Amarnath Challapalli
Eric O. Aboagye- 1Department of Clinical Oncology, Bristol Cancer Institute, Bristol, UK
- 2Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
Cancer cells do reprogram their energy metabolism to enable several functions, such as generation of biomass including membrane biosynthesis, and overcoming bioenergetic and redox stress. In this article, we review both established and evolving radioprobes developed in association with positron emission tomography (PET) to detect tumor cell metabolism and effect of treatment. Measurement of enhanced tumor cell glycolysis using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose is well established in the clinic. Analogs of choline, including [11C]choline and various fluorinated derivatives are being tested in several cancer types clinically with PET. In addition to these, there is an evolving array of metabolic tracers for measuring intracellular transport of glutamine and other amino acids or for measuring glycogenesis, as well as probes used as surrogates for fatty acid synthesis or precursors for fatty acid oxidation. In addition to providing us with opportunities for examining the complex regulation of reprogramed energy metabolism in living subjects, the PET methods open up opportunities for monitoring pharmacological activity of new therapies that directly or indirectly inhibit tumor cell metabolism.
Introduction
Mammalian cells possess molecular machineries that regulate their proliferation, differentiation, and death. Malignant transformation is a multistep process involving genetic alterations, disruption of regulatory circuits, and dynamic changes in the genome. It has been suggested that malignant growth is governed by six essential alterations in cell physiology: self-sufficiency in growth signals, insensitivity to growth-inhibitory (antigrowth) signals, evasion of programed cell death (apoptosis), limitless replicative potential, sustained angiogenesis, and tissue invasion and metastasis (1). Recent advances led to the notion that progressive evolution of normal cells to a neoplastic state involves not only the successive acquisition of hallmark capabilities but also contributions of recruited normal cells (which form tumor-associated stroma, constituting the “tumor microenvironment”) (2).
Metabolic reprograming is an important property of the cancer cells. In the presence of abundant nutrients, oncogenic signaling facilitates assimilation of carbons into macromolecules, such as lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids. The net result of this is to support cell growth and proliferation. Glucose and glutamine are abundant nutrients, and both feed into multiple nodes of central metabolism. Glutamine also provides two nitrogen atoms for synthesis of hexosamines, nucleotides, and amino acids, all of which are also required for growth (3). Among the host of pathways altered in cancer, glucose and glutamine metabolism are consistently reprogramed by mutations in MYC, TP53, the Ras-related oncogenes, and the LKB1-AMP kinase (AMPK) and PI3 kinase (PI3K) signaling pathways. Oncogenic Ras increases both glucose uptake via enhanced expression of glucose transporter (GLUT) 1, and utilization (4), in addition to regulating glutamine metabolism, promoting cell survival and growth (5). Increased MYC also enhances glycolysis, and glutamine catabolism, resulting in cell growth (6).
The hallmarks of cancer are all linked to proliferation of cancer cells, thus making cell proliferation an important capability leading to immortalization and generation of macroscopic tumors. The framework of hallmarks assumes a homogeneous population of cancer cells and considers the hallmarks as distinct entities, with a one-to-one relation between oncogenic events (the inducers), the signaling pathways (transmission), and the hallmarks (the effects). However, one oncogenic event, or one signaling cascade, could induce several hallmarks accounting for the dynamic and spatial heterogeneity of tumors (7). This heterogeneity provides a framework to interpret pathological, diagnostic, and therapeutic observations of tumors and supports the need for non-invasive serial studies on the whole tumor mass and the use of simultaneous, multi-targeted therapies for treating cancer.
Routine clinical evaluation of cancer therapeutics involves assessment of the change in tumor burden (anatomical measurements). Tumor shrinkage (objective response) and time to disease progression are both important endpoints, as these have been linked to an improvement in overall survival or other time to event measures in randomized phase III studies (8). These measures also determine the efficacy of drugs under study. In order to have standardized and widely accepted criteria for measurement of response to allow comparisons to be made across studies, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria were formulated (9). These criteria have been widely adopted for trials where the primary endpoints are objective response or disease progression. Since the introduction of RECIST in 2000, the increasing utilization of imaging technologies, such as MRI, FDG positron emission tomography (PET), and targeted cytostatic therapies, have prompted an update in the guidelines (RECIST v1.1) (10). The definitions of the criteria used to determine objective tumor response for target lesions are as follows:
1) Complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm.
2) Partial response (PR): at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
3) Progressive disease (PD): at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression.)
4) Stable disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
RECIST has limitations due to its reliance on changes in tumor size with therapy. First, uni-dimensional measurements may be apparent only after three to four cycles of chemotherapy. In non-responders, this means subjecting patients to cumulative toxicity of three to four cycles of treatment with little benefit. Moreover, the change in the tumor diameter may be non-uniform. Second, changes in measurements of smaller lesions are not reliable (11). Third, cytostatic treatments may not necessarily cause a decrease in tumor size or volume. Use of functional imaging overcomes several of these limitations. The use of PET has, for example, resulted in accurate imaging of subtle tumor biologic changes and the detection of early response to anti-cancer therapy (12). Tumors having increased metabolic activity may take up greater amounts of a radioactive tracer as compared to adjacent normal tissues; in that regard, sub-millimeter tumors have been known to show significant radiotracer uptake for certain tracers (13). Similarly, any change in metabolic or signaling pathway activity consequent to successful treatment could result in changes in uptake of the tracer on PET (14). Thus, PET is a useful tool in oncology to image certain metabolic pathways and response to therapy.
This review gives an overview of metabolic processes imaged by PET focusing on both established and evolving radioprobes to detect tumor glycolysis, choline metabolism, intracellular transport of glutamine, and other amino acids, as well as fatty acid metabolism (Figure 1). In particular, we emphasize the role of radiolabeled choline, acetate, and amino acid tracers for monitoring efficacy or predicting response to new therapies that directly or indirectly inhibit tumor cell metabolism.
Figure 1. Radioprobes utilized in the imaging of tumor cell metabolism.
Methodology
A comprehensive PubMed literature search was performed, identifying articles relating to PET imaging in malignant disease, particularly those reporting on response assessment with radiolabeled tracers, focusing on [11C]- and [18F]-labeled choline, acetate, methionine, and glutamine derivatives, up to July 2015. Search terms that were used to identify such articles were “acetate,” “choline,” “methionine,” “glutamine,” “tryptophan,” “FACBC,” and “PET” or “positron emission tomography.” Original publications were selected for inclusion in this review.
Overview of Pathways Traced by Pet Imaging
Glycolysis and Glycolysis-Linked Metabolic Pathways
A review of metabolism will be incomplete without reference to glycolysis. Energy production in normal cells is predominantly the result of oxidative phosphorylation, as opposed to glycolysis. However, tumor cells predominantly use glycolysis as a means to energy production irrespective of oxygen levels. Aerobic glycolysis (AG) refers to glucose utilization in excess of that needed for oxidative phosphorylation, despite sufficient oxygen to metabolize glucose to carbon dioxide and water. AG plays an important role in the biosynthesis of glycogen, proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids (15). AG, also known as the Warburg effect, supports the biosynthetic requirements of proliferating cancer cells (16). PET using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) has been widely used in the evaluation of various tumor types on the basis that an increase in AG will be reflected in an increase in the total glucose consumption of the tissue.
In a large pooled review of over 18,000 patient studies, it was shown that [18F]FDG PET has a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 88% for tumor detection (17). [18F]FDG PET has also been evaluated in response assessment following treatment with conventional chemotherapeutic agents both in the preclinical (18) and in the clinical setting (19–25), with the premise that decreases in glycolysis may occur in tumors that are sensitive to the applied cancer therapeutics and that the tumors that are resistant to treatment will show unchanged glucose metabolism. The prediction of treatment response has also been analyzed in many studies following treatment with different targeted therapies, e.g., monoclonal antibodies and small molecules inhibitors (26). However, [18F]FDG PET has the following limitations: (1) False positive uptake in some benign processes, such as infection and inflammatory lesions (27); (2) low sensitivity in well-differentiated/low-grade tumors that have relatively low glucose metabolism such as carcinoid tumors, bronchoalveolar cell carcinoma, and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (28–30); (3) low sensitivity in hypocellular cancers, such as desmoplastic or mucinous tumors (31); (4) increased [18F]FDG accumulation in some normal body regions, such as lymphoid tissue and brown fat (32); and (5) lack of clinical utility due to high urinary excretion and low expression of GLUT in prostate cancer (PCa) (30). Thus, newer radiotracers to image tumors accurately are being developed to address these shortcomings, as well as explore other metabolic pathways of tumors that can be imaged using PET. Two evolving imaging strategies somewhat linked to glycolysis will be discussed next.
Further to the Warburg effect, the final rate-limiting step in AG, catalyzed by pyruvate kinase (PK), controls the balance between energy production and metabolic precursor synthesis. The M2 isoform of PK (PKM2) is preferentially expressed in cancer cells and channels glycolytic intermediates into pentose phosphate pathway for nucleotide synthesis (33). PKM2 can be allosterically regulated to assume a high- or low-activity state. In cancer cells, there is downregulation of PK activity favoring a microenvironment that is conducive to cell proliferation. 1-((2,6-difluorophenyl)sulfonyl)-4-((methoxy-11C)phenoxy)sulfonyl)piperazine ([11C]DASA-23) (Figure 1) has been developed as a non-invasive PET probe to measure activity of PKM2 in preclinical glioblastoma models (34). Witney and co-workers have demonstrated that [11C]DASA-23 improved tumor visualization and predicted response to PKM2 activator, which resulted in loss of PET signal. The clinical translation of these findings is eagerly awaited.
Another glycolysis-linked pathway that has come to the fore is glycogenesis. Glycogen, the principal glucose store in mammalian cells, is synthesized from uridine diphosphate glucose (UDP-glucose) catalyzed by glycogen synthase (GS). Tumor cells originating from epithelial tissues, especially in the quiescent state also accumulate glycogen, in addition to increased glycolytic flux (35, 36). In order to gain biological insight into the role of glycogenesis, PET with [18F]-N-(methyl-(2-fluoroethyl)-1H[1,2,3]triazole-4-yl) glucosamine ([18F]NFTG) has been studied (37). The authors showed that glycogen levels, [18F]NFTG, but not [18F]FDG uptake, increased proportionately with cell density and G1/G0 arrest. This increase in glycogen levels and [18F]NFTG uptake has potential application in the assessment of oncogenic pathways related to glycogenesis and the detection of post-treatment tumor quiescence. However, there have been no studies evaluating response to therapy.
Choline Metabolism: Choline PET
Choline is a precursor of phosphatidylcholine (PC), an essential component of phospholipids in the cell membrane (38) and is required for structural stability and cell growth. It is also essential for the synthesis of neurotransmitters such as acetylcholine (by reaction of choline with acetyl-CoA), and production of potent lipid mediators, such as platelet-activating factor. Choline kinase (CHK) is the first enzyme in the Kennedy pathway (39), and is responsible for the de novo synthesis of PC. CHK phosphorylates choline to phosphocholine (PCho), the rate-limiting step in the Kennedy pathway. PCho is further phosphorylated to cytidine diphosphate-choline (CDP-choline) by the enzyme cytidylyltransferase and then to other intermediates before being incorporated into cell membrane phospholipids as PC. Malignant transformation is associated with enhanced choline transport and utilization, characterized in a large part by increased CHKα expression, which leads to a phenotype of increased radiolabeled choline uptake (40, 41).
