Abstract
Collateral sprouting of surviving axons contributes to the synaptic reorganization after brain injury. To study this clinically relevant phenomenon, we used complex organotypic tissue cultures of mouse entorhinal cortex (EC) and hippocampus (H). Single EC-H cultures were generated to analyze associational sprouting, and double EC-H cultures were used to evaluate commissural sprouting of mossy cells in the dentate gyrus (DG) following entorhinal denervation. Entorhinal denervation (transection of the perforant path) was performed at 14 days in vitro (DIV) and associational/commissural sprouting was assessed at 28 DIV. First, associational sprouting was studied in genetically hybrid EC-H cultures of beta-actin-GFPtg and wild-type mice. Using calretinin as a marker, associational axons were found to re-innervate almost the entire entorhinal target zone. Denervation experiments performed with EC-H cultures of Thy1-YFPtg mice, in which mossy cells are YFP-positive, confirmed that the overwhelming majority of sprouting associational calretinin-positive axons are mossy cell axons. Second, we analyzed associational/commissural sprouting by combining wild-type EC-H cultures with calretinin-deficient EC-H cultures. In these cultures, only wild-type mossy cells contain calretinin, and associational and commissural mossy cell collaterals can be distinguished using calretinin as a marker. Nearly the entire DG entorhinal target zone was re-innervated by sprouting of associational and commissural mossy cell axons. Finally, viral labeling of newly formed associational/commissural axons revealed a rapid post-lesional sprouting response. These findings demonstrate extensive and rapid re-innervation of the denervated DG outer molecular layer by associational and commissural mossy cell axons, similar to what has been reported to occur in juvenile rodent DG in vivo.
Introduction
Regardless of the underlying cause, central nervous system (CNS) injuries result in primary damage at the lesion site and secondary denervation damage in connected brain areas. Thus, even spatially circumscribed CNS lesions cannot be considered local injuries since every lesion challenges the neuronal network. In line with this view of CNS damage, the CNS reacts to lesions with a profound rewiring of its connections. This lesion-induced plastic response may homeostatically restabilize or destabilize the perturbed network, causing changes in the throughput of information in denervated areas (Steward, 1994; Vlachos et al., 2012a, b, 2013). In some cases, the reorganization of surviving pathways may even be functionally restorative, resulting in the recovery of some of the functions that have been lost (Fawcett, 2009; Garcia-Alias et al., 2009; Maier et al., 2009; Filli and Schwab, 2015).
One of the mechanisms contributing to the reorganization of connections in denervated areas of the CNS is collateral sprouting of surviving axons. Although collateral sprouting was described several decades ago, and considerable efforts have gone into understanding the rules of sprouting (Steward, 1994; Deller and Frotscher, 1997; Deller et al., 2007; Perederiy and Westbrook, 2013), we do not fully understand the dynamics, specificity, or the regulatory mechanisms underlying axon sprouting, needed to exploit its potential in therapy. Although rehabilitation of patients with CNS injuries aims at training and enhancing the function of surviving pathways and, thus, the rewiring mechanisms, there are no standardized pharmacological treatments that target sprouting in a clinical setting (Filli and Schwab, 2015). Thus, a reinvestigation of the mechanisms underlying denervation-induced collateral sprouting may be useful in the search for novel targets.
A useful strategy for addressing the above questions related to sprouting is the use of an in vitro denervation model in which sprouting conditions can be controlled. Accordingly, we transferred the classic in vivo entorhinal denervation model (Steward et al., 1974; Lynch et al., 1976; Cotman and Nadler, 1978; Steward, 1994; Deller and Frotscher, 1997) to organotypic tissue cultures, and demonstrated robust collateral sprouting of associational axons following entorhinal denervation in vitro (Prang et al., 2003; Del Turco and Deller, 2007). Using this same model, we analyzed dendritic changes of granule cells in response to entorhinal denervation and identified sphingosin-1-phosphate (S1P) as a regulatory molecule and potential therapeutic target (Willems et al., 2016). Furthermore, we demonstrated the role of homeostatic plasticity mechanisms in the context of brain reorganization (Vlachos et al., 2012a, b, 2013). In all of these studies, single entorhinal cortex (EC) and hippocampus (H) cultures (EC-H) were used in which associational mossy cell axons sprout and re-innervate the entorhinal zone (Prang et al., 2003). Under in vivo conditions, however, mossy cells have commissural collaterals, which contribute to the re-innervation of the contralateral dentate gyrus in vivo (Del Turco et al., 2003). Whether these collaterals would also sprout in vitro has remained unclear. To study associational and commissural mossy cell sprouting systematically, and to extend the model for sprouting analysis, we have built complex tissue culture systems using double cultures of EC and H. In these complex cultures, we revisited associational sprouting and studied, for the first time, commissural sprouting in vitro. Our data indicate that both collaterals of the mossy cells sprout and contribute to the re-innervation of the denervated entorhinal target zone in the dentate outer molecular layer. Mossy cell sprouting in vitro is extensive and similar to what has been reported previously in juvenile rodents (Gall and Lynch, 1978, 1980; Gall et al., 1980; McWilliams and Lynch, 1983).
Materials and Methods
Animals
Thy1-YFPtg (Feng et al., 2000) and beta-actin-GFPtg (Okabe et al., 1997) reporter mice, as well as calretinin-deficient (Schurmans et al., 1997) and wild-type mice (C57Bl6/J), were used in this study. Mice were maintained in a 12 h light/dark cycle with food and water available ad libitum. Every effort was made to minimize distress of animals. Animal care and experimental procedures were performed in agreement with the German law on the use of laboratory animals (animal welfare act; TierSchG). Animal welfare was supervised and approved by the Institutional Animal Welfare Officer of Goethe-University Frankfurt, Faculty of Medicine.
Organotypic Tissue Cultures
Entorhino-hippocampal tissue cultures were prepared from mouse brain at postnatal days 4–5 according to previously published protocols (Prang et al., 2003; Del Turco and Deller, 2007). To prepare complex cultures of wild-type hippocampus with GFP-positive entorhinal cortex, animals were decapitated and wild-type hippocampi without attached entorhinal cortex and entorhinal cortex (EC) of beta-actin–GFPtg hippocampi were dissected. For Thy1-YFPtg cultures, animals were decapitated and hippocampi with attached entorhinal cortex (entorhino-hippocampal culture, EC-H) were dissected. To prepare complex cultures of two entorhino-hippocampal cultures, animals were decapitated and EC-H of wild-type and calretinin-deficient animals were dissected. For brain dissection, ice-cold preparation medium (Minimal essential medium (MEM, Gibco) containing 2 mM Glutamax (Gibco), pH 7.3) was used. Slices (300–350 μm) were cut using a Leica vibratome (VT1200S, Leica). Organotypic tissue cultures were maintained on porous-membrane filter insets (Millicell-CM, Millipore) and incubated in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37°C. Medium for cultivation contained 42% MEM, 25% basal medium eagle (Gibco), 25% heat-inactivated normal horse serum (Gibco), 2.5% HEPES buffer solution (Invitrogen), 0.15% bicarbonate (Invitrogen), 0.675% glucose (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich), 100 U/ml penicillin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 2 mM Glutamax. The pH was adjusted to 7.3 and the medium was replaced every 2–3 days. Organotypic tissue cultures were incubated for up to 28 days in vitro (DIV).
