Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Oncol., 31 March 2022
Sec. Hematologic Malignancies

Case Report: Personalized Therapeutical Approaches with Lenalidomide in Del(5q): A Case Series

  • 1Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy and Hemostaseology, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
  • 2Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany

Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) with del(5q) represents a unique WHO entity, which is often treated with lenalidomide according to standard clinical practice. Guidelines concerning treatment duration have thus far not been implemented, but rather comprise an indefinite therapy until loss of response. This review presents three red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent MDS with del(5q) cases, starting with one rare case with an unbalanced translocation t(2;5), involving the breakpoint of del(5q) and loss of the 5q15-5q31 region. To the best of our knowledge, no comparable case has been described before with a response to lenalidomide. Strikingly, treatment-induced and maintained cytogenetic complete remission (cCR) in this patient. Furthermore, we report two cases of classical del(5q), in which lenalidomide was interrupted after a short period of lenalidomide therapy at the time cCR was achieved. Despite drug holiday cCR was maintained for seven and nine years, respectively. Then del(5q) re-emerged in the absence of novel molecular aberrations and re-treatment with lenalidomide could again achieve cCR in both cases. Together, this series presents three cases of personalized therapy of MDS with del(5q).

Introduction

MDS namely describes a disease, characterized by dysplastic bone marrow cytomorphology leading to peripheral blood cytopenia and possible transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The typical hallmark of this disease is its huge diversity and heterogeneity, not only in terms of cytogenetical and cytomorphological changes, but also in its individual clinical courses and risk of disease progression. The current WHO classification distinguishes thirteen distinct entities of MDS, including MDS with del(5q) to the loss of 5q31 or 5q32 as the common region of deletion (CDR) (1). as a subgroup of MDS. According to the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) cytogenetic risk categories MDS with del(5q) is classified as lower risk in most cases. Erythroid insufficiency and favorable transformation risk in the absence of a TP53 mutation represent the main clinical characteristics. Patients mostly suffer from reduced quality of life due to anemia and dependency on RBC-transfusions. Lenalidomide represents the first-line treatment for transfusion-dependent MDS with del(5q). Evidently, it leads to transfusion independence in two-thirds of patients while cCR is seen in 50% of cases (24). Patients treated with lenalidomide display no increased risk of disease progression to AML (2, 5). As of now, medical guidelines offer no consensus regarding the duration and possible drug holiday of treatment with lenalidomide, which can be associated with hematological and economic toxicities (6).

The pharmacological effect of lenalidomide acts via a dual mechanism: First by selectively inhibiting the growth of del(5q) positive progenitors through ubiquitination by the E3 ubiquitin ligase cereblon (7). Second restoration of erythropoiesis is achieved by inactivating p53 in erythroid progenitor cells and stabilizing EPO receptors (2, 8). Nevertheless, progression or loss of response occurs in 50% of all cases within two years of treatment with lenalidomide (4). Before and during lenalidomide treatment regular controls of TP53 alterations are obligate to detect clonal evolution well enough in advance. Currently, it is recommended to treat patients continuously until loss of response or disease progression. We here present three cases of patients including two where lenalidomide was stopped as a personalized concept to avoid toxicity or potentially promote clonal evolution.

Case Description

Case 1 presented with a rare del(5q) as a result of an unbalanced translocation, leading to a partial loss of 5q (Figure 1). The patient was 47 years of age at the time of diagnosis, presenting with progressive macrocytic anemia (Hb 4,1 mmol/l). The patients karyotype displayed 46,XX, der(2)t(2;5)(p23;q31),der(5)t(2;5)(p25;q15) in 21 of 31 analyzed metaphases with an additional 47, XX,+8 in three metaphases. Having a normal count of blasts in the bone marrow and no peripheral blasts, she was scored within the intermediate-1 risk group according to IPSS. Supposing the same underlying cellular path mechanism as in regular del(5q) MDS, a therapy with lenalidomide (10 mg daily, day 1 to 21) was initiated. Although in this case no classic MDS with del(5q) was evident, cCR and transfusion-independency could rapidly be achieved after 6 months of treatment. However, novel mutations within ASXL1 (VAF 7%) and DNMT3A (VAF 10%) emerged, while the pathological karyotype remains at detection level (1/20 metaphases). Since then, therapy with lenalidomide is been continued with ongoing complete hematological remission.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 (A) Schematic depiction of breaking points, rearrangement and derivates of 46, XX, der(2)t(2;5)(p23;q31), der(5)t(2;5)(p25;q15)[21]: The model was constructed using http://www.cydas.org/OnlineAnalysis/ (9). (B) 46, XX, der(2)t(2;5)(p23;q31), der(5)t(2;5)(p25;q15)[21]: Whole chromosome painting of case 1 with karyotype: 46, XX, der(2)t(2;5)(p23;q31), der(5)t(2;5)(p25;q15). Chromosome 2 in red, chromosome 5 in green. (C) t(2;5): Part of the karyogram of case 1 depicting t(2;5) as part of 46, XX, der(2)t(2;5)(p23;q31),der(5)t(2;5)(p25;q15)[21].

