Ya Liu1†
Kezhou Li- 1Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- 2Core Facilities, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- 3CAAC Academy, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan, China
- 4Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1 and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibodies, are involved in T cell-mediated immune response augmentation and promote anti-tumor immunity. Cancer patients treated with combination of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy exhibit superior clinical outcomes and tolerance compared with patients treated with monotherapies. However, immutherapy is associated with several concomitant immune-related adverse events (irAEs). For instance, IrAEs interferes with function of gastrointestinal tract, endocrine, dermatological, nervous system and musculoskeletal systems. ICIs-associated pancreatic injury might causes decrease in endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function, resulting in metabolic and nutritional disorders. Clinicians who administer immune checkpoint inhibitors to cancer patients are diagnosed with hyperglycemia, abdominal pain and steatorrhea. Currently, the precise mechanism of ICIs-associated pancreatic injury has not been fully explored. This paper summarizes incidence, diagnosis, clinical characteristics, potential mechanisms, and treatment management patterns of ICIs-associated pancreatic AEs based on previous studies. In addition, possible management approaches of these adverse effects are presented in this paper. in the findings summarized in this paper lay a basis for management of ICIs-associated pancreatic AEs and expanding future immunotherapy applications.
Introduction
Programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptors bind to programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), transport negative signals to T cells, and regulate functions of effector T cells. These receptors are expressed by T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells. In addition to normal T cells, several tumor cells upregulate PD-L1 on their surface, thus evading antitumor immune response and promoting immune tolerance by inactivating T cells through the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. These processes cause delay in the immune activation cycle. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) expressed on the surface of T cells downregulates immune responses against cancer cells in the early stages of the immune activation cycle. The mechanism of action is by interacting with the surface molecules B7.1 (CD80) and B7.2 (CD86) on antigen-presenting cells (1–5). These interactions promote tumor cells and aid in evasion of immunosurveillance. Therefore, use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (nivolumab and pembrolizumab), anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies (atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab), and anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies (ipilimumab and tremelimumab), triggers activation and expansion of T lymphocytes. These inhibitors act by blocking inhibitory signals of T cells and enhancing ability of the immune system to fight cancer cells (Figure 1).
Figure 1 Mechanism of ICIs associated pancreatic adverse events. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies bind and block inhibitory signals, thus causing the widespread activation and expansion of T lymphocytes by blocking the inhibitory signals of T cells and enhancing the ability of the immune system to fight cancer cells. CD3+ T lymphocytes densely infiltrate the pancreatic islets, thereby increasing the ratio of CD8+/CD4+ T lymphocytes in peritumoral areas. The increased CD8+ T cells may cause damage to pancreatic cells, including islet β-cells and acinar, thereby destroying exocrine and endocrine pancreatic tissues which lead to a decrease in endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function. Meanwhile, a small proportion of patients would accompanied by peripancreatic fatty infiltration and pancreatic atrophy. APC, antigen-presenting cell; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; TCR, T cell receptor.
Mechanisms of the 3 immunotherapy agents are different from each other and ICIs alone or in combination with chemotherapy are conventional first- or second-line therapies. This has been attributed to favorable survival durations and tolerance for many types of malignancies, including metastatic melanoma (6), advanced non-small cell lung cancer (7), Hodgkin lymphoma (8), metastatic renal cell carcinoma (9), and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (10). Despite the efficacy of immunotherapy, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), often involving endocrine tissues including pneumonitis, hypophysitis, thyroiditis, colitis, pancreatitis, and autoimmune diabetes, have emerged as potential challenges to patients (11, 12).
Incidence rate of ICIs-associated pancreatic AEs (pancreatitis, hyperglycemia, elevated amylase/lipase, and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency) is relatively low. Most of these events have been described as a case report (Table 1). Cancer patients treated with ICIs present with symptoms collectively described as ICIs-associated pancreatic AEs including abdominal pain, vomiting, dyspepsia, irregular stools, and large daily glucose fluctuations (7, 13, 32). ICIs-associated pancreatic AEs are rare, however they result in poor quality of life and affect safety of patients. This minireview retrieved data on ICIs-associated pancreatic AEs from several publications and summarizes different clinical and pathophysiological mechanisms and effective treatments for these effects (Table 2).
Table 1 Published case reports and case series of immune checkpoint inhibitors associated with diabetes mellitus.
Table 2 Immune checkpoint inhibitors associated with pancreatic injury.
ICIs Associated With Diabetes Mellitus
The duration before onset of ICIs associated with diabetes mellitus (ICIs-DM) is between 3 weeks and 81 weeks after immunotherapy initiation, and most cases are reported in patients without pre-existing T2DM (11, 25, 47, 68–70). Drug administration significantly changes blood glucose level in cancer patients. HbA1C may be nearly normal or slightly elevated, C-peptide is low or undetectable, and severe cases are associated with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (4, 32). A few ICIs-DM cases with pre-existing T2DM present with rapid hyperglycemia, however, DKA and undetectable C-peptide are uncommon (Table 1). Most ICIs-DM cases are observed during treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors either alone or in combination with other immunotherapies. On the contrary, a few ICIs-DM cases are reported for patients exposed to CTLA-4 inhibitor monotherapy (7, 11, 70). Patients with advanced tumors are more likely to receive first-line systemic immunotherapy, and may receive combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and CTLA-4 inhibitors. ICIs-induced DM incidence of combined therapy is 17%, which is significantly higher compared with that of single PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor treatment (6%) (11).
