Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Oncol., 03 March 2022
Sec. Head and Neck Cancer
This article is part of the Research Topic Advances in the Involvement of Human Papilloma Virus in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma View all 15 articles

Editorial: Advances in the Involvement of Human Papilloma Virus in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • 1Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium
  • 2Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, University Paris Saclay, Paris, France
  • 3Department of Otolaryngology, Elsan Hospital, Paris, France
  • 4Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHRU de Lille, Hopital Claude Huriez, Lille, France
  • 5Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium

Background

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are the sixth most common cancers in males and the eighth most common in females worldwide, accounting for over 890,000 new cases in 2017 (1, 2). HNSCCs represent 5.3% of all cancers. From a mortality standpoint, they involve more than 500,000 deaths worldwide, representing 5.3% of all cancer deaths (2). Irrespective to the world region, the most prevalent HNSCCs in 2017 were lip and oral cavity (390,000 new cases), laryngeal (211,000 new cases), pharyngeal (179,000 new cases) and nasopharyngeal (110,000 new cases) carcinomas (2). The main risk factors for HNSCCs are alcohol and tobacco consumption and persistent infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) that is associated with the rising incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in the United States and Europe (3, 4). The incidence of HPV-induced HNSCC depends on the world region and the method used to assess the presence of HPV (5). The incidence of HPV-induced HNSCC has increased since the 80s (5).

HPV infection is predominantly attributable to subtypes HPV-16 and HPV-18 even if there is geographical heterogeneity between continents (3, 6, 7). Young, nondrinking and nonsmoking individuals with HPV-induced OSCC often have advanced carcinoma, but they have a better prognosis compared with patients with tobacco- and alcohol-induced OSCC (6, 7). The mechanisms underlying the better prognosis of patients with HPV-induced HNSCC remain poorly understood and may involve interactions between HPV antigens and the host-immune system, leading to an improved responses of immune cells against tumor (8). In that way, an increasing number of studies reported significant differences in the composition of tumor-infiltrating immune cells in HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC (8). Most authors recognized that the overexpression of some immune cells may be considered as a significant prognostic factor for HNSCC patients (8). In this Research Topic, several research groups published clinical and experimental studies about the involvement of HPV in the development of OSCC and non-OSCC.2

Immunological Features of HPV-Induced Carcinoma

The better survival outcomes of patients with HPV-positive OSCC may be explained by immunological differences between HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCCs. The HPV infection is associated with an increased CD8+ T tumor cell infiltration and PD-1 expression by CD8+ T cells in both OSCC and non-OSCC, which is associated with better overall survival (OS). The interaction between the tumor environment and CD8+ T cells is mediated through many cytokines, including IFN-g and IL-2, -4, -8, -12 and -17 (9, 10). Recent studies supported interactions between CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in HPV-positive HNSCC (8). Precisely, in tumor environment, CD4+ T cells may be converted into Th17 cells, which could potentiate the cytotoxic effects of CD8+ T cells against HPV-induced tumor cells (8). M1 and M2 macrophages are additional immune cells that may have an important role in HPV-induced carcinogenesis (11). M2 macrophages are involved in the enhancement of immunosuppression through the stimulation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) that induces a favorable environment for tumor growth through the secretion of TGF-b, TNF-a, and IL-10 (8). In HPV-negative HNSCC, an increased proportion of M2 cells is an important factor underlying the improvement of OS (8). The involvement of Foxp3 Tregs in HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC remains uncertain. Indeed, several researches showed that an increase of Tregs in HPV-positive HNSCC environment was associated with improved OS (8, 12), while others reported similar findings in HNSCC but no influence of the HPV status (8, 13). Foxp3 Tregs may inhibit the protumoral effects of inflammatory immune cells, which is a favorable prognostic marker at some tumor sites, whereas in other tumor sites, Treg infiltration may be associated with poor survival outcomes regarding their conventional regulatory function (13). The activation of Tregs may be associated with myeloid derived suppressor cells infiltration, these cells being associated with tumor progression and PD-L1 expression (14).

Limitations and Heterogeneity Studies

The findings of studies investigating the immune cell features of HPV-induced HNSCCs have to be considered with cautious because many limitations. The method used to determine the HPV status may significantly vary from one to another study. In many centers, the detection of HPV infection is made with p16 immunostaining. Some authors used p16 immunostaining to compare data from HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCCs, while others used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or other direct methods of DNA identification (15). In fact, some tumors can be HPV-positive/p16- or HPV-negative/p16+, which can be related to the lack of specificity of p16 in identifying HPV infection. As demonstrated in two studies (15, 16), the use of p16 immunostaining versus DNA detection may lead to substantial differences in the study results, which may bias the comparison between studies.

From an epidemiological standpoint, the analysis of study results (e.g. OS, disease-free survival) has to consider inclusion criteria. For example, the survival analysis according to the HPV stratus has to consider the ethnicity, tumor site, tobacco and alcohol histories, and the types of treatment (e.g. surgery, chemoradiation, radiotherapy or immunotherapy) (15); all of these points being known to influence the immune cell infiltrate.