Perforant Path Lesion in vitro
Entorhino-hippocampal cultures were allowed to mature until 14 DIV. Using a sterile scalpel blade, entorhino-hippocampal cultures were completely transected as described (Del Turco and Deller, 2007). After the lesion, the cultures were placed back into the incubator and kept until 14 days post lesion.
Adeno-Associated Virus Production
HEK293T cells were transfected with pDP1rs (Plasmid Factory), pDG (Plasmid Factory), and GFP-vector plasmid (12:8:5) by calcium phosphate seeding and precipitation adapted from Grimm (2002). Cells were collected 48 h after transfection, washed twice with Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), centrifuged at 800 rpm for 4 min and re-suspended in PBS. Viral particles within the cells were released by 4 freeze- and thaw cycles and supernatant was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min to remove cell debris. The final supernatant was collected, aliquoted, and stored at −80 °C.
Viral Labeling
To label hilar mossy cells, tissue cultures were transduced with an adeno-associated virus serotype 2 (AAV2) containing GFP under the human Synapsin 1 promoter (AAV2-hSyn1-GFP). Injections were performed using an injection pipette pulled from thin-walled borosilicate capillaries (Harvard Apparatus, 30-0066). Pipettes were held by a head stage with a HL-U holder (Axon Instruments) and positioned using a micro-manipulator (Luigs and Neumann). Approximately 0.05–0.1 μl of AAV2-hSyn1-GFP was injected directly into the hilar region of the dentate gyrus using a syringe. Tissue cultures were visualized with an upright microscope (Nikon FN1) using a 10× water immersion objective lens (Nikon Plan Fluor, NA 0.30). All injections were performed 3–4 days after the tissue cultures were prepared.
Time-Lapse Imaging of Organotypic Tissue Cultures
Live imaging of tissue cultures was performed as previously described (Muller et al., 2010). The membrane insert with the cultures was placed into a 30 mm petri dish that contained imaging medium (37 °C) which consisted of NaCl 129 mM, KCl 4 mM, MgCl2 1 mM, CaCl2 2 mM, glucose 4.2 mM, HEPES 10 mM, Trolox 0.1 mM, streptomycin 0.1 mg/ml, penicillin 100 U/ml; pH 7.4. The osmolarity of the imaging medium was adjusted with sucrose to the osmolarity of the incubation medium. Imaging was done with an upright confocal microscope (Zeiss, Pascal; 488 nm excitation laser) equipped with a temperature-regulated stage (37 °C), using a 10× water immersion objective lens (0.3 NA; Zeiss) to visualize tissue cultures and to identify AAV-labeled mossy cells in the hilus of the DG. Image stacks (approximately 20 images per stack; z-axis interval between consecutive frames: 5 μm) of DG regions were obtained at a resolution of 1024 × 1024 pixels. Tissue cultures were imaged on 14, 17, 20, 24, and 28 days in vitro for less than 10 min per culture in order to keep exposure time and phototoxic damage minimal. GFP-intensity levels of AAV-injected cultures were equalized at DIV 14 using Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Version 13.0.1 × 64) to account for differences in GFP expression between cultures.
Immunofluorescence
Tissue cultures were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4) for 4 h. After several washes with 50 mM Tris–buffered saline (TBS; pH 7.4), cultures were re-sliced into 30 μm sections on a vibratome (VT 1000S, Leica). For cutting on a cryostat cultures were fixed in 4% PFA in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4) and 4% sucrose for 1 h at room temperature (RT), followed by 2% PFA and 30% sucrose in PBS overnight at 4°C. After several washes with 50 mM TBS (pH 7.4), cultures were re-sliced into 30 μm sections on a cryostat (CM3050 S, Leica). Free-floating sections were washed several times in 50 mM TBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100, incubated in a blocking buffer (0.5% Triton X-100, 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in 50 mM TBS) for 30 min at RT and subsequently incubated with the appropriate primary antibody (diluted in 0.1% Triton X-100, 1% BSA in 0.05 M TBS) for 2 days at RT. Rabbit anti-calretinin (1:1000, Swant) and mouse anti-NeuN (1:1000, Chemicon) were used as primary antibodies. After several washing steps, sections were incubated with the appropriate secondary Alexa-conjugated antibodies (1:2000, Invitrogen) for 4 h at RT, counterstained with DRAQ5 (1:10,000, Thermo Fisher Scientific) or Hoechst (1:50,000, Sigma-Aldrich) to visualize nuclei, and mounted in Fluorescence Mounting Medium (Dako, Agilent Technologies).
Quantification of the Sprouting Response Following Denervation
To quantify the expansion of the associational or commissural fiber plexus from the inner into the denervated outer molecular layer, confocal image stacks (EZ-C1, Nikon) of middle sections from re-sliced tissue cultures were captured (10× objective; pinhole size: 30 μm). Using the counterstains to visualize the cytoarchitecture of the DG, the width of the total molecular layer was determined from the outer border of the granule cell layer to the hippocampal fissure using ImageJ (Schneider et al., 2012). This was done at three locations (0°, −60°, + 60°), with 0° being defined as a line from the middle of the hilus through the crest of the DG to the hippocampal fissure. In a second step, the width of the calretinin-positive or the YFP-positive fiber plexus was measured from the outer border of the granule cell layer to the outer border of the main plexus. The percentage of the molecular layer covered by the calretinin-positive or the YFP-positive fiber plexus was calculated for the three locations in control and denervated cultures and subsequently averaged per culture. This algorithm ensured defined sampling of the supra- and infrapyramidal blades of the DG as well as the crest region and, thus, yielded an overall parameter of the extent of sprouting.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was done using GraphPad Prism 6 Software. Mann–Whitney test or Kruskal–Wallis test was used. Significance level was set at: ∗p < 0.05. Individual tests and test parameters are indicated in figure captions.