ICIs-DM are classified into 4 types based on the different clinical and biological profiles of ICIs-induced diabetes and their potential pathophysiology. These types include: acute autoimmune insulin-dependent DM, type 2 diabetes-like phenotype, diabetes-induced by autoimmune pancreatitis, and diabetes following autoimmune lipoatrophy (5, 55).
Several studies report that acute autoimmune insulin-dependent DM type, an extremely rare irAE is associated with high mortality. Abrupt onset of hyperglycemia is associated with DKA, whereas hyperglycemia with a concomitant near-normal HbA1c level is an indicator of a fulminant disease. Marie‑Léa Gauci et al., reported that among 132 patients suffering from melanoma, treatment with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTL-4 resulted in T1D accompanied with high blood glucose levels and undetectable C-peptide concentrations in 3 cases. Furthermore, 2 patients presented with positive autoantibodies [glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) and tyrosine-phosphatase inhibitor (IA2)] before anti-PD-1 treatment and diabetes onset. These findings imply that these patients are likely to develop T1D (6). Positive autoantibodies are implicated in progressive insulinopenia and insulin-dependent DM, similar to cases of adult-onset autoimmune diabetes (71). CD8+ T cell clones promoted by blocking PD-1 or PD-L1 are the primary cell types involved in destruction of insulin-secreting β-cells associated with DM, without affecting α-cells (6). PD-1/PD-L1 interaction plays a vital role in preventing onset of diabetes in animals. Notably, mice without antibodies develop diabetes, whereas other mice with autoantibodies are unnecessarily predicted to have diabetes (50). Kochupurakkal et al. reported some of the risk factors associated with anti-diabetic immune tolerance. For instance, upregulation of CTLA-4 and regulatory T cells (Treg) through low IL2 production is correlated with high number of DCs and increased T cell stimulation and activation in the absence of negative costimulation induced by PD-1/PD-L1 pathway (51). The period between start of ICIs therapy and onset of T1DM is linked to the presence or absence of GAD antibodies (GADA). Individuals with pre-existing positive GAD antibodies have high risk of developing T1DM in the first 2 months after initiation of treatment. Similarly, GADA-negative patients have a high risk of developing T1DM, however, this effect becomes evident after 2 months of treatment (37). High-risk human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type (HLA-DR4 allele) results in increased susceptibility of humans to T1D (52).
A few subjects exhibit pre-existing T2DM, which is effectively regulated without insulin. These patients experience a sharp increase in blood glucose levels after treatment initiation with ICIs. This outcome implies that ICIs can decompensate glucose control. Most of these patients have a higher BMI, relatively older age, hypertension, detectable C-peptide, and higher HbA1c compared with patients with acute autoimmune insulin-dependent DM. Interestingly, a few cases eventually develop diabetic ketoacidosis since most patients with pre-existing T2DM self administer hypoglycemic drugs, therefore, they self-monitor their blood glucose levels (5, 6, 16, 25, 53). Kotwal et al. reported 9 cases with unexplained worsening of glycemic control for pre-existing T2D after they commenced ICIs therapy. Their HbA1c increased by 10% in 6 months, and most patients needed another antihyperglycemic agent or insulin. Consequently, they had underwent outpatient visits and inpatient admission due to poor blood glucose control (16). Interestingly, laboratory findings showed increased C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in a subset of patients at the time of presentation, implying that immunotherapy induced an inflammatory profile (6). CRP levels are negatively associated with insulin sensitivity, therefore, chronic subclinical inflammation causes insulin resistance (IR) in which is implicated in pathogenesis of T2D (54). Therefore, T2D-like phenotype is an insidious side effect on glycemia attributed to an abnormal inflammatory state induced by long-term ICIs therapy.
Previous studies report several cases of new-onset DM developed autoimmune pancreatitis after cancer immunotherapy. Dehghani et al. reported a 63-year-old Caucasian man without genetic history of diabetes or autoimmune disease, administered with nivolumab for treatment of advanced melanoma. The patient developed focal pancreatitis 15 months after initiation of nivolumab therapy. CT scans showed peripancreatic fatty infiltration around the pancreatic tail. However, he was asymptomatic with normal serum lipase, IgG4, and fasting blood glucose level (6.2 mmol/liter). After 3 more months, his blood lipase was threefold the normal level, fecal elastase-1 decreased to 58 mg/g (normal values > 200 mg/g), serum glucose increased to 11 mmol/liter, HbA1c was 9.3%, and diabetes-associated autoantibodies were negative. Despite these findings, the patent showed no clinical signs. MRI results showed a 50% decrease from the initial pancreatic volume (24). In addition, Marchand et al. reported a dynamic change in pancreatic volume similar to that reported in previous cases. Initially, pancreatic volume increased by 15% after 4 courses of nivolumab, pancreatic atrophy subsequently developed, and the initial volume significantly decreased (63%) 3 months later at the onset of DM (22). Activation of resident immune cells (CD8+ T cell clones) is promoted by immunotherapy infiltrates in and around pancreatic islets rather than CD4+ T cells. This phenomenon explains development of pancreatitis and increase in pancreatic volume before the onset of diabetes. Increased CD8+ T cells might damage pancreatic cells, including islet β-cells and acinar, thereby destroying exocrine and endocrine pancreatic tissues ultimately resulting in pancreatitis-related diabetes and pancreatic atrophy (22, 55).