Case 2 represents a 58-year-old woman first diagnosed with MDS del(5q) in 2006 due to anemia. At this time average hemoglobin-levels (Hb) were measured at 6,8 mmol/l (Figure 2). Cytogenetical analysis revealed an isolated del(5q) with no further aberration, molecular genetics showed no mutations, especially no TP53 mutation. Prognosis was scored as intermediate-1 according to IPSS. At first, the patient was kept under constant surveillance (watch & wait) without need for treatment due to little risk of malignant transformation and no need for RBC transfusions. In 2011 anemia progressed (Hb 4,8 mmol/l) with new RBC transfusion dependency, despite cytogenetic and molecular characteristics remaining unchanged (isolated del(5q)). In line with the current guidelines a therapy with lenalidomide with a daily dose of 10 mg for day 1-14, following a drug holiday for seven days was started. Two months later hemoglobin levels normalized. After three months the patient showed cCR in bone marrow analysis. Lenalidomide was continued for two years with cCR being maintained. During this period no further genetic changes accumulated as assessed by regular cytogenetic and molecular analysis incl. the absence of a TP53 mutation. After two years of treatment and persistent cCR, treatment was terminated and switched to active surveillance with the patient remaining in cCR for close to seven years. In 2020 (six years after stopping) anemia resurfaced (Hb 5,1 mmol/l) alongside a cytogenetic relapse del(5q) in 5 out of 20 metaphasis. Due to renewed disease activity another period of lenalidomide therapy was successfully initiated.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Exemplary course of Hemoglobin (case 2) upon treatment and drug holiday with lenalidomide.

The final case displays a quite similar course of a 57-year-old woman. The patient was first diagnosed in 2010 with MDS del(5q) and likewise scored as intermediate-1 risk, according to IPSS. At the time of diagnosis hemoglobin-levels were already lower than in case 2 (Hb 4,7 mmol/l), so that RBC transfusions became necessary shortly after diagnosis. The treatment with lenalidomide was initiated immediately, according to the dosage regimen mentioned in case 2. CCR was reached after five months of treatment and maintained. Again, lenalidomide was paused, after one year of stable cCR, with cCR being maintained for nearly nine years without further treatment. During this time regular bone marrow analysis showed no further alterations. In 2021 hemoglobin-levels began to drop down to 4,4 mmol/l and the bone marrow puncture revealed the re-emergence of del(5q) in 7 out of 35 metaphasis. Following, another cycle of lenalidomide therapy at a dosage of 5 mg was initiated, leading to quick reconstitution of hemoglobin levels.

Methods

As previously described according to standard methods, chromosome banding analysis and FISH (10), as well as next-generation sequencing (11) were performed by MLL – Munich Leukemia Laboratory.

