Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Oncol., 27 October 2022
Sec. Cancer Imaging and Image-directed Interventions
This article is part of the Research Topic Reviews in Cancer Imaging and Image-directed Interventions View all 17 articles

Affinity probes based on small-molecule inhibitors for tumor imaging

Xinzeyu Yi&#x;Xinzeyu YiZheng Wang&#x;Zheng WangXiang Hu*Xiang Hu*Aixi Yu*Aixi Yu*
  • Department of Orthopedics Trauma and Microsurgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

Methods for molecular imaging of target areas, including optical imaging, radionuclide imaging, magnetic resonance imaging and other imaging technologies, are helpful for the early diagnosis and precise treatment of cancers. In addition to cancer management, small-molecule inhibitors are also used for developing cancer target probes since they act as the tight-binding ligands of overexpressed proteins in cancer cells. This review aims to summarize the structural designs of affinity probes based on small-molecule inhibitors from the aspects of the inhibitor, linker, dye and radionuclide, and discusses the influence of the modification of these structures on affinity and pharmacokinetics. We also present examples of inhibitor affinity probes in clinical applications, and these summaries will provide insights for future research and clinical translations.

Introduction

Multiple enzymes and receptor proteins in organisms are involved in life processes such as cell metabolism, proliferation, differentiation, migration, and apoptosis by regulating biochemical reactions or signaling pathways. Small-molecule inhibitors can regulate protein function by reversibly or irreversibly binding with these proteins (1, 2). By specifically binding to highly expressed proteins in cancer cells and producing effects, many small-molecule inhibitors have been used in targeted cancer therapy. Moreover, new targets and subtype-selective inhibitors have also been developed in response to the problems of cancer resistance and potential side effects (36). On this basis, affinity probes based on small-molecule inhibitors (AfPIs) for targeted cancer imaging have become research areas of major interest in recent years. Despite their severe metabolic problems, like peptide probes (7, 8), AfPIs not only have the advantages of non-immunogenicity, easy structure modification, fast target recognition, and strong affinity, but also have a broader biodistribution and a higher signal-to-noise ratio than antibody-conjugated probes or peptide probes (9, 10). Hence, they are efficient tools for cancer research and have broad application prospects in early diagnosis, prognosis assessment, surgery navigation and drug delivery monitoring (11, 12).

This review summarizes the tumor-targeting AfPIs emerging in recent years and aims to provide design strategies for developing novel AfPIs. The key challenges and corresponding solutions in the design of such probes are discussed below. Herein, we classify AfPIs into traditional visible-region, near-infrared, radiolabeled and dual-modal probes for comparison. We specifically focus on near-infrared and radiolabeled probes with promising clinical applications, and reveal the characteristics of the two probe types and provide references for future clinical translation. Scheme 1 summarises the classifications of AfPIs and their features.

SCHEME 1
www.frontiersin.org

Scheme 1 The classifications of AfPIs and their features. In this review, we classified AfPIs into visible-region, near-infrared, radiolabeled and dual-modal probes, and introduced them from three aspects: the inhibitors, linkers and dyes or radionuclides.

Visible-region AfPIs

Fluorescence imaging is an excellent, noninvasive imaging method that allows the visualization of cell status and many biochemical reactions (13, 14). The introduction of inhibitor structures enhances the targeting ability of probes to distinguish cancer from the normal region. This section focuses on the fluorescent AfPIs in the visible region (wavelength below 700 nm), mainly used for targeted imaging of cells or tissues. As shown in Figure 1, the recognition group Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) inhibitor SBE13 (15) was conjugated with linker and coumarin derivatives chosen for fluorophores, forming two kinds of PLK1 affinity probes, 1 and 2, with emission wavelengths of 480 nm and 660 nm, respectively. Modifying the coumarin structure in 2 resulted in intramolecular charge transfer (ICT), and a redshift close to the near-infrared region in its emission could be imaged in vivo (9). Overexpression of PLK1 in some human tumor cells makes it a target for antitumor drug treatment (16). By binding with PLK1, the probe is concentrated in the PLK1 kinase-rich region to distinguish it from normal regions. Although the imaging effect of 2 was demonstrated in vivo, 660 nm is insufficient to meet the needs of in vivo detection. In addition, inhibitors with unique structures can also serve as fluorescent moieties; hence, no extra dye conjugation is warranted. For instance, histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) inhibitors containing a naphthalimide skeleton, which is intrinsically fluorescent, were synthesized as inhibitor-based affinity probes (3 and 4) to detect the expression of HDAC6 in tumor cells (Figure 1) (17, 18). Moreover, there are affinity probes based on the biotin-avidin system that conjugate inhibitors and biotin for proteomic analysis and imaging in cells (19). However, these probes without an OFF-ON function will lead to false positives and phototoxicity because they will be retained in normal tissue regions and release fluorescence. Furthermore, their low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) blurs the tumor location (20, 21).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Some structures of traditional visible AfPIs and their parent inhibitors (Blue, inhibitor structure; green and red, fluorophores).

Hence, smart probes with an “OFF-ON” design appear more attractive. Because affinity probes bind to proteins directly, the “trigger” can be activated by changing the spatial conformation rather than an enzymatic or chemical reduction stimulus (22). Photoinduced electron transfer (PeT) involves a-PeT and d-PeT processes. In the a-PeT process, the inhibitor provides electrons to the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of the adjacent fluorophore. In contrast, the fluorophore donates its electrons to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the inhibitor in the d-PeT process. Finally, the electrons in the LUMO of the fluorophore fail to return to the HOMO, resulting in fluorescence quenching (23). When the inhibitor binds to the target, changes in the spatial structure or electronic energy levels will disrupt the process, releasing fluorescence (Figure 2). Based on this principle, Peng et al. (24) used the intramolecular spatial folding effect caused by small-molecule inhibitors and dyes to design the fluorescence probe 5 targeting the Golgi apparatus of cancer cells based on the cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitor indomethacin (IMC). When IMC binds to the amino acid residues Arg120, Tyr355 and Glu522 of the COX-2 molecule, its folded structure is open, and the PeT effect disappears, resulting in the release of fluorescence with a maximum excitation wavelength of 547 nm. Although the two-photon property of the probe has improved its tissue penetration to a certain extent, its emission wavelength still limits its application in biological imaging in vivo. Based on 5-bromobenzofuran-2-carboxylic acid, an inhibitor of Pim-1 kinase, Guo designed probe 6 with a PeT effect, whose emission wavelength reached the red light level and achieved live animal imaging of tumor xenograft mice (25). Similar to the COX-2 probe, probe 6 changes from the folded state to the unfolded state by binding with Pim-1 kinase, thereby removing the fluorescence quenching and releasing the fluorescence. Compared with traditional non-OFF-ON probes, this type of probe utilizes the conformational changes of inhibitors and dyes to exhibit a higher SNR, reduce the phototoxicity of nontargeted areas, and significantly reduce the false-positive phenomenon during imaging.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 The quenching mechanism of PeT effects and AfPIs are designed based on PeT effects. When probes do not bind to the proteins, the fluorescence is quenched by Pet effects. After binding to proteins, the folded structure is open and the PeT effect disappears, resulting in the release of fluorescence (HOMO, highest occupied molecular orbital; LUMO, lowest unoccupied molecular orbital).

Many commercial fluorescent dyes in the visible region have been developed (26), and less steric hindrance and better pharmacokinetics can be easily obtained by modifying the structure of dyes. However, due to the short wavelength of these probes, it is difficult to obtain good results for in vivo imaging, so they are more suitable for qualitative or semiquantitative research at the molecular level and imaging at the level of cells or tissue slices. Designing near-infrared probes with near-infrared dyes is the future trend in the clinical translation of AfPIs.