Choline Tracers
Choline has been radiolabeled with [11C], [18F] for tracing choline transport and phosphorylation in several tumor types. In one of the first studies, Hara and colleagues showed that phosphorylation led to intracellular retention of the carbon label [11C] in PCa (42), thus enabling imaging of this metabolic pathway. The same group also showed that [11C]choline had good uptake in brain tumors with almost negligible activity in the blood after 5 min (43). This work inspired others to use [11C]choline as a PET radiotracer to image other tumors, including renal (30), esophageal (44–48), and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (44). [11C]choline is particularly useful in PCa as there is negligible urinary bladder excretion, a challenge with [18F]FDG. The utility of [11C]choline in visualizing and staging PCa has been extensively reported (42, 49).
[18F]Fluorocholine ([18F]FCH) was developed to overcome the short physical half-life of carbon-11 (20.4 min). The longer half-life (109.8 min) of [18F] was deemed potentially advantageous in permitting late imaging of tumors when sufficient clearance of parent tracer in systemic circulation had occurred. Since DeGrado and co-workers first reported the use of [18F]FCH (50), the tracer has proven safe for human administration (51) and has been extensively used in patients for diverse pathologies.
[11C]Choline (and fluoro-analog) is, however, readily oxidized to [11C]betaine by choline oxidase mainly in kidney and liver tissues, with metabolites detectable in plasma soon after injection of the radiotracer (52–54). This makes discrimination of the relative contributions of parent radiotracer from catabolites difficult when a late imaging protocol is used. A more metabolically stable [18F]choline analog, [18F]fluoromethyl-[1,2-2H4]choline ([18F]D4-FCH), based on the deuterium isotope effect (55) has been developed. The simple substitution of deuterium [2D] for hydrogen [1H] and the presence of [18F] improve the stability of the compound and reduce degradation of the parent tracer (54, 56, 57). This modification is hypothesized to increase the net availability of the parent tracer for phosphorylation and trapping within cells leading to a better signal-to-background contrast, thus improving tumor detection sensitivity of PET. [18F]D4-FCH has been validated for imaging tumors preclinically (56, 57). [18F]D4-FCH injection was also found to be safe and well tolerated in healthy volunteers with a favorable dosimetry profile (58). Further clinical studies are now underway to evaluate the utility of [18F]D4-FCH in cancer patients.
As the large proportion of studies evaluating response with choline radiotracers has been conducted in PCa – a disease that is managed by a plethora of agents, including androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy – this will be the main aspect of the review although other malignancies will be briefly discussed.
Preclinical Studies
Radiolabeled choline uptake has been extensively investigated in cells and animal models of cancer to determine factors that affect intrinsic uptake and allow interpretation of clinical findings (Table 1).
Table 1. Response assessment: preclinical studies.
Hara and colleagues demonstrated that androgen depletion markedly suppressed the uptake of [3H]choline in androgen-dependent LNCaP cells but not in androgen-independent PC3 cells (59). Anti-androgens were subsequently shown to modulate choline uptake in androgen-dependent cell lines and also inhibit proliferation (60, 61). Regarding chemotherapy, the effects of docetaxel have been studied by Krause et al. (62), who showed a reduction in the mean [11C]choline uptake in PC3 xenograft mouse model as early as 1 week after initiation of docetaxel. A significant reduction of mean tracer uptake of 45% was associated with a mean tumor growth inhibition of 20%. They concluded that [11C]choline might be a useful tool for monitoring responses to taxane-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced PCa. These findings were confirmed by Schwarzenbock et al. in a LNCaP-xenograft mouse model (63). Thus, labeled choline uptake is intrinsically responsive to anti-androgen therapy and chemotherapy.
Regarding RT, Holzapfel et al. have studied the effect of 6 Gy of radiation on PC3 and LNCaP cells, in vitro (64). Radiation-induced effects were variable with a transient increase in radiotracer uptake in androgen-independent PC3 cells but a decrease in androgen-dependent LNCaP cells. In both cell lines, modulation of tracer uptake was dose-independent following irradiation with 2–12 Gy with a mean increase to 120% in PC3 cells and a mean decrease to 74% in LNCaP cells. The authors suggested that changes of tumor choline uptake monitored by PET after RT may be due to a combination of factors, including therapeutic efficacy and altered tracer transport in cancer cells as a consequence of irradiation. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) responses have also been evaluated. Fei and co-workers evaluated the potential use of [11C]choline PET to monitor early tumor response to PDT in animal models. For treated tumors, normalized [11C]choline uptake decreased significantly at 24 and 48 h after PDT, associated with decreases in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. The authors concluded that [11C]choline PET has the potential to determine response in a PDT-treated tumor within 48 h after therapy (65).
Clinical Studies
To date, only anecdotal reports (50, 66) and two small clinical studies (67, 68) have assessed the role of [11C]choline PET as a method to monitor the therapeutic effects of ADT (Table 2). Fuccio et al. (67) retrospectively evaluated the effect of 6 months of androgen deprivation (Zoladex in 12 and Bicalutamide in 2 patients) in 14 PCa patients with recurrence after radical prostatectomy. They concluded that androgen deprivation significantly decreases [11C]choline uptake in androgen-sensitive patients. In another study in six primary PCa patients having bicalutamide therapy, Giovacchini et al. (68) showed an average reduction of 45% in the [11C]choline uptake (SUVmax from 11.8 to 6.4) corresponding to a 78% decrease in PSA following a median of 4 months of therapy. A similar magnitude of reduction in SUVave and SUVmax in the prostate tumors corresponding to 94% reduction in PSA was shown by Challapalli and co-workers, in patients having neoadjuvant ADT (69).
Table 2. Choline PET response assessment: clinical studies.
There is paucity of data on use of [11C]choline PET to monitor response to RT. Based on 2-month post-RT [11C]choline PET/CT reductions, Casamassima and colleagues inferred that high-dose RT was effective in eradication of limited nodal recurrences (70). More recently, in a study of 11 patients with intermediate-risk PCa, Amani and co-workers evaluated sequential [11C]choline PET/CT scans before and up to 12 months after completion of RT (74 Gy/37 fractions). None of the patients received hormonal therapy. They concluded that RT significantly decreased intra-prostatic [11C]choline uptake (as measured by SUVmax and tumor-to-muscle ratio (TMR) (71). Thus, the concern that RT might increase labeled choline transport does not appear to occur in patients at clinically relevant doses. Furthermore, in a proof of concept study, Challapalli and co-workers showed that choline uptake in prostate tumors, determined by [11C]choline PET/CT, is sensitive to ADT and RT, and could be used as an objective quantitative tool for response assessment. ADT decreased tumor-imaging variables – SUV60,ave, SUV60,max, TMRave, and TMRmax – by 26–60%. RT also decreased [11C]choline uptake within primary prostate tumors (though of lesser magnitude: 12–27%), compared to that seen with ADT, except for TMRmax where a significant reduction (40%) was seen (Figure 2) (69). Similarly, Beheshti and colleagues demonstrated that reduced [18F]FCH uptake is seen in PCa patients who respond to the hormone therapy often without any significant morphological CT changes (72, 73). These studies show the potential of radiolabeled choline to detect response of early PCa to therapies used routinely in the clinic.
Figure 2. Axial [11C]choline PET and fused PET/CT at level of the prostate. (A,B) Baseline scan with focal activity in the peripheral zone (black and white arrows). (C,D) Post-neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NAD) scan (8–10 weeks after initiating NAD) with a marked reduction in [11C]choline uptake in the peripheral zone. (E,F) Post- radiotherapy combined with concurrent androgen deprivation therapy (RT-CAD) scan (4 months after completion of RT-CAD) with a further reduction in prostate activity and increased obturator internus muscular activity (black and white asterisk).
Chemotherapy, Radium-223, and drugs interfering with androgen receptor (AR) machinery, such as enzalutamide and abiraterone, are the main stay of treatments in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Currently, there is excessive reliance on changes in serum PSA as an indicator of therapeutic efficacy and there are no predictive diagnostic tools to identify an early objective response in patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide, although AR splice variants detectable in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are evolving (74). The Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group recommends waiting 12 weeks before the first evaluation of response to ensure adequate drug exposure (75). Therefore, studies investigating new biomarkers for outcome prediction and disease monitoring are urgently needed. To this effect, labeled choline PET is under evaluation to assess therapeutic response.
Kwee and colleagues evaluated effects of docetaxel chemotherapy on circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and [18F]FCH PET/CT uptake in CRPC. Tumor-derived plasma cfDNA concentrations increased significantly after one and three treatment cycles, possibly due to post-chemotherapy necrotic cell lysis. Lower cfDNA concentrations at baseline were found to be associated with PET responses as measured after the third chemotherapy cycle. They concluded that it is feasible to annotate potential tumor sources of cfDNA using [18F]FCH PET/CT imaging, and that plasma cfDNA content and [18F]FCH PET/CT-detected tumor activity are potential response markers in CRPC (76). Caffo et al. showed that enzalutamide induces volume reductions in primary tumors and metabolic changes in metastatic lesions as detected by [18F]FCH PET/CT (77). In a proof of principle study, De Giorgi et al. evaluated [18F]FCH PET/CT as an early predictor of outcome in mCRPC patients treated with enzalutamide (78). They concluded that the combination of [18F]FCH PET/CT and decrease in PSA level could be a valid tool to predict progression-free survival (PFS) in mCRPC patients.
In a similar study with abiraterone, De Giorgi et al. demonstrated that early [18F]FCH PET/CT can predict clinical outcome (PFS and overall survival: OS) than PSA response in patients on abiraterone. Using fairly arbitrary thresholds for change in SUV (as specified in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines), a PSA decline ≥50% was shown to be associated with the [18F]FCH PET/CT response (12/42)/non-response (18/42) in 71% of patients (79). Miyazaki and co-workers evaluated acute changes in net metabolically active tumor volume (MATV) and total lesion activity (TLA) detected by [18F]FCH PET/CT imaging midway during treatment with radium-223 dichloride, in two patients. After the third dose of radium-223 dichloride, near-total disappearance of abnormal skeletal activity was observed in one case, while a heterogeneous tumor response was observed in the other (80). It can be summarized that, while being a proliferation-independent phenotype (13), changes in labeled choline uptake reflects response to therapy although the optimal time still needs to be clarified.
Non-Prostate Tumors
In addition to PCa, radiolabeled choline has been utilized in other tumor histotypes. Parashar et al. explored whether [18F]FCH PET could serve as an predictive biomarker for early detection of RT/chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) response in patients with lesions at the base of the tongue, tonsil, nodes, hypopharynx, maxilla, palate, lung, pancreas, brain, uterus, and rectum. They demonstrated reductions in SUVmax in 88% of lesions (CR: 7/16 and PR: 7/16) and concluded that changes in SUVmax after 3–4 weeks of initiation of RT were predictive of final outcome (81). Panagiotidis and co-workers showed that simultaneous PET/MRI with [18F]FCH in a patient with pineal germ cell tumor demonstrated a reduction in both size and radiotracer activity of the mass after chemotherapy (82).
