Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol., 11 January 2022
Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Cancers
This article is part of the Research Topic Hard but Hopeful: the Clinical and Translational Research Progress in Pancreatic Cancer View all 13 articles

Lipoxins and Resolvins in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: A Preliminary Report

Wojciech Blogowski*Wojciech Blogowski1*Katarzyna DolegowskaKatarzyna Dolegowska2Anna DeskurAnna Deskur3Barbara DolegowskaBarbara Dolegowska2Teresa StarzynskaTeresa Starzynska3
  • 1Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Zielona Gora, Zielona Gora, Poland
  • 2Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
  • 3Department of Gastroenterology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland

Eicosanoids are bioactive lipids derived from arachidonic acid, which have emerged as key regulators of a wide variety of pathophysiological processes in recent times and are implicated as mediators of gastrointestinal cancer. In this study, we investigated the systemic levels of lipoxygenase (LOX)-derived lipoxin A4 and B4, together with resolvin D1 and D2 in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 68), as well as in healthy individuals (n = 32). Systemic concentrations of the aforementioned immunoresolvents were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In this study, we observed that compared with concentrations in healthy individuals, the peripheral concentrations of the aforementioned eicosanoids were significantly elevated (2- to 10-fold) in patients with pancreatic cancer (in all cases p<0.00001). No significant association was observed between eicosanoid levels and the TNM clinical staging. Furthermore, we observed no significant differences in concentrations of the analyzed bioactive lipids between patients diagnosed with early-stage (TNM stage I-II) and more advanced disease (TNM stage III-IV). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of each aforementioned immunoresolvent showed area under the curve values ranging between 0.79 and 1.00. Sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values of the eicosanoids involved in the detection/differentiation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma ranged between 56.8% and 100%. In summary, our research is the first study that provides clinical evidence to support a systemic imbalance in LOX-derived lipoxins and resolvins as the mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This phenomenon occurs regardless of the clinical TNM stage of the disease. Furthermore, our study is the first to preliminarily highlight the role of peripheral levels of immunoresolvents, particularly resolvin D1, as potential novel biomarkers of pancreatic cancer in humans.

Introduction

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an extremely aggressive and invariably fatal malignancy in humans. Approximately 60,000 individuals are diagnosed with this malignancy that is known to cause 50,000 deaths annually in the United States. Multiple risk factors including age, certain genetic syndromes, smoking, diabetes, alcohol abuse, and obesity are implicated as etiopathogenetic contributors to pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and several molecular pathways associated with pancreatic cancer have been identified (1, 2). However, the exact mechanisms underlying this disease remain unclear. Therefore, prevention, early detection, and prompt treatment are clinically challenging.

Bioactive lipids derived from arachidonic acid (AA), referred to as eicosanoids are implicated as key factors in carcinogenesis, in recent times. These AA derivatives represent a large family of substances that affect multiorgan function, including gastrointestinal physiology and regulate several pathophysiological processes in the body, such as vascular flow, angiogenesis, cellular proliferation, inflammation, and metabolism (36). From the biochemical viewpoint, AA-derived eicosanoids are produced via the CYP450, cyclo-oxygenase (COX), or lipoxygenase (LOX) enzymatic pathways (7, 8). Among the various eicosanoids generated via the aforementioned enzymatic pathways, bioactive lipids such as leukotrienes, hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids, lipoxins, and resolvins have gained much attention as significant contributors to malignancies. This effect is mainly associated with their actions on immune cell function and modulation of both initiation (leukotrienes) and resolution (lipoxins, resolvins) of inflammatory processes (912). Although acute inflammation is usually a physiological response that protects the body from temporary microbial infections or injurious stimuli, uncontrolled chronic inflammation predisposes to carcinogenesis via DNA injury, epigenetic dysregulation, genomic instability, and/or changes in intracellular signaling. LOX-derived lipoxins and resolvins participate in resolution of inflammation; several experimental studies have shown their benefits in suppression of chronic inflammation-induced tumorigenesis (13, 14). These results support the potential application of these immunoresolvents as promising preventive or anti-cancer agents (1518); however, limited information is available regarding their role in the development of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in humans.