Near-infrared AfPIs

The near-infrared (NIR) band can be roughly divided into near-infrared window I (700-1000 nm) and near-infrared window II (1000-1700 nm) (27) and exhibits a higher penetrating capability than visible fluorescence in tissues. In addition, compared with traditional visible-light imaging, near-infrared imaging is less affected by biological matrix scattering and tissue autofluorescence, which gives it a higher signal-to-noise ratio and better spatial resolution. Therefore, near-infrared imaging is more suitable for in vivo imaging, and NIR AfPIs are also ideal for early diagnosis, surgery navigation and photothermal therapy of tumors (2830). Near-infrared inhibitor probes mainly include three structures: inhibitors, linkers and near-infrared dyes. The influences of these three structures on the affinity and metabolism of the probe and the design strategy of the probe are discussed in the following.

Inhibitor structure in AfPIs

The presence or absence of the inhibitor structure in the probe and the modification of crucial groups in the inhibitor structure will significantly impact the probe’s affinity and selectivity. Taking the monoamine oxidase (MAO) series of probes as an example, MAO is an important enzyme that regulates some biochemical reactions in the body, controlling the metabolism of catecholamines and serotonin. It plays a crucial role in the progression of tumors and Parkinson’s disease. MAO contains two isoforms: MAO-A and MAO-B. The original design of the MAO-A targeting probe 7 only contains a fluorophore and propylamine group as the recognition moiety. When propylamine meets MAO, the propylamine group undergoes a continuous oxidation/β-elimination reaction and is removed, releasing free fluorescent groups and producing fluorescence (31). However, this probe shows no subtype selectivity and has insufficient affinity. Based on this probe structure, Wu et al. (32) introduced the structure of the MAO-A selective inhibitor clorgyline to the probe (8), which gave the probe higher MAO-A affinity and selectivity. Replacement of the chlorine substituent on the benzene ring, such as the methoxy group (probe 9), drastically decreased the selectivity of the probe to lower than that of 8 but still higher than that of the previous generation probe 7, which lacked an inhibitor structure. Similarly, the clorgyline derivative probes 10 and 11 based on the dicyanomethylene-4H-pyran chromophore (DCM) structure developed by Yang et al. (33) had a higher selectivity for MAO-A than MAO-B, with relative fluorescence intensity of approximately 42-fold. However, when the halogen substituent was changed, the affinity of the unsubstituted (H atom) probe 12 decreased slightly, and the selectivity decreased by approximately 20-fold. The resulting product lost selectivity and affinity if it was substituted with methoxy or methyl. Comparing the performance of these probes shows that in addition to the fact that the halogen element chlorine plays a key role in binding, steric hindrance may also have a certain effect. This potential effect is consistent with previous molecular docking results for MAO-A and clorgyline (34). When clorgyline undergoes docking with MAO-A, two chlorine atoms form hydrogen bonds with the Cys323 and Thr326 residues of MAO-A (Figure 3A). These hydrogen bonds help stabilize the binding between the inhibitor and the protein. Wu et al. (35) chose to connect the NIR dye to the other end of the clorgyline to synthesize 13, protecting two chlorine atoms so that the probe had a more potent antitumor ability than the parent compound. Although the mitochondrial-targeting effect of the NIR dyes here contributes to the antitumor ability, it also illustrates the importance of protecting key groups.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Structures of clorgyline and clorgyline-derived AfPIs (Blue, inhibitor structure; red fluorophores). (A) Molecular docking shows that clorgyline forms hydrogen bonds between its chlorine atoms and the Cys323 and Thr326 residues of MAO-A (PDB ID: 2BXR).

The above studies indicate that the interaction between the targets of some key groups of AfPIs and the steric hindrance of some groups play critical roles in the performance of probe affinity. In designing AfPIs, the groups of the inhibitor that play a vital role in binding to the target must be protected to avoid diminishing the overall affinity of the probe. However, the loss of certain key groups does not necessarily or directly lead to the failure of probe imaging. For example, in the aforementioned OFF-ON probe based on the Pim-1 inhibitor, the carboxyl group on its parent inhibitor structure can form a salt bridge and hydrogen bond with Pim-1 kinase, which is crucial for binding kinase. And when the carboxyl group is destroyed, this will lead to an apparent loss of affinity (36). This result shows that imaging can still be achieved in the case of the loss of some key groups, possibly because the benzene ring still contains a bromine atom to help stabilize the binding, and the OFF-ON imaging mechanism avoids the fluorescence of probes when they are not bound to the kinase. This also illustrates the imaging advantages of OFF-ON probes from another aspect, which can avoid the problem that the tumor cannot be distinguished sufficiently from the surrounding normal tissues due to a loss of affinity.

Containing multiple inhibitor structures or co-targeting through multiple regions can also help probes more easily gather in the target region. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a peripheral glutamate carboxypeptidase, is a biomarker highly expressed by prostate cancer cells. PSMA is located on the cell membrane surface, and its active site faces the outside of the cell; this enzyme has become a common target for AfPIs (37). Its representative inhibitor structure is glutamate-urea-lysine. Based on this structure, the NIR dye can be connected to achieve targeted prostate cancer imaging (38, 39). On this basis, Kwon et al. (40) established two bivalent AfPIs, 15 and 16, with two GLU units, and these probes exhibited a higher tumor uptake rate than that with only one GLU unit (14). Later, 2-nitroimidazole, which has a targeted hypoxia effect, was introduced onto the other end of the structure to synthesize 17 (41) so that the dual-targeting effect of hypoxia and PSMA was achieved without significant loss of the original affinity of PSMA(Figure 4A). There was a partial loss of affinity in compound 18 with the introduction of two 2-nitroimidazole groups simultaneously, which may be ascribed to the increased steric hindrance. The simultaneous existence of multiple recognition groups further enhances the imaging effect, reducing the false-negative rate and thus identifying tumor regions more clearly. At the same time, attention needs to be paid to the increase in steric hindrance caused by introducing new groups.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Structures of the PSMA inhibitor and its derived AfPIs (Blue, GLU units Green, 2-nitroimidazole group). (A) Schematic of bivalent and dual-targeted AfPIs for prostate cancer (PC, prostate cancer).

When designing a novel AfPI, the factors affecting inhibitor affinity must be considered, and the probe should be designed as a new “inhibitor”. For example, when designing the structure of CYP1B1 targeted AfPI, Meng et al. (42) excluded areas bound to the enzyme and made modifications in a relatively safe area via molecular docking (Figure 5A). Wang et al. (46) avoided the sulfonamide structure of celecoxib and chose to modify the pyrazole ring position to reduce the loss of affinity. In this approach, determining the inhibitor’s crucial structure, attempting to protect these structures in connecting dyes and linkers, and performing molecular dynamics simulation on these structures is conducive to predicting whether the synthesized probe can bind to the target protein.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 Conjugations between inhibitors and NIR fluorophores. (A) Conducting molecular docking analysis of CYP1B1 inhibitor and its target before conjugation to avoid the loss of affinity. Reprinted with permission (42). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (B) The common types of NIR fluorophores. (C) Conjugating with the heptamethine cyanine dye MHI148 can improve the antitumor effect of the MAO-A inhibitor isoniazid. Reprinted with permission (43). Copyright 2018 Elsevier. (D) The conjugation of FTS with cancer-targeting heptamethine cyanine dye improved its pharmacological profile. Reprinted with permission (44). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (E) Molecular docking results demonstrated a 20 Å tunnel region in PSMA. Reprinted with permission (45). Copyright 2020 Elsevier.

