Peyman Tabnak
Zanyar HajiEsmailPoor
Soroush Soraneh2†- 1Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
- 2Faculty of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
Lung cancer is the second commonly diagnosed malignancy worldwide and has the highest mortality rate among all cancers. Tremendous efforts have been made to develop novel strategies against lung cancer; however, the overall survival of patients still is low. Uncovering underlying molecular mechanisms of this disease can open up new horizons for its treatment. Ferroptosis is a newly discovered type of programmed cell death that, in an iron-dependent manner, peroxidizes unsaturated phospholipids and results in the accumulation of radical oxygen species. Subsequent oxidative damage caused by ferroptosis contributes to cell death in tumor cells. Therefore, understanding its molecular mechanisms in lung cancer appears as a promising strategy to induce ferroptosis selectively. According to evidence published up to now, significant numbers of research have been done to identify ferroptosis regulators in lung cancer. Therefore, this review aims to provide a comprehensive standpoint of molecular mechanisms of ferroptosis in lung cancer and address these molecules’ prognostic and therapeutic values, hoping that the road for future studies in this field will be paved more efficiently.
Highlights
● GPX4, system , NRF2, p53, and UPS are the main ferroptosis regulators in lung cancer.
● Ferroptosis has a close relationship with the immune system status in lung cancer.
● The expression of ferroptosis-related genes including, ALOX15, PEBP1, GLS2, and PHKG2, positively predict prognosis.
● The expression of ferroptosis-related genes, including CISD1, ACSL3, FANCD2, and SLC7A11, negatively predict prognosis.
● Combining ferroptosis inhibitors with radiotherapy or chemotherapy synergistically kills lung tumors.
1 Introduction
With 11.4% and 18% of prevalence and total cancer death rate, respectively, lung cancer is the second common cancer and the leading cause of cancer death worldwide (1). Though tobacco smoking still is the critical risk factor for lung cancer, the importance of non-tobacco risk factors such as environmental and occupational exposures, chronic lung disease, and lifestyle factors is growing (2). Based on cell origin, lung cancers are divided into two primary subtypes, including non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC, more common form) and small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC, less common form). Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), as the most common histological subtype of NSCLC, accounts for 38.5% of all lung cancer cases (3). Currently, conventional treatment choices include surgery and adjuvant therapies (e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy); however, half of the patients succumb within the first year of diagnosis, and five years overall survival is below 18 percent (4). Given the facts mentioned above, the health burden caused by lung cancer is remarkable and extensive efforts have been made to improve the disease in recent years. Understanding the molecular mechanism of lung cancer opens up new horizons for developing novel strategies to manage and fight against this malignancy (5). Ferroptosis, discovered in 2012, was first identified as a type of oxidative iron-dependent programmed cell death (PCD) different from apoptosis, necrosis, and autophagy. Following treatments with small molecules such as erastin, some morphological changes like chromatin condensation, cytoplasmic and organelle swelling, formation of double-membrane vesicles, shrunken mitochondria, and plasma membrane rupture were observed in affected cells (6). This process initiates with the accumulation of various pro-ferroptotic molecules contributing to lipid peroxidation through the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) under the assistance of iron (7). Our understanding of ferroptosis has been growing over the last decade, and the numbers of ferroptosis regulators are increasing (8). Two main inhibitors of ferroptosis, including system and glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), prevent phospholipid peroxidation under physiological conditions. Control of cellular metabolism by different nutrients, intra/intercellular signaling pathways (e.g., p53 and NRF2), and environmental stress play an essential role in the synthesis of ferroptosis stimulators such as ROS and phospholipids containing polyunsaturated fatty acid chains (PUFA-PLs) (9). Ferroptosis is effective in eliciting a therapeutic response by experimental reagents (e.g., erastin and RSL3), approved drugs (e.g., sulfasalazine and artemisinin), ionizing radiation, and cytokines (e.g., IFNγ and TGFβ1), leading to inhibition of tumor growth in various cancer types (10). Therefore, cell death caused by ferroptosis is a great step toward cancer therapy. A study has shown that in Xuanwei area of China which the incidence of lung cancer is very high, ferroptosis dysregulation may implicate in the development of the disease (11). In this study, we particularly aimed to review the role of ferroptosis in lung cancer and provide insights into molecular mechanisms, prognostic and therapeutic importance of ferroptosis regulators.
2 Ferroptosis Regulators in Lung Cancer
2.1 Ferroptosis Suppressors
2.1.1 System
System (xCT) is a cystine/glutamate antiporter consisting of two subunits, including SLC3A2 and SLC7A11, which is responsible for exporting glutamate and importing cystine (12). Upon this transportation, cystine in the cytosol following an NADPH-consuming reduction reaction by thioredoxin reductase 1 (TXNRD1) is converted to cysteine, an antioxidant amino acid and precursor of tripeptide glutathione (GSH). Moreover, GSH is also a potent antioxidant that is used by glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) for inhibition of ferroptosis by preventing the accumulation of lipid hydroperoxides (LOOHs) and converting them to lipid alcohols (LOHs) (Figure 1). Therefore, system as a membrane heterodimer is implicated in inhibition of ferroptosis under oxidative stress to provide cancer cell survival (13). Up to now, various studies have pointed to the role of this system in the regulation of ferroptosis in lung cancer, most of them representing SLC7A11 as the targets of various novel drugs and upstream regulators (Figure 1). For example, a recent study has elucidated that there is a positive relationship between the level of transcription factor SOX2 and SLC7A11 in lung cancer stem-like cells (CSLC), and upregulation of SOX2 in lung tumors can highly inhibit ferroptosis and increase resistance to imidazole ketone erastin (IKE), a strong inducer of ferroptosis (14). Likewise, a similar relationship was observed between RNA binding protein RBMS1 and SLC7A11, in a way that depletion of RBMS1 sensitizes lung cancer cells to ferroptosis and radiotherapy (15). Moreover, Ma et al. have reported that YT521-B homology domain containing 2 (YTHDC2) is a downregulated tumor suppressor in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), which can suppress the activity of system through targeting mRNA encoding SLC7A11 (16). However, their further investigations revealed that inhibition of SLC7A11 by YTHDC2 is not enough to induce ferroptosis in lung adenocarcinoma. Therefore, they proposed that SLC3A2 as another subunit of system should be inhibited by YTHDC2 as well. High-level induction of YTHDC2 could inhibit the expression of SLC3A2 indirectly by inhibiting the expression of HOXA13. Further in vivo experiments also confirmed that the induction of YTHDC2 can highly contribute to ferroptosis. Therefore, elevating the levels of YTHDC2 was shown to be a promising strategy in LUAD to induce ferroptosis by selectively inhibiting the expression of both subunits of system in tumor cells (17).
Figure 1 An illustration showing regulation of ferroptosis suppressors, including system ,GPX4, FSP1, and NFS1 in lung cancer by different molecules and treatments. System is upregulated and downregulated due to increase of SOX2 (↓ Ferroptosis) and decrease of YTHDC2 levels (↑ Ferroptosis), respectively. TXNRD1 is inhibited by auranofin (↑ Ferroptosis). Inhibited NFS1 and subsequently decreased ISCs biosynthesis leads to an iron starvation response which causes Fe2+ influx to cells by TRFC (↑ Ferroptosis). As a ferroptosis inhibitor, GPX4 is suppressed by a group of drugs depicted in the blue box (↑ Ferroptosis). In addition, GPX4 is positively upregulated by enhanced expressions of CREB and STYK1 (↓ Ferroptosis). FSP1, which inhibits ferroptosis independently, is upregulated upon increased expression of oncogenic miR-4443 (↑ Ferroptosis).