Results
Laminar Termination of Calretinin- Positive Associational and Entorhinal Axons in the Dentate Gyrus of Re-sliced Entorhino-Hippocampal Hybrid Cultures
To determine whether the laminar termination pattern of the two major projection systems to the dentate gyrus, i.e., the calretinin-positive associational projection arising from hilar mossy cells and the entorhinal projection arising from layer II neurons of the entorhinal cortex (EC), were maintained in organotypic tissue cultures, genetically hybrid cultures were generated at postnatal day 4–5. Entorhinal cortex derived from a beta-actin-GFPtg reporter mouse was co-cultured with hippocampus obtained from wild-type mice, and maintained in vitro until DIV 28. After fixation, re-slicing and immunolabeling for calretinin, essentially all calretinin-positive mossy cell axons and all GFP-positive entorhinal axons present within the culture could be visualized using confocal imaging (Figure 1). Although a segregated termination of calretinin-positive associational and entorhinal axons could be seen at all levels of the re-sliced DG (Figure 1), the most defined termination pattern of the two projections was found in middle sections (Figures 1b,c). At this culture level, the shape of the granule cell layer as well as the laminar termination pattern of calretinin-positive fibers in the inner molecular layer and entorhinal axons in the outer molecular layer appeared closest to the in vivo situation, i.e., most organotypic (Figures 1g–i).
FIGURE 1
In the part of our study in which we analyzed and quantified denervation-induced sprouting, we focused on the middle sections of re-sliced cultures. We consider this methodological approach important, since it takes the three-dimensional organization of the tissue cultures into account and clear tissue borders are needed for reliable quantification of the sprouting response. In addition, the shape of the granule cell layer varied toward more superficial levels, possibly because proliferation and differentiation of granule cells continues in vitro for days after preparation of the culture (Radic et al., 2017).
Associational Sprouting of Mossy Cell Axons Following Lesion
After assessing the 3D-organization, we used the hybrid EC-H tissue cultures described above for the analysis of associational sprouting following entorhinal denervation (Figure 2). At DIV 14 the entorhino-hippocampal projection was transected using a sterile scalpel and at DIV 28 associational sprouting was analyzed in middle sections of re-sliced cultures labeled for calretinin (Figures 2b,d). Non-lesioned cultures (DIV 28) served as controls (Figures 2a,c). Because GFP-positive entorhinal axons could be identified using direct fluorescence, completeness of the lesion could be verified by the absence of EC axons in the dentate gyrus prior to re-slicing of the culture.
FIGURE 2
In controls (Figures 2a,c,e,f) the calretinin-positive fiber plexus in the inner molecular layer was well-defined, easy to identify, and it covered ∼30% of the width of the molecular layer (Figure 2i). Of note, in addition to the calretinin-positive mossy cells, some hippocampal interneurons also contain calretinin (Blasco-Ibanez and Freund, 1997). The axons of these interneurons are present throughout the culture, including the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus. However, compared to the dense calretinin-positive plexus in the inner molecular layer formed by hilar mossy cells, calretinin-positive axons of presumed interneurons are scarce. The border between the calretinin-positive mossy cell axons and the “entorhinal zone” of the molecular layer is, thus, well-defined and amenable to quantification (Figures 2a,c,e).
Following entorhinal denervation (Figures 2b,d,g,h) GFP-positive EC axons were lost. In contrast, virtually the entire molecular layer was filled with calretinin-positive axons. These axons reached up to the hippocampal fissure and covered ∼95% of the width of the molecular layer (Figure 2i). This result was highly reproducible, robust and massive, since the density of calretinin-positive fibers in the denervated zone was close to the density of calretinin-positive fibers in the inner molecular layer in some cases (e.g., Figures 2d,g).
We conclude from our observations in vitro that sprouting calretinin-positive axons extensively re-innervate the entire “entorhinal zone” of the slice-cultured dentate gyrus.
Changes in Calretinin- Immunofluorescence Observed After Entorhinal Denervation Reflect Sprouting of Hilar Mossy Cell Axons
The re-innervation of the outer dentate molecular layer by calretinin-immunopositive axons strongly suggests that mossy cell axons leave their classical “associational” termination zone in the inner molecular layer and invade the “entorhinal zone” of the dentate gyrus. However, since calretinin is also present in the axons of some GABAergic interneurons (Blasco-Ibanez and Freund, 1997), which may also sprout following entorhinal denervation (Nadler et al., 1974; Nadler, 1981; Goldowitz et al., 1982; Deller et al., 1995a; Houser, 2014), we wanted to corroborate and validate our findings using a second approach. To accomplish, we generated EC-H cultures of Thy1-YFP-transgenic animals (Feng et al., 2000). In the dentate gyrus of these cultures, variable numbers of granule cells and mossy cells express the YFP-transgene (Figure 3). In some cultures, mossy cells predominate, and a well-defined YFP-positive mossy cell axon plexus was observed in the inner molecular layer (Figures 3b,d). Both, mossy cell somata and mossy cell axons targeting the inner molecular layer were strongly calretinin-positive (Figures 3a,b,d–f) in these YFPtg culture preparations.
FIGURE 3
Next, we performed an entorhinal denervation experiment and denervated EC-H cultures prepared from Thy1-YFPtg mouse brains at DIV 14. At DIV 28, the cultures were fixed, re-sliced, and immunolabeled for calretinin. Similar to what we have shown above for calretinin immunolabeling (Figure 2), calretinin-immunopositive axons were abundant throughout the denervated “entorhinal target zone” (Figures 3h,i). This pattern of sprouting was mirrored by YFP-positive fibers arising from hilar mossy cells (Figures 3g,i). Following denervation, calretinin and YFP-positive fibers covered 96% and 100% of the width of the molecular layer, respectively (Figures 3j,k). The overlay of both markers indicates that the overwhelming majority of axons re-innervating the denervated outer molecular layer of the dentate gyrus are double-labeled, i.e., are mossy cell axons.
We conclude from these experiments that associational mossy cell axons are primarily responsible for the re-innervation of the denervated dentate gyrus in EC-H single cultures (denervation occurring at DIV 14).
Associational and Commissural Sprouting Following Bilateral Entorhinal Denervation of Wild-Type and Calretinin-Deficient Double Cultures
In the intact brain, axons of hilar mossy cells form both the ipsilateral inner molecular layer (the associational projection) and the same region of the contralateral dentate gyrus (the commissural projection). Therefore, we determined whether the commissural axon collateral of mossy cells in vitro forms the same reorganization as it does in vivo.