Dyes and linkers in AfPIs

Near-infrared dyes can be roughly classified into two types: nonorganic and organic. Nonorganic dyes include single-walled carbon nanotubes, quantum dots, and rare-earth materials (26) (Figure 5B). Similar to antibodies, inhibitors can be introduced into these inorganic dyes through covalent or noncovalent binding to achieve targeted imaging (47, 48), in which covalent binding is more stable, and these inorganic materials can also be used to deliver targeted drugs to achieve the integration of diagnosis and treatment (49). However, these inorganic materials need to be functionalized in advance (50), and the limitations of water solubility, photothermal stability, immunity uptake and biological clearance in the body must be addressed (51).

Organic dyes have lower molecular weight and higher plasticity, biocompatibility and safety than inorganic dyes. Additionally, some of them have been approved for clinical use or have started in clinical trials, such as indocyanine green (ICG). Some heptamethine cyanine dyes can also preferentially accumulate in the mitochondria of tumor cells through the high expression of organic anion transporter peptides (OATPs) in tumors and the higher transmembrane potential of tumor cells (52, 53), and they can achieve tumor seeking, accumulation and retention via the covalent binding of meso-chlorine and albumin (54). The conjugation of these dyes and small-molecule inhibitors provides a way to change the pharmacokinetics (55). In addition, the overall properties of organic dyes, such as excitation/emission wavelengths, water-solubility and photostability, can be easily adjusted by chemical modification.

The introduction of dyes and linkers is related to the affinity and pharmacokinetics of the probe, and the differences in some substituents on these dyes will alter the probe metabolism and accumulation of the tumor area. Generally, when choosing dyes, better water solubility and higher emission wavelengths are pursued because these characteristics will be conducive to clinical translation. However, in the process of conjugating dyes, due to steric hindrance or changes in functional groups, the overall affinity of the probe will decrease, which is not conducive to later targeted imaging. Therefore, suitable dyes and synthetic routes should be chosen to avoid loss of affinity. Additionally, better imaging results can be achieved if improvements can be made to synthesize probes that overcome parent inhibitors’ deficiencies. Genistein has limited clinical antitumor applications because of its low oral bioavailability and poor pharmacokinetics. Guan et al. (56) conjugated genistein with the near-infrared dye IR-783 and used the advantage that IR-783 could be transported by OATPs and enriched in breast cancer cells to improve its antitumor effect and achieve NIR imaging. Similarly, Lv et al. (43)conjugated the MAO-A inhibitor isoniazid with the heptamethine cyanine dye MHI148 and used its mitochondrial targeting ability to obtain a theranostic probe for prostate cancer (Figure 5C), which showed a more potent antitumor effect than the parent inhibitor isoniazid. Similar designs have been reported in many other studies. When S-trans-trans-farnesyl salicylic acid (FTS), an RAS and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, was connected with the heptamethine cyanine dye, the inhibitory effect on mTOR and antitumor effect of the probe was better than FTS, and the EC50 was reduced from 51.3 nm to 16.8 nm (Figure 5D) (44). These results may be ascribed to the fact that the sulfonate group and the tumor-targeting ability of the dye improve its dose distribution. Inorganic dyes can also achieve this effect. Hu (7) combined carbon quantum dots with an ST14 (suppressor of tumorigenicity 14) inhibitor to improve renal clearance and increase the retention of the inhibitor in tumors, which is beneficial for its antitumor effect and imaging. These studies demonstrated that the improved pharmacokinetics ascribed to introducing dyes and linkers could enhance the tumor targeting and antitumor ability of AfPIs.

Although there have been many studies on AfPIs in the first NIR window, AfPIs whose emission wavelength falls in the second NIR window are just emerging (57, 58), and the wavelength of the existing inhibitor probes is generally low, possibly because it is relatively difficult to design novel dyes. To achieve a redshift of the wavelength, extended π conjugation is required (59). After the probe is combined with small molecules, the resulting structure will become more complex, and the binding effect will be more uncontrollable, so existing dyes are conjugated in most studies. Furthermore, when the wavelength of dyes redshifts to the second NIR window, their quantum yields drop sharply (60). Other issues that NIR dyes share, including water solubility and probe biocompatibility, are challenges that still need to be overcome in studying inhibitor NIR-II window probes.

The linker is also critical to the properties of the probes. It can avoid the effect of steric hindrance of the dye on the affinity of the inhibitor and can improve the metabolic kinetics of the probe through modifications, such as with polyethylene glycol (PEG). Taking prostate cancer as an example, Son et al. used the PEG chain as a linker to conjugate 4,4-difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (BODIPY) and Glu-CO-Lys to construct probes (45). The molecular docking results showed that the PEG linker was located in the tunnel region, with a length of approximately 20 Å (Figure 5E), which is consistent with previous findings (61). This design allows the entire fluorophore molecule to be outside the target molecule and avoids steric hindrance caused by the introduction of the bulky dye. PEG improves the water solubility and biocompatibility of the probe and eliminates adverse effects of the lipophilic dye BODIPY so that its metabolic kinetics in vivo are improved, and the overall affinity is also ensured. When Kwon et al. (40) attempted to change the glutamine structure in the linker to a benzene structure to obtain 16 based on the structure of 15, the probe showed slower clearance and lower affinity than 15 because of the introduction of the benzene ring structure on the linker. The same is true for the principle of designing radionuclide probes and modifications in the linker area can significantly improve the tumor uptake rate and in vivo pharmacokinetics (37, 62).

Clinical applications

The probe tool should be based on actual clinical problems and converted into clinical applications, which is our ultimate goal in designing AfPIs. Zhu et al. (63) used two AfPIs to perform dual-target imaging of BCL2 and MDM2, simultaneously detecting the activities/expression of apoptosis markers. Arlauckas et al. (64) designed and synthesized JAS239, a novel AfPIs targeting choline kinase alpha (ChoKα), and realized the goals of breast cancer imaging, antitumor therapy and monitoring choline metabolism in breast cancer. Osada et al. (65) took heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) as the target and used the inhibitor SNX-5422 to connect the near-infrared dye with the PEG chain as the linker to image the target area of the subtype estrogen receptor-positive luminal invasive lobular carcinoma. Their study was representative of the use of imaging to detect a histological subtype that is difficult to diagnose early. This application reflects the advantages of inhibitor probe imaging at the molecular level, which can achieve subtype classification and higher sensitivity than traditional imaging examination (66). It is also possible to use heat shock protein inhibitors to target and inhibit the overexpression of heat shock proteins in tumor cells, thereby enhancing the efficiency of NIR photothermal therapy (67). In addition, there are applications such as surgery navigation and postoperative reconfirmation of the tumor area (57, 68). The design of these probes is based on an actual clinical problem rather than simple imaging and diagnosis of tumors, so they have a promising application prospect in the clinic.

This section mainly discusses the three key elements, inhibitors, dyes and linkers, and their novel applications in the design of NIR AfPIs, with MAO and PSMA inhibitors as examples. Each element may have a significant impact on the fundamental properties of the probe. When designing the structure, not only the properties of the three elements but also the interactions between them must be considered to improve the pharmacokinetics and avoid adverse effects such as decreased affinity caused by the increased steric hindrance.

Radiolabeled AfPIs

According to the imaging principle, radiolabeled AfPIs can be classified into single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) probes. Compared with SPECT, PET has a lower radiation dose and higher resolution and sensitivity, but the high costs limit its application in primary medical institutions (69). SPECT probes can provide longer image acquisition time due to a longer half-life (a few hours to a few days). Unlike PET, which emits two 511-eV photons, SPECT probes can emit photons with different energies, allowing multiple probes to be imaged simultaneously (70, 71). Our focus is on the imaging effect of radioactive probes based on inhibitors, and due to the differences in radionuclides, the design ideas of the probes will differ significantly. Radioactive elements commonly used in labeling inhibitors include nonmetallic C, F, Br and I, while metal elements include Ga, Cu, Tc and Zr. Depending on their isotopes, Ga and I can be used for PET or SPECT imaging.