While the choline phenotype has been reported as being proliferation independent in PCa (13), the phenotype is intrinsically associated with proliferation in breast cancer cells (83). In particular, PCho formation is linked to the activity of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling function (84). It was, thus, postulated that therapy response in breast cancer might be accompanied by predictable changes in the tumor retention of [11C]choline. In a clinical study involving breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab, [11C]choline uptake decreased in two patients responding to trastuzumab compared to non-responders (85). Regarding targeted therapies, Middendorp et al. also evaluated use of [18F]fluoroethylcholine (FEC) PET/CT in staging and monitoring therapy response of advanced RCC before and 10 weeks after two cycles of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. FEC PET/CT showed heterogeneous changes, with progression in one patient and a PR in the second patient, which were concordant with the RECIST response (86). Thus, changes in uptake of labeled choline in non-prostate histotypes also appear to reflect therapy response.
Fatty Acid Metabolism
Fatty Acid Synthesis: Acetate PET
Cancer cells are dependent on their ability to gain access to energy and substrate precursors, by reprograming the normal metabolic pathways required for the proliferation and survival of tumor cells, to synthesize of proteins, nucleotides, and lipids (87). Cancer cells are also characterized by a lipogenic phenotype (88), and often require that fatty acids be generated de novo to maintain proliferation and viability. As a result, fatty acid biosynthesis has gained significance as a potential therapeutic target in multiple cancers.
Acetate is metabolized in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle yielding CO2 and water (89). However, in cancer cells, acetate is preferentially utilized for fatty acid synthesis as a component of acetyl-CoA. Intracellularly, acetate is converted to acetyl-CoA by acetyl-CoA synthase (ACeS), and fed into the fatty acid synthesis pathway. [11C]Acetate PET was originally used to assess myocardial function (90). In myocardial tissues, carbons derived from [11C]acetate are incorporated into CO2 during the TCA cycle, allowing for PET visualization of oxygen consumption. However, in tumor cells, [11C]acetate is incorporated into membrane lipids due to over-expression of fatty acid synthase (FASN). This property is exploited for tumor imaging with [11C]acetate (91). The majority of studies analyzing the efficacy of [11C]acetate PET in tumors have focused on the detection of PCa (91). In addition to PCa, there are a number of other tumor types in which [11C]acetate PET shows high contrast, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), thymomas, renal cancers, brain tumors, and bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (92). These studies demonstrate that [11C]acetate is useful in diagnosis, staging, and predicting disease progression in certain cancers, and it is logical that [11C]acetate could also be used to stratify patients for specific therapies, as well as a method to monitor response to therapy.
Preclinical Studies
Emonds et al. evaluated the effect of 5 days of ADT on the uptake of [11C]acetate, together with [18F]FDG and [11C]choline in vivo. They found that ADT significantly decreased the uptake of [11C]choline and tended to decrease [18F]FDG uptake. [11C]Acetate uptake was unaffected by ADT in both PCa xenograft models [LAPC-4 (androgen sensitive), 22Rv1 cells (androgen-independent)]. The authors concluded that [11C]acetate uptake occurs independently of androgens and, thus, may be more favorable for detecting tumor viability during or following ADT (93). These findings were corroborated by Oyama et al. who also showed that [18F]FDG PET, detected metabolic changes within days of androgen ablation, while there was no significant difference in [11C]acetate uptake in a murine model of PCa (94).
[11C]Acetate PET could potentially be used as a surrogate for monitoring FASN activity as the incorporation of [11C]acetate into membrane lipids is regulated by FASN expression. There is potential that this approach may be an effective means to validate FASN inhibitors as they progress through clinical development. Yoshii et al. (95) evaluated a method to predict FASN-targeted therapy outcome using radiolabeled acetate uptake in LNCaP, PC3, 22Rv1, and DU145 cells. They demonstrated that uptake of radiolabeled acetate reflects FASN expression and sensitivity to FASN-targeted therapy with orlistat. Furthermore, Vavere et al. demonstrated that the FASN inhibitor C75 could reduce [11C]acetate uptake by up to 60% in PCa xenografts (96). While these studies are promising (Table 1), it has been noted recently that optimal acquisition of [11C]acetate images may require late imaging (~90 min) to increase sensitivity toward lipid incorporation (97).
Clinical Studies
Yu and co-workers, tested the feasibility of [11C]acetate PET imaging to assess response to therapy in men with bone metastatic PCa. Patients were imaged before and 6–12 weeks after initial ADT for new metastatic PCa or after first-line chemotherapy with docetaxel for CRPC. Changes in qualitative assessment and tumor:normal uptake ratio correlated with clinical response criteria. They concluded that [11C]acetate PET scanning was highly accurate for determining response to treatment in patients with bone metastases (98). Regarding therapy planning, Gomez and co-workers reported that [11C]acetate PET aids in detection of lymph node metastases especially in high risk PCa patients and led to changes of radiation therapy treatment field/volume or dose in about one-third of the patients (37%). Changes in [11C]acetate may serve as a tool for monitoring radiation therapy response (99).
There are anecdotal reports of [11C]acetate PET monitoring response in RCC and meningiomas. Maleddu et al. suggested that [11C]acetate PET could predict response to sunitinib as early as 2 weeks after therapy initiation (100). In the evaluation of meningiomas, Liu RS et al. demonstrated that [11C]acetate had good sensitivity for detection of meningiomas compared to [18F]FDG, and concluded that [11C]acetate performed better in monitoring five patients who had received gamma-knife surgery (101). [11C]acetate PET has also been used in assessing response to therapy in multiple myeloma. Bone marrow histology and whole-body (WB) MRI were used as comparators. In 13 patients who had repeat examination after induction therapy, visual and quantitative analysis, suggested a higher detection rate for both diffuse and focal myeloma lesions at diagnosis. After treatment, a 66% reduction in SUVmax was seen in patients with at least a very good PR (≥ 90% reduction in M-protein) versus a 34% reduction in those with a PR (≥50% reduction in M-protein). They concluded that [11C]acetate may be valuable for response assessment (102). In aggregate, the initial data with [11C]acetate for monitoring response is promising (Table 3) but the short half-life of the tracer may reduce sensitivity for imaging lipid incorporation, and its use is limited to centers with in-house cyclotron. Moreover, acetate is not specific to fatty acid synthesis, it also serves as a substrate for protein acetylation, and is utilized in cholesterol synthesis.
Table 3. Acetate PET response assessment: clinical studies.
[18F]Fluoroacetate
[18F]Fluoroacetate ([18F]FACE), a [18F]fluorinated acetate analog (t1/2: 110 min), which is putatively converted to fatty acids and incorporated into lipids, has been tested as an alternative PET tracer for imaging fatty acid synthesis. However, there are only limited clinical reports using [18F]FACE for oncologic diagnosis of patients with cancer (103, 104), thus far with no studies evaluating therapy response.
Fatty Acid Oxidation: [18F]Fluoropivalic Acid PET
In addition to fatty acid synthesis, the critical nature of fatty acid oxidation for cancer cells survival has been recognized (105). Short-chain carboxylates, including acetate, propionate, butyrate, and the non-natural substrate pivalate (trimethylacetate) use the early steps of the fatty acid oxidation pathway involving acyl-CoA and acyl-carnitine synthesis (106). A new radioprobe, 3-18F-fluoro-2,2-dimethylpropionic acid, also called [18F]fluoropivalic acid ([18F]FPIA), for imaging the early steps of the fatty acid oxidation pathway has been validated and has shown promise for cancer detection (107). Further studies are eagerly awaited.
Amino Acid Metabolism
Amino acids play an important role in the synthesis of a variety of nitrogen-containing compounds, such as proteins and nucleotides during cell growth, and their increased transport and utilization are be associated with early events in carcinogenesis (108). Natural amino acids are transported into cells by specific carrier-mediated transport systems and further incorporated into proteins and intermediary metabolites to different extents. Thus, investigators have studied the utility of several radiolabeled natural amino acids (including methionine, glycine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, and leucine) as tumor-imaging agents with PET (109). Amino acid scanning provides higher contrast between tumor and normal brain compared to [18F]FDG PET, due to the low uptake of amino acids in normal brain. However, of the several amino acid tracers investigated for tumor imaging, only a few have been evaluated beyond the initial feasibility studies in human patients.
Glutamine
Glutamine is the most abundant amino acid in plasma and occupies a unique niche in intermediary metabolism by providing a major inter-organ shuttle for both nitrogen and carbon (110). This makes it essential for cell proliferation by contributing to synthesis of nucleic acids, proteins, and hexosamines. Loss of amino and amido groups in glutamine produces alpha-ketoglutarate that also promotes cell growth, anaplerosis and adenosine-tri-phosphate (ATP) generation (111). Malignant transformation, involving enhanced c-Myc expression, increases glutamine metabolism by increased expression of cell surface transporters (112, 113).
Glutamine metabolism lends itself to evaluation by PET imaging, most relevant in non-[18F]FDG avid tumors, such as prostate, bronchoalveolar carcinomas, carcinoid tumors, and low-grade lymphomas. These malignancies may use glutamine as an alternative nutrient source and as such are more easily detected by a glutamine-based tracer. Venneti and co-workers, for example demonstrated that PET imaging in vivo with the glutamine analog 4-[18F]-(2S,4R)-fluoroglutamine ([18F]FGln) facilitates clear tumor delineation due to high tumor-to-background ratio. Chemo/radiation therapy reduced [18F]FGln tumor uptake, which was associated with decreased tumor burden, confirmed on autoradiography. In contrast, there were no anatomical or structural changes seen on T2-weighted MRI sequences, within the same time frame. These findings were translated into humans (six patients) and an increased [18F]FGln uptake was seen in patients with progressive brain tumors, but not in patients with SD (114).
Methionine
Methionine, an essential sulfur amino acid, is necessary for growth and development. It plays an important role in protein synthesis and is a predominant methyl group donor for multiple metabolic pathways. Malignant transformation enhances demand for methionine in cancer cells caused by increased fluxes in the pathways of protein synthesis, transmethylation, and transsulfuration. This forms the basis for higher uptake of labeled methionine in tumors.
Currently, PET using L-[methyl-11C]-methionine ([11C]methionine) is the most popular amino acid imaging modality for tumors, although its use is restricted to PET centers with an on-site cyclotron facility. [11C]methionine PET has been extensively studied in gliomas. Its role in initial diagnosis, differentiation of tumor recurrence from radiation injury, grading, prognostication, tumor extent delineation, biopsy planning, surgical resection and RT planning has been evaluated (115). A number of oncologic imaging studies have evaluated the role of [11C]methionine in response assessment and have been described in detail in the preclinical setting (116–127) (Table 1) and in patients (128–170) (Table 4). While most studies have focused on non-hematological solid tumors, multiple myeloma also represents an evolving area of interest. In this case, preclinical studies demonstrate superiority of [11C]methionine to [18F]FDG in monitoring novel anti-myeloma therapy involving proteasome inhibition (119).
Table 4. Methionine PET response assessment: clinical studies.