Discussion

The most frequently observed genetic changes within MDS is a del(5q). Haploinsufficiency causing casein kinase CK1α dependency of erythroid cells is proposed as the most likely pathomechanism (12). The regular del(5q) has been narrowed to a CDR including 5q32 and 5q31 (13). The first patient presented with an unusual complex rearrangement with breaks occurring at 2p23 and 2p25 as well as in 5q15 and 5q31 with fusion of 2p23 and 5q31 and 5q15 and 2p25, leading to loss of the segments 2p23 to 2p25 and the segment 5q15 to 5q31, thus preserving parts of 5q31 and 5q32. Cereblon (CRBN) poses the target of immunomodulatory drugs, such as lenalidomide and acts as substrate receptor of the CRL4CRBN E3 ubiquitin ligase, therefore mandating degradation. Cereblon is located on 3p26.2 and therefore spared from the complex karyotype displayed in case 1 (14). Although the CDR of MDS del(5q) was unaffected the patient still presented with the typical clinical features of del(5q) phenotype, such as macrocytic anemia, erythroid hypoplasia, normal or elevated platelet count and hypolobulated megakaryocytes (15). In terms of RBC, she responded well to lenalidomide, which is common for 26,9% of non-del(5q) as well (16). However, achieving CR in non-del(5q) upon lenalidomide treatment is very rarely observed (2, 16). Contrary, controls within our patient showed a rapid achievement of cCR upon lenalidomide treatment. At the time no comparable case of this particular karyotype responding to lenalidomide has been published. Following profound research of literature, the only relatable data describes an analysis of a cohort inheriting multiple interstitial deletion, one of which was 5q15-5q31 (17). However, most of these deletions included loss of 5q31 as the CDR of MDS del(5q) as well, which leaves our particular case unique so far. Although MDS del(5q) is usually associated with favorable risk of progression, data exist of AML-patients, displaying a karyotype including loss of 5q31 (15, 18, 19). Referring to the herein described unbalanced translocation, it is of note, that the specific CDR 5q31 of MDS with del(5q) remains partially preserved. However, 5q31represents the distinct breaking point. Thus, a fusion kinetic could be conceivable, as well.

Since 2005 lenalidomide has been FDA approved for patients with lower risk MDS del(5q) and failure of treatment with Erythropoiesis stimulating agents or dependency to RBC-transfusion (20). Lenalidomide is a very efficient treatment with high rates of CR and cCR with independence to RBC-transfusion (5). At the same time, lenalidomide does not seem to increase the rates of progression to AML (6). Most adverse effects were reported during first weeks of treatment most frequently in form of severe cytopenia (like thrombocytopenia and neutropenia) and could be resolved by dose reduction or disruption (3, 21). The greater challenge in clinical use of lenalidomide is posed by the fact, that a majority of the treated patients develop drug resistance upon time, due to PP2Acα-overexpression or evolving TP53-mutation (2). Therefore, regular controls of TP53 alterations are obligate. The median duration of response for isolated del(5q) is about 2.3 years (4). All three cases showed no alteration of TP53 at time of first diagnosis, nor during therapy with lenalidomide. In both cases treatment was paused after several months of stable cCR. Interestingly despite pausing lenalidomide, cCR could be maintained for more than 7 and 9 years without dependency to RBC-transfusions. Cases of prolonged transfusion independence and absence of cytopenia upon cessation of lenalidomide treatment have been described before (2226); the longest being 36 months (26). Giagounidids et al. report a case in which a treatment period of only 28 days was sufficient to achieve transfusion independence for 21 months (23). However, in most of these cases treatment success was referred to as the absence of transfusion dependency or severe cytopenia, but in most of the cases no stringent cytogenetic remission could be obtained. Notably, none of the cases describes the re-initiation of treatment leading to a second cCR, like shown in the herein described cases. These similar cases emphasize the need of addressing the question of how long lenalidomide treatment should last. Furthermore, it poses the concern, if a strict cCR will be obligate for pausing therapy. We therefore suggest that this strategy should be explored in a prospective clinical trial.

To our knowledge this is the first reported case of an unbalanced translocation between chromosome 2 and 5, leading to loss of 5q15-5q31 and responding to lenalidomide.

Conclusion

Our cases suggest that a drug holiday (like in CML) of lenalidomide upon reaching stable CR might be advisable to avoid drug resistance or clonal evolution. A clinical trial recommending the duration of lenalidomide therapy among MDS del(5q) would be of high interest.

Ethics Statement

Ethical review and approval were not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

AS and AK collected data for the study, searched the literature, and wrote the manuscript. CH provided part of the data, illustrations, and wrote methods. UP conceived the manuscript, reviewed topic presentation, structure of the manuscript, illustrations and photographs. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

The author(s) acknowledge support from the German Research Foundation (DFG) and Universität Leipzig within the program of Open Access Publishing.