Nonmetallic radionuclide labels

Nonmetallic radionuclide labels can be introduced with a low influence on the affinity of inhibitors because nonradioactive carbon, nitrogen and oxygen atoms are inherently present in various biomolecules and compounds. As a result, compared with the nonlabeled inhibitors, only minimal changes occur in the chemical properties of the final probes. In the PET imaging [11C] NMS-E973 probe constructed by Vermeulen et al. (72), the carbon atoms on the methyl group of the Hsp90 inhibitor NMS-E973 (19) (73) were replaced with 11C (20) to conduct in vivo melanoma imaging. The time of synthesis and purification should be limited to 2-3 half-lives to ensure the effectiveness of the radiolabeled APSMI (74), and the half-life of 11C is short, which limits its clinical application. However, the introduction of 11C generally does not change the pharmacological properties of the parent inhibitor, and it can be used to study the fate of the inhibitor in vivo. Brown et al. (75) used the 11C-labeled focal adhesion kinase (FAK) inhibitor GSK2256098 to study the pharmacokinetics of parent inhibitor in vivo and compared the distribution of probes in normal brain and tumor tissues to study the impact of tumors on the blood-brain barrier. Yu et al. (76) labeled the transient receptor potential channel subfamily member 5 (TRPC5) inhibitor HC608 (21) to obtain 22 to study its metabolism in vivo and the effect of targeting TrpC5. Moreover, the half-lives of 13N and 15O, at 10 min and 2 min, respectively, are too short to be used for labeling inhibitors.

Probes labeled with halogen radionuclides have been widely used to diagnose tumors and metastases in the clinic. 18F-labeled fludeoxyglucose (FDG) as a PET probe has been used particularly often (77), but due to the active glucose metabolism in the brain and inflammation, it still has limitations in tumor imaging (7880). Such probes based on small-molecule inhibitors can reduce the false-positive rate because AfPIs can specifically bind to the target, and some of them have entered clinical trials (81). For inhibitors with fluorine in the structure, the loss of affinity caused by radiolabeling can be avoided, such as by replacing the fluorine atom (24) or carbon atom (25) on the benzene ring of the ROS1 inhibitor lorlatinib (23) (82). For inhibitors that do not contain fluorine atoms, 18F can be substituted for a hydrogen atom or hydroxyl group through electrophilic or nucleophilic reactions, which will not cause significant steric hindrances because of their similar sizes. Additionally, the C-F bond formed is stronger than the C-H bond and thus is not easily destroyed in the body (83), which can decrease false positives in imaging. In the [18F] labeled tropomyosin receptor kinase (Trk) inhibitor (27) synthesized by Bernard-Gauthier et al. (84), the hydrogen atom on the benzene ring was replaced on the parent inhibitor (26), resulting in a loss of affinity. However, this loss is acceptable because it does not considerably affect the imaging effect of the probe (Figures 6A, B). Another method to add F to the noncritical area of the inhibitor, such as the PEG chain (28), which can also avoid the damage of steric hindrance to the affinity, can improve the metabolic kinetics of the probe and is conducive to the imaging effect (62, 85). However, it is necessary to verify the affinity of probes by molecular docking and affinity experiments.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6 Some structures of radiolabeled AfPIs with nonmetallic radionuclide labels(Red: radionuclide labels). (A, B) The molecular docking result of [18F] labeled TrkA inhibitor with TrkA protein showed that the labeled inhibitor could bind with Trk. Reprinted with permission (84). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.

Radiobromine and radioiodine are also commonly used labeling inhibitors. 76Br (29) (86) and 124I (87) are used for PET imaging and 123I/125I (30) (88, 89) for SPECT Imaging. Although the steric hindrance of I and Br is greater than that of F, inhibitors can still be introduced through the abovementioned strategy, with a slight loss of affinity. In addition, these radionuclides exhibit a longer half-life than 18F, facilitating the final synthesis of the AfPIs. When these halogen radionuclides are introduced, they may have greater affinity than the parent inhibitors (90), possibly ascribed to the electronegativity of the halogen radionuclides and the extra hydrogen bond formed between the radionuclides and the target receptor.

In general, introducing nonmetallic radionuclide labels to inhibitors to realize tumor imaging is relatively simple. Direct replacement of the original nonradioactive atoms or adding radionuclide with a linker, such as PEG, can avoid diminishing the affinity.

Metallic radionuclide labels

Unlike nonmetallic radionuclide labels, metallic radionuclides cannot be directly introduced into the inhibitor, so the aid of a metal chelating agent is required. To allow the inhibitors to be labeled without considerably changing their physicochemical properties, bifunctional chelating agents are ideal candidates, which can conjugate with metal ions and inhibitors and can easily react with common functional groups (such as carboxyl, amino and alkyne/azide groups) on inhibitors to form stable covalent bonds (91).

Bifunctional chelating agents can be roughly classified into acyclic and macrocyclic, and the latter is more stable in complexation than the former (92). As a part of the linker in the probe, the chelating agent should be chosen after considering the following factors. The first requirement is that it does not affect the affinity of the original inhibitor and ensures that the ligand can bind to the target later. The design is the same as other AfPIs: The chelating agent cannot affect the critical binding group, and the change in steric hindrance needs to be considered. Second, the thermodynamic stability and kinetic inertness of the chelating agent should be ideal to avoid the release of metal ions to cause biological toxicity (93). During the synthetic process, the production of isomers should also be circumvented to avoid affecting the overall physicochemical properties of the probe. Based on the chelating agent, the metabolism of the probe can be improved by inserting hydrophobic/hydrophilic groups to achieve a careful balance, obtaining the optimal imaging effect. In addition, the insertion of PEG can improve water solubility and promote metabolism, which is governed by the same principle described above. The properties of metal radionuclides, such as size, shape and coordination number, also affect the choice of the chelating agent (94, 95). Therefore, when choosing a chelating agent, the nature of the metal radionuclides should be considered. Commonly used chelating agents for a given radionuclide are often not bad choices.

In summary, the design of radiolabeled AfPIs differs according to the kind of radionuclide. For nonmetal radionuclides, the atoms or groups in the parent inhibitor can be substituted directly, while for metal radionuclides, bifunctional chelating agents are warranted to reduce the loss of affinity. Regardless of the type, the main idea is to complete radionuclide labeling without lowering the affinity of the parent inhibitor while considering the metabolism and biological safety of the final product.

Dual-modal AfPIs

The advantage of dual-modal probes is that they combine the two imaging technologies to take full advantage of each technique and offset their disadvantages, achieving the goals of high sensitivity and high resolution simultaneously. The most direct examples are PET/CT, SPECT/CT and PET/MRI, which use the anatomical information provided by CT or MRI technology to offset the insufficient spatial resolution of PET/SPECT, and these approaches have also been widely used in the clinic. PET/optical imaging (OI) or SPECT/OI can overcome not only the insufficient tissue penetration of fluorescent probes but also provide higher imaging resolution than PET and SPECT. Based on the connection of the PSMA inhibitor to the Cy3 fluorescent dye, Kommidi et al. (96) introduced 18F through the click reaction at the distal end of the linker to achieve dual-modal imaging. PET imaging is helpful for preoperative planning, while fluorescence imaging can help surgery navigation for tumor resection and reconfirm the edge after surgery. Metal radionuclides can also be labeled on inhibitors with fluorescent dyes using bifunctional chelating agents. Baranski et al. (68) used Glu-urea-Lys-HBED-CC as the core structure to connect 68Ga and various fluorescent dyes, and performed fluorescence-guided tumor resection in mice using a probe connected with IRDye 800CW. Near-infrared dyes provide a greater imaging depth for fluorescence imaging, making fluorescence-guided surgical resection possible, and deeper tumor tissues need to be positioned by PET before surgery. In addition to diagnosis and surgery navigation, PET/OI can be used to observe the administration and metabolism of the inhibitor by labeling the parent structure. Wang et al. (11) designed a PET/OI dual-modal dasatinib probe to compare the effect of convection-enhanced delivery on bypassing the blood-brain barrier and delivering it to glioma by intravenous administration. Fluorescence imaging overcomes the shortcoming that PET cannot monitor drug delivery at the cellular level. These applications are examples of solving clinical needs through the combination of radionuclide imaging and optical imaging. In addition, by adding functional groups, such as amino groups, to α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles, inhibitors and fluorescent dyes can be labeled to achieve MRI/OI dual-modal imaging (97).