In this study, we preliminarily investigated the systemic concentrations of lipoxins (A4 and B4) and resolvins (D1 and D2) in patients with pancreatic cancer and compared these values with those observed in healthy individuals. Moreover, we investigated the association between clinical TNM staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and immunoresolvents’ levels in patients with cancer. We additionally investigated whether systemic concentrations of lipoxins and resolvins show any significant diagnostic value for detection/differentiation of pancreatic cancer.

Material and Methods

Study Participants and Clinical Protocols

We recruited 100 individuals in this study. All participants were evaluated (in an outpatient or inpatient setting) at our Department and were confirmed to be stable with good general health. Exclusion criteria were as follows: an active infectious/inflammatory disease, a history of any malignancy, administration of medications that could potentially interfere with AA metabolism (such as COX inhibitors), a history of blood transfusions within 6 months prior to study enrollment, active supplementation of lipid derivatives (omega-3 fatty acids), and/or refusal to participate in the study.

Among the 100 patients recruited for the study, 68 were diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and were categorized into the “cancer” group. Similar to previous studies performed by our group (1921), diagnosis of pancreatic cancer was based on evaluation of biopsy specimens obtained via endoscopic ultrasound, paracentesis (in patients with neoplastic ascites), or liver biopsy (in patients with metastatic disease). All patients underwent laboratory tests and imaging (abdominal/chest computed tomography and/or abdominal ultrasonography), and these results were subsequently used for TNM staging of the cancer. In this study, stage I and II pancreatic adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 5 and 17 patients, respectively. Advanced-stage disease (stage III) occurred in 11 patients and metastatic disease (stage IV) in 35 patients. All patients had a recent diagnosis of pancreatic cancer at the time of study inclusion; therefore, no patient received any chemotherapy or any cytotoxic therapy within a year preceding the diagnosis, and no active acute infection or disease was observed in any patient.

The control group in our study included 32 volunteers in an overall good state of health.

Blood Sample Collection and Systemic Immunoresolvent Level Measurements

Peripheral blood samples (8–10 mL) were obtained from all individuals enrolled in this study. The samples were immediately processed based on standard laboratory protocols; plasma was separated, frozen, and stored at –80°C until further tests were performed. The systemic concentrations of analyzed immunoresolvents (lipoxin A4 and B4 and resolvin D1 and D2) were measured using commercially available, high-sensitivity enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (Wuhan EIAab Science Co, Ltd., China and Cayman Chemicals, MI, USA) based on the manufacturers’ instructions.

Statistical Analysis

Similarly to our previous studies (22, 23) all of the received results were subjected to a comprehensive analysis with use of statistical software. Specifically, normality of distribution of the variables was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Continuous variables that were abnormally distributed were subjected to log transformation. Subsequently, if normality of the distribution was obtained then Student’s t-test was used to compare mean values of examined parameters between appropriate groups. Otherwise a Mann–Whitney U-test for non-parametric variables was used. In order to calculate the correlations between parametric and non-parametric variables we used Pearson’s or Spearman’s correlation rank tests (respectively). In addition, a multivariate regression analyses were performed with use of a stepwise selection method. In order to exclude eventual presence of any residual confounding we entered individually the variables that initially were excluded from the constructed model. Finally, we constructed the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and calculated the area under curve (AUC) values for all tested immunoresolvents as eventual diagnostic substances for pancreatic cancer in humans. All of these statistical analyses were performed with use of the SPSS software and p<0.05 values were considered as significant.

Results

Baseline Characteristics of Study Participants

Table 1 summarizes baseline characteristics of the study participants. No statistically significant differences were observed in age and sex distribution, body mass index (BMI), smoking and alcohol consumption habits, and medication history. However, statistical analysis showed significantly higher levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19.9 - pancreatic cancer marker) in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma than in healthy controls. Similarly, C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in the cancer group (Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 General characteristics of analyzed patients and healthy individuals enrolled in the study [data presented as means ± SD or median (interquartile range)].

