Caitlin Shannon Latimer
Zainuddin Quadri
David G. Cook- 1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- 2Department of Physiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
- 3Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States
- 4Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- 5Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
Editorial on the Research Topic
Meeting new challenges in translationally relevant neurodegenerative disease research
Human neurodegenerative disease includes a broad range of complex disorders with distinct underlying pathologies and often overlapping clinical presentations that are driven by interactions between environment and genetic influences. Alzheimer's disease is the most common neurodegenerative disease, but Lewy body diseases and other synucleinopathies, Huntington's disease, motor neuron diseases, frontotemporal dementias, and many others, are important causes of cognitive and motor impairments that have limited available treatments. These disorders not only rob the individual of their independence but are also major stressors for caregivers and families and come with significant financial implications. It is estimated that 153 million people will be living with Alzheimer's disease (AD) by 2050, due to the world's aging population and the cost of dementia care is projected to increase from $1.33 trillion in 2020 to $9.12 trillion in 2050 (GBD 2019 Dementia Forecasting Collaborators). As such there is a great need and interest in better understanding, diagnosing, and treating these disorders. The landscape of neurodegenerative research is undergoing a significant transformation, fueled by rapid advancements in modern genetic and systems biology approaches.
Leading this revolution are discoveries in the genetics of neurodegenerative disease that reveal the intricate genetic architecture of these diseases. This includes rare, but highly penetrant causal mutations that have helped advance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of disease. For example, familial forms of AD are due to mutations in genes involved in amyloid processing (Goate et al., 1991; Hardy, 2017), a discovery that has driven the development of biomarkers and targeted treatment strategies. The genetics of other neurodegenerative diseases have highlighted the complexity of the genetic underpinnings. For example, alterations in the Chromosome 9 Open Reading Frame 72 (C9orf72) gene emerged as a pivotal factor in the etiology of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS; Renton et al., 2011; Balendra and Isaacs, 2018). These two diseases have very different clinical presentations due to the selective vulnerability of disparate types of neurons, and yet the same hexanucleotide repeat expansion can cause either or both phenotypes, showcasing the interconnectedness of genetic variants across seemingly distinct conditions. Similarly, different mutations in a single gene, namely the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) gene, can give rise to a spectrum tau pathology affecting different cell types (astrocytes, oligodendroglia, pyramidal neurons) and variable regional vulnerability (Giannini et al., 2022, 2023). The complexity of these disorders is further exemplified by the genetic heterogeneity of some neurodegenerative diseases, such as spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA), where multiple genes contribute to overlapping clinical symptoms and the loss of Purkinje cells remains a consistent hallmark, regardless of the causal gene (Klockgether et al., 2019).
In addition to these highly penetrant, yet rare causal genes, there have been significant advances in understanding the contribution of risk genes to the development of neurodegenerative disease. Sporadic, late onset AD in particular is likely driven by a combination of more common susceptibility genes (Jun et al., 2010; Pimenova et al., 2017). These include genes that result in an increased risk of AD, such as the APOE 4′ allele of the apoE gene as well as numerous protective variants that contribute to enhanced resistance and resilience to AD (Strittmatter et al., 1993; Kunkle et al., 2019). It has also become increasingly apparent that the impact of these various risk alleles is at least in part dependent on interactions with environmental exposures, including traumatic brain injury, air pollution, exercise, diet, and education (Gatz et al., 2006; Sakowski et al., 2024). The intricate interplay among genetic, cellular, and environmental factors underscores the multifaceted nature of neurodegeneration, and exploring these important yet complex interactions enriches our understanding of how they shape disease onset and progression.
Adding to the intricacy of neurodegenerative disease is our expanding appreciation for how many different factors contribute to the initiation and progression of the pathology and clinical expression of the disease. For example, biologic sex appears to underlie differences in susceptibility to neurodegenerative disease and response to treatment strategies (Arenaza-Urquijo et al., 2024). Additionally, while the pathologic proteins that in part define each of the neurodegenerative disease have long been the focus of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, there are many other changes that occur and likely contribute to the disease process. These include alterations in inflammatory pathways and neuron-glial interactions (Chen et al., 2016; Patani et al., 2023; Castro-Gomez and Heneka, 2024), oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction (Monzio Compagnoni et al., 2020), and vascular and white matter changes (Nasrabady et al., 2018; Paolini Paoletti et al., 2021). There exists a complex interplay between these various factors and the pathologic proteins that ultimately leads to neurodegeneration and clinical symptoms, but which aspects are the causal mechanisms vs. the downstream consequences of disease are still poorly understood and require continued investigation.