2.1.2 GPX4
GPX4, a selenoperoxidase and a key upstream regulator of ferroptosis, plays two roles at the same time including, converting GSH to glutathione disulfide (GSSG) and reducing phospholipid hydroperoxides (PLOOHs) to their corresponding alcohol (PLOHs), thereby preventing the accumulation of lipid peroxides and leading to suppression of ferroptosis. In addition, GSSG can be recycled to GSH under the action of glutathione–disulfide reductase (GSR) using the electrons provided by NADPH/H+ (9) (Figure 1). Various studies have reported that GPX4 is upregulated in different cancers, including LUAD, and is associated with poor prognosis of patients and chemotherapy resistance. Suppression of GPX4 by a small molecule inhibitor named RSL3 strongly enhances the anticancer effects of cisplatin in vivo. In other words, RSL3 combined with cisplatin could induce ferritinophagy/ferroptosis (18). Another study has also shown that the levels of GPX4 and mTORC1 are higher in NSCLC cells, and inhibition of these molecules provides a promising strategy to overcome lapatinib resistance in vivo (19). cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) is also an upregulated oncogene in LUAD tissues that positively regulates the expression of GPX4, and their levels are closely related to tumor size and stage (20). A similar relationship was also observed between serine threonine tyrosine kinase 1 (STYK1) and GPX4 in NSCLC. In brain metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma, Glutathione S‐transferase M1 (GSTM1) is another protein that is stablized by GPX4 and concurrently result in inhibition of ferroptosis and subsequent resistance to platinum through increasing GSH consumption (21). We will further show that many drugs and upstream signaling pathways significantly affect the regulation of GPX4 in lung cancer (22)(Figure 1 and Table 2).
2.1.3 FSP1
Recent studies have identified that GPX4 is not the only ferroptosis suppressor in human cancer cells, and ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1, formerly known as AIFM2) independent of GSH suppresses lipid peroxidation and subsequent ferroptosis through converting ubiquinone (coenzyme Q10, CoQ10) to ubiquinol (CoQH2, reduced form of CoQ10) using an NADPH-consuming reduction reaction (Figure 1). Therefore, this pathway is also referred to as the CoQ-dependent pathway (9). Bersuker et al. showed that FSP1 expression positively correlates with ferroptosis resistance in various cell lines, particularly in the xenograft mouse model of lung cancer (23).
2.1.4 NFS1
Cysteine desulfurase nitrogen fixation 1 homolog (NFS1) is an enzyme that extracts sulfur from cysteine for the biosynthesis of iron-sulfur clusters (ISCs) and is expressed at higher levels in differentiated lung adenocarcinomas. A study has demonstrated that suppressing NFS1 as well as ISCs biosynthesis triggers an iron-starvation response and subsequent iron influx to cells by molecules such as transferrin receptor protein (TRFC), thereby promoting ferroptosis and inhibiting tumor growth in lung tumors (24, 25) (Figure 1).
2.1.5 NRF2
Transcription factor nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NFE2L2 or NRF2) is an overriding antioxidant transcription regulator of genes involved in lipid peroxidation and the accumulation of free iron (26). Takahashi et al. emphasized that hyperactivation of NRF2 is required for proliferation and survival of 3D culture models of lung tumors through preventing ferroptosis. However, NRF2 downregulation was not enough to suppress ferroptosis since GPX4 levels were increased, proposing that enhanced oxidative stress caused by NRF2 downregulation might activate other cytoprotective signaling pathways, including nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), involved in activating downstream antioxidant enzymes. Notably, simultaneous inhibition of NRF2 and GPX4 could efficiently induce ferroptosis (27). The study by Liu et al. showed that Wnt signaling pathway through provoking NRF2 increases the activity of GPX4 in brain metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma cells, thereby resulting in chemoresistance to platinum (21). In addition, the activity of NRF2 positively reflects erastin resistance in isogenic lung cancer cell models, regardless of Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1(KEAP1) mutation (28), a molecule that represses NRF2 via its ubiquitin proteasomal degradation in normal conditions (29). Likewise, KEAP1-mutant lung cancer cells were shown to have higher levels of NRF2 and its downstream target SLC7A11. In addition, KEAP1 deficient lung tumors were shown to be sensitive to inhibition of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) due to their glucose dependency (30). Similarly, Wohlhieter et al. (31) showed that LUAD tumors with concurrent mutations in serine/threonine kinase 11 (STK11) and KEAP1 were more resistant to ferroptosis since the activity of NRF2 pathway and targets involved in ferroptosis such as SLC7A11 and GPX4 were increased, leading to worse overall survival and enhanced tumor proliferation both in vivo and in vitro (Figure 2). Moreover, their further investigations turned out that stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD1, SCD) was necessary for the proliferation of the cells mentioned above (Figure 2). SCD1 was previously shown to participate in aberrant lipid metabolism and promoted cell growth in lung cancer (32); therefore, its genetic and pharmacological inhibition could sensitize STK11/KEAP1 co-mutant cells to ferroptosis induction even in vivo. Noteworthy to mention, the role of mitochondria and the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle has been highlighted recently in regulating ferroptosis (33). NRF2 can also affect mitochondrial function. For example, in NSCLC, FOCAD-FAK signaling was shown to be involved in cysteine deprivation-induced ferroptosis, and NRF2 was shown to inhibit the FOCAD-FAK signaling axis and induce ferroptosis via increasing the activity of Complex I in the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) and TCA cycle. However, inhibiting NRF2 is not enough for ferroptosis induction since the FOCAD-FAK axis does not affect GPX4. Therefore, adding an NRF2 inhibitor such as brusatol concurrent with erastin can promote ferroptosis induction better in NSCLC cells (34) (Figure 2). Similarly, a novel study conducted by Kang et al. has highlighted the role of the NRF2 signaling pathway in cystine depletion conditions. NSCLC cells with higher expression levels of NRF2 produce many γ-glutamyl-peptides due to increased activity of glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (GCLC). Following production of γ-glutamyl-peptide, glutamate is not accumulated in the cytosol anymore and this process leads to ferroptosis inhibition (35). Activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2) is another protein with an oncogenic role in lung cancer and increases NRF2 expression following treatments with a group of drugs named BET inhibitors (BETi, with the ability to induce ferroptosis in breast cancer) in LUAD, leading to ferroptosis resistance (36). In addition, a very recent study has shown that the expression of E3 ubiquitin ligase Mindbomb 1 (MIB1) is upregulated in a group of lung squamous and adenocarcinoma cells and correlates negatively with patients’ survival. Nevertheless, cells overexpressing MIB1 are more sensitive to ferroptosis due to proteasomal degradation of NRF2 by MIB1 (37). Taken together, due to the prominent role of NRF2 in regulating ferroptosis, targeting it by various treatments can significantly induce ferroptosis (see Table 2).
Figure 2 An illustration showing the role of NRF2 in regulating ferroptosis in lung cancer and its control by different molecules and treatments. NRF2 inhibits ferroptosis. KEAP1-mutant cells overexpress NRF2 and inhibit ferroptosis; while using GLUT1 inhibitor agents in these cells induces ferroptosis. Co-mutant STK11 and KEAP1 cells (depicted by dotted box) are more resistant to ferroptosis (↓ Ferroptosis) due to increased levels of GPX4 and SLC7A11 (which is not shown here). The combination of lncRNA-MT1DP and erastin inhibits NRF2 by increasing the activity of miR-365a-3p (↑ Ferroptosis). ATF2 activation by BET inhibitors causes NRF2 upregulation (↓ Ferroptosis). ZVI-NP mediates NRF2 degradation by inducing GSK3β/β-TrCP (↑ Ferroptosis). USP11 activation causes NRF2 induction (↓ Ferroptosis). A significant number of drugs (depicted in the blue box) inhibits NRF2 (↑ Ferroptosis). FOCAD-FAD axis, which mediates ferroptosis by induction of TCA cycle and complex I in the mitochondria, is inhibited by NRF2 (↓ Ferroptosis). Higher levels of NRF2 increase the activity of GCLC (↓ Ferroptosis). A large group of drugs (the biggest blue box) could inhibit system (↑ Ferroptosis). HO-1 naturally causes ferroptosis (not shown here); while its degradation by another group of drugs (depicted in the blue box) inhibits ferroptosis (↓ Ferroptosis).
2.2 Ferroptosis Inducer
2.2.1 ACSL4
Acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 (ACSL4) is a crucial enzyme responsible for lipid metabolism, which converts PUFAs to PUFA-CoAs, and following the action of LPCAT3, the products of this reaction are esterified into phospholipid containing polyunsaturated fatty acid chain (PUFA-PLs). Then, these PUFA-PLs are oxidized by another enzyme named ALOX15 into PL-PUFA-OOHs. Since PL-PUFA-OOHs can trigger ferroptotic cell death, the activity of the abovementioned enzymes contributes to the promotion of ferroptosis (38). Surprisingly, although ALOX15 and ACSL4 facilitate the ferroptosis process, recent studies showed that higher expression of these molecules was associated with increased cancer malignant features. Thereby, these molecules can act as double-edged swords either by promoting or inhibiting cancer progression (39). However in SCLC, Bebber et al. showed that ACSL4 and LPCAT3 are expressed at higher levels in non-neuroendocrine (non-NE-SCLC) than NE-SCLC, contributing to ferroptosis sensitivity and resistance, respectively in the abovementioned cells. Moreover, they proposed that TRX antioxidant pathway is overactivated in NE-SCLC cells, and its inhibition by auranofin alongside treatment with buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), as a GSH level reducer, could successfully induce ferroptosis and inhibit tumor progression in mice with xenograft NE-SCLC tumors (40). In addition, ACSL4 was found to act as a tumor suppressor and a favorable prognostic factor in patients with LUAD and promoted ferroptosis but inhibited tumor cell survival, invasion, and migration. Most interestingly, a high-fat diet could reverse these effects via downregulating ACSL4 both in vivo and in vitro (41).
