Piaoping Kong1‡
Lingyu Zhang1‡Zhengliang Zhang1Kangle Feng1Yiwen Sang1
Xiuzhi Duan1
Chunhua Liu2
Tao Sun1
Zhihua Tao1*†
Weiwei Liu1*†- 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- 2Department of Blood Transfusion, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men in the western world, but the lack of specific and sensitive markers often leads to overtreatment of prostate cancer which eventually develops into castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Novel protein markers for diagnosis and management of CRPC will be promising. In this review, we systematically summarize and discuss the expression pattern of emerging proteins in tissue, cell lines, and serum when castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC) progresses to CRPC; focus on the proteins involved in CRPC growth, invasion, metastasis, metabolism, and immune microenvironment; summarize the current understanding of the regulatory mechanisms of emerging proteins in CSPC progressed to CRPC at the molecular level; and finally summarize the clinical applications of emerging proteins as diagnostic marker, prognostic marker, predictive marker, and therapeutic marker.
Introduction
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-cutaneous cancer in men in the western world, and is responsible for about 300,000 deaths each year (1). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been thought to be the mainstay of treatment for men with advanced symptomatic prostate cancer which is called castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC). While after an initial effective response, patients often stop responding and progress to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) (2). It can be identified by a rise in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), bone scan, biopsy, and/or positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of recurrent/new metastases (3). At a conference held in March 2015, 41 experts from 17 countries and regions all agreed that the diagnosis of CRPC should meet the following two conditions: i) The serum testosterone level of the castrated is <1.7 nmol/l and ii) indicating biochemical progression. Biochemical progression is characterized by the PSA expression levels increasing twice in a row from an interval of 1 week or >3 consecutive measurements with the lowest value increasing>50% and >2 g/l, and ≥2 increases in novel lesions based on bone scanning or soft tissue lesions with the corresponding evaluation criteria of the solid tumor. At current, symptom progression is not sufficient for diagnosis of CRPC (4). Diagnosis as early as possible and precise management of CRPC are the urgent need. Proteins are the ultimate targets of most anticancer drugs (5). In this regard, investigation of protein expression and its function in promoting CRPC enable discovery of potential biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis and therapeutic drug targets of CRPC.
Recently, with the development of high-throughput technology, a majority of proteins have been studied. Recent studies have demonstrated that proteins such as 2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase (DECRI), alpha (1, 6) fucosyltransferase 8 (FUT8), and actinin-4 (ACTN4) are regulated in CRPC (6–8). Aberrant expression of proteins may promote CRPC cell growth, invasion, and metastasis, but inhibit cell apoptosis of the tumor and antitumor drug sensitivity. The molecular mechanisms of prostate cancer progression to CRPC are not very clear to date. In this review, we summarized the altered proteins when CSPC progressed to CRPC, and we focused on the functions, mechanisms, and clinical implementation of related proteins in CRPC.
The Expression Pattern of Emerging Proteins in CSPC to CRPC
Large amounts of proteins have been found to express differently compared CSPC with CRPC. The altered proteins in the transition from CSPC to CRPC and the relevant references are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1 The altered proteins when CSPC progression to CRPC.
The Expression Pattern of Emerging Proteins in CRPC Tissue
Prostate cancer tissue could readily be obtained by prostatectomy or biopsy (42). In addition, more effective markers for CRPC diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutic management, and the mechanisms of transformation of CSPC to CRPC could be found by investigating the expression pattern of proteins in prostate cancer tissue.
Developmental changes in enzyme levels have been discovered during prostate cancer progression to CRPC. PARP-2 is a member of Poly (ADPribose) Polymerase (PARP) family which plays a critical role in AR-mediated transcription in PCa and prostate cancer progression to CRPC compared with other members (9). To explore the oncogenic role of PARP-2 in PCa, the study used a set of PCa tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing 1129 tissue cores and found that significantly increased PARP-2 protein expression was observed in CRPC compared with primary PCa tumors (9). Selective targeting of PARP-2 may provide an alternative therapeutic strategy for AR inhibition that is comparable with enzalutamide treatment through disrupting FOXA1 binding rather than targeting AR directly (9). Compared to currently used PARP in targeting both PARP-1 and PARP-2, PCa patients may benefit from selective targeting of PARP-2 because pan-inhibitors generally have more side effects than selective inhibitors (9). Although the use of Src family kinases (SFKs) inhibitors in prostate cancer cell lines has also been the subject of several publications, it is still not entirely clear which SFK member plays a dominant role in the transition to hormone independence in prostate cancer compared with PARP (10). To investigate the association between SFK activity and clinical data in prostate cancer patients, Oleg Tatarov et al. compared prostate tumor samples taken before hormone deprivation therapy and following hormone relapse from 50 patients by immunohistochemistry (10). They found that the expression of total Src and phospho-SrcY527 representing an inactive form of SFKs in the cytoplasm decreased in the transition from CSPC to CRPC, while more intense membrane staining of overall SFK member Lyn was observed in CRPC samples when compared with CSPC (10). There was no change found in the expression of SFK member Fgr (10). In addition, SFK activity was upregulated in 28% of patients with CRPC compared to patients with CSPC (10). However, only a subset of AIPC patients may be suitable for SFK inhibitor therapy. The single-agent activity of SFK inhibitors in PCa clinical trials is disappointing (11). A study has shown that Semaphorin 3C (SEMA3C) drives the activation of multiple receptor tyrosine kinase pathways including EGFR, HER2/ErbB2, MET, and SRC, so inhibition of only one pathway may not be sufficient because other compensatory receptor tyrosine kinase pathways are simultaneously activated (11). James W Peacock et al. examined the expression of SEMA3C in a panel of human PCa specimens representing untreated hormone naive and CRPC bone metastases and observed that increased SEMA3C expression was correlated with CRPC bone metastases (11). Ring finger protein 6 (RNF6), an ubiquitin E3 ligase, may potentially be a new therapeutic target of CRPC (13). Kexin Xu et al. found that nuclear staining of RNF6 in CRPC tissues was remarkably higher than those in CSPC tissues (13). Furthermore, the frequency of detection of RNF6 positive nuclear staining was significantly increased in CRPC tissues compared to the CSPC tissues (13).
In addition to kinases above, there are other proteins that change during prostate cancer progression to CRPC. A previous study discovered that yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1), which plays a crucial role in the mammalian hippo signaling pathway and AR, formed a protein complex in the nucleus of prostate cancer cells (43). In addition, the YAP1–AR interactions are androgen-independent and resistant to enzalutamide in CRPC (43). AR-V7 is truncated after canonical AR exon 3, with inclusion of a cryptic exon 3b (CE3b) derived from an intron in the expressed protein (44). Jonathan Welti et al. found that nuclear AR-V7 expression was significantly higher in CRPC compared to CSPC (14). The authors further demonstrated a reverse trend with a decrease in nuclear AR-V7 in a small subset of CRPC, which might be explained by an increase in other AR variants that are constitutively active (14). Similarly, Arnaud Blomme et al. discovered that expression of the AR-V7 variant significantly increased in Bicalutamide-resistant cells while decreased or did not change in the apalutamide- and enzalutamide resistant cells (6). Yoshinori Matsuda et al. also found that higher nuclear YAP (nYAP) expression was expressed in a docetaxel-resistant subline (22RV-1-DR) compared to parental 22Rv-1 and knockdown of YAP1 inhibited 22Rv1-DR cell proliferation (45). Another study using immunohistochemistry also demonstrated that YAP1 and p21-activated kinase 2 (PAK2), a regulator of cell motility that mediates the actions of Cdc42 and Rac small GTPases, were increased in castration-resistant tumors (19, 46, 47). Moreover, nYAP expression is an independent prognostic factor in high-risk patients treated with docetaxel-based chemohormonal therapy (45). Therefore, the interaction between AR, including its splice variants and hippo pathway proteins as tissue biomarkers in CRPC, should be further investigated. Transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) is a prostate-specific and androgen-responsive serine protease which is frequently rearranged at the genomic level with members of the E26 transformation-specific (ETS) gene family (48). The most frequent fusion involves the “ETS-related gene” or “ERG” occurring in approximately 40%–50% of primary PCa (21). Nuclear ERG protein expression was observed to be less frequent in CRPC compared with primary PCa by immunohistochemistry (21). HLA-DMB, a protein involved in inflammation, association with ERG was decreased in CRPC metastases compared with primary PCa (21). And CD3 cell number association with ERG was found to change from positive to negative in CRPC metastases when compared with primary PCa (21). Furthermore, expression of DCLK1 shows correlation with ERG expression and may play a role in the transformation of primary PCa to metastatic CPRC which deserves further study (21).
Several studies have found that changes in phosphorylation pattern of proteins could also be observed during transformation of CSPC to CRPC. Phosphorylation is a reversible posttranslational modification that can inform about the activity status of kinase-driven signaling pathways (19). A study found that nearly 50% of CRPC tissues showed higher expression levels of overall tyrosine phosphorylation than hormone naive prostate cancer (49). Justin M et al. analyzed metastatic CRPC and treatment naive tissues by quantitative label free mass spectrometry, and 297 phosphotyrosine peptides and 8051 hosphoserine/phosphothreonine peptides were identified from 54 total runs corresponding to 27 samples of interest (11 treatment-naive,16 metastatic CRPC) (50).
The Expression Pattern of Emerging Proteins in Cell Lines
Cell lines are a good model for studies about prostate cancer to find the expression pattern of proteins, for the reason that different conditions and variations in patients can be mimicked to be observed and it would not have been able to be assessed otherwise. In addition, the majority of interventional studies can be carried out without being affected by other variables (42). Some proteins were discovered by traditional techniques such as western blotting (WB), while some new proteins were discovered by mass spectrometry.
Some proteins have been found expressed differently between CSPC and CRPC by traditional techniques such as WB. ACTN4, a member of the spectrin gene superfamily, always acts as an oncogene in various cancer types (23). To identify novel therapeutic targets for CRPC, Yu Ishizuya et al. applied WB to examine the expression of ACTN4 in four prostate cancer cell lines (8). It was shown that ACTN4 expression level was higher in DU145 cells and PC-3 cells than in LNCaP cells (8). Sungyeon Park et al. also verified that the protein level of ACTN4 was increased in LNCaP-AI cells compared with LNCaP cells (23). A previous study reported that ACTN4 interacts with glucocorticoid receptor and plays a role in glucocorticoid receptor activation (51). However, restored glucocorticoid receptor expression is crucial for CRPC cell proliferation during the CRPC transition (52). Therefore, the molecular mechanism of ACTN4 in CRPC transition deserves further study. Another study using WB revealed a significant deregulation of transducin beta like related 1 (TBLR1), which is a transcriptional coactivator of androgen receptor (AR) when prostate cancer progresses to CRPC (24). TBLR1, also known as TBL1XR1, a core component of the nuclear receptor corepressor complex and a silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid receptor complex, which was significantly important for the regulation of multiple nuclear receptors, functions as a tumor suppressor when expressed in the nucleus in prostate (53–56). The expression level of cytoplasmic TBLR1 was moderately higher in PCa cells than benign prostate cells (24). CRPC cells express higher levels of TBLR1 cytoplasmic expression and lower levels of nuclear expression compared with CSPC (24). In addition, a cytoplasmic specific isoform of TBLR1 approximately 5 kDa was observed lower in molecular weight, which expressed higher levels in CRPC cells (24). Interestingly, Madeleine Saupe et al. discovered that one of the major contributors to chemoresistance in solid cancer entities, multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1), is of less importance for drug resistance in PCa cells (25). They examined expression of MDR1 in the established PCa cell lines 22Rv1, LNCaP, and PC-3 by WB and found that MDR1 basal expression only could be detected in the PCa cell line 22Rv1 (25). However, MDR1 expression level did not change when incubation of 22Rv1 cells with cabazitaxel, docetaxel, and abiraterone (25).
