A Retraction of the Original Research Article
Comparing the predictive value of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parametric response mapping and conventional perfusion magnetic resonance imaging for clinical outcomes in patients with chronic ischemic stroke
by He, R., Zhou, J., Xu, X., Wei, X., Wang, F., and Li, Y. (2023). Front. Neurosci. 17:1177044. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1177044
The journal retracts the article cited above.
Following publication, concerns were raised regarding the data used in the study. Specifically, during the investigation, which was conducted in accordance with Frontiers' policies, the authors failed to provide appropriate authorization for use of the clinical data that supports their study and failed to satisfactorily answer concerns over the misrepresentation of this data. Unauthorized data use and the misrepresentation of data are breaches of Frontiers' guidelines and those of the Committee on Publication Ethics. As such, this article is being retracted.
This retraction was approved by the Chief Executive Editor of Frontiers. The authors do not agree to this retraction.
Citation: Frontiers Editorial Office (2024) Retraction: Comparing the predictive value of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parametric response mapping and conventional perfusion magnetic resonance imaging for clinical outcomes in patients with chronic ischemic stroke. Front. Neurosci. 18:1504798. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1504798
Received: 01 October 2024; Accepted: 01 October 2024;
Published: 07 October 2024.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2024 Frontiers Editorial Office. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Frontiers Editorial Office, research.integrity@frontiersin.org
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Frontiers Editorial Office