Peripheral Concentrations of Immunoresolvents in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer vs. Healthy Volunteers

Figure 1 shows the mean values of systemic levels of immunoresolvents. We observed that peripheral levels of lipoxin A4 and B4 were significantly higher in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma than in healthy individuals (in both cases p<0.00001). Similar findings were observed with regard to resolvin D1 and D2 concentrations. Specifically, the mean peripheral levels of resolvin D1 and D2 were significantly higher (in both cases p<0.00001) in the cancer group than in the control group (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Mean values of the systemic levels of examined immunoresolvents in patients with pancreatic cancer and control individuals together with their statistical comparison (values presented as means ± standard deviation in pg/mL). *p < 0.00001 (vs “control” group).

Clinical Association Between Systemic Levels of Immunoresolvents and TNM Staging of Pancreatic Cancer

We investigated the association, if any, between significant changes in systemic levels of immunoresolvents and the clinical staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Correlation analysis showed no significant association between the TNM stage and lipoxin A4 (r=0.08), lipoxin B4 (r=0.13), resolvin D1 (r=0.03), and resolvin D2 (r=0.01) levels (p>0.28 in all cases). Multivariate regression analysis showed similar results (Table 2). Additionally, we subcategorized patients from the “cancer” group into two separate subgroups (TNM I–II and TNM III–IV) based on the clinical TNM staging and performed an intergroup comparison of the mean peripheral concentrations of lipoxins and resolvins. Analysis showed no significant differences in mean systemic immunoresolvent levels between patients diagnosed with TNM stage I–II pancreatic cancer and those with more advanced disease (stage III or IV) (p at least >0.21 in all cases) (Figure 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Results of statistical analysis of associations between systemic concentrations of examined immunoresolvents and clinical staging of pancreatic cancer in patients (modelling using multivariate regression analysis).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Mean systemic levels of examined immunoresolvents in subgroups of pancreatic cancer patients divided according to the TNM staging and healthy individuals together with their statistical comparison (values presented as means ± standard deviation in pg/mL). *p < 0.003 (vs “control” group).

Immunoresolvents as Potential Markers of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

In view of the significant differences in the mean concentrations of all immunoresolvents between healthy individuals and patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, we performed preliminary analysis to determine whether systemic levels of these substances are of diagnostic value for the detection and/or differentiation of pancreatic cancer in humans. Therefore, we constructed ROC curves for each eicosanoid and calculated the AUC values. Preliminary analysis revealed that systemic levels of all immunoresolvents investigated in this study showed strong diagnostic potential as promising biomarkers of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. AUC values ranged between 0.79 and 1.00 (Figure 3). Based on these results, we attempted to determine potential diagnostic cut-off values for levels of the aforementioned immunoresolvents and preliminarily characterized their estimated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (Table 3). We observed that resolvin D1 concentrations showed the most promising results with regard to diagnostic potential (up to 100%). Other newly proposed biomarkers showed approximately 75%–94.1% sensitivity, 65.6%–87.5% specificity, and 82.5%–94.1% and 56.8%–87.5% positive and negative predictive values, respectively.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for examined immunoresolvents as potential (bio)markers of pancreatic cancer. Calculated sensitivity (y-axis) is plotted against 1-specificity formula (x-axis) for examined immunoresolvents: (A) lipoxin A4 (LPxA4), (B) lipoxin B4 (LPxB4), (C) resolvin D1 (RsvD1) and (D) resolvin D2 (RsvD2) as potential indicators of pancreatic cancer. AUC, area under ROC curve; p, level of significance.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 Diagnostic value of examined immunoresolvents to discriminate presence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in our patients.

Discussion

LOX-derived lipoxins and resolvins represent a family of substances that play a major role in successful resolution of inflammation. Therefore, they are also expected to be significant mediators of carcinogenesis, because uncontrolled chronic inflammation is known to be associated with the development of solid malignancies (2427). However, limited data are available regarding the significance of immunoresolvents in the development of pancreatic adenocarcinoma; few clinical studies have discussed these bioactive lipids in patients with this malignancy. In this study, we investigated a broad panel of immunoresolvents in patients with pancreatic cancer and attempted to determine the clinical associations and diagnostic value, if any, of these substances.