2.3 Signaling Pathways and Their Crosstalk With Ferroptosis in Lung Cancer
2.3.1 EGFR and MAPK
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway is involved in the progression of various cancers, and its mutation is frequently seen in lung adenocarcinomas (42). It is noteworthy to mention that the previously mentioned SCD1 is stabilized by EGFR via Y55 phosphorylation and contributes to cancer progression in lung cancer (32). Moreover, activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) as a downstream target of the EGFR pathway is required to induce ferroptosis (Figure 3). Following cystine-deprived conditions, those NSCLC cells with the highest MAPK signaling activity significantly lose their viability through a ferroptosis process caused by inhibited and promoted expression of GPX4 and NOX4, respectively (43).
Figure 3 An illustration showing signaling pathways involved in regulating ferroptosis in lung cancer and their possible crosstalk together. MAPK activation leads to GPX4 inhibition and NOX4 activation (↑ Ferroptosis). SCD1 stabilization by EGFR via its Y55 phosphorylation inhibits ferroptosis through aberrant lipid metabolism (↓ Ferroptosis). Under the hypoxic condition, EGLNs degrades HIF-1α. Therefore, LSH expression is increased and induces SCD1 expression (↓ Ferroptosis). LSH can upregulate lncRNA-LINC00336. This interaction results in CBS inhibition via sponging/inhibiting MIR6852 (↓ Ferroptosis). In addition, LSH downregulates lncRNA-NEAT1 and inhibits p53 via G3BP1 downregulation (↓ Ferroptosis). Upregulation of SAT1 by p53 promotes ferroptosis, and RNF113A deficiency causes ferroptosis by increasing SAT1. Two drugs induce the expression of p53 and drive the cell toward ferroptosis (↑ Ferroptosis). ΔNp63α inhibits ferroptosis. USP35 overexpression leads to ferroptosis suppression by stabilization of FPN (↑ Ferroptosis). Moreover, FPN is inhibited upon decreased expression of miR-302a-3p (↑ Ferroptosis). Zinc intoxication causes ferroptosis by inhibition of the System inhibition circumstances, glutamate is accumulated in the cell, which results in the calcium ions accumulation. This accumulation induces ferroptosis by CaM and ADCY10 activation (↑ Ferroptosis). Erianin activates CaM (↑ Ferroptosis). USP14 inhibition by 6-Gingerol leads to autophagy induced ferroptosis (↑ Ferroptosis).
2.3.2 HIF-1α
Hypoxia, as a hallmark of cancer, leads to excess tumor vascularization and progression (44). Activation of both MAPK and EGFR pathways can induce the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) (44, 45). In addition, induction of HIF-1 by EGFR can make A549 lung cancer cells resistant to another type of PCD called anoikis under the lipid raft-disrupting stress (45). Emerging evidence also supports the role of HIFs in the induction of ferroptosis (46, 47). Jiang et al. showed that iron-dependent enzymes Egl nine homolog (EGLNs) under hypoxia conditions degrades HIF-1α (Figure 3), leading to increased lymphoid-specific helicase (LSH) expression, a chromatin remodeling factor that acts as an oncogene and ferroptosis inhibitor in lung cancer via increasing the expression of SCD1 (48, 49).
2.3.3 P53
Tumor suppressor P53 has a dual role in regulating ferroptosis. Spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase (SAT1) is one of those proteins which is upregulated by p53 and responsible for oxidative stress and ferroptosis (50, 51). However, SAT1 is under the control of factors other than p53. For instance, RNF113A is an oncogene RNA-binding protein whose deficiency provokes ferroptosis via promoting SAT1 expression (Figure 3) and was upregulated and contributed to cisplatin resistance in lung adenocarcinomas (52). Recently, it has been discovered that ΔNp63α as a major isoform of p63 can inhibit ferroptosis and oxidative stress independent of p53 and NRF2 activity in lung cancer through transcriptional controlling the expression of genes involved in glutathione synthesis (53).
2.3.4 Proteasomal Degradation Pathway
Ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) belongs to a degradation pathway that controls lipid peroxidation and iron accumulation via degradation of molecules involved in ferroptosis (8). A recent review has also highlighted the role of ubiquitination in ferroptosis (54). Ubiquitin‐specific protease 35 (USP35) is a deubiquitinase that is overexpressed in lung cancer, and its knockdown, in addition to promoting ferroptosis and chemotherapeutic sensitivity to cisplatin and paclitaxel, inhibits lung cancer cell growth, colony formation, and tumor progression. The mechanism by which USP35 overexpression led to ferroptosis was attributed to ferroportin (FPN) stabilization, a protein responsible for exporting iron to the outside of the cells (Figure 3) (55). In the same way, a similar relationship between deubiquitinase USP11 and NRF2 was found in patients with NSCLC (SCC subtype), leading to ferroptosis resistance and cell proliferation (Figure 3) (56). Noteworthy to mention, the effects of some drugs in inducing ferroptosis are also carried out by the proteasome degradation system. For instance, concurrent treatment with siramesine alongside lapatinib was shown to induce ferroptosis via proteasome degradation of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) (57).
2.3.5 Autophagy
Autophagy is another intracellular degradation pathway in which various molecules and organelles in the cell are engulfed and then degraded following the formation of lysosomal structures (8). There is close crosstalk between ferroptosis and autophagy, in a way that some of the recent reviews consider ferroptosis as a type of autophagy-dependent cell death (58, 59). The reason behind this assumption is that in the presence of some ferroptosis inducers such as erastin and RSL3, the formation of autophagosomes and components of the autophagy system is also provoked, and thereby ferroptosis is promoted (58). Some pieces of evidence support this relationship in lung cancer. Following inhibition of USP14 by 6-Gingerol (a natural product) in A549 lung cancer cells, the levels of ROS, iron concentration, and autophagosomes started to increase and contributed to increased expression of ferroptosis and autophagy-related proteins in vivo and in vitro (Figure 3). Therefore, it can be concluded that USP proteins are a common executer among autophagy and ferroptosis process (60). Similarly, treatment with curcumin, a well-known natural derived product, could significantly induce cell death both in vivo and in vitro through an autophagy-dependent ferroptosis mechanism and inhibition of autophagy reversed ferroptosis caused by curcumin in NSCLC (61).
2.3.6 Hippo/YAP Pathway
Hippo is an evolutionarily conserved signaling pathway with potent tumor suppressor activities involved in determining cell fate. Its dysregulation highly induces cancer progression and therapy resistance through aberrant activation of two transcriptional coactivators, including yes-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ). When hippo signaling is off, YAP and TAZ are translocated to the nucleus and interact with DNA binding transcription factors named TEA domain family member (TEAD) to provoke the expression of genes involved in cell proliferation (62). Recently the role of Hippo/YAP/TAZ axis in regulating ferroptosis was described as dependent on the distance between cells and their contact. In other words, when there is no contact between the cells (low-density conditions), due to the inactivation of Hippo signaling, YAP and TAZ trigger the expression of genes responsible for ferroptosis induction rather than apoptosis. While this process is reversed when cells get closer to each other and extracellular E-cadherin stimulates Hippo pathway activation, leading to increased apoptosis (62). In LUAD, Zhang et al. demonstrated that the magnitude of YAP suppression is a crucial determiner of ferroptosis sensitivity. While inhibiting system by sorafenib could induce ferroptosis and decrease YAP levels, suppressing GPX4 could not, proposing that subsequent glutamate accumulation in the cytosol might sensitize cells to ferroptosis. Their further experiments showed that glutamate repletion conditions (e.g., system inhibition) provokes Ca2+ ions accumulation in the cytosol and ADCY10 initiates a cascade of reactions leading to YAP destabilization and subsequent ferroptosis (Figure 3). Since ADCY10 is expressed higher in advanced stage and therapy resistance LUAD cells, targeting ADCY10 as a molecule linked with YAP and ferroptosis was shown to have clinical significance (63).