Abbreviations

MDS, Myelodysplastic syndrome; cCR, cytogenetic complete Remission; RBC, red blood cell; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; IPSS, International Prognostic Scoring System; CDR, common region of deletion; Hb, hemoglobin.

References

1. Talati C, Sallman D, List A. Lenalidomide: Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Del(5q) and Beyond. Semin Hematol (2017) 54(3):159–66. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2017.06.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Fenaux P, Giagounidis A, Selleslag D, Beyne-Rauzy O, Mufti G, Mittelman M, et al. A Randomized Phase 3 Study of Lenalidomide Versus Placebo in RBC Transfusion-Dependent Patients With Low-/Intermediate-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Del5q. Blood (2011) 118(14):3765–76. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-330126

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. List A, Dewald G, Bennett J, Giagounidis A, Raza A, Feldman E, et al. Lenalidomide in the Myelodysplastic Syndrome With Chromosome 5q Deletion. N Engl J Med (2006) 355(14):1456–65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061292

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. List A, Kurtin S, Roe DJ, Buresh A, Mahadevan D, Fuchs D, et al. Efficacy of Lenalidomide in Myelodysplastic Syndromes. N Engl J Med (2005) 352(6):549–57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041668

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Kuendgen A, Lauseker M, List AF, Fenaux P, Giagounidis AA, Brandenburg NA, et al. Lenalidomide Does Not Increase AML Progression Risk in RBC Transfusion-Dependent Patients With Low- or Intermediate-1-Risk MDS With Del(5q): A Comparative Analysis. Leukemia (2013) 27(5):1072–9. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.369

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Platzbecker U, Kubasch AS, Homer-Bouthiette C, Prebet T. Current Challenges and Unmet Medical Needs in Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Leukemia (2021) 35(8):2182–98. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01265-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kronke J, Fink EC, Hollenbach PW, MacBeth KJ, Hurst SN, Udeshi ND, et al. Lenalidomide Induces Ubiquitination and Degradation of CK1alpha in Del(5q) MDS. Nature (2015) 523(7559):183–8. doi: 10.1038/nature14610

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Basiorka AA, McGraw KL, De Ceuninck L, Griner LN, Zhang L, Clark JA, et al. Lenalidomide Stabilizes the Erythropoietin Receptor by Inhibiting the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Rnf41. Cancer Res (2016) 76(12):3531–40. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1756

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Hiller B, Bradtke J, Balz H, Rieder H. CyDAS: A Cytogenetic Data Analysis System. Bioinformatics (2005) 21(7):1282–3. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti146

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Schoch C, Schnittger S, Bursch S, Gerstner D, Hochhaus A, Berger U, et al. Comparison of Chromosome Banding Analysis, Interphase- and Hypermetaphase-FISH, Qualitative and Quantitative PCR for Diagnosis and for Follow-Up in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Study on 350 Cases. Leukemia (2002) 16(1):53–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402329

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Hartmann L, Haferlach C, Meggendorfer M, Kern W, Haferlach T, Stengel A. Myeloid Malignancies With Isolated 7q Deletion can be Further Characterized by Their Accompanying Molecular Mutations. Genes Chromosomes Cancer (2019) 58(10):698–704. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22761

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Tobiasson M, Greenberg P. Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Moving Towards Personalized Management. Haematologica (2020) 105(7):1765–79. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.248955

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Boultwood J, Fidler C, Strickson AJ, Watkins F, Gama S, Kearney L, et al. Narrowing and Genomic Annotation of the Commonly Deleted Region of the 5q- Syndrome. Blood (2002) 99(12):4638–41. doi: 10.1182/blood.V99.12.4638