One way to address this question is to study the response of both axon collaterals to entorhinal denervation in vitro. Since calretinin is a robust marker for mossy cells and their axons, we used calretinin to study sprouting of both mossy cell axon collaterals. To distinguish between ipsi- and contralateral mossy cell axons, we co-cultured an EC-H culture generated from the brain of a wild-type mouse (mossy cells are calretinin-positive), with an EC-H culture generated from the brain of a calretinin-deficient mouse in which the mossy cells are calretinin-negative. Immunostaining of these cultures for calretinin only reveals the calretinin-positive wild-type axons whereas the calretinin-negative mossy cell axons arising from the calretinin-deficient EC-H culture are unlabeled (Figure 4).
FIGURE 4
Indeed, in calretinin-immunolabeled control double cultures, calretinin-positive mossy cell somata were seen only in the hilus of the wild-type culture (Figure 4). In line with this, the associational and commissural calretinin-positive axon plexuses were present in the ipsi- and contralateral dentate gyrus (Figures 4a,b,d), covering 38 and 36% of the molecular layer, respectively (Figure 4f). We then performed an entorhinal cortex lesion at DIV 14 and quantified the expansion of both calretinin-positive fiber plexus at DIV 28. At this time point, calretinin-positive fibers covered nearly the entire molecular layer in both dentate gyri (Figures 4c,e,f). Calretinin-positive axons covered 93 and 91% of the width of the molecular layers associationally and commissurally, respectively (Figure 4f).
We conclude from our findings that entorhinal denervation can induce associational as well as commissural mossy cell sprouting.
Associational and Commissural Sprouting Begins Within Days After Entorhinal Denervation of Wild-Type Double Cultures
Next, we assessed the dynamics of sprouting after in vitro entorhinal cortex lesion. To address this question, wild-type EC-H double cultures were prepared and AAV2-hSyn1-GFP was injected into one hilus. At 14 DIV, one group of cultures was lesioned (Figures 5f–j), whereas the other group served as non-lesioned controls (Figures 5a–e). Otherwise, both groups were treated identically and repetitively imaged as whole mounts (Figure 5). At the end of the imaging period some cultures were fixed, re-sliced, and immunostained for calretinin (Figure 6; see next paragraph).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
In both groups, the AAV successfully transduced granule cells and hilar neurons with hSyn1-GFP. In general, injections were limited to the DG. Within the injected dentate gyrus, the site and size of the injection, as well as the number of transduced cells varied between cultures. Expression of GFP was detected ∼8–10 days following injection of the virus and GFP expression levels increased throughout the entire observation period (Figure 5). Because of this change in GFP expression we used only differences in the distribution pattern (and not in signal strength) of GFP-labeled axons between time-matched control and lesioned cultures for the evaluation of sprouting.
Control cultures injected with AAV showed in the molecular layer ipsilateral to the injection (“associational side”) a dense GFP-labeled axon plexus in the inner molecular layer and numerous GFP-labeled axons in the outer molecular layer. In those injections in which some granule cells had also been transduced, GFP-labeled granule cell dendrites were present in parts of the molecular layer. Of note, the border of the GFP-axon plexus in the inner molecular layer, which arises from mossy cell axons, could be well-delineated. Although the intensity of the GFP-signal increased with time, the termination pattern of these inner molecular layer fibers remained apparently unchanged in controls. Likewise, in the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus contralateral to the injection (“commissural side”) a dense GFP-labeled axon plexus was seen in the inner molecular layer. A much smaller number of GFP-labeled commissural axons were also found in the outer molecular layer, as seen in vivo (Deller et al., 1995b, 1996). Similar to the associational side, the outer border of the commissural GFP-plexus in the inner molecular layer could be readily defined. In controls, the termination pattern of these commissural fibers remained apparently unchanged.
In denervated cultures injected with the AAV, the situation was similar to controls at DIV 14. However, as early as DIV 17, GFP-positive fibers from the inner molecular layer were observed to enter the denervated “entorhinal target zone” of the dentate gyrus. This sprouting response continued and appeared to be relatively complete by DIV 24, i.e., 10 days post lesion. We conclude from these data that associational/commissural sprouting starts rapidly, i.e., within only a few days following entorhinal denervation in vitro at DIV 14.
Associational and Commissural Sprouting Seen in AAV2-hSyn1- GFP-Injected Wild-Type Double Cultures Mirrors Sprouting of Calretinin-Positive Fibers
Since AAV injections transduce all types of neurons, we wanted to confirm that the majority of GFP-positive axons seen in the inner molecular layer of controls and in the entire molecular layer of denervated cultures were calretinin-positive. As shown in vivo (Blasco-Ibanez and Freund, 1997), and in this in vitro study (Figure 3), calretinin primarily labels mossy cell axons and is a marker for mossy cell axon sprouting. Accordingly, we fixed, re-sliced, and immunostained the AAV-injected wild-type double cultures for calretinin (Figure 6).
In control as well as in denervated cultures an extensive overlap between GFP-positive and calretinin-positive axons was seen (Figure 6), in particular in the inner molecular layer of controls (Figures 6a–c) and in the entire molecular layer following denervation (Figures 6d–f). As expected, overlap of the two markers was not as complete as that seen in the case of the YFPtg cultures (c.f. Figure 3), since some GFP-positive axons do not arise from mossy cells.
Discussion
In the absence of any specific treatment for CNS damage, e.g., stem cells to replace neurons, or drugs that might induce axonal regeneration to restore anatomical connectivity, lesion-induced reorganization in the CNS might be an effective strategy. Since collateral sprouting is one of the mechanisms in this rewiring process, it appears to be timely to reinvestigate its rules and mechanisms using in vitro systems, such as the entorhinal denervation model in vitro (Prang et al., 2003; Del Turco and Deller, 2007; Vlachos et al., 2012a, 2013).
The present study was performed to better understand the sprouting of mossy cell axons following entorhinal denervation in vitro. Our findings can be summarized as follows: (1) Using EC-H co-cultures of beta-actin-GFPtg and wild-type mice, we could show that calretinin-positive associational axons re-innervate the denervated “entorhinal” zone of the DG (Figures 7a,b). (2) Using EC-H cultures of Thy1-YFPtg mice, we demonstrated that calretinin-immunolabeling can be used to visualize mossy cell sprouting. (3) In double cultures of EC-H, a hippocampal commissural system forms. By co-culturing EC-H of wild-type and EC-H of calretinin-deficient mice, the associational and commissural collaterals of the wild-type mossy cell population could be distinguished. Following entorhinal lesions of these double cultures, re-innervation of the entorhinal zone by associational axons was seen in the wild-type DG and re-innervation by commissural axons was observed on the calretinin-deficient side (Figures 7c,d). (4) Using AAV injected wild-type double-cultures, we found that associational/commissural sprouting of mossy cell axons occurs rapidly post-lesion. Taken together, we conclude that the associational and the commissural collaterals of mossy cells respond rapidly to entorhinal denervation in vitro. The speed and extent of the in vitro sprouting response was similar to that reported in juvenile rodents in vivo.