Autoimmune lipoatrophy also known as acquired generalized lipodystrophy (AGL) causes significant reduction in whole-body fat. Absence of adipocytes promotes ectopic lipid droplet accumulation in other body parts. Abnormal adipose storage is frequently associated with insulin resistance and DM. Falcao et al. reported a case of immune-related AGL. A 57-year-old woman with well-managed T2D (HbA1c 6.7%) received nivolumab for clear cell renal carcinoma. On the 2nd month of treatment, she presented with loss of subcutaneous fat tissues in the facial neck, shoulders, arms, and buttocks. In addition, the patients showed an abnormal pattern of adipose tissues in her abdomen and calves, implying she had central obesity. Further, she was diagnosed with deterioration of glycemic control and HbA1c (10.5%). Her low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and triglyceride levels increased, whereas the high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels decreased. Histological analysis of the subcutaneous biopsy of the medial surface of the arm showed chronic lobular panniculitis with CD3+ lymphocytic infiltration and extensive fibroelastosis replacement. Poor glycemic control was primarily attributed to increased IR and progression of autoimmune lipoatrophy (15, 56). Other studies report new-onset DM secondary to AGL in patients without personal or family history during immunotherapy (15, 55).
Several studies have reported ICIs-associated diabetes providing information for identifying individuals at risk. Routine measurement of HbA1c and blood glucose during treatment should be carried out in clinical work. Furthermore, testing biomarkers including cytokines, novel autoantibodies, and high-risk genetics before ICIs treatment could provide potential predictive valuable information for ICIs-DM (72). Currently, few biomarkers associated with irAE have been reported. Therefore, further studies are essential to identify more potential biomarkers, including proteins, lipids, mRNA, miRNA, and exosomes. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for management of ICIs-related toxicities (version 1.2020) are the most current comprehensive guidelines adopted in clinical practice, specifically, when symptoms including polyuria, polydipsia, nausea, and vomiting associated with changes in blood glucose levels occur after immunotherapy. Based on these guidelines, patients with (1) new-onset hyperglycemia < 200 mg/dl and (2) history of T2D with low suspicion for DKA should be continuously treated with ICIs. However, their serial blood glucose after administration of each dose should be monitored. The diet and lifestyle of these patients should be modified, and endocrine consultation should be considered if patients are symptomatic or if their glucose levels are persistently uncontrolled. Patients with (3) new-onset fasting glucose > 200 mg/dl, (4) random blood glucose > 250 mg/dl, (5) history of T2D with fasting/random glucose > 250 mg/dl, and (6) workup negative for DKA should be given similar treatments and management. Patients presenting with (7) DKA should have immunotherapy discontinued, however immunotherapy can be restarted once DKA is resolved. Patients requiring inpatient care and endocrine consultation should be administered with insulin as prescribed by a medical oncologist and an endocrinologist. DKA should be managed based on institutional guidelines, i.e., intravenous (IV) fluids +/– potassium supplementation, IV insulin therapy, and hourly monitoring of laboratory indicators (glucose, serum ketones, blood pH, and anion gap) to correct anion gap and electrolyte disorder (73).
ICIs Associated With Asymptomatic Pancreatic Enzyme Elevation
ICIs associated with pancreatic injury affect endocrine and exocrine functions of the pancreas (DM), and the effects may be asymptomatic or symptomatic. Diagnosis of acute pancreatitis depends on identification of at least 2 of the following features: (1) severe epigastric pain often radiating to the back; (2) elevated serum lipase/amylase levels (at least three times the upper normal limit); and (3) characteristic findings of acute pancreatitis on abdominal imaging. Imaging (CT, MRI, and PET/CT) of ICIs-associated pancreatitis shows any of the following: (1) new focal or diffuse pancreatic enlargement; (2) decreased enhancement and surrounding fat stranding without a focal lesion suspicious for metastasis; and (3) diffuse increased FDG uptake (62). Elevations in amylase/lipase are graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 5.0) where by Grade 1 represents amylase or lipase levels ≤ 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN); Grade 2 represents levels > 1.5-2.0 × ULN; Grade 3represents levels >2.0 - 5.0 × ULN and Grade 4 represents levels > 5.0 × ULN. Notably, pancreatitis is defined by grading system whereby Grade 2 represents asymptomatic enzyme elevation or radiologic findings only; Grade 3 represents severe pain; vomiting; medical intervention indicated (e.g., analgesia, nutritional support); Grade 4 represents life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated and Grade 5 represents cases resulting in death (57).
In a recent meta-analysis, incidence of asymptomatic elevation in pancreatic enzymes after ICIs treatment was 2.7% (211/7702), whereas incidence of grade 2 pancreatitis was 1.9% (150/7702). Furthermore, most patients with pancreatic injury and treated with ICIs show slight increase in amylase and lipase levels. However, patients have no symptoms of pancreatitis and present no radiographic abnormalities for pancreatic glands (58). Similar observations have been reported in other studies. Michot et al. explored elevated serum lipase with a grade of ≥2 related to an anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 treatment and its outcomes. They reported that most patients (71%, 15/21) who underwent anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 treatment presented with an asymptomatic increase in serum lipase levels, with a peak incidence in 0.4 months to 11.4 months (median=2.8 months, around 5 treatment cycles) after initiation of treatment. Moreover, approximately 14% (3/21) of patients developed typical acute pancreatitis (59).
The relationship between asymptomatically elevated amylase/lipase levels and pancreatitis is not clear. Friedman et al. enrolled 119 patients with melanoma treated with nivolumab + ipilimumab to a study. The findings from the study showed that 20% of these patients manifested grade ≥ 3 amylase elevations, 6.3% had grade ≥ 3 lipase elevations, 20% had increased levels of both enzymes, and 1.7% developed immune-related pancreatitis (60). Therefore, other nonimmune-mediated causes of asymptomatically elevated pancreatic enzyme levels should be explored. For instance, this increase may be related to T cell-mediated inflammation present in other organs, a metastatic disease, or renal failure, and may not be related to pancreatic inflammation (61, 63). Pancreatic enzyme monitoring in asymptomatic patients is not recommended as a routine procedure unless for cases where pancreatitis is suspected. NCCN guidelines state that treatment with ICIs can be continued for patients with slight increase in amylase and lipase levels (at least 3 times the upper normal limit) if pancreatitis is excluded (73).