Enzymes involved in the androgen and metabolic pathway are always regulated in CRPC cells. To identify novel therapeutic targets for CRPC therapy, a study investigated the expression of p66Shc in PCa (27). p66Shc, a 66 kDa proto-oncogene Src homologous-collagen homologue adaptor protein, mediates receptor tyrosine kinase signal transduction and was identified as a sensor for apoptosis induced by oxidative stress (57). Matthew A. Ingersoll et al. discovered that LNCaP-AS cells expressed relatively lower levels of p66Shc protein compared to AR-negative AI PC-3 and DU145 cells (27). Another study also verified that p66Shc protein level was increased in LNCaP-AI and VCaP-AI cells compared with their AS counterparts (28). An interesting study demonstrated that intrinsically disordered proteins conformational dynamics also played a role in driving phenotypic heterogeneity (58). Prostate-Associated Gene 4 (PAGE4) is an intrinsically disordered protein that functions as a potentiator of the Activator Protein-1 (AP-1) transcription factor (58). Homeodomain-Interacting Protein Kinase 1 (HIPK1) acts on PAGE4 phosphorylates it at T51 and S9, while CDC-Like Kinase 2 (CLK2) hyperphosphorylates PAGE4 at multiple S/T residues, including T51 and S9 (58). HIPK1 was identified to express in both CSPC and CRPC cells, but the expression of CLK2 and PAGE4 was only discovered in CSPC cells (58). HIPK1-phosphorylated PAGE4 exhibited a relatively compact set of conformations bound to AP-1, but CLK2-phosphorylated PAGE4 was more extended, resembling random coils with reduced affinity for AP-1 (58). The result indicated that conformational dynamics of PAGE4 played a role in PCa progression to CRPC (58).
In order to identify new biomarkers, proteomic technologies such as 2DE-MS, MALDI-MS and SELDI-MS, and i-TRAQ are widely used in PCa and a majority of proteins regulated are discovered during prostate cancer progression to CRPC (59). In a study using quantitative proteomics, 203 differential proteins in total were differentially expressed in LNCaP and PC3 cells (29). Vinculin (VCL), an actin filament-binding protein, and Filamin C (FLNC), an important component of cytoskeleton, were observed to have significantly higher expression in PC3 cells when compared to LNCaP cells (29, 30).
In another study using established androgen-dependent (AD) and androgen-independent (AI) murine PCa cell lines, PLum-AD and PLum-AI, respectively, a total of 683 proteins were identified, among which 99 were significantly regulated in PLum-AI cells compared to PLum-AD cells (45 increased and 54 decreased) by Liqui Chromatography (LC)–Mass Spectrometer (MS)/MS Analysis (31). Among them, eight proteins (Comt, Rps11, Nos2, Oxr1, Pck2, Grb10, Cat, Nqo1) were only identified in PLum-AI cells while 12 proteins (Acat2, Fdps, Epcam, Casp3, Tpd52, Ap1s1, Atp6v1g1, Hnrnpul2, Xpnpep1, Hmgcs1, Oasl1, Ifit1) were exclusively observed in PLum-AD cells (31). Furthermore, EpCAM and caspase 3 were significantly decreased in PLum-AI cells, while vimentin and catalase were found to highly increase in PLum-AI cells (31). Biological process gene ontology (GO) analysis of the differentially expressed proteins demonstrated enrichment of biological functions and pathways in PLum-AI cells that are central to PI3 kinase and androgen receptor pathways (31). Besides, other relevant biological processes that are enriched in PLum-AI cells included cell adhesion and cell migration processes, cell and DNA damage, apoptosis, and cell cycle regulation (31).
To understand the mechanisms leading to CRPC transformation, the proteomes of LNCaP cell line and its androgen-independent derivative, LNCaP-SF, were compared by MS (33). The result showed that 42 proteins were upregulated while 46 proteins were downregulated in LNCaP-SF cells compared to LNCaP cells (33). Interestingly, five proteins of the ketogenesis pathway (BDH1, HMGCL, HMGCS2, ACAT1, and OXCT1) were increased in LNCaP-SF cells (33). Additionally, it was discovered that ACAT1, HMGCS2, BDH1, and HMGCL all displayed significantly higher expression in the LuCaP 96AI xenograft-derived cells (33).
Naseruddin Höti et al. found that a glycosylation-related enzyme, FUT8, was increased in CRPC and responsible for resistance to androgen deprivation by LC-MS/MS (7, 35). To dissect the mechanism of castration resistance, proteomic studies have also been conducted by comparing castration-resistant LNCaP-95 cells and LNCaP cells (37). A total of 1883 proteins altered between the two cell types (37). Significant involvement of metabolic pathways was shown to increase in LNCaP-95 cells (37). Furthermore, amplification of PI3K/AKT pathway and proteasome proteins overexpression were also discovered (37). Conversely, the mitochondrial oxidation phosphorylation was severely inhibited in castration-resistant LNCaP-95 cells relative to LNCaP cells (37). Interestingly, the author discovered that Dicer, a cytoplasmic endoribonuclease microRNA regulator, was induced in LNCaP-95 prostate cancer cells (37). Another study performed an integrative proteomic analysis and found that 15 proteins could promote androgen-resistance acquisition (38). It was also verified that 11 out of these 15 proteins correlated with biological processes involved in PCa progression (38). Comparing CSPC with CRPC, ZHANG Xiaobo et al. found that 11 membrane proteins were differently expressed, such as the aER60 precursor, Neural-Cadherin precursor, Claudin-4, and so on (60). The expression level of Claudin-4 in PC-3 cells was discovered to be higher than in LNCaP cells by Immunofluorescence (60).
Recently, a study found that 13 proteins were differentially expressed comparing AR inhibitors (ARI)-resistant cell lines with WT LNCaP cells, such as SQRDL, EPHX1 (6). Among these proteins, DECR1 was found to consistently increase in ARI-resistant cells as compared to WT LNCaP cells (6). Moreover, other proteins differentially expressed in CRPC and CSPC, such as PGP 9.5, stathmin, ICAM-1, purine-rich element binding protein α and ChA, were also discovered by proteomic studies (61–64).
In addition to changes in the expression levels, epigenetic changes have also been studied in cell lines in recent years. For instance, Ravi Pathak et al. found that the number of cellular proteins undergoing acetylation was more in the CSPC with respect to the CRPC (65).
The Expression Pattern of Emerging Proteins in Serum
Although biopsies are considered to be the “gold standard” for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, biopsies are invasive and are associated with complications such as bleeding and sepsis. Biopsy also has the problem of false negative caused by ineffective sampling, which means it is necessary to carry out more research on non-invasive body fluids. However, in recent years, there has been little research in the area about altered proteins in serum in prostate cancer when progressing to CRPC.
Although serum PSA is widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer, it is highly expressed in both benign and malignant prostate epithelium. Therefore, a more specific serum marker needs to be found. Human β-2-microglobulin (B2M) was more specific for androgen stimulation under the conditions tested compared with PSA and discovered in the serum of mice which bear human prostate cancer xenograft (66). It was also found to express in human prostate cancer tissues and cell lines (66). Importantly, serum B2M levels were increased in metastatic CRPC patients (66). Further studies are warranted to investigate if B2M could be a useful marker for PCa. Another study also investigated the marker for treatment of metastatic CRPC patients by analyzing the expression levels of three EMT-related proteins (67). Integrin α4 is a ‘‘matricellular’’ protein receptor that forms a complex with integrin β7 or β1, which then adheres to fibronectin (67). Fibronectin is a crucial ECM glycoprotein as an actor in both pathological and physiological processes (67). When comparing blood samples of benign prostatic hyperplasia patients and a healthy control group with the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients, Ece Konac et al. discovered a decreased integrin-α4 expression in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients, although being statistically insignificant (67). It was significant that protein expressions of periostin and fibronectin increased in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients compared with BPH and heathy groups (67). Elevated periostin expression in metastatic patients was identified to correlate with bone metastasis (67). Interestingly, a study demonstrated that increased serum tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) expression in CRPC correlated with neuroendocrine differentiation of PCa (40). Yixuan Gong et al. found that serum TIMP-1 expression is increased in CRPC patients compared to CSPC patients (40). Also, elevated TIMP-1 levels correlated with higher chromogranin A and lower PSA levels in sera, features consistent with neuroendocrine prostate cancer (40).
To make it clear whether the quantity of antibodies or the types of proteins changes with prostate cancer progression, serum samples from newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer, castration-sensitive non-metastatic prostate cancer, castration-resistant non-metastatic prostate cancer, and castration-resistant metastatic disease were analyzed (68). The study revealed the largest change in composition of recognized antibody targets occurred between patients with castration-sensitive and castration-resistant disease, such as C12orf51, RPL22L1, and TBL1XR1 (68). GO analysis identified differences between patients with castration-sensitive and castration-resistant disease in recognition of proteins associated with amide metabolism, chromatin structure, nucleic acid binding, and protein localization to the membrane (68). Another study using two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, nine proteins were found to express differently in the serum samples collected at diagnosis compared with those after ADT (69). It was further found that clusterin (CLU) expression was 1.51-fold higher and transthyretin expression was 1.58-fold lower in the sera of post-ADT patients with respect to those from pre-ADT patients (69).
It was suggested that inflammation can promote the development of prostate cancer. Evidence from lots of studies showed that many biomarkers associated with prostatic inflammation diseases also existed in prostate cancer (70). Gilbert J. Wise et al. discovered that the anti-inflammatory Th2 cytokines IL-4, IL-6, and IL-10 were significantly increased in the hormone refractory group compared with hormone sensitive group by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (41).
Docetaxel chemotherapy improves survival and symptoms in men with metastatic CRPC. However, 50% of patients were resistant to Docetaxel (71). Using Docetaxel-sensitive PC3 cells and Docetaxel resistant PC3-Rx cells, Liangli Zhao et al. found that MIC-1 and AGR2 were increased and decreased in Docetaxel resistant cells by protein profiling in serum (71). Caspase-cleaved proteins are released from disintegrated apoptotic cells, which could be detected in the circulation (72). G Kramer et al. evaluated a total of 82 patients with CRPC and discovered that caspase-cleaved cytokeratin 18 (CK18-Asp396) and total CK18 were significantly upregulated induced by Docetaxel in serum (72).
The Function of Emerging Proteins in CRPC
Recently, a majority of studies were carried out to investigate the function of the emerging proteins. It was widely verified that proteins could play a crucial role in growth, invasion, and metastasis of CRPC. (Exhibited in Figures 1–3).
Figure 1 The role of emerging proteins in CRPC growth, invasion and metastasis. The emerging proteins involved in CRPC growth are showing as golden, and the proteins involved in CRPC invasion and metastasis are showing as green. The proteins involved in both CRPC growth and CRPC invasion and metastasis are showing as orange.
Figure 2 The role of emerging proteins in CRPC metabolism.
Figure 3 The role of emerging proteins in CRPC immune microenvironment.