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Shen C, Nayak A, Neitzel LR, Adams AA, Silver-Isenstadt M, Sawyer LM, et al. The E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Component, Cereblon, is an Evolutionarily Conserved Regulator of Wnt Signaling. Nat Commun (2021) 12(1):5263. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25634-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Van den Berghe H, Cassiman JJ, David G, Fryns JP, Michaux JL, Sokal G. Distinct Haematological Disorder With Deletion of Long Arm of No. Chromosome Nat (1974) 251(5474):437–8. doi: 10.1038/251437a0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Santini V, Almeida A, Giagounidis A, Gropper S, Jonasova A, Vey N, et al. Randomized Phase III Study of Lenalidomide Versus Placebo in RBC Transfusion-Dependent Patients With Lower-Risk Non-Del(5q) Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Ineligible for or Refractory to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents. J Clin Oncol (2016) 34(25):2988–96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.66.0118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Swolin B, Weinfeld A, Ridell B, Waldenstrom J, Westin J. On the 5q- Deletion: Clinical and Cytogenetic Observations in Ten Patients and Review of the Literature. Blood (1981) 58(5):986–93. doi: 10.1182/blood.V58.5.986.986

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Wang Y, Xue Y, Chen S, Wu Y, Pan J, Zhang J, et al. A Novel T(5;11)(Q31;P15) Involving the NUP98 Gene on 11p15 is Associated With a Loss of the EGR1 Gene on 5q31 in a Patient With Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet (2010) 199(1):9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2010.01.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Kasi Loknath Kumar A, Weckbaugh B, Sirridge C, Woodroof J, Persons D, Kambhampati S. Myelodysplastic Syndrome With Concomitant T(5;21)(Q15;Q22) and Del(5)(Q13q33): Case Report and Review of Literature. Stem Cell Investig (2016) 3:3. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2306-9759.2016.02.01

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Greenberg PL, Stone RM, Al-Kali A, Barta SK, Bejar R, Bennett JM, et al. Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2017) 15(1):60–87. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Giagounidis A, Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, Muus P, Platzbecker U, Sanz G, et al. Practical Recommendations on the Use of Lenalidomide in the Management of Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Ann Hematol (2008) 87(5):345–52. doi: 10.1007/s00277-008-0449-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Durr D, Siciliano RD, Hummel Y, O’Meara A, Hirschi A, Burkhard R, et al. Lenalidomide in 5q Minus Myelodysplastic Syndrome: How Long is Enough? Ann Hematol (2010) 89(1):105–6. doi: 10.1007/s00277-009-0775-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Giagounidis AA, Haase S, Heinsch M, Gohring G, Schlegelberger B, Aul C. Lenalidomide in the Context of Complex Karyotype or Interrupted Treatment: Case Reviews of Del(5q)MDS Patients With Unexpected Responses. Ann Hematol (2007) 86(2):133–7. doi: 10.1007/s00277-006-0217-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Hatzimichael E, Lagos K, Vassou A, Gougopoulou D, Papoudou-Bai A, Briasoulis E. Durable Response to Lenalidomide in a Patient With Myelodysplastic Syndrome Associated With Isolated 5q Deletion and JAK2 V617F Mutation Despite Discontinuation of Treatment. Mol Clin Oncol (2016) 5(1):23–6. doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.866

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Pisani F, Orlandi G, Merola R. Long-Term Response in a Patient With Del(5q) Myelodysplastic Syndrome Who Discontinued Lenalidomide and Obtained a Good Response and Tolerance to Rechallenge. Case Rep Oncol (2014) 7(1):277–84. doi: 10.1159/000362643

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Vozella F, Latagliata R, Carmosino I, Volpicelli P, Montagna C, Romano A, et al. Lenalidomide for Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Del(5q): How Long Should it Last? Hematol Oncol (2015) 33(1):48–51. doi: 10.1002/hon.2134

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: MDS del(5q), lenalidomide, case-report, del(5q), t(2;5)

Citation: Stein A, Kubasch AS, Haferlach C and Platzbecker U (2022) Case Report: Personalized Therapeutical Approaches with Lenalidomide in Del(5q): A Case Series. Front. Oncol. 12:866470. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.866470

Received: 31 January 2022; Accepted: 09 March 2022;
Published: 31 March 2022.

Edited by:

Jeffrey J. Pu, University of Arizona, United States

Reviewed by:

Maria Teresa Voso, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy
Elliot Epner, Sierra Epigenetics, United States

Copyright © 2022 Stein, Kubasch, Haferlach and Platzbecker. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Anna Stein, YW5uYS5zdGVpbkBtZWRpemluLnVuaS1sZWlwemlnLmRl

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.