As with single-modal AfPIs, the affinity, metabolism and tissue distribution should also be considered for dual-modal AfPIs. Conducting multiple labeling at the same time will inevitably cause more significant potential damage to affinity because it may alter more groups or cause greater steric hindrance, so additional dyes and radionuclide labeling should be as far as possible from the target area when the probe structure is being designed. Metabolism and tissue distribution need to be modified according to the in vivo performance of the core structure of probes. For example, Kimura et al. (98) used hydrophobic Cy5.5 dye to enhance tumor retention and reduce the impact of 64Cu labeling on the imaging effect. Alternatively, increasing the number of sulfonate groups could improve the water solubility of the probe and switch the hepatobiliary to renal elimination, and a more concentrated signal at the tumor was obtained (99). Therefore, further structure modification can improve the metabolism and tissue distribution and eliminate the influence of multiple labels on the imaging effect of the probe.

Although much progress has been made in dual-modal imaging in recent years, the bimodal imaging probes including the dual-modal AfPIs still fall short of applicability in the clinic due to the limitations of the development of imaging instruments and software. However, these dual-modal or trimodal probes can provide more anatomical or functional information, and this considerable advantage is worthy of more research and development.

Conclusion

The design and synthesis of AfPIs involve interdisciplinary research, and numerous issues need to be considered, including the affinity, distribution and pharmacokinetics in vivo of probes; the synthetic route; and translation to clinical applicability. It is necessary to perform molecular docking before designing probes to determine the effect of changes in steric hindrance and modification of moieties on their affinity. Moreover, the probe’s fate in vivo is crucial for imaging, and appropriate dyes and linkers can significantly improve the pharmacokinetic and imaging efficacy of the probe.

Over the last decade, there have been tremendous advances in the research of AfPIs. The AfPIs have been proved to have better specificity, smaller molecular weight, lower immunogenicity and faster targeting than protein and peptide probes. Although there are many reports on radiolabeled AfPIs, and some have entered into clinical trials, there is considerable room for improvement in NIR and dual-modal AfPIs, especially in the second NIR window. This challenge is related to the lack of suitable dyes and the greater difficulty of design and synthesis in the second NIR window probe. Therefore, problems such as developing new-generation inhibitors, NIR dyes and bifunctional chelators, improving quantum yield, and biological safety are still hindering the clinical application of AfPIs and are warranted to be solved. Finally, the probe is only a tool, and the ultimate objective is to solve medical needs. Hence, the final product should be convenient for clinical application in disease diagnosis or treatment.

In conclusion, it remains to be seen whether AfPIs can be applied in the clinic. However, with the development of more economical imaging instruments and new-generation inhibitors with fewer side effects and better selectivity, and the urgent need for more reliable detection methods and more efficient and safer treatment for cancer, AfPIs have broad prospects for cancer diagnosis and treatment monitoring.

Author contributions

XY: initiating and writing the manuscript. ZW: initiating and writing the manuscript. XH: revising and editing the manuscript. AY: revising and editing the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research is funded by the Open Competition Mechanism Science and Technology Project of Hubei Province (2022, NO.028).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Sharpe AH, Pauken KE. The diverse functions of the Pd1 inhibitory pathway. Nat Rev Immunol (2018) 18(3):153–67. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Lv PC, Jiang AQ, Zhang WM, Zhu HL. Fak inhibitors in cancer, a patent review. Expert Opin Ther Pat (2018) 28(2):139–45. doi: 10.1080/13543776.2018.1414183

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Gorecki L, Andrs M, Rezacova M, Korabecny J. Discovery of atr kinase inhibitor berzosertib (Vx-970, M6620): Clinical candidate for cancer therapy. Pharmacol Ther (2020) 210:107518. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107518

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Huang Y, Su R, Sheng Y, Dong L, Dong Z, Xu H, et al. Small-molecule targeting of oncogenic fto demethylase in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell (2019) 35(4):677–91 e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.03.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Inoue-Yamauchi A, Jeng PS, Kim K, Chen HC, Han S, Ganesan YT, et al. Targeting the differential addiction to anti-apoptotic bcl-2 family for cancer therapy. Nat Commun (2017) 8:16078. doi: 10.1038/ncomms16078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Han H, Jain AD, Truica MI, Izquierdo-Ferrer J, Anker JF, Lysy B, et al. Small-molecule myc inhibitors suppress tumor growth and enhance immunotherapy. Cancer Cell (2019) 36(5):483–97 e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.10.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hu P, Shang L, Chen J, Chen X, Chen C, Hong W, et al. A nanometer-sized protease inhibitor for precise cancer diagnosis and treatment. J Mater Chem B (2020) 8(3):504–14. doi: 10.1039/c9tb02081k

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Werle M, Bernkop-Schnurch A. Strategies to improve plasma half life time of peptide and protein drugs. Amino Acids (2006) 30(4):351–67. doi: 10.1007/s00726-005-0289-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Hou JT, Ko KP, Shi H, Ren WX, Verwilst P, Koo S, et al. Plk1-targeted fluorescent tumor imaging with high signal-to-Background ratio. ACS Sens (2017) 2(10):1512–6. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00544

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Loktev A, Lindner T, Mier W, Debus J, Altmann A, Jager D, et al. A tumor-imaging method targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts. J Nucl Med (2018) 59(9):1423–9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.210435

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Wang M, Kommidi H, Tosi U, Guo H, Zhou Z, Schweitzer ME, et al. A murine model for quantitative, real-time evaluation of convection-enhanced delivery (Rt-ced) using an (18)[F]-positron emitting, fluorescent derivative of dasatinib. Mol Cancer Ther (2017) 16(12):2902–12. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Chou PH, Luo CK, Wali N, Lin WY, Ng SK, Wang CH, et al. A chemical probe inhibitor targeting Stat1 restricts cancer stem cell traits and angiogenesis in colorectal cancer. J BioMed Sci (2022) 29(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12929-022-00803-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Markiewicz R, Litowczenko J, Gapinski J, Wozniak A, Jurga S, Patkowski A. Nanomolar nitric oxide concentrations in living cells measured by means of fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Molecules (2022) 27(3):1010. doi: 10.3390/molecules27031010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Danylchuk DI, Jouard PH, Klymchenko AS. Targeted solvatochromic fluorescent probes for imaging lipid order in organelles under oxidative and mechanical stress. J Am Chem Soc (2021) 143(2):912–24. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c10972

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Keppner S, Proschak E, Schneider G, Spankuch B. Identification and validation of a potent type ii inhibitor of inactive polo-like kinase 1. ChemMedChem (2009) 4(11):1806–9. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.200900338

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Yu Z, Deng P, Chen Y, Liu S, Chen J, Yang Z, et al. Inhibition of the Plk1-coupled cell cycle machinery overcomes resistance to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer. Adv Sci (Weinh) (2021) 8(23):e2100759. doi: 10.1002/advs.202100759