FIGURE 7
Calretinin as a Marker for the Analysis of Sprouting Mossy Cell Axons
In previous work (Prang et al., 2003), we provided the first evidence for the sprouting of associational calretinin-positive axons after entorhinal denervation in vitro. In our present study, we revisited this phenomenon using genetically hybrid and re-sliced EC-H co-cultures. The data show that sprouting of associational calretinin-positive axons is robust, with sprouting calretinin-positive axons re-innervating the molecular layer all the way to the hippocampal fissure.
The use of calretinin as a marker for mossy cell axons is possible in mouse tissue, because mossy cells in mice, in contrast to rat mossy cells, express this calcium-binding protein constitutively (Blasco-Ibanez and Freund, 1997). However, calretinin is not only present in mossy cells, but also in a subpopulation of interneurons in the DG and hippocampus (Blasco-Ibanez and Freund, 1997). Since interneurons have been shown to contribute to the re-innervation of the denervated DG (Nadler et al., 1974; Nadler, 1981; Goldowitz et al., 1982; Deller et al., 1995a), we could not exclude that a substantial fraction of sprouting calretinin-positive fibers arises from such calretinin-positive interneurons. Therefore, we decided to use a second approach and employed EC-H cultures generated from Thy1-YFPtg mouse brain. In these cultures, mossy cells and granule cells but not calretinin-positive interneurons express YFP and, thus, sprouting YFP-positive axons in the molecular layer following entorhinal denervation are sprouting mossy cell axons. Using these cultures, we were able to directly compare mossy cell axon sprouting to the sprouting response seen with calretinin immunolabeling, which reflects sprouting of calretinin-positive mossy cells and, potentially, sprouting of calretinin-positive interneurons. This approach also allowed us to detect and estimate the fraction of sprouting axons arising from calretinin-positive interneurons. Of note, almost all YFP-positive axons found in the denervated outer molecular layer were also calretinin-positive (and vice versa), demonstrating that the overwhelming majority of calretinin-positive axons re-innervating the molecular layer after entorhinal denervation originate from mossy cell axons. Compared to the number of sprouting mossy cell axons, sprouting of axons of calretinin-positive interneurons appears to be, in fact, negligible. We also conclude, that calretinin is an excellent and highly robust marker that can be used to visualize sprouting mossy cell axons in mouse tissue cultures.
However, if Thy1-YFPtg tissue cultures are more specific for mossy cell axons, why did we continue to use calretinin-immunolabeling to visualize the sprouting response instead of switching to Thy1-YFPtg cultures? Several methodological reasons explain this choice: In our hands the use of calretinin-immunofluorescence is technically simple, results are highly robust and the extent of sprouting can readily be quantified. Also, the standardized use of calretinin as a marker for sprouting mossy cell axons makes it possible to compare the extent of sprouting across all conditions. In contrast, preparations from Thy1-YFPtg mice contain variable numbers of YFP-positive mossy and granule cells, considerably increasing the number of cultures needed for experimentation. Only a minority of cultures show a useful YFP-expression pattern. This is an even greater constraint in the case of YFP-positive double-cultures. Thus, although Thy1-YFPtg cultures were of the essence to demonstrate the overlap of calretinin and mossy cells, they do not appear to be the ideal choice for the routine analysis of sprouting, e.g., in high-throughput assays.
Calretinin-Deficient Mice as a Tool to Dissect Associational and Commissural Mossy Cell Sprouting
After validating calretinin as an excellent marker for sprouting mossy cell axons, we considered analyzing mossy cell sprouting in double cultures of wild-type EC-H. In such double cultures organotypic commissural projections exist and mossy cells project axon collaterals into the ipsi- as well as the contralateral DG. However, within the inner molecular layer of the DG, calretinin-positive associational collaterals from one side mix with calretinin-positive commissural collaterals from the other side. Since calretinin-immunolabeling will visualize both collaterals, this does not allow for a separate analysis of the two mossy cell axon collaterals. To solve this problem, we co-cultured a wild-type EC-H with an EC-H generated from calretinin-deficient mice. In these preparations only the mossy cell axons originating from the wild-type mouse contain calretinin and, thus, calretinin could be employed to visualize and quantify sprouting of associational and the commissural mossy cell axon collaterals, respectively.
Since we used tissue from calretinin-deficient mutant mice as a tool, we wondered whether removing calretinin from mossy cells could affect the sprouting response of the wild-type axons we were monitoring. Our observations do not provide any evidence for such an influence on wild-type sprouting axons since (i) sprouting in the wild-type-calretinin-deficient double cultures was similar to sprouting observed in the wild-type condition (associational sprouting), (ii) sprouting was not altered in the environment of the calretinin-deficient DG, and, (iii) sprouting was similar in virally traced wild-type and calretinin-deficient preparations. We conclude that although absence of calretinin from adult neurons may have some specific effects (Schurmans et al., 1997; Gurden et al., 1998), it does not seem to grossly affect the sprouting response of calretinin-positive wild-type axons in the hybrid EC-H double cultures.
Associational and Commissural Axon Collaterals of Mossy Cells React Rapidly, Simultaneously and Massively to Entorhinal Denervation
Mossy cells are remarkable relay cells that connect large parts of both hippocampi (Scharfman and Schwartzkroin, 1988; Sloviter, 1994; Deller et al., 1995b; Zappone and Sloviter, 2001; Scharfman and Myers, 2012; Scharfman, 2016; Bui et al., 2018). Loss of hilar mossy cells is commonly seen in human temporal lobe epilepsy (Sloviter, 1996) and it can be reproducibly induced in temporal-lobe epilepsy mouse models (Kienzler et al., 2006, 2009; Volz et al., 2011; Kienzler-Norwood et al., 2017). Accordingly, mossy cells have received much attention in recent years and their role in physiology and pathology has been intensely investigated (see Scharfman, 2016 for review). In comparison, much less is known about their restorative abilities, e.g., their ability to reshape their axonal arbors using collateral sprouting. In particular in disease contexts, e.g., temporal lobe epilepsy, knowledge about their ability to contribute to brain repair could be helpful.