CRPC Growth
Many proteins have been shown to play a key role in the growth of CRPC through gene silencing and other gene editing methods. Knockdown of RNF6 was found to attenuate the growth of CWR-R1 and C4-2B in androgen-depleted media (13). Additionally, it was found that RNF6 may function by regulating AR target genes and suppressing androgen-suppressed gene BMF which was a proapoptotic member of BCL2 family proteins (13). In addition, silencing of SEMA3C resulted in reduced cell growth that was rescued by the addition of recombinant SEMA3C: Fc in DU145 cells (11). It was discovered that increased SEMA3C expression was correlated with CRPC bone metastases (11). Yu Ishizuya et al. discovered that ACTN4 was increased in DU145 cells as well as exosomes from this cell line (8). Downregulation of ACTN4 expression by siRNA in DU145 cells significantly attenuated cell growth (8). Checkpoint Kinase 2 (CHK2) were identified to play a role in CRPC growth (73). To identify signaling pathways regulating cell growth of PCa, a high-throughput RNAi screen was used by Huy Q Ta et al. and discovered that knockdown of CHK2 significantly increased the growth of PCa and hypersensitized cells to low androgen levels (73). Similarly, knockdown of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) resulted in decreased proliferative and clonogenic ability in PC-3, DU145, and C4-2B cells (32). Another study demonstrated that after transfecting LNCaP-AI cells with p66Shc shRNA, there was a reduced cell proliferation in LNCaP-AI cells (28).
In contrast, overexpression of FUT8 in prostate cancer cells was discovered to promote the proliferation of cells in androgen-ablated conditions (35). In addition, FUT8 overexpression by transfecting plasmid DNA carrying FUT8 gene contributed to increased level of cell surface epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and corresponding downstream signaling, resulting in increased cell survival in androgen-depleted conditions (7).
The Rab-proteins and endosomal sorting complexes crucial for transport (ESCRT) machinery were important in vesicular trafficking and secretion (74, 75). RAB27A, RAB27B, and VPS36, which were components of rab-proteins and ESCRT machinery, respectively, were verified to be prognostic biomarker for patients with localized PCa (76). It was shown by qRT-PCR that PCa tissue expressed low levels of VPS36, especially in CRPC tissues (76). Interestingly, knockdown of RAB27B and VPS36 significantly decreased colony formation but did not reduce the growth of PC3 cells (76). Golgi phosphoprotein 3 (GOLPH3) has been identified to be a highly conserved Golgi membrane protein using proteomic analysis of the Golgi apparatus and showed to regulate the mitochondrial lipids as a mitochondrial protein (77–79). GOLPH3 protein expression was significantly increased in PCa, especially in two androgen-independent cell lines, PC-3 and DU145 (80). Silencing GOLPH3 expression suppressed cell proliferation of PC-3 by inhibiting phosphorylation of AKT and mTOR (80). In addition, aspartyl (asparaginyl) βhydrolase (ASPH) is a transmembrane protein and it was reported that ASPH silencing decreased cell proliferation, invasion, and cyclin D1 expression level through regulation of the NOTCH signaling (39). Similarly, Masahiro Sugiura et al. found that AR-V7 knockdown lead to suppression of CRPC growth by activating both common AR/AR-V7 target and specific AR-V7 target (15).
Moreover, transcriptional repressor REST was found to play a role in CRPC cell proliferation (5). REST depletion resulted in cell cycle arrest in G1, which could be rescued by knockdown of p53 (5). Therefore, it was indicated that REST loss had a negative regulation of cell cycle progression by the activation of the p53 pathway (5). Similarly, Arnaud Blomme et al. found that DECR1 deletion led to decreased CRPC tumor growth (6). The normal epithelial cell-specific-1 (NES1) gene is also named as KLK10 which is a member of the kallikrein family and encodes human kallikrein 10 (hK10) (81). It was reported that KLK10 decelerated CRPC proliferation (82). Jiajia Hu et al. obtained a high-purity KLK10-expressed stable cell line PC3-KLK10 by reconstructed lentiviral vector, and they found that over-expressing KLK10 in PC3 could decrease tumor proliferation and increase apoptosis and inhibit glucose metabolism at the same time (82). Furthermore, a negative feedback loop was investigated between KLK10 and Bcl-2/HK-2 (82).
Some studies used drugs to inhibit protein function to study its effect on the growth of CRPC. YAP1 and PAK2 were also reported to regulate the growth in CRPC (19). A MS-based quantitative proteomic approach was implemented and YAP1 and PAK2 were identified to change in phosphorylation comparing protein phosphorylation in orthotopic xenograft tumors which were grown in either intact or castrated mice (19). Furthermore, elevated levels of PAK2 and YAP1 in clinical samples of CRPC were also demonstrated (19). PAK2 regulated cell proliferation and mitotic timing (19). The growth of androgen-independent PC3 xenografts could be inhibited by pharmacologic inhibitors of PAK2 (PF-3758309) and YAP1 (Verteporfin) (19). Similarly, Oleg Tatarov et al. found that src inhibition by dasatinib resulted in reduced migration and proliferation of CRPC cells (10).
In addition, Serum and glucocorticoid-induced protein kinase 1 (SGK1), a member of the ‘AGC’ subfamily, was reported by us to play an important role in cancer development (83). We have previously investigated that inhibition of SGK1 by either GSK650394 or SGK1 shRNA led to decreased cell viability in PC3 cells by inducing autophagy-dependent apoptosis via the mTOR-Foxo3a pathway (84).
Signaling axis also has been found to promote the growth of the CRPC. Matrix metalloproteinases 9 (MMP9) was found to correlate with AR protein expression in the tissues of primary and metastatic PCa and high MMP9 expression level correlated with poor prognosis (85). Constitutive activation of AR upregulated expression level of MMP9 and VEGF/VEGF receptors (85). Furthermore, it was shown that AR influences MMP9/VEGF signaling axis via PIP5K1α/AKT and MMP9 physically interacted with PIP5K1α through formation of protein–protein complexes (85). The elevated sequential activation of AR/PIP5K1α/AKT/MMP9/VEGF signaling axis resulted in increased invasiveness and growth of metastatic CRPC (85). Conversely, treated with PIP5K1α inhibitor, invasion activity of CRPC cells expressing activated AR were dramatically repressed (85). Similarly, Musashi2 (MSI2) belongs to the evolutionarily conserved Musashi RBP family and downregulation of MSI2 was reported to reduce CRPC cell proliferation by regulation of AR (86, 87). Moreover, IL-8 signaling was reported to regulate cyclin D1 expression and activate signal transduction pathways underpinning CRPC cell proliferation (88).
CRPC Invasion and Metastasis
We have previously discovered that inhibition of SGK1 induced autophagy contributed to reduced EMT by the downregulation of snail, leading to decreased cell migratory ability of PC3 (89). Similarly, p66Shc was reported to promote the migratory activity of PCa cells including CRPC cells (27). Matthew A. Ingersoll et al. found that higher p66Shc expression was correlated with high cell migratory ability across several PCa cell lines (27). PCa cells expressing low levels of p66Shc could be induced to metastasize by peroxide treatment in a dose-dependent manner (27). Highly expressed p66Shc in PCa cells increased the cell migratory ability which could be attenuated by p66Shc shRNA transfection or expression of oxidase-deficient dominant-negative p66Shc W134F mutant (27). Furthermore, Rac1, a protein that was activated in p66Shc-elevated cells, was validated and it was shown that p66Shc promoted formation of lamellipodia through Rac1 activation indicating (27).These results indicated that p66Shc increases cell migratory ability through ROS-mediated activation of migration-associated proteins, especially Rac1 (27).
In addition, VCL and FLNC were also verified to play a critical role in CRPC cell metastasis (29, 30). Jianzhong Ai et al. discovered that knockdown of VCL and FLNC gene expression significantly decreased PCa cell metastasis (30). To analyze the link between chemokine CXCL1 and neutrophil-derived cytokines LCN2, Yongning Lu et al. found that CXCL1-LCN2 axis activates Src signaling and triggers the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), resulting in enhanced tumor metastasis (90).
Bromodomain and Extraterminal domain (BET) proteins (BRD2, BRD3, BRD4, and testis-specific BRDT) are a family of chromatin-associated proteins that could detect and bind to acetylated lysine residues on nucleosomal histone tails resulting in regulation of gene expression (91, 92). Jordan S. Shafran et al. discovered that BRD4 reduced cell migration of all models of CRPC, but BRD2 and BRD3 only modulated migration and invasion in less aggressive models which kept AR signaling (93). Moreover, these researchers found that BRD4 regulated CRPC cell migration and invasion through transcription of AHNAK (93).
ACTN4 was also identified to promote CRPC invasion (8). Knockdown of ACTN4 inhibited cell invasion in DU145 cells (8). In addition, knockdown of YAP1 and PAK2 both reduced cell colony formation and cell invasion activity also suggested an important factor in CRPC invasion (19). Similarly, AR-V7 positivity associated with a higher bone, or any site, metastasis in CRPC (16). Moreover, knockdown of EpCAM contributed to reduced invasion in PC-3, DU145, and C4-2B cells (32). Xiangchun Wang et al. found that loss of FUT8 in PC3 cells resulted in decreased cell motility (36). PSA was crucial in development of CRPC and Haoyong Li et al. investigated that PSA promoted the apoptosis in vitro (94). Conversely, PSA knockdown decreased tumorigenesis and metastasis of C4-2 cells in vitro and in vivo (94). And PSA may promote the tumorigenesis by mediating MCM4 (94).
To identify the mechanism correlated with more distant metastasis, kinases differentially expressed between the CRPC cell lines PC-3 and PC-3M, which was a metastasis-derived variant of PC-3 cells, were analyzed by MS-based comparative phosphoproteome strategy (95). In this study, 151 phosphoproteins differently expressed between the CRPC cell lines PC-3 and PC-3M were identified (95). Seven motifs, -SP-, -SxxE-, -PxS-, -PxSP-, -SxxK-, -SPxK-, and -SxxxxxP-, were discovered to express a higher level in PC-3M cells compared to PC-3 cells (95). Based on these motifs, the kinases Ste20-like kinase (SLK), p21-activated kinase (PAK)2, mammalian Ste20-like kinase (MST)4, A-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (ARAF), and mitogenactivated kinase kinase (MAP2K)2 were increased in PC-3M cells relative to PC-3 cells, suggesting that MST4, MAP2K2, ARAF, PAK2, and SLK are kinases potentially associated with increased migratory ability (95).
CRPC Metabolism
AR play a crucial role in regulation of metabolism in PCa cells throughout the transition from early-stage, androgen-sensitive CSPC to androgen-independent CRPC (96). It was reported that AR is reprogrammed to increase fatty acid synthesis (FAS) from glucose in CRPC cells (6). Comparing the proteomes of three pairs of CSPC and CRPC cell lines, the researchers found that most of the differentially expressed proteins between each pair function in metabolism (6). PPARG, PGC1A, NR1H2, NR1H3, GLUT1, ACC, and ACLY are all metabolism-related proteins and have changed during the development of CRPC (6). Knockdown of the AR reduced glucose utilization in CRPC cells and AR-depleted cells showed reduced expression level of ACC and ACLY (6). DECR1 was reported to regulate lipid homeostasis in CRPC (6). It was found that DECR1 involves in redox homeostasis in the way of maintaining a balance between saturated and unsaturated phospholipids (6). Knockout of DECR1 induced ER stress and made CRPC cells sensitive to ferroptosis (6). Moreover, DECR1 deletion decreased lipid metabolism of CRPC in vivo (6). Another study discovered that knockdown of YAP1 led to restored lipid content and reduced free fatty acid level in enzalutamide-resistant cells (20).
In addition, it was demonstrated that sterol response element-binding protein (SREBP) family are transcriptional regulators that coordinately activate over 20 functionally related enzymes associated with lipid and cholesterol synthesis (97). Susan L. Ettinger et al. found SREBPs and their downstream effector genes increased during progression to CRPC in the LNCaP xenograft model of PCa and contributed significantly to cell metabolism (97). Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) family were shown to increase uptake of glucose and protein synthesis, whereas reducing serum free fatty acids (FFA) and hepatic glucose production (98). In addition, this family plays a key role in androgen-independent progression (98).