We observed that patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma showed significantly elevated levels of immunoresolvents, such as lipoxins and resolvins. Our results are consistent with those reported by previous studies, which show significant genetic expression of LOX enzymes in the ductal cells of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and in resected tissue specimens (2830). Previous studies have reported that only sporadic LOX expression was detected in pancreatic ductal cells in normal human pancreas. In our study, compared with levels in healthy individuals, we observed an approximate 2-fold mean increase in systemic lipoxin levels and specifically a 10-fold or higher increase in systemic resolvin D1 levels in patients with pancreatic cancer. Interestingly, such significant elevations in lipoxin and resolvin levels were observed regardless of the clinical staging of the pancreatic cancer based on the international TNM classification. The mean (elevated) immunoresolvent levels were similar between patients with both early- and advanced (metastatic)-stage disease. Unfortunately, currently, the exact etiology of elevated immunoresolvent levels and the exact molecular consequences of this phenomenon in patients with pancreatic cancer remain unclear. Several experimental studies that have investigated this subject at the molecular level show that immunoresolvents may inhibit pancreatic cancer progression and dissemination. Specifically, research has shown that immunoresolvents may inhibit differentiation of pancreatic stellate cells into cancer-induced fibroblast-like myofibroblasts and “re-program” the tumor stroma, reverse mesenchymal phenotypes of pancreatic cancer cells, and attenuate their invasion and metastasis via inhibition of (i) autocrine transforming growth factor β1 signaling, (ii) reactive oxygen species production and, (iii) activity of the extracellular signal regulated kinases that downregulate matrix metalloproteinases (3133). Based on the findings of these studies, the extent of the spontaneous eicosanoid response in patients with pancreatic cancer remains unclear, and the reason for the lack of a sustained increase in systemic generation of lipoxins and resolvins in advanced-stage pancreatic malignancy remains unexplained. Considering the conclusions drawn from all aforementioned molecular studies, it is reasonable to infer that significantly elevated lipoxin and resolvin levels most likely represent a natural response to pancreatic carcinogenesis in humans, to inhibit uncontrolled inflammation that is a hallmark of pancreatic cancer and additionally accelerates the progression of malignancy. However, further molecular and translational studies are warranted to accurately characterize this phenomenon, particularly focused on the exact mechanisms underlying this process and to verify whether modulation (particularly intensification) of the eicosanoid response could not offer clinical benefit in patients with pancreatic cancer.

In view of the significant differences in peripheral levels of lipoxins and resolvins observed in this study, we preliminarily investigated the diagnostic potential of these eicosanoids as biomarkers of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in humans. ROC curve analysis showed significantly high clinical diagnostic potential of the aforementioned immunoresolvents, particularly of resolvin D1. Therefore, our results support the hypotheses presented by previous studies, which suggest that genetic expression of LOX and/or LOX-derived eicosanoids may be significantly associated with carcinogenesis in addition to being promising biomarkers of various types of solid malignancies (34, 35). We emphasize that our results are preliminary considering the small sample size of our study; further large-scale clinical studies are warranted to validate and characterize the diagnostic potential of the aforementioned immunoresolvents in patients with pancreatic cancer.

In summary, our study highlights the significant alterations in the systemic balance of immunoresolvents, such as lipoxins and resolvins in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and that this finding is unaffected by the clinical TNM stage of the disease. Furthermore, our study is the first to preliminarily measure peripheral levels of lipoxins and resolvins, (particularly resolvin D1), which may potentially serve as novel biomarkers of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in humans.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because data set includes multiple clinical information. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to drannab@wp.pl.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the (Bio)Ethics Committee of the Pomeranian Medical University, and study participants provided written informed consent for participation in the study.

Author Contributions

WB, AD and TS developed and performed the clinical study protocols, as well as evaluated the clinical data. KD and BD developed the laboratory protocols and performed biochemical analyses. WB interpreted results, wrote and revised the article. All authors contributed to the article and approved its final version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Rawla P, Sunkara T, Gaduputi V. Epidemiology of Pancreatic Cancer: Global Trends, Etiology and Risk Factors. World J Oncol (2019) 10:10–27. doi: 10.14740/wjon1166

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ilic M, Ilic I. Epidemiology of Pancreatic Cancer. World J Gastroenterol (2016) 22:9694–705. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i44.9694

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Johnson AM, Kleczko EK, Nemenoff RA. Eicosanoids in Cancer: New Roles in Immunoregulation. Front Pharmacol (2020) 11:595498. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.595498