In the present study, we have seen that mossy cells react to denervation rapidly and very strongly, i.e., they start re-innervating the denervated DG within the first days after the lesion and they cover the entire denervated zone. Of note, both axon collaterals showed this massive growth response, suggesting that a given mossy cell can react with its entire axonal arbor to denervation. Furthermore, the sprouting response on one side did not appear to be limited by the fact that sprouting occurred on the other side. This massive growth propensity of the mossy cells is remarkable, since axonal sprouting – other than axonal regeneration following axotomy – does not require reprograming of the reacting neuron (Steward, 1995; Caroni, 1997). The ability of neurons to undergo this reprograming and to regenerate their axons is age-dependent and ends in mouse EC-H cultures after the first week in vitro (Prang et al., 2001, 2003; Del Turco and Deller, 2007). Mossy cells are, thus, using their structural plasticity programs to extensively re-innervate the dentate gyrus between DIV 14 and DIV 28.
Of note, the reactive response of mossy cell axons to entorhinal denervation is limited to the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus. Although entorhinal cortex lesion also denervates the neighboring stratum lacunosum-moleculare of CA3 and CA1, mossy cell axons stay within the DG and do not leave their home region. Since axonal guidance occurs at the growth cone of a growing axon (Campbell and Holt, 2001), a number of attractive or repulsive factors, for example matrix molecules (Smith et al., 2015), neurotransmitters and soluble neurotrophic factors (Zheng et al., 1994; Zhang and Poo, 2002) derived from neurons or glial cells, could play a role in this region-specific response (Goldberg, 2003; Stoeckli, 2018).
Sprouting of Mossy Cell Axons in vitro Is Similar to Sprouting of Mossy Cell Axons in Juvenile Rodents in vivo
The sprouting response of mossy cell axons in our culture preparations was extensive and covered the entire denervated zone. This is much more extensive than what we have seen following entorhinal denervation in adult mice in vivo using a combination of anterograde tracing and calretinin-labeling (Del Turco et al., 2003). In adult brains calretinin-positive mossy cell axons grow only for short distances into the “entorhinal zone”. Nevertheless, the mossy cell sprouting response observed in adult mice was still more extensive than the one observed in rats, where mossy cell axons remain primarily within their home territory (Frotscher et al., 1997).
What could explain these differences in the sprouting propensity of mossy axons? With regard to the difference between the in vitro situation studied here and the sprouting observed in adult mice (Del Turco et al., 2003), we propose that the age of the cultures plays an important role. Although relevant maturation and differentiation steps have occurred (Prang et al., 2001, 2003), organotypic tissue cultures are still “juvenile” and, thus, highly plastic. More specifically, cultures are generated between postnatal days 4–5 and lesions are performed at DIV 14, corresponding to juvenile animals lesioned in vivo between 2–3 weeks postnatally. Such animals have been investigated previously and a much stronger sprouting response of juveniles has been reported compared to adults (Gall and Lynch, 1980, 1981; Gall et al., 1980): Mossy cell axons of juveniles leave their home layer in large numbers and re-innervate the entire denervated “entorhinal zone” of the dentate, similar to what we have seen in vitro. This effect is also much faster than in adults (Gall and Lynch, 1978; McWilliams and Lynch, 1983). Of note, strength as well as speed of re-innervation diminish with age (Gall and Lynch, 1981; Hoff et al., 1982a, b; McWilliams and Lynch, 1983), suggesting that the growth propensity or plasticity of mossy cells decreases with maturation (Caroni, 1997; Goldberg, 2003) or other molecules are expressed that restrict and pattern the sprouting response (Deller et al., 2000). The same considerations hold true for the differences observed between mouse and rat (Deller et al., 2007): Intrinsic factors regulating the strength of the growth response or extrinsic factors guiding and/or limiting the sprouting response of mossy cell axons could be different, which could explain the differences in mossy axon sprouting seen between the species.
Statements
Data availability statement
Datasets generated for this study may be made available on request to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
DD, MP, VB, and LH-E acquired and analyzed the data. DD and TD conceived and supervised the study, and wrote the manuscript. All authors were involved in data interpretation, critically revising the manuscript, read, and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by BMBF (OGEAM 031L0109B) and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC1080).
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Serge N. Schiffmann, Bruxelles, for the calretinin-deficient animals and Heike Korff, Ute Fertig, David Danehl, and Charlotte Nolte-Uhl for expert technical assistance.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
Blasco-IbanezJ. M.FreundT. F. (1997). Distribution, ultrastructure and connectivity of calretinin-immunoreactive mossy cells of the mouse dentate gyrus.Hippocampus7307–320. 10.1002/(sici)1098-1063(1997)7:3<307::aid-hipo6>3.0.co;2-h
2
BuiA. D.NguyenT. M.LimouseC.KimH. K.SzaboG. G.FelongS.et al (2018). Dentate gyrus mossy cells control spontaneous convulsive seizures and spatial memory.Science359787–790. 10.1126/science.aan4074
3
CampbellD. S.HoltC. E. (2001). Chemotropic responses of retinal growth cones mediated by rapid local protein synthesis and degradation.Neuron321013–1026. 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00551-7
4
CaroniP. (1997). Intrinsic neuronal determinants that promote axonal sprouting and elongation.Bio Essays19767–775. 10.1002/bies.950190906
5
CotmanC. W.NadlerJ. V. (1978). “Reactive synaptogenesis in the hippocampus,” in Neuronal Plasticity, ed.CotmanC. W., (New York, NY: Raven Press), 227–271.