ICIs Associated With Pancreatitis
ICIs associated with pancreatitis (ICIs-P) are extremely rare irAEs, making diagnosis a clinical challenge. As previously described, diagnosis of ICIs-P requires at least 2 criteria among the significant symptoms of pancreatitis, including radiographic evidence, and changes in laboratory data. George et al. evaluated 33 trials in a meta-analysis and reported that incidence of pancreatitis in the CTLA-4 group was higher compared with that of the PD-1 group (4% vs. 1%). Moreover, incidence of grade 2 pancreatitis in CTLA-4-PD-1 combination group was 10.6%, significantly higher compared with that of mono-immunotherapy (58).
Kohlmann et al. reported a case of ICIs-P within the first 4 months of immunotherapy. The patient manifested a belt-shaped epigastric pain 106 days after immunotherapy initiation. Laboratory findings showed that serum lipase and serum amylase levels increased to 394.2 and 318 U/l, respectively. Pancreatic computed tomography showed edematous swelling within the tail of the pancreas. Therefore, ICIs-P was diagnosed based on the aforementioned criteria, immunotherapy was immediately halted, and the patient was administered withmethylprednisolone (1.3 mg/kg, total 128 mg). The symptoms gradually improved, and glucocorticosteroid dose was reduced. When the dosage was reduced to 8 mg, clinical symptoms relapsed, and serum lipase levels increased again (>600 U/l). Therefore, the patient received long-term treatment (6.5 months) of high-dose systemic methylprednisolone with significant slow tapering until clinical symptoms were cleared and normal levels of serum pancreatic enzymes achieved. Therefore, management of ICIs-P requires a high initial dose and slow tapering of glucocorticosteroid dose (64).
Pathophysiological features underlying ICIs-P remain elusive. Similar to other irAEs, mechanisms can be thourgh inflammatory responses in the pancreas after ICIs administration. A few studies report on functional T cell activation induced by ICIs treatment. Immunohistochemical analysis shows that CD3+ T lymphocytes densely infiltrate pancreatic islets in “healthy” (nontumoral) areas, thereby increasing the ratio of CD8+/CD4+ T lymphocytes in peritumoral areas. These findings imply that immune T cell infiltrates might be the prevalent cytotoxic components of ICIs treatment (65). Furthermore, dense CD8+, TIA1+, and granzyme B+ lymphoid infiltration are present within a biopsied lesion as shown by immunohistochemical analysis (66).
NCCN guidelines for management of ICIs-P state that when potential symptoms of ICIs-P appear, laboratory tests and abdominal imaging should be performed. Once the diagnosis of ICIs-P is confirmed, hospital admission is recommended, however, other management approaches depend on grading. For grade 2 pancreatitis (moderate), treatment with ICIs should be discontinued, and 0.5–1 mg/kg/day prednisone/methylprednisolone should be administered until symptoms improve to grade ≤1. After achieving grade ≤1, the dose should be tapered for 4–6 weeks, and IV hydration should be administered. For grade 3–4 of pancreatitis (severe and life-threatening), immunotherapy should be permanently discontinued, and treatment with a double daily dose of glucocorticosteroids rather than moderate grade and IV fluids should be started (73).
ICIs Associated With Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency
Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) is different from the first 2 types of pancreatic exocrine injury. Cancer patients under ICIs treatment might manifest weight loss despite their good appetite, irregular stools, steatorrhea, and abdominal pain, a condition called ICIs-PEI. Chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic surgery are the main causes of PEI, whereas immunotherapy does not commonly cause PEI. Prasanna et al. reported a case of a patient who developed isolated ICIs-PEI associated with pembrolizumab therapy. In this study, a 77-year-old male patient who underwent cutaneous melanoma resection from his left ear, was administered with pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg, every 3 weeks) after 4 years due to pulmonary metastases. After 16 months of treatment, the patient presented with explosive diarrhea and passing “stools like oil.” His CRP level was high, however lipase and amylase levels were normal. Colonoscopy and gastroscopy did not show any evidence of colitis. with the patients was suspected to have potential immune-related colitis, therefore, he was given prednisolone (empirical medication), shich showed no clinical response. A slight decrease in the fecal pancreatic elastase-1 level (<200 μg/g, moderate PEI) and a repeat test carried out 3 months later showed significantly lower level of pancreatic elastase-1 (<15 μg/g, severe PEI) compared with the level observed before. The patient was diagnosed with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Therefore, he was subjected to pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT), and his symptoms were progressively alleviated within 7–10 days (67).
Activated and increased CD8+ T cells were attributed to immunotherapy infiltrate inside and around the pancreas which resulted in damage of pancreatic cells. This phenomenon decreased the number of pancreatic ductal and acinar cells (exocrine pancreas) and resulted in pancreatic atrophy. These changes decrease secretion of pancreatic enzymes and affect release of bicarbonate, water, and enzymes into the duodenum. Furthermore, symptoms associated with food digestion (specifically fat malabsorption) are observed. Although direct methods are the gold standard for diagnosing ICIs-PEI, fecal pancreatic elastase-1 test an indirect test (100% sensitivity and 93% specificity) is commonly used (74). Pancreatin (pancreatin enteric-coated capsules) is used to increase mixing of chyme and pancreatic enzymes and for compensation of insufficient pancreatic enzymes, thus promoting nutrient uptake.