Leucine Analogs
Leucine is one of the preferential amino acid required for proliferating tumor cells and is, therefore, of interest in molecular imaging of anabolic cancer processes. 1-Amino-3-[18F]fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (anti-[18F]FACBC), a synthetic non-natural leucine analog, has been widely studied in imaging brain (171, 172), prostate tumors (173, 174), and pulmonary lesions (175). The non-natural amino acids are not metabolized but are taken up through both the L-type transporter and the energy-dependent A-type transporter (176). The tracer accumulation in PCa cells correlates with the expression level of the alanine, serine, and cysteine preferring system-mediated amino acid transport with the large neutral amino acid transporter (LAT1) as an important transport system (177, 178). There are only two preclinical studies that evaluated the role of anti-[18F]FACBC in predicting response [Table 1; (121, 124)] and in these cases anti-[18F]FACBC PET provided useful information on early response. Future studies are eagerly awaited.
Tryptophan Analogs
Tryptophan is an essential amino acid required for biosynthesis of proteins, serotonin, and niacin in the brain and other tissues (179). The amino acid PET tracer alpha-[11C]methyl-L-tryptophan (AMT) is transported in tumor tissue by LAT1 but is not incorporated into proteins (180). Instead, AMT is utilized by the kynurenine immunomodulatory pathway (181). Under pathological conditions, induction of this pathway’s rate-limiting enzyme, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), leads to increased metabolism of tryptophan and, thus, AMT accumulation (182). Tryptophan analogs have been widely studied in imaging high-grade gliomas (182, 183), CRPC (184), and neuroendocrine tumors (185). In a case report, Peng and co-workers suggested that AMT PET may be useful for assessing progression and therapeutic response of optic glioma (186). Further studies are eagerly awaited.
Discussion
Several metabolic pathways are deranged in cancer in a proliferation-dependent or proliferation-independent manner. These metabolic pathways, particularly enhanced glycolysis, offer the opportunity to detect cancer often with high contrast. In this review article, we discuss about the role of established and evolving metabolism tracers for prediction/monitoring response to therapy. The effect of drug or radiation therapy on each metabolic phenotype ought to be carefully considered to enable assignment of biological and clinical relevance to the changes seen. Notably, these therapies may directly or indirectly inhibit tumor cell metabolism, or indeed the changes may simply reflect loss of cell viability and influence the timing of post-treatment scanning. For [18F]FDG PET, the effect of the so-called targeted or biologic therapies on response monitoring has been reviewed (26) with the suggestion that the drugs may directly affect GLUT/hexokinase expression or activity with changes occurring within hours to days after initiating treatment. This type of information is less mature when other metabolism tracers are considered. For example, as discussed above, only a few studies have attempted to directly link the biology of androgen deprivation to changes in the tumor labeled choline signal. Regarding imaging variables, different variables have been used in the assessment of non-FDG tracers (see Tables 1–4). Some of these variables, e.g., TMR, may be considered, for instance, when RT is the choice of therapy to account for the effect of radiation on normal tissues.
Whatever the mechanism of signal change, be it direct or via loss of cell viability, it is important to consider the intrinsic variability of the quantitative measure, as well as that magnitude of change (threshold) for response. For [18F]FDG uptake, the intrinsic measurement variability (without treatment) ranges from 10 to 20% in different tumor phenotypes (187, 188). Based on pooling together reproducibility data, a consensus for quantifying PET response by EORTC PET study group was reached (189). The tumor responses were graded as follows:
1) Complete metabolic response (CMR): complete resolution of FDG uptake.
2) Partial metabolic response (PMR): a decrease (across all lesions) of minimum of 15% in tumor SUV after one cycle or >25% after more than one cycle of chemotherapy.
3) Stable metabolic disease (SMD): an increase of <25% or a decrease of <15% in SUV, and no visible increase in extent of FDG tumor uptake (20% in longest dimension).
4) Progressive metabolic disease (PMD): an increase in FDG tumor SUV of >25% within tumor region defined on baseline scan; visible increase in extent of FDG tumor uptake (20% in longest dimension) or appearance of new FDG uptake in metastatic lesions.
More recently, PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) guidelines have been formulated (190). These are based on the premise that cancer response as assessed by PET is a continuous and time-dependent variable. The tumor responses were graded as follows:
1) CMR: visual disappearance of all metabolically active tumors.
2) PMR: more than a 30% decline and a 0.8-unit decline in SULpeak between the most intense lesion before treatment and the most intense lesion after treatment, although not necessarily the same lesion.
3) SMD: not CMR, PMR, or PMD.
4) PMD: more than a 30% and 0.8-unit increase in SULpeak or new lesions, if confirmed. A >75% increase in total lesion glycolysis is also proposed as another metric of progression.
The PERCIST criteria differ from the EORTC criteria in that the SUV is normalized to the lean body mass and five tumors (up to two per organ) with the most intense [18F]FDG uptake lesions being considered target lesions; SULmean is the recommended imaging variable, as it has better test–retest variability (8–10%), is statistically less susceptible to variance, and is less subjective due to clear definition of target lesions.
Notably, these criteria are specific for [18F]FDG PET and may differ for other tracers. For example, Kenny and co-workers have evaluated the reproducibility of [11C]choline in breast cancer (85). A decrease of 40% for SUV30min, and 24% for SUV60min, was classified statistically as response. However, it is not clear if these criteria could be widely applied across different tumor sites or across different PET tracers, as the intrinsic variability may be isotope, patient, or scanner related.
In the future, further evaluation is required to assess the role of metabolic-PET imaging in assessing response to treatment and follow-up after treatment. These include what the optimal time (early or delayed) for performing the scan after treatment is, what the relevant imaging variables for predicting response are, how often to scan, whether imaging sensitivity and specificity are sufficient to predict response or progression, and whether changes in imaging variables can be used as surrogates for predicting patient outcomes. Future studies will need to be designed to establish the answers to these questions.
Conclusion
In this article, we aimed to give an overview of metabolic processes imaged by PET and focused on both established and evolving radioprobes to detect tumor glycolysis, choline metabolism, intracellular transport of glutamine, and other amino acids, as well as fatty acid metabolism. In particular, we emphasize the role of radiolabeled choline, acetate, and amino acid tracers for monitoring efficacy or predicting response to new therapies that directly or indirectly inhibit tumor cell metabolism. The optimal imaging time point, pertinent imaging variable, and criteria for response will require further interrogation.
Author Contributions
AC and EA have contributed to the conception, layout of the review, and reviewed and proof read.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Funding
EA’s laboratory receives core funding from Cancer Research UK and the UK Medical Research Council.
References
1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell (2000) 100(1):57–70. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9
2. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell (2011) 144(5):646–74. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
3. DeBerardinis RJ, Cheng T. Q’s next: the diverse functions of glutamine in metabolism, cell biology and cancer. Oncogene (2010) 29(3):313–24. doi:10.1038/onc.2009.358
4. Ying H, Kimmelman AC, Lyssiotis CA, Hua S, Chu GC, Fletcher-Sananikone E, et al. Oncogenic Kras maintains pancreatic tumors through regulation of anabolic glucose metabolism. Cell (2012) 149(3):656–70. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.058
5. Son J, Lyssiotis CA, Ying H, Wang X, Hua S, Ligorio M, et al. Glutamine supports pancreatic cancer growth through a KRAS-regulated metabolic pathway. Nature (2013) 496(7443):101–5. doi:10.1038/nature12040
6. Wise DR, DeBerardinis RJ, Mancuso A, Sayed N, Zhang XY, Pfeiffer HK, et al. Myc regulates a transcriptional program that stimulates mitochondrial glutaminolysis and leads to glutamine addiction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2008) 105(48):18782–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.0810199105
7. Floor SL, Dumont JE, Maenhaut C, Raspe E. Hallmarks of cancer: of all cancer cells, all the time? Trends Mol Med (2012) 18(9):509–15. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2012.06.005
8. Buyse M, Thirion P, Carlson RW, Burzykowski T, Molenberghs G, Piedbois P. Relation between tumour response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer. Lancet (2000) 356(9227):373–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02528-9
9. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst (2000) 92(3):205–16. doi:10.1093/jnci/92.3.205
10. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer (2009) 45(2):228–47. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
11. Revel MP, Bissery A, Bienvenu M, Aycard L, Lefort C, Frija G. Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable? Radiology (2004) 231(2):453–8. doi:10.1148/radiol.2312030167
12. Dose Schwarz J, Bader M, Jenicke L, Hemminger G, Janicke F, Avril N. Early prediction of response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer using sequential 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med (2005) 46(7):1144–50.
13. Contractor K, Challapalli A, Barwick T, Winkler M, Hellawell G, Hazell S, et al. Use of [11C]choline PET-CT as a noninvasive method for detecting pelvic lymph node status from prostate cancer and relationship with choline kinase expression. Clin Cancer Res (2011) 17(24):7673–83. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2048
14. Juweid ME, Cheson BD. Positron-emission tomography and assessment of cancer therapy. N Engl J Med (2006) 354(5):496–507. doi:10.1056/NEJMra050276
15. Lunt SY, Vander Heiden MG. Aerobic glycolysis: meeting the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol (2011) 27:441–64. doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154237
16. Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science (2009) 324(5930):1029–33. doi:10.1126/science.1160809
17. Gambhir SS, Czernin J, Schwimmer J, Silverman DH, Coleman RE, Phelps ME. A tabulated summary of the FDG PET literature. J Nucl Med (2001) 42(5 Suppl):1S–93S.
18. Jensen MM, Kjaer A. Monitoring of anti-cancer treatment with (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FLT PET: a comprehensive review of pre-clinical studies. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2015) 5(5):431–56.
19. Maffione AM, Marzola MC, Capirci C, Colletti PM, Rubello D. Value of (18)F-FDG PET for predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2015) 204(6):1261–8. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.13210
20. Pasha MA, Marcus C, Fakhry C, Kang H, Kiess AP, Subramaniam RM. FDG PET/CT for management and assessing outcomes of squamous cell cancer of the oral cavity. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2015) 205(2):W150–61. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.13830
21. Kwee RM, Marcus C, Sheikhbahaei S, Subramaniam RM. PET with fluorodeoxyglucose F 18/computed tomography in the clinical management and patient outcomes of esophageal cancer. PET Clin (2015) 10(2):197–205. doi:10.1016/j.cpet.2014.12.003
22. Sheikhbahaei S, Marcus C, Hafezi-Nejad N, Taghipour M, Subramaniam RM. Value of FDG PET/CT in patient management and outcome of skeletal and soft tissue sarcomas. PET Clin (2015) 10(3):375–93. doi:10.1016/j.cpet.2015.03.003
23. Sheikhbahaei S, Marcus C, Subramaniam RM. 18F FDG PET/CT and head and neck cancer: patient management and outcomes. PET Clin (2015) 10(2):125–45. doi:10.1016/j.cpet.2014.12.001
24. El-Galaly TC, Hutchings M. Imaging of non-Hodgkin lymphomas: diagnosis and response-adapted strategies. Cancer Treat Res (2015) 165:125–46. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13150-4_5
25. Meignan M, Itti E, Gallamini A, Younes A. FDG PET/CT imaging as a biomarker in lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2015) 42(4):623–33. doi:10.1007/s00259-014-2973-6
26. Contractor KB, Aboagye EO. Monitoring predominantly cytostatic treatment response with 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med (2009) 50(Suppl 1):97S–105S. doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.057273
27. van Waarde A, Elsinga PH. Proliferation markers for the differential diagnosis of tumor and inflammation. Curr Pharm Des (2008) 14(31):3326–39. doi:10.2174/138161208786549399
28. Fleming IN, Gilbert FJ, Miles KA, Cameron D. Opportunities for PET to deliver clinical benefit in cancer: breast cancer as a paradigm. Cancer Imaging (2010) 10:144–52. doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2010.0020
29. Higashi K, Ueda Y, Seki H, Yuasa K, Oguchi M, Noguchi T, et al. Fluorine-18-FDG PET imaging is negative in bronchioloalveolar lung carcinoma. J Nucl Med (1998) 39(6):1016–20.