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Das UN. "Cell Membrane Theory of Senescence" and the Role of Bioactive Lipids in Aging, and Aging Associated Diseases and Their Therapeutic Implications. Biomolecules (2021) 112:241. doi: 10.3390/biom11020241

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Hisano Y, Hla T. Bioactive Lysolipids in Cancer and Angiogenesis. Pharmacol Ther (2019) 193:91–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.07.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Verma G, Marella A, Shaquiquzzaman M, Alam M. Immunoinflammatory Responses in Gastrointestinal Tract Injury and Recovery. Acta Biochim Pol (2013) 60:143–9. doi: 10.18388/abp.2013_1964

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Wang B, Wu L, Chen J, Dong L, Chen C, Wen Z, et al. Metabolism Pathways of Arachidonic Acids: Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutic Targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther (2021) 6:94. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00443-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Calder P. Eicosanoids. Essays Biochem (2020) 64:423–41. doi: 10.1042/EBC20190083

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Panigrahy D, Gilligan MM, Serhan CN, Kashfi K. Resolution of Inflammation: An Organizing Principle in Biology and Medicine. Pharmacol Ther (2021) 107879. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107879

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Serhan CN, Levy BD. Resolvins in Inflammation: Emergence of the Pro-Resolving Superfamily of Mediators. J Clin Invest (2018) 128:2657–69. doi: 10.1172/JCI97943

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Chandrasekharan JA, Sharma-Walia N. Lipoxins: Nature's Way to Resolve Inflammation. J Inflammation Res (2015) 8:181–92. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S90380

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Greene ER, Huang S, Serhan CN, Panigrahy D. Regulation of Inflammation in Cancer by Eicosanoids. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat (2011) 96:27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2011.08.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Lee HN, Na HK, Surh YS. Resolution of Inflammation as a Novel Chemopreventive Strategy. Semin Immunopathol (2013) 35:151–61. doi: 10.1007/s00281-013-0363-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Fishbein A, Hammock BD, Serhan CN, Panigrahy D. Carcinogenesis: Failure of Resolution of Inflammation? Pharmacol Ther (2021) 218:107670. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107670

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. de-Brito NM, da-Costa HC, Simoes RL, Barja-Fidalgo C. Lipoxin-Induced Phenotypic Changes in CD115 + LY6C Hi Monocytes TAM Precursors Inhibits Tumor Development. Front Oncol (2019) 9:540. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00540

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Khophai S, Thanee M, Techasen A, Namwat N, Klanrit P, Titapun A, et al. Zileuton Suppresses Cholangiocarcinoma Cell Proliferation and Migration Through Inhibition of the Akt Signaling Pathway. Onco Targets Ther (2018) 11:7019–29. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S178942

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Claria J, Lee MH, Serhan CN. Aspirin-Triggered Lipoxins (15-Epi-LX) Are Generated by the Human Lung Adenocarcinoma Cell Line (A549)-Neutrophil Interactions and Are Potent Inhibitors of Cell Proliferation. Mol Med (1996) 2:583–96. doi: 10.1007/BF03401642

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Gilligan MM, Gartung AA, Sulciner ML, Norris PC, Sukhatme VP, Bielenberg DR, et al. Aspirin-Triggered Proresolving Mediators Stimulate Resolution in Cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2019) 116:6292–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804000116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Deskur A, Salata D, Budkowska M, Dolegowska B, Starzynska T, Blogowski W. Selected Hemostatic Parameters in Patients With Pancreatic Tumors. Am J Transl Res (2014) 6:768–76.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

20. Blogowski W, Dolegowska K, Deskur A, Dolegowska B, Starzynska T. An Attempt to Evaluate Selected Aspects of "Bone-Fat Axis" Function in Healthy Individuals and Patients With Pancreatic Cancer. Medicine (2015) 94:e1303. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001303

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Bodnarczuk T, Deskur A, Dolegowska K, Dolegowska B, Starzynska T, Blogowski W. Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic Acids in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: A Preliminary Report. Am J Cancer Res (2018) 8:1865–72.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

22. Madej-Michniewicz A, Budkowska M, Salata D, Dolegowska B, Starzynska T, Blogowski W. Evaluation of Selected Interleukins in Patients With Different Gastric Neoplasms: A Preliminary Report. Sci Rep (2015) 5:14382. doi: 10.1038/srep14382