Conclusion
Immunotherapy-associated pancreatic adverse events result in metabolic and nutritional disorders and are classified into pancreatic endocrine injury and exocrine insufficiency. Activation of T lymphocytes densely infiltrates in and around the pancreatic islets, destroys exocrine and endocrine pancreatic tissues thus causing ICIs-DM, asymptomatic pancreatic enzyme elevation, ICIs-P, and ICIs-PEI. Therefore, timely patient and physician education, clinical evaluations (systemic physical examination and appropriate laboratory tests) before each dose of immunotherapy, familiarity with ICIs-associated pancreatic injury characteristics by the clinicians, appropriate protocol of irAE management immunotherapy, self-surveillance, and outpatient follow-up are vital aspects affecting patient outcomes.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This research was sponsored by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), No. 51675356; the Key Research and Development Projects in Sichuan Province (No. 2020YFS0261); the Key Research and Development Projects in Sichuan Province (No. 2019YFS0043); and the 1·3·5 Project for Disciplines of Excellence–Clinical Research Incubation Project (ZY2017302), West China Hospital, Sichuan University.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
ICIs, Immune checkpoint inhibitors; PD-1, Programmed death 1; PD-L1, Programmed death-ligand 1; CTLA-4, Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4; irAEs, Immune-related adverse events; DM, Diabetes mellitus; Type 2 DM, Type 2 diabetes mellitus; F1DM, Fulminant type 1 diabetes; DKA, Diabetic ketoacidosis; GAD, Glutamic acid decarboxylase; Treg, T regulatory cells; HLA, Human leukocyte antigen; CRP, C-reactive protein; AGL, Acquired generalized lipodystrophy; ICIs-P, Immune checkpoint inhibitors associated with pancreatitis; PEI, Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency; SCC Jaw, Sarcomatoid squamous cell carcinoma of the Jaw; NSCLC, Non-small cell lung cancer; SCLC, Small-cell lung cancer; RCC, Renal cell carcinoma; MCC, Merkel cell carcinoma; HNSCC, Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; HCC, Hepatocellular carcinoma; NR, Not reported; IA-2, Islet-associated antigen-2; IAA, Insulin autoantibodies; ZnT8, Zinc transporter 8; ICA, Islet cell antibody; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; ULN, Upper limit of normal.
References
1. Hickmott L, De La Peña H, Turner H, Ahmed F, Protheroe A, Grossman A, et al. Anti-PD-L1 atezolizumab-Induced Autoimmune Diabetes: a Case Report and Review of the Literature. Targeted Oncol (2017) 12(2):235–41. doi: 10.1007/s11523-017-0480-y
2. Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer (2012) 12(4):252–64. doi: 10.1038/nrc3239
3. Keir ME, Liang SC, Guleria I, Latchman YE, Qipo A, Albacker LA, et al. Tissue expression of PD-L1 mediates peripheral T cell tolerance. J Exp Med (2006) 203(4):883–95. doi: 10.1084/jem.20051776
4. Changizzadeh PN, Mukkamalla SKR, Armenio VA. Combined checkpoint inhibitor therapy causing diabetic ketoacidosis in metastatic melanoma. J Immunother Cancer (2017) 5(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0303-9
5. Stamatouli AM, Quandt Z, Perdigoto AL, Clark PL, Kluger H, Weiss SA, et al. Collateral Damage: Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Induced With Checkpoint Inhibitors. Diabetes (2018) 67(8):1471–80. doi: 10.2337/dbi18-0002
6. Gauci ML, Boudou P, Baroudjian B, Vidal-Trecan T, Da Meda L, Madelaine-Chambrin I, et al. Occurrence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in patients treated with immunotherapy (anti-PD-1 and/or anti-CTLA-4) for metastatic melanoma: a retrospective study. Cancer Immunol Immunother: CII (2018) 67(8):1197–208. doi: 10.1007/s00262-018-2178-0
7. Porntharukchareon T, Tontivuthikul B, Sintawichai N, Srichomkwun P. Pembrolizumab- and ipilimumab-induced diabetic ketoacidosis and isolated adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency: a case report. J Med Case Rep (2020) 14(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13256-020-02502-w
8. Munakata W, Ohashi K, Yamauchi N, Tobinai K. Fulminant type I diabetes mellitus associated with nivolumab in a patient with relapsed classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Int J Hematol (2017) 105(3):383–6. doi: 10.1007/s12185-016-2101-4
9. Singh V, Chu Y, Gupta V, Zhao CW. A Tale of Immune-Related Adverse Events With Sequential Trials of Checkpoint Inhibitors in a Patient With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cureus (2020) 12(6):e8395. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8395
10. Wen L, Zou X, Chen Y, Bai X, Liang T. Sintilimab-Induced Autoimmune Diabetes in a Patient With the Anti-tumor Effect of Partial Regression. Front Immunol (2020) 11. 2076. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02076
11. Quandt Z, Young A, Anderson M. Immune checkpoint inhibitor diabetes mellitus: a novel form of autoimmune diabetes. Clin Exp Immunol (2020) 200(2):131–40. doi: 10.1111/cei.13424
12. Bajwa R, Cheema A, Khan T, Amirpour A, Paul A, Chaughtai S, et al. Adverse Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (Programmed Death-1 Inhibitors and Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated Protein-4 Inhibitors): Results of a Retrospective Study. J Clin Med Res (2019) 11(4):225–36. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3750
13. Kusuki K, Suzuki S, Mizuno Y. Pembrolizumab-induced fulminant type 1 diabetes with C-peptide persistence at first referral. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep (2020) 2020. doi: 10.1530/edm-19-0152