30. Schoder H, Larson SM. Positron emission tomography for prostate, bladder, and renal cancer. Semin Nucl Med (2004) 34(4):274–92. doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2004.06.004
31. Higashi T, Saga T, Nakamoto Y, Ishimori T, Fujimoto K, Doi R, et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) – usefulness and limitations in “clinical reality”. Ann Nucl Med (2003) 17(4):261–79. doi:10.1007/BF02988521
32. Wechalekar K, Sharma B, Cook G. PET/CT in oncology – a major advance. Clin Radiol (2005) 60(11):1143–55. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2005.05.018
33. Liu VM, Vander Heiden MG. The role of pyruvate kinase M2 in cancer metabolism. Brain Pathol (2015) 25(6):781–3. doi:10.1111/bpa.12311
34. Witney TH, James ML, Shen B, Chang E, Pohling C, Arksey N, et al. PET imaging of tumor glycolysis downstream of hexokinase through noninvasive measurement of pyruvate kinase M2. Sci Transl Med (2015) 7(310):310ra169. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aac6117
35. Cheng KW, Agarwal R, Mitra S, Lee JS, Carey M, Gray JW, et al. Rab25 increases cellular ATP and glycogen stores protecting cancer cells from bioenergetic stress. EMBO Mol Med (2012) 4(2):125–41. doi:10.1002/emmm.201100193
36. Takahashi S, Satomi A, Yano K, Kawase H, Tanimizu T, Tuji Y, et al. Estimation of glycogen levels in human colorectal cancer tissue: relationship with cell cycle and tumor outgrowth. J Gastroenterol (1999) 34(4):474–80. doi:10.1007/s005350050299
37. Witney TH, Carroll L, Alam IS, Chandrashekran A, Nguyen QD, Sala R, et al. A novel radiotracer to image glycogen metabolism in tumors by positron emission tomography. Cancer Res (2014) 74(5):1319–28. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2768
38. Zeisel SH. Dietary choline: biochemistry, physiology, and pharmacology. Annu Rev Nutr (1981) 1:95–121. doi:10.1146/annurev.nu.01.070181.000523
39. Gibellini F, Smith TK. The Kennedy pathway – de novo synthesis of phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylcholine. IUBMB Life (2010) 62(6):414–28. doi:10.1002/iub.354
40. Ackerstaff E, Pflug BR, Nelson JB, Bhujwalla ZM. Detection of increased choline compounds with proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy subsequent to malignant transformation of human prostatic epithelial cells. Cancer Res (2001) 61(9):3599–603.
41. Glunde K, Bhujwalla ZM, Ronen SM. Choline metabolism in malignant transformation. Nat Rev Cancer (2011) 11(12):835–48. doi:10.1038/nrc3162
42. Hara T, Kosaka N, Kishi H. PET imaging of prostate cancer using carbon-11-choline. J Nucl Med (1998) 39(6):990–5.
43. Hara T, Kosaka N, Shinoura N, Kondo T. PET imaging of brain tumor with [methyl-11C]choline. J Nucl Med (1997) 38(6):842–7.
44. Ramirez de Molina A, Sarmentero-Estrada J, Belda-Iniesta C, Taron M, Ramirez de Molina V, Cejas P, et al. Expression of choline kinase alpha to predict outcome in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol (2007) 8(10):889–97. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70279-6
45. Tian M, Zhang H, Higuchi T, Oriuchi N, Endo K. Oncological diagnosis using (11)C-choline-positron emission tomography in comparison with 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F] fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography. Mol Imaging Biol (2004) 6(3):172–9. doi:10.1016/j.mibio.2004.02.003
46. Tamura K, Yoshikawa K, Tsujii H, Murata H. [Diagnosis of esophageal cancer using positron emission tomography]. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi (2002) 103(4):325–30.
47. Jager PL, Que TH, Vaalburg W, Pruim J, Elsinga P, Plukker JT. Carbon-11 choline or FDG-PET for staging of oesophageal cancer? Eur J Nucl Med (2001) 28(12):1845–9. doi:10.1007/s002590100655
48. Kobori O, Kirihara Y, Kosaka N, Hara T. Positron emission tomography of esophageal carcinoma using (11)C-choline and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose: a novel method of preoperative lymph node staging. Cancer (1999) 86(9):1638–48. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991101)86:9<1638::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-U
49. Reske SN, Blumstein NM, Neumaier B, Gottfried HW, Finsterbusch F, Kocot D, et al. Imaging prostate cancer with 11C-choline PET/CT. J Nucl Med (2006) 47(8):1249–54.
50. DeGrado TR, Coleman RE, Wang S, Baldwin SW, Orr MD, Robertson CN, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of 18F-labeled choline as an oncologic tracer for positron emission tomography: initial findings in prostate cancer. Cancer Res (2001) 61(1):110–7.
51. Treglia G, Giovannini E, Di Franco D, Calcagni ML, Rufini V, Picchio M, et al. The role of positron emission tomography using carbon-11 and fluorine-18 choline in tumors other than prostate cancer: a systematic review. Ann Nucl Med (2012) 26(6):451–61. doi:10.1007/s12149-012-0602-7
52. Bansal A, Shuyan W, Hara T, Harris RA, Degrado TR. Biodisposition and metabolism of [(18)F]fluorocholine in 9L glioma cells and 9L glioma-bearing fisher rats. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2008) 35(6):1192–203. doi:10.1007/s00259-008-0736-y
53. Roivainen A, Forsback S, Gronroos T, Lehikoinen P, Kahkonen M, Sutinen E, et al. Blood metabolism of [methyl-11C]choline; implications for in vivo imaging with positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med (2000) 27(1):25–32. doi:10.1007/PL00006658
54. Smith G, Zhao Y, Leyton J, Shan B, Nguyen QD, Perumal M, et al. Radiosynthesis and pre-clinical evaluation of [(18)F]fluoro-[1,2-(2)H(4)]choline. Nucl Med Biol (2011) 38(1):39–51. doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.06.012
55. Gadda G. pH and deuterium kinetic isotope effects studies on the oxidation of choline to betaine-aldehyde catalyzed by choline oxidase. Biochim Biophys Acta (2003) 1650(1–2):4–9. doi:10.1016/S1570-9639(03)00188-2
56. Leyton J, Smith G, Zhao Y, Perumal M, Nguyen QD, Robins E, et al. [18F]fluoromethyl-[1,2-2H4]-choline: a novel radiotracer for imaging choline metabolism in tumors by positron emission tomography. Cancer Res (2009) 69(19):7721–8. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1419
57. Witney TH, Alam IS, Turton DR, Smith G, Carroll L, Brickute D, et al. Evaluation of deuterated 18F- and 11C-labeled choline analogs for cancer detection by positron emission tomography. Clin Cancer Res (2012) 18(4):1063–72. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2462
58. Challapalli A, Sharma R, Hallett WA, Kozlowski K, Carroll L, Brickute D, et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of deuterium-substituted 18F-fluoromethyl-[1, 2-2H4]choline in healthy volunteers. J Nucl Med (2014) 55(2):256–63. doi:10.2967/jnumed.113.129577
59. Hara T, Bansal A, DeGrado TR. Effect of hypoxia on the uptake of [methyl-3H]choline, [1-14C] acetate and [18F]FDG in cultured prostate cancer cells. Nucl Med Biol (2006) 33(8):977–84. doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2006.08.002
60. Al-Saeedi F. Effects of flutamide on [methyl-(3)h]-choline uptake in human prostate cancer-3 cells: a pilot study. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp (2007) 68(4):226–41. doi:10.1016/j.curtheres.2007.08.003
61. Emonds KM, Swinnen JV, van Weerden WM, Vanderhoydonc F, Nuyts J, Mortelmans L, et al. Do androgens control the uptake of 18F-FDG, 11C-choline and 11C-acetate in human prostate cancer cell lines? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2011) 38(10):1842–53. doi:10.1007/s00259-011-1861-6
62. Krause BJ, Souvatzoglou M, Herrmann K, Weber AW, Schuster T, Buck AK, et al. [11C]Choline as pharmacodynamic marker for therapy response assessment in a prostate cancer xenograft model. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2010) 37(10):1861–8. doi:10.1007/s00259-010-1493-2
63. Schwarzenbock S, Sachs D, Souvatzoglou M, Schuster T, Nawroth R, Weirich G, et al. [[(1)(1)C]choline as a pharmacodynamic marker for docetaxel therapy. Response assessment in a LNCaP prostate cancer xenograft mouse model]. Nuklearmedizin (2013) 52(4):141–7. doi:10.3413/Nukmed-0521-12-07
64. Holzapfel K, Müller S, Seidl C, Grosu A-L, Schwaiger M, Senekowitsch-Schmidtke R. Effects of irradiation on the [Methyl-<sup>3</sup>H]choline uptake in the human prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP and PC3. Strahlenther Onkol (2008) 184(6):319–24. doi:10.1007/s00066-008-1799-1
65. Fei B, Wang H, Wu C, Chiu SM. Choline PET for monitoring early tumor response to photodynamic therapy. J Nucl Med (2010) 51(1):130–8. doi:10.2967/jnumed.109.067579
66. De Waele A, Van Binnebeek S, Mottaghy FM. Response assessment of hormonal therapy in prostate cancer by [11C] choline PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med (2010) 35(9):701–3. doi:10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181e9faf5
67. Fuccio C, Schiavina R, Castellucci P, Rubello D, Martorana G, Celli M, et al. Androgen deprivation therapy influences the uptake of 11C-choline in patients with recurrent prostate cancer: the preliminary results of a sequential PET/CT study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2011) 38(11):1985–9. doi:10.1007/s00259-011-1867-0
68. Giovacchini G, Picchio M, Coradeschi E, Scattoni V, Bettinardi V, Cozzarini C, et al. [(11)C]choline uptake with PET/CT for the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer: relation to PSA levels, tumour stage and anti-androgenic therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2008) 35(6):1065–73. doi:10.1007/s00259-008-0716-2
69. Challapalli A, Barwick T, Tomasi G, O’Doherty M, Contractor K, Stewart S, et al. Exploring the potential of [11C]choline-PET/CT as a novel imaging biomarker for predicting early treatment response in prostate cancer. Nucl Med Commun (2014) 35(1):20–9. doi:10.1097/MNM.0000000000000014
70. Casamassima F, Masi L, Menichelli C, Bonucci I, Casamassima E, Lazzeri M, et al. Efficacy of eradicative radiotherapy for limited nodal metastases detected with choline PET scan in prostate cancer patients. Tumori (2011) 97(1):49–55.