2.3.7 Calcium and Zinc Effects
The latest review on ferroptosis insists that ions other than iron (e.g., zinc) cannot induce ferroptosis (8); however, other ions can indirectly affect ferroptosis. As just mentioned earlier, at least in lung cancer, accumulation of Ca2+ subsequently triggers the reactions that lead to ferroptosis sensitivity (63). Likewise, treating lung cancer cells with erianin (a natural product) promoted ferroptosis via calcium/calmodulin (CaM) signaling activation, a pathway involved in increasing intracellular Ca2+ levels (Figure 3) (64). Moreover, zinc intoxication in NSCLC cells upregulates the mTORC2/RICTOR pathway, resulting in system phosphorylation and subsequent ferroptosis (Figure 3). However, it should be noted that these effects of zinc are reversed after a specific time and are limited using iron chelator deferoxamine and vitamin E (65).
2.3.8 mTOR Pathway
The mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) is an essential negative regulator of autophagy (8). Moreover, GPX4 is also involved in regulating ferroptosis, and the levels of mTOR are positively correlated with GPX4 levels; therefore, mTOR inhibitors can induce autophagy-dependent ferroptosis (66). For this reason, “inhibition of GPX4 or mTORC1 overcomes resistance to Lapatinib via promoting ferroptosis in NSCLC cells” (19), while zinc intoxication increases mTORC2 activity and ferroptosis (65). This proposes the theory that mTORC1 and mTORC2 may have distinct impacts on regulating ferroptosis, at least in lung cancer. Moreover, it has been proposed that lung tumors, which in them NRF2 signaling pathway is activated more than usual, are more dependent on the mTOR pathway, and synergistic cooperation between NRF2 and mTOR signaling can enhance cell proliferation in 3D cultures (27).
2.4 Non-Coding RNAs
Non-coding-RNAs (ncRNAs) make up a considerable part of the human transcriptome. They are the hot topic of interest these days since they are involved in many physiologic and pathologic conditions, particularly cancer (67). Recent studies have highlighted the role of ncRNAs in regulating the expression of genes involved in ferroptosis in cancer (68). microRNAs (miRNAs) long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs belong to ncRNAs whose roles in regulating gene expression have been frequently emphasized. Their role in regulating ferroptosis in lung cancer is discussed as below:
2.4.1 miRNAs
miRNAs are a class of ncRNAs with 18-25 nucleotides long that can inhibit protein translation by affecting the expression of their target mRNAs (69). Tumor suppressor miRNAs are downregulated in cancers, and their targets are oncogenic proteins. miR-302a-3p is one of those downregulated tumor suppressor miRNAs that induces ferroptosis via targeting 3’-UTR of FPN mRNA in NSCLC. Ectopic induction of miR-302a-3p mimics provides a promising strategy against NSCLCs and sensitizes them to erastin, RSL3, cisplatin, and paclitaxel (70). Similarly, miR-324-3p expression is downregulated in cisplatin-resistant NSCLC cells, and its overexpression sensitizes resistant cells to cisplatin via targeting GPX4 (Figure 1) (71). Moreover, tumor cells can release exosomes containing miRNAs to their surrounding microenvironment. miR-4443 is an oncogenic miRNA found abundantly in exosomes released from cisplatin-resistant NSCLCs and suppresses ferroptosis in vivo and in vitro through increasing FSP1 protein level indirectly by targeting methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3), a molecule that causes N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation of FSP1 (72) (Figure 1).
2.4.2 lncRNAs
lncRNAs are a group of non-coding RNAs which are more than 200 nucleotides in length. Similar to miRNAs, these molecules affect gene expression through an extensive range of mechanisms. Moreover, they may act as sponges for miRNAs and inhibit their activity (73). For example, LSH can increase the expression of lncRNA-LINC00336 in lung cancer and thereby inhibit ferroptosis through sponging the activity of MIR6852, a miRNA that targets mRNA of a ferroptosis suppressor named cystathionine-β-synthase (CBS) (74) (Figure 3). Similarly, LSH is responsible for the downregulation of tumor suppressor lncRNA-P53RRA in NSCLC. P53RRA activates the p53 signaling pathway and induces ferroptosis via interacting with Ras GTPase-activating protein-binding protein 1 (G3BP1)(Figure 3) (75). Furthermore, lncRNA-NEAT1 was shown to induce ferroptosis in NSCLC by increasing the expression levels of ACSL4 mRNA (76). Recently, Sui et al. showed that SAT1 mRNA could be stabilized by an RNA binding protein named U2AF2 and consequently lead to ferroptosis in LUAD. However, lncRNA-ASMTL‐AS1, which is responsible for recruiting U2AF2 and promoting SAT1 expression, is downregulated in LUAD cells, and thereby recovering its expression can inhibit malignant features of the cancer cells (77). Targeted delivery of ncRNAs can be considered a promising strategy against cancer. Gai et al. adopted a novel strategy to induce ferroptosis in NSCLC tumors by deploying folate-modified liposomes containing lncRNA-MT1DP combined with erastin. Since MT1DP increases the activity of miR-365a-3p, a miRNA that targets NRF2, subsequent deactivation of NRF2 (Figure 2) confers sensitivity to erastin-induced ferroptosis in vivo and in vitro (78).
2.4.3 circRNAs
circRNAs are more stable than miRNAs and lncRNA due to their covalently-closed structures, and their dysregulation is implicated in the progression of various cancer, including lung cancer (79). CircDTL is an upregulated oncogene circular RNA in NSCLC cells that inhibits ferroptosis via acting as a sponge for miR-1287-5p, a miRNA that targets GPX4. Moreover, inhibition of circDTL can increase the sensitivity of lung cancer cells to erastin in vivo (80).
3 Ferroptosis and Prognosis of Patients With Lung Cancer
Up to now, thanks to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets, a significant number of studies have been conducted to analyze the expression profile of genes involved in ferroptosis in patients with lung cancer, particularly LUAD (81–93). As seen in Table 1, these studies have shown that ferroptosis regulator genes can predict the prognosis and overall survival of patients very efficiently. For example, various studies have shown that the expression of ALOX15, PEBP1, GLS2, and PHKG2 was associated with better prognosis and overall survival (low hazard ratio). In contrast, the expression of CISD1, ACSL3, FANCD2, SLC7A11, PGD, and GCLC was associated with poor prognosis (high hazard ratio). Therefore, the expression of these genes has the applicability of being used as biomarkers for predicting the prognosis of patients. Moreover, pathway analyses of ferroptosis-related genes have revealed that there is a close relationship between ferroptosis and immune system response, suggesting that future studies should pay more attention to this aspect of ferroptosis in lung cancer. Regarding the relationship between the immune system and ferroptosis, Huang et al. have shown that AKR1C1 negatively correlates with infiltrating level of immune cells, including CD4+ T cells, neutrophils, and dendritic cells in NSCLC. Moreover, its high-level expression negatively predicts overall survival and inhibits ferroptosis in NSCLC (98). Consistent with pathways discussed earlier, the involvement of signaling pathways including p53, fatty acid metabolism, ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, and mTORC1 in ferroptosis is notable. In addition, several studies have evaluated the expression of ferroptosis-related long non-coding RNAs and their risk ratio (94–97). Descriptions and highlights of each conducted study are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1 Bioinformatic studies predicting prognosis of patients based on the expression of ferroptosis-related genes and non-coding RNAs.
