Sirin A. Adham
Myron R. Szewczuk
Fatima Mraiche
Emanuel Petricoin- 1Department of Biology, College of Science, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman
- 2Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- 3College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
- 4Institute for Biomedical Innovation, George Mason University, Manassas, VA, United States
Editorial on the Research Topic
Recent advancements in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for specific breast cancer subtypes
Introduction
Most locally advanced breast cancer patients undergo pre-surgery treatment known as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The purpose of NAC is to reduce the tumor’s size and improve surgical outcomes, cosmetic results, and chances of conservative breast surgery, control tumor progression and observe tumor sensitivity (or resistance) to the chosen treatment regimen (1–4). Several studies have suggested better survival outcomes in patients achieving complete pathological remission than in patients with residual or progressive disease at the time of definitive surgery (5, 6). However, the mechanisms of primary resistance and strategies to overcome those are a matter of intense research. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer subtype and is responsible for most of the annual mortality rate of breast cancer (7, 8).
This Research Topic focused on studies that tackle the most recent advances in treating breast cancer using NAC. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is used safely to treat breast cancer patients (9). In addition, it has a superior benefit over free doxorubicin since it is distributed in smaller volumes with extended circulation time (10). A recent clinical trial demonstrated that pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is safe for TNBC with a particular focus on elderly patients and those with risks of developing cardiotoxicity (Gil-Gil et al.)
Taxane, carboplatin, and trastuzumab (TCH) neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen along with HER-2 targeted therapy is the first line treatment for HER-2 positive tumors. However, some patients have residual tumors and do not achieve complete pathological response (pCR) with this regimen (11). Based on the KATHERINE trial, HER-2-positive patients with residual disease are subjected to treatment escalation either by adding another HER-2 inhibitor or prolonging the use of HER-2 adjuvant therapy (12). A study on this topic found that to screen out non-pCR patients, four cycles of TCH are the optimal treatment duration for screening high-risk HER2-positive breast cancer patients for escalation treatment, and there is no need for longer treatment cycles (Xie et al.)
Current cancer treatments focus on tailoring therapies based on unique biomarkers and tumor targets, including immunotherapy. One of the studies on this topic confirmed the efficacy and safety of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy TNBC, (Li et al.). This study included four different randomized controlled trials. The addition of the ICI to NAC increased the survival of TNBC regardless of the PD-L-1 status of the tumors, which is in line with many other recent studies that showed the positive benefit of adding immunotherapies with traditional NAC for the treatment of early TNBC (13, 14). In support of the latter, Pembrolizumab has been approved by the FDA along with NAC for the treatment of high-risk early-stage TNBC (15).
Following the NAC treatment, most patients would go for surgery. The surgical options can be either mastectomy or oncoplastic breast surgery, the latter usually provides the patient with better quality of life, and it is becoming a more common procedure (16). Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) showed various benefits over mastectomy (17); however, BCT is not considered for patients with tumors in the central and nipple portion (TCNP). The breast tumor location is an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer. Tumors that exist in the upper outer quadrant (UOQ) are the most prevalent and known to have better survival when compared with tumors that arise in the lower inner quadrant (LIQ) and medial regions (18). On the other hand, they had poor prognoses compared to other peripheral quadrants (19). In this topic, the authors added a new hope for patients with TCNP: BCT could be safely used since it exhibited a superior prognosis to mastectomy based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (Wang et al.).