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Ho YH, Wang KJ, Hung PY, Cheng YS, Liu JR, Fung ST, et al. A highly Hdac6-selective inhibitor acts as a fluorescent probe. Org Biomol Chem (2018) 16(42):7820–32. doi: 10.1039/c8ob00966j

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Zhang Y, Yan J, Yao TP. Discovery of a fluorescent probe with Hdac6 selective inhibition. Eur J Med Chem (2017) 141:596–602. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.10.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Chen WL, Li DD, Wang ZH, Xu XL, Zhang XJ, Jiang ZY, et al. Design, synthesis, and initial evaluation of affinity-based small molecular probe for detection of Wdr5. Bioorg Chem (2018) 76:380–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2017.11.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Zhang Y, Zhang X-F, Chen Q, Cao X-Q, Shen S-L. A novel near-infrared fluorescence off-on probe for imaging hypoxia and nitroreductase in cells and in vivo. Sens Actuators B: Chem (2022) 353:131145. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2021.131145

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Zhu S, Lu Y, Jin J, Yu J, Lu W. An Hsp90 inhibitor based fluorescent probe for selective tumor targeting. Dyes Pigm (2021) 196:109783. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2021.109783

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Bian J, Li X, Xu L, Wang N, Qian X, You Q, et al. Affinity-based small fluorescent probe for Nad(P)H:Quinone oxidoreductase 1 (Nqo1). design, synthesis and pharmacological evaluation. Eur J Med Chem (2017) 127:828–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.10.062

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Sun W, Li M, Fan J, Peng X. Activity-based sensing and theranostic probes based on photoinduced electron transfer. Acc Chem Res (2019) 52(10):2818–31. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00340

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Zhang H, Fan J, Wang J, Zhang S, Dou B, Peng X. An off-on cox-2-Specific fluorescent probe: Targeting the golgi apparatus of cancer cells. J Am Chem Soc (2013) 135(31):11663–9. doi: 10.1021/ja4056905

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Guo S, Fan J, Wang B, Xiao M, Li Y, Du J, et al. Highly selective red-emitting fluorescent probe for imaging cancer cells in situ by targeting pim-1 kinase. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces (2018) 10(2):1499–507. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b14553

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Kenry, Duan Y, Liu B. Recent advances of optical imaging in the second near-infrared window. Adv Mater (2018) 30(47):e1802394. doi: 10.1002/adma.201802394

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Zhu S, Tian R, Antaris AL, Chen X, Dai H. Near-Infrared-Ii molecular dyes for cancer imaging and surgery. Adv Mater (2019) 31(24):e1900321. doi: 10.1002/adma.201900321

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Tang C, Du Y, Liang Q, Cheng Z, Tian J. Development of a novel histone deacetylase-targeted near-infrared probe for hepatocellular carcinoma imaging and fluorescence image-guided surgery. Mol Imaging Biol (2020) 22(3):476–85. doi: 10.1007/s11307-019-01389-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Mukkamala R, Lindeman SD, Kragness KA, Shahriar I, Srinivasarao M, Low PS. Design and characterization of fibroblast activation protein targeted pan-cancer imaging agent for fluorescence-guided surgery of solid tumors. J Mater Chem B (2022) 10(12):2038–46. doi: 10.1039/d1tb02651h

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Wang W, Zhang X, Ni X, Zhou W, Xie C, Huang W, et al. Semiconducting polymer nanoparticles for nir-ii fluorescence imaging-guided Photothermal/Thermodynamic combination therapy. Biomater Sci (2022) 10(3):846–53. doi: 10.1039/d1bm01646f

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Albers AE, Rawls KA, Chang CJ. Activity-based fluorescent reporters for monoamine oxidases in living cells. Chem Commun (Camb) (2007) 44):4647–9. doi: 10.1039/b713190a

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Wu X, Shi W, Li X, Ma H. A strategy for specific fluorescence imaging of monoamine oxidase a in living cells. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl (2017) 56(48):15319–23. doi: 10.1002/anie.201708428

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Yang Z, Li W, Chen H, Mo Q, Li J, Zhao S, et al. Inhibitor structure-guided design and synthesis of near-infrared fluorescent probes for monoamine oxidase a (Mao-a) and its application in living cells and in vivo. Chem Commun (Camb) (2019) 55(17):2477–80. doi: 10.1039/c8cc10084e

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Ma J, Yoshimura M, Yamashita E, Nakagawa A, Ito A, Tsukihara T. Structure of rat monoamine oxidase a and its specific recognitions for substrates and inhibitors. J Mol Biol (2004) 338(1):103–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Wu JB, Lin TP, Gallagher JD, Kushal S, Chung LW, Zhau HE, et al. Monoamine oxidase a inhibitor-near-Infrared dye conjugate reduces prostate tumor growth. J Am Chem Soc (2015) 137(6):2366–74. doi: 10.1021/ja512613j

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Xiang Y, Hirth B, Asmussen G, Biemann HP, Bishop KA, Good A, et al. The discovery of novel benzofuran-2-Carboxylic acids as potent pim-1 inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett (2011) 21(10):3050–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.03.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Krishnan MA, Pandit A, Sharma R, Chelvam V. Imaging of prostate cancer: Optimizing affinity to prostate specific membrane antigen by spacer modifications in a tumor spheroid model. J Biomol Struct Dyn (2021) 39:1–22. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2021.1936642

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Matsuoka D, Watanabe H, Shimizu Y, Kimura H, Yagi Y, Kawai R, et al. Structure-activity relationships of succinimidyl-Cys-C(O)-Glu derivatives with different near-infrared fluorophores as optical imaging probes for prostate-specific membrane antigen. Bioorg Med Chem (2018) 26(9):2291–301. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2018.03.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Overchuk M, Damen MPF, Harmatys KM, Pomper MG, Chen J, Zheng G. Long-circulating prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted nir phototheranostic agent. Photochem Photobiol (2020) 96(3):718–24. doi: 10.1111/php.13181

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Kwon YD, Chung HJ, Lee SJ, Lee SH, Jeong BH, Kim HK. Synthesis of novel multivalent fluorescent inhibitors with high affinity to prostate cancer and their biological evaluation. Bioorg Med Chem Lett (2018) 28(4):572–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.01.047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Kwon YD, Oh JM, La MT, Chung HJ, Lee SJ, Chun S, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of multifunctional fluorescent inhibitors with synergistic interaction of prostate-specific membrane antigen and hypoxia for prostate cancer. Bioconjug Chem (2019) 30(1):90–100. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00767

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Meng Q, Wang Z, Cui J, Cui Q, Dong J, Zhang Q, et al. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of cytochrome P450 1b1 targeted molecular imaging probes for colorectal tumor detection. J Med Chem (2018) 61(23):10901–9. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Lv Q, Yang X, Wang M, Yang J, Qin Z, Kan Q, et al. Mitochondria-targeted prostate cancer therapy using a near-infrared fluorescence dye-monoamine oxidase a inhibitor conjugate. J Control Release (2018) 279:234–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.04.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Guan Y, Zhang Y, Xiao L, Li J, Wang JP, Chordia MD, et al. Improving therapeutic potential of farnesylthiosalicylic acid: Tumor specific delivery Via conjugation with heptamethine cyanine dye. Mol Pharm (2017) 14(1):1–13. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00906

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Son SH, Kwon H, Ahn HH, Nam H, Kim K, Nam S, et al. Design and synthesis of a novel bodipy-labeled psma inhibitor. Bioorg Med Chem Lett (2020) 30(3):126894. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.126894

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Wang X, Wang L, Xie L, Xie Z, Li L, Bui D, et al. Design and synthesis of a novel nir celecoxib-based fluorescent probe for cyclooxygenase-2 targeted bioimaging in tumor cells. Molecules (2020) 25(18):4037. doi: 10.3390/molecules25184037