4 Treatments for Induction of Ferroptosis in Lung Cancer
Molecules such as system and GPX4 are potent inhibitors of the ferroptosis process, and two well-known small molecules which can inhibit them are erastin (99) and RSL3 (18), respectively. However, with a more detailed look, it can be concluded that the involvement of other signaling pathways might regulate key molecules of ferroptosis. For instance, Huang et al. have mentioned that treatment with erastin induces ROS production in NSCLC cells, which activate the p53 signaling pathway. Moreover, p53 can also inhibit the expression of SCL7A11 post-transcriptionally and subsequently induce ferroptosis (99). Recently, cisplatin (DDP) as a conventional chemotherapeutic agent has been shown to induce ferroptosis in different human cancer cell lines such as NSCLC by inhibiting GSH-GPX system activity, and its combination with erastin synergistically promoted treatment efficacy (100). Similarly, PRLX93936 is an analog of erastin, which its concurrent treatment with DDP can induce ferroptosis via GPX4 inhibition (101). Therefore, it seems that combining ferroptosis inhibitors with other treatments is an effective strategy to induce ferroptosis more potently. As seen in Table 2, the combination of erastin with other treatments has shown stunning anticancer properties through ferroptosis induction. In addition, the role of natural products in regulating ferroptosis has been highlighted in recent studies, suggesting them as future potential candidates in ferroptosis therapy, particularly in lung cancer. For better drug delivery, nanomaterials have received a lot of attention during recent years due to their ability for ferroptosis induction (117). Zero-valent-iron nanoparticle (ZVI-NP) is a type of nanomaterials conventionally used to remove pollutants from groundwater due to its high ability to produce ROS. Recently, their anticancer activity has been investigated in vivo and in vitro against lung cancer. Hsieh et al. have reported that silver-coated ZVI-NP (ZVI@Ag) can strongly induce lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis in lung cancer via GSK3β/β-TrCP-dependent degradation of NRF2. Moreover, it can provoke immune system activity by increasing cytotoxic CD8+ T cells and M1 (CD8+) anti-tumor macrophages (113). Another example of the applicability of nanoparticles for induction of ferroptosis in lung cancer is the synthesis of folate (FA)-modified liposome (FA-LP) nanoparticles containing erastin and lncRNA-MT1DP (E/M@FA-LPs), which has been mentioned earlier (78). Finally, another novel application of ferroptosis inhibitors such as erastin, IKE, RSL3 and sorafenib is administering them concurrent with radiotherapy to overcome radioresistance in NSCLC cells (116).
Table 2 Treatments for induction of ferroptosis in lung cancer.
5 Conclusion and Future Perspectives
This review provided an overall viewpoint and understanding of ferroptosis in lung cancer from molecular basis to prognostic and therapeutic significance. Although our understanding of ferroptosis is still insufficient, impressive efforts have been made during recent years to uncover the underlying mechanisms of ferroptosis, especially in NSCLC. To our knowledge, recent evidence has mainly focused on the role of system and GPX4 as main inhibitors of ferroptosis and other regulators and signaling pathways such as NRF2, p53, and UPS. These molecules have prominent roles in the ferroptosis process in lung cancer and are targeted by different treatments. Targeted delivery of drugs and ncRNAs involved in regulating ferroptosis and concurrent use of ferroptosis inhibitors alongside chemotherapy or radiotherapy have shown promising cytotoxic effects against lung cancer. Moreover, recent conducted bioinformatic analyses specifically address the impact of ferroptosis regulators in predicting patients’ overall survival and their close relationship with immune response. Therefore, it is suggested that future studies investigate the link between ferroptosis and immune response in lung cancer. As another limitation, the majority of these studies have focused on NSCLC, and there are very few studies that have evaluated ferroptosis in other subtypes of lung cancer (e.g., SCLC). These data together indicate that ferroptosis as a newly discovered cell death appears a promising target in lung cancer that can serve as a new candidate for its future treatment.
Author Contributions
PT wrote the original draft. ZH drew the figures and their captions. SS assisted PT in writing the manuscript. SS and ZH both should be considered second authors. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We would like to add our special thanks to Frontiers Fee Support Office, Frontiers in Oncology Editorial Office, and Frontiers in Oncology Production Office.
References
1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin (2021) 71:209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
2. Bade BC, Dela Cruz CS. Lung Cancer 2020: Epidemiology, Etiology, and Prevention. Clin Chest Med (2020) 41:1–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2019.10.001
3. Rodriguez-Canales J, Parra-Cuentas E, Wistuba II. Diagnosis and Molecular Classification of Lung Cancer. Lung Cancer (2016) 170:25–46. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40389-2_2
4. Zappa C, Mousa SA. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Treatment and Future Advances. Transl Lung Cancer Res (2016) 5:288. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2016.06.07
5. Cooper WA, Lam DCL, O’Toole SA, Minna JD. Molecular Biology of Lung Cancer. J Thorac Dis (2013) 5:S479. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.08.03
6. Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, Skouta R, Zaitsev EM, Gleason CE, et al. Ferroptosis: An Iron-Dependent Form of Nonapoptotic Cell Death. Cell (2012) 149:1060–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.042
7. Hirschhorn T, Stockwell BR. The Development of the Concept of Ferroptosis. Free Radic Biol Med (2019) 133:130–43. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.09.043
8. Tang D, Chen X, Kang R, Kroemer G. Ferroptosis: Molecular Mechanisms and Health Implications. Cell Res (2021) 31:107–25. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-00441-1
9. Jiang X, Stockwell BR, Conrad M. Ferroptosis: Mechanisms, Biology and Role in Disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2021) 22:266–82. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00324-8
10. Chen X, Kang R, Kroemer G, Tang D. Broadening Horizons: The Role of Ferroptosis in Cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2021) 18:280–96. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-00462-0
11. Li G, Yang J, Zhao G, Shen Z, Yang K, Tian L, et al. Dysregulation of Ferroptosis may Involve in the Development of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Xuanwei Area. J Cell Mol Med (2021) 25:2872–84. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16318
12. Shin C-S, Mishra P, Watrous JD, Carelli V, D’Aurelio M, Jain M, et al. The Glutamate/Cystine xCT Antiporter Antagonizes Glutamine Metabolism and Reduces Nutrient Flexibility. Nat Commun (2017) 8:1–11. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15074
13. Koppula P, Zhuang L, Gan B. Cystine Transporter SLC7A11/xCT in Cancer: Ferroptosis, Nutrient Dependency, and Cancer Therapy. Protein Cell (2021) 12:599–620. doi: 10.1007/s13238-020-00789-5
14. Wang X, Chen Y, Wang X, Tian H, Wang Y, Jin J, et al. Stem Cell Factor SOX2 Confers Ferroptosis Resistance in Lung Cancer via Upregulation of SLC7A11. Cancer Res (2021) 81:5217–29. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-0567
15. Zhang W, Sun Y, Bai L, Zhi L, Yang Y, Zhao Q, et al. RBMS1 Regulates Lung Cancer Ferroptosis Through Translational Control of SLC7A11. J Clin Invest (2021) 131(22):1–20. doi: 10.1172/JCI152067
16. Ma L, Chen T, Zhang X, Miao Y, Tian X, Yu K, et al. The M6a Reader YTHDC2 Inhibits Lung Adenocarcinoma Tumorigenesis by Suppressing SLC7A11-Dependent Antioxidant Function. Redox Biol (2021) 38:101801. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101801
17. Ma L, Zhang X, Yu K, Xu X, Chen T, Shi Y, et al. Targeting SLC3A2 Subunit of System XC– Is Essential for M6a Reader YTHDC2 to be an Endogenous Ferroptosis Inducer in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Free Radic Biol Med (2021) 168:25–43. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.03.023
18. Zhang X, Sui S, Wang L, Li H, Zhang L, Xu S, et al. Inhibition of Tumor Propellant Glutathione Peroxidase 4 Induces Ferroptosis in Cancer Cells and Enhances Anticancer Effect of Cisplatin. J Cell Physiol (2020) 235:3425–37. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29232
19. Ni J, Chen K, Zhang J, Zhang X. Inhibition of GPX4 or mTOR Overcomes Resistance to Lapatinib via Promoting Ferroptosis in NSCLC Cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2021) 567:154–60. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.06.051
20. Wang Z, Zhang X, Tian X, Yang Y, Ma L, Wang J, et al. CREB Stimulates GPX4 Transcription to Inhibit Ferroptosis in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Oncol Rep (2021) 45:1–12. doi: 10.3892/or.2021.8039