14. Yilmaz M. Nivolumab-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus as an immune-related adverse event. J Oncol Pharm Pract: Off Publ Int Soc Oncol Pharm Practition (2020) 26(1):236–9. doi: 10.1177/1078155219841116
15. Falcao CK, Cabral MCS, Mota JM, Arbache ST, Costa-Riquetto AD, Muniz DQB, et al. Acquired Lipodystrophy Associated With Nivolumab in a Patient With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2019) 104(8):3245–8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-02221
16. Kotwal A, Haddox C, Block M, Kudva YC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors: an emerging cause of insulin-dependent diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care (2019) 7(1):e000591. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000591
17. Hakami OA, Ioana J, Ahmad S, Tun TK, Sreenan S, McDermott JH. A case of pembrolizumab-induced severe DKA and hypothyroidism in a patient with metastatic melanoma. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep (2019) 2019. doi: 10.1530/edm-18-0153
18. Mengíbar JL, Capel I, Bonfill T, Mazarico I, Espuña LC, Caixàs A, et al. Simultaneous onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus and silent thyroiditis under durvalumab treatment. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep (2019) 2019(1). doi: 10.1530/edm-19-0045
19. Okahata S, Sakamoto K, Mitsumatsu T, Kondo Y, Noso S, Ikegami H, et al. Fulminant type 1 diabetes associated with Isolated ACTH deficiency induced by anti-programmed cell death 1 antibody-insight into the pathogenesis of autoimmune endocrinopathy. Endocr J (2019) 66(4):295–300. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ18-0328
20. Sakaguchi C, Ashida K, Yano S, Ohe K, Wada N, Hasuzawa N, et al. A case of nivolumab-induced acute-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus in melanoma. Curr Oncol (Toronto Ont) (2019) 26(1):e115–e8. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4130
21. Shibayama Y, Kameda H, Ota S, Tsuchida K, Cho KY, Nakamura A, et al. Case of fulminant type 1 diabetes induced by the anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibody, avelumab. J Diabetes Invest (2019) 10(5):1385–7. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13022
22. Marchand L, Thivolet A, Saintigny P, Fabien N, Vouillarmet J, Thivolet C. Anti-Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) Antibodies and the Pancreas: A Diabetic Storm Ahead? Diabetes Care (2018) 41(3):638–9. doi: 10.2337/dc17-2243
23. Li S, Zhang Y, Sun Z, Hu J, Fang C. Anti-PD-1 pembrolizumab induced autoimmune diabetes in Chinese patient: A case report. Medicine (2018) 97(45):e12907. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000012907
24. Dehghani L, Mikail N, Kramkimel N, Soyer P, Lebtahi R, Mallone R, et al. Autoimmune pancreatitis after nivolumab anti-programmed death receptor-1 treatment. Eur J Cancer (Oxford England: 1990) (2018) 104:243–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.09.014
25. Matsuura N, Koh G, Konishi C, Minamino S, Takahara Y, Harada H, et al. Fulminant onset of insulin-dependent diabetes with positive anti-GAD antibody titers during treatment with nivolumab in a patient with NSCLC. Cancer Immunol Immunother: CII (2018) 67(9):1417–24. doi: 10.1007/s00262-018-2203-3
26. Zaied AA, Akturk HK, Joseph RW, Lee AS. New-onset insulin-dependent diabetes due to nivolumab. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep (2018) 2018. doi: 10.1530/edm-17-0174
27. Shiba M, Inaba H, Ariyasu H, Kawai S, Inagaki Y, Matsuno S, et al. Fulminant Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Accompanied by Positive Conversion of Anti-insulin Antibody after the Administration of Anti-CTLA-4 Antibody Following the Discontinuation of Anti-PD-1 Antibody. Internal Med (Tokyo Japan) (2018) 57(14):2029–34. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9518-17
28. Takahashi A, Tsutsumida A, Namikawa K, Yamazaki N. Fulminant type 1 diabetes associated with nivolumab in a patient with metastatic melanoma. Melanoma Res (2018) 28(2):159–60. doi: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000418
29. Sakurai K, Niitsuma S, Sato R, Takahashi K, Arihara Z. Painless Thyroiditis and Fulminant Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in a Patient Treated with an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor, Nivolumab. Tohoku J Exp Med (2018) 244(1):33–40. doi: 10.1620/tjem.244.33
30. Capitao R, Bello C, Fonseca R, Saraiva C. New-onset diabetes after nivolumab treatment. BMJ Case Rep (2018) 2018. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-220999
31. Kumagai R, Muramatsu A, Nakajima R, Fujii M, Kaino K, Katakura Y, et al. Acute-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus caused by nivolumab in a patient with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma. J Diabetes Invest (2017) 8(6):798–9. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12627
32. Godwin JL, Jaggi S, Sirisena I, Sharda P, Rao AD, Mehra R, et al. Nivolumab-induced autoimmune diabetes mellitus presenting as diabetic ketoacidosis in a patient with metastatic lung cancer. J Immunother Cancer (2017) 5:40. doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0245-2
33. Chae YK, Chiec L, Mohindra N, Gentzler R, Patel J, Giles F. A case of pembrolizumab-induced type-1 diabetes mellitus and discussion of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced type 1 diabetes. Cancer Immunol Immunother: CII (2017) 66(1):25–32. doi: 10.1007/s00262-016-1913-7
34. Kapke J, Shaheen Z, Kilari D, Knudson P, Wong S. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Case Series, Review of the Literature, and Optimal Management. Case Rep Oncol (2017) 10(3):897–909. doi: 10.1159/000480634