6
Del TurcoD.DellerT. (2007). Organotypic entorhino-hippocampal slice cultures–a tool to study the molecular and cellular regulation of axonal regeneration and collateral sprouting in vitro.Methods Mol. Biol.39955–66. 10.1007/978-1-59745-504-6_5
7
Del TurcoD.WoodsA. G.GebhardtC.PhinneyA. L.JuckerM.FrotscherM.et al (2003). Comparison of commissural sprouting in the mouse and rat fascia dentata after entorhinal cortex lesion.Hippocampus13685–699. 10.1002/hipo.10118
8
DellerT.Del TurcoD.RappertA.BechmannI. (2007). Structural reorganization of the dentate gyrus following entorhinal denervation: species differences between rat and mouse.Prog. Brain Res.163501–528. 10.1016/s0079-6123(07)63027-1
9
DellerT.FrotscherM. (1997). Lesion-induced plasticity of central neurons: sprouting of single fibers in the rat hippocampus after unilateral entorhinal lesion.Prog. Neurobiol.53687–727. 10.1016/s0301-0082(97)00044-0
10
DellerT.FrotscherM.NitschR. (1995a). Morphological evidence for the sprouting of inhibitory commissural fibers in response to the lesion of the excitatory entorhinal input to the rat dentate gyrus.J. Neurosci.156868–6878. 10.1523/jneurosci.15-10-06868.1995
11
DellerT.NitschR.FrotscherM. (1995b). Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin (PHAL) tracing of commissural fibers to the rat dentate gyrus: evidence for a previously unknown commissural projection to the outer molecular layer.J. Comp. Neurol.35255–68. 10.1002/cne.903520105
12
DellerT.HaasC. A.FrotscherM. (2000). Reorganization of the rat fascia dentata after a unilateral entorhinal cortex lesion: role of the extracellular matrix.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.911207–220. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06728.x
13
DellerT.NitschR.FrotscherM. (1996). Heterogeneity of the commissural projection to the rat dentate gyrus: a Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin tracing study.Neuroscience75111–121. 10.1016/0306-4522(96)00255-2
14
FawcettJ. W. (2009). Recovery from spinal cord injury: regeneration, plasticity and rehabilitation.Brain132(Pt 6), 1417–1418. 10.1093/brain/awp121
15
FengG.MellorR. H.BernsteinM.Keller-PeckC.NguyenQ. T.WallaceM.et al (2000). Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP.Neuron2841–51. 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00084-2
16
FilliL.SchwabM. E. (2015). Structural and functional reorganization of propriospinal connections promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury.Neural Regen. Res.10509–513. 10.4103/1673-5374.155425
17
FrotscherM.HeimrichB.DellerT. (1997). Sprouting in the hippocampus is layer-specific.Trends Neurosci.20218–223. 10.1016/s0166-2236(96)01018-1
18
GallC.LynchG. (1978). Rapid axon sprouting in the neonatal rat hippocampus.Brain Res.153357–362. 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90415-8
19
GallC.LynchG. (1981). Fiber architecture of the dentate gyrus following ablation of the entorhinal cortex in rats of different ages: evidence for two forms of axon sprouting in the immature brain.Neuroscience6903–910. 10.1016/0306-4522(81)90171-8
20
GallC.LynchG. S. (1980). The regulation of fiber growth and synaptogenesis in the developing hippocampus.Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.1159–180. 10.1016/s0070-2153(08)60119-2
21
GallC.McWilliamsR.LynchG. (1980). Accelerated rates of synaptogenesis by “sprouting” afferents in the immature.hippocampal formation.J. Neurol.1931047–1061. 10.1002/cne.901930416
22
Garcia-AliasG.BarkhuysenS.BuckleM.FawcettJ. W. (2009). Chondroitinase ABC treatment opens a window of opportunity for task-specific rehabilitation.Nat. Neurosci.121145–1151. 10.1038/nn.2377
23
GoldbergJ. L. (2003). How does an axon grow?Genes Dev.17941–958. 10.1101/gad.1062303
24
GoldowitzD.VincentS. R.WuJ. Y.HökfeltT. (1982). Immunohistochemical demonstration of plasticity in GABA neurons of the adult rat dentate gyrus.Brain Res.238413–420. 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90116-0
25
GrimmD. (2002). Production methods for gene transfer vectors based on adeno-associated virus serotypes.Methods28146–157. 10.1016/s1046-2023(02)00219-0
26
GurdenH.SchiffmannS. N.LemaireM.BöhmeG. A.ParmentierM.SchurmansS. (1998). Calretinin expression as a critical component in the control of dentate gyrus long-term potentiation induction in mice.Eur. J. Neurosci.103029–3033. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1998.00373.x
27
HoffS. F.ScheffS. W.BernadoL. S.CotmanC. W. (1982a). Lesion-induced synaptogenesis in the dentate gyrus of aged rats.J. Comp. Neurol.205246–252. 10.1002/cne.902050304
28
HoffS. F.ScheffS. W.CotmanC. W. (1982b). Lesion-induced synaptogenesis in the dentate gyrus of aged rats.II. demonstration of an impaired degeneration clearing response.J. Comp. Neurol.205253–259. 10.1002/cne.902050305
29
HouserC. R. (2014). Do structural changes in GABA neurons give rise to the epileptic state?Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.813151–160. 10.1007/978-94-017-8914-1_12
30
KienzlerF.JedlickaP.VuksicM.DellerT.SchwarzacherS. W. (2006). Excitotoxic hippocampal neuron loss following sustained electrical stimulation of the perforant pathway in the mouse.Brain Res.1085195–198. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.055
31
KienzlerF.NorwoodB. A.SloviterR. S. (2009). Hippocampal injury, atrophy, synaptic reorganization, and epileptogenesis after perforant pathway stimulation-induced status epilepticus in the mouse.J. Comp. Neurol.515181–196. 10.1002/cne.22059
32
Kienzler-NorwoodF.CostardL.SadangiC.MullerP.NeubertV.BauerS.et al (2017). A novel animal model of acquired human temporal lobe epilepsy based on the simultaneous administration of kainic acid and lorazepam.Epilepsia58222–230. 10.1111/epi.13579
33
LynchG.GallC.RoseG.CotmanC. W. (1976). Changes in the distribution of the dentate gyrus associational system following unilateral or bilateral entorhinal lesion in the adult rat.Brain Res.11057–71. 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90208-0
34
MaierI. C.IchiyamaR. M.CourtineG.SchnellL.LavrovI.EdgertonV. R.et al (2009). Differential effects of anti-Nogo-A antibody treatment and treadmill training in rats with incomplete spinal cord injury.Brain132(Pt 6), 1426–1440. 10.1093/brain/awp085
35
McWilliamsJ. R.LynchG. (1983). Rate of synaptic replacement in denervated rat hippocampus declines precipitously from the juvenile period to adulthood.Science221572–574. 10.1126/science.6867730
36
MullerC. M.VlachosA.DellerT. (2010). Calcium homeostasis of acutely denervated and lesioned dentate gyrus in organotypic entorhino-hippocampal co-cultures.Cell Calcium47242–252. 10.1016/j.ceca.2009.12.006
37