21. Liu W, Zhou Y, Duan W, Song J, Wei S, Xia S, et al. Glutathione Peroxidase 4-Dependent Glutathione High-Consumption Drives Acquired Platinum Chemoresistance in Lung Cancer-Derived Brain Metastasis. Clin Transl Med (2021) 11:1–22. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.517
22. Lai Y, Zhang Z, Li J, Li W, Huang Z, Zhang C, et al. STYK1/NOK Correlates With Ferroptosis in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, Biochem. Biophys Res Commun (2019) 519:659–66. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.09.032
23. Bersuker K, Hendricks JM, Li Z, Magtanong L, Ford B, Tang PH, et al. The CoQ Oxidoreductase FSP1 Acts Parallel to GPX4 to Inhibit Ferroptosis. Nature (2019) 575:688–92. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1705-2
24. Alvarez SW, Sviderskiy VO, Terzi EM, Papagiannakopoulos T, Moreira AL, Adams S, et al. NFS1 Undergoes Positive Selection in Lung Tumours and Protects Cells From Ferroptosis. Nature (2017) 551:639–43. doi: 10.1038/nature24637
25. Alvarez SW, Possemato R. Leveraging the Iron-Starvation Response to Promote Ferroptosis. Oncotarget (2018) 9:10830. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24395
26. Dodson M, Castro-Portuguez R, Zhang DD. NRF2 Plays a Critical Role in Mitigating Lipid Peroxidation and Ferroptosis. Redox Biol (2019) 23:101107. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101107
27. Takahashi N, Cho P, Selfors LM, Kuiken HJ, Kaul R, Fujiwara T, et al. 3D Culture Models With CRISPR Screens Reveal Hyperactive NRF2 as a Prerequisite for Spheroid Formation via Regulation of Proliferation and Ferroptosis. Mol Cell (2020) 80:828–44. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.10.010
28. Kwon O-S, Kwon E-J, Kong H-J, Choi J-Y, Kim Y-J, Lee E-W, et al. Systematic Identification of a Nuclear Receptor-Enriched Predictive Signature for Erastin-Induced Ferroptosis. Redox Biol (2020) 37:101719. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101719
29. Deshmukh P, Unni S, Krishnappa G, Padmanabhan B. The Keap1–Nrf2 Pathway: Promising Therapeutic Target to Counteract ROS-Mediated Damage in Cancers and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Biophys Rev (2017) 9:41–56. doi: 10.1007/s12551-016-0244-4
30. Koppula P, Olszewski K, Zhang Y, Kondiparthi L, Liu X, Lei G, et al. KEAP1 Deficiency Drives Glucose Dependency and Sensitizes Lung Cancer Cells and Tumors to GLUT Inhibition. Iscience (2021) 24:102649. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108444
31. Wohlhieter CA, Richards AL, Uddin F, Hulton CH, Quintanal-Villalonga À., Martin A, et al. Concurrent Mutations in STK11 and KEAP1 Promote Ferroptosis Protection and SCD1 Dependence in Lung Cancer. Cell Rep (2020) 33:108444. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108444
32. Zhang J, Song F, Zhao X, Jiang H, Wu X, Wang B, et al. EGFR Modulates Monounsaturated Fatty Acid Synthesis Through Phosphorylation of SCD1 in Lung Cancer. Mol Cancer (2017) 16:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0704-x
33. Gao M, Yi J, Zhu J, Minikes AM, Monian P, Thompson CB, et al. Role of Mitochondria in Ferroptosis. Mol Cell (2019) 73:354–63. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.042
34. Liu P, Wu D, Duan J, Xiao H, Zhou Y, Zhao L, et al. NRF2 Regulates the Sensitivity of Human NSCLC Cells to Cystine Deprivation-Induced Ferroptosis via FOCAD-FAK Signaling Pathway. Redox Biol (2020) 37:101702. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101702
35. Kang YP, Mockabee-Macias A, Jiang C, Falzone A, Prieto-Farigua N, Stone E, et al. Non-Canonical Glutamate-Cysteine Ligase Activity Protects Against Ferroptosis. Cell Metab (2021) 33:174–89. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.12.007
36. Wang L, Chen Y, Mi Y, Qiao J, Jin H, Li J, et al. ATF2 Inhibits Ani-Tumor Effects of BET Inhibitor in a Negative Feedback Manner by Attenuating Ferroptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2021) 558:216–23. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.08.113
37. Wang H, Huang Q, Xia J, Cheng S, Pei D, Zhang X, et al. The E3 Ligase MIB1 Promotes Proteasomal Degradation of NRF2 and Sensitizes Lung Cancer Cells to Ferroptosis. Mol Cancer Res (2021). doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-21-0342
38. Yuan Z, Liu T, Wang H, Xue L, Wang J. Fatty Acids Metabolism: The Bridge Between Ferroptosis and Ionizing Radiation. Front Cell Dev Biol (2021) 9:1691. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.675617
39. Li D, Li Y. The Interaction Between Ferroptosis and Lipid Metabolism in Cancer. Signal Transduction Targeting Ther (2020) 5:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41392-019-0089-y
40. Bebber CM, Thomas ES, Stroh J, Chen Z, Androulidaki A, Schmitt A, et al. Ferroptosis Response Segregates Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Neuroendocrine Subtypes. Nat Commun (2021) 12:1–19. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22336-4
41. Zhang Y, Li S, Li F, Lv C, Yang Q. High-Fat Diet Impairs Ferroptosis and Promotes Cancer Invasiveness via Downregulating Tumor Suppressor ACSL4 in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Biol Direct (2021) 16:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s13062-020-00284-1
42. da Cunha Santos G, Shepherd FA, Tsao MS. EGFR Mutations and Lung Cancer. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis (2011) 6:49–69. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-011110-130206
43. Poursaitidis I, Wang X, Crighton T, Labuschagne C, Mason D, Cramer SL, et al. Oncogene-Selective Sensitivity to Synchronous Cell Death Following Modulation of the Amino Acid Nutrient Cystine. Cell Rep (2017) 18:2547–56. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.054
44. Muz B, de la Puente P, Azab F, Azab AK. The Role of Hypoxia in Cancer Progression, Angiogenesis, Metastasis, and Resistance to Therapy. Hypoxia (2015) 3:83. doi: 10.2147/HP.S93413
45. Lee S-H, Koo KH, Park J-W, Kim H-J, Ye S-K, Park JB, et al. HIF-1 Is Induced via EGFR Activation and Mediates Resistance to Anoikis-Like Cell Death Under Lipid Rafts/Caveolae-Disrupting Stress. Carcinogenesis (2009) 30:1997–2004. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp233
46. Feng X, Wang S, Sun Z, Dong H, Yu H, Huang M, et al. Ferroptosis Enhanced Diabetic Renal Tubular Injury via HIF-1α/HO-1 Pathway in Db/Db Mice. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2021) 12:21. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.626390
47. Fuhrmann DC, Mondorf A, Beifuß J, Jung M, Brüne B. Hypoxia Inhibits Ferritinophagy, Increases Mitochondrial Ferritin, and Protects From Ferroptosis. Redox Biol (2020) 36:101670. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101670
48. Jiang Y, Mao C, Yang R, Yan B, Shi Y, Liu X, et al. EGLN1/c-Myc Induced Lymphoid-Specific Helicase Inhibits Ferroptosis Through Lipid Metabolic Gene Expression Changes. Theranostics (2017) 7:3293. doi: 10.7150/thno.19988
49. Jiang Y, He Y, Liu S, Tao Y. Chromatin Remodeling Factor Lymphoid-Specific Helicase Inhibits Ferroptosis Through Lipid Metabolic Genes in Lung Cancer Progression. Chin J Cancer (2017) 36:1–3. doi: 10.1186/s40880-017-0248-x
50. Kang R, Kroemer G, Tang D. The Tumor Suppressor Protein P53 and the Ferroptosis Network. Free Radic Biol Med (2019) 133:162–8. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.05.074
51. Ou Y, Wang S-J, Li D, Chu B, Gu W. Activation of SAT1 Engages Polyamine Metabolism With P53-Mediated Ferroptotic Responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci (2016) 113:E6806–12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607152113
52. Shostak K, Jiang Z, Charloteaux B, Mayer A, Habraken Y, Tharun L, et al. The X-Linked Trichothiodystrophy-Causing Gene RNF113A Links the Spliceosome to Cell Survival Upon DNA Damage. Nat Commun (2020) 11:1–21. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15003-7
53. Wang GX, Tu H-C, Dong Y, Skanderup AJ, Wang Y, Takeda S, et al. Δnp63 Inhibits Oxidative Stress-Induced Cell Death, Including Ferroptosis, and Cooperates With the BCL-2 Family to Promote Clonogenic Survival. Cell Rep (2017) 21:2926–39. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.030
54. Wang X, Wang Y, Li Z, Qin J, Wang P. Regulation of Ferroptosis Pathway by Ubiquitination. Front Cell Dev Biol (2021) 9. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.699304
55. Tang Z, Jiang W, Mao M, Zhao J, Chen J, Cheng N. Deubiquitinase USP35 Modulates Ferroptosis in Lung Cancer via Targeting Ferroportin. Clin Transl Med (2021) 11:e390. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.390
56. Meng C, Zhan J, Chen D, Shao G, Zhang H, Gu W, et al. The Deubiquitinase USP11 Regulates Cell Proliferation and Ferroptotic Cell Death via Stabilization of NRF2 USP11 Deubiquitinates and Stabilizes NRF2. Oncogene (2021) 40:1706–20. doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01660-5
57. Villalpando-Rodriguez GE, Blankstein AR, Konzelman C, Gibson SB. Lysosomal Destabilizing Drug Siramesine and the Dual Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Lapatinib Induce a Synergistic Ferroptosis Through Reduced Heme Oxygenase-1 (HO-1) Levels, Oxid. Med Cell Longev (2019) 2019:1–14. doi: 10.1155/2019/9561281
58. Zhou B, Liu J, Kang R, Klionsky DJ, Kroemer G, Tang D. Ferroptosis Is a Type of Autophagy-Dependent Cell Death. In: Semin. Cancer Biol. Elsevier (2020). p. 89–100.