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Kulkarni NS, Parvathaneni V, Shukla SK, Barasa L, Perron JC, Yoganathan S, et al. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor conjugated quantum dots for non-small cell lung cancer (Nsclc) treatment. Eur J Pharm Sci (2019) 133:145–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2019.03.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Asha Krishnan M, Yadav K, Roach P, Chelvam V. A targeted near-infrared nanoprobe for deep-tissue penetration and imaging of prostate cancer. Biomater Sci (2021) 9(6):2295–312. doi: 10.1039/d0bm01970d

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Lin R, Huang J, Wang L, Li Y, Lipowska M, Wu H, et al. Bevacizumab and near infrared probe conjugated iron oxide nanoparticles for vascular endothelial growth factor targeted Mr and optical imaging. Biomater Sci (2018) 6(6):1517–25. doi: 10.1039/c8bm00225h

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Gao MX, Yang L, Zheng Y, Yang XX, Zou HY, Han J, et al. “Click” on alkynylated carbon quantum dots: An efficient surface functionalization for specific biosensing and bioimaging. Chem - A Eur J (2017) 23(9):2171–8. doi: 10.1002/chem.201604963

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Liu J, Zhao X, Xu H, Wang Z, Dai Z. Amino acid-capped water-soluble near-infrared region Cuins2/Zns quantum dots for selective cadmium ion determination and multicolor cell imaging. Anal Chem (2019) 91(14):8987–93. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01183

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Yi X, Cao Z, Yuan Y, Li W, Cui X, Chen Z, et al. Design and synthesis of a novel mitochondria-targeted osteosarcoma theranostic agent based on a Pim1 kinase inhibitor. J Control Release (2021) 332:434–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.02.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Zhang C, Liu T, Luo P, Gao L, Liao X, Ma L, et al. Near-infrared oxidative phosphorylation inhibitor integrates acute myeloid leukemia-targeted imaging and therapy. Sci Adv (2021) 7(1):eabb6104. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb6104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Usama SM, Lin CM, Burgess K. On the mechanisms of uptake of tumor-seeking cyanine dyes. Bioconjug Chem (2018) 29(11):3886–95. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00708

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Usama SM, Park GK, Nomura S, Baek Y, Choi HS, Burgess K. Role of albumin in accumulation and persistence of tumor-seeking cyanine dyes. Bioconjug Chem (2020) 31(2):248–59. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00771

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Guan Y, Zhang Y, Zou J, Huang LP, Chordia MD, Yue W, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of genistein-Ir783 conjugate: Cancer cell targeted delivery in mcf-7 for superior anti-cancer therapy. Molecules (2019) 24(22):4120. doi: 10.3390/molecules24224120

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Zhang L, Shi X, Li Y, Duan X, Zhang Z, Fu H, et al. Visualizing tumors in real time: A highly sensitive psma probe for nir-ii imaging and intraoperative tumor resection. J Med Chem (2021) 64(11):7735–45. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00444

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Wu J, Lee HJ, You L, Luo X, Hasegawa T, Huang KC, et al. Functionalized nir-ii semiconducting polymer nanoparticles for single-cell to whole-organ imaging of psma-positive prostate cancer. Small (2020) 16(19):e2001215. doi: 10.1002/smll.202001215

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Gayton J, Autry SA, Meador W, Parkin SR, Hill GA Jr., Hammer NI, et al. Indolizine-cyanine dyes: Near infrared emissive cyanine dyes with increased stokes shifts. J Org Chem (2019) 84(2):687–97. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b02521

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Cosco ED, Caram JR, Bruns OT, Franke D, Day RA, Farr EP, et al. Flavylium polymethine fluorophores for near- and shortwave infrared imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl (2017) 56(42):13126–9. doi: 10.1002/anie.201706974

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Chen Y, Pullambhatla M, Banerjee SR, Byun Y, Stathis M, Rojas C, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of low molecular weight fluorescent imaging agents for the prostate-specific membrane antigen. Bioconjug Chem (2012) 23(12):2377–85. doi: 10.1021/bc3003919

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Zhou Z, Zalutsky MR, Chitneni SK. Fluorine-18 labeling of the Mdm2 inhibitor Rg7388 for pet imaging: Chemistry and preliminary evaluation. Mol Pharm (2021) 18(10):3871–81. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00531

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Zhu D, Guo H, Chang Y, Ni Y, Li L, Zhang ZM, et al. Cell- and tissue-based proteome profiling and dual imaging of apoptosis markers with probes derived from venetoclax and idasanutlin. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl (2018) 57(30):9284–9. doi: 10.1002/anie.201802003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Arlauckas SP, Kumar M, Popov AV, Poptani H, Delikatny EJ. Near infrared fluorescent imaging of choline kinase alpha expression and inhibition in breast tumors. Oncotarget (2017) 8(10):16518–30. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14965

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Osada T, Kaneko K, Gwin WR, Morse MA, Hobeika A, Pogue BW, et al. In vivo detection of Hsp90 identifies breast cancers with aggressive behavior. Clin Cancer Res (2017) 23(24):7531–42. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1453

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Zhang K, Liu Z, Yao Y, Qiu Y, Li F, Chen D, et al. Structure-based design of a selective class I histone deacetylase (Hdac) near-infrared (Nir) probe for epigenetic regulation detection in triple-negative breast cancer (Tnbc). J Med Chem (2021) 64(7):4020–33. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c02161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Gao G, Jiang YW, Sun W, Guo Y, Jia HR, Yu XW, et al. Molecular targeting-mediated mild-temperature photothermal therapy with a smart albumin-based nanodrug. Small (2019) 15(33):e1900501. doi: 10.1002/smll.201900501

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Baranski AC, Schafer M, Bauder-Wust U, Roscher M, Schmidt J, Stenau E, et al. Psma-11-Derived dual-labeled psma inhibitors for preoperative pet imaging and precise fluorescence-guided surgery of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med (2018) 59(4):639–45. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.201293

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Reinfelder J, Kuwert T, Beck M, Sanders JC, Ritt P, Schmidkonz C, et al. First experience with Spect/Ct using a 99mtc-labeled inhibitor for prostate-specific membrane antigen in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med (2017) 42(1):26–33. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001433

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Zhang L, Suksanpaisan L, Jiang H, DeGrado TR, Russell SJ, Zhao M, et al. Dual-isotope spect imaging with nis reporter gene and duramycin to visualize tumor susceptibility to oncolytic virus infection. Mol Ther Oncolytics (2019) 15:178–85. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2019.10.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Tamarappoo B, Otaki Y, Manabe O, Hyun M, Cantu S, Arnson Y, et al. Simultaneous Tc-99m Pyp/Tl-201 dual-isotope spect myocardial imaging in patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis. J Nucl Cardiol (2020) 27(1):28–37. doi: 10.1007/s12350-019-01753-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Vermeulen K, Naus E, Ahamed M, Attili B, Siemons M, Luyten K, et al. Evaluation of [(11)C]Nms-E973 as a pet tracer for in vivo visualisation of Hsp90. Theranostics (2019) 9(2):554–72. doi: 10.7150/thno.27213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Brasca MG, Mantegani S, Amboldi N, Bindi S, Caronni D, Casale E, et al. Discovery of nms-E973 as novel, selective and potent inhibitor of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90). Bioorg Med Chem (2013) 21(22):7047–63. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2013.09.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Pimlott SL, Sutherland A. Molecular tracers for the pet and spect imaging of disease. Chem Soc Rev (2011) 40(1):149–62. doi: 10.1039/b922628c