35. Teramoto Y, Nakamura Y, Asami Y, Imamura T, Takahira S, Nemoto M, et al. Case of type 1 diabetes associated with less-dose nivolumab therapy in a melanoma patient. J Dermatol (2017) 44(5):605–6. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.13486
36. Ishikawa K, Shono-Saito T, Yamate T, Kai Y, Sakai T, Shimizu F, et al. A case of fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus, with a precipitous decrease in pancreatic volume, induced by nivolumab for malignant melanoma: analysis of HLA and CTLA-4 polymorphisms. Eur J Dermatol: EJD (2017) 27(2):184–5. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2016.2923
37. Usui Y, Udagawa H, Matsumoto S, Imai K, Ohashi K, Ishibashi M, et al. Association of Serum Anti-GAD Antibody and HLA Haplotypes with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Triggered by Nivolumab in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Thoracic Oncol: Off Publ Int Assoc Study Lung Cancer (2017) 12(5):e41–e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.12.015
38. Mizab Mellah C, Sánchez Pérez M, Santos Rey MD, Hernández García M. Fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus associated with pembrolizumab. Endocrinol Diabetes Y Nutricion (2017) 64(5):272–3. doi: 10.1016/j.endinu.2017.01.005
39. Leonardi GC, Oxnard GR, Haas A, Lang JP, Williams JS, Awad MM. Diabetic Ketoacidosis as an Immune-related Adverse Event from Pembrolizumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Immunother (Hagerstown Md: 1997) (2017) 40(6):249–51. doi: 10.1097/cji.0000000000000173
40. Hofmann L, Forschner A, Loquai C, Goldinger SM, Zimmer L, Ugurel S, et al. Cutaneous, gastrointestinal, hepatic, endocrine, and renal side-effects of anti-PD-1 therapy. Eur J Cancer (Oxford England: 1990) (2016) 60:190–209. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.02.025
41. Okamoto M, Okamoto M, Gotoh K, Masaki T, Ozeki Y, Ando H, et al. Fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus with anti-programmed cell death-1 therapy. J Diabetes Invest (2016) 7(6):915–8. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12531
42. Miyoshi Y, Ogawa O, Oyama Y. Nivolumab, an Anti-Programmed Cell Death-1 Antibody, Induces Fulminant Type 1 Diabetes. Tohoku J Exp Med (2016) 239(2):155–8. doi: 10.1620/tjem.239.155
43. Hansen E, Sahasrabudhe D, Sievert L. A case report of insulin-dependent diabetes as immune-related toxicity of pembrolizumab: presentation, management, and outcome. Cancer Immunol Immunother: CII (2016) 65(6):765–7. doi: 10.1007/s00262-016-1835-4
44. Aleksova J, Lau PK, Soldatos G, McArthur G. Glucocorticoids did not reverse type 1 diabetes mellitus secondary to pembrolizumab in a patient with metastatic melanoma. BMJ Case Rep (2016) 2016. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2016-217454
45. Humayun MA, Poole R. A case of multiple immune toxicities from Ipilimumab and pembrolizumab treatment. Hormones (Athens Greece) (2016) 15(2):303–6. doi: 10.14310/horm.2002.1656
46. Martin-Liberal J, Furness AJ, Joshi K, Peggs KS, Quezada SA, Larkin J. Anti-programmed cell death-1 therapy and insulin-dependent diabetes: a case report. Cancer Immunol Immunother: CII (2015) 64(6):765–7. doi: 10.1007/s00262-015-1689-1
47. Hughes J, Vudattu N, Sznol M, Gettinger S, Kluger H, Lupsa B, et al. Precipitation of autoimmune diabetes with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Diabetes Care (2015) 38(4):e55–7. doi: 10.2337/dc14-2349
48. Mellati M, Eaton KD, Brooks-Worrell BM, Hagopian WA, Martins R, Palmer JP, et al. Anti-PD-1 and Anti-PDL-1 Monoclonal Antibodies Causing Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care (2015) 38(9):e137–8. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0889
49. Gaudy C, Clévy C, Monestier S, Dubois N, Préau Y, Mallet S, et al. Anti-PD1 Pembrolizumab Can Induce Exceptional Fulminant Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care (2015) 38(11):e182–3. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1331
50. Ansari MJ, Salama AD, Chitnis T, Smith RN, Yagita H, Akiba H, et al. The programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway regulates autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice. J Exp Med (2003) 198(1):63–9. doi: 10.1084/jem.20022125
51. Kochupurakkal NM, Kruger AJ, Tripathi S, Zhu B, Adams LT, Rainbow DB, et al. Blockade of the programmed death-1 (PD1) pathway undermines potent genetic protection from type 1 diabetes. PloS One (2014) 9(2):e89561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089561
52. Rajasalu T, Brosi H, Schuster C, Spyrantis A, Boehm BO, Chen L, et al. Deficiency in B7-H1 (PD-L1)/PD-1 coinhibition triggers pancreatic beta-cell destruction by insulin-specific, murine CD8 T-cells. Diabetes (2010) 59(8):1966–73. doi: 10.2337/db09-1135
53. Zagouras A, Patil PD, Yogi-Morren D, Pennell NA. Cases from the Immune-Related Adverse Event Tumor Board: Diagnosis and Management of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Induced Diabetes. Oncologist (2020) 25(11):921-4. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0806
54. Donath MY, Shoelson SE. Type 2 diabetes as an inflammatory disease. Nat Rev Immunol (2011) 11(2):98–107. doi: 10.1038/nri2925
55. Marchand L, Disse E, Dalle S, Reffet S, Vouillarmet J, Fabien N, et al. The multifaceted nature of diabetes mellitus induced by checkpoint inhibitors. Acta Diabetol (2019) 56(12):1239–45. doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01402-w
56. Haddad N, Vidal-Trecan T, Baroudjian B, Zagdanski AM, Arangalage D, Battistella M, et al. Acquired generalized lipodystrophy under immune checkpoint inhibition. Br J Dermatol (2020) 182(2):477–80. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18124