59. Liu J, Kuang F, Kroemer G, Klionsky DJ, Kang R, Tang D. Autophagy-Dependent Ferroptosis: Machinery and Regulation. Cell Chem Biol (2020) 27:420–35. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.02.005
60. Tsai Y, Xia C, Sun Z. The Inhibitory Effect of 6-Gingerol on Ubiquitin-Specific Peptidase 14 Enhances Autophagy-Dependent Ferroptosis and Anti-Tumor In Vivo and In Vitro. Front Pharmacol (2020) 11. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.598555
61. Tang X, Ding H, Liang M, Chen X, Yan Y, Wan N, et al. Curcumin Induces Ferroptosis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer via Activating Autophagy. Thorac Cancer (2021) 12:1219–30. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13904
62. Boopathy GTK, Hong W. Role of Hippo Pathway-YAP/TAZ Signaling in Angiogenesis. Front Cell Dev Biol (2019) 7:49. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00049
63. Zhang X, Yu K, Ma L, Qian Z, Tian X, Miao Y, et al. Endogenous Glutamate Determines Ferroptosis Sensitivity via ADCY10-Dependent YAP Suppression in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Theranostics (2021) 11:5650. doi: 10.7150/thno.55482
64. Chen P, Wu Q, Feng J, Yan L, Sun Y, Liu S, et al. Erianin, a Novel Dibenzyl Compound in Dendrobium Extract, Inhibits Lung Cancer Cell Growth and Migration via Calcium/Calmodulin-Dependent Ferroptosis. Signal Transduction Targeting Ther (2020) 5:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0149-3
65. Palmer LD, Jordan AT, Maloney KN, Farrow MA, Gutierrez DB, Gant-Branum R, et al. Zinc Intoxication Induces Ferroptosis in A549 Human Lung Cells. Metallomics (2019) 11:982–93. doi: 10.1039/C8MT00360B
66. Liu Y, Wang Y, Liu J, Kang R, Tang D. Interplay Between MTOR and GPX4 Signaling Modulates Autophagy-Dependent Ferroptotic Cancer Cell Death. Cancer Gene Ther (2021) 28:55–63. doi: 10.1038/s41417-020-0182-y
67. Slaby O, Laga R, Sedlacek O. Therapeutic Targeting of Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer. Biochem J (2017) 474:4219–51. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20170079
68. Xie B, Guo Y. Molecular Mechanism of Cell Ferroptosis and Research Progress in Regulation of Ferroptosis by Noncoding RNAs in Tumor Cells. Cell Death Discovery (2021) 7:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41420-021-00483-3
69. Uddin A, Chakraborty S. Role of miRNAs in Lung Cancer. J Cell Physiol (2018), 1–10. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26607
70. Wei D, Ke Y-Q, Duan P, Zhou L, Wang C-Y, Cao P. MicroRNA-302a-3p Induces Ferroptosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells via Targeting Ferroportin. Free Radic Res (2021) 55:1–10. doi: 10.1080/10715762.2021.1947503
71. Deng S, Wu D, Li L, Liu T, Zhang T, Li J, et al. miR-324-3p Reverses Cisplatin Resistance by Inducing GPX4-Mediated Ferroptosis in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cell Line A549, Biochem. Biophys Res Commun (2021) 549:54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.02.077
72. Song Z, Jia G, Ma P, Cang S. Exosomal miR-4443 Promotes Cisplatin Resistance in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma by Regulating FSP1 M6a Modification-Mediated Ferroptosis. Life Sci (2021) 276:119399. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119399
73. Wang X, Yin H, Zhang L, Zheng D, Yang Y, Zhang J, et al. The Construction and Analysis of the Aberrant lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA Network in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Thorac Dis (2019) 11:1772. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.69
74. Wang M, Mao C, Ouyang L, Liu Y, Lai W, Liu N, et al. Long Noncoding RNA LINC00336 Inhibits Ferroptosis in Lung Cancer by Functioning as a Competing Endogenous RNA. Cell Death Differ (2019) 26:2329–43. doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0304-y
75. Mao C, Wang X, Liu Y, Wang M, Yan B, Jiang Y, et al. A G3BP1-Interacting lncRNA Promotes Ferroptosis and Apoptosis in Cancer via Nuclear Sequestration of P53. Cancer Res (2018) 78:3484–96. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3454
76. Wu H, Liu A. Long Non-Coding RNA NEAT1 Regulates Ferroptosis Sensitivity in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Int Med Res (2021) 49:0300060521996183. doi: 10.1177/0300060521996183
77. Sui X, Hu N, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Wang P, Xiu G. ASMTL-AS1 Impedes the Malignant Progression of Lung Adenocarcinoma by Regulating SAT1 to Promote Ferroptosis. Pathol Int (2021) 71(11):741–51. doi: 10.1111/pin.13158
78. Gai C, Liu C, Wu X, Yu M, Zheng J, Zhang W, et al. MT1DP Loaded by Folate-Modified Liposomes Sensitizes Erastin-Induced Ferroptosis via Regulating miR-365a-3p/NRF2 Axis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells. Cell Death Dis (2020) 11:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-02939-3
79. Chen H-H, Zhang T-N, Wu Q-J, Huang X-M, Zhao Y-H. Circular RNAs in Lung Cancer: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. Front Oncol (2021) 11:2616. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.664290
80. Shanshan W, Hongying M, Jingjing F, Yiming Y, Yu R, Rui Y. CircDTL Functions as an Oncogene and Regulates Both Apoptosis and Ferroptosis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells. Front Genet (2021) 1681. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.743505
81. Ren Z, Hu M, Wang Z, Ge J, Zhou X, Zhang G, et al. Ferroptosis-Related Genes in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Prognostic Signature and Immune, Drug Resistance, Mutation Analysis. Front Genet (2021) 12. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.672904
82. Cai J, Li C, Li H, Wang X, Zhou Y. Establishment of a Ferroptosis-Related Gene Signature for Prognosis in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients. PeerJ (2021) 9:e11931. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11931
83. Ma C, Li F, Luo H. Prognostic and Immune Implications of a Novel Ferroptosis-Related Ten-Gene Signature in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Ann Transl Med (2021) 9:1–26. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7936
84. Wang Y, Chen W, Zhu M, Xian L. Ferroptosis-Related Gene Signature and Patterns of Immune Infiltration Predict the Overall Survival in Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma. Front Mol Biosci (2021) 8. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.692530
85. Tian Q, Zhou Y, Zhu L, Gao H, Yang J. Development and Validation of a Ferroptosis-Related Gene Signature for Overall Survival Prediction in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Front Cell Dev Biol (2021) 9. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.684259
86. Tu G, Peng W, Cai Q, Zhao Z, Peng X, He B, et al. Construction and Validation of a 15-Gene Ferroptosis Signature in Lung Adenocarcinoma. PeerJ (2021) 9:e11687. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11687
87. Li F, Ge D, Sun S. A Novel Ferroptosis-Related Genes Model for Prognosis Prediction of Lung Adenocarcinoma. BMC Pulm Med (2021) 21:229. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01588-2
88. Wang S, Wu C, Ma D, Hu Q. Identification of a Ferroptosis-Related Gene Signature (FRGS) for Predicting Clinical Outcome in Lung Adenocarcinoma. PeerJ (2021) 9:e11233. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11233
89. Sun S, Guo W, Lv F, Zhang G, Wang J, Li R, et al. Comprehensive Analysis of Ferroptosis Regulators in Lung Adenocarcinomas Identifies Prognostic and Immunotherapy-Related Biomarkers. Front Mol Biosci (2021) 8:107. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.587436
90. Liu T, Luo H, Zhang J, Hu X, Zhang J. Molecular Identification of an Immunity- and Ferroptosis-Related Gene Signature in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. BMC Cancer (2021) 21:783. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08541-w