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Brown NF, Williams M, Arkenau HT, Fleming RA, Tolson J, Yan L, et al. A study of the focal adhesion kinase inhibitor Gsk2256098 in patients with recurrent glioblastoma with evaluation of tumor penetration of [11c]Gsk2256098. Neuro Oncol (2018) 20(12):1634–42. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Yu Y, Liang Q, Liu H, Luo Z, Hu H, Perlmutter JS, et al. Development of a carbon-11 pet radiotracer for imaging Trpc5 in the brain. Org Biomol Chem (2019) 17(22):5586–94. doi: 10.1039/c9ob00893d

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Nestle U, Schimek-Jasch T, Kremp S, Schaefer-Schuler A, Mix M, Küsters A, et al. Imaging-based target volume reduction in chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-Small-Cell lung cancer (Pet-plan): A multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol (2020) 21(4):581–92. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30013-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Descamps L, Olagne L, Merlin C, Cachin F, Soubrier M, Mathieu S. Utility of Pet/Ct in the diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis (2018) 77(11):e81. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212660

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Dolan RD, McLees NG, Irfan A, McSorley ST, Horgan PG, Colville D, et al. The relationship between tumor glucose metabolism and host systemic inflammatory responses in patients with cancer: A systematic review. J Nucl Med (2019) 60(4):467–71. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.216697

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Jamadar SD, Ward PG, Li S, Sforazzini F, Baran J, Chen Z, et al. Simultaneous task-based bold-fmri and [18-f] fdg functional pet for measurement of neuronal metabolism in the human visual cortex. Neuroimage (2019) 189:258–66. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Pan KH, Wang JF, Wang CY, Nikzad AA, Kong FQ, Jian L, et al. Evaluation of 18f-dcfpyl psma Pet/Ct for prostate cancer: A meta-analysis. Front Oncol (2020) 10:597422. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.597422

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Collier TL, Normandin MD, Stephenson NA, Livni E, Liang SH, Wooten DW, et al. Synthesis and preliminary pet imaging of (11)C and (18)F isotopologues of the Ros1/Alk inhibitor lorlatinib. Nat Commun (2017) 8:15761. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15761

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. O’Hagan D. Understanding organofluorine chemistry. an introduction to the c-f bond. Chem Soc Rev (2008) 37(2):308–19. doi: 10.1039/b711844a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Bernard-Gauthier V, Mossine AV, Mahringer A, Aliaga A, Bailey JJ, Shao X, et al. Identification of [(18)F]Track, a fluorine-18-Labeled tropomyosin receptor kinase (Trk) inhibitor for pet imaging. J Med Chem (2018) 61(4):1737–43. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01607

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Yang D, Comeau A, Bowen WD, Mach RH, Ross BD, Hong H, et al. Design and investigation of a [(18)F]-labeled benzamide derivative as a high affinity dual sigma receptor subtype radioligand for prostate tumor imaging. Mol Pharm (2017) 14(3):770–80. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b01020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Ordonez AA, Carroll LS, Abhishek S, Mota F, Ruiz-Bedoya CA, Klunk MH, et al. Radiosynthesis and pet bioimaging of (76)Br-bedaquiline in a murine model of tuberculosis. ACS Infect Dis (2019) 5(12):1996–2002. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00207

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Nie P, Kalidindi T, Nagle VL, Wu X, Li T, Liao GP, et al. Imaging of cancer gamma-secretase activity using an inhibitor-based pet probe. Clin Cancer Res (2021) 27(22):6145–55. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0940

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Tang L, Peng C, Tang B, Li Z, Wang X, Li J, et al. Radioiodinated small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor for Her2-selective spect imaging. J Nucl Med (2018) 59(9):1386–91. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.205088

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Hirata M, Yao T, Fujimura S, Kanai Y, Yoshimoto M, Sato T, et al. Development of a P38alpha-selective radioactive probe for qualitative diagnosis of cancer using spect. Ann Nucl Med (2019) 33(5):333–43. doi: 10.1007/s12149-019-01341-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Maresca KP, Hillier SM, Femia FJ, Keith D, Barone C, Joyal JL, et al. A series of halogenated heterodimeric inhibitors of prostate specific membrane antigen (Psma) as radiolabeled probes for targeting prostate cancer. J Med Chem (2009) 52(2):347–57. doi: 10.1021/jm800994j

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Chen KT, Nguyen K, Ieritano C, Gao F, Seimbille Y. A flexible synthesis of (68)Ga-labeled carbonic anhydrase ix (Caix)-targeted molecules Via Cbt/1,2-aminothiol click reaction. Molecules (2018) 24(1):23. doi: 10.3390/molecules24010023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Lattuada L, Barge A, Cravotto G, Giovenzana GB, Tei L. The synthesis and application of polyamino polycarboxylic bifunctional chelating agents. Chem Soc Rev (2011) 40(5):3019–49. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00199f

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Guillou A, Lima LMP, Esteban-Gomez D, Le Poul N, Bartholoma MD, Platas-Iglesias C, et al. Methylthiazolyl tacn ligands for copper complexation and their bifunctional chelating agent derivatives for bioconjugation and copper-64 radiolabeling: An example with bombesin. Inorg Chem (2019) 58(4):2669–85. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b03280

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Li L, de Guadalupe Jaraquemada-Pelaez M, Aluicio-Sarduy E, Wang X, Barnhart TE, Cai W, et al. Coordination chemistry of [Y(Pypa)](-) and comparison immuno-pet imaging of [(44)Sc]Sc- and [(86)Y]Y-Pypa-Phenyl-Trc105. Dalton Trans (2020) 49(17):5547–62. doi: 10.1039/d0dt00437e

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Kelly JM, Amor-Coarasa A, Nikolopoulou A, Kim D, Williams C Jr., Vallabhajosula S, et al. Assessment of psma targeting ligands bearing novel chelates with application to theranostics: Stability and complexation kinetics of (68)Ga(3+), (111)in(3+), (177)Lu(3+) and (225)Ac(3). Nucl Med Biol (2017) 55:38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2017.10.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Kommidi H, Guo H, Nurili F, Vedvyas Y, Jin MM, McClure TD, et al. (18)F-positron Emitting/Trimethine cyanine-fluorescent contrast for image-guided prostate cancer management. J Med Chem (2018) 61(9):4256–62. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Mekawy MM, Saito A, Sumiyoshi A, Riera JJ, Shimizu H, Kawashima R, et al. Hybrid magneto-fluorescent nano-probe for live apoptotic cells monitoring at brain cerebral ischemia. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl (2019) 100:485–92. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Kimura RH, Miao Z, Cheng Z, Gambhir SS, Cochran JR. A dual-labeled knottin peptide for pet and near-infrared fluorescence imaging of integrin expression in living subjects. Bioconjug Chem (2010) 21(3):436–44. doi: 10.1021/bc9003102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Schwegmann K, Hohn M, Hermann S, Schafers M, Riemann B, Haufe G, et al. Optimizing the biodistribution of radiofluorinated barbiturate tracers for matrix metalloproteinase imaging by introduction of fluorescent dyes as pharmacokinetic modulators. Bioconjug Chem (2020) 31(4):1117–32. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00817

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: inhibitor, affinity probe, near-infrared, radiotracer, tumor imaging

Citation: Yi X, Wang Z, Hu X and Yu A (2022) Affinity probes based on small-molecule inhibitors for tumor imaging. Front. Oncol. 12:1028493. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1028493

Received: 26 August 2022; Accepted: 17 October 2022;
Published: 27 October 2022.

Edited by:

Xin-Wu Cui, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China

Reviewed by:

Guohui Liu, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China
Mohammad Hojjat-Farsangi, Karolinska Institutet (KI), Sweden
Zhaogang Teng, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, China

Copyright © 2022 Yi, Wang, Hu and Yu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Aixi Yu, eXVhaXhpQHdodS5lZHUuY24=; Xiang Hu, c2hhd25odTIwMDJAd2h1LmVkdS5jbg==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.