Amidst this complexity, the importance of integrating diverse approaches cannot be overstated. Animal models, bioinformatics, and human neuropathological studies play pivotal roles in bridging the gap between genetic discoveries and clinical realities, offering invaluable insights into disease pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies. The evaluation of the clinical and neuropathologic consequences of neurodegenerative diseases in humans is an essential component to neurodegenerative disease research that should not be overlooked. Most of these diseases are uniquely human, and models, while offering certain distinct advantages, are still just models that require integration with the evaluation of human central nervous system structure and function. The flip side is that human studies are inherently descriptive, necessitating the use of model systems to interrogate potential mechanisms for causal relationships with the pathology observed in the human disease. Therefore, a thoughtful, integrated approach that leverages both human tissues and data with appropriate model systems will yield the most translatable, potentially actionable results. Rodent models have dominated the field, largely driven by transgenic animals harboring rare, disease-causing mutations, which has limited the translatability of these models. However, newer models include the expression of more common, risk genes (Kotredes et al., 2021). Additionally, there has been an expansion in the use of animal models that naturally develop aspects of neurodegenerative disease; in particular dogs and non-human primates (Frye et al., 2021; Urfer et al., 2021; Cogram et al., 2024). While these large animal models are important for studying complex behaviors and brain-wide alterations, invertebrate systems, stem cells, and organoid models are ideal for mechanistic studies and high through-put screening assays (Giunti et al., 2021; Young and Goldstein, 2023; Pazzin et al., 2024). By harnessing the power of modern genetic and systems biology alongside interdisciplinary collaborations, we can unlock new avenues for translational research, ultimately paving the way for innovative therapies and personalized interventions tailored to the unique needs of patients.
In this Research Topic, we present this collection of articles that delve into the forefront of neurodegenerative disease research. Each article offers a unique perspective on the complexities of neurodegeneration and the promising avenues for future research, from elucidating novel genetic pathways underlying disease pathogenesis to exploring molecular mechanisms of resilience.
1. Insights from C. elegans Models of ALS and FTLD-TDP (Eck et al.). This review summarizes the insights gained from using the nematode C. elegans to study mechanisms of ALS and FTLD-TDP, emphasizing how this model can be leveraged to advance mechanistic research.
2. Molecular basis of resilience to Alzheimer's disease (Montine et al.). This review explores the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying resilience to AD and the importance of studying human populations.
3. Quantifying endo-lysosomal morphology in Alzheimer's disease (Rose et al.). This study offers insights into endo-lysosomal dysfunction and cytopathology in sporadic AD, highlighting how human tissues can be leveraged to uncover potential disease mechanisms.
4. Exploring brain extracellular matrix in age-associated neurodegeneration (Hendrickson et al.). This perspective article investigates the translational potential of interregional variations in brain extracellular matrix components in age-associated neurodegenerative disorders, incorporating tissues from both human brain and animal models.
The future of neurodegenerative disease research depends on these types of integrated methods in order to effectively harness the power of human genetics, multiomics, neuropathology, bioinformatics, and animal models. Cross-disciplinary approaches in particular are necessary to ultimately unravel the complex pathways of neurodegeneration and identify novel diagnostic and treatment strategies for improving brain health and function.
Author contributions
CL: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. ZQ: Writing – review & editing. DC: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
The editors thank all the contributing authors and reviewers and the Frontiers team for their support of this Research Topic.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Arenaza-Urquijo, E. M., Boyle, R., Casaletto, K., Anstey, K. J., Vila-Castelar, C., Colverson, A., et al. (2024). Sex and gender differences in cognitive resilience to aging and Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer Dement. 2024:13844. doi: 10.1002/alz.13844
Balendra, R., and Isaacs, A. M. (2018). C9orf72-mediated ALS and FTD: multiple pathways to disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 14, 544–558. doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0047-2
Castro-Gomez, S., and Heneka, M. T. (2024). Innate immune activation in neurodegenerative diseases. Immunity 57, 790–814. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2024.03.010
Chen, W. W., Zhang, X., and Huang, W. J. (2016). Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases (review). Mol. Med. Rep. 13, 3391–3396. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2016.4948
Cogram, P., Garduño, B. M., Ren, B., and Xu, X. (2024). First international conference on unconventional animal models of Alzheimer's disease and aging. J. Alzheimer's Dis. 98, 333–336. doi: 10.3233/JAD-249004
Frye, B. M., Craft, S., Latimer, C. S., Keene, C. D., Montine, T. J., Register, T. C., et al. (2021). Aging-related Alzheimer's disease-like neuropathology and functional decline in captive vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus). Am. J. Primatol. 83:e23260. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23260