Perspectives and Conclusion

Epidemiological, clinical, and immunological outcomes of HPV-induced HNSCCs are all points investigated in studies of this Research Topic. Precisely, the following outcomes were studied in the present Research Topic: prevalence data of HPV-induced HNSCC in Syria (16), importance of extranodal extension HPV-positive OSCC (Gupta et al.), tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy in OSCC (Beltz et al.), survival outcomes according to lymph node invasion in oral SCC (Welters et al.), nonsmoking and nondrinking outcomes in HNSCC (Li et al.; Yang et al.), the impact of tonsillectomy in the management of unknown primary HNSCC regarding p16 status (Mulder et al.), and recurrent respiratory papillomatosis risk factors (Podeur et al.). Many grey areas have to be explored in the next few years to better understand the prognosis differences between HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC patients, as well as the influence of some conditions on both immunological and survival features. A promising topic is the study of the influence of gut, laryngopharyngeal and oral microbiota on the immune regulation in tumor environment and its interaction with HPV infection.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

All reviewers who contributed to the reviewing process of this Research Topic.

References

1. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol (2019) 5:1749–68. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Aupérin A. Epidemiology of Head and Neck Cancers: An Update. Curr Opin Oncol (2020) 32(3):178–86. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000629

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Gillison ML, Koch WM, Capone RB, Spafford M, Westra WH, Wu L, et al. Evidence for a Causal Association Between Human Papillomavirus and a Subset of Head and Neck Cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst (2000) 92(9):709–20. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.9.709

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Filleul O, Preillon J, Crompot E, Lechien J, Saussez S. Incidence of Head and Neck Cancers in Belgium: Comparison With World Wide and French Data. Bull Cancer (2011) 98(10):1173–83. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2011.1456

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Gillison ML, Chaturvedi AK, Anderson WF, Fakhry C. Epidemiology of Human Papillomavirus-Positive Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol (2015) 33:3235–42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6995

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. O’Rorke MA, Ellison MV, Murray LJ, Moran M, James J, Anderson LA. Human Papillomavirus Related Head and Neck Cancer Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oral Oncol (2012) 48(12):1191–201. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.06.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Descamps G, Karaca Y, Lechien JR, Kindt N, Decaestecker C, Remmelink M, et al. Classical Risk Factors, But Not HPV Status, Predict Survival After Chemoradiotherapy in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol (2016) 142(10):2185–96. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2203-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Lechien JR, Seminerio I, Descamps G, Mat Q, Mouawad F, Hans S, et al. Impact of HPV Infection on the Immune System in Oropharyngeal and Non-Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. Cells (2019) 8(9):1061. doi: 10.3390/cells8091061

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Russell S, Angell T, Lechner M, Liebertz DJ, Correa AJ, Sinha UK, et al. Immune Cell Infiltration Patterns and Survival in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Head Neck Oncol (2013) 5(3):24.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

10. Partlová SM, Bouček JE, Kloudová KG, Lukešová E, Zábrodský M, Grega M, et al. Distinct Patterns of Intratumoral Immune Cell Infiltrates in Patients With HPV-Associated Compared to Non-Virally Induced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Oncoimmunology (2015) 4(1):e965570. doi: 10.4161/21624011.2014.965570

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Ou D, Adam J, Garberis I, Blanchard P, Nguyen F, Levy A, et al. Influence of Tumor-Associated Macrophages and HLA Class I Expression According to HPV Status in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Receiving Chemo/Bioradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol (2019) 130:89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.08.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Seminerio I, Descamps G, Dupont S, de Marrez L, Laigle JA, Lechien JR, et al. Infiltration of FoxP3+ Regulatory T Cells is a Strong and Independent Prognostic Factor in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) (2019) 11(2):227. doi: 10.3390/cancers11020227

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. De Meulenaere A, Vermassen T, Aspeslagh S, Zwaenepoel K, Deron P, Duprez F, et al. Prognostic Markers in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Focus on CD70 and Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocytes. Pathology (2017) 49(4):397–404. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2017.02.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Yu GT, Bu LL, Huang CF, Zhang WF, Chen WJ, Gutkind JS, et al. PD-1 Blockade Attenuates Immunosuppressive Myeloid Cells Due to Inhibition of CD47/Sirpα Axis in HPV Negative Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Oncotarget (2015) 6(39):42067–80. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5955

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Nordfors C, Grün N, Tertipis N, Ährlund-Richter A, Haeggblom L, Sivars L, et al. CD8+ and CD4+ Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Relation to Human Papillomavirus Status and Clinical Outcome in Tonsillar and Base of Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Eur J Cancer (2013) 49(11):2522–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.03.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Punt S, Dronkers EA, Welters MJ, Goedemans R, Koljenović S, Bloemena E, et al. A Beneficial Tumor Microenvironment in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Is Characterized by a High T Cell and Low IL-17(+) Cell Frequency. Cancer Immunol Immunother (2016) 65(4):393–403. doi: 10.1007/s00262–016–1805-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: cancer, head neck, HPV, human papillomavirus, carcinoma, otolaryngology, head neck, surgery

Citation: Lechien JR, Mouawad F, Hans S and Saussez S (2022) Editorial: Advances in the Involvement of Human Papilloma Virus in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 12:795280. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.795280

Received: 14 October 2021; Accepted: 31 January 2022;
Published: 03 March 2022.

Edited and reviewed by:

Jan Baptist Vermorken, University of Antwerp, Belgium

Copyright © 2022 Lechien, Mouawad, Hans and Saussez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jerome R. Lechien, Jerome.Lechien@umons.ac.be

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.