Interestingly, a study reported that the mitochondrial oxidation phosphorylation (mOxPhos) significantly decreased in castration-resistant LNCaP-95 cells relative to LNCaP cells (37). Comparing the wild type with androgen ablated LNCaP-95 cells, a lot of proteins in the OxPhos complexes reduced in the LNCaP-95 castrated resistant cells (37). Complex I, the major entry point for electrons to the respiratory chain and the rate-limiting step in overall respiration, was discovered to have many protein subunits downregulated, indicating the dysfunction of NADH dehydrogenase (37). A similar lower expression of cytochrome c oxidase, cytochrome c reductase in complex IV and the ATPase in complex V, were also investigated in the LNCaP-95 androgen resistant prostate cancer cells (37).
Moreover, the aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C3(AKR1C3), the prostatic enzyme was found to increase in CRPC and confirmed to convert androstenedione (A) to testosterone (T) by real-time reverse transcription-PCR and immunohistochemistry (99). PKC could be activated with phorbol ester (TPA) (100). It was reported that the release of ethanolamine (Etn) was only specifically upregulated in the metastatic basal PC3 cell line on TPA treatment most probably by PKC activation of PLD1 and the turnover of ethanolamine phosphoglycerides (EtnPGs) was also increased (100). Moreover, it was found that Etn released from cells may decrease uptake of choline (Cho), influencing the membrane PtdEtn : PtdCho ratio and regulating the action of PtdEtn-binding proteins such as the anti-apoptotic hPEBP4 and RKIP (100). These results suggested that PKC regulated PLD1 and release of Etn then influenced uptake of Cho in PC3 cells (100).
CRPC Immune Microenvironment
A study reported that reactive nitrogen species (RNS) secreted by myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) could induce T cell tolerance (101). Shan Feng et al. discovered that lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (LCK), an initiating tyrosine kinase in the T cell receptor signaling cascade and nitrated at Tyr394 by MDSCs, inhibited T cell activation and reduced interleukin 2 production (101). In the mouse model of CRPC, CRPC is resistant to an immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy, while the results come out conversely when combined ICB with an RNS neutralizing agent, which indicated that RNS played an imported role in CRPC immunity (101).
In addition, programmed death−ligand 1 (PD−L1) was identified to be upregulated in CRPC cells induced by hypoxia, while addition of PD-L1 antibody increased expression of NKG2D ligand and the immune cytolytic activity of NK cells toward CRPC cells (102). It was discovered that inhibition of the Janus kinase (JAK)1,2/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) signaling pathway reduced the PD−L1 expression in CRPC cells and increased expression of NKG2D ligands (102). In addition, inhibition of JAK1,2/Stat3 signaling pathway increased the sensitivity of CRPC cells to NK cell immunity (102). Christian D. Fankhauser et al. also found that PD-L1 was not expressed in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) or localized PCa and was only expressed in a minority of CRPC tumors and infiltrating immune cells (103). Moreover, they discovered a moderate positive correlation between PanCK and PD-L1 expression (103).
Novel potential links of E6-Associated Protein (E6AP) with immune response have been exposed by pathway analyses in DU145 cells (104). Comparing the significantly changed transcripts and proteins following E6AP knockdown in DU145 cells, some transcripts were found to change consistently in the same direction as the proteins (104). Interferon signaling, interferon gamma signaling, and cytokine signaling in immune system were predominantly associated with these proteins (104). In addition, clusterin was identified as a novel target of E6AP (104). In contrast, overexpression of prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) was found in both androgen-dependent and androgen-independent prostate cancers (105). PSCA is an autoantigen which can induce immunological tolerance and hardly incite effective immunologic response (105).
To find which prostate cancer associated proteins induce immune responses, Douglas G. McNeel et al. evaluated the inherent humoral immune response against p53 and HER-2/neu, PSA, prostatic acid phosphatase in 200 patients (106). The results showed that for PSA and HER-2/neu the prevalence of antibody immunity was increased in patients with androgen independent disease (106).
Molecular Mechanism of Emerging Proteins in CSPC to CRPC
The mechanisms of prostate cancer progression to CRPC associated with proteins are complex and mainly involve the AR-dependent and AR-independent mechanisms. (Summarized in Figures 4 and 5).
Figure 4 Emerging proteins mediate CRPC progression via AR-dependent way. The different mechanisms are showing as different colors.
Figure 5 Emerging proteins mediate CRPC progression via AR-independent way.
Emerging Proteins Mediate CRPC Progression via AR-Dependent Way
Some proteins promote CRPC progression by regulating intra-tumoral levels of androgens in CRPC. Epidemiologic and in vitro studies demonstrate OATP transporters exert an effect on the response of PCa to therapy of androgen deprivation by regulating intra-tumor androgens (107). It also has previously been shown that castration resistant metastases express higher levels of multiple SLCO transporters than primary PCa (108). Based on these studies, Sean Green, PhD et al. examined uptake of androgen in LNCaP cells in vivo which were engineered to express OATP transporters and found that LNCaP cells expressing OATP1B1 and 2B1 showed an increased uptake of DHEAS resulting in a higher level of intra-tumor androgens, suggesting that OATP transporters promote CRPC progression in an AR-dependent way (107). Proteins contributed to CRPC progression by changing the localization of AR were also verified. Flightless I (FLII) is a member of the gelsolin superfamily of actin-remodeling proteins and functions as a transcriptional coregulator (109). It was reported to inhibit CRPC progression through targeting androgen receptor signaling (109). A positive correlation between the expression of FLII and overall survival of prostate cancer patients expressing high levels of AR expression was shown by a clinical gene expression array dataset (109). The protein and mRNA levels of FLII decreased in human prostate cancers (109). FLII binds with AR through the ligand-binding domain of AR and a competitive binding to AR was observed between FLII and the ligand (109). These researchers found that FLII inhibited AR transactivation and reduced AR nuclear localization (109). FLII contributed to growth of prostate cancer cells through AR-dependent signaling, and reintroducing FLII in CRPC cells sensitized the cells to endocrine therapies (109).
Other proteins regulated CRPC progression by controlling AR splicing and expression. Global changes in chromatin accessibility were known to promote cancer progression in the way of reprogramming transcription factor binding which was associated with histone acetylation readers such as BRD4 (110). Chromatin accessibility was verified to define CRPC. It was discovered that deregulation of AR expression drives chromatin relaxation mediated by AR/androgen-regulated bromodomain-containing proteins (BRDs) (110). Furthermore, the author reported that BRDs were highly expressed in CRPCS and that ATAD2 and BRD2 had prognostic value (110). Consistent with prior reports, Jonathan Welti et al. found that nuclear BRD4 protein expressed higher level in CRPC than treatment-naive biopsies in the same patient and higher expression at diagnosis correlated with worse outcome (111). The expression of BRD2, BRD3, and BRD4 RNA in CRPC biopsies associated with AR-driven transcription (111). AR-V7 expression and AR signaling could be decreased by Chemical BETi and knockdown of combined BET family protein (111). BETi reduced persistent AR signaling and growth of a xenograft model derived from CRPC patient with AR amplification and AR-V7 expression (111). RNA-binding protein PSF was also shown to contribute to CRPC progression by regulating splicing activities for AR expression (112). PSF targeted at mRNAs of spliceosome-related genes and promoted AR splicing and expression by coordinating these spliceosome proteins to form a complex (112). Moreover, high-speed sequence analysis was used and found that PSF stabilized and activated key long noncoding RNAs and AR-regulated gene expressions in prostate cancer cells (112). Activation of AR and the expression of its variants along with the downstream signals are crucial for CRPC progression (112). It was known that overexpression of the full-length androgen receptor (AR-FL) and AR splice variants (AR-Vs) promote the progression of CRPC (113). A striking positive correlation between the level of c-Myc and the activity of the AR pathway, between the activity of the c-Myc pathway and the level of individual AR isoforms, and between the activities of the two pathways, was discovered (113). Furthermore, the c-Myc signature is highly expressed in tumors with high levels of AR, as is the AR signature in c-Myc-high-expressing tumors (113). c-Myc regulation of activity and expression of AR-FL and AR-Vs was confirmed in a patient-derived xenograft model and cell models, suggesting that c-Myc promoted CRPC through the regulation of activity and expression of AR-FL and AR-Vs (113). In addition, Prakash Kulkarn et al. discovered that when PAGE4 is phosphorylated by HIPK1, HIPK1-PAGE4 enhanced c-Jun and suppressed AR activity in CRPC cells (58).
There are lots of studies showing that proteins changed AR transcriptional activity to mediate CRPC progression. An ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF6 was identified as one of AR-associated proteins by proteomic screen and may contribute to CRPC progression (13). RNF6 was found to induce AR ubiquitination and increase AR transcriptional activity (13). Mutation of RNF6-induced ubiquitination acceptor sites on AR or specific knockdown of RNF6 selectively regulates expression levels of a subset of AR target genes and attenuates recruitment of AR and its coactivators to androgen-responsive elements which were present in the regulatory region of these genes (13). In addition, RNF6 is overexpressed in human CRPC tissues and critical for growth of prostate cancer cells under androgen-depleted conditions, suggesting that RNF6-induced ubiquitination may alter AR transcriptional activity and specificity by modulating co-factor recruitment and played a role in CRPC progression (13). Another study reported that knockdown of CHK2 hypersensitized PCa cells to low androgen levels indicating a crucial role of CHK2 in progression to CRPC (73). The study found that CHK2 exerted its effects dependent on CDC25C and CDK1 which were downstream signaling proteins (73). In addition, CHK2 depletion promoted androgen receptor (AR) transcriptional activity on androgen-regulated genes, validating the finding that CHK2 influences PCa proliferation through the AR partly (73). Interestingly, the author further validated that CHK2 was a novel AR-repressed gene, indicating that there existed a negative feedback loop between AR and CHK2 (73). In addition, CHK2 physical association between CHK2 and AR was further discovered, and that cell cycle inhibition enhanced this association (73). It was also shown that CHK2 signaling was lost during prostate cancer transformation to CRPC (73). Moreover, Bin Guia et al. found that implementation of genetic or pharmacological means to target PARP-2 selectively blocks interaction between FOXA1 and PARP-2, which in turn decreased AR-mediated transcription and inhibited anchorage-independent growth of LNCaP cells and AR-positive CRPC cell growth (9). It can be inferred that PARP-2 have an influence on development of CRPC through transcriptionally modulating AR-mediated gene expression (9).
In a recent report, Arnaud Blomme et al. found that active AR signaling and nuclear AR were observed in CRPC cells and AR was reprogrammed to promote CRPC progression (6). Acquired metabolic phenotype was common in CRPC cells and correlated with perturbed glucose and lipid metabolism (6). Knockdown of the AR impaired glucose utilization and reduced expression of ACC and ACLY in resistant cells, suggesting that AR is reprogrammed to promote fatty acid synthesis from glucose in resistant cells and promote CRPC progression (6). DECR1 increased in ARI-resistant cells compared to WT LNCaP and maintains lipid homeostasis in CRPC cells (6). Further study revealed that the expression of DECR1 was required for growth of CRPC tumor in vivo (6).
Hence, these findings augment investigators’ comprehension of CRPC progressions via the consideration of proteins and AR-dependent signaling pathways.