In summary, the topic added recent advancements in NAC for breast cancer, which further contribute to our understanding of the best treatment options. One article concluded that PLD could be used safely in elderly patients, TNBC, and patients prone to cardiovascular diseases. Furthermore, four cycles of the neoadjuvant TCH with anti-HER-2 are the optimum duration for treatment escalation to screen out the patients who don’t achieve pCR. Moreover, the addition of ICI to the neoadjuvant preoperative treatment for TNBC showed better survival regardless of tumor PDL-1 status. Finally, patients with TCNP breast cancer can be operated on using BCT since the results indicated a superior prognosis to mastectomy. The Research Topic added new and valuable information to breast oncologists and clinical researchers.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Acknowledgments
We sincerely thank all the authors and reviewers participating in this Research Topic.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Kaufmann M, Von Minckwitz G, Mamounas EP, Cameron D, Carey LA, Cristofanilli M, et al. Recommendations from an international consensus conference on the current status and future of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol (2012) 19(5):1508–16. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2108-2
2. Piotrzkowska-Wróblewska H, Dobruch-Sobczak K, Klimonda Z, Karwat P, Roszkowska-Purska K, Gumowska M, et al. Monitoring breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with ultrasound signal statistics and integrated backscatter. PloS One (2019) 14(3):e0213749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213749
3. Liu S, Wang H, Li J, Zhang J, Wu J, Li Y, et al. FZR1 as a novel biomarker for breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy prediction. Cell Death Dis (2020) 11(9):1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03004-9
4. Duanmu H, Huang PB, Brahmavar S, Lin S, Ren T, Kong J, et al. Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using deep learning with integrative imaging, molecular and demographic data. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer: Tomography (2022) 8(6): 2784–95. doi: 10.3390/tomography8060232
5. Pereira NP, Curi C, Osório CA, Marques EF, Makdissi FB, Pinker K, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of patients with breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy provides early prediction of pathological response–a prospective study. Sci Rep (2019) 9(1):1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52785-3
6. Grapin M, Coutant C, Riedinger J-M, Ladoire S, Brunotte F, Cochet A, et al. Combination of breast imaging parameters obtained from 18F-FDG PET and CT scan can improve the prediction of breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in luminal/HER2-negative breast cancer. Eur J Radiol (2019) 113:81–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.005
7. Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, André F, Tordai A, Mejia JA, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (2008) 26(8):1275–81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.4147
8. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res (2007) 13(15):4429–34. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3045
9. O’Shaughnessy JA. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer (2003) 4(5):318–28. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2003.n.037
10. Solomon R, Gabizon AA. Clinical pharmacology of liposomal anthracyclines: focus on pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma (2008) 8(1):21–32. doi: 10.3816/CLM.2008.n.001
11. Goutsouliak K, Veeraraghavan J, Sethunath V, De Angelis C, Osborne CK, Rimawi MF, et al. Towards personalized treatment for early stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2020) 17(4):233–50. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0299-9
12. Joensuu H. Escalating and de-escalating treatment in HER2-positive early breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev (2017) 52:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.11.002
13. Loibl S, Schneeweiss A, Huober J, Braun M, Rey J, Blohmer J-U, et al. Neoadjuvant durvalumab improves survival in early triple-negative breast cancer independent of pathological complete response. Ann Oncol (2022) 33(11):1149–58. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1940
14. Schmid P, Cortes J, Dent R, Pusztai L, McArthur H, Kümmel S, et al. Event-free survival with pembrolizumab in early triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med (2022) 386(6):556–67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112651
15. Shah M, Osgood CL, Amatya AK, Fiero MH, Pierce WF, Nair A, et al. FDA Approval summary: pembrolizumab for neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of patients with high-risk early-stage triple negative breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2022). doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1110
16. Pardo-Garcia R, Montero-Fernandez MA. The interface between breast conserving surgery with oncoplastic techniques and mastectomy: when to perform one or the other–a narrative review. Ann Breast Surg (2022) 1–9. doi: 10.21037/abs-21-35
17. Nijenhuis MV, Emiel JT. Who should not undergo breast conservation? Breast (2013) 22:S110–S4. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.021
18. Kroman N, Wohlfahrt J, Mouridsen HT, Melbye M. Influence of tumor location on breast cancer prognosis. Int J Cancer (2003) 105(4):542–5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11116
Keywords: neoadjuvant chemotherapy, TNBC, conservative breast therapy, cardiotoxicity, breast cancer
Citation: Adham SA, Szewczuk MR, Mraiche F and Petricoin E (2022) Editorial: Recent advancements in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for specific breast cancer subtypes. Front. Oncol. 12:1100427. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1100427
Received: 16 November 2022; Accepted: 23 November 2022;
Published: 13 December 2022.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Kara Britt, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, AustraliaCopyright © 2022 Adham, Szewczuk, Mraiche and Petricoin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sirin A. Adham, c2FkaGFtQHNxdS5lZHUub20=; c2lyaW5hZGhhbUB5YWhvby5jb20=