57. NC I. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute (2017).
58. George J, Bajaj D, Sankaramangalam K, Yoo JW, Joshi NS, Gettinger S, et al. Incidence of pancreatitis with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in advanced cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatology (2019) 19(4):587–94. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2019.04.015
59. Michot JM, Ragou P, Carbonnel F, Champiat S, Voisin AL, Mateus C, et al. Significance of Immune-related Lipase Increase Induced by Antiprogrammed Death-1 or Death Ligand-1 Antibodies: A Brief Communication. J Immunother (Hagerstown Md 1997) (2018) 41(2):84–5. doi: 10.1097/cji.0000000000000202
60. Friedman CF, Clark V, Raikhel AV, Barz T, Shoushtari AN, Momtaz P, et al. Thinking Critically About Classifying Adverse Events: Incidence of Pancreatitis in Patients Treated With Nivolumab + Ipilimumab. J Natl Cancer Institute (2017) 109(4). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw260
61. Grover S, Rahma OE, Hashemi N, Lim RM. Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Toxicities of Checkpoint Inhibitors: Algorithms for Management. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book (2018) 38:13–9. doi: 10.1200/edbk_100013
62. Alessandrino F, Sahu S, Nishino M, Adeni AE, Tirumani SH, Shinagare AB, et al. Frequency and imaging features of abdominal immune-related adverse events in metastatic lung cancer patients treated with PD-1 inhibitor. Abdom Radiol (NY) (2019) 44(5):1917–27. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01935-2
63. Porcu M, Solinas C, Migali C, Battaglia A, Schena M, Mannelli L, et al. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Pancreatic Injury: Imaging Findings and Literature Review. Targeted Oncol (2020) 15(1):25–35. doi: 10.1007/s11523-019-00694-w
64. Kohlmann J, Wagenknecht D, Simon JC, Ziemer M. Immune-related pancreatitis associated with checkpoint blockade in melanoma. Melanoma Res (2019) 29(5):549–52. doi: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000611
65. Yoneda S, Imagawa A, Hosokawa Y, Baden MY, Kimura T, Uno S, et al. T-Lymphocyte Infiltration to Islets in the Pancreas of a Patient Who Developed Type 1 Diabetes After Administration of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Diabetes Care (2019) 42(7):e116–e8. doi: 10.2337/dc18-2518
66. Di Giacomo AM, Danielli R, Guidoboni M, Calabrò L, Carlucci D, Miracco C, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody, in patients with metastatic melanoma unresponsive to prior systemic treatments: clinical and immunological evidence from three patient cases. Cancer Immunol Immunother: CII (2009) 58(8):1297–306. doi: 10.1007/s00262-008-0642-y
67. Prasanna T, McNeil CM, Nielsen T, Parkin D. Isolated immune-related pancreatic exocrine insufficiency associated with pembrolizumab therapy. Immunotherapy (2018) 10(3):171–5. doi: 10.2217/imt-2017-0126
68. Clotman K, Janssens K, Specenier P, Weets I, De Block CEM. Programmed Cell Death-1 Inhibitor-Induced Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2018) 103(9):3144–54. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-00728
69. Wright JJ, Salem JE, Johnson DB, Lebrun-Vignes B, Stamatouli A, Thomas JW, et al. Increased Reporting of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Diabetes. Diabetes Care (2018) 41(12):e150–e1. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1465
70. Zheng Z, Liu Y, Yang J, Tan C, Zhou L, Wang X, et al. Diabetes mellitus induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. Diabetes Metab Res Rev (2020) e3366. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3366
71. Laugesen E, Østergaard JA, Leslie RD. Latent autoimmune diabetes of the adult: current knowledge and uncertainty. Diabetes Med (2015) 32(7):843–52. doi: 10.1111/dme.12700
72. González-Rodríguez E, Rodríguez-Abreu D. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Review and Management of Endocrine Adverse Events. Oncologist (2016) 21(7):804–16. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0509
73. Thompson JA, Schneider BJ, Brahmer J, Andrews S, Armand P, Bhatia S, et al. 27 NCCN Guidelines Insights: Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities, Version 1.2020. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw: JNCCN (2020) 18(3). doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0012
Keywords: immune checkpoint inhibitors, immune-related adverse events, ICIs associated with diabetes mellitus, amylase/lipase, pancreatitis, pancreatic exocrine insufficiency
Citation: Liu Y, Zhang H, Zhou L, Li W, Yang L, Li W, Li K and Liu X (2021) Immunotherapy-Associated Pancreatic Adverse Events: Current Understanding of Their Mechanism, Diagnosis, and Management. Front. Oncol. 11:627612. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.627612
Received: 09 November 2020; Accepted: 18 January 2021;
Published: 25 February 2021.
Edited by:
Franz Rödel, University Hospital Frankfurt, GermanyReviewed by:
Emily Jane Gallagher, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United StatesShaheen Khan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States
Copyright © 2021 Liu, Zhang, Zhou, Li, Yang, Li, Li and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xubao Liu, xbliu@medmail.com.cn; Kezhou Li, huaxipancreas@163.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work