Emerging Proteins Mediate CRPC Progression via AR-Independent Way
FUT8 was identified to increase in CRPC indicating a role in CRPC progression (7). Naseruddin Höti et al. found that overexpression of FUT8 contributed to increase the level of cell surface epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and its relevant downstream signaling, resulting in increased cell survival of PCa in androgen-depleted conditions (7). The coregulatory mechanisms of FUT8 and EGFR expression in CRPC xenograft models were studied furthermore and it was shown that castration induced FUT8 overexpression correlated with elevated expression of EGFR (7). The findings suggested that FUT8 played an important role in escaping castration-induced cell death and promoting the progression of CRPC (7).
Similarly, it was reported that Caveolin-1 (Cav-1) regulates castration resistance through ACC1-FASN upregulation in an AR-independent way and lipid synthesis (114). Theodoros Karantanos et al. discovered that overexpression of Cav-1 promoted castration resistance in PTENcKO tumors (114). Cav-1 altered the expression of ACC1 and FASN in PCa cells in an AR-independent way at the transcriptional level and promoted synthesis of palmitate (114). Inhibition of FASN was more effective in Cav-1-overexpressing cells (114). Cav-1 induction increased the expression of ACC1 and FASN in PTENcKO tissues and reduced the apoptotic effects of castration, which increased Cav-1 and ACC1 expression (114). Furthermore, the researchers found that FASN was a crucial actor in the survival of PCa cells which expressed Cav-1 under androgen deprivation (114). Upregulation of palmitoleate and oleate correlated with a poor response to AA in the bone marrow aspirates from mCRPC (114).
Interestingly, a study reported that RhoGDI (GDI) α decreased in LNCaP-IL6+ cells, which was generated by treating LNCaP cells chronically with interleukin-6 (IL-6) and grew in a hormone resistant way, comparing with LNCaP cells (115). GDIα overexpression inhibited PCa cells growth and sensitized LNCaP-IL6+ cells to androgen deprivation (115). Conversely, GDIα downregulation promoted androgen-sensitive LNCaP cells growth in androgen-deprived state, suggesting that GDIα promoted development of CRPC in an AR-independent way (115).
It was known that IL-6 played a role in the development of CRPC (116). IL-6 expression are increased in CRPC patients and regulate AR activity (116). Proteomic analysis revealed expression of 27 proteins changed in LNCaP cells compared with cells without IL-6 treatment and valosin-containing protein (VCP)/p97 plays a crucial role in co-regulation of altered proteins (116). Moreover, it was discovered that IL-6 induced VCP expression through Pim-1 via STAT3 activation is AR independent, suggesting that VCP played a role in CRPC (116).
In addition, activation of growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathway is a crucial mechanism in mediating cancer survival, growth and treatment resistance (11). James W Peacock discovered that SEMA3C drives activation of multiple RTKs including EGFR, ErbB2, and MET in a cognate ligand-independent manner via Plexin B1 (11). SEMA3C increased in CRPC, where it promoted growth and castration resistance of cells. Inhibition of SEMA3C delays progression of CRPC and enzalutamide-resistance (11). These results indicate that SEMA3C promoted CRPC through RTK signaling, which was also aindependent of AR (11).
A recent report discovered that TLK1>NEK1>YAP1 axis plays an important role during the progression to CRPC (117). Md Imtiaz Khalil et al. previously demonstrated that TLK1>NEK1>ATR>Chk1 axis is a crucial actor in cell cycle arrest when CSPC cells suffered androgen deprivation (117). The overexpression of wt-NEK1and YAP1 contributed to a rapid transition to growth of CRPC (117). Higher expression of wt-NEK1 associated with accumulation of YAP1, indicating that TLK1>NEK1>YAP1 axis led to adaptation to CRPC growth (117). NEK1 could be co-immunoprecipitated with YAP1 (117). YAP1 was found to be phosphorylated by NEK1 on six esidues in vitro, which might enhance its interaction with transcriptional partners and promote reprogramming of the cells toward CRPC (117).
The Clinical Application of Proteins in CRPC
The methods commonly used for CRPC screening include a rise in PSA, bone scan, biopsy, and/or PET imaging of recurrent/new metastases (3). But diagnostic accuracy is low and CRPC progression is not monitored in the best way.
Proteins as a Diagnostic Marker
Sharp et al. explored nuclear AR-V7 expression in same-patient, matched biopsies, as 63 patients progressed from CSPC to CRPC. They found that nuclear AR-V7 protein significantly increased from CSPC to CRPC (17). Nuclear AR-V7 can be detected by immunohistochemistry and could be a good diagnostic marker for CRPC. Serum B2M levels were increased in metastatic CRPC patients, and B2M was more specific for androgen stimulation under the conditions tested compared with PSA (66). What’s more, B2M can be easily detected in serum, which increases potential applicability to guided therapy of CRPC. In addition, enzymes of the ketogenic pathway are increased in an androgen-independent derivative of LNCaP cell line and LuCaP 96AI castration-resistant xenograft (33). These enzymes might be potential biomarkers for CRPC diagnosis but further studies are needed to confirm this (33).
Proteins as a Prognostic Marker
Recently, research has found that some proteins might be potential biomarkers for CRPC prognosis, such as SRC and FLII (10, 109). Increased SFK activity was associated with reduced time from biochemical relapse to death (10). Furthermore, increased SFK activity in AIPC patients may have higher transfer potential (10). Similarly, higher AR-V7 in CRPC biopsies was associated with shorter PSA-PFS (118). In addition, CRPC-specific AR-V7 protein expression and positive protein detection were significantly associated with worse outcomes (17). In conclusion, AR-V7 has been reliably detected in many types of human biological samples and thus can serve as a negative prognostic biomarker. High DECR1 expression was found to associate with poor prognosis in CRPC (6). Moreover, DECR1 overexpression dramatically decreased patient disease-free survival and was associated with worse outcome in metastatic patients (6). Additionally, other proteins with prognostic potential such as ASPH, BDH1, HMGCL, HMGCS2, ACAT1, OXCT1, etc. were also discovered in different research (33, 34, 39). These proteins are all potential prognostic markers and can be detected by immunohistochemistry. In the future, they can be used in combination to stratify CRPC risk, so as to give patients more personalized and reasonable treatment.
Proteins as a Predictive Marker
Although progress has been made in the therapy for CRPC in recent years, an urgent challenge still exists because there are fewer predictive biomarkers for CRPC compared to prognostic biomarkers (119). Therefore, implementation of proteins as biomarkers has great potential. In a study, Eleni Efstathiou et al. found that the absence of AR-V7 in bone marrow biopsies from mCRPC correlated with better treatment response to enzalutamide (120). CRPC patients with AR-V7 positive CTCs were associated with resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone (121, 122). This means that AR-V7 can be detected not only in tissues but also in CTCs, which are non-invasive and adds potential applicability for guided therapy with the development of AR-V7-assay. Similarly, inhibitor of de-ubiquitinase USP7 P5091 reduced levels of tumor suppressor protein CCDC6, sensitizing the CRPC cells to PARP inhibitors (123). Therefore, CCDC6 and USP7 can be potential biomarkers of sensitivity to PARP-inhibitors in CRPC (123). KENTA ONISHI et al. found that expression of KLG in primary prostate cancer lesions correlated with CRPC progression and KLG could be a predictor of resistance to docetaxel (124). Taken together, these proteins may be predictive biomarkers for CRPC and could also be detected by immunohistochemistry, which facilitates the selection of optimal treatment modalities for patients.
Proteins as a Therapeutic Target
Good anti-tumor drugs can kill tumor cells specifically and effectively on the premise of not impairing healthy cells (125). However, many drugs used today to treat tumors have more or less side effects. The proteins that are regulated in CRPC tissue and influence progression will become promising candidates for therapeutic targets. Inhibition of SEMA3C by small molecules was discovered to have an effect on the growth of DU145 cell lines, which indicated SEMA3C could be a potential therapeutic target (12). Furthermore, SEMA3C is not required for homeostasis in adult tissues, so SEMA3C inhibition may be well tolerated in adults (11). Similarly, RORg antagonist targeting MDR1 expression resensitizes cross-resistant CRPC to taxanes (26). Both inhibitors are available and may be used clinically in the future. Other proteins may become therapeutic targets by using RNA interference technology. For example, downregulation of ACTN4 by RNA interference significantly reduced cell proliferation and invasion in DU145 cells (8). A 5α-steroid reductase ‘type 3 5α-steroid reductase’ (SRD5A3) was identified to overexpress in CRPC (126). Knockdown of SRD5A3 in prostate cancer cells contributed to a dominant decrease in DHT production and a significant reduction in cell viability, suggesting a role in maintenance of androgen–androgen receptor-pathway activity in CRPC cells and the enzymatic activity might be a potential target for therapy of CRPC (126). However, this strategy requires further study to develop an optimal delivery system to protect the stability of RNAi-based drugs and investigate indications of various diseases with these drugs in early and late clinical trials. There are some proteins requiring further study to clarify their potential as therapeutic targets. YAP1 and PAK2 were identified to regulate cell colony formation and cell invasion activity without obvious changes in the activity of AKT, MAPK, or mTORC1 pathways, indicating that PAK2 and YAP1 may be potential therapeutic targets of CRPC (19). Moreover, MAR-binding proteins that are regulated in the prostate cancer cells could improve our understanding of CRPC process, and these proteins were reported to be promising targets for prostate cancer therapy (127). In addition, Huy Q Ta et al. proposed that perturbing CHK2 signaling may be a novel therapeutic approach to sensitize CRPC to ADT and radiation (73). Other proteins with the potential of being therapeutic targets such as AR-V7, TBLR1, EpCAM, caspase 3, vimentin, catalase, ERG, etc. were also proposed in different studies (18, 22, 24, 31, 32).
Currently, AR-V7 is one of the most well-studied and most promising proteins used as a PCa biomarker. It may be used as a biomarker for diagnosis, prognosis, prediction, and treatment. Although the proteins we mentioned above play an important role in prostate cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and development, more research is still needed to better understand and use these proteins.
Conclusions and Perspectives
The rapidly increasing number of studies have found that the expression of proteins changes and proteins play a crucial role in the development of CRPC. Summarizing the biological roles of these proteins in CRPC will help to find more markers for diagnosis, prognosis, prediction, and treatment. These potential markers provide new insight into the mechanism of CRPC development and can be combined with existing markers for better management of CRPC patients.
With the development of high-throughput proteomics technology, a large number of proteins have been found to play an important role in the tumorigenesis and development of prostate cancer. In this review, we summarize the changes of protein expression between CSPC and CRPC and the proteins that promote the growth, metastasis, and invasion of CRPC. Furthermore, we summarize the related mechanisms of proteins in promoting CRPC, mainly including AR-dependent and AR-independent mechanisms. Understanding the role of these proteins in the development of CRPC will help to develop drugs that target the corresponding proteins or signaling pathways. Inhibition of abnormally expressed proteins or signaling pathways can lead to more efficient treatment for patients.
Biopsies are invasive and are associated with complications such as bleeding and sepsis. In the future, numerous markers may be investigated in non-invasive body fluids. More studies will also focus on the other roles of these potential markers in CRPC, as well as in the clinical application. In addition to proteins, other types of markers will also be further evaluated, such as IncRNA and exosomes. Moreover, further development of proteomic technologies will also promote the understanding of markers.