Gatz, M., Reynolds, C. A., Fratiglioni, L., Johansson, B., Mortimer, J. A., Berg, S., et al. (2006). Role of genes and environments for explaining Alzheimer disease. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 63, 168–174. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.2.168
Giannini, L. A. A., Mol, M. O., Rajicic, A., van Buuren, R., Sarkar, L., Arezoumandan, S., et al. (2023). Presymptomatic and early pathological features of MAPT-associated frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 11:126doi: 10.1186/s40478-023-01588-9
Giannini, L. A. A., Ohm, D. T., Rozemuller, A. J. M., Dratch, L., Suh, E., van Deerlin, V. M., et al. (2022). Isoform-specific patterns of tau burden and neuronal degeneration in MAPT-associated frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Acta Neuropathol. 144, 1065–1084. doi: 10.1007/s00401-022-02487-4
Giunti, S., Andersen, N., Rayes, D., and De Rosa, M. J. (2021). Drug discovery: insights from the invertebrate Caenorhabditis elegans. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 9:e00721. doi: 10.1002/prp2.721
Goate, A., Chartier-Harlin, M. C., Mullan, M., Brown, J., Crawford, F., Fidani, L., et al. (1991). Segregation of a missense mutation in the amyloid precursor protein gene with familial Alzheimer's disease. Nature 349, 704–706. doi: 10.1038/349704a0
Hardy, J. (2017). The discovery of Alzheimer-causing mutations in the APP gene and the formulation of the “amyloid cascade hypothesis.” FEBS J. 284, 1040–1044. doi: 10.1111/febs.14004
Jun, G., Naj, A. C., Beecham, G. W., Wang, L. S., Buros, J., Gallins, P. J., et al. (2010). Meta-analysis confirms CR1, CLU, and PICALM as Alzheimer's disease risk loci and reveals interactions with APOE genotypes. Arch. Neurol. 67, 1473–1484. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.201
Klockgether, T., Mariotti, C., and Paulson, H. L. (2019). Spinocerebellar ataxia. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 5:24. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0074-3
Kotredes, K. P., Oblak, A., Pandey, R. S., Lin, P. B., Garceau, D., Williams, H., et al. (2021). Uncovering disease mechanisms in a novel mouse model expressing humanized APOEε4 and Trem2*R47H. Front. Aging Neurosci. 13:735524. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.735524
Kunkle, B. W., Grenier-Boley, B., Sims, R., Bis, J. C., Damotte, V., Naj, A. C., et al. (2019). Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer's disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat. Genet. 51, 414–430. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0358-2
Monzio Compagnoni, G., Di Fonzo, A., Corti, S., Comi, G. P., Bresolin, N., and Masliah, E. (2020). The role of mitochondria in neurodegenerative diseases: the lesson from Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 57, 2959–2980. doi: 10.1007/s12035-020-01926-1
Nasrabady, S. E., Rizvi, B., Goldman, J. E., and Brickman, A. M. (2018). White matter changes in Alzheimer's disease: a focus on myelin and oligodendrocytes. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 6:22. doi: 10.1186/s40478-018-0515-3
Paolini Paoletti, F., Simoni, S., Parnetti, L., and Gaetani, L. (2021). The contribution of small vessel disease to neurodegeneration: focus on Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22:4958. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094958
Patani, R., Hardingham, G. E., and Liddelow, S. A. (2023). Functional roles of reactive astrocytes in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 19, 395–409. doi: 10.1038/s41582-023-00822-1
Pazzin, D. B., Previato, T. T. R., Budelon Gonçalves, J. I., Zanirati, G., Xavier, F. A. C., da Costa, J. C., et al. (2024). Induced pluripotent stem cells and organoids in advancing neuropathology research and therapies. Cells 13:745. doi: 10.3390/cells13090745
Pimenova, A. A., Raj, T., and Goate, A. M. (2017). Untangling genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease. Biol. Psychiat. 83, 300–310. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.014
Renton, A. E., Majounie, E., Waite, A., Simón-Sánchez, J., Rollinson, S., Gibbs, J. R., et al. (2011). A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9p21-linked ALS-FTD. Neuron 72, 257–268. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.010
Sakowski, S. A., Koubek, E. J., Chen, K. S., Goutman, S. A., and Feldman, E. L. (2024). Role of the exposome in neurodegenerative disease: recent insights and future directions. Ann. Neurol. 95, 635–652. doi: 10.1002/ana.26897
Strittmatter, W. J., Saunders, A. M., Schmechel, D., Pericak-Vance, M., Enghild, J., Salvesen, G. S., et al. (1993). Apolipoprotein E: high-avidity binding to beta-amyloid and increased frequency of type 4 allele in late-onset familial Alzheimer disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 1977–1981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.5.1977
Urfer, S. R., Darvas, M., Czeibert, K., Sándor, S., Promislow, D. E. L., Creevy, K. E., et al. (2021). Canine Cognitive Dysfunction (CCD) scores correlate with amyloid beta 42 levels in dog brain tissue. Geroscience 43, 2379–2386. doi: 10.1007/s11357-021-00422-1
Keywords: neurodegeneration, models, neuropathology, genetics, translational research
Citation: Latimer CS, Quadri Z and Cook DG (2024) Editorial: Meeting new challenges in translationally relevant neurodegenerative disease research. Front. Neurosci. 18:1453770. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1453770
Received: 24 June 2024; Accepted: 25 July 2024;
Published: 22 August 2024.
Edited by:
Guo-Yuan Yang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, ChinaReviewed by:
Juan Chen, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, ChinaShaohua Qi, Houston Methodist Research Institute, United States
Zhi Zhang, University of Michigan–Dearborn, United States
Copyright © 2024 Latimer, Quadri and Cook. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Caitlin Shannon Latimer, caitlinl@uw.edu