NadlerJ. V. (1981). Desensitization-like changes in GABA-receptor binding of rat fascia dentata after entorhinal lesion.Neurosci. Lett.26275–281. 10.1016/0304-3940(81)90145-2
38
NadlerJ. V.CotmanC. W.LynchG. (1974). Biochemical plasticity of short-axon interneurons: increased glutamate decarboxylase activity in the denervated area of the rat dentate gyrus following entorhinal lesion.Brain Res.45403–413. 10.1016/0014-4886(74)90128-9
39
OkabeM.IkawaM.KominamiK.NakanishiT.NishimuneY. (1997). ‘Green mice’ as a source of ubiquitous green cells.FEBS Lett.407313–319. 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)00313-x
40
PerederiyJ. V.WestbrookG. L. (2013). Structural plasticity in the dentate gyrus- revisiting a classic injury model.Front. Neural Circuits7:17. 10.3389/fncir.2013.00017
41
PrangP.Del TurcoD.DellerT. (2003). Associational sprouting in the mouse fascia dentata after entorhinal lesion in vitro.Brain Res.978205–212. 10.1016/s0006-8993(03)02836-1
42
PrangP.Del TurcoD.KapfhammerJ. P. (2001). Regeneration of entorhinal fibers in mouse slice cultures is age dependent and can be stimulated by NT-4, GDNF, and modulators of G-proteins and protein kinase C.Exp. Neurol.169135–147. 10.1006/exnr.2001.7648
43
RadicT.JungenitzT.SingerM.BeiningM.CuntzH.VlachosA.et al (2017). Time-lapse imaging reveals highly dynamic structural maturation of postnatally born dentate granule cells in organotypic entorhino-hippocampal slice cultures.Sci. Rep.7:43724. 10.1038/srep43724
44
ScharfmanH. E. (2016). The enigmatic mossy cell of the dentate gyrus.Nat. Rev. Neurosci.17562–575. 10.1038/nrn.2016.87
45
ScharfmanH. E.MyersC. E. (2012). Hilar mossy cells of the dentate gyrus: a historical perspective.Front. Neural Circ.6:106. 10.3389/fncir.2012.00106
46
ScharfmanH. E.SchwartzkroinP. A. (1988). Electrophysiology of morphologically identified mossy cells of the dentate hilus recorded in guinea pig hippocampal slices.J. Neurosci.83812–3821. 10.1523/jneurosci.08-10-03812.1988
47
SchneiderC. A.RasbandW. S.EliceiriK. W. (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.Nat. Methods9671–675. 10.1038/nmeth.2089
48
SchurmansS.SchiffmannS. N.GurdenH.LemaireM.LippH. P.SchwamV.et al (1997). Impaired long-term potentiation induction in dentate gyrus of calretinin-deficient mice.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.9410415–10420. 10.1073/pnas.94.19.10415
49
SloviterR. S. (1994). The functional organization of the hippocampal dentate gyrus and its relevance to the pathogenesis of temporal lobe epilepsy.Ann. Neurol.35640–654. 10.1002/ana.410350604
50
SloviterR. S. (1996). Hippocampal pathology and pathophysiology in temporal lobe epilepsy.Neurologia11(Suppl. 4), 29–32.
51
SmithP. D.Coulson-ThomasV. J.FoscarinS.KwokJ. C.FawcettJ. W. (2015). GAG-ing with the neuron: the role of glycosaminoglycan patterning in the central nervous system.Exp. Neurol.274(Pt B), 100–114. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.08.004
52
StewardO. (1994). “Reorganization of neuronal circuitry following central nervous system trauma: naturally occurring processes and opportunities for therapeutic intervention,” in The Neurobiology of Central Nervous System Trauma, edsSalzmanS. K.FadenA. I., (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 266–287.
53
StewardO. (1995). The process of reinnervation in the dentate gyrus of adult rats: gene expression by neurons during the period of lesion-induced growth.J. Comp. Neurol.359391–411. 10.1002/cne.903590304
54
StewardO.CotmanC. W.LynchG. (1974). Growth of a new fiber projection in the brain of adult rats: reinnervation of the dentate gyrus by the contralateral entorhinal cortex following ipsilateral entorhinal lesion.Exp. Brain Res.2045–66.
55
StoeckliE. T. (2018). Understanding axon guidance: are we nearly there yet?Development145:dev151415. 10.1242/dev.151415
56
VlachosA.Bas OrthC.SchneiderG.DellerT. (2012a). Time-lapse imaging of granule cells in mouse entorhino-hippocampal slice cultures reveals changes in spine stability after entorhinal denervation.J. Comp. Neurol.5201891–1902. 10.1002/cne.23017
57
VlachosA.BeckerD.JedlickaP.WinkelsR.RoeperJ.DellerT. (2012b). Entorhinal denervation induces homeostatic synaptic scaling of excitatory postsynapses of dentate granule cells in mouse organotypic slice cultures.PLoS One7:e32883. 10.1371/journal.pone.0032883
58
VlachosA.HeliasM.BeckerD.DiesmannM.DellerT. (2013). NMDA-receptor inhibition increases spine stability of denervated mouse dentate granule cells and accelerates spine density recovery following entorhinal denervation in vitro.Neurobiol. Dis.59267–276. 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.07.018
59
VolzF.BockH. H.GierthmuehlenM.ZentnerJ.HaasC. A.FreimanT. M. (2011). Stereologic estimation of hippocampal GluR2/3- and calretinin-immunoreactive hilar neurons (presumptive mossy cells) in two mouse models of temporal lobe epilepsy.Epilepsia521579–1589. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03086.x
60
WillemsL. M.ZahnN.FerreirosN.ScholichK.MaggioN.DellerT.et al (2016). Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor inhibition prevents denervation-induced dendritic atrophy.Acta Neuropathol. Commun.4:28. 10.1186/s40478-016-0303-x
61
ZapponeC. A.SloviterR. S. (2001). Commissurally projecting inhibitory interneurons of the rat hippocampal dentate gyrus: a colocalization study of neuronal markers and the retrograde tracer fluoro-gold.J. Comp. Neurol.441324–344.
62
ZhangX.PooM. M. (2002). Localized synaptic potentiation by BDNF requires local protein synthesis in the developing axon.Neuron36675–688.
63
ZhengJ. Q.FelderM.ConnorJ. A.PooM. M. (1994). Turning of nerve growth cones induced by neurotransmitters.Nature368140–144.
Summary
Keywords
calretinin, calretinin-knock out, collateral sprouting, entorhinal cortex lesion, perforant path transection, plasticity, regeneration
Citation
Del Turco D, Paul MH, Beeg Moreno VJ, Hildebrandt-Einfeldt L and Deller T (2019) Re-innervation of the Denervated Dentate Gyrus by Sprouting Associational and Commissural Mossy Cell Axons in Organotypic Tissue Cultures of Entorhinal Cortex and Hippocampus. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 12:270. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00270
Received
26 August 2019
Accepted
22 October 2019
Published
12 November 2019
Volume
12 - 2019
Edited by
Jochen C. Meier, Technische Universitat Braunschweig, Germany
Reviewed by
Robert S. Sloviter, Morehouse School of Medicine, United States; Carola A. Haas, University of Freiburg, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Del Turco, Paul, Beeg Moreno, Hildebrandt-Einfeldt and Deller.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Thomas Deller, t.deller@em.uni-frankfurt.de
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.