Author Contributions
PK and LZ finished the manuscript and abstract; ZZ and KF consulted relevant literatures and completed English revision; YS, XD, CL, and TS completed the figures and tables; WL and ZT provided constructive feedback and guidance; WL completed critical revisions and proofread the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Science Foundation Project (Grant nos. 81802571), and Zhejiang Medical and Health Science and Technology Project (2019RC039).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Glossary
References
1. Fararjeh AS, Liu YN. ZBTB46, SPDEF, and ETV6: Novel Potential Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Int J Mol Sci (2019) 20(11):2802. doi: 10.3390/ijms20112802
2. Pernigoni N, Zagato E, Calcinotto A, Troiani M, Mestre R, Calì B, et al. Commensal Bacteria Promote Endocrine Resistance in Prostate Cancer Through Androgen Biosynthesis. Sci (New York NY) (2021) 374(6564):216–24. doi: 10.1126/science.abf8403
3. Vellky JE, Ricke WA. Development and Prevalence of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Subtypes. Neoplasia (2020) 22(11):566–75. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2020.09.002
4. Huang Y, Jiang X, Liang X, Jiang G. Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer. Oncol Lett (2018) 15(5):6063–76. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8123
5. Flores-Morales A, Bergmann TB, Lavallee C, Batth TS, Lin D, Lerdrup M, et al. Proteogenomic Characterization of Patient-Derived Xenografts Highlights the Role of REST in Neuroendocrine Differentiation of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2019) 25(2):595–608. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0729
6. Blomme A, Ford CA, Mui E, Patel R, Ntala C, Jamieson LE, et al. 2,4-Dienoyl-CoA Reductase Regulates Lipid Homeostasis in Treatment-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Nat Commun (2020) 11(1):2508. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16126-7
7. Hoti N, Lih TS, Pan J, Zhou Y, Yang G, Deng A, et al. A Comprehensive Analysis of FUT8 Overexpressing Prostate Cancer Cells Reveals the Role of EGFR in Castration Resistance. Cancers (Basel) (2020) 12(2):468. doi: 10.3390/cancers12020468
8. Ishizuya Y, Uemura M, Narumi R, Tomiyama E, Koh Y, Matsushita M, et al. The Role of Actinin-4 (ACTN4) in Exosomes as a Potential Novel Therapeutic Target in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2020) 523(3):588–94. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.12.084
9. Gui B, Gui F, Takai T, Feng C, Bai X, Fazli L, et al. Selective Targeting of PARP-2 Inhibits Androgen Receptor Signaling and Prostate Cancer Growth Through Disruption of FOXA1 Function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2019) 116(29):14573–82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908547116
10. Tatarov O, Mitchell T, Seywright M, Leung H, Brunton V, Edwards J. SRC Family Kinase Activity Is Up-Regulated in Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res an Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res (2009) 15(10):3540–9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1857
11. Peacock JW, Takeuchi A, Hayashi N, Liu L, Tam KJ, Al Nakouzi N, et al. SEMA3C Drives Cancer Growth by Transactivating Multiple Receptor Tyrosine Kinases via Plexin B1. EMBO Mol Med (2018) 10(2):219–38. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201707689
12. Lee CCW, Munuganti RSN, Peacock JW, Dalal K, Jiao IZF, Shepherd A, et al. Targeting Semaphorin 3C in Prostate Cancer With Small Molecules. J Endocr Soc (2018) 2(12):1381–94. doi: 10.1210/js.2018-00170
13. Xu K, Shimelis H, Linn DE, Jiang R, Yang X, Sun F, et al. Regulation of Androgen Receptor Transcriptional Activity and Specificity by RNF6-Induced Ubiquitination. Cancer Cell (2009) 15(4):270–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.02.021
14. Welti J, Rodrigues DN, Sharp A, Sun S, Lorente D, Riisnaes R, et al. Analytical Validation and Clinical Qualification of a New Immunohistochemical Assay for Androgen Receptor Splice Variant-7 Protein Expression in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol (2016) 70(4):599–608. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.049
15. Sugiura M, Sato H, Okabe A, Fukuyo M, Mano Y, Shinohara KI, et al. Identification of AR-V7 Downstream Genes Commonly Targeted by AR/AR-V7 and Specifically Targeted by AR-V7 in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer. Transl Oncol (2021) 14(1):100915. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100915
16. Li Q, Wang Z, Yi J, Shen H, Yang Z, Yan L, et al. Clinicopathological Characteristics of Androgen Receptor Splicing Variant 7 (AR-V7) Expression in Patients With Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Transl Oncol (2021) 14(9):101145. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101145
17. Sharp A, Coleman I, Yuan W, Sprenger C, Dolling D, Rodrigues D, et al. Androgen Receptor Splice Variant-7 Expression Emerges With Castration Resistance in Prostate Cancer. J Clin Invest (2019) 129(1):192–208. doi: 10.1172/JCI122819
18. Kanayama M, Lu C, Luo J, Antonarakis ES. AR Splicing Variants and Resistance to AR Targeting Agents. Cancers (Basel) (2021) 13(11):2563. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112563
19. Jiang N, Hjorth-Jensen K, Hekmat O, Iglesias-Gato D, Kruse T, Wang C, et al. In Vivo Quantitative Phosphoproteomic Profiling Identifies Novel Regulators of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Growth. Oncogene (2015) 34(21):2764–76. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.206
20. Lee HC, Ou CH, Huang YC, Hou PC, Creighton CJ, Lin YS, et al. YAP1 Overexpression Contributes to the Development of Enzalutamide Resistance by Induction of Cancer Stemness and Lipid Metabolism in Prostate Cancer. Oncogene (2021) 40(13):2407–21. doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01718-4
21. Roudier MP, Winters BR, Coleman I, Lam HM, Zhang X, Coleman R, et al. Characterizing the Molecular Features of ERG-Positive Tumors in Primary and Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer. Prostate (2016) 76(9):810–22. doi: 10.1002/pros.23171
22. Kao CJ, Martiniez A, Shi XB, Yang J, Evans CP, Dobi A, et al. miR-30 as a Tumor Suppressor Connects EGF/Src Signal to ERG and EMT. Oncogene (2014) 33(19):2495–503. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.200
23. Park S, Kang M, Kim S, An HT, Gettemans J, Ko J. Alpha-Actinin-4 Promotes the Progression of Prostate Cancer Through the Akt/GSK-3beta/Beta-Catenin Signaling Pathway. Front Cell Dev Biol (2020) 8:588544. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.588544
24. Daniels G, Zhang X, Zhong X, Santiago L, Wang L, Wu X, et al. Cytoplasmic, Full Length and Novel Cleaved Variant, TBLR1 Reduces Apoptosis in Prostate Cancer Under Androgen Deprivation. Oncotarget (2016) 7(26):39556–71. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9005
25. Saupe M, Rauschenberger L, Preuss M, Oswald S, Fussek S, Zimmermann U, et al. Differential Expression of the Multidrug Resistance 1 (MDR1) Protein in Prostate Cancer Cells is Independent From Anticancer Drug Treatment and Y Box Binding Protein 1 (YB-1) Activity. World J Urol (2015) 33(10):1481–6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1469-0
26. Wang Y, Huang Z, Chen CZ, Liu C, Evans CP, Gao AC, et al. Therapeutic Targeting of MDR1 Expression by RORgamma Antagonists Resensitizes Cross-Resistant CRPC to Taxane via Coordinated Induction of Cell Death Programs. Mol Cancer Ther (2020) 19(2):364–74. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0327
27. Ingersoll M, Chou Y, Lin J, Yuan T, Miller D, Xie Y, et al. p66Shc Regulates Migration of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Cells. Cell Signal (2018) 46:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2018.02.008
28. Miller DR, Ingersoll MA, Chatterjee A, Baker B, Shrishrimal S, Kosmacek EA, et al. p66Shc Protein Through a Redox Mechanism Enhances the Progression of Prostate Cancer Cells Towards Castration-Resistance. Free Radic Biol Med (2019) 139:24–34. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.05.015
29. Ai J, Lu Y, Wei Q, Li H. Comparative Proteomics Uncovers Correlated Signaling Network and Potential Biomarkers for Progression of Prostate Cancer. Cell Physiol Biochem (2017) 41(1):1–9. doi: 10.1159/000447813
30. Ai J, Jin T, Yang L, Wei Q, Yang Y, Li H, et al. Vinculin and Filamin-C Are Two Potential Prognostic Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets for Prostate Cancer Cell Migration. Oncotarget (2017) 8(47):82430–6. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19397
31. Bahmad HF, Peng W, Zhu R, Ballout F, Monzer A, Elajami MK, et al. Protein Expression Analysis of an In Vitro Murine Model of Prostate Cancer Progression: Towards Identification of High-Potential Therapeutic Targets. J Pers Med (2020) 10(3):83. doi: 10.3390/jpm10030083
32. Ni J, Cozzi P, Hao J, Beretov J, Chang L, Duan W, et al. Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (EpCAM) Is Associated With Prostate Cancer Metastasis and Chemo/Radioresistance via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathway. Int J Biochem Cell Biol (2013) 45(12):2736–48. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.09.008
33. Saraon P, Cretu D, Musrap N, Karagiannis GS, Batruch I, Drabovich AP, et al. Quantitative Proteomics Reveals That Enzymes of the Ketogenic Pathway Are Associated With Prostate Cancer Progression. Mol Cell Proteomics (2013) 12(6):1589–601. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M112.023887
34. Labanca E, Bizzotto J, Sanchis P, Anselmino N, Yang J, Shepherd PDA, et al. Prostate Cancer Castrate Resistant Progression Usage of Non-Canonical Androgen Receptor Signaling and Ketone Body Fuel. Oncogene (2021) 40(44):6284–98. doi: 10.1101/2021.01.12.21249395
35. Hoti N, Yang S, Hu Y, Shah P, Haffner MC, Zhang H. Overexpression of Alpha (1,6) Fucosyltransferase in the Development of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Cells. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis (2018) 21(1):137–46. doi: 10.1038/s41391-017-0016-7
36. Wang X, Chen J, Li QK, Peskoe SB, Zhang B, Choi C, et al. Overexpression of α (1,6) Fucosyltransferase Associated With Aggressive Prostate Cancer. Glycobiology (2014) 24(10):935–44. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwu051
37. Hoti N, Shah P, Hu Y, Yang S, Zhang H. Proteomics Analyses of Prostate Cancer Cells Reveal Cellular Pathways Associated With Androgen Resistance. Proteomics (2017) 17(6):10. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201600228
38. Ferrari N, Granata I, Capaia M, Piccirillo M, Guarracino MR, Vene R, et al. Adaptive Phenotype Drives Resistance to Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer. Cell Commun Signal (2017) 15(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12964-017-0206-x
39. Barboro P, Benelli R, Tosetti F, Costa D, Capaia M, Astigiano S, et al. Aspartate Beta-Hydroxylase Targeting in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Modulates the NOTCH/HIF1alpha/GSK3beta Crosstalk. Carcinogenesis (2020) 41(9):1246–52. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgaa053
40. Gong Y, Chippada-Venkata UD, Galsky MD, Huang J, Oh WK. Elevated Circulating Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) Levels Are Associated With Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer. Prostate (2015) 75(6):616–27. doi: 10.1002/pros.22945
41. Wise G, Marella V, Talluri G, Shirazian D. Cytokine Variations in Patients With Hormone Treated Prostate Cancer. J Urol (2000) 164:722–5. doi: 10.1097/00005392-200009010-00024
42. Intasqui P, Bertolla RP, Sadi MV. Prostate Cancer Proteomics: Clinically Useful Protein Biomarkers and Future Perspectives. Expert Rev Proteomics (2018) 15(1):65–79. doi: 10.1080/14789450.2018.1417846
