 10.1038/ng0501-29
158. Horie Y, Suzuki A, Kataoka E, Sasaki T, Hamada K, Sasaki J, et al. Hepatocyte-Specific Pten Deficiency Results in Steatohepatitis and Hepatocellular Carcinomas. J Clin Invest (2004) 113(12):1774–83. doi: 10.1172/JCI20513
159. Su C. Survivin in Survival of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Lett (2016) 379(2):184–90. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.06.016
160. Wang D, Liu J, Liu S, Li W. Identification of Crucial Genes Associated With Immune Cell Infiltration in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis. Front Genet (2020) 11:342. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00342
161. Wang Q, Wu PC, Roberson RS, Luk BV, Ivanova I, Chu E, et al. Survivin and Escaping in Therapy-Induced Cellular Senescence. Int J Cancer (2011) 128(7):1546–58. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25482
162. Ito T, Shiraki K, Sugimoto K, Yamanaka T, Fujikawa K, Ito M, et al. Survivin Promotes Cell Proliferation in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Hepatology (2000) 31(5):1080–5. doi: 10.1053/he.2000.6496
163. Garmpis N, Damaskos C, Garmpi A, Georgakopoulou VE, Sarantis P, Antoniou EA, et al. Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Evidence and Future Opportunities. J Pers Med (2021) 11(3):223. doi: 10.3390/jpm11030223
164. Geng Y, Michowski W, Chick JM, Wang YE, Jecrois ME, Sweeney KE, et al. Kinase-Independent Function of E-Type Cyclins in Liver Cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci (2018) 115(5):1015–20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711477115
165. Ghanem I, Riveiro ME, Paradis V, Faivre S, de Parga PMV, Raymond E. Insights on the CXCL12-CXCR4 Axis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Carcinogenesis. Am J Trans Res (2014) 6(4):340.
Keywords: small interfering RNA (siRNA), antisense oligonucleotide (ASO), aptamer, ribozyme, riboswitch, CRISPR/Cas9, RNAi strategies
Citation: Sartorius K, Antwi SO, Chuturgoon A, Roberts LR and Kramvis A (2022) RNA Therapeutic Options to Manage Aberrant Signaling Pathways in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Dream or Reality? Front. Oncol. 12:891812. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.891812
Received: 08 March 2022; Accepted: 04 April 2022;
Published: 04 May 2022.
Edited by:
Liangrong Shi, Central South University, ChinaReviewed by:
Xiaojin Wu, First People’s Hospital of Xuzhou, ChinaHao Lu, Nanjing Medical University, China
Copyright © 2022 Sartorius, Antwi, Chuturgoon, Roberts and Kramvis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kurt Sartorius, S3VydC5TYXJ0b3JpdXNAd2l0cy5hYy56YQ==