71. Amanie J, Jans HS, Wuest M, Pervez N, Murtha A, Usmani N, et al. Analysis of intraprostatic therapeutic effects in prostate cancer patients using [(11)C]-choline pet/ct after external-beam radiation therapy. Curr Oncol (2013) 20(2):104–10. doi:10.3747/co.20.1217
72. Beheshti M, Vali R, Waldenberger P, Fitz F, Nader M, Hammer J, et al. The use of F-18 choline PET in the assessment of bone metastases in prostate cancer: correlation with morphological changes on CT. Mol Imaging Biol (2009) 11(6):446–54. doi:10.1007/s11307-009-0217-0
73. Beheshti M, Vali R, Waldenberger P, Fitz F, Nader M, Loidl W, et al. Detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer by 18F fluorocholine and 18F fluoride PET-CT: a comparative study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2008) 35(10):1766–74. doi:10.1007/s00259-008-0788-z
74. Antonarakis ES, Lu C, Wang H, Luber B, Nakazawa M, Roeser JC, et al. AR-V7 and resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med (2014) 371(11):1028–38. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1315815
75. Scher HI, Halabi S, Tannock I, Morris M, Sternberg CN, Carducci MA, et al. Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. J Clin Oncol (2008) 26(7):1148–59. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4487
76. Kwee S, Song MA, Cheng I, Loo L, Tiirikainen M. Measurement of circulating cell-free DNA in relation to 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT imaging in chemotherapy-treated advanced prostate cancer. Clin Transl Sci (2012) 5(1):65–70. doi:10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00375.x
77. Caffo O, Maines F, Donner D, Veccia A, Chierichetti F, Galligioni E. Impact of enzalutamide administration on primary prostate cancer volume: a metabolic evaluation by choline positron emission tomography in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer (2014) 12(5):312–6. doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2014.03.004
78. De Giorgi U, Caroli P, Scarpi E, Conteduca V, Burgio SL, Menna C, et al. (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT for early response assessment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with enzalutamide. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2015) 42(8):1276–83. doi:10.1007/s00259-015-3042-5
79. De Giorgi U, Caroli P, Burgio SL, Menna C, Conteduca V, Bianchi E, et al. Early outcome prediction on 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone. Oncotarget (2014) 5(23):12448–58. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.2558
80. Miyazaki KS, Kuang Y, Kwee SA. Changes in skeletal tumor activity on (18)F-choline PET/CT in patients receiving (223)radium radionuclide therapy for metastatic prostate cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2015) 49(2):160–4. doi:10.1007/s13139-014-0314-0
81. Parashar B, Wernicke AG, Rice S, Osborne J, Singh P, Nori D, et al. Early assessment of radiation response using a novel functional imaging modality – [18F]fluorocholine PET (FCH-PET): a pilot study. Discov Med (2012) 14(74):13–20.
82. Panagiotidis E, Shankar A, Afaq A, Bomanji J. Assessing therapy response of secreting pineal germ cell tumor on simultaneous 18F-choline PET/MRI. Clin Nucl Med (2014) 39(9):e387–8. doi:10.1097/RLU.0000000000000231
83. Al-Saeedi F, Welch AE, Smith TA. [methyl-3H]Choline incorporation into MCF7 tumour cells: correlation with proliferation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2005) 32(6):660–7. doi:10.1007/s00259-004-1707-6
84. Lodi A, Woods SM, Ronen SM. MR-detectable metabolic consequences of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibition. NMR Biomed (2014) 27(6):700–8. doi:10.1002/nbm.3109
85. Kenny LM, Contractor KB, Hinz R, Stebbing J, Palmieri C, Jiang J, et al. Reproducibility of [11C]choline-positron emission tomography and effect of trastuzumab. Clin Cancer Res (2010) 16(16):4236–45. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0468
86. Middendorp M, Maute L, Sauter B, Vogl TJ, Grunwald F. Initial experience with 18F-fluoroethylcholine PET/CT in staging and monitoring therapy response of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Ann Nucl Med (2010) 24(6):441–6. doi:10.1007/s12149-010-0375-9
87. DeBerardinis RJ, Lum JJ, Hatzivassiliou G, Thompson CB. The biology of cancer: metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation. Cell Metab (2008) 7(1):11–20. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.002
88. Swinnen JV, Brusselmans K, Verhoeven G. Increased lipogenesis in cancer cells: new players, novel targets. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care (2006) 9(4):358–65. doi:10.1097/01.mco.0000232894.28674.30
89. Landau BR. Acetate’s metabolism, CO2 production, and the TCA cycle. Am J Clin Nutr (1991) 53(4):981–2.
90. Brown M, Marshall DR, Sobel BE, Bergmann SR. Delineation of myocardial oxygen utilization with carbon-11-labeled acetate. Circulation (1987) 76(3):687–96. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.76.3.687
91. Mohsen B, Giorgio T, Rasoul ZS, Werner L, Ali GR, Reza DK, et al. Application of C-11-acetate positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging in prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. BJU Int (2013) 112(8):1062–72. doi:10.1111/bju.12279
92. Grassi I, Nanni C, Allegri V, Morigi JJ, Montini GC, Castellucci P, et al. The clinical use of PET with (11)C-acetate. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2012) 2(1):33–47.
93. Emonds KM, Swinnen JV, Lerut E, Koole M, Mortelmans L, Mottaghy FM. Evaluation of androgen-induced effects on the uptake of [18F]FDG, [11C]choline and [11C]acetate in an androgen-sensitive and androgen-independent prostate cancer xenograft model. EJNMMI Res (2013) 3(1):31. doi:10.1186/2191-219X-3-31
94. Oyama N, Kim J, Jones LA, Mercer NM, Engelbach JA, Sharp TL, et al. MicroPET assessment of androgenic control of glucose and acetate uptake in the rat prostate and a prostate cancer tumor model. Nucl Med Biol (2002) 29(8):783–90. doi:10.1016/S0969-8051(02)00346-3
95. Yoshii Y, Furukawa T, Oyama N, Hasegawa Y, Kiyono Y, Nishii R, et al. Fatty acid synthase is a key target in multiple essential tumor functions of prostate cancer: uptake of radiolabeled acetate as a predictor of the targeted therapy outcome. PLoS One (2013) 8(5):e64570. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064570
96. Vavere AL, Kridel SJ, Wheeler FB, Lewis JS. 1-11C-acetate as a PET radiopharmaceutical for imaging fatty acid synthase expression in prostate cancer. J Nucl Med (2008) 49(2):327–34. doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.046672
97. Lewis DY, Boren J, Shaw GL, Bielik R, Ramos-Montoya A, Larkin TJ, et al. Late imaging with [1-(11)C]acetate improves detection of tumor fatty acid synthesis with PET. J Nucl Med (2014) 55(7):1144–9. doi:10.2967/jnumed.113.134437
98. Yu EY, Muzi M, Hackenbracht JA, Rezvani BB, Link JM, Montgomery RB, et al. C11-acetate and F-18 FDG PET for men with prostate cancer bone metastases: relative findings and response to therapy. Clin Nucl Med (2011) 36(3):192–8. doi:10.1097/RLU.0b013e318208f140
99. Hinojosa Gomez J, Blake M, Hernandez JO, Balam J, Teh BS. C11-acetate positron emission tomography (PET) for prostate cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol (2012) 84(3):S371–2. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.981
100. Maleddu A, Pantaleo MA, Castellucci P, Astorino M, Nanni C, Nannini M, et al. 11C-acetate PET for early prediction of sunitinib response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Tumori (2009) 95(3):382–4.
101. Liu RS, Chang CP, Guo WY, Pan DH, Ho DM, Chang CW, et al. 1-11C-acetate versus 18F-FDG PET in detection of meningioma and monitoring the effect of gamma-knife radiosurgery. J Nucl Med (2010) 51(6):883–91. doi:10.2967/jnumed.109.070565
102. Lin C, Ho CL, Ng SH, Wang PN, Huang Y, Lin YC, et al. (11)C-acetate as a new biomarker for PET/CT in patients with multiple myeloma: initial staging and postinduction response assessment. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2014) 41(1):41–9. doi:10.1007/s00259-013-2520-x
103. Ho CL, Cheung MK, Chen S, Cheung TT, Leung YL, Cheng KC, et al. [18F]fluoroacetate positron emission tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma and metastases: an alternative tracer for [11C]acetate? Mol Imaging (2012) 11(3):229–39.
104. Takemoto K, Hatano E, Nishii R, Kagawa S, Kishibe Y, Takahashi M, et al. Assessment of [(18)F]-fluoroacetate PET/CT as a tumor-imaging modality: preclinical study in healthy volunteers and clinical evaluation in patients with liver tumor. Ann Nucl Med (2014) 28(4):371–80. doi:10.1007/s12149-014-0823-z
105. Carracedo A, Cantley LC, Pandolfi PP. Cancer metabolism: fatty acid oxidation in the limelight. Nat Rev Cancer (2013) 13(4):227–32. doi:10.1038/nrc3483
106. Bastiaansen JA, Cheng T, Mishkovsky M, Duarte JM, Comment A, Gruetter R. In vivo enzymatic activity of acetylCoA synthetase in skeletal muscle revealed by (13)C turnover from hyperpolarized [1-(13)C]acetate to [1-(13)C]acetylcarnitine. Biochim Biophys Acta (2013) 1830(8):4171–8. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.03.023
107. Witney TH, Pisaneschi F, Alam IS, Trousil S, Kaliszczak M, Twyman F, et al. Preclinical evaluation of 3-18F-fluoro-2,2-dimethylpropionic acid as an imaging agent for tumor detection. J Nucl Med (2014) 55(9):1506–12. doi:10.2967/jnumed.114.140343
108. Isselbacher KJ. Increased uptake of amino acids and 2-deoxy-D-glucose by virus-transformed cells in culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1972) 69(3):585–9. doi:10.1073/pnas.69.3.585
109. Jager PL, Vaalburg W, Pruim J, de Vries EG, Langen KJ, Piers DA. Radiolabeled amino acids: basic aspects and clinical applications in oncology. J Nucl Med (2001) 42(3):432–45.
110. Albano F, Anelli L, Zagaria A, Coccaro N, D’Addabbo P, Liso V, et al. Genomic segmental duplications on the basis of the t(9;22) rearrangement in chronic myeloid leukemia. Oncogene (2010) 29(17):2509–16. doi:10.1038/onc.2009.524
111. DeBerardinis RJ, Mancuso A, Daikhin E, Nissim I, Yudkoff M, Wehrli S, et al. Beyond aerobic glycolysis: transformed cells can engage in glutamine metabolism that exceeds the requirement for protein and nucleotide synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2007) 104(49):19345–50. doi:10.1073/pnas.0709747104
112. Rajagopalan KN, DeBerardinis RJ. Role of glutamine in cancer: therapeutic and imaging implications. J Nucl Med (2011) 52(7):1005–8. doi:10.2967/jnumed.110.084244
113. Zhu A, Lee D, Shim H. Metabolic positron emission tomography imaging in cancer detection and therapy response. Semin Oncol (2011) 38(1):55–69. doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.11.012
114. Venneti S, Dunphy MP, Zhang H, Pitter KL, Zanzonico P, Campos C, et al. Glutamine-based PET imaging facilitates enhanced metabolic evaluation of gliomas in vivo. Sci Transl Med (2015) 7(274):274ra17. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa1009
115. Singhal T, Narayanan TK, Jain V, Mukherjee J, Mantil J. 11C-L-methionine positron emission tomography in the clinical management of cerebral gliomas. Mol Imaging Biol (2008) 10(1):1–18. doi:10.1007/s11307-007-0115-2
116. Higashi K, Clavo AC, Wahl RL. In vitro assessment of 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, L-methionine and thymidine as agents to monitor the early response of a human adenocarcinoma cell line to radiotherapy. J Nucl Med (1993) 34(5):773–9.