43. Kuser-Abali G, Alptekin A, Lewis M, Garraway I, Cinar B. YAP1 and AR Interactions Contribute to the Switch From Androgen-Dependent to Castration-Resistant Growth in Prostate Cancer. Nat Commun (2015) 6:8126. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9126
44. Ryan CJ, Smith MR, de Bono JS, Molina A, Logothetis CJ, de Souza P, et al. Abiraterone in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Without Previous Chemotherapy. N Engl J Med (2013) 368(2):138–48. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209096
45. Matsuda Y, Narita S, Nara T, Mingguo H, Sato H, Koizumi A, et al. Impact of Nuclear YAP1 Expression in Residual Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy With Docetaxel for High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer. BMC Cancer (2020) 20(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06844-y
46. Harvey KF, Zhang X, Thomas DM. The Hippo Pathway and Human Cancer. Nat Rev Cancer (2013) 13(4):246–57. doi: 10.1038/nrc3458
48. Tomlins S, Rhodes D, Perner S, Dhanasekaran S, Mehra R, Sun X, et al. Recurrent Fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS Transcription Factor Genes in Prostate Cancer. Sci (New York NY) (2005) 310(5748):644–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1117679
49. Ramroop JR, Stein MN, Drake JM. Impact of Phosphoproteomics in the Era of Precision Medicine for Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol (2018) 8:28. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00028
50. Drake JM, Paull EO, Graham NA, Lee JK, Smith BA, Titz B, et al. Phosphoproteome Integration Reveals Patient-Specific Networks in Prostate Cancer. Cell (2016) 166(4):1041–54. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.007
51. Zhao X, Khurana S, Charkraborty S, Tian Y, Sedor J, Bruggman L, et al. α Actinin 4 (ACTN4) Regulates Glucocorticoid Receptor-Mediated Transactivation and Transrepression in Podocytes. J Biol Chem (2017) 292(5):1637–47. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.755546
52. Puhr M, Hoefer J, Eigentler A, Ploner C, Handle F, Schaefer G, et al. The Glucocorticoid Receptor Is a Key Player for Prostate Cancer Cell Survival and a Target for Improved Antiandrogen Therapy. Clin Cancer Res an Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res (2018) 24(4):927–38. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0989
53. Tomita A, Buchholz D, Obata K, Shi Y. Fusion Protein of Retinoic Acid Receptor Alpha With Promyelocytic Leukemia Protein or Promyelocytic Leukemia Zinc Finger Protein Recruits N-CoR-TBLR1 Corepressor Complex to Repress Transcription In Vivo. J Biol Chem (2003) 278(33):30788–95. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303309200
54. Yoon H, Chan D, Huang Z, Li J, Fondell J, Qin J, et al. Purification and Functional Characterization of the Human N-CoR Complex: The Roles of HDAC3, TBL1 and TBLR1. EMBO J (2003) 22(6):1336–46. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg120
55. Tomita A, Buchholz D, Shi Y. Recruitment of N-CoR/SMRT-TBLR1 Corepressor Complex by Unliganded Thyroid Hormone Receptor for Gene Repression During Frog Development. Mol Cell Biol (2004) 24(8):3337–46. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.8.3337-3346.2004
56. Perissi V, Scafoglio C, Zhang J, Ohgi K, Rose D, Glass C, et al. TBL1 and TBLR1 Phosphorylation on Regulated Gene Promoters Overcomes Dual CtBP and NCoR/SMRT Transcriptional Repression Checkpoints. Mol Cell (2008) 29(6):755–66. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.020
57. Rajendran M, Thomes P, Zhang L, Veeramani S, Lin M. p66Shc–a Longevity Redox Protein in Human Prostate Cancer Progression and Metastasis: p66Shc in Cancer Progression and Metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev (2010) 29(1):207–22. doi: 10.1007/s10555-010-9213-8
58. Kulkarni P, Jolly MK, Jia D, Mooney SM, Bhargava A, Kagohara LT, et al. Phosphorylation-Induced Conformational Dynamics in an Intrinsically Disordered Protein and Potential Role in Phenotypic Heterogeneity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2017) 114(13):E2644–E53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700082114
59. Tanase C, Codrici E, Popescu I, Mihai S, Enciu A, Necula L, et al. Prostate Cancer Proteomics: Current Trends and Future Perspectives for Biomarker Discovery. Oncotarget (2017) 8(11):18497–512. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14501
60. Zhang X, Tang Z, Qi L, Chen H, Luo Q. [Screening of Membrane Antigen Differentially Expressed in Androgen-Dependent Prostate Cancer and Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban (2012) 37(8):817–23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.08.010
61. Leiblich A, Cross SS, Catto JW, Pesce G, Hamdy FC, Rehman I. Human Prostate Cancer Cells Express Neuroendocrine Cell Markers PGP 9.5 and Chromogranin A. Prostate (2007) 67(16):1761–9. doi: 10.1002/pros.20654
62. Ghosh R, Gu G, Tillman E, Yuan J, Wang Y, Fazli L, et al. Increased Expression and Differential Phosphorylation of Stathmin may Promote Prostate Cancer Progression. Prostate (2007) 67(10):1038–52. doi: 10.1002/pros.20601
63. Inoue T, Leman ES, Yeater DB, Getzenberg RH. The Potential Role of Purine-Rich Element Binding Protein (PUR) Alpha as a Novel Treatment Target for Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer. Prostate (2008) 68(10):1048–56. doi: 10.1002/pros.20764
64. Conrad F, Zhu X, Zhang X, Chalkley RJ, Burlingame AL, Marks JD, et al. Human Antibodies Targeting Cell Surface Antigens Overexpressed by the Hormone Refractory Metastatic Prostate Cancer Cells: ICAM-1 Is a Tumor Antigen That Mediates Prostate Cancer Cell Invasion. J Mol Med (Berl) (2009) 87(5):507–14. doi: 10.1007/s00109-009-0446-3
65. Pathak R, Philizaire M, Mujtaba S. Dichotomy in the Epigenetic Mark Lysine Acetylation Is Critical for the Proliferation of Prostate Cancer Cells. Cancers (Basel) (2015) 7(3):1622–42. doi: 10.3390/cancers7030854
66. Gross M, Top I, Laux I, Katz J, Curran J, Tindell C, et al. Beta-2-Microglobulin Is an Androgen-Regulated Secreted Protein Elevated in Serum of Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2007) 13(7):1979–86. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1156
67. Konac E, Kiliccioglu I, Sogutdelen E, Dikmen AU, Albayrak G, Bilen CY. Do the Expressions of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Proteins, Periostin, Integrin-Alpha4 and Fibronectin Correlate With Clinico-Pathological Features and Prognosis of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer? Exp Biol Med (Maywood) (2017) 242(18):1795–801. doi: 10.1177/1535370217728499
68. Potluri HK, Ng TL, Newton MA, Zhang J, Maher CA, Nelson PS, et al. Antibody Profiling of Patients With Prostate Cancer Reveals Differences in Antibody Signatures Among Disease Stages. J Immunother Cancer (2020) 8(2):e001510. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001510
69. Wang D, Liang H, Mao X, Liu W, Li M, Qiu S. Changes of Transthyretin and Clusterin After Androgen Ablation Therapy and Correlation With Prostate Cancer Malignancy. Transl Oncol (2012) 5(2):124–32. doi: 10.1593/tlo.11259
70. Gaudreau PO, Stagg J, Soulieres D, Saad F. The Present and Future of Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer: Proteomics, Genomics, and Immunology Advancements. Biomark Cancer (2016) 8(Suppl 2):15–33. doi: 10.4137/BIC.S31802
71. Zhao L, Lee BY, Brown DA, Molloy MP, Marx GM, Pavlakis N, et al. Identification of Candidate Biomarkers of Therapeutic Response to Docetaxel by Proteomic Profiling. Cancer Res (2009) 69(19):7696–703. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4901
72. Yamamoto-Ishikawa K, Suzuki H, Nezu M, Kamiya N, Imamoto T, Komiya A, et al. The Isolation and Identification of Apolipoprotein C-I in Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer Using Surface-Enhanced Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. Asian J Androl (2009) 11(3):299–307. doi: 10.1038/aja.2008.38
73. Ta HQ, Ivey ML, Frierson HF Jr., Conaway MR, Dziegielewski J, Larner JM, et al. Checkpoint Kinase 2 Negatively Regulates Androgen Sensitivity and Prostate Cancer Cell Growth. Cancer Res (2015) 75(23):5093–105. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0224
74. Colombo M, Moita C, van Niel G, Kowal J, Vigneron J, Benaroch P, et al. Analysis of ESCRT Functions in Exosome Biogenesis, Composition and Secretion Highlights the Heterogeneity of Extracellular Vesicles. J Cell Sci (2013) 126(Pt 24):5553–65. doi: 10.1242/jcs.128868
75. Ostrowski M, Carmo NB, Krumeich S, Fanget I, Raposo G, Savina A, et al. Rab27a and Rab27b Control Different Steps of the Exosome Secretion Pathway. Nat Cell Biol (2010) 12(1):19–30. doi: 10.1038/ncb2000
76. Worst TS, Meyer Y, Gottschalt M, Weis CA, von Hardenberg J, Frank C, et al. RAB27A, RAB27B and VPS36 are Downregulated in Advanced Prostate Cancer and Show Functional Relevance in Prostate Cancer Cells. Int J Oncol (2017) 50(3):920–32. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2017.3872
77. Bell AW, Ward MA, Blackstock WP, Freeman HN, Choudhary JS, Lewis AP, et al. Proteomics Characterization of Abundant Golgi Membrane Proteins. J Biol Chem (2001) 276(7):5152–65. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006143200
78. Nakashima-Kamimura N, Asoh S, Ishibashi Y, Mukai Y, Shidara Y, Oda H, et al. MIDAS/GPP34, a Nuclear Gene Product, Regulates Total Mitochondrial Mass in Response to Mitochondrial Dysfunction. J Cell Sci (2005) 118(Pt 22):5357–67. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02645
79. Wu C, Taylor R, Lane D, Ladinsky M, Weisz J, Howell K. GMx33: A Novel Family of Trans-Golgi Proteins Identified by Proteomics. Traffic (Copenhagen Denmark) (2000) 1(12):963–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2000.11206.x
80. Li W, Guo F, Gu M, Wang G, He X, Zhou J, et al. Increased Expression of GOLPH3 Is Associated With the Proliferation of Prostate Cancer. J Cancer (2015) 6(5):420–9. doi: 10.7150/jca.11228
81. Luo L, Grass L, Howarth D, Thibault P, Ong H, Diamandis E. Immunofluorometric Assay of Human Kallikrein 10 and Its Identification in Biological Fluids and Tissues. Clin Chem (2001) 47(2):237–46. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/47.2.237
82. Hu J, Lei H, Fei X, Liang S, Xu H, Qin D, et al. NES1/KLK10 Gene Represses Proliferation, Enhances Apoptosis and Down-Regulates Glucose Metabolism of PC3 Prostate Cancer Cells. Sci Rep (2015) 5:17426. doi: 10.1038/srep17426
83. Sang Y, Kong P, Zhang S, Zhang L, Cao Y, Duan X, et al. SGK1 in Human Cancer: Emerging Roles and Mechanisms. Front Oncol (2020) 10:608722. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.608722
84. Liu W, Wang X, Liu Z, Wang Y, Yin B, Yu P, et al. SGK1 Inhibition Induces Autophagy-Dependent Apoptosis via the mTOR-Foxo3a Pathway. Br J Cancer (2017) 117(8):1139–53. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.293
85. Larsson P, Syed Khaja AS, Semenas J, Wang T, Sarwar M, Dizeyi N, et al. The Functional Interlink Between AR and MMP9/VEGF Signaling Axis Is Mediated Through PIP5K1alpha/pAKT in Prostate Cancer. Int J Cancer (2020) 146(6):1686–99. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32607
86. Nakamura M, Okano H, Blendy J, Montell C. Musashi, a Neural RNA-Binding Protein Required for Drosophila Adult External Sensory Organ Development. Neuron (1994) 13(1):67–81. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90460-X
87. Zhao J, Zhang Y, Liu XS, Zhu FM, Xie F, Jiang CY, et al. RNA-Binding Protein Musashi2 Stabilizing Androgen Receptor Drives Prostate Cancer Progression. Cancer Sci (2020) 111(2):369–82. doi: 10.1111/cas.14280
88. MacManus CF, Pettigrew J, Seaton A, Wilson C, Maxwell PJ, Berlingeri S, et al. Interleukin-8 Signaling Promotes Translational Regulation of Cyclin D in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer Cells. Mol Cancer Res (2007) 5(7):737–48. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-0032