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Blogowski W, Madej-Michniewicz A, Marczuk N, Dolegowska B, Starzynska T. Interleukins 17 and 23 in Patients With Gastric Neoplasms. Sci Rep (2016) 6:37451. doi: 10.1038/srep37451

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Zhang Q, Zhu B, Li Y. Resolution of Cancer-Promoting Inflammation: A New Approach for Anticancer Therapy. Front Immunol (2017) 8:71. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Zhang T, Hao H, Zhou XY. The Role of Lipoxin in Regulating Tumor Immune Microenvironments. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat (2019) 144:106341. doi: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2019.106341

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Tian R, Zuo X, Jaoude J, Mao F, Colby J, Shureiqi I. ALOX15 as a Suppressor of Inflammation and Cancer: Lost in the Link. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat (2017) 132:77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2017.01.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Janakiram NB, Rao CV. Role of Lipoxins and Resolvins as Anti-Inflammatory and Proresolving Mediators in Colon Cancer. Curr Mol Med (2009) 9:565–79. doi: 10.2174/156652409788488748

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Knab LM, Grippo PJ, Bentrem DJ. Involvement of Eicosanoids in the Pathogenesis of Pancreatic Cancer: The Roles of Cyclooxygenase-2 and 5-Lipoxygenase. World J Gastroenterol (2014) 20:10729–39. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i31.10729

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Zhou GX, Ding XL, Wu SB, Zhang HF, Cao W, Qu LS, et al. Inhibition of 5-Lipoxygenase Triggers Apoptosis in Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Oncol Rep (2015) 33:661–8. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3650

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Hennig R, Ding XZ, Tong WG, Schneider MB, Standop J, Friess H, et al. 5-Lipoxygenase and Leukotriene B(4) Receptor Are Expressed in Human Pancreatic Cancers But Not in Pancreatic Ducts in Normal Tissue. Am J Pathol (2002) 161:421–8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64198-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Schnittert J, Heinrich MA, Kuninty PR, Storm G, Prakash J. Reprogramming Tumor Stroma Using an Endogenous Lipid Lipoxin A4 to Treat Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Lett (2018) 420:247–58. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.01.072

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Zong L, Chen K, Jiang Z, Chen X, Sun L, Ma J, et al. Lipoxin A4 Reverses Mesenchymal Phenotypes to Attenuate Invasion and Metastasis via the Inhibition of Autocrine TGF-β1 Signaling in Pancreatic Cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2017) 36:181. doi: 10.1186/s13046-017-0655-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Zong L, Li J, Chen X, Chen K, Li W, Li X, et al. Lipoxin A4 Attenuates Cell Invasion by Inhibiting ROS/ERK/MMP Pathway in Pancreatic Cancer. Oxid Med Cell Longev (2016) 2016:6815727. doi: 10.1155/2016/6815727

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Chen A, Zhang Y, Sun D, Xu S, Guo Y, Wang X. Investigation of the Content Differences of Arachidonic Acid Metabolites in a Mouse Model of Breast Cancer by Using LC-MS/MS. J Pharm BioMed Anal (2021) 194:113763. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113763

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Ruan GT, Gong YZ, Zhu LC, Gao F, Liao XW, Wang XK, et al. The Perspective of Diagnostic and Prognostic Values of Lipoxygenases mRNA Expression in Colon Adenocarcinoma. Onco Targets Ther (2020) 13:9389–405. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S251965

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: immunoresolvents, lipoxygenase, lipoxin, pancreatic cancer, resolvin

Citation: Blogowski W, Dolegowska K, Deskur A, Dolegowska B and Starzynska T (2022) Lipoxins and Resolvins in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: A Preliminary Report. Front. Oncol. 11:757073. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.757073

Received: 11 August 2021; Accepted: 30 November 2021;
Published: 11 January 2022.

Edited by:

Min Li, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, United States

Reviewed by:

Andrea Liostti, Local Health Authority of Imola, Italy
Alessandro Boscarelli, Institute for Maternal and Child Health Burlo Garofolo (IRCCS), Italy

Copyright © 2022 Blogowski, Dolegowska, Deskur, Dolegowska and Starzynska. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Wojciech Blogowski, drannab@wp.pl

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.