117. Kubota K, Ishiwata K, Kubota R, Yamada S, Tada M, Sato T, et al. Tracer feasibility for monitoring tumor radiotherapy: a quadruple tracer study with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose or fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyuridine, L-[methyl-14C]methionine, [6-3H]thymidine, and gallium-67. J Nucl Med (1991) 32(11):2118–23.
118. Kubota K, Kubota R, Yamada S, Tada M. Effects of radiotherapy on the cellular uptake of carbon-14 labeled L-methionine in tumor tissue. Nucl Med Biol (1995) 22(2):193–8. doi:10.1016/0969-8051(94)00099-6
119. Luckerath K, Lapa C, Albert C, Herrmann K, Jorg G, Samnick S, et al. 11C-Methionine-PET: a novel and sensitive tool for monitoring of early response to treatment in multiple myeloma. Oncotarget (2015) 6(10):8418–29. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.3053
120. Murayama C, Harada N, Kakiuchi T, Fukumoto D, Kamijo A, Kawaguchi AT, et al. Evaluation of D-18F-FMT, 18F-FDG, L-11C-MET, and 18F-FLT for monitoring the response of tumors to radiotherapy in mice. J Nucl Med (2009) 50(2):290–5. doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.057091
121. Ono T, Sasajima T, Doi Y, Oka S, Ono M, Kanagawa M, et al. Amino acid PET tracers are reliable markers of treatment responses to single-agent or combination therapies including temozolomide, interferon-beta, and/or bevacizumab for glioblastoma. Nucl Med Biol (2015) 42(7):598–607. doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.01.008
122. Paquette M, Tremblay S, Benard F, Lecomte R. Quantitative hormone therapy follow-up in an ER+/ERalphaKD mouse tumor model using FDG and [11C]-methionine PET imaging. EJNMMI Res (2012) 2(1):61. doi:10.1186/2191-219X-2-61
123. Reinhardt MJ, Kubota K, Yamada S, Iwata R, Yaegashi H. Assessment of cancer recurrence in residual tumors after fractionated radiotherapy: a comparison of fluorodeoxyglucose, L-methionine and thymidine. J Nucl Med (1997) 38(2):280–7.
124. Sasajima T, Ono T, Shimada N, Doi Y, Oka S, Kanagawa M, et al. Trans-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutanecarboxylic acid (anti-18F-FACBC) is a feasible alternative to 11C-methyl-L-methionine and magnetic resonance imaging for monitoring treatment response in gliomas. Nucl Med Biol (2013) 40(6):808–15. doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2013.04.007
125. Sato K, Kameyama M, Ishiwata K, Katakura R, Yoshimoto T. Metabolic changes of glioma following chemotherapy: an experimental study using four PET tracers. J Neurooncol (1992) 14(1):81–9. doi:10.1007/BF00170948
126. Schaider H, Haberkorn U, Berger MR, Oberdorfer F, Morr I, van Kaick G. Application of alpha-aminoisobutyric acid, L-methionine, thymidine and 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose to monitor effects of chemotherapy in a human colon carcinoma cell line. Eur J Nucl Med (1996) 23(1):55–60. doi:10.1007/BF01736990
127. Trencsenyi G, Marian T, Lajtos I, Krasznai Z, Balkay L, Emri M, et al. 18FDG, [18F]FLT, [18F]FAZA, and 11C-methionine are suitable tracers for the diagnosis and in vivo follow-up of the efficacy of chemotherapy by miniPET in both multidrug resistant and sensitive human gynecologic tumor xenografts. Biomed Res Int (2014) 2014:787365. doi:10.1155/2014/787365
128. Bergstrom M, Muhr C, Lundberg PO, Langstrom B. PET as a tool in the clinical evaluation of pituitary adenomas. J Nucl Med (1991) 32(4):610–5.
129. Chesnay E, Babin E, Constans JM, Agostini D, Bequignon A, Regeasse A, et al. Early response to chemotherapy in hypopharyngeal cancer: assessment with (11)C-methionine PET, correlation with morphologic response, and clinical outcome. J Nucl Med (2003) 44(4):526–32.
130. Chiba Y, Kinoshita M, Okita Y, Tsuboi A, Isohashi K, Kagawa N, et al. Use of (11)C-methionine PET parametric response map for monitoring WT1 immunotherapy response in recurrent malignant glioma. J Neurosurg (2012) 116(4):835–42. doi:10.3171/2011.12.JNS111255
131. Galldiks N, Kracht LW, Burghaus L, Thomas A, Jacobs AH, Heiss WD, et al. Use of 11C-methionine PET to monitor the effects of temozolomide chemotherapy in malignant gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2006) 33(5):516–24. doi:10.1007/s00259-005-0002-5
132. Galldiks N, Ullrich R, Schroeter M, Fink GR, Kracht LW. Imaging biological activity of a glioblastoma treated with an individual patient-tailored, experimental therapy regimen. J Neurooncol (2009) 93(3):425–30. doi:10.1007/s11060-008-9790-3
133. Galldiks N, von Tempelhoff W, Kahraman D, Kracht LW, Vollmar S, Fink GR, et al. 11C-methionine positron emission tomographic imaging of biologic activity of a recurrent glioblastoma treated with stereotaxy-guided laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy. Mol Imaging (2012) 11(4):265–71.
134. Ghigi G, Micera R, Maffione AM, Castellucci P, Cammelli S, Ammendolia I, et al. 11C-methionine vs. 18F-FDG PET in soft tissue sarcoma patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy: preliminary results. In Vivo (2009) 23(1):105–10.
135. Gudjonsson O, Blomquist E, Lilja A, Ericson H, Bergstrom M, Nyberg G. Evaluation of the effect of high-energy proton irradiation treatment on meningiomas by means of 11C-L-methionine PET. Eur J Nucl Med (2000) 27(12):1793–9. doi:10.1007/s002590000335
136. Hasebe M, Yoshikawa K, Ohashi S, Toubaru S, Kawaguchi K, Sato J, et al. A study on the prognostic evaluation of carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck adenocarcinoma with C-11 methionine PET. Mol Imaging Biol (2010) 12(5):554–62. doi:10.1007/s11307-010-0318-9
137. Herholz K, Kracht LW, Heiss WD. Monitoring the effect of chemotherapy in a mixed glioma by C-11-methionine PET. J Neuroimaging (2003) 13(3):269–71. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2003.tb00190.x
138. Huovinen R, Leskinen-Kallio S, Nagren K, Lehikoinen P, Ruotsalainen U, Teras M. Carbon-11-methionine and PET in evaluation of treatment response of breast cancer. Br J Cancer (1993) 67(4):787–91. doi:10.1038/bjc.1993.143
139. Ishimori T, Saga T, Nagata Y, Nakamoto Y, Higashi T, Mamede M, et al. 18F-FDG and 11C-methionine PET for evaluation of treatment response of lung cancer after stereotactic radiotherapy. Ann Nucl Med (2004) 18(8):669–74. doi:10.1007/BF02985960
140. Jang SJ, Lee KH, Lee JY, Choi JY, Kim BT, Kim SJ, et al. (11)C-methionine PET/CT and MRI of primary central nervous system diffuse large B-cell lymphoma before and after high-dose methotrexate. Clin Nucl Med (2012) 37(10):e241–4. doi:10.1097/RLU.0b013e318252d1ea
141. Jansson T, Westlin JE, Ahlstrom H, Lilja A, Langstrom B, Bergh J. Positron emission tomography studies in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer: a method for early therapy evaluation? J Clin Oncol (1995) 13(6):1470–7.
142. Katz L, Choueiri TK, Bellmunt J. (1)(1)C-methionine positron-emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) in evaluating metastatic transitional cell carcinoma response to sunitinib therapy. BJU Int (2010) 106(9):1249–50. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09732.x
143. Kawai N, Miyake K, Yamamoto Y, Nishiyama Y, Maeda Y, Kageji T, et al. Use of 11C-methionine positron emission tomography in basal germinoma: assessment of treatment response and residual tumor. Childs Nerv Syst (2009) 25(7):845–53. doi:10.1007/s00381-009-0841-7
144. Koizumi M, Saga T, Yoshikawa K, Suzuki K, Yamada S, Hasebe M, et al. 11C-methionine-PET for evaluation of carbon ion radiotherapy in patients with pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer. Mol Imaging Biol (2008) 10(6):374–80. doi:10.1007/s11307-008-0156-1
145. Kubota K, Yamada S, Ishiwata K, Ito M, Fujiwara T, Fukuda H, et al. Evaluation of the treatment response of lung cancer with positron emission tomography and L-[methyl-11C]methionine: a preliminary study. Eur J Nucl Med (1993) 20(6):495–501. doi:10.1007/BF00175162
146. Lee J, Lee BL, Yoo KH, Sung KW, Koo HH, Lee SJ, et al. Atypical basal ganglia germinoma presenting as cerebral hemiatrophy: diagnosis and follow-up with 11C-methionine positron emission tomography. Childs Nerv Syst (2009) 25(1):29–37. doi:10.1007/s00381-008-0674-9
147. Leskinen-Kallio S, Minn H, Joensuu H. PET and [11C]methionine in assessment of response in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Lancet (1990) 336(8724):1188. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)92799-N
148. Letocha H, Ahlstrom H, Malmstrom PU, Westlin JE, Fasth KJ, Nilsson S. Positron emission tomography with L-methyl-11C-methionine in the monitoring of therapy response in muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Br J Urol (1994) 74(6):767–74. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.1994.tb07123.x
149. Lindholm P, Lapela M, Nagren K, Lehikoinen P, Minn H, Jyrkkio S. Preliminary study of carbon-11 methionine PET in the evaluation of early response to therapy in advanced breast cancer. Nucl Med Commun (2009) 30(1):30–6. doi:10.1097/MNM.0b013e328313b7bc
150. Lindholm P, Leskinen-Kallio S, Grenman R, Lehikoinen P, Nagren K, Teras M, et al. Evaluation of response to radiotherapy in head and neck cancer by positron emission tomography and [11C]methionine. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (1995) 32(3):787–94. doi:10.1016/0360-3016(95)00007-L
151. Miwa K, Matsuo M, Shinoda J, Aki T, Yonezawa S, Ito T, et al. Clinical value of [(1)(1)C]methionine PET for stereotactic radiation therapy with intensity modulated radiation therapy to metastatic brain tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2012) 84(5):1139–44. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.02.032
152. Muhr C, Gudjonsson O, Lilja A, Hartman M, Zhang ZJ, Langstrom B. Meningioma treated with interferon-alpha, evaluated with [(11)C]-L-methionine positron emission tomography. Clin Cancer Res (2001) 7(8):2269–76.