89. Liu W, Wang X, Wang Y, Dai Y, Xie Y, Ping Y, et al. SGK1 Inhibition-Induced Autophagy Impairs Prostate Cancer Metastasis by Reversing EMT. J Exp Clin Cancer Res CR (2018) 37(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0743-1
90. Lu Y, Dong B, Xu F, Xu Y, Pan J, Song J, et al. CXCL1-LCN2 Paracrine Axis Promotes Progression of Prostate Cancer via the Src Activation and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Cell Commun Signal (2019) 17(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12964-019-0434-3
91. Denis G, Green M. A Novel, Mitogen-Activated Nuclear Kinase Is Related to a Drosophila Developmental Regulator. Genes Dev (1996) 10(3):261–71. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.3.261
92. Belkina A, Blanton W, Nikolajczyk B, Denis G. The Double Bromodomain Protein Brd2 Promotes B Cell Expansion and Mitogenesis. J Leukocyte Biol (2014) 95(3):451–60. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1112588
93. Shafran JS, Andrieu GP, Gyorffy B, Denis GV. BRD4 Regulates Metastatic Potential of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Through AHNAK. Mol Cancer Res (2019) 17(8):1627–38. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-1279
94. Li H, Ma Z, Che Z, Li Q, Fan J, Zhou Z, et al. Comprehensive Role of Prostate-Specific Antigen Identified With Proteomic Analysis in Prostate Cancer. J Cell Mol Med (2020) 24(17):10202–15. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15634
95. Gao Y, Ha Y, Kwon T, Cho Y, Lee S, Lee J. Characterization of Kinase Expression Related to Increased Migration of PC-3m Cells Using Global Comparative Phosphoproteome Analysis. Cancer Genomics Proteomics (2020) 17(5):543–53. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20210
96. Shu Q, Cai T, Chen X, Zhu H, Xue P, Zhu N, et al. Proteomic Comparison and MRM-Based Comparative Analysis of Metabolites Reveal Metabolic Shift in Human Prostate Cancer Cell Lines. J Proteome Res (2015) 14(8):3390–402. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00464
97. Ettinger S, Sobel R, Whitmore T, Akbari M, Bradley D, Gleave M, et al. Dysregulation of Sterol Response Element-Binding Proteins and Downstream Effectors in Prostate Cancer During Progression to Androgen Independence. Cancer Res (2004) 64(6):2212–21. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-2148-2
98. Gennigens C, Menetrier-Caux C, Droz JP. Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) Family and Prostate Cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol (2006) 58(2):124–45. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.10.003
99. Stanbrough M, Bubley GJ, Ross K, Golub TR, Rubin MA, Penning TM, et al. Increased Expression of Genes Converting Adrenal Androgens to Testosterone in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer. Cancer Res (2006) 66(5):2815–25. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4000
100. Schmitt J, Noble A, Otsuka M, Berry P, Maitland NJ, Rumsby MG. Phorbol Ester Stimulates Ethanolamine Release From the Metastatic Basal Prostate Cancer Cell Line PC3 But Not From Prostate Epithelial Cell Lines LNCaP and P4E6. Br J Cancer (2014) 111(8):1646–56. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.457
101. Feng S, Cheng X, Zhang L, Lu X, Chaudhary S, Teng R, et al. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Inhibit T Cell Activation Through Nitrating LCK in Mouse Cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2018) 115(40):10094–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800695115
102. Xu LJ, Ma Q, Zhu J, Li J, Xue BX, Gao J, et al. Combined Inhibition of JAK1,2/Stat3PDL1 Signaling Pathway Suppresses the Immune Escape of Castrationresistant Prostate Cancer to NK Cells in Hypoxia. Mol Med Rep (2018) 17(6):8111–20. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8905
103. Fankhauser C, Schüffler P, Gillessen S, Omlin A, Rupp N, Rueschoff J, et al. Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Analysis of PD-L1 Shows Scarce Expression in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Oncotarget (2018) 9(12):10284–93. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22888
104. Gulati T, Huang C, Caramia F, Raghu D, Paul P, Goode R, et al. Proteotranscriptomic Measurements of E6-Associated Protein (E6AP) Targets in DU145 Prostate Cancer Cells. Mol Cell Proteomics MCP (2018) 17(6):1170–83. doi: 10.1074/mcp.RA117.000504
105. Dong L, Zhang X, Ren J, Wu S, Yu T, Hou L, et al. Human Prostate Stem Cell Antigen and HSP70 Fusion Protein Vaccine Inhibits Prostate Stem Cell Antigen-Expressing Tumor Growth in Mice. Cancer Biother Radiopharm (2013) 28(5):391–7. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2012.1357
106. McNeel D, Nguyen L, Storer B, Vessella R, Lange P, Disis M. Antibody Immunity to Prostate Cancer Associated Antigens Can be Detected in the Serum of Patients With Prostate Cancer. J Urol (2000) 164(5):1825–9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67114-5
107. Green SM, Kaipainen A, Bullock K, Zhang A, Lucas JM, Matson C, et al. Role of OATP Transporters in Steroid Uptake by Prostate Cancer Cells In Vivo. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis (2017) 20(1):20–7. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.42
108. Wright J, Kwon E, Ostrander E, Montgomery R, Lin D, Vessella R, et al. Expression of SLCO Transport Genes in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Impact of Genetic Variation in SLCO1B3 and SLCO2B1 on Prostate Cancer Outcomes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2011) 20(4):619–27. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1023
109. Wang T, Song W, Chen Y, Chen R, Liu Z, Wu L, et al. Flightless I Homolog Represses Prostate Cancer Progression Through Targeting Androgen Receptor Signaling. Clin Cancer Res (2016) 22(6):1531–44. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1632
110. Urbanucci A, Barfeld SJ, Kytola V, Itkonen HM, Coleman IM, Vodak D, et al. Androgen Receptor Deregulation Drives Bromodomain-Mediated Chromatin Alterations in Prostate Cancer. Cell Rep (2017) 19(10):2045–59. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.049
111. Welti J, Sharp A, Yuan W, Dolling D, Nava Rodrigues D, Figueiredo I, et al. Targeting Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal (BET) Family Proteins in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC). Clin Cancer Res (2018) 24(13):3149–62. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3571
112. Takayama KI, Suzuki T, Fujimura T, Yamada Y, Takahashi S, Homma Y, et al. Dysregulation of Spliceosome Gene Expression in Advanced Prostate Cancer by RNA-Binding Protein PSF. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2017) 114(39):10461–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706076114
113. Bai S, Cao S, Jin L, Kobelski M, Schouest B, Wang X, et al. A Positive Role of C-Myc in Regulating Androgen Receptor and its Splice Variants in Prostate Cancer. Oncogene (2019) 38(25):4977–89. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0768-8
114. Karantanos T, Karanika S, Wang J, Yang G, Dobashi M, Park S, et al. Caveolin-1 Regulates Hormone Resistance Through Lipid Synthesis, Creating Novel Therapeutic Opportunities for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Oncotarget (2016) 7(29):46321–34. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10113
115. Zhu Y, Tummala R, Liu C, Nadiminty N, Lou W, Evans CP, et al. RhoGDIalpha Suppresses Growth and Survival of Prostate Cancer Cells. Prostate (2012) 72(4):392–8. doi: 10.1002/pros.21441
116. Duscharla D, Reddy Kami Reddy K, Dasari C, Bhukya S, Ummanni R. Interleukin-6 Induced Overexpression of Valosin-Containing Protein (VCP)/p97 Is Associated With Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer (AIPC) Progression. J Cell Physiol (2018) 233(10):7148–64. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26639
117. Khalil MI, Ghosh I, Singh V, Chen J, Zhu H, De Benedetti A. NEK1 Phosphorylation of YAP Promotes Its Stabilization and Transcriptional Output. Cancers (Basel) (2020) 12(12):3666. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123666
118. Zhu Y, Sharp A, Anderson C, Silberstein J, Taylor M, Lu C, et al. Novel Junction-Specific and Quantifiable In Situ Detection of AR-V7 and its Clinical Correlates in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol (2018) 73(5):727–35. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.009
119. Terada N, Akamatsu S, Kobayashi T, Inoue T, Ogawa O, Antonarakis E. Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer: Latest Evidence and Clinical Implications. Ther Adv Med Oncol (2017) 9(8):565–73. doi: 10.1177/1758834017719215
120. Efstathiou E, Titus M, Wen S, Hoang A, Karlou M, Ashe R, et al. Molecular Characterization of Enzalutamide-Treated Bone Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol (2015) 67(1):53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.005
121. Antonarakis E, Lu C, Wang H, Luber B, Nakazawa M, Roeser J, et al. AR-V7 and Resistance to Enzalutamide and Abiraterone in Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med (2014) 371(11):1028–38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1315815
122. Antonarakis E, Lu C, Luber B, Wang H, Chen Y, Zhu Y, et al. Clinical Significance of Androgen Receptor Splice Variant-7 mRNA Detection in Circulating Tumor Cells of Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With First- and Second-Line Abiraterone and Enzalutamide. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol (2017) 35(19):2149–56. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.1961
123. Morra F, Merolla F, Napolitano V, Ilardi G, Miro C, Paladino S, et al. The Combined Effect of USP7 Inhibitors and PARP Inhibitors in Hormone-Sensitive and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Cells. Oncotarget (2017) 8(19):31815–29. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16463
124. Onishi K, Miyake M, Hori S, Onishi S, Iida K, Morizawa Y, et al. Gamma-Klotho Is Correlated With Resistance to Docetaxel in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Oncol Lett (2020) 19(3):2306–16. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11308
125. Xu YH, Deng JL, Wang G, Zhu YS. Long Non-Coding RNAs in Prostate Cancer: Functional Roles and Clinical Implications. Cancer Lett (2019) 464:37–55. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.08.010
126. Uemura M, Tamura K, Chung S, Honma S, Okuyama A, Nakamura Y, et al. Novel 5 Alpha-Steroid Reductase (SRD5A3, Type-3) Is Overexpressed in Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer. Cancer Sci (2008) 99(1):81–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00656.x
Keywords: protein, castration-resistant prostate cancer, castration-sensitive prostate cancer, marker, therapeutic resistance
Citation: Kong P, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Feng K, Sang Y, Duan X, Liu C, Sun T, Tao Z and Liu W (2022) Emerging Proteins in CRPC: Functional Roles and Clinical Implications. Front. Oncol. 12:873876. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.873876
Received: 11 February 2022; Accepted: 30 March 2022;
Published: 10 June 2022.
Edited by:
Eneda Toska, Johns Hopkins Medicine, United StatesReviewed by:
Benyi Li, University of Kansas Medical Center, United StatesPanagiotis J. Vlachostergios, Cornell University, United States
Copyright © 2022 Kong, Zhang, Zhang, Feng, Sang, Duan, Liu, Sun, Tao and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Weiwei Liu, liuweiwei@zju.edu.cn; Zhihua Tao, zrtzh@zju.edu.cn
†ORCID:Weiwei Liu, orcid.org/0000-0003-4708-8057
Zhihua Tao, orcid.org/0000-0002-0906-7143
‡These authors have contributed equally to this work