91. Zhang A, Yang J, Ma C, Li F, Luo H. Development and Validation of a Robust Ferroptosis-Related Prognostic Signature in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Front Cell Dev Biol (2021) 9:1632. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.616271
92. Jin J, Liu C, Yu S, Cai L, Sitrakiniaina A, Gu R, et al. A Novel Ferroptosis-Related Gene Signature for Prognostic Prediction of Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma. Aging (Albany NY) (2021) 13:16144. doi: 10.18632/aging.203140
93. Zhu G, Huang H, Xu S, Shi R, Gao Z, Lei X, et al. Prognostic Value of Ferroptosis-Related Genes in Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma. Thorac Cancer (2021) 12(12):1890–9. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13998
94. Zheng Z, Zhang Q, Wu W, Xue Y, Liu S, Chen Q, et al. Identification and Validation of a Ferroptosis-Related Long Non-Coding RNA Signature for Predicting the Outcome of Lung Adenocarcinoma. Front Genet (2021) 12. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.690509
95. Guo Y, Qu Z, Li D, Bai F, Xing J, Ding Q, et al. Identification of a Prognostic Ferroptosis-Related lncRNA Signature in the Tumor Microenvironment of Lung Adenocarcinoma. Cell Death Discovery (2021) 7:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41421-020-00236-z
96. Yao J, Chen X, Liu X, Li R, Zhou X, Qu Y. Characterization of a Ferroptosis and Iron-Metabolism Related lncRNA Signature in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell Int (2021) 21:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-02027-2
97. Lu L, Liu L-P, Zhao Q-Q, Gui R, Zhao Q-Y. Identification of a Ferroptosis-Related LncRNA Signature as a Novel Prognosis Model for Lung Adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol (2021) 11:2443. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.675545
98. Huang F, Zheng Y, Li X, Luo H, Luo L. Ferroptosis-Related Gene AKR1C1 Predicts the Prognosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Cell Int (2021) 21:1–16. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-02267-2
99. Huang C, Yang M, Deng J, Li P, Su W, Jiang R. Upregulation and Activation of P53 by Erastin−Induced Reactive Oxygen Species Contribute to Cytotoxic and Cytostatic Effects in A549 Lung Cancer Cells. Oncol Rep (2018) 40:2363–70. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6585
100. Guo J, Xu B, Han Q, Zhou H, Xia Y, Gong C, et al. Ferroptosis: A Novel Anti-Tumor Action for Cisplatin. Cancer Res Treat Off J Korean Cancer Assoc (2018) 50:445. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.572
101. Liang Z, Zhao W, Li X, Wang L, Meng L, Yu R. Cisplatin Synergizes With PRLX93936 to Induce Ferroptosis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells, Biochem. Biophys Res Commun (2021) 569:79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.06.088
102. Zhang T, Sun B, Zhong C, Xu K, Wang Z, Hofman P, et al. Targeting Histone Deacetylase Enhances the Therapeutic Effect of Erastin-Induced Ferroptosis in EGFR-Activating Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma. Transl Lung Cancer Res (2021) 10:1857. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-303
103. Gai C, Yu M, Li Z, Wang Y, Ding D, Zheng J, et al. Acetaminophen Sensitizing Erastin-Induced Ferroptosis via Modulation of Nrf2/heme Oxygenase-1 Signaling Pathway in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Cell Physiol (2020) 235:3329–39. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29221
104. Li Y, Yan H, Xu X, Liu H, Wu C, Zhao L. Erastin/sorafenib Induces Cisplatin−Resistant Non−Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell Ferroptosis Through Inhibition of the Nrf2/xCT Pathway. Oncol Lett (2020) 19:323–33. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.11066
105. Meng M, Huang M, Liu C, Wang J, Ren W, Cui S, et al. Local Anesthetic Levobupivacaine Induces Ferroptosis and Inhibits Progression by Up-Regulating P53 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Aging (Albany NY) (2021) 13:1–12. doi: 10.18632/aging.203138
106. Boullosa LF, Van Loenhout J, Flieswasser T, De Waele J, Hermans C, Lambrechts H, et al. Auranofin Reveals Therapeutic Anticancer Potential by Triggering Distinct Molecular Cell Death Mechanisms and Innate Immunity in Mutant P53 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Redox Biol (2021) 42:101949. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.101949
107. Zhang Q, Yi H, Yao H, Lu L, He G, Wu M, et al. Artemisinin Derivatives Inhibit Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells Through Induction of ROS-Dependent Apoptosis/Ferroptosis. J Cancer (2021) 12:4075. doi: 10.7150/jca.57054
108. Wu C-Y, Yang Y-H, Lin Y-S, Chang G-H, Tsai M-S, Hsu C-M, et al. Dihydroisotanshinone I Induced Ferroptosis and Apoptosis of Lung Cancer Cells. Biomed Pharmacother (2021) 139:111585. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111585
109. Li X, Li W, Yang P, Zhou H, Zhang W, Ma L. Anticancer Effects of Cryptotanshinone Against Lung Cancer Cells Through Ferroptosis. Arab J Chem (2021) 14:103177. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103177
110. Iida Y, Okamoto-κatsuyama M, Maruoka S, Mizumura K, Shimizu T, Shikano S, et al. Effective Ferroptotic Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cell Death From SLC7A11 Inhibition by Sulforaphane. Oncol Lett (2021) 21:1. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.12332
111. Lou J-S, Zhao L-P, Huang Z-H, Chen X-Y, Xu J-T, Tai WC-S, et al. Ginkgetin Derived From Ginkgo Biloba Leaves Enhances the Therapeutic Effect of Cisplatin via Ferroptosis-Mediated Disruption of the Nrf2/HO-1 Axis in EGFR Wild-Type Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Phytomedicine (2021) 80:153370. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2020.153370
112. Wu W, Geng Z, Bai H, Liu T, Zhang B. Ammonium Ferric Citrate Induced Ferroptosis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Through the Inhibition of GPX4-GSS/GSR-GGT Axis Activity. Int J Med Sci (2021) 18:1899. doi: 10.7150/ijms.54860
113. Hsieh C-H, Hsieh H-C, Shih F-S, Wang P-W, Yang L-X, Shieh D-B, et al. An Innovative NRF2 Nano-Modulator Induces Lung Cancer Ferroptosis and Elicits an Immunostimulatory Tumor Microenvironment. Theranostics (2021) 11:7072. doi: 10.7150/thno.57803
114. Yuan L-Q, Wang C, Lu D-F, Zhao X-D, Tan L-H, Chen X. Induction of Apoptosis and Ferroptosis by a Tumor Suppressing Magnetic Field Through ROS-Mediated DNA Damage. Aging (Albany NY) (2020) 12:3662. doi: 10.18632/aging.102836
115. Ye LF, Chaudhary KR, Zandkarimi F, Harken AD, Kinslow CJ, Upadhyayula PS, et al. Radiation-Induced Lipid Peroxidation Triggers Ferroptosis and Synergizes With Ferroptosis Inducers. ACS Chem Biol (2020) 15:469–84. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.9b00939
116. Pan X, Lin Z, Jiang D, Yu Y, Yang D, Zhou H, et al. Erastin Decreases Radioresistance of NSCLC Cells Partially by Inducing GPX4−Mediated Ferroptosis. Oncol Lett (2019) 17:3001–8. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.9888
Keywords: lung cancer, ferroptosis, biomarkers, cell death, Nrf2, iron metabolism, ROS, immunity
Citation: Tabnak P, HajiEsmailPoor Z and Soraneh S (2021) Ferroptosis in Lung Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Prognostic and Therapeutic Opportunities. Front. Oncol. 11:792827. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.792827
Received: 11 October 2021; Accepted: 15 November 2021;
Published: 02 December 2021.
Edited by:
Jian Chen, Guilin Medical University, ChinaReviewed by:
Xiao Zhang, Shanghai Jiaotong University, ChinaMichael Wayne Epperly, University of Pittsburgh, United States
Copyright © 2021 Tabnak, HajiEsmailPoor and Soraneh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Peyman Tabnak, ZHJ0YWJuYWtAZ21haWwuY29t;; tabnakp@tbzmed.ac.ir
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share second authorship