153. Nariai T, Tanaka Y, Wakimoto H, Aoyagi M, Tamaki M, Ishiwata K, et al. Usefulness of L-[methyl-11C] methionine-positron emission tomography as a biological monitoring tool in the treatment of glioma. J Neurosurg (2005) 103(3):498–507. doi:10.3171/jns.2005.103.3.0498
154. Nuutinen J, Jyrkkio S, Lehikoinen P, Lindholm P, Minn H. Evaluation of early response to radiotherapy in head and neck cancer measured with [11C]methionine-positron emission tomography. Radiother Oncol (1999) 52(3):225–32. doi:10.1016/S0167-8140(99)00091-2
155. Nuutinen J, Sonninen P, Lehikoinen P, Sutinen E, Valavaara R, Eronen E, et al. Radiotherapy treatment planning and long-term follow-up with [(11)C]methionine PET in patients with low-grade astrocytoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2000) 48(1):43–52. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00604-0
156. Ogawa T, Kanno I, Hatazawa J, Inugami A, Fujita H, Shimosegawa E, et al. Methionine PET for follow-up of radiation therapy of primary lymphoma of the brain. Radiographics (1994) 14(1):101–10. doi:10.1148/radiographics.14.1.8128041
157. Ribom D, Schoenmaekers M, Engler H, Smits A. Evaluation of 11C-methionine PET as a surrogate endpoint after treatment of grade 2 gliomas. J Neurooncol (2005) 71(3):325–32. doi:10.1007/s11060-004-2031-5
158. Roelcke U, von Ammon K, Hausmann O, Kaech DL, Vanloffeld W, Landolt H, et al. Operated low grade astrocytomas: a long term PET study on the effect of radiotherapy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (1999) 66(5):644–7. doi:10.1136/jnnp.66.5.644
159. Sato K, Kameyama M, Kayama T, Yoshimoto T, Ishiwata K, Ito M. Serial positron emission tomography imaging of changes in amino acid metabolism in low grade astrocytoma after radio- and chemotherapy – case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) (1995) 35(11):808–12. doi:10.2176/nmc.35.808
160. Sawataishi J, Mineura K, Sasajima T, Kowada M, Sugawara A, Shishido F. Effects of radiotherapy determined by 11C-methyl-L-methionine positron emission tomography in patients with primary cerebral malignant lymphoma. Neuroradiology (1992) 34(6):517–9. doi:10.1007/BF00598964
161. Shintani S, Tsuruoka S, Shiigai T. Serial positron emission tomography (PET) in gliomatosis cerebri treated with radiotherapy: a case report. J Neurol Sci (2000) 173(1):25–31. doi:10.1016/S0022-510X(99)00296-8
162. Sorensen J, Savitcheva II, Engler H, Langstrom B. 3. Utility of PET and 11C-methionine in the paediatric brain tumors. Clin Positron Imaging (2000) 3(4):157. doi:10.1016/S1095-0397(00)00069-8
163. Tamura K, Yoshikawa K, Ishikawa H, Hasebe M, Tsuji H, Yanagi T, et al. Carbon-11-methionine PET imaging of choroidal melanoma and the time course after carbon ion beam radiotherapy. Anticancer Res (2009) 29(5):1507–14.
164. Tang BN, Sadeghi N, Branle F, De Witte O, Wikler D, Goldman S. Semi-quantification of methionine uptake and flair signal for the evaluation of chemotherapy in low-grade oligodendroglioma. J Neurooncol (2005) 71(2):161–8. doi:10.1007/s11060-004-9654-4
165. Toubaru S, Yoshikawa K, Ohashi S, Tanimoto K, Hasegawa A, Kawaguchi K, et al. Accuracy of methionine-PET in predicting the efficacy of heavy-particle therapy on primary adenoid cystic carcinomas of the head and neck. Radiat Oncol (2013) 8:143. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-8-143
166. Tsuyuguchi N, Hakuba A, Okamura T, Ochi H, Suzuki T, Sunada I. PET for diagnosis of malignant lymphoma of the scalp: comparison of [11C]methyl-L-methionine and [18F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose. J Comput Assist Tomogr (1997) 21(4):590–3. doi:10.1097/00004728-199707000-00011
167. Voges J, Herholz K, Holzer T, Wurker M, Bauer B, Pietrzyk U, et al. 11C-methionine and 18F-2-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: a tool for diagnosis of cerebral glioma and monitoring after brachytherapy with 125I seeds. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg (1997) 69(1–4 Pt 2):129–35. doi:10.1159/000099864
168. Wieder H, Ott K, Zimmermann F, Nekarda H, Stollfuss J, Watzlowik P, et al. PET imaging with [11C]methyl- L-methionine for therapy monitoring in patients with rectal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2002) 29(6):789–96. doi:10.1007/s00259-002-0779-4
169. Wurker M, Herholz K, Voges J, Pietrzyk U, Treuer H, Bauer B, et al. Glucose consumption and methionine uptake in low-grade gliomas after iodine-125 brachytherapy. Eur J Nucl Med (1996) 23(5):583–6. doi:10.1007/BF00833397
170. Zhang H, Yoshikawa K, Tamura K, Tomemori T, Sagou K, Tian M, et al. [(11)C]methionine positron emission tomography and survival in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas treated by carbon ion radiotherapy. Clin Cancer Res (2004) 10(5):1764–72. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0190-3
171. Ono M, Oka S, Okudaira H, Schuster DM, Goodman MM, Kawai K, et al. Comparative evaluation of transport mechanisms of trans-1-amino-3-[(1)(8)F]fluorocyclobutanecarboxylic acid and L-[methyl-(1)(1)C]methionine in human glioma cell lines. Brain Res (2013) 1535:24–37. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.08.037
172. Shoup TM, Olson J, Hoffman JM, Votaw J, Eshima D, Eshima L, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of [18F]1-amino-3-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid to image brain tumors. J Nucl Med (1999) 40(2):331–8.
173. Savir-Baruch B, Schuster DM, Jarkas N, Master VA, Nieh PT, Halkar RK, et al. Pilot evaluation of anti-1-amino-2-[18F] fluorocyclopentane-1-carboxylic acid (anti-2-[18F] FACPC) PET-CT in recurrent prostate carcinoma. Mol Imaging Biol (2011) 13(6):1272–7. doi:10.1007/s11307-010-0445-3
174. Schuster DM, Votaw JR, Nieh PT, Yu W, Nye JA, Master V, et al. Initial experience with the radiotracer anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid with PET/CT in prostate carcinoma. J Nucl Med (2007) 48(1):56–63.
175. Amzat R, Taleghani P, Miller DL, Beitler JJ, Bellamy LM, Nye JA, et al. Pilot study of the utility of the synthetic PET amino-acid radiotracer anti-1-amino-3-[(18)F]fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid for the noninvasive imaging of pulmonary lesions. Mol Imaging Biol (2013) 15(5):633–43. doi:10.1007/s11307-012-0606-7
176. Huang C, McConathy J. Radiolabeled amino acids for oncologic imaging. J Nucl Med (2013) 54(7):1007–10. doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.113100
177. Oka S, Okudaira H, Yoshida Y, Schuster DM, Goodman MM, Shirakami Y. Transport mechanisms of trans-1-amino-3-fluoro[1-(14)C]cyclobutanecarboxylic acid in prostate cancer cells. Nucl Med Biol (2012) 39(1):109–19. doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.06.008
178. Okudaira H, Shikano N, Nishii R, Miyagi T, Yoshimoto M, Kobayashi M, et al. Putative transport mechanism and intracellular fate of trans-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutanecarboxylic acid in human prostate cancer. J Nucl Med (2011) 52(5):822–9. doi:10.2967/jnumed.110.086074
179. Peters JC. Tryptophan nutrition and metabolism: an overview. Adv Exp Med Biol (1991) 294:345–58. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-5952-4_32
180. Diksic M, Nagahiro S, Sourkes TL, Yamamoto YL. A new method to measure brain serotonin synthesis in vivo. I. Theory and basic data for a biological model. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (1990) 10(1):1–12. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1990.1
181. Chugani DC, Muzik O. Alpha[C-11]methyl-L-tryptophan PET maps brain serotonin synthesis and kynurenine pathway metabolism. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2000) 20(1):2–9. doi:10.1097/00004647-200001000-00002
182. Juhasz C, Chugani DC, Muzik O, Wu D, Sloan AE, Barger G, et al. In vivo uptake and metabolism of alpha-[11C]methyl-L-tryptophan in human brain tumors. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2006) 26(3):345–57. doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600199
183. Christensen M, Kamson DO, Snyder M, Kim H, Robinette NL, Mittal S, et al. Tryptophan PET-defined gross tumor volume offers better coverage of initial progression than standard MRI-based planning in glioblastoma patients. J Radiat Oncol (2014) 3(2):131–8. doi:10.1007/s13566-013-0132-5
184. Kalkner KM, Ginman C, Nilsson S, Bergstrom M, Antoni G, Ahlstrom H, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 11C-5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostatic adenocarcinoma. Nucl Med Biol (1997) 24(4):319–25. doi:10.1016/S0969-8051(97)00064-4
185. Koopmans KP, Neels OC, Kema IP, Elsinga PH, Sluiter WJ, Vanghillewe K, et al. Improved staging of patients with carcinoid and islet cell tumors with 18F-dihydroxy-phenyl-alanine and 11C-5-hydroxy-tryptophan positron emission tomography. J Clin Oncol (2008) 26(9):1489–95. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.15.1126
186. Peng F, Juhasz C, Bhambhani K, Wu D, Chugani DC, Chugani HT. Assessment of progression and treatment response of optic pathway glioma with positron emission tomography using alpha-[(11)C]methyl-L-tryptophan. Mol Imaging Biol (2007) 9(3):106–9. doi:10.1007/s11307-007-0090-7
187. Minn H, Zasadny KR, Quint LE, Wahl RL. Lung cancer: reproducibility of quantitative measurements for evaluating 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake at PET. Radiology (1995) 196(1):167–73. doi:10.1148/radiology.196.1.7784562
188. Weber WA, Ziegler SI, Thodtmann R, Hanauske AR, Schwaiger M. Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET. J Nucl Med (1999) 40(11):1771–7.
189. Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, Herholz K, Hoekstra O, Lammertsma AA, et al. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur J Cancer (1999) 35(13):1773–82. doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00229-4
Keywords: tumor metabolism, positron emission tomography, choline, acetate, methionine, glutamine
Citation: Challapalli A and Aboagye EO (2016) Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Tumor Cell Metabolism and Application to Therapy Response Monitoring. Front. Oncol. 6:44. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00044
Received: 25 November 2015; Accepted: 12 February 2016;
Published: 29 February 2016
Edited by:
Zaver Bhujwalla, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USAReviewed by:
Sridhar Nimmagadda, Johns Hopkins University, USAMarie-France Penet, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA
Copyright: © 2016 Challapalli and Aboagye. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Eric O. Aboagye, eric.aboagye@imperial.ac.uk